[go: up one dir, main page]

JP2001099883A - Method for locating fault on transmission line - Google Patents

Method for locating fault on transmission line

Info

Publication number
JP2001099883A
JP2001099883A JP28283499A JP28283499A JP2001099883A JP 2001099883 A JP2001099883 A JP 2001099883A JP 28283499 A JP28283499 A JP 28283499A JP 28283499 A JP28283499 A JP 28283499A JP 2001099883 A JP2001099883 A JP 2001099883A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
fault
accident
matrix
current
section
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP28283499A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3756026B2 (en
Inventor
Yasutaka Yamaguchi
保孝 山口
Koichi Tsuji
浩一 辻
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kinkei System Corp
Original Assignee
Kinkei System Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kinkei System Corp filed Critical Kinkei System Corp
Priority to JP28283499A priority Critical patent/JP3756026B2/en
Publication of JP2001099883A publication Critical patent/JP2001099883A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3756026B2 publication Critical patent/JP3756026B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Locating Faults (AREA)
  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To enhance location accuracy of a fault section or fault point on a transmission line. SOLUTION: A fault section or fault point on a transmission line is located by formulating a transmission circuit according to Kirchhoff's first and second laws using the telemetric data of a generator and a load in order to grasp the system state prevailing before fault, adding the formula of measurements of means for detection the current and voltage of the transmission line at the time of fault, decreasing the number of variables by specifying a sound line through matrix operation and then solving simultaneous equations including the fault current and the fault point as variables.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、風雨,氷雪,落
雷,樹木・飛来物の接触あるいは鳥獣害等の種々の原因
により送電線に事故が発生した場合にその事故区間及び
事故地点を特定する送電線の故障点標定方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention specifies an accident section and an accident point when an accident occurs in a transmission line due to various causes such as wind and rain, ice and snow, lightning, contact with trees and flying objects, and bird and animal damage. The present invention relates to a method for locating a fault on a transmission line.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】かかる送電線の故障点標定方法として
は、従来、キルヒホッフの第二法則に基づくインピーダ
ンス形が主流であったが、送電回路にキルヒホッフの第
一法則及び第二法則を適用したマトリックス演算形が一
部実用化されている。後者の方式は、事故に関係するな
るべく多くの情報を取り込み、それをキルヒホッフの法
則で定式化し、電線回路の式と事故地点での式とを導出
してこれをニュートン・ラフソン法で解くもので、事故
線数が多い場合に前者の方式よりも標定精度が高いと考
えられている。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, as a method of locating a fault in a transmission line, an impedance type based on Kirchhoff's second law has been mainly used, but a matrix in which Kirchhoff's first and second laws are applied to a power transmission circuit. Some arithmetic forms have been put to practical use. The latter method captures as much information as possible about the accident, formulates it using Kirchhoff's law, derives the equation for the electric wire circuit and the equation at the point of the accident, and solves this using the Newton-Raphson method. It is considered that the orientation accuracy is higher than the former method when the number of accident lines is large.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上記従
来構成では、事故区間及び事故地点の標定精度が必ずし
も十分ではなく、標定精度の一層の向上が望まれてい
た。本発明は、上記実情に鑑みてなされたものであっ
て、その目的は、事故区間及び事故地点の標定精度の向
上を図る点にある。
However, in the above-mentioned conventional configuration, the location accuracy of the accident section and the location of the accident is not always sufficient, and it has been desired to further improve the location accuracy. The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and an object of the present invention is to improve the location accuracy of an accident section and an accident point.

【0004】[0004]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記請求項1記載の構成
を備えることにより、事故前の系統状態を把握するため
発電機及び前記負荷のテレメーター情報を用いて、送電
回路をキルヒホッフの第一及び第二法則で定式化し、こ
れに事故時の電圧検出手段及び電流検出手段の計測値の
式を付加し、マトリックス演算によって健全線を特定す
ることにより変数を減少させる。これによって、事故が
生じていない健全線に関する変数は連立方程式から除外
することが可能となり、連立方程式の冗長度を増大させ
て、変数の数に対して利用できる情報量が多くなる。ま
た、このように冗長度を増大させることによって誤差を
含む要素を抑制することが可能となる。もって、送電線
の事故区間及び事故地点の標定精度の向上を図ることが
できるに至った。
According to the first aspect of the present invention, a power transmission circuit is configured by Kirchhoff's first system using a generator and telemeter information of the load in order to grasp a system state before an accident. And formulas of the measured values of the voltage detection means and the current detection means at the time of an accident are added to the formula, and the variables are reduced by specifying a healthy line by a matrix operation. This makes it possible to exclude variables relating to a healthy line in which no accident has occurred from the simultaneous equations, thereby increasing the redundancy of the simultaneous equations and increasing the amount of information available for the number of variables. Also, by increasing the redundancy in this way, it is possible to suppress elements including errors. As a result, it was possible to improve the accuracy of locating the faulty section and the faulty point of the transmission line.

【0005】又、上記請求項2記載の構成を備えること
により、電圧・電流非計測端の事故中の振る舞いを事故
前の前記発電機及び前記負荷のテレメーター情報と潮流
計算結果から求めた等価回路で模擬し、前記送電回路の
各ノードにキルヒホッフの第一法則を適用し、前記発電
機は内部誘起電圧が一定の三相電源とリアクタンスの直
列回路で模擬し、前記負荷は事故中に電流が変化しない
定電流特性負荷で模擬することにより前記送電回路の定
式化を行う。すなわち、送電回路を定式化するにあたっ
て、上述のようにして、送電線に接続される発電機や負
荷を模擬してキルヒホッフの第一法則を適用すること
で、必ずしも発電機や負荷の接続箇所において直接的に
電流・電圧を測定しなくても、事故区間及び事故地点の
特定を行うことができ、装置の設置負担の軽減等を図る
ことが可能となる。
[0005] Further, by providing the configuration according to the second aspect, the behavior of the voltage / current non-measurement end during an accident is obtained from the telemeter information of the generator and the load before the accident and the power flow calculation result. Circuit, applying Kirchhoff's first law to each node of the power transmission circuit, the generator was simulated with a series circuit of a three-phase power supply and reactance with constant internal induced voltage, and the load The power transmission circuit is formulated by simulating the load with a constant current characteristic that does not change. That is, in formulating the power transmission circuit, as described above, by applying Kirchhoff's first law by simulating the generator and load connected to the transmission line, it is not always necessary to connect the generator and load at the connection point. Without directly measuring the current and voltage, the accident section and the accident point can be specified, and the installation load of the device can be reduced.

【0006】又、上記請求項3記載の構成を備えること
により、各送電線を線路亘長に比例する相互インピーダ
ンスとπ形回路で模擬した対地静電容量とで模擬するこ
とにより前記送電回路の定式化を行う。これによって、
送電線の簡素且つ的確な定式化が可能となる。
Further, by providing the configuration of the third aspect, each transmission line is simulated with a mutual impedance proportional to the length of the line and a ground capacitance simulated with a π-type circuit, whereby Formulate. by this,
A simple and accurate formulation of the transmission line is possible.

【0007】又、上記請求項4記載の構成を備えること
により、送電線の接続点間の区間夫々の回路方程式をキ
ルヒホッフの第一法則で結合し、これに前記電圧検出手
段及び電流検出手段の計測値の式を付加して、左辺を変
数マトリックスとし且つ右辺を定数マトリックスとする
マトリックス演算式を作成し、前記左辺の変数マトリッ
クスを、新たな変数を定義することにより少なくとも後
の処理で利用する成分については要素が定数のみからな
る線形なマトリックスに変形することにより前記送電回
路の定式化を行う。従って、変数の部分と定数の部分と
を分離してマトリックスを作成することで、後のマトリ
ックス演算を容易に行うことができる。
In addition, by providing the configuration according to the fourth aspect, the circuit equations of the sections between the connection points of the transmission line are connected by Kirchhoff's first law, and the circuit equations of the voltage detection means and the current detection means are connected to this. A measurement formula is added to create a matrix operation formula in which the left side is a variable matrix and the right side is a constant matrix, and the left side variable matrix is used in at least later processing by defining a new variable. For the components, the power transmission circuit is formulated by transforming the components into a linear matrix consisting only of constants. Therefore, by creating a matrix by separating the variable part and the constant part, the subsequent matrix operation can be easily performed.

【0008】又、上記請求項5記載の構成を備えること
により、事故地点の相対位置をkとして事故点電流if
とk・if だけを変数とするマトリックスとなるように
予め前記送電回路の定式化を行い、事故時において電圧
検出手段及び電流検出手段の計測値と前記右辺の定数マ
トリックスとの演算から定数ベクトルを作成し、これに
よって得られる複素連立方程式を解く。すなわち、事故
前に処理できることは予め処理しておき、事故発生時に
おいて事故区間及び事故地点を特定するために必要な処
理を少なくすることができ、事故区間及び事故地点の特
定を迅速に行うことができる。
Further, by providing the configuration according to claim 5, the fault point current if
Is formulated in advance so as to be a matrix having only the variables k and if as constants. In the event of an accident, a constant vector is obtained by calculating the measured values of the voltage detecting means and the current detecting means and the constant matrix on the right side. And solve the resulting complex system of equations. In other words, what can be processed before the accident is processed in advance, the processing required to identify the accident section and the accident point when the accident occurs can be reduced, and the accident section and the accident point can be quickly identified. Can be.

【0009】又、上記請求項6記載の構成を備えること
により、前記事故点電流if とk・if だけを変数とす
るマトリックスにおいて、区間の中央地点で事故が発生
したと仮定して事故点電流if を求め、健全線か否かを
識別するための設定値より少ない場合、その線を健全線
と判定して前記事故点電流if とk・if だけを変数と
するマトリックスにおける該当する線の事故点電流if
をif =0として、従ってk・if =0として、これに
よって得られる複素連立方程式を解く。すなわち、ある
線で事故が発生したものと仮定した場合に流れる事故点
電流を求めて、その求めた事故点電流の値が事故点電流
として妥当なものか否かによって、その線が健全線か否
かを判別するのであり、健全線か否かの判断を容易且つ
簡便に行える。送電線の事故の約95%は、3線以下の
事故であるので、上述のように健全線を判定すること
で、変数を大きく減らすことができ、マトリックスの対
角化等により極めて容易に且つ精度良く事故区間及び事
故地点を特定できる。又、故障点電流が小さい微地絡の
場合でも精度良く解を求めることが可能となる。
With the configuration according to the sixth aspect of the present invention, in the matrix in which only the fault point currents if and k · if are used as variables, it is assumed that the fault has occurred at the center of the section. determined point current i f, is less than the set value for identifying whether healthy line, in a matrix that only the variable by determining the line between healthy line the fault point current i f and k · i f Fault point current if of the relevant line
Let i f = 0, and thus k · i f = 0, solve the resulting complex system of equations. That is, the fault point current flowing when it is assumed that an accident has occurred on a certain line is determined, and whether the line is a sound line depends on whether the obtained fault point current value is appropriate as the fault point current. Therefore, it can be easily and easily determined whether or not the line is sound. Approximately 95% of transmission line accidents are accidents involving three or less lines. Therefore, by determining a healthy line as described above, the number of variables can be greatly reduced. Accident sections and accident points can be specified with high accuracy. Further, a solution can be obtained with high accuracy even in the case of a small ground fault where the fault point current is small.

【0010】又、上記請求項7記載の構成を備えること
により、前記事故点電流if とk・if だけを変数とす
るマトリックスにおいて、前記複素連立方程式の式の数
が変数の数より大であるときは、前記事故点電流if
k・if だけを変数とするマトリックスをマトリックス
の対角化によって直接解くことにより前記相対位置kを
求め、前記式の数が変数の数より小であるときは、ニュ
ートン・ラフソン法によって前記相対位置kを求める。
すなわち、複素連立方程式の式の数に余裕があるとき
は、直接的に式を解いて単純な処理で精度の良い解を求
め、余裕がないときは、ニュートン・ラフソン法による
繰り返し計算で極力精度の良い解を求めて、状況に応じ
て可及的に事故区間及び事故地点の標定精度の向上を図
るのである。
Further, with the configuration according to the seventh aspect, in the matrix having only the fault point currents if and k · if as variables, the number of equations of the complex simultaneous equations is larger than the number of variables. Is satisfied, the relative position k is obtained by directly solving a matrix having only the fault point currents if and k · if as variables by diagonalization of the matrix, and the number of the equations is smaller than the number of variables. If, the relative position k is obtained by the Newton-Raphson method.
In other words, if there is room for the number of equations in the complex system of equations, directly solve the equation to obtain an accurate solution with simple processing, and if there is no room, use the Newton-Raphson method to calculate the accuracy as much as possible. The aim is to improve the localization accuracy of the accident section and the accident point as much as possible according to the situation.

【0011】又、上記請求項8記載の構成を備えること
により、送電線の接続点間の区間毎に事故地点の相対位
置kを求め、その求めた値が、0〜1.0の範囲にある
とき、その区間が事故区間であると特定する。従って、
送電線の接続点間の区間毎に事故地点の相対位置kを求
めることで、事故区間を的確に特定できる。
In addition, by providing the configuration according to claim 8, the relative position k of the accident point is obtained for each section between the connection points of the transmission line, and the obtained value is set in a range of 0 to 1.0. At some point, the section is identified as an accident section. Therefore,
By calculating the relative position k of the accident point for each section between the transmission line connection points, the accident section can be accurately specified.

【0012】[0012]

【発明の実施の形態】本発明を、三相交流2回線送電線
の3端子系統構成に適用した場合の実施の形態について
説明する。以下、等価回路の基本的な考え方から順次説
明する。 1.故障点標定の基本式 故障点標定の基礎理論はキルヒホッフの第一,第二法則
を使って事故現象を定式化し,この非線形方程式から事
故点の位置と事故点の抵抗値を求めるものであるが,こ
の理論が広い分野で一般的に適用できるようマトリック
スの表現と解法にいくつかの工夫をしている。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment in which the present invention is applied to a three-terminal system configuration of a three-phase AC two-circuit transmission line will be described. Hereinafter, the basic concept of the equivalent circuit will be sequentially described. 1. Basic formula for fault location The basic theory of fault location is to formulate the accident phenomenon using Kirchhoff's first and second laws, and to calculate the location of the fault and the resistance at the fault from this nonlinear equation. In order to make this theory applicable to a wide range of fields, we have made some efforts to express and solve the matrix.

【0013】以下、図1に示す三相交流2回線送電線の
3端子系統構成を対象に説明する。送電線の接続点から
接続点までを区間と呼び,図1は3区間で構成されてい
るとする。送電線の亘長上において,短絡・地絡などの
事故が発生したときに,事故区間と事故地点を算出す
る。電気所の母線には発電機,負荷が接続されるが送電
線の分岐点には接続されない。本例では区間1の母線1
側の情報を取り込むように電圧検出手段としてのPT
(変成器)及び電流検出手段としてのCT(変流器)が
配置されている。遠隔地点の発電機出力計量装置WG,
変電所負荷計量装置WLの測定情報がテレメーターで演
算処理装置に入力されている。この故障標定理論では、
複数地点の同時事故は考慮せず(両端計測方式では解け
るが地点多重事故は極めて少ない),いずれかの区間の
一ヶ所とする。分岐点の近くで事故が発生した場合事故
区間を判定できないことがあるので,各区間で事故があ
ると仮想し事故点の位置をそれぞれ求めることとする。
A description will now be given of a three-terminal system configuration of the three-phase AC two-circuit transmission line shown in FIG. A section from a connection point of a transmission line to a connection point is called a section, and FIG. 1 is assumed to be configured with three sections. When an accident such as a short circuit or ground fault occurs over the length of the transmission line, the accident section and accident point are calculated. The generator and load are connected to the bus of the substation, but not to the branch point of the transmission line. In this example, bus 1 of section 1
PT as voltage detection means
(Transformer) and CT (current transformer) as current detecting means. Remote generator output metering device WG,
The measurement information of the substation load weighing device WL is input to the arithmetic processing device by a telemeter. In this fault location theory,
Simultaneous accidents at multiple points are not taken into account (both ends can be solved, but multiple point accidents are very few), and one point in any section is used. If an accident occurs near the branch point, it may not be possible to determine the accident section. Therefore, it is assumed that there is an accident in each section, and the position of the accident point is determined.

【0014】1.1事故区間におけるキルヒホッフの式 一つの区間を各相毎に表示したのが図2である。1号線
1L,2号線2Lにまたがる事故が発生するので,相を
No.1〜No.6により表示する。送電線の送受端子
の電圧,電流に添え字S,Rを付け表示してある。kは
事故点までの距離で全長を1とおいた割合によって相対
位置として示してあり,S端子至近端事故のときk=0
である。以下の式の展開でベクトルを小文字の太字(2
回線送電線の場合,6次ベクトル),行列を大文字の太
字(6×6次,3×3次)で表現する。但し、明細書本
文の文章中及び式に一部においては、ベクトル又はマト
リックスであっても表記の都合上通常の文字によって表
示している。hS は事故点のS側各相電流、hR は事故
点のR側各相電流、vf は事故点の各相電圧、if は事
故点の各相電流、r(1)〜r(6)は各相の事故点抵
抗、it は塔脚電流、ut は鉄塔の電位、zt は塔脚イ
ンピーダンス、Zは送電線の相互インピーダンス、yは
各線の対地静電容量である。これらの諸元で事故区間の
電圧,電流の関係を定式化すると(1)〜(8)とな
る。ここで各変数v,i,h,ut は複素数で,k,r
は実数である。
1.1 Kirchhoff's Equation in Accident Section FIG. 2 shows one section for each phase. Since an accident occurs over Line 1 1L and Line 2 2L, the phase is set to No. 1 to No. 6 is displayed. The suffixes S and R are attached to the voltage and current of the transmission / reception terminal of the transmission line. k is the distance to the accident point and is shown as a relative position by the ratio of the total length being 1;
It is. In the expansion of the following expression, convert the vector to lowercase bold (2
In the case of a circuit transmission line, a 6th-order vector) and a matrix are represented by bold capital letters (6x6th, 3x3rd order). However, in the text of the specification text and a part of the formulas, even vectors or matrices are represented by ordinary characters for convenience of description. h S is S side phase currents of the fault point, h R is R-side phase currents of the fault point, v f is the phase voltage of the fault point, i f the phase currents of the fault point, r (1) ~r (6) the respective phases of the fault point resistance, i t is the tower foot current, u t the potential of the steel tower, z t is the tower foot impedance, Z is the mutual impedance of the transmission line, y is the earth capacitance of each line . Formulating the relationship between the voltage and current in the fault section based on these specifications gives (1) to (8). Wherein each variable v, i, h, in the u t is a complex number, k, r
Is a real number.

【数1】 (1)〜(6)の式を変数を共通にしてマトリックス表
現すると(9)式となる。
(Equation 1) When the expressions (1) to (6) are expressed in a matrix with common variables, the expression (9) is obtained.

【数2】 S ,iR にかかるマトリックスの要素に変数を入れな
いように、新たに変数k・if を変数として設定して、
(9)式を更に対角化すると(10)式となる。
(Equation 2) A new variable k · if is set as a variable so as not to put a variable in an element of the matrix relating to i S and i R.
Formula (9) is further diagonalized to formula (10).

【数3】 (10)式で送電線の両端電流が、両端電圧vS ,vR
と事故点電流if の関数として表せることがわかる。F
4 ,F5 の部分の式を事故区間の式として後で使用す
る。
(Equation 3) In equation (10), the current at both ends of the transmission line is the voltage at both ends v S , v R
It can be seen that this can be expressed as a function of the fault point current if . F
4, later using an expression portion of F 5 as an expression for fault section.

【0015】1.2 発電機と負荷の模擬 両端計測方式の場合(10)式のiS ,iR ,vS ,v
R が既知であり連立方程式は解けるが,片端計測方式の
場合更に式を増す必要がある。事故前のテレメーター値
あるいは推定値を使い発電機と負荷を等価回路で定式化
し,各ノードにキルヒホッフの第一法則を適用する。
1.2 Simulating the generator and load In the case of the two-end measurement method, i S , i R , v S , v
Although R is known and simultaneous equations can be solved, it is necessary to further increase the equation in the case of single-ended measurement. The generator and load are formulated in an equivalent circuit using the telemeter values or estimated values before the accident, and Kirchhoff's first law is applied to each node.

【0016】(1)事前潮流計算 図1で発電機出力と負荷の値がそれぞれWG ,WL で与
えられ,計測端の電圧,電流が与えられた場合,遠隔端
子のノード電圧は潮流計算で求めることができる。さら
に,この電圧とWG ,WL から,負荷と発電機の等価回
路を次のように求める。
[0016] (1) pre-load flow diagram 1 the generator output and the load values respectively W G, given by W L, when the voltage of the measuring end, current is applied, the node voltage of the remote terminal power flow Can be obtained by Moreover, finding the voltage and W G, from W L, an equivalent circuit of the load and generator as follows.

【0017】(2)発電機の等価回路 発電機を、図3に示すように、3相対称内部誘起電圧e
G と直列インピーダンスzG で表すと,発電機端子電圧
G と相電流iG の関係は(11)式の通りとなる。
(2) Equivalent Circuit of Generator The generator is connected to a three-phase symmetric internal induced voltage e as shown in FIG.
When expressed by G and the series impedance z G , the relationship between the generator terminal voltage v G and the phase current i G is as shown in Expression (11).

【数4】 (11)式の内部誘起電圧eG とインピーダンスzG
次の2点を満足するように設定する。 ・事故前の発電機出力がWG であること。 ・発電機の至近端事故での故障電流が発電機の次過渡リ
アクタンス(xd '')で短絡されたものに等しいこと。
一般に事故前の端子電圧をvGOとすると内部誘起電圧e
GOは eGO=vGO+jxd ''・(WG * /vGO * ) ………… (12) 但し,*は共役を表す。発電機の次過渡リアクタンスは
運転状態に関係ないので y=1/jxd '' iG =yG GO−YG G =iGO−YG G ………… (13) (13)式の第2項は定数マトリックスに組み込むこと
ができる。第1項は発電機出力によって決まる固定分で
事前に設定する。以下の式の展開ではiGOをi G と読み
かえて表現する。
(Equation 4)The internal induced voltage e in equation (11)GAnd impedance zGIs
Set to satisfy the following two points.・ The generator output before the accident is WGThat.・ The fault current in the near-end accident of the generator
Actance (xd'').
Generally, the terminal voltage before the accident isGOThen the internal induced voltage e
GOIs eGO= VGO+ Jxd'' ・ (WG */ VGO *) (12) where * represents conjugate. The next transient reactance of the generator is
Y = 1 / jx because it is not related to the driving conditiond'' iG= YGeGO-YGvG= IGO-YGvG ………… (13) Incorporate the second term in equation (13) into a constant matrix
Can be. The first term is a fixed component determined by the generator output
Set in advance. In the expansion of the following equation, iGOTo i GRead
Express it instead.

【0018】(3)負荷の等価回路 負荷の電圧特性は通常定インピーダンス特性,定電流特
性,定電力特性に分類されている。全国的調査結果によ
ると定電力特性60%,定インピーダンス特性40%の
割合が実測に近いことがわかっており,ここでは定電流
特性を採用することする。事故前の負荷をWL ,電圧を
LOとすると,負荷電流iL は, iL =(WL /vLO* ………… (14) で表わされる。
(3) Equivalent Circuit of Load The load voltage characteristics are generally classified into constant impedance characteristics, constant current characteristics, and constant power characteristics. According to the results of a nationwide survey, it is known that the ratio of the constant power characteristic of 60% and the constant impedance characteristic of 40% is close to the actual measurement, and here the constant current characteristic is adopted. Assuming that the load before the accident is W L and the voltage is v LO , the load current i L is represented by i L = (W L / v LO ) * (14)

【0019】1.3各区間マトリックスの統合 図1の3端子送電線を例にしてマトリックスを統合し,
全系の電圧・電流の関係を定式化する。 (イ)キルヒホッフの第2法則 (10)式のF4 及びF5 を各区間に適用すると(1
5)式のF-2nd部分となる。 (ロ)キルヒホッフの第1法則 ノード1は計測端であるので除き,その他のノードにつ
いてキルヒホッフの第一法則を適用するとF-1stの部分
の式となる。右辺のiG ,iL は前節の式から求めるも
ので運用状態によって変化する可変部分である。 (ハ)電圧等式 送電線の分岐点あるいは電気所の母線で送電線は接続さ
れる。一方ここでは送電線の両端電圧は区間毎,個別の
変数として扱っているので区間接続の式が必要になる。
それが(15)式のF-VEQの部分となる。 (ニ)PT,CT計測値の式 図1で母線の電圧はPTで送電線の電流はCTで計測さ
れる。この計測値をもとにして事故様相を特定する。
1.3 Integration of Each Section Matrix The matrix is integrated using the three-terminal transmission line of FIG. 1 as an example.
Formulate the relationship between voltage and current for the entire system. (B) the F 4 and F 5 of the second law (10) of the Kirchhoff is applied to each section (1
5) This is the F- 2nd part of the equation. (B) Kirchhoff's first law Except for node 1 which is the measuring end, applying Kirchhoff's first law to the other nodes gives the formula of F- 1st . I G and i L on the right side are obtained from the equations in the previous section, and are variable portions that change depending on the operation state. (C) Voltage equation The transmission line is connected at the branch point of the transmission line or the bus at the substation. On the other hand, in this case, the voltage between both ends of the transmission line is treated as an individual variable for each section, so an equation for section connection is required.
That is the F- VEQ part of equation (15). (D) Formulas of PT and CT measurement values In FIG. 1, the voltage of the bus is measured by PT, and the current of the transmission line is measured by CT. The accident situation is specified based on the measured values.

【数5】 (15)式のFPCT の部分がそれで,片端,両端計測そ
れぞれについて,変数と計測値を対応させる。右辺の定
数マトリックスは適用する送電線毎にあらかじめ計算さ
れ,計測値を代入すると列ベクトルbW となる。 bW =〔iG ,iL ,vPT,iCT1 ,iCT2 T ………… (16)
(Equation 5) (15) portion of the formula F PCT it, one end, the both ends measured to correspond with the measured value variable. Right side of the constant matrices are pre-calculated for each transmission line to be applied, the column vector b W Substituting the measured value. b W = [i G, i L, v PT , i CT1, i CT2 ] T ............ (16)

【0020】1.4 統合マトリックスの対角化 (15)式を対角化すると(17)式となる。最終的に
事故点の位置kと事故点抵抗r1 〜r6 を求めたいわけ
であるが,状態変数を減らして方程式をコンパクトにす
るための手順を順次説明する。(17)式で事故点電流
F を表すマトリックスDf は(15)式の対角化で一
度の計算されているが、仮想する事故区間によって対象
とする一つが選択される。
1.4 Diagonalization of Integrated Matrix When equation (15) is diagonalized, equation (17) is obtained. Finally, it is desired to obtain the position k of the fault point and the fault point resistances r 1 to r 6. The procedure for reducing the state variables and making the equation compact will be described sequentially. Although the matrix D f representing the fault point current i F in the equation (17) is calculated once by diagonalization in the equation (15), one target is selected according to a virtual fault section.

【数6】 (17)式の非対角化行の式を新しく定義したDf ,D
B マトリックスで表すと(18)式となる。
(Equation 6) (17) D f , D which newly defines the off-diagonalized row equation
When expressed in a B matrix, the expression (18) is obtained.

【数7】 1.5 連立方程式の作成 故障点標定に関係する基本式を縮約したわけであるが、
残ったのはk,if の関係を示すコンパクトな(18)
式となった。(18)式の変数と式の数を図1の例で示
すと、変数の数に関しては、複素数のif が6個、実数
のkが1個の計13個となり、又、式の数に関しては、
複素数の式が6本で計12個となる。従って、(18)
式だけではkを求められない。
(Equation 7) 1.5 Creation of simultaneous equations Although the basic equations related to fault location have been reduced,
What remains is a compact (18) showing the relationship between k and if.
It became an expression. (18) When the variables of the equation and the number of the equations are shown in the example of FIG. 1, regarding the number of the variables, the complex number if is 6 and the real number k is 1, which is a total of 13; about,
There are a total of twelve complex number equations. Therefore, (18)
K cannot be determined only by the equation.

【0021】2.連立方程式の解法 (18)式は事故前の系統状態と事故中の計測端の情報
をすべて含んでおり,この連立方程式を解いて事故点の
位置kを求める。 2.1 両端計測方式 複数の接続点で変成器PT等の計測情報が得られる両端
計測方式では、式の数が変数の数に比較して余裕がある
場合(18)式からkを解くことは容易である。(1
8)式を単位化し、(19)式の通りk・if とif
右辺定数で表し、その比からkが求まる。尚、右辺DB
は固定マトリックスで事前に設定されており、事故時入
力データとの演算で列ベクトルbk が計算される。すな
わち、
2. Solution of simultaneous equations Equation (18) contains all information on the system state before the accident and the measuring end during the accident, and solves the simultaneous equations to find the position k of the accident point. 2.1 Both-ends measurement method In the two-ends measurement method in which measurement information of the transformer PT and the like can be obtained at a plurality of connection points, solve k from equation (18) when the number of equations has a margin compared to the number of variables. Is easy. (1
Equation (8) is unitized, and as shown in equation (19), k · if and if are represented by constants on the right side, and k is obtained from the ratio. In addition, right side D B
Is preset in a fixed matrix, and a column vector b k is calculated by an operation with input data at the time of an accident. That is,

【数8】 (i) =(k・if(i))/if(i)=bk(1+6)/bk(i) kは各線毎に求まり、その平均値kavを事故点の位置と
する。
(Equation 8) k (i) = (k · if (i) ) / if (i) = b k (1 + 6) / b k (i) k is obtained for each line, and the average value k av of the accident point is calculated. Position.

【数9】 2.2 片端計測方式 (1)解法 (18)式のDfは、(6×12)の次数を持つマトリ
ックスでこの左半分を対角化したあとのマトリックスを
(20)のようにDK ,DBKとする。 1・if +kDK f =DBK・bW …………… (20) ((20)式において、「1」は単位行列を示す) 更に右辺定数項をbK とすると(21)式が得られる。
(Equation 9) 2.2 Df at one end measuring system (1) solution (18) is, D K as the matrix after diagonalized the left half in the matrix with the degree of (6 × 12) (20), DBK . 1 · i f + kD K i f = D BK · b W ............... (20) (( in 20), "1" indicates a unit matrix) further when the right-hand side constant term and b K (21) An expression is obtained.

【数10】 ここで、事故地点を区間の中央と仮定して、すなわち if =(1+kDK -1k …………… (22) において、k=0.5として事故点電流if を求める。
このように求めたif の値が、設定しきい値(例えば、
f の最大値の1/2)より少ない電線の場合、その線
を事故が発生していない健全線と判定して、その線
(n)に関するif(n)とk・if(n)とを変数から消去す
る。
(Equation 10) Here, assuming that the accident point is at the center of the section, that is, if = (1 + kD K ) −1 b k (22), the accident point current if is obtained by setting k = 0.5.
The value of if obtained in this way is equal to a set threshold value (for example,
For less wire than 1/2) of the maximum value of i f, it is determined that the sound line fault has not occurred to the line, the line (n) regarding i f (n) and k · i f (n ) Is deleted from the variable.

【0022】(1−1) 複素連立方程式の式の数と変
数の数との差が大であるとき 例えば、#4〜#6線が健全線の場合、(21)式は
(23)式となり、
(1-1) When the difference between the number of complex simultaneous equations and the number of variables is large. For example, if lines # 4 to # 6 are sound lines, equation (21) becomes equation (23). Becomes

【数11】 左辺のk・if の部分を対角化すると(24)式とな
り、この時の右辺定数ベクトルbKuは、if とk・if
の解となり、(25)式から#n線のkが求まる。 k(n) =k・if(n)/if(n)=bKu(n) /bKu(n+3) …… (25) このようにして求めたk(n) が0〜1.0の範囲にある
とき、その区間が事故区間であると特定する。又、kの
平均値kavは(26)式から求まる。 kav=(1/3)Σk(n) …………… (26) 尚、事故線数が少なく(23)式の変数の数が6より少
ない場合、k・if の列の要素の値が大きい行を選び式
の数と変数の数とを等しくして対角化を行い、k(n)
標定精度の向上を図る。
[Equation 11] The diagonalization of the k · if portion on the left side gives equation (24). At this time, the right side constant vector b Ku is given by if and k · if
And k of the #n line is obtained from the equation (25). k (n) = k · if (n) / if (n) = b Ku (n) / b Ku (n + 3) (25) When k (n) obtained in this way is 0 to When it is in the range of 1.0, the section is specified as an accident section. Further, the average value k av of k is obtained from equation (26). k av = (1/3) Note .SIGMA.k (n) ............... (26), when the number of accidents ruling is small (23) of the variable is less than 6, the sequence of elements of k · i f A row having a large value is selected, the number of formulas is made equal to the number of variables, and diagonalization is performed to improve the k (n) orientation accuracy.

【0023】(1−2) 複素連立方程式の式の数と変
数の数との差が小であるとき 健全線と判定できる線の数が少なく、複素連立方程式の
式の数と変数の数との差が小であるとき、ニュートン・
ラフソン法の繰り返し計算によって相対位置kを求め
る。より具体的には、健全線とは判定できず事故を起こ
している可能性のある線夫々についてif とk・if
を独立した変数と考え、夫々の式をk,i f (n) につい
て偏微分する形でニュートン・ラフソン法を適用して、
繰り返し計算によりkの修正量Δkが許容値より小さく
なったときに計算を終了し、kを求める。そのようにし
て求めたkが0〜1.0の範囲にあるとき、その区間が
事故区間であると特定する。 (1−3) 健全線の数が零である場合 この場合は、上述のように(18)式のみでは、解を求
めることができないので、更に式を追加して連立方程式
を解く。具体的には、事故点ブランチの式すなわち計測
端のCT計測値から事故点の塔脚電流it を、
(1-2) The number and variation of complex simultaneous equations
When the difference from the number is small, the number of lines that can be
When the difference between the number of expressions and the number of variables is small, Newton
Find relative position k by repeated calculation of Rafson method
You. More specifically, it cannot be determined that the line is healthy, and an accident occurs.
I for each of the lines that may befAnd kifWhen
Are independent variables, and each expression is k, i f (n)About
Apply the Newton-Raphson method in the form of partial differentiation
The amount of correction Δk of k is smaller than the allowable value by iterative calculation
When it becomes, the calculation is terminated and k is obtained. Like that
When k obtained in the above is in the range of 0 to 1.0, the section is
Identify the accident section. (1-3) When the Number of Healthy Lines is Zero In this case, as described above, the solution is obtained only by Expression (18).
It is not possible to add
Solve. Specifically, the formula of the accident point branch,
Tower leg current i at the fault point from the CT measurement value at the endtTo

【数12】 と推定して、(7)式に代入することにより式を追加で
きる。尚、この式で、YSUM は、CT設置点から見た対
地充電容量の合計値である。この後、連立方程式をニュ
ートン・ラフソン法の繰り返し計算によって相対位置k
を求める。そのようにして求めたkが0〜1.0の範囲
にあるとき、その区間が事故区間であると特定する。
(Equation 12) And by substituting into equation (7), the equation can be added. In this equation, Y SUM is the total value of the ground charge capacity viewed from the CT installation point. Thereafter, the simultaneous equations are calculated by the Newton-Raphson method repeatedly to calculate the relative position k.
Ask for. When k thus obtained is in the range of 0 to 1.0, the section is specified as an accident section.

【0024】(2)標定精度 (23)式〜(26)式による解法の精度が従来の非線
形連立方程式をニュートン・ラフソン法で解く方法より
も優れていることを図2のような2端子2回線送電線を
例に説明する。非計測端には定電流負荷iL が接続され
ており、左辺D K ,右辺DBKマトリックスは、(27)
式で表すことができる。
(2) Orientation Accuracy The accuracy of the solution by the equations (23) to (26) is the
From solving Newton-Raphson method for simultaneous equations
The two-terminal two-circuit transmission line shown in Fig. 2
An example is described. Constant current load i at the non-measurement endLIs connected
And the left side D K, Right side DBKThe matrix is (27)
It can be represented by an equation.

【数13】 この式でDは以下の式で定義されるものである。2回線
送電線における6線間の相互インピーダンスをZとし
て、Z-1を4分割してA1 〜A4 とする。
(Equation 13) In this equation, D is defined by the following equation. Assuming that the mutual impedance between the six lines in the two-line transmission line is Z, Z −1 is divided into four to be A 1 to A 4 .

【数14】 ここで、 D≡A12 -1(A1 +A2 +A3 +A4 ) ……………… (29) と定義する。通常、送電線は、1号線と2号線とで対象
配置となっており、 A1 =A4 ,A2 =A3 ,A12=A34 …………… (30) が成立する。(30)式の関係があるので、(29)式
のDは(31)式のように単位行列となる。 D=A12 -1(2A12)=2・1 …………… (31) ((31)式の最右辺で「1」は、単位行列である) (30),(31)を(27)式の代入すると(32)
式が得られる。
[Equation 14] Here, D≡A 12 −1 (A 1 + A 2 + A 3 + A 4 ) is defined as (29). Normally, the transmission lines are symmetrically arranged at Line 1 and Line 2, and A 1 = A 4 , A 2 = A 3 , A 12 = A 34 (30) is established. Since there is a relationship of Expression (30), D in Expression (29) is a unit matrix as in Expression (31). D = A 12 −1 (2A 12 ) = 2.1 (31) (“1” on the right-hand side of the equation (31) is a unit matrix) 27) Substituting equation (32)
An expression is obtained.

【数15】 (23)式の例のように、#4〜#6線が健全線の場
合、#1〜#3の事故線(n)について、 k(n) =(k・if(n))/if(n) =(2iCT2(n)−iL(n))/(iCT1(n)+iCT2(n)−iL(n)) ………… (33) となり、この(33)式からkが求まる。(33)式は
送電線の相互インピーダンスZの影響を受けないことが
わかる。すなわち、A相,B相,C相の夫々に健全線が
1本以上あれば(33)式からkが求まり、送電線の相
互インピーダンスの影響を受けない。(32)式を合計
し、零相CT電流をI01,I02とすると、(34)式が
得られる。 k=2I02/(I01+I02) ………… (34) 但し、
(Equation 15) When the # 4 to # 6 lines are sound lines as in the example of Expression (23), k (n) = (k · if (n) ) / for the accident lines (n) of # 1 to # 3. if (n) = ( 2iCT2 (n) -iL (n) ) / ( iCT1 (n) + iCT2 (n) -iL (n) ) (33) K) is obtained from the equation. It can be seen that equation (33) is not affected by the mutual impedance Z of the transmission line. That is, if there is at least one healthy line in each of the A phase, the B phase, and the C phase, k is determined from the equation (33), and is not affected by the mutual impedance of the transmission line. When the equations (32) are summed and the zero-phase CT currents are I 01 and I 02 , the equation (34) is obtained. k = 2I 02 / (I 01 + I 02 ) (34) where

【数16】 このように、負荷電流iL の影響を受けない単純な式と
なる。すなわち1線地絡事故(1φG)の場合には負荷
電流の影響を受けないことになる。一般に、送電線の相
互インピーダンスZや負荷電流iL は正確な特定が必ず
しも容易ではなく誤差要因となるため、上述のようにそ
れらの影響を受けずに事故地点の相対位置kが特定でき
ることで、相対位置kの標定精度が高いことがわかる。
(Equation 16) Thus, a simple equation that is not affected by the load current i L is obtained. That is, in the case of a one-line ground fault (1φG), the load current is not affected. In general, since the mutual impedance Z and the load current i L of the transmission line are not always easy to specify accurately and cause an error, as described above, the relative position k of the accident point can be specified without being affected by them. It can be seen that the positioning accuracy of the relative position k is high.

【0025】3. シミュレーション計算例 以上説明した解法の実用性を検証するためプログラムを
作成し、154kV2回線2端子送電線(101.5k
m)を対象にシミュレーションを計算した。受電端には
240MWの発電機と300AのNGR(変圧器中性点
接地抵抗)を接続し、事故電流は汎用回路解析プログラ
ムであるEMTPで求めた。表1にこのシミュレーショ
ン結果を示す
3. Example of simulation calculation A program was created to verify the practicality of the solution described above, and a 154 kV two-circuit two-terminal transmission line (101.5 k
A simulation was calculated for m). A 240 MW generator and a 300 A NGR (transformer neutral point grounding resistor) were connected to the receiving end, and the fault current was determined by EMTP, a general-purpose circuit analysis program. Table 1 shows the simulation results.

【表1】 表1において、「従来型」として示しているのは、従来
のニュートン・ラフソン法によるものであり、k=0.
5,Rf=500Ωの1線地絡事故(1φG)に対し、
標定誤差は20.6%と実用性に乏しい状態であった。
これに対して、表1において「新型」として示す本発明
を適用した場合は、−2.6%と桁違いに精度が上がっ
ている。2φG(2線地絡事故),3φG(3線地絡事
故)についてもこの傾向は同じである。500Ωの地絡
は154kVでは30%程度のVoであり、本発明を適
用した場合は非常に高感度であることが分かる。
[Table 1] In Table 1, "conventional type" is indicated by the conventional Newton-Raphson method, where k = 0.
5, For one-line ground fault (1φG) with Rf = 500Ω,
The orientation error was 20.6%, which was poor for practical use.
On the other hand, when the present invention shown as "new type" in Table 1 is applied, the accuracy is increased by an order of magnitude to -2.6%. This tendency is the same for 2φG (two-line ground fault) and 3φG (three-line ground fault). The ground fault of 500Ω is Vo of about 30% at 154 kV, and it can be seen that the sensitivity is very high when the present invention is applied.

【0026】4. 故障点標定装置 以上説明した送電線の故障点標定方法の処理を、図1に
示す演算処理装置OPに実行させることによって、送電
線の故障点標定装置を構成することができる。前記送電
回路の定式化を、事故地点の相対位置をkとして事故点
電流if とk・if だけを変数とする上記(20)式又
は(21)式のマトリックスとなるように行って、予
め、演算処理装置OPに備えられたメモリ等の記憶手段
に記憶しておき、事故時においてPT計測値及びCT計
測値と右辺の定数マトリックスとの演算から定数ベクト
ルを作成し、これによって得られる複素連立方程式を解
くことにより、事故区間及び事故地点を特定する。複素
連立方程式を解く過程は、(22)式以降で説明した通
りである。
4. Failure Point Locating Apparatus By causing the processing unit OP shown in FIG. 1 to execute the processing of the transmission line failure point locating method described above, a transmission line failure point locating apparatus can be configured. Formulation of the power transmission circuit is performed such that the relative position of the fault point is k, and the fault point current if and only k · if are variables, and the matrix of the above formula (20) or (21) is obtained. It is stored in advance in a storage means such as a memory provided in the arithmetic processing unit OP, and in the event of an accident, a constant vector is created from an operation of the PT measurement value and the CT measurement value with the constant matrix on the right-hand side. By solving the complex simultaneous equations, an accident section and an accident point are specified. The process of solving the complex system of equations is as described in equation (22) and thereafter.

【0027】〔別実施形態〕以下、本発明の別実施形態
を列記する。 上記実施の形態では、本発明を三相交流2回線送電
線の3端子系統構成に適用した場合を例示しているが、
その他の種々の系統構成に適用できるのは明らかであ
る。 上記実施の形態では、健全線を特定するためにk=
0.5を(22)式に代入しているが、このときのkの
値は0.5近辺の値であっても良い。
[Other Embodiments] Hereinafter, other embodiments of the present invention will be listed. In the above embodiment, the case where the present invention is applied to a three-terminal system configuration of a three-phase AC two-circuit transmission line is illustrated.
Obviously, it can be applied to various other system configurations. In the above embodiment, k =
Although 0.5 is substituted into Expression (22), the value of k at this time may be a value around 0.5.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の実施の形態にかかる電力系統のシステ
ム構成図
FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram of a power system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】本発明の実施の形態にかかる2回線送電線の事
故区間の等価回路
FIG. 2 is an equivalent circuit of an accident section of a two-circuit transmission line according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図3】本発明の実施の形態にかかる発電機の等価回路FIG. 3 is an equivalent circuit of the generator according to the embodiment of the present invention.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

CT 電流検出手段 if 事故点電流 k 事故地点の相対位置 PT 電圧検出手段 yi 対地静電容量 Z 相互インピーダンスCT Current detecting means if Current of fault point k Relative position of fault point PT Voltage detecting means y i Capacitance to ground Z Mutual impedance

Claims (8)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 事故前の系統状態を把握するため発電機
及び前記負荷のテレメーター情報を用いて、送電回路を
キルヒホッフの第一及び第二法則で定式化し、これに事
故時の送電線の電流検出手段及び電圧検出手段の計測値
の式を付加し、マトリックス演算によって健全線を特定
することにより変数を減少させ、事故点電流と事故地点
を変数とする連立方程式を解くことによって事故区間及
び事故地点を特定する送電線の故障点標定方法。
1. A power transmission circuit is formulated by Kirchhoff's first and second laws using a generator and telemeter information of the load in order to grasp the state of the system before the accident. The equations of the measured values of the current detection means and the voltage detection means are added, the variables are reduced by specifying a healthy line by a matrix operation, and the fault section and the fault section are solved by solving a simultaneous equation using the fault point current and the fault point as variables. A method for locating a fault on a transmission line to identify the location of an accident.
【請求項2】 電圧・電流非計測端の事故中の振る舞い
を事故前の前記発電機及び前記負荷のテレメーター情報
と潮流計算結果から求めた等価回路で模擬し、前記送電
回路の各ノードにキルヒホッフの第一法則を適用し、前
記発電機は内部誘起電圧が一定の三相電源とリアクタン
スの直列回路で模擬し、前記負荷は事故中に電流が変化
しない定電流特性負荷で模擬することにより前記送電回
路の定式化を行う請求項1記載の送電線の故障点標定方
法。
2. The behavior of a voltage / current non-measurement end during an accident is simulated by an equivalent circuit obtained from telemeter information of the generator and the load before the accident and a power flow calculation result, and is applied to each node of the power transmission circuit. Applying Kirchhoff's first law, the generator is simulated by a series circuit of a three-phase power supply and a reactance in which the internally induced voltage is constant, and the load is simulated by a constant current characteristic load whose current does not change during an accident. The method of claim 1, wherein the power transmission circuit is formulated.
【請求項3】 各送電線を線路亘長に比例する相互イン
ピーダンスとπ形回路で模擬した対地静電容量とで模擬
することにより前記送電回路の定式化を行う請求項1又
は2記載の送電線の故障点標定方法。
3. The transmission system according to claim 1, wherein each power transmission line is formulated by simulating each transmission line with a mutual impedance proportional to the line length and a ground capacitance simulated by a π-type circuit. Fault location method for electric wires.
【請求項4】 送電線の接続点間の区間夫々の回路方程
式をキルヒホッフの第一法則で結合し、これに前記電圧
検出手段及び電流検出手段の計測値の式を付加して、左
辺を変数マトリックスとし且つ右辺を定数マトリックス
とするマトリックス演算式を作成し、前記左辺の変数マ
トリックスを、新たな変数を定義することにより少なく
とも後の処理で利用する成分については要素が定数のみ
からなる線形なマトリックスに変形することにより前記
送電回路の定式化を行う請求項1〜3のいずれか1項に
記載の送電線の故障点標定方法。
4. A circuit equation of each section between connection points of a transmission line is connected according to Kirchhoff's first law, and the equations of the measured values of the voltage detecting means and the current detecting means are added thereto. Create a matrix operation expression with a matrix and the right side as a constant matrix, and define a new variable for the variable matrix on the left side, and at least components used only in later processing are linear matrices whose elements are only constants. The transmission line fault locating method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the power transmission circuit is formulated by deforming the power transmission circuit into a fault.
【請求項5】 事故地点の相対位置をkとして事故点電
流if とk・if だけを変数とするマトリックスとなる
ように予め前記送電回路の定式化を行い、事故時におい
て電圧検出手段及び電流検出手段の計測値と前記右辺の
定数マトリックスとの演算から定数ベクトルを作成し、
これによって得られる複素連立方程式を解くことによ
り、事故区間及び事故地点を特定する請求項4記載の送
電線の故障点標定方法。
5. The power transmission circuit is preliminarily formulated so as to form a matrix having only the fault point current if and k · if as variables, with the relative position of the fault point as k. Create a constant vector from the calculation of the measured value of the current detection means and the constant matrix on the right side,
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the fault section and the fault point are specified by solving a complex simultaneous equation obtained by the calculation.
【請求項6】 前記事故点電流if とk・if だけを変
数とするマトリックスにおいて、区間の中央地点で事故
が発生したと仮定して事故点電流if を求め、健全線か
否かを識別するための設定値より少ない場合、その線を
健全線と判定して前記事故点電流if とk・if だけを
変数とするマトリックスにおける該当する線の事故点電
流if をif =0として、これによって得られる複素連
立方程式を解くことにより、事故区間及び事故地点を特
定する請求項5記載の送電線の故障点標定方法。
6. In a matrix using only the fault point currents if and k · if as variables, the fault point current if is determined assuming that an accident has occurred at the center of the section, and whether or not the fault line is sound is determined. If less than the set value for identifying the fault point current i f of the line corresponding in matrix that only the variable by determining the line between healthy line the fault point current i f and k · i f i f 6. The fault locating method for a transmission line according to claim 5, wherein the fault section and the fault point are specified by solving complex simultaneous equations obtained by setting = 0.
【請求項7】 前記事故点電流if とk・if だけを変
数とするマトリックスにおいて、前記複素連立方程式の
式の数が変数の数より大であるときは、前記事故点電流
f とk・if だけを変数とするマトリックスをマトリ
ックスの対角化によって直接解くことにより前記相対位
置kを求め、前記式の数が変数の数より小であるとき
は、ニュートン・ラフソン法によって前記相対位置kを
求める請求項5又は6記載の送電線の故障点標定方法。
7. In a matrix having only the fault point currents if and k · if as variables, when the number of equations of the complex simultaneous equations is larger than the number of variables, the fault point currents if and The relative position k is obtained by directly solving a matrix having only k · if as a variable by diagonalization of the matrix. When the number of the equations is smaller than the number of variables, the relative position k is calculated by the Newton-Raphson method. 7. The method according to claim 5, wherein the position k is determined.
【請求項8】 送電線の接続点間の区間毎に事故地点の
相対位置kを求め、その求めた値が、0〜1.0の範囲
にあるとき、その区間が事故区間であると特定する請求
項1〜7のいずれか1項に記載の送電線の故障点標定方
法。
8. A relative position k of an accident point is calculated for each section between connection points of transmission lines, and when the calculated value is in a range of 0 to 1.0, the section is identified as an accident section. The fault locating method for a transmission line according to claim 1.
JP28283499A 1999-10-04 1999-10-04 Fault location method for transmission lines Expired - Lifetime JP3756026B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP28283499A JP3756026B2 (en) 1999-10-04 1999-10-04 Fault location method for transmission lines

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP28283499A JP3756026B2 (en) 1999-10-04 1999-10-04 Fault location method for transmission lines

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2001099883A true JP2001099883A (en) 2001-04-13
JP3756026B2 JP3756026B2 (en) 2006-03-15

Family

ID=17657690

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP28283499A Expired - Lifetime JP3756026B2 (en) 1999-10-04 1999-10-04 Fault location method for transmission lines

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3756026B2 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006054965A (en) * 2004-08-12 2006-02-23 Koichi Tsuji Accident determining device for transmission system
JP2007097265A (en) * 2005-09-27 2007-04-12 Koichi Tsuji Accident localizer for distribution system
CN103076540A (en) * 2012-12-28 2013-05-01 辽宁省电力有限公司沈阳供电公司 Fault-tolerance correction method for matrix algorithm fault location result of power distribution network
JP2014532388A (en) * 2011-09-20 2014-12-04 ユソン インストルメント アンド エレクトリック カンパニー リミテッド System and method for monitoring the state of power equipment by constant measurement of on-line electrical circuits
CN113592107A (en) * 2021-07-19 2021-11-02 广东电网能源发展有限公司 Bypass simulation method and system of power transmission line, intelligent terminal and storage medium
CN113625120A (en) * 2021-08-17 2021-11-09 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 A distribution network fault location method, device, terminal and storage medium
CN119125770A (en) * 2024-09-18 2024-12-13 国网上海市电力公司 A method for dynamic safety assessment of cable line systems considering coupling effects

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103235238B (en) * 2013-04-23 2016-02-10 贵州电网公司输电运行检修分公司 A kind of transmission line travelling wave Wave record method
CN103439607B (en) 2013-08-28 2016-11-23 三川电力设备股份有限公司 By method and system and the Fault Locating Method of failure wave-recording identification element population parameter

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006054965A (en) * 2004-08-12 2006-02-23 Koichi Tsuji Accident determining device for transmission system
JP2007097265A (en) * 2005-09-27 2007-04-12 Koichi Tsuji Accident localizer for distribution system
JP2014532388A (en) * 2011-09-20 2014-12-04 ユソン インストルメント アンド エレクトリック カンパニー リミテッド System and method for monitoring the state of power equipment by constant measurement of on-line electrical circuits
CN103076540A (en) * 2012-12-28 2013-05-01 辽宁省电力有限公司沈阳供电公司 Fault-tolerance correction method for matrix algorithm fault location result of power distribution network
CN103076540B (en) * 2012-12-28 2015-08-12 辽宁省电力有限公司沈阳供电公司 The method of the fault-tolerant correction of power distribution network matrix algorithms localization of fault result
CN113592107A (en) * 2021-07-19 2021-11-02 广东电网能源发展有限公司 Bypass simulation method and system of power transmission line, intelligent terminal and storage medium
CN113592107B (en) * 2021-07-19 2023-11-07 广东电网能源发展有限公司 Bypass simulation method and system of power transmission line, intelligent terminal and storage medium
CN113625120A (en) * 2021-08-17 2021-11-09 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 A distribution network fault location method, device, terminal and storage medium
CN113625120B (en) * 2021-08-17 2024-04-12 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Distribution network fault location method, device, terminal and storage medium
CN119125770A (en) * 2024-09-18 2024-12-13 国网上海市电力公司 A method for dynamic safety assessment of cable line systems considering coupling effects

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3756026B2 (en) 2006-03-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Dāsa Determining the locations of faults in distribution systems
Kersting et al. Short circuit analysis of IEEE test feeders
EP2698642A2 (en) "Fault analysis in electric networks having a plurality of multi-phase buses"
Santos et al. Dynamic simulation of induced voltages in high voltage cable sheaths: Steady state approach
CN112285426B (en) Grounding resistance testing method and system of tower grounding device and terminal equipment
CN112285425B (en) Grounding resistance calculation method and device of tower grounding device and terminal equipment
CN111141995B (en) Line double-end steady-state distance measuring method and system based on amplitude comparison principle
JP2001099883A (en) Method for locating fault on transmission line
Cifuentes-Chaves et al. Time domain analysis for fault location in power distribution systems considering the load dynamics
Zhu Analysis of transmission system faults in the phase domain
JP2004012292A (en) Fault location method for transmission line and fault location system using the same
Popovic A digital fault-location algorithm taking into account the imaginary part of the grounding impedance at the fault place
CN118011096A (en) Method, system, storage medium and device for obtaining zero-sequence impedance of line section to ground
Talaq Fault calculations using three terminal Thevenin’s equivalent circuit
JPH0219779A (en) Locating method for grounding fault point in three terminal parallel circuit duplex power transmission line of high resistance
Montagna et al. A comprehensive approach to fault analysis using phase coordinates
Kersting Transformer model test system
JPH0779524A (en) System protective unit employing matrix operation
CN115149505B (en) Apparatus, system and method for dual-circuit transmission system
JP4490758B2 (en) Accident identification device for power transmission system
CN120370099B (en) Method for determining fault phase and fault distance during single-phase earth fault
JP4752006B2 (en) Three-phase three-wire load simulator
CN115526041B (en) Method and device for determining voltage transformer model
JPH08285909A (en) Nonlinear inductance model forming method for arrester
Sreejith et al. Development of steady state model for transformer internal faults

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20051027

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20051115

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20051201

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20051220

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Ref document number: 3756026

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090106

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100106

Year of fee payment: 4

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110106

Year of fee payment: 5

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110106

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120106

Year of fee payment: 6

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130106

Year of fee payment: 7

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130106

Year of fee payment: 7

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term