EP3666391B1 - A centrifugal separator - Google Patents
A centrifugal separator Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3666391B1 EP3666391B1 EP19214930.0A EP19214930A EP3666391B1 EP 3666391 B1 EP3666391 B1 EP 3666391B1 EP 19214930 A EP19214930 A EP 19214930A EP 3666391 B1 EP3666391 B1 EP 3666391B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- phase
- ejection
- liquid food
- discs
- flow
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B04—CENTRIFUGAL APPARATUS OR MACHINES FOR CARRYING-OUT PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES
- B04B—CENTRIFUGES
- B04B1/00—Centrifuges with rotary bowls provided with solid jackets for separating predominantly liquid mixtures with or without solid particles
- B04B1/04—Centrifuges with rotary bowls provided with solid jackets for separating predominantly liquid mixtures with or without solid particles with inserted separating walls
- B04B1/08—Centrifuges with rotary bowls provided with solid jackets for separating predominantly liquid mixtures with or without solid particles with inserted separating walls of conical shape
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B04—CENTRIFUGAL APPARATUS OR MACHINES FOR CARRYING-OUT PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES
- B04B—CENTRIFUGES
- B04B1/00—Centrifuges with rotary bowls provided with solid jackets for separating predominantly liquid mixtures with or without solid particles
- B04B1/10—Centrifuges with rotary bowls provided with solid jackets for separating predominantly liquid mixtures with or without solid particles with discharging outlets in the plane of the maximum diameter of the bowl
- B04B1/14—Centrifuges with rotary bowls provided with solid jackets for separating predominantly liquid mixtures with or without solid particles with discharging outlets in the plane of the maximum diameter of the bowl with periodical discharge
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B04—CENTRIFUGAL APPARATUS OR MACHINES FOR CARRYING-OUT PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES
- B04B—CENTRIFUGES
- B04B11/00—Feeding, charging, or discharging bowls
- B04B11/04—Periodical feeding or discharging; Control arrangements therefor
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B04—CENTRIFUGAL APPARATUS OR MACHINES FOR CARRYING-OUT PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES
- B04B—CENTRIFUGES
- B04B7/00—Elements of centrifuges
- B04B7/08—Rotary bowls
- B04B7/12—Inserts, e.g. armouring plates
- B04B7/14—Inserts, e.g. armouring plates for separating walls of conical shape
Definitions
- the invention relates to a centrifugal separator for separating liquid food into a light phase, a heavy phase, and an ejection phase that comprises solid impurities, and to a method of separating liquid food.
- centrifugal separators Separators for separating liquid food into different phases of varying density under the influence of a centrifugal force are called centrifugal separators.
- the liquid food is introduced in a rotating disc stack of the centrifugal separator.
- heavier sediment and lighter particles in the liquid food begin to settle radially outwards respectively inwards in the separation channels according to their density.
- Heavier solid impurities collect in a sediment space at the periphery of the separator, and are intermittently ejected as an ejection phase from an ejection port at the periphery.
- this is achieved by a centrifugal separator according to claim 1.
- this is achieved by a method for separating liquid food according to claim 11.
- Having a first set of discs to limit the liquid food to flow between a periphery and a center portion of the disc stack, and a second set of discs comprising distribution openings for distributing a flow of the light phase from the distribution openings towards a center channel and a flow of the heavy phase from the distribution openings towards the periphery, provides for improved separation performance for liquid food containing particles of reduced size or increased density while minimizing product losses.
- Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of a centrifugal separator 100 for separating liquid food (RP) into a light phase (LP), a heavy phase (HP), and an ejection phase (SI) that comprises solid impurities (SI).
- the separator 100 comprises a centrifuge bowl 101, and an inlet 102 for the liquid food (RP) at a bottom portion 103 of the centrifuge bowl 101.
- the separator 100 comprises outlets 104, 104', for the heavy phase (HP) and the light phase (LP) at a top portion 105 of the centrifuge bowl 101.
- An ejection port 106 is arranged at a periphery 107 of the centrifuge bowl 101 to eject the ejection phase (SI) from the centrifuge bowl 101.
- Having a first set of discs 110 to limit the liquid food (RP) to flow between the periphery 107 and the center portion 113 of the disc stack 108 provides for maximizing the radial distance along which the liquid food (RP) flows, which allows for an efficient separation of solid impurities (SI).
- the liquid food (RP) flows radially inwards through the interspaces 112 towards the center portion 113, and on the way through the disc stack 108 the solid impurities (SI) are separated and thrown back along the undersides of the discs 109 to the periphery 107 where they are collected and subsequently ejected through the ejection port 106.
- the time of passage also allows very small particles to be separated. This is particularly advantageous in case the liquid food contains an increased ratio of fine particles, which may be the case for e.g. coconut water.
- the first set of discs 110 provides for an efficient separation of small solid impurities (SI)
- the second set of discs 111 provides for a separation of the heavy phase (HP) and the light phase (LP) via the distribution of flow through the distribution openings 114 as described above.
- fat particles of lower density flows radially inwards from the distribution openings 114, as opposed to the heavy phase (HP), and the fat can be extracted through the outlet for the light phase (104').
- the flow of liquid food (RF) through the inlet 102 may be reduced or completely stopped when the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port 106. Completely stopping the flow of liquid food (RF) through the inlet 102 may provide for reducing the aforementioned turbulence further.
- LP light phase
- HP heavy phase
- the first outlet valve 118 may be arranged to increase the flow of the light phase (LP) through the outlet 104' for the light phase (LP) for a defined second time interval ( ⁇ t 2 ).
- the second time interval ( ⁇ t 2 ) may start at a predetermined first time (t' s ) before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106), as schematically illustrated in Fig. 2 . This provides for further avoiding the aforementioned backflow and mixing of the light phase (LP) and the heavy phase (HP).
- the second time interval ( ⁇ t 2 ) may further end at a predetermined second time (t' e ) after the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port 106.
- the predetermined first time (t s ) of the first time interval ( ⁇ t 1 ) may be in the range of 1 to 4 seconds before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port 106.
- the predetermined second time (t' s ) of the second time interval ( ⁇ t 2 ) may be in the range of 1 to 4 seconds before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port 106.
- a range of 1 to 4 seconds may provide for a particularly efficient separation with reduced risk of mixing the light phase (LP) and the heavy phase (HP) as well as minimized product losses.
- the separator 100 may comprise a second outlet valve 119 that is arranged at the outlet 104 for the heavy phase (HP) to reduce the flow of the heavy phase (HP) through the outlet 104 for the heavy phase (HP) when the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port 106.
- the extraction of the heavy phase (HP) may thus be reduced or avoided during the ejection of the solid impurities (SI). Any undesired turbulence or backflow as described above may thus not affect the heavy phase (HP) and the extraction thereof may be resumed as the ejection is completed.
- Fig. 3b illustrates another flow chart of a method 200.
- the method 200 may comprise reducing 203 the flow of the liquid food (RP) into the separator 100 while ejecting 204 the ejection phase (SI) from the separator 100. Turbulence in the separator 100 may thus be reduced, as described above.
- RP liquid food
- SI ejection phase
- the liquid food (RP) may be coconut water. It is conceivable that the liquid food (RP) may comprise other food where separation of a light phase (LP), a heavy phase (HP), and solid impurities (IS) is desirable.
- LP light phase
- HP heavy phase
- IS solid impurities
- the method 200 may be carried out with a temperature of the liquid food (RP) in the range 4 - 15°C. This provides for facilitated separation of small solid impurities (SI) since the particles may form larger aggregates more easily in this temperature range. Hence, in case of separating coconut water, the coconut water may have a temperature in the range 4 - 15°C.
Landscapes
- Meat, Egg Or Seafood Products (AREA)
- Separation Of Solids By Using Liquids Or Pneumatic Power (AREA)
- Centrifugal Separators (AREA)
Description
- The invention relates to a centrifugal separator for separating liquid food into a light phase, a heavy phase, and an ejection phase that comprises solid impurities, and to a method of separating liquid food.
- Separators for separating liquid food into different phases of varying density under the influence of a centrifugal force are called centrifugal separators. The liquid food is introduced in a rotating disc stack of the centrifugal separator. Under the influence of the centrifugal force heavier sediment and lighter particles in the liquid food begin to settle radially outwards respectively inwards in the separation channels according to their density. Heavier solid impurities collect in a sediment space at the periphery of the separator, and are intermittently ejected as an ejection phase from an ejection port at the periphery.
- Separators are typically utilized for separating raw milk into skimmilk and cream. A problem with previous separators is that the efficiency is reduced for the separation of liquid food other than milk. For example, sub-optimal separation of liquid food containing an increased ratio of fine particles and/or high-density particles may result in a cloudy appearance in an otherwise clear liquid phase of the food product. This may affect the perceived quality of the liquid food product. Furthermore, the lowered performance may also lead to increased product losses.
-
- It is an object of the invention to at least partly overcome one or more limitations of the prior art. In particular, it is an object to provide an improved centrifugal separator with increased performance for separating liquid food, in particular liquid food containing an increased ratio of fine particles and/or high-density particles compared to milk.
- In a first aspect of the invention, this is achieved by a centrifugal separator according to claim 1. In another aspect of the invention, this is achieved by a method for separating liquid food according to claim 11.
- Having a first set of discs to limit the liquid food to flow between a periphery and a center portion of the disc stack, and a second set of discs comprising distribution openings for distributing a flow of the light phase from the distribution openings towards a center channel and a flow of the heavy phase from the distribution openings towards the periphery, provides for improved separation performance for liquid food containing particles of reduced size or increased density while minimizing product losses.
- Still other objectives, features, aspects and advantages of the invention will appear from the following detailed description as well as from the drawings.
- Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings.
-
Fig. 1 is a cross-sectional side view of a centrifugal separator for separating liquid food into a light phase, a heavy phase, and an ejection phase that comprises solid impurities; -
Fig. 2 is a diagram showing a time interval for the ejection of an ejection phase in relation to the timing of changes in flow through an inlet valve and a first outlet valve; and -
Figs. 3a-c are flowcharts of methods for separating liquid food into a light phase, a heavy phase and an ejection phase. - Embodiments of the invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all, embodiments of the invention are shown. The invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein.
-
Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of acentrifugal separator 100 for separating liquid food (RP) into a light phase (LP), a heavy phase (HP), and an ejection phase (SI) that comprises solid impurities (SI). Theseparator 100 comprises acentrifuge bowl 101, and aninlet 102 for the liquid food (RP) at abottom portion 103 of thecentrifuge bowl 101. Theseparator 100 comprisesoutlets 104, 104', for the heavy phase (HP) and the light phase (LP) at atop portion 105 of thecentrifuge bowl 101. Anejection port 106 is arranged at aperiphery 107 of thecentrifuge bowl 101 to eject the ejection phase (SI) from thecentrifuge bowl 101. Theejection port 106 may be configured to open for a short period of time, and with a predefined frequency so that the impurities collected at theperiphery 107, i.e. at the sediment space, are regularly emptied from thecentrifuge bowl 101. Theseparator 100 comprises adisc stack 108 ofconical discs 109 arranged inside thecentrifuge bowl 101. Thedisc stack 108 comprises a first set ofdiscs 110 arranged in thebottom portion 103, and a second set ofdiscs 111 arranged in thetop portion 105. The liquid food (RP) passes the first set ofdiscs 110 before passing the second set ofdiscs 111 when received through theinlet 102. - The
discs 109 in the first set ofdiscs 110 defineinterspaces 112 in between thedisks 109. Theinterspaces 112 extend from theperiphery 107 of thedisc stack 108 to anaxial center portion 113 of thedisc stack 108 and limit the liquid food (RP) to flow between theperiphery 107 and thecenter portion 113 of thedisc stack 108. Thediscs 109 in the second set ofdiscs 111 define interspaces 112' in between thedisks 109 and comprisedistribution openings 114 that are located between theperiphery 107 and thecenter portion 113 of thedisc stack 108. Thedistribution openings 114 distribute a flow of the liquid food (RP) so that the light phase (LP) flows from thedistribution openings 114 towards acenter channel 115 at thecenter portion 113 and the heavy phase (HP) flows from thedistribution openings 114 towards theperiphery 107. The light phase (LP) flows from thecenter channel 115 to the outlet 104' for the light phase (LP), and the heavy phase (HP) flows from theperiphery 107 to theoutlet 104 for the heavy phase (HP). - Having a first set of
discs 110 to limit the liquid food (RP) to flow between theperiphery 107 and thecenter portion 113 of thedisc stack 108 provides for maximizing the radial distance along which the liquid food (RP) flows, which allows for an efficient separation of solid impurities (SI). The liquid food (RP) flows radially inwards through theinterspaces 112 towards thecenter portion 113, and on the way through thedisc stack 108 the solid impurities (SI) are separated and thrown back along the undersides of thediscs 109 to theperiphery 107 where they are collected and subsequently ejected through theejection port 106. As the liquid food (RP) passes along the full radial width of thediscs 109, the time of passage also allows very small particles to be separated. This is particularly advantageous in case the liquid food contains an increased ratio of fine particles, which may be the case for e.g. coconut water. While the first set ofdiscs 110 provides for an efficient separation of small solid impurities (SI), the second set ofdiscs 111 provides for a separation of the heavy phase (HP) and the light phase (LP) via the distribution of flow through thedistribution openings 114 as described above. For example, fat particles of lower density flows radially inwards from thedistribution openings 114, as opposed to the heavy phase (HP), and the fat can be extracted through the outlet for the light phase (104'). Theseparator 100 thus provides for an optimized removal of solid impurities (SI) of reduced size as well as efficient separation of the light phase (LP) and the heavy phase (HP) in a singlecompact disc stack 108. The amount of fine solid impurities (SI) and any portion of the light phase (LP), e.g. fat, in the separated heavy phase (HP) can thus be minimized. Providing such pure extraction of the heavy phase (HP) may be particularly advantageous in case the liquid food is coconut water. Any cloudiness caused by fine solid impurities and/or solid impurities of high density, such as fibres or coconut meat etc, or the coconut fat, may thus be minimized. The purity of the separated coconut water, i.e. the heavy phase (HP), may thus be increased. This also provides for an increased perceived quality from the consumer perspective. Such improved separation efficiency and food quality may thus be provided by asingle separator 100. This provides for minimizing cost and resources as well as a more compact and less complex production line. - The number of
discs 109 in the first set ofdiscs 110 may be higher than the number ofdiscs 109 in the second set ofdiscs 111. This provides for a further increase separation performance of solid impurities (SI) in the liquid food (RP). - The
separator 100 may comprise aninlet valve 116 that is arranged at theinlet 102 to reduce the flow of liquid food (RF) through theinlet 102 when the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through theejection port 106. Reducing the flow of liquid food (RF) through theinlet 102 provides for reducing turbulence in theseparator 100 as the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through theejection port 106. The reduced turbulence of the flow of liquid food (RP) in theseparator 100 provides for minimizing loss of liquid food (RP) other than the solid impurities (SI) through theejection port 106. The reduced losses allows for increasing the efficiency of theseparator 100. The flow of liquid food (RF) through theinlet 102 may be reduced or completely stopped when the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through theejection port 106. Completely stopping the flow of liquid food (RF) through theinlet 102 may provide for reducing the aforementioned turbulence further. - The
inlet valve 116 may be connected to acontroller 117 configured to control the flow of liquid food (RF) through theinlet 102, as schematically shown inFig. 1 . - The
inlet valve 116 may be arranged to reduce the flow of liquid food (RF) through theinlet 102 for a defined first time interval (Δt1). The first time interval (Δt1) may start at a predetermined first time (ts) before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through theejection port 106.Fig. 2 is a diagram showing the first time interval (Δt1) in relation to the time interval, from t1 to t2, during which the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through theejection port 106. Starting the first time interval (Δt1) at a predetermined first time (ts) before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through theejection port 106 provides for further reducing any turbulence of the liquid food (RP) in theseparator 100. - The first time interval (Δt1) may end at a predetermined second time (te) after the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the
ejection port 106, as schematically illustrated inFig. 2 . This further provides for avoiding flushing out liquid food (RP) through theejection port 106 as the ejection phase (SI) is ejected. - The
separator 100 may comprise afirst outlet valve 118 that is arranged at the outlet 104' for the light phase (LP) to increase the flow of the light phase (LP) through the outlet 104' for the light phase (LP) when the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through theejection port 106. Increasing the flow of the light phase (LP) provides for reducing any backflow of the light phase (LP) as the ejection phase (SI) is ejected. I.e. the replacement of a certain volume of liquid which is ejected through theejection port 106 may create a flow towards theejection port 106. Increasing the flow of the light phase (LP) allows for compensating the backflow, which otherwise may risk mixing of the light phase (LP) and the heavy phase (HP). Avoiding such mixing provides for a more efficient separation. For example, in the case the liquid food is coconut water, the risk of having the coconut cream in the light phase (LP) mixing with the clear coconut water of the heavy phase (HP) is reduced. Any "cloudiness" of the extracted coconut water, caused by the coconut cream may thus be avoided to attain a pure high quality product. - The
first outlet valve 118 may be connected to acontroller 117 configured to control the flow of liquid food (RF) through thefirst outlet valve 118, as schematically shown inFig. 1 . - The
first outlet valve 118 may be arranged to increase the flow of the light phase (LP) through the outlet 104' for the light phase (LP) for a defined second time interval (Δt2). The second time interval (Δt2) may start at a predetermined first time (t's) before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106), as schematically illustrated inFig. 2 . This provides for further avoiding the aforementioned backflow and mixing of the light phase (LP) and the heavy phase (HP). - The second time interval (Δt2) may further end at a predetermined second time (t'e) after the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the
ejection port 106. - In one example, the
first outlet valve 118 increases the flow of the light phase (LP) through the outlet 104' for the light phase (LP) while theinlet valve 116 reduces the flow of liquid food (RF) through theinlet 102 when the ejection phase (SI) is ejected. I.e. the first time interval (Δt1) overlaps with the second time interval (Δt2) during a duration between t1 and t2, as schematically illustrated inFig. 2 . It should however be understood that any of theinlet valve 116 and thefirst outlet valve 118 may be independently controlled to vary the flow as described above to provide for the mentioned advantageous benefits. - In one example, the first time interval (Δt1) is equal to the second time interval (Δt2). Hence, the flow of the light phase (LP) through the outlet 104' for the light phase (LP) is increased during the same time interval as the flow of the liquid food (RF) through the
inlet 102 is reduced. This may provide for a particularly efficient separation. It is however conceivable that in some examples the predetermined first times (ts, t's) are equal, and that the predetermined second times (te, t'e) are different, and vice versa, depending on the particular application while providing for the above mentioned advantageous benefits. - The predetermined first time (ts) of the first time interval (Δt1) may be in the range of 1 to 4 seconds before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the
ejection port 106. Alternatively or in addition, the predetermined second time (t's) of the second time interval (Δt2) may be in the range of 1 to 4 seconds before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through theejection port 106. A range of 1 to 4 seconds may provide for a particularly efficient separation with reduced risk of mixing the light phase (LP) and the heavy phase (HP) as well as minimized product losses. - The predetermined second time (te) of the first time interval (Δt1) may be in the range of 1 to 6 seconds after the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the
ejection port 106. Alternatively or in addition, the predetermined second time (t'e) of the second time interval (Δt2) may be in the range of 1 to 6 seconds after the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through theejection port 106. A range of 1 to 6 seconds may provide for a particularly high separation performance and minimized product losses. - The
separator 100 may comprise asecond outlet valve 119 that is arranged at theoutlet 104 for the heavy phase (HP) to reduce the flow of the heavy phase (HP) through theoutlet 104 for the heavy phase (HP) when the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through theejection port 106. The extraction of the heavy phase (HP) may thus be reduced or avoided during the ejection of the solid impurities (SI). Any undesired turbulence or backflow as described above may thus not affect the heavy phase (HP) and the extraction thereof may be resumed as the ejection is completed. The flow of the heavy phase (HP) through thesecond outlet valve 119 may be reduced or completely stopped when the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through theejection port 106. Completely stopping the flow may be particularly advantageous in attaining a high separation performance. Thesecond outlet valve 119 may be connected to acontroller 117 configured to control the flow of liquid food (RF) through thesecond outlet valve 119, as schematically shown inFig. 1 . -
Fig. 3a illustrates a flow chart of amethod 200 for separating liquid food (RP) into a light phase (LP), a heavy phase (HP) and an ejection phase (SI) that comprises solid impurities (SI) in aseparator 100. Themethod 200 comprises distributing 201 a flow of the liquid food (RP) through a first set ofdiscs 110 in adisc stack 108 arranged in theseparator 100 so that the liquid food (RP) is limited to flow between aperiphery 107 and acenter portion 113 of thedisc stack 108. Themethod 200 further comprises distributing 202 a flow of the liquid food (RP) through a second set ofdiscs 111 in thedisc stack 108 so that the light phase (LP) flows fromdistribution openings 114, located between theperiphery 107 and thecenter portion 113, towards acenter channel 115 at thecenter portion 113, and the heavy phase (HP) flows from thedistribution openings 114 towards theperiphery 107. Themethod 200 thus allows for an efficient separation of liquid food (RP) containing an increased ratio of fine particles, which may be the case of e.g. coconut water, as described above in relation to theseparator 100 andFigs. 1 - 2 . -
Fig. 3b illustrates another flow chart of amethod 200. Themethod 200 may comprise reducing 203 the flow of the liquid food (RP) into theseparator 100 while ejecting 204 the ejection phase (SI) from theseparator 100. Turbulence in theseparator 100 may thus be reduced, as described above. -
Fig. 3c illustrates another flow chart of amethod 200. Themethod 200 may comprise increasing 203' the flow of the light phase (LP) through an outlet 104' for the light phase (LP) while ejecting 204 the ejection phase (SI) from theseparator 100. Backflow of the light phase (LP) may thus be reduced, providing for a improved separation and product quality, as described above. -
Fig. 3d illustrates another flow chart of amethod 200. Themethod 200 may comprise reducing 203" the flow of the heavy phase (HP) through anoutlet 104 for the heavy phase (HP) while ejecting 204 the ejection phase (SI) from theseparator 100. This further provides for an efficient separation of the heavy phase (HP), as described above. - As mentioned, the liquid food (RP) may be coconut water. It is conceivable that the liquid food (RP) may comprise other food where separation of a light phase (LP), a heavy phase (HP), and solid impurities (IS) is desirable.
- The
method 200 may be carried out with a temperature of the liquid food (RP) in the range 4 - 15°C. This provides for facilitated separation of small solid impurities (SI) since the particles may form larger aggregates more easily in this temperature range. Hence, in case of separating coconut water, the coconut water may have a temperature in the range 4 - 15°C. - From the description above follows that, although various embodiments of the invention have been described and shown, the invention is not restricted thereto, but may also be embodied in other ways within the scope of the subject-matter defined in the following claims.
Claims (15)
- A centrifugal separator (100) for separating liquid food (RP) into a light phase (LP), a heavy phase (HP), and an ejection phase (SI) that comprises solid impurities (SI), the separator (100) comprisinga centrifuge bowl (101),an inlet (102) for the liquid food (RP) at a bottom portion (103) of the centrifuge bowl (101) and outlets (104, 104') for the heavy phase (HP) and the light phase (LP) at a top portion (105) of the centrifuge bowl (101),an ejection port (106) arranged at a periphery (107) of the centrifuge bowl (101) to eject the ejection phase (SI) from the centrifuge bowl (101),a disc stack (108) of conical discs (109) arranged inside the centrifuge bowl (101), the disc stack (108) comprising a first set of discs (110) arranged in the bottom portion (103), and a second set of discs (111) arranged in the top portion (105),wherein the liquid food (RP) passes the first set of discs (110) before passing the second set of discs (111) when received through the inlet (102), whereindiscs (109) in the first set of discs (110) define interspaces (112) in between the disks (109), the interspaces (112) extending from the periphery (107) of the disc stack (108) to an axial center portion (113) of the disc stack (108) and limiting the liquid food (RP) to flow between the periphery (107) and the center portion (113) of the disc stack (108), and in thatdiscs (109) in the second set of discs (111) define interspaces (112') in between the disks (109) and comprise distribution openings (114) that are located between the periphery (107) and the center portion (113) of the disc stack (108) for distributing a flow of the liquid food (RP) where the light phase (LP) flows from the distribution openings (114) towards a center channel (115) at the center portion (113) and the heavy phase (HP) flows from the distribution openings (114) towards the periphery (107), characterized bya first outlet valve (118) that is arranged at the outlet (104') for the light phase (LP) to increase the flow of the light phase (LP) through the outlet (104') for the light phase (LP) when the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106), wherein the first outlet valve (118) is arranged to increase the flow of the light phase (LP) through the outlet (104') for the light phase (LP) for a defined second time interval (Δt2), wherein the second time interval (Δt2) starts at a predetermined first time (t's) before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106).
- A separator according to claim 1, wherein the number of discs (109) in the first set of discs (110) is higher than the number of discs (109) in the second set of discs (111).
- A separator according to claim 1 or 2, comprising
an inlet valve (116) that is arranged at the inlet (102) to reduce the flow of liquid food (RF) through the inlet (102) when the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106). - A separator according to claim 3, wherein the inlet valve (116) is arranged to reduce the flow of liquid food (RF) through the inlet (102) for a defined first time interval (Δt1), wherein the first time interval (Δt1) starts at a predetermined first time (ts) before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106).
- A separator according to claim 4, wherein the first time interval (Δt1) ends at a predetermined second time (te) after the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106).
- A separator according to claim 1, wherein the second time interval (Δt2) ends at a predetermined second time (t'e) after the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106).
- A separator according to claim 4, wherein the first time interval (Δt1) is equal to the second time interval (Δt2).
- A separator according to claim 4, wherein the predetermined first time ts and/or t's is in the range of 1 to 4 seconds before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106).
- A separator according to claim 5 and 6, wherein the predetermined second time te and/or t'e is in the range of 1 to 6 seconds after the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106).
- A separator according to any of claims 1 - 9, comprising a second outlet valve (119) that is arranged at the outlet (104) for the heavy phase (HP) to reduce the flow of the heavy phase (HP) through the outlet (104) for the heavy phase (HP) when the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106).
- A method (200) for separating liquid food (RP) into a light phase (LP), a heavy phase (HP) and an ejection phase (SI) that comprises solid impurities (SI) in a separator (100), the method comprisesdistributing (201) a flow of the liquid food (RP) through a first set of discs (110) in a disc stack (108) arranged in the separator (100) so that the liquid food (RP) is limited to flow between a periphery (107) and a center portion (113) of the disc stack (108), anddistributing (202) a flow of the liquid food (RP) through a second set of discs (111) in the disc stack (108) so that the light phase (LP) flows from distribution openings (114), located between the periphery (107) and the center portion (113), towards a center channel (115) at the center portion (113), and the heavy phase (HP) flows from the distribution openings (114) towards the periphery (107), characterized byincreasing (203') the flow of the light phase (LP) through an outlet (104') for the light phase (LP) while ejecting (204) the ejection phase (SI) from the separator (100), for a defined second time interval (Δt2), wherein the second time interval (Δt2) starts at a predetermined first time (t's) before the ejection phase (SI) is ejected through the ejection port (106).
- A method according to claim 11, comprising
reducing (203) the flow of the liquid food (RP) into the separator (100) while ejecting (204) the ejection phase (SI) from the separator (100). - A method according to any of claims 11 - 12, comprising
reducing (203") the flow of the heavy phase (HP) through an outlet (104) for the heavy phase (HP) while ejecting (204) the ejection phase (SI) from the separator (100). - A method according to any of claims 11 - 13, wherein the liquid food (RP) is coconut water.
- A method according to any one of claims 11 - 14, wherein the temperature of the liquid food (RP) is in the range 4 - 15°C.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP18212162 | 2018-12-13 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP3666391A1 EP3666391A1 (en) | 2020-06-17 |
| EP3666391B1 true EP3666391B1 (en) | 2023-08-23 |
Family
ID=64665246
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP19214930.0A Active EP3666391B1 (en) | 2018-12-13 | 2019-12-10 | A centrifugal separator |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP3666391B1 (en) |
| PH (1) | PH12021551358A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2020120499A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10654050B1 (en) | 2019-05-21 | 2020-05-19 | Empirical Innovations, Inc. | Centrifugal separators and separation methods employing multiple pistons and facilitating intermediate material ejection |
| CN112170029A (en) * | 2020-08-12 | 2021-01-05 | 郑州天一萃取科技有限公司 | A novel high-efficiency drum and centrifuge including the same |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2500100A (en) * | 1946-08-10 | 1950-03-07 | Laval Separator Co De | Centrifugal bowl |
| SE227107C1 (en) * | 1967-05-18 | 1969-07-29 | Alfa Laval Ab | |
| DE2363741B2 (en) * | 1973-12-21 | 1976-06-16 | CONTROL UNIT FOR A SELF-DRAINING FULL-SLEEVE CENTRIFUGE | |
| SE520744C2 (en) * | 1999-03-08 | 2003-08-19 | Alfa Laval Corp Ab | Method and apparatus for indicating an undesirable operating condition at a centrifugal separator |
-
2019
- 2019-12-10 EP EP19214930.0A patent/EP3666391B1/en active Active
- 2019-12-10 WO PCT/EP2019/084485 patent/WO2020120499A1/en not_active Ceased
-
2021
- 2021-06-09 PH PH12021551358A patent/PH12021551358A1/en unknown
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| PH12021551358A1 (en) | 2021-11-22 |
| BR112021008196A2 (en) | 2021-08-03 |
| EP3666391A1 (en) | 2020-06-17 |
| WO2020120499A1 (en) | 2020-06-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US11660613B2 (en) | Separation disc for a centrifugal separator having spacing members with a triangular shape | |
| EP3666391B1 (en) | A centrifugal separator | |
| US20260014569A1 (en) | Centrifugal separator with optimized disc separation | |
| EP2730339B1 (en) | A centrifugal separator | |
| AU2009304096B2 (en) | Method for reducing the pulp content of fruit juices containing pulp | |
| EP0574364B1 (en) | Centrifuge for oil extraction from oily slurries working without addition of drinkable water | |
| EP3501659B1 (en) | Separating milk | |
| EP3801918B1 (en) | A centrifugal separator | |
| EP4046719B1 (en) | A centrifugal separator | |
| EA009244B1 (en) | Method of improving the efficiency of fat separation in the separation of a liquid food product | |
| CN115379902A (en) | Centrifuge and related systems and methods | |
| BR112021008196B1 (en) | CENTRIFUGAL SEPARATOR AND METHOD FOR SEPARATING LIQUID FOODS | |
| US4460352A (en) | Centrifuge drum for clarifying and/or separating liquids | |
| US20130319952A1 (en) | Deoiling hydrocyclone | |
| EP4268964B1 (en) | A centrifugal separator | |
| RU2195370C2 (en) | Separator for emulsions | |
| EP4268966B1 (en) | A method of separating a liquid feed mixture comprising yeast | |
| US3443746A (en) | Counter-current wash for centrifugal separator | |
| US8273391B2 (en) | Method for producing cheese | |
| SE539191C2 (en) | Method and apparatus for separating two phases | |
| RU2216408C2 (en) | Emulsion separator | |
| EP4159319A1 (en) | A centrifugal separator | |
| RU2537863C1 (en) | Cream separator | |
| JP2010042371A (en) | Centrifuge |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20201217 |
|
| RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20230302 |
|
| GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTC | Intention to grant announced (deleted) | ||
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20230511 |
|
| P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230426 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602019035509 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1601948 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20231124 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20231223 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20231226 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20231123 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20231223 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20231124 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602019035509 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602019035509 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20240524 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231210 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20231210 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20231231 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231210 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240702 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231210 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231210 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231231 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231231 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231210 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231210 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240702 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231231 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231231 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20191210 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20191210 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230823 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20251223 Year of fee payment: 7 |