JP2005241889A - Proficiency system and proficiency program - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To create an evaluation system for evaluating knowledge, technology, managing capability for making use of them and a personal capability to positively act for a purpose with curiosity and interest and to provide a curriculum arranging system which feeds back an evaluation result by the evaluation system. <P>SOLUTION: The system comprises; a knowledge technology measuring means for measuring systematic knowledge and operation; a managing capability measuring means for measuring capabilities to arrange, infer and conceive information and to investigate a fact and express it as a whole; and a personal capability measuring means for measuring intellectual curiosity and intellectual interest and student's capability is evaluated and enhanced further. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

  The present invention relates to the construction of an evaluation system that evaluates knowledge / technical skills, operational skills that make use of them, and private ability to actively engage with the objective in the education of learners, and the evaluation results of the evaluation system. This is related to the feedback curriculum and syllabus system.

  Traditionally, after the war in Japan, children were given knowledge-based education. Therefore, a system that evaluates the knowledge and technical skills acquired by children through education was used to measure the growth of children after education.

  As inventions of systems for evaluating knowledge and technical ability, there are Patent Document 1 and Patent Document 2.

  For example, in Patent Document 1, as a solution for evaluating knowledge and technical skills, “a user downloads teaching materials to a portable game machine 104/106 via a personal computer or a mobile phone, and proceeds with learning there. When the learning of the learning material is completed, the result is transmitted to the learning management server 1011. The learning management server 1011 evaluates the result and analyzes the elements included in the question to which an incorrect answer is input, It is proposed to extract common elements and create a new re-learning curriculum for use by users. "

Further, in Patent Document 2, as a means for evaluating knowledge / technical skills, “a question prepared in advance regarding knowledge or practical skills related to a plurality of elements constituting a predetermined skill that the user desires to acquire is obtained via a communication network. The answer to the question presented by the user to the user terminal 20 is received by the terminal 20, and the user's ability level with respect to the predetermined skill is determined based on the answer of the user. It is determined in each of the practical skills. Based on the determined user ability level, an educational curriculum for the predetermined skill of the user is created.
JP 2002-82598 A, FIG. 1, page 11 JP 2002-258731 A, FIG. 5, page 6

  However, students who have only received such knowledge-based education are difficult to carry out their duties as real power in the real world, so they have been re-educated at the workplace after their employment and acquired other abilities. It was.

  However, in recent recessions like Japan, there is no room for new graduates to re-educate at work, leading to an increase in the unemployment rate for young people, and the gap between the workplace and new graduate students It is getting serious.

  Applicants earnestly researched new educational methods to help students acquire new abilities compared to conventional educational methods, and I actively worked with interest and interest in the operational ability and purpose of utilizing knowledge. It has led to the development of a new teaching method that assesses power and enhances it.

  Therefore, the purpose of the present invention is to construct an evaluation system that evaluates knowledge / technical skills, operational skills that make use of them, and private ability to actively engage with interests in the learning of learners, and the evaluation system. The purpose is to provide a curriculum and syllabus organization system that feeds back evaluation results.

  In order to achieve the above object, the proficiency system according to the present invention is a knowledge technology measuring means for measuring systematized knowledge and operations, and inferring information by inferring information and investigating facts. It consists of an operational ability measurement means that measures the ability to express together and a private ability measurement means that measures intellectual curiosity and intellectual interest, and evaluates and further enhances the learner's ability.

  In addition, benchmark data and evaluation criteria for measuring systematized knowledge and syllabus, and evaluation criteria for measuring operational ability, consisting of the ability to organize, infer, conceive, research facts, and express information collectively It has a database server provided with a proficiency database consisting of the following standard data.

  Further, the database server is characterized in that, among the weighting parameters for each item stored in advance in the proficiency database, the parameters for the correct answer are accumulated and recorded in the student database.

  In addition, it is connected to another terminal via a network, has a database for displaying web pages, is connected to a database server, and the evaluation result is disclosed to a specific terminal.

  Then, the database server accumulates the parameters for the correct answer among the weighting parameters for each item pre-stored in the proficiency database, and determines the curriculum according to the evaluation result value recorded in the student database. Items and their order.

  The proficiency program according to the present invention is an operation that shows the ability to measure knowledge technology that measures systematized knowledge and operations, organizes information, infers and contemplates, investigates facts, and expresses them together. Evaluate and further enhance the ability of learners by measuring their power and measuring their private curiosity and intellectual interest.

  Further, the present invention is characterized in that it is connected to another terminal via a network, has a database for displaying a web page, is connected to a database server, and the evaluation result is disclosed to a specific terminal.

  Furthermore, the database server accumulates the parameters for the correct answer among the weighting parameters for each item pre-stored in the proficiency database, and determines the curriculum according to the value of the evaluation result recorded in the student database. And syllabus items and their order.

  An evaluation system that evaluates knowledge and technical skills, operational skills that make use of them, and private skills that are actively engaged with interest and interest by implementing the proficiency system according to the present invention And a curriculum and syllabus organization system that feeds back the evaluation results of the evaluation system.

  Further, by using the evaluation criteria according to the present invention, a plurality of abilities can be evaluated without being influenced by the evaluator.

  Furthermore, since the evaluation result is output using the evaluation criterion for the test result, the learner can always be objectively evaluated.

  In addition, it is possible to provide services to remote locations by using a web server and a network.

  And by using a weighting parameter as an evaluation method, data with higher objectivity can be generated.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

  As shown in FIG. 1, the method for evaluating the learning ability that the applicant of the present invention has intensively studied is knowledge / technical ability, operational ability (operating ability is the ability to clarify information (survey ability), and the ability to manipulate information). (Organizational power), information-derived power (inference power), and information-shaping power (expressive power), and private power can be displayed on a three-dimensional axis. The total overall force can be displayed in the three-dimensional space 2. The axis indicated by 4 is the knowledge ability axis 4 that means the level of knowledge and technical ability that the student has acquired, and the axis indicated by 6 is the operational ability axis 6 that indicates the magnitude of the operational ability that the student has acquired. The axis indicated by 8 is a private power axis 8 indicating the magnitude of the private power that the student is wearing.

  According to the evaluation by the evaluation system of the present invention, students can be divided into six types from type I to type VII according to relative amounts of knowledge / technical skills, operational skills, and private skills.

  As shown in (a) of FIG. 2, the knowledge / technical skills, operational skills, and private skills of Type I students are relatively high compared to intellectual and private skills. This student has high operational skills but low knowledge, technical skills and private skills. Therefore, the overall force evaluation data indicated by the server is a rectangular parallelepiped extending long toward the operation force axis 6 as shown in FIG.

  Looking at this type of evaluation data, knowledge and technical ability is low and operational ability is high, so in everyday life, it is difficult to affirm the insignificant part of the other person's story in ordinary conversation, and it is poor in autonomy I understand. In addition, students of this type do not have a positive attitude to work even if they do something, and it is difficult to carry out highly complete work due to lack of knowledge about work. I can't do a good job.

  The knowledge / technical skills, operational skills, and private skills of Type II students are as shown in FIG. This student has high operational and private skills but low knowledge and technical skills. Therefore, the overall force evaluation data shown by the server is a rectangular parallelepiped extending long toward the operational force and the private power shaft 8 as shown in FIG.

  This type of student has high personality and ability to act on their own without consideration of others, but if it is completed, it has the potential to become a great researcher. This type of student, when working, tends to focus on the speed of work progress and perform the next task while performing the task in front of him. I try to proceed according to the way I think, but because I can't set up the progress of the work, I am fascinated with the immediate task and do the work timidly.

  The knowledge, technical skills, operational skills, and private skills of type IV students are as shown in FIG. This student has high private skills but low knowledge, technical skills, and operational skills. Therefore, the overall force evaluation data indicated by the server is a rectangular parallelepiped extending long toward the private axis 8 as shown in FIG.

  This type of student has a high level of personality, so although he tries to actively work without liking the work around him, he does not know the setup of the work and is also not flexible in the event of unforeseen circumstances For this reason, it is unlikely that a job will be completed, and its aggressiveness is often worthless. Even if the work done by this type of student is trivial, this type of student tends to be self-satisfied and misunderstand it as valuable. Even if this type of student asks for an opinion about the events that occur around him, it is unlikely that he will always put himself at the center of comparison and get a better opinion.

  The knowledge / technical skills, operational skills, and private skills of V-type students are as shown in FIG. This student has a high level of knowledge and technology, but low operational and private skills. Therefore, the overall force evaluation data indicated by the server is a rectangular parallelepiped extending long toward the knowledge ability axis 4 as shown in FIG.

  Students of this type are too confident in their knowledge, and if they apply knowledge, they can answer problems that can be answered quickly, but they will answer only after processing problems and knowledge that cannot be answered by their own knowledge. Given a problem that can be answered, it takes a long time to answer, or it becomes confusing without being answered. In addition, there is no aggressiveness to think differently from others, and there is a tendency to work according to the rules determined by others, or according to the same judgment as others who have done the same work as myself.

  The knowledge / technical skills, operational skills, and private skills of type VI students are as shown in FIG. This student has high knowledge, technical ability, and private ability, but low operational ability. Therefore, the overall force evaluation data indicated by the server is a rectangular parallelepiped extending long toward the knowledge ability axis 4 and the private ability axis 8 as shown in FIG.

  This type of student has a high level of knowledge and technology, so the probability of completing a job is higher than that of an IV type student. However, due to the low operational capabilities, there are many cases where work fails due to inability to respond flexibly. Although it has excellent ability to understand other people's stories, it tends to reject it stubbornly if it is contrary to my thoughts. Even if there is a problem that can be solved quickly if someone else is used, I believe in my strength and try to find the answer myself and try to be satisfied. In everyday conversations, if you are interested in a topic that you are interested in, you try to participate actively, but after you become familiar with the content of the conversation, you are a person who has the personality of trying to leave the group that has the conversation.

  The knowledge / technical skills, operational skills, and private skills of VII students are as shown in FIG. This student has high knowledge, technical skills, and operational skills, but has low private skills. Therefore, the overall force evaluation data indicated by the server is a rectangular parallelepiped extending long toward the knowledge force axis 4 and the operation force axis 6 as shown in FIG.

  This type of student has more valuable knowledge than ordinary students and tends to teach others their own knowledge. I am also interested in expressing the contents of conversations in simple words and convincing the participants of conversation, and I am not obsessed with examining the contents of conversations. Because you are too confident in your knowledge, you may omit explanations that are necessary for others to understand, and after you are pointed out that necessary explanations have been omitted, give the necessary explanations I often make mistakes.

  A first embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS. FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an evaluation system for knowledge / technical skills and operational skills according to the first embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing answers to the knowledge / technical skills and operational skills tests input from the educator terminal. An example, FIG. 5 is an evaluation table as an example showing the evaluation of the knowledge / technical skills and operational skills of students created as a result of the implementation of the invention, FIG. 6 is an example of a proficiency sheet as a reference for evaluation, FIG. FIG. 4 is a flowchart of an evaluation system for knowledge / technical ability and operational ability based on the configuration diagram of FIG. 3.

  In FIG. 3, 9 is the proficiency system of the first embodiment, 10 is an educator terminal, 17 is an authentication server, 18 is a database server, 20 is a test database, 22 is test result data, 24 is a program database, 26 Is a program, 28 is a proficiency database, 30 is benchmark data, 32 is sub-standards data, 34 is a student database, 36 is student knowledge / technical ability evaluation data, and 38 is student operational ability evaluation data.

  Referring to FIG. 3, in the proficiency system 9 of the present embodiment, the educator terminal 10 is connected to the authentication server 17 in the proficiency system 9 through an electric communication line. Each server and database in the proficiency system 9 is connected as follows.

  The database server 18 is electrically connected to the test database 20. The database server 18 is electrically connected to the program database 24. The database server 18 is electrically connected to the proficiency database 28. The database server 18 is electrically connected to the student database 34.

  The educator terminal 10 is a terminal used by an educator and has a function of connecting to a network, and may be any of a personal computer, a mobile phone terminal, a PDA, and the like.

  The authentication server 17 is connected to the educator terminal 10 and transmits an authentication information request signal including an ID and a password to the connection request signal transmitted from the educator terminal 10 and sent from the educator terminal 10. The server authenticates the connection only with the signal from the educator terminal 10 that matches the authentication information including the ID and password with the authentication information registered in advance in an authentication database (not shown).

  The database server 18 uses the benchmark data 30 and the standards data 32 from the test result 22 transmitted from the educator terminal 10 authenticated by the authentication server 17 to use the student knowledge / technical skill evaluation data 36 and the student operational ability evaluation data 38. It is a server having a function of performing the operation.

  The test database 20 is a database that is a collection of test results 22 input from the educator terminal 10. The test result 22 is result data of a test performed by an educator.

  The program database 24 is a database that is a collection of programs 26. The program 26 is a program necessary for the database server 18 to perform calculations.

  The proficiency database 28 is a database that is a collection of benchmark data 30 and sub-standards data 32, and data common to the benchmark data 30 and sub-standards data 32, and is recorded in the form of a sheet called a proficiency sheet. . Detailed information is shown in FIG.

  Hereinafter, the data structure in the proficiency database 28 will be described with reference to FIG.

  The proficiency database 28 includes benchmark data 30, substandards data 32, and elements common to the benchmark data 30 and the substandards data 32.

  The benchmark data 30 is composed of elements of content information 46 and benchmark information 48. The benchmark data 48 is composed of elements of grade / semester / number information 50, unit information 52, and item information 54.

  The sub-standards data 32 includes elements of standard information 56 and sub-standard information 58. The sub-standards information 58 includes elements of aim information 60, viewpoint information 62, survey power information 64, organizing power information 66, inference power information 68, and expressive power information 70.

  Data common to the benchmark data 30 and the substandards data 32 is composed of elements of goal information 40, subgoal information 42, and subject information 44.

  In the proficiency database 28, each information is recorded so as to be suitable.

  The benchmark data 30 is evaluation standard data used by the database server 18 to calculate the student knowledge / technical skill evaluation data 36. The content information 46 is information on learning items performed by each subject. The benchmark information 48 is a learning item for each class. The grade / semester / count information 50 is information on the grade of the student, the time of receipt, and the order of the unit information 52. The unit information 52 is information on the name of one phrase of the learning content of each subject. The item information 54 is information representing the theme of one phrase of the learning content. In the item information 56 column of FIG. 6, “◯” is recorded in the item information 54 corresponding to the test question that the student answered correctly, and “X” is recorded in the item information 54 corresponding to the question that was incorrect. .

  The sub-standards data 32 is evaluation standard data used by the database server 18 to calculate the student operational ability evaluation data 38. The standard information 56 is information on a proficiency level that each subject takes in aiming for a goal. The sub-standards information 58 is information for learning for each unit (class). The aim information 60 is information on a learning target common to the unit. The viewpoint information 62 is information on learning contents that the student should wear in the unit. The research ability information 64 is score information that is allocated to each viewpoint information 62 with a score of 0 to 2 and serves as an evaluation standard for the research ability. The organizing power information 68 is score information that is distributed to each viewpoint information 62 by a score of 0 to 2 and serves as an evaluation standard for organizing power. The inference power information 68 is score information serving as an evaluation standard for inference power, which is distributed to each viewpoint information 64 with a score of 0 to 2. The expressive power information 70 is score information serving as an evaluation standard for expressive power distributed to each viewpoint information 62 by a score of 0 to 2.

  The goal data 40 is information on what the four subjects commonly aim for as preparatory education. The subgoal information 42 is information that is described by subdividing the contents of the goal 40. The course information 44 is information on courses that students learn and test.

  The student database 34 is a database that is a collection of student knowledge / technical ability evaluation data 36 and student operational ability evaluation data 38. The student knowledge / technical ability evaluation data 36 is individual data indicating evaluation of knowledge / technical ability. The student operational ability evaluation data 38 is individual data indicating operational ability.

  Prior to the implementation of the first embodiment of the present invention, the educator performs a test to test the student's knowledge, technical ability, and operational ability. As a result, a test result 22 as shown in FIG. 4 is obtained. In the case of FIG. 4, the correct answer is marked with a circle and the incorrect answer is marked with a cross. In the test, each problem corresponds to item information 54 of the benchmark data 30 and viewpoint information 62 of the standards database 32.

  The knowledge / technical skill and operational ability evaluation system will be described below based on the flowchart of FIG.

  The educator accesses the authentication server 17 from the educator terminal 10 through the telecommunication line and transmits a connection request signal. Upon receiving the connection request signal, the authentication server 17 returns an ID and password information request signal. When the ID and password information is input to the educator terminal 10 and transmitted to the authentication server 17, and the ID and password information transmitted by the authentication server 17 is compared with the pre-registered ID and password information, and they match. The educator terminal 10 is permitted to be connected. If they do not match, a signal indicating that the educator terminal 10 cannot be connected is transmitted to the educator terminal 10.

  The educator terminal 10 permitted to connect transmits a test result input screen request signal to the database server 18 of the test result input screen. Then, the database server 18 selects test result input screen data recorded in advance in the program DB 24 and transmits it to the educator terminal 10 to display the test result input screen. The educator inputs the test result 22 on the displayed test result input screen and transmits it to the database server 18 (step A10).

  When the test result 22 is transmitted to the database server 18, the test result 22 is recorded in the test database 20.

  The database server 18 uses the program 26 of the program database 24, the benchmark data 30, and the standards data 32 simultaneously with recording in the database 20, and from the test result 22 in the database server 18, the knowledge / technique and operation of the student The ability is calculated, and student knowledge / technical ability evaluation data 36 and student operation ability evaluation data 38 are created.

  The database server 18 calculates the student's knowledge and technical skills as follows. In the case of information indicating that each question is correctly answered in the test result 22, “◯” is recorded in the item information 54 in the benchmark data 30. If the information is incorrect, x is recorded in the item information 54 in the benchmark data 30. The number of item information 54 recorded as ◯ is recorded in the student knowledge / technical skill evaluation data 36.

  The database server 18 calculates the operational capabilities of the students as follows. In the case of information indicating that each question is correctly answered in the test result 22, the scores of the research power information 64, the organizing power information 66, the reasoning power information 68, and the expressive power information 70 allocated to each viewpoint information 62 of the benchmark data 30 are obtained. Record the effective score. In the case of information that the answer is incorrect, the scores of the research ability information 64, the organization ability information 66, the reasoning ability information 68, and the expression ability information 70 allocated to each viewpoint information 54 of the benchmark data 30 are recorded as invalid scores. To do. The effective score and all the recorded scores are recorded as the evaluation of the student's operational ability, and this is recorded in the student operational ability evaluation data 38.

  According to the embodiment, when it is necessary to record the investigative power among the operational skills, the score of the research power information 64 allocated to each viewpoint information 62 is the sum of all the recorded effective scores. The points are recorded in the student operation ability evaluation data 38.

  According to the embodiment, when it is necessary to record the organizing power of the operation power, it is the score of the organizing power information 66 allocated to each viewpoint information 62, and is the total of all the recorded effective scores. The points are recorded in the student operation ability evaluation data 38.

  According to the embodiment, when it is also necessary to record the inference power of the operation power, the score of the inference power information 68 allocated to each viewpoint information 62 is the sum of all the recorded effective scores. The points are recorded in the student operation ability evaluation data 38.

  According to the embodiment, when it is necessary to record the expressive power in the operational power, the score of the expressive power information 70 allocated to each viewpoint information 62 is the sum of all the recorded effective scores. The points are recorded in the student operation ability evaluation data 38. (Step A20).

  The database server 18 gives the created student knowledge / technical ability evaluation data 36 and student operational ability evaluation data 38 the format shown in the evaluation table of FIG.

In the evaluation table of FIG. 5, the student's knowledge and technical ability is divided into the vertical line of the benchmark, and the student's operational ability is divided into the research ability, the organizing ability, the reasoning ability, and the expressive ability in the substandard line. .
The database server 18 records each data having the format in this way in the student database 34 and displays it on the educator terminal 10 (step A30).

  By implementing the first embodiment, not only the student's knowledge and technical skills are evaluated for the student's learning ability, but also the operational ability including research, organizing, reasoning, and expressive ability is objectively evaluated. It becomes possible.

(Second Embodiment)
Hereinafter, a second embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. 4, 5, 6, and 8 to 10. FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an evaluation system for knowledge / technical ability, operational ability, and private ability, which is a part of the implementation of the present invention, and FIG. 9 is an example of a proficiency sheet for student private ability standards as a reference for evaluation. 10 is a flowchart of the evaluation system for knowledge / technical ability and operational ability based on the configuration diagram of FIG.

  In FIG. 8, only items different from those in FIG. 3 will be described. The major difference between the second embodiment and the first embodiment is the evaluation of private power, that is, intellectual curiosity and the degree of intellectual interest. The student personality standard 80 is recorded in the proficiency database 78 for the evaluation of private ability.

  As shown in FIG. 9, the student private power standard 80 is divided into the same items as the benchmark data and corresponds, and the presence or absence of private power of each item is registered in advance. In other words, it indicates whether or not solving the problem corresponding to each item is a problem that will be an evaluation point of private power, and if the problem marked with “○” can be solved, evaluation of private power This means that even if the problem marked with “x” is solved, it does not relate to the evaluation of private power.

  Accordingly, the data obtained by the program 26 evaluating the test results in accordance with the student private ability standard 80 is the student private ability data 76 recorded in the student database 74.

  The knowledge / technical skill and operational ability evaluation system will be described below based on the flowchart of FIG. The point that the test result is input from the authenticated educational terminal 10 to the database server 82 (b10) is the same as in the first embodiment.

  Next, the difference from FIG. 7 is that the database server 82 uses the student private ability standard 80 to calculate the student's private ability from the test result 22 and the student private ability standard, and to calculate the student private ability evaluation data. 76 is created (b20).

  That is, whether each question or a question for testing private ability is determined in advance and stored in the student private ability standard. Therefore, the database server 82 evaluates the private answer as a question that is a correct answer in the input test result and that tests the private ability. The number of answers is the personal power of the test results.

  The calculated private ability is transmitted to the educator terminal 10 as student knowledge / technical ability evaluation data and student operational ability evaluation data as student private ability data, and is displayed as a result on the display unit (b30).

  By implementing the proficiency evaluation system shown in the second embodiment, the student's learning ability is also objectively examined, including student knowledge / technical ability, research ability, organizing ability, reasoning ability, and expressive ability. In addition to being able to evaluate, it is possible to evaluate the student's private ability.

(Third embodiment)
Hereinafter, a third embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS.

  FIG. 11 shows a configuration diagram of a proficiency system according to the third embodiment of the present invention. In particular, differences from the second embodiment according to the present invention will be described.

  The first difference allows network connection, and the authentication server 17 is electrically connected to the web server 12. The web server 12 is electrically connected to the web database 14. The web server 12 is connected to the educator terminal 10 via the network 105.

  The web server 12 has a function of transmitting the web data 16 to the educator terminal 10 in response to the web page request signal transmitted from the educator terminal 10 and a function of transmitting the request signal to the database server 82 via the authentication server 17. And a server having a function of transmitting a calculation result from the database server 82 to the educator terminal 10.

  The web database 14 is a database that is a collection of web data 16. The web data 16 is data recorded in a web display language necessary for displaying all home pages.

  A content database and an output database are connected as a database connected to the database server 82 as a second difference.

  The content database is a database of items or materials for creating each output result. The text content 98 for creating text, the test content 100 for creating materials and problem examples, and the curriculum. For each subject, subject, etc., a syllabus content 102 including an outline of goals, contents, teaching materials, a learning instruction plan, and an evaluation, and criteria for selecting contents for creating an output database from data of the student database 74 are recorded. The selected content selection criterion 104 is recorded.

  On the other hand, the output database is selected from the student database 20 and the text content 98 according to the content selection criterion 104, and the text data 92, which is text data selected according to the content selection criterion 104, and from the student database 20 and the test content 100. Test data 94, which is the test data, and syllabus data 96, which is test data selected from the student database 20 and the syllabus content 102 according to the content selection criteria 104.

  FIG. 13 shows a configuration comprising a configuration (a) indicating the knowledge / technical ability and operational capability of the text content 98, the test content 100, and the syllabus content 102, and a configuration (b) indicating private capability. Each of the text content 98, the test content 100, and the syllabus content 102 includes an item 120 for each content, a benchmark 122 for the item 120, an operational strength 124, and a private strength 126.

  On the other hand, the content selection criteria 104 records a plurality of criteria for selecting content with respect to the result of the student database 74, selects one of the criteria, and selects an item from the content according to the selected criteria. To do. As a selection criterion to be recorded, first, a benchmark 122 with a low evaluation score in the student database 74, an operational skill point 124, and a private skill point 126 are selected as a criterion for preferentially selecting content with a high score. Although the above criteria can be satisfied, evaluation may be biased.

  Also, as a second method, priority is provided in order from the lowest evaluation score in the student database 74, and data is collected in accordance with the priority order, so that balanced content can be selected.

  Furthermore, as a third method, priority is provided in descending order of evaluation scores in the student database 74, and data is collected in accordance with the priority order, so that the ability of high evaluation points can be further enhanced.

  Next, FIG. 12 shows a flowchart of the third embodiment according to the present invention.

  After the educator is authenticated by the authentication server from the educator terminal 10 through the telecommunication line, the test result input screen is transmitted to the web server 12. Then, the web server 12 stores the web data recorded in the web database 14. 16 is selected and transmitted to the educator terminal 10 to display the test result input screen. The educator inputs the test result 22 on the displayed test result input screen and transmits it to the web server 12 (step C10). The web server 12 transmits the received test result 2 to the database server 82. Therefore, the database server 82 performs the test result evaluation step (C20) and the evaluation data result display step (C30) as in the first and second embodiments. Therefore, the education terminal 10 can input the test result and display the evaluation result from any place connected to the network.

  The difference from the flowchart of the second embodiment is that the student database 74, which is evaluation data, the text content 98, the test content 100, the syllabus content 102, and the content selection criteria 104, the text data 92, the test data 94, This is a step (C50) of generating syllabus data 96.

  Here, there are cases where all of the text data 92, test data 94, and syllabus data 96 are generated, or only a part thereof. In addition, a content selection criterion 104 is provided as a selection criterion for generation, and evaluation is performed according to an evaluation that places importance on the evaluation score for each field, item, subject, and evaluation method of each result of the student database 74. It can also be a selection criterion that concentrates and strengthens in bad fields or a selection criterion that further enhances the evaluation.

  By implementing the proficiency evaluation system shown in the third embodiment, the student's knowledge and technical skills, operational skills including research, organizing, reasoning, and expressive skills, and students In addition to being able to evaluate objectively, it has become easier to create text data, test data, and syllabus data based on the evaluation results.

  The proficiency system according to the present invention measures knowledge technology measuring means for measuring systematized knowledge and operations, and the ability to organize and infer information, conceive, investigate facts, and express them collectively. It consists of an operational ability measurement means and a private ability measurement means that measures intellectual curiosity and intellectual interest, and evaluates and further enhances the learner's ability to obtain an unprecedented evaluation of the learner and its feedback be able to. Therefore, the present invention can be applied to an institution that conducts all education such as elementary schools, junior high schools, high schools, universities, various schools, and cram schools and prep schools.

The conceptual diagram of the evaluation method of the learning ability which makes the foundation of this invention is shown. It is a graph of the example of evaluation of the student's knowledge / technical ability, operational ability, and private ability according to the present invention, and (a) to (f) show type I to type VII. 1 shows a configuration diagram of an evaluation system for knowledge / technical ability and operational ability according to a first embodiment of the present invention. FIG. It is a block diagram of the data of the answer result of the test of knowledge / technical ability and operational ability in the first embodiment of the present invention. It is a block diagram of the answer evaluation data of the test of knowledge / technical ability and operational ability in the first embodiment of the present invention. It is a block diagram of the proficiency data in the first embodiment of the present invention. 3 is a flowchart of an evaluation system for knowledge / technical ability and operational ability according to the first embodiment of the present invention. The block diagram of the evaluation system of the knowledge and technical capability, operational capability, and private capability which are the 2nd Embodiment of this invention is shown. It is a block diagram of the evaluation criteria data of private power in the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart of the knowledge and technical capability, operational capability, and private capability which are the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. It is a block diagram of a proficiency system that evaluates knowledge / technical ability, operational ability, and private ability according to the third embodiment of the present invention and feeds back to a text or syllabus. It is a flowchart of the proficiency system that evaluates knowledge / technical ability, operational ability, and private ability according to a third embodiment of the present invention and feeds back to a text or syllabus. The text content, test content, and knowledge of the syllabus content of the proficiency system that evaluates the knowledge / technical ability, operational ability, and private ability according to the third embodiment of the present invention and feeds back to the text or syllabus. The block diagram which consists of the structure (a) which shows technical power and operational power, and the structure (b) which shows private power is shown.

Explanation of symbols

2 3D space 4 Knowledge power axis 6 Operational power axis 8 Private power axis 9 Proficiency system 10 Educator terminal 12 Web server 14 Web database 16 Web data 17 Authentication server 18 Database server 20 Test database 22 Test result data 24 Program database 26 Program 28 Proficiency database 30 Benchmark data 32 Substandards data 34 Student database 36 Student knowledge / technical skill evaluation data 38 Student operational ability evaluation data 40 Goal information 42 Subgoal information 44 Course information 46 Content information 48 Benchmarks information 50 Semester / Number of Information 52 Unit Information 54 Item Information 56 Standards Information 58 Sub Standards Information 60 Aim Information 62 Viewpoint Information 64 Survey Power Information 66 Organizing Power Information 6 Reasoning information 70 Expressive information 74 Student database 76 Student private data 78 Proficiency database 80 Student private standard 82 Database server 92 Text data 94 Test data 96 Syllabus data 98 Text content 100 Test content 102 Syllabus content 104 Content selection criteria 105 Network 120 Content item 122 Benchmark 124 Operational point 126 Private point

Claims (8)

  Knowledge technology measurement means that measures systematized knowledge and operations, operational ability measurement means that measures the ability to organize and infer information, conceive, envision, investigate facts, and express, and intellectual curiosity A proficiency system that evaluates and further enhances the ability of learners by measuring their personal interest and measuring their intellectual interest.   Benchmark data and information used as an evaluation standard for measuring systematized knowledge and operations The proficiency system according to claim 1, further comprising a database server including a proficiency database composed of standard data.   2. The database server according to claim 1, wherein the test results are accumulated in the student database by accumulating parameters for correct answers among the weighting parameters for each item stored in advance in the proficiency database. Proficiency system.   The proficiency system according to claim 1, wherein the system is connected to another terminal via a network, has a database for displaying a web page, is connected to a database server, and discloses an evaluation result to a specific terminal.   The database server accumulates the parameters for the correct answer among the weighting parameters for each item stored in the proficiency database in advance, and the curriculum items according to the values of the evaluation results recorded in the student database. The proficiency system according to claim 1, wherein the order is selected.   Measure knowledge skills that measure systematized knowledge and operations, measure operational ability to show the ability to organize and infer information, conceive, conceive, investigate facts and express them together, with intellectual curiosity A proficiency program that measures and enhances the ability of learners to measure their personal ability to measure intellectual interest.   7. The proficiency program according to claim 6, wherein the program is connected to another terminal via a network, has a database for displaying a web page, is connected to a database server, and the evaluation result is disclosed to a specific terminal.   The database server accumulates the parameters for the correct answer among the weighting parameters for each item for which the test results are stored in advance in the proficiency database, and determines the curriculum items according to the evaluation result values recorded in the student database. And a sequence thereof are selected. 7. The proficiency program according to claim 6, wherein:

Images