EP0419435B1 - Device for tightening threaded joints - Google Patents
Device for tightening threaded joints Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0419435B1 EP0419435B1 EP19900850316 EP90850316A EP0419435B1 EP 0419435 B1 EP0419435 B1 EP 0419435B1 EP 19900850316 EP19900850316 EP 19900850316 EP 90850316 A EP90850316 A EP 90850316A EP 0419435 B1 EP0419435 B1 EP 0419435B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- torque
- joint
- tightening
- frequency
- power tool
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25B—TOOLS OR BENCH DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, FOR FASTENING, CONNECTING, DISENGAGING OR HOLDING
- B25B23/00—Details of, or accessories for, spanners, wrenches, screwdrivers
- B25B23/14—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers
- B25B23/147—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers specially adapted for electrically operated wrenches or screwdrivers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25B—TOOLS OR BENCH DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, FOR FASTENING, CONNECTING, DISENGAGING OR HOLDING
- B25B23/00—Details of, or accessories for, spanners, wrenches, screwdrivers
- B25B23/14—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers
Definitions
- This invention relates to a device for tightening threaded joints in two subsequent steps, namely a first step during which a joint is tightened to a predetermined torque snug level and a second step during which the joint is further tightened up to a final predetermined pretension level, cf. the preamble of claim 1 corresponding to EP-A-0 266 066.
- the main purpose of the invention is to accomplish a device by which a threaded joint is tightened up to a predetermined pretension level during the second tightening step and by which the stiffness that varies from joint to joint is prevented from causing an undesirable scattering of the obtained pretension level as well as a tiresome jerky reaction torque characteristic to be handled by the operator.
- a shortcoming of this known method is that the full power application on the screw joint from the start of the second tightening step still causes scattering of the final pretension level. The delivered torque as well as the rotation speed will increase too rapidly to avoid an unacceptable torque overshoot at very stiff joints.
- the device according to the invention is particularly intended for manually supported tightening tools by which the tiresome and uncomfortable jerks normally occurring at the end of the tightening process are eliminated.
- the torque growth characteristic depends on a number of factors such as the output power of the tool, the rotation speed of the tool, the characteristic of the threaded joint etc.
- the output torque growth is always a function of the threaded joint characteristic, such as if the threaded joint has a weak characteristic with a slow torque growth in relation to the angle of rotation or a stiff characteristic with a steep torque growth in relation to angle of rotation, the output torque growth of the tool will vary correspondingly.
- the optimum torque growth speed from the ergonomic point of view depends on several parameters such as
- the above problems are solved in that the torque growth speed in the second step is controlled to correspond to man' s ability to respond to the developed reaction torque.
- suitable torque growth values should be 25-150 Nm/s, whereas in the torque range above 150 Nm 250 Nm/s in combination with short tightening times 0,1 - 0,2 s are suitable. In the latter case, the process time is too short for the operator to react at all.
- Fig 1 there is shown a three-axes diagram illustrating the relationship between torque designated M, the angle speed designated ⁇ and time t. Following the horizontal time axis, the first tightening step I is illustrated at the left and the second subsequent tightening step II is illustrated at the right.
- the first tightening step I is commenced in that a constant torque D1 is applied on the threaded joint. D1 represents the torque developed by the power tool, whereas the reaction torque from the threaded joint is illustrated by a curve abc. As the installed torque in the threaded joint, curve abc, has reached a snug level M s , the torque application from the power tool is ceased.
- the first tightening step is completed.
- a torque D2 developed by the power tool is successively increased from a level corresponding to the torque level D1 of the first tightening step.
- the applied torque D2 is gradually increased along a straight line.
- joint characteristics a, b, and c which represent joints of different stiffness. Curve a represent the stiffest joint and c the weakest joint.
- the threaded joints are intended to be pretensioned up to a final predetermined level corresponding to a torque M F , and dependent on how stiff the torque/time characteristic of the actual joint the second tightening step will last for different time intervals. This means that the weakest joint c will take the longest time to finish, while joint a with the steepest torque/angle characteristic will be finished in the shortest time t a .
- the resultant advantage of the new device according to the invention is that for a stiff joint, which reaches its final pretension level very quickly, the angle speed at the end of the tightening process is brought down and the torque overshoot is substantially reduced whereas the end speed at a weak joint c, which reaches its final pretension level less abruptly, is higher. Because of the weak characteristic of the latter, the kinetic energy of the rotating parts will not cause any significant torque overshoot despite a relatively high final angle speed.
- the device illustrated in Fig 2 comprises an electrically powered tightening tool 10 comprising a brushless AC-motor, a power supply means 11 and a control unit 12.
- the power supply means 11 comprises an inverter which is fed with DC power from a DC power source 14 and which delivers AC power of variable frequency and voltage amplitude to the tool 10.
- a power detecting means 15 is provided between the DC power source 14 and the power supply means 11 and is connected to the control unit 12. To the latter there is also connected a torque rate adjusting means 16 by which a desirable value of the torque changing speed may be set.
- the control unit 12 comprises a programmable processor in which all necessary data for a two-step tightening process are installed.
- Fig 2 also shows that the power tool carries a sensing means 25 for detecting the actual torque values during operation of the tool.
- This sensing means 25 is connected to a comparating unit 26 in which the actual sensed torque values are compared to a desired set value. As the actual sensed value reaches the preset value a signal is delivered to the control unit 12.
- a preferable way to accomplish the above described control of the applied torque when using an inverter drive for an AC-powered tool is to perform the active control on the AC frequency supplied to the tool.
- the drive frequency which in fact is determining for the angle speed of the tool is increased in a certain way to generate a phase lag in relation to the joint. This phase lag is in turn generative of an increasing drive torque in the motor of the tool.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Details Of Spanners, Wrenches, And Screw Drivers And Accessories (AREA)
- Control Of Motors That Do Not Use Commutators (AREA)
Description
- This invention relates to a device for tightening threaded joints in two subsequent steps, namely a first step during which a joint is tightened to a predetermined torque snug level and a second step during which the joint is further tightened up to a final predetermined pretension level, cf. the preamble of claim 1 corresponding to EP-A-0 266 066.
- The main purpose of the invention is to accomplish a device by which a threaded joint is tightened up to a predetermined pretension level during the second tightening step and by which the stiffness that varies from joint to joint is prevented from causing an undesirable scattering of the obtained pretension level as well as a tiresome jerky reaction torque characteristic to be handled by the operator.
- As to the problem with scattering of the obtained pretension level in screw joints having different stiffness or torque growth characteristics, a previous two step tightening method is described in the above mentioned EP-A-0 266 066 which comprises measures for reducing such pretension scattering. According to this known method, the rotation speed during the first tightening step is controlled in response to a torque datum chosen for the actual screw joint, such that the rotation speed is reduced to zero at the attainment of the torque datum. Thereafter, the second tightening step is commenced at full power from the tightening tool.
- A shortcoming of this known method is that the full power application on the screw joint from the start of the second tightening step still causes scattering of the final pretension level. The delivered torque as well as the rotation speed will increase too rapidly to avoid an unacceptable torque overshoot at very stiff joints.
- By governing the increase rate of the torque application it is possible to obtain a tightening process which is advantageous both from the ergonomic and the pretension accuracy point of view. The device according to the invention is particularly intended for manually supported tightening tools by which the tiresome and uncomfortable jerks normally occurring at the end of the tightening process are eliminated.
- The torque growth characteristic depends on a number of factors such as the output power of the tool, the rotation speed of the tool, the characteristic of the threaded joint etc. For a certain tool, however, the output torque growth is always a function of the threaded joint characteristic, such as if the threaded joint has a weak characteristic with a slow torque growth in relation to the angle of rotation or a stiff characteristic with a steep torque growth in relation to angle of rotation, the output torque growth of the tool will vary correspondingly.
- The optimum torque growth speed from the ergonomic point of view depends on several parameters such as
- 1. The strength of the operator.
- 2. The operator' s ability to react fast.
- 3. The torque level.
- 4. The torque snug level, if used.
- 5. The operator' s work position.
- 6. The shut-off speed.
- Since there are several parametres involved, it is realized that from the ergonomic point of view it is important to be able to adjust the torque growth speed for obtaining a good reaction torque characteristic.
- By the invention, the above problems are solved in that the torque growth speed in the second step is controlled to correspond to man' s ability to respond to the developed reaction torque.
- This is obtained by means of a device having the features recited in the appended claim.
- In the torque range of 15-150 Nm, suitable torque growth values should be 25-150 Nm/s, whereas in the torque range above 150 Nm 250 Nm/s in combination with short tightening times 0,1 - 0,2 s are suitable. In the latter case, the process time is too short for the operator to react at all.
- The method and device according to the invention will be described in further detail below with reference to the drawings.
- On the drawings:
- Fig 1 shows a diagram illustrating the torque growth when using a device according to the invention.
- Fig 2 shows schematically a device according to one embodiment of the invention.
- In Fig 1 there is shown a three-axes diagram illustrating the relationship between torque designated M, the angle speed designated φ̇ and time t. Following the horizontal time axis, the first tightening step I is illustrated at the left and the second subsequent tightening step II is illustrated at the right. The first tightening step I is commenced in that a constant torque D1 is applied on the threaded joint. D1 represents the torque developed by the power tool, whereas the reaction torque from the threaded joint is illustrated by a curve abc. As the installed torque in the threaded joint, curve abc, has reached a snug level Ms, the torque application from the power tool is ceased. The first tightening step is completed.
- Looking at the angle speed illustrated below the horizontal time axis, there is shown a very steep acceleration of the joint up to an angle rotation level φ̇₁ which remains substantially constant up to the point ts in which the torque snug level Ms is reached.
- When starting the second step, a torque D2 developed by the power tool is successively increased from a level corresponding to the torque level D1 of the first tightening step. According to the illustration of Fig 1, the applied torque D2 is gradually increased along a straight line. To illustrate the reaction torque from the threaded joint, there are illustrated three different joint characteristics a, b, and c which represent joints of different stiffness. Curve a represent the stiffest joint and c the weakest joint.
- The threaded joints are intended to be pretensioned up to a final predetermined level corresponding to a torque MF, and dependent on how stiff the torque/time characteristic of the actual joint the second tightening step will last for different time intervals. This means that the weakest joint c will take the longest time to finish, while joint a with the steepest torque/angle characteristic will be finished in the shortest time ta.
- Looking now at the most significant features of the present invention, it is to be noted that due to the acceleration of the tightening speed the angle speed will be significantly different at the end of the second tightening step for the different joints. The final pretension level is reached very quickly by joint a which has a steep torque/angle characteristic. This means that the time lapsed is short and the final angle speed φ̇ a is low. Since joint c takes a longer time to reach the pretension level MF, the final angle speed φ̇ c is much higher than the final speed for joint a.
- The resultant advantage of the new device according to the invention is that for a stiff joint, which reaches its final pretension level very quickly, the angle speed at the end of the tightening process is brought down and the torque overshoot is substantially reduced whereas the end speed at a weak joint c, which reaches its final pretension level less abruptly, is higher. Because of the weak characteristic of the latter, the kinetic energy of the rotating parts will not cause any significant torque overshoot despite a relatively high final angle speed.
- The device illustrated in Fig 2 comprises an electrically powered
tightening tool 10 comprising a brushless AC-motor, a power supply means 11 and acontrol unit 12. The power supply means 11 comprises an inverter which is fed with DC power from aDC power source 14 and which delivers AC power of variable frequency and voltage amplitude to thetool 10. - A power detecting means 15 is provided between the
DC power source 14 and the power supply means 11 and is connected to thecontrol unit 12. To the latter there is also connected a torque rate adjusting means 16 by which a desirable value of the torque changing speed may be set. - The
control unit 12 comprises a programmable processor in which all necessary data for a two-step tightening process are installed. - Fig 2 also shows that the power tool carries a
sensing means 25 for detecting the actual torque values during operation of the tool. This sensing means 25 is connected to a comparatingunit 26 in which the actual sensed torque values are compared to a desired set value. As the actual sensed value reaches the preset value a signal is delivered to thecontrol unit 12. - A preferable way to accomplish the above described control of the applied torque when using an inverter drive for an AC-powered tool is to perform the active control on the AC frequency supplied to the tool. The drive frequency which in fact is determining for the angle speed of the tool is increased in a certain way to generate a phase lag in relation to the joint. This phase lag is in turn generative of an increasing drive torque in the motor of the tool.
Claims (2)
- Device for tightening a threaded joint in two subsequent steps, comprising a first step during which the joint is tightened to a predetermined snug level, and a second step during which the joint is further tightened to a desired pretension level, said device comprising an AC-motor driven power tool (10), a power supply means (11) including a variable voltage and frequency output inverter connected to said power tool, and a control means (12) for governing a torque related parameter of the power supplied to said power tool (10),
characterized in that said torque related parameter is the frequency, that said control means (12) includes a programmable unit capable of changing continuously in relation to time the frequency of said power supply means to thereby change said parameter, and an adjusting means for setting a time related increase rate of said parameter for accomplishing a continuously increasing rotation speed of said power tool (10), starting from zero during said second tightening step. - Device according to claim 1, wherein said control means comprises a microprocessor in which a circuit is arranged to provide a ramp for gradually increasing the output frequency of said inverter during tightening.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| SE8903134A SE8903134L (en) | 1989-09-22 | 1989-09-22 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TENSION OF THROUGH TAPES |
| SE8903134 | 1989-09-22 |
Publications (3)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP0419435A2 EP0419435A2 (en) | 1991-03-27 |
| EP0419435A3 EP0419435A3 (en) | 1991-12-04 |
| EP0419435B1 true EP0419435B1 (en) | 1995-07-19 |
Family
ID=20376960
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP19900850316 Expired - Lifetime EP0419435B1 (en) | 1989-09-22 | 1990-09-24 | Device for tightening threaded joints |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP0419435B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP3505175B2 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69020994T2 (en) |
| SE (1) | SE8903134L (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE506118C2 (en) * | 1993-09-02 | 1997-11-10 | Atlas Copco Tools Ab | Method for tightening threaded joints to a desired bias level by means of a manually operated force nut puller comprising a downward phase and a biasing phase, sensing the torque resistance in the joint and interrupting rotation at the desired bias level reached |
| SE513563C2 (en) * | 1998-03-19 | 2000-10-02 | Atlas Copco Tools Ab | Method for self-programming control systems for power nuts during initial tightening procedures |
| US7058291B2 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2006-06-06 | Black & Decker Inc. | Brushless DC motor |
| US6538403B2 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2003-03-25 | Black & Decker Inc. | Brushless DC motor sensor control system and method |
| US6975050B2 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2005-12-13 | Black & Decker Inc. | Brushless DC motor |
| DE10133923B4 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2015-10-22 | Paul-Heinz Wagner | Method for automatically controlling a screwing operation |
| CA2535299C (en) * | 2006-02-06 | 2014-07-22 | Dan Provost | Method for applying preset torques to threaded fasteners and a power tool therefor |
| DE102006017193A1 (en) | 2006-04-12 | 2007-10-25 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for tightening a screw connection and screwing tool |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS5969271A (en) * | 1982-10-13 | 1984-04-19 | 第一電通株式会社 | Screw clamping device using induction motor |
| NZ214090A (en) * | 1985-11-06 | 1989-01-27 | Sps Technologies | Pulse width control of ac induction motor |
-
1989
- 1989-09-22 SE SE8903134A patent/SE8903134L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
1990
- 1990-09-24 DE DE1990620994 patent/DE69020994T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1990-09-24 EP EP19900850316 patent/EP0419435B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-09-25 JP JP25204690A patent/JP3505175B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| SE8903134L (en) | 1991-03-23 |
| DE69020994T2 (en) | 1996-04-11 |
| JPH03184775A (en) | 1991-08-12 |
| SE8903134D0 (en) | 1989-09-22 |
| EP0419435A2 (en) | 1991-03-27 |
| JP3505175B2 (en) | 2004-03-08 |
| DE69020994D1 (en) | 1995-08-24 |
| EP0419435A3 (en) | 1991-12-04 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5245747A (en) | Device for tightening threaded joints | |
| EP0811466B1 (en) | Improvements in or relating to power tools | |
| US5637968A (en) | Power tool with automatic downshift feature | |
| US8025106B2 (en) | Method for tightening a screw connection and screw driving tool | |
| KR100376990B1 (en) | Torque control type impact wrench | |
| JP3452373B2 (en) | Screw fastening device and screw fastening method | |
| US4851170A (en) | Injection control method of injection molding machine | |
| US5519604A (en) | Method and device for tightening threaded joints | |
| GB2265728A (en) | System and method to compensate for torque overshoot in rotary power tools | |
| EP0419435B1 (en) | Device for tightening threaded joints | |
| EP1699600B1 (en) | Method for governing the operation of a pneumatic impulse wrench and a power screw joint tightening tool system | |
| US4947015A (en) | Process for the control of the feed motion and touch-on motion of a grinding wheel | |
| EP1015187B1 (en) | Process for tightening screw joints | |
| EP0271903A2 (en) | Apparatus for tightening screw-threaded fasteners | |
| EP0271902A2 (en) | Method of and apparatus for tightening screw-threaded fasteners | |
| EP0266066B1 (en) | Power tool | |
| JPH07124827A (en) | Screw tightening device | |
| JP4467666B2 (en) | Nutrunner control method and control device | |
| JPH07106548B2 (en) | Electric screwdriver with slip detection function | |
| EP0419436B1 (en) | Method and device for tightening threaded joints | |
| EP0403460B1 (en) | Power wrench for tightening screw joints | |
| JPS63191B2 (en) | ||
| JPH08126945A (en) | Automatic grinding robot | |
| JPH02116479A (en) | Screw fastening device | |
| JP2576224B2 (en) | Numerical control unit |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT |
|
| PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19920507 |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19931014 |
|
| RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ATLAS COPCO TOOLS AB, NACKA |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT |
|
| ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed | ||
| REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69020994 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19950824 |
|
| ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed | ||
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20080915 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20080926 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20080924 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20081002 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20090924 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20100531 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090930 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100401 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090924 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090924 |