CN113838517B - Test data analysis method for reflecting hard disk efficiency - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of hard disk test data, and discloses a test data analysis method that reflects hard disk performance. The operator groups the data that needs to be tested, and then places the grouped data in a directory path, and Add the specified keywords set to complete the data storage, and then the operator repeats this operation to add test data to multiple hard drives respectively. This test data analysis method that reflects the performance of hard disks allows operators to quickly test the performance of multiple hard disks by using a data detector, and select the better performing hard disk through comparison. This has high work efficiency and saves money. In order to save manpower and material resources, the search speed of 5 to 20 hard disks is recorded and filtered layer by layer, so that the search speed of each hard disk is expressed on a piece of paper in the form of data to facilitate operator screening.

Description

A test data analysis method reflecting hard disk performance

Technical field

The invention relates to the technical field of hard disk test data, specifically a test data analysis method that reflects hard disk performance.

Background technique

The computer hard drive is the main storage device of the computer. A hard drive consists of one or more aluminum or glass platters. These discs are covered with ferromagnetic material. The vast majority of hard drives are fixed hard drives, permanently sealed and secured within the hard drive. Early hard drive storage media were replaceable, but today's typical hard drives are fixed storage media that are sealed within the hard drive (except for a filter hole to balance air pressure). With the development, removable hard disks have also appeared, and they have become more and more popular and come in more and more types. The hard disks installed on most microcomputers are called "Winchester" because they all use Winchester technology. "hard disk" or simply "warm disk".

Some servers have as many as twenty or more hard disks. Therefore, during the performance test of each hard disk of the server through testing software, dozens to hundreds of record files are usually generated. However, manually analyzing the performance of each hard disk from these record files requires a lot of manpower and is inefficient.

Contents of the invention

The purpose of the present invention is to provide a test data analysis method that reflects the performance of a hard disk, so as to solve the problems raised in the above background technology.

In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides the following technical solution: a test data analysis method that reflects hard disk performance, including the following steps:

S1: One-time data directory setting

The operator groups the data that needs to be tested, and then places the grouped data in the directory path, and adds the specified keywords to the data to complete the data storage. Then the operator repeats this operation to store multiple hard disks. Add test data separately.

S2: One-time data screening

The operator tests multiple hard drives separately, inserts the multiple hard drives into multiple data retrievers respectively, completes the installation of the hard drives, searches for keywords in the data retrievers, and records the time the hard drive searches for the keywords. Then repeat this operation until all hard drives are tested.

S3: A time comparison

The operator compares the keyword search times of multiple hard drives, selects multiple hard drives with similar times and faster search speeds for secondary data screening, excludes the remaining hard drives, and clears the records inside the data retriever.

S4: Secondary data setup

The operator groups the data that needs to be tested, and then places the grouped data in the same directory path, and adds the specified keywords to the data to complete the data storage. Then the operator repeats this operation to select the Add test data to multiple hard drives with similar times and faster search speeds.

S5: Secondary data screening

The operator tests multiple selected hard drives separately, and inserts the multiple selected hard drives into multiple clear-record data retrievers to complete the secondary installation of the hard drive. Search for keywords and record the time it takes for multiple selected hard drives to search for keywords. Then repeat this operation until all selected hard drives are tested.

S6: Final data screening time comparison

The operator compares the keyword search times of multiple selected hard drives and selects the drive with the fastest time. Then the operator can compare the keyword search times of the hard drives to determine the performance of multiple hard drives.

Preferably, the number of hard disks in step S1 is 5 to 20. The data test between multiple hard disks is more representative, and the keywords are placed in the same directory path at one time.

Preferably, the data retrievers used in step S2 are of the same model to avoid gaps between the data retrievers, which may affect the detection of data.

Preferably, in step S3, the operator records the search keyword speeds of 5 to 20 hard drives, and extracts 3 to 10 top-ranked hard drives with similar search speeds from the records for secondary data testing. Make the data more accurate.

Preferably, the model of the data retriever used in step S4 is the same as that in step S1 to avoid errors in detection, and the keyword settings are more complicated, and the directory where the keywords are located is placed at a deeper level to increase the hard drive search key. word difficulty.

Preferably, the operator installs the selected 3 to 10 hard disks in the data retriever in step S4 in step S5. After the installation is completed, the operator can search for keywords and store the 3 to 10 hard disks. The times when keywords are searched for each hard drive are recorded separately to avoid confusion.

Preferably, in step S6, the operator compares the time records of 3 to 10 hard drives searching for keywords, and selects the hard drive with the fastest search speed. Then the performance of the hard drive will be better, and the operator will search for the remaining keywords. Hard drives are ranked to make the results better and clearer.

Compared with the existing technology, the present invention provides a test data analysis method that reflects hard disk performance, which has the following beneficial effects:

1. This test data analysis method reflects the performance of hard disks. Operators can quickly test the performance of multiple hard disks by using a data detector, and select the hard disk with better performance through comparison, which results in high work efficiency. , saving manpower and material resources.

2. This test data analysis method that reflects the performance of hard disks records the search speed of 5 to 20 hard disks for keywords and filters them layer by layer, so that the search speed of each hard disk is expressed on a piece of paper in the form of data. Convenient for operators to filter.

Detailed ways

The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be described clearly and completely below. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some of the embodiments of the present invention, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts fall within the scope of protection of the present invention. .

Example 1:

A test data analysis method that reflects hard disk performance includes the following steps:

S1: One-time data directory setting

The operator groups the data that needs to be tested, and then places the grouped data in the directory path, and adds the specified keywords to the data to complete the data storage. Then the operator repeats this operation to store the five hard disks. Add test data separately.

S2: One-time data screening

The operator tests the five hard drives separately, inserts the five hard drives into the five data retrievers respectively, completes the installation of the hard drives, searches for keywords in the data retrievers, and records the time the hard drive searches for the keywords. Then repeat this operation until 5 hard drives are tested.

S3: A time comparison

The operator compared the keyword search times of the five hard drives, and selected three hard drives with similar times and faster search speeds for secondary data screening, excluded the remaining hard drives, and cleared the records in the data retriever.

S4: Secondary data setup

The operator groups the data that needs to be tested, and then places the grouped data in the same directory path, and adds the specified keywords to the data to complete the data storage. Then the operator repeats this operation to select the Add test data to three hard drives with similar times and faster search speeds.

S5: Secondary data screening

The operator tests the three selected hard disks separately, and inserts the three selected hard disks into three clear-recorded data retrievers respectively to complete the secondary installation of the hard disk. Search for keywords and record the time it took for the three selected hard drives to search for the keywords. Then repeat this operation until all three selected hard drives have been tested.

S6: Final data screening time comparison

The operator compares the keyword search times of the three selected hard drives and selects the drive with the fastest time. Then the operator can compare the keyword search times of the hard drives to determine the performance of multiple hard drives.

Example 2:

A test data analysis method that reflects hard disk performance includes the following steps:

S1: One-time data directory setting

The operator groups the data that needs to be tested, and then places the grouped data in the directory path, and adds the specified keywords to the data to complete the data storage. Then the operator repeats this operation to store 10 hard disks. Add test data separately.

S2: One-time data screening

The operator tests multiple hard drives separately, inserts 10 hard drives into 10 data retrievers respectively, completes the installation of the hard drives, searches for keywords in the 10 data retrievers, and records the time it takes for the hard drives to search for keywords. Record, and then repeat this operation until 10 hard drives are tested.

S3: A time comparison

The operator compared the keyword search times of 10 hard drives, and selected 5 hard drives with similar times and faster search speeds for secondary data screening, excluded the remaining hard drives, and cleared the records in the data retriever.

S4: Secondary data setup

The operator groups the data that needs to be tested, and then places the grouped data in the same directory path, and adds the specified keywords to the data to complete the data storage. Then the operator repeats this operation to select the Add test data to the five hard drives with similar times and faster search speeds.

S5: Secondary data screening

The operator tests the 5 selected hard disks respectively, and inserts the 5 selected hard disks into the 5 data retrievers that clear the records, thereby completing the secondary installation of the hard disks. Search for keywords and record the time it took for the five selected hard drives to search for the keywords. Then repeat this operation until all five selected hard drives have been tested.

S6: Final data screening time comparison

The operator compares the keyword search times of the five selected hard drives and selects the drive with the fastest time. Then the operator can compare the keyword search times of the hard drives to determine the performance of the five hard drives.

Embodiment three:

A test data analysis method that reflects hard disk performance includes the following steps:

S1: One-time data directory setting

The operator groups the data that needs to be tested, and then places the grouped data in the directory path, and adds the specified keywords to the data to complete the data storage. Then the operator repeats this operation to store 20 hard disks. Add test data separately.

S2: One-time data screening

The operator tests 20 hard drives separately, inserts the 20 hard drives into 20 data retrievers respectively, completes the installation of the hard drives, searches for keywords in the data retrievers, and records the time the hard drive searches for the keywords. Then repeat this operation until all hard drives are tested.

S3: A time comparison

The operator compared the keyword search times of 20 hard drives, and selected 10 hard drives with similar times and faster search speeds for secondary data screening, excluded the remaining hard drives, and cleared the records in the data retriever.

S4: Secondary data setup

The operator groups the data that needs to be tested, and then places the grouped data in the same directory path, and adds the specified keywords to the data to complete the data storage. Then the operator repeats this operation to select the Add test data to 10 hard disks with similar times and faster search speeds.

S5: Secondary data screening

The operator tests the 10 selected hard disks separately, and inserts the 10 selected hard disks into 10 data retrievers that clear the records, thereby completing the secondary installation of the hard disks. Search for keywords and record the time it took for the 10 selected hard drives to search for the keywords. Then repeat this operation until all 10 selected hard drives have been tested.

S6: Final data screening time comparison

The operator compares the keyword search times of multiple selected hard drives and selects the drive with the fastest time. Then the operator can compare the keyword search times of the hard drives to determine the performance of multiple hard drives.

Comparing Embodiment 1, 2 and 3, Embodiment 1 uses 5 hard disks for performance testing, Embodiment 2 uses 10 hard disks for performance testing, and Embodiment 3 uses 20 hard disks for performance testing. test, so the test results of Example 3 are more accurate, but the test time used in Example 3 takes longer to complete than Example 1 and Example 2, and the accuracy of the test results of Example 2 is Compared with Embodiment 1, it is more accurate. Embodiment 2 takes less time to test than Embodiment 3. In a certain period of time, more hard drives can be tested. Therefore, after comparison, Embodiment 2 is the best implementation of this solution. example.

It should be noted that in this article, relational terms such as first and second are only used to distinguish one entity or operation from another entity or operation, and do not necessarily require or imply that these entities or operations are mutually exclusive. any such actual relationship or sequence exists between them. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprises," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that includes a list of elements includes not only those elements, but also those not expressly listed other elements, or elements inherent to the process, method, article or equipment. Without further limitation, an element defined by the statement "comprises a..." does not exclude the presence of additional identical elements in a process, method, article, or apparatus that includes the stated element. Although the embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that various changes, modifications, and substitutions can be made to these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention. and modifications, the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims (1)

1. A test data analysis method for reflecting the efficiency of a hard disk is characterized in that: the method comprises the following steps:

s1: primary data directory setup

The operator groups the data to be tested, then places the data after grouping in a directory path, adds the data with a set designated keyword to finish data storage, and then repeats the operation to respectively add test data to a plurality of hard disks;

s2: primary data screening

An operator performs separate testing on a plurality of hard disks, inserts the plurality of hard disks into a plurality of data retrievers respectively, completes the installation of the hard disks, searches keywords in the data retrievers by the operator, records the time of searching the keywords by the hard disks, and then repeats the operation until all the hard disks are tested;

s3: one time comparison

The method comprises the steps that an operator compares the time of searching keywords by a plurality of hard disks, selects a plurality of hard disks with similar time and higher searching speed from the plurality of hard disks to perform secondary data screening, eliminates the rest hard disks, and empties records in a data retriever;

s4: secondary data setting

The operator groups the data to be tested, then places the data after grouping in the same directory path, adds the data with specified keywords, and then the operator repeats the operation to add test data to a plurality of hard disks which are selected to have similar time and faster searching speed;

s5: secondary data screening

The method comprises the steps that an operator performs a test on a plurality of selected hard disks respectively, inserts the plurality of selected hard disks into a plurality of data retrievers for emptying records respectively, so that secondary installation of the hard disks is completed, searches keywords in the data retrievers for emptying records, records the time for searching the keywords by the plurality of selected hard disks, and then repeats the operation until all the plurality of selected hard disks are tested;

s6: final data screening time comparison

Comparing the time of searching the keywords by the plurality of selected hard disks by an operator, selecting the hard disk with the highest time from the time, and then determining the efficiency of the plurality of hard disks by comparing the time of searching the keywords by the operator;

in the step S3, an operator records the speeds of 5-20 hard disk search keywords, extracts 3-10 hard disks which are ranked at the front and have similar search speeds from the records, and performs secondary data test;

the data retriever used in the step S4 is the same as the model in the step S1, the setting of the keywords is more complex, and the catalogue where the keywords are located is placed in a deeper level;

in the step S5, an operator installs 3 to 10 selected hard disks in the data retriever in the step S4, after the installation is finished, the operator can search keywords and record the time of 3 to 10 hard disks searching the keywords respectively;

in the step S6, an operator compares the time records of the keywords searched by 3-10 hard disks, selects the hard disk with the highest searching speed from the time records, and ranks the rest hard disks.