EP1102026B1 - Electro-optical out-door battle-field simulator based on image processing. - Google Patents
Electro-optical out-door battle-field simulator based on image processing. Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1102026B1 EP1102026B1 EP00403178A EP00403178A EP1102026B1 EP 1102026 B1 EP1102026 B1 EP 1102026B1 EP 00403178 A EP00403178 A EP 00403178A EP 00403178 A EP00403178 A EP 00403178A EP 1102026 B1 EP1102026 B1 EP 1102026B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- target
- housing
- simulator
- weapon
- targets
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 title description 2
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 17
- 239000000779 smoke Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 description 2
- 206010052904 Musculoskeletal stiffness Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004438 eyesight Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100001261 hazardous Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000026843 stiff neck Diseases 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
- F41G3/26—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying
- F41G3/2616—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device
- F41G3/2622—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile
- F41G3/2661—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile in which the light beam is sent from the target to the weapon
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
- F41G3/26—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying
- F41G3/2616—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device
- F41G3/2622—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile
- F41G3/2666—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile with means for selecting or varying PRF or time coding of the emitted beam
- F41G3/2672—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile with means for selecting or varying PRF or time coding of the emitted beam using PRF adapted receiver
- F41G3/2677—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile with means for selecting or varying PRF or time coding of the emitted beam using PRF adapted receiver with PRF determination
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a military training system for firing a weapon at a target and, more particularly, to a training system for firing an electro-optically guided anti-tank missile.
- More realistic simulation lends greater verisimilitude and helps train soldiers in conditions that more closely resemble battlefield conditions.
- a soldier needs to aim a weapon, pull a trigger or otherwise activate firing, and see the results of a "hit".
- a further requirement is that a training control center be able to monitor all training activities, if possible, in real time.
- the same system can also be attached to various types of guns and artillery and operated similarly.
- US 4,793,811 discloses such a pulsed laser weapon firing simulation system, which is configured to measure the period of time from the appearance of the target to the actual firing by the operator, through the steps of identification and acquisition of the target.
- Drawbacks of current simulation systems include :
- a simulator for simulating the firing of a weapon at one of a plurality of targets, each target having a respective shape, including: a housing substantially identical in size and shape to at least a discrete portion of the weapon; a sensor, operationally connected to the housing, for acquiring a plurality of images of at least one of the targets; an image processor for detecting and analyzing changes among the images and for initiating control signals based on the analysis; for each target, an infra-red lamp that is alternatively activated by one of the control signals to flash at a unique, respective frequency and deactivated by another of the control signals; and a mechanism for transmitting the control signals to the lamps.
- analysis by said image processor of light produced by a said infra-red lamp and detected by said sensor indicates at which target from amongst said plurality of targets said housing has been aimed, thus accurately simulating the aiming step of the firing of the weapon without any laser device.
- the transmitting mechanism is wireless.
- the transmitting mechanism is wired.
- the senor includes a CCD television camera.
- the senor forms part of the guidance system of an electro-optically guided missile.
- a look-up table for the image processor including data about shapes of the targets and a capability of the image processor to utilize the data to calculate accuracy of aim at a target.
- a pyrotechnic charge that is detonatable by a respective control signal and that is able to release variable quantifies of smoke in accordance with the calculated accuracy of aim.
- a method for identifying an acquired target comprising the steps of: (a) providing a weapon simulator including a housing substantially identical in size and shape to at least a discrete portion of the weapon; a sensor, operationally connected to the housing, for acquiring a plurality of images of a target; an image processor for detecting and analyzing changes among these images and for initiating control signals based on the analysis; for each target, an infra-red lamp that is alternatively activated by one of the control signals to flash at a unique, respective frequency and deactivated by another of the control signals; and a mechanism for transmitting the control signals to the lamps; (b) aiming the housing at one of the targets; (c) transmitting a signal to activate all the infra-red lamps; (d) acquiring the plurality of images, at known time intervals, of the target aimed at; (e) passing the images to the image processor, (f) calculating the flash frequency of the lamp on the target, aimed at by comparing successive images from the
- a method for determining accuracy of aim comprising the further steps of providing a target-shape look-up table that includes data about the shapes of the respective targets and comparing the sensor images of an acquired target with the shape data.
- a method for a visual simulation of a hit there is provided a method for a visual simulation of a hit.
- a method for a visual simulation of a hit comprising the steps of providing, at each target, a pyrotechnic charge and detonating the charge at an identified target.
- a method for visually simulating the accuracy of a hit comprising the further step of differentially detonating the charge.
- a method for simulation of firing of ballistic weapons comprising the further step of providing calculation algorithms for the image processor that include calculation of parabolic trajectories incorporating known muzzle velocities, angle of elevation, and range of said target.
- the present invention is of an outdoors military training system for firing a weapon at a target, which provides for interaction between the training weapon and the target.
- the present invention can be used for field training for electro-optically guided anti-tank missile systems.
- the present invention incorporates reporting mechanisms so that a training control center can be instantly aware of the results of training exercises.
- the present invention is a substitute for, or additional to, the currently used BT46 system, which is based on laser mechanisms.
- the present invention may also be adapted to field training for other types of guns and artillery.
- the present invention utilizes the in-built target seeking mechanism of ATMS, with the addition of a light-weight, inexpensive, and unobtrusive image processor.
- operation relies on identification of the frequency of a flashing infra-red lamp located on an acquired target. Identification is done by means of the image processor fed by the seeker sensor, such as a television camera in the missile's own target-seeker head, or by an add-on sensor.
- the seeker sensor such as a television camera in the missile's own target-seeker head, or by an add-on sensor.
- the simulated weapon is a housing that represents, in shape and size, a discrete portion of a real weapon, and sufficient of the launcher to enable training in aiming and firing. It includes a missile guidance system but neither propulsion system nor explosive charge.
- Figure 1 shows a schematic view of the present invention in operation, for the case of an ATMS, and Figure 2 a block diagram of the relevant parts of the missile's seeker head and the image processor.
- the electro-optical guidance system of a missile simulator 10 includes a sensor 20, such as a CCD television camera or imager, in the seeker head 11 thereof.
- the missile simulator could be an actual missile, less the propulsion system and explosive charge thereof.
- sensor 20 which is sensitive to infra-red and visible light, captures an image 26 of a target 12.
- Sensor 20 is mounted on gimbals 21, which are an intrinsic part of the seeker, so that the pitch 27 and yaw 28 thereof may be varied to enable sensor 20 to see or to lock onto target 12.
- each potential target 12 is equipped with a respective flashing infra-red lamp 13 mounted thereon, which is invisible to the operator's eye but detectable by sensor 20 (CCD television camera or IIR imager).
- the flashing frequency is unique to each particular target 12 whereupon each lamp 13 is located.
- Successive images 26 from sensor 20 are passed, at predetermined time intervals, to an image processor 22 that detects changes among images 26.
- the time intervals are short enough to enable image processor 26 to calculate the flash frequency of lamp 13, and, by comparison with a pre-programmed look-up table 23, to identify at which target missile 10 is 'aiming'.
- image processor 22 By comparison with data, contained in a second look-up table 24, about the shape and size of the targets, image processor 22 also determines the accuracy of aiming.
- This information is relayed by a wireless signal 17 to target 12, in order to detonate a pyrotechnic charge 19 situated at target 12 to simulate a 'hit' by releasing smoke 14.
- a second wireless signal 16 is transmitted to a training control center, in order to enable trainers to monitor and control the training program and also to rate a trainee.
- stages of operation are:
- the invention by utilizing the missile's in-built sensor, solves the problem of the difference between the missile line of sight, which may vary in flight, and that of an externally attached laser, as occurs in existing systems.
- the invention by utilizing a passive, already in-built sensor such as a CCD camera, has advantages of weight, safety (no laser beam), operational simplicity (calibration is not needed as it would be for a separate laser system aligned with the missile), debriefing (possibility of video record), low cost (less technically complicated), and better visibility in adverse weather conditions (CCD is more sensitive than the human eye and is less affected by atmospheric conditions than lasers).
- the present invention is normally integrated into the simulated weapon and is therefore unobtrusive, there is the consequence that a conventional laser, may be added to the simulated weapon to facilitate integration into conventional battlefield simulators that use laser or other techniques such as in the earlier mentioned BT46 system. This adds versatility to the invention.
- the present invention is partially realized by a simpler system, in which the image processing stage is employed without sending a signal 16 back to the control center and/or the target 12 by use of transmitter 15, which may therefore be absent.
- wireless communication is replaced with wired transmission of signals and data.
- transmitter 15 is absent and is replaced by cables.
- Yet another embodiment of the present invention is for non-electro-optically guided weapons systems, such as rifles and artillery.
- a gun or cannon is substituted for the launcher, there is no missile, and a sighting mechanism substitutes for the guidance system.
- 'discrete portion' of the weapon includes only the gun or cannon and the sighting mechanism and 'aiming' means pointing the housing so that, if it were a real weapon, a projectile fired therefrom would follow a trajectory to the target; thus the sensor needs to be adjustable for range and other considerations in the same way as sights on a real weapon.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
- Processing Or Creating Images (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Testing, Inspecting, Measuring Of Stereoscopic Televisions And Televisions (AREA)
- Optical Radar Systems And Details Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a military training system for firing a weapon at a target and, more particularly, to a training system for firing an electro-optically guided anti-tank missile.
- Military training exercises use simulation, wherever possible, rather than live ammunition or actual firing of weapons, both to save costs and to avoid unnecessary use of dangerous equipment.
- More realistic simulation lends greater verisimilitude and helps train soldiers in conditions that more closely resemble battlefield conditions. Thus, in firing exercises, a soldier needs to aim a weapon, pull a trigger or otherwise activate firing, and see the results of a "hit".
- A further requirement is that a training control center be able to monitor all training activities, if possible, in real time.
- To heighten the sense of reality, there is a need for battlefield simulation systems that are integrated with armament systems and not intrusive add-ons.
- Current weapons firing simulation systems employ a laser installed on the weapon that makes it possible to simulate firing, using a laser pulse instead of ammunition, and to identify the target hit.
- In the case of anti-tank missile systems (ATMS), current simulations employ a pulsed laser, which is attached to and aligned with the missile launcher and which is fired instead of a missile. Detectors placed on the target are illuminated by the laser, may record a hit, and can relay that information both to the operator of the missile and to the training control center. This method is used in, for example, the Swedish BT46 system from Saab Training Systems.
- The same system can also be attached to various types of guns and artillery and operated similarly.
- US 4,793,811 discloses such a pulsed laser weapon firing simulation system, which is configured to measure the period of time from the appearance of the target to the actual firing by the operator, through the steps of identification and acquisition of the target.
- These are suitable approaches for rigid, so-called "stiff-neck" weapons, whose aiming is restricted to the direction of a sensor fixed relative to the missile, but not for the new generation of ATMS which feature "flexible neck" seekers, whose sensors have an overall wider field of view obtained by varying the sensor orientation relative to the missile's canister axis. The problem here is that there is not necessarily any connection between the line of sight of the launcher and that of the seeker head.
- Drawbacks of current simulation systems include :
- Rigid laser alignment:
- Being attached rigidly outside the missile or gun barrel, the laser mimics the launcher operation but not that of the separate target seeker, which is located in the seeker head of the missile and operates independently of the launcher before and after firing. A sensor in the seeker head is mounted on gimbals and can alter its pitch and yaw with respect to missile orientation and the target position, as required, in order to lock onto a desired target, something the launcher-mounted laser is unable to do.
- The situation may be likened to a light on a miner's helmet that may not necessarily be illuminating the spot where the miner is actually looking. Thus, a laser "hit" is not necessarily indicative of a missile hit; nor does a laser "miss" necessarily indicate a missile miss.
- The laser apparatus is a relatively heavy and cumbersome add-on. It requires calibration before use and is not easy to use.
- The laser apparatus is hazardous to human eyesight.
- The laser apparatus is limited by adverse weather conditions.
- Thus there is a recognized need for, and it would be highly advantageous to have, a training system that is better integrated with and better simulates the missile's target-seeking operation, itself, and that is safer, less intrusive and cumbersome, and less adversely affected by weather conditions.
- According to the present invention there is provided a simulator for simulating the firing of a weapon at one of a plurality of targets, each target having a respective shape, including: a housing substantially identical in size and shape to at least a discrete portion of the weapon; a sensor, operationally connected to the housing, for acquiring a plurality of images of at least one of the targets; an image processor for detecting and analyzing changes among the images and for initiating control signals based on the analysis; for each target, an infra-red lamp that is alternatively activated by one of the control signals to flash at a unique, respective frequency and deactivated by another of the control signals; and a mechanism for transmitting the control signals to the lamps.
- Thereby, analysis by said image processor of light produced by a said infra-red lamp and detected by said sensor indicates at which target from amongst said plurality of targets said housing has been aimed, thus accurately simulating the aiming step of the firing of the weapon without any laser device.
- According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the transmitting mechanism is wireless.
- According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the transmitting mechanism is wired.
- According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the sensor includes a CCD television camera.
- According to further features in preferred embodiments of the invention, the sensor forms part of the guidance system of an electro-optically guided missile.
- According to further features of the present invention, there is provided a look-up table for the image processor including data about shapes of the targets and a capability of the image processor to utilize the data to calculate accuracy of aim at a target.
- According to further features in preferred embodiments of the invention, there is provided, at each target, a pyrotechnic charge that is detonatable by a respective control signal and that is able to release variable quantifies of smoke in accordance with the calculated accuracy of aim.
- According to the present invention, there is provided a method for identifying an acquired target comprising the steps of: (a) providing a weapon simulator including a housing substantially identical in size and shape to at least a discrete portion of the weapon; a sensor, operationally connected to the housing, for acquiring a plurality of images of a target; an image processor for detecting and analyzing changes among these images and for initiating control signals based on the analysis; for each target, an infra-red lamp that is alternatively activated by one of the control signals to flash at a unique, respective frequency and deactivated by another of the control signals; and a mechanism for transmitting the control signals to the lamps; (b) aiming the housing at one of the targets; (c) transmitting a signal to activate all the infra-red lamps; (d) acquiring the plurality of images, at known time intervals, of the target aimed at; (e) passing the images to the image processor, (f) calculating the flash frequency of the lamp on the target, aimed at by comparing successive images from the sensor; and (g) identifying the target aimed at by comparing the frequency with a look-up table of the unique frequencies.
- According to further features of the present invention there is provided a method for determining accuracy of aim.
- According to further features of the present invention there is provided a method for determining accuracy of aim comprising the further steps of providing a target-shape look-up table that includes data about the shapes of the respective targets and comparing the sensor images of an acquired target with the shape data.
- According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method for a visual simulation of a hit.
- According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method for a visual simulation of a hit comprising the steps of providing, at each target, a pyrotechnic charge and detonating the charge at an identified target.
- According to preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method for visually simulating the accuracy of a hit comprising the further step of differentially detonating the charge.
- According to another embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method for simulation of firing of ballistic weapons.
- According to another embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method for simulation of firing of ballistic weapons comprising the further step of providing calculation algorithms for the image processor that include calculation of parabolic trajectories incorporating known muzzle velocities, angle of elevation, and range of said target.
- The invention is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
- Figure 1 shows a configuration for battlefield training for electro-optically guided anti-tank missile systems;
- Figure 2 is a schematic representation of the guided missile's seeker head, showing the essential components of the present invention; and
- Figure 3 shows an implementation for non-electro-optically guided weapons.
- The present invention is of an outdoors military training system for firing a weapon at a target, which provides for interaction between the training weapon and the target. Specifically, the present invention can be used for field training for electro-optically guided anti-tank missile systems. The present invention incorporates reporting mechanisms so that a training control center can be instantly aware of the results of training exercises. The present invention is a substitute for, or additional to, the currently used BT46 system, which is based on laser mechanisms.
- The present invention may also be adapted to field training for other types of guns and artillery.
- The present invention utilizes the in-built target seeking mechanism of ATMS, with the addition of a light-weight, inexpensive, and unobtrusive image processor.
- According to the present invention, operation relies on identification of the frequency of a flashing infra-red lamp located on an acquired target. Identification is done by means of the image processor fed by the seeker sensor, such as a television camera in the missile's own target-seeker head, or by an add-on sensor.
- The principles and operation of the present invention may be better understood with reference to the drawings and the accompanying description.
- In general, the simulated weapon is a housing that represents, in shape and size, a discrete portion of a real weapon, and sufficient of the launcher to enable training in aiming and firing. It includes a missile guidance system but neither propulsion system nor explosive charge. Figure 1 shows a schematic view of the present invention in operation, for the case of an ATMS, and Figure 2 a block diagram of the relevant parts of the missile's seeker head and the image processor.
- The electro-optical guidance system of a
missile simulator 10 includes asensor 20, such as a CCD television camera or imager, in theseeker head 11 thereof. In practice, the missile simulator could be an actual missile, less the propulsion system and explosive charge thereof. - In normal use,
sensor 20, which is sensitive to infra-red and visible light, captures animage 26 of atarget 12.Sensor 20 is mounted ongimbals 21, which are an intrinsic part of the seeker, so that thepitch 27 andyaw 28 thereof may be varied to enablesensor 20 to see or to lock ontotarget 12. - In the present invention, each
potential target 12 is equipped with a respective flashing infra-red lamp 13 mounted thereon, which is invisible to the operator's eye but detectable by sensor 20 (CCD television camera or IIR imager). The flashing frequency is unique to eachparticular target 12 whereupon eachlamp 13 is located. -
Successive images 26 fromsensor 20 are passed, at predetermined time intervals, to animage processor 22 that detects changes amongimages 26. The time intervals are short enough to enableimage processor 26 to calculate the flash frequency oflamp 13, and, by comparison with a pre-programmed look-up table 23, to identify at whichtarget missile 10 is 'aiming'. By comparison with data, contained in a second look-up table 24, about the shape and size of the targets,image processor 22 also determines the accuracy of aiming. This information is relayed by awireless signal 17 to target 12, in order to detonate apyrotechnic charge 19 situated attarget 12 to simulate a 'hit' by releasingsmoke 14. Asecond wireless signal 16 is transmitted to a training control center, in order to enable trainers to monitor and control the training program and also to rate a trainee. - In more detail, the stages of operation are:
- 1.
Weapon simulator 10 is aimed attarget 12. - 2.
Seeker head 11 acquirestarget 12 and the operator locks ontotarget 12. At thatmoment wireless transmitter 15 transmits asignal 17A to all targets and activates an infra-red lamp 13 located on each target. Eachlamp 13 flashes at a unique frequency specific to the associated target thereof. - 3. Simultaneously,
sensor 20 passes a sequence ofimages 26, at predetermined time intervals, oftarget 12, including flashinglamp 13, to imageprocessor 22. - 4.
Image processor 22 calculates the frequency oflamp 13 on acquiredtarget 12 by comparing successive images and, by comparing the frequency with an in-built look-up table ofrespective target frequencies 23, identifies which target has been acquired. - 5. Having thus identified
target 12,image processor 22 performs a further comparison ofimage 26 oftarget 12 with target-shape data 24 stored withinimage processor 22 to estimate aiming precision. - 6. When the trainee operator is satisfied with his aim, he 'fires' the
missile, which does not actually launch. Instead, a
signal 17B is sent bytransmitter 15 to detonate associatedpyrotechnic charge 19 located attarget 12, releasingsmoke 14, to simulate a 'hit'. The charge is differentially detonatable: it is possible to vary the amount of smoke in accordance with the accuracy of aim to provide a visual representation of that accuracy. - 7. Information about the launcher, the target 'hit', and the accuracy of
aim is transmitted to
simulation control center 16 to update the data held there. - 8. Preferably, the entire target-acquisition process is recorded at the control center on videotape for later debriefing.
- 9. The system allows for simulation of the times of flight and probability of hitting a target, for the purpose of simulation of various types of munitions (such as missile, shell, bullet, etc).
-
- It is seen that the invention, by utilizing the missile's in-built sensor, solves the problem of the difference between the missile line of sight, which may vary in flight, and that of an externally attached laser, as occurs in existing systems.
- Furthermore, the invention, by utilizing a passive, already in-built sensor such as a CCD camera, has advantages of weight, safety (no laser beam), operational simplicity (calibration is not needed as it would be for a separate laser system aligned with the missile), debriefing (possibility of video record), low cost (less technically complicated), and better visibility in adverse weather conditions (CCD is more sensitive than the human eye and is less affected by atmospheric conditions than lasers).
- Moreover, since the present invention is normally integrated into the simulated weapon and is therefore unobtrusive, there is the consequence that a conventional laser, may be added to the simulated weapon to facilitate integration into conventional battlefield simulators that use laser or other techniques such as in the earlier mentioned BT46 system. This adds versatility to the invention.
- In another embodiment the present invention is partially realized by a simpler system, in which the image processing stage is employed without sending a
signal 16 back to the control center and/or thetarget 12 by use oftransmitter 15, which may therefore be absent. - In yet another embodiment of the present invention, wireless communication is replaced with wired transmission of signals and data. In this case,
transmitter 15 is absent and is replaced by cables. - Yet another embodiment of the present invention is for non-electro-optically guided weapons systems, such as rifles and artillery. In such a ballistic implementation, wherein a gun or cannon is substituted for the launcher, there is no missile, and a sighting mechanism substitutes for the guidance system. In such cases, 'discrete portion' of the weapon includes only the gun or cannon and the sighting mechanism and 'aiming' means pointing the housing so that, if it were a real weapon, a projectile fired therefrom would follow a trajectory to the target; thus the sensor needs to be adjustable for range and other considerations in the same way as sights on a real weapon. In this embodiment as illustrated in Figure 3, there is no signal from
sensor 20 to an operator's screen andsensor 20 is not mounted on gimbals but is secured rigidly to aweapon barrel 31. An inexpensive, light-weight CCD television camera sensor is less obtrusive than a laser, as used in current systems. In this case, the aforementioned provision mentioned in stage of operation 9, for simulation of time of flight etc comes into play to cope with the case of ballistic projectiles, wherein the sensor points at the target while the gun barrel does not because the projectile describes a parabolic trajectory. All needed details for the simulation are calculated from positional data. - While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, it will be appreciated that many variations, modifications and other applications of the invention may be made.
Claims (16)
- A simulator (10) for simulating the firing of a weapon at one of a plurality of targets (12), each target (12) having a respective shape, comprising :a) a housing substantially identical in size and shape to at least a discrete portion of the weapon;b) a sensor (20), operationally connected to said housing, for acquiring a plurality of images (26) of at least one of the targets (12); andc) an image processor (22) for detecting and analyzing changes among said images (26) and for initiating control signals (17) based on said analysis,
characterized in that the simulator further comprises :d) for each target (12), an infra-red lamp (13) that is alternatively:i) activated by one of said control signals (17) to flash at a unique, respective frequency andii) deactivated by another of said control signals; ande) a mechanism (15) for transmitting said control signals (17) to said lamps (13), whereby analysis by said image processor (22) of light produced by a said infra-red lamp (13) and detected by said sensor (20) indicates at which target (12) from amongst said plurality of targets (12) said housing has been aimed, thus accurately simulating the aiming step of the firing of the weapon. - A simulator (10) according to claim 1, characterized in that said mechanism (15) is wireless.
- A simulator (10) according to claim 1, characterized in that said mechanism (15) is wired.
- A simulator (10) according to claim 1, characterized in that said sensor (20) includes a CCD television camera.
- A simulator (10) according to claim 1, characterized in that said sensor (20) includes part of a guidance system of an electro-optically guided missile.
- A simulator (10) according to claim 1, characterized in that said image processor (22) includes a look-up table (24) that includes data about shapes of respective said targets (12), said image processor (22) being operative to calculate an accuracy of an aim at the target (12) whereat the firing of the weapon is simulated.
- A simulator (10) according to claim 1, characterized in that it further comprises:f) at each target (12), a pyrotechnic charge (19) that is detonatable by a respective said control signal (17).
- A simulator (10) according to claim 7, characterized in that said image processor (22) includes a look-up table (24) that includes data about shapes of respective said targets (12), said image processor (22) being operative to calculate an accuracy of an aim at the target (12) whereat the firing of the weapon is simulated.
- A simulator (10) according to claim 8, characterized in that said pyrotechnic charge (19) is differentially detonatable in accordance with said accuracy of aim calculation.
- A method of simulating the firing of a weapon at one of a plurality of targets (12), characterized in that it comprises the steps of:a) providing :(i) a weapon simulator (10) including a housing substantially identical in size and shape to at least a discrete portion of the weapon ;(ii) a sensor (20), operationally connected to said housing, for acquiring a plurality of images (26) of the target (12) ; and(iii) an image processor (22) for detecting and analyzing changes among said images (26) and for initiating control signals (17) based on said analysis;(iv) for each target (12), an infra-red lamp (13) that is alternatively:(A) activated by one of said control signals (17) to flash at a unique, respective frequency and(B) deactivated by another of said control signals (17) ; and(v) a mechanism (15) for transmitting said control signals (17) to said lamps (13) ;b) aiming said housing at one of the targets (12);c) activating all said infra-red lamps (13);d) acquiring a plurality of images (26), at predetermined time intervals, of the target (12) whereat said housing is aimed ;e) passing said images (26) to said image processor (22);f) calculating a flash frequency of the lamp (13) on the target (12) whereat said housing is aimed, by comparing successive said images (26) andg) identifying the target (12) whereat said housing is aimed, by comparing said calculated flash frequency with a look-up table (23) of said respective frequencies,
- The method of claim 10, characterized in that it further comprises the step of :h) visually simulating a hit.
- The method of claim 11, characterized in that said simulating is effected by steps including :i) providing, at each target (12), a pyrotechnic charge (19) ; andii) detonating said charge (19) at the target (12) whereat said housing is aimed.
- The method according to claim 12, characterized in that said charge (19) is detonated differentially.
- The method according to claim 10, characterized in that it further comprises the step of :h) determining an accuracy of said aim.
- The method according to claim 14, characterized in that determining of said accuracy is effected by steps including :i) providing a look-up table (24) that includes data about shapes of the targets (12) ; andii) comparing said images (26) of the target (12) with said shape date.
- The method according to claim 14, characterized in that said determining of said accuracy is effected by steps including calculating a trajectory from said housing to the target (12) whereat said housing is aimed.
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IL13299799 | 1999-11-17 | ||
IL13299799A IL132997A0 (en) | 1999-11-17 | 1999-11-17 | Electro optical field simulator for anti-tank systems |
IL13809500 | 2000-08-25 | ||
IL13809500A IL138095A (en) | 2000-08-25 | 2000-08-25 | Electro-optical, out-door battle-field simulator based on image processing |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1102026A1 EP1102026A1 (en) | 2001-05-23 |
EP1102026B1 true EP1102026B1 (en) | 2004-10-20 |
Family
ID=26323908
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP00403178A Expired - Lifetime EP1102026B1 (en) | 1999-11-17 | 2000-11-15 | Electro-optical out-door battle-field simulator based on image processing. |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1102026B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE280381T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE60015054T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2231139T3 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1579239A1 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2005-09-28 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Providing a user with location-based information |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3405017C2 (en) * | 1984-02-13 | 1994-04-14 | Wegmann & Co Gmbh | Device for monitoring combat vehicles, in particular main battle tanks, during practice shooting with simulated shots |
DE3643107A1 (en) * | 1986-12-17 | 1988-06-30 | Precitronic | DEVICE FOR SHOT SIMULATION |
FR2772908B1 (en) * | 1997-12-24 | 2000-02-18 | Aerospatiale | MISSILE SHOOTING SIMULATOR WITH IMMERSION OF THE SHOOTER IN A VIRTUAL SPACE |
-
2000
- 2000-11-15 ES ES00403178T patent/ES2231139T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-11-15 DE DE60015054T patent/DE60015054T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2000-11-15 EP EP00403178A patent/EP1102026B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-11-15 AT AT00403178T patent/ATE280381T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE60015054T2 (en) | 2005-12-01 |
EP1102026A1 (en) | 2001-05-23 |
ES2231139T3 (en) | 2005-05-16 |
DE60015054D1 (en) | 2004-11-25 |
ATE280381T1 (en) | 2004-11-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6813593B1 (en) | Electro-optical, out-door battle-field simulator based on image processing | |
US5026158A (en) | Apparatus and method for displaying and storing impact points of firearm projectiles on a sight field of view | |
US8459997B2 (en) | Shooting simulation system and method | |
US5281142A (en) | Shooting simulating process and training device | |
US6059573A (en) | Mortar training device with functional simulated propelling charges | |
US10539393B2 (en) | System and method for shooting simulation | |
US7927102B2 (en) | Simulation devices and systems for rocket propelled grenades and other weapons | |
US5641288A (en) | Shooting simulating process and training device using a virtual reality display screen | |
US8414298B2 (en) | Sniper training system | |
US8496480B2 (en) | Video capture, recording and scoring in firearms and surveillance | |
US6942486B2 (en) | Training simulator for sharp shooting | |
US8888491B2 (en) | Optical recognition system and method for simulated shooting | |
US8678824B2 (en) | Shooting simulation system and method using an optical recognition system | |
KR20030005234A (en) | Precision gunnery simulator system and method | |
US5526749A (en) | Laser detonated projectile apparatus | |
US8459996B2 (en) | Training device for grenade launchers | |
US11359887B1 (en) | System and method of marksmanship training utilizing an optical system | |
RU2179698C2 (en) | Trainer of controllers-operators of missile launchers or guns and machine guns | |
EP1102026B1 (en) | Electro-optical out-door battle-field simulator based on image processing. | |
JP2020046083A (en) | Guided missile avoidance training device for helicopter | |
IL138095A (en) | Electro-optical, out-door battle-field simulator based on image processing | |
US11662178B1 (en) | System and method of marksmanship training utilizing a drone and an optical system | |
TR2023014868U5 (en) | Armored Vehicle Laser Shooting Training System | |
WO2025012091A1 (en) | User interface and targeting system | |
CN114705079A (en) | Intelligent shooting gun and intelligent artillery control system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20010913 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Free format text: AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: RAFAEL - ARMAMENT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY LTD. |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20030610 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20041020 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20041020 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20041020 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20041020 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20041115 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20041115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 60015054 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20041125 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20041130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050120 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050120 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: AMMANN PATENTANWAELTE AG BERN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2231139 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20050721 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050320 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20081126 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20081113 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20081021 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20081120 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20081106 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20081114 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20081029 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20081107 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V1 Effective date: 20100601 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20091115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20100730 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091115 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091130 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091130 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091130 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100601 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100601 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20110329 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091115 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110316 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091116 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20131122 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141116 |