Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects in the prior art, the invention provides a method for calculating the strain behavior of any strain and stress of unloading of a unidirectional ceramic matrix composite.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
the method for calculating the stress-strain behavior of any strain loading and unloading of the unidirectional ceramic matrix composite is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
step 1: judging whether the ceramic matrix composite generates matrix cracks, if not, considering that the material is not damaged, and calculating the stress under the current strain load by adopting a mixing ratio formula; if the matrix crack is generated, calculating the stress by adopting the following steps;
step 2: calculating critical strain corresponding to complete debonding of the interface when the composite material is loaded;
and step 3: calculating critical strain corresponding to complete slippage of an interface when the composite material is unloaded;
and 4, step 4: and (3) obtaining the stress of the composite material through an equation of stress increment by combining the critical strain calculated in the step (2) and the critical strain calculated in the step (3) based on a shear-lag model.
In order to optimize the technical scheme, the specific measures adopted further comprise:
further, in the step 1, the maximum strain load including the current and the previous maximum strain loads is obtainedi_max(ii) a If no damage occurs inside the material, the strain corresponds to a stress of:
σi_max=i_maxEc(1)
wherein E iscIs the modulus of elasticity of the composite material; the mean matrix crack spacing was initially calculated by substituting equation (1) into the Weibull distribution equation shown below:
wherein L is the average matrix crack spacing,Lsatis the saturated spacing of cracks in the matrix, sigma0And m is a statistical parameter, L is mixed with the length L of the composite materialcmpComparing, if the average matrix crack spacing is larger than the length of the composite material, no matrix crack is generated, the material is not damaged, and the stress under the current strain is calculated by adopting the formula shown as follows:
σi=iEc(3)
wherein,ifor the current strain, σiThe stress corresponding to the current strain; otherwise, if the material is damaged, the stress of the material is calculated by adopting the following steps.
Further, in the step 2, based on a shear model, in the loading process, the load reaches a certain magnitude, the composite material interface is completely debonded, and the average matrix crack distance is kept unchanged; at the very complete debonding of the composite, there is a relationship between stress and interfacial debond length as shown below:
wherein,
critical stress corresponding to just complete debonding of the composite material, L
d_crTan theta is the critical debond length, tan theta, corresponding to when the interface is just fully debonded
1Is expressed as
C
1Is expressed as
v
fIs the fiber volume fraction, E
fIs the modulus of elasticity of the fiber, E
cIs the equivalent elastic modulus, tau, of the composite material
iIs the interfacial shear stress of the composite material, r
fIs the radius of the fiber, σ
f_thIs the fiber thermal residual stress; at this point, the critical strain at which the composite just completely debonds
Expressed as:
further, the interfacial debond length and the average matrix crack spacing satisfy the following equation:
Lcr/2=Ld_cr(6)
wherein, L
crCombining the formulas (2), (4) and (6) to obtain the critical strain corresponding to the complete debonding of the interface by a numerical solving method, wherein the critical strain is the actual saturated matrix crack spacing corresponding to the complete debonding of the interface
Critical stress
And actual saturated matrix crack spacing L
cr;
When the current loading strain satisfies equation (7):
the average matrix crack spacing L need to be recalculated.
Further, in the step 3, if the peak load of a loading process before the current strain unloading process is the historical maximum strain load, before the current strain unloading process is calculated, the critical unloading strain corresponding to the complete slippage of the interface is calculated; after the last strain loading process is finished, assuming that n pairs of slip regions exist, the stress increment required by complete slip of the interface is as follows:
wherein,
is the length of the kth forward slip region,
the critical strain corresponding to the complete slippage of the interface is obtained by the stress increment required by the complete slippage of the corresponding interface state at the end of the previous strain loading cycle
Comprises the following steps:
wherein σ
i-1Loading the load at the end of the cycle for the previous step; during unloading, when the unloading strain is less than
When the interface is completely slipped, otherwise, the interface is partially slipped.
Further, in the step 4, based on the shear model, the following is performed:
for any loading process, a material generates a new slip region, gradually covers a reverse slip region, skips over the forward slip region when encountering the forward slip region, and continuously covers the reverse slip region until the loading process is completed, and finally the end point of the newly generated forward slip region falls into the reverse slip region; assuming that the number of the slip zone is gradually reduced from the matrix crack of the material to the bonding zone (i.e. gradually reduced from left to right), at this time, the loading strain is greater than the strain corresponding to the forward slip zone on the left side of the reverse slip zone and is less than the strain corresponding to the forward slip zone on the right side; if the forward slip region completely covers the reverse slip region, the material debonding length and the slip length are increased until the material is completely debonded; when the material is completely debonded, the debonding length and the sliding length of the material are not increased any more;
for the unloading process, the material generates a reverse slip region and gradually covers the forward slip region, when the material encounters the reverse slip region, the material skips the reverse slip region and continuously covers the forward slip region until the unloading process is completed, and finally the terminal point of the newly generated reverse slip region falls into the forward slip region; at the moment, the unloading strain is smaller than the strain corresponding to the left reverse slip zone of the forward slip zone and larger than the strain corresponding to the right reverse slip zone; if the reverse slip zone completely covers the forward slip zone, the reverse slip zone will not continue to be generated because the compression process will not cause the material to generate new debonding and slip zones.
Further, in the step 4, it is assumed that the slip zones occur in pairs and the forward slip zone is in front; before the current load cycle, assuming that there are already n pairs of slip zones, for the slip zone that is missing, assuming it is present and of length 0; at the time of initial loading, 0 pair of slippage areas exist;
based on the above settings, when the current strain load is in the loading or unloading process, the stress-strain behavior is calculated as follows:
1) in the loading process, if the current loading strain meets the following relationship:
i≥i_max(10)
the loading process covers all the slip zones, and only one pair of non-zero forward slip zones and a reverse slip zone with the length of 0 exist under the current loading strain load; if the composite material is completely debonded before the current load, the corresponding stress under the current loading strain is:
at this time, the length of the first forward slip region is:
if the composite material is partially debonded under the current load, the current strain is determined
iCurrent stress σ
iAverage matrix crack spacing L and interfacial debond length L
dSubstituting in equations (4) and (5), respectively
L
crAnd L
d_crAnd combined with equation (2) with stress σ
iSolving the equation (5) for unknown number by numerical method to obtain the current loading stress sigma
iAverage matrix crack spacing L and debond length L
d;
At this time, the length of the first forward slip region
Comprises the following steps:
recording the strain generated in the first forward slip region
And strain at the time of first reverse slip region
2) In the loading process, if the current loading strain meets the following relationship:
i<i_max(14)
the current strain loading process will not completely cover all of the slip zones already present and the average matrix crack spacing L remains constant, and the forward slip zone produced by the current loading process will fall within the reverse slip zone satisfying the relationship shown below:
wherein j is the number of the reverse slip region meeting the requirement,
and
the strain generated in the j & ltth & gt and j +1 & ltth & gt forward slip zones respectively;at the moment, the nth to j +1 pairs of slippage areas are covered, a jth reverse slippage area, a jth +1 forward slippage area and a jth +1 reverse slippage area with the length of 0 are newly generated, and the length of the front j-1 pair of slippage areas is not changed;
updating the jth reverse slip zone length as:
wherein,
is the length of the kth reverse slip zone,
the length of the reverse slip zone covered under the current strain load increment;
the length of the j +1 th positive slip region is as follows:
stress increment delta sigma corresponding to current loading strain
iLength of the covered reverse slip region
Satisfies the following relationship:
the current loading strain and stress delta satisfy the relationship shown below:
wherein,
showing the actual stress of the fiber in the kth pair of slip regions and the coordinate axisThe difference between the area and the area formed by the fiber stress and the area formed by the coordinate axis when the composite material is not damaged is assumed, wherein the coordinate axis x represents the distance from one point on the composite material to the crack plane, and the coordinate axis y represents the fiber stress of the point; only when the length of the slip region changes,
the change will occur; when there is no change in the slip region,
remain unchanged during the loading and unloading processes,
the expression is as follows:
wherein,
the difference value of the peak fiber stress in the kth pair of slippage area and the fiber stress in the bonding area is expressed as follows:
equations (16) to (18) and equations (20) to (21) are substituted into equation (19) to produce Δ σ
iTo solve the object, equation (19) relates to Δ σ
iThe stress increment delta sigma under the current strain is obtained by solving the unitary quadratic equation
i(ii) a There are 2 solutions to the quadratic equation of unity, find the current load σ
i=(σ
i-1+Δσ
i) The stress generated by the j +1 th and j forward slip regions refers to the stress corresponding to the slip region before the current load calculation; substituting the solving result into formulas (16) to (18) to obtain the slip distinguishing distribution and the stress under the current strain load; recording the j +1 forward slip regionStrain generated
And strain generated in the j +1 th reverse slip region
3) In the unloading process, if the current unloading strain meets the following relationship:
the unloading process will not completely cover all slip zones already present and the average matrix crack spacing remains unchanged; the reverse slip zone resulting from the current unloading process will fall within the forward slip zone satisfying the following relationship:
wherein,
and
respectively corresponding strain generated in the j & ltth & gt and j & lt-1 & gt reverse slip zones; at the moment, n to j +1 pairs of slippage areas are covered, a jth reverse slippage area and a jth forward slippage area are newly generated, and the length of the front j-1 pair of slippage areas is kept unchanged; the jth reverse slip zone length is:
wherein,
for the length of the forward slip zone covered under the current unloading strain load increment, the length of the jth forward slip zone is as follows:
stress increment corresponding to current unloading strain increment and covered forward slip region length
Satisfies the following relationship:
the current unload strain and stress delta satisfy the relationship shown below:
equations (20) to (21) and (24) to (26) are substituted into equation (27) by Δ σ
iTo solve the object, equation (27) is for Δ σ
iHas 2 solutions to find the current load sigma
i=(σ
i-1+Δσ
i) The stress generated by the jth reverse slip region is less than or equal to the stress generated by the jth reverse slip region and is greater than the stress generated by the jth-1 reverse slip region; substituting the solving result into formulas (24) - (26) to obtain the distribution and stress of the slip region under the current strain load; recording the strain generated in the jth reverse slip region
4) When unloaded, the unload strain satisfies the relationship shown below:
if the composite material completely slips in the reverse direction, the unloading process covers all existing slip zones, and only one reverse slip zone with the length being non-zero and one forward slip zone with the length being 0 exist under the current load; again because the compression process does not cause the material to create new debonded areas and slip areas, this reverse slip zone is equal to the total length of all slip zones already present:
the stress under strain load at this time was calculated by the following formula:
recording the strain when the 1 st forward slip region is generated
And strain at the time of generation of 1 st reverse slip region
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
1. the invention provides a prediction method of any strain loading and unloading stress strain behavior of a unidirectional ceramic matrix composite, which considers mesoscopic damage mechanisms such as matrix cracking, interface debonding, covering of a sliding area and the like, and different interface states such as whether an interface is completely debonded and completely slid or not, and provides a direct calculation method of matrix crack spacing;
2. the method for judging the coverage of the slippage area is simpler and more efficient, the equation relation between stress and strain can be quickly established, the solution of the stress is converted into the solution of the equation, the stress-strain behavior of the unidirectional ceramic matrix composite under the action of any strain loading and unloading is quickly predicted, and a foundation is provided for the dynamics research of the ceramic matrix composite.
Detailed Description
The present invention will now be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Table 1 is a table of parameters for a unidirectional ceramic matrix composite.
TABLE 1 Material parameters
The method for calculating the stress-strain behavior of any strain loading and unloading of the unidirectional ceramic matrix composite specifically comprises the following steps:
step 1: and judging whether the ceramic matrix composite generates matrix cracks, if not, determining that the material is not damaged, and calculating the stress under the current strain load by adopting a mixing ratio formula. If a matrix crack occurs, the stress is calculated by the following procedure.
Obtaining a maximum pre-strain load including the current andi_max. If no damage occurs inside the material, the strain corresponds to a stress of:
σi_max=i_maxEc(1)
wherein E iscIs the modulus of elasticity of the composite material. The mean matrix crack spacing was initially calculated by substituting equation (1) into the Weibull distribution equation shown below:
wherein L is the average matrix crack spacing, LsatIs the saturated spacing of cracks in the matrix, sigma0And m is a statistical parameter, L is compared with the length L of the composite materialcmpA comparison is made. If the average matrix crack spacing is larger than the length of the composite material, no matrix crack is generated, the material is not damaged, and the stress under the current strain is calculated by adopting the formula shown as follows:
σi=iEc(3)
wherein,ifor the current strain, σiCorresponding to the current strainAnd (4) stress. Otherwise, if the material is damaged, the stress of the material is calculated by adopting the following steps.
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an arbitrary strain-plus-unload curve. The present example is illustrated with the last unloading process as the current strain load cycle. The composite material has already developed matrix cracks prior to the current strain relief cycle, and therefore the calculation of the stress-strain curve for the current strain relief cycle requires the following steps.
Step 2: and calculating the critical strain corresponding to complete debonding of the interface when the composite material is loaded. Based on a shear-lag model, in the loading process, the load reaches a certain magnitude, the composite material interface is completely debonded, and the average matrix crack spacing is kept unchanged. At the very complete debonding of the composite, there is a relationship between stress and interfacial debond length as shown below:
wherein,
critical stress corresponding to just complete debonding of the composite material, L
d_crTan theta is the critical debond length, tan theta, corresponding to when the interface is just fully debonded
1Is expressed as
C
1Is expressed as
v
fIs the fiber volume fraction, E
fIs the modulus of elasticity of the fiber, E
cIs the equivalent elastic modulus, tau, of the composite material
iIs the interfacial shear stress of the composite material, r
fIs the radius of the fiber, σ
f_thIs the fiber thermal residual stress. At this point, the strain at which the composite just completely debonded
Can be expressed as:
further, the interfacial debond length and the average matrix crack spacing satisfy the following equation:
Lcr/2=Ld_cr(6)
wherein, L
crThe critical strain corresponding to the complete debonding of the interface can be obtained by combining the formulas (2), (4) and (6) and a numerical solution method for the actual saturated matrix crack spacing corresponding to the complete debonding of the interface
Critical stress
And actual saturated matrix crack spacing L
cr. Wherein the matrix crack spacing only needs to be recalculated if the current loading strain satisfies equation (7).
In this example, complete debonding of the composite corresponds to a strain of 0.0057. In addition, the unloading process does not need to recalculate the crack spacing of the matrix, and the step is skipped. After the loading of the previous step is finished, the average matrix crack spacing is 1502 mu m.
And step 3: and if the peak load of a loading process before the current strain unloading process is the historical maximum strain load, calculating the critical unloading strain corresponding to the complete slippage of the interface before the calculation of the current strain unloading process. After the last strain loading process is finished, assuming that n pairs of slip regions exist, the stress increment required by complete slip of the interface is as follows:
wherein,
is the length of the kth forward slip region,
the stress increment required for complete slippage of the corresponding interface state at the end of the previous strain loading cycle. The critical strain corresponding to complete interface slip is:
wherein σ
i-1And loading the load at the end of the cycle process for the previous step. During unloading, when the unloading strain is less than
When the interface is completely slipped, otherwise, the interface is partially slipped.
In this example, step 3 need not be performed because the peak load of the loading process prior to the current load is not the historical maximum strain load. During the previous unload cycle calculation, the strain corresponding to complete interface slip was-0.0013.
And 4, step 4: based on a shear-lag model, for any loading process, a material generates a new slip region and gradually covers a reverse slip region, when a forward slip region is encountered, the forward slip region is skipped, the reverse slip region is continuously covered until the loading process is completed, and finally the end point of the newly generated forward slip region falls into the reverse slip region. At this time, the loading strain is greater than the strain corresponding to the left forward slip region of the reverse slip region and less than the strain corresponding to the right forward slip region (assuming that the number of the slip regions gradually decreases from the crack of the substrate of the material to the bonding region, i.e. gradually decreases from left to right). If the forward slip zone completely covers the reverse slip zone, the material debonding length and the slip length will increase until the material is completely debonded. When fully debonded, the debonded length and the slip length of the material will not increase. In the unloading process, the material generates a reverse slip region and gradually covers the forward slip region, when the material encounters the reverse slip region, the material skips the reverse slip region and continuously covers the forward slip region until the unloading process is completed, and finally the terminal point of the newly generated reverse slip region falls into the forward slip region. At this time, the unloading strain is smaller than the strain corresponding to the left reverse slip region of the forward slip region and larger than the strain corresponding to the right reverse slip region. If the reverse slip zone completely covers the forward slip zone, the reverse slip zone will not continue to be generated because the compression process will not cause the material to generate new debonding and slip zones.
It is assumed that the slip zones occur in pairs with the forward slip zone preceding. Before the current load cycle, it is assumed that there are already n pairs of slip zones, and for the slip zone that is missing, it is assumed that it is present and of length 0. At initial loading, there are 0 pairs of slip zones.
Based on the above discussion, the current strain load is discussed below as a calculation of stress during loading or unloading.
1) In the loading process, if the current loading strain meets the following relationship:
i≥i_max(10)
the loading process covers all the slip zones, and only one pair of non-zero forward slip zones and a reverse slip zone with the length of 0 exist under the current loading strain load; if the composite material is completely debonded before the current load, the corresponding stress under the current loading strain is:
at this time, the length of the first forward slip region is:
if the composite material is partially debonded under the current load, the current strain is determined
iCurrent stress σ
i(unknown parameters), average matrix crack spacing L and interfacial debond length L
dSubstituting in equations (4) and (5), respectively
L
crAnd L
d_crWill combine equation (2) with stress σ
iSolving the equation (5) for unknown number by numerical method to obtain the current loading stress sigma
iAverage matrix crack spacing L and debond length L
d。
At this time, the length of the first slip zone is:
recording the strain generated in the first forward slip region
And strain at the time of first reverse slip region
2) In the loading process, if the current loading strain meets the following relationship:
i<i_max(14)
the current strain loading process will not completely cover all of the slip zones already present and the average matrix crack spacing L remains the same.
j is the reverse glide zone number that meets the requirements, where,
and
the strains at the time of generation of the j-th and j + 1-th forward slip regions, respectively. At this time, the n to j +1 pairs of slip regions are covered, and a new j reverse slip region, a j +1 forward slip region and a length of 0 are generatedThe front j-1 pair of slip zones of the (j + 1) th reverse slip zone have no change in length.
The jth reverse slip zone length is:
wherein,
is the length of the kth reverse slip zone,
is the length of the reverse slip zone covered at the current strain load increment.
The length of the j +1 th positive slip region is as follows:
stress increment delta sigma corresponding to current loading strain
iLength of the covered reverse slip region
Satisfies the following relationship:
the current loading strain and stress delta satisfy the relationship shown below:
wherein,
the difference value between the area enclosed by the fiber actual stress and the coordinate axis in the kth pair of slippage areas and the area enclosed by the fiber stress and the coordinate axis when the composite material is not damaged is shown (the coordinate axis x represents the previous one on the composite material)The distance of the point from the crack plane, the coordinate axis y representing the fiber stress at that point); only when the length of the slip region changes,
the change will occur; when there is no change in the slip region,
remain unchanged during the loading and unloading processes,
the expression is as follows:
wherein,
the difference value of the peak fiber stress in the kth pair of slippage area and the fiber stress in the bonding area is expressed as follows:
equations (16) to (18) and equations (20) to (21) are substituted into equation (19) to produce Δ σ
iTo solve the object, equation (19) relates to Δ σ
iThe stress increment delta sigma under the current strain is obtained by solving the unitary quadratic equation
i(ii) a There are 2 solutions to the quadratic equation of unity, find the current load σ
i=(σ
i-1+Δσ
i) The stress generated by the j +1 th and j forward slip regions refers to the stress corresponding to the slip region before the current load calculation; substituting the solving result into formulas (16) to (18) to obtain the slip distinguishing distribution and the stress under the current strain load; recording the strain generated in the j +1 forward slip region
And strain generated in the j +1 th reverse slip region
3) In the unloading process, if the current unloading strain meets the following relationship:
the unloading process will not completely cover all slip zones already present and the average matrix crack spacing remains unchanged. The reverse slip zone resulting from the current unloading process will fall within the forward slip zone satisfying the following relationship:
wherein,
and
corresponding strains when the j-th and j-1-th reverse slip regions are generated respectively. At the moment, n to j +1 pairs of slip zones are covered, a new jth reverse slip zone and a jth forward slip zone are generated, and the length of the front j-1 pair of slip zones is kept unchanged. The jth reverse slip zone length is:
wherein,
for the length of the forward slip zone covered under the current unloading strain load increment, the length of the jth forward slip zone is as follows:
stress increment corresponding to current unloading strain increment and covered forward slip region length
Satisfies the following relationship:
the current unload strain and stress delta satisfy the relationship shown below:
equations (20) to (21) and (24) to (26) are substituted into equation (27) by Δ σ
iTo solve the object, equation (27) is for Δ σ
iHas 2 solutions to find the current load sigma
i=(σ
i-1+Δσ
i) The stress generated by the jth reverse slip region is less than or equal to the stress generated by the jth reverse slip region and is greater than the stress generated by the jth-1 reverse slip region; substituting the solving result into formulas (24) - (26) to obtain the distribution and stress of the slip region under the current strain load; recording the strain generated in the jth reverse slip region
4) When unloaded, the unload strain satisfies the relationship shown below:
if the composite material slips completely in the reverse direction, the unloading process will cover all slip zones that already exist, and only one reverse slip zone with a length of non-zero and one forward slip zone with a length of 0 will exist under the current load. Again because the compression process does not cause the material to create new debonded areas and slip areas, this reverse slip zone is equal to the total length of all slip zones already present:
the stress under strain load at this time was calculated by the following formula:
recording the variation of the 1 st forward slip region
And strain at the time of generation of 1 st reverse slip region
In this example, the strain during the current unloading process is not less than the strain corresponding to the complete slip of the interface, so the case 3) in step 4 is performed during the whole unloading process. After the current unload strain load cycle is calculated, the composite material slip zone distribution and the fiber stress distribution are shown in fig. 2, and the slip zone length is shown in table 2. From which it can be found that there are 2 pairs of slip zones. Under any of the strain-plus-unload curves in fig. 1, the stress-strain prediction curve of the material is shown in fig. 3.
TABLE 2 Length distribution of glide region
| Number of slipping zone
|
Forward slip zone length/um
|
Reverse slip zone length/um
|
| 1
|
9.08
|
44.94
|
| 2
|
5.59
|
49.83 |
The above is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and the protection scope of the present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned embodiments, and all technical solutions belonging to the idea of the present invention belong to the protection scope of the present invention. It should be noted that modifications and embellishments within the scope of the invention may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the principle of the invention.