CN114444131A - Document review method and computer storage medium - Google Patents

Abstract

The embodiment of the application provides a document auditing method and a computer storage medium, wherein the document auditing method comprises the following steps: when the auditing triggering operation of the online document to be audited is detected, acquiring the information of the online document to be audited, wherein the information of the online document at least comprises original link information and attribute information corresponding to the online document; obtaining a snapshot link corresponding to the online document according to the original link information; generating an examination and approval sheet according to the snapshot link content and the attribute information corresponding to the online document; and sending the examination and approval sheet to an examination and approval node corresponding to the online document so as to obtain an examination and approval result of the online document. By the embodiment of the application, the safety of document publishing is effectively guaranteed.

Description

Document review method and computer storage medium

technical field

The embodiments of the present application relate to the field of computer technologies, and in particular, to a document review method and a computer storage medium.

Background technique

With the development of Internet technology, more and more enterprises and organizations conduct their daily operations based on the Internet. In the process of daily operations of enterprises and organizations, many work-related content will be deposited into online documents. In some scenarios where information disclosure is required, such as the scenario of publishing external help manuals for companies and organizations, it is necessary to disclose the online documents of companies and organizations to facilitate the disclosure and dissemination of information.

Document disclosure in this case is called document public release, that is, online documents belonging to enterprises and organizations are published as web pages, which facilitates the external disclosure of enterprise and organization information, and can also update document content in real time. However, in order to ensure the compliance and security of online document publishing, it currently needs to be reviewed by relevant personnel in the enterprise and organization before publishing, and public publishing can only be done after the review is passed.

However, this method consumes a lot of manpower, and it often happens that the audit is omitted or tampered after the audit due to human factors. Therefore, how to provide a solution for effectively reviewing documents that need to be publicly released has become an urgent problem to be solved.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of this, the embodiments of the present application provide a document review solution to at least partially solve the above problems.

According to a first aspect of the embodiments of the present application, there is provided a document review method, comprising: when an review triggering operation of an online document to be reviewed is detected, acquiring information of the online document to be reviewed, wherein the The information of the online document at least includes the original link information and attribute information corresponding to the online document; the snapshot link corresponding to the online document is obtained according to the original link information; according to the content of the snapshot link and the attribute information corresponding to the online document, generating Approval form; send the approval form to the approval node corresponding to the online document to obtain the review result of the online document.

According to a second aspect of the embodiments of the present application, an electronic device is provided, including: a processor, a memory, a communication interface, and a communication bus, and the processor, the memory, and the communication interface communicate with each other through the communication bus. The memory is used for storing at least one executable instruction, and the executable instruction enables the processor to perform an operation corresponding to the method described in the first aspect.

According to a third aspect of the embodiments of the present application, a computer storage medium is provided on which a computer program is stored, and when the program is executed by a processor, the method according to the first aspect is implemented.

According to a fourth aspect of the embodiments of the present application, a computer program product is provided, including computer instructions, the computer instructions instructing a computing device to perform operations corresponding to the method described in the first aspect.

According to the document review solution provided by the embodiment of the present application, when there is an online document that needs to be reviewed, such as release review, the document review is performed through a review trigger operation, and after the trigger operation is detected, the information of the corresponding online document is obtained, but it is not directly based on the The information generates an approval form for document release review, but a snapshot of the online document is generated first. In this way, the document review can be performed based on the snapshot, and the snapshot cannot be modified. Even if the document is approved in the future, it will be released based on the snapshot. Therefore, on the one hand, when an online document is published, it is necessary to review the triggering operation to carry out the follow-up process, so as to avoid the situation that the online document is directly published without review; The approval sheet corresponds to the approval snapshot. If the publisher modifies the online document after the approval sheet is issued, it will not affect the review of the online document before the modification and the subsequent release, which improves the review efficiency; and, If the publisher does not perform the re-examination triggering operation, it will not trigger a new document audit, nor will the revised online document be published based on the audit result of the online document before the modification. It can be seen that the solution of the embodiment of the present application not only improves the efficiency of document review, but also effectively avoids the omission of review caused by human factors or the release of documents that have been tampered with after review, effectively ensuring the security of document review and publication. sex.

Description of drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following briefly introduces the accompanying drawings required for the description of the embodiments or the prior art. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only These are some embodiments described in the embodiments of the present application. For those of ordinary skill in the art, other drawings can also be obtained according to these drawings.

1 is a schematic diagram of an applicable system according to an embodiment of the application;

FIG. 2A is a flow chart of steps of a document review method according to Embodiment 1 of the present application;

FIG. 2B is a schematic diagram of an example of a scenario in the embodiment shown in FIG. 2A;

3 is a flow chart of steps of a document review method according to Embodiment 2 of the present application;

4 is a flow chart of steps of a document review method according to Embodiment 3 of the present application;

FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to Embodiment 4 of the present application.

Detailed ways

In order to make those skilled in the art better understand the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application, the following will clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present application. The embodiments described above are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all the embodiments. All other embodiments obtained by persons of ordinary skill in the art based on the embodiments in the embodiments of the present application should fall within the protection scope of the embodiments of the present application.

The specific implementation of the embodiments of the present application is further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings of the embodiments of the present application.

FIG. 1 shows an exemplary system to which embodiments of the present application are applicable. As shown in FIG. 1, the system 100 may include a server 102, a communication network 104, and/or one or more user equipments 106, exemplified in FIG. 1 as a plurality of user equipments. It should be noted that the user equipment 106 in this example may be a user equipment of a personal user terminal, or may be a user equipment of an enterprise user terminal, which is not limited in this embodiment of the present application.

Server 102 may be any suitable server for storing information, data, programs, and/or any other suitable type of content. In some embodiments, server 102 may perform any suitable function. For example, in some embodiments, the server 102 may be used to store and provide data related to document review, including but not limited to document attribute information, link information, approval form data, approval rule information, document storage related data, etc. Wait. As an optional example, in some embodiments, the server 102 may be used to generate an approval form according to the corresponding information, and send it to the corresponding approval node. However, those skilled in the art should understand that this part of the operation can also be performed on the user equipment 106 .

In some embodiments, communication network 104 may be any suitable combination of one or more wired and/or wireless networks. For example, the communication network 104 can include any one or more of the following: the Internet, an intranet, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a wireless network, a digital subscriber line (DSL) network, a frame relay network, Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) network, Virtual Private Network (VPN) and/or any other suitable communication network. User equipment 106 can be connected to communication network 104 via one or more communication links (eg, communication link 112 ), which communication network 104 can be linked to via one or more communication links (eg, communication link 114 ) server 102. The communication link may be any communication link suitable for transferring data between the user equipment 106 and the server 102, such as a network link, dial-up link, wireless link, hardwired link, any other suitable communication link or any suitable combination of such links.

User devices 106 may include any one or more user devices suitable for online document publishing and/or online document review. In some embodiments, user equipment 106 may comprise any suitable type of device. For example, in some embodiments, user equipment 106 may include a mobile device, tablet computer, laptop computer, desktop computer, wearable computer, game console, media player, vehicle entertainment system, and/or any other suitable type of user equipment. Note that in some embodiments, the user device 106 may additionally or alternatively be used to implement the document review methods described in the various embodiments below.

Although server 102 is illustrated as one device, in some embodiments, any suitable number of devices may be used to perform the functions performed by server 102 . For example, in some embodiments, multiple devices may be used to implement the functions performed by server 102 . Alternatively, the functions of server 102 may be implemented using cloud services.

Based on the above system, an embodiment of the present application provides a document review method, which will be described below through multiple embodiments.

Example 1

Referring to FIG. 2A , it shows a flowchart of steps of a document review method according to Embodiment 1 of the present application.

Step S202: When it is detected that there is an audit triggering operation of the online document to be reviewed, the information of the online document to be reviewed is acquired.

In this embodiment of the present application, an online document refers to a document that can be accessed within an enterprise or organization through a link address. Those skilled in the art can understand that the online document can be directly generated online, or it can be generated by converting the original off-line document into an online document through any method (eg, uploading to a corresponding website, etc.). Each online document corresponds to a web page link address, that is, the original link information in the embodiment of the present application.

The review triggering operation for the online document can be any appropriate triggering operation, for example, it can be a click operation on a preset button, a voice command operation issued by voice, a preset gesture operation, and so on. If an audit-triggered operation is performed on an online document, it means that the online document needs to be reviewed, such as the review when it is released to the outside world. It can be released to personnel within these scopes, and it can also be released to other departments or personnel within the enterprise and organization. After the audit triggering operation is executed, the document audit process will be started, and the information of the online document to be audited will be obtained first. In the embodiment of the present application, the information of the online document includes at least original link information and attribute information corresponding to the online document. The attribute information is used to characterize the document attributes of the online document, and may include but not limited to some or all of the title information, identification information, document size information, storage location information, publisher information, etc. of the online document. However, it is not limited to this, and those skilled in the art can also add other attribute information according to actual needs.

Step S204: Obtain a snapshot link corresponding to the online document according to the original link information.

As mentioned above, each online document corresponds to an original link information, which can be understood as the original link address of the online document. Then, through the original link information, the online document can be accessed and the content of the online document can be obtained. , which is usually text content, but is not limited to this. Rich media content, or audio and video content, etc., are also applicable to the solutions of the embodiments of the present application.

In a feasible manner of the embodiment of the present application, after the content of the online document is obtained, a snapshot (that is, a webpage snapshot) may be generated for the content, that is, when the snapshot link corresponding to the online document is obtained according to the original link information, the snapshot link corresponding to the online document may be obtained according to the The content of the online document is obtained from the original link information, and a snapshot and a snapshot link corresponding to the snapshot are generated for the online document based on the obtained content. A snapshot is a webpage content captured and saved at a certain moment. The snapshot is not affected by changes to the original webpage. No matter the subsequent webpage content modification or deletion or link failure, it will not affect the webpage snapshot collected at that moment. Also based on this, in the embodiment of the present application, in order to prevent the online document to be reviewed from being modified after it is submitted for review, so that the final published document may be inconsistent with the document submitted for review, a corresponding snapshot is generated for the online document to be published. , and conduct corresponding approval based on the snapshot in the future to avoid inconsistency between the content of the review and the content of the submission for review, and to avoid inconsistency between the content of the publication and the content of the submission for review in the future.

Snapshots generated for online documents also have corresponding snapshot links, through which the snapshot content can be accessed.

Step S206: Generate an approval form according to the content of the snapshot link and the attribute information corresponding to the online document.

The approval form may be in the form of a form, but it is not limited to this, and other forms, such as non-form text form, are also applicable, as long as it can at least reflect the corresponding document information to be approved. In a feasible manner, a default approval form template can be provided by the system for use, so as to simplify the generation and processing of the approval form and facilitate user operations. In another feasible way, an approval form template can be generated during application according to the actual needs of the user, for example, a form that meets the needs of the user is generated according to the information (such as format, content, style, etc.) selected by the user to generate the approval form template. User-generated approval form templates can be stored for subsequent use by the user.

The content of the snapshot link may be the content of the snapshot corresponding to the snapshot link.

Step S208: Send the approval form to the approval node corresponding to the online document to obtain the review result of the online document.

For an online document that needs to be reviewed, it usually corresponds to at least one approval node for reviewing the content of the online document. The approval node may be an upper-level or multi-level node of the node where the online document is located, or may be another approval node that does not have a direct subordinate relationship with the node where the online document is located. For example, if the online storage space where the online document is located is regarded as a node, the manager of the online storage space can be regarded as the upper-level node of the node where the online document is located. For another example, if the publisher of the online document is regarded as a node, the upper-level or multi-level leaders of the publisher can be regarded as the upper-level or multi-level nodes of the node where the online document is located.

Among them, for each approval node, the items that need to be reviewed for the content of the online document may be the same or may be different. In a feasible manner, an approval rule may be preset for the approval node, so that the approval node performs machine review of the document according to the approval rule. In another feasible way, the approval rule can also be notified to the reviewer corresponding to the approval node, and the reviewer can manually review the document. In yet another feasible way, the above two ways can be combined, and manual review is added on the basis of machine review, so as to improve the accuracy of approval for online document release.

It should be noted that, in the embodiments of the present application, unless otherwise specified, the quantities related to "multiple" such as "multi-level", "multiple" and "multiple" all mean two or more.

Hereinafter, the above process will be exemplarily described with a specific example, as shown in FIG. 2B .

FIG. 2B is an example of a scenario in the embodiment shown in FIG. 2A . In this example, enterprise X is set to conduct daily work summary and training through an instant messaging tool, and the instant messaging tool provides online storage for enterprise X to store data Enterprise X allocates the online storage space to multiple departments for use, and each department is responsible for the management of the storage space of this department, including storing online documents, publishing online documents within enterprise X, and publishing online documents to the external public. documentation etc. In addition, it is assumed that employee A needs to publish the online document Y of his department to the external public. The superior leader node of employee A is employee B, and employee C is responsible for the document review of the entire enterprise on the basis of department review.

Based on the above settings, employee A displays the existing online document M in the department through the display page of the online storage space in the instant messaging tool, and the online document has a corresponding web page link P. For example, after clicking "online document M", It will jump to the webpage link P, and display the content of the online document M through the webpage. In the content display page of the online document, corresponding to each online document, there is also a corresponding trigger button for publishing the document. It should be understood that, in practical applications, different trigger buttons may also be set according to different release scopes, such as “internal” release and so on. In this example, after employee A clicks the "Publish to the outside world" button corresponding to the online document M, the instant messaging tool obtains the link information of the online document M, namely the webpage link P, and the attribute information of the online document M, for example, the online document M's title. Furthermore, the instant messaging tool accesses the webpage according to the webpage link P, obtains the content of the online document M, and generates a webpage snapshot N and a corresponding snapshot link Q for the content. And, on this basis, a corresponding approval form is generated according to the snapshot link P of the webpage snapshot N and the attribute information (title in this example) of the online document M. Because employee A's upper-level leader node is employee B, employee C needs to review after employee B's review. Therefore, the approval form will be sent to employee B's node first, and employee B's node will perform a double review by machine and human. . (It should be understood by those skilled in the art that, in practical applications, only one of machine auditing or manual auditing may be used). Among them, the specific approval rules used in the machine review part can be set by those skilled in the art according to actual needs, such as sensitive word inspection, etc. The manual review part can further conduct corresponding review based on the results of the machine review, such as further sensitive word inspection, etc. Check for leaks. Optionally, when the solution is implemented based on the instant messaging tool, when the approval form is sent to the node where employee B is located, a message can also be prompted to employee B.

The node where employee B is located accesses the webpage snapshot N based on the snapshot link Q, and performs content review based on the webpage snapshot N. After being reviewed by the node where employee B is located, the approval form will be sent to the node where employee C is located. If the node where employee B is located has the content that the review fails, the node where employee B is located can directly report to the node where employee A is located. pass. In this case, for the node where employee C is located, the node where employee C is located can still conduct an advance review based on the approval form, and can feedback the review opinion to the node where employee A is located through forms such as instant messaging. If the node where employee B is located has passed the audit, the node where employee C is located will conduct the machine and manual audit corresponding to its node. Suppose, whether there is any content that does not conform to industry norms in the audit document of the node where employee C is located, the machine audit part can be audited through the pre-set approval rules, and the manual audit part can be further supplemented based on the machine audit results. The review of the node where employee C is located still accesses the webpage snapshot N based on the snapshot link Q, and performs content review based on the webpage snapshot N. In this example, the content of the set webpage snapshot N has passed the review of the node where employee B is located and the node where employee C is located, and can be released to the outside world. A link for publishing based on the snapshot link Q corresponding to the webpage snapshot N, that is, a webpage link W is generated, so as to publish the online document M based on the webpage link W, which is essentially the webpage snapshot N of the online document. As a result, the compliance and security of the online documentation for external publication are ensured.

With this embodiment, when there is an online document that needs to be reviewed, such as release review, the document review is performed through the review trigger operation, and after the trigger operation is detected, the information of the corresponding online document is obtained, but the document release review is not directly generated according to the information. Instead, a snapshot of the online document will be generated first. In this way, the document review can be performed based on the snapshot, and the snapshot cannot be modified. Even if the document passes the review, it will be released based on the snapshot. Therefore, on the one hand, when an online document is published, it is necessary to review the triggering operation to carry out the follow-up process, so as to avoid the situation that the online document is directly published without review; The approval sheet corresponds to the approval snapshot. If the publisher modifies the online document after the approval sheet is issued, it will not affect the review of the online document before the modification and the subsequent release, which improves the review efficiency; and, If the publisher does not perform the re-examination triggering operation, it will not trigger a new document audit, nor will the revised online document be published based on the audit result of the online document before the modification. It can be seen that the solution of the embodiment of the present application not only improves the efficiency of document review, but also effectively avoids the omission of review caused by human factors or the release of documents that have been tampered with after review, effectively ensuring the security of document review and publication. sex.

The document review method in this embodiment may be executed by any appropriate electronic device with data processing capability, including but not limited to: a server, a mobile terminal (such as a mobile phone, a PAD, etc.), a PC, and the like.

Embodiment 2

Referring to FIG. 3 , a flow chart of steps of a document review method according to Embodiment 2 of the present application is shown.

The document review method of this embodiment includes the following steps:

Step S302: Receive online document publishing settings.

Wherein, the setting includes at least one of the following: whether to allow publishing of online documents, whether to conduct publishing approval for publishing online documents, and whether to conduct re-publishing approval after online document content is updated.

Online document publishing settings are options provided to users for controlling document publishing approval rules. Through these options, users can flexibly set corresponding publishing settings. In a feasible way, it is also possible to set the scope of application for the online document publishing setting, for example, it may be applicable to the entire enterprise or organization, or applicable to certain departments or individuals, etc., so as to improve the flexibility of document review.

In practical applications, the above settings may be implemented in any appropriate form, for example, in the form of checking boxes, etc. The embodiments of the present application do not limit the specific form of online document publishing settings.

In addition, this step is optional, and the specific settings of online document publishing settings can also be set by the system by default, such as allowing online document publishing by default, publishing online documents requiring publishing approval, and requiring re-publishing approval after online document content is updated, etc. .

In practical applications, after receiving the user's online document publishing settings, the settings will be sent to the server for storage for subsequent use.

Step S304: Receive an audit triggering operation for the online document.

As previously mentioned, this audit-triggered operation can be implemented in any suitable form.

Step S306: Determine whether the publisher of the online document to be reviewed has passed the publishing certification; if it has not passed the publishing certification, the publisher's document publishing operation is prohibited, and this process ends. If the issuance authentication is passed, step S308 is executed.

In this optional step, when the client receives an audit trigger operation on the online document, in addition to triggering the audit, it will also send an authentication request message to the server to request the server to confirm whether the publisher of the online document has passed the publication. Authentication; after determining the authentication result, the server will feed back a corresponding request response message to the client, which carries information indicating whether the publisher has passed the publication authentication. After receiving the request response message, the client obtains corresponding information indicating whether the publisher has passed the publishing certification, and then judges whether the publisher of the online document to be reviewed has passed the publishing certification according to the information.

The use of publishing certification can effectively review the qualifications of publishers, so as to reduce the possibility of publishing illegal online documents and the risks caused by them.

It should be noted that this step is also an optional step. In the absence of this step, risks are managed and controlled through subsequent review of online documents.

Step S308 : when it is detected that there is an audit triggering operation of the online document to be reviewed, obtain the information of the online document to be reviewed.

In this embodiment, the online document is an unpublished online document to be reviewed for publication. However, those skilled in the art should understand that the review of online documents that need to be reviewed in other scenarios is also applicable to the solution of this embodiment. The information of the online document at least includes original link information and attribute information corresponding to the online document.

For the specific implementation of this step, reference may be made to the description of the relevant part in the foregoing Embodiment 1, which will not be repeated here.

Step S310: Obtain a snapshot link corresponding to the online document according to the original link information.

For the specific implementation of this step, reference may be made to the description of the relevant part in the foregoing Embodiment 1, which will not be repeated here.

Step S312: Generate an approval form according to the content of the snapshot link and the attribute information corresponding to the online document.

First of all, it should be noted that, in a feasible implementation manner, the user equipment 106 can locally obtain the approval form by generating the content according to the snapshot link content and the attribute information corresponding to the online document. In another feasible implementation manner, the snapshot link content and attribute information corresponding to the online document may be sent to the server 102 , and the server 102 generates an approval form according to the snapshot link content and the attribute information corresponding to the online document, and sends it to the user device 106 , so that the user device 106 obtains the approval form.

In a specific implementation manner, generating the approval form according to the content of the snapshot link and the attribute information corresponding to the online document may be implemented as follows: setting audit access rights for the snapshot content corresponding to the snapshot link; At least one, as well as review access rights and attribute information corresponding to the online document, to generate an approval form. In this way, by setting the review access authority, the snapshot of the online document can only be accessed by the corresponding approval node and/or reviewer, while others have no access, thereby improving the security and confidentiality of the online document review.

Furthermore, in order to make the approval process more efficient and convenient, there are also packages for implementing the corresponding functions. A suite is a multi-part data model used to achieve target functions, which mainly includes: basic information part, suite property part, suite property setting item part and control list part in the suite. Wherein, the basic information part may include kit identification information, kit description information, and the like. The kit properties section provides kit property setting items for kit developers to set and use. Kit developers can implement different data processing logic by setting different kit property values, such as kit rendering and linkage logic. The suite property setting item part is similar to the common control setting item, which can be used to set the properties of the suite/controls in the suite. The controls list in the kit section gives basic information on the controls and controls used in the kit. In the embodiment of the present application, most of these controls are form controls, so as to meet the needs of approval form generation and information transmission. Those skilled in the art can set corresponding data of each part of the kit according to actual requirements, so as to realize the kit that can generate the approval sheet.

Based on this, when the approval form is specifically generated, the approval kit can be used to obtain the snapshot link content of the snapshot and the attribute information corresponding to the online document; and the approval kit can generate an online document based on the snapshot link content and the attribute information. Approval information corresponding to the service; an approval document is generated based on the approval information.

The service to which the online document belongs is related to the service provided or used by the enterprise and organization, for example, it may be an e-commerce service, a database service, or a cloud computing service, and so on. Based on this, approval information that can express the service to which the online document belongs can be generated by the approval suite based on the snapshot link content and the attribute information, so as to facilitate subsequent document review, especially manual review. Taking e-commerce as an example, if the attribute information of an online document includes the title "Preferential Mode", it can be generated as "Commodity Preferential Mode" through the approval suite to give it meanings related to the services that enterprises and organizations can provide.

However, it should be noted that, in practical applications, snapshots of online documents and snapshot links can also be generated, and subsequent approval nodes can be determined, an approval form can be generated and sent to the corresponding approval node for document review until the generation The process of publishing links is incorporated into the Approval Suite functionality. While being convenient for users to use, the functions that can be implemented by the approval suite can also be uniformly set and managed, so as to facilitate maintenance of the approval process and reduce the implementation cost of the solution in the embodiment of the present application.

Step S314: Determine the approval node according to the online document.

First of all, it should be noted that in this embodiment, the approval node is determined before sending the approval form to the approval node corresponding to the online document to obtain the review result of the online document as an example, but those skilled in the art should understand that, This step can be executed at any time before sending the approval form to the approval node corresponding to the online document to obtain the review result of the online document. For example, it can be executed before or after any of the foregoing steps S302-312, not limited to The execution sequence in this embodiment can also be executed in parallel with any one of the foregoing steps S302-312.

In a feasible manner, this step may be implemented as: determining the administrator node of the document storage space where the online document is located as the approval node; and/or determining the first level according to the first level node of the publisher corresponding to the online document The at least one-level superior node of the node determines the at least one-level superior node as an approval node.

In the way of determining the administrator node as the approval node, because the administrator has the management responsibility for the document storage space, in some enterprises and organizations with simple organizational structure, the administrator node can directly approve the document to Improve approval efficiency while meeting approval requirements. In the method of determining at least one level of superior node as an approval node, the online document publisher may have one or more levels of superior leader nodes, and the one or more levels of superior leader nodes are determined as approval nodes, and the online document can be effectively processed. to ensure the compliance and security of online document publishing.

In another feasible manner, this step can be implemented as: obtaining the organization personnel information of the organization where the publisher corresponding to the online document is located, and displaying the organization personnel information; receiving a selection operation for the organization personnel information, selecting the The node where the organization personnel are located is used as the approval node. In this way, the approval node can be selected more flexibly according to the actual situation, and it can be compatible with most actual approval scenarios, and has good applicability.

In addition, in the case where the approval node has the function of automatic machine review, each approval node corresponds to at least one approval rule, such as a rule for approving whether an online document is compliant, a rule for approving whether an online document is legal, using Rules for approving whether the online document contains forbidden words or sensitive words, rules for approving whether the online document involves confidential information of enterprises and organizations, etc., are not limited in this embodiment of the present application.

In practical applications, the above two methods can be selected for use or used in combination.

After the approval node is determined, subsequent online document approval operations can be performed.

Step S316: Send the approval form to the approval node corresponding to the online document to obtain the review result of the online document.

In a feasible manner, this step can be implemented as: sending the approval form to the approval node corresponding to the online document, the approval node includes at least one approval node, and each approval node has a corresponding approval rule; and approval form, perform document review on online documents, and obtain the review results of online documents.

The approval form contains the link information and/or the content of the snapshot link of the snapshot corresponding to the online document. Based on this, the snapshot can be accessed, the content of the snapshot can be obtained, and then the approval is carried out based on the approval rules, thus ensuring the standardization and smoothness of the approval process. sex.

At this point, the online document can be effectively reviewed, but for some documents that need to be published, optionally, the following steps can also be performed.

Step S318: If the document is approved, the online document is released.

In the specific implementation of this step, if it is determined that the document has passed the review, the snapshot content corresponding to the snapshot link is set for external disclosure, and a document release link is generated according to the link information of the snapshot link; according to the document release link, the online document is released. . Therefore, the public or the corresponding department can access the online document through the external disclosure setting, and the purpose of information dissemination by publishing the online document is realized. In addition, publishing based on snapshot links can also effectively ensure that the published content is indeed audited, safe and compliant content.

It should be noted that, in some cases, the content of the original online document needs to be updated, and the updated online document needs to be published. In this case, in order to ensure the compliance and security of the online document, the publication of the updated online document may also be approved.

For example, in a feasible manner, after receiving the update operation on the published online document, the information of the updated online document may be obtained; and the updated online document may be obtained according to the link information in the information of the updated online document. The content of the document, and based on the obtained content, an update snapshot and a snapshot link corresponding to the update snapshot are generated for the updated online document; according to at least one of the link information and the content of the snapshot link corresponding to the snapshot link corresponding to the update snapshot, and The attribute information corresponding to the updated online document is generated, and the approval form of the updated online document is generated; the approval form is sent to the approval node to conduct the document review of the updated online document; after the document is approved, use The document publishing link updates the snapshot link corresponding to the update snapshot, and publishes the updated online document according to the updated snapshot link.

With this embodiment, when there is an online document that needs to be reviewed, such as release review, it is necessary to conduct document review through the review trigger operation, and after detecting the trigger operation, the information of the corresponding online document is obtained, but the document release is not directly generated according to the information. For the approved approval form, a snapshot of the online document will be generated first. In this way, the document review can be performed based on the snapshot, and the snapshot cannot be modified. Even if the document is approved in the future, it will be released based on the snapshot. Therefore, on the one hand, when an online document is published, it is necessary to review the triggering operation to carry out the follow-up process, so as to avoid the situation that the online document is directly published without review; The approval sheet corresponds to the approval snapshot. If the publisher modifies the online document after the approval sheet is issued, it will not affect the review of the online document before the modification and the subsequent release, which improves the review efficiency; and, If the publisher does not perform the re-examination triggering operation, it will not trigger a new document audit, nor will the revised online document be published based on the audit result of the online document before the modification. It can be seen that the solution of the embodiment of the present application not only improves the efficiency of document review, but also effectively avoids the omission of review caused by human factors or the release of documents that have been tampered with after review, effectively ensuring the security of document review and publication. sex.

The document review method in this embodiment may be executed by any appropriate electronic device with data processing capability, including but not limited to: a server, a mobile terminal (such as a mobile phone, a PAD, etc.), a PC, and the like.

Embodiment 3

Referring to FIG. 4 , it shows a flowchart of steps of a document review method according to Embodiment 3 of the present application.

The document review method of this embodiment includes the following steps:

Step S402: After it is determined that the online document cannot be displayed or cannot be completely displayed, an audit trigger operation for auditing the online document is received; according to the audit trigger operation, information of the online document to be reviewed is obtained.

After some online documents are published, permissions may be set to allow only some users, such as platform members or authorized specific users, to browse and view. In this case, for users without permission, the online document will not be displayed or fully displayed. To deal with this situation, in this embodiment, a corresponding review option may be set for this type of online document, for users who want to browse or view the online document but do not have permission to apply and review the application. If the user triggers the corresponding review option, the corresponding platform, application or web page, etc. will receive the review triggering operation for reviewing the online document. At this time, the information of the online document to be reviewed will be obtained based on the review triggering operation.

In this embodiment, the information of the online document includes at least the original link information and attribute information corresponding to the online document, and also includes the information of the creator of the online document and/or the information of the authorized person. As mentioned above, the attribute information is used to characterize the document attributes of the online document, which may include, but is not limited to, part or all of the title information, identification information, document size information, storage location information, etc. of the online document. However, it is not limited to this, and those skilled in the art can also add other attribute information according to actual needs.

The information of the creator of the online document and/or the information of the authorized person may include, but is not limited to, identification information, audit address information, and the like. Among them, the identification information is used to uniquely identify the creator of the online document, or the authorised person corresponding to the online document; the audit address information is used to indicate the address for receiving the audit request, and the operator who triggers the audit can send the audit request to The address indicated by the audit address information, so that the creator or the authorized person can conduct the audit.

Step S404: Obtain a snapshot link corresponding to the online document according to the original link information.

Step S406: Generate an approval form according to the content of the snapshot link and the attribute information corresponding to the online document.

For the specific implementation of steps S404-S406, reference may be made to the descriptions of the relevant parts in the foregoing embodiments, which will not be repeated here.

Step S408: Determine the approval node according to the information of the creator and/or the person with authorized authority.

In this step, the difference from the previous embodiments is that the authorisation of the online document from the creator and/or the person with the authorization authority needs to be obtained for the complete display of the online document. Therefore, the approval node is implemented as the creator and/or The approval node corresponding to the person with the authorization authority, that is, the approval node is determined according to the information of the creator and/or the person with the authorization authority.

Step S410: Send the approval form to the approval node corresponding to the online document to obtain the review result of the online document.

For the specific implementation of this step, reference may be made to the descriptions of the relevant parts in the foregoing embodiments, which will not be repeated here.

Through this embodiment, for the scenarios where the published online documents need authorization to be displayed completely, the review of browsing and viewing in such scenarios can be realized. In addition to effectively ensuring the security of document review and publication, it can also Improve user experience.

Embodiment 4

Referring to FIG. 5 , a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to Embodiment 4 of the present application is shown. The specific embodiments of the present application do not limit the specific implementation of the electronic device.

As shown in FIG. 5 , the electronic device may include: a processor (processor) 502 , a communication interface (Communications Interface) 504 , a memory (memory) 506 , and a communication bus 508 .

in:

The processor 502 , the communication interface 504 , and the memory 506 communicate with each other through the communication bus 508 .

The communication interface 504 is used to communicate with other electronic devices or servers.

The processor 502 is configured to execute the program 510, and specifically may execute the relevant steps in the above-mentioned embodiments of the document review method.

Specifically, the program 510 may include program code including computer operation instructions.

The processor 502 may be a CPU, or an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), or one or more integrated circuits configured to implement the embodiments of the present application. One or more processors included in the smart device may be the same type of processors, such as one or more CPUs; or may be different types of processors, such as one or more CPUs and one or more ASICs.

The memory 506 is used to store the program 510 . Memory 506 may include high-speed RAM memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk memory.

The program 510 may specifically be used to cause the processor 502 to execute the document review method described in any one of the above method embodiments.

For the specific implementation and effects of the steps in the program 510, reference can be made to the corresponding descriptions in the corresponding steps and units in the above-mentioned embodiments of the document review method, and have corresponding beneficial effects, which are not repeated here. Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working process of the devices and modules described above may refer to the corresponding process descriptions in the foregoing method embodiments, which will not be repeated here.

Embodiments of the present application further provide a computer program product, including computer instructions, where the computer instructions instruct a computing device to perform operations corresponding to any of the document review methods in the foregoing multiple method embodiments.

It should be pointed out that, according to the needs of implementation, each component/step described in the embodiments of the present application may be split into more components/steps, or two or more components/steps or part of operations of components/steps may be combined into New components/steps to achieve the purpose of the embodiments of the present application.

The above-described methods according to the embodiments of the present application may be implemented in hardware, firmware, or as software or computer codes that may be stored in a recording medium (such as CD ROM, RAM, floppy disk, hard disk, or magneto-optical disk), or implemented by Network downloaded computer code originally stored in a remote recording medium or non-transitory machine-readable medium and will be stored in a local recording medium so that the methods described herein can be stored on a computer using a general purpose computer, special purpose processor or programmable or such software processing on a recording medium of dedicated hardware such as ASIC or FPGA. It is to be understood that a computer, processor, microprocessor controller or programmable hardware includes storage components (eg, RAM, ROM, flash memory, etc.) that can store or receive software or computer code when the software or computer code is executed by a computer, When accessed and executed by a processor or hardware, the document review methods described herein are implemented. Furthermore, when a general purpose computer accesses code for implementing the document review method shown herein, execution of the code converts the general purpose computer into a special purpose computer for executing the document review method shown herein.

Those of ordinary skill in the art can realize that the units and method steps of each example described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented in electronic hardware, or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether these functions are performed in hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Skilled persons may use different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application, but such implementations should not be considered beyond the scope of the embodiments of the present application.

The above embodiments are only used to illustrate the embodiments of the present application, but are not intended to limit the embodiments of the present application. Those of ordinary skill in the relevant technical fields can also make various Therefore, all equivalent technical solutions also belong to the scope of the embodiments of the present application, and the patent protection scope of the embodiments of the present application should be defined by the claims.

Claims (14)

1. A document review method, comprising: When it is detected that there is an audit triggering operation of the online document to be reviewed, information of the online document to be reviewed is obtained, wherein the information of the online document at least includes original link information and attribute information corresponding to the online document; Obtain a snapshot link corresponding to the online document according to the original link information; generating an approval form according to the content of the snapshot link and the attribute information corresponding to the online document; The approval form is sent to the approval node corresponding to the online document to obtain the review result of the online document. 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the generating an approval form according to the content of the snapshot link and the attribute information corresponding to the online document comprises: Set audit access permissions for the snapshot content corresponding to the snapshot link; An approval form is generated according to at least one of the link information of the snapshot link and the content of the snapshot, as well as the review access authority and attribute information corresponding to the online document. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the method further comprises: If the document is reviewed and approved, the snapshot content corresponding to the snapshot link is set for external disclosure, and a document release link is generated according to the link information of the snapshot link; According to the document publishing link, the online document is published. 4. The method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein before the sending the approval form to the approval node corresponding to the online document to obtain an approval result of the online document, further comprising: : Acquiring the organization personnel information of the organization where the publisher corresponding to the online document belongs, and displaying the organization personnel information; A selection operation for the organization personnel information is received, and the node where the selected organization personnel are located is used as an approval node. 5. The method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein, before the sending the approval form to the approval node corresponding to the online document to obtain the review result of the online document, the Methods also include: determining the administrator node of the document storage space where the online document is located as an approval node; and / or, At least one-level superior node of the first-level node is determined according to the first-level node of the publisher corresponding to the online document, and the at least one-level superior node is determined as an approval node. 6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the sending the approval form to an approval node corresponding to the online document to obtain an approval result of the online document comprises: sending the approval form to an approval node corresponding to the online document, the approval node includes at least one approval node, and each approval node has a corresponding approval rule; The approval node performs document review on the online document according to the corresponding approval rule and the approval form, and obtains the review result of the online document. 7. The method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein the generating an approval form according to the content of the snapshot link and the attribute information corresponding to the online document comprises: Obtain the attribute information corresponding to the content of the snapshot link and the online document by using the approval kit; and generating, through the approval suite, approval information corresponding to the service to which the online document belongs based on the snapshot link content and the attribute information; According to the approval information, an approval document is generated. 8. The method of claim 3, wherein the method further comprises: Receive an update operation on the published online document, and obtain the information of the updated online document; Obtain the content of the updated online document according to the link information in the information of the updated online document, and generate an update snapshot and a snapshot link corresponding to the update snapshot for the updated online document based on the obtained content; generating an approval form for the updated online document according to at least one of link information corresponding to the snapshot link corresponding to the updated snapshot and content of the snapshot link, and attribute information corresponding to the updated online document; sending the approval form to the approval node for document review of the updated online document; After the document is approved, the snapshot link corresponding to the update snapshot is updated using the document release link, and the updated online document is published according to the updated snapshot link. 9. The method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein, before acquiring the information of the online document to be reviewed when the review triggering operation of the online document to be reviewed is detected, the Methods also include: Online document publishing settings are received, wherein the settings include at least one of the following: whether to allow publishing of online documents, whether to conduct publishing approval for publishing online documents, and whether to conduct re-publishing approval after online document content is updated. 10. The method of any one of claims 1-3, wherein the method further comprises: Judging whether the publisher of the online document to be reviewed has passed the publishing certification; If the publication certification is not passed, the document publishing operation of the publisher is prohibited; if the publication certification is passed, the review triggering operation of obtaining the online document to be reviewed is performed when the presence of the online document to be reviewed is detected. information manipulation. 11. The method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein the online document to be reviewed is an unpublished online document to be reviewed for publication. 12. The method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein the obtaining the snapshot link corresponding to the online document according to the original link information comprises: The content of the online document is obtained according to the original link information, and a snapshot and a snapshot link corresponding to the snapshot are generated for the online document based on the obtained content. 13. The method of any one of claims 1-3, wherein, The obtaining the information of the online document to be reviewed when it is detected that there is an audit triggering operation of the online document to be reviewed includes: after determining that the online document cannot be displayed or cannot be completely displayed, receiving a review of the online document. An audit triggering operation for auditing; according to the audit triggering operation, the information of the online document to be reviewed is obtained; wherein, the information of the online document also includes the information of the creator of the online document and/or the person with authorized authority Information; Before the sending the approval form to the approval node corresponding to the online document to obtain the approval result of the online document, the method further includes: determining according to the information of the creator and/or the person with authorized authority Approval node. 14. A computer storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, the program implementing the document review method according to any one of claims 1-13 when the program is executed by a processor.

Images