[go: up one dir, main page]

EP2640811B1 - A process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption - Google Patents

A process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2640811B1
EP2640811B1 EP11807796.5A EP11807796A EP2640811B1 EP 2640811 B1 EP2640811 B1 EP 2640811B1 EP 11807796 A EP11807796 A EP 11807796A EP 2640811 B1 EP2640811 B1 EP 2640811B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sulfur
ppm
adsorbent
diesel
cut
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP11807796.5A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2640811A2 (en
Inventor
Sarvesh Kumar
Alok Sharma
Brijesh Kumar
Santanam Rajagopal
Ravinder Kumar Malhotra
Anand Kumar
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Indian Oil Corp Ltd
Original Assignee
Indian Oil Corp Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Indian Oil Corp Ltd filed Critical Indian Oil Corp Ltd
Publication of EP2640811A2 publication Critical patent/EP2640811A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2640811B1 publication Critical patent/EP2640811B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G67/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only
    • C10G67/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only
    • C10G67/06Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only including a sorption process as the refining step in the absence of hydrogen
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G25/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with solid sorbents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/10Feedstock materials
    • C10G2300/1037Hydrocarbon fractions
    • C10G2300/1048Middle distillates
    • C10G2300/1055Diesel having a boiling range of about 230 - 330 °C
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/20Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
    • C10G2300/201Impurities
    • C10G2300/202Heteroatoms content, i.e. S, N, O, P
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/40Characteristics of the process deviating from typical ways of processing
    • C10G2300/4018Spatial velocity, e.g. LHSV, WHSV
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2400/00Products obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00 - C10G69/14
    • C10G2400/04Diesel oil

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to desulfurization of diesel and in particular to a novel process for deep desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption. More particularly the present disclosure pertains to an integrated process comprising diesel hydro de-sulfurisation (DHDS) or diesel hydrotreatrnent (DHDT) with reduced severity, to desulfurize high sulfur-containing (1 -2%) diesel stream to a much lower level of sulfur content of 350 ppm in the treated diesel stream, followed by an adsorption procedure for effecting deep desulfurization to reduce overall sulfur content to less than 10 ppm with reduced hydrogen consumption, as compared to high severity DHDS or DHDT procedures followed in the prior art.
  • DHDS diesel hydro de-sulfurisation
  • DHDT diesel hydrotreatrnent
  • the residual sulfur below 500 ppm in diesel is mostly refractory sulfur. Removal of the refractory sulfur of the diesel through conventional hydrotreating requires severe operating conditions like higher pressure, lower 'Liquid Hourly Space Velocity (LHSV)', higher consumption of hydrogen, and use of highly active and expensive catalyst systems.
  • LHSV Liquid Hourly Space Velocity
  • the present invention provides a novel process to utilize a reactive adsorbent for reducing refractory sulfur present in diesel from 350 to less than 10 ppm.
  • the process developed in the present invention can be utilized in the downstream of existing DHDS/DHDT units.
  • the hydrogen consumption is significantly low, since it is consumed only for saturation of olefinic bond generated by cleavage of the sulfur from the sulfur compounds.
  • the combination will result in reduced hydrogen consumption at refineries.
  • the DHDS procedure employs catalytic hydrogenation to upgrade the quality of diesel so as to conform to the environmental norms by mainly removing sulfur and nitrogen. In addition, this procedure brings about saturation of olefins and aromatic compounds.
  • Catalysts are formulated by combining varying amounts of nickel or cobalt with molybdenum oxides on an aluminium base. Important operating parameters of this procedure are, inter alia, temperature, pressure, nature of catalyst, feed flow rate, feed characteristics, etc.
  • the catalysts used therein are meant for carrying out reaction under less severe/drastic condition and at a faster rate.
  • US publication US20070261994A1 discloses a method for producing a super-low sulfur gas oil blending component or a super-low sulfur gas oil composition having a sulfur content of less than 5 ppm, under relatively mild conditions, without greatly increasing the hydrogen consumption and without remarkably decreasing the aromatic content.
  • the hydrogen consumption reduction is not clearly specified.
  • the composition of the catalyst used is different.
  • the present invention uses a process of splitting the treated diesel between two fractions, which is not present in this US publication.
  • US patent 6,551,501B1 discloses a combined process for improved hydrotreating of diesel fuels, in which the feed to be hydrotreated is pretreated with a selective adsorbent prior to the hydrotreating step to remove polar materials, especially nitrogen containing compounds (N-compounds).
  • both the hydrotreatrnent and adsorption process are used to reduce the sulfur content in the fuel; however, the reduction of sulfur content in two publications is different.
  • the splitting of hydrocarbon and reduction of hydrogen consumption is not mentioned.
  • PCT application WO2008122706A2 discloses an improved method for deep desulphurisation of a gasoil comprising a catalytic hyrodesulphurisation unit preceded by an absorption unit for nitrogen compounds inhibiting the hydrodesulphurisation reaction.
  • the present invention uses either DHDT or DHD S process followed by adsorption process for sulfur removal.
  • the type of catalyst, reduction of hydrogen consumption and reduction of severity are not mentioned in the PCT publication.
  • WO 2004/050800 concerns a method for desulphuration, denitrogenation and/or dearomatization of a hydrocarbon feed containing sulphur compounds of the benzoand/or dibenzothiophene type, nitrogen compounds of indole and/or carbazole type and polyaromatic compounds, comprising a step which consists in adsorbing the feed in an adsorption column containing an adsorbent including a n electron acceptor based complexing agent; recovering a desulphurized, denitrogenated and/or dearomatizedand adsorption effluent and stopping the adsorption of the feed on the column.
  • the invention is applicable to final desulphuration of a diesel fuel.
  • US 2006/0131 217 describes a process for desulphurizing a gas oil type hydrocarbon cut by adsorption to obtain a desulphurized effluent containing less than 10 ppm by weight in a yield of more than 95% by weight.
  • Said process comprises a step for simulated moving bed adsorption of sulphurcontaining compounds in the feed, a raffinate distillation step and an extract distillation step.
  • the present invention is defined in claim 1.
  • the present invention provides splitting of treated diesel containing about 350 ppm of refractory sulfur into two cuts viz Initial boiling point (IBP) 140-150°C - 280/300°C and 280/300°C to Final boiling point (FBP).
  • the 280/300°C-IBP cut contains preferably less than 10 ppm sulfur which can be blended into diesel stream without any further treatment and the 280/300°C-FBP cut containing about 500-600 ppm of refractory sulfur can be desulfurized using novel adsorption process capable of bringing down sulfur content of diesel to less than 10 ppm.
  • the process in accordance with this invention can be utilized in the downstream of existing DHDS/DHDT units.
  • the present invention shows consumption of hydrogen is significantly low as compared to the prior art, because hydrogen is consumed only for bringing about saturation of olefinic bonds generated by cleavage of sulfur from the sulfur-containing compounds.
  • the present invention discloses a novel process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption, which comprises hydrotreating high sulfur-containing diesel stream (1.0 -2.0% by wt. of S) over a NiMo catalyst to reduce sulfur-contentto a level of 350 ppm, followed by subjecting the treated diesel stream to an adsorption procedure to bring down sulfur content to less than 10 ppm.
  • high sulfur diesel stream containing about 1.0-2.0 wt% sulfur can be hydrodesulfurized to a level of 350 ppm sulfur product utilizing conventional DHDS or DHDT process with subsequent processing by an adsorption process to reduce sulfur content below 10 ppm.
  • treated diesel containing about 350 ppm of refractory sulfur is split into two cuts viz. IBP(140-150°C) -280/300°C and 280/300°C to FBP.
  • the 280/300°C-IBP cut contains less than 10 ppm sulfur. This cut can be blended into diesel stream without any further treatment.
  • the 280/300°C-FBP cut containing about 500-600 ppm of refractory sulfur canbe desulfurized using an adsorption process.
  • the adsorption process comprises two numbers of fixed bed reactors, which are being operated in swing mode of adsorption and regeneration.
  • 280/300°C-FBP cut along with hydrogen is contacted with the adsorbent in down or up flow mode at 350 - 400°C, 15 - 30 bar, hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratio of 100 - 400 Nm 3 /m 3 , liquid hourly space velocity of0.5 -2.0 h- 1 depending on the sulfur contents of feed.
  • the sulfur compounds are chemically adsorbed on the adsorbent followed by cleavage of the sulfur atom form the sulfur compound.
  • the hydrocarbon molecule of the sulfur compound is released back into the hydrocarbon stream.
  • the presence of hydrogen during the adsorption also prevents deactivation of adsorbent due to coking.
  • the treated diesel contains less than 10 ppm sulfur which can be blended with other cut to produce diesel pool containing less than 10 ppm sulfur. After reaching the breakthrough point, the adsorbent is regenerated at 350 - 500°C.
  • Regeneration of adsorbent is accomplished in situ by controlled oxidation of the adsorbed carbon and sulfur with lean air followed by activation with hydrogen.
  • the cycle time will vary from 4 to 10 days depending on feed sulfur and boiling range.
  • the adsorbent has higher strength and thermal stability compared to hydrotreating catalyst.
  • the regenerability studies for the adsorbent has been conducted in pilot plant for 6 months (25 cycles) and there was no loss of activity and physical properties, hence the life of the adsorbent is expected to be similar to that of hydrotreating catalyst systems.
  • Adsorbent The adsorbent used in the process is disclosed in prior art ( US 2007/0023325 ) which is comprised of a base component, a reactive component, and booster.
  • the base component of adsorbent is a porous material, which provides extrudibility and strength. Such materials include alumina, clay, magnesia, titania or a mixture of two or more such materials.
  • the reactive component of the adsorbent is a spinel oxide and prepared through solid-state reaction of the individual metal oxides. This component is responsible for detaching the sulfur atom from the sulfur compounds.
  • the activity booster component of the adsorbent is a bimetallic alloy generated in situ from mixed metal oxides.
  • the present disclosure also provides a process for regeneration of adsorbent comprises the steps of controlled oxidation of the adsorbed carbon and sulfur with lean air at a temperature ranging between 350°C and 500°C, and activation with hydrogen wherein the process is carried out in situ.
  • Diesel stream containing 1.53 wt% sulfur was hydrodesulfurized using commercial DHDS and DHDT catalyst system in a hydroprocessing micro-reactor unit (MRU).
  • MRU hydroprocessing micro-reactor unit
  • Table-1 Details of feed/product properties and operating conditions 1.
  • Feed/ product properties Feed DHDT Product DHDS Product a) Density @ 15 °C, g/cc 0.8449 0.8107 0.8265 b) Sulfur, ppm 15300 20 30 c) CI (D4737) 50.8 57.9 55.1 4. H2 Consumption, wt% of feed 1.3 1.0
  • Diesel stream containing 1.53 wt% sulfur was hydrodesulfurized using highly active commercial DHDS and DHDT catalyst system in a hydroprocessing micro-reactor unit (MRU). The severity of operating parameters was reduced to get 350 ppm sulfur product.
  • Table-2 Details of feed/ product properties and operating conditions (350 ppm sulfur product) 1.
  • Feed/ product properties Feed DHDT Product DHDS Product a) Density @ 15 °C, g/cc 0.8449 0.8279 0.8283 b) Sulfur, ppm 15300 350 350 c) CI (D4737) 50.8 54.5 54.2 4. H2 Consumption, wt% of feed 0.7 0.7
  • the 350 ppm sulfur product was subsequently treated by an adsorption process to reduce total sulfur content below 10 ppm.
  • the detailed GC-SCD analysis of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur product diesel is given below in Table-3.
  • the GC-SCD Chromatograms of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur product diesel is given below in Figure-2 of the drawings.
  • Table-3 GC-SCD of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur Product Diesel S. No.
  • the 350 ppm sulfur product diesel from DHDS or DHDT was split into two cuts viz. IBP to 280°C and FBP to 280°C.
  • the 280°C IBP cut contains less than 10 ppm sulfur.
  • the 280°C-FBP cut containing 530 ppm of refractory sulfur was desulfurized using an adsorption process to reduce sulfur below 10 ppm. The details of various cuts and final product diesel are given below in Table-4.
  • Table-4 Details of various cuts and final product diesel Property IBP-280 °C 280°C -FBP (390°C) 280°C -FBP treated by Adsorption process Final Product Diesel Wt fraction 0.35 0.65 0.65 1.00 S,ppm 8 530 6 7 Density, g/cc 0.83 0.8450 0.8450 0.8397
  • the liquid product from the separator of DHDS/DHDT is sent to splitter where wild naphtha [150 (-)°C cut] is separated from top of the column, 150-280°C cut from the middle and 280(+)°C cut from bottom is separated. Bottom or bottom along with middle cut is further deep desulfurized using novel adsorption process to reduce total sulfur content below 10 ppm.
  • the Adsorption process scheme is given in Figure-4 of the drawings.
  • cetane number of the product is not improved.
  • cetane number specification is same for Euro-III and Euro-IV diesel, the process is particularly suitable as a finishing step for further treatment of Euro-III diesel after DHDS/DHDT.
  • the existing DHDT unit can be operated at lesser severity, just sufficient to meet the cetane requirement, and further sulfur reduction can be achieved by employing the adsorption process. This will result in substantial saving of precious hydrogen. From the data (Table-5), it can be observed that by combining the adsorption process with DHDS or DHDT units saves about 20 to 40% hydrogen consumption respectively. Table-5: Saving of hydrogen by integration of Adsorption process with DHDS or DHDT unit S. No.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present disclosure relates to desulfurization of diesel and in particular to a novel process for deep desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption. More particularly the present disclosure pertains to an integrated process comprising diesel hydro de-sulfurisation (DHDS) or diesel hydrotreatrnent (DHDT) with reduced severity, to desulfurize high sulfur-containing (1-2%) diesel stream to a much lower level of sulfur content of 350 ppm in the treated diesel stream, followed by an adsorption procedure for effecting deep desulfurization to reduce overall sulfur content to less than 10 ppm with reduced hydrogen consumption, as compared to high severity DHDS or DHDT procedures followed in the prior art.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION AND PRIOR ART
  • With increasing concern for environmental pollution, regulatory norms are becoming increasingly stricter, forcing refiners to search for novel and economically viable routes to produce cleaner, eco-friendly fuels. The refining procedures adopted so far invariably use severe/drastic operating conditions involving high degree of hydrogen consumption and expensive catalyst systems.
  • The residual sulfur below 500 ppm in diesel is mostly refractory sulfur. Removal of the refractory sulfur of the diesel through conventional hydrotreating requires severe operating conditions like higher pressure, lower 'Liquid Hourly Space Velocity (LHSV)', higher consumption of hydrogen, and use of highly active and expensive catalyst systems.
  • The present invention provides a novel process to utilize a reactive adsorbent for reducing refractory sulfur present in diesel from 350 to less than 10 ppm. The process developed in the present invention can be utilized in the downstream of existing DHDS/DHDT units. In the process, the hydrogen consumption is significantly low, since it is consumed only for saturation of olefinic bond generated by cleavage of the sulfur from the sulfur compounds. The combination will result in reduced hydrogen consumption at refineries.
  • The DHDS procedure employs catalytic hydrogenation to upgrade the quality of diesel so as to conform to the environmental norms by mainly removing sulfur and nitrogen. In addition, this procedure brings about saturation of olefins and aromatic compounds. Catalysts are formulated by combining varying amounts of nickel or cobalt with molybdenum oxides on an aluminium base. Important operating parameters of this procedure are, inter alia, temperature, pressure, nature of catalyst, feed flow rate, feed characteristics, etc. The catalysts used therein are meant for carrying out reaction under less severe/drastic condition and at a faster rate.
  • Removal of sulfur according to DHDS: Diesel contains sulfur compounds such as mercaptans, sulphides, and/or disulphides which are removed as H2S, as shown below:-

            Mercaptan → C-C-C-C-SH+H2=C-C-C-C-H+H2S

            Sulphide → C-C-S-C-C+2H2=2C-C-H+H2S

            Disulphide → C-C-S-S-C-C+3H2=2C-C-H+2H2S

  • US publication US20070261994A1 discloses a method for producing a super-low sulfur gas oil blending component or a super-low sulfur gas oil composition having a sulfur content of less than 5 ppm, under relatively mild conditions, without greatly increasing the hydrogen consumption and without remarkably decreasing the aromatic content. However unlike the present invention, the hydrogen consumption reduction is not clearly specified. Moreover the composition of the catalyst used is different. The present invention uses a process of splitting the treated diesel between two fractions, which is not present in this US publication.
  • US patent 6,551,501B1 discloses a combined process for improved hydrotreating of diesel fuels, in which the feed to be hydrotreated is pretreated with a selective adsorbent prior to the hydrotreating step to remove polar materials, especially nitrogen containing compounds (N-compounds). In the present invention both the hydrotreatrnent and adsorption process are used to reduce the sulfur content in the fuel; however, the reduction of sulfur content in two publications is different. In the US publication the splitting of hydrocarbon and reduction of hydrogen consumption is not mentioned.
  • PCT application WO2008122706A2 discloses an improved method for deep desulphurisation of a gasoil comprising a catalytic hyrodesulphurisation unit preceded by an absorption unit for nitrogen compounds inhibiting the hydrodesulphurisation reaction. However, the present invention uses either DHDT or DHD S process followed by adsorption process for sulfur removal. The type of catalyst, reduction of hydrogen consumption and reduction of severity are not mentioned in the PCT publication.
  • US publication US2007023325 A1 , by the applicant of the present invention has been mentioned separately in the following description. It discloses the adsorbent that has been used in the present invention too.
  • Hence there is a need to provide such a desulfurization process that the sulfur content of the diesel can be brought down to less than 10 ppm, while ensuring minimum consumption of hydrogen. This invention therefore aims at overcoming the difficulties or drawbacks of the procedures adopted in the prior art for desulfurization of diesel.
    US 2006/0191821 describes a process for deep desulfurization of a gas oil-type hydrocarbon fraction by adsorption in the presence of hydrogen on a solid that contains zinc oxide and a promoter in oxide form. Said adsorbent solid is regenerated by a controlled combustion with dilute air.
    WO 2004/050800 concerns a method for desulphuration, denitrogenation and/or dearomatization of a hydrocarbon feed containing sulphur compounds of the benzoand/or dibenzothiophene type, nitrogen compounds of indole and/or carbazole type and polyaromatic compounds, comprising a step which consists in adsorbing the feed in an adsorption column containing an adsorbent including a n electron acceptor based complexing agent; recovering a desulphurized, denitrogenated and/or dearomatizedand adsorption effluent and stopping the adsorption of the feed on the column. The invention is applicable to final desulphuration of a diesel fuel.
    US 2006/0131 217 describes a process for desulphurizing a gas oil type hydrocarbon cut by adsorption to obtain a desulphurized effluent containing less than 10 ppm by weight in a yield of more than 95% by weight. Said process comprises a step for simulated moving bed adsorption of sulphurcontaining compounds in the feed, a raffinate distillation step and an extract distillation step.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is defined in claim 1.
  • The present invention provides splitting of treated diesel containing about 350 ppm of refractory sulfur into two cuts viz Initial boiling point (IBP) 140-150°C - 280/300°C and 280/300°C to Final boiling point (FBP). The 280/300°C-IBP cut contains preferably less than 10 ppm sulfur which can be blended into diesel stream without any further treatment and the 280/300°C-FBP cut containing about 500-600 ppm of refractory sulfur can be desulfurized using novel adsorption process capable of bringing down sulfur content of diesel to less than 10 ppm.
  • Accordingly, the process in accordance with this invention can be utilized in the downstream of existing DHDS/DHDT units. The present invention shows consumption of hydrogen is significantly low as compared to the prior art, because hydrogen is consumed only for bringing about saturation of olefinic bonds generated by cleavage of sulfur from the sulfur-containing compounds.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention discloses a novel process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption, which comprises hydrotreating high sulfur-containing diesel stream (1.0 -2.0% by wt. of S) over a NiMo catalyst to reduce sulfur-contentto a level of 350 ppm, followed by subjecting the treated diesel stream to an adsorption procedure to bring down sulfur content to less than 10 ppm.
  • In this integrated process, high sulfur diesel stream containing about 1.0-2.0 wt% sulfur can be hydrodesulfurized to a level of 350 ppm sulfur product utilizing conventional DHDS or DHDT process with subsequent processing by an adsorption process to reduce sulfur content below 10 ppm.
  • In one embodiment treated diesel containing about 350 ppm of refractory sulfur is split into two cuts viz. IBP(140-150°C) -280/300°C and 280/300°C to FBP. The 280/300°C-IBP cut contains less than 10 ppm sulfur. This cut can be blended into diesel stream without any further treatment. The 280/300°C-FBP cut containing about 500-600 ppm of refractory sulfur canbe desulfurized using an adsorption process.
  • The adsorption process comprises two numbers of fixed bed reactors, which are being operated in swing mode of adsorption and regeneration. During the adsorption process, 280/300°C-FBP cut along with hydrogen is contacted with the adsorbent in down or up flow mode at 350 - 400°C, 15 - 30 bar, hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratio of 100 - 400 Nm3/m3, liquid hourly space velocity of0.5 -2.0 h-1 depending on the sulfur contents of feed. During the adsorption process, the sulfur compounds are chemically adsorbed on the adsorbent followed by cleavage of the sulfur atom form the sulfur compound. The hydrocarbon molecule of the sulfur compound is released back into the hydrocarbon stream. The presence of hydrogen during the adsorption also prevents deactivation of adsorbent due to coking. The treated diesel contains less than 10 ppm sulfur which can be blended with other cut to produce diesel pool containing less than 10 ppm sulfur. After reaching the breakthrough point, the adsorbent is regenerated at 350 - 500°C.
  • Regeneration of adsorbent is accomplished in situ by controlled oxidation of the adsorbed carbon and sulfur with lean air followed by activation with hydrogen. The cycle time will vary from 4 to 10 days depending on feed sulfur and boiling range. The adsorbent has higher strength and thermal stability compared to hydrotreating catalyst. The regenerability studies for the adsorbent has been conducted in pilot plant for 6 months (25 cycles) and there was no loss of activity and physical properties, hence the life of the adsorbent is expected to be similar to that of hydrotreating catalyst systems.
  • Adsorbent: The adsorbent used in the process is disclosed in prior art ( US 2007/0023325 ) which is comprised of a base component, a reactive component, and booster. The base component of adsorbent is a porous material, which provides extrudibility and strength. Such materials include alumina, clay, magnesia, titania or a mixture of two or more such materials. The reactive component of the adsorbent is a spinel oxide and prepared through solid-state reaction of the individual metal oxides. This component is responsible for detaching the sulfur atom from the sulfur compounds. The activity booster component of the adsorbent is a bimetallic alloy generated in situ from mixed metal oxides.
  • The present disclosure also provides a process for regeneration of adsorbent comprises the steps of controlled oxidation of the adsorbed carbon and sulfur with lean air at a temperature ranging between 350°C and 500°C, and activation with hydrogen wherein the process is carried out in situ.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS
  • The present invention will be further explained with the help of the drawings accompanying this specification, in which -
    • Fig. 1 shows a flow diagram of hydroprocessing micro reactor unit (MRU);
    • Fig. 2 shows GC-SCD chromatograms of 350 and 10ppm sulfur-product diesel;
    • Fig. 3 depicts the integrated process scheme for deep desulfurization of high sulfur diesel feedstock and
    • Fig. 4 gives a schematic representation of the adsorption procedure.
  • The invention will be further defined by the examples given hereafter by way of illustration and not by way of limitation.
  • Examples: Comparative example 1
  • Diesel stream containing 1.53 wt% sulfur was hydrodesulfurized using commercial DHDS and DHDT catalyst system in a hydroprocessing micro-reactor unit (MRU). The process flow diagram of MRU is shown in Figure-1. The severity of operating parameters was chosen to get 10-30 ppm sulfur product. The details of feed/ product properties and operating conditions are given in Table-I: Table-1: Details of feed/product properties and operating conditions
    1. Operating Conditions DHDT DHDS
    LHSV, h-1 0.6 0.6
    Temperature, °C 370 370
    H2/HC ratio, Nm3/m3 400 400
    Pressure, bar 100 50
    2. Catalyst NiMo CoMo
    3. Feed/ product properties
    Feed DHDT Product DHDS Product
    a) Density @ 15 °C, g/cc 0.8449 0.8107 0.8265
    b) Sulfur, ppm 15300 20 30
    c) CI (D4737) 50.8 57.9 55.1
    4. H2 Consumption, wt% of feed 1.3 1.0
  • Comparative example 2
  • Diesel stream containing 1.53 wt% sulfur was hydrodesulfurized using highly active commercial DHDS and DHDT catalyst system in a hydroprocessing micro-reactor unit (MRU). The severity of operating parameters was reduced to get 350 ppm sulfur product. The details of feed/ product properties and operating conditions are given in Table-2: Table-2: Details of feed/ product properties and operating conditions (350 ppm sulfur product)
    1. Operating Conditions DHDT DHDS
    LHSV, h·1 1.0 1.0
    Temperature, °C 350 350
    H2/HC,Nm3/m-3 250 250
    Pressure, bar 50 50
    2. Catalyst NiMo CoMo
    3. Feed/ product properties
    Feed DHDT Product DHDS Product
    a) Density @ 15 °C, g/cc 0.8449 0.8279 0.8283
    b) Sulfur, ppm 15300 350 350
    c) CI (D4737) 50.8 54.5 54.2
    4. H2 Consumption, wt% of feed 0.7 0.7
  • The 350 ppm sulfur product was subsequently treated by an adsorption process to reduce total sulfur content below 10 ppm. The detailed GC-SCD analysis of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur product diesel is given below in Table-3. The GC-SCD Chromatograms of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur product diesel is given below in Figure-2 of the drawings. Table-3: GC-SCD of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur Product Diesel
    S. No. 'S' Compound RT Total 'S' in ppm
    Minutes 350 ppm 'S' Product <10 ppm 'S Product
    1 C6BT-4 38.73 4
    2 C7BT-1 41.15 5
    3 4-MDBT 41.68 27
    4 MDBT-1 42.19 5
    5 MDBT-2 42.55 6
    6 C7BT-2 42.85 8
    7 C2DBT-1 44.13 8
    8 4,6-DMDBT 44.44 35 2.0
    9 C2DBT-2 44.99 32
    10 C2DBT-3 45.66 24
    11 C2DBT-4 46.05 17
    12 C2DBT-5 46.44 3
    13 C2DBT-6 46.67 17 0.7
    14 C3DBT-1 47.37 24
    15 C3DBT-2 47.90 12
    16 C3DBT-3 48.27 16 0.6
    17 C3DBT-4 48.67 26 0.3
    18 C3DBT-5 49.08 7
    19 C3DBT-6 49.26 3
    20 C3DBT-7 49.52 9
    21 C4DBT-1 49.78 7
    22 C4DBT-2 50.27 11
    23 C4DBT-3 50.67 IO 0.4
    24 C4DBT-4 51.20 16
    25 C4DBT-5 51.90 3
    26 C4DBT 52.17 9
    27 C5DBT-J 52.52 5
    28 C5DBT-2 52.83 3
    Total 350 4
  • It may be observed from GC-SCD of 350 ppm residual sulfur containing diesel, the most of the sulfur compound exist in the boiling above 300°C.
  • Example-3
  • Since most of the sulfur compounds exist in the boiling range above 300°C in 350-500 ppm hydrodesulfurized diesel (example-2), the 350 ppm sulfur product diesel from DHDS or DHDT was split into two cuts viz. IBP to 280°C and FBP to 280°C. The 280°C IBP cut contains less than 10 ppm sulfur. The 280°C-FBP cut containing 530 ppm of refractory sulfur was desulfurized using an adsorption process to reduce sulfur below 10 ppm. The details of various cuts and final product diesel are given below in Table-4. Table-4: Details of various cuts and final product diesel
    Property IBP-280 °C 280°C -FBP (390°C) 280°C -FBP treated by Adsorption process Final Product Diesel
    Wt fraction 0.35 0.65 0.65 1.00
    S,ppm 8 530 6 7
    Density, g/cc 0.83 0.8450 0.8450 0.8397
  • The integrated process scheme for deep desulfurization of high sulfur diesel feed stocks is given in Figure-3.
  • In this process scheme shown in Fig. 3 of the drawings, the liquid product from the separator of DHDS/DHDT is sent to splitter where wild naphtha [150 (-)°C cut] is separated from top of the column, 150-280°C cut from the middle and 280(+)°C cut from bottom is separated. Bottom or bottom along with middle cut is further deep desulfurized using novel adsorption process to reduce total sulfur content below 10 ppm. The Adsorption process scheme is given in Figure-4 of the drawings.
  • In the Adsorption process cetane number of the product is not improved. However, since cetane number specification is same for Euro-III and Euro-IV diesel, the process is particularly suitable as a finishing step for further treatment of Euro-III diesel after DHDS/DHDT.
  • The existing DHDT unit can be operated at lesser severity, just sufficient to meet the cetane requirement, and further sulfur reduction can be achieved by employing the adsorption process. This will result in substantial saving of precious hydrogen. From the data (Table-5), it can be observed that by combining the adsorption process with DHDS or DHDT units saves about 20 to 40% hydrogen consumption respectively. Table-5: Saving of hydrogen by integration of Adsorption process with DHDS or DHDT unit
    S. No. Activity Hydrogen Consumption wt% of feed
    1 From 1.53 % sulfur feed to 30 ppm sulfur product by DHDS (CoMo) 1.0
    From 1.53% sulfur feed to 350 ppm sulfur product by DHDS (CoMo) 0.70
    From 350 ppm sulfur product to <10 ppm sulfur product by Adsorption process 0.1
    Saving of hydrogen as per present invention DHDS vs. DHDS+ Adsorption process 0.20
    2. From 1.53 % sulfur feed to 20 ppm sulfur product by DHDT (NiMo) 1.30
    From 1.53 % sulfur feed to 350 ppm sulfur product by DHDT (NiMo) 0.70
    From 350 sulfur product to <IO sulfur product by Adsorption process 0.10
    Saving of hydrogen as per present invention DHDT vs. DHDT+ Adsorption process 0.50
  • ADVANTAGES OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
    1. i. The invention offers an integrated process comprising DHDS or DHDT operating with reduced severity followed by an reactive adsorption process.
    2. ii. The deep desulfurization procedure involving high sulfur-containing diesel stream effectively brings down the sulfur content to less than 10 ppm.
    3. iii. The invented process reduces hydrogen consumption by 20 -40% as compared to only DHD S orDHDTprocedure with high severity.
    4. iv. The subject invention effectively reduces severity of DHDS or DHDT procedure and brings down sulfur content to 350 level, with a further reduction to less than 10 ppm by employing the reactive adsorption procedure.

Claims (1)

  1. A process for desulfurization of diesel comprising the steps of:
    - hydrotreating a diesel stream containing 1.0 - 2.0% by wt. of Sulfur over a NiMo or a CoMo catalyst to reduce sulfur-content to a level of 350 ppm,
    - splitting the hydrotreated diesel containing about 350 ppm of refractory sulfur into two cuts:
    (i) first cut with an initial boiling point (IBP) of 140-150°C to 280-300 °C containing less than 10 ppm sulfur;
    (ii) second cut with 280-300°C to final boiling point (FBP) containing about 500-600 ppm of refractory sulfur; and
    - subjecting the treated second cut to an adsorption procedure to bring down sulfur content to less than 10 ppm;
    wherein the adsorption procedure comprises the steps of:
    - operating two fixed bed reactors in swing mode of adsorption and regeneration, and
    - contacting the second cut with an adsorbent along with hydrogen in down or up-flow mode at a temperature of 350 - 400°C, pressure of 15-30 bar, hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratio of 100
    - 400 Nm3/m3, and liquid hourly space velocity of 0.5 - 2.0 h-1;
    wherein the sulfur compounds are chemically adsorbed on the adsorbent followed by cleavage of sulfur from the sulfur compound and hydrocarbon molecules of the sulfur compound are released back into the hydrocarbon stream;
    wherein the adsorbent is regenerated by oxidation of the adsorbed carbon and sulfur with air at a temperature ranging between 350° and 500°C and activation with hydrogen, wherein the process is carried out in situ;
    wherein the adsorbent is comprised of a base component, a reactive component, and booster; where the base component of adsorbent is a porous material which include alumina, clay, magnesia, titania or a mixture of two or more said materials; the reactive component of the adsorbent is a spinel oxide; and the activity booster component of the adsorbent is a bimetallic alloy generated in situ from mixed metal oxides.
EP11807796.5A 2010-11-19 2011-11-16 A process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption Active EP2640811B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IN1309KO2010 2010-11-19
PCT/IN2011/000795 WO2012066574A2 (en) 2010-11-19 2011-11-16 A process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2640811A2 EP2640811A2 (en) 2013-09-25
EP2640811B1 true EP2640811B1 (en) 2021-07-14

Family

ID=45470634

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11807796.5A Active EP2640811B1 (en) 2010-11-19 2011-11-16 A process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20130270155A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2640811B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2012066574A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111871339A (en) * 2020-07-16 2020-11-03 南京延长反应技术研究院有限公司 Diesel hydrogenation reaction system and method
SA121430164B1 (en) * 2020-09-21 2024-01-18 انديان اويل كوربوريشن ليمتد A Process and a System for Production of Multiple Grade De-Aromatized Solvents from Hydroc

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1057879A3 (en) 1999-06-02 2001-07-04 Haldor Topsoe A/S A combined process for improved hydrotreating of diesel fuels
US20030070965A1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2003-04-17 Shih Stuart S. Method for the production of very low sulfur diesel
FR2847587B1 (en) * 2002-11-25 2006-03-17 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR THE DESULFURATION, DEAZATION AND / OR DEAROMATION OF A HYDROCARBONATED LOAD ON A COMPLEXING ADSORBENT BASED ON PI ELECTRONS ACCEPTORS
FR2878252B1 (en) * 2004-11-23 2008-08-22 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR DESULFURIZING A HYDROCARBON CUT IN A SIMPLE MOBILE BED
JP4987485B2 (en) 2004-12-28 2012-07-25 Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 Method for producing ultra-low sulfur gas oil base or ultra-low sulfur gas oil composition and ultra-low sulfur gas oil composition
FR2882562B1 (en) * 2005-02-25 2010-05-14 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR DEPTH DEDIFURING BY ADSORPTION OF A HYDROCARBON CUT OF GAS TYPE
US8222180B2 (en) * 2005-08-01 2012-07-17 Indian Oil Corporation Limited Adsorbent composition for removal of refractory sulphur compounds from refinery streams and process thereof
FR2913235B1 (en) 2007-03-02 2011-02-25 Inst Francais Du Petrole IMPROVED METHOD FOR DESULFURIZING AND DEAZATING A GASOLINE TYPE HYDROCARBON CUT CONTAINING NITROGEN COMPOUNDS
US20100155302A1 (en) * 2008-12-18 2010-06-24 Kaminsky Mark P Purification of ultralow sulfur diesel fuel

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2012066574A3 (en) 2012-09-27
WO2012066574A2 (en) 2012-05-24
US20130270155A1 (en) 2013-10-17
EP2640811A2 (en) 2013-09-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8366913B2 (en) Process to produce low sulfur catalytically cracked gasoline without saturation of olefinic compounds
EP1174485B1 (en) Process comprising two gasoline hydrodesulphurisation steps with intermediary elimination of H2S
KR100694775B1 (en) Process for the production of gasolines with low sulfur contents
CN101094908B (en) Oxidative desulfurization method
JP4786102B2 (en) Two-stage advanced naphtha desulfurization with reduced formation of mercaptans
US9260672B2 (en) Process for deep desulfurization of cracked gasoline with minimum octane loss
CN101313053B (en) Selective naphtha hydrodesulfurization with high temperature mercaptan decomposition
CN1253993A (en) Production method of low-sulfur gasoline
KR20070104843A (en) Process for desulphurizing olefinic gasolines, comprising at least two distinct hydrodesulphurization steps
JP4423037B2 (en) Multistage hydrodesulfurization of cracked naphtha streams with interstage fractionation
KR20140147737A (en) Process for producing a gasoline with a low sulphur and mercaptans content
JP4724301B2 (en) Improved catalyst activation method for selective hydrodesulfurization of cat naphtha
JP2008525586A (en) Selective hydrodesulfurization and mercaptan cracking processes, including interstage separation
MXPA00001801A (en) Process for the production of low sulphur gasolines.
CA2488239C (en) Process to remove sulfur contaminants from hydrocarbon streams
CN105733672A (en) Combined production method of ultra-low sulfur gasoline
US11254880B2 (en) Desulfurization and sulfur tolerant hydrogenation processes of hydrocarbon feedstocks
EP2640811B1 (en) A process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption
JP5219247B2 (en) Method for producing low sulfur cracking gasoline base and unleaded gasoline composition
KR101009469B1 (en) Hydrogenation Method for Removing Mercaptan from Gasoline
KR101218929B1 (en) Process for the hydrotreatment of an olefinic gasoline comprising a selective hydrogenation stage
CN109575992B (en) Clean production method of low-sulfur gasoline
Ali Naphtha hydrotreatment
CN102041085A (en) Method for removing sulfur and reducing olefins to low-grade gasoline

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130619

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20181017

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210319

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: KUMAR, SARVESH

Inventor name: SHARMA, ALOK

Inventor name: KUMAR, BRIJESH

Inventor name: RAJAGOPAL, SANTANAM

Inventor name: MALHOTRA, RAVINDER KUMAR

Inventor name: KUMAR, ANAND

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011071376

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1410661

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1410661

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211014

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211115

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211014

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011071376

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602011071376

Country of ref document: DE

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220419

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20211116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211116

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20211130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211116

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211116

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20111116

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20241128

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20241127

Year of fee payment: 14

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210714