EP2640811B1 - A process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption - Google Patents
A process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2640811B1 EP2640811B1 EP11807796.5A EP11807796A EP2640811B1 EP 2640811 B1 EP2640811 B1 EP 2640811B1 EP 11807796 A EP11807796 A EP 11807796A EP 2640811 B1 EP2640811 B1 EP 2640811B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sulfur
- ppm
- adsorbent
- diesel
- cut
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G67/00—Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only
- C10G67/02—Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only
- C10G67/06—Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only including a sorption process as the refining step in the absence of hydrogen
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G25/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with solid sorbents
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/10—Feedstock materials
- C10G2300/1037—Hydrocarbon fractions
- C10G2300/1048—Middle distillates
- C10G2300/1055—Diesel having a boiling range of about 230 - 330 °C
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/20—Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
- C10G2300/201—Impurities
- C10G2300/202—Heteroatoms content, i.e. S, N, O, P
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/40—Characteristics of the process deviating from typical ways of processing
- C10G2300/4018—Spatial velocity, e.g. LHSV, WHSV
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2400/00—Products obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00 - C10G69/14
- C10G2400/04—Diesel oil
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to desulfurization of diesel and in particular to a novel process for deep desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption. More particularly the present disclosure pertains to an integrated process comprising diesel hydro de-sulfurisation (DHDS) or diesel hydrotreatrnent (DHDT) with reduced severity, to desulfurize high sulfur-containing (1 -2%) diesel stream to a much lower level of sulfur content of 350 ppm in the treated diesel stream, followed by an adsorption procedure for effecting deep desulfurization to reduce overall sulfur content to less than 10 ppm with reduced hydrogen consumption, as compared to high severity DHDS or DHDT procedures followed in the prior art.
- DHDS diesel hydro de-sulfurisation
- DHDT diesel hydrotreatrnent
- the residual sulfur below 500 ppm in diesel is mostly refractory sulfur. Removal of the refractory sulfur of the diesel through conventional hydrotreating requires severe operating conditions like higher pressure, lower 'Liquid Hourly Space Velocity (LHSV)', higher consumption of hydrogen, and use of highly active and expensive catalyst systems.
- LHSV Liquid Hourly Space Velocity
- the present invention provides a novel process to utilize a reactive adsorbent for reducing refractory sulfur present in diesel from 350 to less than 10 ppm.
- the process developed in the present invention can be utilized in the downstream of existing DHDS/DHDT units.
- the hydrogen consumption is significantly low, since it is consumed only for saturation of olefinic bond generated by cleavage of the sulfur from the sulfur compounds.
- the combination will result in reduced hydrogen consumption at refineries.
- the DHDS procedure employs catalytic hydrogenation to upgrade the quality of diesel so as to conform to the environmental norms by mainly removing sulfur and nitrogen. In addition, this procedure brings about saturation of olefins and aromatic compounds.
- Catalysts are formulated by combining varying amounts of nickel or cobalt with molybdenum oxides on an aluminium base. Important operating parameters of this procedure are, inter alia, temperature, pressure, nature of catalyst, feed flow rate, feed characteristics, etc.
- the catalysts used therein are meant for carrying out reaction under less severe/drastic condition and at a faster rate.
- US publication US20070261994A1 discloses a method for producing a super-low sulfur gas oil blending component or a super-low sulfur gas oil composition having a sulfur content of less than 5 ppm, under relatively mild conditions, without greatly increasing the hydrogen consumption and without remarkably decreasing the aromatic content.
- the hydrogen consumption reduction is not clearly specified.
- the composition of the catalyst used is different.
- the present invention uses a process of splitting the treated diesel between two fractions, which is not present in this US publication.
- US patent 6,551,501B1 discloses a combined process for improved hydrotreating of diesel fuels, in which the feed to be hydrotreated is pretreated with a selective adsorbent prior to the hydrotreating step to remove polar materials, especially nitrogen containing compounds (N-compounds).
- both the hydrotreatrnent and adsorption process are used to reduce the sulfur content in the fuel; however, the reduction of sulfur content in two publications is different.
- the splitting of hydrocarbon and reduction of hydrogen consumption is not mentioned.
- PCT application WO2008122706A2 discloses an improved method for deep desulphurisation of a gasoil comprising a catalytic hyrodesulphurisation unit preceded by an absorption unit for nitrogen compounds inhibiting the hydrodesulphurisation reaction.
- the present invention uses either DHDT or DHD S process followed by adsorption process for sulfur removal.
- the type of catalyst, reduction of hydrogen consumption and reduction of severity are not mentioned in the PCT publication.
- WO 2004/050800 concerns a method for desulphuration, denitrogenation and/or dearomatization of a hydrocarbon feed containing sulphur compounds of the benzoand/or dibenzothiophene type, nitrogen compounds of indole and/or carbazole type and polyaromatic compounds, comprising a step which consists in adsorbing the feed in an adsorption column containing an adsorbent including a n electron acceptor based complexing agent; recovering a desulphurized, denitrogenated and/or dearomatizedand adsorption effluent and stopping the adsorption of the feed on the column.
- the invention is applicable to final desulphuration of a diesel fuel.
- US 2006/0131 217 describes a process for desulphurizing a gas oil type hydrocarbon cut by adsorption to obtain a desulphurized effluent containing less than 10 ppm by weight in a yield of more than 95% by weight.
- Said process comprises a step for simulated moving bed adsorption of sulphurcontaining compounds in the feed, a raffinate distillation step and an extract distillation step.
- the present invention is defined in claim 1.
- the present invention provides splitting of treated diesel containing about 350 ppm of refractory sulfur into two cuts viz Initial boiling point (IBP) 140-150°C - 280/300°C and 280/300°C to Final boiling point (FBP).
- the 280/300°C-IBP cut contains preferably less than 10 ppm sulfur which can be blended into diesel stream without any further treatment and the 280/300°C-FBP cut containing about 500-600 ppm of refractory sulfur can be desulfurized using novel adsorption process capable of bringing down sulfur content of diesel to less than 10 ppm.
- the process in accordance with this invention can be utilized in the downstream of existing DHDS/DHDT units.
- the present invention shows consumption of hydrogen is significantly low as compared to the prior art, because hydrogen is consumed only for bringing about saturation of olefinic bonds generated by cleavage of sulfur from the sulfur-containing compounds.
- the present invention discloses a novel process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption, which comprises hydrotreating high sulfur-containing diesel stream (1.0 -2.0% by wt. of S) over a NiMo catalyst to reduce sulfur-contentto a level of 350 ppm, followed by subjecting the treated diesel stream to an adsorption procedure to bring down sulfur content to less than 10 ppm.
- high sulfur diesel stream containing about 1.0-2.0 wt% sulfur can be hydrodesulfurized to a level of 350 ppm sulfur product utilizing conventional DHDS or DHDT process with subsequent processing by an adsorption process to reduce sulfur content below 10 ppm.
- treated diesel containing about 350 ppm of refractory sulfur is split into two cuts viz. IBP(140-150°C) -280/300°C and 280/300°C to FBP.
- the 280/300°C-IBP cut contains less than 10 ppm sulfur. This cut can be blended into diesel stream without any further treatment.
- the 280/300°C-FBP cut containing about 500-600 ppm of refractory sulfur canbe desulfurized using an adsorption process.
- the adsorption process comprises two numbers of fixed bed reactors, which are being operated in swing mode of adsorption and regeneration.
- 280/300°C-FBP cut along with hydrogen is contacted with the adsorbent in down or up flow mode at 350 - 400°C, 15 - 30 bar, hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratio of 100 - 400 Nm 3 /m 3 , liquid hourly space velocity of0.5 -2.0 h- 1 depending on the sulfur contents of feed.
- the sulfur compounds are chemically adsorbed on the adsorbent followed by cleavage of the sulfur atom form the sulfur compound.
- the hydrocarbon molecule of the sulfur compound is released back into the hydrocarbon stream.
- the presence of hydrogen during the adsorption also prevents deactivation of adsorbent due to coking.
- the treated diesel contains less than 10 ppm sulfur which can be blended with other cut to produce diesel pool containing less than 10 ppm sulfur. After reaching the breakthrough point, the adsorbent is regenerated at 350 - 500°C.
- Regeneration of adsorbent is accomplished in situ by controlled oxidation of the adsorbed carbon and sulfur with lean air followed by activation with hydrogen.
- the cycle time will vary from 4 to 10 days depending on feed sulfur and boiling range.
- the adsorbent has higher strength and thermal stability compared to hydrotreating catalyst.
- the regenerability studies for the adsorbent has been conducted in pilot plant for 6 months (25 cycles) and there was no loss of activity and physical properties, hence the life of the adsorbent is expected to be similar to that of hydrotreating catalyst systems.
- Adsorbent The adsorbent used in the process is disclosed in prior art ( US 2007/0023325 ) which is comprised of a base component, a reactive component, and booster.
- the base component of adsorbent is a porous material, which provides extrudibility and strength. Such materials include alumina, clay, magnesia, titania or a mixture of two or more such materials.
- the reactive component of the adsorbent is a spinel oxide and prepared through solid-state reaction of the individual metal oxides. This component is responsible for detaching the sulfur atom from the sulfur compounds.
- the activity booster component of the adsorbent is a bimetallic alloy generated in situ from mixed metal oxides.
- the present disclosure also provides a process for regeneration of adsorbent comprises the steps of controlled oxidation of the adsorbed carbon and sulfur with lean air at a temperature ranging between 350°C and 500°C, and activation with hydrogen wherein the process is carried out in situ.
- Diesel stream containing 1.53 wt% sulfur was hydrodesulfurized using commercial DHDS and DHDT catalyst system in a hydroprocessing micro-reactor unit (MRU).
- MRU hydroprocessing micro-reactor unit
- Table-1 Details of feed/product properties and operating conditions 1.
- Feed/ product properties Feed DHDT Product DHDS Product a) Density @ 15 °C, g/cc 0.8449 0.8107 0.8265 b) Sulfur, ppm 15300 20 30 c) CI (D4737) 50.8 57.9 55.1 4. H2 Consumption, wt% of feed 1.3 1.0
- Diesel stream containing 1.53 wt% sulfur was hydrodesulfurized using highly active commercial DHDS and DHDT catalyst system in a hydroprocessing micro-reactor unit (MRU). The severity of operating parameters was reduced to get 350 ppm sulfur product.
- Table-2 Details of feed/ product properties and operating conditions (350 ppm sulfur product) 1.
- Feed/ product properties Feed DHDT Product DHDS Product a) Density @ 15 °C, g/cc 0.8449 0.8279 0.8283 b) Sulfur, ppm 15300 350 350 c) CI (D4737) 50.8 54.5 54.2 4. H2 Consumption, wt% of feed 0.7 0.7
- the 350 ppm sulfur product was subsequently treated by an adsorption process to reduce total sulfur content below 10 ppm.
- the detailed GC-SCD analysis of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur product diesel is given below in Table-3.
- the GC-SCD Chromatograms of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur product diesel is given below in Figure-2 of the drawings.
- Table-3 GC-SCD of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur Product Diesel S. No.
- the 350 ppm sulfur product diesel from DHDS or DHDT was split into two cuts viz. IBP to 280°C and FBP to 280°C.
- the 280°C IBP cut contains less than 10 ppm sulfur.
- the 280°C-FBP cut containing 530 ppm of refractory sulfur was desulfurized using an adsorption process to reduce sulfur below 10 ppm. The details of various cuts and final product diesel are given below in Table-4.
- Table-4 Details of various cuts and final product diesel Property IBP-280 °C 280°C -FBP (390°C) 280°C -FBP treated by Adsorption process Final Product Diesel Wt fraction 0.35 0.65 0.65 1.00 S,ppm 8 530 6 7 Density, g/cc 0.83 0.8450 0.8450 0.8397
- the liquid product from the separator of DHDS/DHDT is sent to splitter where wild naphtha [150 (-)°C cut] is separated from top of the column, 150-280°C cut from the middle and 280(+)°C cut from bottom is separated. Bottom or bottom along with middle cut is further deep desulfurized using novel adsorption process to reduce total sulfur content below 10 ppm.
- the Adsorption process scheme is given in Figure-4 of the drawings.
- cetane number of the product is not improved.
- cetane number specification is same for Euro-III and Euro-IV diesel, the process is particularly suitable as a finishing step for further treatment of Euro-III diesel after DHDS/DHDT.
- the existing DHDT unit can be operated at lesser severity, just sufficient to meet the cetane requirement, and further sulfur reduction can be achieved by employing the adsorption process. This will result in substantial saving of precious hydrogen. From the data (Table-5), it can be observed that by combining the adsorption process with DHDS or DHDT units saves about 20 to 40% hydrogen consumption respectively. Table-5: Saving of hydrogen by integration of Adsorption process with DHDS or DHDT unit S. No.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
Description
- The present disclosure relates to desulfurization of diesel and in particular to a novel process for deep desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption. More particularly the present disclosure pertains to an integrated process comprising diesel hydro de-sulfurisation (DHDS) or diesel hydrotreatrnent (DHDT) with reduced severity, to desulfurize high sulfur-containing (1-2%) diesel stream to a much lower level of sulfur content of 350 ppm in the treated diesel stream, followed by an adsorption procedure for effecting deep desulfurization to reduce overall sulfur content to less than 10 ppm with reduced hydrogen consumption, as compared to high severity DHDS or DHDT procedures followed in the prior art.
- With increasing concern for environmental pollution, regulatory norms are becoming increasingly stricter, forcing refiners to search for novel and economically viable routes to produce cleaner, eco-friendly fuels. The refining procedures adopted so far invariably use severe/drastic operating conditions involving high degree of hydrogen consumption and expensive catalyst systems.
- The residual sulfur below 500 ppm in diesel is mostly refractory sulfur. Removal of the refractory sulfur of the diesel through conventional hydrotreating requires severe operating conditions like higher pressure, lower 'Liquid Hourly Space Velocity (LHSV)', higher consumption of hydrogen, and use of highly active and expensive catalyst systems.
- The present invention provides a novel process to utilize a reactive adsorbent for reducing refractory sulfur present in diesel from 350 to less than 10 ppm. The process developed in the present invention can be utilized in the downstream of existing DHDS/DHDT units. In the process, the hydrogen consumption is significantly low, since it is consumed only for saturation of olefinic bond generated by cleavage of the sulfur from the sulfur compounds. The combination will result in reduced hydrogen consumption at refineries.
- The DHDS procedure employs catalytic hydrogenation to upgrade the quality of diesel so as to conform to the environmental norms by mainly removing sulfur and nitrogen. In addition, this procedure brings about saturation of olefins and aromatic compounds. Catalysts are formulated by combining varying amounts of nickel or cobalt with molybdenum oxides on an aluminium base. Important operating parameters of this procedure are, inter alia, temperature, pressure, nature of catalyst, feed flow rate, feed characteristics, etc. The catalysts used therein are meant for carrying out reaction under less severe/drastic condition and at a faster rate.
- Removal of sulfur according to DHDS: Diesel contains sulfur compounds such as mercaptans, sulphides, and/or disulphides which are removed as H2S, as shown below:-
Mercaptan → C-C-C-C-SH+H2=C-C-C-C-H+H2S
Sulphide → C-C-S-C-C+2H2=2C-C-H+H2S
Disulphide → C-C-S-S-C-C+3H2=2C-C-H+2H2S
- US publication
US20070261994A1 discloses a method for producing a super-low sulfur gas oil blending component or a super-low sulfur gas oil composition having a sulfur content of less than 5 ppm, under relatively mild conditions, without greatly increasing the hydrogen consumption and without remarkably decreasing the aromatic content. However unlike the present invention, the hydrogen consumption reduction is not clearly specified. Moreover the composition of the catalyst used is different. The present invention uses a process of splitting the treated diesel between two fractions, which is not present in this US publication. -
US patent 6,551,501B1 discloses a combined process for improved hydrotreating of diesel fuels, in which the feed to be hydrotreated is pretreated with a selective adsorbent prior to the hydrotreating step to remove polar materials, especially nitrogen containing compounds (N-compounds). In the present invention both the hydrotreatrnent and adsorption process are used to reduce the sulfur content in the fuel; however, the reduction of sulfur content in two publications is different. In the US publication the splitting of hydrocarbon and reduction of hydrogen consumption is not mentioned. -
PCT application WO2008122706A2 discloses an improved method for deep desulphurisation of a gasoil comprising a catalytic hyrodesulphurisation unit preceded by an absorption unit for nitrogen compounds inhibiting the hydrodesulphurisation reaction. However, the present invention uses either DHDT or DHD S process followed by adsorption process for sulfur removal. The type of catalyst, reduction of hydrogen consumption and reduction of severity are not mentioned in the PCT publication. - US publication
US2007023325 A1 , by the applicant of the present invention has been mentioned separately in the following description. It discloses the adsorbent that has been used in the present invention too. - Hence there is a need to provide such a desulfurization process that the sulfur content of the diesel can be brought down to less than 10 ppm, while ensuring minimum consumption of hydrogen. This invention therefore aims at overcoming the difficulties or drawbacks of the procedures adopted in the prior art for desulfurization of diesel.
US 2006/0191821 describes a process for deep desulfurization of a gas oil-type hydrocarbon fraction by adsorption in the presence of hydrogen on a solid that contains zinc oxide and a promoter in oxide form. Said adsorbent solid is regenerated by a controlled combustion with dilute air.
WO 2004/050800 concerns a method for desulphuration, denitrogenation and/or dearomatization of a hydrocarbon feed containing sulphur compounds of the benzoand/or dibenzothiophene type, nitrogen compounds of indole and/or carbazole type and polyaromatic compounds, comprising a step which consists in adsorbing the feed in an adsorption column containing an adsorbent including a n electron acceptor based complexing agent; recovering a desulphurized, denitrogenated and/or dearomatizedand adsorption effluent and stopping the adsorption of the feed on the column. The invention is applicable to final desulphuration of a diesel fuel.
US 2006/0131 217 describes a process for desulphurizing a gas oil type hydrocarbon cut by adsorption to obtain a desulphurized effluent containing less than 10 ppm by weight in a yield of more than 95% by weight. Said process comprises a step for simulated moving bed adsorption of sulphurcontaining compounds in the feed, a raffinate distillation step and an extract distillation step. - The present invention is defined in
claim 1. - The present invention provides splitting of treated diesel containing about 350 ppm of refractory sulfur into two cuts viz Initial boiling point (IBP) 140-150°C - 280/300°C and 280/300°C to Final boiling point (FBP). The 280/300°C-IBP cut contains preferably less than 10 ppm sulfur which can be blended into diesel stream without any further treatment and the 280/300°C-FBP cut containing about 500-600 ppm of refractory sulfur can be desulfurized using novel adsorption process capable of bringing down sulfur content of diesel to less than 10 ppm.
- Accordingly, the process in accordance with this invention can be utilized in the downstream of existing DHDS/DHDT units. The present invention shows consumption of hydrogen is significantly low as compared to the prior art, because hydrogen is consumed only for bringing about saturation of olefinic bonds generated by cleavage of sulfur from the sulfur-containing compounds.
- The present invention discloses a novel process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption, which comprises hydrotreating high sulfur-containing diesel stream (1.0 -2.0% by wt. of S) over a NiMo catalyst to reduce sulfur-contentto a level of 350 ppm, followed by subjecting the treated diesel stream to an adsorption procedure to bring down sulfur content to less than 10 ppm.
- In this integrated process, high sulfur diesel stream containing about 1.0-2.0 wt% sulfur can be hydrodesulfurized to a level of 350 ppm sulfur product utilizing conventional DHDS or DHDT process with subsequent processing by an adsorption process to reduce sulfur content below 10 ppm.
- In one embodiment treated diesel containing about 350 ppm of refractory sulfur is split into two cuts viz. IBP(140-150°C) -280/300°C and 280/300°C to FBP. The 280/300°C-IBP cut contains less than 10 ppm sulfur. This cut can be blended into diesel stream without any further treatment. The 280/300°C-FBP cut containing about 500-600 ppm of refractory sulfur canbe desulfurized using an adsorption process.
- The adsorption process comprises two numbers of fixed bed reactors, which are being operated in swing mode of adsorption and regeneration. During the adsorption process, 280/300°C-FBP cut along with hydrogen is contacted with the adsorbent in down or up flow mode at 350 - 400°C, 15 - 30 bar, hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratio of 100 - 400 Nm3/m3, liquid hourly space velocity of0.5 -2.0 h-1 depending on the sulfur contents of feed. During the adsorption process, the sulfur compounds are chemically adsorbed on the adsorbent followed by cleavage of the sulfur atom form the sulfur compound. The hydrocarbon molecule of the sulfur compound is released back into the hydrocarbon stream. The presence of hydrogen during the adsorption also prevents deactivation of adsorbent due to coking. The treated diesel contains less than 10 ppm sulfur which can be blended with other cut to produce diesel pool containing less than 10 ppm sulfur. After reaching the breakthrough point, the adsorbent is regenerated at 350 - 500°C.
- Regeneration of adsorbent is accomplished in situ by controlled oxidation of the adsorbed carbon and sulfur with lean air followed by activation with hydrogen. The cycle time will vary from 4 to 10 days depending on feed sulfur and boiling range. The adsorbent has higher strength and thermal stability compared to hydrotreating catalyst. The regenerability studies for the adsorbent has been conducted in pilot plant for 6 months (25 cycles) and there was no loss of activity and physical properties, hence the life of the adsorbent is expected to be similar to that of hydrotreating catalyst systems.
- Adsorbent: The adsorbent used in the process is disclosed in prior art (
US 2007/0023325 ) which is comprised of a base component, a reactive component, and booster. The base component of adsorbent is a porous material, which provides extrudibility and strength. Such materials include alumina, clay, magnesia, titania or a mixture of two or more such materials. The reactive component of the adsorbent is a spinel oxide and prepared through solid-state reaction of the individual metal oxides. This component is responsible for detaching the sulfur atom from the sulfur compounds. The activity booster component of the adsorbent is a bimetallic alloy generated in situ from mixed metal oxides. - The present disclosure also provides a process for regeneration of adsorbent comprises the steps of controlled oxidation of the adsorbed carbon and sulfur with lean air at a temperature ranging between 350°C and 500°C, and activation with hydrogen wherein the process is carried out in situ.
- The present invention will be further explained with the help of the drawings accompanying this specification, in which -
-
Fig. 1 shows a flow diagram of hydroprocessing micro reactor unit (MRU); -
Fig. 2 shows GC-SCD chromatograms of 350 and 10ppm sulfur-product diesel; -
Fig. 3 depicts the integrated process scheme for deep desulfurization of high sulfur diesel feedstock and -
Fig. 4 gives a schematic representation of the adsorption procedure. - The invention will be further defined by the examples given hereafter by way of illustration and not by way of limitation.
- Diesel stream containing 1.53 wt% sulfur was hydrodesulfurized using commercial DHDS and DHDT catalyst system in a hydroprocessing micro-reactor unit (MRU). The process flow diagram of MRU is shown in Figure-1. The severity of operating parameters was chosen to get 10-30 ppm sulfur product. The details of feed/ product properties and operating conditions are given in Table-I:
Table-1: Details of feed/product properties and operating conditions 1. Operating Conditions DHDT DHDS LHSV, h-1 0.6 0.6 Temperature, °C 370 370 H2/HC ratio, Nm3/m3 400 400 Pressure, bar 100 50 2. Catalyst NiMo CoMo 3. Feed/ product properties Feed DHDT Product DHDS Product a) Density @ 15 °C, g/cc 0.8449 0.8107 0.8265 b) Sulfur, ppm 15300 20 30 c) CI (D4737) 50.8 57.9 55.1 4. H2 Consumption, wt% of feed 1.3 1.0 - Diesel stream containing 1.53 wt% sulfur was hydrodesulfurized using highly active commercial DHDS and DHDT catalyst system in a hydroprocessing micro-reactor unit (MRU). The severity of operating parameters was reduced to get 350 ppm sulfur product. The details of feed/ product properties and operating conditions are given in Table-2:
Table-2: Details of feed/ product properties and operating conditions (350 ppm sulfur product) 1. Operating Conditions DHDT DHDS LHSV, h·1 1.0 1.0 Temperature, °C 350 350 H2/HC,Nm3/m-3 250 250 Pressure, bar 50 50 2. Catalyst NiMo CoMo 3. Feed/ product properties Feed DHDT Product DHDS Product a) Density @ 15 °C, g/cc 0.8449 0.8279 0.8283 b) Sulfur, ppm 15300 350 350 c) CI (D4737) 50.8 54.5 54.2 4. H2 Consumption, wt% of feed 0.7 0.7 - The 350 ppm sulfur product was subsequently treated by an adsorption process to reduce total sulfur content below 10 ppm. The detailed GC-SCD analysis of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur product diesel is given below in Table-3. The GC-SCD Chromatograms of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur product diesel is given below in Figure-2 of the drawings.
Table-3: GC-SCD of 350 and 10 ppm sulfur Product Diesel S. No. 'S' Compound RT Total 'S' in ppm Minutes 350 ppm 'S' Product <10 ppm ' S Product 1 C6BT-4 38.73 4 2 C7BT-1 41.15 5 3 4-MDBT 41.68 27 4 MDBT-1 42.19 5 5 MDBT-2 42.55 6 6 C7BT-2 42.85 8 7 C2DBT-1 44.13 8 8 4,6-DMDBT 44.44 35 2.0 9 C2DBT-2 44.99 32 10 C2DBT-3 45.66 24 11 C2DBT-4 46.05 17 12 C2DBT-5 46.44 3 13 C2DBT-6 46.67 17 0.7 14 C3DBT-1 47.37 24 15 C3DBT-2 47.90 12 16 C3DBT-3 48.27 16 0.6 17 C3DBT-4 48.67 26 0.3 18 C3DBT-5 49.08 7 19 C3DBT-6 49.26 3 20 C3DBT-7 49.52 9 21 C4DBT-1 49.78 7 22 C4DBT-2 50.27 11 23 C4DBT-3 50.67 IO 0.4 24 C4DBT-4 51.20 16 25 C4DBT-5 51.90 3 26 C4DBT 52.17 9 27 C5DBT-J 52.52 5 28 C5DBT-2 52.83 3 Total 350 4 - It may be observed from GC-SCD of 350 ppm residual sulfur containing diesel, the most of the sulfur compound exist in the boiling above 300°C.
- Since most of the sulfur compounds exist in the boiling range above 300°C in 350-500 ppm hydrodesulfurized diesel (example-2), the 350 ppm sulfur product diesel from DHDS or DHDT was split into two cuts viz. IBP to 280°C and FBP to 280°C. The 280°C IBP cut contains less than 10 ppm sulfur. The 280°C-FBP cut containing 530 ppm of refractory sulfur was desulfurized using an adsorption process to reduce sulfur below 10 ppm. The details of various cuts and final product diesel are given below in Table-4.
Table-4: Details of various cuts and final product diesel Property IBP-280 °C 280°C -FBP (390°C) 280°C -FBP treated by Adsorption process Final Product Diesel Wt fraction 0.35 0.65 0.65 1.00 S,ppm 8 530 6 7 Density, g/cc 0.83 0.8450 0.8450 0.8397 - The integrated process scheme for deep desulfurization of high sulfur diesel feed stocks is given in Figure-3.
- In this process scheme shown in
Fig. 3 of the drawings, the liquid product from the separator of DHDS/DHDT is sent to splitter where wild naphtha [150 (-)°C cut] is separated from top of the column, 150-280°C cut from the middle and 280(+)°C cut from bottom is separated. Bottom or bottom along with middle cut is further deep desulfurized using novel adsorption process to reduce total sulfur content below 10 ppm. The Adsorption process scheme is given in Figure-4 of the drawings. - In the Adsorption process cetane number of the product is not improved. However, since cetane number specification is same for Euro-III and Euro-IV diesel, the process is particularly suitable as a finishing step for further treatment of Euro-III diesel after DHDS/DHDT.
- The existing DHDT unit can be operated at lesser severity, just sufficient to meet the cetane requirement, and further sulfur reduction can be achieved by employing the adsorption process. This will result in substantial saving of precious hydrogen. From the data (Table-5), it can be observed that by combining the adsorption process with DHDS or DHDT units saves about 20 to 40% hydrogen consumption respectively.
Table-5: Saving of hydrogen by integration of Adsorption process with DHDS or DHDT unit S. No. Activity Hydrogen Consumption wt% of feed 1 From 1.53 % sulfur feed to 30 ppm sulfur product by DHDS (CoMo) 1.0 From 1.53% sulfur feed to 350 ppm sulfur product by DHDS (CoMo) 0.70 From 350 ppm sulfur product to <10 ppm sulfur product by Adsorption process 0.1 Saving of hydrogen as per present invention DHDS vs. DHDS+ Adsorption process 0.20 2. From 1.53 % sulfur feed to 20 ppm sulfur product by DHDT (NiMo) 1.30 From 1.53 % sulfur feed to 350 ppm sulfur product by DHDT (NiMo) 0.70 From 350 sulfur product to <IO sulfur product by Adsorption process 0.10 Saving of hydrogen as per present invention DHDT vs. DHDT+ Adsorption process 0.50 -
- i. The invention offers an integrated process comprising DHDS or DHDT operating with reduced severity followed by an reactive adsorption process.
- ii. The deep desulfurization procedure involving high sulfur-containing diesel stream effectively brings down the sulfur content to less than 10 ppm.
- iii. The invented process reduces hydrogen consumption by 20 -40% as compared to only DHD S orDHDTprocedure with high severity.
- iv. The subject invention effectively reduces severity of DHDS or DHDT procedure and brings down sulfur content to 350 level, with a further reduction to less than 10 ppm by employing the reactive adsorption procedure.
Claims (1)
- A process for desulfurization of diesel comprising the steps of:- hydrotreating a diesel stream containing 1.0 - 2.0% by wt. of Sulfur over a NiMo or a CoMo catalyst to reduce sulfur-content to a level of 350 ppm,- splitting the hydrotreated diesel containing about 350 ppm of refractory sulfur into two cuts:(i) first cut with an initial boiling point (IBP) of 140-150°C to 280-300 °C containing less than 10 ppm sulfur;(ii) second cut with 280-300°C to final boiling point (FBP) containing about 500-600 ppm of refractory sulfur; and- subjecting the treated second cut to an adsorption procedure to bring down sulfur content to less than 10 ppm;
wherein the adsorption procedure comprises the steps of:- operating two fixed bed reactors in swing mode of adsorption and regeneration, and- contacting the second cut with an adsorbent along with hydrogen in down or up-flow mode at a temperature of 350 - 400°C, pressure of 15-30 bar, hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratio of 100- 400 Nm3/m3, and liquid hourly space velocity of 0.5 - 2.0 h-1;wherein the sulfur compounds are chemically adsorbed on the adsorbent followed by cleavage of sulfur from the sulfur compound and hydrocarbon molecules of the sulfur compound are released back into the hydrocarbon stream;
wherein the adsorbent is regenerated by oxidation of the adsorbed carbon and sulfur with air at a temperature ranging between 350° and 500°C and activation with hydrogen, wherein the process is carried out in situ;
wherein the adsorbent is comprised of a base component, a reactive component, and booster; where the base component of adsorbent is a porous material which include alumina, clay, magnesia, titania or a mixture of two or more said materials; the reactive component of the adsorbent is a spinel oxide; and the activity booster component of the adsorbent is a bimetallic alloy generated in situ from mixed metal oxides.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| IN1309KO2010 | 2010-11-19 | ||
| PCT/IN2011/000795 WO2012066574A2 (en) | 2010-11-19 | 2011-11-16 | A process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP2640811A2 EP2640811A2 (en) | 2013-09-25 |
| EP2640811B1 true EP2640811B1 (en) | 2021-07-14 |
Family
ID=45470634
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP11807796.5A Active EP2640811B1 (en) | 2010-11-19 | 2011-11-16 | A process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20130270155A1 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP2640811B1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2012066574A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111871339A (en) * | 2020-07-16 | 2020-11-03 | 南京延长反应技术研究院有限公司 | Diesel hydrogenation reaction system and method |
| SA121430164B1 (en) * | 2020-09-21 | 2024-01-18 | انديان اويل كوربوريشن ليمتد | A Process and a System for Production of Multiple Grade De-Aromatized Solvents from Hydroc |
Family Cites Families (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP1057879A3 (en) | 1999-06-02 | 2001-07-04 | Haldor Topsoe A/S | A combined process for improved hydrotreating of diesel fuels |
| US20030070965A1 (en) * | 1999-11-01 | 2003-04-17 | Shih Stuart S. | Method for the production of very low sulfur diesel |
| FR2847587B1 (en) * | 2002-11-25 | 2006-03-17 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | PROCESS FOR THE DESULFURATION, DEAZATION AND / OR DEAROMATION OF A HYDROCARBONATED LOAD ON A COMPLEXING ADSORBENT BASED ON PI ELECTRONS ACCEPTORS |
| FR2878252B1 (en) * | 2004-11-23 | 2008-08-22 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | PROCESS FOR DESULFURIZING A HYDROCARBON CUT IN A SIMPLE MOBILE BED |
| JP4987485B2 (en) | 2004-12-28 | 2012-07-25 | Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 | Method for producing ultra-low sulfur gas oil base or ultra-low sulfur gas oil composition and ultra-low sulfur gas oil composition |
| FR2882562B1 (en) * | 2005-02-25 | 2010-05-14 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | PROCESS FOR DEPTH DEDIFURING BY ADSORPTION OF A HYDROCARBON CUT OF GAS TYPE |
| US8222180B2 (en) * | 2005-08-01 | 2012-07-17 | Indian Oil Corporation Limited | Adsorbent composition for removal of refractory sulphur compounds from refinery streams and process thereof |
| FR2913235B1 (en) | 2007-03-02 | 2011-02-25 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | IMPROVED METHOD FOR DESULFURIZING AND DEAZATING A GASOLINE TYPE HYDROCARBON CUT CONTAINING NITROGEN COMPOUNDS |
| US20100155302A1 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2010-06-24 | Kaminsky Mark P | Purification of ultralow sulfur diesel fuel |
-
2011
- 2011-11-16 EP EP11807796.5A patent/EP2640811B1/en active Active
- 2011-11-16 US US13/988,305 patent/US20130270155A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-11-16 WO PCT/IN2011/000795 patent/WO2012066574A2/en not_active Ceased
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| None * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2012066574A3 (en) | 2012-09-27 |
| WO2012066574A2 (en) | 2012-05-24 |
| US20130270155A1 (en) | 2013-10-17 |
| EP2640811A2 (en) | 2013-09-25 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8366913B2 (en) | Process to produce low sulfur catalytically cracked gasoline without saturation of olefinic compounds | |
| EP1174485B1 (en) | Process comprising two gasoline hydrodesulphurisation steps with intermediary elimination of H2S | |
| KR100694775B1 (en) | Process for the production of gasolines with low sulfur contents | |
| CN101094908B (en) | Oxidative desulfurization method | |
| JP4786102B2 (en) | Two-stage advanced naphtha desulfurization with reduced formation of mercaptans | |
| US9260672B2 (en) | Process for deep desulfurization of cracked gasoline with minimum octane loss | |
| CN101313053B (en) | Selective naphtha hydrodesulfurization with high temperature mercaptan decomposition | |
| CN1253993A (en) | Production method of low-sulfur gasoline | |
| KR20070104843A (en) | Process for desulphurizing olefinic gasolines, comprising at least two distinct hydrodesulphurization steps | |
| JP4423037B2 (en) | Multistage hydrodesulfurization of cracked naphtha streams with interstage fractionation | |
| KR20140147737A (en) | Process for producing a gasoline with a low sulphur and mercaptans content | |
| JP4724301B2 (en) | Improved catalyst activation method for selective hydrodesulfurization of cat naphtha | |
| JP2008525586A (en) | Selective hydrodesulfurization and mercaptan cracking processes, including interstage separation | |
| MXPA00001801A (en) | Process for the production of low sulphur gasolines. | |
| CA2488239C (en) | Process to remove sulfur contaminants from hydrocarbon streams | |
| CN105733672A (en) | Combined production method of ultra-low sulfur gasoline | |
| US11254880B2 (en) | Desulfurization and sulfur tolerant hydrogenation processes of hydrocarbon feedstocks | |
| EP2640811B1 (en) | A process for desulfurization of diesel with reduced hydrogen consumption | |
| JP5219247B2 (en) | Method for producing low sulfur cracking gasoline base and unleaded gasoline composition | |
| KR101009469B1 (en) | Hydrogenation Method for Removing Mercaptan from Gasoline | |
| KR101218929B1 (en) | Process for the hydrotreatment of an olefinic gasoline comprising a selective hydrogenation stage | |
| CN109575992B (en) | Clean production method of low-sulfur gasoline | |
| Ali | Naphtha hydrotreatment | |
| CN102041085A (en) | Method for removing sulfur and reducing olefins to low-grade gasoline |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130619 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20181017 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20210319 |
|
| RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: KUMAR, SARVESH Inventor name: SHARMA, ALOK Inventor name: KUMAR, BRIJESH Inventor name: RAJAGOPAL, SANTANAM Inventor name: MALHOTRA, RAVINDER KUMAR Inventor name: KUMAR, ANAND |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602011071376 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1410661 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210815 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1410661 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210714 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211014 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211115 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211014 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211015 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602011071376 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602011071376 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20220419 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20211116 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211116 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211130 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20211130 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211116 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211116 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220601 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20111116 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220630 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220630 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20241128 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20241127 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210714 |