[go: up one dir, main page]

HK1185302B - Carbon dioxide sequestrations involving two-salt-based thermolytic processes - Google Patents

Carbon dioxide sequestrations involving two-salt-based thermolytic processes

Info

Publication number
HK1185302B
HK1185302B HK13112743.0A HK13112743A HK1185302B HK 1185302 B HK1185302 B HK 1185302B HK 13112743 A HK13112743 A HK 13112743A HK 1185302 B HK1185302 B HK 1185302B
Authority
HK
Hong Kong
Prior art keywords
mgcl
hcl
heat
reaction
group
Prior art date
Application number
HK13112743.0A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
HK1185302A (en
Inventor
Joe David Jones
Ai Yablonsky
Original Assignee
Carbonfree Chemicals Holdings, Llc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Carbonfree Chemicals Holdings, Llc filed Critical Carbonfree Chemicals Holdings, Llc
Publication of HK1185302A publication Critical patent/HK1185302A/en
Publication of HK1185302B publication Critical patent/HK1185302B/en

Links

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION I. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to the field of removing carbon dioxide from a source, such as the waste stream (e.g. flue gas) of a power plant, whereby Group 2 silicate minerals are converted into Group 2 chloride salts and SiO2, Group 2 chloride salts are converted into Group 2 hydroxide and/or Group 2 hydroxychloride salts. These in turn may be reacted with carbon dioxide to form Group 2 carbonate salts, optionally in the presence of catalysts. These steps may be combined to form a cycle in which carbon dioxide is sequestered in the form of carbonate salts and byproducts from one or more steps, such as heat and chemicals, are re-used or recycled in one or more other steps.
II. Description of Related Art
Considerable domestic and international concern has been increasingly focused on the emission of CO2 into the air. In particular, attention has been focused on the effect of this gas on the retention of solar heat in the atmosphere, producing the "greenhouse effect." Despite some debate regarding the magnitude of the effect, all would agree there is a benefit to removing CO2 (and other chemicals) from point-emission sources, especially if the cost for doing so were sufficiently small.
Greenhouse gases are predominately made up of carbon dioxide and are produced by municipal power plants and large-scale industry in site-power-plants, though they are also produced in any normal carbon combustion (such as automobiles, rain-forest clearing, simple burning, etc.). Though their most concentrated point-emissions occur at power-plants across the planet, making reduction or removal from those fixed sites an attractive point to effect a removal-technology. Because energy production is a primary cause of greenhouse gas emissions, methods such as reducing carbon intensity, improving efficiency, and sequestering carbon from power-plant flue-gas by various means has been researched and studied intensively over the last thirty years.
Attempts at sequestration of carbon (in the initial form of gaseous CO2) have produced many varied techniques, which can be generally classified as geologic, terrestrial, or ocean systems. An overview of such techniques is provided in the Proceedings of First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, (2001). To date, many if not all of these techniques are too energy intensive and therefore not economically feasible, in many cases consuming more energy than the energy obtained by generating the carbon dioxide. Alternative processes that overcome one or more of these disadvantages would be advantageous.
Lackner et al. Energy 1995, vol 20, pp 1153-1170 discloses a process for the sequestration of CO2 and binding thereof in magnesium and calcium carbonate form. For this, ultramafic rocks, e.g. serpentine or olivine, is dissolved in hydrochloric acid, and a magnesium chloride solution and silica gel is formed. By this process enough heat is released to maintain boiling temperature of the solution. Subsequently, CO2 is added to the solution to precipitate calcite and magnesite but also calcium and magnesium hydroxides could be precipitated and used for dry carbonation in a separate step. The heat released in the exothermic carbonation reaction is re-used in other process steps.
In the process, HCI is regenerated by decomposing magnesium chloride to magnesium hydroxide chloride and HCl. Solutions containing MgCl2, CaCl, and excess acid are neutralised by addition of magnesium hydroxide chloride, which leads to precipitation of Ca(OH)2, which is carbonated in a separate step. For energy efficiency, heat exchangers are suggested for recovering the heat liberated in the condensation for use in the vaporisation step, in combination with heat provided by the carbonation step.
The referenced shortcomings are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather are among many that tend to impair the effectiveness of previously known techniques for removing carbon dioxide from waste streams; however, those mentioned here are sufficient to demonstrate that the methodologies appearing in the art have not been altogether satisfactory and that a significant need exists for the techniques described and claimed in this disclosure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Disclosed herein are methods and apparatuses for carbon dioxide sequestration, including removing carbon dioxide from waste streams. In one aspect there are provided methods of sequestering carbon dioxide produced by a source, comprising:
  1. (a)
    1. (a) heating a first halide or hydrate thereof with water, at least a part of which is obtained from the water of step (b), under conditions suitable to form a first product mixture comprising a first hydroxide, oxide, and/or hydroxychloride and HCl;
    2. (b) admixing some or all of the first hydroxide, oxide, and/or hydroxychloride with a second halide or hydrate thereof and carbon dioxide under conditions suitable to form a second product mixture comprising a first halide or hydrate thereof, a carbonate salt, and water; and
    3. (c) separating some or all of the carbonate salt from step (b), and
    4. (d) admixing a Group 2 silicate mineral with HCl obtained from step (a), under conditions suitable to form a third product mixture comprising a Group 2 chloride, water, and silicon dioxide, wherein the silicon dioxide is removed from the Group 2 chloride formed and at least a part of the Group 2 chloride is used in step (b),
whereby the carbon dioxide is sequestered into a mineral product form.
In some embodiments, the first halide or hydrate thereof of step (a) is a first chloride salt or hydrate thereof, and the second step (a) product is HCl. In some embodiments, the first chloride salt or hydrate thereof of step (a) is MgCl2. In some embodiments, the first chloride salt or hydrate thereof of step (a) is a hydrated form of MgCl2. In some embodiments, the first chloride salt or hydrate thereof of step (a) is MgCl2·6H2O. In some embodiments, the first hydroxide salt of step (a) is Mg(OH)2. In some embodiments, the first hydroxychloride salt of step (a) is Mg(OH)Cl. In some embodiments, the first step (a) product comprises predominantly Mg(OH)Cl. In some embodiments, the first step (a) product comprises greater than 90% by weight Mg(OH)Cl. In some embodiments, the first step (a) product is Mg(OH)Cl. In some embodiments, the first oxide salt of step (a) is MgO.
In some embodiments, the second halide or hydrate thereof of step (b) is a second chloride salt or hydrate thereof, for example, CaCl2. In some embodiments, the first chloride salt of step (b) is MgCl2. In some embodiments, the first chloride salt of step (b) is a hydrated form of MgCl2. In some embodiments, the first chloride salt of step (b) is MgCl2·6H2O.
In some embodiments, some or all of the water in step (a) is present in the form of steam or supercritical water. In some embodiments, some or all of the water of step (a) is obtained from the water of step (b). In some embodiments, step (b) further comprises admixing sodium hydroxide salt in the second admixture.
In some embodiments, some or all of the HCl in step (d) is obtained from step (a). In some embodiments, the methods of step (d) further comprises agitating the Group 2 silicate mineral with HCl. In some embodiments, some or all of the heat generated in step (d) is recovered. In some embodiments, some or all of the second chloride salt of step (b) is the Group 2 chloride salt of step (d). In some embodiments, the methods further comprise a separation step, wherein the silicon dioxide is removed from the Group 2 chloride salt formed in step (d). In some embodiments, some of the water of step (a) is obtained from the water of step (d).
In some embodiments, the Group 2 silicate mineral of step (d) comprises a Group 2 inosilicate. In some embodiments, the Group 2 silicate mineral of step (d) comprises CaSiO3. In some embodiments, the Group 2 silicate mineral of step (d) comprises MgSiO3. In some embodiments, the Group 2 silicate mineral of step (d) comprises olivine (Mg2[SiO4]). In some embodiments, the Group 2 silicate mineral of step (d) comprises serpentine (Mg6[OH]8[Si4O10]). In some embodiments, the Group 2 silicate mineral of step (d) comprises sepiolite (Mg4[(OH)2Si6O15]·6H2O), enstatite (Mg2[Si2O6]), diopside (CaMg[Si2O6]), and/or tremolite Ca2Mg5{[OH]Si4O11}2. In some embodiments, the Group 2 silicate further comprises iron and or manganese silicates. In some embodiments, the iron silicate is fayalite (Fe2[SiO4]).
In some embodiments, some or all of the first halide or hydrate thereof formed in step (b) is a chloride and is used as the first halide in step (a).
In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide is in the form of flue gas, wherein the flue gas further comprises N2 and H2O.
In some embodiments, suitable reacting conditions of step (a) comprise a temperature from about 200 °C to about 500 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is from about 230 °C to about 260 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is about 250 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is from about 200 °C to about 250 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is about 240 °C.
In some embodiments, suitable reacting conditions of step (a) comprise a temperature from about 50 °C to about 200 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is from about 90 °C to about 260 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is from about 90 °C to about 230 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is about 130 °C.
In some embodiments, suitable reacting conditions of step (a) comprise a temperature from about 400 °C to about 550 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is from about 450 °C to about 500 °C.
In some embodiments, suitable reacting conditions of step (a) comprise a temperature from about 20 °C to about 100 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is from about 25 °C to about 95 °C.
In some embodiments, suitable reacting conditions of step (a) comprise a temperature from about 50 °C to about 200 °C. In some embodiments, the temperature is from about 90 °C to about 150 °C.
Other objects, features and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and the specific examples, while indicating specific embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The following drawings form part of the present specification and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the present disclosure. The invention may be better understood by reference to one of these drawings in combination with the detailed description of specific embodiments presented herein. FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system for a Group 2 hydroxide-based process to sequester CO2 as Group 2 carbonates according to the present invention. FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system in which Mg2+ functions as a catalyst for the sequestration of CO2 as calcium carbonate according to the present invention. FIG. 3 is a simplified process flow diagram according to some embodiments of the processes of the present invention. Shown is a Group-II hydroxide-based process, which sequesters CO2 as limestone (composed largely of the mineral calcite, CaCO3). The term "road salt" in this figure refers to a Group II chloride, such as CaCl2 and/or MgCl2, either or both of which are optionally hydrated. In embodiments comprising MgCl2, heat may be used to drive the reaction between road salt and water (including water of hydration) to form HCl and magnesium hydroxide, Mg(OH)2, and/or magnesium hydroxychloride, Mg(OH)Cl. In embodiments comprising CaCl2, heat may be used to drive the reaction between road salt and water to form calcium hydroxide and HCl. The HCl is reacted with, for example, calcium inosilicate rocks (optionally ground), to form additional road salt, e.g., CaCl2, and sand (SiO2). FIG. 4 is a simplified process-flow diagram corresponding to some embodiments of the present invention. Silicate rocks are used in the present invention to sequester CO2 as CaCO3. The term "road salt" in this figure refers to a Group II chloride, such as CaCl2 and/or MgCl2, either or both of which are optionally hydrated. In the road salt boiler, heat may be used to drive the reaction between road salt, e.g., MgCl2·6H2O, and water (including water of hydration) to form HCl and Group II hydroxides, oxides, and/or mixed hydroxide-chlorides, including, for example, magnesium hydroxide, Mg(OH)2, and/or magnesium hydroxychloride, Mg(OH)Cl. In embodiments comprising CaCl2, heat may be used to drive the reaction between road salt and water to form calcium hydroxide and HCl. The HCl is reacted with silicate rocks, e.g., inosilicates, to form additional road salt, e.g., CaCl2, and sand (SiO2). Ion exchange reaction between Mg2+ and Ca2+ may used, in some of these embodiments, to allow, for example, the cycling of Mg2+ ions. FIG. 5 is a process flow diagram showing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. In this embodiment, a 35% MgCl2, 65% H2O solution is heated to 536 °F (280 °C), then the stream leaves in the stream labeled "H2O-MgOH," which comprises a solution of MgCl2 and solid Mg(OH)2. Typically, when Mg(OH)Cl dissolves in water it forms Mg(OH)2 (solid) and MgCl2 (dissolved). Here the MgCl2 is not used to absorb CO2 directly, rather it is recycled. The net reaction is the capture of CO2 from flue gas using inexpensive raw materials, CaCl2 and water, to form CaCO3. Results from the simulation suggest that it is efficient to recirculate a MgCl2 stream and then to react it with H2O and heat to form Mg(OH)2. One or more of the aforementioned compounds then reacts with a CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to ultimately form CaCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2 formed is recycled to the first reactor to repeat the process. FIG. 6 is a process flow diagram showing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. The net reaction is the capture of CO2 from flue gas using inexpensive raw materials, CaCl2 and water, to form CaCO3. In this embodiment, the hexahydrate is dehydrated in three separate chambers and decomposed in the fourth chamber where the HCl that is formed from the decomposition is recirculated back to the third chamber to prevent any side reactions. Reactions occurring in these chambers include the following:
100 °C
125 °C
160 °C
(HCl vapor present)
130 °C
HCl recirculates to the 3rd chamber.
100°C 90°C-120°C
125°C 160°C-185°C
160°C 190°C- 230°C *
130°C 230°C- 260°C **
HCl recirculates to the 3rd chamber.
The first three reactions above may be characterized as dehydrations, while the fourth may be characterized as a decomposition. Results from this simulation, which is explained in greater detail in Example 2, indicate that at lower temperatures (130-250 °C) the decomposition of MgCl2·6H2O results in the formation of Mg(OH)Cl instead of MgO. The Mg(OH)Cl then reacts with H2O to form MgCl2 and Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form CaCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2 formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again.
FIG. 7 is a process flow diagram showing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. The net reaction is the capture of CO2 from flue gas using inexpensive raw materials, CaCl2 and water, to form CaCO3. In this embodiment, the magnesium hexahydrate is dehydrated in two separate chambers and decomposed in a third chamber. Both dehydration and decomposition reactions occur in the third chamber. There is no recirculating HCl. Reactions occurring in these chambers include the following:
100 °C
125 °C
130 °C
130 °C
100°C 90°C-120°C
125°C 160°C-185°C
130°C 190°C- 230°C *
* No recirculating HCl
The first, second and fourth reactions above may be characterized as dehydrations, while the third may be characterized as a decomposition. As in the embodiment of FIG. 6, the temperatures used in this embodiment result in the formation of Mg(OH)Cl from the MgCl2·6H2O rather than MgO. The Mg(OH)Cl then reacts with H2O to form MgCl2 and Mg(OH)2, which reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form CaCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2 formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again. Additional details regarding this simulation are provided in Example 3 below.
FIG. 8 is a process flow diagram showing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. The net reaction is the capture of CO2 from flue gas using inexpensive raw materials, CaCl2 and water, to form CaCO3. Results from this simulation indicate that it is efficient to heat MgCl2·6H2O to form MgO. The MgO then reacts with H2O to form Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form CaCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2 formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again. In this embodiment, the magnesium hexahydrate is simultaneously dehydrated and decomposed in one chamber at 450 °C. This is the model termperature range. The preferred range in some emobodiments, is 450 °C - 500 °C. Thus the decomposition goes completely to MgO. The main reaction occurring in this chamber can be represented as follows:
450 °C
Additional details regarding this simulation are provided in Example 4 below.
FIG. 9 is a process flow diagram showing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software similar to the embodiment of FIG. 8 except that the MgCl2·6H2O is decomposed into an intermediate compound, Mg(OH)Cl at a lower temperature of 250 °C in one chamber. The Mg(OH)Cl is then dissolved in water to form MgCl2 and Mg(OH)2, which follows through with the same reaction with CaCl2 and CO2 to form CaCO3 and MgCl2. The main reaction occurring in this chamber can be represented as follows:
250 °C
The reaction was modeled at 250 °C. In some embodiments, the preferred range is from 230 °C to 260 °C. Additional details regarding this simulation are provided in Example 5 below.
FIG. 10 shows a graph of the mass percentage of a heated sample of MgCl2·6H2O. The sample's initial mass was approximately 70 mg and set at 100%. During the experiment, the sample's mass was measured while it was being thermally decomposed. The temperature was quickly ramped up to 150 °C, and then slowly increased by 0.5 °C per minute. At approximately 220 °C, the weight became constant, consistent with the formation of Mg(OH)Cl.
FIG. 11 shows X-ray diffraction data corresponding to the product of Example 7.
FIG. 12 shows X-ray diffraction data corresponding to the product from the reaction using Mg(OH)2 of Example 8.
FIG. 13 shows X-ray diffraction data corresponding to the product from the reaction using Mg(OH)Cl of Example 8.
FIG. 14 shows the effect of temperature and pressure on the decomposition of MgCl2·(H2O).
FIG. 15 is a process flow diagram of an embodiment of the Ca/Mg process described herein.
FIG. 16 is a process flow diagram of a variant of the process, whereby only magnesium compounds are used. In this embodiment the Ca2+ - Mg2+ switching reaction does not occur.
FIG. 17 is a process flow diagram of a different variant of the process which is in between the previous two embodiments. Half of the Mg2+ is replaced by Ca2+, thereby making the resulting mineralized carbonate MgCa(CO3)2 or dolomite.
FIG. 18 - CaSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl Process, Cases 10 & 11. This figure shows a process flow diagram providing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. The net reaction is the capture of CO2 from flue gas using inexpensive raw materials, CaSiO3, CO2 and water, to form SiO2 and CaCO3. Results from this simulation indicate that it is efficient to use heat from the HCl reacting with CaSiO3 and heat from the flue gas emitted by a natural gas or coal fired power plant to carry out the decomposition of MgCl2·6H2O to form Mg(OH)Cl. The Mg(OH)Cl then reacts with H2O to form MgCl2 and Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form CaCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2 formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again. In this embodiment, the magnesium chloride hexahydrate is dehydrated to magnesium chloride dihydrate MgCl2·2H2O in the first chamber using heat from the HCl and CaSiO3 reaction and decomposed in a second chamber at 250°C using heat from the flue gas. Thus the decomposition goes partially to Mg(OH)Cl. The main reactions occurring in this chamber can be represented as follows:
-259 90 °C-150 °C
-266 25 °C - 95 °C
** Enthalpies are based on reaction temperatures, and temperatures of incoming reactant and outgoing product streams. Additional details regarding this simulation are provided in Examples 10 and 11 below.
FIG. 19 - CaSiO3-MgO Process, Cases 12 & 13. This figure shows a process flow diagram providing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. The net reaction is the capture of CO2 from flue gas using inexpensive raw materials, CaSiO3, CO2 and water, to form SiO2 and CaCO3. Results from this simulation indicate that it is efficient to use heat from the HCl reacting with CaSiO3 and heat from flue gas emitted by a natural gas or coal fired power plant to carry out the decomposition of MgCl2·6H2O to form MgO. The MgO then reacts with H2O to form Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form CaCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2 formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again. In this embodiment, the magnesium chloride hexahydrate is dehydrated to magnesium chloride dihydrate MgCl2·2H2O in the first chamber using heat from the HCl and CaSiO3 reaction and decomposed in a second chamber at 450°C using heat from the flue gas. Thus the decomposition goes completely to MgO. The main reactions occurring in this chamber can be represented as follows:
560 450 °C - 500 °C
-264 90 °C - 150 °C
-133 25 °C - 95 °C
** Enthalpies are based on reaction temperatures, and temperatures of incoming reactant and outgoing product streams. Additional details regarding this simulation are provided in Examples 12 and 13 below.
FIG. 20 - MgSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl Process, Cases 14 & 15. This figure shows a process flow diagram providing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. The net reaction is the capture of CO2 from flue gas using inexpensive raw materials, MgSiO3, CO2 and water, to form SiO2 and MgCO3. Results from this simulation indicate that it is efficient to use heat from the HCl reacting with MgSiO3 and heat from the flue gas emitted by a natural gas or coal fired power plant to carry out the decomposition of MgCl2·2H2O to form Mg(OH)Cl. The Mg(OH)Cl then reacts with H2O to form MgCl2 and Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with CO2 from the flue gas to form MgCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2 formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again. In this embodiment, the magnesium chloride remains in the dihydrate form MgCl2·2H2O due to the heat from the HCl and MgSiO3 prior to decomposition at 250°C using heat from the flue gas. Thus the decomposition goes partially to Mg(OH)Cl. The main reactions occurring in this chamber can be represented as follows:
139.8 230 °C - 260°C
-282.8 90 °C - 150 °C
-193.1 25 °C - 95 °C
** Enthalpies are based on reaction temperatures, and temperatures of incoming reactant and outgoing product streams. Additional details regarding this simulation are provided in Examples 14 and 15 below.
FIG. 21 - MgSiO3-MgO Process, Cases 16 & 17. This figure shows a process flow diagram providing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. The net reaction is the capture of CO2 from flue gas using inexpensive raw materials, MgSiO3, CO2 and water, to form SiO2 and MgCO3. Results from this simulation indicate that it is efficient to use heat from the HCl reacting with MgSiO3 and heat from the flue gas emitted by a natural gas or coal fired power plant to carry out the decomposition of MgCl2·2H2O to form MgO. The MgO then reacts with H2O to form Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with CO2 from the flue gas to form MgCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. In this embodiment, the magnesium chloride remains in the dihydrate form MgCl2·2H2O due to the heat from the HCl and MgSiO3 prior to decomposition at 450°C using heat from the flue gas. Thus the decomposition goes completely to MgO. The main reactions occurring in this chamber can be represented as follows:
232.9 450 °C - 500°C
-293.5 90 °C - 150 °C
-100 25 °C - 95 °C
** Enthalpies are based on reaction temperatures, and temperatures of incoming reactant and outgoing product streams. Additional details regarding this simulation are provided in Examples 16 and 17 below.
FIG. 22 - Diopside-Mg(OH)Cl Process, Cases 18 & 19. This figure shows a process flow diagram providing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. The net reaction is the capture of CO2 from flue gas using inexpensive raw materials, diopside MgCa(SiO3)2, CO2 and water, to form SiO2 and dolomite MgCa(CO3)2. Results from this simulation indicate that it is efficient to use heat from the HCl reacting with MgCa(SiO3)2 and heat from the flue gas emitted by a natural gas or coal fired power plant to carry out the decomposition of MgCl2·6H2O to form Mg(OH)Cl. The Mg(OH)Cl then reacts with H2O to form MgCl2 and Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form MgCa(CO3)2 which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2 formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again. In this embodiment, the magnesium chloride hexahydrate is dehydrated to magnesium chloride dihydrate MgCl2·2H2O in the first chamber using heat from the HCl and CaSiO3 reaction and decomposed to Mg(OH)Cl in a second chamber at 250°C using heat from the flue gas. The main reactions occurring in this chamber can be represented as follows:
433 230 °C - 260 °C
-235 90 °C-150 °C
-282.8 90 °C-150 °C
-442 25 °C - 95 °C
** Enthalpies are based on reaction temperatures, and temperatures of incoming reactant and outgoing product streams. Additional details regarding this simulation are provided in Examples 18 and 19 below.
FIG. 23 - Diopside-MgO Process, Cases 20 & 21. This figure shows a process flow diagram providing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. The net reaction is the capture of CO2 from flue gas using inexpensive raw materials, diopside MgCa(SiO3)2, CO2 and water, to form SiO2 and dolomite MgCa(CO3)2. Results from this simulation indicate that it is efficient to use heat from the HCl reacting with MgCa(SiO3)2 and heat from the flue gas emitted by a natural gas or coal fired power plant and/or other heat source to carry out the decomposition of MgCl2·6H2O to form MgO. The MgO then reacts with H2O to form Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form MgCa(CO3)2 which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2 formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again. In this embodiment, the magnesium chloride hexahydrate is dehydrated to magnesium chloride dihydrate MgCl2·2H2O in the first chamber using heat from the HCl and CaSiO3 reaction and decomposed to MgO in a second chamber at 450°C using heat from the flue gas. The main reactions occurring in this chamber can be represented as follows:
560 450 °C - 500°C
-240 90 °C-150 °C
-288 90 °C - 150 °C
-258 25 °C - 95 °C
** Enthalpies are based on reaction temperatures, and temperatures of incoming reactant and outgoing product streams. Additional details regarding this simulation are provided in Examples 20 and 21 below.
FIG. 24 illustrates the percent CO2 captured for varying CO2 flue gas concentrations, varying temperatures, whether the flue gas was originated from coal or natural gas, and also whether the process relied on full or partial decomposition. See Examples 10 through 13 of the CaSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl and CaSiO3-MgO processes.
FIG. 25 illustrates the percent CO2 captured for varying CO2 flue gas concentrations, varying temperatures, whether the flue gas was originated from coal or natural gas, and also whether the process relied on full or partial decomposition. See Examples 14 through 17 of the MgSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl and MgSiO3-MgO processes.
FIG. 26 illustrates the percent CO2 captured for varying CO2 flue gas concentrations, varying temperatures, whether the flue gas was originated from coal or natural gas, and also whether the process relied on full or partial decomposition. See Examples 18 through 21 of the Diopside - Mg(OH)Cl and Diopside - MgO processes.
FIGS. 28-29 show graphs of the mass percentages of heated samples of MgCl2·6H2O. The initial masses of the samples were approximately 70 mg each and were each set at 100%. During the experiment, the masses of the samples were measured while they was being thermally decomposed. The temperature was ramped up to 200 °C then further increased over the course of a 12 hour run. The identities of the decomposed materials can be confirmed by comparing against the theoretical plateaus provided. FIG. 28 is a superposition of two plots, the first one being the solid line, which is a plot of time (minutes) versus temperature (°C). The line illustrates the ramping of temperature over time; the second plot, being the dashed line is a plot of weight % (100% = original weight of sample) versus time, which illustrates the reduction of the sample's weight over time whether by dehydration or decomposition. FIG. 29 is also a superposition of two plots, the first (the solid line) is a plot of weight% versus temperature (°C), illustrating the sample's weight decreasing as the temperature increases; the second plot (the dashed line) is a plot of the derivative of the weight% with respect to temperature (wt.%/°C) versus temperature °C. When this value is high it indicates a higher rate of weight loss for each change per degree. If this value is zero, the sample's weight remains the same although the temperature is increasing, indicating an absence of dehydration or decomposition. Note Figure 28 and 29 are of the same sample.
FIG. 30 - MgCl2 ·6H2O Decomposition at 500°C after One Hour. This graph shows the normalized final and initial weights of four test runs of MgCl2·6H2O after heating at 500 °C for one hour. The consistent final weight confirms that MgO is made by decomposition at this temperature.
FIG. 31 - Three-Chamber Decomposition. This figure shows a process flow diagram providing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. In this embodiment, heat from cold flue gas (chamber 1), heat from mineral dissolution reactor (chamber 2), and external natural gas (chamber 3) are used as heat sources. This process flow diagram illustrates a three chamber process for the decomposition to Mg(OH)Cl. The first chamber is heated by 200 °C flue gas to provide some initial heat about ∼8.2% of the total required heat, the second chamber which relies on heat recovered from the mineral dissolution reactor to provide 83% of the needed heat for the decomposition of which 28% is from the hydrochloric acid/mineral silicate reaction and 55% is from the condensation and formation of hydrochloric acid, and finally the third chamber, which uses natural gas as an external source of the remaining heat which is 8.5% of the total heat. The CO2 is from a combined cycle power natural gas plant, so very little heat is available from the power plant to power the decomposition reaction.
FIG. 32 - Four-Chamber Decomposition. This figure shows a process flow diagram providing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. In this embodiment, heat from cold flue gas (chamber 1), heat from additional steam (chamber 2), heat from mineral dissolution reactor (chamber 3), and external natural gas (chamber 4) are used as heat sources. This process flow diagram illustrates a four chamber process for the decomposition to Mg(OH)Cl, the first chamber provides 200 °C flue gas to provide some initial heat about ∼8.2% of the total required heat, the second chamber provides heat in the form of extra steam which is 0.8% of the total heat needed, the third chamber which relies on heat recovered from the mineral dissolution reactor to provide 83% of the needed heat for the decomposition of which 28% is from the hydrochloric acid/mineral silicate reaction and 55% is from the condensation and formation of hydrochloric acid, and finally the fourth chamber, which uses natural gas as an external source of the remaining heat which is 8.0% of the total heat. The CO2 is from a combined cycle natural gas power plant, so very little heat is available from the power plant to power the decomposition reaction.
FIG. 33 - Two-Chamber Decomposition. This figure shows a process flow diagram providing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. In this embodiment, heat from mineral dissolution reactor (chamber 1), and external natural gas (chamber 2) are used as heat sources. This process flow diagram illustrates a two chamber process for the decomposition to Mg(OH)Cl, the first chamber which relies on heat recovered from the mineral dissolution reactor to provide 87% of the needed heat for the decomposition of which 28% is from the hydrochloric acid/mineral silicate reaction and 59% is from the condensation and formation of hydrochloric acid, and the second chamber, which uses natural gas as an external source of the remaining heat which is 13% of the total heat. The CO2 is from a combined cycle natural gas power plant, so very little heat is available from the power plant to power the decomposition reaction.
FIG. 34 - Two-Chamber Decomposition. This figure shows a process flow diagram providing parameters and results from a process simulation using Aspen Plus process software. In this embodiment, heat from mineral dissolution reactor (chamber 1), and hot flue gas from open cycle natural gas plant (chamber 2) are used as heat sources. This process flow diagram illustrates a two chamber process for the decomposition to Mg(OH)Cl, the first chamber which relies on heat recovered from the mineral dissolution reactor to provide 87% of the needed heat for the decomposition of which 28% is from the hydrochloric acid/mineral silicate reaction and 59% is from the condensation and formation of hydrochloric acid, and the second chamber, which uses hot flue gas as an external source of the remaining heat which is 13% of the total heat. The CO2 is from an open cycle natural gas power plant, therefore substantial heat is available from the power plant in the form of 600 °C flue gas to power the decomposition reaction.
FIG. 35 shows a schematic diagram of a Auger reactor which may be used for the salt decomposition reaction, including the decomposition of MgCl2·6H2O to M(OH)Cl or MgO. Such reactors may comprises internal heating for efficient heat utilization, external insulation for efficient heat utilization, a screw mechanism for adequate solid transport (when solid is present), adequate venting for HCl removal. Such a reactors has been used to prepare ∼1.8kg of ∼90% Mg(OH)Cl.
FIG. 36 shows the optimization index for two separate runs of making Mg(OH)Cl using an Auger reactor. The optimization index = % conversion × % efficiency.
FIG. 37 shows a process flow diagram of an Aspen model that simulates an CaSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl Process.
DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
The present invention relates to carbon dioxide sequestration, including energy-efficient processes in which Group 2 chlorides are converted to Group 2 hydroxides and hydrogen chloride, which are then used to remove carbon dioxide from waste streams. The hydrogen chloride is further reacted with Group 2 silicates to produce additional Group 2 chloride starting materials and silica.
In some embodiments, the methods of the invention comprise one or more of the following general components: (1) the conversion of Group 2 silicate minerals with hydrogen chloride into Group 2 chlorides and silicon dioxide, (2) conversion of Group 2 chlorides into Group 2 hydroxides and hydrogen chloride, (3) an aqueous decarbonation whereby gaseous CO2 is absorbed into an aqueous caustic mixture comprising Group 2 hydroxides to form Group 2 carbonate and/or bicarbonate products and water, (4) a separation process whereby the carbonate and/or bicarbonate products are separated from the liquid mixture, (5) the reuse or cycling of by-products, including energy, from one or more of the steps or process streams into another one or more steps or process streams. Each of these general components is explained in further detail below.
While many embodiments of the present invention consume some energy to accomplish the absorption of CO2 and other chemicals from flue-gas streams and to accomplish the other objectives of embodiments of the present invention as described herein, one advantage of certain embodiments of the present invention is that they provide ecological efficiencies that are superior to those of the prior art, while absorbing most or all of the emitted CO2 from a given source, such as a power plant.
Another additional benefit of certain embodiments of the present invention that distinguishes them from other CO2-removal processes is that in some market conditions, the products are worth considerably more than the reactants required or the net-power or plant-depreciation costs. In other words, certain embodiments are industrial methods of producing chloro-hydro-carbonate products at a profit, while accomplishing considerable removal of CO2 and incidental pollutants of concern.
I. Definitions
As used herein, the terms "carbonates" or "carbonate products" are generally defined as mineral components containing the carbonate group, [CO3]2-. Thus, the terms encompass both carbonate/bicarbonate mixtures and species containing solely the carbonate ion. The terms "bicarbonates" and "bicarbonate products" are generally defined as mineral components containing the bicarbonate group, [HCO3]1-. Thus, the terms encompass both carbonate/bicarbonate mixtures and species containing solely the bicarbonate ion. As used herein "Ca/Mg" signifies either Ca alone, Mg alone or a mixture of both Ca and Mg. The ratio of Ca to Mg may range from 0:100 to 100:0, including, e.g., 1:99, 5:95, 10:90, 20:80, 30:70, 40:60, 50:50, 60:40, 70:30, 80:20, 90:10, 95:5, and 99:1. The symbols "Ca/Mg", "MgxCa(1-x)" and CaxMg(1-x)" are synonymous. In contrast, "CaMg" or "MgCa" refers to a 1:1 ratio of these two ions.
As used herein, the term "ecological efficiency" is used synonymously with the term "thermodynamic efficiency" and is defined as the amount of CO2 sequestered by certain embodiments of the present invention per energy consumed (represented by the equation "∂CO2/∂E"), appropriate units for this value are kWh/ton CO2. CO2 sequestration is denominated in terms of percent of total plant CO2; energy consumption is similarly denominated in terms of total plant power consumption.
The terms "Group II" and "Group 2" are used interchangeably.
"Hexahydrate" refers to MgCl2·6H2O.
In the formation of bicarbonates and carbonates using some embodiments of the present invention, the term "ion ratio" refers to the ratio of cations in the product divided by the number of carbons present in that product. Hence, a product stream formed of calcium bicarbonate (Ca(HCO3)2) may be said to have an "ion ratio" of 0.5 (Ca/C), whereas a product stream formed of pure calcium carbonate (CaCO3) may be said to have an "ion ratio" of 1.0 (Ca/C). By extension, an infinite number of continuous mixtures of carbonate and bicarbonate of mono-, di- and trivalent cations may be said to have ion ratios varying between 0.5 and 3.0.
Based on the context, the abbreviation "MW" either means molecular weight or megawatts.
The abbreviation "PFD" is process flow diagram.
The abbreviation "Q" is heat (or heat duty), and heat is a type of energy. This does not include any other types of energy.
As used herein, the term "sequestration" is used to refer generally to techniques or practices whose partial or whole effect is to remove CO2 from point emissions sources and to store that CO2 in some form so as to prevent its return to the atmosphere. Use of this term does not exclude any form of the described embodiments from being considered "sequestration" techniques.
In the context of a chemical formula, the abbreviation "W" refers to H2O.
The pyroxenes are a group of silicate minerals found in many igneous and metamorphic rocks. They share a common structure consisting of single chains of silica tetrahedra and they crystallize in the monoclinic and orthorhombic systems. Pyroxenes have the general formula XY(Si,Al)2O6, where X represents calcium, sodium, iron (II) and magnesium and more rarely zinc, manganese and lithium and Y represents ions of smaller size, such as chromium, aluminium, iron(III), magnesium, manganese, scandium, titanium, vanadium and even iron (II).
In addition, atoms making up the compounds of the present invention are intended to include all isotopic forms of such atoms. Isotopes, as used herein, include those atoms having the same atomic number but different mass numbers. By way of general example and without limitation, isotopes of hydrogen include tritium and deuterium, and isotopes of carbon include 13C and 14C.
The use of the word "a" or "an," when used in conjunction with the term "comprising" in the claims and/or the specification may mean "one," but it is also consistent with the meaning of "one or more," "at least one," and "one or more than one."
Throughout this application, the term "about" is used to indicate that a value includes the inherent variation of error for the device, the method being employed to determine the value, or the variation that exists among the study subjects.
The terms "comprise," "have" and "include" are open-ended linking verbs. Any forms or tenses of one or more of these verbs, such as "comprises," "comprising," "has," "having," "includes" and "including," are also open-ended. For example, any method that "comprises," "has" or "includes" one or more steps is not limited to possessing only those one or more steps and also covers other unlisted steps.
The term "effective," as that term is used in the specification and/or claims, means adequate to accomplish a desired, expected, or intended result.
The above definitions supersede any conflicting definition in any of the reference mentioned herein. The fact that certain terms are defined, however, should not be considered as indicative that any term that is undefined is indefinite. Rather, all terms used are believed to describe the invention in terms such that one of ordinary skill can appreciate the scope and practice the present invention.
II. Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide Using Salts of Group II Metals
FIG. 1 depicts a simplified process-flow diagram illustrating general, exemplary embodiments of the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure. This diagram is offered for illustrative purposes only, and depicts specific embodiments of the present invention.
In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 , reactor 10 (e.g., a road salt boiler) uses power, such as external power and/or recaptured power (e.g., heat from hot flue gas or an external source of heat such as solar concentration or combustion), to drive a reaction represented by equation 1.         (Ca/Mg)Cl2 + 2 H2O → (Ca/Mg)(OH)2 + 2 HCl     (1) The water used in this reaction may be in the form of liquid, steam, a crystalline hydrate, e.g., MgCl2·6H2O, CaCl2·2H2O, or it may be supercritical. In some embodiments, the reaction uses MgCl2 to form Mg(OH)2 and/or Mg(OH)Cl (see, e.g., FIG. 2). In some embodiments, the reaction uses CaCl2 to form Ca(OH)2. Some or all of the Group 2 hydroxide or hydroxychloride (not shown) from equation 1 are delivered to reactor 20. In some embodiments, some or all of the Group 2 hydroxide and/or Group 2 hydroxychloride is delivered to reactor 20 as an aqueous solution. In some embodiments, some or all of the Group 2 hydroxide is delivered to reactor 20 in an aqueous suspension. In some embodiments, some or all of the Group 2 hydroxide is delivered to reactor 20 as a solid. Some or all of the hydrogen chloride (e.g., in the form of vapor or in the form of hydrochloric acid) is delivered to reactor 30 (e.g., a rock melter). In some embodiments, the resulting Group 2 hydroxides are further heated to remove water and form corresponding Group 2 oxides. In some variants, some or all of these Group 2 oxides may then be delivered to reactor 20.
Carbon dioxide from a source, e.g., flue-gas, enters the process at reactor 20 (e.g., a fluidized bed reactor, a spray-tower decarbonator or a decarbonation bubbler), potentially after initially exchanging waste-heat with a waste-heat/DC generation system. In some embodiments the temperature of the flue gas is at least 125 °C. The Group 2 hydroxide, some or all of which may be obtained from reactor 10, reacts with carbon dioxide in reactor 20 according to the reaction represented by equation 2.         (Ca/Mg)(OH)2 + CO2 → (Ca/Mg)CO3 + H2O     (2) The water produced from this reaction may be delivered back to reactor 10. The Group 2 carbonate is typically separated from the reaction mixture. Group 2 carbonates have a very low K sp (solubility product constant). So they be separated as solids from other, more soluble compounds that can be kept in solution. In some embodiments, the reaction proceeds through Group 2 bicarbonate salts. In some embodiments, Group 2 bicarbonate salts are generated and optionally then separated from the reaction mixture. In some embodiments, Group 2 oxides, optionally together with or separately from the Group 2 hydroxides, are reacted with carbon dioxide to also form Group 2 carbonate salts. In some embodiments, the flue gas, from which CO2 and/or other pollutants have been removed, is released to the air.
Group 2 silicates (e.g., CaSiO3, MgSiO3, MgO·FeO·SiO2, etc.) enter the process at reactor 30 (e.g., a rock melter or a mineral dissociation reactor). In some embodiments, these Group 2 silicates are ground in a prior step. In some embodiments, the Group 2 silicates are inosilicates. These minerals may be reacted with hydrochloric acid, either as a gas or in the form of hydrochloric acid, some or all of which may be obtained from reactor 10, to form the corresponding Group 2 metal chlorides (CaCl2 and/or MgCl2), water and sand (SiO2). The reaction can be represented by equation 3.         2 HCl + (Ca/Mg)SiO3 → (Ca/Mg)Cl2 + H2O + SiO2     (3) Some or all of the water produced from this reaction may be delivered to reactor 10. Some or all of the Group 2 chlorides from equation 3 may be delivered to reactor 20. In some embodiments, some or all of the Group 2 chloride is delivered to reactor 20 as an aqueous solution. In some embodiments, some or all of the Group 2 chloride is delivered to reactor 20 in an aqueous suspension. In some embodiments, some or all of the Group 2 chloride is delivered to reactor 20 as a solid.
The net reaction capturing the summation of equations 1-3 is shown here as equation 4:         CO2 + (Ca/Mg)SiO3 → (Ca/Mg)CO3 + SiO2     (4)
In another embodiment, the resulting MgxCa(1-x)CO3 sequestrant is reacted with HCl in a manner to regenerate and concentrate the CO2. The Ca/MgCl2 thus formed is returned to the decomposition reactor to produce CO2 absorbing hydroxides or hydroxyhalides.
Through the process shown in FIG. 1 and described herein, Group 2 carbonates are generated as end-sequestrant material from the captured CO2. Some or all of the water, hydrogen chloride and/or reaction energy may be cycled. In some embodiments, only some or none of these are cycled. In some embodiments, the water, hydrogen chloride and reaction energy made be used for other purposes.
In some embodiments, and depending on the concentration of CO2 in the flue gas stream of a given plant, the methods disclosed herein may be used to capture 33-66% of the plant's CO2 using heat-only as the driver (no electrical penalty). In some embodiments, the efficiencies of the methods disclosed herein improve with lower CO2-concentrations, and increase with higher (unscrubbed) flue-gas temperatures. For example, at 320 °C and 7% CO2 concentration, 33% of flue-gas CO2 can be mineralized from waste-heat alone. In other embodiments, e.g., at the exit temperatures of natural gas turbines approximately 100% mineralization can be achieved.
These methods and devices can be further modified, e.g., with modular components, optimized and scaled up using the principles and techniques of chemistry, chemical engineering, and/or materials science as applied by a person skilled in the art. Such principles and techniques are taught, for example, in U.S. Patent 7,727,374 , U.S. Patent Application Publications 2006/0185985 and 2009/0127127 , U.S. Patent Application No. 11/233,509, filed September 22, 2005 , U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/718,906, filed September 20, 2005 ; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/642,698, filed January 10, 2005 ; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/612,355, filed September 23, 2004 , U.S. Patent Application No. 12/235,482, filed September 22, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/973,948, filed September 20, 2007 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/032,802, filed February 29, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/033,298, filed March 3, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/288,242, filed January 20, 2010 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/362,607, filed July 8, 2010 , and International Application No. PCT/US08/77122, filed September 19, 2008 .
The above examples were included to demonstrate particular embodiments of the present invention.
III. Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide Using Mg2+ as Catalyst
FIG. 2 depicts a simplified process-flow diagram illustrating general, exemplary embodiments of the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure. This diagram is offered for illustrative purposes only, and depicts specific embodiments of the present invention.
In the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 , reactor 100 uses power, such as external power and/or recaptured power (e.g., heat from hot flue gas), to drive a decomposition -type reaction represented by equation 5.         MgCl2·x(H2O) + yH2O → z'[Mg(OH)2] + z"[MgO] + z"'[MgCl(OH)] + (2z' + 2z" + z"')[HCl]     (5) The water used in this reaction may be in the form of a hydrate of magnesium chloride, liquid, steam and/or it may be supercritical. In some embodiments, the reaction may occur in one, two, three or more reactors. In some embodiments, the reaction may occur as a batch, semi-batch of continuous process. Some or all of the magnesium salt product are delivered to reactor 200. In some embodiments, some or all of the magnesium salt product is delivered to reactor 200 as an aqueous solution. In some embodiments, some or all of the magnesium salt product is delivered to reactor 200 in an aqueous suspension. In some embodiments, some or all of the magnesium salt product is delivered to reactor 200 as a solid. Then, some or all of the hydrogen chloride (e.g., in the form of vapor or in the form of hydrochloric acid) is delivered to reactor 300 (e.g., a rock melter). In some embodiments, the Mg(OH)2 is further heated to remove water and form MgO. In some embodiments, the MgCl(OH) is further heated to remove HCl and form MgO. In some variants, one or more of Mg(OH)2, MgCl(OH) and MgO may then be delivered to reactor 200.
Carbon dioxide from a source, e.g., flue-gas, enters the process at reactor 200 (e.g., a fluidized bed reactor, a spray-tower decarbonator or a decarbonation bubbler), potentially after initially exchanging waste-heat with a waste-heat/DC generation system. In some embodiments the temperature of the flue gas is at least 125 °C. Admixed with the carbon dioxide is the magnesium salt product from reactor 100 and CaCl2 (e.g., rock salt). The carbon dioxide reacts with the magnesium salt product and CaCl2 in reactor 200 according to the reaction represented by equation 6.         CO2 + CaCl2 + z'[Mg(OH)2] + z"[MgO] + z"'[MgCl(OH)] → (z' + z" + z"')MgCl2 + (z' + ½z"')H2O + CaCO3     (6) In some embodiments, the water produced from this reaction may be delivered back to reactor 100. The calcium carbonate product (e.g., limestone, calcite) is typically separated (e.g., through precipitation) from the reaction mixture. In some embodiments, the reaction proceeds through magnesium carbonate and bicarbonate salts. In some embodiments, the reaction proceeds through calcium bicarbonate salts. In some embodiments, various Group 2 bicarbonate salts are generated and optionally then separated from the reaction mixture. In some embodiments, the flue gas, from which CO2 and/or other pollutants have been removed, is released to the air, optionally after one or more further purification and/or treatment steps. In some embodiments, the MgCl2 product, optionally hydrated, is returned to reactor 100. In some embodiments, the MgCl2 product is subjected to one or more isolation, purification and/or hydration steps before being returned to reactor 100.
Calcium silicate (e.g., 3CaO·SiO2, Ca3SiO5; 2CaO·SiO2, Ca2SiO4; 3CaO·2SiO2, Ca3Si2O7 and CaO·SiO2, CaSiO3 enters the process at reactor 300 (e.g., a rock melter). In some embodiments, these Group 2 silicates are ground in a prior step. In some embodiments, the Group 2 silicates are inosilicates. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, the inosilicate is CaSiO3 (e.g., wollastonite, which may itself, in some embodiments, contain small amounts of iron, magnesium and/or manganese substituting for iron). The CaSiO3 is reacted with hydrogen chloride, either gas or in the form of hydrochloric acid, some or all of which may be obtained from reactor 100, to form CaCl2, water and sand (SiO2). The reaction can be represented by equation 7.         2 HCl + (Ca/Mg)SiO3 → (Ca/Mg)Cl2 + H2O + SiO2     (7)
-254 90 °C - 150 °C
-288 90 °C - 150 °C
The net reaction capturing the summation of equations 5-7 is shown here as equation 8:         CO2 + CaSiO3 → CaCO3 + SiO2     (8)
-89 -39
These methods and devices can be further modified, optimized and scaled up using the principles and techniques of chemistry, chemical engineering, and/or materials science as applied by a person skilled in the art. Such principles and techniques are taught, for example, in U.S. Patent 7,727,374 , U.S. Patent Application Publications 2006/0185985 and 2009/0127127 , U.S. Patent Application No. 11/233,509, filed September 22, 2005 , U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/718,906, filed September 20, 2005 ; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/642,698, filed January 10, 2005 ; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/612,355, filed September 23, 2004 , U.S. Patent Application No. 12/235,482, filed September 22, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/973,948, filed September 20, 2007 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/032,802, filed February 29, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/033,298, filed March 3, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/288,242, filed January 20, 2010 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/362,607, filed July 8, 2010 , and International Application No. PCT/US08/77122, filed September 19, 2008 ..
The above examples were included to demonstrate particular embodiments of the invention.
IV. Conversion of Group 2 Chlorides into Group 2 Hydroxides or Group II Hydroxy Chlorides
Disclosed herein are processes that react a Group 2 chloride, e.g., CaCl2 or MgCl2, with water to form a Group 2 hydroxide, a Group 2 oxide, and/or a mixed salt such as a Group 2 hydroxide chloride. Such reactions are typically referred to as decompositions. In some embodiments, the water may be in the form of liquid, steam, from a hydrate of the Group 2 chloride, and/or it may be supercritical. The steam may come from a heat exchanger whereby heat from an immensely combustible reaction, i.e. natural gas and oxygen or hydrogen and chlorine heats a stream of water. In some embodiments, steam may also be generated through the use of plant or factory waste heat. In some embodiments, the chloride salt, anhydrous or hydrated, is also heated.
In the case of Mg2+ and Ca2+, the reactions may be represented by equations 9 and 10, respectively:         MgCl2+ 2 H2O → Mg(OH)2 + 2 HCl(g) ΔH = 263 kJ/mole**     (9)         CaCl2 + 2 H2O → Ca(OH)2 + 2 HCl(g) ΔH = 284 kJ/mole**     (10) **Measured at 100 °C. The reactions are endothermic meaning energy, e.g., heat has to be applied to make these reactions occur. Such energy may be obtained from the waste-heat generated from one or more of the exothermic process steps disclosed herein. The above reactions may occur according to one of more of the following steps:         CaCl2 + (x + y + z) H2O → Ca2·xH2O + Cl·yH2O + Cl·zH2O     (11)         Ca+2·xH2O + Cl-·yH2O + Cl-·zH2O → [Ca2+·(x-1)(H2O)OH-]+ + Cl-·(yH2O) + Cl-·(z-1)H2O + H3O+     (12)         [Ca2+·(x-1)(H2O)OH-]+ + Cl·(yH2O) + Cl-·(z-1)H2O + H3O+ → [Ca2+·(x-1)(H2O)OH-]+ + Cl-·(yH2O)- + zH2O + HCl(g)↑     (13)         [Ca2+·(x-1)(H2O)OH-]+ + Cl·(yH2O) → [Ca2+·(x-2)(H2O) (OH-)2] + Cl-·(y-1)H2O + H3O+     (14)         [Ca2+·(x-2)(H2O) (OH-)2] + Cl-·(y-1)H2O + H3O+ → Ca(OH)2↓ + (x-2)H2O + yH2O + HCl↑     (15) The reaction enthalpy (ΔH) for CaCl2 + 2 H2O → Ca(OH)2 + 2 HCl(g) is 284 kJ/mole at 100 °C. In some variants, the salt MgCl2·6H2O, magnesium hexahydrate, is used. Since water is incorporated into the molecular structure of the salt, direct heating without any additional steam or water may be used to initiate the decomposition. Typical reactions temperatures for the following reactions are shown here: From 95-110 °C:         MgCl2·6H2O → MgCl2·4H2O + 2 H2O     (16)         MgCl2·4H2O → MgCl2·2H2O + 2 H2O     (17) From 135-180 °C:         MgCl2·4H2O → Mg(OH)Cl + HCl + 3 H2O     (18)         MgCl2·2H2O → MgCl2·H2O + H2O     (19) From 185-230 °C:         MgCl2·2H2O → Mg(OH)Cl + HCl +H2O     (20) From >230 °C:         MgCl2·H2O → MgCl2 + H2O     (21)         MgCl2·H2O → Mg(OH)Cl + HCl     (22)         Mg(OH)Cl → MgO + HCl     (23)
95 °C-110 °C 115.7 100°C
95 °C-110 °C 134.4 100°C
135 °C - 180 °C 275 160°C
135 °C - 180 °C 70.1 160°C
185 °C-230 °C 141 210°C
>230 °C 76.6 240°C
>230 °C 70.9 240°C
>230 °C 99.2 450°C
V. Reaction of Group 2 Hydroxides and CO2 to Form Group 2 Carbonates
In another aspect of the present disclosure, there are provided apparatuses and methods for the decarbonation of carbon dioxide sources using Group 2 hydroxides, Group 2 oxides, and/or Group 2 hydroxide chlorides as CO2 adsorbents. In some embodiments, CO2 is absorbed into an aqueous caustic mixture and/or solution where it reacts with the hydroxide and/or oxide salts to form carbonate and bicarbonate products. Sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide and magnesium hydroxide, in various concentrations, are known to readily absorb CO2. Thus, in embodiments of the present invention, Group 2 hydroxides, Group 2 oxides (such as CaO and/or MgO) and/or other hydroxides and oxides, e.g., sodium hydroxide may be used as the absorbing reagent.
For example, a Group 2 hydroxide, e.g., obtained from a Group 2 chloride, may be used in an adsorption tower to react with and thereby capture CO2 based on one or both of the following reactions:         Ca(OH)2 + CO2 → CaCO3 + H2O     (24)
  • ΔH = -117.92 kJ/mol**
  • ΔG =-79.91 kJ/mol**
        Mg(OH)2 + CO2 → MgCO3 + H2O     (25)
  • ΔH = -58.85 kJ/mol**
  • ΔG = -16.57 kJ/mol**
** Calculated at STP.
In some embodiments of the present invention, most or nearly all of the carbon dioxide is reacted in this manner. In some embodiments, the reaction may be driven to completion, for example, through the removal of water, whether through continuous or discontinous processes, and/or by means of the precipitation of bicarbonate, carbonate, or a mixture of both types of salts. See example 1, below, providing a simulation demonstrating the ability to capture CO2 from flue gas using an inexpensive raw material, Ca(CO)2 derived from CaCl2, to form CaCO3.
In some embodiments, an initially formed Group 2 may undergo an salt exchange reaction with a second Group 2 hydroxide to transfer the carbonate anion. For example:         CaCl2 + MgCO3 +→ MgCl2 + CaCO3     (25a)
These methods and devices can be further modified, optimized and scaled up using the principles and techniques of chemistry, chemical engineering, and/or materials science as applied by a person skilled in the art. Such principles and techniques are taught, for example, in U.S. Patent 7,727,374 , U.S. Patent Application No. 11/233,509, filed September 22, 2005 , U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/718,906, filed September 20, 2005 ; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/642,698, filed January 10, 2005 ; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/612,355, filed September 23, 2004 , U.S. Patent Application No. 12/235,482, filed September 22, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/973,948, filed September 20, 2007 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/032,802, filed February 29, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/033,298, filed March 3, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/288,242, filed January 20, 2010 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/362,607, filed July 8, 2010 , and International Application No. PCT/US08/77122, filed September 19, 2008 .
VI. Silicate Minerals for the Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide
The present invention provided methods of sequestering carbon dioxide using silicate minerals. The silicate minerals make up one of the largest and most important classes of rock-forming minerals, constituting approximately 90 percent of the crust of the Earth. They are classified based on the structure of their silicate group. Silicate minerals all contain silicon and oxygen. In the present invention, Group 2 silicates are used to accomplish the energy efficient sequestration of carbon dioxide.
In some embodiments, compositions comprising Group 2 inosilicates may be used. Inosilicates, or chain silicates, have interlocking chains of silicate tetrahedra with either SiO3, 1:3 ratio, for single chains or Si4O11, 4:11 ratio, for double chains.
In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein use compositions comprising Group 2 inosilicates from the pyroxene group. For example, enstatite (MgSiO3) may be used.
In some embodiments, compositions comprising Group 2 inosilicates from the pyroxenoid group are used. For example, wollastonite (CaSiO3) may be used. In some embodiments, compositions comprising mixtures of Group 2 inosilicates may be employed, for example, mixtures of enstatite and wollastonite. In some embodiments, compositions comprising mixed-metal Group 2 inosilicates may be used, for example, diopside (CaMgSi2O6).
Wollastonite usually occurs as a common constituent of a thermally metamorphosed impure limestone. Typically wollastonite results from the following reaction (equation 26) between calcite and silica with the loss of carbon dioxide:         CaCO3 + SiO2 → CaSiO3 + CO2     (26)
In some embodiments, the present invention has the result of effectively reversing this natural process. Wollastonite may also be produced in a diffusion reaction in skarn. It develops when limestone within a sandstone is metamorphosed by a dyke, which results in the formation of wollastonite in the sandstone as a result of outward migration of calcium ions.
In some embodiments, the purity of the Group 2 inosilicate compositions may vary. For example, it is contemplated that the Group 2 inosilicate compositions used in the disclosed processes may contain varying amounts of other compounds or minerals, including non-Group 2 metal ions. For example, wollastonite may itself contain small amounts of iron, magnesium, and manganese substituting for calcium.
In some embodiments, compositions comprising olivine and/or serpentine may be used. CO2 mineral sequestration processes utilizing these minerals have been attempted. The techniques of Goldberg et al. (2001) are specifically referred to.
The mineral olivine is a magnesium iron silicate with the formula (Mg,Fe)2SiO4. When in gem-quality, it is called peridot. Olivine occurs in both mafic and ultramafic igneous rocks and as a primary mineral in certain metamorphic rocks. Mg-rich olivine is known to crystallize from magma that is rich in magnesium and low in silica. Upon crystallization, the magna forms mafic rocks such as gabbro and basalt. Ultramafic rocks, such as peridotite and dunite, can be residues left after extraction of magmas and typically are more enriched in olivine after extraction of partial melts. Olivine and high pressure structural variants constitute over 50% of the Earth's upper mantle, and olivine is one of the Earth's most common minerals by volume. The metamorphism of impure dolomite or other sedimentary rocks with high magnesium and low silica content also produces Mg-rich olivine, or forsterite.
VII. Generation of Group 2 Chlorides from Group 2 Silicates
Group 2 silicates, e.g., CaSiO3, MgSiO3, and/or other silicates disclosed herein, are reacted with hydrochloric acid, either as a gas or in the form of aqueous hydrochloric acid, to form the corresponding Group 2 metal chlorides (CaCl2 and/or MgCl2), water and sand. The HCl produced in equation 1 is used to regenerate the MgCl2 and/or CaCl2 in equation 3. A process loop is thereby created. Table 1 below depicts some of the common calcium/magnesium containing silicate minerals that may be used, either alone or in combination. Initial tests by reacting olivine and serpentine with HCl have been successful. SiO2 was observed to precipitate out and MgCl2 and CaCl2 were collected. Table 1. Calcium/Magnesium Minerals.
Olivine 1:1 1:2
Serpentine 3:2 undefine d
Sepiolite 2:3 undefine d
Enstatite 1:1 undefine d
Diopside 1:1 undefine d
Tremolite 7:8 undefine d
Wollastonit e 1:1 undefine d
See "Handbook of Rocks, Minerals & Gemstones by Walter Schumann Published 1993, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, New York.
VIII. Further Embodiments
In some embodiments, the conversion of carbon dioxide to mineral carbonates may be defined by two salts. The first salt is one that may be heated to decomposition until it becomes converted to a base (hydroxide and/or oxide) and emits an acid, for example, as a gas. This same base reacts with carbon dioxide to form a carbonate, bicarbonate or basic carbonate salt.
For example, in some embodiments, the present disclosure provides processes that react one or more salts from Tables A-C below with water to form a hydroxides, oxides, and/or a mixed hydroxide halides. Such reactions are typically referred to as decompositions. In some embodiments, the water may be in the form of liquid, steam, and/or from a hydrate of the selected salt. The steam may come from a heat exchanger whereby heat from an immensely combustible reaction, i.e. natural gas and oxygen or hydrogen and chlorine heats a stream of water. In some embodiments, steam may also be generated through the use of plant or factory waste heat. In some embodiments, the halide salt, anhydrous or hydrated, is also heated. Table A. Decomposition Salts
NC N 4747 N NC N 10906 N 7490 N
3876 N 19497 N 8295 N 13616 N 7785 N
3006 N 4336 N 9428 N 13814 N 8196 N
6110 N 6044 N 11859 N 9806 N 8196 N
Table B. Decomposition Salts (cont.)
4698 N 3433 N 10346 N 6143 N
4500* 6W* 5847 2W 9855 6W 8098 2W
5010 6W 2743 N 10346 6W 8114 2W
2020 N 4960 N 9855 6W 10890 2W
Table B. Decomposition Salts (cont.)
* Subsequent tests have proven the heat of reaction within 1.5-4% of the thermodynamically derived value using TGA (thermogravinometric analysis) of heated samples and temperature ramp settings.
Table C. Decomposition Salts (cont.)
3318 N 2101 N 5847 N 5847 N 3285 N
5043 6W 3860 4W 3860 6W 4550 6W 8098 4W
5256 6W 11925 4W 9855 6W 5010 6W 4418 4W
5043 6W 3055 4W 4123 6W 5831 6W 4271 4W
NC 4W 13485 4W 3351 4W 8985 6W 8344 7W
Table D. Decomposition Salts (cont.)
2168 N 13255 7W
5486 N 7490 7W
6242 N 5029 7W
6110 N 4813 7W
6159 N 10561 6W
For Tables A-D, the numerical data corresponds to the energy per amount of CO2 captured in kWh/tonne, NC = did not converge, and NA = data not available.
This same carbonate, bicarbonate or basic carbonate of the first salt reacts with a second salt to do a carbonate/bicarbonate exchange, such that the anion of second salt combines with the cation of the first salt and the cation of the second salt combines with the carbonate/bicarbonate ion of the first salt, which forms the final carbonate/bicarbonate.
In some cases, the hydroxide derived from the first salt is reacted with carbon dioxide and the second salt directly to form a carbonate/bicarbonate derived from (combined with the cation of) the second salt. In other cases, the carbonate/bicarbonate/basic carbonate derived from (combined with the cation of) the first salt is removed from the reactor chamber and placed in a second chamber to react with the second salt.
This reaction may be beneficial when making a carbonate/bicarbonate when a salt of the second metal is desired, and this second metal is not as capable of decomposing to form a CO2 absorbing hydroxide, and if the carbonate/bicarbonate compound of the second salt is insoluble, i.e. it precipitates from solution. Below is a non-exhaustive list of examples of such reactions that may be used either alone or in combination, including in combination with one or more either reactions discussed herein.
Examples for a Decomposition of a Salt-1:         2NaI + H2O → Na2O + 2HI and/or Na2O + H2O → 2NaOH
MgCl2·6H2O → MgO + 5H2O + 2HCl and/or MgO + H2O → Mg(OH)2 Examples of a Decarbonation:         2NaOH + CO2 → Na2CO3+ H2O and/or Na2CO3 + CO2 + H2O → 2NaHCO3
Mg(OH)2 + CO2 → MgCO3 + H2O and/or Mg(OH)2 + 2CO2 → Mg(HCO3)2 Examples of a Carbonate exchange with a Salt-2:         Na2CO3 + CaCl2 → CaCO3↓ + 2NaCl         Na2CO3 + 2AgNO3 → Ag2CO3↓ + 2NaNO3         Ca(OH)2 + Na2CO3 → CaCO3↓ + 2NaOH*
* In this instance the carbonate, Na2CO3 is Salt-2, and the salt decomposed to form Ca(OH)2, i.e. CaCl2 is the Salt-1. This is the reverse of some of the previous examples in that the carbonate ion remains with Salt-1.
Known carbonate compounds include H2CO3, Li2CO3, Na2CO3, K2CO3, Rb2CO3, Cs2CO3, BeCO3, MgCO3, CaCO3, MgCO3, SrCO3, BaCO3, MnCO3, FeCO3, CoCO3, CuCO3, ZnCO3, Ag2CO3, CdCO3, Al2(CO3)3, Tl2CO3, PbCO3, and La2(CO3)3 . Group IA elements are known to be stable bicarbonates, e.g., LiHCO3, NaHCO3, RbHCO3, and CsHCO3. Group IIA and some other elements can also form bicarbonates, but in some cases, they may only be stable in solution. Typically rock-forming elements are H, C, O, F, Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, Mg and Fe. Salts of these that can be thermally decomposed into corresponding hydroxides by the least amount of energy per mole of CO2 absorbing hydroxide may therefore be considered potential Salt-1 candidates.
Based on the energies calculated in Tables A-D, several salts have lower energies than MgCl2 ·6H2O. Table E below, summarizes these salts and the percent penalty reduction through their use relative to MgCl2·6H2O. Table E: Section Lower Energy Alternative Salts
4500 0%
LiCl 3876 16%
LiBr 3006 50%
NaBr 4336 4%
2020 123%
3433 31%
2743 64%
3318 36%
2102 114%
3860 17%
3055 47%
3860 17%
4123 9%
3351 34%
3285 37%
4418 2%
4271 5%
3137 43%
AgF 2168 108%
The following salts specify a decomposition reaction through their respective available MSDS information. Table F.
4500
5043
1023 too rare
4123 too rare
3860 May oxidize to ferric oxide, this will not form a stable carbonate
LiBr 3006 too rare
1606 leaves Nox
3351
not aval. toxic byproducts
2331
Table F.
http://avogadro.chem.iastate.edu/MSDS/MnCl2.htm
http://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductMSDSDetailCB6170714_EN.htm
http://www.espimetals.com/index.php/msds/527-cobalt-iodide
LiBr http://www.chemcas.com/material/cas/archive/7550-35-8_vl.asp
http://avogadro.chem.iastate.edu/MSDS/MgNO3-6H2O.htm
http://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductMSDSDetailCB0323842_EN.htm
http://www.espimetals.com/index.php/msds/460-cadmium-chloride
http://avogadro.chem.iastate.edu/MSDS/Ca%28NO3%292-4H2O.htm
IX. Limestone Generation and Uses
In aspects of the present invention there are provided methods of sequestering carbon dioxide in the form of limestone. Limestone is a sedimentary rock composed largely of the mineral calcite (calcium carbonate: CaCO3). This mineral has many uses, some of which are identified below.
Limestone in powder or pulverized form, as formed in some embodiments of the present invention, may be used as a soil conditioner (agricultural lime) to neutralize acidic soil conditions, thereby, for example, neutralizing the effects of acid rain in ecosystems. Upstream applications include using limestone as a reagent in desulfurizations.
Limestone is an important stone for masonry and architecture. One of its advantages is that it is relatively easy to cut into blocks or more elaborate carving. It is also long-lasting and stands up well to exposure. Limestone is a key ingredient of quicklime, mortar, cement, and concrete.
Calcium carbonate is also used as an additive for paper, plastics, paint, tiles, and other materials as both white pigment and an inexpensive filler. Purified forms of calcium carbonate may be used in toothpaste and added to bread and cereals as a source of calcium. CaCO3 is also commonly used medicinally as an antacid.
Currently, the majority of calcium carbonate used in industry is extracted by mining or quarrying. By co-generating this mineral as part of carbon dioxide sequestration in some embodiments, this invention provides a non-extractive source of this important product.
X. Magnesium Carbonate Generation and Uses
In aspects of the present invention there are provided methods of sequestering carbon dioxide in the form of magnesium carbonate. Magnesium carbonate, MgCO3, is a white solid that occurs in nature as a mineral. The most common magnesium carbonate forms are the anhydrous salt called magnesite (MgCO3) and the di, tri, and pentahydrates known as barringtonite (MgCO3·2H2O), nesquehonite (MgCO3·3H2O), and lansfordite (MgCO3·5H2O), respectively. Magnesium carbonate has a variety of uses; some of these are briefly discussed below.
Magnesium carbonate may be used to produce magnesium metal and basic refractory bricks. MgCO3 is also used in flooring, fireproofing, fire extinguishing compositions, cosmetics, dusting powder, and toothpaste. Other applications are as filler material, smoke suppressant in plastics, a reinforcing agent in neoprene rubber, a drying agent, a laxative, and for color retention in foods. In addition, high purity magnesium carbonate is used as antacid and as an additive in table salt to keep it free flowing.
Currently magnesium carbonate is typically obtained by mining the mineral magnesite. By co-generating this mineral as part of carbon dioxide sequestration in some embodiments, this invention provides a non-extractive source of this important product.
XI. Silicon Dioxide Generation and Uses
The present invention provided methods of sequestering carbon dioxide that produce silicon dioxide as a byproduct. Silicon dioxide, also known as silica, is an oxide of silicon with a chemical formula of SiO2 and is known for its hardness. Silica is most commonly found in nature as sand or quartz, as well as in the cell walls of diatoms. Silica is the most abundant mineral in the Earth's crust. This compound has many uses; some of these are briefly discussed below.
Silica is used primarily in the production of window glass, drinking glasses and bottled beverages. The majority of optical fibers for telecommunications are also made from silica. It is a primary raw material for many whiteware ceramics such as earthenware, stoneware and porcelain, as well as industrial Portland cement.
Silica is a common additive in the production of foods, where it is used primarily as a flow agent in powdered foods, or to absorb water in hygroscopic applications. In hydrated form, silica is used in toothpaste as a hard abrasive to remove tooth plaque. Silica is the primary component of diatomaceous earth which has many uses ranging from filtration to insect control. It is also the primary component of rice husk ash which is used, for example, in filtration and cement manufacturing.
Thin films of silica grown on silicon wafers via thermal oxidation methods can be quite beneficial in microelectronics, where they act as electric insulators with high chemical stability. In electrical applications, it can protect the silicon, store charge, block current, and even act as a controlled pathway to limit current flow.
Silica is typically manufactured in several forms including glass, crystal, gel, aerogel, fumed silica, and colloidal silica. By co-generating this mineral as part of carbon dioxide sequestration in some embodiments, this invention provides another source of this important product.
XII. Separation of Products
Separation processes may be employed to separate carbonate and bicarbonate products from the liquid solution and/or reaction mixture. By manipulating the basic concentration, temperature, pressure, reactor size, fluid depth, and degree of carbonation, precipitates of one or more carbonate and/or bicarbonate salts may be caused to occur. Alternatively, carbonate/bicarbonate products may be separated from solution by the exchange of heat energy with incoming flue-gases.
The exit liquid streams, depending upon reactor design, may include water, CaCO3, MgCO3, Ca(HCO3)2, Mg(HCO3)2, Ca(OH)2, Ca(OH)2, NaOH, NaHCO3, Na2CO3, and other dissolved gases in various equilibria. Dissolved trace emission components such as H2SO4, HNO3, and Hg may also be found. In one embodiment, removing/separating the water from the carbonate product involves adding heat energy to evaporate water from the mixture, for example, using a reboiler. Alternatively, retaining a partial basic solution and subsequently heating the solution in a separating chamber may be used to cause relatively pure carbonate salts to precipitate into a holding tank and the remaining hydroxide salts to recirculate back to the reactor. In some embodiments, pure carbonate, pure bicarbonate, and mixtures of the two in equilibrium concentrations and/or in a slurry or concentrated form may then be periodically transported to a truck/tank-car. In some embodiments, the liquid streams may be displaced to evaporation tanks/fields where the liquid, such as water, may be carried off by evaporation.
The release of gaseous products includes a concern whether hydroxide or oxide salts will be released safely, i.e., emitting "basic rain." Emission of such aerosolized caustic salts may be prevented in some embodiments by using a simple and inexpensive condenser/reflux unit.
In some embodiments, the carbonate salt may be precipitated using methods that are used separately or together with a water removal process. Various carbonate salt equilibria have characteristic ranges where, when the temperature is raised, a given carbonate salt, e.g., CaCO3 will naturally precipitate and collect, which makes it amenable to be withdrawn as a slurry, with some fractional NaOH drawn off in the slurry.
XIII. Recovery of Waste-Heat
Because certain embodiments of the present invention are employed in the context of large emission of CO2 in the form of flue-gas or other hot gases from combustion processes, such as those which occur at a power plant, there is ample opportunity to utilize this 'waste' heat, for example, for the conversion of Group 2 chlorides salts into Group 2 hydroxides. For instance, a typical incoming flue-gas temperature (after electro-static precipitation treatment, for instance) is approximately 300 °C. Heat exchangers can lower that flue-gas to a point less than 300°C, while warming the water and/or Group 2 chloride salt to facilitate this conversion.
Generally, since the flue-gas that is available at power-plant exits at temperatures between 100°C (scrubbed typical), 300°C (after precipitation processing), and 900°C (precipitation entrance), or other such temperatures, considerable waste-heat processing can be extracted by cooling the incoming flue-gas through heat-exchange with a power-recovery cycle, for example an ammonia-water cycle (e.g., a "Kalina" cycle), a steam cycle, or any such cycle that accomplishes the same thermodynamic means. Since some embodiments of the present invention rely upon DC power to accomplish the manufacture of the reagent/absorbent, the process can be directly powered, partially or wholly, by waste-heat recovery that is accomplished without the normal transformer losses associated with converting that DC power to AC power for other uses. Further, through the use of waste-heat-to-work engines, significant efficiencies can be accomplished without an electricity generation step being employed at all. In some conditions, these waste-heat recovery energy quantities may be found to entirely power embodiments of the present invention.
XIV. Alternative Processes
As noted above, some embodiments of the apparatuses and methods of the present disclosure produce a number of useful intermediates, by-products, and final products from the various reaction steps, including hydrogen chloride, Group 2 carbonate salts, Group 2 hydroxide salts, etc. In some embodiments, some or all of these may be used in one or more of the methods described below. In some embodiments, some or all of one of the starting materials or intermediates employed in one or more of the steps described above are obtained using one or more of the methods outlined below.
A. Use of Chlorine for the Chlorination of Group 2 Silicates
In some embodiments the chlorine gas may be liquefied to hydrochloric acid that is then used to chlorinate Group 2 silicate minerals. Liquefaction of chlorine and subsequent use of the hydrochloric acid is particularly attractive especially in situations where the chlorine market is saturated. Liquefaction of chlorine may be accomplished according to equation 27:         Cl2(g) + 2 H2O (l) + hv (363 nm) → 2 HCl (l) + ½ O2 (g)     (27)
In some embodiments, the oxygen so produced may be returned to the air-inlet of the power plant itself, where it has been demonstrated throughout the course of power-industry investigations that enriched oxygen-inlet plants have (a) higher Carnot-efficiencies, (b) more concentrated CO2 exit streams, (c) lower heat-exchange to warm inlet air, and (d) other advantages over non-oxygen-enhanced plants. In some embodiments, the oxygen may be utilized in a hydrogen/oxygen fuel cell. In some embodiments, the oxygen may serve as part of the oxidant in a turbine designed for natural gas power generation, for example, using a mixture of hydrogen and natural gas.
B. Use of Chlorine for the Chlorination of Group 2 Hydroxides
In some embodiments the chlorine gas may be reacted with a Group 2 hydroxide salts to yield a mixture of a chloride and a hypochlorite salts (equation 28). For example, HCl may be sold as a product and the Group 2 hydroxide salt may be used to remove excess chlorine.         Ca/Mg(OH)2 + Cl2 → ½ Ca/Mg(OCl)2 + ½ Ca/MgCl2 + H2O     (28) The Group 2 hypochlorites may then be decomposed using a cobalt or nickel catalyst to form oxygen and the corresponding chloride (equation 29).         Ca/Mg(OCl)2 → Ca/MgCl2 + O2     (29) The calcium chloride and/or the magnesium chloride may then be recovered.
XV. Removal of other Pollutants from Source
In addition to removing CO2 from the source, in some embodiments of the invention, the decarbonation conditions will also remove SOx and NOx and, to a lesser extent, mercury. In some embodiments of the present invention, the incidental scrubbing of NOx, SOx, and mercury compounds can assume greater economic importance; i.e., by employing embodiments of the present invention, coals that contain large amounts of these compounds can be combusted in the power plant with, in some embodiments, less resulting pollution than with higher-grade coals processed without the benefit of the CO2 absorption process. Such principles and techniques are taught, for example, in U.S. Patent 7,727,374 , U.S. Patent Application No. 11/233,509, filed September 22, 2005 , U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/718,906, filed September 20, 2005 ; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/642,698, filed January 10, 2005 ; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/612,355, filed September 23, 2004 , U.S. Patent Application No. 12/235,482, filed September 22, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/973,948, filed September 20, 2007 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/032,802, filed February 29, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/033,298, filed March 3, 2008 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/288,242, filed January 20, 2010 , U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/362,607, filed July 8, 2010 , and International Application No. PCT/US08/77122, filed September 19, 2008 ..
XVI. Examples
The following examples are included to demonstrate some embodiments of the invention. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the techniques disclosed in the examples which follow represent techniques discovered by the inventor to function well in the practice of the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute preferred modes for its practice.
Example 1 - Process Simulation of Capture CO2 from Flue Gas Using CaCl2 to form CaCO3.
Using Aspen Plus v. 7.1 software using known reaction enthalpies, reaction free energies and defined parameters to determine mass and energy balances and suitable conditions for capturing CO2 from a flue gas stream utilizing CaCl2 and heat to form CaCO3 product were simulated. These results show that it is possible to capture CO2 from flue gas using inexpensive raw materials, CaCl2 and water, to form CaCO3.
Part of the defined parameters includes the process flow diagram shown in FIG. 5. Results from the simulation suggest that it is efficient to recirculate an MgCl2 stream to react with H2O and heat to form Mg(OH)2. This Mg(OH)2 then reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form CaCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2 formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again. This process is not limited to any particular source for CaCl2. For example, it may be obtained from reacting calcium silicate with HCl to yield CaCl2.
Constraints and parameters specified for this simulation include:
  • The reactions were run at 100% efficiencies with no losses. The simulations can be modified when pilot runs determine the reaction efficiencies.
  • Simulations did not account for impurities in the CaCl2 feed stock or in any make-up MgCl2 required due to losses from the system.
The results of this simulation indicate a preliminary net energy consumption of approximately 130 MM Btu/hr. Tables 2a and 2b provide mass and energy accounting for the various streams (the columns in the table) of the simulated process. Each stream corresponds to the stream of FIG. 5.
The process consists of two primary reaction sections and one solids filtration section. The first reactor heats MgCl2/water solution causing it to break down into a HCl/H2O vapor stream and a liquid stream of Mg(OH)2. The HCl/H2O vapor stream is sent to the HCl absorber column. The Mg(OH)2 solution is sent to reactor 2 for further processing. The chemical reaction for this reactor can be represented by the following equation:         MgCl2 + 2 H2O → Mg(OH)2 + 2HCl     (30)
A CaCl2 solution and a flue gas stream are added to the MgCl2 in reactor 2. This reaction forms CaCO3, MgCl2 and water. The CaCO3 precipitates and is removed in a filter or decanter. The remaining MgCl2 and water are recycled to the first reactor. Additional water is added to complete the water balance required by the first reactor. The chemical reaction for this reactor can be represented by the following equation:         Mg(OH)2 + CaCl2 + CO2 → CaCO3 (s) + MgCl2 + H2O     (31)
The primary feeds to this process are CaCl2, flue gas (CO2) and water. MgCl2 in the system is used, reformed and recycled. The only MgCl2 make-up required is to replace small amounts that leave the system with the CaCO3 product, and small amounts that leave with the HCl/water product.
This process is a net energy user. There is cross heat exchange to recover the heat in high temperature streams to preheat the feed streams. Significant heat recovery may be obtained by reacting the concentrated HCl thus formed with silicate minerals. Table 2a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Simulation of Capture CO2 from Flue Gas Using CaCl2 to form CaCO3.
Temperature F 485.8 151.6 250 95 77 95 104 77 536
Pressure psia 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
Vapor Frac 0 0 0.025 0 0 1 0 0
Mole Flow Ibmol/hr 1594.401 7655.248 7653.691 3568.272 139.697 139.502 611.154 2220.337 1594.401
Mass Flow lb/hr 53195.71 162514.8 162514.8 115530.1 15504 13962.37 19206 40000 53195.71
Volume Flow gal/min 38.289 238.669 12389.12 114.43 14.159 30680.73 80.111 40.178
Enthalpy MMBtu/hr -214.568 -918.028 -909.155 -574.405 -47.795 -27.903 -273.013 -205.695
1473.175 105624.1 105603 33281.39 750.535 40000 1473.172
HCl trace trace 0.001 trace trace
< 0.001 0.091 0.005 6158.236
CO
0.055 0.055 0.055 2116.894
0.137 0.137 0.137 10180.34
15504
Mg(OH)Cl
7.797 trace 7.797
11114.84 14507.52 14506.86 11942.37 11115.59
< 0.001 trace trace trace trace < 0.001
< 0.001 trace < 0.001
22.961 15.364 17.613 25.319 20.435
HClO
21433.25
13962.37 13962.37
0.174
42.623
8137.518 7.043 5.576 0.08 8139.306
0.001 < 0.001 0.119
32447.21 42352.6 42338.81 34877.24 32447.21
< 0.001 0.001 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
trace trace 0.001
0.028 0.65 0.65 0.288 0.039 1 0.028
HCl trace trace 3 PPB trace trace
trace 563 PPB 40 PPB 0.321
CO
336 PPB 336 PPB 473 PPB 0.11
844 PPB 844 PPB 1 PPM 0.53
1
Mg(OH)Cl
48 PPM trace 67 PPM
0.209 0.089 0.089 0.103 0.209
1 PPB trace trace trace trace 5 PPB
1 PPB trace 1 PPB
432 PPM 95 PPM 108 PPM 219 PPM 384 PPM
HClO
0.186
0.121 1
1 PPM
262 PPM
0.153 43 PPM 34 PPM 691 PPB 0.153
5 PPB trace 1 PPM
0.61 0.261 0.261 0.302 0.61
trace 6 PPB 6 PPB trace 2 PPB trace
trace trace 12 PPB
81.774 5863.026 5861.857 1847.398 41.661 2220.337 81.773
HCl trace trace < 0.001 trace trace
trace 0.002 < 0.001 139.929
CO
0.002 0.002 0.002 66.155
0.005 0.005 0.005 363.408
139.697
Mg(OH)Cl
0.195 trace 0.195
457.328 596.922 596.894 491.376 457.358
< 0.001 trace trace trace trace < 0.001
trace trace trace
0.556 0.372 0.426 0.613 0.495
HClO
105.426
139.502 139.502
0.002
0.195
139.533 0.121 0.096 0.001 139.564
< 0.001 trace 0.002
915.211 1194.604 1194.215 983.753 915.211
trace < 0.001 < 0.001 trace trace trace
trace trace < 0.001
0.051 0.766 0.766 0.518 0.068 1 0.051
HCl trace trace 2 PPB trace trace
trace 271 PPB 29 PPB 0.229
CO
223 PPB 223 PPB 478 PPB 0.108
640 PPB 640 PPB 1 PPM 0.595
1
Mg(OH)Cl
25 PPM trace 55 PPM
0.287 0.078 0.078 0.138 0.287
49 PPB trace trace trace 2 PPB 156 PPB
trace trace trace
349 PPM 49 PPM 56 PPM 172 PPM 310 PPM
HClO
0.03
0.039 1
269 PPB
25 PPM
0.088 16 PPM 12 PPM 383 PPB 0.088
2 PPB trace 547 PPB
0.574 0.156 0.156 0.276 0.574
1 PPB 8 PPB 7 PPB trace 2 PPB 1 PPB
trace trace 6 PPB
PH 5.319 6.955 5.875 7.557 6.999 5.152
Table 2b. Mass and Energy Accounting for Simulation of Capture CO2 from Flue Gas Using CaCl2 to form CaCO3.
Temperature F 77 536 250 286.8 95 95
Pressure psia 15 15 15 15 15 15
Vapor Frac 0 1 0.025 0.021 0 1
Mole Flow Ibmol/hr 3383.073 5781.846 7655.866 3814.738 3427.371 433.305
Mass Flow lb/hr 60947 109319.3 162515 93195.71 101567.8 12375.59
Volume Flow gal/min 122.063 512251.6 12240.14 5364.891 104.123 21428.56
Enthalpy MMBtu/hr -415.984 -561.862 -909.177 -487.581 -502.044 -0.364
60947 99124.11 105634.7 41473.17 33262.52 59.861
HCl 10195.18 0.087 0.009 trace trace
trace 18.689
CO
0.055 2116.839
0.137 10180.2
Mg(OH)Cl
7.797
14519.48 11116.3 11938.09
trace < 0.001 trace trace
< 0.001
0.112 17.999 25.309
HClO
21468.81
0.175
8141.025 0.024
trace
42360.62 32447.2 34864.84
< 0.001 trace < 0.001 < 0.001
trace
Mass Frac
1 0.907 0.65 0.445 0.327 0.005
HCl 0.093 534 PPB 92 PPB trace trace
trace 0.002
CO
538 PPB 0.171
1 PPM 0.823
Mg(OH)Cl
77 PPM
0.089 0.119 0.118
trace 2 PPB trace trace
1 PPB
689 PPB 193 PPM 249 PPM
HClO
0.211
2 PPM
0.087 240 PPB
trace
0.261 0.348 0.343
2 PPB trace 2 PPB trace
trace
3383.073 5502.224 5863.617 2302.111 1846.35 3.323
HCl 279.622 0.002 < 0.001 trace trace
trace 0.425
CO
0.002 66.154
0.005 363.404
Mg(OH)Cl
0.195
597.414 457.388 491.201
trace < 0.001 trace trace
trace
0.003 0.436 0.613
HClO
105.601
0.002
139.593 < 0.001
trace
1194.83 915.211 983.403
trace trace trace trace
trace
1 0.952 0.766 0.603 0.539 0.008
HCl 0.048 311 PPB 62 PPB trace trace
trace 980 PPM
CO
498 PPB 0.153
1 PPM 0.839
Mg(OH)Cl
57 PPM
0.078 0.12 0.143
2 PPB 43 PPB trace trace
trace
354 PPB 114 PPM 179 PPM
HClO
0.031
607 PPB
0.037 122 PPB
trace
0.156 0.24 0.287
2 PPB trace 2 PPB trace
trace
PH 6.999 3.678 5.438 7.557
Example 2 (Case 1)- Process Simulation of Magnesium Ion Catalyzed Capture CO2 from Flue Gas Using CaCl2 to form CaCO3.
Results from the simulation suggest that it is efficient to heat a MgCl2·6H2O stream in three separate dehydration reactions, each in its own chamber, followed by a decomposition reaction, also in its own chamber, to form Mg(OH)Cl and HCl, i.e. total of four chambers. The Mg(OH)Cl is reacted with H2O to form MgCl2 and Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form CaCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2·6H2O formed is recycled along with the earlier product to the first reactor to begin the process again.
This process is not limited to any particular source for CaCl2. For example, it may be obtained from reacting calcium silicate with HCl to yield CaCl2.
Constraints and parameters specified for this simulation include:
  • The reactions were run at 100% efficiencies with no losses. The simulations can be modified when pilot runs determine the reaction efficiencies.
  • Simulations did not account for impurities in the CaCl2 feed stock or in any make-up MgCl2 required due to losses from the system.
  • Part of the defined parameters include the process flow diagram shown in FIG. 6.
The results of this simulation indicate a preliminary net energy consumption of 5946 kwh/tonne CO2. Table 3 provides mass and energy accounting for the various streams of the simulated process. Each stream corresponds to the stream of FIG. 6.
The process consists of two primary reactors and one solids filtration section. The first reactor heats MgCl2·6H2O causing it to break down into a HCl/H2O vapor stream and a solid stream of Mg(OH)Cl. The HCl/H2O vapor stream is sent to a heat exchanger to recover extra heat. The Mg(OH)2 formed from the Mg(OH)Cl is sent to reactor 2 for further processing. Chemical reaction(s) occurring in this reactor include the following:         MgCl2·6H2O + Δ → Mg(OH)Cl + 5 H2O↑ + HCl↑     (32)         2 Mg(OH)Cl(aq) → Mg(OH)2 + MgCl2     (33)
A CaCl2 solution and a flue gas stream are added to the Mg(OH)2 in reactor 2. This reaction forms CaCO3, MgCl2 and water. The CaCO3 precipitates and is removed in a filter or decanter. The remaining MgCl2 and water are recycled to the first reactor. Additional water is added to complete the water balance required by the first reactor. Chemical reaction(s) occurring in this reactor include the following:         Mg(OH)2 + CaCl2 + CO2 → CaCO3 ↓(s) + MgCl2 + H2O     (34)
The primary feeds to this process are CaCl2, flue gas (CO2) and water. MgCl2 in the system is used, reformed and recycled. The only MgCl2 make-up required is to replace small amounts that leave the system with the CaCO3 product, and small amounts that leave with the HCl/water product.
This process is a net energy user. The amount of energy is under investigation and optimization. There is cross heat exchange to recover the heat in high temperature streams to preheat the feed streams.
The steps for this process (Case 1) are summarized below:
53333 MTPY
134574 MTPY
HCl Dry 88368 MTPY
105989 MTPY
Hexahydrate recycled 597447 MTPY
1757
2135
1150
1051
YIELDS 90% HCl VAPOR
0.9 MW
Heat Recovery 148
from 28% HCl vapor
TOTAL 5946
Table 3a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Case 1 Simulation.
Temperature C 25 95 104 25 100 125 160 130
Pressure psia 14.7 14.7 15.78 14.7 16.166 16.166 16.166 14.696
Mass VFrac 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
Mass SFrac 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mass Flow tonne/year 134573.943 121369.558 166332.6 290318.99 105883.496 105890.399 17179.526 97647.172
Volume Flow gal/min 30.929 22.514 76673.298 8099.644 82228.086 87740.919 10242.935 48861.42
Enthalpy MW -30.599 -46.174 -17.479 -146.075 -44.628 -44.47 -3.258 -10.757
Density lb/cuft 136.522 169.146 0.068 1.125 0.04 0.038 0.053 0.063
0 0 6499.971 290318.99 105883.496 105885.779 5681.299 9278.695
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCl 0 0 0 0 0 4.62 11498.227 88368.477
0 0 53333.098 0 0 0 0 0
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 18333.252 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 88166.278 0 0 0 0 0
134573.943 80.499 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 121289.059 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.039 1 1 1 0.331 0.095
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.669 0.905
0 0 0.321 0 0 0 0 0
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.11 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.53 0 0 0 0 0
1 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0.999 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 11.441 511.008 186.372 186.376 10 16.332
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0.004 10 76.854
0 0 38.427 0 0 0 0 0
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 18.168 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 99.8 0 0 0 0 0
38.45 0.023 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 38.427 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 3b. Mass and Energy Accounting for Case 1 Simulation.
Temperature °C 125 100 104 95 95 95 160 130 160
Pressure psia 16.166 16.166 14.696 14.7 14.7 14.7 22.044 14.696 22.044
Mass VFrac 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Mass SFrac 1 1 1 0.998 0 0.999 1 1 0
Mass Flow tonne/year 385672.688 491563.087 597446.583 598447.468 106499.178 719817.026 332737.843 235090.671 70114.371
Volume Flow gal/min 39.902 39.902 116.892 147.062 56469.408 167.321 39.902 43.473 42506.729
Enthalpy MW -117.767 -175.272 -230.554 -231.312 0.241 -277.487 -88.626 -71.431 -25.379
Density lb/cuft 303.274 386.542 160.371 127.684 0.059 134.984 261.649 169.678 0.052
0 0 0 1000 0 1000 0 0 58620.764
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11493.607
0 0 0 0 0.532 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.165 18333.088 0.165 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.72 88165.558 0.72 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 80.499 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 121289.059 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49037.72 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 332737.843 0 0
385662.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 491563.087 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 597446.583 597446.583 0 597446.583 0 0 0
 Mg(OH)Cl 9.728 0 0 0 0 0 0 186052.951 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.002 0 0.001 0 0 0.836
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.164
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.172 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.828 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0.168 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.209 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0.998 0 0.83 0 0 0
 Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.791 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1.76 0 1.76 0 0 103.182
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.996
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 18.168 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.001 99.799 0.001 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0.023 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 38.427 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.332 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 93.186 0 0
93.182 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 93.186 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 93.186 93.186 0 93.186 0 0 0
 Mg(OH)Cl 0.004 0 0 0 0 0 0 76.854 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Example 3 - Process Simulation of Magnesium Ion Catalyzed Capture CO2 from Flue Gas Using CaCl2 to form CaCO3.
Part of the defined parameters includes the process flow diagram shown in FIG. 7. Results from the simulation suggest that it is efficient to heat a MgCl2·6H2O stream to form Mg(OH)Cl in two separate dehydration reactions, each in their own chambers followed by a decomposition reaction, also in its own chamber to form Mg(OH)Cl and HCl, i.e. a total of three chambers. The Mg(OH)Cl is reacted with H2O to form MgCl2 and Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form CaCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2.6H2O formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again. This process is not limited to any particular source for CaCl2. For example, it may be obtained from reacting calcium silicate with HCl to yield CaCl2.
Constraints and parameters specified for this simulation include:
  • The reactions were run at 100% efficiencies with no losses. The simulations can be modified when pilot runs determine the reaction efficiencies.
  • Simulations did not account for impurities in the CaCl2 feed stock or in any make-up MgCl2 required due to losses from the system.
The results of this simulation indicate a preliminary net energy consumption of 4862 kwh/tonne CO2. Table 4 provides mass and energy accounting for the various streams of the simulated process. Each stream corresponds to the stream in FIG. 7.
The process consists of two primary reactors and one solids filtration section. The first reactor heats MgCl2.6H2O causing it to break down into a HCl/H2O vapor stream and a solid stream of Mg(OH)Cl. The HCl/H2O vapor stream is sent to a heat exchanger to recover extra heat. The Mg(OH)2 formed from the Mg(OH)Cl is sent to reactor 2 for further processing. Chemical reaction(s) occurring in this reactor include the following:         MgCl2·6H2O + Δ → Mg(OH)Cl + 5 H2O↑ + HCl↑     (35)         2 Mg(OH)Cl(aq) → Mg(OH)2 + MgCl2     (36)
A CaCl2 solution and a flue gas stream are added to the Mg(OH)2 in reactor 2. This reaction forms CaCO3, MgCl2 and water. The CaCO3 precipitates and is removed in a filter or decanter. The remaining MgCl2 and water are recycled to the first reactor. Additional water is added to complete the water balance required by the first reactor. Chemical reaction(s) occurring in this reactor include the following:         Mg(OH)2 + CaCl2 + CO2 → CaCO3 ↓(s) + MgCl2 + H2O     (37)
The primary feeds to this process are CaCl2, flue gas (CO2) and water. MgCl2 in the system is used, reformed and recycled. The only MgCl2 make-up required is to replace small amounts that leave the system with the CaCO3 product, and small amounts that leave with the HCl/water product.
This process is a net energy user. The amount of energy is under investigation and optimization. There is cross heat exchange to recover the heat in high temperature streams to preheat the feed streams.
The steps for this process (Case 2) are summarized below:
Hexahydrate is dehydrated in 2 separate chambers. Step 1 hex to tetra, Step 2 tetra to di. Di-hydrate is decomposed into 100% Mg(OH)Cl.
53333 MTPY
134574 MTPY
HCl Dry 88368 MTPY
105989 MTPY
Hexahydrate recycled 492737 MTPY
1445
1774
DI-HYDRATE
1790
TO 100% Mg(OH)Cl (130 °C)
YEILDS 66% HCl VAPOR
NO USE OF HCl PP
0.9
Heat Recovery 148
from 28% HCl vapor
Table 4a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Case 2 Simulation.
Temperature °C 98 114.1 101 25 95 40 25 100 125 130
Pressure psia 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.7 14.7 15.78 14.7 14.696 22.044 14.696
Mass VFrac 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1
Mass SFrac 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Mass Flow tonne/year 492736.693 405410.587 306683.742 134573.943 121369.558 166332.6 234646.82 87326.106 87329.947 132027.689
Volume Flow gal/min 96.405 32.909 224394.519 30.929 22.514 63660.018 6546.44 74598.258 53065.241 80593.954
Enthalpy MW -190.292 -144.291 -98.931 -30.599 -46.174 -17.821 -118.063 -36.806 -36.675 -25.187
Density lb/cuft 160.371 386.542 0.043 136.522 169.146 0.082 1.125 0.037 0.052 0.051
0 0 218315.265 0 0 6499.971 234646.82 87326.106 87326.106 43663.053
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0 0 88368.477 0 0 0 0 0 3.841 88364.636
0 0 0 0 0 53333.098 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 18333.252 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 88166.278 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 134573.943 80.499 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 121289.059 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 405410.587 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 4a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Case 2 Simulation.
492736.693 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.712 0 0 0.039 1 1 1 0.331
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCl 0 0 0.288 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.669
0 0 0 0 0 0.321 0 0 0 0
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0.11 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0.53 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0.001 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.999 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgCl2*4W 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgCl2*6W 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 384.27 0 0 11.441 413.016 153.708 153.708 76.854
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCl 0 0 76.854 0 0 0 0 0 0.003 76.851
0 0 0 0 0 38.427 0 0 0 0
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 18.168 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 99.8 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 38.45 0.023 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 38.427 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 76.854 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
76.854 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 4b. Mass and Energy Accounting for Case 2 Simulation.
Temperature °C 94.9 100 75 95 95 95 125 130 118.1
Pressure psia 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.7 14.7 14.7 22.044 14.696 14.696
Mass VFrac 0.979 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Mass SFrac 0 1 1 0.998 0 0.998 1 1 0
Mass Flow tonne/year 306683.742 405410.587 492736.693 493737.578 106499.178 615107.136 318080.64 186052.951 306683.742
Volume Flow gal/min 215496.035 32.909 96.405 126.575 56469.408 146.834 32.909 32.909 234621.606
Enthalpy MW -99.487 -144.553 -190.849 -190.859 0.241 -237.034 -97.128 -61.083 -98.668
Density lb/cuft 0.045 386.542 160.371 122.394 0.059 131.442 303.277 177.393 0.041
218315.265 0 0 1000 0 1000 0 0 218315.265
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 88368.477 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88368.477
0 0 0 0 0.532 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.165 18333.088 0.165 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.72 88165.558 0.72 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 80.499 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 121289.059 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 318077.568 0 0
0 405410.587 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 492736.693 492736.693 0 492736.693 0 0 0
 Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 186052.951 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 3.072 0 0
 MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mass Frac
0.712 0 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0 0.712
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0.288 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.288
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.172 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.828 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0.197 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0.998 0 0.801 0 0 0
 Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
384.27 0 0 1.76 0 1.76 0 0 384.27
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 76.854 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76.854
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 18.168 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.001 99.799 0.001 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0.023 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 38.427 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 76.852 0 0
0 76.854 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 76.854 76.854 0 76.854 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76.854 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Example 4 - Process Simulation of Magnesium Ion Catalyzed Capture CO2 from Flue Gas Using CaCl2 to Form CaCO3.
Part of the defined parameters include the process flow diagram shown in FIG. 8. Results from the simulation suggest that it is efficient to heat a MgCl2·6H2O stream to form MgO in a single chamber. The MgO is reacted with H2O to form Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form CaCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2·6H2O formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again. This process is not limited to any particular source for CaCl2. For example, it may be obtained from reacting calcium silicate with HCl to yield CaCl2.
Constraints and parameters specified for this simulation include:
  • The reactions were run at 100% efficiencies with no losses. The simulations can be modified when pilot runs determine the reaction efficiencies.
  • Simulations did not account for impurities in the CaCl2 feed stock or in any make-up MgCl2 required due to losses from the system.
The results of this simulation indicate a preliminary net energy consumption of 3285 kwh/tonne CO2. Table 5 provides mass and energy accounting for the various streams of the simulated process. Each stream corresponds to the stream of FIG. 8.
The process consists of two primary reactors and one solids filtration section. The first reactor heats MgCl2·6H2O causing it to break down into a HCl/H2O vapor stream and a solid stream of MgO. The HCl/H2O vapor stream is sent to a heat exchanger to recover extra heat. The Mg(OH)2 formed from the MgO is sent to reactor 2 for further processing. Chemical reaction(s) occurring in this reactor include the following:         MgCl2·6H2O + Δ → MgO + 5 H2O↑ + 2 HCl↑     (38)         MgO + H2O → Mg(OH)2     (39)
A CaCl2 solution and a flue gas stream are added to the Mg(OH)2 in reactor 2. This reaction forms CaCO3, MgCl2 and water. The CaCO3 precipitates and is removed in a filter or decanter. The remaining MgCl2 and water are recycled to the first reactor. Additional water is added to complete the water balance required by the first reactor. Chemical reaction(s) occurring in this reactor include the following::         Mg(OH)2 + CaCl2 + CO2 → CaCO3 ↓(s) + MgCl2 + H2O     (40)
The primary feeds to this process are CaCl2, flue gas (CO2) and water. MgCl2 in the system is used, reformed and recycled. The only MgCl2 make-up required is to replace small amounts that leave the system with the CaCO3 product, and small amounts that leave with the HCl/water product.
This process is a net energy user. The amount of energy is under investigation and optimization. There is cross heat exchange to recover the heat in high temperature streams to preheat the feed streams.
The steps for this process (Case 3) are summarized below:
Hexahydrate is dehydrated and decomposed simultaneously at 450C. Reactor yeilds 100% MgO.
53333 MTPY
134574 MTPY
HCl Dry 88368 MTPY
105989 MTPY
Hexahydrate recycled 246368 MTPY
HEXAHYDRATE
3778 kWh/tonne CO2
TO 100% MgO (450 °C)
YIELDS 44.7% HCl VAPOR
RECYCLES HALF AS MUCH HEXAHYDRATE
BUT NEEDS HIGH QUALITY HEAT
Heat Recovery 493 kWh/tonne CO2
from 45% HCl vapor
TOTAL 3285 kWh/tonne CO2
Table 5a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Case 3 Simulation.
Temperature °C 25 95 104 25 120 353.8 104
Pressure psia 14.7 14.7 15.78 14.7 14.696 14.7 14.7
Mass VFrac 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Mass SFrac 1 1 0 0 0 1 1
Mass Flow tonne/year 134573.943 121369.558 166332.6 125489.188 197526.11 246368.347 246368.347
Volume Flow gal/min 30.929 22.514 76673.298 3501.038 137543.974 48.203 48.203
Enthalpy MW -30.599 -46.174 -17.479 -63.14 -52.762 -92.049 -95.073
Density lb/cuft 136.522 169.146 0.068 1.125 0.045 160.371 160.371
0 0 6499.971 125489.188 109157.633 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0 0 0 0 88368.477 0 0
0 0 53333.098 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 18333.252 0 0 0 0
0 0 88166.278 0 0 0 0
134573.943 80.499 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 121289.059 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 246368.347 246368.347
 Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.039 1 0.553 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0 0 0 0 0.447 0 0
0 0 0.321 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.11 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.53 0 0 0 0
1 0.001 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0.999 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 1
 Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 11.441 220.881 192.135 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0 0 0 0 76.854 0 0
0 0 38.427 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 18.168 0 0 0 0
0 0 99.8 0 0 0 0
38.45 0.023 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 38.427 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 38.427 38.427
 Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 5b. Mass and Energy Accounting for Case 3 Simulation.
Temperature °C 450 100 95 140 140 95 95 450 140
Pressure psia 14.696 14.696 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.696 14.7
Mass VFrac 0 0 0 0.004 0 1 0 1 1
Mass SFrac 1 1 0.996 0.996 1 0 0.997 0 0
Mass Flow tonne/year 48842.237 48842.237 247369.231 247369.231 246368.347 106499.178 368738.79 197526.11 1000.885
Volume Flow gal/min 6.851 6.851 78.372 994.232 48.203 56469.408 98.632 252994.849 946.03
Enthalpy MW -22.38 -23 -95.676 -95.057 -94.638 0.241 -141.851 -49.738 -0.419
Density lb/cuft 223.695 223.695 99.036 7.807 160.371 0.059 117.304 0.024 0.033
0 0 1000 1000 0 0 1000 109157.633 1000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88368.477 0
0 0 0 0 0 0.532 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.165 0.165 0 18333.088 0.165 0 0.165
0 0 0.72 0.72 0 88165.558 0.72 0 0.72
0 0 0 0 0 0 80.499 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 121289.059 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 246368.347 246368.347 246368.347 0 246368.347 0 0
 Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 MgO 48842.237 48842.237 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.004 0.004 0 0 0.003 0.553 0.999
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.447 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0.172 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0.828 0 0 0.001
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0.329 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.996 0.996 1 0 0.668 0 0
 Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 MgO 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1.76 1.76 0 0 1.76 192.135 1.76
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76.854 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 18.168 0 0 0
0 0 0.001 0.001 0 99.799 0.001 0 0.001
0 0 0 0 0 0 0.023 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 38.427 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 38.427 38.427 38.427 0 38.427 0 0
 Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 MgO 38.427 38.427 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Example 5 - Process Simulation of Magnesium Ion Catalyzed Capture CO2 from Flue Gas Using CaCl2 to form CaCO3.
Part of the defined parameters include the process flow diagram shown in FIG. 9. Results from the simulation suggest that it is efficient to heat a MgCl2·6H2O stream to form Mg(OH)Cl in a single chamber. The Mg(OH)Cl is reacted with H2O to form MgCl2 and Mg(OH)2, which then reacts with a saturated CaCl2/H2O solution and CO2 from the flue gas to form CaCO3, which is filtered out of the stream. The resulting MgCl2·6H2O formed is recycled to the first reactor to begin the process again. This process is not limited to any particular source for CaCl2. For example, it may be obtained from reacting calcium silicate with HCl to yield CaCl2.
Constraints and parameters specified for this simulation include:
  • The reactions were run at 100% efficiencies with no losses. The simulations can be modified when pilot runs determine the reaction efficiencies.
  • Simulations did not account for impurities in the CaCl2 feed stock or in any make-up MgCl2 required due to losses from the system.
The results of this simulation indicate a preliminary net energy consumption of 4681 kwh/tonne CO2. Table 6 provides mass and energy accounting for the various streams of the simulated process. Each stream corresponds to the stream of FIG. 9.
The process consists of two primary reactors and one solids filtration section. The first reactor heats MgCl2.6H2O causing it to break down into a HCl/H2O vapor stream and a solid stream of Mg(OH)Cl. The HCl/H2O vapor stream is sent to a heat exchanger to recover extra heat. The Mg(OH)2 formed from the Mg(OH)Cl is sent to reactor 2 for further processing. Chemical reaction(s) occurring in this reactor include the following:         MgCl2.6H2O + Δ → Mg(OH)Cl + 5 H2O↑ + HCl↑     (41)         2 Mg(OH)Cl(aq) → Mg(OH)2 + MgCl2     (42)
A CaCl2 solution and a flue gas stream are added to the Mg(OH)2 in reactor 2. This reaction forms CaCO3, MgCl2 and water. The CaCO3 precipitates and is removed in a filter or decanter. The remaining MgCl2 and water are recycled to the first reactor. Additional water is added to complete the water balance required by the first reactor. Chemical reaction(s) occurring in this reactor include the following:         Mg(OH)2 + CaCl2 + CO2 → CaCO3 ↓(s) + MgCl2 + H2O     (43)
The primary feeds to this process are CaCl2, flue gas (CO2) and water. MgCl2 in the system is used, reformed and recycled. The only MgCl2 make-up required is to replace small amounts that leave the system with the CaCO3 product, and small amounts that leave with the HCl/water product.
This process is a net energy user. The amount of energy is under investigation and optimization. There is cross heat exchange to recover the heat in high temperature streams to preheat the feed streams.
The steps for this process (Case 4) are summarized below:
Hexahydrate is dehydrated and decomposed simultaneously at 250 °C. Reactor yields 100% Mg(OH)CI.
53333 MTPY
134574 MTPY
HCl Dry 88368 MTPY
105989 MTPY
Hexahydrate recycled 492737 MTPY
5043 kWh/tonne CO2
TO 100% Mg(OH)CI (250 °C)
YEILDS 28.8% HCl VAPOR
2.2 MW
Heat Recovery 361 kWh/tonne CO2
from 28% HCl vapor
TOTAL 4681 kWh/tonne CO2
Table 6a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Case 4 Simulation.
Temperature °C 25 95 104 25 120 188 104 250
Pressure psia 14.7 14.7 15.78 14.7 14.696 14.7 14.7 14.696
Mass VFrac 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Mass SFrac 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1
Mass Flow tonne/year 134573.943 121369.558 166332.6 234646.82 306683.742 492736.693 492736.693 186052.951
Volume Flow gal/min 30.929 22.514 76673.298 6546.44 235789.67 96.405 96.405 32.909
Enthalpy MW -30.599 -46.174 -17.479 -118.063 -98.638 -188.114 -190.147 -60.661
Density lb/cuft 136.522 169.146 0.068 1.125 0.041 160.371 160.371 177.393
0 0 6499.971 234646.82 218315.265 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 HCl 0 0 0 0 88368.477 0 0 0
0 0 53333.098 0 0 0 0 0
 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 18333.252 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 88166.278 0 0 0 0 0
134573.943 80.499 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 121289.059 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 492736.693 492736.693 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 186052.951
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.039 1 0.712 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCl 0 0 0 0 0.288 0 0 0
0 0 0.321 0 0 0 0 0
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.11 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.53 0 0 0 0 0
1 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0.999 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 11.441 413.016 384.27 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCl 0 0 0 0 76.854 0 0 0
0 0 38.427 0 0 0 0 0
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 18.168 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 99.8 0 0 0 0 0
38.45 0.023 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 38.427 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 76.854 76.854 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76.854
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 6b. Mass and Energy Accounting for Case 4 Simulation.
Temperature °C 100 95 113.8 113.8 95 95 250 113.8
Pressure psia 14.696 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.696 14.7
Mass VFrac 0 0 0.002 0 1 0 1 1
Mass SFrac 1 0.998 0.998 1 0 0.998 0 0
Mass Flow tonne/year 186052.95 493737.58 493737.58 492736.69 106499.18 615107.14 306683.74 1000.89
Volume Flow gal/min 32.909 126.575 982.405 96.405 56469.408 146.834 313756.5 886
Enthalpy MW -61.189 -190.859 -190.331 -189.91 0.241 -237.034 -96.605 -0.421
Density lb/cuft 177.393 122.394 15.769 160.371 0.059 131.442 0.031 0.035
0 1000 1000 0 0 1000 218315.27 1000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 88368.477 0
0 0 0 0 0.532 0 0 0
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0.165 0.165 0 18333.088 0.165 0 0.165
0 0.72 0.72 0 88165.558 0.72 0 0.72
0 0 0 0 0 80.499 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 121289.06 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 492736.69 492736.69 492736.69 0 492736.69 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 186052.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0.002 0.002 0 0 0.002 0.712 0.999
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.288 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.172 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.828 0 0 0.001
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0.197 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0.998 0.998 1 0 0.801 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1.76 1.76 0 0 1.76 384.27 1.76
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 76.854 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 18.168 0 0 0
0 0.001 0.001 0 99.799 0.001 0 0.001
0 0 0 0 0 0.023 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 38.427 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 76.854 76.854 76.854 0 76.854 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 76.854 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Example 6 - Road Salt Boiler: Decomposition of MgCl2·6H2O
FIG. 10 shows a graph of the mass percentage of a heated sample of MgCl6H2O. The sample's initial mass was approximately 70 mg and set at 100%. During the experiment, the sample's mass was measured while it was being thermally decomposed. The temperature was quickly ramped up to 150 °C, and then slowly increased by 0.5 °C per minute. At approximately 220 °C, the weight became constant, consistent with the formation of Mg(OH)Cl. The absence of further weight decrease indicated that almost all the water has been removed. Two different detailed decompositional mass analyses are shown in FIGS. 28 and 29, with the theoretical plateaus of different final materials shown. FIG. 30 confirms that MgO can be made by higher temperatures (here, 500 °C) than those which produce Mg(OH)Cl.
Example 7 - Dissolution of Mg(OH)Cl in H2O
A sample of Mg(OH)Cl, produced by the heated decomposition of MgCl2·6H2O, was dissolved in water and stirred for a period of time. Afterwards, the remaining precipitate was dried, collected and analyzed. By the formula of decomposition, the amount of Mg(OH)2 could be compared to the expected amount and analyzed. The chemical reaction can be represented as follows:         2 Mg(OH)Cl (aq) → Mg(OH)2 + MgCl2     (44)
The solubility data for Mg(OH)2 and MgCl2 is as follows:
  • MgCl2 52.8 gm in 100 gm. H2O (very soluble)
  • Mg(OH)2 0.0009 gm in 100 gm. H2O (virtually insoluble)
Theoretical weight of recovered Mg(OH)2:
  • Given weight of sample: 3.0136 gm. MW Mg(OH)Cl 76.764MW Mg(OH)2 58.32Moles Mg(OH)2 formed per mole Mg(OH)Cl = ½
  • Expected amount of Mg(OH)22 Mg(OH)Cl (aq) → Mg(OH)2 + MgCl23.016gm ∗ (MW Mg(OH)2 ÷ (MW Mg(OH)Cl ∗ ½ = 1.1447 gm
  • Precipitate collected = 1.1245 gm
  • % of theoretical collected = (1.1447 ÷ 1.1245) ∗ 100 = 98.24%
Analytical data:
Next the sample of Mg(OH)2 was sent for analysis, XRD (X-ray -diffraction) and EDS. Results are shown in FIG. 11. The top row of peaks is that of the sample, the spikes in the middle row are the signature of Mg(OH)2 while the spikes at the bottom are those of MgO. Thus verifying that the recovered precipitate from the dissolution of Mg(OH)Cl has a signal resembling that of Mg(OH)2.
Element (calc.) k-ratio Wt % ZAF (1-Sigma) Atom % Element Wt % Err.
Mg-K 0.9472 1.014 96.88 96.02 +/-0.23
Si-K 0.0073 2.737 1.74 1.99 +/- 0.17
Cl-K 0.0127 1.570 1.38 2.00 +/-0.16
Total 100.00 100.00
Note: Results do not include elements with Z<11 (Na).
The EDS analysis reveals that very little chlorine [Cl] was incorporated into the precipitate. Note, this analysis cannot detect oxygen or hydrogen.
Example 8 - Decarbonation Bubbler Experiment: Production of CaCO3 by reacting CO2 with Mg(OH)2 {or Mg(OH)Cl} and CaCl2
Approximately 20 grams of Mg(OH)2 was placed in a bubble column with two liters of water and CO2 was bubbled though it for x minutes period of time. Afterwards some of the liquid was collected to which a solution of CaCl2 was added. A precipitate immediately formed and was sent through the XRD and EDS. The chemical reaction can be represented as follows:         Mg(OH)2 + CO2 + CaCl2 → CaCO3↓ + H2O     (45)
The XRD analysis (FIG. 12) coincides with the CaCO3 signature.
EDS
Element (calc.) k-ratio Wt % ZAF (1-Sigma) Atom % ) Element Wt % Err.
Mg-K 0.0070 2.211 2.52 1.55 +/-0.10
Al-K 0.0013 1.750 0.33 0.22 +/-0.04
Si-K 0.0006 1.382 0.12 0.09 +/- 0.03
Cl-K 0.0033 1.027 0.38 0.34 +/- 0.03
Ca-K 0.9731 1.005 96.64 97.80 +/- 0.30
Total 100.00 100.00
Note: Results do not include elements with Z<11 (Na).
The EDS analysis indicates almost pure CaCO3 with only a 1.55% by weight magnesium impurity and almost no Chlorine from the CaCl2.
The same test was performed, except that Mg(OH)Cl from the decomposition of MgCl2·6H2O was used instead of Mg(OH)2. Although Mg(OH)Cl has half the hydroxide [OH-], as Mg(OH)2 it is expected to absorb CO2 and form precipitated CaCO3 (PCC).
The XRD analysis (FIG. 13) coincides with the CaCO3 signature.
EDS
  • Chi-sqd = 5.83 Livetime = 300.0 Sec.
  • Standardless Analysis
  • PROZA Correction Acc.Volt.= 20 kV Take-off Angle=35.00 deg Number of Iterations = 3
Element (calc.) k-ratio Wt % ZAF (1-Sigma) Atom % Element Wt % Err.
Mg-K 0.0041 2.224 1.48 0.90 +/- 0.09
S -K 0.0011 1.071 0.14 0.11 +/- 0.04
Ca-K 0.9874 1.003 98.38 98.98 +/- 0.34
Total 100.00 100.00
Example 9A - Rock Melter Experiment: Reaction of Olivine and Serpentine with HCl
Samples of olivine (Mg,Fe)2SiO4 and serpentine Mg3Si2O5(OH)4were crushed and reacted with 6.1 molar HCl over a period of approximately 72 hours. Two sets of tests were run, the first at room temperature and the second at 70 °C. These minerals have variable formulae and often contain iron. After the samples were filtered, the resulting filtrand and filtrate were dried in an oven overnight. The samples then went through XRD and EDS analysis. The filtrates should have MgCl2 present and the filtrand should be primarily SiO2.
Olivine Filtrate Reacted with HCl at Room Temperature
Element (calc.) k-ratio Wt % ZAF (1-Sigma) Atom % Element Wt % Err.
Mg-K 0.1960 1.451 37.06 28.45 +/-0.18
Si-K 0.0103 1.512 1.75 1.56 +/- 0.11
Cl-K 0.5643 1.169 58.89 65.94 +/-0.31
Fe-K 0.0350 1.161 2.30 4.06 +/-0.22
Total 100.00 100.00
Olivine Filtrate Reacted with HCl at 70 °C
Note: Results do not include elements with Z<11 (Na).
Element (calc.) k-ratio Wt % ZAF (1-Sigma) Atom % Element Wt % Err.
Mg-K 0.1172 1.684 27.39 19.74 +/-0.12
Si-K 0.0101 1.459 1.77 1.48 +/-0.07
Cl-K 0.5864 1.142 63.70 66.94 +/- 0.24
Fe-K 0.0990 1.144 6.84 11.33 +/-0.21
Ni-K 0.0045 1.128 0.29 0.51 +/-0.09
Total 100.00 100.00
Serpentine Filtrate Reacted with HCl at Room Temperature
Note: Results do not include elements with Z<11 (Na).
Element (calc.) k-ratio Wt % ZAF (1-Sigma) Atom % Element Wt % Err.
Mg-K 0.1674 1.466 32.47 24.53 +/- 0.15
Al-K 0.0025 1.863 0.55 0.46 +/-0.06
Si-K 0.0033 1.456 0.55 0.48 +/-0.04
Cl-K 0.6203 1.141 64.22 70.77 +/- 0.27
Ca-K 0.0016 1.334 0.17 0.21 +/- 0.05
Cr-K 0.0026 1.200 0.19 0.31 +/- 0.07
Mn-K 0.0011 1.200 0.08 0.14 +/-0.08
Fe-K 0.0226 1.160 1.51 2.62 +/- 0.10
Ni-K 0.0042 1.128 0.26 0.48 +/- 0.10
Total 100.00 100.00
Serpentine Filtrate Reacted with HCl at 70°C
Note: Results do not include elements with Z<11 (Na).
Element (calc. k-ratio Wt % ZAF (1-Sigma) Atom % Element Wt % Err.
Mg-K 0.1759 1.455 33.67 25.59 +/-0.14
Al-K 0.0017 1.886 0.39 0.33 +/-0.06
Si-K 0.0087 1.468 1.46 1.28 +/-0.04
Cl-K 0.6014 1.152 62.46 69.27 +/- 0.25
Cr-K 0.0016 1.199 0.12 0.19 +/-0.06
Fe-K 0.0268 1.161 1.78 3.11 +/-0.17
Ni-K 0.0020 1.130 0.12 0.22 +/-0.08
Total 100.00 100.00
Note: Results do not include elements with Z<11 (Na).
The filtrate clearly for both minerals serpentine and olivine at ambient conditions and 70 °C all illustrate the presence of MgCl2, and a small amount of FeCl2 in the case of olivine.
Olivine Filtrand Reacted with HCl at Room Temperature
Element (calc.) k-ratio Wt % ZAF (1-Sigma) Atom % Element Wt % Err.
Mg-K 0.2239 1.431 37.68 32.04 +/- 0.14
Si-K 0.3269 1.622 53.96 53.02 +/- 0.19
Cl-K 0.0140 1.658 1.87 2.32 +/-0.06
Cr-K 0.0090 1.160 0.58 1.05 +/- 0.08
Mn-K 0.0013 1.195 0.08 0.16 +/-0.09
Fe-K 0.0933 1.167 5.57 10.89 +/-0.26
Ni-K 0.0045 1.160 0.25 0.52 +/- 0.11
Total 100.00 100.00
Note: Results do not include elements with Z<11 (Na).
Olivine Filtrand Reacted with HCl at 70 °C
Element (calc.) k-ratio Wt % ZAF (1-Sigma) Atom % Element Wt % Err.
Mg-K 0.2249 1.461 38.87 32.86 +/- 0.16
Si-K 0.3030 1.649 51.12 49.94 +/- 0.21
Cl-K 0.0223 1.638 2.96 3.65 +/- 0.14
Ca-K 0.0033 1.220 0.29 0.41 +/- 0.05
Cr-K 0.0066 1.158 0.42 0.76 +/- 0.08
Mn-K 0.0023 1.193 0.15 0.28 +/- 0.10
Fe-K 0.0937 1.163 5.61 10.89 +/- 0.29
Ni-K 0.0074 1.158 0.42 0.86 +/- 0.13
Cu-K 0.0029 1.211 0.16 0.35 +/- 0.16
Total 100.00 100.00
Note: Results do not include elements with Z<11 (Na).
Given that the formula for olivine is (Mg,Fe)2SiO4, and this is a magnesium rich olivine. The raw compound has a Mg:Si ratio of 2:1. However the filtrand, that which does not pass through the filter has a (Mg + Fe:Si) ratio of (37+5.5:52) or 0.817:1. (Atom % on the chart), evidently more than 50% of the magnesium passed through the filter.
Serpentine Filtrand Reacted with HCl at Room Temperature
Element (calc.) k-ratio Wt % ZAF (1-Sigma) Atom % Element Wt % Err.
Mg-K 0.1930 1.595 37.32 30.78 +/- 0.15
Si-K 0.2965 1.670 51.94 49.50 +/- 0.20
Cl-K 0.0065 1.633 0.88 1.06 +/- 0.06
Cr-K 0.0056 1.130 0.36 0.63 +/- 0.08
Fe-K 0.1532 1.155 9.33 17.69 +/- 0.31
Ni-K 0.0029 1.159 0.17 0.34 +/- 0.12
Total 100.00 100.00
Note: Results do not include elements with Z<11 (Na).
Serpentine Filtrand Reacted with HCl at 70 °C
Element (calc.) k-ratio Wt % ZAF (1-Sigma) Atom % Element Wt % Err.
Mg-K 0.1812 1.536 33.53 27.83 +/- 0.13
Si-K 0.3401 1.593 56.49 54.18 +/- 0.18
Cl-K 0.0106 1.651 1.45 1.75 +/- 0.11
Cr-K 0.0037 1.142 0.24 0.43 +/- 0.07
Mn-K 0.0009 1.188 0.05 0.10 +/- 0.08
Fe-K 0.1324 1.159 8.05 15.35 +/- 0.26
Ni-K 0.0032 1.160 0.18 0.37 +/- 0.11
Total 100.00 100.00
Note: Results do not include elements with Z<11 (Na).
Given that the formula of serpentine is (Mg,Fe)3Si2O5(OH)4 the initial 1.5:1 ratio of (Mg + Fe) to Si has been whittled down to (37 + 9.3:56.5) = 0.898:1.
Example 9B - Temperature/Pressure Simulation for Decomposition of MgCl2·6(H2O)
Pressure and temperature was varied, as shown below (Table 7) and in FIG. 14, to determine the effect this has on the equilibrium of the decomposition of MgCl2·6(H2O). Inputs are:
  1. 1) MgCl2·6H2O
  2. 2) CaCl2
  3. 3) The temperature of the hot stream leaving the heat exchanger (HX) labeled Mg(OH)Cl (see FIGS. 7-8).
  4. 4) Percentage of Solids separated in decanter.
  5. 5) Water needed labeled H2O
  6. 6) Flue Gas.
Table 7.
400 5 51.08399 25.31399 25.77001 23.63765 3883
410 5 38.427 0 38.427 19.85614 3261
420 5 38.427 0 38.427 19.87482 3264
430 5 38.427 0 38.427 19.89354 3268
440 5 38.427 0 38.427 19.9123 3271
450 5 38.427 0 38.427 19.93111 3274
400 7 76.854 76.854 0 31.37484 5153
410 7 53.24627 29.63854 23.60773 24.31186 3993
420 7 38.427 0 38.427 19.87482 3264
430 7 38.427 0 38.427 19.89354 3268
440 7 38.427 0 38.427 19.9123 3271
450 7 38.427 0 38.427 19.93111 3274
400 9 76.854 76.854 0 31.37484 5153
410 9 72.85115 68.84829 4.002853 30.20646 4961
420 9 50.2148 23.5756 26.6392 23.42411 3847
430 9 38.427 0 38.427 19.89354 3268
440 9 38.427 0 38.427 19.9123 3271
450 9 38.427 0 38.427 19.93111 3274
400 11 76.854 76.854 0 31.37484 5153
410 11 76.854 76.854 0 31.41 5159
420 11 64.78938 52.72476 12.06462 27.81251 4568
430 11 44.67748 12.50096 32.17652 21.77822 3577
440 11 38.427 0 38.427 19.9123 3271
450 11 38.427 0 38.427 19.93111 3274
400 13 76.854 76.854 0 31.37484 5153
410 13 76.854 76.854 0 31.41 5159
420 13 76.854 76.854 0 31.44515 5165
430 13 55.59535 34.3367 21.25865 25.07026 4118
440 13 38.427 0 38.427 19.9123 3271
450 13 38.427 0 38.427 19.93111 3274
400 15 76.854 76.854 0 31.37484 5153
410 15 76.854 76.854 0 31.41 5159
420 15 76.854 76.854 0 31.44515 5165
430 15 66.51322 56.17244 10.34078 28.36229 4659
440 15 46.41875 15.98351 30.43525 22.32544 3667
450 15 38.427 0 38.427 19.93111 3274
200 5 127 76.854 0 47.51946 7805
210 5 85 76.854 0 33.34109 5476
220 5 77 76.854 0 30.74184 5049
230 5 77 76.854 0 30.77702 5055
240 5 77 76.854 0 30.8122 5061
250 5 77 76.854 0 30.84739 5067
200 7 184 76.854 0 66.57309 10935
210 7 125 76.854 0 46.75184 7679
220 7 85 76.854 0 33.32609 5474
230 7 77 76.854 0 30.777 5055
240 7 77 76.854 0 30.81218 5061
250 7 77 76.854 0 30.84737 5067
200 9 297 76.854 0 89.51079 14702
210 9 165 76.854 0 60.16258 9882
220 9 113 76.854 0 42.92123 7050
230 9 78 76.854 0 31.04401 5099
240 9 77 76.854 0 30.81217 5061
250 9 77 76.854 0 30.84735 5067
200 11 473 76.854 0 136.5784 22433
210 11 205 76.854 0 73.57332 12084
220 11 142 76.854 0 52.51638 8626
230 11 98 76.854 0 38.01558 6244
240 11 77 76.854 0 30.81216 5061
250 11 77 76.854 0 30.84734 5067
200 13 684 76.854 0 192.9858 31698
210 13 303 76.854 0 91.43505 15018
220 13 170 76.854 0 62.11152 10202
230 13 119 76.854 0 44.98715 7389
240 13 83.3323 76.854 0 33.00459 5421
250 13 76.854 76.854 0 30.84733 5067
200 15 930.5287 76.854 0 258.7607 42502
210 15 422.9236 76.854 0 123.7223 20322
220 15 198.7291 76.854 0 71.70666 11778
230 15 139.6567 76.854 0 51.95871 8534
240 15 98.51739 76.854 0 38.14363 6265
250 15 76.854 76.854 0 30.84733 5067
Examples 10 - 21
The following remaining examples are concerned with obtaining the necessary heat to perform the decomposition reaction using waste heat emissions from either coal or natural gas power plants. In order to obtain the necessary heat from coal flue gas emissions, the heat source may be located prior to the baghouse where the temperature ranges from 320-480 °C in lieu of the air pre-heater. See Reference: pages 11-15 of "The structural design of air and gas ducts for power stations and industrial Boiler Applications," Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers (August 1995). Open cycle natural gas plants have much higher exhaust temperatures of 600 °C. See Reference: pages 11-15 of "The structural design of air and gas ducts for power stations and industrial Boiler Applications," Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers (August 1995). Additionally, the decomposition reaction of MgCl2·6H2O may also run in two different modes, complete decomposition to MgO or a partial decomposition to Mg(OH)Cl. The partial decomposition to Mg(OH)Cl requires in some embodiments a temperature greater than 180 °C whereas the total decomposition to MgO requires in some embodiments a temperature of 440 °C or greater.
Additionally the incoming feed to the process can be represented as a continuum between 100% Calcium Silicate (CaSiO3) and 100% Magnesium Silicate (MgSiO3) with Diopside (MgCa(SiO3)2) (or a mixture of CaSiO3 and MgSiO3 in a 1:1 molar ratio) representing an intermediate 50% case. For each of these cases the resulting output will range in some embodiments from calcium carbonate (CaCO3) to magnesium carbonate (MgCO3) with Dolomite CaMg(CO3)2 representing the intermediate case. The process using 100% calcium silicate is the Ca-Mg process used in all of the previously modeled embodiments. It is also important to note that the 100% magnesium silicate process uses no calcium compounds; whereas the 100% calcium silicate incoming feed process does use magnesium compounds, but in a recycle loop, only makeup magnesium compounds are required.
Further details regarding the Ca-Mg, Mg only, Diopside processes, for example, using complete and partial decomposition of hydrated MgCl2 to MgO and Mg(OH)Cl, respectively, are depicted below.
I) Ca-Mg Process
Overall reaction CaSiO3 + CO2 → CaCO3 + SiO2
  1. a) Full decomposition ("the CaSiO3-MgO process"):
    1. 1) MgCl2.6H2O + Δ → MgO + 5H2O↑ + 2HCl↑ A thermal decomposition reaction.
    2. 2) 2HCl(aq) + CaSiO3 → CaCl2(aq) + SiO2↓ + H2O A rock melting reaction. Note 5 H2O will be present per 2 moles of HCl during the reaction.
    3. 3) MgO + CaCl2(aq) + CO2 → CaCO3↓ + MgCl2(aq) Some versions of this equation use Mg(OH)2 which is formed from MgO and H2O.
    4. 4) MgCl2(aq) + 6H2O → MgCl2·6H2O Regeneration of MgCl2.6H2O, return to #1.
  2. b) Partial decomposition ("the CaSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl process"):
    1. 1) 2 × [MgCl2·6H2O + Δ → Mg(OH)Cl + 5H2O↑ + HCl↑] Thermal decomposition. Twice as much MgCl2·6H2O is needed to trap the same amount of CO2.
    2. 2) 2HCl(aq) + CaSiO3 → CaCl2(aq) + SiO2↓ + H2O Rock melting reaction.
    3. 3) 2Mg(OH)Cl + CaCl2(aq) + CO2 → CaCO3 ↓ + 2MgCl2(aq) + H2O CO2 capture reaction
    4. 4) 2 MgCl2 + 12H2O → 2MgCl2·6H2O Regeneration of MgCl2.6H2O, return to #1.
II) Mg Only Process
Overall reaction MgSiO3 + CO2 → MgCO3 + SiO2 c) Full decomposition ("the MgSiO3-MgO process")
  1. 1) 2HCl(aq) + MgSiO3 + (x-1)H2O → MgCl2 + SiO2↓ + xH2O Rock melting reaction.
  2. 2) MgCl2·xH2O + Δ → MgO + (x-1)H2O↑ + 2HCl↑ Thermal decomposition reaction. Note "x-1" moles H2O will be produced per 2 moles of HCl.
  3. 3) MgO + CO2 → MgCO3 CO2 capture reaction.
Note, in this embodiment no recycle of MgCl2 is required. The value of x, the number of waters of hydration is much lower than 6 because the MgCl2 from the rock melting reaction is hot enough to drive much of the water into the vapor phase. Therefore the path from the rock melting runs at steady state with "x" as modeled with a value of approximately 2. d) Partial decomposition ("the MgSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl process")
  1. 1) 2HCl(aq) + MgSiO3 → MgCl2 + SiO2↓ + H2O Rock melting reaction. Note "x-1" H2O will be present per mole of HCl during the reaction.
  2. 2) 2 × [MgCl2.xH2O + Δ → Mg(OH)Cl + (x-1) H2O↑ + HCl↑] Decomposition. Twice as much MgCl2·(x-1)H2O is needed to trap the same amount of CO2.
  3. 3) 2Mg(OH)Cl + CO2 → MgCO3↓ + MgCl2 + H2O CO2 capture reaction.
  4. 4) MgCl2(aq) + 6H2O → MgCl2·6H2O Regenerate MgCl2·6H2O, Return to #1.
Note, in this embodiment half of the MgCl2 is recycled. The value of x, the number of waters of hydration is somewhat lower than 6 because half of the MgCl2 is from the rock melting reaction which is hot enough to drive much of the water into the vapor phase and the remaining half is recycled from the absorption column. Therefore the number of hydrations for the total amount of MgCl2 at steady state will have a value of approximately 4, being the average between the MgCl2·6H2O and MgCl2·2H2O.
III) Diopside or Mixed process:
Note diopside is a mixed calcium and magnesium silicate and dolomite is a mixed calcium and magnesium carbonate.
Overall reaction: ½ CaMg(SiO3)2 + CO2 → ½ CaMg(CO3)2 + SiO2
  • e) Full decomposition ("the Diopside-MgO process"): 1) MgCl2.6H2O + Δ → MgO + 5H2O↑ + 2HCl↑ Thermal decomposition.2) HCl + ½ CaMg(SiO3)2 → ½ CaCl2 + ½ MgSiO3↓ + ½ SiO2↓ + ½ H2O First rock melting reaction.3) HCl + ½ MgSiO3 → ½MgCl2 + ½ SiO2↓ + ½ H2O Second rock melting reaction. The MgCl2 returns to #1.4) MgO + ½ CaCl2 + CO2 → ½ CaMg(CO3)2↓ + ½ MgCl25) ½ MgCl2 + 3H2O → ½ MgCl2.6H2O Regenerate MgCl2.6H2O, return to #1.
  • f) Partial decomposition ("the Diopside-Mg(OH)Cl process"): 1) 2 × [MgCl2·6H2O + Δ → Mg(OH)Cl + 5H2O↑ + HCl↑] Thermal decomposition. Twice as much MgCl2·6H2O is needed to trap the same amount of CO2.2) HCl + ½ CaMg(SiO3)2 → ½ CaCl2 + ½ MgSiO3↓ + ½ SiO2↓ + ½ H2O First rock melting reaction.3) HCl + ½ MgSiO3 → ½MgCl2 + ½ SiO2↓ + ½ H2O Second rock melting reaction. Here the MgCl2 returns to #1.4) 2Mg(OH)Cl + ½ CaCl2 + CO2 → ½ CaMg(CO3)2↓ + 3/2 MgCl2 + H2O5) 3/2 MgCl2 + 9H2O → 3/2 MgCl2·6H2O Regenerate MgCl2·6H2O, return to #1
Table 9. Summary of Processes
Example Process Flue gas source Detailed mass and energy balance of each process stream
10 Coal 320-550 7.2% - 18% Table 14
11 Nat. gas 600 7.2% - 18% Table 14
12 Coal 550 7.2% - 18% Table 15
13 Nat. gas 600 7.2% - 18% Table 15
14 Coal 320-550 7.2% - 18% Table 16
15 Nat. gas 600 7.2% - 18% Table 16
16 Coal 550 7.2% - 18% Table 17
17 Nat. gas 600 7.2% - 18% Table 17
18 Diopside-Mg(OH)Cl Coal 320-550 7.2% - 18% Table 18
19 Diopside-Mg(OH)Cl Nat. gas 600 7.2% - 18% Table 18
20 Diopside-MgO Coal 550 7.2% - 18% Table 19
21 Diopside-MgO Nat. gas 600 7.2% - 18% Table 19
1 - The temperature range of 320-550 °C includes models run at 320, 360, 400, 440 and 550 °C respectively.
2 - The CO2 percentage of flue gas 7.2% - 18% includes models run at 7.2%, 10%, 14% and 18% respectively.
Calcium Silicate process:
The CaSiO3-MgO and CaSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl decomposition processes are further divided into two stages, the first step consists of a dehydration reaction where MgCl2·6H2O is converted to MgCl2·2H2O + 4 H2O and the second step in which the MgCl2·2H2O is converted to Mg(OH)Cl + HCl + H2O if partial decomposition is desired or required and MgO + 2HCl + H2O if total decomposition is desired or required. FIG. 15 describes a layout of this process.
Magnesium Silicate process:
The MgSiO3-MgO and MgSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl processes consists of a one chamber decomposition step in which the HCl from the decomposition chamber reacts with MgSiO3 in the rock-melting reactor and the ensuing heat of reaction leaves the MgCl2 in the dihydrate form MgCl2·2H2O as it leaves the rock-melting chamber in approach to the decomposition reactor where it is converted to either MgO or Mg(OH)Cl as described earlier. This process may be preferred if calcium silicates are unavailable. The HCl emitted from the decomposition reacts with MgSiO3 to form more MgCl2. The magnesium silicate process follows a different path from the calcium. The process starts from the "rock melting reaction HCl + silicate", and then moves to the "decomposition reaction (MgCl2 + heat)," and lastly the absorption column. In the calcium silicate process, all the magnesium compounds rotate between the decomposition reaction and the absorption reaction. FIG. 16 describes the layout of this process.
Mixed Magnesium and Calcium Silicate "Diopside" process:
The intermediate process Diopside-MgO and Diopside-Mg(OH)Cl also involve a two stage decomposition consisting of the dehydration reaction MgCl2·6H2O + Δ → MgCl2·2H2O + 4 H2O followed by the decomposition reaction MgCl2·2H2O + Δ → MgO + 2HCl + H2O (full decomposition) or MgCl2·2H2O + Δ → Mg(OH)Cl + HCl + H2O partial decomposition. FIG. 17 describes a layout of this process.
The ensuing HCl from the decomposition then reacts with the Diopside CaMg(SiO3)2 in a two step "rock melting reaction." The first reaction creates CaCl2 through the reaction 2HCl + CaMg(SiO3)2 → CaCl2(aq) + MgSiO3↓ + SiO2↓ + H2O. The solids from the previous reaction are then reacted with HCl a second time to produce MgCl2 through the reaction MgSiO3 + 2HCl → MgCl2 + SiO2↓+H2O. The CaCl2 from the first rock melter is transported to the absorption column and the MgCl2 from the second rock melter is transported to the decomposition reactor to make Mg(OH)Cl or MgO.
Basis of the reaction:
All of these examples assume 50% CO2 absorption of a reference flue gas from a known coal fired plant of interest. This was done to enable a comparison between each example. The emission flow rate of flue gas from this plant is 136,903,680 tons per year and the CO2 content of this gas is 10% by weight. This amount of CO2 is the basis for examples 10 through 21 which is:
  • Amount of CO2 present in the flue gas per year: 136,903,680 tons per year ∗ 10% = 13,690,368 tons per year
  • Amount of CO2 absorbed per year. 13,690,368 tons per year ∗ 50% = 6,845,184 tons per year of CO2.
Since the amount of CO2 absorbed is a constant, the consumption of reactants and generation of products is also a constant depending on the reaction stoichiometry and molecular weight for each compound.
For all the examples of both the CaSiO3-MgO and the CaSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl process (examples 10-13) the overall reaction is:         CaSiO3 + CO2 → CaCO3 + SiO2
For all the examples of both the MgSiO3-MgO and the MgSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl process (examples 14-17) the overall reaction is:         MgSiO3 + CO2 → MgCO3 + SiO2
For all the examples of both the Diopside-MgO and the Diopside-Mg(OH)Cl process (examples 18-21) the overall reaction is:         ½ CaMg(SiO3)2+ CO2 → ½ CaMg(CO3)2+ SiO2
The Aspen model enters the required inputs for the process and calculates the required flue gas to provide the heat needed for the decomposition reaction to produce the carbon dioxide absorbing compounds MgO, Mg(OH)2 or Mg(OH)Cl. This flue gas may be from a natural gas or a coal plant and in the case of coal was tested at a range of temperatures from 320 °C to 550 °C. This flue gas should not be confused with the reference flue gas which was used a standard to provide a specific amount of CO2 removal for each example. A process with a higher temperature flue gas would typically require a lesser amount of flue gas to capture the same amount of carbon dioxide from the basis. Also a flue gas with a greater carbon dioxide concentration would typically result in greater amount of flue gas needed to capture the carbon dioxide because there is a greater amount of carbon dioxide that needs to be captured.
The consumption of reactants and generation of products can be determined from the basis of CO2 captured and the molecular weights of each input and each output for each example. Table 10. Molecular Masses of Inputs and Outputs (all embodiments).
116.16
99.69
Diopside* 215.85
100.09
84.31
Dolomite* 184.40
60.08
44.01
Table 10. Molecular Masses of Inputs and Outputs (all embodiments).
For Examples 10-13:
  • The CaSiO3 consumption is: 6,845,184 tons per year ∗ (116.16 / 44.01) = 18,066,577 tons per year.
  • The CaCO3 production is: 6,845,184 tons per year ∗ (100.09 / 44.01) = 15,559,282 tons per year.
  • The SiO2 production is: 6,845,184 tons per year ∗ (60.08 / 44.01) = 9,344,884 tons per year
The same type of calculations may be done for the remaining examples. This following table contains the inputs and outputs for examples 10 through 21. Basis: 6,845,184 tons CO2 absorbed per year. Table 11. Mass Flows of Inputs and Outputs for Examples 10-21.
6,845,184 6,845,184 6,845,184
Table 11. Mass Flows of Inputs and Outputs for Examples 10-21.
136,903,680 136,903,680 136,903,680
13,690,368 13,690,368 13,690,368
18,066,577
15,613,410
Diopside 16,839,993
Table 11. Mass Flows of Inputs and Outputs for Examples 10-21.
9,344,884 9,344,884 9,344,884
15,559,282
13,111,817
Dolomite 14,319,845
Running the Aspen models generated the following results for the heat duty for each step of the decomposition reaction, dehydration and decomposition. The results for each example are summarized in the table below. Table 12. Power (Rate of Energy for each process at the particular basis of CO2 absorption).
2670 1087 n/a n/a 2614 1306
Table 12. Power (Rate of Energy for each process at the particular basis of CO2 absorption).
Table 12. Power (Rate of Energy for each process at the particular basis of CO2 absorption).
*D&D equals dehydration and decomposition
Table 13. Percentage CO2 captured as a function of flue gas temperature and CO2 concentration. Examples 10 through 13.
10 10 10 10 10 12 11 13
33% 45% 57% 70% 105% 83% 121% 96%
24% 32% 41% 50% 75% 60% 87% 69%
17% 23% 29% 36% 54% 43% 62% 50%
13% 18% 23% 28% 42% 33% 48% 39%
A value of over 100% means that excess heat is available to produce more Mg(OH)Cl or MgO. FIG. 24 illustrates the percent CO2 captured for varying CO2 flue gas concentrations, varying temperatures, whether the flue gas was originated from coal or natural gas, and also whether the process relied on full or partial decomposition for examples 10 through 13 of the CaSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl and CaSiO3-MgO processes. Table 14. Percentage CO2 captured as a function of flue gas temperature and CO2 concentration. Examples 14 through 17.
14 14 14 14 14 16 15 17
24% 34% 45% 55% 84% 86% 93% 96%
17% 25% 32% 40% 61% 62% 67% 69%
12% 18% 23% 28% 43% 44% 48% 49%
10% 14% 18% 22% 34% 34% 37% 38%
FIG. 25 illustrates the percent CO2 captured for varying CO2 flue gas concentrations, varying temperatures, whether the flue gas was originated from coal or natural gas, and also whether the process relied on full or partial decomposition for examples 14 through 17 of the MgSiO3-Mg(OH)Cl and MgSiO3-MgO processes. Table 15. Percentage CO2 captured as a function of flue gas temperature and CO2 concentration. Examples 18 through 21.
18 18 18 18 18 20 19 21
28% 38% 48% 59% 88% 79% 101% 91%
20% 27% 35% 42% 63% 57% 73% 65%
14% 19% 25% 30% 45% 40% 52% 47%
11% 15% 19% 23% 35% 31% 41% 36%
Table 15. Percentage CO2 captured as a function of flue gas temperature and CO2 concentration. Examples 18 through 21.
* Note Diop equals Diopside
FIG. 26 illustrates the percent CO2 captured for varying CO2 flue gas concentrations, varying temperatures, whether the flue gas was originated from coal or natural gas, and also whether the process relied on full or partial decomposition for examples 18 through 21 of the Diopside - Mg(OH)Cl and Diopside - MgO processes. Table 16a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 10 and 11 Simulation.
PH
Temperature °C 112.6 95 149.9 150 95 25 100 25 200 250
Pressure psia 14.696 15 100 14.696 14.7 14.696 15.78 14.7 14.696 14.696
Mass VFrac 0 0.793 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Mass SFrac 1 0.207 0 0.163 1 1 0 0 0 0
Mass Flow tonne/year 5.73E+07 3.96E+07 4.36E+07 5.21 E+07 1.41E+07 164E+07 6.21 E+07 1.80E+07 3.57E+07 3.57E+07
Volume Flow gal/min 11216.8 2.2E+07 17031.4 18643.542 2616.633 2126.004 3.11 E+07 502184.16 3.30E+07 3.65E+07
Enthalpy MW -22099.5 -3288.21 -17541.7 -21585.353 -5368.73 -7309.817 -2926.806 -9056.765 -11331.898 -11240.08
Density lb/cuft 160.371 0.059 80.305 87.619 169.173 241.725 0.063 1.125 0.034 0.031
0 1.80E+07 2.79E+07 2.79E+07 0 0 3.10E+06 1.80E+07 2.54E+07 2.54E+07
HCl 0 0 0.004 0.004 0 0 0 0 1.03E+07 1.03E+07
0 0 0 0 0 0 6.21 E+06 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 6.21 E+06 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 4.65E+07 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1.41E+07 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.73E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 8.22E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 3.43E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 5.65E+06 5.65E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 .007 0 1.64E+07 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 8.47E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 16b. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 10 and 11 Simulation.
PH 9.453 9.453
Temperature C 215 80 95 95 149.9 95 250 115
Pressure psia 14.696 14.696 14.7 14.7 100 14.7 14.696 14.696
Mass VFrac .502 0 0 1 0 0 0 .165
Mass SFrac .498 1 0 0 1 .152 1 .207
Mass Flow tonne/year 5.73E+07 5.73E+07 7.84E+07 5.27E+07 8.47E+06 9.26E+07 2.16E+07 3.96E+07
Volume Flow gal/min 3.03E+07 11216.796 33789.492 282E+07 1607.826 32401.78 3828.933 6.33E+06
Enthalpy MW -1877.989 -22191.287 -32705.27 120.09 0 -38074.2 -7057.97 -4070.06
Density lb/cuft .059 160.371 72.846 0.059 165.327 89.628 177.393 0.197
2.54E+07 0 5.16E+07 0 0 5.16E+07 0 1.80E+07
HCl 3.40E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.074 25.781 0 0.074 0 0
0 0 2510.379 6.20E+06 0 2510.379 0 0
0 0 8109.244 4.65E+07 0 8109.245 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1.41E+07 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.14E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 5.73E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 7.15E+06 0 0 0 0 0 2.16E+07 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.22E+06
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 3324.433 0 0 3324.433 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 6.85E+06 0 0 6.85E+06 0 3.43E+06
0 0 1644.031 0 0 1644.031 0 0
0 0 2.00E+07 0 0 2.00E+07 0 1.00E+07
0 0 61.424 0 0 61.424 0 0
0 0 27.297 0 0 27.297 0 0
OH- 0 0 690.278 0 0 690.278 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.007 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 8.47E+06 0 0 0
Table 17a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 12 and 13 Simulation.
PH
Temperature °C 271 255.5 149.8 150 95 25 100 25 200 450
Pressure psia 14.696 15 100 14.696 14.7 14.696 15.78 14.7 14.696 14.696
Mass VFrac 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Mass SFrac 1 1 0 0.215 1 1 0 0 0 0
Mass Flow tonne/year 2.87E+07 2.37E+07 3.09E+07 3.94E+07 1.41E+07 1.64E+07 6.21 E+07 1.80E+07 2.30E+07 2.30E+07
Volume Flow gal/min 5608.398 10220.835 10147.12 11758.176 2616.827 2126.004 3.11 E+07 502184.16 1.93E+07 2.94E+07
Enthalpy MW -10826.6 -11660.74 -11347.9 -15391.633 -5369.12 -7309.817 -2926.806 -9056.765 -6056.076 -5786.994
Density lb/cuft 160.371 72.704 95.515 105.035 169.173 241.725 0.063 1.125 0.037 0.024
0 1.55E+07 1.52E+07 1.52E+07 0 0 3.10E+06 1.80E+07 1.27E+07 1.27E+07
HCl 0 0 0.015 0.015 0 0 0 0 1.03E+07 1.03e+07
0 0 0 0 0 0 6.21 E+06 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 6.21 E+06 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 4.65E+07 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1.41E+07 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.87E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)CI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 8.22E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 5.65E+06 5.65E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OH- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.023 1.64E+07 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 8.47E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 17b. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 12 and 13 Simulation.
PH 9.304 9.304
Temperature °C 215 80 95 95 149.8 95 450 115
Pressure psia 14.696 14.696 14.7 14.7 100 14.7 14.696 14.696
Mass VFrac 0.502 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Mass SFrac 0.498 1 0 0 1 0.221 1 1
Mass Flow tonne/year 2.87E+07 2.87E+07 4.98E+07 5.27E+07 8.47E+06 6.39E+07 5.68E+06 2.37E+07
Volume Flow gal/min 1.51E+07 5608.398 25330.305 2.82E+07 1607.826 22988.79 797.11 10220.84
Enthalpy MW -9388.949 -11095.644 -21589.89 120.08 0 -26959.3 -2603.98 -11955.9
Density Ib/cuft 0.059 160.371 61.662 0.059 165.327 87.199 223.695 72.704
127E+07 0 3.63E+07 0 0 3.63E+07 0 1.55E+07
HCl 1.70E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.145 79.255 0 0.145 0 0
0 0 1919.222 6.20E+06 0 1919.222 0 0
0 0 6199.3 4.65E+07 0 6199.301 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1.41E+07 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.07E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 2.87E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)CI 3.58E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.22E+06
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.68E+06 0
0 0 2208.676 0 0 2208.676 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 3.43E+06 0 0 3.43E+06 0 0
0 0 1225.309 0 0 1225.309 0 0
0 0 1.00E+07 0 0 1.00E+07 0 0
0 0 110.963 0 0 110.963 0 0
0 0 63.12 0 0 63.12 0 0
OH- 0 0 519.231 0 0 519.231 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.023 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 8.47E+06 0 0 0
Table 18a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 14 and 15 Simulation.
PH
Temperature °C 100 25 26 250 200.7 200 200
Pressure psia 15.78 1 14.696 14.696 15 14.696 14.696
Mass VFrac 1 0 0.798 1 0.238 0 0.169
Mass SFrac 0 0 0.186 0 0 1 0.289
Mass Flow tons/year 1.37E+08 1.00E+07 1.58E+08 1.69E+07 2.31 E+07 4.08E+07 3.26E+07
Volume Flow gal/min 62.21 E+07 4569.619 4.91 E+07 1.22E+07 5.22E+06 3828.933 5.33E+06
Enthalpy MW -5853.92 -4563.814 -13984.7 -2861.732 0 -11194.13 -10932.15
Density lb/cuft 0.063 62.249 0.091 0.04 0.126 303.28 0.174
6.85E+06 1.00e+07 5.19E+06 5.60E+06 8.37E+06 0 8.37E+06
HCl 0 0 0 1.13E+07 126399.9 0 126399.87
1.37E+07 0 6.85E+06 0 0 0 0
1.37E+07 0 1.37E+07 0 0 0 0
1.03E+08 0 1.03E+08 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 4.08E+07 0
0 0 1.09E+07 0 0 0 0
0 0 1.83E+07 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.001 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 3.74E+06 0 3.74E+06
CI- 0 0 0 0 1.09E+07 0 1.09E+07
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OH- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 9.24E+06
0 0 0 0 0 0 174011.19
Table 18b. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 14 and 15 Simulation.
PH .0864 6.24
Temperature °C 26 25 200.7 60 250 95
Pressure psia 14.696 14.696 15 44.088 14.696 44.088
Mass VFrac 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mass SFrac 1 1 1 0.248 1 0.268
Mass Flow tons/year 1.31 E+07 1.56E+07 0 9.41 E+06 1.71 E+08 2.39E+07 3.39E+07
Volume Flow gal/min 1985.546 2126.004 1613.601 178707.499 3828.933 8016.874
Enthalpy MW 0 -6925.208 0 0 -18961.843 -7057.974 -12123.17
Density Ib/cuft 187.864 208.902 165.967 27.184 177.393 120.206
0 0 0 5.19E+06 0 1.00E+07
HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 6.85E+06 0 0
0 0 0 1.37E+07 0 0
0 0 0 1.03E+08 0 0
1.31 E+07 0 0 1.31 E+07 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1.09E+07 0 0
0 0 0 1.83E+07 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 2.39E+07 0
0 0 0 0 0 9.07E+06
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.001 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 3.78E+06
0 0 0 0 0 1.10E+07
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
OH- 0 0 0 0 0 0.029
0 0 9.24E+06 0 0 0
0 1.56E+07 174011.19 0 0 0
Table 19a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 16 and 17 Simulation.
PH 6.583
Temperature °C 100 25 59.6 450 200 200 200
Pressure psia 15.78 1 14.696 14.696 15 14.696 14.696
Mass VFrac 1 0 0.004 1 0 0 0
Mass SFrac 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Mass Flow tons/year 1.37E+08 1.00E+07 1.70E+07 1.41 E+07 2.04E+07 2.04E+07 2.98e+07
Volume Flow gal/min 6.21 E+07 4569.619 40446.86 1.26E+07 1914.466 1914.466 3522.292
Enthalpy MW -5853.92 -4563.814 -7633.28 -1728.6 0 -5597.066 -9628.072
Density Ib/cuft 0.063 62.249 11.94 0.032 303.28 303.28 240.308
685.E+06 1.00E+07 1.68E+07 2.80E+06 0 0 0
HCl 0 0 0 1.13E+07 0 0 0
1.37E+07 0 56280.04 0 0 0 0
1.37E+07 0 18848.97 0 0 0 0
1.03E+08 0 56346.51 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 2.04E+07 2.04E+07 2.04E+07
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 77.467 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 744.857 0 0 0 0
Cl- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1.19 0 0 0 0
0 0 3259.779 0 0 0 0
OH- 0 0 0.109 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 9.34E+06
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 19b. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 16 and 17 Simulation.
PH 6.583 8.537
Temperature °C 59.6 25 60 200 60 450 95
Pressure psia 14.696 14.696 44.088 15 44.088 14.696 44.088
Mass VFrac 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Mass SFrac 1 1 0 1 0.436 1 0.558
Mass Flow tons/year 1.31 E+07 1.56E+07 1.23E+08 9.34E+06 3.01 E+07 6.27E+06 1.63E+07
Volume Flow gal/min 1983.661 2126.004 1.76E+07 1607.826 9945.342 797.11 5155.55
Enthalpy MW 0 -6925.208 -1613.054 0 -12593.788 -2603.979 -7331.893
Density Ib/cuft 187.864 208.902 0.199 165.327 86.031 223.695 89.76
0 0 0 0 1.68E+07 0 7.20E+06
HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 6.78E+06 0 56280.036 0 0
0 0 1.37E+07 0 18848.966 0 0
0 0 1.03E+08 0 56346.51 0 0
1.31 E+07 0 0 0 1.31 E+07 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 9.07E+06
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 6.27E+06 0
0 0 343.415 0 77.467 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 2722.849 0 744.857 0 14.282
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 4.344 0 1.19 0 0
0 0 14439.982 0 3259.779 0 0
OH- 0 0 0.481 0 0.109 0 19.989
0 0 0 9.34E+06 0 0 0
0 1.56E+07 0 0 0 0 0
Table 20a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 18 and 19 Simulation.
PH
Temperature °C 200 160 100 25 250 100 349.1 349.1 160 160 160 100
Pressure psia 14.696 14.696 15.78 1 14.696 14.69 6 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696
Mass VFrac 0.378 0.473 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0.311 0 0
Mass SFrac 0.622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.342 1 0.291
Mass Flow tons/year 6.32E+0 7 2.40E+07 1.37E+08 1.00E+0 7 3.94E+0 7 0.001 197E+07 1.97E+07 26.688 3.65E+07 1.25E+07 3.22E+07
Volume Flow gal/min 2.29E+0 7 1.02E+07 6.21 E+07 4569.61 9 3.64E+0 7 0.001 1.82E+07 1.82E+07 11.834 1.02E+07 1866.916 9636.543
Enthalpy MW -19530.7 -8042.026 -5853.92 4563.81 4 -11241.7 0 -5620.856 -5620.856 -0.002 -13498.19 -5456.154 12759.56 3
Density Ib/cuft 0.079 0.067 0.063 62.249 0.031 0.075 0.031 0.031 0.064 0.102 190.163 94.933
2.29E+0 7 1.54E+07 6.85E+06 1.00E+0 7 2.08E+0 7 0 1.40E+07 1.40E+07 0 1.54E+07 0 1.54E+07
HCl 983310.7 0 0 0 1.13E+0 7 0.001 5.67E+06 5.67E+06 26.688 26.688 0 0.001
0 0 1.37E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1.37E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1.03E+08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3.73E+0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 2.07E+0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 2494.617 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2494.617 0 1.89E+06
0 3.11 E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.11 E+06 0 4128.267
0 5.51 E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.51 E+06 0 5.51 E+06
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11965.65 9 11965.65 9 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.67E+06 4.67E+06 9.34E+06
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.80E+06 7.80E+06 36.743
DIOPSIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DOLOMITE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 20b. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 18 and 19 Simulation.
PH 5.163 6.252
Temperature °C 25 100 100 95 95 100 95 95 250 95 95
Pressure psia 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696
Mass VFrac 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Mass SFrac 1 0 1 0.828 1 1 0.317 1 1 0.268 0
Mass Flow tons/year 168E+07 2.28E+07 4.74E+07 5.73E+07 1.58E+07 9.34E+06 1.95E+08 1.43E+07 2.39E+07 3.39E+07 1.23E+08
Volume Flow gal/min 1063.002 8028.716 8412.597 13075.55 2804.199 1607.827 185622 2276.765 3828.933 8017.333 5.85E+07
Enthalpy MW -7167.458 0 -16601.2 -21023.6 -5537.26 0 -27714.4 0 -7057.97 -12113.4 -1510.76
Density Ib/cuft 450.627 80.836 160.371 124.605 160.371 165.327 29.855 178.921 177.393 120.2 0.06
0 1.54E+07 0 9.84E+07 0 0 9.84E+06 0 0 1.00E+07 0
HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 6.85E+06 0 0 0 6.85E+06
0 0 0 0 0 0 1.37E+07 0 0 0 1.37E+07
0 0 0 0 0 0 1.03E+08 0 0 0 1.03E+08
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 4.74E+07 4.74E+07 1.58E+07 0 4.74E+07 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.39E+07 0 0
0 0 0 12011.06 0 0 12011.06 0 0 9.07E+06 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 11.135 0 0 11.135 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1.89E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.78E+06 0
0 4128.267 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 5.51 E+06 0 4.627 0 0 4.627 0 0 1.10E+07 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 9.34E+06 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 36.743 0 0 0 0 0
DIOPSIDE 1.68E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DOLOMITE 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.43E+07 1.43E+07 0 0 0
Table 21a. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 20 and 21 Simulation.
PH
Temperature °C 200 160 100 25 450 100 449.5 449.5 160 160 160 100
Pressure psia 14.696 14.696 15.78 1 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696
Mass VFrac 0.378 0.256 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0.148 0 0
Mass SFrac 0.622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.423 1 0.371
Mass Flow tons/year 3.16E+07 1.70E+07 1.37E+08 1.00E+07 2.54E+07 0.006 1.27E+07 1.27E+07 10.275 2.95E+07 1.25E+07 2.52E+07
Volume Flow gal/min 1.14E+07 3.91E+06 6.21 E+07 4569.619 2.94E+07 0.002 1.47E+07 1.47E+07 4.556 3.91 E+06 1866.915 6342.437
Enthalpy MW -9765.36 5388.055 -5853.92 4563.814 -5787.5 0 2893.751 2893.751 -.0001 -10844.21 -5456.149 -9602.42
Density Ib/cuft 0.079 0.124 0.063 62.249 0.025 0.075 0.025 0.025 0.064 0.215 190.163 112.823
1.15E+07 8.41 E+06 6.85E+06 1.00E+07 1.40e+07 0 7.00E+06 7.00E+06 0 8.41 E+06 0 8.41.E+06
HCl 491655.4 0 0 0 1.13E+07 0.006 5.67E+06 5.67E+06 10.275 10.275 0 0.006
0 0 1.37E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1.37E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1.03E+08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.86E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)Cl 1.04E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 2494.624 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2494.624 0 1.89E+06
0 3.11E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.11 E+06 0 4119.258
0 5.51 E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.51E+06 0 5.51 E+06
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11939.547 11939.547 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.67E+06 4.67E+06 9.34E+06
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.80E+06 7.80E+06 14.153
DIOPSIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DOLOMITE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 21b. Mass and Energy Accounting for Examples 20 and 21 Simulation.
PH -0.879 5.271 8.545
Temperature °C 25 100 100 95 95 100 95 95 450 95 95
Pressure psia 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696 14.696
Mass VFrac 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Mass SFrac 1 0 1 0 0.484 1 1 0.177 1 1 0.558
Mass Flow tons/year 1.68E+07 1.58E+07 1.58E+07 3.27E+07 1.58E+07 9.34E+06 1.70E+08 1.43E+07 6.27E+06 1.63E+07 1.23E+08
Volume Flow gal/min 1063.002 4734.61 2804.199 10786.59 2804.199 1607.826 183332.5 2276.772 797.11 5155.892 5.85E+07
Enthalpy MW -7167.458 0 -5533.74 -13087 -5537.26 0 -19788.2 0 -2603.98 -7331.92 -1510.64
Density lb/cuft 450.627 94.994 160.371 86.167 160.371 165.327 26.409 178.921 223.695 89.754 0.06
0 8.41E+06 0 1.68E+07 0 0 1.68E+07 0 0 7.20E+06 0
HCl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 6.85E+06 0 0 0 6.85E+06
0 0 0 0 0 0 1.37E+07 0 0 0 1.37E+07
0 0 0 0 0 0 1.03E+08 0 0 0 1.03E+08
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1.58E+07 1.58E+07 1.58E+07 0 1.58E+07 0 0 0 0
Mg(OH)CI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 11678.01 0 0 11678.01 0 0 9.07E+06 0
MgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.27E+06 0 0
0 0 0 908.901 0 0 908.901 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1.89E+06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.555 0
0 4119.258 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 5.51 E+06 0 377.667 0 0 377.667 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.006 0 0 0.006 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 9.34E+06 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 14.153 0 0 0 0 0
DIOPSIDE 1.68E+07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DOLOMITE 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.43E+07 1.43E+07
Example 22: Decomposition of other salts.
The thermal decomposition of other salts has been measured in lab. A summary of some test results are shown in the table below. Table 22. Decomposition of other salts.
400 30
400 45 64% decomposition.
400 90 100% decomposition
400 135 100% decomposition
400 30
600 50 61% decomposition
600 Overnight 100% decomposition
LiCl 450 120 ∼0% decomposition
Example 22: Two, Three and Four-Chamber Decomposition Models
Table 23 (see below) is a comparison of the four configurations corresponding to FIGS. 31-34. Depicted are the number and description of the chambers, the heat consumed in MW (Megawatts), the percentage of heat from that particular source and the reduction of required external heat in kW-H/tonne of CO2 because of available heat from other reactions in the process, namely the hydrochloric acid reaction with mineral silicates and the condensation of hydrochloric acid. In the FIG. 34 example, the hot flue gas from the open-cycle natural gas plant also qualifies.
Example 23: Output Mineral Compared with Input Minerals-Coal
In this case study involving flue gas from a coal-based power plant, Table 24 illustrates that the volume of mineral outputs (limestone and sand) are 83% of the volume of input minerals (coal and inosilicate). The results summarized in Table 24 are based on a 600 MWe coal plant; total 4.66 E6 tonne CO2, includes CO2 for process-required heat.
Example 24: Output Mineral Compared with Input Minerals-Natural Gas
In this case study summarized in Table 25 (below) involving flue gas from a natural gas-based power plant, the "rail-back volume" of minerals is 92% of the "rail-in volume" of minerals. The results summarized in Table 25 are (based on a 600 MWe CC natural gas plant; total 2.41 E6 tonne CO2, which includes CO2 for process-required heat. Table 23. Two, Three and Four-Chamber Decomposition Results
3
MW of Heat 83.9 Not used 286 563 86.8
Percentage of Total Heat 8.2% Not used 28.0% 55.2% 8.5%
Reduction kW-Hr/tonne -506.7 Not used -1727.4 -3400.5 Not a reduction
4
MW of Heat 83.9 8.7 286 563 82.2
Percentage of Total Heat 8.2% 0.8% 27.9% 55.0% 8.0%
Reduction kW-Hr/tonne -506.7 -52.5 -1727.4 -3400.5 Not a reduction
2
MW of Heat Not used Not used 279 586 129.3
Percentage of Total Heat Not used Not used 28% 59% 13%
Reduction kW-Hr/tonne Not used Not used -1685.1 -3539.4 Not a reduction
2
MW of Heat Not used Not used 243 512 112.9
Percentage of Total Heat Not used Not used 28% 59% 13%
Reduction kW-Hr/tonne Not used Not used -1467.7 -3092.4 -681.9
Table 24. Coal Scenario - Volume of Mineral Outputs Compared with Volume of Mineral Inputs
0.8 1.57 1.97 1.73 69.5
0.71 12.30 17.32 13.56 611.8
681.25
0.9 10.60 11.78 11.68 415.9
1.5 6.35 4.23 7.00 149.5
n/a 16.95 16.01 18.68 565.4
83.00%
Table 25. Natural Gas Scenario - Volume of Mineral Outputs Compared with Volume of Mineral Inputs
0.8 1.57 1.97 1.73 69.5
0.71 12.30 17.32 13.56 611.8
681.25
0.9 10.60 11.78 11.68 415.9
1.5 6.35 4.23 7.00 149.5
n/a 16.95 16.01 18.68 565.4
83.00%
REFERENCES
The following references, to the extent that they provide exemplary procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein, are herewith specifically mentioned.
  • U.S. Prov. Appln. 60/612,355
  • U.S. Prov. Appln. 60/642,698
  • U.S. Prov. Appln. 60/718,906
  • U.S. Prov. Appln. 60/973,948
  • U.S. Prov. Appln. 61/032,802
  • U.S. Prov. Appln. 61/033,298
  • U.S. Prov. Appln. 61/288,242
  • U.S. Prov. Appln. 61/362,607
  • U.S. Patent Appln. 11/233,509
  • U.S. Patent Appln. 12/235,482
  • U.S. Patent Pubn. 2006/0185985
  • U.S. Patent Pubn. 2009/0127127
  • U.S. Patent 7,727,374
  • PCT Appln. PCT/US08/77122
  • Goldberg et al., Proceedings of First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, 14-17 May 2001, Washington, DC., section 6c,United States Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. available at: http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/01/carbon_seq/6c1.pdf.
  • Proceedings of First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, 14-17 May 2001, Washington, DC. United States Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. CD-ROM USDOE/NETL-2001/1144; also available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/01/carbon_seq/carbon_seq01.html.

Claims (6)

  1. A method of sequestering carbon dioxide, comprising:
    (a) heating a first halide or hydrate thereof with water, at least a part of which is obtained from the water of step (b), under conditions suitable to form a first product mixture comprising a first hydroxide, oxide, and/or hydroxychloride and HCl;
    (b) admixing some or all of the first hydroxide, oxide, and/or hydroxychloride with a second halide or hydrate thereof and carbon dioxide under conditions suitable to form a second product mixture comprising a first halide or hydrate thereof, a carbonate salt, and water; and
    (c) separating some or all of the carbonate salt from step (b), and
    (d) admixing a Group 2 silicate mineral with HCl obtained from step (a), under conditions suitable to form a third product mixture comprising a Group 2 chloride, water, and silicon dioxide, wherein the silicon dioxide is removed from the Group 2 chloride formed and the Group 2 chloride is used as some or all of the second halide or hydrate thereof in step (b), whereby the carbon dioxide is sequestered into a mineral product form.
  2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first product mixture comprises predominantly Mg(OH)Cl.
  3. The method according to any one of claims 1 or 2, wherein heat is generated in step (d) and recovered.
  4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein some of the water of step (a) is obtained from the water of step (d).
  5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein some or all of the first halide or hydrate thereof formed in step (b) is a chloride and is used as the first halide in step (a).
  6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein step (b) further comprises admixing sodium hydroxide.
HK13112743.0A 2010-07-08 2011-07-08 Carbon dioxide sequestrations involving two-salt-based thermolytic processes HK1185302B (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US61/362,607 2010-07-08
US61/370,030 2010-08-02
US61/406,536 2010-10-25
US61/451,078 2011-03-09

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
HK1185302A HK1185302A (en) 2014-02-14
HK1185302B true HK1185302B (en) 2021-09-10

Family

ID=

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2590729B1 (en) Carbon dioxide sequestrations involving two-salt-based thermolytic processes
US9339761B2 (en) Carbon dioxide sequestration methods using group 2 silicates and chlor-alkali processes
US20130202516A1 (en) Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Involving Two-Salt-Based Thermolytic Processes
US8795508B2 (en) Carbon dioxide sequestration through formation of group-2 carbonates and silicon dioxide
KR20250056231A (en) Passive and forced synthesis of MG(OH)2 for magnesium-based CO2 capture
HK1185302B (en) Carbon dioxide sequestrations involving two-salt-based thermolytic processes
AU2011274391B8 (en) Carbon dioxide sequestrations involving two-salt-based thermolytic processes
OA16950A (en) Carbon dioxide sequestration involving two-salt-based thermolytic processes.
HK1177708A (en) Carbon dioxide sequestration through formation of group-2 carbonates and silicon dioxide