GB2080349A - Chlorine-resistant Spandex Fibers - Google Patents
Chlorine-resistant Spandex Fibers Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2080349A GB2080349A GB8118921A GB8118921A GB2080349A GB 2080349 A GB2080349 A GB 2080349A GB 8118921 A GB8118921 A GB 8118921A GB 8118921 A GB8118921 A GB 8118921A GB 2080349 A GB2080349 A GB 2080349A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- zinc oxide
- fiber
- accordance
- oxide particles
- range
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01F—CHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
- D01F6/00—Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof
- D01F6/58—Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from homopolycondensation products
- D01F6/70—Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from homopolycondensation products from polyurethanes
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01F—CHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
- D01F8/00—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof
- D01F8/18—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof from other substances
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Artificial Filaments (AREA)
Abstract
A spandex fiber characterised in that, for increasing the resistance of the fiber to chlorine-induced degradation, the fiber contains an effective amount of finely divided zinc oxide having a purity of at least 99.4%.
Description
SPECIFICATION
Chlorine-resistant Spandex Fibers
This invention relates to spandex fibers intended for use in chlorinated aqueous environments, such as are encountered in swimming pools. In particular, the invention concerns such fibers containing finely divided zinc oxide.
Spandex fibers, made from long chain synthetic polymers comprised of at least 85% of segmented polyurethanes, are well-known in the art. Yarns of such fibers have been used to produce attractive fabrics, which are useful for, among other things, swimwear. However, the water in swimming pools is chlorinated to such an extent that the active chlorine content is usually between 0.5 and 3 ppm (parts per million) or higher. Exposure of polyurethane spandex fibers in such an environment can result in degradation of the physical properties (e.g., toughness) of the fiber. From a practical standpiont, some degradation can be tolerated without its effects being noticeable to the user of fabrics made with these fibers. Nonetheless, improvements in the resistance to chlorine-induced degradation is needed, especially for yarns of low denier (e.g., less than tOO denier).It is an object of this invention to provide such an improvement.
The present invention provides a spandex fiber with improved resistance to chlorine-induced degradation by having an effective amount of finely divided high purity zinc oxide dispersed in the fiber.
Zinc oxide assaying at least 99.4 ZnO, preferably at least 99.7% ZnO, is suitable for use in this invention. Zinc oxide concentrations as low as one-half percent or as high as ten percent or more can be effective, but the preferred concentration of the zinc oxide is in the range of 1 to 3% based on the weight of the fiber. The preferred mean particle size is in the range of 0.1 to 1 micron.
As used herein the term fiber includes staple fibers and/or continuous filaments.
In accordance with the present invention, the effective amount of finely divided zinc oxide can vary over a fairly broad range. Improvements in resistance to chlorine-induced degradation are obtained at zinc oxide concentrations as low as 1/2%. However, larger improvements are obtained when the concentration is at least 1%. Although large concentrations of zinc oxide in the fiber (e.g., 10% or more) can sometimes be used, a concentration of less than 5% usually is used because excessive amounts of the additive adversely affect some of the physical properties of the fiber (as produced) as compared to the same fiber without the zinc oxide additive. The preferred range of concentrations of zinc oxide in the fiber is therefore 1 to 3%.
The zinc oxide additive, in accordance with the present invention, is finely divided. This permits a more homogeneous distribution of the zinc oxide in the fiber than could be obtained if the zinc oxide particles were larger. Generally, small particle sizes are used, such as those having a mean size of less than 5 microns. Particles that have a mean size of greater than 5 microns can lead to difficulties in fiber spinning, and, therefore, are generally avoided. Commercially available zinc oxide particles having a mean size of 0.1 micron, or even somewhat smaller, are satisfactory. The preferred range of mean particle size is 0.1 to 1 micron.
Zinc oxide of high purity (e.g., at least 99.4% ZnO) is suitable for use in the present invention.
Although less pure zinc oxide can provide some improvement in resistance to chlorine-induced degradation, the higher purity material provides much better chlorine degradation resistance and fewer adverse effects on physical properties and whiteness retention of the fiber. The high purity zinc oxide can be made by oxidizing zinc metal as in the "indirect" or French Process or an equivalent thereof. In contrast the "direct" or American Process does not provide zinc oxide of as high purity. Among the suitable, high purity commercially available zinc oxides are "AZO"-77 (sold by ASARCO of Columbus,
Ohio), "KADOX"-15 (sold by New Jersey Zinc Company of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania), zinc oxide #20 or #91 1 (sold by St. Joe Zinc Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) and U.S.P. zinc oxide (sold by
Mallinckrodt of St. Louis, Missouri).
An indication of the purity of the zinc oxide is provided by the sulfur content of the zinc oxide.
Elemental analysis has indicated that impurities in the zinc oxide frequently contain cadmium, calcium, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, potassium, sodium, sulfur, etc. A convenient measure of the general level of the impurity content of the zinc oxide is its sulfur content. The high purity zinc oxide used in the present invention generally has a sulfur content of more than 0.025% and preferably no more than 0.005%.
In the process of making spandex fibers according to the present invention, which process includes dissolving a long chain synthetic polymer comprising at least 85% segmented polyurethane in an organic solvent and then dry spinning the solution through orifices into filaments, an effective amount of zinc oxide particles, preferably amounting to at least one-half percent and as much as ten percent or more by weight of the polymer, is dispersed within the filaments. The zinc oxide particles can be added at any of several points in the preparation of the spandex fibers. For example, the zinc oxide may be added as slurry to a solution or dispersion of other additives and then mixed with or injected into the polymer solution upstream of the fiber-spinning orifices.Of course, the zinc oxide particles can be added separately to the polymer spinning solution, as a dry powder or as a slurry in a suitable medium.
As indicated above, the improved spandex fibers of the present invention are made from segmented polyurethane polymers, such as those based on polyethers, polyesters, polyetheresters and the like. Such fibers are prepared by well-known methods, such as those described in U.S. Patents 2,929,804, 3,097,192, 3,428,711, 3,553,290 and 3,555,11 5. Some of these spandex polymers are more susceptible than others to chlorine-induced degradation. This can be seen, for example, by comparing the results of Example I below, which concemed spandex fibers made from polyether-based polyurethane, with the results of Example II, which concemed spandex fibers made from polyesterbased polyurethane.As shown by these Examples, spandex fibers, such as those made from polyetherbased polyurethanes, benefit more than others from the inclusion of zinc oxide particles in accordance with the invention. For this reason, embodiments of the invention that include polyether-based polyurethanes are preferred.
The spandex fibers of the invention may also contain a variety of additives for different purposes, such as delustrants, antioxidants, dyes, stabilizers against heat, light and fumes, etc. so long as such additives do not produce antagonistic effects with the zinc oxide. Also, when finishing or dyeing yarns or fabrics made from fibers of the invention, care must be exercised to avoid deactivating or dissolving the zinc oxide.
The following test procedures are used for measuring the various parameters discussed above.
The concentration of zinc oxide in the fiber is determined as follows. A weighted sample of fiber is ashed in a platinum dish in a muffle furnace at 8000C for 10 minutes. The thusly formed residue is dissolved in 50% HCI solution. Insolubles are removed by filtration. Then, in accordance with the procedures described in "Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorptions", Perkin-Elmer Corp. of Norwalk,
Connecticut (1973), the filtrate is analyzed with a Perkin-Elmer Model 370 Atomic Absorption
Spectrophotometer (or equivalent) equipped with a zinc lamp and calibrated with a sample containing a known amount of zinc oxide. The zinc oxide concentration is then calculated as a percent of the total weight of the fiber.
The purity of the zinc oxide can be measured by means of a potassium ferrocyanide titration as described in "Commercial Methods of Analyses" by F. O. Snell and F. M. Biffen, McGraw-Hill Book
Company Inc., New York [1944] pages 504-506. The sulfur content of the zinc oxide can be measured by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. A Philips model PW-1400 X-ray spectrometer equipped with a graphite crystal in a vacuum atmosphere and an X-ray tube with a silver target is suitable. The spectrophotometer is operated at 50,000 volts and 40 milliamps. The response of the K, line of sulfur is measured according to the general directions of the PW-1400 operation manual published by NV Philips Gloeilampanfabrieken, Eindhoven, The Netherlands [1980].The instrument is calibrated by analysing samples of zinc oxide found by other means to contain no detectable quantities of sulfur and to which known amounts of potassium sulfate were added.
The mean size of the zinc oxide particles in the fiber is measured by Joyce-Loebl-Disk-Centrifuge techniques in accordance with procedures described in "Instruction Manual for Cl-Joyce Loebl Disk
Centrifuge Mk-lll with Photosedimentometer", Joyce Loebl Co. Ltd., Durham, England. Usually, the mean particle size in the fiber is about equal to the size of the particles fed to the polymer solution used in preparing the fibers. Very little reduction in particle size occurs in the process of making the fibers containing the zinc oxide.
Toughness of the spandex fiber is defined as the product of the break tenacity and break elongation and is measured on an Instron machine. A 2-inch (5.1-cm) length of yarn of known denier is suspended between the clamps of an Instron Model TM testing machine, equipped with a tensile load cell of "A" capacity. The sample is elongated at the rate of 20 inches/minute (51 cm/min). The percent elongation at yarn break (break elongation) and the retractive force in grams at yarn break, divided by the original denier of the yarn (break tenacity) are recorded. All testing is carried out at700F (21 C) and 65% relative humidity after the yarns have been brought to equilibrium with those conditions.
Three test samples are averaged for each determination.
To test the resistance of the spandex fibers to chlorine-induced degradation, an 8-inch (20-cm.) long sample of yarn (e.g., 4-filament,40 denier) made from the fibers is subjected to a "chlorinatedwater exposure test." In this test the yarn is extended to 15096 of its original length and then, while maintained extended, is immersed for 24 or 72 hours in a stirred water bath of about 1 50-liter volume, maintained at about 220C, a pH of 7.5 by addition of hydrochloric acid, and an active chlorine concentration of 3 parts per million by addition of sodium hypochloride solution. After exposure, the sample is dried and its physical properties measured as described in the preceding paragraph. The performance of yarns in the chlorinated-water exposure test correlates with the performance of corresponding yarns in swimwear fabrics exposed in chlorinated swimming pools.
The concentration of chlorine in "chlorinated" water is defined herein as the concentration of chlorine that is capable of oxidizing iodide ion to iodine. This concentration is measured by a potassium iodide, sodium thiosulfate titration and is reported as parts per million of "active chlorine" (Cl2). The titration method consists of adding 20 milliliters of a 10% potassium iodide aqueous solution, 10 milliliters of glacial acetic acid and 5 milliliters of 0.5% starch solution to 200 millilieters of the chlorinated water to be analyzed and titrating the mixture to a starch/iodine end point with 0.01 N sodium thiosulfate.
The invention is further illustrated, but is not intended to be limited, by the following examples in which all percentages are by total weight of the fibers unless otherwise specified.
Example I
This example illustrates the reduction that is obtained in chlorine-induced degradation when a dispersion of zinc oxide particles is present in a spandex yarn made from a polyether-based linear segmented polyurethane.
A solution of segmented polyurethane in N,N-dimethylacetamide was prepared in accordance with the general procedure described in U.S. Patent 3,428,711 (e.g., first sentence of Example II and the description of Example I). An intimate mixture was prepared of p,p'-methylenediphenyl and diisocyanate and polytetramethylene ether glycol (of about 1 800 molecular weight) in a molar ratio of 1.70 and was held at 80 to 900C for 90 to 100 minutes to yield an isocyanate-terminated polyether (i.e., a capped glycol), which was then cooled to 600C and mixed with N,N-dimethylacetamide to provide a mixture containing about 45% solids.Then, while maintaining vigorous mixing, the capped glycol was reacted for 2 to 3 minutes at a temperature of about 750C with diethylamine and an 80/20 molar ratio of ethylenediamine and 1 3-cylcohexylenediamine chain extenders. The molar ratio of diamine chain extender to diethylamine was 6.31 and the molar ratio of diamine chain extenders to unreacted isocyanate in the capped glycol was 0.948. The resultant solution of segmented polyurethane contained approximately 36% solids and has a viscosity of about 2100 poises at 400C.
This polymer had an intrinsic viscosity of 0.95, measured at 250C in N,N-dimethylacetamide at a concentration of 0.5 gram per 100 ml of solution.
To the resultant viscous polymer solution were added titanium dioxide, a copolymer of diisopropylaminoethyl methacrylate and n-decyl methacrylate (in a 70/30 weight ratio), 1,1 -bis (3-tbutyl-6-methyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)butane, and ultramarine blue pigment (sold by Reckitts, Ltds., North
Humberside, England) in addition to the amounts of zinc oxide indicated in the table below, such that these additives respectively amounted to 4.7, 4.7, 1.0, and 0.01% based on the weight of the final fibers. The zinc oxide (St. Joe 20, manufactured by St. Joe Zinc Company) had a purity of 99.4% ZnO, a sulfur content of 1 85 ppm and an average particle size of 0.4 micron.
The polymer solution was dry spun in a conventional manner through orifices to form coalesced 4-filament, 40-denier yarns. These yarns were then subjected to a simulated finishing treatment during which the yarns (usually a 20-cm. sample) were immersed for 30 minutes at atmospheric pressure in 3 liters of 85 to 960C water which contained 4.5 grams of tetrasodium pyrophosphate and 4.5 grams of "Duponol EP" (a detergent mainly consisting of diethanolamine lauryl sulfate, sold by E. I. du Pont de
Nemours and Company of Wilmington, Delaware).
The finished yarns, designated as yarns "a" through "g", were then subjected to the "chlorinatedwater exposure test". The results of the exposure to the chlorinated water are summarized in the Table below.
Note that yarn "a" and yarn "b", which were comparison yarns and contained zero and 0.26% zinc oxide, respectively, were severely degraded in physical properties within a very short time. For example, in 24 hours of exposure to the chlorinated water, these two yarns were degraded to less than 10% of their initial toughness and in 72 hours, to 2% or less. In contrast, after 24 hours exposure, yarn "c" of this invention, which contained 0.7% zinc oxide, retained more than 30% of its initial toughness and yarn "d" of this invention which contained 1.3% zinc oxide, retained more than 80% of its toughness. Yarns "e", "f" and "g", which respectively contained 1.5,2.1 and 2.7% zinc oxide also demonstrated strong resistance to chlorine-induced degradation.Thus, the data in the table show that these yarns of the invention having zinc oxide contents in the preferred range of 1 to 3%, retain 8 to 10 times as much of their initial toughness after 24 hours of exposure to chlorinated water and about 40 times as much of their initial toughness after 72 hours of exposure as do such polyether-based spandex fibers in which no zinc oxide or ineffective amounts of zinc oxide are present.
Example II
This example illustrates the reduction that is obtained in chlorine-induced degradation when a dispersion of zinc oxide particles is present in a spandex yarn made from a polyester-based linear segmented polyurethane.
A hydroxy-terminated polyester of about 3400 molecular weight was formed by reaction of 1 7.3 parts of ethylene glycol and 14.9 parts of butanediol with 67.8 parts of adipic acid. An isocyanateterminated polyester was then formed by reacting at 800 C, 100 parts of the hydroxy-terminated polyester with 13.0 parts of p,p'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate. The isocyanate-terminated polyester was then dissolved in 163.2 parts of N,N-dimethylacetamide and reacted with 1.30 parts ethylenediamine and 0.19 parts of diethylamine dissolved in an additional 54.6 parts of N,Ndimethylacetamide. The resultant polymer solution was blended with (a) the polyurethane formed as described in U.S.Patent 3,555,115 by the reaction of t-butyldiethanolamine and methylene-bis-(4cyclohexylisocyanate) and (b) the condensation polymer from p-cresol and divinylbenzene, as described in U.S. Patent 3,553,290, which additives respectively amounted to 1.0 and 0.5 by weight of the final fibers that were produced by spinning. The thusly prepared polymer solution was dry spun in the conventional manner through orifices to form a coalesced four-filament, 40-denier yarn (yarn "h"). A second yarn (yarn "i") was prepared in the same way as yarn "h", except that zinc oxide particles of about 1 micron average size manufactured by Mallinckrodt and having a purity of 99.7%
ZnO and a sulphur content of 24 ppm were blended into the polymer solution prior to spinning.The zinc oxide content of yarn"i" was 1.1% Yarns "h" and "i" were then finished as in Example I. The yarns were then subjected to the "chlorinated-water exposure test". The results are shown in the Table below. Note that yarn "i", which contained 1.1% zinc oxide, is much superior to yarn "h" (which contained no zinc oxide) in its ability to resist chlorine-induced degradation.
Table
Effects of Exposure to Chlorinated Water
On Yarn Properties
%of Exposure Elongation, Tenacity* Toughness % Initial
Sample ZnO Hours % gpd gpd.%** Toughness
a O 0 560 1.10 610 100
24 340 0.15 50 8
72 150 0.05 8 1
b 0.26 0 520 0.85 440 100
24 270 0.15 40 9
72 170 0.07 10 2
c 0.70 0 550 1.04 580 100
24 440 0.42 190 34
72 290 0.14 40 7
d 1.3 0 440 0.92 410 100
24 430 0.79 340 83
72 470 0.73 340 83
e 1.5 0 510 0.86 440 100
24 460 0.85 400 91
72 460 0.74 340 77
f 2.1 0 460 1.01 460 100
24 430 0.82 350 76
72 450 0.77 340 74
9 2.7 0 570 0.98 560 100
24 470 1.02 480 86
72 450 0.80 360 64
h O 0 760 0.55 420 100
24 700 0.31 220 52
72 610 0.15 90 21
1.1 0 810 0.49 400 100
24 750 0.45 340 85
72 750 0.41 310 77
*Tenacity is in grams per denier (gpd)
**Tougness is grams per denier tenacity multiplied by % elongation, (gpd.%).
As many different embodiments of this invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, it is to be understood that this invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments described herein, except as defined in the appended claims.
Claims (20)
1. A spandex fiber characterised in that, for increasing the resistance of the fiber to chlorineinduced degradation, the fiber contains an effective amount of finely divided zinc oxide having a purity of at least 99.4%.
2. A fiber in accordance with claim 1 wherein the zinc oxide has a sulfur content of no more than 0.025%.
3. A fiber in accordance with claim 2 wherein the zinc oxide has a purity of at least 99.7% and a sulfur content of no more than 0.005%.
4. A fiber in accordance with any one of the preceding claims wherein the zinc oxide concentration is in the range of 1/2 to 10 percent by weight of the fiber.
5. A fiber in accordance with claim 4 wherein the zinc oxide concentration is in the range of 1 to 3 percent by weight of the fiber.
6. A fiber in accordance with any one of the preceding claims wherein the mean size of the zinc oxide particles is in the range of 0.1 to 5 microns.
7. A fiber in accordance with claim 6 wherein the mean size of the zinc oxide particles is in the range of 0.1 to 1 micron.
8. A fiber in accordance with claim 1 substantially as herein described in Example I or Example II.
9. A process for preparing a spandex fiber, wherein a long chain synthetic polymer comprising at least 85% segmented polyurethane is dissolved in an organic solvent and the thusly formed polymer solution is then dry spun through orifices into fiber, characterised in that an effective amount of high purity zinc oxide particles is dispersed within the fiber.
10. A process in accordance with claim 9 wherein the concentration of zinc oxide particles is in the range of 1/2 to 10 percent by weight of the fiber.
11. A process in accordance with claim 10 wherein the concentration of zinc oxide particles is in the range of 1 to 3 percent by weight of the fiber.
1 2. A process in accordance with any one of claims 9 to 11 wherein the mean size of the zinc oxide particles is in the range of 0.1 to 5 microns.
1 3. A process in accordance with any one of claims 9 to 12 wherein the zinc oxide particles have a purity of at least 99.4% and a sulfur content of no more than 0.025%.
14. A process in accordance with claim 1 3 wherein the zinc oxide particles have a purity of at least 99.7% and a sulfur content of no more than 0.005%
1 5. A process in accordance with claim 12 wherein the mean size of the zinc oxide particles is in the range of 0.1 to 1 micron.
1 6. A process in accordance with any one of claims 9 to 1 5 wherein the zinc oxide particles are added to a mixture of other additives and then injected into the polymer solution upstream of the orifices.
17. A process in accordance with any one of claims 9 to 1 5 wherein a slurry of zinc oxide particles is formed in a compatible medium and then added to the polymer solution upstream of the orifices.
1 8. A process for preparing a spandex fiber in accordance with claim 1 substantially as herein described in Example 1 or Example II.
19. A spandex fiber when prepared by a process in accordance with any one of claims 9 to 18.
20. Each and every novel product, process, method and composition herein disclosed.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16160680A | 1980-06-20 | 1980-06-20 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| GB2080349A true GB2080349A (en) | 1982-02-03 |
| GB2080349B GB2080349B (en) | 1983-10-26 |
Family
ID=22581895
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB8118921A Expired GB2080349B (en) | 1980-06-20 | 1981-06-19 | Chlorine-resistant spandex fibres |
Country Status (16)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS6043444B2 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR840001630B1 (en) |
| AR (1) | AR223928A1 (en) |
| BR (1) | BR8103820A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1166379A (en) |
| CH (1) | CH646733A5 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE3124197C2 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES8300885A1 (en) |
| FR (1) | FR2485043A1 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB2080349B (en) |
| HK (1) | HK38384A (en) |
| IE (1) | IE51118B1 (en) |
| IT (1) | IT1136846B (en) |
| MX (1) | MX161236A (en) |
| NL (1) | NL188533C (en) |
| SG (1) | SG4084G (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4810737A (en) * | 1987-11-16 | 1989-03-07 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Spinning of spandex filaments |
| WO2000009789A1 (en) * | 1998-08-10 | 2000-02-24 | Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Elastomeric polyurethane fiber |
| US6353049B1 (en) | 1997-02-13 | 2002-03-05 | Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha | Elastic polyurethane fiber and process for producing the same |
| US8623950B2 (en) | 2008-10-28 | 2014-01-07 | Tae Kwang Ind. Co., Ltd. | High heat and chlorine resistant polyurethaneurea elastic fiber and preparation of thereof |
Families Citing this family (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS5959912A (en) * | 1982-09-22 | 1984-04-05 | Toyobo Co Ltd | Polyurethane elastomer yarn and its preparation |
| JPS59150142A (en) * | 1983-02-15 | 1984-08-28 | 東洋紡績株式会社 | Knitted fabric for swimming suit |
| JPS646143U (en) * | 1987-06-29 | 1989-01-13 | ||
| CN1065295C (en) * | 1996-09-24 | 2001-05-02 | 烟台氨纶股份有限公司 | Method for manufacturing chlorine-resistant spandex fiber |
| WO2002008123A1 (en) | 2000-07-24 | 2002-01-31 | Kyowa Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. | Liquid raw material for producing formed polyurethane or aromatic polyamide and use of hydrotalcite compound particles therefor |
| KR100438005B1 (en) * | 2002-04-04 | 2004-06-30 | 주식회사 두본 | Method for producing chlorine-resistant polyurethane elastic fiber and the fiber |
| US20080057812A1 (en) * | 2004-12-06 | 2008-03-06 | Asahi Kasei Fibers Corporation | Stretch Woven Fabric |
| JP5688601B2 (en) | 2011-06-23 | 2015-03-25 | 東レ・オペロンテックス株式会社 | Polyurethane yarn and fabric and swimsuit using the same |
Family Cites Families (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE1161007B (en) * | 1955-12-29 | 1964-01-09 | E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Wilmington, Del. (V. St. A.) | Manufacture of synthetic resin films or threads |
| FR1182890A (en) * | 1956-11-26 | 1959-06-30 | Us Rubber Co | Preservation of polyester-urethane polymers |
| US3386942A (en) * | 1964-06-29 | 1968-06-04 | Eastman Kodak Co | Stabilization of non-yellowing segmented polyurethane copolymers of polymeric diols, functionally aliphatic diisocyanates and functionally aliphatic diamines |
| GB1078317A (en) * | 1964-09-18 | 1967-08-09 | Bayer Ag | Polyurethane materials |
| FR1469613A (en) * | 1966-01-06 | 1967-02-17 | Rhone Poulenc Sa | Process for stabilizing polyurethane polyureas |
| US3743708A (en) * | 1970-11-20 | 1973-07-03 | American Cyanamid Co | Submicron metal oxide particles and their process for manufacture |
| US3994881A (en) * | 1975-07-24 | 1976-11-30 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Spandex process and product based on tetra-halogenated diisocyanates and diamines |
-
1981
- 1981-06-17 ES ES503163A patent/ES8300885A1/en not_active Expired
- 1981-06-17 BR BR8103820A patent/BR8103820A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1981-06-18 CH CH401881A patent/CH646733A5/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1981-06-18 JP JP56093119A patent/JPS6043444B2/en not_active Expired
- 1981-06-18 MX MX187882A patent/MX161236A/en unknown
- 1981-06-18 CA CA000380077A patent/CA1166379A/en not_active Expired
- 1981-06-18 FR FR8112038A patent/FR2485043A1/en active Granted
- 1981-06-18 AR AR285766A patent/AR223928A1/en active
- 1981-06-19 IT IT22474/81A patent/IT1136846B/en active
- 1981-06-19 KR KR1019810002235A patent/KR840001630B1/en not_active Expired
- 1981-06-19 NL NLAANVRAGE8102970,A patent/NL188533C/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1981-06-19 DE DE3124197A patent/DE3124197C2/en not_active Expired
- 1981-06-19 IE IE1360/81A patent/IE51118B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1981-06-19 GB GB8118921A patent/GB2080349B/en not_active Expired
-
1984
- 1984-01-16 SG SG40/84A patent/SG4084G/en unknown
- 1984-05-03 HK HK383/84A patent/HK38384A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4810737A (en) * | 1987-11-16 | 1989-03-07 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Spinning of spandex filaments |
| US6353049B1 (en) | 1997-02-13 | 2002-03-05 | Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha | Elastic polyurethane fiber and process for producing the same |
| CN1089821C (en) * | 1997-02-13 | 2002-08-28 | 旭化成株式会社 | Elastic polyurethane fiber and process for producing same |
| WO2000009789A1 (en) * | 1998-08-10 | 2000-02-24 | Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Elastomeric polyurethane fiber |
| US6406788B1 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2002-06-18 | Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha | Elastic polyurethane fiber |
| US8623950B2 (en) | 2008-10-28 | 2014-01-07 | Tae Kwang Ind. Co., Ltd. | High heat and chlorine resistant polyurethaneurea elastic fiber and preparation of thereof |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE3124197C2 (en) | 1990-01-04 |
| ES503163A0 (en) | 1982-11-01 |
| GB2080349B (en) | 1983-10-26 |
| MX161236A (en) | 1990-08-24 |
| KR840001630B1 (en) | 1984-10-12 |
| FR2485043A1 (en) | 1981-12-24 |
| JPS6043444B2 (en) | 1985-09-28 |
| CA1166379A (en) | 1984-04-24 |
| CH646733A5 (en) | 1984-12-14 |
| AR223928A1 (en) | 1981-09-30 |
| NL188533C (en) | 1992-07-16 |
| ES8300885A1 (en) | 1982-11-01 |
| SG4084G (en) | 1985-02-15 |
| HK38384A (en) | 1984-05-11 |
| KR830006489A (en) | 1983-09-24 |
| NL188533B (en) | 1992-02-17 |
| IE811360L (en) | 1981-12-20 |
| DE3124197A1 (en) | 1982-02-25 |
| BR8103820A (en) | 1982-03-09 |
| FR2485043B1 (en) | 1984-08-10 |
| IE51118B1 (en) | 1986-10-01 |
| IT8122474A0 (en) | 1981-06-19 |
| NL8102970A (en) | 1982-01-18 |
| IT1136846B (en) | 1986-09-03 |
| JPS5729609A (en) | 1982-02-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4340527A (en) | Chlorine-resistant spandex fibers | |
| KR970009334B1 (en) | Polyurethane composition | |
| CA1166379A (en) | Chlorine-resistant spandex fibers | |
| JP2761532B2 (en) | Improved fibers from spandex based on polyethers | |
| EP0046073A2 (en) | Spandex filament and spandex yarn comprising it | |
| JPS5959912A (en) | Polyurethane elastomer yarn and its preparation | |
| KR20000071017A (en) | Elastic polyurethane fiber and process producing the same | |
| EP0843029B1 (en) | Chlorine-resistant elasthane fibers | |
| JP2887402B2 (en) | Polyurethane composition | |
| US3133036A (en) | Polyurethane fibers containing a colorless leuco derivative of a blue-violet dye | |
| DE69412824T2 (en) | SPANDEX CONTAINING BARIUM SULFATE | |
| DE3879457T2 (en) | SPANDEX, MADE WITH A DIAMINE BLEND. | |
| EP1200518A1 (en) | Polyurethane-urea fibres with improved resistance | |
| DE69202863T2 (en) | STABILIZED POLYURETHANE SOLUTION AND SPANDEX FIBERS. | |
| JP2000282328A (en) | Polyurethane elastic fiber | |
| KR0124963B1 (en) | Manufacturing method of color resistant polyurethane elastic fiber | |
| JPH11323662A (en) | Polyurethane elastic fiber | |
| KR100397705B1 (en) | Spandex fiber having improved resistances to discoloration and chlorine | |
| US20080057812A1 (en) | Stretch Woven Fabric | |
| JPH04126764A (en) | Oligomeric semicarbazide additive for spandex | |
| US6372834B1 (en) | Stabilized spandex | |
| US4169876A (en) | Process for spinning flame-resistant acrylonitrile polymer fibers | |
| JPH09132877A (en) | Union knitted or woven fabric of elastic yarn containing metallic compound and polyamide fiber | |
| JPS62184109A (en) | matte synthetic fiber | |
| JPH07157658A (en) | Heat-and light-resistant polyamide composition and its production |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE20 | Patent expired after termination of 20 years |
Effective date: 20010618 |