EP1043700B1 - Machine for sorting securities - Google Patents
Machine for sorting securities Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1043700B1 EP1043700B1 EP00200982A EP00200982A EP1043700B1 EP 1043700 B1 EP1043700 B1 EP 1043700B1 EP 00200982 A EP00200982 A EP 00200982A EP 00200982 A EP00200982 A EP 00200982A EP 1043700 B1 EP1043700 B1 EP 1043700B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sorting
- sign
- computer
- detector device
- security
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003909 pattern recognition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D11/00—Devices accepting coins; Devices accepting, dispensing, sorting or counting valuable papers
- G07D11/50—Sorting or counting valuable papers
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a machine for sorting securities, such as bank notes, each security being provided with an individual sign, which machine is provided with a detector device, in particular a clean/dirty detector device or an authenticity characteristic detector device, for measuring momentaneous values of a number of parameters of a separate security and for generating a measuring signal per momentaneous value, with a computer provided with a sorting algorithm connected to the detector device for receiving the measuring signals issued by it, which computer issues sorting signals on the basis of the measuring signals and the sorting algorithm, and with a sorting means connected to the computer for the reception of the sorting signals and for sorting the securities in reaction to it (see for example EP-A-553 402).
- a detector device in particular a clean/dirty detector device or an authenticity characteristic detector device
- a computer provided with a sorting algorithm connected to the detector device for receiving the measuring signals issued by it, which computer issues sorting signals on the basis of the measuring signals and the sorting algorithm
- a sorting means connected to the computer for the reception
- the detector device may for instance measure the reflection, transmission and/or damage of the security. If, for instance insufficient or incorrect reflection is measured, the sorting means is able to sort said security as insufficient or incorrect on the basis of that information. To that end the detector device is provided with a certain algorithm which on the basis of the reflection measured and a sufficient or correct reflection value (or a range of sufficient or correct reflection values) sorts the security. Additionally it is known to first of all measure all necessary parameters, and to process these parameters in an algorithm which on the basis of the parameters measured and pre-entered values calculates whether the security meets the requirements or not, and thus sorts the securities.
- a machine of the kind described above according to the invention is characterized in that the computer is provided with a file including a correspondence list, in which correspondence list the individual sign of each separate security and original values of the number of parameters are included immediately after manufacture of the security concerned, and with a file of sorting algorithms, and in that the detector device is provided with a sign detector for the detection of an individual sign, for generating a sign indication signal and for issuing the sign indication signal to the computer, and in that the computer chooses an accompanying sorting algorithm from the algorithm file in reaction to a sign indication signal via the original values.
- the present invention is based on the insight that each security has separate characteristics, irrespective of how accurate its manufacture takes place.
- the known sorting machines sort on the basis of an average value which may adopt any characteristic.
- the sorting machine is able with the help of a computer to compare the momentaneous values of a separate security to the original values by means of an accompanying algorithm, which allows for a much more accurate sorting.
- Choosing the sorting algorithm can take place via the original values, in other words certain values are accompanied by certain algorithms, or via the detected individual sign, in other words each security is accompanied by one algorithm. This situation in which each security is accompanied by one algorithm is the most optimal in sorting securities.
- the sorting algorithm is identical for a group of separate securities, of which group at least one of the number of parameters is at least almost identical.
- group at least one of the number of parameters is at least almost identical.
- the paper parameters when a group of bank notes is printed on a certain kind of paper originating from one single stock, said group as paper parameters are concerned, will show an at least almost identical value after measuring/detection.
- the paper parameters when a new stock of paper is used, the paper parameters, however accurately one tries to make the various stocks identical to each other, will be different from each other.
- one (or more) common original values for the parameters have to be included in the file for a whole group of bank notes.
- the individual sign also contains an indication of the country of origin, which country indication is qualifying for choosing the sorting algorithm. In some cases choosing an algorithm exclusively based on the country of origin would suffice. Particularly when the security is a Euro bank note, the algorithm could be chosen on the basis of the country detected after detecting the sign.
- the individual sign then is the serial number of the security.
- the detector device contains one or several detectors. For example detectors for detecting for instance reflection, transmission, and/or damage of a security, such as a bank note, can be provided. The values measured by said detectors are compared to a reference value in a computer, generally with the help of an algorithm. If the values measured do not tally with the reference values, the security is sorted off. This sorting off may take place immediately after the detector concerned, or not until all values have been measured and all these values have been processed in an algorithm. Sorting off can also take place when the security is not clean enough.
- the detector device can also be used for the detection of authenticity characteristics.
- the present invention which is particularly but not exclusively suitable for sorting Euro bank notes, adds a file to it, which is accommodated in the computer.
- a correspondence list is included, which preferably contains the individual sign of each separate security and original values of the number of parameters immediately after manufacture of the security concerned.
- the computer also contains a file of sorting algorithms.
- the detector device is further provided with a sign detector for detecting an individual sign, for generating a sign indication signal and for issuing the sign indication signal to the computer.
- the computer chooses an accompanying sorting algorithm from the algorithm file in reaction to a sign indication signal via the original values, with the help of which algorithm the security can be sorted.
- the detector device may be a clean/dirty detector or an authenticity characteristics detector device. In both cases a certain limiting value or a certain pattern recognition algorithm can be chosen depending on a country code or on another characteristic.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
- Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a machine for sorting securities, such as bank notes, each security being provided with an individual sign, which machine is provided with a detector device, in particular a clean/dirty detector device or an authenticity characteristic detector device, for measuring momentaneous values of a number of parameters of a separate security and for generating a measuring signal per momentaneous value, with a computer provided with a sorting algorithm connected to the detector device for receiving the measuring signals issued by it, which computer issues sorting signals on the basis of the measuring signals and the sorting algorithm, and with a sorting means connected to the computer for the reception of the sorting signals and for sorting the securities in reaction to it (see for example EP-A-553 402).
- Such sorting machines have been used for quite some time now, and depending on the security to be sorted and the wishes of the user of the machine, the detector device may for instance measure the reflection, transmission and/or damage of the security. If, for instance insufficient or incorrect reflection is measured, the sorting means is able to sort said security as insufficient or incorrect on the basis of that information. To that end the detector device is provided with a certain algorithm which on the basis of the reflection measured and a sufficient or correct reflection value (or a range of sufficient or correct reflection values) sorts the security. Additionally it is known to first of all measure all necessary parameters, and to process these parameters in an algorithm which on the basis of the parameters measured and pre-entered values calculates whether the security meets the requirements or not, and thus sorts the securities.
- Although such known sorting machines function satisfactorily, it appears in a number of cases that securities, in particular bank notes, which are sorted as not meeting the desired values, nonetheless can be used. On the other hand bank notes which have successfully passed the sorting process appeared to be incorrect.
- It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a machine for sorting securities, such as bank notes, which more accurately yet in a simple manner sorts securities.
- This object is solved by the features of claims 1 and 2.
- To that end a machine of the kind described above according to the invention is characterized in that the computer is provided with a file including a correspondence list, in which correspondence list the individual sign of each separate security and original values of the number of parameters are included immediately after manufacture of the security concerned, and with a file of sorting algorithms, and in that the detector device is provided with a sign detector for the detection of an individual sign, for generating a sign indication signal and for issuing the sign indication signal to the computer, and in that the computer chooses an accompanying sorting algorithm from the algorithm file in reaction to a sign indication signal via the original values. The present invention is based on the insight that each security has separate characteristics, irrespective of how accurate its manufacture takes place. The known sorting machines sort on the basis of an average value which may adopt any characteristic. As a result it may for instance occur that a newly printed bank note is nonetheless branded as dirty or not meeting the requirements, which is undesirable and leads to unnecessary waste. By storing the values of the relevant number of parameters of each separate security in a file immediately after a security has been manufactured, the sorting machine is able with the help of a computer to compare the momentaneous values of a separate security to the original values by means of an accompanying algorithm, which allows for a much more accurate sorting. Choosing the sorting algorithm can take place via the original values, in other words certain values are accompanied by certain algorithms, or via the detected individual sign, in other words each security is accompanied by one algorithm. This situation in which each security is accompanied by one algorithm is the most optimal in sorting securities.
- Preferably the sorting algorithm is identical for a group of separate securities, of which group at least one of the number of parameters is at least almost identical. When for instance a group of bank notes is printed on a certain kind of paper originating from one single stock, said group as paper parameters are concerned, will show an at least almost identical value after measuring/detection. When a new stock of paper is used, the paper parameters, however accurately one tries to make the various stocks identical to each other, will be different from each other. As a result one (or more) common original values for the parameters have to be included in the file for a whole group of bank notes.
- Preferably the individual sign also contains an indication of the country of origin, which country indication is qualifying for choosing the sorting algorithm. In some cases choosing an algorithm exclusively based on the country of origin would suffice. Particularly when the security is a Euro bank note, the algorithm could be chosen on the basis of the country detected after detecting the sign. Preferably the individual sign then is the serial number of the security.
- As sorting machines have been used for quite some time now, and as a result sorting machines are known to the expert, a further description of them will be left out here. It is known that depending on the security to be sorted and the wishes of the user of the machine, the detector device contains one or several detectors. For example detectors for detecting for instance reflection, transmission, and/or damage of a security, such as a bank note, can be provided. The values measured by said detectors are compared to a reference value in a computer, generally with the help of an algorithm. If the values measured do not tally with the reference values, the security is sorted off. This sorting off may take place immediately after the detector concerned, or not until all values have been measured and all these values have been processed in an algorithm. Sorting off can also take place when the security is not clean enough. The detector device can also be used for the detection of authenticity characteristics.
- The present invention, which is particularly but not exclusively suitable for sorting Euro bank notes, adds a file to it, which is accommodated in the computer. In this file a correspondence list is included, which preferably contains the individual sign of each separate security and original values of the number of parameters immediately after manufacture of the security concerned. The computer also contains a file of sorting algorithms. The detector device is further provided with a sign detector for detecting an individual sign, for generating a sign indication signal and for issuing the sign indication signal to the computer. The computer chooses an accompanying sorting algorithm from the algorithm file in reaction to a sign indication signal via the original values, with the help of which algorithm the security can be sorted. Choosing the sorting algorithm can take place via the original values, in other words certain values are accompanied by certain algorithms, or via the detected individual sign, in other words each security is accompanied by one algorithm. This situation in which each security is accompanied by one algorithm, is the most optimal in sorting securities.
- The implementation of the present invention, with the measures and preferences described above, will be easy for the expert to carry out, without giving a further description of each of these measures. It is noted here that the detector device may be a clean/dirty detector or an authenticity characteristics detector device. In both cases a certain limiting value or a certain pattern recognition algorithm can be chosen depending on a country code or on another characteristic.
Claims (9)
- Machine for sorting securities, such as bank notes, each security being provided with an individual sign, which machine is provided with a detector device for measuring momentaneous values of a number of parameters of a separate security and for generating a measuring signal per momentaneous value, with a computer provided with a sorting algorithm connected to the detector device for receiving the measuring signals issued by it, which computer issues sorting signals on the basis of the measuring signals and the sorting algorithm, and with a sorting means connected to the computer for the reception of the sorting signals and for sorting the securities in reaction to it, characterized in that the computer is provided with a file including a correspondence list, in which correspondence list the individual sign of each separate security and original values of the number of parameters are included immediately after manufacture of the security concerned, and with a file of sorting algorithms, and in that the detector device is provided with a sign detector for the detection of an individual sign, for generating a sign indication signal and for issuing the sign indication signal to the computer, and in that the computer chooses an accompanying sorting algorithm from the algorithm file in reaction to a sign indication signal via the original values.
- Machine for sorting securities, such as bank notes, each security being provided with an individual sign, which machine is provided with a detector device for measuring momentaneous values of a number of parameters of a separate security and for generating a measuring signal per momentaneous value, with a computer provided with a sorting algorithm connected to the detector device for receiving the measuring signals issued by it, which computer issues sorting signals on the basis of the measuring signals and the sorting algorithm, and with a sorting means connected to the computer for the reception of the sorting signals and for sorting the securities in reaction to it, characterized in that the computer is provided with a file including a correspondence list, in which correspondence list the individual sign of each separate security and an accompanying sorting algorithm are included, and in that the detector device is provided with a sign detector for the detection of an individual sign, for generating a sign indication signal and for issuing the sign indication signal to the computer, and in that in reaction to a sign indication signal the computer chooses the sorting algorithm from the algorithm file, which according to the correspondence list belongs to the sign indication signal.
- Machine according to claim 2, characterized in that the sorting algorithm belonging to each separate security with an individual sign is based on the values of the number of parameters immediately after manufacturing the security concerned.
- Machine according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the sorting algorithm is identical for a group of separate securities, of which group at least one of the number of parameters is at least almost identical.
- Machine according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the individual sign also contains an indication of the country of origin, which country indication is qualifying for choosing the sorting algorithm.
- Machine according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the security is a Euro bank note.
- Machine according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the individual sign is the serial number of the security.
- Machine according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the detector device is a clean/dirty detector device.
- Machine according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the detector device is an authenticity characteristic detector device.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| NL1011766 | 1999-04-09 | ||
| NL1011766A NL1011766C2 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 1999-04-09 | Machine for sorting securities. |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP1043700A1 EP1043700A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 |
| EP1043700B1 true EP1043700B1 (en) | 2005-11-30 |
Family
ID=19768987
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP00200982A Expired - Lifetime EP1043700B1 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2000-03-20 | Machine for sorting securities |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP1043700B1 (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE311639T1 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE60024348T2 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2254106T3 (en) |
| NL (1) | NL1011766C2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012165959A1 (en) | 2011-06-01 | 2012-12-06 | De Nederlandsche Bank N.V. | Method and device for classifying security documents such as banknotes |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102009058439A1 (en) * | 2009-12-16 | 2011-06-22 | Giesecke & Devrient GmbH, 81677 | Method for checking value documents |
| DE102009058438A1 (en) * | 2009-12-16 | 2011-06-22 | Giesecke & Devrient GmbH, 81677 | Method for checking value documents |
| ES2549461B1 (en) * | 2014-02-21 | 2016-10-07 | Banco De España | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE STATE OF USE OF BANK TICKETS, AND ITS CLASSIFICATION IN APTOS AND NOT SUITABLE FOR CIRCULATION |
| EP3327680B1 (en) * | 2015-07-21 | 2022-05-04 | Glory Ltd. | Paper currency processing device and paper currency processing method |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB8704269D0 (en) * | 1987-02-24 | 1987-04-01 | Rue Systems De | Monitoring system |
| JP3204967B2 (en) * | 1990-08-29 | 2001-09-04 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Paper sheet management device and cash automatic transaction device |
| EP0553402B1 (en) * | 1992-01-31 | 1997-06-18 | Mars, Incorporated | Device for the classification of a pattern, in particular of a currency note or a coin |
-
1999
- 1999-04-09 NL NL1011766A patent/NL1011766C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2000
- 2000-03-20 DE DE60024348T patent/DE60024348T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-03-20 ES ES00200982T patent/ES2254106T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-03-20 EP EP00200982A patent/EP1043700B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-03-20 AT AT00200982T patent/ATE311639T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012165959A1 (en) | 2011-06-01 | 2012-12-06 | De Nederlandsche Bank N.V. | Method and device for classifying security documents such as banknotes |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| NL1011766C2 (en) | 2000-10-10 |
| ES2254106T3 (en) | 2006-06-16 |
| DE60024348T2 (en) | 2006-08-24 |
| EP1043700A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 |
| DE60024348D1 (en) | 2006-01-05 |
| ATE311639T1 (en) | 2005-12-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6546351B1 (en) | Note-specific currency processing | |
| EP1061480B1 (en) | Method of measuring currency limpness | |
| JPS5927383A (en) | Selector for learning coin or the like | |
| US6798900B1 (en) | Paper sheet identification method and apparatus | |
| DE69527806T2 (en) | Method and apparatus for checking US banknotes | |
| EP0280436A2 (en) | Monitoring system | |
| US20040225407A1 (en) | Device for working sheet-like material | |
| EP1043700B1 (en) | Machine for sorting securities | |
| US5790245A (en) | Paper examining method and apparatus | |
| US6247573B1 (en) | Money screening method and unit | |
| EP1184815A3 (en) | Coin wrapping machine | |
| KR100194748B1 (en) | Banknotes Identification Device | |
| CN111612965B (en) | Method, apparatus and device for denomination recognition using security thread magnetic encoding | |
| US7997418B2 (en) | Method and device for processing units of money | |
| JPS63255793A (en) | How to identify paper sheets | |
| KR100481680B1 (en) | Bill counting device | |
| JP2004164458A (en) | Bill processor | |
| KR100638575B1 (en) | Banknote counting and counterfeit detection device using forgery sensor using capacitance | |
| NZ507810A (en) | Coin sorting method and device where the features of the coin are sensed and the coin identified as being either authentic or counterfeit | |
| JP2008135067A (en) | Leaf-like article identification method and device thereof | |
| JPH01108697A (en) | Selector with size measuring circuit for sheet paper | |
| JPS6355690A (en) | Sheet paper processor | |
| JPH01108696A (en) | Selector with pattern detection circuit for sheet paper | |
| JPS6355689A (en) | Sheet paper processor | |
| JPH10320607A (en) | Method and device for discriminating money |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
| AKX | Designation fees paid |
Free format text: AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20010312 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051130 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 60024348 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20060105 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060228 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060228 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060228 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20060313 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20060313 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20060314 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060320 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20060320 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060331 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060331 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20060331 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20060331 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060502 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2254106 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
| ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20060831 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20070314 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Owner name: DE NEDERLANDSCHE BANK N.V. Free format text: DE NEDERLANDSCHE BANK N.V.#WESTEINDE 1#1017 ZR AMSTERDAM (NL) -TRANSFER TO- DE NEDERLANDSCHE BANK N.V.#WESTEINDE 1#1017 ZR AMSTERDAM (NL) |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070320 |
|
| NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20071001 |
|
| BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *DE NEDERLANDSCHE BANK N.V. Effective date: 20070331 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070331 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071001 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070331 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070331 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20070321 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070321 |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20080320 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051130 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080320 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070320 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20110316 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20120306 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20121130 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120402 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 60024348 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20131001 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131001 |