EP2371665B1 - Condition monitoring - Google Patents
Condition monitoring Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2371665B1 EP2371665B1 EP11158565.9A EP11158565A EP2371665B1 EP 2371665 B1 EP2371665 B1 EP 2371665B1 EP 11158565 A EP11158565 A EP 11158565A EP 2371665 B1 EP2371665 B1 EP 2371665B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- condition monitoring
- condition
- parameter
- data
- waveform
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L23/00—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
- B61L23/04—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for monitoring the mechanical state of the route
- B61L23/042—Track changes detection
- B61L23/044—Broken rails
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
- B61L27/50—Trackside diagnosis or maintenance, e.g. software upgrades
- B61L27/53—Trackside diagnosis or maintenance, e.g. software upgrades for trackside elements or systems, e.g. trackside supervision of trackside control system conditions
Definitions
- This invention relates to a condition monitoring system for a railway network, a railway network comprising such a condition monitoring system, and a method of condition monitoring of railway equipment.
- this invention relates to arranging for local compression or consolidation in condition monitoring systems, in order to reduce the communications bandwidth required to transmit condition monitoring or measuring data to a central system.
- condition management data There is an increasing desire to gather condition management data from across the various different systems deployed within railway systems, in order to construct condition management systems, with the ultimate aim of improving reliability and availability of the railway.
- blocks 1, 1' are field locations, for example trackside locations
- block 2 is an "office" location, i.e. a centralised location, which may be remote from each field location 1, 1', and which houses complex or expensive equipment, and which may oversee operations at a number of different field locations.
- office location i.e. a centralised location
- two field locations 1 and 1' are shown in Fig. 1 , such systems may include any practical number of such field locations.
- remote equipment 3 such as a points machine, track circuit equipment, signal lamp equipment is controlled by a remote equipment controller 4, which in turn is coupled with an interlocking 5 at the office location 2.
- condition monitoring unit 6 for example a points machine current monitoring unit, coupled with the remote equipment 3 and which sends data to a condition management facility 7 at the office location 2.
- condition management facility 7 is operable to collate and process the condition monitoring data received from the condition monitoring unit 6, to assess functioning of the equipment 3 and to determine if there are any errors occurring or maintenance issues to be addressed.
- the system 7 may instigate maintenance activities on the equipment, in order to pre-empt failures.
- a problem with this system is the need for a relatively large communications bandwidth, to transmit the condition monitoring data, which as noted above may be large, from the remote field location 1 to the office location 2.
- the ideal solution consolidates the data just enough so that it can be carried by the available bandwidth. As long as relatively minor consolidation is performed, then adequate monitoring may still be achieved.
- condition monitoring system in accordance with a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a condition monitoring system according to claim 1.
- the present invention is suitable for both for retrofitting to existing installations, or for implementation in new installations.
- FIG. 2 schematically shows a condition monitoring system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As far as possible, similar components to those of Fig. 1 are denoted with similar reference numerals.
- blocks 1, 1' are field locations, for example trackside locations
- block 2 is an "office" location, i.e. a centralised location, which may be remote from each field location 1, 1', and which houses complex or expensive equipment, and which may oversee operations at a number of different field locations.
- remote equipment 3 such as a points machine, track circuit or signal lamp
- a remote equipment controller 4 which in turn is coupled with an interlocking 5 at the office location 2.
- condition monitoring unit 6 for example a points machine current monitoring unit, coupled with the remote equipment 3.
- a data consolidation unit 8 for consolidating said data, the functioning of which will be described in more detail below.
- Data consolidation unit 8 sends consolidated condition monitoring data to a condition management facility 7 at the office location 2.
- Each additional field location 1' may have similar equipment and connectivity to office location 2.
- field locations are shown as having separate, individual connections to office location 2, however it is alternatively possible to use bus communication instead, such that each field location communicates with office location 2 via a common communications bus.
- condition management algorithms at the office location 2 are adapted to process the consolidated data, and raise any necessary alarms and warnings.
- data consolidation unit 8 performs consolidation of the condition monitoring data received from condition monitoring unit 6, to produce a number of discrete values representative of the waveform, such that the original waveform could be at least partially reconstructed from those discrete values.
- Fig. 3 schematically shows a waveform representing the variation of a parameter ("A") over time (“t") during a discrete event.
- parameters may comprise the current drawn by points motors during movement of the points, or the current / voltage measured within a particular track circuit during passage by a train.
- the waveform shown is exemplary only, and generally the waveform will be dependent upon the parameter in question.
- the waveform can, for example, be characterised by the following values:
- processing means which may be located within condition monitoring unit 6, is set to identify the start and conclusion of the event by analysing the sensor data directly, e.g. by detecting a statistically significant change in the sensed value of the parameter, and correlating this to either the start or conclusion of an event.
- the event may be detected by other means, for example point movement may be correlated with sensors mounted on the points to directly determine movement, or by synchronising the event duration with the application of current to the points motors.
- condition monitoring unit 6 which analyses the incoming data, and consolidates it to produce as many representative values as required, such as those values set out above.
- the consolidated data are then transmitted to the condition management facility 7 at the office location 2. This requires less bandwidth than transmission of original, unconsolidated data. Since the data is consolidated rather than compressed, no additional equipment / functionality is required at office location 2, although the algorithms employed by office location 2 must be adapted to process the consolidated data.
- the consolidated data does not contain all the information of the original data obtained from the sensors provided at remote equipment 3, by suitable selection of the consolidation technique employed, sufficient information may be received by condition management facility 7 to enable adequate monitoring, fault detection / diagnosis and control of the remote equipment 3. Furthermore, in the case where the inventive methodology is retrofitted to an existing installation, the transmission may still be enabled over the existing communications system.
- FIG. 2 shows data consolidation unit 8 being a separate component to condition monitoring unit 6.
- consolidation means e.g. circuitry
- each data consolidation means may be retro-fitted to existing condition monitoring units 6 / 6'.
- the controlling software for condition monitoring unit 6 may be adapted to include data consolidation capabilities.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Selective Calling Equipment (AREA)
- Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
Description
- This invention relates to a condition monitoring system for a railway network, a railway network comprising such a condition monitoring system, and a method of condition monitoring of railway equipment.
- More particularly, this invention relates to arranging for local compression or consolidation in condition monitoring systems, in order to reduce the communications bandwidth required to transmit condition monitoring or measuring data to a central system.
- There is an increasing desire to gather condition management data from across the various different systems deployed within railway systems, in order to construct condition management systems, with the ultimate aim of improving reliability and availability of the railway.
- Typically, this is achieved using either extra measuring or monitoring equipment, or else building such measuring or monitoring equipment into the railway systems themselves. Whichever method is used, there are potentially large amounts of data generated. As examples which can generate large amounts of data may be mentioned:
- i) Points condition monitoring equipment, which measure current drawn by points motors during movement of the points. Typically these will require some hundreds of current values each time a point moves.
- ii) Track circuit condition monitoring equipment, which measures current and/or voltage within the track circuit, to enable the profile of shunting of track circuits by trains to be examined.
- iii) Signal lamp condition monitoring equipment, which measures inrush current as a signal lamp is turned on.
- iv) Points condition monitoring equipment, which measures air pressure used to drive pneumatically-operated points during points movement.
- A typical architecture with separate condition monitoring is shown in the accompanying drawing, in which
blocks 1, 1' are field locations, for example trackside locations, andblock 2 is an "office" location, i.e. a centralised location, which may be remote from eachfield location 1, 1', and which houses complex or expensive equipment, and which may oversee operations at a number of different field locations. Although twofield locations 1 and 1' are shown inFig. 1 , such systems may include any practical number of such field locations. In thefield location 1,remote equipment 3, such as a points machine, track circuit equipment, signal lamp equipment is controlled by aremote equipment controller 4, which in turn is coupled with an interlocking 5 at theoffice location 2. Also in thefield location 1 there is acondition monitoring unit 6, for example a points machine current monitoring unit, coupled with theremote equipment 3 and which sends data to acondition management facility 7 at theoffice location 2. Each additional field location 1' may have similar equipment and connectivity tooffice location 2. Thecondition management facility 7 is operable to collate and process the condition monitoring data received from thecondition monitoring unit 6, to assess functioning of theequipment 3 and to determine if there are any errors occurring or maintenance issues to be addressed. Depending on the type of error detected bycondition management system 7, thesystem 7 may instigate maintenance activities on the equipment, in order to pre-empt failures. - A problem with this system is the need for a relatively large communications bandwidth, to transmit the condition monitoring data, which as noted above may be large, from the
remote field location 1 to theoffice location 2. - In many instances, there may not be a readily available communications system from remote field locations to the office location, as the only current communications system is for the vital controlling of the railway equipment, and it would not be practicable or acceptable to superimpose non-vital condition monitoring data on this system.
- As prior art may be mentioned
US-A1-2006/020375 ,US-A-5743495 andUS-A1-2008/296441 , which show the pre-characterising features ofclaim 1. - It is an aim of the present invention to overcome this problem. This aim is achieved by the system of
claim 1 and the method ofclaim 8, thereby consolidating the condition monitoring or measuring data remotely, to a relatively small number of discrete values, and then transmitting these to the central office location. - This will have two effects:
- i) There will be a degradation of the condition monitoring or measuring data available in the central office location; and
- ii) There will be a reduction in the bandwidth requirements to transmit the condition monitoring or measuring data from the remote field locations to the central office location.
- The ideal solution consolidates the data just enough so that it can be carried by the available bandwidth. As long as relatively minor consolidation is performed, then adequate monitoring may still be achieved.
- In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a condition monitoring system according to
claim 1. In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a railway network according toclaim 7. In accordance with a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of condition monitoring according toclaim 8. Accordingly, the present invention enables: - a) A process or system for the consolidation of data representing a waveform to a series of discrete values which still permit the necessary condition management processing, thus permitting the gathering of data even when there is low bandwidth available, without providing an additional communications system.
- b) Application of such a process or system to the railway domain, to enable wider condition management.
- c) A system or process in which condition monitoring or measuring data from condition monitoring or measuring means at a remote location is consolidated to a number of discrete values and these are transmitted to a central location at a bandwidth less than necessary for transmitting all of said condition monitoring or measuring data.
- The present invention is suitable for both for retrofitting to existing installations, or for implementation in new installations.
- The invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures, of which:
-
Fig. 1 schematically shows a typical conditioning monitoring system; -
Fig. 2 schematically shows a condition monitoring system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and -
Fig. 3 shows a typical waveform of a measured variable. -
Fig. 2 schematically shows a condition monitoring system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As far as possible, similar components to those ofFig. 1 are denoted with similar reference numerals. - As shown, as in
Fig. 1 ,blocks 1, 1' are field locations, for example trackside locations, andblock 2 is an "office" location, i.e. a centralised location, which may be remote from eachfield location 1, 1', and which houses complex or expensive equipment, and which may oversee operations at a number of different field locations. Although twofield locations 1 and 1' are shown inFig. 2 , such systems may include any practical number of such field locations. In thefield location 1,remote equipment 3, such as a points machine, track circuit or signal lamp is controlled by aremote equipment controller 4, which in turn is coupled with an interlocking 5 at theoffice location 2. Also in thefield location 1 there is acondition monitoring unit 6, for example a points machine current monitoring unit, coupled with theremote equipment 3. Linked withcondition monitoring unit 6, and adapted to receive condition monitoring data fromcondition monitoring unit 6, is adata consolidation unit 8 for consolidating said data, the functioning of which will be described in more detail below. -
Data consolidation unit 8 sends consolidated condition monitoring data to acondition management facility 7 at theoffice location 2. Each additional field location 1' may have similar equipment and connectivity tooffice location 2. InFig. 2 , field locations are shown as having separate, individual connections tooffice location 2, however it is alternatively possible to use bus communication instead, such that each field location communicates withoffice location 2 via a common communications bus. - The condition management algorithms at the
office location 2 are adapted to process the consolidated data, and raise any necessary alarms and warnings. - As mentioned above,
data consolidation unit 8 performs consolidation of the condition monitoring data received fromcondition monitoring unit 6, to produce a number of discrete values representative of the waveform, such that the original waveform could be at least partially reconstructed from those discrete values. Various different types of consolidation are possible. For example,Fig. 3 schematically shows a waveform representing the variation of a parameter ("A") over time ("t") during a discrete event. In practice, such parameters may comprise the current drawn by points motors during movement of the points, or the current / voltage measured within a particular track circuit during passage by a train. For simplicity, the waveform shown is exemplary only, and generally the waveform will be dependent upon the parameter in question. - The waveform can, for example, be characterised by the following values:
- i) Average value of the parameter over the duration of the discrete event -
A - ii) Duration of event (t2 - t1)
- iii) Maximum value of the parameter during the event - "Apeak"
- iv) Parameter value after specific time interval(s) from the start of the event - At
- v) Average value of the parameter in specific time frame(s) (Δt) -
A Δt - It will be noted that various of these values depend upon identifying the start and / or conclusion of a discrete event. There are various ways of doing this, dependent on the type of event in question. According to the invention as claimed, processing means, which may be located within
condition monitoring unit 6, is set to identify the start and conclusion of the event by analysing the sensor data directly, e.g. by detecting a statistically significant change in the sensed value of the parameter, and correlating this to either the start or conclusion of an event. Additionally, the event may be detected by other means, for example point movement may be correlated with sensors mounted on the points to directly determine movement, or by synchronising the event duration with the application of current to the points motors. - The exact consolidation methods applied will be determined by the condition management processing required in the office location, noting that there will always be a compromise between high detail (i.e. a closer representation of the waveform) leading to a correspondingly high volume of data to be sent to
office location 2, and low detail (i.e. a "sparser" representation of the waveform) leading to a correspondingly low volume of data to be sent to theoffice location 2. - Whichever consolidation technique is used however, the basic functioning is similar - the full condition monitoring data is passed from
condition monitoring unit 6 todata consolidation unit 8, which analyses the incoming data, and consolidates it to produce as many representative values as required, such as those values set out above. - The consolidated data are then transmitted to the
condition management facility 7 at theoffice location 2. This requires less bandwidth than transmission of original, unconsolidated data. Since the data is consolidated rather than compressed, no additional equipment / functionality is required atoffice location 2, although the algorithms employed byoffice location 2 must be adapted to process the consolidated data. - Although the consolidated data does not contain all the information of the original data obtained from the sensors provided at
remote equipment 3, by suitable selection of the consolidation technique employed, sufficient information may be received bycondition management facility 7 to enable adequate monitoring, fault detection / diagnosis and control of theremote equipment 3. Furthermore, in the case where the inventive methodology is retrofitted to an existing installation, the transmission may still be enabled over the existing communications system. - The above-described embodiment is exemplary only, and various alternatives within the scope of the claims will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example,
Fig. 2 showsdata consolidation unit 8 being a separate component to conditionmonitoring unit 6. Rather than having aseparate unit 8, it is possible to include consolidation means, e.g. circuitry, withincondition monitoring unit 6 itself. In this case, each data consolidation means may be retro-fitted to existingcondition monitoring units 6 / 6'. In other embodiments, the controlling software forcondition monitoring unit 6 may be adapted to include data consolidation capabilities.
Claims (11)
- A condition monitoring system suitable for a railway network comprising:a sensor (6) for producing condition monitoring data relating to the operation of railway equipment, wherein the data describes a waveform of a parameter;consolidation means (8) for processing the data produced by the sensor to produce a consolidated data set which comprises a plurality of discrete values representative of the waveform of the parameter; andoutput means for outputting the consolidated data set, wherein the sensor (6), the consolidation means (8) and the output means are located at a trackside location (1), characterized by further comprising processing means set to identify the start and conclusion of the waveform by analyzing the condition monitoring data.
- A condition monitoring system according to claim 1, further comprising a condition management facility (7) for processing the consolidated data set, and transmission means for transmitting the output consolidated data set to the condition management facility (7).
- A condition monitoring system according to claim 2, wherein the condition management facility (7) is located at a location remote from the trackside location (1).
- A condition monitoring system according to any preceding claim, wherein the discrete values are selected from the group comprising: the average value of the parameter over the duration of a discrete event, the duration of said discrete event, the maximum value of the parameter during said discrete event, the parameter value after a specific time interval from the start of said discrete event, and the average value of the parameter during a specific time frame.
- A condition monitoring system according to any preceding claim, for monitoring the condition of railway points.
- A condition monitoring system according to any of claims 1 to 5, for monitoring railway track circuits.
- A railway network comprising the condition monitoring system of any preceding claim.
- A method of condition monitoring of railway equipment, comprising the steps of:a) producing, by a sensor (6), condition monitoring data relating to the operation of the equipment, wherein the data describes a waveform of a parameter;b) processing, by consolidation means (8), the produced condition monitoring data to produce a consolidated data set which comprises a plurality of discrete values representative of the waveform of the parameter; andc) outputting, by output means, the consolidated data set; wherein the sensor (6), the consolidation means (8) and the output means are located at a trackside location (1),
the method being characterized by further identifying the start and conclusion of the waveform by analyzing the condition monitoring data with processing means. - A method according to claim 8, wherein the discrete values are selected from the group comprising: the average value of the parameter over the duration of a discrete event, the duration of said discrete event, the maximum value of the parameter during said discrete event, the parameter value after a specific time interval from the start of said discrete event, and the average value of the parameter during a specific time frame.
- A method according to any of claims 8 to 9, for monitoring the condition of railway points.
- A method according to any of claims 8 to 9, for monitoring railway track circuits.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| PL11158565T PL2371665T3 (en) | 2010-03-17 | 2011-03-16 | Condition monitoring |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBGB1004421.2A GB201004421D0 (en) | 2010-03-17 | 2010-03-17 | Condition monitoring |
Publications (3)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP2371665A2 EP2371665A2 (en) | 2011-10-05 |
| EP2371665A3 EP2371665A3 (en) | 2012-08-22 |
| EP2371665B1 true EP2371665B1 (en) | 2017-12-13 |
Family
ID=42227844
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP11158565.9A Active EP2371665B1 (en) | 2010-03-17 | 2011-03-16 | Condition monitoring |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP2371665B1 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2662061T3 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB201004421D0 (en) |
| PL (1) | PL2371665T3 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2559614B (en) * | 2017-02-13 | 2019-06-12 | Hitachi Rail Europe Ltd | Communication of train on-board condition monitoring data |
| GB2581390B (en) * | 2019-02-15 | 2021-03-03 | Thales Holdings Uk Plc | Diagnostic system and a method of diagnosing faults |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5743495A (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 1998-04-28 | General Electric Company | System for detecting broken rails and flat wheels in the presence of trains |
| US7502670B2 (en) * | 2004-07-26 | 2009-03-10 | Salient Systems, Inc. | System and method for determining rail safety limits |
| US7823841B2 (en) * | 2007-06-01 | 2010-11-02 | General Electric Company | System and method for broken rail and train detection |
-
2010
- 2010-03-17 GB GBGB1004421.2A patent/GB201004421D0/en not_active Ceased
-
2011
- 2011-03-16 ES ES11158565.9T patent/ES2662061T3/en active Active
- 2011-03-16 PL PL11158565T patent/PL2371665T3/en unknown
- 2011-03-16 EP EP11158565.9A patent/EP2371665B1/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY: "consolidated", 31 December 2009 (2009-12-31), Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.thefreedictionary.com/p/consolidated> [retrieved on 20130912] * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| PL2371665T3 (en) | 2018-05-30 |
| ES2662061T3 (en) | 2018-04-05 |
| GB201004421D0 (en) | 2010-05-05 |
| EP2371665A3 (en) | 2012-08-22 |
| EP2371665A2 (en) | 2011-10-05 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| RU2509317C2 (en) | Device to detect fault for monitoring plant of railway vehicle, appropriate plant and method | |
| CN108072806B (en) | Track circuit fault diagnosis system and method | |
| EP3375691A1 (en) | Monitoring system for a railway infrastructure | |
| KR102130271B1 (en) | Apparatus for detecting partial discharge | |
| EP3715880B1 (en) | Method and device for determining the state of an electric line | |
| KR101488420B1 (en) | System and method for monitoring a railroad car using wireless and self-generation sensor | |
| CN103569623B (en) | Load-transfer device fault length of run diagnostic system and method | |
| EP2371665B1 (en) | Condition monitoring | |
| US9139211B2 (en) | Device for detecting the occupied or available status of a track segment and method for operating such a device | |
| KR100669225B1 (en) | AF track circuit device | |
| CN202077136U (en) | Superposing device for elevator | |
| CN118494559A (en) | Railway signal monitoring alarm system | |
| CN110823275A (en) | Running state detection system and method of wheel sensor | |
| CN110095668A (en) | Track circuit choke transformer job information real time on-line monitoring system, method | |
| CN105759777B (en) | Fault of electric locomotive processing system and method | |
| CN117360589B (en) | Positive line code monitoring system and detection method based on in-station track railway | |
| JP6144595B2 (en) | Fire receiver | |
| KR200391711Y1 (en) | AF Track Circuit | |
| CN109459637B (en) | Real-time detection system for adjacent line interference of track circuit | |
| CN107727988B (en) | Track circuit core wire grounding detection device, system and method | |
| CN110691022A (en) | Communication load adjusting method, device and system based on CAN bus | |
| CN106740800B (en) | The CAN bus message maintenance monitoring system and working method of braking system | |
| KR20190025859A (en) | Method for distributed processing management using internet of things device and smart factory system thereof | |
| CN109066989B (en) | Substation measurement and control device and method with functions of data verification and abnormal alarm | |
| KR20150026179A (en) | Onboard detection system for high-speed railway track circuit and method thereof |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B61L 27/00 20060101AFI20120719BHEP Ipc: B61L 23/04 20060101ALI20120719BHEP |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130222 |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20131119 |
|
| RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SIEMENS RAIL AUTOMATION HOLDINGS LIMITED |
|
| RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SIEMENS RAIL AUTOMATION HOLDINGS LIMITED |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170712 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 954059 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171215 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602011044092 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2662061 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20180405 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20171213 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180313 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180313 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180413 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602011044092 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180914 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180331 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180316 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180316 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180331 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180331 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180331 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602011044092 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: MAIER, DANIEL OLIVER, DIPL.-ING. UNIV., DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602011044092 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED, FRIMLEY, GB Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS RAIL AUTOMATION HOLDINGS LTD., FRIMLEY, CAMBERLEY, GB Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602011044092 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DEFFNER, ROLF, DR., DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602011044092 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED, GB Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS RAIL AUTOMATION HOLDINGS LTD., FRIMLEY, CAMBERLEY, GB |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602011044092 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DEFFNER, ROLF, DR., DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: PC2A Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED Effective date: 20191212 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180316 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20110316 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171213 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602011044092 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DEFFNER, ROLF, DR., DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602011044092 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED, GB Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED, FRIMLEY, SURREY, GB |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: UEP Ref document number: 954059 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171213 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20250207 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20250314 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20250306 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20250520 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20250403 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20250620 Year of fee payment: 15 |