[go: up one dir, main page]

JP2004095425A - Supply on-off valve failure diagnosis system - Google Patents

Supply on-off valve failure diagnosis system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2004095425A
JP2004095425A JP2002256461A JP2002256461A JP2004095425A JP 2004095425 A JP2004095425 A JP 2004095425A JP 2002256461 A JP2002256461 A JP 2002256461A JP 2002256461 A JP2002256461 A JP 2002256461A JP 2004095425 A JP2004095425 A JP 2004095425A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
valve
fuel gas
pressure
failure diagnosis
stop
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2002256461A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3864875B2 (en
Inventor
Toru Fuse
布施 徹
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nissan Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Priority to JP2002256461A priority Critical patent/JP3864875B2/en
Publication of JP2004095425A publication Critical patent/JP2004095425A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3864875B2 publication Critical patent/JP3864875B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/30Hydrogen technology
    • Y02E60/50Fuel cells

Landscapes

  • Examining Or Testing Airtightness (AREA)
  • Fuel Cell (AREA)

Abstract

【課題】起動時に速やかな供給開閉弁の故障診断を行うシステムを提供する。
【解決手段】燃料ガスを供給する燃料ガス供給配管3に備えた第一開閉弁8、第一開閉弁8の下流に備えた第二開閉弁9、第一、第二開閉弁8、9間の燃料ガスの圧力を検出する第一圧力センサ6を備える。さらに、停止時に第一開閉弁8、第二開閉弁9の順番で閉じる停止時開閉弁操作部、停止時の第一圧力センサ6の出力を記憶する停止時記憶処理部、停止時と運転再開時の第一圧力センサ6の出力を比較して第一、第二開閉弁8、9の故障を判断する故障診断部と、を備える。
【選択図】   図1
A system for promptly diagnosing a failure of a supply on-off valve at startup is provided.
A first on-off valve provided in a fuel gas supply pipe for supplying a fuel gas, a second on-off valve provided downstream of the first on-off valve, and between the first and second on-off valves. A first pressure sensor 6 for detecting the pressure of the fuel gas. Furthermore, a stop-time on-off valve operation unit that closes in the order of the first on-off valve 8 and the second on-off valve 9 at the time of stop, a stop-time storage processing unit that stores an output of the first pressure sensor 6 at the time of stop, and a stop-time and operation restart A failure diagnosis unit that compares the output of the first pressure sensor 6 at the time to determine the failure of the first and second on-off valves 8 and 9.
[Selection diagram] Fig. 1

Description

【0001】
【産業上の利用分野】
本発明は、燃料電池システムの故障診断装置に関する。特に、燃料ガス供給システムの供給開閉弁の漏れ診断を行うことにより供給開閉弁の故障診断を行うシステムに関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
従来の燃料ガスの供給開閉弁の故障診断装置として、特開平9−22711号公報に開示されたようなものがある。これは、燃料電池に燃料ガスを供給する燃料ガス供給配管に、上流側から第一開閉弁、第二開閉弁を備え、さらに、第一開閉弁と第二開閉弁との間の圧力を測定する水素ガス圧力センサを備える。起動時に、第一開閉弁と第二開閉弁とを閉じた状態で、水素ガス圧力センサが検出するガス圧から第一開閉弁の故障診断を行う。続いて、第一開閉弁を所定時間だけ開いてから再び閉じ、閉弁から所定時間経過後に水素ガス圧力センサが検出するガス圧から、第二開閉弁の故障診断を行う。
【0003】
【発明が解決しようとしている問題点】
しかしながら、漏れを検知するためには燃料ガス供給配管にガスを供給しておく必要があるので、起動前の時点で既に故障している場合、例えば、運転停止中の故障は燃料供給を開始するまで検知することができない。また、起動前に故障診断を行う際には診断時間を確保する必要があるので、走行や運転開始までの時間が延長してしまう。
【0004】
そこで、本発明は、起動時に供給開閉弁の故障を速やかに行うことができる供給開閉弁の故障診断システムを提供することを目的とする。
【0005】
【問題点を解決するための手段】
本発明は、燃料ガスを用いて発電を行う燃料電池と、前記燃料電池に供給する燃料ガスを貯蔵する燃料ガスタンクと、前記燃料ガスタンクから前記燃料電池に燃料ガスを供給する燃料ガス供給配管と、前記燃料ガス供給配管に配置した第一開閉弁と、燃料ガスの流れ方向に沿って前記第一開閉弁の下流側に配置した第二開閉弁と、前記第一開閉弁と前記第二開閉弁との間の燃料ガスの圧力を検出する第一圧力センサと、を備える。さらに、前記燃料電池停止時に、前記第一開閉弁を閉じてから前記第二開閉弁を閉じる停止時開閉弁操作部と、前記燃料電池停止時の前記第一圧力センサの出力を記憶する停止時圧力記憶部と、前記燃料電池停止後の運転再開時の前記第一圧力センサの出力と、前記停止時圧力記憶部に記憶した前記燃料電池停止時の前記第一圧力センサの出力と、を比較して、前記第一開閉弁および前記第二開閉弁の少なくとも一方が故障しているかどうかを判断する故障診断部と、を備える。
【0006】
【作用及び効果】
燃料電池停止時に燃料供給配管中の圧力を測定し、燃料電池再開時に燃料電池停止時の圧力と運転再開時の圧力とを比較し、その比較結果から第一開閉弁および第二開閉弁の少なくとも一方が故障しているかどうかを判断する。これにより、燃料電池に燃料ガスを供給することなく故障を検知することができる。また、故障診断のために走行や運転開始を待つ必要がない。これにより、起動時に第一開閉弁および第二開閉弁の故障診断を速やかに行うことができる。
【0007】
【発明の実施の形態】
本実施形態に用いる供給開閉弁(ここでは後述する第一、第二開閉弁8、9)の故障診断システムの構成を図1に示す。
【0008】
燃料電池1には、図示しない酸化剤ガス供給システムから酸化剤ガスが、また燃料供給システムから燃料ガスが供給され、その酸化剤ガス中の酸素と燃料ガス中の水素との間で電気化学反応を生じることにより発電を行う。
【0009】
燃料供給システムとしては、燃料ガスの貯蔵タンクである燃料ガスタンク2、燃料ガスの流通路である燃料ガス供給配管3を備え、燃料ガスタンク2から燃料ガス供給配管3を介して燃料電池1に燃料ガスを供給する。また、燃料ガス供給配管3には、燃料ガスの流れ方向に沿って、上流側から第一開閉弁8、第二開閉弁9、第三開閉弁10を配置する。ここで、第一、第二開閉弁8、9は燃料ガスの供給・停止を調整し、第三開閉弁10は、燃料電池1の燃料極の圧力を一定に保つように調整される。
【0010】
第一開閉弁8と第二開閉弁9との間の燃料ガス供給配管3の一部により形成される第一容積部11には、第一温度センサ5、第一圧力センサ6を備え、第一容積部11内の温度T1と圧力P1を検出可能とする。また、第二開閉弁9と第三開閉弁10との間の燃料ガス供給配管3の一部より形成される第二容積部12には、第二圧力センサ7を備え、第二容積部12の圧力P2を検出可能とする。さらに、燃料ガスタンク2にも圧力センサ4を設け、タンク内の圧力Ptを検出可能とする。
【0011】
このような故障診断システムにおいて、コントローラ20を備え、各センサの出力から第一〜三開閉弁8〜10の制御を行い、また、起動時には第一、第二開閉弁8、9の故障診断を行う。
【0012】
次に、このような供給開閉弁の故障診断システムのコントローラ20による制御方法を説明する。本実施形態の制御方法を、燃料電池1の運転を停止する際に行われる図2に示す停止処理部と、燃料電池1の運転を開始する際に行われる図3に示す診断処理部とから構成する。
【0013】
まず、図2を用いて燃料電池1の停止時における停止処理部の制御方法を説明する。
【0014】
燃料電池1の運転停止の指令が出力されたら、ステップS1の停止処理判定部に進む。この停止処理判定部においては、次回の起動時に供給開閉弁の故障診断を行うための停止処理を行うかどうかを判断し、実際には図4に示すような制御を行う。
【0015】
図4において、停止処理部開始の指令を受けたら、ステップS7に進み、燃料ガスタンク2内の圧力Ptが所定値DGNPtより大きいかどうかを判断する。所定値DGNPtより大きければステップS8に進み、停止処理フラグFDGNV=1として、停止処理を行うと判断する。一方、ステップS7において、圧力Ptが所定値DGNPt以下であればステップS9に進み、停止処理フラグFDGNV=0として、停止処理を行わないと判断する。
【0016】
ここで、燃料ガスタンク2内の圧力が小さい場合には、後述する停止処理を行っても燃料ガスタンク2、第一容積部11、第二容積部12内の圧力の差は小さくなってしまう。このような場合には、燃料ガス漏れがない場合でも環境変化による影響を受けやすく、誤って供給開閉弁が故障していると判断してしまう可能性がある。そこで、このような誤診をする可能性がある場合、ここでは燃料ガスタンク2内の圧力が所定値DGNPt以下である場合には、次回の起動時には故障判断を行わないと設定し、そのまま燃料電池1を停止する。
【0017】
このように停止処理判定を行ったら、図2においてステップS2の停止処理操作部に進む。停止処理操作部においては、次回の起動時に供給開閉弁の故障診断を行うための処理を行い、実際には図5のフローチャートに示すように制御する。
【0018】
図5のステップS10において、停止処理判定部(図2S1)で求めた停止処理フラグFDGNVが1であるかどうかを判断する。停止処理フラグFDGNVが1ではないと判断されたら停止処理は行わないので、ステップS15に進み第一〜三開閉弁8〜10を、例えば同時に閉じて停止処理操作部における制御を終了する。ここでは第一〜三開閉弁8〜10を同時に閉じるとしたが、この限りではない。
【0019】
一方、ステップS10において、停止処理フラグFDGNVが1である場合には、ステップS11に進み、第一開閉弁8を閉じるタイミングtm1を算出する。このタイミングtm1を求める方法を図6に示す。
【0020】
tm1を算出する指令を確認したら、ステップS26において、供給開閉弁の閉塞の支持がでたら第一開閉8を即座に閉塞するように、つまり、tm1=0に設定する。このようにステップS11(図6)においてtm1を設定したら、ステップS12に進む。
【0021】
ステップS12においては、第二開閉弁9を閉じるタイミングtm2を算出する。タイミングtm2の算出方法を図7に示すフローチャートを用いて説明する。
【0022】
タイミングtm2を求める指令を確認したらステップS17に進み、第二容積部12の圧力P2が最終的に落ち着く目標の設定圧力TGP2を読み出す。これは例えば、運転停止中の燃料電池1の燃料極の圧力である。
【0023】
ステップS18に進み、現在の燃料ガスタンク2の圧力Ptと第二容積部12の設定圧力の差分ΔDP(=Pt−TGP2)を求める。ステップS19に進み、図8に示す差分ΔDPに対するタイミングtm2を示すマップ等から、タイミングtm2を求める。ここでは、例えば図8のマップでは、実験等により予め求めておいたP1=TGP2+(Pt−TGP2)/2となる、つまりP1がPtとTGP2の中間値となるようなタイミングtm2を示す。ここではタイミングtm2をマップにより求めているが、第一圧力センサ6の出力をモニタし、P1=TGP2+(Pt−TGP2)/2となった時点をタイミングtm2としてもよい。
【0024】
ステップS13(図7)においてタイミングtm2を求めたら、図5のステップS14に進む。ステップS14では、第三開閉弁10を閉じるタイミングtm3を求める。タイミングtm3を図9に示したフローチャートを用いて求める。
【0025】
タイミングtm3を求める指令を確認したら、図9ステップS20に進み、第一容積部12の圧力P2が設定圧力TGP2になった時をタイミングtm3と設定する。つまり、第二圧力センサ7の出力を検出し、その値がTGP2となった時点を第三開閉弁10を閉じるタイミングtm3とする。
【0026】
ステップS13(図9)においてタイミングtm3を設定したら、図5のステップS14に進み、ステップS11〜S13において求めた各タイミングtm1〜3に応じて、第一〜三開閉弁8〜10を閉じる。
【0027】
このように、ステップS2(図5)における停止処理操作部の制御が終了したらステップS3に進み、停止時記憶処理部を行う。ここでは図10に示すような制御を行う。
【0028】
つまり、停止時記憶処理を開始するように指令を受けたら、図10のステップS21において、燃料ガスタンク2内の圧力Pt、第一容積部11内の圧力P1および温度T1、第二容積部12内の圧力P2、停止処理フラグFDGNPをメモリに記憶させる。
【0029】
このように停止時記憶処理部の制御を終了したら、図2における停止処理を終了する。ここで、図2に示すような停止処理の動作を行った場合のタイミングチャートの例を図14に示す。
【0030】
燃料ガスタンク2内の圧力が所定の圧力DGNPtより高い場合、第一開閉弁8を閉じると、燃料ガスタンク2内の圧力P1に比べて第一開閉弁8より下流側(第一、第二容積部11、12)の圧力が低くなる。これは、この時点でも燃料電池1では水素を消費しているため、燃料ガスは燃料電池1に向かって流れているためである。同様に、第二開閉弁9を閉じると、第一容積部11の圧力はその時点の圧力を維持するのに対して、第二開閉弁9の下流側(第二容積部12)の圧力はさらに低下する。その後、第三開閉弁10を閉じることで、第二容積部12の圧力は第三開閉弁10をとじた時点の圧力を維持する。よって、第一〜三開閉弁8〜10の故障がない場合にはPt>P1>P2が維持される。ここではPtとP1、P1とP2の圧力差がほぼ同じになるようにタイミングtm2を設定している。
【0031】
次に、燃料電池1の起動時に行う故障診断方法について、図3のフローチャートを用いて説明する。
【0032】
ステップS4において記憶メモリを図11に示すフローチャートに従って呼び出す。記憶メモリの呼び出しの指令を受けたら、ステップS22に進みメモリに記憶していた値を呼び出す。ここでは、図10のステップS21においてメモリに記憶させておいた値、つまり燃料ガスタンク2内の圧力Pt、第一容積部11内の圧力P1および温度T1、第二容積部12内の圧力P2、停止処理フラグFDGNPを読み出す。ステップS23において、各々の値を演算に使用するために変数MPt、MP1、MP2、MT1、MFDGNPにあてはめる。
【0033】
ステップS4(図11)において記憶メモリを呼び出したら、ステップS5に進む。ステップS5の故障診断判定部では、図12に示すような制御に従って故障診断を行うかどうかを判断する。
【0034】
図12のステップS24において、第一容積部11の温度T1と、メモリに記憶しておいた第一容積部11の温度MT1との温度差の絶対値|T1−MT1|と、所定値DGNT1とを比較する。絶対値|T1−MT1|がDGNT1より大きければステップS27に進み、診断許可フラグFDGNP=0として故障診断を行わないように設定する。
【0035】
一方、絶対値|T1−MT1|がDGNT1以下であればステップS25に進み、燃料ガスタンク2の圧力Ptと、メモリに記憶しておいた燃料ガスタンク2の圧力MPtとの比較を行う。これにより、前回停止から今回起動を開始するまでの間に燃料ガスタンク2に燃料ガスが補充されたかどうかを判断する。現在の圧力と前回の圧力との差(Pt−MPt)が所定値DGNPFより大きければ燃料ガスが補充されたと判断してステップS27に進み、診断許可フラグFDGNP=0として故障診断を行わないように設定する。一方、(Pt−MPt)がDGNPF以下であれば補充が行われていないと判断してステップS25に進み診断許可フラグFDGNP=1として故障診断を行うように設定する。
【0036】
前回の停止時の温度に対して、起動時の温度が大きく離れているような場合には、供給開閉弁の漏れの状態にかかわらず圧力の変化が大きくなり、誤って供給開閉弁が故障していると判断してしまう可能性がある。そこで、圧力変化の故障診断への影響を無視できる範囲、ここでは絶対値|T1−MT1|がDGNT1以下である場合に故障診断を行い、それ以外の時には故障診断を行わずに起動を開始する。そのため、判断基準となる温度は第一温度センサ5の出力に限らず、燃料ガスタンク2内の燃料ガスの温度等で判断してもよい。また、燃料ガスタンク2内の圧力の変化を見ることで、停止中に燃料ガスが補充されたかどうかを判断し、補充された場合には故障診断を行わずに燃料電池1の起動を開始する。
【0037】
ステップS5(図12)において故障診断を行うかどうかを判断したらステップS6に進む。ステップS6の故障診断部では、図13に示すような制御を行う。
【0038】
ステップS28において診断許可フラグFDGNP=1およびMDGNP=1であるかどうかを判断する。FDNGP=1かつMFDNGP=1でなければ故障診断を行わないので、ステップS36に進み、故障結果フラグFDGNOK=1、第一開閉弁故障フラグFDGNV1=0、第二開閉弁故障フラグFDGNV2=0と設定する。ここで、故障結果フラグは、診断の結果故障があるかどうかを示しており、FDGNOK=1であれば正常、FDGNOK=0であれば第一開閉弁8または第二開閉弁9の少なくとも一方に故障があることを示す。また、第一開閉弁故障フラグFDGNV1、第二開閉弁故障フラグFDGNV2はそれぞれの供給開閉弁の故障診断結果を示しており、1であれば故障あり、0であれば正常であることを示している。つまり、ステップS28において故障診断を行わないと判断した時には、正常であると判断して故障診断を終了し、燃料電池1を起動する。
【0039】
一方、ステップS28においてFDGNP=1かつMFDGNP=1である場合には故障診断を行うのでステップS29に進む。ステップS29では、第一容積部11の圧力P1を温度で補正する。つまり、P1=P1×MT1/T1として、温度による圧力変化を考慮して補正圧力P1を算出する。ステップS30において、温度補正した圧力P1とメモリに記憶しておいた圧力MP1とを比較する。ここでは、P1がMP1より大きく、その差が所定値DPA1より大きいかどうか、つまりP1−MP1>DPA1であるかどうかを判断する。ここで、所定値DPA1は、環境の変化や測定誤差による誤診を避けるための値である。
【0040】
所定値DPA1より大きければ、前回の停止時に比較して第一容積部11の圧力が高くなったと判断する。そこでステップS31に進み、燃料ガスタンク2から第一開閉弁8を介して第一容積部11に燃料ガスが供給されたと判断し、これにより、第一開閉弁8が故障していると判断する。そこで、診断結果フラグFDGNOK=0、第一開閉弁故障フラグFDGNV1=1、と設定して第一開閉弁8に故障があることを示す。また、このとき第二開閉弁故障フラグFDGNV2=0と設定し、故障診断を終了する。
【0041】
一方、ステップS30でP1−MP1>DPA1ではないと判断されたらステップS32に進み、FDGNV1=0、つまり第一開閉弁8には故障がないと判断してからステップS33に進む。
【0042】
次にステップS33において、MP1がP1より大きく、その差が所定値DPB1より大きいかどうか、つまり、MP1−P1>DPB1であるかどうかを判断する。ここで、所定値DPB1も、環境の変化や測定誤差による誤診を避けるための値である。
【0043】
所定値DPB1より大きければ、前回の停止時に比較して第一容積部11の圧力が小さくなったと判断する。そこでステップS34に進み、第一容積部11内の燃料ガスが、第二開閉弁9を介してより圧力の低い第二容積部12に移動したと考え、第二開閉弁9が故障していると判断する。そこで、故障結果フラグFDGNOK=0、第二開閉弁故障フラグFDGNV2=1と設定し故障診断を終了する。
【0044】
一方ステップS33において、第二開閉弁9が故障していると判断されなかったら、ステップS35に進み、故障結果フラグFDGNOK=1、第二開閉弁故障フラグFDGNV2=0と設定して故障診断を終了する。
【0045】
以上の結果である故障結果フラグFDGNOKが1なら正常、0なら故障であることが分かる。また、FDGNOKが0の場合には、第一開閉弁8または第二開閉弁9のどちらが故障しているかを、FDGNV1、FDGNV2の結果から判断することが可能である。
【0046】
次に、本実施形態における効果を説明する。
【0047】
本実施形態は、燃料電池1と、燃料ガスタンク2と、燃料ガスタンク2から燃料電池1に燃料ガスを供給する燃料ガス供給配管3と、燃料ガス供給通路に配置した第一開閉弁8と、第一開閉弁8の下流側に配置した第二開閉弁9と、第一容積部11の圧力を検出する第一圧力センサ6と、を備える。また、燃料電池1停止時に、第一開閉弁8を閉じてから第二開閉弁9を閉じる停止時開閉弁操作部(S14)と、停止時の第一圧力センサ6の出力を記憶する停止時記憶処理部(S3)を備える。さらに、停止後の運転再開時の第一圧力センサ6の出力と、記憶した停止時の第一圧力センサ6の出力と、を比較して、第一開閉弁8および第二開閉弁9の少なくとも一方が故障しているかどうかを判断する故障診断部(S6)と、を備える。これにより、燃料電池1に燃料を供給することなく故障を検知することができる。また、故障診断のために走行や運転開始を待つ必要がないので、起動時に速やかな故障診断を行うことができる。
【0048】
また、第二開閉弁9と燃料電池1の間に第三開閉弁10を備え、停止時開閉弁操作部(S14)において、第二開閉弁9を閉じてから第三開閉弁10を閉じる。このように第三開閉弁10を備えることで、故障がないときには第二開閉弁9の下流側の圧力を一定に維持することができる。これにより、燃料電池1内で圧力変化が生じた場合にも、第二開閉弁の故障を正確に判断することができる。
【0049】
燃料ガスタンク2の圧力を測定する圧力センサ4と、第二容積部12の圧力を検出する第二圧力センサ7と、第一〜三開閉弁8〜10を閉じるタイミングを設定する停止時開閉弁制御手段(S11〜S13)と、を備える。停止時に、圧力センサ4と第一圧力センサ6と第二圧力センサ7の出力に応じて、設定したタイミングに従って第一〜三開閉弁8〜10を閉じる。これにより、燃料ガスタンク2と第一容積部11との圧力差および第一容積部11と第二容積部12との圧力差をつけて停止することができるので、停止中に第一開閉弁8、第二開閉弁9からの燃料ガスの漏れを検出することができる。ここでは、特に燃料ガスタンク2と第一容積部11との圧力差および第一容積部11と第二容積部12との圧力差とが同程度になるように設定するので、第一、第二開閉弁8、9の故障を同様に検出することができる。
【0050】
燃料ガスタンク2に貯蔵された燃料ガスの状態に基づいて、停止操作を行うかどうかを決定する停止処理判定部(S1)を備える。これにより、停止操作を行っても、後の故障診断を正確に出来ないような場合には、停止操作・故障診断を避けることができるので、誤診を避けることができ、また無駄な動作を省略することができる。
【0051】
例えば、燃料ガスタンク2の圧力を測定する圧力センサ4を備え、圧力センサ4の出力が所定値以上である場合に停止操作を行うと判断する。燃料ガスタンク2内の圧力が低い場合、停止時処理を行っても燃料ガスタンク2および第一、二容積部11、12の圧力との差が少ないので、燃料ガス漏れがない場合でも環境変化による影響を受け易く、誤って供給開閉弁の故障と診断してしまうことがある。そこで、燃料ガスタンク2内の圧力が所定値以上である場合のみに停止処理を行うことで、これを回避することができる。
【0052】
燃料ガスタンク2の圧力を測定する圧力センサ4と、燃料ガスタンク2または燃料ガス供給配管3中の少なくとも一箇所の燃料ガスの温度変化を検出または推測する温度検出手段、ここでは第一温度センサ5を備える。停止後の運転再開直前の燃料ガスの圧力と温度に基づいて、故障診断を行うかどうかを判断する故障診断判定部(S5)と、を備える。これにより、環境の変化等に伴って燃料ガスの状態が著しく変化して、誤診を生じやすくなるような場合には、故障診断を避けることができる。これにより、より正確な故障診断を行うことができる。
【0053】
故障診断判定部(S5)において、前回の停止時における第一温度センサ5の出力と、燃料電池1の運転再開直前における第一温度センサ5の出力との差が、所定値以上の場合には故障診断は行わない。前回停止時の温度に対して、起動時の温度が大きく離れている場合には、第一、第二開閉弁8、9の漏れの状態によらず圧力の変化が大きくなり、誤って故障と判断してしまう可能性がある。そこで、第一温度センサ5の出力が、停止時と起動時とで大きく異なる場合には故障診断を行わないことで、誤診を避けることができる。
【0054】
第一開閉弁8と、第二開閉弁9と、の間に第一温度センサ5を設け、故障診断部(S6)において判断する際に、前回の停止時の第一温度センサ5の出力と、運転再開時の第一温度センサ5の出力と、に基づき圧力補正を行う。これにより、前回停止時の温度に対して起動時の温度が変化している場合でも、圧力の比較を行うことができる。
【0055】
なお、本実施形態では、燃料ガスタンク2を一つのタンクで構成したが、複数のタンクから構成してもよい。そのときには、タンク毎に少なくとも第一開閉弁8、第二開閉弁9を備える。このように構成することで、タンク数にかかわらず開閉弁の故障診断を行うことができる。
【0056】
また、燃料ガスタンク2に燃料ガスが供給されているような場合、例えば、燃料改質システム等を備え、燃料ガスタンク2に燃料ガスが供給されているような場合には、図2のステップS1に示した停止処理判定部を省略することもできる。さらにTGP2が外気圧等のほぼ一定の値の場合には、Pt、P2がほぼ一定値となるので、図5のステップS11〜13においてtm1〜tm3を求めず、図14においてPt−P1=P1−P2となるtm1〜tm3を予め実験等で求めておくこともできる。
【0057】
このように、本発明は上記実施の形態に限定されるわけではなく、特許請求の範囲に記載の技術思想の範囲以内で様々な変更が成し得ることは言うまでもない。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本実施形態における供給開閉弁の故障診断システムの構成図である。
【図2】本実施形態における停止処理のフローチャートである。
【図3】本実施形態における診断処理のフローチャートである。
【図4】本実施形態における停止処理判定のフローチャートである。
【図5】本実施形態における停止処理操作のフローチャートである。
【図6】本実施形態におけるtm1算出のフローチャートである。
【図7】本実施形態におけるtm2算出のフローチャートである。
【図8】図7のフローチャートにおいてtm2を求めるのに用いるマップである。
【図9】本実施形態におけるtm3算出のフローチャートである。
【図10】本実施形態における停止時記憶処理のフローチャートである。
【図11】本実施形態における記憶メモリ呼び出しのフローチャートである。
【図12】本実施形態における故障診断判断のフローチャートである。
【図13】本実施形態における故障診断のフローチャートである。
【図14】本実施形態における停止処理時のタイミングチャートである。
【符号の説明】
1  燃料電池
2  燃料ガスタンク
3  燃料ガス供給配管
4  供給部圧力センサ(圧力センサ)
5  第一温度センサ(温度検出手段、第一温度センサ)
6  第一圧力センサ
7  第二圧力センサ
8  第一開閉弁
9  第二開閉弁
10 第三開閉弁
20 コントローラ
S1 停止処理判定部
S3 停止時記憶処理部
S5 故障診断判定部
S6 故障診断部
S14 停止時開閉弁操作部
S11〜13 停止時開閉制御手段
[0001]
[Industrial applications]
The present invention relates to a failure diagnosis device for a fuel cell system. In particular, the present invention relates to a system for performing a failure diagnosis of a supply on-off valve by performing a leakage diagnosis of a supply on-off valve of a fuel gas supply system.
[0002]
[Prior art]
As a conventional failure diagnosis device for a fuel gas supply on-off valve, there is one disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 9-22711. This includes a first on-off valve and a second on-off valve from the upstream side in a fuel gas supply pipe for supplying fuel gas to the fuel cell, and further measures the pressure between the first on-off valve and the second on-off valve A hydrogen gas pressure sensor. At start-up, the first on-off valve and the second on-off valve are closed, and a failure diagnosis of the first on-off valve is performed based on the gas pressure detected by the hydrogen gas pressure sensor. Subsequently, the first on-off valve is opened for a predetermined time and then closed again, and a failure diagnosis of the second on-off valve is performed based on the gas pressure detected by the hydrogen gas pressure sensor after a lapse of a predetermined time from the closing.
[0003]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, since it is necessary to supply gas to the fuel gas supply pipe in order to detect a leak, if a failure has already occurred before the start-up, for example, a failure during operation stop starts the fuel supply. Cannot be detected. Further, when performing a failure diagnosis before starting, it is necessary to secure a diagnosis time, so that the time until traveling or starting operation is extended.
[0004]
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a failure diagnosis system for a supply on-off valve that can promptly perform a failure on the supply on-off valve at the time of startup.
[0005]
[Means for solving the problem]
The present invention provides a fuel cell that generates power using fuel gas, a fuel gas tank that stores fuel gas supplied to the fuel cell, a fuel gas supply pipe that supplies fuel gas from the fuel gas tank to the fuel cell, A first on-off valve disposed on the fuel gas supply pipe, a second on-off valve disposed downstream of the first on-off valve along a flow direction of the fuel gas, the first on-off valve and the second on-off valve A first pressure sensor that detects the pressure of the fuel gas between the first pressure sensor and the first pressure sensor. Further, when the fuel cell is stopped, the first on-off valve is closed and then the second on-off valve is closed, and the second on-off valve is operated when the fuel cell is stopped, and the output of the first pressure sensor is stored when the fuel cell is stopped. The pressure storage unit compares the output of the first pressure sensor when the operation is restarted after the fuel cell is stopped with the output of the first pressure sensor when the fuel cell is stopped stored in the stop-time pressure storage unit. A failure diagnosis unit that determines whether at least one of the first on-off valve and the second on-off valve has failed.
[0006]
[Action and effect]
When the fuel cell is stopped, the pressure in the fuel supply pipe is measured, and when the fuel cell is restarted, the pressure when the fuel cell is stopped is compared with the pressure when the operation is restarted.From the comparison result, at least the first on-off valve and the second on-off valve are used. Determine if one is faulty. Thus, a failure can be detected without supplying fuel gas to the fuel cell. Further, there is no need to wait for running or starting operation for failure diagnosis. Thereby, the failure diagnosis of the first on-off valve and the second on-off valve can be quickly performed at the time of startup.
[0007]
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
FIG. 1 shows a configuration of a failure diagnosis system for a supply on-off valve (first and second on-off valves 8 and 9 described later) used in the present embodiment.
[0008]
The fuel cell 1 is supplied with an oxidant gas from an oxidant gas supply system (not shown) and a fuel gas from the fuel supply system. An electrochemical reaction occurs between oxygen in the oxidant gas and hydrogen in the fuel gas. Is generated to generate power.
[0009]
The fuel supply system includes a fuel gas tank 2 serving as a fuel gas storage tank and a fuel gas supply pipe 3 serving as a fuel gas flow passage. The fuel gas is supplied from the fuel gas tank 2 to the fuel cell 1 via the fuel gas supply pipe 3. Supply. The first on-off valve 8, the second on-off valve 9, and the third on-off valve 10 are arranged in the fuel gas supply pipe 3 from the upstream side along the fuel gas flow direction. Here, the first and second on-off valves 8 and 9 adjust the supply and stop of the fuel gas, and the third on-off valve 10 is adjusted so as to keep the pressure of the fuel electrode of the fuel cell 1 constant.
[0010]
The first volume section 11 formed by a part of the fuel gas supply pipe 3 between the first opening / closing valve 8 and the second opening / closing valve 9 includes a first temperature sensor 5 and a first pressure sensor 6. The temperature T1 and the pressure P1 in the one volume section 11 can be detected. The second volume 12 formed by a part of the fuel gas supply pipe 3 between the second on-off valve 9 and the third on-off valve 10 is provided with the second pressure sensor 7, Pressure P2 can be detected. Further, a pressure sensor 4 is provided in the fuel gas tank 2 so that the pressure Pt in the tank can be detected.
[0011]
In such a failure diagnosis system, a controller 20 is provided, which controls the first to third on-off valves 8 to 10 from the output of each sensor, and performs a failure diagnosis of the first and second on-off valves 8 and 9 at startup. Do.
[0012]
Next, a control method by the controller 20 of such a failure diagnosis system of the supply on-off valve will be described. The control method of the present embodiment includes a stop processing unit shown in FIG. 2 that is performed when the operation of the fuel cell 1 is stopped, and a diagnostic processing unit that is performed when the operation of the fuel cell 1 is started. Constitute.
[0013]
First, a control method of the stop processing unit when the fuel cell 1 is stopped will be described with reference to FIG.
[0014]
When the command to stop the operation of the fuel cell 1 is output, the process proceeds to a stop processing determination unit in step S1. The stop processing determination unit determines whether or not to perform a stop processing for performing a failure diagnosis of the supply on-off valve at the next start-up, and actually performs control as shown in FIG.
[0015]
In FIG. 4, when a stop processing unit start command is received, the process proceeds to step S7, and it is determined whether the pressure Pt in the fuel gas tank 2 is larger than a predetermined value DGNPt. If it is larger than the predetermined value DGNPt, the process proceeds to step S8, where it is determined that the stop processing is performed by setting the stop processing flag FDGNV = 1. On the other hand, if it is determined in step S7 that the pressure Pt is equal to or less than the predetermined value DGNPt, the process proceeds to step S9, where the stop processing flag FDGNV is set to 0, and it is determined that the stop processing is not performed.
[0016]
Here, when the pressure in the fuel gas tank 2 is small, the difference between the pressures in the fuel gas tank 2, the first volume section 11, and the second volume section 12 becomes small even if a stop process described later is performed. In such a case, even if there is no fuel gas leakage, the fuel cell is easily affected by the environmental change, and there is a possibility that the supply on-off valve is erroneously determined to be faulty. Therefore, if there is a possibility of such a misdiagnosis, here, if the pressure in the fuel gas tank 2 is equal to or lower than the predetermined value DGNPt, it is set that no failure determination is performed at the next startup, and the fuel cell 1 To stop.
[0017]
After the stop processing determination is performed in this manner, the process proceeds to the stop processing operation unit in step S2 in FIG. The stop processing operation unit performs processing for performing a failure diagnosis of the supply on-off valve at the next start-up, and actually performs control as shown in the flowchart of FIG.
[0018]
In step S10 in FIG. 5, it is determined whether or not the stop processing flag FDGNV obtained by the stop processing determination unit (S1 in FIG. 2) is 1. If it is determined that the stop processing flag FDGNV is not 1, the stop processing is not performed, so the process proceeds to step S15, and the first to third on-off valves 8 to 10 are simultaneously closed, for example, and the control in the stop processing operation unit is ended. Here, the first to third on-off valves 8 to 10 are closed at the same time, but this is not a limitation.
[0019]
On the other hand, when the stop processing flag FDGNV is 1 in step S10, the process proceeds to step S11, and a timing tm1 for closing the first on-off valve 8 is calculated. FIG. 6 shows a method for obtaining the timing tm1.
[0020]
After confirming the command for calculating tm1, in step S26, if the supply on / off valve is supported to be closed, the first opening / closing 8 is immediately closed, that is, tm1 = 0 is set. After setting tm1 in step S11 (FIG. 6), the process proceeds to step S12.
[0021]
In step S12, a timing tm2 for closing the second on-off valve 9 is calculated. The method of calculating the timing tm2 will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.
[0022]
When the command for obtaining the timing tm2 is confirmed, the process proceeds to step S17, and the target set pressure TGP2 at which the pressure P2 of the second volume 12 finally calms down is read. This is, for example, the pressure of the fuel electrode of the fuel cell 1 during shutdown.
[0023]
Proceeding to step S18, a difference ΔDP (= Pt−TGP2) between the current pressure Pt of the fuel gas tank 2 and the set pressure of the second volume section 12 is determined. Proceeding to step S19, the timing tm2 is obtained from a map or the like showing the timing tm2 for the difference ΔDP shown in FIG. Here, for example, the map of FIG. 8 shows a timing tm2 such that P1 = TGP2 + (Pt−TGP2) / 2, which is obtained in advance through experiments or the like, that is, P1 is an intermediate value between Pt and TGP2. Here, the timing tm2 is obtained from the map, but the output of the first pressure sensor 6 may be monitored, and the time when P1 = TGP2 + (Pt−TGP2) / 2 may be set as the timing tm2.
[0024]
When the timing tm2 is obtained in step S13 (FIG. 7), the process proceeds to step S14 in FIG. In step S14, a timing tm3 for closing the third on-off valve 10 is obtained. The timing tm3 is determined using the flowchart shown in FIG.
[0025]
After confirming the command for obtaining the timing tm3, the process proceeds to step S20 in FIG. 9, and the timing when the pressure P2 of the first volume section 12 reaches the set pressure TGP2 is set as the timing tm3. That is, the output of the second pressure sensor 7 is detected, and the time when the value becomes TGP2 is defined as the timing tm3 for closing the third on-off valve 10.
[0026]
After setting the timing tm3 in step S13 (FIG. 9), the process proceeds to step S14 in FIG. 5, and the first to third on-off valves 8 to 10 are closed according to the timings tm1 to tm3 obtained in steps S11 to S13.
[0027]
As described above, when the control of the stop processing operation unit in step S2 (FIG. 5) is completed, the process proceeds to step S3, and the stop-time storage processing unit is performed. Here, control as shown in FIG. 10 is performed.
[0028]
That is, when a command to start the stop-time storage process is received, in step S21 in FIG. 10, the pressure Pt in the fuel gas tank 2, the pressure P1 and the temperature T1 in the first volume 11, and the temperature T1 in the second volume 12 The pressure P2 and the stop processing flag FDGNP are stored in the memory.
[0029]
When the control of the storage processing unit at the time of termination is terminated in this way, the termination processing in FIG. 2 is terminated. Here, FIG. 14 shows an example of a timing chart when the operation of the stop processing as shown in FIG. 2 is performed.
[0030]
When the pressure in the fuel gas tank 2 is higher than the predetermined pressure DGNPt, when the first on-off valve 8 is closed, the first on-off valve 8 is located on the downstream side of the first on-off valve 8 (first and second volume parts) as compared with the pressure P1 in the fuel gas tank 2. 11, 12) The pressure decreases. This is because the fuel cell 1 still consumes hydrogen at this point, and the fuel gas is flowing toward the fuel cell 1. Similarly, when the second on-off valve 9 is closed, the pressure in the first volume section 11 maintains the pressure at that time, whereas the pressure on the downstream side (the second volume section 12) of the second on-off valve 9 becomes It drops further. After that, by closing the third on-off valve 10, the pressure in the second volume portion 12 maintains the pressure at the time when the third on-off valve 10 is closed. Therefore, when there is no failure in the first to third on-off valves 8 to 10, Pt>P1> P2 is maintained. Here, the timing tm2 is set so that the pressure differences between Pt and P1 and between P1 and P2 are substantially the same.
[0031]
Next, a failure diagnosis method performed when the fuel cell 1 is started will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
[0032]
In step S4, the storage memory is called according to the flowchart shown in FIG. When a command to call the storage memory is received, the process proceeds to step S22 to call the value stored in the memory. Here, the values stored in the memory in step S21 of FIG. 10, that is, the pressure Pt in the fuel gas tank 2, the pressure P1 and the temperature T1 in the first volume 11, the pressure P2 in the second volume 12, Read the stop processing flag FDGNP. In step S23, each value is applied to variables MPt, MP1, MP2, MT1, and MFDGNP for use in the calculation.
[0033]
When the storage memory is called in step S4 (FIG. 11), the process proceeds to step S5. The failure diagnosis determination unit in step S5 determines whether to perform failure diagnosis according to the control shown in FIG.
[0034]
In step S24 of FIG. 12, the absolute value | T1-MT1 | of the temperature difference between the temperature T1 of the first volume section 11 and the temperature MT1 of the first volume section 11 stored in the memory, and the predetermined value DGNT1 To compare. If the absolute value | T1−MT1 | is larger than DGNT1, the process proceeds to step S27, and the diagnosis permission flag FDGNP = 0 is set so that the failure diagnosis is not performed.
[0035]
On the other hand, if the absolute value | T1-MT1 | is equal to or smaller than DGNT1, the process proceeds to step S25 to compare the pressure Pt of the fuel gas tank 2 with the pressure MPt of the fuel gas tank 2 stored in the memory. Thus, it is determined whether the fuel gas has been replenished to the fuel gas tank 2 during the period from the previous stop to the start of the current start. If the difference (Pt-MPt) between the current pressure and the previous pressure is larger than the predetermined value DGNPF, it is determined that the fuel gas has been replenished, and the process proceeds to step S27, where the diagnosis permission flag FDGNP = 0 is set so that failure diagnosis is not performed. Set. On the other hand, if (Pt-MPt) is equal to or less than DGNPF, it is determined that replenishment has not been performed, and the process proceeds to step S25, where a diagnosis permission flag FDGNP = 1 is set so that failure diagnosis is performed.
[0036]
If the temperature at startup is significantly different from the temperature at the previous stop, the pressure change will increase irrespective of the state of leakage of the supply on-off valve, and the supply on-off valve will fail erroneously. May be determined to be Therefore, the failure diagnosis is performed when the influence of the pressure change on the failure diagnosis is negligible, in this case, when the absolute value | T1-MT1 | is less than or equal to DGNT1, and in other cases, the start is started without performing the failure diagnosis. . Therefore, the temperature used as the criterion is not limited to the output of the first temperature sensor 5 and may be determined based on the temperature of the fuel gas in the fuel gas tank 2 or the like. Further, by checking the change in the pressure in the fuel gas tank 2, it is determined whether or not the fuel gas has been replenished during the stop. If the fuel gas has been replenished, the fuel cell 1 is started without performing a failure diagnosis.
[0037]
If it is determined in step S5 (FIG. 12) whether to perform a failure diagnosis, the process proceeds to step S6. The failure diagnosis unit in step S6 performs control as shown in FIG.
[0038]
In step S28, it is determined whether or not the diagnosis permission flag FDGNP = 1 and MDGNP = 1. Unless FDNGP = 1 and MFDNGP = 1, the failure diagnosis is not performed. Therefore, the process proceeds to step S36, and the failure result flag FDGNOK = 1, the first on-off valve failure flag FDGNV1 = 0, and the second on-off valve failure flag FDGNV2 = 0 are set. I do. Here, the failure result flag indicates whether or not there is a failure as a result of the diagnosis. If FDGNOK = 1, it is normal, and if FDGNOK = 0, at least one of the first on-off valve 8 and the second on-off valve 9 is provided. Indicates a failure. Further, the first on-off valve failure flag FDGNV1 and the second on-off valve failure flag FDGNV2 indicate the failure diagnosis results of the respective supply on-off valves, where 1 indicates failure and 0 indicates normal. I have. That is, when it is determined in step S28 that the failure diagnosis is not to be performed, it is determined that the failure is normal, the failure diagnosis is terminated, and the fuel cell 1 is started.
[0039]
On the other hand, if FDGNP = 1 and MFDGNP = 1 in step S28, a failure diagnosis is performed, and the process proceeds to step S29. In step S29, the pressure P1 of the first volume section 11 is corrected by the temperature. That is, P 0 Assuming that 1 = P1 × MT1 / T1, the correction pressure P is taken into account in consideration of pressure changes due to temperature 0 1 is calculated. In step S30, the temperature-corrected pressure P 0 1 is compared with the pressure MP1 stored in the memory. Here, P 0 1 is greater than MP1, and whether the difference is greater than a predetermined value DPA1 0 It is determined whether 1-MP1> DPA1. Here, the predetermined value DPA1 is a value for avoiding misdiagnosis due to a change in environment or a measurement error.
[0040]
If it is larger than the predetermined value DPA1, it is determined that the pressure in the first volume section 11 has become higher than at the time of the previous stop. Then, the process proceeds to step S31, in which it is determined that the fuel gas has been supplied from the fuel gas tank 2 to the first volume portion 11 through the first on-off valve 8, and thereby it is determined that the first on-off valve 8 has failed. Therefore, the diagnosis result flag FDGNOK = 0 and the first on-off valve failure flag FDGNV1 = 1 are set to indicate that the first on-off valve 8 has a failure. At this time, the second on-off valve failure flag FDGNV2 = 0 is set, and the failure diagnosis ends.
[0041]
On the other hand, in step S30, P 0 If it is determined that 1-MP1> DPA1, it is determined that FDGNV1 = 0, that is, that the first on-off valve 8 has no failure, and then proceeds to step S33.
[0042]
Next, in step S33, MP1 0 1 and whether the difference is greater than a predetermined value DPB1, that is, MP1-P 0 It is determined whether 1> DPB1. Here, the predetermined value DPB1 is also a value for avoiding a misdiagnosis due to a change in environment or a measurement error.
[0043]
If it is larger than the predetermined value DPB1, it is determined that the pressure in the first volume section 11 has become smaller than at the time of the previous stop. Then, the process proceeds to step S34, and it is considered that the fuel gas in the first volume 11 has moved to the second volume 12 having a lower pressure via the second on-off valve 9, and the second on-off valve 9 has failed. Is determined. Therefore, the failure result flag FDGNOK = 0 and the second on-off valve failure flag FDGNV2 = 1 are set, and the failure diagnosis ends.
[0044]
On the other hand, if it is not determined in step S33 that the second on-off valve 9 has failed, the process proceeds to step S35, where the failure result flag FDGNOK = 1 and the second on-off valve failure flag FDGNV2 = 0 are set, and the failure diagnosis ends. I do.
[0045]
If the failure result flag FDGNOK, which is the above result, is 1, it is understood that it is normal, and if it is 0, it is failure. When FDGNOK is 0, it is possible to determine which of the first on-off valve 8 and the second on-off valve 9 has failed from the results of FDGNV1 and FDGNV2.
[0046]
Next, effects of the present embodiment will be described.
[0047]
This embodiment includes a fuel cell 1, a fuel gas tank 2, a fuel gas supply pipe 3 for supplying a fuel gas from the fuel gas tank 2 to the fuel cell 1, a first on-off valve 8 disposed in a fuel gas supply passage, A second on-off valve 9 arranged downstream of the one on-off valve 8 and a first pressure sensor 6 for detecting the pressure of the first volume 11 are provided. Further, when the fuel cell 1 is stopped, the first on-off valve 8 is closed, and then the second on-off valve 9 is closed. A storage processing unit (S3) is provided. Further, the output of the first pressure sensor 6 when the operation is restarted after the stop is compared with the stored output of the first pressure sensor 6 when the stop is performed, and at least the first on-off valve 8 and the second on-off valve 9 are compared. A failure diagnosis unit (S6) for determining whether one of them has failed. Thereby, a failure can be detected without supplying fuel to the fuel cell 1. Further, since there is no need to wait for traveling or operation start for the failure diagnosis, the failure diagnosis can be performed promptly at the time of startup.
[0048]
Further, a third on-off valve 10 is provided between the second on-off valve 9 and the fuel cell 1, and the third on-off valve 10 is closed after the second on-off valve 9 is closed in the stop-time on-off valve operation section (S14). By providing the third on-off valve 10 as described above, the pressure on the downstream side of the second on-off valve 9 can be kept constant when there is no failure. Thereby, even when a pressure change occurs in the fuel cell 1, a failure of the second on-off valve can be accurately determined.
[0049]
A pressure sensor 4 for measuring the pressure of the fuel gas tank 2, a second pressure sensor 7 for detecting the pressure of the second volume 12, and a stop-time on-off valve control for setting a timing for closing the first to third on-off valves 8 to 10 Means (S11 to S13). At the time of stop, the first to third on-off valves 8 to 10 are closed according to the set timing according to the outputs of the pressure sensor 4, the first pressure sensor 6, and the second pressure sensor 7. Thereby, it is possible to stop with the pressure difference between the fuel gas tank 2 and the first volume 11 and the pressure difference between the first volume 11 and the second volume 12, so that the first on-off valve 8 can be stopped during the stop. Thus, it is possible to detect the leakage of the fuel gas from the second on-off valve 9. Here, in particular, since the pressure difference between the fuel gas tank 2 and the first volume 11 and the pressure difference between the first volume 11 and the second volume 12 are set to be substantially the same, the first and second volumes are set. The failure of the on-off valves 8 and 9 can be similarly detected.
[0050]
A stop processing determination unit (S1) for determining whether to perform a stop operation based on the state of the fuel gas stored in the fuel gas tank 2 is provided. This makes it possible to avoid the stop operation and the failure diagnosis when the subsequent failure diagnosis cannot be accurately performed even if the stop operation is performed, so that a misdiagnosis can be avoided and unnecessary operation is omitted. can do.
[0051]
For example, a pressure sensor 4 that measures the pressure of the fuel gas tank 2 is provided, and when the output of the pressure sensor 4 is equal to or more than a predetermined value, it is determined that the stop operation is performed. When the pressure in the fuel gas tank 2 is low, the difference between the pressure of the fuel gas tank 2 and the pressures of the first and second volume portions 11 and 12 is small even when the stop processing is performed. In some cases, the supply opening / closing valve is erroneously diagnosed. Therefore, this can be avoided by performing the stop processing only when the pressure in the fuel gas tank 2 is equal to or higher than the predetermined value.
[0052]
A pressure sensor 4 for measuring the pressure of the fuel gas tank 2 and temperature detecting means for detecting or estimating a temperature change of the fuel gas in at least one portion of the fuel gas tank 2 or the fuel gas supply pipe 3, here a first temperature sensor 5. Prepare. A failure diagnosis determining unit (S5) for determining whether to perform a failure diagnosis based on the pressure and temperature of the fuel gas immediately before the restart of the operation after the stop. Thus, in a case where the state of the fuel gas significantly changes due to a change in the environment or the like and a misdiagnosis is likely to occur, a failure diagnosis can be avoided. As a result, more accurate failure diagnosis can be performed.
[0053]
When the difference between the output of the first temperature sensor 5 at the time of the previous stop and the output of the first temperature sensor 5 immediately before restarting the operation of the fuel cell 1 is equal to or more than a predetermined value, No fault diagnosis is performed. If the temperature at the start is far away from the temperature at the previous stop, the change in pressure becomes large irrespective of the state of leakage of the first and second on-off valves 8 and 9, resulting in an erroneous failure. There is a possibility of judgment. Therefore, when the output of the first temperature sensor 5 is significantly different between the time of the stop and the time of the start, the failure diagnosis is not performed, so that erroneous diagnosis can be avoided.
[0054]
A first temperature sensor 5 is provided between the first on-off valve 8 and the second on-off valve 9, and when the failure diagnosis unit (S <b> 6) makes a determination, the output of the first temperature sensor 5 at the time of the previous stop is determined. , The pressure is corrected based on the output of the first temperature sensor 5 when the operation is restarted. Thereby, even when the temperature at the time of starting has changed from the temperature at the time of the previous stop, the pressure can be compared.
[0055]
In the present embodiment, the fuel gas tank 2 is constituted by one tank, but may be constituted by a plurality of tanks. At that time, at least a first on-off valve 8 and a second on-off valve 9 are provided for each tank. With this configuration, failure diagnosis of the on-off valve can be performed regardless of the number of tanks.
[0056]
When the fuel gas is supplied to the fuel gas tank 2, for example, when a fuel reforming system is provided and the fuel gas is supplied to the fuel gas tank 2, the process proceeds to step S 1 in FIG. The illustrated stop processing determination unit may be omitted. Further, when TGP2 has a substantially constant value such as the outside air pressure, Pt and P2 have substantially constant values. Therefore, tm1 to tm3 are not obtained in steps S11 to S13 in FIG. 5, and Pt-P1 = P1 in FIG. Tm1 to tm3 that becomes -P2 can be obtained in advance by experiments or the like.
[0057]
As described above, the present invention is not limited to the above embodiment, and it goes without saying that various changes can be made within the scope of the technical idea described in the claims.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of a failure diagnosis system for a supply on-off valve according to an embodiment.
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a stop process according to the embodiment.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a diagnosis process according to the embodiment.
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a stop processing determination according to the embodiment.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a stop processing operation in the embodiment.
FIG. 6 is a flowchart of tm1 calculation in the embodiment.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart of tm2 calculation in the embodiment.
FIG. 8 is a map used for obtaining tm2 in the flowchart of FIG. 7;
FIG. 9 is a flowchart of tm3 calculation in the embodiment.
FIG. 10 is a flowchart of a stop-time storage process in the embodiment.
FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a storage memory call in the embodiment.
FIG. 12 is a flowchart of a failure diagnosis determination according to the embodiment.
FIG. 13 is a flowchart of a failure diagnosis according to the present embodiment.
FIG. 14 is a timing chart at the time of a stop process in the embodiment.
[Explanation of symbols]
1 fuel cell
2 Fuel gas tank
3 Fuel gas supply piping
4 Supply unit pressure sensor (pressure sensor)
5 First temperature sensor (temperature detecting means, first temperature sensor)
6 First pressure sensor
7 Second pressure sensor
8 First open / close valve
9 Second on-off valve
10 Third open / close valve
20 Controller
S1 stop processing determination unit
S3 Stop-time storage processing unit
S5 Failure diagnosis determination unit
S6 Failure diagnosis unit
S14 Stop-time on-off valve operation unit
S11-13 Shutdown opening / closing control means

Claims (9)

燃料ガスを用いて発電を行う燃料電池と、
前記燃料電池に供給する燃料ガスを貯蔵する燃料ガスタンクと、
前記燃料ガスタンクから前記燃料電池に燃料ガスを供給する燃料ガス供給配管と、
前記燃料ガス供給配管に配置した第一開閉弁と、
燃料ガスの流れ方向に沿って前記第一開閉弁の下流側に配置した第二開閉弁と、
前記第一開閉弁と前記第二開閉弁との間の燃料ガスの圧力を検出する第一圧力センサと、
前記燃料電池停止時に、前記第一開閉弁を閉じてから前記第二開閉弁を閉じる停止時開閉弁操作部と、
前記燃料電池停止時の少なくとも前記第一圧力センサの出力を記憶する停止時圧力記憶部と、
前記燃料電池停止後の運転再開時の前記第一圧力センサの出力と、前記停止時圧力記憶部に記憶した前記燃料電池停止時の前記第一圧力センサの出力と、を比較して、前記第一開閉弁および前記第二開閉弁の少なくとも一方が故障しているかどうかを判断する故障診断部と、を備えたことを特徴とする供給開閉弁の故障診断システム。
A fuel cell that generates power using fuel gas,
A fuel gas tank for storing fuel gas to be supplied to the fuel cell;
A fuel gas supply pipe for supplying fuel gas from the fuel gas tank to the fuel cell,
A first on-off valve disposed on the fuel gas supply pipe,
A second on-off valve arranged downstream of the first on-off valve along the flow direction of the fuel gas,
A first pressure sensor that detects the pressure of the fuel gas between the first on-off valve and the second on-off valve,
When the fuel cell is stopped, a stop-time on-off valve operating unit that closes the second on-off valve after closing the first on-off valve,
A stop-time pressure storage unit that stores at least the output of the first pressure sensor when the fuel cell is stopped,
The output of the first pressure sensor when the operation is restarted after the fuel cell is stopped is compared with the output of the first pressure sensor when the fuel cell is stopped, which is stored in the stop-time pressure storage unit. A failure diagnosis system for a supply on-off valve, comprising: a failure diagnosis unit that determines whether at least one of the one on-off valve and the second on-off valve has failed.
前記第二開閉弁と前記燃料電池の間に第三開閉弁を備え、
前記停止時開閉弁操作部において、前記第二開閉弁をとじてから前記第三開閉弁を閉じる請求項1に記載の供給開閉弁の故障診断システム。
A third on-off valve is provided between the second on-off valve and the fuel cell,
The failure diagnosis system for a supply on-off valve according to claim 1, wherein the third on-off valve is closed after closing the second on-off valve in the stop-time on-off valve operating section.
前記燃料ガスタンクの圧力を測定する供給部圧力センサと、
前記第二開閉弁と前記第三開閉弁との間の燃料ガスの圧力を検出する第二圧力センサと、
前記第一開閉弁と、前記第二開閉弁と、前記第三開閉弁と、を閉じるタイミングを設定する停止時開閉弁制御手段と、を備え、
燃料電池停止時に、前記供給部圧力センサと前記第一圧力センサと前記第二圧力センサとの出力に応じて、前記停止時開閉弁制御手段により設定したタイミングに従って前記停止時開閉弁操作部により前記第一開閉弁、前記第二開閉弁、前記第三開閉弁を閉じる請求項2に記載の供給開閉弁の故障診断システム。
A supply pressure sensor for measuring the pressure of the fuel gas tank,
A second pressure sensor that detects the pressure of the fuel gas between the second on-off valve and the third on-off valve,
The first on-off valve, the second on-off valve, and the third on-off valve, the stop-time on-off valve control means to set the timing to close,
When the fuel cell is stopped, according to the output of the supply unit pressure sensor, the first pressure sensor, and the second pressure sensor, the stop-time on-off valve operating unit operates according to the timing set by the stop-time on-off valve control unit. The failure diagnosis system for a supply on-off valve according to claim 2, wherein the first on-off valve, the second on-off valve, and the third on-off valve are closed.
前記燃料ガスタンクに貯蔵された燃料ガスの状態に基づいて、前記停止時開閉弁操作部による停止操作を行うかどうかを決定する停止処理判定部を備えた請求項1に記載の供給開閉弁の故障診断システム。The failure of the supply opening / closing valve according to claim 1, further comprising a stop processing determination unit that determines whether to perform a stop operation by the opening / closing valve operating unit based on the state of the fuel gas stored in the fuel gas tank. Diagnostic system. 前記燃料ガスタンクの圧力を測定する供給部圧力センサを備え、
前記停止処理判定部は、前記供給部圧力センサの出力が所定値以上である場合に停止操作を行うと判断する請求項4に記載の供給開閉弁の故障診断システム。
A supply unit pressure sensor for measuring the pressure of the fuel gas tank,
The failure diagnosis system for a supply on-off valve according to claim 4, wherein the stop processing determination unit determines that a stop operation is performed when an output of the supply unit pressure sensor is equal to or more than a predetermined value.
前記燃料ガスタンクの圧力を測定する供給部圧力センサと、
前記燃料ガスタンクまたは前記燃料ガス供給配管中の少なくとも一箇所の燃料ガスの温度の変化を検出または推測する温度検出手段と、
前記燃料電池停止後の運転再開時の燃料ガスの圧力と温度に基づいて、前記故障診断部における故障診断を行うかどうかを判断する故障診断判定部と、を備える請求項1に記載の供給開閉弁の故障診断システム。
A supply pressure sensor for measuring the pressure of the fuel gas tank,
Temperature detection means for detecting or estimating a change in the temperature of the fuel gas in at least one portion of the fuel gas tank or the fuel gas supply pipe,
2. The supply switch according to claim 1, further comprising: a failure diagnosis determination unit configured to determine whether to perform a failure diagnosis in the failure diagnosis unit based on a pressure and a temperature of the fuel gas when the operation is restarted after the fuel cell is stopped. Valve failure diagnosis system.
前記故障診断判定部において、前回の停止時における前記温度検出手段の出力と、前記燃料電池の運転再開時における前記温度検出手段の出力と、の差が、所定値以上の場合には、前記故障診断部における故障診断は行わないと判断する請求項6に記載の供給開閉弁の故障診断システム。In the failure diagnosis determination unit, when a difference between the output of the temperature detection unit at the time of the previous stop and the output of the temperature detection unit at the time of restarting operation of the fuel cell is equal to or more than a predetermined value, the failure is determined. The failure diagnosis system for a supply on-off valve according to claim 6, wherein it is determined that the failure diagnosis is not performed in the diagnosis unit. 前記燃料ガス供給タンクを一つまたは複数装着し、前記燃料ガス供給タンク毎に少なくとも前記第一開閉弁および前記第二開閉弁を備える請求項1に記載の供給開閉弁の故障診断システム。The failure diagnosis system for a supply on-off valve according to claim 1, wherein one or a plurality of the fuel gas supply tanks are mounted, and at least the first on-off valve and the second on-off valve are provided for each of the fuel gas supply tanks. 前記第一開閉弁と、前記第二開閉弁と、の間に設けた第一温度センサと、
前記故障診断判断部における判断を行う際に、前回の停止時の前記第一温度センサの出力と、前記燃料電池の運転再開時の第一温度センサの出力と、に基づき圧力補正を行う請求項1に記載の供給開閉弁の故障診断システム。
A first temperature sensor provided between the first on-off valve and the second on-off valve,
A pressure correction is performed based on an output of the first temperature sensor at the time of a previous stop and an output of the first temperature sensor at the time of restarting operation of the fuel cell when making a determination in the failure diagnosis determination unit. 2. The failure diagnosis system for the supply on-off valve according to 1.
JP2002256461A 2002-09-02 2002-09-02 Failure diagnosis system for supply on / off valve Expired - Fee Related JP3864875B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002256461A JP3864875B2 (en) 2002-09-02 2002-09-02 Failure diagnosis system for supply on / off valve

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002256461A JP3864875B2 (en) 2002-09-02 2002-09-02 Failure diagnosis system for supply on / off valve

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2004095425A true JP2004095425A (en) 2004-03-25
JP3864875B2 JP3864875B2 (en) 2007-01-10

Family

ID=32061680

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2002256461A Expired - Fee Related JP3864875B2 (en) 2002-09-02 2002-09-02 Failure diagnosis system for supply on / off valve

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3864875B2 (en)

Cited By (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005011577A (en) * 2003-06-17 2005-01-13 Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd Method for determining state of control valve in fuel cell system
WO2005088756A1 (en) * 2004-03-17 2005-09-22 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Device and method for detecting gas leakage
WO2006033425A1 (en) * 2004-09-22 2006-03-30 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and fuel cell system failure judgment method
JP2006108024A (en) * 2004-10-08 2006-04-20 Toyota Motor Corp High pressure gas supply device and fuel cell system using the same
WO2006048983A1 (en) * 2004-11-04 2006-05-11 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system
JP2006134861A (en) * 2004-10-08 2006-05-25 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system and gas leak detection method
JP2006140132A (en) * 2004-10-13 2006-06-01 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel supply device
WO2006062237A1 (en) * 2004-12-07 2006-06-15 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and method for inspecting gas leakage of same
JP2006164729A (en) * 2004-12-07 2006-06-22 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system and gas leak inspection method thereof
JP2006164730A (en) * 2004-12-07 2006-06-22 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system and gas leak inspection method thereof
JP2006210086A (en) * 2005-01-27 2006-08-10 Equos Research Co Ltd Fuel cell system and operation method thereof
WO2007004719A1 (en) * 2005-07-01 2007-01-11 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel battery system, method for detecting gas leakage in such system, and mobile object
WO2007013668A1 (en) * 2005-07-27 2007-02-01 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system
WO2007018132A1 (en) * 2005-08-09 2007-02-15 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and method for judging fuel gas leakage in fuel cell system
JP2007048542A (en) * 2005-08-09 2007-02-22 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system, gas leak detection device, and gas leak detection method
JP2007149496A (en) * 2005-11-28 2007-06-14 Honda Motor Co Ltd Fuel cell system
JP2007311304A (en) * 2006-05-22 2007-11-29 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system
JP2007329105A (en) * 2006-06-09 2007-12-20 Toyota Motor Corp Abnormality detection device for fuel cell system and abnormality detection method for the same
JP2008084730A (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-10 Aisin Seiki Co Ltd Fuel cell system
US20090053567A1 (en) * 2005-08-12 2009-02-26 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel gas feeding device and control method therefor
WO2009060702A1 (en) * 2007-11-08 2009-05-14 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and hydrogen leak judgment method in the system
DE112008002494T5 (en) 2007-09-28 2010-12-30 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, Toyota-shi The fuel cell system
JP2012151125A (en) * 2004-10-08 2012-08-09 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system and gas leakage detection method
JP2012253033A (en) * 2012-08-20 2012-12-20 Aisin Seiki Co Ltd Fuel cell system
EP2597713A1 (en) * 2011-11-28 2013-05-29 Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system
DE102006025125B4 (en) * 2005-06-01 2013-09-05 GM Global Technology Operations LLC (n. d. Ges. d. Staates Delaware) Method for detecting leaks in gas supply systems with redundant valves, fuel cell system and its use
KR101509788B1 (en) 2009-10-01 2015-04-06 현대자동차주식회사 Diagnostic method for solenoid valve
JP2015152512A (en) * 2014-02-18 2015-08-24 アズビル株式会社 Flow control valve leakage diagnostic device
JP2015156444A (en) * 2014-02-20 2015-08-27 ファナック株式会社 Gas laser device that efficiently performs startup step
EP2291627A4 (en) * 2008-06-12 2017-03-22 Scania CV AB (publ) Method and system for diagnosis of gas leakage in a gas-powered vehicle
JP2017180748A (en) * 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 日立オートモティブシステムズメジャメント株式会社 Fuel gas filling device
JP2021060203A (en) * 2019-10-03 2021-04-15 大陽日酸株式会社 Airtightness test method for hydrogen station
US11139495B2 (en) 2016-03-09 2021-10-05 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Method of inspecting a fuel cell system, and the fuel cell system
CN113776800A (en) * 2021-09-03 2021-12-10 长虹美菱股份有限公司 An electric switching valve detection device and method thereof
CN119712333A (en) * 2024-12-30 2025-03-28 重庆凯瑞动力科技有限公司 Gaseous fuel pressure regulator diagnostic system and diagnostic control method

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102896008B1 (en) 2019-10-23 2025-12-04 현대자동차주식회사 Dicision system and dicision method of fuel cell hydrogen supply failure

Cited By (49)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005011577A (en) * 2003-06-17 2005-01-13 Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd Method for determining state of control valve in fuel cell system
US7581431B2 (en) 2004-03-17 2009-09-01 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Gas leak detection device and method for same
WO2005088756A1 (en) * 2004-03-17 2005-09-22 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Device and method for detecting gas leakage
WO2006033425A1 (en) * 2004-09-22 2006-03-30 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and fuel cell system failure judgment method
US8349509B2 (en) 2004-09-22 2013-01-08 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and fuel cell system failure judgment method
JP2006108024A (en) * 2004-10-08 2006-04-20 Toyota Motor Corp High pressure gas supply device and fuel cell system using the same
JP2012151125A (en) * 2004-10-08 2012-08-09 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system and gas leakage detection method
JP2006134861A (en) * 2004-10-08 2006-05-25 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system and gas leak detection method
JP2006140132A (en) * 2004-10-13 2006-06-01 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel supply device
WO2006048983A1 (en) * 2004-11-04 2006-05-11 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Fuel cell system
JP2006164730A (en) * 2004-12-07 2006-06-22 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system and gas leak inspection method thereof
JP2006164729A (en) * 2004-12-07 2006-06-22 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system and gas leak inspection method thereof
WO2006062237A1 (en) * 2004-12-07 2006-06-15 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and method for inspecting gas leakage of same
JP2006210086A (en) * 2005-01-27 2006-08-10 Equos Research Co Ltd Fuel cell system and operation method thereof
DE102006025125B4 (en) * 2005-06-01 2013-09-05 GM Global Technology Operations LLC (n. d. Ges. d. Staates Delaware) Method for detecting leaks in gas supply systems with redundant valves, fuel cell system and its use
DE112006001772B4 (en) 2005-07-01 2022-08-04 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and method for detecting a gas leak in such a system
JP2007012535A (en) * 2005-07-01 2007-01-18 Toyota Motor Corp FUEL CELL SYSTEM, GAS LEAK DETECTING METHOD, AND MOBILE BODY
US8173315B2 (en) 2005-07-01 2012-05-08 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel battery system, method for detecting gas leakage in such system, and mobile object
WO2007004719A1 (en) * 2005-07-01 2007-01-11 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel battery system, method for detecting gas leakage in such system, and mobile object
JP2007035445A (en) * 2005-07-27 2007-02-08 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system
US8486577B2 (en) 2005-07-27 2013-07-16 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system
WO2007013668A1 (en) * 2005-07-27 2007-02-01 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system
US7829233B2 (en) 2005-08-09 2010-11-09 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and method for judging fuel gas leak in a fuel cell system
WO2007018132A1 (en) * 2005-08-09 2007-02-15 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and method for judging fuel gas leakage in fuel cell system
JP2007048542A (en) * 2005-08-09 2007-02-22 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system, gas leak detection device, and gas leak detection method
US20090053567A1 (en) * 2005-08-12 2009-02-26 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel gas feeding device and control method therefor
US9742015B2 (en) * 2005-08-12 2017-08-22 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel gas feeding device and control method therefor
JP2007149496A (en) * 2005-11-28 2007-06-14 Honda Motor Co Ltd Fuel cell system
JP2007311304A (en) * 2006-05-22 2007-11-29 Toyota Motor Corp Fuel cell system
JP2007329105A (en) * 2006-06-09 2007-12-20 Toyota Motor Corp Abnormality detection device for fuel cell system and abnormality detection method for the same
US8765313B2 (en) 2006-09-28 2014-07-01 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and method of controlling same
JP2008084730A (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-10 Aisin Seiki Co Ltd Fuel cell system
US8541142B2 (en) 2007-09-28 2013-09-24 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system
DE112008002494T5 (en) 2007-09-28 2010-12-30 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, Toyota-shi The fuel cell system
US8343679B2 (en) 2007-11-08 2013-01-01 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and hydrogen leak judgment method in the system
WO2009060702A1 (en) * 2007-11-08 2009-05-14 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system and hydrogen leak judgment method in the system
EP2291627A4 (en) * 2008-06-12 2017-03-22 Scania CV AB (publ) Method and system for diagnosis of gas leakage in a gas-powered vehicle
KR101509788B1 (en) 2009-10-01 2015-04-06 현대자동차주식회사 Diagnostic method for solenoid valve
EP2597713A1 (en) * 2011-11-28 2013-05-29 Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel cell system
JP2012253033A (en) * 2012-08-20 2012-12-20 Aisin Seiki Co Ltd Fuel cell system
JP2015152512A (en) * 2014-02-18 2015-08-24 アズビル株式会社 Flow control valve leakage diagnostic device
US9240665B2 (en) 2014-02-20 2016-01-19 Fanuc Corporation Gas laser apparatus carrying out improved startup process
JP2015156444A (en) * 2014-02-20 2015-08-27 ファナック株式会社 Gas laser device that efficiently performs startup step
US11139495B2 (en) 2016-03-09 2021-10-05 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Method of inspecting a fuel cell system, and the fuel cell system
JP2017180748A (en) * 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 日立オートモティブシステムズメジャメント株式会社 Fuel gas filling device
JP2021060203A (en) * 2019-10-03 2021-04-15 大陽日酸株式会社 Airtightness test method for hydrogen station
JP7477953B2 (en) 2019-10-03 2024-05-02 大陽日酸株式会社 Hydrogen station airtightness test method
CN113776800A (en) * 2021-09-03 2021-12-10 长虹美菱股份有限公司 An electric switching valve detection device and method thereof
CN119712333A (en) * 2024-12-30 2025-03-28 重庆凯瑞动力科技有限公司 Gaseous fuel pressure regulator diagnostic system and diagnostic control method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3864875B2 (en) 2007-01-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3864875B2 (en) Failure diagnosis system for supply on / off valve
JP5105218B2 (en) Abnormality judgment device
CN100563053C (en) Fuel cell system
JP4356991B2 (en) Evaporative gas purge system leak diagnosis device
US20070196709A1 (en) Fuel cell system and control method of same
KR20200042568A (en) Fuel cell hydrogen supply fault diagnosis system and diagnosis method
KR101646382B1 (en) Fault diagnosis method for hydrogen pressure sensor of fuel cell system
JP2007211789A (en) Leak diagnosis device for evaporated gas purge system
WO2007018132A1 (en) Fuel cell system and method for judging fuel gas leakage in fuel cell system
JP5816842B2 (en) Gas leak detection system for fuel cell system
JP4033376B2 (en) Fuel supply device
WO2008071402A1 (en) Leakage test in a fuel cell system
JP2020035538A (en) Fuel gas supply control device and method, and method of starting fuel cell vehicle
JP3783649B2 (en) Vehicle fuel gas supply device
JP2018533187A (en) Fuel cell system leak monitoring
CN120188019A (en) Fuel cell system, gas tank system and method for operating a gas tank system
JP2005347185A (en) Fuel cell system and abnormality determination method thereof
WO2006048983A1 (en) Fuel cell system
JP4363475B2 (en) Fuel cell system
JP2024021279A (en) Hydrogen supply device and hydrogen supply method
JP2003035215A (en) Fuel temperature estimating device and abnormality diagnosing device
JP2006145252A (en) Gas leak detection device
JP2020149773A (en) Fuel cell system
KR20170039497A (en) System and Method for checking error of Fuel Tank Pressure Sensor
JP2009094000A (en) Fuel cell system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20050624

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20060614

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20060620

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20060817

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20060912

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20060925

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 3864875

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091013

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101013

Year of fee payment: 4

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111013

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121013

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121013

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131013

Year of fee payment: 7

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees