[go: up one dir, main page]

CN119903967A - Method and system for predicting risk behavior of freight insurance products on online freight platforms based on explainable machine learning - Google Patents

Method and system for predicting risk behavior of freight insurance products on online freight platforms based on explainable machine learning Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN119903967A
CN119903967A CN202510087674.8A CN202510087674A CN119903967A CN 119903967 A CN119903967 A CN 119903967A CN 202510087674 A CN202510087674 A CN 202510087674A CN 119903967 A CN119903967 A CN 119903967A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
prediction
freight
machine learning
data
model
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202510087674.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
李明政
高倩
余玉刚
冯雷
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
HEFEI WEITIAN YUNTONG INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
Institute Of International Finance University Of Science And Technology Of China
University of Science and Technology of China USTC
Original Assignee
HEFEI WEITIAN YUNTONG INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
Institute Of International Finance University Of Science And Technology Of China
University of Science and Technology of China USTC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by HEFEI WEITIAN YUNTONG INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO LTD, Institute Of International Finance University Of Science And Technology Of China, University of Science and Technology of China USTC filed Critical HEFEI WEITIAN YUNTONG INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
Priority to CN202510087674.8A priority Critical patent/CN119903967A/en
Publication of CN119903967A publication Critical patent/CN119903967A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F18/00Pattern recognition
    • G06F18/20Analysing
    • G06F18/21Design or setup of recognition systems or techniques; Extraction of features in feature space; Blind source separation
    • G06F18/214Generating training patterns; Bootstrap methods, e.g. bagging or boosting
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F18/00Pattern recognition
    • G06F18/20Analysing
    • G06F18/24Classification techniques
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N20/00Machine learning
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N5/00Computing arrangements using knowledge-based models
    • G06N5/01Dynamic search techniques; Heuristics; Dynamic trees; Branch-and-bound
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/08Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
    • G06Q10/083Shipping
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/08Insurance
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/10Internal combustion engine [ICE] based vehicles
    • Y02T10/40Engine management systems

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Technology Law (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

本发明提出的基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测方法,包括以下步骤:S1、从网络货运平台获取原始样本数据,以及对应的历史出险结果;S2、原始样本数据预处理及数据集划分;S3、基于预处理完成的数据进行欠采样处理;S4、基于处理完成的预测样本数据进行特征选择;S5、多种机器学习预测模型的构建、训练及测试;S6、多种机器学习预测模型的对比评估,确定最优预测模型;S7、由优预测模型处理预测请求,并返回预测结果。本发明公开的基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测系统,包括:数据接收模块和预测模块,预测模模块中含有上述步骤S6所获得最优的预测模型。

The method for predicting the risk behavior of freight protection products on online freight platforms based on explainable machine learning proposed by the present invention includes the following steps: S1, obtaining original sample data and corresponding historical risk results from the online freight platform; S2, preprocessing the original sample data and dividing the data set; S3, undersampling processing based on the preprocessed data; S4, feature selection based on the processed prediction sample data; S5, construction, training and testing of multiple machine learning prediction models; S6, comparative evaluation of multiple machine learning prediction models to determine the optimal prediction model; S7, processing the prediction request by the optimal prediction model, and returning the prediction result. The system for predicting the risk behavior of freight protection products on online freight platforms based on explainable machine learning disclosed by the present invention includes: a data receiving module and a prediction module, and the prediction module contains the optimal prediction model obtained in the above step S6.

Description

Method and system for predicting network freight platform freight guarantee product dangerous behavior based on interpretable machine learning
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of prediction of dangerous behaviors of freight transportation platform freight transportation guarantee products, in particular to a network freight transportation platform freight transportation guarantee product dangerous behavior prediction method and system based on interpretable machine learning.
Background
With the application of Internet technology and big data, the logistics industry resources are integrated, and the development of a network freight platform is accelerated. On a network freight platform, owners, logistics enterprises and drivers can perform autonomous matching and autonomous pricing through the platform. In the process of cargo transportation, the problem of small freight loss often occurs due to the driving of a driver and the characteristics of the cargo, and the conventional insurance often suffers from larger freight loss due to the limit of claim free amount, thereby leading to the loss of the driver of the platform. In order to reduce the loss of the freight rate of the driver and establish a benign cooperative relationship between the driver and the logistics enterprises, and further to build a benign logistics ecological circle taking a truck driver as a core, the system is used as one of the largest network freight platforms nationwide, and the road song group combined insurance company particularly promotes the small freight rate guarantee service of the driver, namely the freight rate guarantee insurance. The platform integrates data of owners, logistics enterprises and drivers, the insurance products can be priced by detecting the behavior data of the drivers on the platform, and the drivers can make a decision on whether to purchase the products according to own requirements. If the driver purchases insurance, the platform can pay for the goods loss, otherwise, the driver can bear the goods loss by himself.
Considering the benefits of the freight guarantee service, at present, two problems exist in the operation of the service:
1. Risk factors affecting the risk of the small-amount goods loss guarantee order;
2. The vehicle's dangerous behavior of a certain order cannot be predicted.
In addition, current vehicle risk prediction utilizes historical data and statistical methods to predict the probability that a vehicle may have an insurance claim event in a future period of time. Current research techniques are mainly focused on the fields of data mining, machine learning, big data analysis, etc. Researchers typically use multi-source data such as historical risk records of vehicles, driver behavior data, vehicle state information, environmental factors, and traffic conditions to identify high risk individuals or groups by constructing risk assessment models (patent literature number: CN 109784586 A;CN 112381314A;CN 118395262A). These models may include logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, support vector machines, neural networks, ensemble learning methods, and the like.
Therefore, the current vehicle risk prediction method generally needs to use multi-source data such as historical risk records of vehicles, driver behavior data, vehicle state information, environmental factors, traffic conditions and the like to identify high-risk individuals or groups by constructing a risk assessment model, but in the practical application field, the data needs to be a premise that the vehicles are already provided with a certain driving behavior detection recording device to obtain the information, but in the practical application field, only a few vehicles are provided with similar recording devices, so that enterprises who push out freight guarantee services are difficult to acquire related data and thus predict vehicle risk. And the data characteristics of the platform such as the characteristics of the item, the characteristics of the goods, the history characteristics of the driver and the like are not considered in the current vehicle risk prediction, so that the made vehicle risk prediction cannot completely and comprehensively describe the risk behaviors possibly caused by the item characteristics or the order environment factors such as the characteristics of the goods.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the technical problems in the background art, the invention provides the network freight platform freight guarantee product risk-escaping behavior prediction method and system based on the interpretable machine learning.
The invention provides a network freight platform freight guarantee product risk-escaping behavior prediction method based on interpretable machine learning, which comprises the following steps:
s1, acquiring original sample data and corresponding historical risk results from a network freight platform, and classifying the acquired original sample data to serve as an alternative field of a subsequent feature selection process;
S2, preprocessing original sample data and dividing data sets
Extracting orders of purchased freight guarantee products according to the original sample data obtained in the step S1, cleaning and filtering the extracted order data to delete the order data with missing values, performing numerical type conversion processing on the data in the form of text classification to enable the data to be accepted by a machine learning algorithm, and performing binary classification marking processing on corresponding historical dangerous results;
s3, undersampling processing is carried out based on the preprocessed data
Randomly undersampling to ensure that the ratio of the number of samples to be processed to the number of samples not to be processed is 1:1, establishing a prediction sample data set with complete data and standard format by the results, extracting part of sample data from the formed prediction sample data set to be used as a training set, and taking the rest of sample data as a test set;
S4, performing feature selection based on the processed prediction sample data
Constructing a prediction model by adopting a plurality of machine learning algorithms based on the prediction sample data set, calculating marginal contribution of each characteristic parameter to a prediction result of the machine learning model, obtaining characteristic importance ranking, and selecting a plurality of characteristics with highest importance to be reserved as input characteristics of a subsequent prediction model;
S5, constructing, training and testing various machine learning prediction models
Extracting a new prediction sample data set based on the characteristics selected in the step S4, extracting part of sample data from the new prediction sample data set to serve as a new training set, and taking the rest part of sample data as a new testing set;
s6, comparing and evaluating multiple machine learning prediction models
According to a preset model evaluation method, the prediction accuracy and generalization of various machine learning prediction models are compared and analyzed, and an optimal prediction model is determined;
S7, processing a prediction request by the optimal prediction model obtained in the step S6, and returning a prediction result, wherein the returned prediction result comprises prediction of an order risk-out result and independent prediction of each characteristic risk-out behavior factor in the order.
Preferably, in S1, the feature classification includes at least three major categories of "driver feature", "vehicle feature", "order feature".
Preferably, the 'driver characteristic' class at least comprises a field of a mobile phone number of a driver and a name of the driver, the 'vehicle characteristic' class at least comprises a field of a license plate number and a vehicle type, and the 'order characteristic' class at least comprises a field of an item ID, a cargo secondary classification, a starting place, a destination, mileage and a time of building a bill.
Preferably, in S2, the classification feature in text form encodes the category type data of the character string type into numerical data using LabelEncoder so that it can be accepted by the machine learning algorithm.
Preferably, in S3, random undersampling is accomplished using RandomUnderSampler functions in the imbalanced-learn library.
Preferably, in S3, the extraction of the training set sample data is completed by using a train_test_split function.
Preferably, the duty cycle of the training set in the sample data is greater than the duty cycle of the test set in the sample data.
Preferably, in S4, the marginal contribution of each feature parameter to the prediction result of the machine learning model is calculated by a feature_ importances _function built in the model.
Preferably, in S5, the extraction of the new training set sample data is done using the train_test_split function.
Preferably, the new training set has a larger duty cycle in the new sample data than the new test set.
Preferably, in S6, the model evaluation method includes:
the method comprises the steps of obtaining a plurality of prediction results of a plurality of machine learning prediction models, determining the accuracy rate, the precision rate, the recall rate and the F1 score of each prediction model based on the plurality of prediction results, and determining an optimal prediction model based on the accuracy rate, the precision rate, the recall rate and the F1 score of each prediction model.
Preferably, the method also comprises S8, multi-method interpretability comparison analysis and risk factor weighting based on an optimal prediction model, wherein the specific method is as follows:
The method comprises the steps of respectively obtaining importance sorting results of all characteristic parameters in the aspect of predicting the risk of the freight guarantee product by using a plurality of interpretability analysis methods, comparing and analyzing, and if the comparison analysis results meet a fixed condition, determining that the importance sorting results of the characteristic parameters obtained by different methods are similar, thereby determining a final importance sorting result of the characteristic parameters, generating a risk factor weighting result of the risk of the freight guarantee product on the basis of the final importance sorting result, and feeding back to a pricing strategy formulation department of a network freight platform for feedback guidance based on formulation optimization of the integral basic price of the freight guarantee product on the project side.
The invention discloses an interpretable machine learning-based network freight platform freight guarantee product risk-escaping behavior prediction system, which comprises a data receiving module and a prediction module, wherein the data receiving module is used for receiving a data;
The data receiving module is used for receiving data input by a user, checking the validity of the received data and transmitting the checked valid data to the prediction module;
The prediction module comprises the optimal prediction model obtained in the step S6, and the prediction module automatically calls the prediction model in the prediction module to process a prediction request according to the received data and returns a prediction result, wherein the returned prediction result comprises the prediction of the order risk-out result and the independent prediction of each characteristic risk-out behavior factor in the order.
The invention discloses a freight guarantee product risk-escaping behavior prediction program development method based on an optimal prediction model, which comprises the following steps:
And (3) saving the optimal prediction model obtained in the step (S6) as a model file, loading the model file by using an HTML program code to obtain a freight guarantee product risk prediction webpage end program, enabling the program to automatically call the saved prediction model according to parameter data input by a user, and obtaining a freight guarantee product risk prediction result after calculation by the prediction model, wherein the obtained freight guarantee product risk prediction result comprises prediction of an order risk result and independent prediction of risk behavior factors of various characteristics in the order.
The invention can identify risk factors and predict the risk of the order by using a machine learning algorithm based on the order characteristics recorded by the platform, including project ID, order ID, driver ID, project_driver_history accumulated quantity of fortune, cargo name, cargo secondary classification, vehicle type, mileage, order construction time, starting place, destination and the like, and can accurately identify the risk of the order by using a machine learning algorithm to explain and analyze the characteristic importance. Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages:
1. The quick and accurate prediction of the network freight platform freight guarantee product risk of the order can be realized by using a machine learning method, other experiments are not needed, the risk of the order can be determined, and the labor cost and the time cost are greatly saved;
2. The characteristic parameters recorded on the platform level are subjected to characteristic selection by utilizing the machine learning characteristic engineering, so that the requirement of special hardware equipment for recording the characteristic data of drivers and vehicles in the traditional risk prediction scheme is avoided, and the method has higher practical value;
3. Aiming at the problem of weak interpretability of the traditional machine learning method, the invention combines the freight guarantee product risk prediction model with various interpretability analysis methods, overcomes the problem of weak interpretability of the traditional machine learning method, fully understands the network freight platform freight guarantee product prediction result of the machine learning model, acquires the importance ranking of the characteristic parameters and enhances the interpretability of the model;
4. The importance degree of the order feature in the prediction model can be determined from a qualitative angle, so that effective feedback guidance is carried out on the optimization of the pricing strategy of the network freight platform in practical application.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for predicting the risk-escaping behavior of a network freight platform freight guarantee product based on interpretable machine learning;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a system for predicting the risk-escaping behavior of a network freight platform freight guarantee product based on interpretable machine learning;
fig. 3 is a wage keeping schematic diagram of the network freight platform freight guarantee product risk-out behavior prediction system based on the interpretable machine learning.
Detailed Description
Referring to fig. 1, the network freight platform freight guarantee product risk-escaping behavior prediction method based on interpretable machine learning provided by the invention comprises the following steps:
S1, acquiring original sample data and a corresponding historical risk-out result from a network freight platform, and dividing data fields into three major categories of 'driver features', 'vehicle features', 'order features', and the like, wherein the 'driver features' category at least comprises fields such as a driver mobile phone number and a driver name, the 'vehicle features' category at least comprises fields such as a license plate number and a vehicle type, the 'order features' category at least comprises fields such as an item ID, a cargo secondary classification, an origin, a destination, a mileage, a construction time and the like, and the data fields are used as alternative fields of a subsequent feature selection process. The method comprises the steps of acquiring original sample data from a network freight platform to form original sample data for predicting the dangerous behavior of freight guarantee products, and taking collected corresponding historical dangerous results as target parameter data, namely data labels, of a data set.
S2, preprocessing original sample data
And (3) extracting orders of purchased freight guarantee products according to the original sample data obtained in the step (S1), cleaning and filtering, and deleting order data where the missing values are located. And coding the type data of the character string type into numerical data by utilizing LabelEncoder aiming at the classification characteristics of the character form so as to enable the numerical data to be accepted by a machine learning algorithm, and carrying out binary classification marking processing (namely, the risk is marked as 1 and the risk is not marked as 0) on the corresponding historical risk results.
S3, undersampling processing and data set division are carried out based on the preprocessed data
Because the network freight platform freight insurance product dangerous behavior distribution has obvious unbalance that dangerous samples (2.65%) are far smaller than non-dangerous samples (97.35%), randomUnderSampler functions in imbalanced-learn libraries are adopted for random undersampling, the ratio of the number of dangerous samples to the number of non-dangerous samples is 1:1, and the sampled data are established to form a prediction sample data set with complete data and standard format.
70% Of sample data is extracted from the set of established predicted sample data as a training set and the remaining 30% of sample data is used as a test set using the train_test_split function. the train_test_split function method can automate the process of data set division, greatly saves time, and can realize random division by setting random seeds, thereby avoiding artificial preference and ensuring the randomness of the data set. the train_test_split function style is as follows:
x_train,x_test,y_train,y_test=
train_test_split(train_data,train_target,test_size,random_state,shuffle)
The method comprises the steps of dividing a training set into a plurality of test sets, wherein x_train is a characteristic parameter of the training set after division, x_test is a characteristic parameter of the test set after division, y_train is a target parameter of the training set after division, y_test is a target parameter of the test set after division, train_data is a sample characteristic parameter data set to be divided, train_target is a sample target parameter data set to be divided, test_size is the data volume of the test set, if the test set is a floating point number between 0 and 1, the test set accounts for a ratio, if the test set is an integer, the number of data in the test set is directly represented, the rest data are counted into the training set, random_state is a seed of a random number and is used for determining how the data set is randomly disturbed and divided, if different random number seeds are set each time, train_test_split functions divide the data set into the training set and the test set in different modes, if the same random number seeds are set each time, the same training set and the test set are obtained each time, if the data are used for carrying out random sequence before the data are divided, if the data are random samples, and if the data are not random, the sequence is not the data is the data, and if the sequence is the data.
In this embodiment, the training set and the test set are divided by adopting the train_test_split function method, and the related parameter setting conditions of the functions are as follows:
the trace_data is characteristic parameter data selected from a data set;
the train_target is target parameter data, namely a historical risk-out result;
test_size is 0.3 and random_state is 42.
S4, performing feature selection based on the processed experimental sample data
The prediction sample data set based on the processing is formed by adopting a Decision Tree (Decision Tree) algorithm, a random forest (RandomForest) algorithm, a K Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithm and a fastest gradient elevator (XGBoost) algorithm to respectively construct prediction models, calculating marginal contribution of each characteristic parameter to a machine learning model prediction result by using a feature_ importances _function built in the model, obtaining feature importance ranking, and selecting a plurality of features with highest average weight selection importance by using feature importance given by four prediction models to be used as input features of a subsequent prediction model. The specific number of feature choices may be 3, 4,5, or 6.
S5, constructing, training and testing various machine learning prediction models
A new predicted sample data set is extracted based on the features selected through step S4, 70% (or 80%) of sample data is extracted from the new predicted sample data set as a new training set using the train_test_split function, and the remaining 30% (or 20%) of sample data is used as a new test set. And constructing a plurality of machine learning prediction models based on the new training set and the new testing set, wherein the machine learning prediction models comprise a Decision Tree (Decision Tree) prediction model, a random forest (RandomForest) prediction model, a K Nearest Neighbor (KNN) prediction model and a fastest gradient elevator (XGBoost) prediction model, and when determining the optimal super-parameter combination of each model, grid search super-parameter optimization is adopted, and the model performance corresponding to each super-parameter combination is determined by combining ten-fold cross verification evaluation. And respectively training and testing each prediction model by utilizing the determined optimal super-parameter combination of each machine learning prediction model, and finally outputting the freight guarantee product risk prediction result of each model.
S6, comparing and evaluating multiple machine learning prediction models
According to the two-classification model evaluation method, the prediction accuracy and generalization of various machine learning prediction models are compared and analyzed, an optimal prediction model is determined, and model evaluation indexes comprise:
Accuracy (Accuracy) the Accuracy refers to the proportion of correctly classified samples to the total number of samples.
Precision, the Precision, refers to the ratio of the number of samples correctly classified as positive by the classifier to the total number of samples output as positive by the classifier.
Recall (Recall) which refers to the ratio of the number of samples correctly classified as positive by the classifier to the total number of samples actually positive.
F1 Score (F1-Score) F1 Score considers both accuracy and recall, which is the harmonic mean of accuracy and recall.
The evaluation index calculating method comprises the following steps:
For the two classification problem, the confusion matrix is 2x2, 0 and 1 respectively, where each row represents a true value and each column represents a predicted value.
And selecting the prediction model with the highest comprehensive performance of the evaluation index as an optimal prediction model.
S7, processing a prediction request by the optimal prediction model obtained in the step S6, and returning a prediction result, wherein the returned prediction result comprises prediction of an order risk-out result and independent prediction of each characteristic risk-out behavior factor in the order.
The traditional machine learning method is more similar to a black box model, and the problem of opacity and weak interpretability exists in the prediction result, so the method is used for carrying out the interpretability analysis on the prediction model, and has very important significance for users to know the specific prediction process of the model and determine the importance ranking of each characteristic parameter.
In model interpretability analysis, the key to determining the ranking of importance of feature parameters is to understand the degree of contribution of each feature parameter to model prediction, which is typically measured by different metrics, which correspond to different model interpretability analysis methods. The model interpretability analysis method comprises a feature_ importances _function method and a SHAP (SHAPLEY ADDITIVE exPlanations) method which are built in the model.
Feature_ importances _function methods are commonly used for tree-based models, such as decision trees, random forests, gradient lifting trees and the like, and the importance of the feature parameters is calculated by means of Gini importance or information gain in the training process of the models, so that the importance ranking of the feature parameters can be obtained through feature_ importances _attribute or method after model training is completed, and the feature parameters with the greatest influence on model prediction are identified, so that the prediction process of the models can be understood.
The SHAP method is a game theory-based method for interpreting model output results of a single prediction. The marginal contribution of each characteristic parameter to the model prediction result is defined by calculating the SHAP value corresponding to each characteristic parameter in the sample data set. SHAP values are the values assigned to each characteristic parameter in the sample data set. Because for each sample in the sample dataset, the predictive model generates a predicted value that is derived from the reference value plus the sum of the corresponding SHAP values for each of the characteristic parameters. The SHAP values corresponding to the characteristic parameters obey the following expression:
yi=ybase+f(xi1)+f(xi2)+……+f(xik)
Where y i is the final model predictor for the ith sample, y base is the baseline value of the model, i.e., the mean of all sample target parameter data in the sample dataset, x i1 is the 1 st feature parameter of the ith sample, x i2 is the 2 nd feature parameter of the ith sample, and so on, f (x i1) is the SHAP value of x i1, i.e., the contribution of the 1 st feature parameter of the ith sample to the final model predictor, f (x i2) is the SHAP value of x i2, i.e., the contribution of the 2 nd feature parameter of the ith sample to the final model predictor, and so on.
The SHAP method has the advantage that it can provide an intuitive explanation about the extent of influence of a characteristic parameter on model prediction, while indicating that the characteristic parameter acts positively on the final model prediction value when f (x ik) >0, whereas indicating that the characteristic parameter acts negatively on the final model prediction value when f (x ik) <0, indicating the positive and negative of the influence. In addition, the SHAP method can be interpreted at both global and local levels, and is applicable to various types of models, including tree models, linear models, neural networks, and the like.
In this embodiment, since the determined freight guarantee product risk prediction model is the fastest gradient elevator model, which calculates the importance of the feature parameters during training, has a built-in feature_ importances _function method, therefore, two methods, namely a feature_ importances _function and SHAP, are selected for carrying out the interpretation analysis of the model, so that the model is helped to quickly determine the risk of the order and the importance ranking of the characteristic parameters, and the pricing strategy formulation of the freight guarantee product is guided based on the result.
S8, multi-method interpretability comparison analysis and risk factor weighting based on an optimal prediction model, wherein the specific method is as follows:
The method comprises the steps of respectively obtaining importance sorting results of all characteristic parameters in the aspect of predicting the risk of the freight guarantee product by using a plurality of interpretability analysis methods, comparing and analyzing, and if the comparison analysis results meet a fixed condition, determining that the importance sorting results of the characteristic parameters obtained by different methods are similar, thereby determining a final importance sorting result of the characteristic parameters, generating a risk factor weighting result of the risk of the freight guarantee product on the basis of the final importance sorting result, and feeding back to a pricing strategy formulation department of a network freight platform for feedback guidance based on formulation optimization of the integral basic price of the freight guarantee product on the project side.
Referring to fig. 2-3, the network freight platform freight guarantee product risk-escaping behavior prediction system based on interpretable machine learning disclosed by the invention comprises a data receiving module and a prediction module;
The data receiving module is used for receiving data input by a user, checking the validity of the received data and transmitting the checked valid data to the prediction module, wherein the data input by the user comprises one or more of driver characteristic data, vehicle characteristic data and order characteristic data.
The prediction module comprises the optimal prediction model obtained in the step S6, and the prediction module automatically calls the prediction model in the prediction module to process a prediction request according to the received data and returns a prediction result, wherein the returned prediction result comprises the prediction of the order risk-out result and the independent prediction of each characteristic risk-out behavior factor in the order.
The invention discloses a freight guarantee product risk-escaping behavior prediction program development method based on an optimal prediction model, which comprises the following steps:
And (3) saving the optimal prediction model obtained in the step (S6) as a model file, and loading by using an HTML program code to obtain a freight guarantee product risk prediction webpage end program, wherein the specific process is as follows:
The method comprises the steps of creating a Web application program and an API interface by using a lightweight Web framework Flask, storing a trained optimal prediction model into a back-end service framework for processing a prediction request, defining the prediction interface by using an @ app. Route decorator, processing a POST request, acquiring feature data input by a user, performing validity check and encoding, performing prediction by using the trained model, and returning a prediction result. The program can automatically call a prediction model according to parameter data input by a user, obtain a freight guarantee product risk prediction result after calculation, and enable the obtained freight guarantee product risk prediction result to comprise prediction of an order risk result and independent prediction of each characteristic risk behavior factor in the order.
In the steps, the model reliability is verified to be qualified, so that the developed freight guarantee product risk prediction program is used as an effective prediction tool, an intuitive and convenient interface is provided for the network freight platform, the network freight platform is helped to quickly determine the risk of the order and the importance ranking of the characteristic parameters, and the pricing strategy formulation of the freight guarantee product is guided based on the result. Meanwhile, the freight guarantee product risk-escaping behavior prediction system has the advantages of convenience, rapidness and high accuracy, a model is not required to be retrained, and a large amount of time cost is saved.
In summary, the invention can utilize a machine learning algorithm to identify risk factors and predict the risk of the order, and interpret and analyze the related feature importance, based on the order features recorded by the platform, including item ID, order ID, driver ID, item_driver_history accumulated quantity of fortune, cargo name, cargo secondary classification, vehicle type, mileage, time of order construction, starting place, destination and the like, so that the platform can accurately identify the risk of the order. Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages:
1. The network freight platform is selected based on the characteristic engineering to collect other characteristic data of the order records so as to predict the order risk, so that the problem that the traditional prediction method is difficult to collect the vehicle driving data is solved;
2. the quick and accurate prediction of the network freight platform freight guarantee product risk of the order can be realized by using a machine learning method, other experiments are not needed, the risk of the order can be determined, and the labor cost and the time cost are greatly saved;
3. the characteristic parameters recorded on the platform level are subjected to characteristic selection by utilizing the machine learning characteristic engineering, so that the requirement of special hardware equipment for recording the characteristic data of drivers and vehicles in the traditional risk prediction scheme is avoided, and the method has higher practical value;
4. Aiming at the problem of weak interpretability of the traditional machine learning method, the invention combines the freight guarantee product risk prediction model with various interpretability analysis methods, overcomes the problem of weak interpretability of the traditional machine learning method, fully understands the network freight platform freight guarantee product prediction result of the machine learning model, acquires the importance ranking of the characteristic parameters and enhances the interpretability of the model;
5. The importance degree of the order feature in the prediction model can be determined from a qualitative angle, so that effective feedback guidance is carried out on the optimization of the pricing strategy of the network freight platform in practical application.
6. The HTML program for predicting the risk of the freight guarantee product can automatically predict the risk of the order according to the imported order characteristic data by one key, avoids redundant experiments, and is convenient for popularization and application of a trained prediction model in industrial practice.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art, who is within the scope of the present invention, should make equivalent substitutions or modifications according to the technical scheme of the present invention and the inventive concept thereof, and should be covered by the scope of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1.基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测方法,其特征在于,包括以下步骤:1. A method for predicting risk behavior of freight protection products on a network freight platform based on explainable machine learning, characterized in that it includes the following steps: S1、从网络货运平台获取原始样本数据,以及对应的历史出险结果,并将获取的原始样本数据进行特征分类,以作为后续特征选择过程的备选字段;S1. Obtain original sample data and corresponding historical accident results from the online freight platform, and classify the obtained original sample data into features as candidate fields for the subsequent feature selection process; S2、原始样本数据预处理及数据集划分S2. Preprocessing of original sample data and division of data sets 针对步骤S1得到的原始样本数据提取出已购买运费保障产品的订单,对提取出的订单数据进行清洗过滤,以删除缺失值所在订单数据,并将形式为文字分类的数据进行数值类型转换处理使其能够被机器学习算法接受,将对应历史出险结果进行二元分类标记处理;Extract the orders of the freight insurance product purchased from the original sample data obtained in step S1, clean and filter the extracted order data to delete the order data with missing values, convert the text classification data into numeric type so that it can be accepted by the machine learning algorithm, and perform binary classification marking on the corresponding historical insurance results; S3、基于预处理完成的数据进行欠采样处理S3. Undersampling based on preprocessed data 进行随机欠采样,使得出险样本数量与未出险样本数量之比为1:1,并将上述结果建立形成数据完整且格式标准的预测样本数据集,并从所形成的预测样本数据集中抽取部分样本数据作为训练集,将其余部分样本数据作为测试集;Perform random undersampling so that the ratio of accident samples to non-accident samples is 1:1, and use the above results to form a complete and standard-formatted prediction sample data set, and extract part of the sample data from the formed prediction sample data set as a training set, and use the rest of the sample data as a test set; S4、基于处理完成的预测样本数据进行特征选择S4. Feature selection based on the processed prediction sample data 基于上述预测样本数据集采用多种机器学习算法进行预测模型的构建,并计算各特征参数对于机器学习模型预测结果的边际贡献,获得特征重要性排序,并选择重要性最高的几个个特征保留作为后续预测模型的输入特征;Based on the above prediction sample data set, a variety of machine learning algorithms are used to build a prediction model, and the marginal contribution of each feature parameter to the prediction result of the machine learning model is calculated to obtain the feature importance ranking, and the most important features are selected to be retained as the input features of the subsequent prediction model; S5、多种机器学习预测模型的构建、训练及测试S5. Construction, training and testing of various machine learning prediction models 基于经过步骤S4选择出的特征提取出新的预测样本数据集,从新的预测样本数据集中抽取部分样本数据作为新的训练集,将其余部分样本数据作为新的测试集;并基于此新的训练集和测试集,构建多种机器学习预测模型,再确定各预测模型的最优超参数组合后分别进行各预测模型的训练和测试,最终输出各模型的运费保障产品出险预测结果;A new prediction sample data set is extracted based on the features selected in step S4, and part of the sample data is extracted from the new prediction sample data set as a new training set, and the rest of the sample data is used as a new test set; and based on the new training set and test set, multiple machine learning prediction models are constructed, and then the optimal hyperparameter combination of each prediction model is determined, and then the training and testing of each prediction model are respectively performed, and finally the prediction results of the freight insurance product of each model are output; S6、多种机器学习预测模型的对比评估S6. Comparative evaluation of multiple machine learning prediction models 依据预设模型评价方法,对比分析多种机器学习预测模型的预测准确性和泛化性,确定最优预测模型;Based on the preset model evaluation method, compare and analyze the prediction accuracy and generalization of various machine learning prediction models to determine the optimal prediction model; S7、由步骤S6所获得的最优预测模型处理预测请求,并返回预测结果,所返回的预测结果包括对订单出险结果的预测以及对订单中各项特征出险行为因素的单独预测。S7. The optimal prediction model obtained in step S6 processes the prediction request and returns the prediction result. The returned prediction result includes the prediction of the accident outcome of the order and the separate prediction of each characteristic accident behavior factor in the order. 2.根据权利要求1所述的基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测方法,其特征在于,S1中,特征分类至少包括“司机特征”、“车辆特征”、“订单特征”三种大类;2. The method for predicting risk behavior of freight protection products on online freight platforms based on explainable machine learning according to claim 1 is characterized in that, in S1, the feature classification includes at least three categories: "driver features", "vehicle features" and "order features"; 优选地,“司机特征”类至少包括字段:司机手机号,司机姓名;“车辆特征”类至少包括字段:车牌号,车型;“订单特征”类至少包括字段:所属项目ID,货物二级分类,起始地,目的地,里程,建单时间。Preferably, the "driver characteristics" class includes at least the following fields: driver's mobile phone number, driver's name; the "vehicle characteristics" class includes at least the following fields: license plate number, vehicle model; the "order characteristics" class includes at least the following fields: project ID, secondary classification of goods, origin, destination, mileage, and order creation time. 3.根据权利要求1所述的基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测方法,其特征在于,S2中,文字形式的分类特征利用LabelEncoder将字符串类型的类别型数据编码为数值型数据,以使其能够被机器学习算法接受。3. According to the method for predicting the risk behavior of freight insurance products on an online freight platform based on explainable machine learning in claim 1, it is characterized in that in S2, the classification features in text form use LabelEncoder to encode the categorical data of the string type into numerical data so that it can be accepted by the machine learning algorithm. 4.根据权利要求1所述的基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测方法,其特征在于,S3中,随机欠采样采用imbalanced-learn库中的RandomUnderSampler函数完成;4. The method for predicting risk behavior of freight guarantee products on a network freight platform based on explainable machine learning according to claim 1 is characterized in that, in S3, random undersampling is completed using the RandomUnderSampler function in the imbalanced-learn library; 优选地,训练集样本数据的抽取利用train_test_split函数完成;Preferably, the extraction of training set sample data is completed using the train_test_split function; 优选地,训练集在样本数据中的占比大于测试集在样本数据中的占比。Preferably, the proportion of the training set in the sample data is greater than the proportion of the test set in the sample data. 5.根据权利要求1所述的基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测方法,其特征在于,S4中,各特征参数对于机器学习模型预测结果的边际贡献由模型内置的feature_importances_函数进行计算。5. According to the method for predicting risk behavior of freight insurance products on online freight platforms based on explainable machine learning in claim 1, it is characterized in that, in S4, the marginal contribution of each feature parameter to the prediction result of the machine learning model is calculated by the feature_importances_ function built into the model. 6.根据权利要求1所述的基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测方法,其特征在于,S5中,新的训练集样本数据的抽取利用train_test_split函数完成;6. The method for predicting risk behavior of freight insurance products on a network freight platform based on explainable machine learning according to claim 1 is characterized in that, in S5, the extraction of new training set sample data is completed using the train_test_split function; 优选地,新的训练集在新的样本数据中的占比大于新的测试集在新的样本数据中的占比。Preferably, the proportion of the new training set in the new sample data is greater than the proportion of the new test set in the new sample data. 7.根据权利要求1所述的基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测方法,其特征在于,S6中,模型评价方法包括:7. The method for predicting risk behavior of freight protection products on a network freight platform based on explainable machine learning according to claim 1, characterized in that in S6, the model evaluation method includes: 获取多种机器学习预测模型的多个预测结果;基于多个预测结果确定每个预测模型的准确率、精确率、召回率和F1评分;基于每个预测模型的准确率、精确率、召回率和F1评分确定最优预测模型。Obtain multiple prediction results of multiple machine learning prediction models; determine the accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score of each prediction model based on the multiple prediction results; determine the optimal prediction model based on the accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score of each prediction model. 8.根据权利要求1所述的基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测方法,其特征在于,还包括:S8、基于最优预测模型的多方法可解释性对比分析和风险因素赋权,具体方法如下:8. The method for predicting risk behavior of freight protection products on a network freight platform based on interpretable machine learning according to claim 1 is characterized in that it also includes: S8, multi-method interpretability comparative analysis and risk factor weighting based on the optimal prediction model, the specific method is as follows: 利用多种可解释性分析方法分别获得各特征参数在预测运费保障产品出险方面的重要性排序结果,并进行比对分析,若对比分析结果满足于定条件,则认定不同方法得到的特征参数重要性排序结果相近,从而确定一个最终的特征参数重要性排序结果,并基于此结果生成运费保障产品出险行为风险因素赋权结果,反馈给网络货运平台定价策略制定部门,用于基于项目侧的运费保障产品整体基本价格的制定优化进行反馈指导。A variety of explainable analysis methods are used to obtain the importance ranking results of each feature parameter in predicting the risk of freight insurance products, and a comparative analysis is performed. If the comparative analysis results meet certain conditions, it is determined that the importance ranking results of feature parameters obtained by different methods are similar, thereby determining a final feature parameter importance ranking result, and based on this result, the weighted result of the risk factor of the freight insurance product risk behavior is generated and fed back to the pricing strategy formulation department of the online freight platform for feedback guidance on the formulation and optimization of the overall basic price of freight insurance products based on the project side. 9.基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测系统,其特征在于,包括:数据接收模块和预测模块;9. A network freight platform freight insurance product risk behavior prediction system based on explainable machine learning, characterized in that it includes: a data receiving module and a prediction module; 数据接收模块用于接收用户输入的数据,并对接收的数据进行有效性检查,将检查有效的数据传送至预测模块;The data receiving module is used to receive the data input by the user, and to check the validity of the received data, and to transmit the checked valid data to the prediction module; 预测模模块中含有权利要求1-7任意所述基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测方法中步骤S6所获得最优的预测模型,预测模模块根据所接收的数据自动调用其内部的预测模型处理预测请求,并返回预测结果,所返回的预测结果包括对订单出险结果的预测以及对订单中各项特征出险行为因素的单独预测。The prediction module contains the optimal prediction model obtained in step S6 of the method for predicting the risk behavior of freight insurance products on an online freight platform based on explainable machine learning as described in any of claims 1-7. The prediction module automatically calls its internal prediction model to process the prediction request according to the received data, and returns the prediction result. The returned prediction result includes the prediction of the risk outcome of the order and the separate prediction of each characteristic risk behavior factor in the order. 10.基于最优预测模型的运费保障产品出险行为预测程序开发方法,其特征在于,包括以下步骤:10. A method for developing a risk behavior prediction program for a freight insurance product based on an optimal prediction model, characterized in that it comprises the following steps: 将权利要求1-7任意所述基于可解释性机器学习的网络货运平台运费保障产品出险行为预测方法中步骤S6所获得最优预测模型保存为模型文件,并利用HTML程序代码加载后得到运费保障产品出险预测网页端程序,并使该程序能够根据用户输入的参数数据自动调用所保存的预测模型,经预测模型计算后获得运费保障产品出险预测结果,所获得运费保障产品出险预测结果包括对订单出险结果的预测以及对订单中各项特征出险行为因素的单独预测。The optimal prediction model obtained in step S6 of the method for predicting the risk behavior of freight insurance products on a network freight platform based on explainable machine learning as described in any of claims 1-7 is saved as a model file, and loaded with HTML program code to obtain a freight insurance product risk prediction web page program, and the program is enabled to automatically call the saved prediction model according to the parameter data input by the user, and obtain the freight insurance product risk prediction result after calculation by the prediction model, and the obtained freight insurance product risk prediction result includes the prediction of the risk result of the order and the separate prediction of each characteristic risk behavior factor in the order.
CN202510087674.8A 2025-01-20 2025-01-20 Method and system for predicting risk behavior of freight insurance products on online freight platforms based on explainable machine learning Pending CN119903967A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202510087674.8A CN119903967A (en) 2025-01-20 2025-01-20 Method and system for predicting risk behavior of freight insurance products on online freight platforms based on explainable machine learning

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202510087674.8A CN119903967A (en) 2025-01-20 2025-01-20 Method and system for predicting risk behavior of freight insurance products on online freight platforms based on explainable machine learning

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN119903967A true CN119903967A (en) 2025-04-29

Family

ID=95467785

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202510087674.8A Pending CN119903967A (en) 2025-01-20 2025-01-20 Method and system for predicting risk behavior of freight insurance products on online freight platforms based on explainable machine learning

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN119903967A (en)

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109784586A (en) * 2019-03-07 2019-05-21 上海赢科信息技术有限公司 The prediction technique and system of the situation of being in danger of vehicle insurance
WO2020011068A1 (en) * 2018-07-10 2020-01-16 第四范式(北京)技术有限公司 Method and system for executing machine learning process
CN113240527A (en) * 2021-06-03 2021-08-10 厦门太也网络科技有限公司 Bond market default risk early warning method based on interpretable machine learning
US20220327482A1 (en) * 2021-01-08 2022-10-13 Covestro Llc Artificial intelligence for freight estimation
CN116416073A (en) * 2023-04-13 2023-07-11 北京宏瓴科技发展有限公司 Risk control method, system, device and storage medium
CN116993356A (en) * 2023-09-01 2023-11-03 中储南京智慧物流科技有限公司 A method for predicting waybill complaints on online freight platforms based on integrated learning
CN117035866A (en) * 2023-08-23 2023-11-10 中国科学技术大学 An incentive mechanism design method and system based on freight guarantee products in the scenario of an online freight platform
CN117271998A (en) * 2023-09-26 2023-12-22 中国科学技术大学 Abnormal waybill monitoring and analysis method and system in online freight platform
CN117971958A (en) * 2024-02-25 2024-05-03 杭州电子科技大学 AI visualization analysis system based on data guidance
US11983777B1 (en) * 2021-07-28 2024-05-14 Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company Systems and methods for risk factor predictive modeling with model explanations
CN118395262A (en) * 2024-04-22 2024-07-26 北京理工新源信息科技有限公司 Heavy-duty truck danger prediction method and device based on big data of vehicle behaviors

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020011068A1 (en) * 2018-07-10 2020-01-16 第四范式(北京)技术有限公司 Method and system for executing machine learning process
CN109784586A (en) * 2019-03-07 2019-05-21 上海赢科信息技术有限公司 The prediction technique and system of the situation of being in danger of vehicle insurance
US20220327482A1 (en) * 2021-01-08 2022-10-13 Covestro Llc Artificial intelligence for freight estimation
CN113240527A (en) * 2021-06-03 2021-08-10 厦门太也网络科技有限公司 Bond market default risk early warning method based on interpretable machine learning
US11983777B1 (en) * 2021-07-28 2024-05-14 Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company Systems and methods for risk factor predictive modeling with model explanations
CN116416073A (en) * 2023-04-13 2023-07-11 北京宏瓴科技发展有限公司 Risk control method, system, device and storage medium
CN117035866A (en) * 2023-08-23 2023-11-10 中国科学技术大学 An incentive mechanism design method and system based on freight guarantee products in the scenario of an online freight platform
CN116993356A (en) * 2023-09-01 2023-11-03 中储南京智慧物流科技有限公司 A method for predicting waybill complaints on online freight platforms based on integrated learning
CN117271998A (en) * 2023-09-26 2023-12-22 中国科学技术大学 Abnormal waybill monitoring and analysis method and system in online freight platform
CN117971958A (en) * 2024-02-25 2024-05-03 杭州电子科技大学 AI visualization analysis system based on data guidance
CN118395262A (en) * 2024-04-22 2024-07-26 北京理工新源信息科技有限公司 Heavy-duty truck danger prediction method and device based on big data of vehicle behaviors

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
余玉刚 等: "平台供应链的管理理论与方法前沿课题", 管理科学, vol. 34, no. 6, 30 November 2021 (2021-11-30), pages 60 - 66 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112884224B (en) Physical object addressing method, physical object addressing device, computing equipment and computer storage medium
CN112700325A (en) Method for predicting online credit return customers based on Stacking ensemble learning
CN112990989B (en) Value prediction model input data generation method, device, equipment and medium
CN112116168B (en) User behavior prediction method and device and electronic equipment
CN112035775B (en) User identification method and device based on random forest model and computer equipment
CN110033284A (en) Source of houses verification method, apparatus, equipment and storage medium
CN112184495A (en) Low-efficiency land stock monitoring system and analysis platform applying same
CN114399367A (en) Insurance product recommendation method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN115309705A (en) Data integration classification system and method for automatically identifying basic data elements of urban information model platform
CN115170327A (en) Business recruitment quotation aid decision-making method and system based on big data
KR20210091591A (en) An electronic device including evaluation operation of originated technology
CN112651493B (en) Accident vehicle discriminating method and device based on joint training model
CN120707155A (en) Customer management method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN119903967A (en) Method and system for predicting risk behavior of freight insurance products on online freight platforms based on explainable machine learning
CN119760638A (en) Charging equipment fault diagnosis method and system based on semantic fusion of multi-source heterogeneous data
Lee et al. The firm life cycle forecasting model using machine learning based on news articles
CN117917678A (en) Methods and related equipment for auxiliary engineering inspection and acceptance
CN116821616A (en) A road traffic risk assessment method, system, equipment and medium
CN115660733A (en) Sales prediction system and method based on artificial intelligence
CN115099860A (en) Real estate assessment method and device
CN119477550B (en) Data asset assessment method and system based on multi-level analysis
CN112668796A (en) Money return prediction method and system
CN115545912B (en) Credit risk prediction method and device based on green identification information
CN119599806B (en) Policy quality inspection method, device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN118569961B (en) Renting pool management method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination