CN114118915A - Logistics timeliness evaluation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium - Google Patents
Logistics timeliness evaluation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114118915A CN114118915A CN202111400355.6A CN202111400355A CN114118915A CN 114118915 A CN114118915 A CN 114118915A CN 202111400355 A CN202111400355 A CN 202111400355A CN 114118915 A CN114118915 A CN 114118915A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- time
- delivery
- carrier
- task
- country
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/083—Shipping
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/083—Shipping
- G06Q10/0838—Historical data
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a logistics aging evaluation method, a logistics aging evaluation device, computer equipment and a storage medium, wherein the method comprises the following steps: calculating an elapsed delivery time for the first dispatch by subtracting the third time from the first time; calculating an elapsed delivery time for a second dispatch by subtracting the fourth time from the second time; merging the elapsed delivery time of the first courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the second carrier; merging the elapsed delivery time of the second courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the first carrier; calculating the express delivery timeliness of the first and second carriers according to the merged data of the first and second carriers; and evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness grade of the carrier. By adopting the technical scheme, the cross-border logistics package monitoring method and the cross-border logistics package monitoring system can realize the timeliness monitoring of cross-border logistics packages, can intervene in the logistics timeliness in time, ensure the service quality and improve the customer experience.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of logistics, in particular to a logistics timeliness assessment method and device, computer equipment and a storage medium.
Background
With the development of internet technology, cross-border electricity business is continuously developed, cross-border business volume is rapidly increased, and international logistics transportation needs are vigorous. The method not only provides a new development opportunity for logistics enterprises serving cross-border transportation, but also makes the logistics enterprises face wider market challenges. In order to meet the dual requirements of a shipper on cargo transportation timeliness and transportation safety, logistics enterprises need to find a method for evaluating overseas carrier timeliness efficiency in a plurality of cross-border transportation, cost reduction and efficiency improvement of cross-border transportation are achieved, and a great number of logistics enterprises are in urgent need of solving the problems.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of this, it is necessary to provide a method and an apparatus for evaluating logistics aging, a computer device, and a storage medium for solving the problems of low informatization degree and low efficiency in cross-border logistics aging evaluation management.
A logistics aging evaluation method comprises the following steps: delivering a first dispatch from a sender in a first country to a recipient in a second country using a first carrier; delivering a second dispatch from a sender in the second country to a recipient in the first country using a second carrier; delivering the first dispatch from the first carrier to a second carrier, and recording a first time at which the second carrier receives the first dispatch; delivering a second courier from the second carrier to the first carrier, recording a second time at which the first carrier receives the second courier; using the second carrier to deliver the first dispatch to the recipient in the second country, and recording a third time in the second country at which the first dispatch was delivered to the recipient; delivering the second shipment to the recipient in the first country using the first carrier, and recording a fourth time in the first country at which the second shipment is delivered to the recipient; calculating an elapsed delivery time for the first dispatch by subtracting the third time from the first time; calculating an elapsed delivery time for a second dispatch by subtracting the fourth time from the second time; merging the elapsed delivery time of the first courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the second carrier; merging the elapsed delivery time of the second courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the first carrier; calculating the express delivery timeliness of the first and second carriers according to the merged data of the first and second carriers; and evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness grade of the carrier.
In one embodiment, the calculating the delivery age of the first and second carriers according to the merged data of the first and second carriers comprises:
acquiring task parameters, wherein the task parameters comprise one or more of the number of tasks, the predicted delivery time of each task, the task creation time of each task and the delivery starting time of each task;
calculating the delivery timeliness of the express based on the task parameters;
calculating the delivery time length d: d ═ p-c, where p is the expected delivery time for each task and c is the task creation time for each task;
calculating delivery timeliness j of the express according to the number n of the tasks and the delivery duration d: j ═ Σd/n。
In one embodiment, after the evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness level of the carrier, the method further includes:
determining to call in or out a delivery participant;
if the time efficiency is high, calling out delivery participants under the condition of meeting the grade of time efficiency;
if the aging is slower, the delivery participants are called in until the aging response reaches an aging acceptable level.
In one embodiment, the first carrier operates in a first country and the second carrier operates in a second, different country.
In one embodiment, after merging the used delivery time of the second express with the used delivery time data of other express delivered by the first carrier, the method further comprises:
acquiring self-defined initial value data;
and acquiring final data corresponding to the delay value, and comparing the final data with the initial value data to acquire the optimal delay value.
In one embodiment, the age level of the carrier includes:
the time efficiency is fast, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time does not exist: the express delivery time efficiency is less than the evaluation condition;
the time is reasonable, and the risk that the task cannot be completed in time does not exist basically: the express delivery aging is equal to the evaluation condition;
the timeliness is slow, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time exists: the express delivery time is larger than the evaluation condition.
A logistics effectiveness evaluation apparatus, comprising:
a first delivery module for delivering a first dispatch from a sender in a first country to a recipient in a second country using a first carrier;
a second delivery module for delivering a second dispatch from a sender in a second country to a recipient in a first country using a second carrier;
a first recording module for delivering the first dispatch from the first carrier to the second carrier and recording a first time at which the first dispatch is received by the second carrier;
a second recording module for delivering a second courier from the second carrier to the first carrier and recording a second time at which the second courier receives the second courier by the first carrier;
a third recording module for using the second carrier to deliver the first dispatch to the recipient in the second country and recording a third time in the second country at which the first dispatch is delivered to the recipient;
a fourth recording module for using the first carrier to deliver the second shipment to the recipient in the first country and recording a fourth time in the first country at which the second shipment is delivered to the recipient;
a first calculating module for calculating an elapsed delivery time for a first dispatch by subtracting the third time from the first time;
a second calculation module for calculating an elapsed delivery time for a second dispatch by subtracting the fourth time from the second time;
a first merging module for merging the used delivery time of the first express with the used delivery time data of other express delivered by the second carrier;
a second merge module for merging the elapsed delivery time of the second courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the first carrier;
a third calculation module for calculating the delivery time limit of the express mail of the first and the second carriers according to the merged data of the first and the second carriers;
and the evaluation module is used for evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness level of the carrier.
In one embodiment, the third computing module comprises:
the task parameter acquiring module is used for acquiring task parameters, and the task parameters comprise one or more of the number of tasks, the predicted delivery time of each task, the task creation time of each task and the delivery starting time of each task;
the first calculation submodule is used for calculating delivery timeliness of the express based on the task parameters;
a second calculation submodule for calculating the delivery duration d: d ═ p-c, where p is the expected delivery time for each task and c is the task creation time for each task;
and the third calculation submodule is used for calculating the delivery timeliness j of the express according to the task number n and the delivery duration d: j ═ Σd/n。
A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, the memory having stored therein computer readable instructions, which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the steps of the above-described logistics aging assessment method.
A storage medium storing computer readable instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the steps of the above-described logistics aging assessment method.
The logistics aging evaluation method, apparatus, computer device and storage medium described above, using a first carrier to deliver a first dispatch from a sender in a first country to a recipient in a second country; delivering a second dispatch from a sender in the second country to a recipient in the first country using a second carrier; delivering the first dispatch from the first carrier to a second carrier, and recording a first time at which the second carrier receives the first dispatch; delivering a second courier from the second carrier to the first carrier, recording a second time at which the first carrier receives the second courier; using the second carrier to deliver the first dispatch to the recipient in the second country, and recording a third time in the second country at which the first dispatch was delivered to the recipient; delivering the second shipment to the recipient in the first country using the first carrier, and recording a fourth time in the first country at which the second shipment is delivered to the recipient; calculating an elapsed delivery time for the first dispatch by subtracting the third time from the first time; calculating an elapsed delivery time for a second dispatch by subtracting the fourth time from the second time; merging the elapsed delivery time of the first courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the second carrier; merging the elapsed delivery time of the second courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the first carrier; calculating the express delivery timeliness of the first and second carriers according to the merged data of the first and second carriers; and evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness grade of the carrier. After the technical scheme is adopted, the domestic and foreign logistics systems are opened, the time effectiveness monitoring of cross-border logistics packages is realized, the logistics time effectiveness can be intervened in time, the service quality is guaranteed, and the customer experience is improved.
Drawings
Various other advantages and benefits will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating the preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a logistics aging evaluation method in an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a logistics aging evaluation method in an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a logistics aging evaluation device in an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 4 is a diagram of a third computing module according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a logistic aging evaluation computer device in the embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.
As used herein, the singular forms "a", "an", "the" and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.
As used herein, the singular forms "a", "an", "the" and "the" include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
As a preferred embodiment, as shown in fig. 1, a logistics aging evaluation method is proposed, which includes the following steps:
step S101, delivering a first dispatch from a sender in a first country to a recipient in a second country using a first carrier;
in order to meet the requirement of more logistics of cross-border e-commerce, the international trunk system of the cross-border e-commerce logistics needs to be docked with more logistics service providers. The express delivery in the invention refers to express delivery objects or mails, realizes cross-border logistics by cooperating with freight companies, and can be transported by roads. Once the dispatch enters the destination country, the time is recorded, and when the package is delivered to the intended recipient and the elapsed time is calculated to be domestic, the second time is recorded. If the express passes through customs, customs delay time can be deducted in a self-defined mode. A first carrier is used to deliver a first dispatch from a sender in a first country to a recipient in a second country.
Step S102 of delivering a second dispatch from a sender in a second country to a recipient in a first country using a second carrier;
a second shipment is delivered from a sender in the second country to a recipient in the first country using a second carrier.
Step S103, delivering the first express from the first carrier to a second carrier, and recording the first time when the second carrier receives the first express;
the first dispatch is delivered from the first carrier to a second carrier, and a first time at which the second carrier receives the first dispatch is recorded by the computer. In the logistics distribution process, a customer enters order information on an order management system, and a logistics carrier acquires the order information and arranges the distribution of the order. The carrier carries out dispatching of the transport vehicles and the drivers and plans the driving routes of the vehicles according to the order dispatching strategy when facing a large amount of order resources and information of available vehicles and drivers, and the vehicles transport the orders according to the planned driving routes.
Step S104, delivering the second express from the second carrier to the first carrier, and recording a second time when the first carrier receives the second express;
a second shipment is delivered from the second carrier to the first carrier and a second time at which the second shipment is received by the first carrier is recorded. The cross-border logistics is also understood as international logistics, and refers to a process of transporting goods from one country to another country or region (first-pass logistics) by means of sea transportation, land transportation and the like, and completing international goods transaction (destination local logistics) by local distribution of the destination country. A first carrier operates in a first country and a second carrier operates in a second, different country.
Step S105, using a second carrier to deliver the first express to a receiver in a second country, and recording a third time for delivering the first express to the receiver in the second country;
the express delivery and logistics business of international express delivery between two or more countries (or regions) needs to be delivered in a destination country to deliver an express to a final destination after the international express reaches the destination country, a second carrier is used for delivering a first express to a receiver in a second country, and a third time for delivering the first express to the receiver is recorded in the second country.
Step S106, using the first carrier to deliver the second express to the receiver in the first country, and recording the fourth time for delivering the second express to the receiver in the first country;
the second shipment is delivered to the recipient in the first country using the first carrier and a fourth time for delivery of the second shipment to the recipient is recorded in the first country.
Step S107, calculating the used delivery time of the first express by subtracting the third time from the first time;
the elapsed delivery time for the first dispatch is calculated by subtracting the third time from the first time.
Step S108, calculating the used delivery time of the second express by subtracting the fourth time from the second time;
the elapsed delivery time for the second dispatch is calculated by subtracting the fourth time from the second time.
Step S109, merging the used delivery time of the first express and the used delivery time data of other express delivered by the second carrier;
merging the elapsed delivery time of the first courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the second carrier
Step S110, merging the used delivery time of the second express with the used delivery time data of other express delivered by the first carrier;
the elapsed delivery time of the second courier is merged with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the first carrier.
Step S111, calculating express delivery timeliness of the first and second carriers according to the merged data of the first and second carriers;
and calculating the express delivery aging of the first carrier and the second carrier according to the merged data of the first carrier and the second carrier. Acquiring task parameters, wherein the task parameters comprise one or more of the number of tasks, the predicted delivery time of each task, the task creation time of each task and the delivery start time of each task, calculating express delivery timeliness based on the task parameters, and calculating the delivery duration d: and d is p-c, wherein p is the predicted delivery time of each task, c is the task creation time of each task, and the express delivery time effectiveness j is calculated according to the number n of the tasks and the delivery time length d: j ═ Σd/n。
And step S112, evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness level of the carrier.
And evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness level of the carrier. The time efficiency is fast, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time does not exist: the express delivery timeliness is smaller than the evaluation condition, the timeliness is good, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time basically does not exist: the express delivery timeliness is equal to the evaluation condition, the timeliness is slow, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time exists: the express delivery time is larger than the evaluation condition.
In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, calculating the express delivery age for the first and second carriers based on the consolidated data for the first and second carriers comprises:
step S201, acquiring task parameters, wherein the task parameters comprise one or more of the number of tasks, the predicted delivery time of each task, the task creation time of each task and the delivery starting time of each task;
task parameters are obtained, and the task parameters comprise one or more of the number of tasks, the predicted delivery time of each task, the task creation time of each task and the delivery starting time of each task.
Step S202, calculating express delivery timeliness based on task parameters;
step S203, calculates a delivery time period d: d ═ p-c, where p is the expected delivery time for each task and c is the task creation time for each task;
step S204, calculating express delivery timeliness j according to the task number n and the delivery duration d: j ═ Σd/n。
Task parameters are obtained, and the task parameters comprise one or more of the number of tasks, the predicted delivery time of each task, the task creation time of each task and the delivery starting time of each task. And calculating the delivery timeliness of the express delivery based on the task parameters. Calculating the delivery time length d: and d is p-c, wherein p is the predicted delivery time of each task, and c is the task creation time of each task. Calculating delivery timeliness j of the express according to the number n of the tasks and the delivery duration d: j ═ Σd/n。
In one embodiment, evaluating the express delivery timeliness, and after determining the timeliness level of the carrier, the method further comprises:
step S301, determining to call in or call out a delivery participant;
step S302, if the aging is fast, calling out delivery participants under the condition of satisfying the grade condition of good aging;
and step S303, if the aging is slow, calling delivery participants until the aging response reaches an aging acceptable level.
And determining to call in or call out the delivery participants, if the aging is fast, calling out the delivery participants under the condition of meeting the grade of the aging, and if the aging is slow, calling in the delivery participants until the aging response reaches the grade of the aging. The task timeliness assessment methods may be implemented using computer equipment. Firstly, the delivery parameters of the tasks can be registered in a management system, the delivery parameters are directly called when the system is used, the processor is used for calculating the delivery time of the tasks, the delivery time of the tasks is evaluated according to the evaluation conditions, the final evaluation result is sent to a terminal user, the user can visually know the condition of the delivery timeliness, and the delivery personnel can be reasonably allocated according to the level of the delivery timeliness, so that the task intensity and the tedious work such as personnel evaluation are reduced, the allocation of human resources is more reasonable and efficient, and the task manager can accurately control the progress of all the tasks.
In one embodiment, the first carrier operates in a first country and the second carrier operates in a second, different country.
The cross-border logistics is also understood as international logistics, and refers to a process of transporting goods from one country to another country or region (first-pass logistics) by means of sea, land or air, and completing international goods transaction (destination local logistics) by local distribution in the destination country. A first carrier operates in a first country and a second carrier operates in a second, different country.
In one embodiment, after merging the used delivery time of the second express with the used delivery time data of other express delivered by the first carrier, the method further comprises the following steps:
step S401, obtaining self-defined initial value data;
in step S402, final data corresponding to the delay value is acquired, and an optimal delay value is acquired by comparing the final data with the initial value data.
And acquiring self-defined initial value data, acquiring final data corresponding to the delay value, and comparing the final data with the initial value data to acquire the optimal delay value. If the express passes through customs, customs delay time can be deducted by self, and the conditions such as customs declaration failure and the like can occur, and even the delivery timeliness of cross-border orders can be delayed. The commodity information comprises commodity names, merchant production places, commodity quantity and other information, the production information comprises production related information such as commodity specifications, raw material sources, production dates, production batch numbers, quality guarantee periods and the like, and the import information comprises customs information such as import customs, customs bill numbers and the like, and relevant certificates such as inspection and quarantine information such as inspection and quarantine numbers, container numbers and the like. Customs staff distributes the tracing code section according to the basic information provided by a dealer and the actual goods condition, attaches a microscopic image for tracing to the source on the external package of the goods, because the current situation is in an epidemic prevention and control stage, if food all needs to enter the market without carrying viruses through nucleic acid detection, when the customs staff scans the code to enter the goods information, the corresponding safety level is generated according to inspection and quarantine information, and the food can enter the market because the inspection is negative. The step can optimize delay items and reduce delay probability.
In one embodiment, the age level of the carrier includes:
the time efficiency is fast, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time does not exist: the express delivery time efficiency is less than the evaluation condition;
the time is reasonable, and the risk that the task cannot be completed in time does not exist basically: the express delivery aging is equal to the evaluation condition;
the timeliness is slow, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time exists: the express delivery time is larger than the evaluation condition.
And the timeliness is fast, the risk that the task cannot be completed on time does not exist at all, and the express delivery timeliness is smaller than the evaluation condition. And the time is still enough, the risk that the task cannot be completed in time does not exist basically, and then the express delivery time is equal to the evaluation condition. The timeliness is slow, and the risk that the task cannot be completed in time exists, so the express delivery timeliness is larger than the evaluation condition. Determining core parameters influencing task delivery in a carrying process, calculating task delivery time by using the core parameters, evaluating the task delivery time according to evaluation conditions related to task time limit of a certain task, determining delivery timeliness level of a carrier, and then reasonably allocating personnel according to the delivery timeliness level so as to meet the requirements of efficient utilization of resources and effective control of task time limit.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 3, there is provided a logistics aging evaluation apparatus including:
a first delivery module 501 for delivering a first dispatch from a sender in a first country to a recipient in a second country using a first carrier;
a second delivery module 502 for delivering a second dispatch from a sender in a second country to a recipient in a first country using a second carrier;
a first recording module 503 for delivering the first dispatch from the first carrier to the second carrier and recording a first time at which the first dispatch is received by the second carrier;
a second registration module 504 for delivering a second courier from the second carrier to the first carrier and registering a second time at which the second courier is received by the first carrier;
a third recording module 505 for using the second carrier to deliver the first dispatch to the recipient in the second country and recording a third time in the second country at which the first dispatch was delivered to the recipient;
a fourth recording module 506 for using the first carrier to deliver the second shipment to the recipient in the first country and recording a fourth time in the first country at which the second shipment is delivered to the recipient;
a first calculating module 507 for calculating an elapsed delivery time for a first dispatch by subtracting the third time from the first time;
a second calculating module 508 for calculating an elapsed delivery time for a second dispatch by subtracting the fourth time from the second time;
a first merge module 509 for merging the elapsed delivery time of the first courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the second carrier;
a second merge module 510 for merging the elapsed delivery time of the second courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the first carrier;
a third calculation module 511, configured to calculate the delivery timeliness of the express items of the first and second carriers according to the merged data of the first and second carriers;
and the evaluation module 512 is used for evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness level of the carrier.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 4, the third calculation module 511 includes:
an obtaining sub-module 5111, configured to obtain task parameters, where the task parameters include one or more of the number of tasks, an expected delivery time of each task, a task creation time of each task, and a delivery start time of each task;
the first calculation submodule 5112 is used for calculating the delivery timeliness of the express based on the task parameters;
a second calculating submodule 5113 configured to calculate the delivery time period d: d ═ p-c, where p is the expected delivery time for each task and c is the task creation time for each task;
a third calculating sub-module 5114, configured to calculate, according to the number of tasks n and the delivery duration d, an express delivery timeliness j: j ═ Σd/n。
In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, as shown in fig. 5, the logistic aging evaluation computer device 600 can generate relatively large differences due to different configurations or performances, and can include one or more processors (CPUs) 610 (e.g., one or more processors) and a memory 620, one or more storage media 630 (e.g., one or more mass storage devices) storing applications 633 or data 632. Memory 620 and storage medium 630 may be, among other things, transient or persistent storage. The program stored in the storage medium 630 may include one or more modules (not shown), each of which may include a series of instruction operations in the logistics aging evaluation computer apparatus 600. Still further, the processor 610 may be configured to communicate with the storage medium 630 to execute a series of instruction operations in the storage medium 630 on the logistics aging evaluation computer apparatus 600. The logistics age assessment computer apparatus 600 may also include one or more power supplies 640, one or more wired or wireless network interfaces 650, one or more input-output interfaces 660, and/or one or more operating systems 631, such as Windows Server, Mac OS X, Unix, Linux, FreeBSD, and the like. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the configuration of the logistics aging evaluation computer apparatus illustrated in FIG. 5 does not constitute a limitation of the logistics aging evaluation computer apparatus and may include more or fewer components than illustrated, or some components in combination, or a different arrangement of components. The logistics aging evaluation computer equipment comprises a memory and a processor, wherein the memory is stored with computer readable instructions, and the computer readable instructions when executed by the processor cause the processor to realize the following steps when executing the computer readable instructions: delivering a first dispatch from a sender in a first country to a recipient in a second country using a first carrier; delivering a second dispatch from a sender in the second country to a recipient in the first country using a second carrier; delivering the first dispatch from the first carrier to a second carrier, and recording a first time at which the second carrier receives the first dispatch; delivering a second courier from the second carrier to the first carrier, recording a second time at which the first carrier receives the second courier; using the second carrier to deliver the first dispatch to the recipient in the second country, and recording a third time in the second country at which the first dispatch was delivered to the recipient; delivering the second shipment to the recipient in the first country using the first carrier, and recording a fourth time in the first country at which the second shipment is delivered to the recipient; calculating an elapsed delivery time for the first dispatch by subtracting the third time from the first time; calculating an elapsed delivery time for a second dispatch by subtracting the fourth time from the second time; merging the elapsed delivery time of the first courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the second carrier; merging the elapsed delivery time of the second courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the first carrier; calculating the express delivery timeliness of the first and second carriers according to the merged data of the first and second carriers; and evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness grade of the carrier.
In one embodiment, said calculating an express delivery age for said first and second carriers based on consolidated data for said first and second carriers comprises:
acquiring task parameters, wherein the task parameters comprise one or more of the number of tasks, the predicted delivery time of each task, the task creation time of each task and the delivery starting time of each task;
calculating the delivery timeliness of the express based on the task parameters;
calculating the delivery time length d: d ═ p-c, where p is the expected delivery time for each task and c is the task creation time for each task;
calculating delivery timeliness j of the express according to the number n of the tasks and the delivery duration d: j ═ Σd/n。
In one embodiment, after the evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness level of the carrier, the method further includes:
determining to call in or out a delivery participant;
if the time efficiency is high, calling out delivery participants under the condition of meeting the grade of time efficiency;
if the aging is slower, the delivery participants are called in until the aging response reaches an aging acceptable level.
In one embodiment, the first carrier operates in a first country and the second carrier operates in a second, different country.
In one embodiment, after merging the used delivery time of the second express with the used delivery time data of other express delivered by the first carrier, the method further comprises:
acquiring self-defined initial value data;
and acquiring final data corresponding to the delay value, and comparing the final data with the initial value data to acquire the optimal delay value.
In one embodiment, the age level of the carrier includes:
the time efficiency is fast, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time does not exist: the express delivery time efficiency is less than the evaluation condition;
the time is reasonable, and the risk that the task cannot be completed in time does not exist basically: the express delivery aging is equal to the evaluation condition;
the timeliness is slow, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time exists: the express delivery time is larger than the evaluation condition.
In one embodiment, a storage medium is presented having computer-readable instructions stored thereon which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the steps of: delivering a first dispatch from a sender in a first country to a recipient in a second country using a first carrier; delivering a second dispatch from a sender in the second country to a recipient in the first country using a second carrier; delivering the first dispatch from the first carrier to a second carrier, and recording a first time at which the second carrier receives the first dispatch; delivering a second courier from the second carrier to the first carrier, recording a second time at which the first carrier receives the second courier; using the second carrier to deliver the first dispatch to the recipient in the second country, and recording a third time in the second country at which the first dispatch was delivered to the recipient; delivering the second shipment to the recipient in the first country using the first carrier, and recording a fourth time in the first country at which the second shipment is delivered to the recipient; calculating an elapsed delivery time for the first dispatch by subtracting the third time from the first time; calculating an elapsed delivery time for a second dispatch by subtracting the fourth time from the second time; merging the elapsed delivery time of the first courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the second carrier; merging the elapsed delivery time of the second courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the first carrier; calculating the express delivery timeliness of the first and second carriers according to the merged data of the first and second carriers; and evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness grade of the carrier.
In one embodiment, said calculating an express delivery age for said first and second carriers based on consolidated data for said first and second carriers comprises:
acquiring task parameters, wherein the task parameters comprise one or more of the number of tasks, the predicted delivery time of each task, the task creation time of each task and the delivery starting time of each task;
calculating the delivery timeliness of the express based on the task parameters;
calculating the delivery time length d: d ═ p-c, where p is the expected delivery time for each task and c is the task creation time for each task;
calculating delivery timeliness j of the express according to the number n of the tasks and the delivery duration d: j ═ Σd/n。
In one embodiment, after the evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness level of the carrier, the method further includes:
determining to call in or out a delivery participant;
if the time efficiency is high, calling out delivery participants under the condition of meeting the grade of time efficiency;
if the aging is slower, the delivery participants are called in until the aging response reaches an aging acceptable level.
In one embodiment, the first carrier operates in a first country and the second carrier operates in a second, different country.
In one embodiment, after merging the used delivery time of the second express with the used delivery time data of other express delivered by the first carrier, the method further comprises:
acquiring self-defined initial value data;
and acquiring final data corresponding to the delay value, and comparing the final data with the initial value data to acquire the optimal delay value.
In one embodiment, the age level of the carrier includes:
the time efficiency is fast, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time does not exist: the express delivery time efficiency is less than the evaluation condition;
the time is reasonable, and the risk that the task cannot be completed in time does not exist basically: the express delivery aging is equal to the evaluation condition;
the timeliness is slow, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time exists: the express delivery time is larger than the evaluation condition.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or part of the steps in the methods of the above embodiments may be implemented by associated hardware instructed by a program, which may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and the storage medium may include: read Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), magnetic or optical disks, and the like.
The technical features of the embodiments described above may be arbitrarily combined, and for the sake of brevity, all possible combinations of the technical features in the embodiments described above are not described, but should be considered as being within the scope of the present specification as long as there is no contradiction between the combinations of the technical features.
The above-mentioned embodiments only express some exemplary embodiments of the present invention, and the description thereof is more specific and detailed, but not construed as limiting the scope of the present invention. It should be noted that, for a person skilled in the art, several variations and modifications can be made without departing from the inventive concept, which falls within the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present patent shall be subject to the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1. A logistics aging evaluation method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
delivering a first dispatch from a sender in a first country to a recipient in a second country using a first carrier;
delivering a second dispatch from a sender in the second country to a recipient in the first country using a second carrier;
delivering the first dispatch from the first carrier to a second carrier, and recording a first time at which the second carrier receives the first dispatch;
delivering a second courier from the second carrier to the first carrier, recording a second time at which the first carrier receives the second courier;
using the second carrier to deliver the first dispatch to the recipient in the second country, and recording a third time in the second country at which the first dispatch was delivered to the recipient;
delivering the second shipment to the recipient in the first country using the first carrier, and recording a fourth time in the first country at which the second shipment is delivered to the recipient;
calculating an elapsed delivery time for the first dispatch by subtracting the third time from the first time;
calculating an elapsed delivery time for a second dispatch by subtracting the fourth time from the second time;
merging the elapsed delivery time of the first courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the second carrier;
merging the elapsed delivery time of the second courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the first carrier;
calculating the express delivery timeliness of the first and second carriers according to the merged data of the first and second carriers;
and evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness grade of the carrier.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein calculating the delivery age of the courier from the consolidated data of the first and second carriers comprises:
acquiring task parameters, wherein the task parameters comprise one or more of the number of tasks, the predicted delivery time of each task, the task creation time of each task and the delivery starting time of each task;
calculating the delivery timeliness of the express based on the task parameters;
calculating the delivery time length d: d ═ p-c, where p is the expected delivery time for each task and c is the task creation time for each task;
calculating delivery timeliness j of the express according to the number n of the tasks and the delivery duration d: j ═ Σd/n。
3. The logistics aging evaluation method of claim 1, wherein the evaluating the express delivery aging, after determining the aging level of the carrier, further comprises:
determining to call in or out a delivery participant;
if the time efficiency is high, calling out delivery participants under the condition of meeting the grade of time efficiency;
if the aging is slower, the delivery participants are called in until the aging response reaches an aging acceptable level.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first carrier operates in a first country and the second carrier operates in a second, different country.
5. The method for evaluating logistics aging according to claim 1, further comprising, after merging the used delivery time of the second express with the used delivery time data of other express delivered by the first carrier:
acquiring self-defined initial value data;
and acquiring final data corresponding to the delay value, and comparing the final data with the initial value data to acquire the optimal delay value.
6. The logistics aging evaluation method of claim 1, wherein the aging level of the carrier comprises:
the time efficiency is fast, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time does not exist: the express delivery time efficiency is less than the evaluation condition;
the time is reasonable, and the risk that the task cannot be completed in time does not exist basically: the express delivery aging is equal to the evaluation condition;
the timeliness is slow, and the risk that the task cannot be completed on time exists: the express delivery time is larger than the evaluation condition.
7. A logistics aging evaluation apparatus, characterized by comprising:
a first delivery module for delivering a first dispatch from a sender in a first country to a recipient in a second country using a first carrier;
a second delivery module for delivering a second dispatch from a sender in a second country to a recipient in a first country using a second carrier;
a first recording module for delivering the first dispatch from the first carrier to the second carrier and recording a first time at which the first dispatch is received by the second carrier;
a second recording module for delivering a second courier from the second carrier to the first carrier and recording a second time at which the second courier receives the second courier by the first carrier;
a third recording module for using the second carrier to deliver the first dispatch to the recipient in the second country and recording a third time in the second country at which the first dispatch is delivered to the recipient;
a fourth recording module for using the first carrier to deliver the second shipment to the recipient in the first country and recording a fourth time in the first country at which the second shipment is delivered to the recipient;
a first calculating module for calculating an elapsed delivery time for a first dispatch by subtracting the third time from the first time;
a second calculation module for calculating an elapsed delivery time for a second dispatch by subtracting the fourth time from the second time;
a first merging module for merging the used delivery time of the first express with the used delivery time data of other express delivered by the second carrier;
a second merge module for merging the elapsed delivery time of the second courier with the elapsed delivery time data of other couriers delivered by the first carrier;
a third calculation module for calculating the delivery time limit of the express mail of the first and the second carriers according to the merged data of the first and the second carriers;
and the evaluation module is used for evaluating the express delivery timeliness and determining the timeliness level of the carrier.
8. The logistics aging evaluation device of claim 7, wherein the third calculation module comprises:
the task parameter acquiring module is used for acquiring task parameters, and the task parameters comprise one or more of the number of tasks, the predicted delivery time of each task, the task creation time of each task and the delivery starting time of each task;
the first calculation submodule is used for calculating delivery timeliness of the express based on the task parameters;
a second calculation submodule for calculating the delivery duration d: d ═ p-c, where p is the expected delivery time for each task and c is the task creation time for each task;
and the third calculation submodule is used for calculating the delivery timeliness j of the express according to the task number n and the delivery duration d: j ═ Σd/n。
9. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, the memory having stored therein computer readable instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the steps of the logistics aging evaluation method of any one of claims 1 to 6.
10. A storage medium storing computer readable instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the steps of the method of logistics ageing assessment according to any one of claims 1 to 6.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111400355.6A CN114118915A (en) | 2021-11-24 | 2021-11-24 | Logistics timeliness evaluation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111400355.6A CN114118915A (en) | 2021-11-24 | 2021-11-24 | Logistics timeliness evaluation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114118915A true CN114118915A (en) | 2022-03-01 |
Family
ID=80440745
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111400355.6A Pending CN114118915A (en) | 2021-11-24 | 2021-11-24 | Logistics timeliness evaluation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114118915A (en) |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20030009351A1 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2003-01-09 | Wade James P. | Method and system for cross-carrier parcel tracking |
| CN108776877A (en) * | 2018-04-17 | 2018-11-09 | 顺丰科技有限公司 | Cross-border method for processing business, system, equipment, computer readable storage medium |
| CN110363410A (en) * | 2019-06-28 | 2019-10-22 | 北京银企融合技术开发有限公司 | A kind of task response timeliness appraisal procedure, dispatching method, equipment and storage medium |
| CN110648089A (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2020-01-03 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | Method and device for determining delivery timeliness of articles |
-
2021
- 2021-11-24 CN CN202111400355.6A patent/CN114118915A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20030009351A1 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2003-01-09 | Wade James P. | Method and system for cross-carrier parcel tracking |
| CN108776877A (en) * | 2018-04-17 | 2018-11-09 | 顺丰科技有限公司 | Cross-border method for processing business, system, equipment, computer readable storage medium |
| CN110648089A (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2020-01-03 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | Method and device for determining delivery timeliness of articles |
| CN110363410A (en) * | 2019-06-28 | 2019-10-22 | 北京银企融合技术开发有限公司 | A kind of task response timeliness appraisal procedure, dispatching method, equipment and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Steven et al. | Choosing a port: An analysis of containerized imports into the US | |
| CN111815231A (en) | Intelligent carpooling method and system for logistics platform | |
| CN111126643B (en) | Reservation method and reservation device of platform and readable storage medium | |
| US8285649B2 (en) | Heuristic cross shipping of disaster relief supplies at points of distribution | |
| CN112364262A (en) | Goods finding route recommendation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN116342021A (en) | Comprehensive platform management method and system based on network freight | |
| CN111445188A (en) | Goods inventory management method and device | |
| CN108062640A (en) | A kind of logistics integrity management system | |
| CN116128397A (en) | A waybill distribution management method, system and device | |
| US20220335368A1 (en) | Method for Evaluating a Freight Order by Means of a Freight Order Evaluation System, and Freight Order Evaluation System | |
| CN112330094A (en) | Container scheduling method and device and server | |
| CN114118915A (en) | Logistics timeliness evaluation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN109784816A (en) | Express delivery distribution method and device | |
| CN111652440B (en) | Cargo volume information management method and device for logistics nodes | |
| CN111915256A (en) | Method for constructing dispatch fence, method for recognizing remote sign-off and related equipment | |
| CN113361998B (en) | Determination method, device, equipment and medium for apportioned transportation cost | |
| US10929805B2 (en) | Adjusting simulation times for cost simulation analysis of transportation lane proposals based on space and time granularities | |
| CN117114555A (en) | Method, system and device for scheduling waybill for reducing empty load rate | |
| CN114693202B (en) | Transport order processing method and device based on mileage freight rate relationship curve | |
| CN116957463A (en) | Method, system and device for processing waybill based on transportation route | |
| Goel | A column generation heuristic for the general vehicle routing problem | |
| CN114022073A (en) | Express delivery method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN114757544A (en) | Method and system for intelligent scheduling of cooperative multiple logistics service providers | |
| Kushwaha et al. | Multi-Trip Pickup and Delivery Problem in One to Many and Many to One (1-M/M-1) Transportation Network | |
| US20200193369A1 (en) | System and method for managing shipping processes and personnel |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |