GB2627378A - Intellectual-property analysis platform - Google Patents
Intellectual-property analysis platform Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2627378A GB2627378A GB2405385.2A GB202405385A GB2627378A GB 2627378 A GB2627378 A GB 2627378A GB 202405385 A GB202405385 A GB 202405385A GB 2627378 A GB2627378 A GB 2627378A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- data
- intellectual
- metric
- score
- property
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/18—Legal services
- G06Q50/184—Intellectual property management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/06—Asset management; Financial planning or analysis
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Systems and methods for generation and use of intellectual-property (IP) analysis platform architectures are disclosed. A scoring component may be utilized to produce scores for IP assets using user seeded searches in varying areas of interest, such as, for example, target technical fields, targeted publications, targeted products, and/or competitor entity portfolios. The scoring component may be further utilized to produce an interactive graphical element including a spatial representation of the scoring of IP assets. The interactive graphical element may include various functionalities and/or information associated with the of IP assets. The scoring component may utilize data from a coverage component, an opportunity component and/or an exposure component to assess a comprehensive score associated with a group of IP assets of a targeted entity.
Claims (15)
1. A system comprising: one or more processors; and one or more non-transitory computer-readable media comprising instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: identifying an entity having intellectual-property assets; performing a first analysis of the intellectual-property assets to determine first data indicating a coverage metric associated with the plurality of intellectual-property assets, wherein the first data includes at least one of: geographical data; breadth data; expiration data; diversity data; revenue alignment data; or invalidity data; performing a second analysis of the intellectual-property assets to determine second data indicating an opportunity metric associated with the intellectual-property assets, wherein the second data includes at least one of: filing velocity data; spending data; predictive analytics data; or precedence data; performing a third analysis of the intellectual-property assets to determine third data indicating an exposure metric associated with the intellectual-property assets, wherein the third data includes at least one of: litigation data; market data; or revenue alignment data; generating, based at least in part on the coverage metric, the opportunity metric, and the exposure metric, a comprehensive metric, wherein the comprehensive metric includes a combination of the coverage metric, the opportunity metric, and the exposure metric; 73 generating a graphical user interface (GUI) configured to display on a computing device, the GUI including the coverage metric, the opportunity metric, the exposure metric, and the comprehensive metric; and causing the user interface to be displayed via a display device of a computing device.
2. The system of claim 1, the operations further comprising: determining a first weight associated with the coverage metric; determining a second weight associated with the opportunity metric; determining a third weight associated with the exposure metric; and applying the first weight, the second weight, and the third weight to generate the comprehensive metric.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein at least one of the first weight, the second weight, or the third weight is determined based at least in part on a confidence level value applied to at least one of the first data, the second data, or the third data.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the opportunity metric is based at least in part on an estimated breadth score for at least one pending intellectual-property asset and an estimated issue date for the at least one pending intellectual-property asset.
5. The system of claim 4, wherein the estimated breadth score is based at least in part on: an art unit associated with the at least one pending intellectual-property asset; an examiner associated with the at least one pending intellectual-property asset; and an originally filed claim associated with the at least one pending intellectual-property asset.
6. The system of claim 1, further comprising: determining an examiner associated with at least one pending intellectual-property asset of the entity; determining a first breadth score for a first originally filed claim of an application previously examined by the examiner; determining a second breadth score for an issued version of the originally filed claim of the application; generating an examiner breadth score based at least in part on a difference between the first breadth score and the second breadth score; determining a predicted breadth score for the at least one pending intellectual -property asset based at least in part on the examiner breadth score; and applying the predicted breadth score to the opportunity metric.
7. The system of claim 1, further comprising: determining an art unit associated with at least one pending intellectual-property asset of the entity; determining a first breadth score for a first originally filed claim of an application previously filed in the art unit; determining a second breadth score for an issued version of the originally filed claim of the application; generating an art unit breadth score based at least in part on a difference between the first breadth score and the second breadth score; determining a predicted breadth score for the at least one pending intellectual -property asset based at least in part on the art unit breadth score; and applying the predicted breadth score to the opportunity metric.
8. A method comprising: identifying an entity having intellectual-property assets; performing a first analysis of the intellectual-property assets to determine first data indicating a coverage metric associated with the plurality of intellectual-property assets, the coverage metric corresponding to a breadth score associated with the intellectual-property assets; performing a second analysis of the intellectual -property assets to determine second data indicating an opportunity metric associated with the intellectual-property assets, the opportunity metric corresponding to a potential increase in the revenue of the entity; performing a third analysis of the intellectual-property assets to determine third data indicating an exposure metric associated with the intellectual-property assets, the exposure metric corresponding to a potential that at least one intellectual-property asset of the intellectual-property assets contributes to a decrease in the opportunity metric; generating a graphical user interface (GUI) configured to display on a computing device, the GUI including the coverage metric, the opportunity metric, and the exposure metric; and causing the GUI to be displayed via a display of the computing device.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein: 75 the first analysis includes evaluating fourth data obtained from a plurality of first data sources to determine the first data; the second analysis includes evaluating fifth data obtained from a plurality of second data sources to determine the second data; and the third analysis includes evaluating sixth data obtained from a plurality of third data sources to determine the third data.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the fourth data includes at least one of: geographical data; breadth data; expiration data; diversity data; revenue alignment data; or invalidity data.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein the fifth data includes at least one of: filing velocity data; spending data; predictive analytics data; or precedence data.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein the sixth data includes at least one of: litigation data; market data; or revenue alignment data.
13. The method of claim 8, further comprising: generating, based at least in part on the first data, the second data, and the third data, fourth data, wherein the fourth data indicates a comprehensive metric associated with the intellectual-property assets; and causing the user interface to display the comprehensive metric.
14. The method of claim 8, further comprising generating the breadth score based at least in part on: calculating, for a document included in the intellectual-property assets, a word count score for individual portions of text included in the document, the word count score being based at least 76 in part on a word count associated with the individual portions of text and word counts associated with additional portions of text from at least one other document of the plurality of documents; calculating a commonness score for the individual portions of text based at least in part a frequency in which words within the individual portions of text are found in the additional portions of text from the at least one other document; calculating a breadth score for the individual portions of text based at least in part on the word count score and the commonness score for the individual portions of text; and calculating an overall breadth score for the document based at least in part on the breadth scores for the individual portions of text.
15. The method of claim 8, further comprising: identifying one or more technology areas associated with the entity; identifying one or more revenue streams of the entity that are associated with the technology areas; identifying a number of the intellectual-property assets of the entity that are associated with the one or more technology areas; generating an alignment metric based at least in part on the number of the intellectual-property assets associated with the one or more technology areas, wherein the alignment metric corresponds to the coverage metric. 77
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US17/478,664 US20230090090A1 (en) | 2021-09-17 | 2021-09-17 | Intellectual-property analysis platform |
| US17/478,506 US20230089425A1 (en) | 2021-09-17 | 2021-09-17 | Intellectual-property analysis platform |
| US17/478,640 US20230086930A1 (en) | 2021-09-17 | 2021-09-17 | Intellectual-property analysis platform |
| US17/478,576 US20230087206A1 (en) | 2021-09-17 | 2021-09-17 | Intellectual-property analysis platform |
| US17/478,603 US20230086106A1 (en) | 2021-09-17 | 2021-09-17 | Intellectual-property analysis platform |
| PCT/US2022/043258 WO2023043704A1 (en) | 2021-09-17 | 2022-09-12 | Intellectual-property analysis platform |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| GB202405385D0 GB202405385D0 (en) | 2024-05-29 |
| GB2627378A true GB2627378A (en) | 2024-08-21 |
Family
ID=85603431
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB2405385.2A Pending GB2627378A (en) | 2021-09-17 | 2022-09-12 | Intellectual-property analysis platform |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| GB (1) | GB2627378A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2023043704A1 (en) |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20070073748A1 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2007-03-29 | Barney Jonathan A | Method and system for probabilistically quantifying and visualizing relevance between two or more citationally or contextually related data objects |
| US20120191757A1 (en) * | 2011-01-20 | 2012-07-26 | John Nicholas Gross | System & Method For Compiling Intellectual Property Asset Data |
| US20160350886A1 (en) * | 2011-04-15 | 2016-12-01 | Ip Street Holdings, Llc | Method and System for Evaluating Intellectual Property |
| US20180189909A1 (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2018-07-05 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Patentability search and analysis |
-
2022
- 2022-09-12 GB GB2405385.2A patent/GB2627378A/en active Pending
- 2022-09-12 WO PCT/US2022/043258 patent/WO2023043704A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20070073748A1 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2007-03-29 | Barney Jonathan A | Method and system for probabilistically quantifying and visualizing relevance between two or more citationally or contextually related data objects |
| US20120191757A1 (en) * | 2011-01-20 | 2012-07-26 | John Nicholas Gross | System & Method For Compiling Intellectual Property Asset Data |
| US20160350886A1 (en) * | 2011-04-15 | 2016-12-01 | Ip Street Holdings, Llc | Method and System for Evaluating Intellectual Property |
| US20180189909A1 (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2018-07-05 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Patentability search and analysis |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| GB202405385D0 (en) | 2024-05-29 |
| WO2023043704A1 (en) | 2023-03-23 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US20190333078A1 (en) | Methods of assessing long-term indicators of sentiment | |
| Friedrich et al. | Scalable GEH: A quality measure for comparing observed and modeled single values in a travel demand model validation | |
| US8965867B2 (en) | Measuring and altering topic influence on edited and unedited media | |
| US20200234193A1 (en) | Cloud computing scoring systems and methods | |
| Khan et al. | An empirical analysis of monetary and multidimensional poverty: evidence from a household survey in Pakistan | |
| Hung et al. | Relationship between government quality, economic growth and income inequality: Evidence from Vietnam | |
| Shen et al. | A time difference of arrival/angle of arrival fusion algorithm with steepest descent algorithm for indoor non-line-of-sight locationing | |
| US20170142119A1 (en) | Method for creating group user profile, electronic device, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium | |
| US20150086947A1 (en) | Computer-based system and method for creating customized medical video information using crowd sourcing | |
| WO2013179340A1 (en) | Information analysis system and information analysis method | |
| Chen et al. | Forecasting tourism demand of tourist attractions during the COVID-19 pandemic | |
| Patterson et al. | Validation of a structural model of an aircraft cockpit panel: An industrial case study | |
| Usmanova | Impact of E-government on Poverty Rate: A Cross-Country Empirical Assessment | |
| Huang et al. | Particle filter–based data assimilation in dynamic data-driven simulation: sensitivity analysis of three critical experimental conditions | |
| US20140052502A1 (en) | Balanced web analytics scorecard | |
| Copenheaver et al. | Lack of gender bias in citation rates of publications by dendrochronologists: What is unique about this discipline? | |
| GB2627378A (en) | Intellectual-property analysis platform | |
| Oh et al. | Rethinking the validity of interviews for employment decision making: Implications of recent developments in meta-analysis | |
| Nordin et al. | Tourist police service quality and service culture influence on tourists’ confidence | |
| Donohue et al. | Uncertainty avoidance, perceptions of emergency remote education, and university commitment: A cross-country analysis | |
| Khan et al. | A Transparent Universal Health Coverage Index with Decomposition by Socioeconomic Groups: Application in Asian and African Settings: JAM Khan et al. | |
| KR20180026277A (en) | Usability evaluation system and method for products | |
| Weeda et al. | Prediction of mental workload of monitoring tasks | |
| MacLeod et al. | The impact of age demographics on interpreting and applying population-wide infection fatality rates for COVID-19 | |
| JP5642058B2 (en) | Attention word analysis method and attention word analysis system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 732E | Amendments to the register in respect of changes of name or changes affecting rights (sect. 32/1977) |
Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20240822 AND 20240828 |