CN116168116A - Method and device for visually displaying test execution plan - Google Patents

Abstract

The present disclosure provides a method and device for visually displaying a test execution plan. In this method, the execution plan to be presented determined from the total execution plan according to the level in the classification rule to which the display device belongs is received, wherein the total execution plan includes the execution plan corresponding to each test task, and the execution plan corresponding to each test task The plan includes the testers, test equipment and test time used to execute the test task. The total execution plan takes the test equipment and/or testers as objects for data structure; the classification rules are divided into multiple levels in descending order. There are three levels, the execution plans displayed by different levels of display devices are different; and the execution plan to be presented is displayed, wherein the execution plan to be presented is aimed at the test equipment and/or testers and displayed in the form of a Gantt chart.

Description

Method and device for visually displaying test execution plan

technical field

The present disclosure relates to the technical field of chemical product testing, and in particular, to a method and device for visually displaying a test execution plan.

Background technique

In the field of chemical production, in addition to producing chemical products on the production line, there will also be laboratories for random inspection and testing of the produced chemical products. At present, the process of random testing of products on the production line is generally as follows. The staff of the laboratory take samples from the production line, and then transport the sampled samples to the laboratory for immediate sample testing to obtain test results, and test The results are fed back to the staff on the production line. In the current test process, the test tasks currently being executed are displayed on the screen of the laboratory, and after a test task is completed, the test task will no longer be displayed on the screen.

Contents of the invention

In view of the above, the present disclosure provides a method and device for visually displaying a test execution plan. Through the technical solution of the present disclosure, it is possible to perform targeted personalized display on different display devices.

According to one aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method for visually displaying a test execution plan, which is executed by a display device, the method comprising: receiving the total execution plan according to the level in the classification rule to which the display device belongs The determined execution plan to be presented, wherein the total execution plan includes the execution plan corresponding to each test task, and the execution plan corresponding to each test task includes testers, test equipment and test time for executing the test task, the total execution plan Data structuring is carried out with test equipment and/or testers as objects; the classification rules are divided into multiple levels according to the order of levels from high to low, and the execution plans displayed by different levels of display devices are different; and the execution plan to be presented display, wherein, the execution plan to be presented takes test equipment and/or testers as objects and is displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents time, and each row is used to represent the Implementation plan.

According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is also provided a device for visually displaying a test execution plan, which is applied to a display device, and the device includes: an execution plan receiving unit, which receives the level according to the classification rule to which the display device belongs The execution plan to be presented is determined from the total execution plan, wherein the total execution plan includes the execution plan corresponding to each test task, and the execution plan corresponding to each test task includes the testers, test equipment and testers used to execute the test task Time, the total execution plan is data structured with test equipment and/or testers as objects; the classification rules are divided into multiple levels in order from high to low, and the execution plans displayed by different levels of display devices are different; and The execution plan display unit is used to display the execution plan to be presented, wherein the execution plan to be presented is aimed at test equipment and/or testers and displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents time, and each row is represented by Indicates the execution plan for the object corresponding to the row.

According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is also provided an electronic device, including: at least one processor, a memory coupled to the at least one processor, and a computer program stored on the memory, the at least one processor Executing the computer program implements any method for visually displaying a test execution plan as described above.

According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is also provided a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the method for visually displaying a test execution plan as described above is implemented.

Description of drawings

A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present disclosure may be realized by reference to the following drawings. In the figures, similar components or features may have the same reference label.

Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of an example of a method for visually displaying a test execution plan according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of an example of a total execution plan provided according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of an example of hardware organization classification rules according to the present disclosure.

Fig. 4 shows a schematic diagram of an example of personnel ranking rules according to the present disclosure.

Fig. 5 shows a schematic diagram of an example of plan information display provided according to the present disclosure.

Fig. 6 shows a block diagram of an example of an apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan according to the present disclosure.

Fig. 7 shows a block diagram of an electronic device for realizing the visual display method of the present disclosure.

Detailed ways

The subject matter described herein will be discussed below with reference to example implementations. It should be understood that the discussion of these implementations is only to enable those skilled in the art to better understand and realize the subject matter described herein, and is not intended to limit the protection scope, applicability or examples set forth in the claims. Changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements discussed without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Various examples may omit, substitute, or add various procedures or components as needed. In addition, features described with respect to some examples may also be combined in other examples.

As used herein, the term "comprising" and its variants represent open terms meaning "including but not limited to". The term "based on" means "based at least in part on". The terms "one embodiment" and "an embodiment" mean "at least one embodiment." The term "another embodiment" means "at least one other embodiment." The terms "first", "second", etc. may refer to different or the same object. The following may include other definitions, either express or implied. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the definition of a term is consistent throughout the specification.

In the field of chemical production, in addition to producing chemical products on the production line, there will also be laboratories for random inspection and testing of the produced chemical products. At present, the process of random testing of products on the production line is generally as follows. The staff of the laboratory take samples from the production line, and then transport the sampled samples to the laboratory for immediate sample testing to obtain test results, and test The results are fed back to the staff on the production line.

In the current test process, the test tasks currently being executed are displayed on the screen of the laboratory, and after a test task is completed, the test task will no longer be displayed on the screen.

There are many kinds of screens in the laboratory, for example, the display screens of the entire laboratory, each room of the laboratory is also equipped with display screens and computer screens of testers. In order to realize targeted and personalized display on different display devices.

The present disclosure provides a method and device for visually displaying a test execution plan. In this method, the execution plan to be presented determined from the total execution plan according to the level in the classification rule to which the display device belongs is received, wherein the total execution plan includes the execution plan corresponding to each test task, and the execution plan corresponding to each test task The plan includes the testers, test equipment and test time used to execute the test task. The total execution plan takes the test equipment and/or testers as objects for data structure; the classification rules are divided into multiple levels in descending order. There are three levels, the execution plans displayed by display devices of different levels are different; and the execution plan to be presented is displayed, wherein, the execution plan to be presented is aimed at the test equipment and/or testers and displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, Gant The horizontal axis of the special graph represents time, and each row is used to represent an execution plan for the object corresponding to the row. Through the technical solution of the present disclosure, it is possible to perform targeted personalized display on different display devices.

The method and device for visually displaying the test execution plan provided by the present disclosure will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

The application scenario of the embodiments of the present disclosure is in a laboratory, where the laboratory is used for sampling and testing chemical products produced on a chemical production line.

FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of an example 100 of a method for visually displaying a test execution plan according to the present disclosure.

The scheme shown in Figure 1 can be implemented by a laboratory display device. The display devices of the laboratory may include various types of devices, for example, a display device for displaying test task information for the entire laboratory, a display device for displaying test task information in each floor of the laboratory, and a display device for displaying A display device for test task information in a department, a display device for displaying test task information in an item group, a display device for displaying test task information in a room, and a device owned by a person in a laboratory.

The personnel of the laboratory may include the supervisor who manages the laboratory, the director in charge of each department, the team leader in charge of each project team, and testers, etc.

As shown in FIG. 1 , at 110 , the execution plan to be presented determined from the total execution plan according to the level in the classification rule to which the display device belongs may be received.

In the present disclosure, for each test task in the laboratory, a total execution plan for the test task to be executed may be generated, and the total execution plan may be presented in the form of a table. FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of an example of a total execution plan provided according to the present disclosure.

The overall execution plan may include the execution plan corresponding to each test task, and the execution plan corresponding to each test task includes testers, test equipment and test time for executing the test task. The overall execution plan is data-structured for test equipment and/or testers. Each execution plan corresponds to a test task.

In one example, the total execution plan can be displayed in the form of a Gantt chart. The horizontal axis of the Gantt chart can represent time, as shown in Figure 2. The time on the horizontal axis can be used to represent the estimated execution time, plan start time, end time, etc. of each execution plan.

The Gantt chart of the total execution plan can include multiple lines, each line is used to represent a data-structured object, test equipment or tester. As shown in Figure 2, the object represented by the first line is the test equipment of the moisture analyzer, and the object represented by the last line is a tester.

In the Gantt chart of the total execution plan, each row represents the execution plan for the object represented, that is, the execution plan in each row requires the object represented by the row to be executed. Taking Figure 2 as an example, for the moisture analyzer represented in the first row, an execution plan assigned to the moisture analyzer is a moisture test starting at around 11:35, and the moisture test needs to be performed by the moisture analyzer.

In this example, each execution plan may be represented by a schematic block diagram, and the length of each schematic block diagram on the horizontal axis may represent the expected execution time of the corresponding execution plan. Taking Figure 2 as an example, in the first row, the start time of the moisture test assigned to the moisture analyzer on the horizontal axis is 11:35, and the end time is 11:55, then the estimated execution time of the moisture test is 20 minutes.

Individual execution plans can be distributed in only one row in the Gantt chart, or in multiple rows. When the execution plan is distributed in multiple lines, it means that the execution plan requires multiple objects to execute, for example, at least one test device and tester are required. Taking Figure 2 as an example, the execution plan named "Impact-10" is distributed in the row representing the injection molding machine and the tester representing "Shuyan Lin", which means that the execution plan requires the injection molding machine and the tester "Shuyan Lin" " to execute.

In the present disclosure, the execution plan to be presented received by the display device may be part or all of the overall execution plan. The execution plans to be presented received by each display device may be obtained based on the display device, and the execution plans to be presented received by different display devices may be different.

In the present disclosure, the grading rules for the laboratory may be divided into multiple levels in descending order of levels, and the execution plans displayed by display devices of different levels may be different.

In one example, the classification rules may include hardware organization classification rules and/or personnel classification rules. The hardware organization grading rules can be obtained by dividing the levels according to the hardware facilities and organizational structure of the laboratory. The hardware facilities of the laboratory can include the entire laboratory, the floors included in the laboratory, each room in the laboratory, each equipment in the laboratory, etc., and the organization can include departments, project teams, etc. in the laboratory.

In one example, the hardware organization level in the hardware organization grading rule may include at least two of the following: laboratories, floors included in the laboratories, departments for different specialties in the laboratories, and departments for performing different types of tests Item groups for tasks, rooms in the lab, and equipment in each room. Equipment in various rooms can include test equipment and personal equipment owned by laboratory personnel. For example, testing equipment may include moisture analyzers, analytical balances, muffle furnaces, and the like. The personal devices of laboratory personnel may include personal computers, mobile phones, etc., wherein the personal devices may include work devices and personal devices.

The descending order of the hardware organization level in the hardware organization classification rule can be: laboratory, floor, department, project group, room, and equipment. That is, the laboratory has the highest level, and the equipment has the highest level. The laboratory may include at least one floor, each floor may include at least one department, each department may include at least one project group, each project group may include at least one room, and each room includes at least one device. FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of an example of hardware organization classification rules according to the present disclosure. As shown in Figure 3, the first level is the highest, and from the first level to the sixth level, each level decreases in turn.

In the hardware organization grading rule, the test tasks corresponding to high-level hardware or organizations may be more than those corresponding to low-level hardware or organizations, and may include the test tasks corresponding to low-level hardware or organizations. For example, the correspondingly displayed test tasks of the laboratory may include correspondingly displayed test tasks of each floor. In an example, the execution plan to be presented displayed by the laboratory-level display device may be the total execution plan.

The correspondence between devices and each hardware organization level in the hardware organization classification rule may be predetermined. Each device can correspond to a hardware organization level. For example, the hardware organization level corresponding to the large-screen device used to display the entire laboratory is laboratory. In an example, a device may also correspond to multiple hardware organization levels. For example, a hardware organization level corresponding to a display device may be floors and departments.

In an example, the personnel grading rule can be obtained by classifying various personnel in the laboratory. The personnel in the laboratory may include: the supervisor who manages the laboratory, the director in charge of each department, the team leader in charge of each project team, and testers, etc.

The personnel levels in the personnel grading rules include at least two of the following: the supervisor who manages the laboratory, the director in charge of each department, the team leader in charge of each project team, and testers. For the same personnel, it can correspond to one personnel level, and can also correspond to multiple personnel levels. For example, a laboratory person can act as director and tester at the same time.

The descending order of personnel levels in the personnel grading rule can be: supervisor, director, team leader, and tester. Fig. 4 shows a schematic diagram of an example of personnel ranking rules according to the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 4 , the first person has the highest level, and each level decreases successively from the first person level to the fourth person level.

In the personnel grading rule, the test tasks corresponding to the high-level personnel may be more than the test tasks corresponding to the low-level personnel, and may also include the test tasks corresponding to the low-level personnel. Here, the test task corresponding to the person refers to the test task displayed on the device of the corresponding person. For example, the test tasks displayed on the supervisor's device may include the test tasks displayed on the director's device. In an example, the execution plan to be presented displayed by the display device belonging to the supervisor level may be the total execution plan. In this way, through personnel grading rules, it is convenient for high-ranking personnel to grasp all the testing tasks that the personnel under their jurisdiction are responsible for in real time.

The corresponding relationship between each personnel level and equipment in the personnel classification rule may be predetermined. Each device can correspond to a personnel level. For example, the personnel level corresponding to the display device for displaying the test tasks in charge of a certain tester is the tester. In one example, one device may also correspond to multiple personnel levels.

In an example, the execution plan to be presented may include a first execution plan to be presented obtained according to a hardware organization grading rule and/or a second execution plan to be presented obtained according to a personnel grading rule.

The first execution plan to be presented may be obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the hardware organization level to which the display device belongs. In one way, it is possible to first determine the hardware organization level to which the display device belongs in the hardware organization classification rule, and then filter out the execution plan of the hardware organization level from the total execution plan, and the selected execution plan is the first pending execution plan. Present the execution plan.

In an example, when there are multiple hardware organization levels to which the display device belongs, the first execution plan to be presented is obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the highest hardware organization level to which the display device belongs. In this example, the display device may belong to multiple different hardware organization levels, and the highest hardware organization level with the highest level may be determined from the multiple hardware organization levels. Then, the first execution plan to be presented corresponding to the display device is obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the highest hardware organization level.

For example, if the hardware organization level to which a display device belongs includes a laboratory and a floor, the first execution plan to be presented corresponding to the display device can be obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the laboratory.

The second execution plan to be presented may be obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the personnel level to which the display device belongs. In one manner, the laboratory personnel to which the display device belongs may be determined first, and then the personnel level of the laboratory personnel in the personnel classification rule is determined. Then, the second execution plan to be presented corresponding to the display device can be obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the determined personnel level.

In an example, when there are multiple personnel levels to which the display device belongs, the second execution plan to be presented is obtained according to the execution plan included in the highest personnel level to which the display device belongs. In this example, the display device may belong to multiple different personnel levels, and the highest personnel level with the highest level may be determined from the multiple personnel levels. Then, the second execution plan to be presented corresponding to the display device is obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the highest personnel level.

For example, if the personnel levels of a display device include team leaders and testers, the second execution plan to be presented corresponding to the display device can be obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the team leader.

In an example of the laboratory system, the display device may be communicatively connected with the central control device, and the overall execution plan may be generated or obtained by the central control device. In this example, the central control device can determine the execution plan to be presented corresponding to the display device from the total execution plan according to the level in the grading rule to which each display device belongs, and then can send the determined execution plan to be presented to the corresponding display screen.

Returning to FIG. 1 , at 120 , the execution plan to be presented can be displayed.

In the present disclosure, the execution plan to be presented targets the test equipment and/or testers and is displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, and each row in the Gantt chart can be used to represent the execution plan for the object corresponding to the row . For the feature description of the execution plan to be presented displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, reference may be made to the above description of the features displayed in the form of a Gantt chart for the overall execution plan. For example, the execution plan to be presented displayed on the display device may be as shown in FIG. 2 .

The execution plan to be presented displayed in the form of a Gantt chart may include multiple rows, and multiple schematic diagrams for representing the execution plan may be displayed in each row. Taking Fig. 2 as an example, the object represented by the second line is an analytical balance, and two schematic blocks are included in this line, which means that the execution plans represented by the two schematic blocks are executed by the analytical balance.

In an example, among the execution plans displayed on the display device, each execution plan may be triggered, and the triggering manner may include clicking, double-clicking, and the like. In one example, when displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, block diagrams in the Gantt chart representing various execution plans may be triggered.

In response to one of the displayed execution plans being triggered, plan information for the triggered execution plan may be displayed. The plan information may include at least one of the test equipment used to execute the execution plan, testers, test start time, test end time, estimated execution time, and execution plan identification, and may also include material information, sample identification, and the like.

In this example, the plan information of the execution plan may be presented in the form of a floating window. When the execution plan is triggered, a floating window may be generated on the display screen, and plan information is displayed in the floating window. Fig. 5 shows a schematic diagram of an example of plan information display provided according to the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 5 , after clicking on the execution plan of “impact”, a floating window of the execution plan of “impact” may be displayed.

The position displayed by the floating window can be customized, and the position displayed by the floating window can be around the triggered schematic diagram of the block used to represent the execution plan. Taking FIG. 5 as an example, the floating window may be displayed above the triggered block diagram representing the execution plan. In an example, the size and position of the floating window may be determined according to the distribution positions of the displayed schematic diagrams of blocks, so as to ensure that the floating window will not block other schematic diagrams of blocks. In another example, when it is unavoidable to block other schematic blocks, an area that can block the least schematic blocks can be determined, and the size of this area is larger than the size of the floating window that can clearly display the planning information. Then, the area may be determined as the area where the floating window is located.

In an example, in response to one of the displayed execution plans being triggered, other execution plans associated with the triggered execution plan may be filtered out from the displayed execution plans. The association here may include execution plans belonging to the same upper level, being in charge of the same tester, using the same test equipment, execution plans belonging to the same department, execution plans belonging to the same project group, execution plans belonging to the same floor, etc. . When multiple execution plans belong to the same upper-level execution plan, in the upper-level execution plan, there may be an execution sequence among the multiple execution plans.

After filtering out other execution plans, the triggered execution plan and other execution plans can be displayed according to a specified rule. At this time, only the triggered execution plan and the filtered execution plan are displayed, and other execution plans other than these execution plans may not be displayed.

The specified rules may include execution sequence and/or correlation, etc. By arranging the displayed execution plans according to the execution sequence, the execution sequence of each execution plan can be displayed as a whole, so as to facilitate the grasp of the overall progress of each execution plan. In addition, when the displayed execution plans are arranged according to the degree of correlation, they may be arranged in descending order of the degree of correlation, so as to focus on presenting other execution plans that are highly related to the triggered execution plan. Relevance rules can be customized. In one example, the correlation can be determined by the following factors in descending order: the same upper-level execution plan, the same tester is responsible for, the same test equipment is used, the execution plan belongs to the same project group, belongs to the same The execution plan of a department and the execution plan belonging to the same floor. That is, when two execution plans belong to the same upper-level execution plan, the correlation between the two execution plans is the highest.

FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of an example of a device for visually displaying a test execution plan (hereinafter referred to as a visual display device 600 ) provided according to the present disclosure.

As shown in FIG. 6 , the visual display device 600 includes: an execution plan receiving unit 610 and an execution plan display unit 620 .

The execution plan receiving unit 610 may be configured to receive the execution plan to be presented determined from the total execution plan according to the level in the grading rule to which the display device belongs, wherein the total execution plan includes the execution plan corresponding to each test task, each The execution plan corresponding to the test task includes the tester, test equipment and test time used to execute the test task. The total execution plan is data structured with the test equipment and/or tester as the object; the classification rules are from high to low The sequence is divided into multiple levels in turn, and different levels of display devices display different execution plans.

The execution plan display unit 620 may be configured to display the execution plan to be presented, wherein the execution plan to be presented is aimed at test equipment and/or testers and displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, and the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents Time, each row is used to represent the execution plan for the object corresponding to the row.

In an example, in the displayed execution plan to be presented, each execution plan that needs to be executed by the object corresponding to each row is represented by a schematic block diagram, and the schematic block diagram corresponding to each execution plan is in the direction of the horizontal axis The length above indicates the estimated execution time of the plan. The visual display device 600 may further include a plan information display unit, and the plan information display unit may be configured to: in response to one of the displayed execution plans being triggered, display the triggered execution plan in the generated floating window The plan information includes at least one of test equipment, testers, test start time, test end time, estimated execution time, and execution plan identification for executing the execution plan.

In an example, the execution plan display unit 620 may also be configured to: in response to an execution plan in the displayed execution plans being triggered, filter out the execution plan associated with the triggered execution plan from the displayed execution plans other execution plans; and displaying the triggered execution plan and other execution plans according to a specified law, where the specified law includes execution order and/or correlation.

The embodiments of the method and device for visually displaying the test execution plan according to the present disclosure are described above with reference to FIG. 1 to FIG. 7 .

The device for visually displaying the test execution plan of the present disclosure may be implemented by hardware, or by software or a combination of hardware and software. Taking software implementation as an example, as a device in a logical sense, it is formed by reading the corresponding computer program instructions in the memory into the memory for operation by the processor of the device where it is located. In the present disclosure, the means for visually displaying the test execution plan can be realized by electronic equipment, for example.

FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of an electronic device 700 for implementing the visual display method of the present disclosure.

As shown in FIG. 7, an electronic device 700 may include at least one processor 710, a memory (for example, non-volatile memory) 720, a memory 730, and a communication interface 740, and at least one processor 710, memory 720, memory 730, and communication The interfaces 740 are connected together via a bus 750 . At least one processor 710 executes at least one computer-readable instruction (ie, the elements implemented in software described above) stored or encoded in a memory.

In one embodiment, computer-executable instructions are stored in the memory, which when executed cause at least one processor 710 to: receive an execution plan to be presented determined from the total execution plan according to the level in the classification rule to which the display device belongs, Wherein, the total execution plan includes the execution plan corresponding to each test task, and the execution plan corresponding to each test task includes testers, test equipment and test time for performing the test task, and the total execution plan is based on the test equipment and/or test personnel Data structuring for objects; classification rules are divided into multiple levels according to the order of levels from high to low, and the execution plans displayed by different levels of display devices are different; and the execution plan to be presented is displayed, wherein the execution plan to be presented The test equipment and/or testers are used as objects and displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents time, and each row is used to represent an execution plan for the object corresponding to the row.

It should be understood that the computer-executable instructions stored in the memory, when executed, cause the at least one processor 710 to perform various operations and functions described above in connection with FIGS. 1-6 in various embodiments of the present specification.

According to one embodiment, a program product, such as a machine-readable medium, is provided. The machine-readable medium may have instructions (that is, the above-mentioned elements implemented in software), which, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to perform various operations and functions described above in conjunction with FIGS. 1-6 in various embodiments of this specification. .

Specifically, a system or device equipped with a readable storage medium can be provided, on which a software program code for realizing the functions of any one of the above embodiments is stored, and the computer or device of the system or device can The processor reads and executes the instructions stored in the readable storage medium.

In this case, the program code itself read from the readable medium can realize the function of any one of the above-mentioned embodiments, so the machine-readable code and the readable storage medium storing the machine-readable code constitute the present invention. a part of.

The computer program code required for the operation of each part of this manual can be written in any one or more programming languages, including object-oriented programming languages, such as Java, Scala, Smalltalk, Eiffel, JADE, Emerald, C++, C#, VB, NET and Python, etc., conventional programming languages such as C language, Visual Basic 2003, Perl, COBOL 2002, PHP and ABAP, dynamic programming languages such as Python, Ruby and Groovy, or other programming languages. The program code may run on the user's computer, or as a stand-alone software package, or partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer, or entirely on a remote computer or server. In the latter case, the remote computer can be connected to the user computer through any form of network, such as a local area network (LAN) or wide area network (WAN), or to an external computer (for example, via the Internet), or in a cloud computing environment, or as a Service use, such as software as a service (SaaS).

Examples of readable storage media include floppy disks, hard disks, magneto-optical disks, optical disks (such as CD-ROM, CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-ROM, DVD-RAM, DVD-RW, DVD-RW), magnetic tape, non- Volatile memory card and ROM. Alternatively, the program code can be downloaded from a server computer or cloud via a communication network.

The foregoing describes specific embodiments of this specification. Other implementations are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recited in the claims can be performed in an order different from that in the embodiments and still achieve desirable results. In addition, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. Multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous in certain embodiments.

Not all the steps and units in the above processes and system structure diagrams are necessary, and some steps or units can be ignored according to actual needs. The execution order of each step is not fixed, and can be determined as required. The device structures described in the above embodiments may be physical structures or logical structures, that is, some units may be realized by the same physical entity, or some units may be realized by multiple physical entities, or may be realized by multiple physical entities. Certain components in individual devices are implemented together.

As used throughout this specification, the term "exemplary" means "serving as an example, instance, or illustration," and does not mean "preferred" or "advantaged" over other embodiments. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing an understanding of the described technology. However, the techniques may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the concepts of the described embodiments.

The optional implementations of the embodiments of this specification have been described in detail above in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. However, the embodiments of this specification are not limited to the specific details of the above implementations. Within the scope of the technical concept of the embodiments of this specification, the Various simple modifications are made to the technical solutions of the embodiments of the specification, and these simple modifications all belong to the protection scope of the embodiments of the specification.

The above description of the content of this specification is provided to enable any person of ordinary skill in the art to implement or use the content of this specification. Various modifications to the content of this specification will be obvious to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein can also be applied to other variants without departing from the scope of protection of the content of this specification . Thus, the disclosure is not to be limited to the examples and designs described herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

Claims (11)

1. A method for visually displaying a test execution plan, performed by a display device, the method comprising: receiving an execution plan to be presented, which is determined from a total execution plan according to the level in a grading rule to which the display equipment belongs, wherein the total execution plan comprises execution plans corresponding to all test tasks, each execution plan corresponding to each test task comprises a tester for executing the test task, test equipment and test time, and the total execution plan is subjected to data structuring by taking the test equipment and/or the tester as objects; the grading rule is sequentially divided into a plurality of grades according to the order from high grade to low grade, and the execution plans displayed by the display devices of different grades are different; and displaying the execution plan to be presented, wherein the execution plan to be presented takes test equipment and/or test personnel as objects and is displayed in a Gantt chart form, the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents time, and each row is used for representing the execution plan of the object corresponding to the row.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the grading rules comprise hardware organization grading rules and/or personnel grading rules, and the execution plan to be presented comprises a first execution plan to be presented obtained according to the hardware organization grading rules and/or a second execution plan to be presented obtained according to the personnel grading rules.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the hardware organization levels in the hardware organization ranking rule comprise at least two of: laboratory, floor that the laboratory includes, department for different specialty in the laboratory, set of items in the department for performing different types of test tasks, room in the laboratory and equipment in each room, including test equipment and laboratory personnel's personal equipment, the order of hardware organization level in the hardware organization grading rule from high to low is: the laboratory, the floor, the department, the project group, the room and the equipment, wherein the first to-be-presented execution plan is obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the hardware organization level to which the display equipment belongs.

4. A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein, when the level of hardware organization to which the display device belongs comprises a plurality of, the first execution plan to be presented is derived from the execution plan corresponding to the highest level of hardware organization to which the display device belongs.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein the person levels in the person grading rule comprise at least two of: the management laboratory's person in charge, the owner who is responsible for each department, the group leader who is responsible for each project group and tester, personnel's order from high to low in the personnel grading rule is: the executive plan to be presented is obtained according to the executive plan corresponding to the personnel level of the display equipment.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein, when the person level to which the display device belongs includes a plurality of person levels, the second to-be-presented execution plan is obtained according to an execution plan corresponding to a highest person level to which the display device belongs.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein, in the execution plan to be presented, each execution plan required to be executed by the object corresponding to each row is represented by a block schematic diagram, and a length of the block schematic diagram corresponding to each execution plan in a horizontal axis direction represents an estimated execution duration of the plan, and the method further comprises: in response to one of the displayed execution plans being triggered, plan information of the triggered execution plan is displayed in the generated floating window, the plan information including at least one of test equipment, a tester, a test start time, a test end time, an estimated execution duration, and an execution plan identification for executing the execution plan.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: in response to one of the displayed execution plans being triggered, screening other execution plans associated with the triggered execution plan from the displayed execution plans; and displaying the triggered execution plan and the other execution plans according to a specified rule, wherein the specified rule comprises an execution sequence and/or a correlation degree.

9. An apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan for use with a display device, the apparatus comprising: an execution plan receiving unit for receiving an execution plan to be presented, which is determined from a total execution plan according to a level in a hierarchical rule to which the display device belongs, wherein the total execution plan comprises execution plans corresponding to all test tasks, each execution plan corresponding to a test task comprises a tester for executing the test task, test equipment and test time, and the total execution plan is subjected to data structuring by taking the test equipment and/or the tester as objects; the grading rule is sequentially divided into a plurality of grades according to the order from high grade to low grade, and the execution plans displayed by the display devices of different grades are different; and an execution plan display unit for displaying the execution plan to be presented, wherein the execution plan to be presented is displayed in a Gantt chart form by taking test equipment and/or test personnel as objects, and the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents time, and each row is used for representing the execution plan of the object corresponding to the row.

10. An electronic device, comprising: at least one processor, a memory coupled with the at least one processor, and a computer program stored on the memory, the at least one processor executing the computer program to implement the method of any of claims 1-8.

11. A computer readable storage medium storing a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements the method of any of claims 1-8.

Images