CN118365424A - Procurement sourcing method and system based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combination - Google Patents
Procurement sourcing method and system based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combination Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN118365424A CN118365424A CN202410601648.8A CN202410601648A CN118365424A CN 118365424 A CN118365424 A CN 118365424A CN 202410601648 A CN202410601648 A CN 202410601648A CN 118365424 A CN118365424 A CN 118365424A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- candidate
- supplier
- combination
- procurement
- combinations
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
- G06Q30/0605—Pooling transaction partners, e.g. group buying or group selling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N20/00—Machine learning
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
本发明实施例提供一种基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源方法及系统,属于采购寻源技术领域。所述方法包括:采集采购需求数据,并基于所述采购需求数据确定候选供应商,获得候选供应商组合;分别计算各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值,以及对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值;基于各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值和对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值分别确定各候选供应商组合的采购评分,并对各候选供应商组合的采购评分执行排序;基于排序结果执行候选供应商组合推荐,并基于推荐的候选供应商组合执行采购寻源,获得采购寻源结果。本发明方案提高了寻源的质量和寻源效率。
The embodiment of the present invention provides a procurement sourcing method and system based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combinations, which belongs to the technical field of procurement sourcing. The method includes: collecting procurement demand data, and determining candidate suppliers based on the procurement demand data to obtain candidate supplier combinations; respectively calculating the combined evaluation scores of each candidate supplier combination, and the basic evaluation scores of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination; respectively determining the procurement scores of each candidate supplier combination based on the combined evaluation scores of each candidate supplier combination and the basic evaluation scores of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination, and sorting the procurement scores of each candidate supplier combination; performing candidate supplier combination recommendation based on the sorting results, and performing procurement sourcing based on the recommended candidate supplier combination to obtain procurement sourcing results. The scheme of the present invention improves the quality and efficiency of sourcing.
Description
技术领域Technical Field
本发明涉及采购寻源技术领域,具体地涉及一种基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源方法及一种基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源系统。The present invention relates to the technical field of procurement sourcing, and in particular to a procurement sourcing method based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combination and a procurement sourcing system based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combination.
背景技术Background technique
供应商关系管理(SRM)是一种致力于实现与供应商建立和维持长久、紧密伙伴关系的的解决方案,它旨在改善企业与供应商之间关系的新型管理机制,实施于围绕企业采购业务相关的领域,目标是通过与供应商建立长期、紧密的业务关系,并通过对双方资源和竞争优势的整合来共同开拓市场,扩大市场需求和份额,降低产品前期的高额成本,实现双赢的企业管理模式。目前已有基于SRM的智能采购平台,其能够响应于目标采购企业的目标采购需求,解析目标采购需求包含的物料名称、规格和数量,筛选当前交易周期下,采购每个物料所需的最小交易成本对应的目标供应商。例如公开号为CN116993444A的中国发明专利申请能够通过分析不同供应商对同规格的物料的交易价格,为采购企业筛选花费最低交易成本的目标供应商,降低采购成本。Supplier relationship management (SRM) is a solution dedicated to establishing and maintaining a long-term, close partnership with suppliers. It is a new management mechanism that aims to improve the relationship between enterprises and suppliers. It is implemented in areas related to enterprise procurement business. The goal is to establish a long-term, close business relationship with suppliers and integrate the resources and competitive advantages of both parties to jointly develop the market, expand market demand and share, reduce the high initial cost of products, and achieve a win-win enterprise management model. At present, there is an intelligent procurement platform based on SRM, which can respond to the target procurement needs of the target procurement enterprise, parse the material name, specification and quantity contained in the target procurement needs, and select the target supplier corresponding to the minimum transaction cost required to purchase each material in the current transaction cycle. For example, the Chinese invention patent application with publication number CN116993444A can analyze the transaction prices of different suppliers for materials of the same specifications, select the target supplier with the lowest transaction cost for the procurement enterprise, and reduce the procurement cost.
然而,采购企业的采购需求往往比较多样化。一方面,对于需求较多,项目协同关系比较复杂的需求,单个供应商往往无法满足需求,因此,对于同一采购需求,可能就需要划发成多个采购清单进行采购寻源。此时,如果采购清单划分地不合理,就有可能给寻源造成困难,或者难以寻找到真正合适的供应商。另一方面,对于需求类型和数据较为零散,但项目协同关系又不多的采购需求,如果将每个零散的采购需求分别进行采购寻源,往往又会增加采购的时间和成本。针对现有采购寻源方案在面对采购企业的采购需求时存在的寻源精准度不高和寻源效率低的问题,需要提出一种新的采购寻源方案。However, the procurement needs of purchasing companies are often diverse. On the one hand, for needs with more demands and more complex project collaboration relationships, a single supplier is often unable to meet the needs. Therefore, for the same procurement demand, it may be necessary to divide it into multiple procurement lists for procurement sourcing. At this time, if the procurement list is not divided reasonably, it may cause difficulties in sourcing, or it may be difficult to find a truly suitable supplier. On the other hand, for procurement needs with scattered demand types and data, but few project collaboration relationships, if each scattered procurement demand is sourced separately, it will often increase procurement time and cost. In view of the problems of low sourcing accuracy and low sourcing efficiency of existing procurement sourcing solutions when facing the procurement needs of purchasing companies, a new procurement sourcing solution needs to be proposed.
发明内容Summary of the invention
本发明实施方式的目的是提供一种基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源方法及系统,以至少解决现有采购寻源方案在面对采购企业的采购需求时存在的寻源精准度不高和寻源效率低的问题。The purpose of the embodiments of the present invention is to provide a procurement sourcing method and system based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combinations, so as to at least solve the problems of low sourcing accuracy and low sourcing efficiency in existing procurement sourcing solutions when facing the procurement needs of purchasing enterprises.
为了实现上述目的,本发明第一方面提供一种基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源方法,所述方法包括:采集采购需求数据,并基于所述采购需求数据确定候选供应商,获得候选供应商组合;分别计算各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值,以及对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值;基于各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值和对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值分别确定各候选供应商组合的采购评分,并对各候选供应商组合的采购评分执行排序;基于排序结果执行候选供应商组合推荐,并基于推荐的候选供应商组合执行采购寻源,获得采购寻源结果。In order to achieve the above-mentioned objectives, the first aspect of the present invention provides a procurement sourcing method based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combinations, the method comprising: collecting procurement demand data, and determining candidate suppliers based on the procurement demand data to obtain candidate supplier combinations; respectively calculating the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination, and the basic evaluation score of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination; respectively determining the procurement score of each candidate supplier combination based on the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination and the basic evaluation score of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination, and sorting the procurement scores of each candidate supplier combination; performing candidate supplier combination recommendation based on the sorting result, and performing procurement sourcing based on the recommended candidate supplier combination to obtain procurement sourcing results.
可选的,所述采集采购需求数据,并基于所述采购需求数据确定候选供应商,获得候选供应商组合,包括:基于所述采购需求数据生成对应的标准化总采购需求列表;基于所述标准化总采购需求列表,确定每一项采购目标所对应的候选供应商,获得候选供应商列表;基于所述标准化总采购需求列表和所述候选供应商列表执行穷举搜索匹配,获得满足所述采购需求数据对应的基础采购需求的所有供应商组合,作为候选供应商组合。Optionally, the procurement demand data is collected, and candidate suppliers are determined based on the procurement demand data to obtain a candidate supplier combination, including: generating a corresponding standardized total procurement demand list based on the procurement demand data; determining the candidate suppliers corresponding to each procurement target based on the standardized total procurement demand list to obtain a candidate supplier list; performing exhaustive search and matching based on the standardized total procurement demand list and the candidate supplier list to obtain all supplier combinations that meet the basic procurement demand corresponding to the procurement demand data as candidate supplier combinations.
可选的,所述基于所述标准化总采购需求列表和所述候选供应商列表执行穷举搜索匹配,获得满足所述采购需求数据对应的基础采购需求的所有供应商组合,作为候选供应商组合,包括:遍历供应商清单中的所有供应商,对每个供应商都考虑是否选择或不选择,从而生成所有可能的供应商组合;对于生成的每个供应商组合,过滤掉其中无法满足所述采购需求数据对应的基础采购需求的供应商组合,将剩余的供应商组合作为候选供应商组合。Optionally, an exhaustive search and match is performed based on the standardized total procurement requirement list and the candidate supplier list to obtain all supplier combinations that meet the basic procurement requirements corresponding to the procurement requirement data as candidate supplier combinations, including: traversing all suppliers in the supplier list, considering whether to select or not select each supplier, thereby generating all possible supplier combinations; for each generated supplier combination, filtering out the supplier combinations that cannot meet the basic procurement requirements corresponding to the procurement requirement data, and taking the remaining supplier combinations as candidate supplier combinations.
可选的,所述分别计算各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值,以及对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值,包括:计算各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商与所述采购需求数据之间的匹配度,作为各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值;计算各候选供应商组合内各单个候选供应商之间的配合度,作为对应各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值。Optionally, the respectively calculating of the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination and the basic evaluation score of a single candidate supplier within each candidate supplier combination includes: calculating the matching degree between a single candidate supplier within each candidate supplier combination and the procurement demand data as the basic evaluation score of a single candidate supplier within each candidate supplier combination; and calculating the coordination degree between each single candidate supplier within each candidate supplier combination as the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination.
可选的,所述计算各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商与所述采购需求数据之间的匹配度,作为各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值,包括:基于所述采购需求数据确定各采购指标的优先级;其中,所述采购指标包括:采购目标、采购数量、采购质量要求和需求交货时间;基于机器学习算法进行各单个候选供应商与各采购指标之间的匹配度,基于确定的匹配度生成各采购指标对应的匹配度分值;基于各采购指标的优先级对各采购指标对应的匹配度分值执行加权求和,获得对应单个候选供应商的与所述采购需求数据之间的匹配度;遍历所有单个候选供应商,获得各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值。Optionally, the calculation of the matching degree between a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination and the procurement demand data as a basic evaluation score for the single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination includes: determining the priority of each procurement indicator based on the procurement demand data; wherein the procurement indicators include: procurement targets, procurement quantities, procurement quality requirements and required delivery times; performing a matching degree between each single candidate supplier and each procurement indicator based on a machine learning algorithm, and generating a matching degree score corresponding to each procurement indicator based on the determined matching degree; performing a weighted summation of the matching degree scores corresponding to each procurement indicator based on the priority of each procurement indicator to obtain a matching degree between the corresponding single candidate supplier and the procurement demand data; and traversing all single candidate suppliers to obtain the basic evaluation scores of the single candidate suppliers in each candidate supplier combination.
可选的,所述计算各候选供应商组合内各单个候选供应商之间的配合度,作为对应各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值,包括:采集各候选供应商组合内各单个候选供应商的实时供货能力信息和留存采购合作信息;基于预构建的组合评价分值打分模型对所述实时供货能力信息和所述留存采购合作信息执行训练,获得各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值。Optionally, the calculation of the degree of cooperation between each individual candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination as the combined evaluation score corresponding to each candidate supplier combination includes: collecting the real-time supply capability information and retained procurement cooperation information of each individual candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination; training the real-time supply capability information and the retained procurement cooperation information based on a pre-built combined evaluation score scoring model to obtain the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination.
可选的,所述方法还包括:执行组合评价分值打分模型预构建,包括:采集历史采购数据,并基于所述历史采购数据执行各候选供应商的历史合作信息读取;执行各候选供应商随机组合,获得多个历史供应商组合;将多个历史供应商组合推送到用户端,并基于所述用户端回收用户的组合评价分值批注结果,作为各历史供应商组合的标注信息,获得标注样本;对所述标注样本执行样本扩充,获得扩充后的标注样本;基于扩充后的标注样本在预选定的神经网络中执行模型训练,获得组合评价分值打分模型。Optionally, the method also includes: executing pre-construction of a combination evaluation score scoring model, including: collecting historical procurement data, and reading historical cooperation information of each candidate supplier based on the historical procurement data; executing random combination of each candidate supplier to obtain multiple historical supplier combinations; pushing multiple historical supplier combinations to the user end, and based on the user end, recovering the user's combination evaluation score annotation results as the labeling information of each historical supplier combination to obtain labeled samples; performing sample expansion on the labeled samples to obtain expanded labeled samples; performing model training in a preselected neural network based on the expanded labeled samples to obtain a combination evaluation score scoring model.
可选的,所述基于各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值和对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值分别确定各候选供应商组合的采购评分,包括:基于各单个候选供应商的基础评价分值,在各候选供应商组合内执行求和处理,获得各候选供应商组合的基础评价分值和;基于预设权重分配关系执行各候选供应商组合的基础评价分值和赋权和各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值赋权,基于赋权结果执行各候选供应商组合的采购评分计算,获得各候选供应商组合的采购评分。Optionally, the procurement score of each candidate supplier combination is determined based on the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination and the basic evaluation score of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination, including: based on the basic evaluation score of each single candidate supplier, performing a summation process in each candidate supplier combination to obtain the sum of the basic evaluation scores of each candidate supplier combination; performing a basic evaluation score and weighting of each candidate supplier combination and a combined evaluation score weighting of each candidate supplier combination based on a preset weight allocation relationship, performing a procurement score calculation for each candidate supplier combination based on the weighting result to obtain a procurement score for each candidate supplier combination.
可选的,所述基于排序结果执行候选供应商组合推荐,包括:基于排序结果,判断采购评分大于预设推荐采购评分阈值的候选供应商组合的数量;若采购评分大于预设推荐采购评分阈值的候选供应商组合的数量大于预设数量阈值N,则在采购评分大于预设推荐采购评分阈值的候选供应商组合中取与预设数量阈值N相等的前N个候选供应商组合作为推荐的候选供应商组合;若采购评分大于预设推荐采购评分阈值的候选供应商组合的数量不大于预设数量阈值N,则将所有采购评分大于预设推荐采购评分阈值的候选供应商组合作为推荐的候选供应商组合。Optionally, the recommendation of candidate supplier combinations based on the sorting results includes: based on the sorting results, determining the number of candidate supplier combinations whose procurement scores are greater than a preset recommended procurement score threshold; if the number of candidate supplier combinations whose procurement scores are greater than the preset recommended procurement score threshold is greater than a preset number threshold N, then taking the first N candidate supplier combinations equal to the preset number threshold N among the candidate supplier combinations whose procurement scores are greater than the preset recommended procurement score threshold as recommended candidate supplier combinations; if the number of candidate supplier combinations whose procurement scores are greater than the preset recommended procurement score threshold is not greater than the preset number threshold N, then taking all candidate supplier combinations whose procurement scores are greater than the preset recommended procurement score threshold as recommended candidate supplier combinations.
可选的,所述基于推荐的候选供应商组合执行采购寻源,获得采购寻源结果,包括:基于各推荐的候选供应商组合生成对应各候选供应商组合的推荐候选供应商集;对各推荐候选供应商集执行并集处理,获得所有待寻源候选推荐候选供应商目标;执行各待寻源候选推荐候选供应商目标寻源,获得各推荐候选供应商的寻源结果;在各推荐的候选供应商组合下执行对应各推荐候选供应商的寻源结果组合,获得各推荐的候选供应商组合的寻源结果。Optionally, the procurement sourcing is performed based on the recommended candidate supplier combinations to obtain procurement sourcing results, including: generating a recommended candidate supplier set corresponding to each candidate supplier combination based on each recommended candidate supplier combination; performing union processing on each recommended candidate supplier set to obtain all candidate recommended candidate supplier targets to be sourced; performing sourcing for each candidate recommended candidate supplier target to be sourced to obtain sourcing results for each recommended candidate supplier; and performing a sourcing result combination corresponding to each recommended candidate supplier under each recommended candidate supplier combination to obtain sourcing results for each recommended candidate supplier combination.
本发明第二方面提供一种基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源系统,所述系统包括:采集单元,用于采集采购需求数据,并基于所述采购需求数据确定候选供应商,获得候选供应商组合;评分单元,用于分别计算各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值,以及对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值;处理单元,用于基于各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值和对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值分别确定各候选供应商组合的采购评分,并对各候选供应商组合的采购评分执行排序;寻源单元,用于基于排序结果执行候选供应商组合推荐,并基于推荐的候选供应商组合执行采购寻源,获得采购寻源结果。The second aspect of the present invention provides a procurement sourcing system based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combinations, the system comprising: a collection unit, used to collect procurement demand data, and determine candidate suppliers based on the procurement demand data to obtain candidate supplier combinations; a scoring unit, used to calculate the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination, and the basic evaluation score of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination; a processing unit, used to determine the procurement score of each candidate supplier combination based on the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination and the basic evaluation score of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination, and to sort the procurement scores of each candidate supplier combination; a sourcing unit, used to recommend candidate supplier combinations based on the sorting results, and perform procurement sourcing based on the recommended candidate supplier combinations to obtain procurement sourcing results.
另一方面,本发明提供一种计算机可读储存介质,该计算机可读存储介质上储存有指令,其在计算机上运行时使得计算机执行上述的基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源方法。On the other hand, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon, which, when executed on a computer, enables the computer to execute the above-mentioned procurement sourcing method based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combinations.
通过上述技术方案,本发明方案具有如下有益效果:Through the above technical solution, the solution of the present invention has the following beneficial effects:
1、提高采购效率:通过智能推荐候选供应商组合,可以快速确定潜在的供应商选择范围,节省采购人员的时间和精力。1. Improve procurement efficiency: By intelligently recommending candidate supplier combinations, you can quickly determine the potential supplier selection range and save procurement personnel’s time and energy.
2、优化供应商选择:通过计算组合评价分值和基础评价分值,可以综合考虑供应商组合的整体表现和单个供应商的能力,有助于选择最优的供应商组合。2. Optimize supplier selection: By calculating the combined evaluation score and the basic evaluation score, the overall performance of the supplier portfolio and the capabilities of individual suppliers can be comprehensively considered, which helps to select the optimal supplier portfolio.
3、提高采购决策准确性:基于采购评分排序结果进行推荐,可以减少主观因素对供应商选择的影响,提高决策的客观性和准确性。3. Improve the accuracy of procurement decisions: Making recommendations based on procurement scoring ranking results can reduce the impact of subjective factors on supplier selection and improve the objectivity and accuracy of decision-making.
4、增强采购结果可靠性:通过执行基于推荐的候选供应商组合的采购寻源,可以确保采购过程符合推荐结果,从而提高采购结果的可靠性和一致性。4. Enhance the reliability of procurement results: By executing procurement sourcing based on the recommended candidate supplier portfolio, it can ensure that the procurement process is consistent with the recommended results, thereby improving the reliability and consistency of procurement results.
本发明实施方式的其它特征和优点将在随后的具体实施方式部分予以详细说明。Other features and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail in the following detailed description.
附图说明BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
附图是用来提供对本发明实施方式的进一步理解,并且构成说明书的一部分,与下面的具体实施方式一起用于解释本发明实施方式,但并不构成对本发明实施方式的限制。在附图中:The accompanying drawings are used to provide a further understanding of the embodiments of the present invention and constitute a part of the specification. Together with the following specific embodiments, they are used to explain the embodiments of the present invention, but do not constitute a limitation on the embodiments of the present invention. In the accompanying drawings:
图1是本发明一种实施方式提供的基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源方法的步骤流程图;FIG1 is a flowchart of the steps of a procurement sourcing method based on supplier combination intelligent recommendation provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
图2是本发明一种实施方式提供的基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源系统的系统结构图。FIG2 is a system structure diagram of a procurement sourcing system based on supplier combination intelligent recommendation provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
以下结合附图对本发明的具体实施方式进行详细说明。应当理解的是,此处所描述的具体实施方式仅用于说明和解释本发明,并不用于限制本发明。The specific implementation of the present invention is described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the specific implementation described herein is only used to illustrate and explain the present invention, and is not used to limit the present invention.
图1是本发明一种实施方式提供的基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源方法的方法流程图。如图1所示,本发明实施方式提供一种基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源方法,所述方法包括:FIG1 is a method flow chart of a procurement sourcing method based on supplier combination intelligent recommendation provided by an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG1 , an embodiment of the present invention provides a procurement sourcing method based on supplier combination intelligent recommendation, the method comprising:
步骤S10:采集采购需求数据,并基于所述采购需求数据确定候选供应商,获得候选供应商组合。Step S10: Collect procurement demand data, and determine candidate suppliers based on the procurement demand data to obtain a candidate supplier combination.
具体的,基于所述采购需求数据生成对应的标准化总采购需求列表;基于所述标准化总采购需求列表,确定每一项采购目标所对应的候选供应商,获得候选供应商列表;基于所述标准化总采购需求列表和所述候选供应商列表执行穷举搜索匹配,获得满足所述采购需求数据对应的基础采购需求的所有供应商组合,作为候选供应商组合。Specifically, a corresponding standardized total procurement requirement list is generated based on the procurement requirement data; based on the standardized total procurement requirement list, the candidate suppliers corresponding to each procurement target are determined to obtain a candidate supplier list; based on the standardized total procurement requirement list and the candidate supplier list, an exhaustive search and matching is performed to obtain all supplier combinations that meet the basic procurement requirements corresponding to the procurement requirement data as candidate supplier combinations.
在本发明实施例中,候选供应商可以基于历史合作供应商留存的供应商画像确定,也可以基于大数据挖掘的潜在供应商进行确定。In an embodiment of the present invention, candidate suppliers may be determined based on supplier portraits retained by historical cooperative suppliers, or may be determined based on potential suppliers mined from big data.
在本发明实施例中,在现代商业环境中,采购管理是企业运营中至关重要的一环。为了有效管理采购需求并确保采购流程的高效性和透明度,许多企业采用自动化和智能化的方法来处理采购需求数据。基于所述采购需求数据生成对应的标准化总采购需求列表是一项关键任务。这涉及将各个部门或项目组提出的采购需求进行整合和标准化,以便更好地管理和分析这些需求。一旦获得了标准化总采购需求列表,接下来的步骤是确定每一项采购目标所对应的候选供应商,从而获得候选供应商列表。这个过程通常涉及对供应商数据库进行筛选和匹配,以确保选定的供应商能够满足企业的采购需求并符合相关的标准和要求。候选供应商的选择可能基于多个因素,包括供应商的信誉、产品质量、交货能力、价格竞争力等。In an embodiment of the present invention, in a modern business environment, procurement management is a vital part of business operations. In order to effectively manage procurement needs and ensure the efficiency and transparency of the procurement process, many companies use automated and intelligent methods to process procurement demand data. Generating a corresponding standardized total procurement demand list based on the procurement demand data is a key task. This involves integrating and standardizing the procurement needs proposed by various departments or project teams in order to better manage and analyze these needs. Once the standardized total procurement demand list is obtained, the next step is to determine the candidate suppliers corresponding to each procurement target, thereby obtaining a list of candidate suppliers. This process usually involves screening and matching the supplier database to ensure that the selected supplier can meet the company's procurement needs and meet the relevant standards and requirements. The selection of candidate suppliers may be based on multiple factors, including the supplier's reputation, product quality, delivery capabilities, price competitiveness, etc.
进一步的,基于标准化总采购需求列表和候选供应商列表执行穷举搜索匹配,以获得满足采购需求数据对应的基础采购需求的所有供应商组合,作为候选供应商组合。本发明方案提出的对应的供应商组合确定关系以确保对所有可能的供应商组合进行全面的搜索和匹配。穷举搜索匹配可以帮助企业找到最佳的供应商组合,从而实现采购成本的最小化和采购效率的最大化。Furthermore, exhaustive search and matching is performed based on the standardized total procurement demand list and the candidate supplier list to obtain all supplier combinations that meet the basic procurement demand corresponding to the procurement demand data as candidate supplier combinations. The corresponding supplier combination determination relationship proposed by the solution of the present invention ensures a comprehensive search and matching of all possible supplier combinations. Exhaustive search and matching can help enterprises find the best supplier combination, thereby minimizing procurement costs and maximizing procurement efficiency.
进一步的,所述基于所述标准化总采购需求列表和所述候选供应商列表执行穷举搜索匹配,获得满足所述采购需求数据对应的基础采购需求的所有供应商组合,作为候选供应商组合,包括:遍历供应商清单中的所有供应商,对每个供应商都考虑是否选择或不选择,从而生成所有可能的供应商组合;对于生成的每个供应商组合,过滤掉其中无法满足所述采购需求数据对应的基础采购需求的供应商组合,将剩余的供应商组合作为候选供应商组合。Furthermore, an exhaustive search and matching is performed based on the standardized total procurement requirement list and the candidate supplier list to obtain all supplier combinations that meet the basic procurement requirements corresponding to the procurement requirement data as candidate supplier combinations, including: traversing all suppliers in the supplier list, considering whether to select or not select each supplier, thereby generating all possible supplier combinations; for each generated supplier combination, filtering out the supplier combinations that cannot meet the basic procurement requirements corresponding to the procurement requirement data, and using the remaining supplier combinations as candidate supplier combinations.
在本发明实施例中,针对生成的标准化总采购需求列表和候选供应商列表,执行穷举搜索匹配的过程采用递归算法。递归算法可以遍历供应商清单中的所有供应商,并对每个供应商进行选择或不选择的操作,从而生成所有可能的供应商组合。在每一步中,算法会考虑当前供应商是选择还是不选择,然后继续向下递归处理下一个供应商,直到遍历完所有供应商,形成所有可能的供应商组合。In the embodiment of the present invention, a recursive algorithm is used to perform an exhaustive search and matching process for the generated standardized total procurement demand list and candidate supplier list. The recursive algorithm can traverse all suppliers in the supplier list and select or not select each supplier, thereby generating all possible supplier combinations. In each step, the algorithm considers whether the current supplier is selected or not, and then continues to recursively process the next supplier until all suppliers are traversed to form all possible supplier combinations.
进一步的,对于生成的每个供应商组合,需要进行基础采购需求的匹配和过滤。这一步可以利用条件判断和筛选算法来实现。对于每个供应商组合,算法会检查其中的供应商是否能够满足所述采购需求数据对应的基础采购需求。如果某个供应商组合中的供应商无法满足基础采购需求,那么该供应商组合将被过滤掉,不纳入候选供应商组合中。剩余的供应商组合则被认为是符合基础采购需求的候选供应商组合。Furthermore, for each generated supplier combination, it is necessary to match and filter the basic procurement requirements. This step can be achieved using conditional judgment and screening algorithms. For each supplier combination, the algorithm will check whether the suppliers therein can meet the basic procurement requirements corresponding to the procurement requirement data. If a supplier in a supplier combination cannot meet the basic procurement requirements, then the supplier combination will be filtered out and will not be included in the candidate supplier combination. The remaining supplier combinations are considered to be candidate supplier combinations that meet the basic procurement requirements.
本发明方案通过执行这样的穷举搜索匹配和过滤过程,可以获得所有可能的供应商组合,并筛选出符合基础采购需求的候选供应商组合。这种方法的益处在于能够全面考虑所有供应商的组合情况,确保每个供应商组合都经过严格的基础采购需求匹配,从而提高了选定供应商的准确性和可靠性。同时,通过自动化算法的应用,可以大大节省人力资源和时间成本,提高采购决策的效率和准确性。The solution of the present invention can obtain all possible supplier combinations and screen out candidate supplier combinations that meet the basic procurement requirements by performing such an exhaustive search, matching and filtering process. The benefit of this method is that it can comprehensively consider the combination of all suppliers and ensure that each supplier combination is strictly matched with the basic procurement requirements, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of the selected suppliers. At the same time, through the application of automated algorithms, human resources and time costs can be greatly saved, and the efficiency and accuracy of procurement decisions can be improved.
步骤S20:分别计算各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值,以及对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值。Step S20: Calculate the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination and the basic evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination.
具体的,本发明方案对候选供应商组合中的各候选供应商分别进行打分得到基础评价分值,其中,基础评价分值表示候选供应商本身对于采购需求的匹配度;对候选供应商组合的组合能力进行打分得到组合评价分值,组合评价分值表示候选供应商之间的配合度;结合各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值和候选供应商组合内的各供应商的基础分,得到各候选供应商组合的总评分。Specifically, the scheme of the present invention scores each candidate supplier in the candidate supplier combination to obtain a basic evaluation score, wherein the basic evaluation score represents the matching degree of the candidate supplier itself to the procurement demand; scores the combination capability of the candidate supplier combination to obtain a combined evaluation score, wherein the combined evaluation score represents the cooperation degree between the candidate suppliers; and combines the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination and the basic score of each supplier in the candidate supplier combination to obtain the total score of each candidate supplier combination.
优选的,所述分别计算各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值,以及对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值,包括:计算各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商与所述采购需求数据之间的匹配度,作为各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值;计算各候选供应商组合内各单个候选供应商之间的配合度,作为对应各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值。Preferably, the respectively calculating of the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination and the basic evaluation score of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination includes: calculating the matching degree between a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination and the procurement demand data as the basic evaluation score of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination; and calculating the coordination degree between each single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination as the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination.
具体的,所述计算各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商与所述采购需求数据之间的匹配度,作为各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值,包括:基于所述采购需求数据确定各采购指标的优先级;其中,所述采购指标包括:采购目标、采购数量、采购质量要求和需求交货时间;基于机器学习算法进行各单个候选供应商与各采购指标之间的匹配度,基于确定的匹配度生成各采购指标对应的匹配度分值;基于各采购指标的优先级对各采购指标对应的匹配度分值执行加权求和,获得对应单个候选供应商的与所述采购需求数据之间的匹配度;遍历所有单个候选供应商,获得各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值。具体的,包括以下步骤:Specifically, the calculation of the matching degree between a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination and the procurement demand data as the basic evaluation score of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination includes: determining the priority of each procurement indicator based on the procurement demand data; wherein the procurement indicators include: procurement target, procurement quantity, procurement quality requirements and required delivery time; performing the matching degree between each single candidate supplier and each procurement indicator based on a machine learning algorithm, and generating a matching degree score corresponding to each procurement indicator based on the determined matching degree; performing weighted summation on the matching degree score corresponding to each procurement indicator based on the priority of each procurement indicator to obtain the matching degree between the corresponding single candidate supplier and the procurement demand data; traversing all single candidate suppliers to obtain the basic evaluation score of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination. Specifically, the steps include:
1)确定采购指标的优先级:采购指标包括采购目标、采购数量、采购质量要求和需求交货时间。在处理采购需求数据时,首先需要确定这些采购指标的优先级顺序,以便在后续的匹配和评估过程中能够更好地权衡各指标的重要性。1) Determine the priority of procurement indicators: Procurement indicators include procurement targets, procurement quantities, procurement quality requirements, and required delivery time. When processing procurement demand data, it is necessary to first determine the priority order of these procurement indicators so that the importance of each indicator can be better weighed in the subsequent matching and evaluation process.
2)机器学习算法匹配候选供应商与采购指标:基于机器学习算法,对每个单个候选供应商与各采购指标之间的匹配度进行评估。这可以通过算法分析供应商的历史数据、资质、交货能力等信息,与采购指标进行比对,从而确定每个供应商在不同指标下的匹配程度。2) Machine learning algorithm matches candidate suppliers with procurement indicators: Based on the machine learning algorithm, the matching degree between each candidate supplier and each procurement indicator is evaluated. This can be done by analyzing the supplier's historical data, qualifications, delivery capabilities and other information through the algorithm, and comparing them with the procurement indicators to determine the matching degree of each supplier under different indicators.
3)生成采购指标的匹配度分值:根据确定的匹配度,为每个采购指标生成对应的匹配度分值。这些分值反映了每个供应商在不同采购指标下的表现,为后续的评估和筛选提供了依据。3) Generate matching scores for procurement indicators: Generate corresponding matching scores for each procurement indicator based on the determined matching degree. These scores reflect the performance of each supplier under different procurement indicators and provide a basis for subsequent evaluation and screening.
4)加权求和计算供应商与采购需求数据的匹配度:基于各采购指标的优先级,对各采购指标对应的匹配度分值进行加权求和。通过这一步骤,可以综合考虑各指标的重要性,得出每个候选供应商与采购需求数据之间的综合匹配度评分。4) Calculate the matching degree between suppliers and procurement demand data by weighted summation: Based on the priority of each procurement indicator, the matching degree scores corresponding to each procurement indicator are weighted summation. Through this step, the importance of each indicator can be comprehensively considered to obtain the comprehensive matching degree score between each candidate supplier and procurement demand data.
5)遍历所有单个候选供应商,获取基础评价分值:遍历所有单个候选供应商,针对每个供应商组合内的单个供应商,计算其基础评价分值。这一评价分值综合考虑了每个供应商在各采购指标下的匹配度,以及各指标的优先级,从而为每个供应商组合提供了综合的评估结果。5) Traverse all single candidate suppliers and obtain basic evaluation scores: Traverse all single candidate suppliers and calculate the basic evaluation scores for each single supplier in each supplier combination. This evaluation score comprehensively considers the matching degree of each supplier under each procurement indicator and the priority of each indicator, thus providing a comprehensive evaluation result for each supplier combination.
本发明方案可以实现对候选供应商的全面匹配和评估,从而生成符合采购需求数据的候选供应商组合。这种方法能够更精确地评估供应商的适配性,提高选定供应商的准确性和可靠性。同时,通过机器学习算法的应用,可以实现对大量供应商数据的快速处理和分析,节省人力资源和时间成本,提高采购管理的效率和质量。这种基于数据驱动和算法支持的采购管理方法有助于企业优化供应链管理,降低采购成本,提高采购决策的准确性和效率,从而增强企业的竞争力和可持续发展能力。The scheme of the present invention can achieve comprehensive matching and evaluation of candidate suppliers, thereby generating a combination of candidate suppliers that meet the procurement demand data. This method can more accurately evaluate the adaptability of suppliers and improve the accuracy and reliability of selected suppliers. At the same time, through the application of machine learning algorithms, it is possible to quickly process and analyze a large amount of supplier data, save human resources and time costs, and improve the efficiency and quality of procurement management. This data-driven and algorithm-supported procurement management method helps enterprises optimize supply chain management, reduce procurement costs, and improve the accuracy and efficiency of procurement decisions, thereby enhancing the competitiveness and sustainable development capabilities of enterprises.
进一步的,所述计算各候选供应商组合内各单个候选供应商之间的配合度,作为对应各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值,包括:采集各候选供应商组合内各单个候选供应商的实时供货能力信息和留存采购合作信息;基于预构建的组合评价分值打分模型对所述实时供货能力信息和所述留存采购合作信息执行训练,获得各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值。具体包括以下步骤:Furthermore, the calculation of the degree of cooperation between each single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination as the combined evaluation score corresponding to each candidate supplier combination includes: collecting the real-time supply capacity information and retained procurement cooperation information of each single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination; training the real-time supply capacity information and the retained procurement cooperation information based on a pre-built combined evaluation score scoring model to obtain the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination. Specifically, the following steps are included:
1)采集实时供货能力信息和留存采购合作信息:首先,需要从各候选供应商处采集实时的供货能力信息,包括生产能力、库存情况、交货速度等数据。同时,收集留存的采购合作信息,如历史交易记录、合作稳定性等,以便更全面地评估供应商的综合表现。1) Collect real-time supply capacity information and retain procurement cooperation information: First, it is necessary to collect real-time supply capacity information from each candidate supplier, including production capacity, inventory status, delivery speed and other data. At the same time, collect retained procurement cooperation information, such as historical transaction records, cooperation stability, etc., in order to more comprehensively evaluate the overall performance of suppliers.
2)构建组合评价分值打分模型:基于采集到的实时供货能力信息和留存采购合作信息,建立一个组合评价分值打分模型。这个模型可以采用机器学习算法,如深度学习模型或回归模型,通过对数据进行训练和学习,从而能够准确预测和评估供应商组合的绩效和配合度。2) Construct a combination evaluation score model: Based on the collected real-time supply capacity information and retained procurement cooperation information, establish a combination evaluation score model. This model can use machine learning algorithms, such as deep learning models or regression models, to train and learn data, so as to accurately predict and evaluate the performance and cooperation of the supplier portfolio.
3)训练模型并生成组合评价分值:在模型构建完成后,利用已有的实时数据和历史信息对模型进行训练。通过训练模型,可以使其学习到各候选供应商组合内各单个候选供应商之间的关联规律和配合度。训练完成后,模型将能够为每个候选供应商组合生成相应的组合评价分值。3) Train the model and generate a combined evaluation score: After the model is built, use the existing real-time data and historical information to train the model. By training the model, it can learn the association rules and coordination between each candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination. After the training is completed, the model will be able to generate a corresponding combined evaluation score for each candidate supplier combination.
4)评估候选供应商组合的绩效:利用生成的组合评价分值,对各候选供应商组合的绩效进行评估和排名。这些评价分值将反映出不同供应商组合的配合度和综合表现,帮助采购团队更好地选择最优的供应商组合。4) Evaluate the performance of candidate supplier combinations: Use the generated combination evaluation scores to evaluate and rank the performance of each candidate supplier combination. These evaluation scores will reflect the degree of cooperation and comprehensive performance of different supplier combinations, helping the procurement team to better select the optimal supplier combination.
本发明方案可以实现对候选供应商组合的全面评估,不仅考虑了单个供应商与采购指标的匹配度,还考虑了供应商之间的配合度和绩效。这种综合评价方法能够更准确地反映出供应商组合的整体表现,为采购决策提供更有力的支持和指导。同时,通过机器学习算法的应用,可以实现对大量数据的快速处理和分析,提高采购管理的效率和决策的准确性,从而优化企业的供应链管理和采购流程。The solution of the present invention can achieve a comprehensive evaluation of the candidate supplier combination, which not only considers the matching degree between a single supplier and the procurement index, but also considers the cooperation and performance between suppliers. This comprehensive evaluation method can more accurately reflect the overall performance of the supplier combination and provide more powerful support and guidance for procurement decisions. At the same time, through the application of machine learning algorithms, it is possible to quickly process and analyze large amounts of data, improve the efficiency of procurement management and the accuracy of decision-making, thereby optimizing the company's supply chain management and procurement process.
进一步的,所述方法还包括:执行组合评价分值打分模型预构建,包括:采集历史采购数据,并基于所述历史采购数据执行各候选供应商的历史合作信息读取;执行各候选供应商随机组合,获得多个历史供应商组合;将多个历史供应商组合推送到用户端,并基于所述用户端回收用户的组合评价分值批注结果,作为各历史供应商组合的标注信息,获得标注样本;对所述标注样本执行样本扩充,获得扩充后的标注样本;基于扩充后的标注样本在预选定的神经网络中执行模型训练,获得组合评价分值打分模型。Furthermore, the method also includes: executing pre-construction of a combination evaluation score scoring model, including: collecting historical procurement data, and reading historical cooperation information of each candidate supplier based on the historical procurement data; executing random combination of each candidate supplier to obtain multiple historical supplier combinations; pushing multiple historical supplier combinations to the user end, and based on the user end, recovering the user's combination evaluation score annotation results as the labeling information of each historical supplier combination to obtain labeled samples; performing sample expansion on the labeled samples to obtain expanded labeled samples; performing model training in a pre-selected neural network based on the expanded labeled samples to obtain a combination evaluation score scoring model.
具体的,首先,需要采集各候选供应商组合内各单个候选供应商的实时供货能力信息和留存采购合作信息。这包括生产能力、交货准时率、产品质量等实时数据,以及历史交易记录、合作稳定性等留存信息。在构建组合评价分值打分模型之前,需要收集大量历史采购数据。这些数据包括过去的采购订单、供应商交易记录、交货情况等,用于分析和评估供应商的过往表现。基于历史采购数据,执行各候选供应商的历史合作信息读取。这包括分析过去的合作情况、交易频率、问题反馈等,以便了解供应商之间的合作历史。通过随机组合各候选供应商,可以获得多个历史供应商组合,这有助于构建更全面的数据集,以便训练评价模型。将多个历史供应商组合推送到用户端,用户进行组合分打分,以便于获得各样本数据的目标数据,训练后的模型便可以获得自主打分的能力。对用户回收的组合评价分值批注结果进行样本扩充,以增加数据的多样性和数量,提高模型的泛化能力和准确性。基于扩充后的标注样本,在预选定的神经网络或其他机器学习模型中执行模型训练。通过训练模型,可以学习到各候选供应商组合内各单个候选供应商之间的配合度,并生成组合评价分值。Specifically, first, it is necessary to collect the real-time supply capacity information and retained procurement cooperation information of each individual candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination. This includes real-time data such as production capacity, delivery on-time rate, product quality, and retained information such as historical transaction records and cooperation stability. Before building a combined evaluation score scoring model, a large amount of historical procurement data needs to be collected. These data include past purchase orders, supplier transaction records, delivery status, etc., which are used to analyze and evaluate the past performance of suppliers. Based on historical procurement data, the historical cooperation information of each candidate supplier is read. This includes analyzing past cooperation status, transaction frequency, problem feedback, etc., in order to understand the cooperation history between suppliers. By randomly combining candidate suppliers, multiple historical supplier combinations can be obtained, which helps to build a more comprehensive data set for training evaluation models. Multiple historical supplier combinations are pushed to the user end, and the user scores the combination points to obtain the target data of each sample data, and the trained model can obtain the ability to score independently. The sample expansion of the combined evaluation score annotation results collected by the user is carried out to increase the diversity and quantity of the data and improve the generalization ability and accuracy of the model. Based on the expanded labeled samples, model training is performed in a pre-selected neural network or other machine learning model. Through the training model, the degree of fit between each candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination can be learned, and a combination evaluation score can be generated.
步骤S30:基于各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值和对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值分别确定各候选供应商组合的采购评分,并对各候选供应商组合的采购评分执行排序。Step S30: Determine the procurement score of each candidate supplier combination based on the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination and the basic evaluation score of each candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination, and sort the procurement scores of each candidate supplier combination.
具体的,基于各单个候选供应商的基础评价分值,在各候选供应商组合内执行求和处理,获得各候选供应商组合的基础评价分值和;基于预设权重分配关系执行各候选供应商组合的基础评价分值和赋权和各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值赋权,基于赋权结果执行各候选供应商组合的采购评分计算,获得各候选供应商组合的采购评分。Specifically, based on the basic evaluation score of each individual candidate supplier, a summation process is performed within each candidate supplier combination to obtain the basic evaluation score and of each candidate supplier combination; based on a preset weight allocation relationship, the basic evaluation score and weighting of each candidate supplier combination and the combined evaluation score weighting of each candidate supplier combination are performed, and based on the weighted results, the procurement score calculation of each candidate supplier combination is performed to obtain the procurement score of each candidate supplier combination.
在本发明实施例中,当公司面临紧急订单或短期需求时,供应商的供货能力变得至关重要,在这种情况下,及时交货和保证供应的能力是首要考虑因素。如果产品质量和合规性要求较高,供应商的供货能力直接影响产品质量和合规性,因此,供应商的生产能力、质量控制和合规性认证变得至关重要。而若当公司与供应商建立长期合作和战略伙伴关系时,供应商之间的组合关系契合度变得重要,这包括合作稳定性、沟通效率和共同发展的能力。In the embodiment of the present invention, when the company faces urgent orders or short-term needs, the supplier's supply capacity becomes crucial. In this case, the ability to deliver on time and guarantee supply is the primary consideration. If the product quality and compliance requirements are high, the supplier's supply capacity directly affects the product quality and compliance. Therefore, the supplier's production capacity, quality control and compliance certification become crucial. When the company establishes long-term cooperation and strategic partnerships with suppliers, the combination relationship fit between suppliers becomes important, including cooperation stability, communication efficiency and the ability to develop together.
可见,在不同的采购需求下,对单独供应商的供货能力和对多个供应商之间的配合默契度之间的敏感程度是存在差异的。为了适应这种差异,本发明方案在执行采购评分计算时,对于各候选供应商组合的基础评价分值和,以及各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值进行适应性的加权处理,以应对不同场景下的敏感性需求,保证获得的最优供应商组合是满足当下用户最为敏感需求的供应商组合。It can be seen that under different procurement needs, there are differences in the sensitivity to the supply capacity of a single supplier and the degree of cooperation between multiple suppliers. In order to adapt to this difference, when performing the procurement scoring calculation, the solution of the present invention performs adaptive weighting processing on the basic evaluation score and the combined evaluation score of each candidate supplier combination, so as to cope with the sensitivity requirements in different scenarios and ensure that the optimal supplier combination obtained is the supplier combination that meets the most sensitive needs of the current user.
步骤S40:基于排序结果执行候选供应商组合推荐,并基于推荐的候选供应商组合执行采购寻源,获得采购寻源结果。Step S40: Recommend candidate supplier combinations based on the ranking results, and perform procurement sourcing based on the recommended candidate supplier combinations to obtain procurement sourcing results.
具体的,所述基于排序结果执行候选供应商组合推荐,包括:基于排序结果,判断采购评分大于预设推荐采购评分阈值的候选供应商组合的数量;若采购评分大于预设推荐采购评分阈值的候选供应商组合的数量大于预设数量阈值N,则在采购评分大于预设推荐采购评分阈值的候选供应商组合中取与预设数量阈值N相等的前N个候选供应商组合作为推荐的候选供应商组合;若采购评分大于预设推荐采购评分阈值的候选供应商组合的数量不大于预设数量阈值N,则将所有采购评分大于预设推荐采购评分阈值的候选供应商组合作为推荐的候选供应商组合。Specifically, the recommendation of candidate supplier combinations based on the sorting results includes: based on the sorting results, determining the number of candidate supplier combinations whose procurement scores are greater than a preset recommended procurement score threshold; if the number of candidate supplier combinations whose procurement scores are greater than the preset recommended procurement score threshold is greater than a preset number threshold N, then taking the first N candidate supplier combinations equal to the preset number threshold N among the candidate supplier combinations whose procurement scores are greater than the preset recommended procurement score threshold as recommended candidate supplier combinations; if the number of candidate supplier combinations whose procurement scores are greater than the preset recommended procurement score threshold is not greater than the preset number threshold N, then taking all candidate supplier combinations whose procurement scores are greater than the preset recommended procurement score threshold as recommended candidate supplier combinations.
进一步的,所述基于推荐的候选供应商组合执行采购寻源,获得采购寻源结果,包括:基于各推荐的候选供应商组合生成对应各候选供应商组合的推荐候选供应商集;对各推荐候选供应商集执行并集处理,获得所有待寻源候选推荐候选供应商目标;执行各待寻源候选推荐候选供应商目标寻源,获得各推荐候选供应商的寻源结果;在各推荐的候选供应商组合下执行对应各推荐候选供应商的寻源结果组合,获得各推荐的候选供应商组合的寻源结果。Furthermore, the procurement sourcing is performed based on the recommended candidate supplier combinations to obtain procurement sourcing results, including: generating a recommended candidate supplier set corresponding to each candidate supplier combination based on each recommended candidate supplier combination; performing union processing on each recommended candidate supplier set to obtain all candidate recommended candidate supplier targets to be sourced; performing sourcing for each candidate recommended candidate supplier target to be sourced to obtain sourcing results for each recommended candidate supplier; and performing a sourcing result combination corresponding to each recommended candidate supplier under each recommended candidate supplier combination to obtain sourcing results for each recommended candidate supplier combination.
在本发明实施例中,各供应商组合中大概率存在相同的供应商,若基于各推荐的候选供应商分别执行寻源,则必定会出现同意供应商执行重复寻源的问题。为了避免该问题,本发明方案首先对各推荐的候选供应商组合执行并集处理,保证每一个候选供应商仅寻源一次。为了便于客户审阅,本发明方案在完成寻源后,又基于各候选供应商组合进行寻源结果组合展示,以供用户进行选择。In the embodiment of the present invention, there is a high probability that the same supplier exists in each supplier combination. If sourcing is performed based on each recommended candidate supplier separately, the problem of repeated sourcing of the agreed supplier will inevitably occur. In order to avoid this problem, the solution of the present invention first performs a union process on each recommended candidate supplier combination to ensure that each candidate supplier is sourced only once. In order to facilitate customer review, after completing the sourcing, the solution of the present invention displays the sourcing results based on each candidate supplier combination for the user to choose.
图2是本发明一种实施方式提供的基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源系统的系统结构图。如图2所示,本发明实施方式提供一种基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源系统,所述系统包括:采集单元,用于采集采购需求数据,并基于所述采购需求数据确定候选供应商,获得候选供应商组合;评分单元,用于分别计算各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值,以及对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值;处理单元,用于基于各候选供应商组合的组合评价分值和对应各候选供应商组合内单个候选供应商的基础评价分值分别确定各候选供应商组合的采购评分,并对各候选供应商组合的采购评分执行排序;寻源单元,用于基于排序结果执行候选供应商组合推荐,并基于推荐的候选供应商组合执行采购寻源,获得采购寻源结果。Figure 2 is a system structure diagram of a procurement sourcing system based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combinations provided by an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in Figure 2, an embodiment of the present invention provides a procurement sourcing system based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combinations, the system comprising: a collection unit, used to collect procurement demand data, and determine candidate suppliers based on the procurement demand data to obtain candidate supplier combinations; a scoring unit, used to calculate the combined evaluation scores of each candidate supplier combination, and the basic evaluation scores of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination; a processing unit, used to determine the procurement scores of each candidate supplier combination based on the combined evaluation scores of each candidate supplier combination and the basic evaluation scores of a single candidate supplier in each candidate supplier combination, and to sort the procurement scores of each candidate supplier combination; a sourcing unit, used to recommend candidate supplier combinations based on the sorting results, and perform procurement sourcing based on the recommended candidate supplier combinations to obtain procurement sourcing results.
本发明实施方式还提供一种计算机可读储存介质,该计算机可读存储介质上储存有指令,其在计算机上运行时使得计算机执行上述的基于供应商组合智能推荐的采购寻源。The embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which instructions are stored, which, when executed on a computer, enable the computer to execute the above-mentioned procurement sourcing based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combinations.
本领域技术人员可以理解实现上述实施方式的方法中的全部或部分步骤是可以通过程序来指令相关的硬件来完成,该程序存储在一个存储介质中,包括若干指令用以使得单片机、芯片或处理器(processor)执行本发明各个实施方式所述方法的全部或部分步骤。而前述的存储介质包括:U盘、移动硬盘、只读存储器(ROM,Read-Only Memory)、随机存取存储器(RAM,Random Access Memory)、磁碟或者光盘等各种可以存储程序代码的介质。Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or part of the steps in the method for implementing the above-mentioned embodiments can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a program, and the program is stored in a storage medium, including several instructions for making a single-chip microcomputer, a chip or a processor (processor) execute all or part of the steps of the method described in each embodiment of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), disk or optical disk and other media that can store program codes.
以上结合附图详细描述了本发明的可选实施方式,但是,本发明实施方式并不限于上述实施方式中的具体细节,在本发明实施方式的技术构思范围内,可以对本发明实施方式的技术方案进行多种简单变型,这些简单变型均属于本发明实施方式的保护范围。另外需要说明的是,在上述具体实施方式中所描述的各个具体技术特征,在不矛盾的情况下,可以通过任何合适的方式进行组合。为了避免不必要的重复,本发明实施方式对各种可能的组合方式不再另行说明。The optional embodiments of the present invention are described in detail above in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. However, the embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the specific details in the above embodiments. Within the technical concept of the embodiments of the present invention, the technical scheme of the embodiments of the present invention can be subjected to a variety of simple modifications, and these simple modifications all belong to the protection scope of the embodiments of the present invention. It should also be noted that the various specific technical features described in the above specific embodiments can be combined in any suitable manner without contradiction. In order to avoid unnecessary repetition, the embodiments of the present invention will not further describe various possible combinations.
此外,本发明的各种不同的实施方式之间也可以进行任意组合,只要其不违背本发明实施方式的思想,其同样应当视为本发明实施方式所公开的内容。In addition, various embodiments of the present invention may be arbitrarily combined, and as long as they do not violate the concept of the embodiments of the present invention, they should also be regarded as the contents disclosed in the embodiments of the present invention.
Claims (12)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202410601648.8A CN118365424B (en) | 2024-05-15 | 2024-05-15 | Purchasing and source searching method and system based on supplier combination intelligent recommendation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202410601648.8A CN118365424B (en) | 2024-05-15 | 2024-05-15 | Purchasing and source searching method and system based on supplier combination intelligent recommendation |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN118365424A true CN118365424A (en) | 2024-07-19 |
CN118365424B CN118365424B (en) | 2025-08-01 |
Family
ID=91883000
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202410601648.8A Active CN118365424B (en) | 2024-05-15 | 2024-05-15 | Purchasing and source searching method and system based on supplier combination intelligent recommendation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN118365424B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN120197781A (en) * | 2025-05-23 | 2025-06-24 | 深圳市携客互联科技有限公司 | Intelligent procurement system and method for supply chain |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060080221A1 (en) * | 2004-08-25 | 2006-04-13 | Deecorp Limited | Reverse auction control method, computer program product, and server |
CN105786838A (en) * | 2014-12-22 | 2016-07-20 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Information matching processing method and apparatus |
CN106934680A (en) * | 2015-12-29 | 2017-07-07 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of method and device for business processing |
CN110991959A (en) * | 2019-11-29 | 2020-04-10 | 珠海乐活公社网络科技有限公司 | E-commerce platform purchase order processing method and device |
CN117391583A (en) * | 2023-10-23 | 2024-01-12 | 南京鑫智链科技信息有限公司 | Purchasing data management method and platform |
CN117522256A (en) * | 2023-08-03 | 2024-02-06 | 杭州杰牌传动科技有限公司 | Purchasing screening method, system, storage medium and terminal based on supplier portrait |
-
2024
- 2024-05-15 CN CN202410601648.8A patent/CN118365424B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060080221A1 (en) * | 2004-08-25 | 2006-04-13 | Deecorp Limited | Reverse auction control method, computer program product, and server |
CN105786838A (en) * | 2014-12-22 | 2016-07-20 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Information matching processing method and apparatus |
CN106934680A (en) * | 2015-12-29 | 2017-07-07 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of method and device for business processing |
CN110991959A (en) * | 2019-11-29 | 2020-04-10 | 珠海乐活公社网络科技有限公司 | E-commerce platform purchase order processing method and device |
CN117522256A (en) * | 2023-08-03 | 2024-02-06 | 杭州杰牌传动科技有限公司 | Purchasing screening method, system, storage medium and terminal based on supplier portrait |
CN117391583A (en) * | 2023-10-23 | 2024-01-12 | 南京鑫智链科技信息有限公司 | Purchasing data management method and platform |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
程雅 等: "基于遗传算法的供应商组合选择", 机械设计与制造, no. 2, 28 February 2013 (2013-02-28), pages 59 - 61 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN120197781A (en) * | 2025-05-23 | 2025-06-24 | 深圳市携客互联科技有限公司 | Intelligent procurement system and method for supply chain |
CN120197781B (en) * | 2025-05-23 | 2025-09-09 | 深圳市携客互联科技有限公司 | Intelligent procurement system and method for supply chain |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN118365424B (en) | 2025-08-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP5677967B2 (en) | Specification, estimation, causal driver discovery and market response elasticity or lift coefficient automation | |
Cheung et al. | A quantitative correlation coefficient mining method for business intelligence in small and medium enterprises of trading business | |
Wu et al. | Financial fraud risk analysis based on audit information knowledge graph | |
US8200526B2 (en) | Method and system for collecting stakeholder relationship data | |
CN103838857B (en) | Automatic service combination system and method based on semantics | |
KR20210001243A (en) | Online and offline information analysis service system by lifecycle according to product life cycle | |
CN113807747A (en) | Enterprise budget management maturity evaluation system | |
KR102491396B1 (en) | Method And Apparatus for Providing Multi-Dimensional Patent Analysis Service Based on Big Data | |
Dwivedi et al. | A two-phase approach to efficiently support product recovery systems in a circular economy context | |
CN120106318B (en) | Supply chain scheduling optimization method and system based on multi-source data | |
CN118365424A (en) | Procurement sourcing method and system based on intelligent recommendation of supplier combination | |
Härting et al. | Cost-benefit considerations for data analytics-an SME-oriented framework enhanced by a management perspective and the process of idea generation | |
Wang et al. | A reliable location design of unmanned vending machines based on customer satisfaction | |
KR102432126B1 (en) | Data preparation method and data utilization system for data use | |
CN118691233B (en) | A digital supply chain information management platform and method | |
CN119990536A (en) | Enterprise data asset evaluation method, system, electronic device and storage medium | |
Elfawal et al. | Supply chain management practices, innovation capabilities and operational performance: An empirical evidence from the FMCG sector | |
CN111415213B (en) | Cognitive purchasing | |
Megeid et al. | The role of big data analytics in supply chain “3Fs”: Financial reporting, financial decision making and financial performance “An Applied Study” | |
Haque | E-commerce product recommendation system based on ml algorithms | |
CN118586969A (en) | A business opportunity stage evaluation method, device and medium based on C139 model | |
CN118396719A (en) | Agricultural product sales lead intelligent rating and recommending method and system | |
CN118134652A (en) | Asset configuration scheme generation method and device, electronic equipment and medium | |
CN117056323A (en) | Data quality assessment method based on data access behaviors | |
Altuntas et al. | A novel technology intelligence tool based on utility mining |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |