EP0064568A1 - A process for the treatment of a fibrous structure - Google Patents
A process for the treatment of a fibrous structure Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0064568A1 EP0064568A1 EP81103658A EP81103658A EP0064568A1 EP 0064568 A1 EP0064568 A1 EP 0064568A1 EP 81103658 A EP81103658 A EP 81103658A EP 81103658 A EP81103658 A EP 81103658A EP 0064568 A1 EP0064568 A1 EP 0064568A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- treatment
- component
- polyester
- fibrous structure
- fibers
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01F—CHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
- D01F11/00—Chemical after-treatment of artificial filaments or the like during manufacture
- D01F11/04—Chemical after-treatment of artificial filaments or the like during manufacture of synthetic polymers
- D01F11/08—Chemical after-treatment of artificial filaments or the like during manufacture of synthetic polymers of macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01F—CHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
- D01F8/00—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof
- D01F8/04—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof from synthetic polymers
- D01F8/14—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof from synthetic polymers with at least one polyester as constituent
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a process for the treatment of a fibrous structure containing polyester.
- alkali treatment developes a soft handle (in the meaning of grip and/or feeling) of said polyester fibrous structure by partial dissolution and removal of fiber material.
- Said alkali treatment is primarily important for the manufacture of polyester fibrous structures comprising essentially one type of polyester.
- the treatment of a fiber mixture consisting of alkali easily soluble fibers and of alkali hardly soluble fibers with alkali can lead to an excellent soft handle by dissolution and removal of the easily soluble fibers.
- the latter treatment does not only need considerably long time in order to completely dissolve the easily soluble fibers, but also may attack the hardly soluble fibers in some extent; especially in case of hardly soluble fibers comprising polyester said alkali treatment may lead to an unexpected deterioration of the physical properties of the hardly soluble polyester fibers.
- somebody tries to shorten the period of treatment by making the easily soluble fibers still more soluble in alkali the resulting very easily soluble fibers cannot withstand the conventional conditions during mixing, blending, knitting and weaving processes due to a deterioration of their physical properties.
- said very easily soluble fibers suffer from certain difficulties during the fiber spinning (extruding) process. At present, this latter method is not practically applied, though an outstanding soft handle can be obtained.
- conjugated (composite) fibers consisting of an alkali easily soluble component and of an alkali hardly soluble component in order to remove one component thereof and to obtain micro (ultra) fine and/or special shaped fibers rises a still more serious problem, since those fine fibers which are designated to remain within the alkali treated fibrous product are very often easily dissolved.
- the present invention provides a process for the treatment of a fibrous structure which structure comprises two components or more, at least one component thereof is a polyester containing S0 3 M groups wherein M represents hydrogen or a metal, which process includes a pre-treatment of the fibrous structure with a degrading amate for said certain polyester prior to the further treatment for the removal of said certain polyester preferably by a treatment with an alkaline reagent (alkali treatment).
- the process according to the present invention results not only in a soft and bonny polyester fibrous structure with sufficient resilience but also enhance this the efficiency of the alkali treatment.
- the term "fibrous structure" is intended to include the whole fiber itself and processed goods such as yarn, staple fiber, tow, top, woven fabric, knitted fabric, and non-woven fabric, made from those fibers. Every type of said fibrous structure may contain finishing agents such as silicone resin, melamine resin and urethane resin.
- the fibrous structure comprises two components or more at least one thereof is a polyester containing S0 3 M groups wherein M represents hydrogen or a metal.
- the arrangement of said components within the fibrous structure includes mixtures of these separately spun components obtained by subsequent mixing or blending processes or the like.
- Another type of arrangement is a fibrous structure formed from conjugated fibers consisting of said two or more components one of which is a 503M group containing polyester.
- a further type of arrangement comprises a fibrous structure obtained by mixing conjugated fibers and ordinary fibers.
- the fibrous structure containing as the removable component a S0 3 M group containing polyester together with one or more other component(s) and the present invention is not limited to any particular arrangement of said components.
- the component A represents the easily soluble component which should be removed by the alkali treatment.
- the sea component A is generally the easily soluble component.
- the easily soluble polyester component which should be removed by the alkali treatment is a polyester containing S0 3 M groups wherein M represents a metal, particularly an.alkali metal or an alkaline earth metal or the hydrogen atom.
- M represents a metal, particularly an.alkali metal or an alkaline earth metal or the hydrogen atom.
- the one or more other component(s) forming the fibrous structure can be selected from synthetic fibers such as polyester, polyamide and polyacryl fibers or from semi-synthetic fibers such as acetate fibers, regenerated fibers such as rayon fibers and/or from natural fibers such as cotton, wool and silk fibers, the material of all of said fibers is rather more hardly soluble with respect to the alkaline reagent than the easily soluble polyester component which should be removed by the alkali treatment.
- the benefits of the' present invention are particularly remarkable in connection with polyester fibers which actually are hardly soluble but not highly resistant with respect to the alkaline reagent and the conditions used in the alkali treatment.
- the alkali treatment results in a hydrolysis of the selected polyester with an alkaline reagent.
- Good results may be obtained with an alkali treatment using the following conditions: (1) maintaining the fibrous structure for 30-120 min within a boiling aqueous solution of an alkaline reagent such as for example sodium hydroxide, or (2) impregnating the fibrous structure with an alkaline reagent and maintaining the impregnated fibrous structure for 10-30 hours at 40-60°C or (3) impregnating the fibrous structure with an alkaline reagent and allowing the action of dry heat or superheated steam for 1-5 min at 130-200°C.
- an alkaline reagent such as for example sodium hydroxide
- the alkaline reagent for the alkali treatment can be selected from typical and known alkaline substances such as alkali metal hydroxides for example sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and the like or alkaline earth metal hydroxide for example calcium hydroxide, barium hydroxide and the like or other basic salts for example sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate and the like.
- alkali metal hydroxides for example sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and the like
- alkaline earth metal hydroxide for example calcium hydroxide, barium hydroxide and the like or other basic salts for example sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate and the like.
- a key feature of the process according to the present invention is thepre-treatment of the fibrous structure prior to the mentioned alkali treatment,
- the intention of said pre-treatment is a degrading of the selected polyester which should be removed afterwards.
- the degrading may yield in a lower average molecular weight of said certain polyester and/or may in any other way promote the effect of the alkali treatment.
- the degrading agents suited for the pre-treatment of polyester in the process of the present invention include for example amines such as ethylenediamine, ethylene- triamine and the like, further monoethanolamine and similar compounds, further zinc salts such as zinc chloride, zinc sulfate, zinc nitrate and the like, further oxidizing agents such as hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorit, sodium chlorit, and further typical acidic compounds, for example inorganic acids such as hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid and the like or organic acids, for example formic acid, oxalic acid and the like.
- Especially acidic compounds have proven to be particularly appropriate, because they selectively degrade the S0 3 M groups containing polyester. Therefore said acidic compounds are preferably used as degrading agents in the pre-treatment of the process according to the present invention.
- the degrading pre-treatment can be effected in several ways, for example by the following processes:
- the degrading pre-treatment is by no way limited to the above-listed methods. Indeed any suited process can be applied which results in a lowering of the average molecular weight of the selected polyester by the action of the degrading agent(s).
- the treatment with acid in a boiling aqueous solution preferred conditions look for a treatment at a pH-value below 2 for about 30 min at 110-140°C or at a pH-value of about 3 for 60 min at 110-140°C.
- selected additives to the treating bath for example such as carrier agent, surfactant agent or quaternary ammonium salt can even improve the results of the action of the degrading agent.
- the process according to the present invention proves to be particularly effective for the treatment of island-in-the-sea-type conjugated fiber both components thereof comprises polyester wherein one polyester component is more easily soluble in the alkaline reagent used for alkali treatment. If somebody tries to remove the easily soluble component (A) of island-in-the-sea-type fibers according to figure 3 only the fibers shown in figure 11 can be obtained, because in addition to the component (A) a part of the hardly soluble component (B) is also dissolved during the alkali treatment. To the contrary the process according to the present invention allows a complete removal of the component (A) prior to the hydrolysis of component (B) starts and therefore the inventive process finally leads to fibers having a cross-section according to figure 10.
- the process according to the present invention allows to maintain the original shape of the island components during the removal of the sea component. Therefore, if an island-in-the-sea-type fiber as shown in figure 1 is treated along the process according to the present invention, the respective independent islands can be obtained separately with minimum damage of the island component in the outside portion thereof. To the contrary, the conventional process sometimes dissolve the outside portion of the island component before the island component located within the inner section of the fiber have been separated.
- the degrading pre-treatment according to the present invention increases the effectiveness of the subsequent alkali treatment, this means the so-called alkali reduction rate of the selected polyester. It is known in the art, that said alkali reduction rate can also be increased by the conventional process, if a quaternary ammonium salt is used during the alkali treatment. The presence of the ammonium salt increases the alkali reduction rates of both components, the polyester intended to be removed and the other component which should remain in the treated fibrous structure. To the contrary the degrading pre-treatment according to the present invention allows to increase selectively the alkali reduction rate of only the one component, which should be removed afterwards. Therefore, the conventional process does not attain the same effect as the process according to the present invention, even if the conventional process uses a quaternary ammonium salt during the alkali treatment.
- a fabric in taffeta weave has been woven from island-in-the-sea-type fibers (75 denier, 36 filaments) as shown in figure 3, using said fibers for both warp and weft yarn.
- the specifications of the used fibers are the following:
- the fabric was immersed in a boiling 1 % aqueous sulfuric acid solution for 60 min. Subsequently the alkali treatment was effected in order to completely remove the component A by immersing said pre-treated fabric in a boiling 1.5 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution for 4 min. After removal from the alkaline bath and drying the fabric shows a weight reduction in the amount of 30.5 %. Thereafter the fabric was dyed using an conventional method. The dyed fabric provided a mild color tone, high water absorption, excellent handle (in the meaning of grip and/or feeling) and was free from the problems originated from yarn slippage and a reduction of yarn tenacity. An investigation of the cross-section of the obtained fibers yields sharp edges such as shown in figure 10.
- the fabric as mentioned in example 1 has been treated directly with the boiling 1.5 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution therefore omitting any degrading pre-treatment with sulfuric acid.
- the complete removal of the component A took 110 min and yielded a weight reduction of the treated and dried fabric in the amount of 48%. This far higher weight reduction indicates that the alkali treatment does not only remove the component A but also remove in an significant amount the component B.
- the fabric according to example 1 has been treated in the boiling 1.5 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution in the additional presence of 0.8 % DYK-1125 (a quaternary ammonium salt available from Ippo Co., Ltd.).
- the component A was completely removed in a short period of 15 min.
- the treated and dried fabric shows a weight reduction in the large amount of 65 %, indicating that the component B has been removed in a rather high extent.
- the fabrics obtained to comparative examples 1 and 2 have been dyed by an conventional method.
- the dyed fabrics show a considerable yarn slippage and poor tenacity.
- the tenacity has been determined with the Elmendorf tearing tester apparatus. The results are the following:
- the process according to the comparative examples 1 and 2 realize the valuable properties of the inventive treated product in a far less amount.
- the fibers obtained by the comparative examples 1 and 2 show a fiber cross-section in some extent as shown in figures 11 and 12, indicating that the original shape of component B has been deformed.
- said fabric was immersed in a boiling 0.5 % aqueous hydrochloric acid solution for 60 min.
- the subsequent alkali treatment for completely removal of the polyester component was effected by immersing the pre-treated fabric in a boiling 0.1 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution for 35 min. Thereafter the fabric was dyed by a conventional method.
- the obtained wool fabric showed an outstanding capability connected with an excellent handle.
- a sample hosiery was prepared by knitting island-in-the-sea-type fibers (225 denier, 24 filaments) having a cross-section as shown in figure 1.
- the specifications of the used fibers are as follows:
- the degrading.pre-treatment of said sample hosiery was effected by immersing said hosiery in a 10 % aqueous phosphoric acid solution for 30 min at 130°C.
- the subsequent alkali treatment was effected by introducing the pre-treated sample in a boiling 1.5 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution for 4 min.
- the combined results of both treatments is a complete removal of the component A and a final product comprising a beatiful hosiery knit consisting of micro fine fibers.
- the weight reduction amounts 22.2 %.
- An investigation of the cross-section of the remaining micro fine fibers proved that the island portions have not been reduced substantially; the tenacity of these micro fine fibers amount 730 g/ filament.
- a further sample of the same hosiery as used in example 3 was treated directly in the boiling 1.5 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution, therefore omitting any degrading pre-treatment with aqueous phosphoric acid solution.
- an alkali treatment period as long as 150 min was necessary.
- Said long alkali treatment yielded in a weight reduction of 44.0 %, proving a significant removal of polyethylene terephthalate microfine fibers.
- a weight lost of the micro fine fibers in an average value of approximately 30 % has been established.
- the tenacity of the remaining micro fine fibers has been decreased as low as 330 g/filament.
- micro fine fibers obtained by the process of the present invention according to the example 3 showed a uniform fiber thickness of 0.2 den, while the respective micro fine fibers obtained according to the comparative example 5 showed a large fluctuation of fiber thickness in the range of 0.1-0.2 den.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Chemical Or Physical Treatment Of Fibers (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a process for the treatment of a fibrous structure containing polyester.
- According to the art the treatment of a polyester fibrous structure with an alkaline reagent (in the following termed as "alkali treatment") developes a soft handle (in the meaning of grip and/or feeling) of said polyester fibrous structure by partial dissolution and removal of fiber material. Said alkali treatment is primarily important for the manufacture of polyester fibrous structures comprising essentially one type of polyester. Furthermore, it is known that the treatment of a fiber mixture consisting of alkali easily soluble fibers and of alkali hardly soluble fibers with alkali can lead to an excellent soft handle by dissolution and removal of the easily soluble fibers. However, the latter treatment does not only need considerably long time in order to completely dissolve the easily soluble fibers, but also may attack the hardly soluble fibers in some extent; especially in case of hardly soluble fibers comprising polyester said alkali treatment may lead to an unexpected deterioration of the physical properties of the hardly soluble polyester fibers. On the other hand, if somebody tries to shorten the period of treatment by making the easily soluble fibers still more soluble in alkali the resulting very easily soluble fibers cannot withstand the conventional conditions during mixing, blending, knitting and weaving processes due to a deterioration of their physical properties. Furthermore, said very easily soluble fibers suffer from certain difficulties during the fiber spinning (extruding) process. At present, this latter method is not practically applied, though an outstanding soft handle can be obtained.
- The alkali treatment of conjugated (composite) fibers consisting of an alkali easily soluble component and of an alkali hardly soluble component in order to remove one component thereof and to obtain micro (ultra) fine and/or special shaped fibers rises a still more serious problem, since those fine fibers which are designated to remain within the alkali treated fibrous product are very often easily dissolved.
- It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for the treatment of a fibrous structure which structure comprises two components or more at least one component thereof is intended to be removed, which treatment includes the removal of said component(s) , and which process facilitates the removal of said component(s) , avoids any significant deterioration of the physical properties of the remaining component(s) and/or results in a better handle of the final product,
- It is a further object of the present invention to provide said respective process for the treatment of a fibrous structure which comprises a mixture of individual fibers consisting of different materials.
- It is a further object of the present invention to provide said respective process for the, treatment of a fibrous structure which contains multi-component fibers, for example so-called island-in-the-sea type fibers.
- It is a still further object of the present invention to provide said respective process for the treatment of a fibrous structure in order to remove at least one component thereof, which represents a polyester.
- As a result of intensive studies by the inventors to solve the above-mentioned problems and objects a process has been established which allows to selectively dissolve only the easily soluble component, especially an easily soluble polyester in a short time. Therefore, the foregoing elucidated problems and objects are solved or greatly reduced by the present invention.
- In order to give a summary, the present invention provides a process for the treatment of a fibrous structure which structure comprises two components or more, at least one component thereof is a polyester containing S03M groups wherein M represents hydrogen or a metal, which process includes a pre-treatment of the fibrous structure with a degrading ageht for said certain polyester prior to the further treatment for the removal of said certain polyester preferably by a treatment with an alkaline reagent (alkali treatment).
- The process according to the present invention results not only in a soft and bonny polyester fibrous structure with sufficient resilience but also enhance this the efficiency of the alkali treatment.
- Further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments thereof taken in connection with the accompanying drawing wherein:
- Figures 1 to 9 present cross-section views of exemplary conjugated fibers suited for the treatment by the process of the present invention;
- Figures 10 to 12 present cross-section views of the product obtained by removal of the sea-component of the conjugated fiber according to figure 3.
- According to the present invention the term "fibrous structure" is intended to include the whole fiber itself and processed goods such as yarn, staple fiber, tow, top, woven fabric, knitted fabric, and non-woven fabric, made from those fibers. Every type of said fibrous structure may contain finishing agents such as silicone resin, melamine resin and urethane resin. According to a distinctive feature of the present invention the fibrous structure comprises two components or more at least one thereof is a polyester containing S03M groups wherein M represents hydrogen or a metal. The arrangement of said components within the fibrous structure includes mixtures of these separately spun components obtained by subsequent mixing or blending processes or the like. Another type of arrangement is a fibrous structure formed from conjugated fibers consisting of said two or more components one of which is a 503M group containing polyester. A further type of arrangement comprises a fibrous structure obtained by mixing conjugated fibers and ordinary fibers. In other words, there are several types of the fibrous structure containing as the removable component a S03M group containing polyester together with one or more other component(s) and the present invention is not limited to any particular arrangement of said components.
- In the fibers having a cross-section according to one of the figures 1 to 9 the component A represents the easily soluble component which should be removed by the alkali treatment. In the special case of conjugated fibers having the typical island-in-the-sea type structure (for example according to figures 1, 2, 5 and 9), the sea component A is generally the easily soluble component.
- The easily soluble polyester component which should be removed by the alkali treatment is a polyester containing S03M groups wherein M represents a metal, particularly an.alkali metal or an alkaline earth metal or the hydrogen atom. Having in mind both, the spinnability of the fibers forming the fibrous structure and the effectiveness of the alkali treatment after the pre-treatment for degrading of the polyester component said removable polyester component should be polyethylene terephthalate copolymerized with preferably 1-15 molar % more preferably with 3-5 molar % of 5-(sodium sulfo)isophthalic acid. The one or more other component(s) forming the fibrous structure can be selected from synthetic fibers such as polyester, polyamide and polyacryl fibers or from semi-synthetic fibers such as acetate fibers, regenerated fibers such as rayon fibers and/or from natural fibers such as cotton, wool and silk fibers, the material of all of said fibers is rather more hardly soluble with respect to the alkaline reagent than the easily soluble polyester component which should be removed by the alkali treatment.
- The benefits of the' present invention are particularly remarkable in connection with polyester fibers which actually are hardly soluble but not highly resistant with respect to the alkaline reagent and the conditions used in the alkali treatment.
- The terms "easily soluble" and "hardly soluble" as used herein describe the solubility of the components forming the fibrous structure at the situation before the removal treatment with alkaline reagent but after the pre-treatment with the degrading agent.
- The alkali treatment results in a hydrolysis of the selected polyester with an alkaline reagent. Good results may be obtained with an alkali treatment using the following conditions: (1) maintaining the fibrous structure for 30-120 min within a boiling aqueous solution of an alkaline reagent such as for example sodium hydroxide, or (2) impregnating the fibrous structure with an alkaline reagent and maintaining the impregnated fibrous structure for 10-30 hours at 40-60°C or (3) impregnating the fibrous structure with an alkaline reagent and allowing the action of dry heat or superheated steam for 1-5 min at 130-200°C. Without intending any limitation the alkaline reagent for the alkali treatment can be selected from typical and known alkaline substances such as alkali metal hydroxides for example sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and the like or alkaline earth metal hydroxide for example calcium hydroxide, barium hydroxide and the like or other basic salts for example sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate and the like. Beside$ the above-stated and preferably used conditions for the alkali treatment any other suited method for removal of at least one component of the fibrous structure can be applied, provided stable working conditions are maintained and the remaining fiber(s) of the treated fibrous structure remains essentially uneffected.
- A key feature of the process according to the present invention is thepre-treatment of the fibrous structure prior to the mentioned alkali treatment, The intention of said pre-treatment is a degrading of the selected polyester which should be removed afterwards. The degrading may yield in a lower average molecular weight of said certain polyester and/or may in any other way promote the effect of the alkali treatment. The degrading agents suited for the pre-treatment of polyester in the process of the present invention include for example amines such as ethylenediamine, ethylene- triamine and the like, further monoethanolamine and similar compounds, further zinc salts such as zinc chloride, zinc sulfate, zinc nitrate and the like, further oxidizing agents such as hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorit, sodium chlorit, and further typical acidic compounds, for example inorganic acids such as hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid and the like or organic acids, for example formic acid, oxalic acid and the like. Especially acidic compounds have proven to be particularly appropriate, because they selectively degrade the S03M groups containing polyester. Therefore said acidic compounds are preferably used as degrading agents in the pre-treatment of the process according to the present invention.
- The degrading pre-treatment can be effected in several ways, for example by the following processes:
- (1) By immersing the fibrous structure for about 10-120 min into a boiling aqueous solution containing the degrading agent;
- (2) by adding the degrading agent to the fibrous structure and the subsequent action of saturated vaporfor about 1to30 min at 100-130°C;
- (3) by adding the degrading agent to the fibrous structure and the subsequent action of dry heat or superheated steam for about 1-10 min at 130-220°C;
- (4) or by adding the degrading agent to the fibrous structure followed by the continued reaction for 10-30 hours at 40-60°C.
- The degrading pre-treatment is by no way limited to the above-listed methods. Indeed any suited process can be applied which results in a lowering of the average molecular weight of the selected polyester by the action of the degrading agent(s). Regarding the treatment with acid in a boiling aqueous solution preferred conditions look for a treatment at a pH-value below 2 for about 30 min at 110-140°C or at a pH-value of about 3 for 60 min at 110-140°C. The addition of selected additives to the treating bath for example such as carrier agent, surfactant agent or quaternary ammonium salt can even improve the results of the action of the degrading agent.
- In the following there are stated some results of the characteristic features of the process according to the present invention in comparison with conventional processes:
- (1} According to a conventional process the treatment of a fibrous structure comprising blended yarn or mixed filament yarn in order to remove the desired component needs a rather long treatment period which often yields to an substantial deterioration of the remaining fibers. To the contrary the process according to the present invention requires a significant shorter treatment period and provides a fibrous structure with a better handle without loss of physical properties of the remaining fibers.
- This highly desired result is obtained without any impairing of spinning and/or weaving conditions of the fibers. As stated earlier some very easily soluble fibers can be rapidly removed by an alkali treatment however the manufacturing conditions of those very easily soluble fibers provides difficulties with respect to stable spinning or weaving conditions. To the contrary, the process according to the present invention does not impair the manufacturing of the fibers, because the distinctive pre-treatment with a selected degrading agent for the polyester promotes the hydrolysis rate in an alkaline environment.
- (2) The process according to the present invention proves to be particularly effective for the treatment of island-in-the-sea-type conjugated fiber both components thereof comprises polyester wherein one polyester component is more easily soluble in the alkaline reagent used for alkali treatment. If somebody tries to remove the easily soluble component (A) of island-in-the-sea-type fibers according to figure 3 only the fibers shown in figure 11 can be obtained, because in addition to the component (A) a part of the hardly soluble component (B) is also dissolved during the alkali treatment. To the contrary the process according to the present invention allows a complete removal of the component (A) prior to the hydrolysis of component (B) starts and therefore the inventive process finally leads to fibers having a cross-section according to figure 10. In fact the process according to the present invention allows to maintain the original shape of the island components during the removal of the sea component. Therefore, if an island-in-the-sea-type fiber as shown in figure 1 is treated along the process according to the present invention, the respective independent islands can be obtained separately with minimum damage of the island component in the outside portion thereof. To the contrary, the conventional process sometimes dissolve the outside portion of the island component before the island component located within the inner section of the fiber have been separated.
- (3) The degrading pre-treatment according to the present invention increases the effectiveness of the subsequent alkali treatment, this means the so-called alkali reduction rate of the selected polyester. It is known in the art, that said alkali reduction rate can also be increased by the conventional process, if a quaternary ammonium salt is used during the alkali treatment. The presence of the ammonium salt increases the alkali reduction rates of both components, the polyester intended to be removed and the other component which should remain in the treated fibrous structure. To the contrary the degrading pre-treatment according to the present invention allows to increase selectively the alkali reduction rate of only the one component, which should be removed afterwards. Therefore, the conventional process does not attain the same effect as the process according to the present invention, even if the conventional process uses a quaternary ammonium salt during the alkali treatment.
- The following examples are provided for a further illustration of the process according to the present invention. These examples serve only for illustration purposes and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention.
- A fabric in taffeta weave has been woven from island-in-the-sea-type fibers (75 denier, 36 filaments) as shown in figure 3, using said fibers for both warp and weft yarn. The specifications of the used fibers are the following:
- Component A: Polyethylene terephthalate copolymerized with 4 molar % of 5-(sodium sulfo) isophthalic acid;
- Component B: Polyethylene terephthalate; Ratio A:B: 30:70
- For effecting the degrading pre-treatment said fabric was immersed in a boiling 1 % aqueous sulfuric acid solution for 60 min. Subsequently the alkali treatment was effected in order to completely remove the component A by immersing said pre-treated fabric in a boiling 1.5 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution for 4 min. After removal from the alkaline bath and drying the fabric shows a weight reduction in the amount of 30.5 %. Thereafter the fabric was dyed using an conventional method. The dyed fabric provided a mild color tone, high water absorption, excellent handle (in the meaning of grip and/or feeling) and was free from the problems originated from yarn slippage and a reduction of yarn tenacity. An investigation of the cross-section of the obtained fibers yields sharp edges such as shown in figure 10.
- The fabric as mentioned in example 1 has been treated directly with the boiling 1.5 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution therefore omitting any degrading pre-treatment with sulfuric acid. The complete removal of the component A took 110 min and yielded a weight reduction of the treated and dried fabric in the amount of 48%. This far higher weight reduction indicates that the alkali treatment does not only remove the component A but also remove in an significant amount the component B.
- The fabric according to example 1 has been treated in the boiling 1.5 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution in the additional presence of 0.8 % DYK-1125 (a quaternary ammonium salt available from Ippo Co., Ltd.). The component A was completely removed in a short period of 15 min. However the treated and dried fabric shows a weight reduction in the large amount of 65 %, indicating that the component B has been removed in a rather high extent.
-
- The process according to the comparative examples 1 and 2 realize the valuable properties of the inventive treated product in a far less amount. The fibers obtained by the comparative examples 1 and 2 show a fiber cross-section in some extent as shown in figures 11 and 12, indicating that the original shape of component B has been deformed.
- From the starting components 20 % staple fiber of polyethylene terephthalate copolymerized with 4 molar % of 5-(sodium sulfo) isophthalic acid, and 80 % wool fiber blended yarn has been prepared. Said yarn was woven into a twill structure and from the obtained twill structure a fabric has been manufactured by conventional twilling process.
- In order to effect the degrading pre-treatment according to the present invention said fabric was immersed in a boiling 0.5 % aqueous hydrochloric acid solution for 60 min. The subsequent alkali treatment for completely removal of the polyester component was effected by immersing the pre-treated fabric in a boiling 0.1 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution for 35 min. Thereafter the fabric was dyed by a conventional method. The obtained wool fabric showed an outstanding capability connected with an excellent handle.
- The same fabric as mentioned in example 2 was treated directly in the boiling 0.1 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution for 35 min omitting any degrading pre-treatment with aqueous hydrochloric acid solution. Said alkali treatment was insufficient to remove the polyester component completely. After a conventional dyeing process the obtained dyed fabric do not show the characteristic features of the fabric obtained by the inventive process.
- The same fabric as mentioned in example 2 was treated in a boiling 1.5 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution omitting any degrading pre-treatment with hydrochloric acid solution. The alkali treatment was effected for a sufficient period in order to remove the polyester component completely. The investigation of the weight reduction proved, that said longer alkali treatment removed in addition a significant part of the wool component. The finally obtained fabric was completely different to the product of the process according to the present invention.
- A sample hosiery was prepared by knitting island-in-the-sea-type fibers (225 denier, 24 filaments) having a cross-section as shown in figure 1. The specifications of the used fibers are as follows:
- Component A: Polyethylene terephthalate copolymerized with 4 molar % of 5-(sodium sulfo) isophthalic acid;
- Component B: Polyethylene terephthalate;
- Ratio A:B: 22:78;
- Denier of component B in monofilament: 0.2 den;
- Component B: 36 filaments.
- The degrading.pre-treatment of said sample hosiery was effected by immersing said hosiery in a 10 % aqueous phosphoric acid solution for 30 min at 130°C. The subsequent alkali treatment was effected by introducing the pre-treated sample in a boiling 1.5 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution for 4 min. The combined results of both treatments is a complete removal of the component A and a final product comprising a beatiful hosiery knit consisting of micro fine fibers. The weight reduction amounts 22.2 %. An investigation of the cross-section of the remaining micro fine fibers proved that the island portions have not been reduced substantially; the tenacity of these micro fine fibers amount 730 g/ filament.
- A further sample of the same hosiery as used in example 3 was treated directly in the boiling 1.5 % aqueous sodium hydroxide solution, therefore omitting any degrading pre-treatment with aqueous phosphoric acid solution. In order to succeed in a complete removal of the component A an alkali treatment period as long as 150 min was necessary. Said long alkali treatment yielded in a weight reduction of 44.0 %, proving a significant removal of polyethylene terephthalate microfine fibers. In fact a weight lost of the micro fine fibers in an average value of approximately 30 % has been established. The tenacity of the remaining micro fine fibers has been decreased as low as 330 g/filament.
- In addition,the micro fine fibers obtained by the process of the present invention according to the example 3 showed a uniform fiber thickness of 0.2 den, while the respective micro fine fibers obtained according to the comparative example 5 showed a large fluctuation of fiber thickness in the range of 0.1-0.2 den.
- Although the present invention has been described with reference to the specific details of particular embodiments it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention, and it is, therefore, aimed in the appended claims to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
the removable polyester component contains S03M groups wherein M represents hydrogen or a metal, and prior to that removal treatment there is provided a pre-treatment of the fibrous structure with a degrading agent for said S03M qroups containing polyester.
wherein said removal treatment is effected by the action of an alkaline reagent.
wherein said degrading agent comprises an acid medium.
wherein said acid medium is an inorganic acid.
wherein said inorganic acid is used in the form of a diluted boiling aqueous acidic solution.
wherein the multi-component fiber provides a plurality of cores within the fiber cross-section, and the S03M groups containing polyester forms the material between said cores.
wherein the multi-component fiber comprises at least 5 cores within the fiber cross-section.
wherein the multi-component fiber comprises at least 10 cores within the fiber cross-section.
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP19810103658 EP0064568B1 (en) | 1981-05-12 | 1981-05-12 | A process for the treatment of a fibrous structure |
| DE8181103658T DE3166794D1 (en) | 1981-05-12 | 1981-05-12 | A process for the treatment of a fibrous structure |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP19810103658 EP0064568B1 (en) | 1981-05-12 | 1981-05-12 | A process for the treatment of a fibrous structure |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP0064568A1 true EP0064568A1 (en) | 1982-11-17 |
| EP0064568B1 EP0064568B1 (en) | 1984-10-24 |
Family
ID=8187707
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP19810103658 Expired EP0064568B1 (en) | 1981-05-12 | 1981-05-12 | A process for the treatment of a fibrous structure |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP0064568B1 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE3166794D1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0361191A3 (en) * | 1988-09-13 | 1991-01-16 | Kuraray Co., Ltd. | Composite fiber and process for producing the same |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB1306974A (en) * | 1970-07-16 | 1973-02-14 | Toray Industries | Synthetic fine filament bundle and island-in-a-sea- type composite filament usable for manufacturing the bundle and processes of manufacturing the same |
| GB1458472A (en) * | 1973-04-05 | 1976-12-15 | Toray Industries | Multi-component fibres |
| US4118529A (en) * | 1975-07-14 | 1978-10-03 | Kuraray Company, Limited | Suede woven fabric and a process of manufacturing the same |
| JPS5551820A (en) * | 1978-09-14 | 1980-04-15 | Toray Ind Inc | Production of polyester split fiber |
| JPS5576110A (en) * | 1978-12-01 | 1980-06-09 | Toray Ind Inc | Production of polyamide split yarn |
-
1981
- 1981-05-12 DE DE8181103658T patent/DE3166794D1/en not_active Expired
- 1981-05-12 EP EP19810103658 patent/EP0064568B1/en not_active Expired
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB1306974A (en) * | 1970-07-16 | 1973-02-14 | Toray Industries | Synthetic fine filament bundle and island-in-a-sea- type composite filament usable for manufacturing the bundle and processes of manufacturing the same |
| GB1458472A (en) * | 1973-04-05 | 1976-12-15 | Toray Industries | Multi-component fibres |
| US4118529A (en) * | 1975-07-14 | 1978-10-03 | Kuraray Company, Limited | Suede woven fabric and a process of manufacturing the same |
| JPS5551820A (en) * | 1978-09-14 | 1980-04-15 | Toray Ind Inc | Production of polyester split fiber |
| JPS5576110A (en) * | 1978-12-01 | 1980-06-09 | Toray Ind Inc | Production of polyamide split yarn |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| PATENTS ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN, Vol. 4 No. 124, September 2, 1980, (C-23) (606) & J& - A - 55 76 110 (TORAY), 09.06.1980 * THE WHOLE ABSTRACT * * |
| PATENTS ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN, Vol. 4, No. 89, June 25, 1980, (C-16) (571) & JP - A - 55 51 520 (Toray), 15.04.1980 * the whole abstract * * |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0361191A3 (en) * | 1988-09-13 | 1991-01-16 | Kuraray Co., Ltd. | Composite fiber and process for producing the same |
| US5059482A (en) * | 1988-09-13 | 1991-10-22 | Kuraray Company, Ltd. | Composite fiber and process for producing the same |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE3166794D1 (en) | 1984-11-29 |
| EP0064568B1 (en) | 1984-10-24 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4367070A (en) | Process for treating fibrous structure | |
| EP0064568B1 (en) | A process for the treatment of a fibrous structure | |
| JP3081782B2 (en) | Method for producing modified cellulose acetate fiber | |
| JPH0598587A (en) | Opal finish of polyester-based fiber, coloration by opal finish and colored fabric obtained by opal finish | |
| CA1156405A (en) | Process for treating fibrous structure | |
| US3018158A (en) | Viscose process | |
| JP3470514B2 (en) | Method for producing high density bulky fabric | |
| JP4015289B2 (en) | Method for preventing fibrillation of solvent-spun cellulose fiber | |
| KR100839501B1 (en) | Reduction of Knitted Fabrics Including Composite Fibers | |
| JP3194244B2 (en) | Method for producing polyester fiber fabric | |
| JPS62199885A (en) | Fiber sheet having opaque pattern and its production | |
| JPH11100738A (en) | Bulky yarn, production of bulky yarn, bulky woven or knit fabric and production of bulky woven or knit fabric | |
| JPS60215868A (en) | Production of bulky cloth | |
| JP5149140B2 (en) | Accelerator for polyester weight loss processing of polyester fiber and alkali weight reduction processing method using the same | |
| KR0125145B1 (en) | How to dye polyester fabric | |
| JPH10259568A (en) | Modified acetate fiber woven / knitted fabric and method for producing the same | |
| JP3179240B2 (en) | How to reduce yarn weight | |
| JP2613240B2 (en) | Synthetic fiber cloth processing method | |
| JP4294744B2 (en) | Fabric processing method including solvent-spun cellulose fiber | |
| JPH081026B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of cotton fabric having bulkiness | |
| JPS61119736A (en) | Sharp dyed polyester latent bulky fiber | |
| JP3458909B2 (en) | Cotton fiber-containing fiber product and method for producing the same | |
| JPS5823965A (en) | Production of polyester lace fabric | |
| JPH07279043A (en) | Fiber product containing cellulose-based fiber and its production | |
| JPH0450365A (en) | Improvement of touch of cellulose fiber |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19820312 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT NL |
|
| ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed | ||
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI NL |
|
| REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3166794 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19841129 |
|
| ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
| PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
| 26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: ENKA AG Effective date: 19850529 |
|
| NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: ENKA AG |
|
| PLBN | Opposition rejected |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED |
|
| 27O | Opposition rejected |
Effective date: 19860621 |
|
| NLR2 | Nl: decision of opposition | ||
| ITTA | It: last paid annual fee | ||
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20000508 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20000510 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20000510 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20000512 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20000531 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20010511 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20010511 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20010511 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20010512 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Effective date: 20010511 |
|
| NLV7 | Nl: ceased due to reaching the maximum lifetime of a patent |
Effective date: 20010512 |