[go: up one dir, main page]

JP2006084350A - Type discriminating method of plastics - Google Patents

Type discriminating method of plastics Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2006084350A
JP2006084350A JP2004270264A JP2004270264A JP2006084350A JP 2006084350 A JP2006084350 A JP 2006084350A JP 2004270264 A JP2004270264 A JP 2004270264A JP 2004270264 A JP2004270264 A JP 2004270264A JP 2006084350 A JP2006084350 A JP 2006084350A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
plastic
sample
correlation
type
plastics
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2004270264A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Yasuo Saito
保雄 斎藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JT Engineering Inc
Original Assignee
JT Engineering Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JT Engineering Inc filed Critical JT Engineering Inc
Priority to JP2004270264A priority Critical patent/JP2006084350A/en
Publication of JP2006084350A publication Critical patent/JP2006084350A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/17Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/25Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
    • G01N21/31Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry
    • G01N21/35Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light
    • G01N21/3563Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light for analysing solids; Preparation of samples therefor
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/17Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/25Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
    • G01N21/31Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry
    • G01N21/35Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light
    • G01N21/359Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light using near infrared light

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a plastics type discriminating method that can certainly discriminating the type of the plastics in an inexpensive constitution without requiring complex information processing, and can easily respond also to addition of a new type of plastics. <P>SOLUTION: The plastics type is discriminated based on the correlation between a reference spectrum obtained by radiating near infrared rays to a plurality of known plastic samples of different types, respectively, and measuring transmitted light transmitted through each plastic sample or reflected light reflected from each plastic sample with a predetermined spectral means, and a measured absorption spectrum obtained by radiating the near infrared rays to the plastic samples of which types are discriminated and measuring the transmitted light transmitted through the discriminated plastic sample or the reflected light reflected from the discriminated plastic sample with the spectral means. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明はプラスチックの種類判別方法に係り、特に食品等の包装、容器等に代表されるプラスチック廃棄物を処理あるいはリサイクルするにあたり、これを種類別に選別するに好適なプラスチックの種類判別方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a plastic type discriminating method, and more particularly, to a plastic type discriminating method suitable for sorting plastic wastes represented by packaging, containers, etc. of foods, etc., according to type.

近時、プラスチックを利用した工業製品は増加の一途を辿っている。特に、プラスチックの応用製品は、我々の身近な生活用品にも深く浸透してきており、もはや重要な生活必需品といっても過言ではない。そのような中、資源の有効利用、引いては地球環境の保全の観点から廃棄されるプラスチックのリサイクルへの要請がますます強くなってきている。   Recently, industrial products using plastic have been increasing. In particular, plastic applied products have penetrated deeply into our daily necessities, and it is no exaggeration to say that they are no longer important daily necessities. Under such circumstances, there is an increasing demand for recycling of plastics that are discarded from the viewpoint of effective use of resources and, in turn, conservation of the global environment.

ところで廃棄されたプラスチックは、所定の方法によってプラスチックの種類を判別した後、プラスチックの種類毎に最適な処理を行い素材として再利用されるほか、石油、石炭などの代替え燃料として使用される。このためプラスチックを素材として再利用する場合、異種類のプラスチックが混入すると品質低下が否めない。あるいは燃料として利用する場合、特に塩素を含むポリ塩化ビニル(PVC)などが混入すると、ダイオキシンの発生やボイラー腐食の原因にもなる。このようなことから、精度の高いプラスチックの種類判別方法への期待が高まりつつある。
この種の判別方法への赤外線分光技術の適用については良く知られており、中でも近赤外線を利用するケースが近年増加している。近赤外線は、中赤外線を利用した場合で大きな外乱要因となる水の付着や温度放射の影響を受けにくいという特徴がある。なお、近赤外線とは、一般的には波長0.8μm〜2.5μmの赤外線、中赤外線とは波長2.5μm〜22μmの赤外線を示す。
By the way, the discarded plastic is discriminated by a predetermined method, and is then reused as a raw material after being optimally processed for each type of plastic and used as an alternative fuel such as oil and coal. For this reason, when plastic is reused as a raw material, quality deterioration cannot be denied if different types of plastic are mixed. Alternatively, when used as a fuel, especially when polyvinyl chloride (PVC) containing chlorine is mixed, dioxins are generated and boiler corrosion is caused. For these reasons, there is an increasing expectation for a highly accurate plastic type discrimination method.
The application of infrared spectroscopy to this type of discrimination method is well known, and in particular, the number of cases using near infrared rays has increased in recent years. Near-infrared rays are characterized by being less susceptible to water adhesion and temperature radiation, which are major disturbance factors when using mid-infrared rays. The near infrared ray generally indicates an infrared ray having a wavelength of 0.8 μm to 2.5 μm, and the mid infrared ray indicates an infrared ray having a wavelength of 2.5 μm to 22 μm.

この種のプラスチックの判別方法としては、廃プラスチックの判別方法が知られている(例えば、特許文献1を参照)。この特許文献に開示される廃プラスチックの判別方法は、水が付着している廃プラスチックに投光器から波長0.6μm〜2.5μmの近赤外線を照射したときの反射光または透過光を受光素子で受光し、この受光素子に接続された判別手段で廃プラスチック中の特定のプラスチックの分子構造に基づく官能基に起因した近赤外線の吸収ピークと既知の複数のプラスチックについて予め求められた近赤外線の吸収ピークとを比較して廃プラスチックを判別するものである。   As a method for discriminating this type of plastic, a method for discriminating waste plastic is known (see, for example, Patent Document 1). The method for discriminating waste plastic disclosed in this patent document uses a light receiving element to reflect or transmit light when the waste plastic to which water is attached is irradiated with near infrared rays having a wavelength of 0.6 μm to 2.5 μm from a projector. Near infrared absorption peak caused by functional group based on molecular structure of specific plastic in waste plastic and near infrared absorption determined in advance for a plurality of known plastics by detecting means connected to this light receiving element Compared with the peak, waste plastic is discriminated.

このほか、判別対象となる複数のプラスチックの、それぞれの吸収波長帯内にあり他と波長の異なる検出光と、そのいずれとも異なる波長の参照光を試料に照射し、検出光の反射または透過光の受光量を表す検出値と、参照光の反射または透過光の受光量を表す参照値との差または比に基づいて、どのプラスチックに属するかを判定しているプラスチックの判定方法が知られている(例えば、特許文献2を参照)。
特許3124142号公報 特開2001−108616号公報
In addition, the sample is irradiated with detection light having a different wavelength from the other, and the reference light having a different wavelength from each other, and the reflected or transmitted light of the detection light. There is known a plastic determination method that determines which plastic belongs based on a difference or ratio between a detected value that represents the amount of received light and a reference value that represents the amount of received or reflected reference light. (For example, refer to Patent Document 2).
Japanese Patent No. 3124142 JP 2001-108616 A

しかしながら、上述した廃プラスチックの判別方法では、吸収ピークの分離のため吸収スペクトルを2次微分した上で使用しており、また、新たな種類のプラスチックが追加された場合、吸収ピークの波長を検索する必要がある。さらに、使用する赤外線が0.6μm〜2.5μmと、可視光の一部と近赤外線の全ての波長域を含んでおり、波長帯域が広いことにより装置を構成する受光素子や分光手段に関わるコストが増加する要因となる。また、近赤外線では、中赤外線を利用した場合で大きな外乱要因となる水の付着や温度放射の影響を受けにくい反面、プラスチック中の官能基に由来する吸収の倍音や結合音が狭い波長範囲の中に錯綜するため、多変量解析などの統計的手法や、吸収スペクトルの1次、2次微分などの前処理併用など、情報処理が煩雑となりやすいという問題がある。   However, in the above-mentioned waste plastic discrimination method, the absorption spectrum is used after second-order differentiation for separating the absorption peak, and when a new kind of plastic is added, the wavelength of the absorption peak is searched. There is a need to. Furthermore, the infrared rays used are 0.6 μm to 2.5 μm, which includes a part of visible light and the entire wavelength range of near infrared rays, and the wide wavelength band relates to the light receiving elements and spectroscopic means constituting the apparatus. Cost increases. In addition, near-infrared light is not easily affected by water adhesion and temperature radiation, which are major disturbance factors when using mid-infrared light, but the overtone and the combined sound derived from functional groups in plastics have a narrow wavelength range. Since this is complicated, there is a problem that information processing tends to be complicated, such as statistical methods such as multivariate analysis, and preprocessing combined with first and second derivatives of absorption spectra.

また、特許文献2の方法では、上述の廃プラスチックの判別方法と同様に、新たなプラスチック種類追加に対して、波長や判別のためのしきい値レベルの設定などの面で煩雑さを否めず拡張性に乏しい。
本発明は、このような従来の事情に基づいてなされたもので、その目的は、複雑な情報処理を必要とせず、安価な構成のもとで、プラスチックの種類を確実に判別する事ができ、新たな種類のプラスチック追加に対しても簡易に対応できるプラスチック種類判別方法を提供することにある。
Further, in the method of Patent Document 2, as with the above-described method for discriminating waste plastic, it is unavoidable to add complexity to the addition of a new plastic type in terms of setting the wavelength and threshold level for discrimination. Scalability is poor.
The present invention has been made on the basis of such a conventional situation, and the object thereof is not to require complicated information processing, and it is possible to reliably determine the type of plastic under an inexpensive configuration. Another object of the present invention is to provide a plastic type discrimination method that can easily cope with the addition of a new type of plastic.

上述した目的を達成するため本発明に係るプラスチックの種類判別方法は、種類の異なる複数の既知のプラスチック試料にそれぞれ近赤外線を照射したとき、各プラスチック試料をそれぞれ透過する透過光、または各プラスチック試料からそれぞれ反射された反射光を所定の分光手段により計測して求めた基準吸収スペクトルと、種類判別対象のプラスチック試料に前記近赤外線を照射し、該判別対象のプラスチック試料を透過する透過光または該判別対象のプラスチック試料から反射された反射光を所定の分光手段により測定した計測吸収スペクトルとの相関関係からプラスチックの種類を判別することを特徴としている。特に前記各吸収スペクトルまたは前記相関関係の対象波長は、1.6μm〜1.9μmの近赤外線が用いられる。   In order to achieve the above-described object, the plastic type discrimination method according to the present invention is a method of transmitting transmitted light that passes through each plastic sample or each plastic sample when a plurality of different types of known plastic samples are each irradiated with near infrared rays. A reference absorption spectrum obtained by measuring the reflected light reflected from each of them by a predetermined spectroscopic means, and the transmitted light transmitted through the plastic sample to be discriminated by irradiating the plastic sample to be discriminated with the near infrared ray It is characterized in that the type of plastic is discriminated from the correlation with the measured absorption spectrum obtained by measuring the reflected light reflected from the plastic sample to be discriminated by a predetermined spectroscopic means. In particular, near infrared rays of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm are used as the target wavelengths of the respective absorption spectra or the correlation.

上述のプラスチックの種類判別方法は、判定の基準となる純粋なプラスチック試料に波長1.6μm〜1.9μmの近赤外線を照射し、このプラスチック試料を透過した透過光またはプラスチック試料によって反射された反射光を所定の分光手段によって分光し、該プラスチック試料の吸収スペクトル(基準吸収スペクトル)を求める。一方、被判定対象のプラスチックに対しても同じ波長の近赤外線を照射し、該プラスチック試料を透過した透過光または該プラスチック試料から反射された反射光を所定の分光手段によって該プラスチック試料の吸収スペクトル(計測吸収スペクトル)を求める。このとき上述した基準級吸収スペクトルのうち、計測吸収スペクトルとの相関の高い吸収スペクトルを見い出し、プラスチックの種類を判別する。   In the plastic type discrimination method described above, a pure plastic sample serving as a criterion for judgment is irradiated with near infrared rays having a wavelength of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm, and the light transmitted through the plastic sample or reflected by the plastic sample is reflected. The light is dispersed by a predetermined spectroscopic means to obtain an absorption spectrum (reference absorption spectrum) of the plastic sample. On the other hand, the near-infrared ray having the same wavelength is also irradiated to the plastic to be judged, and the transmitted light transmitted through the plastic sample or the reflected light reflected from the plastic sample is absorbed by a predetermined spectroscopic means. (Measurement absorption spectrum) is obtained. At this time, an absorption spectrum having a high correlation with the measured absorption spectrum is found out of the reference class absorption spectra described above, and the type of plastic is determined.

相関の高い吸収スペクトルの見い出しについては、次のように行う。
(1)同一波長における計測吸収スペクトルでの吸収量(吸光度)と一つの基準吸収スペクトルでの吸収量(吸光度)を対として所定の波長ピッチ、波長範囲で計測吸収スペクトルと基準吸収スペクトルとの相関係数を算出する。
(2)これを全ての基準吸収スペクトルとの組み合わせに対して行い、各基準吸収スペクトルに対する相関係数を算出する。
(3)相関係数が最も大きく、かつ[1]に近い基準吸収スペクトルとの組み合わせを検索し、その基準吸収スペクトルのプラスチックを被判定対象のプラスチックの種類とする。
Finding an absorption spectrum with high correlation is performed as follows.
(1) A phase between a measured absorption spectrum and a reference absorption spectrum at a predetermined wavelength pitch and wavelength range with a pair of an absorption amount (absorbance) in a measured absorption spectrum at the same wavelength and an absorption amount (absorbance) in one reference absorption spectrum. Calculate the number of relationships.
(2) This is performed for all combinations with reference absorption spectra, and a correlation coefficient for each reference absorption spectrum is calculated.
(3) A combination with the reference absorption spectrum having the largest correlation coefficient and close to [1] is searched, and the plastic of the reference absorption spectrum is set as the type of plastic to be determined.

なお、相関係数は、統計手法として一般的な単相関分析によって算出する。
つまり、計測吸収スペクトルと複数の基準吸収スペクトルとの相関係数を求め、その相関係数が最も大きく、かつ[1]に近い基準吸収スペクトルのプラスチックを求めれば、判定対象のプラスチック種類を判別することができる。
好ましくは、前記分光手段は、回折格子およびリニアアレータイプの受光素子で構成されることが望ましい。
The correlation coefficient is calculated by a single correlation analysis that is a general statistical method.
That is, if the correlation coefficient between the measured absorption spectrum and a plurality of reference absorption spectra is obtained, and the plastic having the largest correlation coefficient and the reference absorption spectrum close to [1] is obtained, the plastic type to be determined is determined. be able to.
Preferably, the spectroscopic means is composed of a diffraction grating and a linear array type light receiving element.

以上、説明したように本発明に係るプラスチックの種類判別方法によれば、予め種類の異なる複数の既知のプラスチック試料にそれぞれ近赤外線を照射し、各プラスチック試料をそれぞれ透過する透過光または各プラスチック試料からそれぞれ反射される反射光を所定の分光手段により計測した基準吸収スペクトルと、種類判別対象のプラスチック試料に前記近赤外線を照射し、該判別対象のプラスチック試料を透過する透過光または該判別対象のプラスチック試料から反射される反射光を所定の分光手段により測定した計測吸収スペクトルとの相関関係を求めているので、プラスチックの種類を適切に判別することが可能となる。   As described above, according to the plastic type discriminating method according to the present invention, a plurality of known plastic samples of different types are each irradiated with near-infrared rays and transmitted light or each plastic sample is transmitted through each plastic sample. The reference absorption spectrum obtained by measuring the reflected light reflected from each by a predetermined spectroscopic means, and the near-infrared light applied to the plastic sample to be subjected to type discrimination, or the transmitted light transmitted through the plastic sample to be discriminated or the discrimination target Since the correlation between the reflected light reflected from the plastic sample and the measured absorption spectrum measured by a predetermined spectroscopic means is obtained, the type of plastic can be appropriately determined.

特に吸収スペクトルまたは相関関係の対象とする波長を1.6μm〜1.9μmの近赤外領域に限定できることから光学系に掛かるコストを抑えることができる。つまり、本発明に係るプラスチックの種類判別方法を適用してプラスチックの種類判別装置を構成した場合、そのコスト低減が可能になる等、実用上多大なる効果を奏し得る。   In particular, since the wavelength targeted for the absorption spectrum or the correlation can be limited to the near-infrared region of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm, the cost applied to the optical system can be suppressed. In other words, when the plastic type discriminating apparatus is configured by applying the plastic type discriminating method according to the present invention, the cost can be reduced.

以下、本発明のプラスチックの種類判別方法について図面を参照しながら説明する。図1は、プラスチックの種類を判別する基準となる各種プラスチック(以下、基準プラスチックと称する)の素材に波長1.0μm〜2.5μmの近赤外線を照射したとき、近赤外線の波長を横軸にとり、縦軸に各基準プラスチックに吸収される赤外線の吸光度を縦軸にとった吸光度スペクトルを示すグラフである。この図において実線は、厚さ0.8mmのポリエチレン(PE)、一点鎖線は、厚さ0.5mmのポリエチレンテレフタレート(PET)、○印を附した実線は、厚さ1.0mmのポリプロピレン(PP)、三角印を附した実線は、厚さ1.0mmのポリスチレン(PS)、×印を附した実線は、厚さ0.75μmのポリ塩化ビニル(PVC)を示している。また、図2は特に1.6μm〜1.9μmの波長域における吸光度を示したものである。図1および図2が示すように、波長1.6μm〜1.9μmおよび波長2.1μm〜2.5μmの領域において吸光度(吸収)の増加傾向が見られ、しかもプラスチックの種類ごとに吸光度スペクトルのパターンが異なっている。このような種類毎のパターンの違いは、プラスチック固有の分子構造の違いを反映したものである。ちなみにこの吸光度は、島津製作所UV3100PCをスリット20nm、波長ピッチ2nmの分光条件とし、透過光を計測したものである。   The plastic type discrimination method of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. Fig. 1 shows the wavelength of near infrared rays on the horizontal axis when near infrared rays having a wavelength of 1.0 µm to 2.5 µm are radiated to the material of various plastics (hereinafter referred to as reference plastics) that serve as a basis for discriminating the type of plastic. It is a graph which shows the light-absorption spectrum which took the light absorbency of the infrared rays absorbed by each reference | standard plastics on a vertical axis | shaft on the vertical axis | shaft. In this figure, the solid line is polyethylene (PE) with a thickness of 0.8 mm, the alternate long and short dash line is polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with a thickness of 0.5 mm, and the solid line with a circle is polypropylene with a thickness of 1.0 mm (PP ), A solid line with a triangle mark indicates polystyrene (PS) with a thickness of 1.0 mm, and a solid line with a mark x indicates polyvinyl chloride (PVC) with a thickness of 0.75 μm. FIG. 2 shows the absorbance in the wavelength range of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm. As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the absorbance (absorption) tends to increase in the wavelength range of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm and the wavelength range of 2.1 μm to 2.5 μm. The pattern is different. The difference in pattern for each type reflects the difference in molecular structure unique to plastics. By the way, this absorbance is obtained by measuring transmitted light using Shimadzu UV3100PC under the spectral condition of slit 20 nm and wavelength pitch 2 nm.

また図3は、図2が示す吸光度特性を、各基準プラスチックの素材毎にピーク値を1として正規化したものである。これらの図が示すように、各基準プラスチックにおける吸光度のピークは、PETが波長1.662μm、PSが波長1.682μm、PVCが波長1.716μm、PPが波長1.724μm、PEが波長1.728μmという結果が得られた。   FIG. 3 is a graph obtained by normalizing the absorbance characteristics shown in FIG. 2 with a peak value of 1 for each reference plastic material. As shown in these figures, the absorbance peaks of each reference plastic are as follows. PET has a wavelength of 1.662 μm, PS has a wavelength of 1.682 μm, PVC has a wavelength of 1.716 μm, PP has a wavelength of 1.724 μm, and PE has a wavelength of 1. A result of 728 μm was obtained.

次に発明者は、これらの吸光度スペクトルからプラスチックの種別が判定可能かどうかを検証すべく6個の試料(A,B,C,D,E,F)を用意した。それぞれの試料の厚みは、試料Aが0.3mm、試料Bが0.15mm、試料Cが0.25mm、試料Dが1.20mm、試料Eが0.10mm、試料Fが1.40mmである。これらの試料に波長1.0μm〜2.5μmの近赤外線を照射したとき、この近赤外線の波長を横軸にとり、縦軸に各プラスチック素材に吸収される赤外線の吸光度を縦軸にとった吸光度スペクトルを示すグラフを描けば図4および図5が得られる。尚、図5は、図4に示す吸光度スペクトルのうち、波長1.6μm〜1.9μmの範囲だけを抽出して描いたグラフである。このようにして得られた各試料の吸光度スペクトルに関して、前述したようにして求めた各基準プラスチックの素材の吸光度スペクトルと相関係数を求めるべく、散布図を作成した。尚、図6〜図11に示す散布図は、相関関係をわかりやすくするためプロットされた点の軌跡を線として描いたものである。したがって、○、△などの線上のマークは実際のプロットとは異なる。   Next, the inventor prepared six samples (A, B, C, D, E, and F) to verify whether or not the type of plastic can be determined from these absorbance spectra. The thickness of each sample is 0.3 mm for sample A, 0.15 mm for sample B, 0.25 mm for sample C, 1.20 mm for sample D, 0.10 mm for sample E, and 1.40 mm for sample F. . When these samples are irradiated with near infrared rays having a wavelength of 1.0 μm to 2.5 μm, the horizontal axis represents the wavelength of the near infrared rays, and the vertical axis represents the absorbance of the infrared rays absorbed by each plastic material. Drawing the graph showing the spectrum gives FIG. 4 and FIG. Note that FIG. 5 is a graph drawn by extracting only the wavelength range of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm from the absorbance spectrum shown in FIG. 4. With respect to the absorbance spectrum of each sample thus obtained, a scatter diagram was prepared in order to obtain the absorbance spectrum and correlation coefficient of each reference plastic material obtained as described above. In addition, the scatter diagrams shown in FIGS. 6 to 11 depict the locus of the plotted points as lines for easy understanding of the correlation. Therefore, the marks on the lines such as ◯ and Δ are different from the actual plot.

まず、各基準プラスチックの吸光度を横軸、試料Aの吸光度を縦軸とし、同一波長における各基準プラスチックの吸光度と試料Aの吸光度を対応させて、所定波長ピッチ、波長範囲のもとでプロットし、図6に示す散布図を作成した。すると、試料Aと基準プラスチックのPEとは、実線で示すように扁平な円を描き相関が強くないことが読み取れる。また試料AとPETとは、一点鎖線で示すようにグラフの上方に向かって突出した軌跡となり、相関がないことがわかる。次に試料AとPPとは、○印を付した線が示すように右肩上がりの傾向が傾向となり、試料Aとやや相関は見られるものの蛇行した軌跡を描くため相関が強くないことがわかる。また試料AとPSとは、△印を附した直線が示すように三角形を描く軌跡となり、まったく相関がないことがわかる。次いで試料AとPVCとは、右肩上がりの直線となり、極めて相関が強いことが読み取れる。これらのことから、試料Aは、PVCであると判別することができる。実際、この試料Aは、PVCである。   First, the absorbance of each reference plastic is plotted on the horizontal axis and the absorbance of sample A is plotted on the vertical axis. The absorbance of each reference plastic and the absorbance of sample A at the same wavelength are matched and plotted under a predetermined wavelength pitch and wavelength range. The scatter diagram shown in FIG. 6 was created. Then, it can be read that the sample A and the PE of the reference plastic draw a flat circle as shown by the solid line and the correlation is not strong. In addition, it can be seen that Sample A and PET have a locus protruding upward in the graph as shown by a one-dot chain line, and there is no correlation. Next, samples A and PP tend to rise to the right as shown by the circled circles, and although there is some correlation with sample A, it shows that the correlation is not strong because it draws a meandering locus. . In addition, it can be seen that Samples A and PS have a triangular trace as indicated by the straight line marked with Δ, and have no correlation. Next, it can be seen that Sample A and PVC become straight lines that rise to the right and have a very strong correlation. From these things, it can be discriminate | determined that the sample A is PVC. In fact, this sample A is PVC.

次に試料Bについても上述した試料Aと同様な散布図を描くと図7に示すようになる。すると、試料Bと基準プラスチックのPEとは、実線で示すように扁平な半円を描き相関が強くないことがわかる。また試料BとPETとは、一点鎖線で示すようにグラフの上方に向かって突出した軌跡となり、相関がないことがわかる。次に試料BとPPとは、○印を付した線が示すように右肩上がりの直線となり、極めて相関が強いことが読み取れる。また試料BとPSとは、△印を附した直線が示すように、一辺がやや蛇行した三角形を描く軌跡となり、まったく相関がないことがわかる。次いで試料BとPVCとは、×印を附した直線が示すように、やや変形した半円となり、相関が強いことが読み取れる。これらのことから、試料Bは、PPであると判別することができる。実際、この試料Bは、PPである。   Next, for Sample B, a scatter diagram similar to Sample A described above is drawn as shown in FIG. Then, it can be seen that the sample B and the PE of the reference plastic draw a flat semicircle as shown by a solid line, and the correlation is not strong. In addition, it can be seen that Sample B and PET have a locus protruding upward in the graph as indicated by a one-dot chain line, and there is no correlation. Next, it can be seen that Samples B and PP are straight ascending as shown by the circled circles and are extremely correlated. In addition, it can be seen that Samples B and PS have a trace that draws a triangle with one side meandering slightly, as shown by the straight line with a Δ mark. Next, it can be seen that Sample B and PVC are slightly deformed semicircles as shown by the straight line with a cross, and that the correlation is strong. From these facts, it can be determined that the sample B is PP. In fact, this sample B is PP.

また試料Cについても上述した試料Aおよび試料Bと同様な散布図を描くと図8に示すようになった。試料Cと基準プラスチックのPEとは、実線で示されるように扁平で横長の三角形を描き相関が強くないことがわかる。一方、試料CとPETとは、一点鎖線で示すように右肩上がりの直線となり、強い相関があることが読み取れる。次に試料CとPPとは、○印を付した線が示すように二辺がやや潰れた三角形となり、相関がないことが分かる。また試料CとPSとは、△印を附した直線が示すように、三角形の一辺を延長した形状となり、まったく相関がないことがわかる。次いで試料CとPVCとは、×印を附した直線が示すように、二辺が大きく潰れた三角形となり、相関がないことが読み取れる。これらのことから、試料Cは、PETであると判別することができる。実際、この試料Cは、PETである。   For Sample C, a scatter diagram similar to Sample A and Sample B described above is shown in FIG. It can be seen that the sample C and the PE of the reference plastic draw a flat and horizontally long triangle as shown by the solid line, and the correlation is not strong. On the other hand, it can be seen that Sample C and PET are straight ascending as shown by the alternate long and short dash line and have a strong correlation. Next, it can be seen that Samples C and PP are triangles with two sides slightly collapsed as indicated by the circled circles, and there is no correlation. Samples C and PS have a shape in which one side of the triangle is extended as indicated by a straight line with a Δ mark, and it can be seen that there is no correlation at all. Next, it can be read that Sample C and PVC are triangles whose two sides are largely crushed, as indicated by the straight line with a cross, and there is no correlation. From these, it can be determined that the sample C is PET. In fact, this sample C is PET.

また試料Dについても上述した試料A,Bおよび試料Cと同様な散布図を描くと図9に示すようになった。まず試料Dと基準プラスチックのPEとは、実線で示されるように二辺がやや潰れた三角形となり、相関がないことが分かる。次に試料DとPETとは、一点鎖線で示すように上方に突出した扁平な楕円となり相関がないことが読み取れる。また試料DとPPとは、○印を付した線が示すように底辺がやや歪な三角形となり、相関がないことが分かる。また試料DとPSとは、△印を附した直線が示すように、右肩上がりの直線となり、強い相関があることが分かる。次いで試料DとPVCとは、×印を附した直線が示すように、二辺がやや潰れた三角形となり、相関がないことが読み取れる。これらのことから、試料Dは、PSであると判別することができる。実際、この試料Dは、PSである。   Further, for Sample D, a scatter diagram similar to Samples A, B, and C described above is shown in FIG. First, it can be seen that the sample D and the PE of the reference plastic are triangles with two sides slightly crushed as shown by the solid line, and there is no correlation. Next, it can be seen that Sample D and PET are flat ellipses protruding upward as shown by the alternate long and short dash line and have no correlation. In addition, it can be seen that the samples D and PP have a slightly distorted triangle at the bottom as shown by the line marked with a circle, and have no correlation. Further, it can be seen that Samples D and PS are straight ascending as shown by the straight line marked with Δ, and have a strong correlation. Next, it can be read that the sample D and PVC are triangles with two sides slightly crushed as shown by the straight line with a cross, and there is no correlation. From these, it can be determined that the sample D is PS. In fact, this sample D is PS.

次に試料Eについても上述した試料A,B,Cおよび試料Dと同様な散布図を描くと図10に示すようになった。まず試料Eと基準プラスチックのPEとは、実線で示されるように右肩上がりの直線となり、強い相関があることがわかる。次に試料EとPETとは、一点鎖線で示すように上方に突出した三角形状を描き相関がないことが読み取れる。また試料EとPPとは、○印を付した線が示すように下方が円周となる扁平した半円を描き、相関がないことが分かる。また試料EとPSとは、△印を附した直線が示すように、三角形となり相関がないことが読み取れる。次いで試料EとPVCとは、×印を附した直線が示すように、立ち上がる煙のような雲形となり、相関がないことが読み取れる。これらのことから、試料Eは、PEであると判別することができる。実際、この試料Eは、PEである。   Next, for Sample E, a scatter diagram similar to Samples A, B, C, and D described above is drawn as shown in FIG. First, it can be seen that the sample E and the PE of the reference plastic have a strong correlation as shown by the solid line and rise upward. Next, it can be seen that Sample E and PET draw a triangular shape protruding upward as shown by the alternate long and short dash line and have no correlation. Samples E and PP draw a flat semicircle with a circle on the lower side as indicated by the circled circle, and it can be seen that there is no correlation. Further, it can be seen that the samples E and PS are triangular and have no correlation as indicated by the straight line marked with Δ. Next, it can be seen that the sample E and the PVC have a cloud shape like rising smoke as indicated by the straight line with a cross, and there is no correlation. From these facts, it can be determined that the sample E is PE. In fact, this sample E is PE.

最後に試料Fについても上述した試料A,B,C,Dおよび試料Eと同様な散布図を描くと図11に示すようになった。この図が示すように試料Eと基準プラスチックのPE,PP,PVCとは、それぞれ実線、○印を附した線および×印を附した線が示すように三角形を描き、いずれも相関がないことが読み取れる。また、試料EとPETに付いては、上側に突出した扁平した楕円となり、相関がないことが読み取れる。更に試料EとPSについては、△印を附した線が示すように上側を円周としたやや扁平な半円となり相関がないことがわかる。このように試料Eは、いずれの基準プラスチックとも相関が低いことが判明する。実際、この試料はPC(ポリカーボネート)である。この試料Fは、本発明のプラスチックの種類判別方法の有用性を確認するために基準プラスチック以外の材料で評価したものである。   Finally, for Sample F, a scatter diagram similar to Samples A, B, C, D, and Sample E described above is shown in FIG. As shown in this figure, sample E and the reference plastics PE, PP, and PVC draw a triangle as shown by the solid line, the line marked with ○, and the line marked with x, respectively, and there should be no correlation Can be read. In addition, it can be read that the samples E and PET are flat ellipses protruding upward and have no correlation. Further, it can be seen that Samples E and PS are slightly flat semicircles with the upper side being the circumference as shown by the line with Δ mark, and there is no correlation. Thus, sample E is found to have a low correlation with any reference plastic. In fact, this sample is PC (polycarbonate). This sample F was evaluated with a material other than the reference plastic in order to confirm the usefulness of the plastic type discrimination method of the present invention.

上述した評価試験は、波長範囲を1.6μm〜1.9μmとして実施したものであるが、その他の波長範囲の場合も含めて、試料毎の相関係数について解析した結果を表1に示す。   The evaluation test described above was carried out at a wavelength range of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm. Table 1 shows the results of analysis of the correlation coefficient for each sample, including other wavelength ranges.

Figure 2006084350
この表に示す波長範囲は、aが波長1.0μm〜2.5μm、bが前述した波長1.6μm〜1.9μm、cが波長2.1μm〜2.5μmを示す。この表に示すように、試料Aについては、全ての波長範囲において、PVCに対する(対PVC)相関係数が最も大きく、0.999と極めて[1]に近い値が得られた。また、他の基準プラスチック(PE,PET,PP,PS)については、いずれも相関係数が[1]から離れた値となった。このようなことからいずれの波長範囲においても、各試料の材質は、基準プラスチックとの相関が強く出ているとき、すなわち相関係数が最も大きく、かつ[1]に近い値となるものが試料の種別を示すと判定することができる。同様に他の試料B,C,D,Eについても、それぞれ対PP,対PET,対PS,対PEの相関係数が、いずれも最も大きく、かつ[1]に近い値になり、各試料の種別を判定できる。
Figure 2006084350
As for the wavelength range shown in this table, a represents a wavelength of 1.0 μm to 2.5 μm, b represents a wavelength of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm, and c represents a wavelength of 2.1 μm to 2.5 μm. As shown in this table, for sample A, the correlation coefficient for PVC (vs. PVC) was the largest in all wavelength ranges, and 0.999 was obtained, a value very close to [1]. In addition, for the other reference plastics (PE, PET, PP, PS), the correlation coefficient was a value away from [1]. Therefore, in any wavelength range, the material of each sample has a strong correlation with the reference plastic, that is, the sample with the largest correlation coefficient and a value close to [1]. It can be determined that it indicates the type. Similarly, for the other samples B, C, D, and E, the correlation coefficients of the pair PP, the pair PET, the pair PS, and the pair PE are all the largest and close to [1]. Can be determined.

しかしながら試料Fについては、相関係数が[1]に極めて近くなる基準プラスチックがない。なお、試料Fについて最も相関係数が大きいのは、対PETにおける0.965(波長範囲:a)、0.919(波長範囲:b)および0.864(波長範囲:c)であり、この場合、相関係数に一定の閾値(例えば0.970)を設け、相関係数が閾値以下のときは非該当と見なすことにより、試料Fは基準プラスチック以外の種類であると判別できる。   However, for sample F, there is no reference plastic whose correlation coefficient is very close to [1]. The largest correlation coefficient for sample F is 0.965 (wavelength range: a), 0.919 (wavelength range: b), and 0.864 (wavelength range: c) for PET. In this case, it is possible to determine that the sample F is of a type other than the reference plastic by providing a certain threshold value for the correlation coefficient (for example, 0.970) and considering that the correlation coefficient is equal to or less than the threshold value.

また、相関係数の最大値から最小値を引いた値、これを相関係数の幅と定義すれば、この幅が最も大きいのが、いずれの試料についても波長1.6μm〜1.9μmの近赤外線である。例えば試料Aについて表1を参照すれば、波長範囲a(1.0μm〜2.5μm)のとき、相関係数の最大値は、0.999であり、最小値は0.747であるから、その差は、0.252となる。同様に試料Aについて、波長範囲b(1.6μm〜1.9μm)のとき、相関係数の最大値は、0.999であり、最小値は−0.105であるから、その差は、1.104となる。また、同様に試料Aについて、波長範囲c(2.1μm〜2.5μm)のとき、相関係数の最大値は、0.999であり、最小値は0.499であるから、その差は、0.500となる。   In addition, if the value obtained by subtracting the minimum value from the maximum value of the correlation coefficient, which is defined as the width of the correlation coefficient, this width is the largest for any sample having a wavelength of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm. Near infrared. For example, referring to Table 1 for the sample A, in the wavelength range a (1.0 μm to 2.5 μm), the maximum value of the correlation coefficient is 0.999, and the minimum value is 0.747. The difference is 0.252. Similarly, for the sample A, in the wavelength range b (1.6 μm to 1.9 μm), the maximum value of the correlation coefficient is 0.999 and the minimum value is −0.105. 1.104. Similarly, for sample A, in the wavelength range c (2.1 μm to 2.5 μm), the maximum value of the correlation coefficient is 0.999 and the minimum value is 0.499, so the difference is , 0.500.

以下、すべての試料についても最も相関係数の幅が広いのは、波長範囲b(1.6μm〜1.9μm)のときである。したがって、波長範囲1.6μm〜1.9μmの近赤外線を用いて試料を判定すれば、相関係数の幅、すなわちダイナミックレンジを広くとることができ、高精度にプラスチックの種類を判定することができる。
前述した評価試験において、基準プラスチックと評価対象プラスチック(A〜E)の厚さは、表2の如く、まったく異なっていたにもかかわらず正しく判別できている。尚、この表の評価対象プラスチックは、各試料の左欄に記載の基準プラスチックと同一種類である。
Hereinafter, the width of the correlation coefficient is the widest for all samples in the wavelength range b (1.6 μm to 1.9 μm). Therefore, if the sample is determined using near infrared rays having a wavelength range of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm, the width of the correlation coefficient, that is, the dynamic range can be widened, and the type of plastic can be determined with high accuracy. it can.
In the evaluation test described above, the thicknesses of the reference plastic and the evaluation target plastics (A to E) can be correctly discriminated despite being completely different as shown in Table 2. In addition, the evaluation object plastic of this table | surface is the same kind as the reference | standard plastics described in the left column of each sample.

Figure 2006084350
さらに、基準プラスチックの内、厚さ0.75mmのポリ塩化ビニルと、評価対象プラスチックの内、厚さ0.3mmのポリ塩化ビニル(試料A)について、波長範囲1.0μm〜2.5μmの吸光度スペクトルを比較したものが図12である。この図が示すように板厚の厚い基準プラスチックの吸光度は、板厚の薄い評価対象プラスチックに対し、概略、厚さに比例する形で増加しているのみで相似形をなしている。このように、吸光度が厚さに概略比例することは、分光分析の分野では一般的な事実である(ここで、概略としたのは、試料表面での正反射にともなう吸光度増加が、厚さとは無関係に存在するためである)。
Figure 2006084350
Furthermore, the absorbance in the wavelength range of 1.0 μm to 2.5 μm for polyvinyl chloride with a thickness of 0.75 mm among the reference plastics and polyvinyl chloride with a thickness of 0.3 mm (sample A) among the plastics to be evaluated. A comparison of the spectra is shown in FIG. As shown in this figure, the absorbance of the reference plastic having a thick plate thickness is similar to that of the evaluation target plastic having a thin plate thickness, generally increasing in proportion to the thickness. Thus, the fact that the absorbance is roughly proportional to the thickness is a general fact in the field of spectroscopic analysis (here, the outline shows that the increase in absorbance due to specular reflection on the sample surface is the thickness and thickness). Because it exists unrelatedly).

そこで波長1.6μm〜1.9μmの範囲に関し、横軸に基準プラスチック吸光度をとり、横軸に評価対象試料の吸光度をとった散布図を描くと、図13のごとく、右肩上がりの直線状の分布となり強い相関があることがわかる。なお、図13は、試料の厚さの影響についてわかりやすくするため、前述図6の試料Aに関する散布図の内、対PVCの場合について抜き出したものである。また、図13の散布図に対応する相関係数は、表1の試料A、かつ波長範囲bの対PVCの欄に記載の0.999である。   Therefore, regarding the wavelength range of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm, the horizontal axis represents the standard plastic absorbance, and the horizontal axis represents the absorbance of the sample to be evaluated. As shown in FIG. It can be seen that there is a strong correlation. Note that FIG. 13 is extracted from the scatter diagram regarding the sample A of FIG. 6 described above for the case of PVC in order to make it easy to understand the influence of the thickness of the sample. Further, the correlation coefficient corresponding to the scatter diagram of FIG. 13 is 0.999 described in the column of the sample A in Table 1 and the wavelength range b versus PVC.

かくして、上述した本発明のプラスチック種類判別方法は、種類判別対象のプラスチック試料に近赤外線を照射し、試料からの透過光もしくは反射光に基づき分光手段により測定した吸収(吸光度)スペクトルと、種類が異なる複数の既知のプラスチック試料について、予め同一方法により測定した吸収(吸光度)スペクトルとの相関関係を求め、相関が強い時、すなわち相関係数が最も大きく、かつ[1]に近い既知のプラスチックが種類判別対象のプラスチック種類であると判定している。このため、板厚の影響を受ける事無く、プラスチックの種類を判別する事が可能となる。   Thus, in the plastic type discrimination method of the present invention described above, an absorption (absorbance) spectrum obtained by irradiating a near-infrared ray to a plastic sample subject to type discrimination and measured by spectroscopic means based on transmitted light or reflected light from the sample, For a plurality of different known plastic samples, the correlation with the absorption (absorbance) spectrum measured in advance by the same method is obtained. When the correlation is strong, that is, the known plastic having the largest correlation coefficient and close to [1] It is determined that the type of plastic is a type discrimination target. For this reason, it is possible to determine the type of plastic without being affected by the plate thickness.

また、上述した本発明のプラスチック種類判別方法では、吸収ピーク波長の比較や特定の波長における受光量の比較と言ったポイントデータによる判別ではなく、所定の波長範囲での吸収スペクトルデータのすべてを使用した相関関係に基づいて判別するため、吸収スペクトル上のノイズなどの影響を受けにくい安定な判別が可能となる。
特に、吸収スペクトルの波長範囲を1.6μm〜1.9μmの近赤外線領域に限定できることから、吸収スペクトルを求めるための分光手段に関わるコストの軽減や、判別にかかる時間の短縮が可能となる。
In the plastic type discrimination method of the present invention described above, all of absorption spectrum data in a predetermined wavelength range is used instead of discrimination by point data such as comparison of absorption peak wavelengths or comparison of received light amounts at specific wavelengths. Since the determination is made based on the correlation, the stable determination that is hardly affected by noise on the absorption spectrum is possible.
In particular, since the wavelength range of the absorption spectrum can be limited to the near infrared region of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm, it is possible to reduce the cost associated with the spectroscopic means for obtaining the absorption spectrum and to shorten the time required for discrimination.

さらに、新たな判別対象プラスチックを追加する場合は、追加するプラスチックの吸収スペクトルを測定し基準パターとして登録するのみで、新たな波長設定や判別ロジック等の追加を必要としないため、新たな判別対象プラスチック追加の際の作業コストが大幅に軽減される。
尚、本発明のプラスチックの種類判別方法は、上記した実施の形態に限定されるものではなく、本発明の要旨を逸脱しない範囲内において種々変更を加え得ることは勿論である。
Furthermore, when adding a new plastic to be discriminated, only the absorption spectrum of the plastic to be added is measured and registered as a reference pattern, and no new wavelength setting or addition of discriminating logic is required. The work cost when adding plastic is greatly reduced.
It should be noted that the plastic type discrimination method of the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and it is needless to say that various changes can be made without departing from the gist of the present invention.

各種プラスチック板に近赤外線を照射したとき、これら各プラスチック板に吸収される吸光度スペクトルを示すグラフ。The graph which shows the light absorbency spectrum absorbed by these each plastic board when near infrared rays are irradiated to various plastic boards. 図1に示す吸光度スペクトルのうち、波長1.6μm〜1.9μmの範囲のみ取り出した吸光度スペクトルを示すグラフ。The graph which shows the light-absorption spectrum which took out only the range of wavelength 1.6micrometer-1.9micrometer among the light-absorption spectra shown in FIG. 図2に示す吸光度スペクトルを、各プラスチック板のピーク吸光度を1として正規化した吸光度スペクトルを示すグラフ。The graph which shows the absorbance spectrum which normalized the absorbance spectrum shown in FIG. 2 by making the peak absorbance of each plastic plate into 1. FIG. 各試料となるプラスチック板に近赤外線を照射したとき、これら各プラスチック板に吸収される吸光度スペクトルを示すグラフ。The graph which shows the light absorbency spectrum absorbed by these each plastic board when near infrared rays are irradiated to the plastic board used as each sample. 図4に示す吸光度スペクトルのうち、波長1.6μm〜1.9μmの範囲のみ取り出した吸光度スペクトルを示すグラフ。FIG. 5 is a graph showing an absorbance spectrum extracted from the absorbance spectrum shown in FIG. 4 only in the wavelength range of 1.6 μm to 1.9 μm. 試料Aと基準プラスチック板とにおける吸光度特性の相関関係を示す散布図。The scatter diagram which shows the correlation of the light absorbency characteristic in the sample A and a reference | standard plastic board. 試料Bと基準プラスチック板とにおける吸光度特性の相関関係を示す散布図。The scatter diagram which shows the correlation of the light absorbency characteristic in the sample B and a reference | standard plastic board. 試料Cと基準プラスチック板とにおける吸光度特性の相関関係を示す散布図。The scatter diagram which shows the correlation of the light absorbency characteristic in the sample C and a reference | standard plastic board. 試料Dと基準プラスチック板とにおける吸光度特性の相関関係を示す散布図。The scatter diagram which shows the correlation of the light absorbency characteristic in the sample D and a reference | standard plastic board. 試料Eと基準プラスチック板とにおける吸光度特性の相関関係を示す散布図。The scatter diagram which shows the correlation of the light absorbency characteristic in the sample E and a reference | standard plastic board. 試料Fと基準プラスチック板とにおける吸光度特性の相関関係を示す散布図。The scatter diagram which shows the correlation of the light absorbency characteristic in the sample F and a reference | standard plastic board. 同種の厚さの異なるプラスチック板に近赤外線を照射したとき、これら各プラスチック板に吸収される吸光度スペクトルを示すグラフ。The graph which shows the light absorbency spectrum absorbed by these plastic plates when near infrared rays are irradiated to the plastic plate of the same kind from which thickness differs. 図12に示す基準プラスチックと未知試料とにおける吸光度特性の相関関係を示す散布図。The scatter diagram which shows the correlation of the light absorbency characteristic in the reference | standard plastics shown in FIG. 12, and an unknown sample.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

A,B,C,D,E 試料
PC ポリカーボネート
PE ポリエチレン
PET ポリエチレンテレフタレート
PP ポリプロピレン
PS ポリスチレン
PVC ポリ塩化ビニル
A, B, C, D, E Sample PC Polycarbonate PE Polyethylene PET Polyethylene terephthalate PP Polypropylene PS Polystyrene PVC Polyvinyl chloride

Claims (3)

種類の異なる複数の既知のプラスチック試料にそれぞれ近赤外線を照射し、各プラスチック試料をそれぞれ透過する透過光または各プラスチック試料からそれぞれ反射される反射光を所定の分光手段により計測した基準吸収スペクトルと、
種類判別対象のプラスチック試料に前記近赤外線を照射し、該判別対象のプラスチック試料を透過する透過光または該判別対象のプラスチック試料から反射される反射光を前記分光手段により測定した計測吸収スペクトルとの相関関係からプラスチックの種類を判別することを特徴とするプラスチックの種類判別方法。
A reference absorption spectrum in which a plurality of different types of known plastic samples are each irradiated with near-infrared rays, and transmitted light transmitted through each plastic sample or reflected light reflected from each plastic sample is measured by a predetermined spectroscopic means,
Irradiating the plastic sample of type discrimination with the near infrared ray, and the measured absorption spectrum obtained by measuring the transmitted light transmitted through the plastic sample of discrimination type or the reflected light reflected from the plastic sample of discrimination type with the spectroscopic means A plastic type discrimination method characterized by discriminating a plastic type from a correlation.
前記各吸収スペクトルまたは前記相関関係の対象波長は、1.6μm〜1.9μmである請求項1に記載のプラスチックの種類判別方法。   2. The plastic type discrimination method according to claim 1, wherein a target wavelength of each absorption spectrum or the correlation is 1.6 [mu] m to 1.9 [mu] m. 前記分光手段は、回折格子およびリニアアレータイプの受光素子で構成されるものである請求項1に記載のプラスチックの種類判別方法。   2. The plastic type discrimination method according to claim 1, wherein the spectroscopic means is composed of a diffraction grating and a linear array type light receiving element.
JP2004270264A 2004-09-16 2004-09-16 Type discriminating method of plastics Pending JP2006084350A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004270264A JP2006084350A (en) 2004-09-16 2004-09-16 Type discriminating method of plastics

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004270264A JP2006084350A (en) 2004-09-16 2004-09-16 Type discriminating method of plastics

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006084350A true JP2006084350A (en) 2006-03-30

Family

ID=36162974

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004270264A Pending JP2006084350A (en) 2004-09-16 2004-09-16 Type discriminating method of plastics

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2006084350A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012120779A1 (en) * 2011-03-09 2012-09-13 パナソニック株式会社 Recycled resin evaluation device and method for producing recycled article from recycled resin
KR101366959B1 (en) * 2011-08-26 2014-02-25 미쓰비시덴키 가부시키가이샤 Apparatus and method for distinguishing resins
JP2017101988A (en) * 2015-12-01 2017-06-08 株式会社島津製作所 Plastic discrimination method and plastic discrimination device
EP3339840A1 (en) * 2016-12-20 2018-06-27 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Resin determining method and resin determining apparatus
JPWO2022180776A1 (en) * 2021-02-26 2022-09-01

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012120779A1 (en) * 2011-03-09 2012-09-13 パナソニック株式会社 Recycled resin evaluation device and method for producing recycled article from recycled resin
KR101366959B1 (en) * 2011-08-26 2014-02-25 미쓰비시덴키 가부시키가이샤 Apparatus and method for distinguishing resins
JP2017101988A (en) * 2015-12-01 2017-06-08 株式会社島津製作所 Plastic discrimination method and plastic discrimination device
EP3339840A1 (en) * 2016-12-20 2018-06-27 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Resin determining method and resin determining apparatus
JP2018100903A (en) * 2016-12-20 2018-06-28 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Resin determination method and apparatus
JPWO2022180776A1 (en) * 2021-02-26 2022-09-01
WO2022180776A1 (en) * 2021-02-26 2022-09-01 株式会社日立製作所 Material identification assistance device, method, and program
JP7436745B2 (en) 2021-02-26 2024-02-22 株式会社日立製作所 Material inspection support equipment, methods and programs

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Zhu et al. Plastic solid waste identification system based on near infrared spectroscopy in combination with support vector machine
Bonifazi et al. A hierarchical classification approach for recognition of low-density (LDPE) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) in mixed plastic waste based on short-wave infrared (SWIR) hyperspectral imaging
CN106872393B (en) A method and device for identifying target materials in plastic waste
US5512752A (en) Method of determining type of plastics
Vulcani et al. The importance of the local density in shaping the galaxy stellar mass functions
EP2749865B1 (en) Reflection characteristic measuring apparatus
Goyetche et al. Issues with the detection and classification of microplastics in marine sediments with chemical imaging and machine learning
JP7137772B2 (en) Inspection system, inspection method and manufacturing method of inspection system
Ramalho et al. Rapid discrimination of wood species from native forest and plantations using near infrared spectroscopy
Mancini et al. Near infrared spectroscopy for the discrimination between different residues of the wood processing industry in the pellet sector
Bec et al. Rapid on-site analysis of soil microplastics using miniaturized NIR spectrometers: Key aspect of instrumental variation
Bonifazi et al. Black plastic waste classification by laser-induced fluorescence technique combined with machine learning approaches
JPH1038807A (en) Plastic discriminating method and plastic discriminating device
JP4581039B2 (en) Grade identification method for polymer materials
WO2016080442A1 (en) Quality evaluation method and quality evaluation device
KR100433980B1 (en) Method and apparatus for paper material discrimination with two near-infrared lights
JP6160475B2 (en) Resin identification method and apparatus
JP2006084350A (en) Type discriminating method of plastics
Ma et al. Three-dimensional grain angle measurement of softwood (Hinoki cypress) using near infrared spatially and spectrally resolved imaging (NIR-SSRI)
JP7130944B2 (en) Inspection system, inspection method and manufacturing method of inspection system
Haddadi et al. Using near-infrared hyperspectral images on subalpine fir board. Part 1: Moisture content estimation
Tan et al. Surface reflectance retrieval from the intensity data of a terrestrial laser scanner
CN109073546B (en) Method and apparatus for detecting the presence of mycotoxins in cereals
Laasonen et al. Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for the fast identification of PVC-based films
Wieser et al. Application of hyperspectral imaging for identification of aging state of styrene–butadiene–styrene

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20070806

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20091007

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20091021

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20100303