GB2517496A - Optimisation of envelope tracked power amplifier - Google Patents
Optimisation of envelope tracked power amplifier Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2517496A GB2517496A GB201315120A GB201315120A GB2517496A GB 2517496 A GB2517496 A GB 2517496A GB 201315120 A GB201315120 A GB 201315120A GB 201315120 A GB201315120 A GB 201315120A GB 2517496 A GB2517496 A GB 2517496A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- modulated
- bias voltage
- voltage
- amplifier
- envelope
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03F—AMPLIFIERS
- H03F1/00—Details of amplifiers with only discharge tubes, only semiconductor devices or only unspecified devices as amplifying elements
- H03F1/02—Modifications of amplifiers to raise the efficiency, e.g. gliding Class A stages, use of an auxiliary oscillation
- H03F1/0205—Modifications of amplifiers to raise the efficiency, e.g. gliding Class A stages, use of an auxiliary oscillation in transistor amplifiers
- H03F1/0211—Modifications of amplifiers to raise the efficiency, e.g. gliding Class A stages, use of an auxiliary oscillation in transistor amplifiers with control of the supply voltage or current
- H03F1/0216—Continuous control
- H03F1/0222—Continuous control by using a signal derived from the input signal
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03F—AMPLIFIERS
- H03F1/00—Details of amplifiers with only discharge tubes, only semiconductor devices or only unspecified devices as amplifying elements
- H03F1/02—Modifications of amplifiers to raise the efficiency, e.g. gliding Class A stages, use of an auxiliary oscillation
- H03F1/0205—Modifications of amplifiers to raise the efficiency, e.g. gliding Class A stages, use of an auxiliary oscillation in transistor amplifiers
- H03F1/0261—Modifications of amplifiers to raise the efficiency, e.g. gliding Class A stages, use of an auxiliary oscillation in transistor amplifiers with control of the polarisation voltage or current, e.g. gliding Class A
- H03F1/0266—Modifications of amplifiers to raise the efficiency, e.g. gliding Class A stages, use of an auxiliary oscillation in transistor amplifiers with control of the polarisation voltage or current, e.g. gliding Class A by using a signal derived from the input signal
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03F—AMPLIFIERS
- H03F1/00—Details of amplifiers with only discharge tubes, only semiconductor devices or only unspecified devices as amplifying elements
- H03F1/08—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce detrimental influences of internal impedances of amplifying elements
- H03F1/22—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce detrimental influences of internal impedances of amplifying elements by use of cascode coupling, i.e. earthed cathode or emitter stage followed by earthed grid or base stage respectively
- H03F1/223—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce detrimental influences of internal impedances of amplifying elements by use of cascode coupling, i.e. earthed cathode or emitter stage followed by earthed grid or base stage respectively with MOSFET's
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03F—AMPLIFIERS
- H03F1/00—Details of amplifiers with only discharge tubes, only semiconductor devices or only unspecified devices as amplifying elements
- H03F1/32—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion
- H03F1/3241—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion using predistortion circuits
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03F—AMPLIFIERS
- H03F3/00—Amplifiers with only discharge tubes or only semiconductor devices as amplifying elements
- H03F3/20—Power amplifiers, e.g. Class B amplifiers, Class C amplifiers
- H03F3/24—Power amplifiers, e.g. Class B amplifiers, Class C amplifiers of transmitter output stages
- H03F3/245—Power amplifiers, e.g. Class B amplifiers, Class C amplifiers of transmitter output stages with semiconductor devices only
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03F—AMPLIFIERS
- H03F2200/00—Indexing scheme relating to amplifiers
- H03F2200/61—Indexing scheme relating to amplifiers the cascode amplifier has more than one common gate stage
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Nonlinear Science (AREA)
- Amplifiers (AREA)
Abstract
Distortion in an envelope-tracking cascode amplifier is reduced by modulating the bias voltage applied to the gate of the cascode transistor 32 in sympathy with the envelope of the RF signal to be amplified. The drain bias voltage of the input transistor 34, which follows the gate bias voltage of the cascode transistor, may thus be modulated so that the RF duty cycle of the input transistor 34 does not change in dependence on the amplitude of the signal envelope. The envelope-tracking supply voltage may be derived using a non-linear mapping function 62. The envelope-tracking bias voltage may be derived by using a second non-linear mapping function 64 or by scaling and offsetting the output of the first non-linear mapping function 62 (figure 4). More than one common-gate transistor may be connected in a series arrangement, with small gate-earthing capacitors chosen to ensure even RF voltage distribution across the totem-pole string (figure 7).
Description
OpricIfrISTION OF VELOPE TRACPD POWER. AMPLIFIER
Field of the Invention:
The present invention relates to power amplifier architectures, and in particular power amplifier architectures employing an envelope tracked modulated power supply, and in which a modulated supply voltaqe and a modulated bias voltage are provided to the power amplifier
Background to the Invention:
Traditionally power amplifiers have operated with a fixed supply voltage and a fixed bias voltage, and are optimised to orovide. for best. tradeoff between efficiency and linearity under these conditions. The instantaneous HF (radio frequency) output voltage is dependent on only the instantaneous RF input voltage in such an arrangement.
In an imoroved arrangement envelope tracking is used to provide a supply voltage for a power amplifier which Is modulated and derived from the instantaneous RF input voitage The instantaneous RF output voltage of the power amplifier Is thus dependent on both the instantaneous supply voltage and the instantaneous RF input voltage. Typically a ron-Jinear mapping function or shaping table is utilised in the envelope path to define the relationship between the power amplifier's HF input voltage and a supply voltage.
Figure i illustrates an example implementation of a known envelope tracking power amplifier architecture. As illustrated in Figure 1, the envelope tracked power amplifier architecture 10, comprises a modulator 2 which generates a modulated signal.
The modulated signal is provided by the modulator 2 to a delay adjust block 11, which in turn provides an input to an upconvert block 12. The unconvert block 12 converts the modulated signal into an RF signal and then provides this as an input to an RF power amplifier 8. The delay adjust block 11 is provided to compensate for delays in the envelope path S as is known to one skilled in the art. It should be noted that in general a delay could also or alternatively he provided in the envelope path. The purpose of any delay is to align the signals in the envelope and RF paths at the power amplifier. The RF power amplifier 8 generates an RF output which isan amplified version of the RF signal at its input.
The modulator 2 also generates a signal to an envelope detect block 4, which generates at its output an envelope signal which represents the envelope of the instantaneous input signal.
The envelope siqnai is provided as an input to a voltage generation block 6 which provides a supply voltage on.
line 22 and a bias voltage Vb on line 20 to the RF power amplifier 8. The illustrated voltage generation block 4 includes first and second non-linear trapping means and an envelope amplifier comprising the suppl.y modulator.
A trade-off between efficiency and linearity may he controlled by the choice of non-linear mapping functions.
In the example of Figure i, there is illustrated non-linear mapping function block 14 provided for generation of a modulated voltage supply, and a second non-linear mapping function block 16 provided for generation of a modulated bias voltage. In the arrangement of Figure 1 the non--linear mapping function block 14 provides an input to an envelope ampifter 18, which generates a modulated supply stipp1y 22, The non-linear mapping function block 16 directly generates the modulated bias voltage Vbia on line 20.
The arrangement as illustrated in Figure 1 is described in more detail in WO 2007/000959. The linearity and efficiency trade-off may be optimised through use of the two non-linear mapping function blocks 14 and 15, to provide both a modulated supply voltage and a modulated bias voltage.
t has long teen a goal to lmplement handset power amplifiers in CMOS (complimentary metal oxide semiconductor) technology rather than GaAs (gallium arsenide) technology, due to CMOS cost and integration advantages.
I4cwever, one problem with fixed supply CMOS power amplifierS is that it is difficult to achieve an acceptable trade-off between efficiency and linearity due to the iiihe.rent "soft compression" characteristics of CMOS power amplifiers and strong!u4-PM modulation.
Furthermore in a second problem the low breakdown voltage of small geometry CMOS processes have wade it difficult to implement watt level handset power amplifiers without suffering excessive output match losses due to the high impedance transformation ratio required at this power level.
The use of envelope tracking power supplies has overcome the first problem of: fixed power supplies, such that the use of envelope tracking in conjunction with CMOS power amplifiers largely overcomes the soft compression problem, as the shapng table rather than the intrinsic device characteristics define the envelope tracking power amplifiers compression characteriStic Hcywever in oider to provide a practical implementation, it is additionally necessary to address the second problem, namely the low breakdown voltage probleilL It is an aim of the present invention t.o provide a power amplifier architecture which can he implemented in CMOS technology in conjunction with an envelope tracking power supply, and which address one or more of the above-stated problems.
Suunary of the Invention: In one aspect the invention provides an amplifier arrangement comprising an envelope tracked power supply providing a modulated supply voltage and a modulated bias voltage; a power amplifier stage having a supply voltage input and two or more bias voltage inputs, wherein the supply voltage input is connected to the modulated supply voltage and at least one of the bias voltage inputs is connected to the modulated bias voltage.
One of the bias voltage inputs may be connected to receive a fixed bias voltage. The power amplifier may comprise stacked transistors, wherein the stacked transistor connected to receive the amplifier input signal is connected to receive a fixed bias voltage, and wherein one or more further stacked transistors are connected to receive the modulated bias voltage.
The power amplifier may comprise at least three stacked transistors, each transistor other than the one connected to receive the amplified input signal being connected to receive a different scaled modulated bias voltage.
There may be provided a first non-linear mapping circuit for providing the modulated supply voltage based on an envelope of an input signal to be amplified.
There may be provided a second non-linear mapping circuit for providing the modulated bias voltage based on the envelope of the input signal to be amplified. There may be provided scaling circuitry for providing the modulated bias voltage derived from the output of the first non-linear mapping circuit. There may be provided a plurality of scaling circuits for providing a plurality of modulated bias voltages derived from the output of the first non-linear mapping circuit.
The transistors of the power amplifier may be CMOS devices, or GaAs HPJ devices, or SiGe devices, or CaN devices, The power amplifier comprises a cascade topology comprising at least two stacked transistors.
An upper cascode transistor may receive the modulated supply vol.tage and the modulated bias voltage, and the lower cascade transistor receives a fixed bias voltage. The envelope tracked power supply may include a first non-i inear mapping circuit. for providing the modulated supply voltage and a second non--linear mapping circuit for providing the modulated bias voltage.
The envelope tracked power supoly may include a single non--linear mapping circuit f or providing the modulated suppi.y voltage and the mcdulated bias voltage.
The modulated bias voltage may be a scaled and offset version of the output of the non--linear mapping circuit.
The power amplifier may comprise a stacked field effect transistor, PET, amplifier topology The envelope tracked power supply may include a single non--linear mapping circuit f or providing the modulated supply voltage and the modulated bias voltage. There may be provided scaling and offsetting circuitry for providing modulated bias voltage. The power amplifier may comprise two or more stacked trans.i-stors, and there istyrovided one or more scaling circuits for providing one or more modulated rnas vo.Ltages to one or more of the two or more transistors The power amplifier may comprise a stacked cascode topology. The envelope tracked power supply may include a single non-linear mapping circuit for providing the modulated supply voltage and. tile modulated bias voltage-The power amplifier may comprise four stackec transstors1 anc. there is provided three scaling and offsetting circuits for providing three modulated bias vltages to the three transistors.
There is also provided a method of providing voltages to a power amplifier having a supply voltage input and two or more bias voltage inputs? comprising connecting the supply voltage input to a modulated supply' voltage and connecting one of the two or more bias voltage inputs to a modulated bias voltage.
The method may further comprise connecting a first bias voltage inout to a modulated bias voltage-and connecting a second bias voltage input to a fixed supply.
The method may further comprise stacked transistors1 the method comprising connecting one of the stacked transistors to receive the input signal to be amplified and the fixed bias voltage.
The method may further comprise connecting each other of the stacked transistors to receive a modulated bias voltage.
The method may provide a modified version of a modulated bias voltage, to each of a plurality of the stacked transistors.
The methoc may comprise modfyng a shaping function output generated for the modulated supply voltage.
Descrintion of the Figures: The present invention is now described by way of reference to the following Figures1 in which: Figure illustrates an envelope tracking power amplifier
architecture in accordance with the prior art;
Figure 2 ±llustrates a prior art arrangement of a cascode power amplifier; Figure 3 illustrates the implementatiOn of a cascade envelope tracked power anplifier architecture in accordance with an improved arrangement; Figure 4 is illustrates the implementation of a modulated cascode envelope tracking power amplifier architecture in accordance with an improved arrangement; Figures 5 (a) to 5 (c) illustrate improved cascade envelope tracking power amplifier performance in accordance with an improved arrangement; Fiaure 5 illustrates a stacked FET power amplifier
architecture in accordance with the prior art;
Figure 7 illustrates a stacked PET envelope tracked power amplifier architecture in accordance with an in'rovement; Figures 8 (a) to B (c) illustrate performance of a stacked PET envelope tracked power amplifier result in accordance with an improvement; Figure 9 illustrates a stacked cascade power ampiii--ler in
accordance with the prior art;
Figure 10 1 ustrates a stacked cascade envelope tracking power amplifier architecture in accordance with an imorovement; ard FiguL es 11(a) to 11(c) illustrate performance of a stacked cascode envelope tracking power amplifier result in accordance with an improvement.
Description of the preferred Errbodiments
The invention is now described by way of reference to a particular example and erttodiment. In. particular the invention is described by way of reference to the implementation of an envelope tracking power supply for a radio frequency power amplifier; which may be utilised in applications such as mobile cellular handsets. However the invention is riot limited to such an application, and in general the invention is applicable to the implementation of any power amplifier incorpcrating an envelope tracked modulated power supply.
The advanta.qeous arrangements described herein are applicable to single stage amplifier arrangements in which the single stage of the amplifier requires at least one supply voltage and two or more bias voltages. The advantageous arrangements may be applicable in multistage amplifier arrangements, in which a single stage of the multtstage arrangement requires two or more bias voltages.
An example is an amplifier stage comprising stacked transistor devices. In general an amplifier comprising stacked transistor devices includes two or more transistor devices.
Two transistor devices are stacked when the source of one transistor device is connected to the d.ran of another transistor device. in aeneral, multiple t..ansistor devices are stacked when the source of each device is connected to the drain, of another device, the transistor devices thus forming a stacked chain. The aim of the stacking is to distribute voltages across the stacked devices, thereby allowing the stacked assetthly to operate at a higher voltage than a single device.
In a stacked arrangement, a lower transistor receives the signal to be amplified at its gate, and an upper transistor provides the amplified output signal at its drain. Each transistor has a gate bias voltage, and thus two gate bias voltages are re.d.red. Alternative stacked architectures recuire additional transistors connected between the lower and upper transistors, and additional qate bias voltaaes are required for each of the additional transistors. C)
In an arrangement where an amplifier is provided with a modulated supply voltage and a modulated gate bias voltage, then for an. amplifier requiring two or more gate bias voltages consderation must be given as to which gates to modulate In the following there are described arrangements in which a. power amplifier stage includes stacked transistor devices? hut in general the advantages discussed can he obtained in any amplifier stage having a power supply input and at least two bias inouts.
to Advantageously5 in accordance with the preferred arrangements described herein a modulated voltage is connected to one or more bias inputs and a fixed voltage is connected to another bias input. More specifically1 the fixed voltage is provided as a bias voltage for the transistor having its gate connected to receive the input signal to he amplified, and one or more modulated voltages are provided as bias voltages for one oi more upper transistors in the stackS The modulated voltage for each transistor may he generated independently5 or may be generated from a common source but scaled and offset5 as discussed in further detail below.
In a first arrangement, the low breakdown voltage problem can be addressed by providing a stacked arrangement using the well--known cascade topology for a power amplifier. In this arrangement two devices are provided.A lower device of the stack operates in common scurce mode and an upper device of the stack operates in common gate mode. This technique may he used in conjunction with specialised high voltage devices to further extend the operating voltage.
An example cascade topology is illustrated in Figure 2.Reference numeral 30 illustrates a power amplifier stage.
As illustrated in Figure 2, the power amplifier 30 receives a no supply voltage v, and two DC bias voltages, VDC h.as 3.
and Ttr h±S 2 An input PB signal is received on line 48, and an amplified PB output signal is provided on an output line 50.
The power amplifier is preferably constituted of an upper CNOS transistor 32 and a lower CMOS transistor 34.
An input match. circuit 38 provides a matching input for the input signal on line 48, and is further connected to the gate of the lower CMOS device 34. The gate of the lower CMOS device 34 is also connected to the first fixed bias voltage V hj via resistor 44. The gate of the upper CMOS device 32 is connected to the second fixed bias voltage VDC bias 2 via the resistor 40.
The gate of the transistor 32 is also connected to electrical ground via capacitor 46, which presents an PB short circuit. The output signal on line 50 is provided through an output match circuit 36, which is connected to the drain of the upper CMOS device 32. The drain of the upper CMOS device 32 is coimecte4 to receive the fixed supply voltage t.rough the inductor 42.
The source of the uoper CMOS device 32 is connected to the draa.n of tue.ower CMuS dev.ce 3'* consscent wltn a stacked topology With reference to Figure 3, there is illustrated the cascode power anlifier topology arrangement of' Figure 2 in combination with an exemplary envelope tracking path including two non.-linear mapping functions for generating both a supply voltage and a bias voltage.
In the. arrangement of Figure 3, it must he determthed which of the two bias inputs of tile Figure 2 arrangement the modulated bias voltage is to be applied.
The characteristics, including efficiency characteristics, of the lowest transistor in the stack can he maintained if the RF auty cycle can be held constant with respect to chanqes in the RF envelope This can he achieved by applying envelope modulation to the gate bias of the upper device in the sL&ck (i.e the cascade transistor), as this indirectly controls the drain bias voltage of the lower device in the stack. The duty cycle of this transistor can be controlled by controlling the voltage on. its drain.
Thus it is advantageous to modulate the bias voltage of the upper transistor and maintain fixed DC bias f-or the lower HI transistor-There is little advantage in modulating the bias of the lower transistor.
Thus the arrangement of Ficure 2 is modified such that the bias voltage applied to the qate of the upper transistor 32 is provided through a gate driver 68, which receives its in-put from a non-linear mapping function block or circuit 64.
The gate of the upper c:MoS transistor 32 is additionally connected to electrical ground by RF shorting capacitor 46.
The modulated supply voltage is provided to a terminal of inductor 42 via the envelope amplifier 66, which receives its input from a non--linear mapping function block or circuit 62.
Each of the non-linear mapping function, circuits 62 and 64 receive an input on line 16 from the envelope path. In the exemplary arrangement of Figure 3 first and second independent shaping tables are used to generate a modulated supply voltage and a modulated bias voltage for the cascade power amplifier arrangement, the gat.e bias input of the lower device of the cascade power amplifier being fixed.
The architecture of Figure 3 is well-suited to a system on a chip i.lementation in which the entire RF transceiver and envelope amplifier and power amplifier are monolithically integrated.
With reference to Figure 4 there is shown' an alternative implementation to Figure 3. Like reference numerals are used in Figure 4 to refer to elements which are equivalent to those elements referred to in Figure 3, In the simplified arrangement of Figure 4 a single non' linear mapping function block or circuit 70 is provided in place of the two distinct non-linear mapping function. blocks 62 and 64. The output of the non1.inear mapping function block 70 is provided at an input to the envelope amplifier 66, and also provided as an input to an amplifier 72 having a gain K. The output of the amplifier 72 is connected to a first input of a combiner 74 * which as a second input receives an output of a block 75. The block 76 provides an offset voltage having value C. The output of the combiner 74 is connected to the gate driver 68.
The overall function of blocks 72, 74, 76 is to provide a linear scaled and offset version of the enveloDe amolifier reference signal (i,e. the signal at the input to the envelope amplifier) to the gate driver 68.
Hence, in the arrangement of Figure 4 the modulated bias oltaqe for the ueper CMOS device 32 is linearly derived from the output of the shapina table 70 which is used to determine the modulated Dower amplifier suoply voltage. This architecture is particularly wellsuited to a cower amplifier module in which the power amplifier and envelope amplifier are monolithically integrated! It can be noted tha.t in the arrangement of Figure 4 the scaling circuitry for generating the modulated bias voltage may take its incut from either the inout or the outDut of the envelope amplifier 66.
A nght irvroverent n efficiency, gain anc. phase piot may he obtained with the architecture of Figure 3 compared with that of Figure 4 as a. result of the additional degrees of freedom allowed by a completely independent shapinq table, but nevertheless Figure 4 illustrates a useful arrangement.
Figures 5 (a) to 5 (c) respectively show gain, phase and efficiency contour plots for the cascode envelope tracking power amplifier of Figure 4. The benefit to efficiency and linearity of co-modulating the cate bias voltage can be clearly seen.
The solid lines 49 show the traiectory across the surfaces if gate bias modulation is used1 whereas the dotted lines 51 show the trajectory across the surfaces if fixed DC gate bias is used.
The use of cascode bias modulation simultaneously improves efficiency and gain and phase flatness1 which in turn are key to achieving good linearity metrics such as adjacent channel power ratio (ACPR) and error vector magnitude (EVM) In particular, the phase characteristics of the power amplifier are markedly improved. For example1 there is 5 degrees phase shift with cascode bias modulation, versus 50 degrees phase shift without bias modulation.
In a second arrangement, the low breakdown voltage problem can be addressed by providing a stacked arrangement using a stacked FET topology A stacked FET topology is shown in Figure 6, and is also disclosed in US 6,137,367 and US 2012/0299658 -In subsequent arrangements described hereafter, for simplicity only a single non-linear mapping block or circuit is used. 1-lowever specific non-linear mapping functions may be used to generate the modulated supply voltage and the modulated bias voltage, and where applicable a plurality of specific non-linear mapping functions may he used to generate a plurality of modulated bias voltages.
with reference to Figure 6, the stacked FET power auplifier topology includes a plurality n of stacked CMOS transistors denoted by reference numerals BO. to 8O. Each of the CMOS transistors BO to 8O receives on its gate a gate voltage signal 1Tgate to via a resistor 981 to 98 respectively. The gate of each transistor 801 to 8O is also connected to electrical ground via a respective capacitor lOOt to loon, having values C.1 to which provides a tuning of the gate voltage.
The drain of the transistor 801 at the top of the block is connected to one terminal of inductor 88, the other terminal of the inductor 88 being connected to a modulated supply voltage. The drain of the transistor 8O. is also connected to one end of an output match circuit 84, the RE output signal 86 being generated by the other end of the output match circuit 84.
The source of the transistor 8O, is connected to the drain of a transistor 96, which has its source connected to electrical ground. The gate of the transistor 96 is connected to one end of the input match circuit 92, the RE thput signal being received on signal line 90 at the other end of the input match circuit 92. The gate of transistor 96 is also connected to the fixed DC. bias voltage Vbias via resistor 94.
The number of stacked transistors ii is implementation dependent. With the exception of the transistors at the top and bottom of the stack, each transistor in the stack has its source connected to the drain of the next lowest transistor, and its drain connected to the source of the next highest transistor consistent with a stack topology.
With reference to Figure 7 there is illustrated the arrangement of Figure s advantageously modified to provide for gate bias modulation for the upper devices in the stack. The arrangement of Figure 7 identifies elements by reference numerals which are common to Figure 6, when the elements of Figure 7 correspond to those of Figure 6, In the arrangement of Figure 7, it is determined to indirectly provide control of the drain voltage of transistor 96 by controlling the gate bias of transistor COn for the same reasons as discussed above with reference to Figure 3. In the stacked arrangement of Figure 7, the voltage at the drains of each of stacked transistors 802 to COn may be indirecti.y controlled by applying modulation to the gates of next higher device in the stack 801 to 8On-1. Thus the gate bias voltage for each of the transistors 8O to eon is modulated, and the gate bias voltage for the lower transistor 96 is fixed.
In Figure 7 the arrangement of Figure 6 is modified such that each of the stacked transistors 80 to a0 receives a gate voltage from a gate driver l04 to 104n. Each of the gate drivers lO4 to i04 receives an input from the output of a combiner l06 to 104. A first input of each combiner 1O6 to lO6 is provided by a respective amplifier ll0 to lion having a respective gain K1 to Rn, and a second input to each combiner 1O6 to 106 is provided by a block l0B to lOSt, providing DC offset voltages C1 to C. !n.le output of the amplifier blocks 1101 to lion are thus offset by DC voltages C1 to C,,. Each amplifier 110?. to 110,, is connected to recetve the envelope signal in. the envelope path at its input, or in the alternative the output of the envelope amplifier as shown by the dotted line.
Thus the gate of each stacked transistor receives a different scaled and offset version of the amplifier reference signal provided by a single non"linear mapping block or circuit.
Thus in the arrangement of Figure 7 the transistor having its gate connected to receive the input signal to be amplified is connected to a fixed gate bias voltage, and all other transistors are connected to receive modulated gate bias voltages. In the described arrangement the scaling/offset for generating the gate voltage for each transistor is chosen to optimise the bias for each transistorS The envelope signal in the envelope path also provides the input to the envelope amplifier 112, which provides the modulated supply signal to one terminal of the inductor 88 in accordance with the arrangement of Figure 6.
Thus in the arrangement of Figure 7 the gate bias voltages for each of the transistors 80 to 30,, are scaled by the respective amplifier ii0 to lion and offset (by the respective hloc:Ks 108 to l08) by addition of no voltages C1 to C arid applied to the gates of the upper stacked transistor devices (device 80, to Boa) The capacitor values 0cunü to 0unen (100k to ioO) are small value capacitors chosen to ensure even distribution of liP voltages across the devices in trestac'c.
The gate driver amplifiers 1O4 to lO4, are designed to have low output impedance at the envelope modulation frequency and high impedance at the RF carrier frequency. The low impedance at envelope frequencies ensures tight control of the gate bias voltages, which in turn prevents the power amplifier from exhibiting so--called memory effects, in which the power amplifier instantaneous output power depends not oily on the instantaneous input power but also on its history.
If envelope tracking is applied to only the supply voltage of a stacked PET power amplifier and the bias voltages of -the stacked devices is not tightly controlled, strong memory effects may be observed, particularly:jt high modulation bandwidths, The gate driver amplifiers 1101 to ii0, can be designed to have low power consumption as they only have to drive small value capacitors at the relatively low envelope rate.
It can be seen from Figure 8 that the performance of the stacked FET configuration can he considerably imnroved by co ) modulating the supply voltage and the gate voltages of the stacked devices. The improvement in gain flatness for the stacked FET configuration through use of co-modulation is particularly notable.
Figures 8 (a) to 8 (c) respect ivel.y show gain, phase and efficiency contour plots for the stacked FET envelope tracking power amplifier of Figure 7. The beneficial effect on efficiency and linearity of co-modulating the gate bias voltage can be clearly seen.
The solid lines 91 show the trajectory across the surfaces if gate bias modulation is used, whereas the dotted lines 87 show the trajectory if fixed. DC gate bias i.s used, The use of a stacked FET envelope tracking power amplifier with simultaneous bias modulation improves efficiency4 gain arid phase flatness, which in turn are key to achieving good 1. inearity metrics such as adj acent channel power ratio (1CPR) and erroriector magnitude (EVN) . In particular, the phase characteristics of the power amplifier are markedly improved In a third arrangement, the low breakdown voltage problem can he addressed by providing a stacked arrangement using a stacked cascode topology. Such a topology is illustrated in Figure 9, and disclosed in US 2011/0018625 and US 2013/0082782.
With reference to Figure 9 the prior art stacked cascode topology for a power amplifier is denoted by reference numeral 150. An RF input signal is received on line 156 as an input to an input match circuit 158, and an RF output signal is generated on line 154 from an output match. circuit 152.
The output of the input match circuit 158 is connected to the gate of a transistor 170, The gate of the transistor 170 is also connected to a fixed DC bias voltage VdC bias. via resistor 160. The drain of a transistor 174 is connected to a fixed supply voltage and also connected to an input terminas or the output match circuit L52, A bias voltage Vb.j5 is connected to a biasing block 162.
The biasing block 162 generates three outputs in the example of Figure 9, a first output to one terminal of a resistor 164, a second ouLpuc to a £irst termnai. or a resistor 180, and a third output to a first terminal of resistor 178. The second terminal of resistor 164 is connected to the gate of transistor 168, the second terminal of resistor 180 is connected to the gate of transistor 176, and the second terminal of resistor 178 is connected to the eate of transistor 174, An VY short capacitor 166 is connected between the gate of transistor 168 and electrical ground. A strall value RF capacitor 182 having value connected between the gate of transistor 176 and electrical ground An RF short capacitor 172 is connected between the gate of transistor 174 and the source of transistor 176.
The source of transistor 174 is connected to the drain of transistor 176, the source of transistor 176 is connected to the drain of transistor 168, and the source of transistor 168 is connected to the drain of transistor 170. The source of transistor 170 is connected to electrical ground.
Figure 10 shows a modification to the arrangement of Figure 9, in which a modulated gate bias volta-ge is used for a stacked cascode envelope tracking power amplifier. Reference numerals are used in Figure 10 to refer to elements which are equivalent to elements of Figure 9.
In the arrangement of Fiaure 10, it is determined to provide control of the drain voltage of transistor 170 for the same reasons as discussed above with reference to Figure 3. In the stacked arrangement of Figure 10, the voltage at the drains of stacked tn.nsistors 168 and 176 may be indirectly contro].led by applying modulation, to the gates of devices 176 and 174 respectively Thus the gate bias voltage for..
transistors 168, 175 and 174 are modulated, and the gate. .bia voltage of transistor 170 is fixed.
n _1o rnnqemeut of Figure 10 each transistor.74, 276, isa receives a gate voltage from a respective gate driver 200, 202, 206. Each gate driver 200, 202, 206 receives art output of a respective combiner 208, 210, 212. Each combiner receives a first input from a respective amplifier 214, 216, 218 having a respective gain K2. IL. and a second input from a respective block 220, 222, 224 ha ving a respective DC offset voltage C, C2, C. The ampli era 214, 216, 218 are connected to receive inputs from the envelope signal, which provides an input to an envelope amplifier 226 which aenera es a modulated supply voltage for the transistor 174 through inductor 228. The amplifiers 214, 216, 218 could receive inputs from the output of the envelope amnlifier 226 as denoted by the dashed line.
In the arrangement of Figure 10 the value of the capacitor 182 is a small value, chosen to ensure even distribution of RF vo].tages across the devices in the stacked cascode.
The value of the capacitOrs 164 and 172 are larger value capacitors than the value of capacitor 182, and provide an RF shortcircUit.
As with the stacked. PET architecture, tight control of the gate bias voltages minimises power amplifier memory effects.
F.iqure.s 11 (a) to 11 (c) respectively show gain, phase and efficiency contour plots for the stacked cascade ervelope tracking power amplifier architecture of Figure 10. The effect of co--modulating the gate bias voltage can be clearly seen.
The solid lines 157 shows the trajectory across the surfaces if gate bias modulation is used, whereas the dotted lines 155 shows the trajectory if fixed DC gate bias is used.
The use of a stacked cascode envelope tracking power amplifier architecture with bias modulation simultaneously improves efficiency and gain an.d phase flatness, which in turn are key to achieving good linearity metrics such as adjacent channel power ratio (ACPR) and error vector magnitude (FVM) The improvement in phase flatness f or the stacked cascode configuration through use of co-modulation is particularly
notable,
Thus the described techniques for increasing operatino voltage can also he used in conj unction with envelope tracking. There are substantial advantages, as discussed hereinabove1 associated with modulating the gate bias voltage of the stacked devices-The examples refer to the application of the disclosed techniques to CMOS technologies5 but the techniques described may be applied to other technologies, such as GaAs HET and
SiGe for example.
The examples refer to application of advantageous techniques to particular implementations of stacked transistor power amplifiers. The principle used in applying the improvement is the same5 and may b-c applied to other arrangements in accordance with the invention as defined by the claims The invention has been described with reference to particular examples, and three example implementations of an exemplary CMOS power amplifier have been described herein above. The invention is limited in its scope to the definition as given in the appended c].aims. The invention is not limited to application in any described embodiment or
example. I0 fl ?
Claims (27)
- CLAIMS1. An amplifier arrangement comprising an envelope tracked power supply providing a modulated supply voltage and a modulated bias voltage; a power amplifier stage having a supply voltage jnput and two or more bias voltage inputs, wherein the supply voltage input is connected to the modulated supply voltage and at least one of the bias voltage inputs is connected to the modulated bias voltage.
- 2, The amplifier arrangement of claim 1 wherein one of the bias voltage inputs is connected to receive a fixed bias voltage.
- 3. The amplifier arrangement of claim 2 wherein the power amplifier comprises stacked transistors, wherein the stacked transistor connected to receive the amplifier input signal is connected to receive a fixed bias voltage, and wherein one or more further stacked transistors are connected to receive the modulated bias voltage.
- 4. The amplifier arrangement of claim 3 wherein the power amplifier comprises at least three stacked transistors; each transistor other than the one connected to receive the amplified input signal being connected to receive a different scaled modulated bias voltage.
- 5. The amplifier arrangement of any one of claims I to 4 wherein there is provided a first non-linear napping circuit for providing the modulated supply voltage based on an envelope of an input signal to be amplified. hi
- 6, The amplifier arrangement of claim 5 wherein there is provided a second non-linear mapping circuit for providing the modulated. bias voltage based on the envelope of the input signal to he amplified.
- 7, The amplifier arrangement of claim S wherein there is provided scaling and offsetting circuitry to derive the modulated bias voltage from the output of the first non-linear mapping circuit.
- 8. The amplifier arrangement of claim 7 wherein there is provided a plurality of scaling and offsetting circuits to derive a plurality of modulated bias voltages from the output of the non--linear mapping circuit.
- 9. The amplifier arrangement of any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein the transistors of the power amplifier are CMOS devices, or GaAs HBT devices, or SiGe devices, or GaN devices.
- 10, The amplifier arrangement of any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein tile power amplifier comprises a cascode topology comprising at least two stacked transistors.
- 11. THe amplifier arrangement of claim 10 wherein an upper cascode transistor receives the modulated supply voltage and the modulated bias voltage, and the lower cascode transistor receives a fixed bias voltage.
- 12. The amplifier arrangement of claim 11 wherein the envelope tracked power supply includes a first non-linear mapping circuit for providing the modulated supply voltage and a second non-linear mapping circuit for providing the modulated bias voltage.
- 13. The amplifier arrangement of claim 10 wherein the envelope tracked power supply includes a single non--linear mapping circuit for providing the modulated supply voltage and the modulated bias voltage.
- 14. The amplifier arrangement of claim 13 wherein the modulated bias voltage is a scaled and offset version of the output of the non-linear mapping circuit.
- 15. The amplilfier arrangement of any one of claims I to 9 wherein the power amplifier comprises a stacked field effect transistor, FET, amplifier topology.
- 16. The amplifier arrangement of claim 15 wherein the envelope tracked power supply includes a single non-linear mapping circuit for providing the modulated supply voltage and the modulated bias voltage.
- 17. The amplifier arrangement of claim 16 wherein there is provided scaling and offsetting circuitry for providing modulated bias voltage.
- 18. The amplifier arrangement of claim 17 wherein the power amplifier comprises three or more stacked transistors, and there is provided two or more scaling circuits for providing two or more modulated bias voltages to two or more of the three or more transistors.
- 19. The amplifier arrangement of any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein the power amplifier comprises a stacked cascode topology.
- 20. The amplifier arrangement of claim 19 wherein the envelope tracked power supply includes a single non-linear mapping circuit for providing the modulated supply voltage and the modulated bias voltage.
- 21. The amplifier arrangement of claim 19 or claim 20 wherein the power amplifier comprises four stacked transistors, and there is provided three scaling and offsetting circuits for providing three modul.ated bias voltages to three of the transistors.
- 22. A method of providing voltages to a power amplifier having a supply voltage input and two or more bias voltage inputs, comprising connecting the supply voltage input to a modulated supply voltage and connecting one of the two bias voltage inputs to a modulated bias voltage.
- 23. The method of claim 22 further comprising connecting a first bias voltage input to a modulated bias voltage and connecting a second bias voltage input to a fixed supply.
- 24. The method of claim 23 wherein the power amplifier comprises stacked transistors, the method comprising connecting one of the stacked transistors to receive the input signal to be amplified and the fixed bias voltage.
- 25. The method of claim 24 comprising connecting each other of the stacked transistors to receive a modulated bias voltage.
- 26. The method of claim 25 comprising providing a modified version of a modulated bias voltage to each of a plurality of the stacked transistors.
- 27. The method of claim 26 comprising modifying a shaping function output generated for the modulated supply voltage.
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB201315120A GB2517496A (en) | 2013-08-23 | 2013-08-23 | Optimisation of envelope tracked power amplifier |
| PCT/EP2014/067926 WO2015025041A1 (en) | 2013-08-23 | 2014-08-22 | Optimisation of envelope tracked power amplifier |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB201315120A GB2517496A (en) | 2013-08-23 | 2013-08-23 | Optimisation of envelope tracked power amplifier |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| GB201315120D0 GB201315120D0 (en) | 2013-10-09 |
| GB2517496A true GB2517496A (en) | 2015-02-25 |
Family
ID=49355846
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB201315120A Withdrawn GB2517496A (en) | 2013-08-23 | 2013-08-23 | Optimisation of envelope tracked power amplifier |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| GB (1) | GB2517496A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2015025041A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR102004803B1 (en) * | 2017-08-24 | 2019-10-01 | 삼성전기주식회사 | Envelope tracking bias circuit |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5142240A (en) * | 1989-12-27 | 1992-08-25 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Amplifier circuit with correction of amplitude and phase distortions |
| US5420536A (en) * | 1993-03-16 | 1995-05-30 | Victoria University Of Technology | Linearized power amplifier |
| GB2438457A (en) * | 2006-03-17 | 2007-11-28 | Nujira Ltd | Radio frequency power amplifier controlled by dual control voltages; the bias supply voltage and the power supply voltage. |
| US20110018625A1 (en) * | 2009-01-19 | 2011-01-27 | Uwe Hodel | Electronic circuit and electronic circuit arrangement |
| US20110070848A1 (en) * | 2009-09-21 | 2011-03-24 | Broadcom Corporation | Dynamic stability, gain, efficiency and impedance control in a linear/non-linear CMOS power amplifier |
| US7940125B2 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2011-05-10 | Realtek Semiconductor Corporation | Power amplifier, power amplifier circuit and power amplifying method |
| US8274336B1 (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2012-09-25 | Amalfi Semiconductor, Inc. | Saturated power amplifier system |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4394590A (en) * | 1979-12-28 | 1983-07-19 | International Rectifier Corp. Japan Ltd. | Field effect transistor circuit arrangement |
| US6148220A (en) * | 1997-04-25 | 2000-11-14 | Triquint Semiconductor, Inc. | Battery life extending technique for mobile wireless applications |
| US6157253A (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2000-12-05 | Motorola, Inc. | High efficiency power amplifier circuit with wide dynamic backoff range |
| WO2009060095A1 (en) * | 2007-11-09 | 2009-05-14 | Nxp B.V. | Electronic circuit with cascode amplifier |
| US8749309B2 (en) * | 2010-12-05 | 2014-06-10 | Rf Micro Devices (Cayman Islands), Ltd. | Gate-based output power level control power amplifier |
-
2013
- 2013-08-23 GB GB201315120A patent/GB2517496A/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2014
- 2014-08-22 WO PCT/EP2014/067926 patent/WO2015025041A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5142240A (en) * | 1989-12-27 | 1992-08-25 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Amplifier circuit with correction of amplitude and phase distortions |
| US5420536A (en) * | 1993-03-16 | 1995-05-30 | Victoria University Of Technology | Linearized power amplifier |
| GB2438457A (en) * | 2006-03-17 | 2007-11-28 | Nujira Ltd | Radio frequency power amplifier controlled by dual control voltages; the bias supply voltage and the power supply voltage. |
| US7940125B2 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2011-05-10 | Realtek Semiconductor Corporation | Power amplifier, power amplifier circuit and power amplifying method |
| US20110018625A1 (en) * | 2009-01-19 | 2011-01-27 | Uwe Hodel | Electronic circuit and electronic circuit arrangement |
| US20110070848A1 (en) * | 2009-09-21 | 2011-03-24 | Broadcom Corporation | Dynamic stability, gain, efficiency and impedance control in a linear/non-linear CMOS power amplifier |
| US8274336B1 (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2012-09-25 | Amalfi Semiconductor, Inc. | Saturated power amplifier system |
| US8432224B1 (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2013-04-30 | Amalfi Semiconductor, Inc. | Power amplifier with back-off efficiency |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2015025041A1 (en) | 2015-02-26 |
| GB201315120D0 (en) | 2013-10-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Bao et al. | A 24–28-GHz Doherty power amplifier with 4-W output power and 32% PAE at 6-dB OPBO in 150-nm GaN technology | |
| US7852153B1 (en) | High efficiency linear microwave power amplifier | |
| Su et al. | An IC for linearizing RF power amplifiers using envelope elimination and restoration | |
| Pornpromlikit et al. | A watt-level stacked-FET linear power amplifier in silicon-on-insulator CMOS | |
| US9716477B2 (en) | Bias control for stacked transistor configuration | |
| US9065405B2 (en) | Compensating for non-linear capacitance effects in a power amplifier | |
| CN110690859B (en) | Power amplifying circuit | |
| WO2012020144A2 (en) | Switch mode power supply for envelope tracking | |
| CN107306118B (en) | Power amplifying module | |
| Watkins et al. | How not to rely on Moore's Law alone: low-complexity envelope-tracking amplifiers | |
| US20170310282A1 (en) | Adaptive impedance power amplifier | |
| Kang et al. | Design of Doherty power amplifiers for handset applications | |
| Jin et al. | CMOS saturated power amplifier with dynamic auxiliary circuits for optimized envelope tracking | |
| US9954490B2 (en) | Amplifier circuitry for envelope modulators, envelope modulators incorporating said amplifier circuitry and method of modulating a signal envelope | |
| de Vreede et al. | Outphasing transmitters, enabling digital-like amplifier operation with high efficiency and spectral purity | |
| Kang et al. | Impact of nonlinear $ C_ {bc} $ on HBT Doherty power amplifiers | |
| Park et al. | CMOS linear power amplifier with envelope tracking operation | |
| Banerjee et al. | High efficiency multi-mode outphasing RF power amplifier in 45nm CMOS | |
| Eron et al. | The head of the class | |
| Saiki et al. | High speed and high efficiency GaN envelope amplifier with source-floating half-bridge switch | |
| Honjo et al. | Ultra high efficiency microwave power amplifier for wireless power transmission | |
| GB2517496A (en) | Optimisation of envelope tracked power amplifier | |
| Chen et al. | A 28-GHz-band highly linear stacked-FET power amplifier IC with high back-off PAE in 56-nm SOI CMOS | |
| Chen et al. | A 28-GHz-band Stacked FET Linear Power Amplifier IC with 36.2% PAE at 3-dB back-off from P1dB in 56-nm SOI CMOS | |
| Sharma et al. | Simulation and designing of three stack GaN HEMT power amplifier for 2–6 GHz bandwidth |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 732E | Amendments to the register in respect of changes of name or changes affecting rights (sect. 32/1977) |
Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20160519 AND 20160525 |
|
| WAP | Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1) |