[go: up one dir, main page]

JP2006268243A - Processing logic verification equipment for station equipment - Google Patents

Processing logic verification equipment for station equipment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2006268243A
JP2006268243A JP2005083271A JP2005083271A JP2006268243A JP 2006268243 A JP2006268243 A JP 2006268243A JP 2005083271 A JP2005083271 A JP 2005083271A JP 2005083271 A JP2005083271 A JP 2005083271A JP 2006268243 A JP2006268243 A JP 2006268243A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
fare
station
determination
settlement
determination module
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2005083271A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4514048B2 (en
Inventor
Satoru Endo
悟 遠藤
Yusuke Nonaka
雄介 野中
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JR East Mechatronics Co Ltd
Original Assignee
JR East Mechatronics Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JR East Mechatronics Co Ltd filed Critical JR East Mechatronics Co Ltd
Priority to JP2005083271A priority Critical patent/JP4514048B2/en
Publication of JP2006268243A publication Critical patent/JP2006268243A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4514048B2 publication Critical patent/JP4514048B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Devices For Checking Fares Or Tickets At Control Points (AREA)

Abstract

【課題】 検証にかかる時間の短縮、コストの低減を図り、運賃誤収受、誤判定を防止する。
【解決手段】 突合済みの運賃判定データ(10)を使用した場合の2駅間運賃が突合済みであり、複合券から読み込んだ定期に対する精算起点駅候補を全て抽出する複数の判定モジュール(21−1、21−2、……21−n)と、各判定モジュールが抽出した精算起点駅候補を突合する突合手段(22)とを備えたものである。
【選択図】 図1
PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To shorten the time required for verification and reduce the cost and prevent erroneous receipt of fare and misjudgment.
SOLUTION: A plurality of determination modules (21-) for extracting all fare settlement origin station candidates for a fixed period read from a composite ticket, when the fare determination data (10) that has already been matched is used. 1, 21-2,... 21 -n) and an abutting means (22) for abutting the settlement origin station candidates extracted by each determination module.
[Selection] Figure 1

Description

本発明は自動改札機、精算機、窓口処理機等の駅務機器の処理ロジックを検証する装置に関する。   The present invention relates to an apparatus for verifying the processing logic of station equipment such as an automatic ticket gate, a settlement machine, and a window processing machine.

定期券とSFカード(ストアード・フェアー・カード)を格納したICカード複合券が使用され、複合券に対する処理を行う改札系の駅務機器(自動改札機、精算機、窓口処理機等)では、ICカードのデータを読み込み、保持している全経路データを参照して最短最安運賃を計算している。   IC card compound tickets that store commuter passes and SF cards (stored fair cards) are used, and in ticketing station equipment (automatic ticket gates, checkout machines, counter processing machines, etc.) that process compound tickets, IC card data is read and the shortest and lowest fare is calculated by referring to all route data stored.

しかし、鉄道線路は複雑に接続しているため運賃算定が複雑な場合があり、運賃算定についての問題点も指摘されている。この対策として、従来、改札系駅務機器の処理モジュールを搭載した複数の判定シミュレータを使用し、特定の定期毎に、過去に指摘された問題点を中心に人間が想定した当該定期に合ったロジックパターン(経路パターン)を判定シミュレータにかけ、判定結果を突合して判定モジュールの正当性を検証することが行われていた。   However, fare calculation may be complicated due to the complicated connection of railroad tracks, and problems with fare calculation have been pointed out. As a countermeasure, conventionally, a plurality of judgment simulators equipped with processing modules for ticket gate system station equipment are used, and at each specific period, it matches the period assumed by humans centering on problems pointed out in the past. A logic pattern (path pattern) is applied to a determination simulator, and the determination results are collated to verify the validity of the determination module.

しかし、過去の問題点を中心に人間が想定したロジックパターンでの検証では、想定に漏れるパターンが存在せざるを得ず、これを避けるためには、特定の1種類の定期毎に、自動により全乗降パターンを確認しなければならない。しかしながら、鉄道線路の全経路についての全乗降パターンは膨大であり、これを行うのは現実的ではない。   However, in verification with logic patterns assumed by humans centering on past problems, there are unavoidable patterns that are not expected, and in order to avoid this, it is automatically performed at each specific type of periodicity. You must check the full boarding / exiting pattern. However, the total boarding / exiting pattern for all routes on the railroad track is enormous, and this is not practical.

本発明は上記課題を解決しようとするもので、ICカード複合券に対する判定モジュールの検証を1つの経路パターンを使用して行えるようにし、検証にかかる時間の短縮、コストの低減を図るとともに、運賃誤収受、誤判定を防止することを目的とする。
そのために本発明は、突合済みの運賃判定データを使用した場合の判定モジュールを利用した2駅間運賃が突合済みであり、複合券から読み込んだ定期に対する精算起点駅候補を全て抽出する複数の判定モジュールと、
各判定モジュールが抽出した精算起点駅候補を突合する突合手段と、
を備えたことを特徴とする。
The present invention is intended to solve the above-described problems, and enables verification of a determination module for an IC card compound ticket using a single route pattern, thereby shortening the time required for verification and reducing costs, The purpose is to prevent misreception and misjudgment.
For this purpose, the present invention is based on the determination module when using the completed fare determination data, and the fare between the two stations using the determination module has already been verified, and a plurality of determinations for extracting all the settlement origin station candidates for the period read from the composite ticket Module,
Reconciliation means for reconciling the settlement origin station candidates extracted by each determination module;
It is provided with.

本発明は、あらかじめ各社間で突合した正当な運賃判定データと、SFトリップの場合のみ、前記運賃判定データを正当に処理できる判定モジュールを使用する。各社の判定モジュールは正当な運賃判定データより、SFトリップの場合のみ正しい運賃を算定することが突合済みである。このような突合済みの運賃判定データと各社の判定モジュールを使用し、ICカード複合券のデータを読み込んで定期の精算起点駅候補を全て抽出し、各判定モジュールが抽出した精算起点駅候補を突合し、不一致の場合は判定モジュールに訂正をかける。SFトリップの場合(2駅間運賃)は全て突合済みであるため複合券に対する判定モジュールの検証は、1つの経路パターンで精算起点駅候補を全て突合するだけで十分であり、検証にかかる時間の短縮、コストの低減を図ると共に、運賃誤収受、誤判定を防止することが可能となる。   The present invention uses legitimate fare determination data collated between companies in advance and a determination module that can legitimately process the fare determination data only in the case of an SF trip. The determination module of each company has already calculated that the correct fare is calculated only in the case of the SF trip from the valid fare determination data. Using such fare determination data and the determination module of each company, the IC card compound ticket data is read to extract all the periodic settlement starting station candidates, and the settlement starting station candidates extracted by each determination module are collated. If there is a mismatch, the determination module is corrected. In the case of SF trips (fares between two stations), since all of them have already been matched, it is sufficient to verify the judgment module for the composite ticket by matching all the settlement origin station candidates with one route pattern. While shortening and cost reduction, it is possible to prevent wrong fare collection and misjudgment.

以下、本発明の実施の形態について説明する。
図1は本発明の処理ロジック検証装置を説明するブロック図、図2は判定処理を説明する図である。
図1において、運賃判定データ10は、各メーカが作成した全路線の駅番号、全路線の交差駅、分岐駅、ラッチデータ及びキロ程(駅間キロ)、任意の駅間の経路、その経路のキロ程や運賃、任意の経路の定期券のエンコード情報(発着駅、経由駅)や運賃、各社線に跨がる全ての経路について運賃を算定するためのデータをあらかじめ各社間で突合したデータである。
Embodiments of the present invention will be described below.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a processing logic verification apparatus according to the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a determination process.
In FIG. 1, the fare determination data 10 includes station numbers of all routes created by each manufacturer, intersections of all routes, branch stations, latch data and kilometers (km between stations), routes between arbitrary stations, and routes thereof. Data for calculating the mileage, fare, encoding information of commuter pass (departure / arrival station, transit station) and fare for any route, and data for calculating the fare for all routes across each company line in advance It is.

ロジック検証装置20は、各社の判定モジュール21−1、21−2、……21−nと、各判定モジュールの出力を突合する手段22を有している。各社の判定モジュール21−1、21−2、……21−nは、前述の正当な運賃判定データを使用してSFトリップ(SFのみによる乗車)について算出した運賃が突合済みであり、正当な運賃判定データから2駅間の正しい運賃を算定できる判定モジュールである。そして、これらの判定モジュールで、複合券から読み込んだ定期に対する精算起点駅候補を全て抽出する。突合手段22は、判定モジュール21−1、21−2、……21−nで抽出された精算起点駅候補を突合する。そして、不一致のものがあれば当該判定モジュールの処理ロジックに修正をかけて全ての判定モジュールが抽出する精算起点駅候補を一致させる。   The logic verification device 20 has determination modules 21-1, 21-2,... 21-n of each company and means 22 for matching the output of each determination module. The determination modules 21-1, 21-2,..., 21-n of the respective companies have already matched the fare calculated for the SF trip (riding only by SF) using the above-mentioned valid fare determination data. It is a determination module that can calculate the correct fare between two stations from the fare determination data. Then, with these determination modules, all the settlement origin station candidates for the period read from the composite ticket are extracted. The matching means 22 matches the settlement origin station candidates extracted by the determination modules 21-1, 21-2, ... 21-n. If there is a mismatch, the processing logic of the determination module is modified to match the settlement origin station candidates extracted by all the determination modules.

判定モジュール21−1、21−2、……21−nは2駅間については正しい運賃を算定できることが検証済みであるので、複合券の運賃算定において、定期経路外の全経路を対象とする必要はなく、1つの経路のみ検証すれば他の経路についての検証は省略可能であり、定期の精算起点駅候補さえ正しく抽出できればよい。   Judgment modules 21-1, 21-2, ... 21-n have been verified to be able to calculate the correct fare for two stations, so all routes outside the regular route are targeted for calculating the fare of a composite ticket. There is no need, and if only one route is verified, verification for other routes can be omitted, and it is only necessary to correctly extract a periodic settlement origin station candidate.

図1に示すような処理ロジック検証装置を用いて運賃決定を行う処理を図2を参照して説明する。図2において、複合券の定期券経路はE駅−F駅(経由駅)−G駅であり、A駅で乗車し、H駅で降車した場合を想定する。   A process for determining a fare using the processing logic verification apparatus as shown in FIG. 1 will be described with reference to FIG. In FIG. 2, the commuter pass route of the composite ticket is E station-F station (passage station) -G station, and it is assumed that the train rides at A station and gets off at H station.

判定モジュールでは、この定期券の精算駅候補を全て抽出する。ここでは端駅であるE駅、G駅、交叉駅であるF駅とする。このような処理を各社の判定モジュールで行い、各社すべての判定モジュールが同じ精算起点駅候補が抽出できるようにする。精算起点駅候補が正しく抽出できれば、判定モジュールは2駅間の運賃を正しく算出できるので、乗車駅Aから最安の精算起点駅Eを抽出し、A駅−E駅間の運賃を算出する。次に、同様にして降車駅Hから最安の精算起点駅Gを抽出し、G駅−H駅間の運賃を算出する。従って、定期経路を利用した最安運賃はA−E運賃+G−H運賃となる。この例では定期経路が全て利用されているが、もちろん定期経路の一部が利用される場合もあり得る。次いで、SFのみ利用した乗車駅Aから降車駅Hまでの最安運賃A−D−Hを算出する。   In the determination module, all the commuter pass settlement station candidates are extracted. Here, it is assumed that E station and G station which are end stations, and F station which is a crossing station. Such a process is performed by the determination module of each company so that all the determination modules of each company can extract the same settlement origin station candidate. If the settlement starting station candidate can be correctly extracted, the determination module can correctly calculate the fare between the two stations. Therefore, the cheapest settlement starting station E is extracted from the boarding station A, and the fare between A station and E station is calculated. Next, in the same manner, the lowest settlement starting station G is extracted from the getting-off station H, and the fare between the G station and the H station is calculated. Therefore, the cheapest fare using the regular route is AE fare + GH fare. In this example, all the regular routes are used, but of course, a part of the regular route may be used. Next, the lowest fare A-D-H from the boarding station A using only SF to the getting-off station H is calculated.

次に、定期経路を利用した最安運賃とSFのみ利用した最安運賃とを比較し、
A−E運賃+G−H運賃>A−D−H運賃
であればSF運賃を採用し、それ以外は定期経路を利用した最安運賃を採用する。
この場合に、従来の判定モジュールの検証では、A駅、H駅をいろいろ変えてあらゆる経路についてのチェックを行っていたが、本発明では2駅間の正しい運賃の算出については全経路について既に検証済みであるため一つの経路(乗車駅、降車駅)についてのみ検証すればよい。
Next, compare the lowest fare using the regular route with the lowest fare using only the SF,
If the AE fare + GH fare> A-D-H fare, the SF fare is adopted, otherwise the cheapest fare using the regular route is adopted.
In this case, in the verification of the conventional determination module, various routes are checked by changing the A station and the H station. In the present invention, the correct fare calculation between the two stations is already verified for all routes. Since it is already completed, only one route (boarding station, getting-off station) needs to be verified.

本発明によれば、検証にかかる時間の短縮、コストの低減を図ると共に、運賃誤収受、誤判定を防止することが可能とであるので産業上の利用価値は極めて大きい。   According to the present invention, it is possible to shorten the time required for verification and reduce costs, and to prevent erroneous receipt of fare and misjudgment, so the industrial utility value is extremely large.

処理ロジック検証装置を説明するブロック図である。It is a block diagram explaining a processing logic verification device. 判定処理を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining a judgment process.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

10…運賃判定データ、21−1、21−2、……21−n…判定モジュール、22…突合。 10 ... fare determination data, 21-1, 21-2, ... 21-n ... determination module, 22 ... matching.

Claims (1)

突合済みの運賃判定データを使用した場合の判定モジュールを利用した2駅間運賃が突合済みであり、複合券から読み込んだ定期に対する精算起点駅候補を全て抽出する複数の判定モジュールと、
各判定モジュールが抽出した精算起点駅候補を突合する突合手段と、
を備えたことを特徴とする駅務機器の処理ロジック検証装置。
A plurality of determination modules for extracting all the settlement origin station candidates for the regular period read from the composite ticket when the fare between the two stations using the determination module when using the combined fare determination data is already verified
Reconciliation means for reconciling the settlement origin station candidates extracted by each determination module;
A processing logic verification device for station service equipment, comprising:
JP2005083271A 2005-03-23 2005-03-23 Processing logic verification equipment for station equipment Expired - Lifetime JP4514048B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005083271A JP4514048B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2005-03-23 Processing logic verification equipment for station equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005083271A JP4514048B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2005-03-23 Processing logic verification equipment for station equipment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006268243A true JP2006268243A (en) 2006-10-05
JP4514048B2 JP4514048B2 (en) 2010-07-28

Family

ID=37204182

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005083271A Expired - Lifetime JP4514048B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2005-03-23 Processing logic verification equipment for station equipment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4514048B2 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0816830A (en) * 1994-06-30 1996-01-19 Toshiba Corp Ticket issuing device
JPH11195149A (en) * 1997-12-26 1999-07-21 Toshiba Corp Fee payment method and payment machine
JP2002157611A (en) * 2000-11-17 2002-05-31 Lecip Corp Train ticket issuing device and commutation ticket

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0816830A (en) * 1994-06-30 1996-01-19 Toshiba Corp Ticket issuing device
JPH11195149A (en) * 1997-12-26 1999-07-21 Toshiba Corp Fee payment method and payment machine
JP2002157611A (en) * 2000-11-17 2002-05-31 Lecip Corp Train ticket issuing device and commutation ticket

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4514048B2 (en) 2010-07-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Nunes et al. Passenger journey destination estimation from automated fare collection system data using spatial validation
Robinson et al. Methods for pre-processing smartcard data to improve data quality
CN102087786B (en) Information fusion-based intelligent traffic information processing method and system for people, vehicle and road
CN102837717B (en) Train number recognition is utilized to judge method and the device of train direct of travel and situation of shunting
NO318125B1 (en) Traffic tax calculation method and system
RU2683412C2 (en) Automatic system of sale and verification of travel tickets on railway transport
CN110674904A (en) A train positioning system and method based on car number system
CN113177072A (en) Path fitting algorithm
CN109657763A (en) A kind of application method of electronic ticket and electronic ticket
JP4514048B2 (en) Processing logic verification equipment for station equipment
JP5172251B2 (en) Transfer boarding system
CN118898873A (en) Travel pricing method and storage medium
CZ20033527A3 (en) Identification system for verifying an authorization for access to an object, or use of an object, in particular a motor vehicle
CN104599387A (en) Method for preventing passengers from evading check of automatic ticket checking system at entrance and exit gate of high-speed railway station
JP4857737B2 (en) Fare verification device
JP4570088B2 (en) Fare verification system
JP5019412B2 (en) Riding management system, in-vehicle management apparatus, riding management method, program thereof, and recording medium
JP4614335B2 (en) Processing logic verification equipment for station equipment
KR20100131875A (en) Train location management system
CN115544185A (en) Action track data processing method and device
JP4857714B2 (en) Boarding fee verification system
JP2006268240A (en) Season ticket route data confirmation system
JP4113151B2 (en) Traffic control system and gate failure detection method
JP2019046354A (en) Settlement determination server, station service system, and settlement determination method
CN113792535B (en) Vehicle-mounted code receiving form automatic generation method and device for indoor sports car test

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20070327

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20091208

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20091211

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100208

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20100430

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20100506

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4514048

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130521

Year of fee payment: 3

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130521

Year of fee payment: 3

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140521

Year of fee payment: 4

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term