JP2003315290A - Evaluation method of crystal structure of materials and steel materials with excellent weather resistance - Google Patents
Evaluation method of crystal structure of materials and steel materials with excellent weather resistanceInfo
- Publication number
- JP2003315290A JP2003315290A JP2002118774A JP2002118774A JP2003315290A JP 2003315290 A JP2003315290 A JP 2003315290A JP 2002118774 A JP2002118774 A JP 2002118774A JP 2002118774 A JP2002118774 A JP 2002118774A JP 2003315290 A JP2003315290 A JP 2003315290A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- steel
- vector
- atoms
- rust
- function
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
Abstract
(57)【要約】
【課題】 本発明は、材料特に、さびの結晶構造評価を
行うための方法及びそれに基づく耐候性に優れた鋼材を
提供する。
【解決手段】 材料の原子の配列を評価する方法におい
て、該材料における任意の結晶ユニットX内の近接する
2つの原子i、jを結ぶベクトルVijと、別の任意の結
晶ユニットY内の近接する2つの原子k、lを結ぶベク
トルVklについて、前記両ベクトル間の距離をr、角度
をθとするとき、ベクトルVijとベクトルVklが距離
r、角度θと関係を満たす位置に原子i、j、k、lを
見出す確率を示す関数A(r,θ)により原子の配列状
態を評価する材料の結晶構造評価法。
(57) Abstract: The present invention provides a method for evaluating a crystal structure of a material, particularly a rust, and a steel material having excellent weather resistance based on the method. In a method for evaluating the arrangement of atoms in a material, a vector V ij connecting two adjacent atoms i and j in an arbitrary crystal unit X in the material and a proximity in another arbitrary crystal unit Y are provided. Assuming that the distance between the two vectors k and l is r and the angle is θ, the vector V ij and the vector V kl are positioned at positions satisfying the distance r and the angle θ. A crystal structure evaluation method for a material in which the arrangement state of atoms is evaluated by a function A (r, θ) indicating a probability of finding i, j, k, and l.
Description
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、材料中の原子の配
列の周期性が不完全である材料であっても、その結晶構
造を評価できる方法、特に大気腐食環境中で安定な密着
さび層を有する耐候性鋼のさび構造の評価法および耐候
性に優れた鋼材に関するものである。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the crystal structure of a material in which the periodicity of atoms in the material is incomplete, and more particularly to a contact rust layer which is stable in an atmospheric corrosive environment. The present invention relates to a method for evaluating a rust structure of a weather resistant steel having the above and a steel material having excellent weather resistance.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】一般的に、材料中の原子の配列を評価す
る方法として、その周期性が高く乱れがない場合には、
結晶の空間群と単位胞における構成原子の位置を指定す
ることにより一義的に記述する方法がとられる(例え
ば、X線回折・散乱技術、菊田著、東京大学出版会、1
992、1章)。これに対して、例えばアモルファス
等、材料中の原子の配列の周期性が低いもしくは欠如し
ている場合には、周期性の分類により表記することはで
きないため、2つの原子間の相関を表す二体分布関数も
しくは動径分布関数(例えば、X線回折・散乱技術、菊
田著、東京大学出版会、1992、3章)により評価す
る。2. Description of the Related Art Generally, as a method for evaluating the arrangement of atoms in a material, if the periodicity is high and there is no disorder,
A unique description method is adopted by specifying the space group of the crystal and the positions of the constituent atoms in the unit cell (eg, X-ray diffraction / scattering technology, Kikuta, The University of Tokyo Press, 1
992, Chapter 1). On the other hand, if the periodicity of the atoms in the material is low or absent, such as amorphous, it cannot be expressed by the classification of the periodicity, and therefore the correlation between the two atoms is represented. It is evaluated by a body distribution function or a radial distribution function (for example, X-ray diffraction / scattering technique, written by Kikuta, The University of Tokyo Press, 1992, Chapter 3).
【0003】しかし、例えば鉄鋼表面に形成されるさび
のように、その原子の配列の周期性が中程度であり、前
述したどちらの方法を用いても、その構造を正しく評価
することができない場合が、実際の材料には多い。少量
のCu,Ni,Cr,P等の元素を添加した鋼材を、数
年以上の期間、大気中に暴露することによって、地鉄直
上に地鉄に密着し、大気腐食に対して地鉄層を保護する
機能を有する保護性さび層が形成され、塗装等の耐食処
理作業が不要ないわゆる耐候性鋼が製造され、橋梁など
の構造材料として使用されている。However, when the periodicity of the arrangement of the atoms is moderate, such as rust formed on the surface of steel, and the structure cannot be evaluated correctly using either of the above-mentioned methods. However, there are many actual materials. By exposing a steel material containing a small amount of elements such as Cu, Ni, Cr, and P to the atmosphere for a period of several years or more, the steel material adheres directly to the iron core and is exposed to atmospheric corrosion. A so-called weather-resistant steel that does not require a corrosion-resistant treatment such as painting is formed by using a protective rust layer having a function of protecting the steel, and is used as a structural material for bridges and the like.
【0004】従来、このような耐候性鋼の保護性さび層
の構造は、その主要部分が平均結晶粒径200nm以下
の微細粒のゲーサイト(α−FeOOH)で構成されて
いるとされていた。しかしながら、このような平均粒径
が200nm以下の微細粒のゲーサイトは、Cu,N
i,Cr,P等の元素が添加されていない普通鋼のさび
層にも存在しており、このような微細粒のゲーサイトの
存在が耐候性鋼の保護性さび層の耐候性機能の発現因子
のすべてではないことが、透過型電子顕微鏡などによる
さび層粒子の構造解析から明らかになった。Conventionally, the structure of the protective rust layer of such weather resistant steel is said to be composed mainly of fine-grained goethite (α-FeOOH) having an average crystal grain size of 200 nm or less. . However, such fine-grained goethite having an average grain size of 200 nm or less is Cu, N
It is also present in the rust layer of ordinary steel to which elements such as i, Cr, and P are not added, and the presence of such fine-grained goethite exerts the weather resistance function of the protective rust layer of the weather resistant steel. It was clarified that not all of the factors are due to the structural analysis of rust layer particles by transmission electron microscopy.
【0005】すなわち、耐候性鋼や普通鋼において、そ
の地鉄直上に密着するさび層中には様々な粒径の結晶粒
が存在し、その結晶構造は、電子線回折等の解析結果に
よると、ゲーサイト(α−FeOOH)が主体であると
されているものの、その他にも添加元素や暴露期間によ
って、アカガネイト(β−FeOOH)、レピドクロサ
イト(γ−FeOOH)、マグネタイト(Fe3O4)等
の結晶構造が存在し、さらにこれらの結晶構造は微細で
あるために、その結晶構造が判定し難い場合もあること
が判明した。さらに、結晶構造の欠陥等により、これら
の相に同定されない構造を有する場合もある。That is, in weather-resistant steel and ordinary steel, there are crystal grains of various grain sizes in the rust layer that adheres directly on the base steel, and the crystal structure is according to the analysis results of electron beam diffraction and the like. , Is mainly composed of goethite (α-FeOOH), but in addition, depending on additional elements and exposure period, acaganate (β-FeOOH), lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH), magnetite (Fe 3 O 4) It has been found that there are cases where it is difficult to determine the crystal structure because there are crystal structures such as), and these crystal structures are fine. Further, there may be a case where the phase has a structure that cannot be identified in these phases due to defects in the crystal structure.
【0006】本来、耐食処理作業が不要な耐候性鋼の表
面層に要求される機能は、それ自体が防食機能を有する
ことである。防食機能とは、表面防食層である保護さび
層形成後に地鉄がそれ以上腐食することを防ぐ機能であ
るから、表面防食層の要件の第一は、その層が腐食の原
因となるCl、O、H等の元素の外部環境からの侵入を
防止できる環境遮断機能を有することである。第二の要
件としては、使用環境下で安定であって変化しないこ
と、すなわち環境安定性を有することである。Originally, the function required of the surface layer of the weather resistant steel which does not require the corrosion resistance treatment is that the surface layer itself has a corrosion preventing function. The anticorrosion function is a function of preventing the base iron from further corroding after the formation of the protective rust layer that is the surface anticorrosion layer, so the first requirement for the surface anticorrosion layer is Cl, which causes corrosion of the layer, It is to have an environment blocking function capable of preventing the invasion of elements such as O and H from the external environment. The second requirement is that it is stable and does not change under the usage environment, that is, it has environmental stability.
【0007】環境遮断性を有するためには、まずさび自
体が緻密で、上記のような環境からの侵入が予想される
元素が透過しにくい構造を有することが必要である。し
たがって、さび層を構成する原子の並び、すなわち原子
相関が重要になる。従って、さび層の原子相関を解析す
ることにより、耐候性鋼等の特性評価が可能であるとい
えるが、さび層の構造の評価は、前述のとおり、周期性
が完全な材料に適用されている評価法、または周期性が
著しく低い材料に適用されている評価法、のどちらかに
よってのみ評価されていたために、耐候性鋼等の特性と
該耐候性鋼上に形成されたさび層の構造との相関は不明
瞭であった。In order to have an environmental barrier property, it is first necessary that the rust itself be dense and have a structure in which it is difficult for the elements that are expected to enter from the environment as described above to permeate. Therefore, the arrangement of atoms forming the rust layer, that is, the atomic correlation becomes important. Therefore, it can be said that by analyzing the atomic correlation of the rust layer, it is possible to evaluate the characteristics of weathering steel, etc.However, as described above, the evaluation of the structure of the rust layer is applied to materials with perfect periodicity. Of the weather resistant steel and the structure of the rust layer formed on the weather resistant steel because the evaluation was performed only by the evaluation method applied to a material having a remarkably low periodicity. The correlation with was unclear.
【0008】[0008]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明は、X線分析法
を用いて周期性が不完全である材料の構造を評価する方
法、特に耐候性鋼のさび層の結晶構造を解析することに
より、その耐候性を評価する方法を提供し、前記評価法
により原子相関を制御した保護性さび層を有する耐候性
に優れた鋼材を確実に提供することを目的とするもので
ある。DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a method for evaluating the structure of a material having incomplete periodicity by using an X-ray analysis method, and particularly by analyzing the crystal structure of the rust layer of weathering steel. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for evaluating the weather resistance thereof, and to reliably provide a steel material having excellent weather resistance having a protective rust layer whose atomic correlation is controlled by the evaluation method.
【0009】[0009]
【課題を解決するための手段】発明者らは、中程度の周
期性をもつ材料の構造評価が、特徴的な原子配列により
評価でき、これによりさび層の結晶構造の評価が可能で
あることを見出した。さらに、前記評価法により、原子
相関を制御した保護性さび層を有する耐候性に優れた鋼
材を提供可能であることを見出した。本発明は、かかる
知見を基に完成されたもので、その要旨とするところ
は、以下の通りである。
(1)材料の原子の配列を評価する方法において、該材
料における任意の結晶ユニットX内の近接する2つの原
子i、jを結ぶベクトルVijと、別の任意の結晶ユニッ
トY内の近接する2つの原子k、lを結ぶベクトルVkl
について、前記両ベクトル間の距離をr、角度をθとす
るとき、ベクトルVijとベクトルVklが距離r、角度θ
と関係を満たす位置に原子i、j、k、lを見出す確率
を示す関数A(r,θ)により原子の配列状態を評価す
る材料の結晶構造評価法。The inventors of the present invention can evaluate the structure of a material having a medium periodicity by a characteristic atomic arrangement, which allows the crystal structure of a rust layer to be evaluated. Found. Further, it was found that the above evaluation method can provide a steel material having a protective rust layer whose atomic correlation is controlled and having excellent weather resistance. The present invention has been completed based on such findings, and the gist thereof is as follows. (1) In a method of evaluating the arrangement of atoms of a material, a vector V ij connecting two adjacent atoms i and j in an arbitrary crystal unit X of the material and an adjacent vector in another arbitrary crystal unit Y Vector V kl connecting two atoms k and l
Regarding, regarding the distance between the two vectors r and the angle θ, the vector V ij and the vector V kl are the distance r and the angle θ.
A crystal structure evaluation method for a material, which evaluates the arrangement state of atoms by a function A (r, θ) indicating the probability of finding atoms i, j, k, and l at a position satisfying the relation.
【0010】(2)前記材料が、鋼材のさび層である
(1)記載の材料の結晶構造評価法。
(3)鋼材表面に生成され、地鉄に密着しているさび層
を有する鋼材であって、該鋼材が質量%にて、Cu:
0.1%以上3%以下、Ni:0.1%以上6%以下の
範囲で、Cu、Niのいずれか一方もしくは両方を含有
し、残部が鉄および不可避的不純物からなり、さらに、
前記さび層が、さび層の任意の結晶ユニットX内の近接
する2つの原子a、bを結ぶベクトルVabと、別の任意
の結晶ユニットY内の近接する2つの原子c、dを結ぶ
ベクトルVcdについて、前記両ベクトル間の距離をr、
角度をθとするとき、ベクトルVabとベクトルVcdが距
離r、角度θと関係を満たす位置に原子a、b、c、d
を見出す確率を示す関数A(r,θ)において、θ=0
°および60゜にピーク値を有する鋼材であることを特
徴とする耐候性鋼に優れた鋼材。(2) The crystal structure evaluation method for a material according to (1), wherein the material is a rust layer of steel. (3) A steel material having a rust layer formed on the surface of the steel material and in close contact with the base steel, wherein the steel material is in a mass% of Cu:
0.1% or more and 3% or less, Ni: 0.1% or more and 6% or less, either or both of Cu and Ni are contained, and the balance consists of iron and inevitable impurities.
The rust layer connects a vector V ab connecting two adjacent atoms a and b in any crystal unit X of the rust layer and a vector connecting two adjacent atoms c and d in another crystal unit Y. For V cd , the distance between the two vectors is r,
When the angle is θ, the atoms a, b, c, d are located at positions where the vector V ab and the vector V cd satisfy the relationship with the distance r and the angle θ.
Θ = 0 in the function A (r, θ) indicating the probability of finding
A steel material excellent in weather resistance steel, which is a steel material having peak values at ° and 60 °.
【0011】[0011]
【発明の実施の形態】本発明は種々の材料の原子相関を
評価するために適用可能であるが、ここでは低合金鋼で
ある耐候性鋼表面に形成されるさびの構造解析を例とし
てその形態を説明する。耐候性鋼に形成されるさびの構
造のひとつであるゲーサイト(a−FeOOH)結晶構
造は、図1に示すように、Feの周りを合計6つのO、
OHが配位したFe(O,OH)6 構造ユニット(以
下、Fe(O,OH)6 ユニットと称する)が、互いに
配位子または結合子を共有することによりネットワーク
{Fe(O,OH)6 ネットワーク}を形成した構造で
ある。BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION The present invention can be applied to evaluate the atomic correlation of various materials. Here, the structural analysis of rust formed on the surface of weathering steel, which is a low alloy steel, is taken as an example. The form will be described. As shown in FIG. 1, a goethite (a-FeOOH) crystal structure, which is one of the structures of rust formed on weather-resistant steel, has a total of 6 O around Fe,
Fe (O, OH) 6 structural units (hereinafter referred to as Fe (O, OH) 6 units) coordinated with OH share a ligand or a bond with each other to form a network {Fe (O, OH) 6 network} is formed.
【0012】しかし、耐鋼性鋼のさび層中には、添加元
素や暴露期間・腐食環境によってゲーサイト(α−Fe
OOH)以外にも、アカガネイト(β−FeOOH)、
レピドクロサイト(γ−FeOOH)、マグネタイト
(Fe3O4)等が存在し、これらの構造の違いは、Fe
(O,OH)6 ユニットの配列の違いによるネットワー
ク{Fe(O,OH)6 ネットワーク}の差異として理
解できる。また、実際の耐候性鋼表面に形成されるさび
の構造は、基本となるFe(O,OH)6 ユニット自体
は存在するものの、そのユニットには一部欠陥が存在
し、Fe(O,OH)6 ユニットの配列の周期性には乱
れが存在している。However, in the rust layer of the steel resistant steel, due to the additive elements, the exposure period and the corrosive environment, goethite (α-Fe
In addition to OOH), akaganate (β-FeOOH),
There are lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH), magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) and the like, and the difference between these structures is Fe.
This can be understood as a difference in the network {Fe (O, OH) 6 network} due to the difference in the arrangement of (O, OH) 6 units. Further, in the actual structure of rust formed on the surface of the weather resistant steel, although the basic Fe (O, OH) 6 unit itself is present, some defects are present in the unit, and Fe (O, OH) 6 is present. ) There is a disorder in the periodicity of the 6- unit sequence.
【0013】耐候性向上のためにはさび層による環境遮
断性が重要であり、そのためには、まずさび自体が緻密
で、腐食の原因となるCl、O、H等の元素の外部環境
からの侵入を防止できる環境遮断機能を有することが必
要である。さらに、使用環境下で安定で変化しないこ
と、すなわち環境安定性を有することが必要である。こ
のためには、さび層のFe(O,OH)6 ユニットの欠
陥が極めて少なく、かつそのユニットの配列が高いこと
が必要となる。さび層のネットワーク構造の決定は、X
線、電子線、中性子、イオンの散乱等の現象を定量的に
解析することにより行う。例えば、X線回折により得ら
れた情報からRMC(Reverse−Monte−C
arlo)法を用いて、ネットワーク構造を決定すれば
よい。その方法を以下に示す。In order to improve the weather resistance, the environmental barrier property of the rust layer is important. For that purpose, first, the rust itself is dense, and elements such as Cl, O, and H that cause corrosion are protected from the external environment. It is necessary to have an environment blocking function that can prevent intrusion. Furthermore, it is necessary to be stable and not change under the use environment, that is, to have environmental stability. For this purpose, it is necessary that Fe (O, OH) 6 units in the rust layer have extremely few defects and that the arrangement of the units is high. The network structure of the rust layer is determined by X
This is done by quantitatively analyzing phenomena such as scattering of rays, electron beams, neutrons, and ions. For example, from information obtained by X-ray diffraction, RMC (Reverse-Monte-C
The network structure may be determined using the (arlo) method. The method is shown below.
【0014】採取したさび試料について、X線ディフラ
クトメーターによる粉末回折図形の測定、および放射光
源を利用したX線異常散乱測定を行う。次に、測定され
た回折強度について吸収等の補正を行った後、動径分布
解析を行い、この結果からRMC(Reverse−M
onte−Carlo)法を用いて、前記さび試料のネ
ットワーク構造を決定する。該RMC(Reverse
−Monte−Carlo)法の手順を以下に示す。With respect to the collected rust sample, a powder diffraction pattern is measured by an X-ray diffractometer and an X-ray anomalous scattering measurement is performed by using a radiation source. Next, after correcting the measured diffraction intensity such as absorption, a radial distribution analysis is performed, and RMC (Reverse-M
The onte-Carlo method is used to determine the network structure of the rust sample. The RMC (Reverse)
The procedure of the -Monte-Carlo) method is shown below.
【0015】さびの仮の初期構造モデルを設定する。
ここで体積VのセルにN個の粒子が存在すると仮定し、
この数密度ρ0は実験値と同じにする。
前記初期配置から部分2体分布関数gij(r)を周期
的境界条件のもとで計算し、式(1)により部分構造因
子aij(Q)へ逆Fourier変換する。なお、部分
2体分布関数の概念およびFourier変換は結晶・
非結晶を問わず適用できる特徴がある。A tentative initial structural model of rust is set.
Here, assuming that there are N particles in a cell of volume V,
This number density ρ 0 is the same as the experimental value. A partial two-body distribution function g ij (r) is calculated from the initial arrangement under a periodic boundary condition, and an inverse Fourier transform is performed on the partial structure factor a ij (Q) by the equation (1). The concept of the partial two-body distribution function and the Fourier transform are
There is a feature that it can be applied regardless of whether it is amorphous or not.
【0016】[0016]
【数1】 [Equation 1]
【0017】ここで、gij(r)は部分2体分布関数、
Qは散乱ベクトル、rは原子間距離、ρ0は密度を示
す。さらに、部分構造因子から干渉関数:i(Q)、お
よび元素まわりの環境干渉関数:△ia (Q)を計算
し、式(2)で与えられる実験データとの統計変動差x
2を見積もる。Where g ij (r) is a partial two-body distribution function,
Q is the scattering vector, r is the interatomic distance, and ρ 0 is the density. Further, interference from the partial structure factor function: i (Q), and elemental surrounding environment interference function: △ i a (Q) is calculated, and statistical fluctuation difference x between the experimental data given in equation (2)
Estimate 2 .
【0018】[0018]
【数2】 [Equation 2]
【0019】なお、ここでσ2 は実験データにおける統
計誤差、i(Q)は実験により求めた部分構造因子、△
ia (Q)は異常散乱実験により求めた特定の元素まわ
りの環境干渉関数、ic (Qm )、△ic a (Qm )は
それぞれ構造モデルに基いて計算された部分構造因子、
特定の元素まわりの環境干渉関数である。
配置された粒子のうち1つを選びランダムな方向に動
かすことにより、エネルギーの異なる仮想的な原子配列
をつくる。
の手順により得られた新しい配置から、と同様の
手順で干渉関数を計算し、統計変動差x2 newを見積も
る。
もしx2 new<x2 oldならば新しい配置を採用し、x2
new>x2 oldならば前の配置に戻す。
〜の手順を繰り返し、計算結果が実験値と誤差の
範囲内で一致するまで行う。Here, σ 2 is the statistical error in the experimental data, i (Q) is the partial structure factor obtained by the experiment, and Δ
i a (Q) is an environmental interference function around a specific element obtained by an anomalous scattering experiment, i c (Q m ) and Δi c a (Q m ) are partial structure factors calculated based on the structural model, respectively.
It is an environmental interference function around a specific element. By selecting one of the arranged particles and moving it in a random direction, a virtual atomic arrangement with different energies is created. From the new arrangement obtained by the procedure of, the interference function is calculated by the same procedure as, and the statistical variation difference x 2 new is estimated. If x 2 new <x 2 old , the new placement is adopted and x 2
If new > x 2 old , return to the previous arrangement. Repeat the procedure from ~ until the calculation result agrees with the experimental value within the error range.
【0020】上記のように、実際の耐候性鋼表面に形成
されるさびの構造は、基本となるFe(O,OH)6 ユ
ニット自体は存在するものの、そのユニットには一部欠
陥が存在し、Fe(O,OH)6 ユニットの配列の周期
性には乱れが存在している。そのため、個々のFe
(O,OH)6 ユニットを代表するパラメータを適用す
ることにより、さびの構造の本質的な評価が可能にな
る。As described above, in the actual structure of the rust formed on the surface of the weather resistant steel, the basic Fe (O, OH) 6 unit itself exists, but some defects exist in the unit. , Fe (O, OH) 6 units have irregularities in the periodicity. Therefore, individual Fe
By applying a parameter representative of (O, OH) 6 units, an essential evaluation of the rust structure is possible.
【0021】図2は、Fe(O,OH)6 ユニットが完
全な周期性をもって配列したFe(O,OH)6 ネット
ワーク構造である場合の結晶構造モデル(一部分につい
て鉄原子のみ記述)である。ここで、任意のFe(O,
OH)6 ユニットA内の近接する2つの原子i、jを結
ぶベクトルVijと、別の任意のFe(O,OH)6 ユニ
ットB内の近接する2つの原子k、lを結ぶベクトルV
klを考えると、ベクトルVijは原子i、jを含むユニッ
トAの、ベクトルVklは原子k、lを含むユニットB
の、それぞれ代表とすることができる。両ベクトル間の
距離をr、角度をθとすると、両ベクトルの配列関係
は、ベクトルVijとベクトルVklが距離rおよび角度θ
の関係を満たす位置に原子i、j、k、lを見出す確率
を表す関数A(r,θ)により表記することができる。FIG. 2 is a crystal structure model in which an Fe (O, OH) 6 unit has a Fe (O, OH) 6 network structure in which the units are arranged with complete periodicity (only some iron atoms are described). Here, any Fe (O,
OH) 2 one atom i to close in 6 units A, and the vector V ij connecting j, another optional Fe (O, OH) 2 one atom k close in 6 units B, the vector V connecting l
Considering kl , the vector V ij is the unit A containing the atoms i and j, and the vector V kl is the unit B containing the atoms k and l.
, Respectively, can be represented. Assuming that the distance between the two vectors is r and the angle is θ, the arrangement relationship between the two vectors is that the vector V ij and the vector V kl are the distance r and the angle θ.
Can be represented by a function A (r, θ) that represents the probability of finding atoms i, j, k, and l at a position that satisfies the relationship of
【0022】すなわち、図2に示すようなFe(O,O
H)6 ユニットが完全な周期性を持って配列したFe
(O,OH)6 ネットワーク構造である場合には、ベク
トルV ijとベクトルVklの距離rおよび角度θが、距離
r=(隣接するユニット間の距離)×(整数=ユニット
間の数)で、かつθ=60°の条件を満たす場合にの
み、原子i、j、k、lが存在し、この条件において、
関数A(r,θ)は高いピーク値をもつことになる。That is, as shown in FIG. 2, Fe (O, O
H)6Fe in which the units are arranged with perfect periodicity
(O, OH)6If it is a network structure,
Toru V ijAnd vector VklThe distance r and the angle θ are
r = (distance between adjacent units) × (integer = unit
The number of intervals) and the condition of θ = 60 ° is satisfied.
There are only atoms i, j, k, l, and under these conditions,
The function A (r, θ) will have a high peak value.
【0023】これを図3を例に説明する。図3は、純鉄
を塩水中に2ヶ月放置した際に生じたさびについて、縦
軸にr、横軸にθをとり、関数A(r,θ)を図示した
ものである。関数A(r,θ)がθ=0°およびθ=6
0°に高いピーク値を有する場合(なお、その定義から
わかるように、θ=0°と、θ=180°、θ=60°
とθ=180−60=120°は、それぞれ本質的に同
じであるため、両者を含めて、以下θ=60°と表現す
る)はFe(O,OH)6 ユニットに欠陥および乱れが
極めて少なく、ほぼ完全な周期性をもって配列している
ことを示す。つまり、θ=0°および60°にピーク値
を有する場合は耐候性に優れたさびであり、有さない場
合は耐候性の劣るさびであると評価できる。This will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 3 shows a function A (r, θ) of rust generated when pure iron is left in salt water for 2 months, with r on the vertical axis and θ on the horizontal axis. Function A (r, θ) is θ = 0 ° and θ = 6
When it has a high peak value at 0 ° (as can be seen from the definition, θ = 0 °, θ = 180 °, θ = 60 °
And θ = 180−60 = 120 ° are essentially the same, so including them both will be expressed as θ = 60 ° below), Fe (O, OH) 6 units have very few defects and disturbances. , Shows that they are arranged with almost perfect periodicity. That is, it can be evaluated that the rust has excellent weather resistance when it has peak values at θ = 0 ° and 60 °, and the rust having poor weather resistance when it does not have it.
【0024】なお、前記角度θは、結晶の状態により若
干変動する。例えば、添加元素等によりFe(O,O
H)6 ユニットが歪んだ場合には、Fe(O,OH)6
ユニットに欠陥および乱れが極めてすくないことを示す
θ=0°およびθ=60°のピーク値は、数度程度ずれ
ることがあり、この場合にはそのずれを考慮したθの角
度範囲に高いピークが存在するように関数A(r,θ)
を設定すればよい。関数A(r,θ)がピーク値を有す
るか否かの判断は、関数A(r,θ)が特定の点(r,
θ)において平均値より高い値を示すか否かにより行
う。平均値は全空間に原子がランダムに配列した場合
と、完全に配列した場合の加重平均により求めればよ
い。また、実際の材料の評価は、基準材料を基に行うこ
とが多く、この場合は試験材料と基準材料の関数A
(r,θ)の差分関数The angle θ varies slightly depending on the crystal state. For example, Fe (O, O
H) 6 units are distorted, Fe (O, OH) 6
The peak values at θ = 0 ° and θ = 60 °, which indicate that the unit has very few defects and disturbances, may deviate by a few degrees, and in this case, a high peak appears in the angle range of θ considering the deviation. Function A (r, θ) to exist
Should be set. Whether or not the function A (r, θ) has a peak value is determined by the function A (r, θ) at a specific point (r,
θ) depending on whether or not the value is higher than the average value. The average value may be obtained by a weighted average when atoms are randomly arranged in the whole space and when atoms are completely arranged. In addition, the evaluation of the actual material is often performed based on the reference material. In this case, the function A of the test material and the reference material is used.
Difference function of (r, θ)
【0025】[0025]
【外1】 [Outer 1]
【0026】が正の値をもつ場合にピーク値を有するも
のと判断する。また、本発明は耐候性鋼のさび構造評価
法において、評価対象とする耐候性鋼は特に限定するも
のではない。本発明の耐候性鋼に優れた鋼材とは、鋼材
表面に生成され、地鉄に密着しているさび層を有する鋼
材であって、該鋼材が、Cu:0.1質量%以上3質量
%以下、Ni:0.1質量%以上6質量%以下の範囲
で、Cu、Niのいずれか一方もしくは両方を含有し、
残部が鉄および不可避的不純物からなり、さらに、該さ
び層がA(r,θ)において、θ=0°および60°に
ピーク値を有する鋼材である。ここで耐候性鋼に優れた
鋼材とは、平均腐食速度が0.01mm/年以下である
ことをいう。When has a positive value, it is determined to have a peak value. In the present invention, the rust structure evaluation method for weather resistant steel is not particularly limited to the weather resistant steel to be evaluated. The steel material excellent in the weather resistant steel of the present invention is a steel material having a rust layer formed on the surface of the steel material and in close contact with the base iron, and the steel material is Cu: 0.1% by mass or more and 3% by mass or more. In the following, in the range of Ni: 0.1% by mass or more and 6% by mass or less, one or both of Cu and Ni is contained,
The balance is iron and unavoidable impurities, and the rust layer is a steel material having peak values at θ = 0 ° and 60 ° in A (r, θ). Here, the steel material excellent in weather resistant steel means that the average corrosion rate is 0.01 mm / year or less.
【0027】前記さび層がA(r,θ)において、θ=
0°および60°にピークを有する場合、さびのFe
(O,OH)6 ユニットの欠陥が極めて少なく、かつそ
のユニットの配列の周期性が高い。そのため、形成され
るさびの結晶粒径も小さく、さび自体が緻密で、腐食の
原因となるCl、O、H等の元素の外部環境からの侵入
を防止できる環境遮断機能を有することになる。さら
に、使用環境下で安定であって変化しないことに対応
し、耐候性に優れた鋼材となる。When the rust layer is A (r, θ), θ =
Fe with rust when it has peaks at 0 ° and 60 °
The defects of (O, OH) 6 units are extremely small, and the periodicity of the arrangement of the units is high. Therefore, the crystal grain size of the rust formed is small, the rust itself is dense, and it has an environmental barrier function capable of preventing the invasion of elements such as Cl, O, and H, which cause corrosion, from the external environment. Further, it is a steel material that is stable under the use environment and does not change and has excellent weather resistance.
【0028】また、保護性さびの生成方法は、表面に生
成を促進する物質を塗布することによっても良いし、自
然に生成させても良い。さび層を構成する成分について
は、ゲーサイト、マグネタイト、不活性非晶質さびなど
が安定性の観点から望ましい。粒子充填後の空隙をさら
に埋める反応を促進するためには、ゲーサイト、アカガ
ネイト、レピドクロサイト、活性非晶質さび等が微量に
混在した方が効率的に環境遮断機能を高めることができ
る。The protective rust may be formed by coating the surface with a substance that promotes the formation, or may be formed naturally. As a component forming the rust layer, goethite, magnetite, inert amorphous rust and the like are preferable from the viewpoint of stability. In order to accelerate the reaction of further filling the voids after the particles are filled, the environmental barrier function can be efficiently enhanced by mixing a small amount of goethite, acaganate, lepidocrocite, active amorphous rust and the like.
【0029】本発明者が調査した範囲では、Cu:0.
1質量%以上3質量%以下、Ni:0.1質量%以上6
質量%以下の範囲で、Cu、Niのいずれか一方もしく
は両方を含有し、残部が鉄および不可避的不純物からな
る場合、該さび層がA(r,θ)において、θ=0°お
よび60°にピーク値を有し耐候性鋼に優れた鋼材を得
ることができる。これは、これらの元素の添加により、
さびの発生の初期反応の起点となる反応サイトが多くな
り多数の点から反応が生成する結果、最終的に得られる
組織が微細となるからである。In the range investigated by the present inventors, Cu: 0.
1 mass% or more and 3 mass% or less, Ni: 0.1 mass% or more 6
When one or both of Cu and Ni are contained in the range of not more than mass% and the balance consists of iron and unavoidable impurities, the rust layer has A = 0, 60 ° in A (r, θ). It is possible to obtain a steel material having a peak value in the and excellent weather resistance steel. This is due to the addition of these elements
This is because there are many reaction sites that are the starting points of the initial reaction of rust generation, and the reaction is generated from many points, so that the finally obtained structure becomes fine.
【0030】また、これらの元素の添加は、形成される
さびそのものをイオン遮断機能の高いものに変化させる
効果もある。これらの効果の発現のためにはCu:0.
1質量%以上、Ni:0.1質量%以上のいずれか一方
もしくは両方を含有させることが必要になる。一方、元
素の添加量が多くなると、さびの構造が大きく変化し、
耐候性が劣化するようになる。そのため、Cu:3%以
下、Ni:6%以下であることが望ましい。The addition of these elements also has the effect of changing the formed rust itself into one having a high ion blocking function. In order to realize these effects, Cu: 0.
It is necessary to contain one or both of 1 mass% or more and Ni: 0.1 mass% or more. On the other hand, when the amount of element added increases, the structure of rust changes significantly,
The weather resistance will deteriorate. Therefore, it is desirable that Cu: 3% or less and Ni: 6% or less.
【0031】[0031]
【実施例】(実施例1)純鉄、純チタン、ステンレス
(SUS304)を塩水中に2ヶ月放置した際に生じた
さびを本発明の方法により評価することにより関数A
(r,θ)を得た。純鉄の結果を図3に示す。例えば、
距離r=0.9nmにおいて、θ=0°、60°、12
0°、180°に高いピークに観察され、このさび層に
おけるFe(O,OH)6 ユニットの配列の周期性が高
いことを示している。本発明の方法では、ある2組の原
子のペアiとj、kとlの相関を、両者の距離rと角度
θにより表現しているために、ある距離に存在するペア
の方位関係がはっきりわかり、構造と特性の関係が明瞭
である。EXAMPLES Example 1 Pure A, pure titanium, and stainless (SUS304) were left to stand in salt water for 2 months, and the rust generated by the method was evaluated by the method of the present invention.
(R, θ) was obtained. The result of pure iron is shown in FIG. For example,
Θ = 0 °, 60 °, 12 at a distance r = 0.9 nm
High peaks were observed at 0 ° and 180 °, which indicates that the periodicity of the arrangement of Fe (O, OH) 6 units in this rust layer is high. In the method of the present invention, the correlation between two pairs of atoms i and j and k and l is expressed by the distance r and the angle θ of the two, so that the azimuth relationship of the pairs existing at a certain distance is clear. Obvious, the relationship between structure and properties is clear.
【0032】(比較例1)純鉄を塩水中に2ヶ月放置し
た際に生じたさびを、従来の構造評価法のひとつである
XAFS(X−ray Absorption Fin
e−structures:X線吸収微細構造)法によ
り評価し、動径分布関数を求めた。その結果を図4に示
す。この従来法では、距離rにある2つの原子間の相関
のみしかわからず、ピークの帰属は困難であるため詳細
な構造がわからず、さらに原子対の方位関係に関する情
報は得られなかった。(Comparative Example 1) Rust generated when pure iron was left in salt water for 2 months was evaluated by XAFS (X-ray Absorption Fin), which is one of the conventional structural evaluation methods.
e-structures: X-ray absorption fine structure) method, and a radial distribution function was obtained. The result is shown in FIG. In this conventional method, only the correlation between the two atoms at the distance r is known, and it is difficult to assign the peaks, so the detailed structure is not known, and further, the information on the azimuth relationship between the atom pairs cannot be obtained.
【0033】(実施例2)本発明の耐候性鋼(Fe−
0.6質量%Cr−0.3質量%Cu−0.5質量%M
n−0.5質量%Si−0.08質量%P)を田園地域
に31年放置した際に生じたさびを、同様の条件で放置
した普通鋼に生じたさびを標準材料として、本発明の方
法により評価することにより関数(Example 2) The weather resistant steel of the present invention (Fe-
0.6 mass% Cr-0.3 mass% Cu-0.5 mass% M
n-0.5 mass% Si-0.08 mass% P) was used in the present invention, with the rust formed when the steel was left standing in the rural area for 31 years as the standard material. Function by evaluating by the method of
【0034】[0034]
【外2】 [Outside 2]
【0035】を得た。それを図5に示す。ある2組の原
子のペアiとj、kとlの相関を両者の距離rと角度θ
により表現しているために、ある距離に存在するペアの
方位関係がはっきりわかり、構造と特性の関係を明瞭で
ある。例えば、距離r=0.9nmにおいて、θ=0
°、60°、120°、180°に高いピークに観察さ
れ、このさび層におけるFe(O,OH)6 ユニットの
配列の周期性が高いことを示している。Was obtained. It is shown in FIG. Correlation between two pairs of atoms i and j, k and l is shown as distance r and angle θ between them.
Since it is expressed by, the azimuth relation of the pair existing at a certain distance can be clearly understood, and the relation between the structure and the characteristic is clear. For example, at a distance r = 0.9 nm, θ = 0
High peaks were observed at °, 60 °, 120 ° and 180 °, indicating that the arrangement of Fe (O, OH) 6 units in this rust layer has a high periodicity.
【0036】(実施例3)CuやNi添加量の異なる鋼
材を海浜地帯に9年間大気暴露した。鋼材表面の最表面
の外層さびをワイアーブラシで機械的に削ぎ落とした後
に、地鉄に密着した密着さび層を採取し、本発明の方法
により評価を行った。そして、ピーク強度の値を、平均
値より20倍以上(◎)、平均値の5〜20倍(○)、
平均値の2〜5倍(△)、平均値の2倍以下(×)、の
四段階で評価した(表1)。ここで、平均値は全空間に
原子がランダムに配列した場合と、完全に配列した場合
の加重平均により求めた。本発明の耐候性鋼(本発明例
No.6〜13)は、いずれもA(r,θ)においてθ
=0゜および60゜付近のピーク強度の評価が、◎+
◎、◎+○、又は○+○であり、平均腐食速度が0.0
10mm/年以下であり、良好な耐食性を示した。従っ
て、本発明の耐候性鋼の耐候性が良好であるとともに、
本発明のA(r,θ)におけるθ=0゜および60゜付
近のピーク強度の評価法が、鋼材のさび層の評価法とし
て適用可能であることが示された。(Example 3) Steel materials having different amounts of Cu and Ni added were exposed to the beach area for 9 years in the atmosphere. After the outermost rust on the outermost surface of the steel material was mechanically scraped off with a wire brush, the adhesive rust layer adhered to the base steel was sampled and evaluated by the method of the present invention. Then, the value of the peak intensity is 20 times or more the average value (⊚), 5 to 20 times the average value (∘),
The evaluation was carried out in four grades of 2 to 5 times the average value (Δ) and 2 times or less the average value (x) (Table 1). Here, the average value was obtained by a weighted average when atoms were randomly arranged in the entire space and when atoms were completely arranged. All of the weather resistant steels of the present invention (Invention Example Nos. 6 to 13) have θ in A (r, θ).
The evaluation of the peak intensity near = 0 ° and 60 ° is ◎ +
◎, ◎ + ○, or ○ + ○ with an average corrosion rate of 0.0
It was 10 mm / year or less, and showed good corrosion resistance. Therefore, while the weather resistance of the weather resistant steel of the present invention is good,
It was shown that the evaluation method of the peak strength in the vicinity of θ = 0 ° and 60 ° in A (r, θ) of the present invention can be applied as the evaluation method of the rust layer of the steel material.
【0037】[0037]
【表1】 [Table 1]
【0038】(比較例2)実施例3と同様に、CuやN
i添加量の異なる鋼材を海浜地帯に大気暴露した。鋼材
表面の最表面の外層さびをワイアーブラシで機械的に削
ぎ落とした後に、地鉄に密着した密着さび層を採取し、
実施例3と同様に本発明の方法により評価を行った(表
1)。比較例の耐候性鋼(比較例No.1〜5)は、い
ずれもA(r,θ)においてθ=0゜および60゜付近
のピーク強度の評価が、○+△、△+△、△+×、また
は×+×であり、平均腐食速度が0.010mm/年よ
り大きく、耐食性が悪い。(Comparative Example 2) As in Example 3, Cu and N
Steels with different amounts of i were exposed to the atmosphere in the beach area. After the outer layer rust on the outermost surface of the steel material was mechanically scraped off with a wire brush, the adhesion rust layer adhered to the base steel was collected,
Evaluation was performed by the method of the present invention in the same manner as in Example 3 (Table 1). The weather resistant steels of Comparative Examples (Comparative Examples Nos. 1 to 5) were evaluated as A + (+, Δ), Δ + Δ, and Δ in the peak strengths near θ = 0 ° and 60 ° in A (r, θ). ++ or XXX, the average corrosion rate is greater than 0.010 mm / year, and the corrosion resistance is poor.
【0039】[0039]
【発明の効果】以上述べたように、本発明により、その
周期性が不完全である材料の構造を評価することができ
た。そして、鋼材表面に生成され、地鉄に密着している
さび層を有する鋼材であって、該鋼材が質量%にて、C
u:0.1%以上3%以下、Ni:0.1%以上6%以
下の範囲で、Cu、Niのいずれか一方もしくは両方を
含有し、残部が鉄および不可避的不純物からなり、さら
に、該さび層がA(r,θ)において、θ=0゜および
60゜にピーク値を有する鋼材であり、十分に低い平均
腐食速度をもたらす密着さび層を有する鋼材を提供でき
た。本発明の鋼材は、塗装等の特別な表面処理を施さな
くとも確実に優れた耐候性を得ることができ、環境負荷
低減や経済性の観点からも、産業上極めて価値の高い発
明であるといえる。As described above, according to the present invention, the structure of a material whose periodicity is incomplete can be evaluated. A steel material having a rust layer formed on the surface of the steel material and in close contact with the base steel, wherein the steel material is C in mass%, C
u: 0.1% or more and 3% or less, Ni: 0.1% or more and 6% or less, containing either or both of Cu and Ni, and the balance consisting of iron and unavoidable impurities. The rust layer was a steel material having peak values at θ = 0 ° and 60 ° in A (r, θ), and it was possible to provide a steel material having an adherent rust layer which provided a sufficiently low average corrosion rate. The steel material of the present invention can surely obtain excellent weather resistance without being subjected to special surface treatment such as painting, and is also an industrially extremely valuable invention from the viewpoint of environmental load reduction and economical efficiency. I can say.
【図1】a−FeOOHの結晶構造の模式図を示す図で
ある。FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a schematic view of a crystal structure of a-FeOOH.
【図2】Fe(O,OH)6 ユニットが完全な周期性を
もって配列した場合の結晶構造モデル(一部分について
鉄原子のみ記述)の模式図を示す図である。FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a schematic diagram of a crystal structure model (only a part of iron atoms is described) where Fe (O, OH) 6 units are arranged with complete periodicity.
【図3】純鉄を塩水中に2ヶ月放置した際に生じたさび
を本発明の方法により評価することにより得られた関数
A(r,θ)を示す図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a function A (r, θ) obtained by evaluating the rust generated when pure iron is left in salt water for 2 months by the method of the present invention.
【図4】純鉄を塩水中に2ヶ月放置した際に生じたさび
を、従来の構造評価法のひとつであるXAFS(X−r
ay Absorption Fine−struct
ures:X線吸収微細構造)法により評価し、求めら
れた動径分布関数を示す図である。FIG. 4 shows rust generated when pure iron is left in salt water for 2 months, which is one of conventional structure evaluation methods, XAFS (X-r
ay Absorption Fine-structure
ures: X-ray absorption fine structure) method and is a diagram showing a determined radial distribution function.
【図5】純鉄を塩水中に2ヶ月放置した際に生じたさび
を本発明の方法により評価することにより得られた関数
A(r,θ)を示す図である。FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a function A (r, θ) obtained by evaluating the rust generated when pure iron is left in salt water for 2 months by the method of the present invention.
フロントページの続き (72)発明者 早稲田 嘉夫 宮城県仙台市青葉区片平2−1−1 東北 大学 多元物質科学研究所内 (72)発明者 鈴木 茂 宮城県仙台市青葉区片平2−1−1 東北 大学 多元物質科学研究所内 (72)発明者 鈴木 環輝 千葉県富津市新富20−1 新日本製鐵株式 会社技術開発本部内 (72)発明者 紀平 寛 千葉県富津市新富20−1 新日本製鐵株式 会社技術開発本部内 Fターム(参考) 2G001 AA01 AA03 AA04 AA05 BA23 CA01 KA01 KA08 KA09 LA02 MA04 NA10 NA11 NA13 NA17Continued front page (72) Inventor Yoshio Waseda 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture Inside Institute for Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials (72) Inventor Shigeru Suzuki 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture Inside Institute for Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials (72) Inventor Tamaki Suzuki 20-1 Shintomi, Futtsu-shi, Chiba Nippon Steel shares Company Technology Development Division (72) Inventor Hiroshi Kihira 20-1 Shintomi, Futtsu-shi, Chiba Nippon Steel shares Company Technology Development Division F term (reference) 2G001 AA01 AA03 AA04 AA05 BA23 CA01 KA01 KA08 KA09 LA02 MA04 NA10 NA11 NA13 NA17
Claims (3)
て、該材料における任意の結晶ユニットX内の近接する
2つの原子i、jを結ぶベクトルVijと、別の任意の結
晶ユニットY内の近接する2つの原子k、lを結ぶベク
トルVklについて、前記両ベクトル間の距離をr、角度
をθとするとき、ベクトルVijとベクトルVklが距離
r、角度θと関係を満たす位置に原子i、j、k、lを
見出す確率を示す関数A(r,θ)により原子の配列状
態を評価する材料の結晶構造評価法。1. A method for evaluating an arrangement of atoms of a material, wherein a vector V ij connecting two adjacent atoms i, j in an arbitrary crystal unit X of the material and another arbitrary crystal unit Y For a vector V kl connecting two adjacent atoms k and l, where the distance between the two vectors is r and the angle is θ, the vector V ij and the vector V kl are positioned so as to satisfy the relationship with the distance r and the angle θ. A crystal structure evaluation method for a material, which evaluates the arrangement state of atoms by a function A (r, θ) indicating the probability of finding atoms i, j, k, l.
1記載の材料の結晶構造評価法。2. The method for evaluating a crystal structure of a material according to claim 1, wherein the material is a rust layer of steel.
るさび層を有する鋼材であって、該鋼材が質量%にて、
Cu:0.1%以上3%以下、Ni:0.1%以上6%
以下の範囲で、Cu、Niのいずれか一方もしくは両方
を含有し、残部が鉄および不可避的不純物からなり、さ
らに、前記さび層が、さび層の任意の結晶ユニットX内
の近接する2つの原子a、bを結ぶベクトルVabと、別
の任意の結晶ユニットY内の近接する2つの原子c、d
を結ぶベクトルVcdについて、前記両ベクトル間の距離
をr、角度をθとするとき、ベクトルVabとベクトルV
cdが距離r、角度θと関係を満たす位置に原子a、b、
c、dを見出す確率を示す関数A(r,θ)で表わした
ときに、θ=0°および60゜に該関数がピーク値を示
すさび層であることを特徴とする耐候性鋼に優れた鋼
材。3. It is generated on the surface of steel and adheres to the base metal.
A steel material having a rubbing layer, wherein the steel material is mass%,
Cu: 0.1% to 3%, Ni: 0.1% to 6%
Either or both of Cu and Ni within the following range
And the balance consists of iron and unavoidable impurities,
In addition, the rust layer is in any crystal unit X of the rust layer.
Vector V connecting two adjacent atoms a and b ofabAnd another
Two adjacent atoms c, d in any crystal unit Y of
Vector V connectingcdFor, the distance between the two vectors
Where r is the angle and θ is the angle, the vector VabAnd vector V
cdAre atoms a, b, at positions that satisfy the relationship with the distance r and the angle θ.
It is represented by a function A (r, θ) that indicates the probability of finding c and d.
At times, the function shows peak values at θ = 0 ° and 60 °.
Steel excellent in weather resistance steel characterized by being a rust layer
Material.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002118774A JP3854533B2 (en) | 2002-04-22 | 2002-04-22 | Evaluation method of weatherability of rust layer of steel |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002118774A JP3854533B2 (en) | 2002-04-22 | 2002-04-22 | Evaluation method of weatherability of rust layer of steel |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2003315290A true JP2003315290A (en) | 2003-11-06 |
| JP3854533B2 JP3854533B2 (en) | 2006-12-06 |
Family
ID=29535520
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002118774A Expired - Fee Related JP3854533B2 (en) | 2002-04-22 | 2002-04-22 | Evaluation method of weatherability of rust layer of steel |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP3854533B2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005227251A (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2005-08-25 | Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Inst | Structure factor tensor element determination method and X-ray diffractometer utilization method therefor |
| JP2010164518A (en) * | 2009-01-19 | 2010-07-29 | Nippon Steel Corp | Method for evaluating weatherability of anticorrosion steel |
| JP2011127191A (en) * | 2009-12-18 | 2011-06-30 | Nippon Steel Corp | Sintered ore analysis method |
| JP2014044079A (en) * | 2012-08-24 | 2014-03-13 | Sumitomo Bakelite Co Ltd | Evaluation method for transparent composite sheet, transparent composite sheet product, and transparent composite sheet |
-
2002
- 2002-04-22 JP JP2002118774A patent/JP3854533B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005227251A (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2005-08-25 | Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Inst | Structure factor tensor element determination method and X-ray diffractometer utilization method therefor |
| JP2010164518A (en) * | 2009-01-19 | 2010-07-29 | Nippon Steel Corp | Method for evaluating weatherability of anticorrosion steel |
| JP2011127191A (en) * | 2009-12-18 | 2011-06-30 | Nippon Steel Corp | Sintered ore analysis method |
| JP2014044079A (en) * | 2012-08-24 | 2014-03-13 | Sumitomo Bakelite Co Ltd | Evaluation method for transparent composite sheet, transparent composite sheet product, and transparent composite sheet |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP3854533B2 (en) | 2006-12-06 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Morcillo et al. | Atmospheric corrosion of weathering steels. Overview for engineers. Part I: Basic concepts | |
| Wu et al. | Atmospheric corrosion behavior and mechanism of a Ni-advanced weathering steel in simulated tropical marine environment | |
| García et al. | New contributions to the understanding of rust layer formation in steels exposed to a total immersion test | |
| Asami et al. | In-depth distribution of rusts on a plain carbon steel and weathering steels exposed to coastal–industrial atmosphere for 17 years | |
| Cook | Spectroscopic identification of protective and non-protective corrosion coatings on steel structures in marine environments | |
| Kim et al. | Effects of Alloying Elements (Cr, Mn) on Corrosion Properties of the High‐Strength Steel in 3.5% NaCl Solution | |
| Abd El Haleem et al. | Environmental factors affecting the corrosion behaviour of reinforcing steel: I. The early stage of passive film formation in Ca (OH) 2 solutions | |
| Hao et al. | A study of the evolution of rust on Mo–Cu-bearing fire-resistant steel submitted to simulated atmospheric corrosion | |
| Townsend et al. | Structure of rust on weathering steel in rural and industrial environments | |
| Kimura et al. | Characterization of nanostructure of rusts formed on weathering steel | |
| Cook | Application of Mössbauer spectroscopy to the study of corrosion | |
| JP2003315290A (en) | Evaluation method of crystal structure of materials and steel materials with excellent weather resistance | |
| Konishi et al. | Characterization of rust layer formed on Fe, Fe-Ni and Fe-Cr alloys exposed to Cl-rich environment by Cl and Fe K-Edge XANES measurements | |
| Syed | Atmospheric corrosion of carbon steel at marine sites in Saudi Arabia | |
| Kimura et al. | Nanoscopic mechanism of protective-rusts formation on weathering steel surfaces | |
| Alhozaimy et al. | Protection against reinforcement corrosion using phosphoric acid-based rust converter | |
| Takahashi et al. | Corrosion behavior of carbon steel coated with a zinc‐rich paint containing metallic compounds under wet and dry cyclic conditions | |
| Kolics et al. | Sorption of sulfate and chloride anions on a well-characterized Al 2024 electrode | |
| JPH08184549A (en) | Evaluation method for corrosion resistance of metallic materials | |
| JP5025852B2 (en) | Method for controlling the appearance of weather resistance of steel | |
| Cook | In-situ identification of iron--zinc intermetallics in galvannealed steel coatings and iron oxides on exposed steel | |
| El-Moneim et al. | XPS and electrochemical studies on the corrosion behaviour of sputter-deposited amorphous Mn-Nb alloys in a neutral chloride solution | |
| Gancs et al. | Interaction of chromate with aluminum in NaCl solutions | |
| Samide et al. | Surface study of the corrosion of carbon steel in solutions of ammonium salts using Mössbauer spectrometry | |
| Kimura et al. | Various scale analyses to create functioning corrosion products |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20040902 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20060502 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20060530 |
|
| A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20060731 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20060829 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20060908 |
|
| R151 | Written notification of patent or utility model registration |
Ref document number: 3854533 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100915 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100915 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110915 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120915 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120915 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130915 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130915 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| S531 | Written request for registration of change of domicile |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130915 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130915 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |