[go: up one dir, main page]

GB2149915A - An improved method of ultrasonic inspection - Google Patents

An improved method of ultrasonic inspection Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2149915A
GB2149915A GB08329268A GB8329268A GB2149915A GB 2149915 A GB2149915 A GB 2149915A GB 08329268 A GB08329268 A GB 08329268A GB 8329268 A GB8329268 A GB 8329268A GB 2149915 A GB2149915 A GB 2149915A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
signals
crack
austenitic
application
welds
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
GB08329268A
Other versions
GB8329268D0 (en
Inventor
Platon Athanasios Kapranos
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
British Nuclear Fuels Ltd
Original Assignee
British Nuclear Fuels Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by British Nuclear Fuels Ltd filed Critical British Nuclear Fuels Ltd
Priority to GB08329268A priority Critical patent/GB2149915A/en
Publication of GB8329268D0 publication Critical patent/GB8329268D0/en
Publication of GB2149915A publication Critical patent/GB2149915A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/44Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G01N29/4409Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor by comparison
    • G01N29/4436Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor by comparison with a reference signal
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/04Analysing solids
    • G01N29/06Visualisation of the interior, e.g. acoustic microscopy
    • G01N29/0609Display arrangements, e.g. colour displays
    • G01N29/0618Display arrangements, e.g. colour displays synchronised with scanning, e.g. in real-time
    • G01N29/0627Cathode-ray tube displays
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/04Analysing solids
    • G01N29/11Analysing solids by measuring attenuation of acoustic waves
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/44Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G01N29/48Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor by amplitude comparison
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/04Wave modes and trajectories
    • G01N2291/044Internal reflections (echoes), e.g. on walls or defects

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Abstract

In the ultrasonic scanning of a material, a compressive stress is applied to the material. The reflected signals obtained during the application of the compressive stress are compared with the reflected signals obtained in the absence of such stress. A difference in the amplitude of the compared signals is indicative of the presence of a flaw in the material. The effect can be used to distinguish between signals resulting from cracks in austenitic welds and signals arising from the metallurgical structure of such welds, the latter being unaffected by the application of compressive stress, and the former being closed by the compressive stress.

Description

SPECIFICATION An improved method of ultrasonic inspection The present invention concerns the ultrasonic inspection of materials, in particular the ultrasonic inspection of austenitic stainless steel weldments.
The metallurgical structure of austenitic weldments interacts in a complex manner with ultrasonic waves resulting in ambiguity when interpreting reflections and possible misinterpretation of defect positions. Changes occur in the reflected signals resulting from flaws or cracks if compression forces are applied to a material under investigation. The effect results in a reduction in reflected signal amplitude as crack closure takes place.
The aim of the invention is to utilise this effect, termed the compression crack closure effect, to positively detect flaws and cracks in austenitic stainless steel materials.
According to the present invention a method of ultrasonic inspection comprises scanning a material under test ultrasonically, applying a compressive stress to the material, noting and comparing reflected signals obtained during the application of compressive stress with the reflected signals obtained in the absence of compressive stress, a difference in the amplitude of the compared signals being indicative of the presence of a flaw in the material.
The coarse and anistropic structure of austenitic weld metal results in a high level of spurious signals and high attenuation levels during ultrasonic inspection. The velocity of ultrasonic waves travelling through anistotropic structures of austenitic welds depends on the orientation of the ultrasonic beam with regard to the axes of the long columnar grains existing in such welds. A velocity maximum occurs at about 45 beam to grain angle and velocity minima occur when the ultrasonic beam is directed parallel and perpendicular to the grain axes. These variations affect the wave propagation in the welds and in general the direction of propagation is not normal to the wave front but deviates by a certain angle.
Such deviation or skewing can result in spurious signals. Spurious signals can also arise at the parent metal/weld metal interface.
The ultrasonic response from a crack or flaw is influenced by the application of compressive stresses on the faces of the crack and significant decreases in the amplitude of the reflected signals take place on the application of compressive stresses. This effect, the compression crack closure effect, can be used to distinguish between a true signal originating from a crack in an austenitic weld and false signals that are inherent due to the metallurgical structure of the welds. Tests have demonstrated that the compression crack closure effect has no influence on the false signals arising from the metallurgical structure of the welds Such false signals remain unaffected and are substantially the same with and without the application of compressive stresses to a material being tested.As the true signals arising from the crack are significantly reduced in amplitude upon the application of compressive stresses to the material it becomes possible to distinguish and identify the presence of a crack in the material. The application of compressive stresses in austenitic welds can be used as a discriminatory technique for the analysis of signals returning from any cracks existing in such welds. The compression crack closure effect manifests itself at low stress levels and can respond even at closure of a transverse crack in austenitic tubing running almost parallel to the ultrasonic sound beam propagation. The reflected signals can be displayed on a CRT screen, a first set of signals being obtained before the application of compressive stresses to the specimen being tested and a second set after the application of such stresses.The two sets of signals are compared to determine whether or not a crack or flaw exists in the material under test.
The compressive stresses can be generated in a number of ways and as example mention can be made of: a. Mechanical means such as shaped vice jaws to fit the shape of a component under test.
b. Passing of hot liquids or gases through tubular products under test.
c. Spraying liquid nitrogen on the surfaces of a component under test.
An alternating load can be applied to the material under test to generate "flutter" in the reflected signals. For example, under the influence of an alternating load a mirror image of the signal envelope generated by a crack in the material under test alternates in step with the resonating load from a minimum value to a maximum value indicated by the original signal envelope. Thus, the original signal envelope remains constant with a mirror image oscillating therein. The oscillating signal is derived from the crack or flaw in the material under test. Background noise and other spurious signals displayed on the CRT do not exhibit an oscillating response or only to such a small extent as not to cause any difficulty in the interpretation of the displayed signals.
1. A method of inspecting austenitic stainless steel material which comprises scanning the material ultrasonically, applying a compressive stress to the material noting and comparing reflected signals obtained during the application of compressive stress with the reflected signals obtained in the absence of compressive stress, a difference in the ampli
**WARNING** end of DESC field may overlap start of CLMS **.

Claims (2)

**WARNING** start of CLMS field may overlap end of DESC **. SPECIFICATION An improved method of ultrasonic inspection The present invention concerns the ultrasonic inspection of materials, in particular the ultrasonic inspection of austenitic stainless steel weldments. The metallurgical structure of austenitic weldments interacts in a complex manner with ultrasonic waves resulting in ambiguity when interpreting reflections and possible misinterpretation of defect positions. Changes occur in the reflected signals resulting from flaws or cracks if compression forces are applied to a material under investigation. The effect results in a reduction in reflected signal amplitude as crack closure takes place. The aim of the invention is to utilise this effect, termed the compression crack closure effect, to positively detect flaws and cracks in austenitic stainless steel materials. According to the present invention a method of ultrasonic inspection comprises scanning a material under test ultrasonically, applying a compressive stress to the material, noting and comparing reflected signals obtained during the application of compressive stress with the reflected signals obtained in the absence of compressive stress, a difference in the amplitude of the compared signals being indicative of the presence of a flaw in the material. The coarse and anistropic structure of austenitic weld metal results in a high level of spurious signals and high attenuation levels during ultrasonic inspection. The velocity of ultrasonic waves travelling through anistotropic structures of austenitic welds depends on the orientation of the ultrasonic beam with regard to the axes of the long columnar grains existing in such welds. A velocity maximum occurs at about 45 beam to grain angle and velocity minima occur when the ultrasonic beam is directed parallel and perpendicular to the grain axes. These variations affect the wave propagation in the welds and in general the direction of propagation is not normal to the wave front but deviates by a certain angle. Such deviation or skewing can result in spurious signals. Spurious signals can also arise at the parent metal/weld metal interface. The ultrasonic response from a crack or flaw is influenced by the application of compressive stresses on the faces of the crack and significant decreases in the amplitude of the reflected signals take place on the application of compressive stresses. This effect, the compression crack closure effect, can be used to distinguish between a true signal originating from a crack in an austenitic weld and false signals that are inherent due to the metallurgical structure of the welds. Tests have demonstrated that the compression crack closure effect has no influence on the false signals arising from the metallurgical structure of the welds Such false signals remain unaffected and are substantially the same with and without the application of compressive stresses to a material being tested.As the true signals arising from the crack are significantly reduced in amplitude upon the application of compressive stresses to the material it becomes possible to distinguish and identify the presence of a crack in the material. The application of compressive stresses in austenitic welds can be used as a discriminatory technique for the analysis of signals returning from any cracks existing in such welds. The compression crack closure effect manifests itself at low stress levels and can respond even at closure of a transverse crack in austenitic tubing running almost parallel to the ultrasonic sound beam propagation. The reflected signals can be displayed on a CRT screen, a first set of signals being obtained before the application of compressive stresses to the specimen being tested and a second set after the application of such stresses.The two sets of signals are compared to determine whether or not a crack or flaw exists in the material under test. The compressive stresses can be generated in a number of ways and as example mention can be made of: a. Mechanical means such as shaped vice jaws to fit the shape of a component under test. b. Passing of hot liquids or gases through tubular products under test. c. Spraying liquid nitrogen on the surfaces of a component under test. An alternating load can be applied to the material under test to generate "flutter" in the reflected signals. For example, under the influence of an alternating load a mirror image of the signal envelope generated by a crack in the material under test alternates in step with the resonating load from a minimum value to a maximum value indicated by the original signal envelope. Thus, the original signal envelope remains constant with a mirror image oscillating therein. The oscillating signal is derived from the crack or flaw in the material under test. Background noise and other spurious signals displayed on the CRT do not exhibit an oscillating response or only to such a small extent as not to cause any difficulty in the interpretation of the displayed signals. CLAIMS
1. A method of inspecting austenitic stainless steel material which comprises scanning the material ultrasonically, applying a compressive stress to the material noting and comparing reflected signals obtained during the application of compressive stress with the reflected signals obtained in the absence of compressive stress, a difference in the ampli tude of the compared signal being indicative of the presence of a flaw in the material.
2. A method of inspecting austenitic materials as claimed in claim 1 substantially as herein described.
GB08329268A 1983-11-02 1983-11-02 An improved method of ultrasonic inspection Withdrawn GB2149915A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB08329268A GB2149915A (en) 1983-11-02 1983-11-02 An improved method of ultrasonic inspection

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB08329268A GB2149915A (en) 1983-11-02 1983-11-02 An improved method of ultrasonic inspection

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB8329268D0 GB8329268D0 (en) 1983-12-07
GB2149915A true GB2149915A (en) 1985-06-19

Family

ID=10551115

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB08329268A Withdrawn GB2149915A (en) 1983-11-02 1983-11-02 An improved method of ultrasonic inspection

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2149915A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4340669A1 (en) * 1993-11-30 1995-06-01 Uwe Dipl Ing Kuehsel Testing the quality of longitudinal compression joints

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113804756B (en) * 2020-06-11 2023-11-17 北京新科启源科技有限公司 Rail defect real-time correction system and method

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1017061A (en) * 1961-02-23 1966-01-12 Central Electr Generat Board Improvements in or relating to methods of detecting flaws in solid material and of apparatus therefor
GB1166427A (en) * 1968-07-16 1969-10-08 Ford Motor Co Ultrasonic Testing of a Rubber to Metal Bond
GB1282812A (en) * 1970-04-21 1972-07-26 Friedrich Foerster Method of detecting welds on inadequate strength in continuously welded tubes
GB1523295A (en) * 1975-10-15 1978-08-31 Shell Int Research Method and apparatus for inspecting stratified material
GB2027544A (en) * 1978-08-04 1980-02-20 Euratom Testing brazed metal joints
GB2138138A (en) * 1983-04-13 1984-10-17 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Dynamic method for the detection of discontinuities in a body
GB2139026A (en) * 1983-04-13 1984-10-31 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Signal processing

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1017061A (en) * 1961-02-23 1966-01-12 Central Electr Generat Board Improvements in or relating to methods of detecting flaws in solid material and of apparatus therefor
GB1166427A (en) * 1968-07-16 1969-10-08 Ford Motor Co Ultrasonic Testing of a Rubber to Metal Bond
GB1282812A (en) * 1970-04-21 1972-07-26 Friedrich Foerster Method of detecting welds on inadequate strength in continuously welded tubes
GB1523295A (en) * 1975-10-15 1978-08-31 Shell Int Research Method and apparatus for inspecting stratified material
GB2027544A (en) * 1978-08-04 1980-02-20 Euratom Testing brazed metal joints
GB2138138A (en) * 1983-04-13 1984-10-17 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Dynamic method for the detection of discontinuities in a body
GB2139026A (en) * 1983-04-13 1984-10-31 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Signal processing

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4340669A1 (en) * 1993-11-30 1995-06-01 Uwe Dipl Ing Kuehsel Testing the quality of longitudinal compression joints

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB8329268D0 (en) 1983-12-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5760307A (en) EMAT probe and technique for weld inspection
KR890000607B1 (en) Defect detection method and apparatus of metal
Dixon et al. A laser–EMAT system for ultrasonic weld inspection
US6205859B1 (en) Method for improving defect detectability with magnetostrictive sensors for piping inspection
US4265120A (en) Fatigue detection utilizing acoustic harmonics
JPS6128863A (en) Nondestructive inspection method of processing member by ultrasonic wave and device thereof
US4760737A (en) Procedure for flaw detection in cast stainless steel
US5383365A (en) Crack orientation determination and detection using horizontally polarized shear waves
Kupperman et al. Ultrasonic NDE of cast stainless steel
US3587300A (en) Back reflection block for ultrasonic flaw detection
GB2149915A (en) An improved method of ultrasonic inspection
Moles et al. Developments in time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD)
Hamade et al. Quality assessment of friction stir welded joints–using the fundamental anti-symmetric Lamb wave mode
US6158285A (en) EMAT inspection of welds in thin steel plates of dissimilar thicknesses
US3218845A (en) Ultrasonic inspection method for inaccessible pipe and tubing
RU2032171C1 (en) Ultrasonic test method for cylindrical parts
KR101561038B1 (en) Ultrasonic inspection of clearance of the lower tube reactor using (Time of Flight Diffraction) ultrasonic wedge curvature correction TOFD
SU1061709A3 (en) Method for identifying nature of flaws in ultrasonic flaw detection
JPH0458148A (en) Ultrasonic flaw detecting device
JPH05172789A (en) Ultrasonic flaw detector
Atto et al. Extra-High-Resolution UTCD Solution for Small-Diameter Pipelines–Introducing Extended Depth Sizing
Ogilvy Identification of pulse-echo rays in austenitic steels
Horn et al. Spatial averaging algorithms for ultrasonic inspection of austenitic stainless steel welds
SU989467A1 (en) Steel isotropic material ultrasonic flaw detection method
Šimeková et al. Phased array ultrasonic testing of thin DP steel electron beam weld joints

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WAP Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1)