HU231094B1 - Use of nicosulfuron and clomazone on fabales/fabaceae - Google Patents

Description

716310 / ZSO

Use of a combination of nicosulforen and clomazone on crops belonging to the genus Arthropods

The present invention relates to the use of a combination of nicosolfoton and clomazone in cultivars belonging to the family Leguminosae / Fabace. More particularly, the present invention relates to the use of nicosulfuron and clomazone for controlling weeds in butterflies / legumes (Leguminosae / Fabacej). a method for the control of weeds in crops belonging to the family Butterflies / Legumes (Leguminosae / Fabace), which comprises applying a combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone to the crop area in an amount effective against the weeds.

The pulses or legumes, which include legumes (Eabales ^::: Leguminosae) the order and pi llangósok (Fabaceae ^::: Papilionaceae) family. On the basis of outstanding importance for agricultural crops, purpose and use of growing these plants fall into two categories die Tiki

.) Legumes, groups of plants belonging to this group, which are grown mainly for their seeds: peas, beans, soybeans, lentils, lupine, horse beans, angled ledges, evening peas, sand beans, peanuts, etc.

.) Group of fibrous fodder plants with butterfly flowers: these are usually grown as fibrous fodder, possibly for green manure; such as alfalfa, red clover, white-tailed deer, roe deer, rabbit's hoof, somhora, purple clover, etc.

Although the sown area of legumes is not very large in the world and in Hungary, their significance is significant, because their seeds, which are rich in white, are important and valuable food and fodder. In addition, some species and varieties of legumes are valuable green fodder and green manure crops, and their impact on soil fertility is also remarkable, as they are considered to be excellent crops.

Soy (Glycine max) is one of the most important crops among butterfly legumes. Soybeans are the fifth most important crop on Earth. Its sown area on Earth is approx. 80 million hectares, of which 300,000 hectares are in the EU. It is mostly considered an oil plant, although it is classified as a protein crop in Hungary.

Soy is one of the most valuable, versatile legumes, and its high biological value of intestines makes it suitable for human consumption, animal feed and industrial processing. The soybean seeds are approx. 40% protein, approx. It also contains 20% oil and many other physiologically important substances, such as vitamins and biologically active compounds. The majority of proteins in soy are albumins (5-7%) and globulins (60-70%). Based on the amino acid composition of soy protein, it can be considered a biologically almost complete protein, as it contains the most important amino acids (tryptophan, lysine, cysteine, leucine, etc.). As with the vast majority of legumes, soybeans are very rich in not only the seeds but the entire soybean plant, so soybeans can be grown for fiber and forage.

The soybean is native to Southeast Asia, where it has been grown for more than 4,000 years. In Europe, only the XVIII. century, began to take root. Its cultivation started in Hungary about 200 years ago, but it has been sown with a significant area only since the 1930s. Domestic utilization began even later, with experiments only beginning at the end of the last century, but its regular and growing tendency to cultivate only from 1935 onwards. Many soybeans are still grown in China, but the largest soybean-growing country in the world today is the United States, where it is grown on about 20-24 million hectares a year. The sown area of soybeans is showing an increasing trend, which is justified by the widespread use of soybeans. It is mainly used for human consumption in the Far East, but the use of soy for direct human consumption, including in soy-fortified foods, is growing worldwide. About 2% of soybeans are used for human consumption. It is consumed in tons of soy milk, tofu or soy cheese, soy flour and soy sauce, and tempeh (Indonesia). In addition, other potential uses for soy include the paint industry, the plastics industry and the pharmaceutical industry.

However, the most significant use of soy is in animal feed, as the soybean meal remaining after the extraction of the oil in it is an essential protein feed. Its stems are also valuable fodder, so it can be used as a fibrous and mass fodder. Therefore, soybeans are considered to be an outstandingly valuable plant that is one of the foundations of modern animal husbandry.

Soybean is a soil and nutritious plant. Its successful cultivation requires high-quality, calcareous soil. Its yield is expected to be around 3 t / ha at this supply level. During fertilization, depending on the soil supply, the total amount of phosphorus and potassium and half of the nitrogen are applied in the autumn, followed by the remainder during spring seedbed preparation.

Like all crops, soybeans are grown during soybean cultivation, making it difficult to produce and adversely affecting yields. The main problem with soybean weed control is that very few suitable herbicides are available and the soybean plant itself has low herbicide tolerance. An additional problem is that the eradication of ragweed is not fully feasible. The general opinion of the experts on this issue can be summarized as meaning that effective weed control of a soybean crop can only be achieved by using a combination of the active ingredients. Good quality soil preparation, adequate nutrient supply, and even depth sowing are essential for soybean cultivation.

From the point of view of plant protection of soybeans, the greatest challenge is the weed control of soybeans, as entomological problems and pathological diseases in soybeans can occur only occasionally, in susceptible varieties, and only in extreme conditions; A healthy, dressed seed is used for rapid, vigorous germination and initial development, thus reducing it during treatment! risks of damage (germination, stress). The herbicides applied on the proem agent help to keep the protruding soybeans free of weeds, and a minimum of 14-14 mm of washing rainfall is required within two weeks to take effect. Pre-preparations are weak against warm-demanding weeds (ragweed, snapper, orphaned sunflower, silkworm, sea buckthorn) that are constantly emerging from the deeper layers of the soil. is in some vintages. Thus, soybeans may need to be hoeed once or twice during the growing season with a machine to avoid covering the plants with soil, as these stems will die or be damaged, so be it. increases harvest loss.

St- ·; ·;

«: · - w

Herbal pesticide treatment may be required before and after sowing. Significant weeds in soybeans that reduce yields and cause crop losses include marsh species »common cocksfoot, porcupine and goosefoot. It is almost common for soybeans to weed in spite of the chemicals used before sowing and germination, in which case post-emergence treatment and / or mechanical weeding is required.

Whereas soybeans, as mentioned above, are extremely important crops in both the food industry, the cosmetics industry, and the chemical industry; all that. and given that there are also very few suitable herbicides for soya, as mentioned above, and that the soybean plant itself has a low herbicide they can be used effectively in the control of soybean weeds

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide alternative compounds and / or solutions which satisfy the above-mentioned needs, i.e. to provide a new herbicide for butterflies / legumes, in particular soya, in addition to the herbicides known from the prior art, with which weed control is effective. , can be solved easily and economically.

The inventor of the present invention has surprisingly found that the present invention can be successfully achieved with a combination of two widely used herbicides, nicosulfuron and clomazone, which have not yet been used in butterflies / legumes, such as soy.

Nicomifuron is absorbed through a sultonylurea-type leaf that inhibits the enzyme acetolactate synthase. post - emergence / POST / herbicide. The discoverer and developer of the base molecule was the Japanese company 1SK, and in the early 1990s it even began to market the active ingredient that was transformed into a product. The offer and market introduction of nicosulfuron in maize (Zea mays) only was authorized and supported with an active ingredient content of 30-70 g / ha. The active ingredient has a successful career in maize production worldwide, with a wide range of herbicides (including a variety of seedling and perennial weeds) and favorable ecotoxicological properties. Over the years, numerous factory formulations have appeared in the world (e.g. mesotrione, w m

Rimsulfuron, dicamba, airazine, 2.4D) are products used exclusively in maize. According to the state of the art, the most important non-maize herbicide containing nicosfuron is Pastora (DuPont), which can be used for pasture / meadow planting and contains mosulfuron in combination with metsulfuron-methylel, while the other is an orchard combination with nicosulfuron. contains a drill bit.

There are a number of documents in the prior art describing the use of nicosulfuron.

For example, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2014/003218 A1 discloses a sergetic herbicidal composition which may also contain microsulfuron as a component. Although the dossier does not indicate that mosulfuron is used alone, it is clear from the description that the combination containing nicosulfurom has not been used in soy. The description describes the active ingredient nicosulfuron in detail, but only mentions its applicability in relation to maize. The first example of the document also describes in detail the use of nicosulfuron and combinations for sown rice and seeded rice; it also discusses experimental results with other active substances (except nicosulfuron), e.g. Greenhouse cereals and field forage crops for experimental purposes. Among the groups listed, butterflies / legumes may be classified as fodder crops for which no combination containing nicos drill has been used. The document therefore does not mention the use of nicosulfurons in the control of butterflies / legumes, especially weeds.

WO 2005082148 A1 discloses herbicidal compositions comprising 2- (4'-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl) -N, N-dimethylnicotinamide, also known as mosulfuron or an herbicidal active ingredient thereof. salt, 2-chloro-4-ylamino-O-isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine, also known as atrazine, a surfactant, a stabilizer, and a carrier. This document also describes only combinations, and although the combinations may be applicable to more than one crop, butterflies / legumes, including soybeans, are not listed.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,500,119,391 discloses a herbicidal composition comprising micosulfuron and S-metolachlor as active ingredients. The document

According to the method, herbicide compositions with a high degree of activity, a wide herbicide spectrum and a long shelf life are prepared by the method contained therein. The compositions describe the effectiveness of a number of weeds. However, according to the document, the effect against weeds is studied only on weeds and not on weeds appearing in crop orchards; nor is there any mention that said compositions may be effective against butterflies / legumes, especially on the weeds in my soybean plantation.

WO 2012070688 discloses a herbicidal composition comprising 1- (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) -3- (3'-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridylsulfonyl) urea, also known as flazasulfuron or herbicides. and nicosultmon, and a method of controlling said composition for controlling unwanted plants (the target area is woody plantations). The document describes in detail the combinations and their application to certain weeds, but does not mention that the combinations are suitable for controlling the weeds of butterflies / legumes, in particular soybeans,

WO2013180309A1 discloses a herbicidal composition comprising nicosulfuron or a herbicidal salt thereof and bicyclopyrone or a herbicidal salt thereof. The document makes no mention at all of soy or that nicosulferon, alone or in combination, may be suitable for any weed control of butterflies / legumes, especially soy.

As can be seen from the above, mkosulfuron is used alone or in combination with a number of other substances, but the prior art does not use it to control butterflies / legumes, in particular soybean weeds, or in combination with clomazone in butterflies / legumes. in particular, its use for controlling soy weeds is not known.

Clomazone is a herbicide that inhibits carotenoid biosynthesis (DOXP synthetase); Clomazone was first marketed by the owner company (FMC) in 1993 in a number of crops (soybeans, peas, corn, winter oilseed rape, sugar cane, pumpkins, tobacco, potatoes, poppies, cabbage, seeded peppers). For the following hours, clomazone may only be used after tillage or after sowing (pre-emergence). Several crops also tolerate stock management (eg soybeans, poppies, peppers), but their use in this form is limited, with very few permits issued. The amount of active ingredient applied varies within very wide limits, taking into account the tolerance of the crop. This value can be from 72 to 960 g / ha of active ingredient

GB2497901A discloses a composition comprising clomazone Clomazone is present in microcapsules having a polymeric wall containing a crosslinked polyacetylene urea polyurea. A preferred composition of the invention is prepared by preparing an water-immiscible organic phase comprising clomazone, one or more polyfunctional isocyanates and a crosslinking resin; preparing an aqueous phase containing one or more polyfunctional amines; dispersing the organic phase in the aqueous phase to form a dispersion of the organic phase in the aqueous phase; then left at the interface between the dispersed organic phase and the aqueous phase. to form a polyacetylene urea-polyurea polymer, the composition thus obtained being used to inhibit the growth of plants. Although the application describes the use of clomazone to inhibit the growth of plants, no mention is made of leguminous butterflies, such as soya, and the use of clomazone in combination with nicosilfuron and, in particular, of legumes / butterflies. use to control soybeans.

US2014274710 discloses herbicidal compositions comprising an herbicidally effective amount of (a) penoxolam or an agriculturally acceptable salt thereof or clomazone or an agriculturally acceptable salt thereof, and (b) benzobicyclone or an agriculturally acceptable salt thereof. The document also describes a method for controlling undesired vegetation in rice, in which the herbicidal composition described above is applied to prevent the appearance or growth of vegetation on said vegetation or in an area adjacent to the vegetation or in the soil or water, ) and (b) are selected so that the composition has a synergistic effect. The document mentions the use of clomazone as a herbicidal component in combination for controlling weeds in rice, does not mention legumes, including soya, and does not disclose the use of the combination with nicosulfinone, in particular the use of said combination in legumes, especially soybeans.

CN105230645A discloses a herbicidal composition comprising bentiazole clomazone and methyl lachlor as an active ingredient, which can be administered as a suspension or a wettable powder. The herbicidal composition contains 1-1.5% bentiazole clomazone, 1-50% metolactor, 2-25% additive and 10-96% filler. The herbicide of the present invention having this composition has a high potency and a broad spectrum of herbicidal activity, and can be used to prevent the emergence of seed-bearing weeds, especially in maize, and which does not have a detrimental effect on the crop. This document also mentions the use of clomazone in combination as a herbicide or herbicide component. However, this use is only mentioned in connection with maize, legumes, such as soya, and the use of the combination with the photon mcost is not described, in particular the use of this combination for weeding legumes / pilots, especially soy.

CN104957150 A discloses a herbicidal composition for soy to prevent the appearance of weeds in soy. The herbicidal composition contains three components (A, B, C) as active ingredient, component A is clomazone (15-20 parts by weight), component B is flumioxazin or flumetsulam (10-15 parts by weight) and component C is metolachlor or acetochlor ( 10-20 parts by weight). The oily suspension type herbicidal composition also contains 25 to 30 thickening wetting agents and a certain amount of miscible oil. The composition is suitable for controlling or preventing a number of weeds in its mouth and is harmless to the plant itself. The document mentions the use of clomazone in combination with soya, but its use is limited to soya, including the pre-emergence period, does not mention its general applicability in legumes / butterflies, nor does it mention the possibility of combining it with mcosidforn. , in particular not the use of this combination for the post-emergence weed control of legumes / pilianos, in particular soybeans.

As can be seen from the above, many combinations of clomazone with de nicosulfuron have been developed over time, depending on the treated plant, and the use of this combination to control weeds / legumes, especially soybeans, is not known at all from the prior art.

Compared to the prior art, the inventor has surprisingly found that the combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone is suitable for controlling weeds / legumes, such as soy.

In particular, the inventor has found that the combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone can be used in butterflies without damaging the cultivated plants. . It has also been found that the combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone has a synergistic effect compared to the use of each active substance alone.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention relates to the use of a combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone in cultivars belonging to the family Legnminosae / Fabace. More particularly, to a combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone in the genus to control emerging weeds. Preferably, the invention relates to the use of a combination of nicosulforon and clomazone for controlling weeds in soybeans. we deliver it.

The invention relates, on the one hand, to the use of a combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone for controlling weeds in butterflies / legumes, in particular soybean cultures. The combination of nicosulforon and clomazone is applied to butterfly / legume cultures in a manner known to those skilled in the art of soybean cultures, wherein the combination of nicosulforon and clomazone is applied to the site of cultivation at any critical time during cultivation. Any period within the scope of the present invention means that the combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone may be applied to the plants from cotyledons to the appearance of flowers. The use of a combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone is post-emergent, i.e. after the emergence of weeds.

B

B v x

As mentioned above, nicosulfuron and clomazone are both known and widely used drugs that are readily available commercially. Examples of suitable agents for use in the present invention include FH-041 (manufactured by Rotam Agrochemical Company Ltd.) and Nic-It (manufactured by FMC Company ex Cheminova).

According to the invention, FH-041 is used primarily and preferably as the nicosulfuron herbicide, but Nic-It has also shown equivalence.

Command 480 (FMC Company) was used as the active ingredient of the present clomazone.

As mentioned above, the invention also relates to a method for the protection of butterflies / legumes, in particular soybean plants, against weeds, which comprises applying a combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone in an amount effective against weeds in the field of butterflies / legumes, e.g. An effective amount within the scope of the present invention means that the amount of nicosulfuron-clomazone applied as a percentage of the weed cover is significantly less than that of the untreated control areas.

According to the present invention, the nicosulfuron-clomazone combination has been successfully applied to a variety of weeds. The combination has been shown to be very effective against butterflies / legumes, especially Amaranthus retrofiexus, Stachys annua, Abüthilon theophrasi, Eura, and Datura stramonium. in case of. The combination showed outstanding performance in the case of hairy pork loin, stubble grass, silk marshmallow and snaps. Other species that can be successfully reduced with the combination:

- species (Setaria sp.), millet (Panicum sp.), sorghum (Sorghum halepense), red squirrel (Digitaria sanguinalis), - white gooseberry (Chenopodium album), - black vine (Solanuni nigrum),

7. - Chenopodium hybrídum,

- fat cartilage (Portulaca oleraceae),

- butterbur (Xanthium strumarium).

It has been found to be particularly advantageous to have the same herbicidal activity at the same phytotoxicity values when the combination has been applied to the herbicide in amounts not higher than those known in the art and even in smaller quantities than those permitted in maize.

This means that the invention makes it possible to control butterflies / legumes, in particular soybeans, in a much more cost-effective and environmentally friendly way, which not only allows cheaper production and cultivation of a plant less relieved by herbicides, but also significantly healthier food or feed.

Examples

The invention is illustrated in more detail by the following examples. It is to be understood that the examples are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any way. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention is more widely applicable, both from an agricultural and scientific and biological point of view, than the experiments and test results described below show, i.e. it is clear to those skilled in the art that most butterflies an equivalent result is obtained.

The efficacy of various herbicides in soybean butterflies was tested. The aim of the experiments was to demonstrate that the combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone was effective in inhibiting the appearance and growth of weeds in soya butterflies / legumes.

As a first step, we will conduct an accredited, EPPO-based small-plot study to evaluate the efficacy of various herbicides on post-emergence application against monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous weeds in soybeans; and to monitor any phytotoxic symptoms on the crop,

None of the tested formulations had any problems during mixing or application.

Comparative studies were performed to evaluate the efficacy of the indicated herbicides in post-emergence application against monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous weeds. The tests were performed by Enrofms Agruscience Services Kft, which strictly followed the requirements and guidelines of the relevant domestic and international regulations.

The experiment in soybeans (GK Bahia and ES Mentor varieties) was set up near Szentes. The experiment was set up on a field soybean field. The crop was sown at a density of 450,000 plants / ha. Postemerge treatment was applied on June 3, 2016 at 2:00 pm The meteorological conditions during the study were as follows: air temperature: 24.8 Ct soil temperature 19.1 C ^ö , relative humidity: 50.1%, wind speed: 0.3 m / s, soil surface: dry.

After subdivision of the experimental sample area, both the different treatments and the untreated control areas were randomized and the treatments were performed. Untreated plots and the relevant market definition were also used as references. Application! As a device, a special small-particle penetrator type Schachtner PSGT3.S3OO / 5O with the following parameters was used:

Pressure on the nozzles 2.6 bar Nozzle type flat scatter Nozzle size DG11O02VS Nozzle distribution 50 cm Number of nozzles 6 Frame length 3 m Frame height 60 cm Travel speed 3.2 km / h Solvent water Application rate 250 1.ha Huj horsepower compressed air

w A ^: A iá

The herbicides used were as follows:

Preparation Active ingredients} Dose ah / ha I would make a dose / ha 1. Command480 · * · FH041 (SAH 13017) clomazone * mcosuluron 0.271'h; i-23 gha ·) <* · · Command 4 SO r Nic4t clomazone r mkomtffurea 0.27 hW0.07 Vha 3. Command 480 * FH041 (SAH13O17): · Spur adjuvant Command 480 4 Nk-lt r Spur adjuvant clomone * nicosulfurte 0.27 l / month to 23 g / ha -r 0.1 Vita Spur adjuvant clomazone r aikosznlfuro 0.27 kha ^ Otto? L-mr-OJ. Vha Spur adjuvant 5. Command 480 - FH04I (SAHI3017) klom & zon r nikcmuhwon 0.34 l /} - 46 g / ha 6. Command 480 * Nic-It klomasm * nicosul & mn 0.54 kha K) d4 Cha 7. Command480 * FH041 (SAH13017B · Spur adjuvant klom & zon r nitosuhuma 0.34 l / ha tod g / ha r 0.2 I ha Spur adjuvant S. Command 480 + Nic4i * Spur adjuvant clomazone * nicosul & ron 0.54 1 / 1ϊϋ? Ό ₅ 14 Vhá-0.2 l / tiu Spur adjuvant 9. Conan -r Dash adjuvant imazamox * · bentazone 1.9 Pte 0.5 1 / ha Dash adjuvant

ah ~~ amount of active ingredient

The reference product was product 9, which is commercially available under the name given in the table. The herbicides used were provided by Eumfíns in Hungary and Semi Agro provided the code number and the products marketed by Sumi Agro.

The phonology of soy at the time of application was as follows:

R.

lake B lake lake

Phonological status (BBCH) majority, percentage 14, 60% Phenological status (BBCH) minimum, percentage 12, 35% Physiological status (BBCH) maximum, percentage 16, 5% Average height: 12 cm Minimum, maximum height 10 cm, 15 cm Station coverage 25%

BBCH = standardized phonological recording system

Weeds

The efficacy of the formulations was tested by the following weed heads; The appearance and density of white geese, furry piglets, stubble, snapper, silkworm and common cocksfoot allowed uniform evaluation (of course, several weed species were present, but their appearance or individual density did not allow for evaluation in all experimental plots).

Name Scientific name EPPO code White goose top Cftewpodíwn CHEAL Jimson-weed Da ^ ra strafnaniwn DATST Marshmallow Abiaíkm íheaphrastí ABUTH Common cocksfoot EehAoeh toa crus-gűHi ECHCG

During treatment, we assessed the weeds present, their phonological condition, and their cover. The weed population was measured in squares with an area of 4 x 0.25 m2 (0.5m x OJm) by counting the individual weeds during the winter, and the soil cover of each weed was estimated for each species! percent in untreated control plots. The values obtained were as follows:

Name Scientific name EPPO code Phaeologic phase of a plant (BBClt) Height (cm) Diameter (cm) Pcs / night Coverage (%) White libstep Cáeaöpoö'w? Ö & íffM CHEAL 14 12 8 10A 4.5 Jimson-weed sínmiam'wn DATS! 14-16 12 8 3 2 Marshmallow Abuiíhfi ABUTH 14 6 6 0.63 Ordinary cock feet ^ c ^ ínocMoa ena-gatti ECHCG 13 5 4 3 1.25

The phonological condition and cover of the weeds during each evaluation were as follows

Name Scientific name EPPO code Reviewed May 2015 Plant Phenological Phase (BBCH) Db / ur Skininess (%) White goose top Chenopodium album CHE AL June 10 14 14.5 6.5 June 16 18 10.3 8.5 July 12 65 13.3 13 August 04 75 13 15.5 Jimson-weed Stramonium database DATST June 10 16 7 7 June 16 18 7 2.75 July 12 65 6 4.75 August 04 75 11.8 7 Marshmallow Abutilon theophrasti ABUTH June 10 14 21 1.75 June 16 16 10.5 2.25 July 12 63 16.8 3.5 August 04 75 20.8 4 Common cocksfoot Echinochloa crus-gah'i ECHCG June 10 13 4.5 7 June 16 15 2.25 3.25 July 12 59 3.25 4.75 August 04 75 4.75 4.8

Results

No application problems were observed with the formulations of the formulations. During the evaluations, we performed the evaluation types listed in the table below:

Evaluation time 2016.06.03? Time since treatment 0 days Phenological phase of plant BBCH 14 Soy 1 Rating name of the cover 25 Weed number. _________button_____ 40 i Weed number, weed control, herbicidal efficacy, phytotoxicity 06/10/2016 7 days 14 6/16/2016 13 days 16 60 | Weed number, weed weed control] efficiency, i phytotoxicity 12/07/2016 39 days 63 35 i Weed number, weed weed control, weed control efficiency, j phytotoxicity

te te

i Time of evaluation Time since treatment Plant phonological phase BBCH Soybean cover i Evaluation | name 08/04/2016 62 days 73 ί 95 1 Number of weeds, weeds 1 germination, weeding new efficiency, ί phytotoxicity

The following results were obtained during the evaluations:

Phytotoxicity:

Date of treatment

10/06/2016 6/16/2016 2016.07.12 04.08.2016 i Phenological condition 14 16 63 I 73 i Plant cover (%) 1 40 60 95 | 95 Between treatment and evaluation time i 7 13 39 and 62 1.Command 480 EC 0.27 l / ha + FH041 i (SAH 13017) 23 g / ha 8.50 7.00 2.50 and 0.00 i 2.Command 480 EC 0,27 l / ha from Nic 0,07 l / ha 14.75 18.50 9.50 0.00 j 3. Cömmand 480 EC 0.27 l / ha + EH041; (SAH13017) 23 g ha * Spur adjuvant 0,1 I ha | 17.00 14.75 5.75 0.00 i! 4.Command 480 EC 0.27 l / ha vNic-It 0.0716ha i v Spur adjuvant 0.116ha; 28.50 27.50 10.75 I 0.00 5Cotnmand 480 EC 0.54 l / ha in FH041 i (SAH 13017) 46 g / ha 31.75 27.25 11.50 0.00 i ó.Command 480 EC 0.54 l / ha + Nic-lt 0.14 I ha i 46.25 45.00 17.50 1 0.00 ί ______________________________ 1 ............ 1 7.Command 480 EC 0.54 l / ha + HI041: (SAH13017) 46 g / ha + Spur adjuvant 0.2 l / ha j 52.50 48.75 15.00 0.00 8.Command 480 EC 0,54 l / ha + Nic-U 0,14 l / ha | + Spur adjuvant 0,2 l / ha 50.00 51.25 16.50 0.00 9.Contm + Dash adjuvant 0.5 Iha 4.75 3.50 ο, οο ο, οο ί

At the time of the first evaluations (7 days after treatment and at the subsequent evaluation), all treatment and treatment combinations showed phytotoxic symptoms on soybean plants. Although there were significant differences between treatments, mild and transient chlorosis was the most severe symptom in the plants.

Weed control efficiency

I) Weed control efficiency (%) for white gooseberry (.tyentfpodium album, CHEAL):

j Treatment date Phenological condition N vegetation cover (%) ImKöóJÖ 14 40 71 () 76,007 16 60 '2016.07.1 63 95 - ₉₅ | Between treatment and evaluation t 13 39 | 62 I time ! .Command 480 EC 0.27 l / ha * FH041 __ _{78 00} ' (SAH 1301?) 23 g / ha 8940 - 94.00 ........._____ 3 .Command 48.0 EC 0.27 Vha + FHÜ41 88.25 93.75 90.00 i 87.25 | (SAHI3ÖI7) 23 g / ha * Spur adjuvant 0.1 1 / ha | 4.Command 480 EC 0.27 l / ha * Nk- k 0.07 leaves | 86.25 AM, 25 88.75 I 90.00 | ·: · Spur adjuvant 0.1 juice T 85 ^ í U3 í ₈ ξ _ο θ ................ | (SAH 130: 17} 46 g / ha é.Command 480 EC 0.54 Vha C Nic-It 044 Vha I 87.25 95.25 | 9K50 ' | 7.Command 480 EC 0.54 Vha 4 FH04I i 83.00 ra ΐ 94.75 | 90.50 | (SAH 13017) 46 g / ha v Spur adjuvant 0.2 Fha | 8.Command 480 EC 0.54 this + Níc-h 0.141 / ha l 91.50 97.00 | 93.75 89.00 1 Spur adjuvant 0.2 1 / ha | S.Conun v Dash adjuvant 0.5 Mia 7 q'kjő ......................__

At the time of treatment, the white goose top was present in the untreated control plots with an individual density of 10.8 pcs / nr 'and 4.5% area coverage. At the time of the first assessment (7 days after treatment), there were significant differences between treatments for goosebumps. Combinations of Command 480EC (0.27 and 0.54L / ha) + FH-041 (0.023 and 0.046kg / ha) or aNi-it (0.07 and 0.14L / ha) (1, 2, 5 and treatments 6) were observed at this early stage. The efficacy of these herbicide combinations with the concomitant use of Spur adjuvant (treatments 3, 4, 7, and 8) resulted in a small increase. Command 480 EC (0.27 / 0.54 L / ha) 4 · FH-041 (0.023 / 0.046 L / ha) showed questionable-acceptable efficacy. Corum 1.9 1 / ha + Dash 0.5 1 / ha (9th treatment) resulted in good weed control efficiency. At the time of the last evaluation (62 days after treatment), all of these treatments and their combinations showed acceptable-good weed control results against white goosefoot.

IL) Weed control efficiency (%) for snapper (Datura Stramonium, DATST):

Date of treatment 06/10/2016 6/16/2016 12/07/2016 08/04/2016 Phenological condition 14 16 63 73 Vegetation cover (%) 40 60 95 95 Time between treatment and evaluation 7 13 39 62 Command 480 EC 0.27 1 / ha + FH041 (SAH13017) 23 g / ha 95 98.25 98.25 98.25 2.Command 480 EC 0.27 Mia + Nicc-It 0.07 Pha 94.75 98.00 98.00 98.25 3.Command 480 EC 0.27 Iha + FII041 (SAH 13017) 23 g / ha + Spur adjuvant 0.1 Mia 95.00 98.50 98.50 98.50 4.:Command 480 EC 0.271 / ha v Nic-It 0.0716ha v Spur adjuvant 0.1 16ha 93.75 98.00 98.00 98.50 Command 480 EC 0.54 Iha + FH041 (SAH 13017) 46 g / ha 94.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 ó.Command 480 EC 0.54 1 / ha + Nic-It 0.14 1 / ha 94.50 97.50 97.50 98.00 7.Command 480 EC 0.54 Fha r FH041 (SAH 13017) 46 g / ha + Spur adjuvant 0.2 1 / ha 95.25 98.25 98.25 98.50 ^ .Command 480 EC 0.54 1 / ha 4- Nic-It 0.14 1 / ha r Spur adjuvant 0.2 1 / ha 95.00 97.75 97.75 98.00 9.Corum t Dash adjuvant 0.5 1 / ha 97.00 98.75 99.00 99.00

At the time of treatment, Csattanó maszag was present in the untreated control plots with an area coverage of ^{3.0 pcs / m 2.} At the time of the first assessment (7 days after treatment), there were no significant differences between treatments compared to the clicking mask. Combinations of Command 480EC (0.27 and 0.54L / ha) + FH-041 (0.023 and 0.046Lg / ha) or Nic-it (0.07 and 0.14L / ha) without adjuvant (1st, Treatments 2, 5, and 6) and adjuvant combinations (treatments 3, 4, 7, and 8) showed good to very good herbicidal efficacy. Already at this early stage, all combinations achieved or approached very good (95%) weed control efficiencies. Corum 1.9 1 / ha + Dash 0.5 1 / ha (Treatment 9) also resulted in very good weed control efficiencies. Weed control efficiency B te a?

B B B intensified by day 39 post-treatment for all treatments and combinations (95.25-99%) (93.7599%). These values showed a stable, constant, excellent value (98-99%) against the clicking mask until the end of the experiment.

IV.) Weed control. efficiency (%) for silkworm (dbutíhn ABUTH):

Date of treatment! 06/10/2016 6/16/2016 2016.07.12 08/04/2016 Phonological condition 14 16 63 73 Vegetation cover (%) 40 60 95 95 Time between treatment and evaluation 7 13 39 62 1.Command 480 EC 0.27 Vha 4 FH041 (SAH130Í7) 23 g / ha 85.00 92.00 95.00 93.50 ZCmmnaitd 4% EC 0.27 Dia + · from Nk 0.07 Eha 88.50 95.00 96.75 95.25 S.Contmaad 480 EC 0.27 Loss 4 FHÖ41 (SAH 13017) § 23 / ha4Spm adjuvant 0.1 lira 89.25 95.50 97.25 92.75 4.Command 480 EC 0.27 Ilia -t Nlc-Il 0.0716ha Spur adjuvant 0, i lf> ha 88.00 95.00 97.25 96.25 SCommaud 480 EC 0.54 Pha r FH041 (SAH130I7) 46 g / ha 88.25 94.50 97.75 96.50 ^ Command 480 EC 0.54 I ha * Nie- It 0.14 Iha 89.50 96.25 97.75 95.25 7.Command 480 EC 0.54 1 / ha * FH041 (SAHl 3017) 46 g of spur adjuvant 0.2 Eha 91.50 96.25 97.75 95.75 S.Contmand 4% EC 0.84 Iha 4 Nic-Ii 0.14 Not available ♦ · Spur adjuvant 0.2 Iha 92.75 97.50 97.75 88.50 9.Corusn 4 Dash adjuvant 0.5 Fha 93.75 98.50 98.50 96.50

At the time of treatment, Selyemmályva was present in the untreated control plots with a density of 2.0 pieces / m2 and an area coverage of 0.63%. At the time of the first assessment (7 days after treatment), there were significant differences between treatments compared to silkworm. Combinations of Command 480EC (0.27 and 0.54L / ha) * FH-041 (0.023 and 0.046kg / ha) or Nicit (0.07 and 0.14L / ha) without adjuvant (L, 2, 5). and 6 treatments) all showed acceptable herbicidal efficacy. Corum 1.91 / ha * Dash 0.51 / ha (Treatment 8) (Treatment 9) resulted in acceptable-good weed control efficiencies. Weed control efficacy was enhanced by day 39 post-treatment for all treatments and combinations (85-98.5%)% hunger yh w and these values showed a stable, very constant value compared to marshmallow until ghost completion.

V.) Weed control efficiency (%) for common cocksfoot (Zm / mmrtó / u cru $ ~ gat / í, ECHCG):

__________-____________________ Treatment date 06/10/2016 6/16/2016 I 12/07/2016 2016.08.04 | Phonological condition __ 1 63 73 Í Vegetation cover (%) 40 60 1 95 I 95 1 Between treatment and evaluation t 13 39 62 i Time 1.Commaxid 480 EC 0.2? Iba FHÖ4Í 80Í25 ...... ........ 8NIGHT .......... 92’00 ......... | (SAH 13017) 23 g / ha Z.Commaud 480 .EC 0.27 Elia Nic-R 0.07 Eha ................. 902) 0 .................. 1 9450 | 3.Command ago EC 0.37 Eha - FHO-H 81.50 90.50 90.50 89.25 (SAH 13917) 23 g / ha Spur adjuvant 0.1 Visa 4.Cemmand 480 EC 0.27 Ilia * Niclt 0.07 feet QC Í-J '-4 U3 92.25 and 92.50 90.25 r Spur adjuvant 0.1 I6ha \ € 5 € 78.00 ................................. * /> 1 L (S AHI 3017) 46 g · ba 6.Cona »ahd480 EC 0.54 Eha - Nie-U 0.141 / ha oi ‘OÖ 93.75 ΐ 96.75 93.00 /.Command 480 EC 0.54 Vha r FH04I 83.75 93.25 1 96.50 92.00 (SAHI3017) 46 g / ha * Spur adjuvant 0.2 Vhs i S.Cbmmand 480 EC 0.54 Iha v Nic4t 0.141 / ha 84.25 93.75 1 95.75 92.50 <Spur adjuvant 0.2 Eha 9.Comm v Hash adjuvant 0.5 1 / hs ......... 76.75 1 8475

At the time of treatment, common diphtheria was present in the untreated control plots with an individual density of ^{3.0 pieces / m 2 and an area coverage of 1.25%.} At the time of the first assessment (7 days after treatment), there were significant differences between treatments compared to common cocksfoot. Non-adjuvanted combinations of Command 480EC (0.27 and 0.54L / ha) + FH-041 (0.023 and 0.046kg / ha) or aicic (0.07 and 0.14ba) . and treatments 6) all showed poorly questionable herbicidal efficacy. Corum 1.9 IZha + Dash 0.51 / ha (9th treatment) resulted in poor weed control efficiency. Weed control efficacy was enhanced by day 39 post-treatment for all treatments and combinations (71.2521)

90.75%) and these values were stable until the end of the experiment compared to the common cock head. It is clear that the combinations according to the invention have an effect equivalent to the combination of the active ingredients used as reference and which have proved to be the best,

It is clear from the results obtained that the combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone is effective against weeds in soybean culture. The results show a particularly significant herbicidal effect in the case of common cockroach and marshmallow, where the combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone showed practically the same herbicidal activity at a significantly lower application rate than the comparative formulations, except for the initial values. Although the experiments could only be evaluated for a few weeds typically present in the soybean culture as required, this was sufficient to provide data on the herbicidal effects of several weeds applied at multiple sites and times. Based on these, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the combination of nicosul drill and clomazone can show efficacy comparable to that of the test plants in any other weeds similar to nicosulfuron and clomazone,

The results have shown in practice that the combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone can be used successfully in soybean cultures for a variety of weeds, especially common cocksfoot, sagebrush and marshmallow, without damaging the cultivated plant over a very wide application period. One of the great advantages of the present invention is that the combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone in soybean has the same herbicidal activity with known phytotoxicity values when applied to the same or smaller amounts of known herbicides.

This also means that the solution according to the invention offers a much more cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative to the control of soybeans compared to the solutions known from the prior art; it also helps to combat resistance as a risk of scarce herbicide use. All this makes it possible to grow cheaper and less herbicidal soybeans and thus produce healthier food or feed.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the applicability of the invention is not limited to the solutions described above, i.e. it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the method of the present invention provides equivalent results for most butterfly / legume plants.

A further unexpected and surprising feature of the invention is that, since the two active ingredients have two molecules with different characteristics and two different modes of action, it fully provides additional benefits to soybean growers in accordance with the requirements of resuscitation, which have so far been very limited. These include a very wide spectrum of weed control from a wide range of monocotyledons and dicotyledons, and that after application, clomazone exerts its germicidal inhibitory effect over a long period of time, thus ensuring longer weed control. Most of the products currently approved for herbicide contain an active ingredient that carries the risk of high fbk resistance, narrow weed control! spectrum. This is also supported by the fact that these products can only be used against dicotyledonous weeds other than imazamox and also have no transdermal effects other than imazamox. It is also a fact that even imazamox was not able to perform in the latter case as the combination of clomazone-nicosulfuron.

uh

Claims (12)

PATENT CLAIMS 1. Use of a combination of nicosforon and clomazone for controlling weeds in crops belonging to the family Leguminosae / Fabace. The method for controlling soy weeds according to claim 1. Use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the combination of nicosulfuron and clomazone is used post-emergence. Use according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the application rate of the combination is from 10 g ah / ha to 40 g ah / ha nicosulfuron + 100 g ah / ha to 400 g ah / ha clomazone. Use according to Claim 4, characterized in that the application rate of the combination is preferably 17 g ah / ha - 34 g ah / ha nicosulfuron + 130 g ah / ha - 260 g ah / ha clomazone. 6. Figures 1-4. Use according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the combination is applied against the following weeds: Echinochloa crus-galli, Setaria sp., Panicum sp., Sorghum halepense , white gooseberry (Chenopodium album), porcupine species (Amaranthus sp.), snapper (Datura strammonium), black ebony (Solanurn nigrum), marshmallow (Abuthilon theophrasti), hell var goose (Chenopodium hybridum), oleraceae), Stachys annua, Xanthium strumarium. Use according to claim 6, wherein the weed is preferably common cocksfoot, snapper, marshmallow. 8. Figures 1-7. Use according to claims 1 to 4, wherein. application takes place in the time interval from the appearance of the cotyledon to the appearance of the first flowers. 9. A method for the protection of crops belonging to the family Leguminosae / Fábaee against weeds, which comprises applying a combination of nicosilfuron and clomazone in an amount effective against the weeds to the crop area. The method of claim 9, wherein the crop is a crop belonging to the family Legumínosae / Fabace. The method according to claim 9, wherein the weed is Echinochloa erus-galli, Setana sp., Panicum sp., Sorghum halepense, Dyptaría sangtünalis (Chenopodium album), Amaranthus sp., Datum strammom um, Solanum nigrum, Abuthilon theophrasti, Chenopodium hybridum, porcupine (Stachys annua), butterbur (Xanthium strumarium). 12. A 9-11. The method of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the method is performed for a period of time from the appearance of the cotyledon to the appearance of the first flowers. The proxy