CN109542084B - A satellite-based augmentation system integrity fault simulation method - Google Patents
A satellite-based augmentation system integrity fault simulation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109542084B CN109542084B CN201811376580.9A CN201811376580A CN109542084B CN 109542084 B CN109542084 B CN 109542084B CN 201811376580 A CN201811376580 A CN 201811376580A CN 109542084 B CN109542084 B CN 109542084B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- fault
- satellite
- station
- faults
- storm
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
- G05B23/0243—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/20—Pc systems
- G05B2219/24—Pc safety
- G05B2219/24065—Real time diagnostics
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Position Fixing By Use Of Radio Waves (AREA)
Abstract
本发明提出一种星基增强系统完好性故障仿真方法,属于卫星导航的星基增强技术领域。包括:步骤1、通过人机交互模块配置用于仿真的站星和故障参数;步骤2、数据导入模块根据配置的站星参数,将用户选取的监测站和用户站在规定时间内的真实的观测文件和导航文件导入;步骤3、故障生成模块根据步骤1配置的故障参数生成对应类型的故障,并计算故障对观测数据产生的影响,将其添加到观测数据中;步骤4、数据输出模块将添加了故障的观测数据按照RINEX格式输出。本发明通过输入实测数据并添加各类完好性故障作为仿真事件,并输出处理后的数据到后续SBAS处理模块,为我国北斗SBAS完好性监测能力的测试验证提供了解决思路。
The invention provides an integrity fault simulation method of a satellite-based augmentation system, which belongs to the technical field of satellite-based augmentation of satellite navigation. Including: step 1, configure the station satellite and fault parameters for simulation through the human-computer interaction module; step 2, the data import module, according to the configured station and satellite parameters, the monitoring station selected by the user and the user station in a specified time. Import observation files and navigation files; step 3, the fault generation module generates corresponding types of faults according to the fault parameters configured in step 1, calculates the impact of the fault on the observation data, and adds it to the observation data; step 4, data output module Output the observation data with added faults in RINEX format. The invention provides a solution idea for the test and verification of the integrity monitoring capability of Beidou SBAS in my country by inputting the measured data, adding various integrity faults as simulation events, and outputting the processed data to the subsequent SBAS processing module.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明属于卫星导航的星基增强技术领域,具体涉及一种星基增强系统完好性故障仿真方法。The invention belongs to the technical field of satellite-based augmentation of satellite navigation, in particular to a method for simulating integrity faults of a satellite-based augmentation system.
背景技术Background technique
目前全球卫星导航系统(global navigation satellite system,GNSS)主要的核心星座包括美国的全球定位系统(global positioning system,GPS)、俄罗斯全球导航卫星系统(global navigation satellite system,GLONASS)、欧盟的伽利略定位系统和中国的北斗导航系统。由于单独使用核心星座无法满足航空用户对精度和完好性的要求,因此增强系统应运而生。增强系统包括星基增强系统、空基增强系统和地基增强系统。其中星基增强系统覆盖范围广,在航空航海应用上更具备优势。At present, the main core constellations of the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) include the global positioning system (GPS) of the United States, the global navigation satellite system (GLONASS) of Russia, and the Galileo positioning system of the European Union. and China's Beidou navigation system. Since the core constellation alone cannot meet the accuracy and integrity requirements of aviation users, augmented systems have emerged. Augmentation systems include satellite-based augmentation systems, space-based augmentation systems, and ground-based augmentation systems. Among them, the satellite-based augmentation system has a wide coverage and has more advantages in aviation and navigation applications.
“中国北斗卫星导航系统白皮书”指出,北斗三代建设过程中需同时开展增强系统与基本系统一体化建设,不仅要实现全球基本导航服务,还要为亚太地区提供星基增强服务,提高系统服务精度和可靠性。The "White Paper on China's Beidou Satellite Navigation System" points out that in the construction of the third generation of Beidou, it is necessary to carry out the integrated construction of the augmentation system and the basic system at the same time, not only to realize the global basic navigation service, but also to provide satellite-based augmentation services for the Asia-Pacific region and improve the system service accuracy. and reliability.
星基增强系统(satellite-based augmentation system,SBAS)对地面站的卫星信号进行处理,计算得到各类改正数及完好性信息,并通过地球静止轨道卫星将信息播发给用户。其最重要的功能之一是提供完好性信息,以保证航空用户的安全。目前,大多数GNSS仿真软件只具备定位解算等功能,缺少完好性故障仿真模块,难以支持完好性监测方法的测试与研究。由于实测数据中出现完好性故障的概率很小,因此需要人为添加特定的故障,生成仿真数据,以支持完好性监测模块的开发与测试。Satellite-based augmentation system (SBAS) processes satellite signals from ground stations, calculates various corrections and integrity information, and broadcasts the information to users through geostationary satellites. One of its most important functions is to provide integrity information for the safety of aviation users. At present, most GNSS simulation software only has functions such as positioning and calculation, and lacks an integrity fault simulation module, which makes it difficult to support the testing and research of integrity monitoring methods. Since the probability of integrity faults in the measured data is very small, it is necessary to artificially add specific faults to generate simulation data to support the development and testing of the integrity monitoring module.
将完好性故障分为三类:空间信号故障,监测站故障,以及传播段故障。Integrity failures are divided into three categories: signal-in-space failures, monitoring station failures, and propagation segment failures.
空间信号故障是导航卫星发射端产生的故障,主要包括星钟故障和星历故障。星钟故障是由于卫星原子钟部件缺陷或老化引起的,产生的误差可分为漂移和跳变两种形式。参考文件[1]中在GPS标准定位服务性能规范中,星钟误差的变化率正常情况下应不大于0.006m/s。参考文件[2]通过对2000年到2017年GPS标准定位服务故障报告进行分析,星钟斜变故障是实际最可能产生的空间信号故障。当星钟产生故障而导致变化率异常增大时,在百秒内引起的测距误差最高可达到数百米甚至数千米。由于卫星轨道运动具有周期性,导致其受到的行星扰动具有规律性,故行星扰动不属于完好性故障研究范围。因此星历故障的产生原因主要是由于卫星机动调轨,属于计划内中断,卫星将提前预报,并设置其健康标识为不健康状态。Signal-in-space faults are faults generated at the transmitter of a navigation satellite, mainly including star clock faults and ephemeris faults. The failure of the satellite clock is caused by the defect or aging of the satellite atomic clock components, and the error can be divided into two forms: drift and jump. In the reference document [1], in the GPS standard positioning service performance specification, the rate of change of the star clock error should not be greater than 0.006m/s under normal circumstances. Reference [2] analyzed the GPS standard positioning service fault reports from 2000 to 2017, and found that the satellite clock skew fault is the most likely space signal fault in practice. When the star clock malfunctions and the rate of change increases abnormally, the ranging error caused within a hundred seconds can reach hundreds of meters or even thousands of meters. Due to the periodicity of satellite orbital motion, the planetary disturbances it receives are regular, so planetary disturbances do not belong to the scope of integrity failure research. Therefore, the main reason for the ephemeris failure is due to the maneuvering of the satellite, which is a planned interruption. The satellite will be forecasted in advance, and its health flag will be set as an unhealthy state.
监测站故障是信号接收端产生的故障。首先,监测站周边电磁干扰会引起信号载噪比严重恶化,测距误差急剧增大。第二种情况是监测站通信网络中断而导致观测数据质量下降至不能正常提供服务。在故障发生时间内,该故障站将接收不到任何有效观测文件和导航文件,正在接收的文件也被迫中断。The monitoring station failure is the failure of the signal receiving end. First, the electromagnetic interference around the monitoring station will cause a serious deterioration of the signal carrier-to-noise ratio and a sharp increase in the ranging error. The second situation is that the communication network of the monitoring station is interrupted and the quality of the observation data is degraded to the point where the service cannot be provided normally. During the time of failure, the failed station will not receive any valid observation files and navigation files, and the files being received are also forced to be interrupted.
传播段故障是由于卫星到接收机之间的传播介质异常导致的故障。导航信号从卫星到接收机的传播途中产生的误差主要有电离层误差、对流层误差以及多径干扰。其中,电离层延迟是最主要的误差来源。电离层异常具有很强的随机性,主要包括电离层暴和电离层闪烁。闪烁是由于电离层中小尺度不均匀体结构引起的,会导致跟踪信号失锁,接收机在短时间内无法跟踪一颗或多颗可见卫星。由于卫星的冗余性,电离层闪烁对定位结果影响有限。Propagation segment failures are failures caused by anomalies in the propagation medium between the satellite and the receiver. The errors generated during the propagation of the navigation signal from the satellite to the receiver mainly include ionospheric error, tropospheric error and multipath interference. Among them, the ionospheric delay is the main error source. Ionospheric anomalies are highly random, mainly including ionospheric storms and ionospheric scintillations. Scintillation is caused by the structure of small-scale inhomogeneities in the ionosphere, which can cause the tracking signal to lose lock and the receiver to be unable to track one or more visible satellites in a short period of time. Due to the redundancy of satellites, ionospheric scintillation has limited impact on positioning results.
电离层暴是指由于太阳爆发的强磁暴使地球空间环境发生扰动,电离层物理参量相对正常状态严重偏离的现象。随着强磁暴的发生,全球范围内的电离层都会出现剧烈变化。电离层暴造成较大的电子密度及电子含量梯度变化,将引起电离层时空相关性的降低,是影响导航定位系统的重要因素。An ionospheric storm is a phenomenon in which the physical parameters of the ionosphere are seriously deviated from the normal state due to the disturbance of the earth's space environment due to the strong magnetic storm of the solar eruption. With the occurrence of strong magnetic storms, the ionosphere changes drastically on a global scale. Ionospheric bursts cause large changes in electron density and electron content gradients, which will reduce the spatial-temporal correlation of the ionosphere, which is an important factor affecting the navigation and positioning system.
参考文件[3]对于SBAS可能存在的电离层扰动影响有两种形式:“泡状”影响是指在平静电离层环境包围中,某一小范围区域电离层延迟产生异常变化,且随时间变化异常扰动只发生在此范围内,不发生移动,电离层异常区域呈区块状。“墙”状影响是指在平静电离层环境上叠加随距离呈梯度变化,且随时间移动的扰动影响,电离层异常区域呈延伸状。Reference [3] has two forms of ionospheric disturbance effects that may exist in SBAS: "bubble-like" effects refer to the abnormal changes in ionospheric delays in a small area surrounded by a calm ionospheric environment, which change with time. Anomalous disturbances only occur within this range, and no movement occurs, and the anomalous area of the ionosphere is block-shaped. The "wall"-like effect refers to the superimposed disturbance effect that changes with distance gradient and moves with time on the calm ionospheric environment, and the ionospheric anomaly area is extended.
参考文件[4]中斯坦福大学GPS实验室基于北美所在中纬度地区的电离层异常数据提出了局域增强系统(local area augmentation system,LAAS)楔形模型,在该模型中,异常情况下的电离层被认为是一个线性半开放的楔形前端,而且相对于地面以固定的速度在移动。楔形模型由电离层异常前端运动速度、宽度和梯度三个参数决定。In reference [4], the GPS Laboratory of Stanford University proposed a local area augmentation system (LAAS) wedge model based on the ionospheric anomaly data in the mid-latitude region where North America is located. In this model, the ionosphere under abnormal conditions Considered a linear semi-open wedge-shaped front end, and moving at a fixed speed relative to the ground. The wedge-shaped model is determined by three parameters, the velocity, width and gradient of the anomalous front of the ionosphere.
参考文献如下:References are as follows:
[1]U.S.Department of Defense.Global positioning system standardpositioning service performance standard[EB/OL].(2008-09)[2018-05-08].[1]U.S.Department of Defense.Global positioning system standardpositioning service performance standard[EB/OL].(2008-09)[2018-05-08].
http://www.gps.gov/technical/ps/2008-SPS-performance-standard.pdf.http://www.gps.gov/technical/ps/2008-SPS-performance-standard.pdf.
[2]WILLIAM J.Global positioning system(GPS)standard positioningservice(SPS)performance analysis report,Appendix C:Performance analysis(PAN)problem report[EB/OL].[2018-05-08].http://www.nstb.tc.faa.gov/DisplayArchive.htm.[2]WILLIAM J.Global positioning system(GPS)standard positioningservice(SPS)performance analysis report,Appendix C:Performance analysis(PAN)problem report[EB/OL].[2018-05-08].http://www .nstb.tc.faa.gov/DisplayArchive.htm.
[3]ALTSHULER E S,FRIES R M,SPARKS L.The WAAS ionospheric spatialthreat model[C]//The Institute of Navigation.Proceedings of the 14thInternational Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute ofNavigation(ION GPS 2001).Salt Lake City,UT:The Institute of Navigation,Inc.,2001:2463-2467.[3] ALTSHULER E S, FRIES RM, SPARKS L. The WAAS ionospheric spatialthreat model[C]//The Institute of Navigation. Proceedings of the 14th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2001).Salt Lake City , UT: The Institute of Navigation, Inc., 2001: 2463-2467.
[4]LUO M,PULLEN S,WALTER T,et al.Ionosphere spatial gradient threatfor LAAS:mitigation and tolerable threat space[C]//The Institute ofNavigation.Proceedings of the 2004National Technical Meeting.Manassas,VA:TheInstitute of Navigation,Inc.,2004:490-501.[4]LUO M,PULLEN S,WALTER T,et al.Ionosphere spatial gradient threat for LAAS:mitigation and tolerable threat space[C]//The Institute of Navigation.Proceedings of the 2004National Technical Meeting.Manassas,VA:TheInstitute of Navigation, Inc., 2004:490-501.
发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
本发明针对目前星基增强系统的GNSS仿真软件只具备定位解算等功能,缺少完好性故障仿真模块,难以支持完好性监测方法的测试与研究的问题,提出了一种星基增强系统完好性故障仿真方法。输入实测数据并添加各类完好性故障作为仿真事件,并输出处理后的数据到后续SBAS处理模块,为我国北斗SBAS完好性监测能力的测试验证提供了解决思路。Aiming at the problems that the current GNSS simulation software of the satellite-based augmentation system only has functions such as positioning and calculation, lacks an integrity fault simulation module, and is difficult to support the testing and research of the integrity monitoring method, a satellite-based augmentation system integrity is proposed. Fault simulation method. Input the measured data and add various integrity faults as simulation events, and output the processed data to the subsequent SBAS processing module, which provides a solution for the test and verification of the integrity monitoring capability of Beidou SBAS in my country.
本发明提出的一种星基增强系统完好性故障仿真方法,包含以下四个步骤:A method for simulating the integrity fault of a satellite-based augmentation system proposed by the present invention includes the following four steps:
步骤1、通过人机交互模块配置用于仿真的站星参数和故障参数。Step 1. Configure the station satellite parameters and fault parameters for simulation through the human-computer interaction module.
站星参数包括用户选择数据处理的时间、监测站的区域、监测站及用户站列表、卫星星座、添加的故障类型;故障类型包括空间信号故障、监测站故障和电离层暴故障;监测站故障包括监测站故障电磁故障和监测站接收机故障;电离层暴故障属于传播段故障。Station and satellite parameters include user-selected data processing time, monitoring station area, monitoring station and user station list, satellite constellation, and added fault types; fault types include space signal faults, monitoring station faults, and ionospheric storm faults; monitoring station faults Including monitoring station failure electromagnetic failure and monitoring station receiver failure; ionospheric storm failure belongs to the propagation section failure.
步骤2、数据导入模块根据人机交互模块配置的站星参数,将用户选取的监测站和用户站在规定时间内的真实的观测文件和导航文件导入;文件格式采用交换格式RINEX。Step 2: The data import module imports the real observation files and navigation files of the monitoring station selected by the user and the user station within the specified time according to the station and satellite parameters configured by the human-computer interaction module; the file format adopts the exchange format RINEX.
步骤3、故障生成模块根据步骤1配置的故障参数生成对应类型的故障,并计算故障对观测数据产生的影响,数据处理模块将计算的影响添加到观测数据中。Step 3. The fault generation module generates a corresponding type of fault according to the fault parameters configured in step 1, and calculates the impact of the fault on the observed data, and the data processing module adds the calculated impact to the observed data.
对于监测站电磁故障,采用均值为0的高斯噪声作为电磁场异常变化对伪距和载波相位观测值的影响;对于监测站接收机故障,将故障站所有观测数据清零;空间信号故障分为阶跃故障和斜坡故障;对于阶跃故障,在故障卫星的所有观测值上添加常数误差;对于斜坡故障,计算随时间线性变化的误差增量;对于电离层暴故障,采用匀速运动的圆台来建立仿真模型,计算圆台风暴模型中每一历元对应的圆形经纬度范围内的电离层垂直延迟值增量,对电离层穿透点经纬度在风暴范围内的所有观测值进行计算更改。For the electromagnetic fault of the monitoring station, the Gaussian noise with a mean value of 0 is used as the influence of the abnormal changes of the electromagnetic field on the pseudorange and carrier phase observations; for the receiver fault of the monitoring station, all the observation data of the faulty station are cleared; the space signal fault is divided into order Step fault and slope fault; for step fault, add a constant error to all observations of the faulty satellite; for slope fault, calculate the error increment that varies linearly with time; The simulation model calculates the ionospheric vertical delay value increment within the circular latitude and longitude range corresponding to each epoch in the circular typhoon storm model, and calculates and changes all the observed values of the ionospheric penetration point latitude and longitude within the storm range.
步骤4、数据输出模块将添加了故障的观测数据按照RINEX格式输出。Step 4. The data output module outputs the observation data with added faults in RINEX format.
本发明与现有技术相比,具有以下明显优势:Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following obvious advantages:
(1)本发明中各参数配置灵活。用户可通过人机交互界面自行选择监测站、用户站、卫星星座、故障类型等参数。(1) Each parameter configuration in the present invention is flexible. Users can choose parameters such as monitoring station, user station, satellite constellation, fault type, etc. by themselves through the man-machine interface.
(2)本发明所选定的完好性故障类型全面。涉及卫星信号发射、传播、接收三个部分可能产生的主要故障类型。(2) The selected integrity fault types in the present invention are comprehensive. It involves the main types of failures that may occur in the three parts of satellite signal transmission, propagation and reception.
(3)本发明中数据输出格式标准化。输出的观测文件和导航文件采用RINEX标准文件格式,可直接用于几何法仿真、动力法仿真、电离层处理、增强电文生成、用户算法仿真、性能评估等各个处理模块,以支持SBAS仿真平台后续的各项功能设计和性能评估工作。(3) The data output format is standardized in the present invention. The output observation files and navigation files are in the RINEX standard file format, which can be directly used in various processing modules such as geometric method simulation, dynamic method simulation, ionospheric processing, enhanced message generation, user algorithm simulation, and performance evaluation to support the follow-up of the SBAS simulation platform. Various functional design and performance evaluation work.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1是本发明星基增强系统完好性故障仿真系统架构图;1 is an architecture diagram of a satellite-based augmentation system integrity fault simulation system of the present invention;
图2是本发明人机交互主界面示意图;Fig. 2 is the main interface schematic diagram of human-computer interaction of the present invention;
图3是本发明监测站故障添加流程图;Fig. 3 is the flow chart of monitoring station fault adding of the present invention;
图4是本发明空间信号故障添加流程图;Fig. 4 is a flow chart of adding a signal-in-space fault of the present invention;
图5是本发明圆台风暴模型截面示意图;Fig. 5 is the cross-sectional schematic diagram of the round table storm model of the present invention;
图6是本发明电离层暴故障添加流程图。FIG. 6 is a flow chart of adding an ionospheric storm fault according to the present invention.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
为了便于本领域普通技术人员理解和实施本发明,下面结合附图对本发明作进一步的详细描述。In order to facilitate those skilled in the art to understand and implement the present invention, the present invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
本发明的星基增强系统的完好性故障仿真系统,如图1所示,包含人机交互、数据导入、故障生成、数据处理以及数据输出五大模块。通过人机交互模块的图形界面对监测站、卫星及完好性故障进行参数配置,在观测数据中添加空间信号故障、监测站故障以及传播段故障作为仿真事件,从而输出处理后的数据为后续SBAS处理模块提供数据源,以支持SBAS完好性监测方法的开发与测试。The integrity fault simulation system of the satellite-based augmentation system of the present invention, as shown in Figure 1, includes five modules: human-computer interaction, data import, fault generation, data processing and data output. The parameters of monitoring stations, satellites and integrity faults are configured through the graphical interface of the human-computer interaction module, and space signal faults, monitoring station faults and propagation segment faults are added to the observation data as simulation events, so that the processed data is output for subsequent SBAS. The processing module provides data sources to support the development and testing of SBAS integrity monitoring methods.
本发明中将完好性故障分为三类,包括:空间信号故障,监测站故障以及传播段故障。空间信号故障是导航卫星发射端产生的故障,包括阶跃故障和斜坡故障,都为星钟故障。监测站故障是信号接收端产生的故障,包括监测站周边电磁干扰的监测站电磁故障以及由于通信网络中断使观测数据无法正常接收的监测站接收机故障。传播段故障是由于卫星到接收机之间的传播介质异常导致的电离层暴故障,其最主要的来源是电离层风暴。本发明的仿真方法中实现对上述故障的仿真。In the present invention, integrity faults are divided into three categories, including: space signal faults, monitoring station faults and propagation section faults. Signal-in-space faults are faults generated at the transmitter of the navigation satellite, including step faults and ramp faults, all of which are star clock faults. The monitoring station fault is the fault generated by the signal receiving end, including the electromagnetic fault of the monitoring station due to the electromagnetic interference around the monitoring station and the fault of the monitoring station receiver that cannot receive the observation data normally due to the interruption of the communication network. Propagation segment failure is an ionospheric storm failure caused by the abnormal propagation medium between the satellite and the receiver, and its main source is the ionospheric storm. The simulation method of the present invention realizes the simulation of the above-mentioned fault.
本发明的星基增强系统完好性故障仿真方法包括四个步骤,下面说明每一步骤。The satellite-based augmentation system integrity fault simulation method of the present invention includes four steps, and each step is described below.
步骤1、用户通过人机交互模块进行灵活的参数配置。需要配置的参数包括:站星参数和故障参数,参数配置通过人机交互主界面进行。Step 1. The user performs flexible parameter configuration through the human-computer interaction module. The parameters that need to be configured include: station satellite parameters and fault parameters. The parameter configuration is carried out through the main interface of human-computer interaction.
如图2所示,为本发明人机交互主界面示意图。首先,通过人机交互主界面进行参数配置,配置的参数包括:用户选择数据处理的时间、监测站的区域、监测站及用户站列表、卫星星座和添加故障的类型。同时,人机交互主界面还会显示监测站和用户站的位置地便于用户选站。As shown in FIG. 2 , it is a schematic diagram of the main interface of human-computer interaction of the present invention. First, configure the parameters through the main interface of human-computer interaction. The parameters to be configured include: the time when the user selects the data processing, the area of the monitoring station, the list of monitoring stations and user stations, the satellite constellation and the type of added fault. At the same time, the main interface of human-computer interaction will also display the location of the monitoring station and the user station, which is convenient for the user to select the station.
然后,根据已选择的故障类型,通过弹出的子窗口进行相应故障参数的配置。故障类型包括:空间信号故障、监测站电磁故障、电离层暴故障和监测站接收机故障。空间信号故障类型包括:阶跃故障和斜坡故障。空间信号故障参数包括:故障星编号、故障类型选择(阶跃或斜坡)、故障起止时间、阶跃值或斜坡值。监测站电磁故障参数包括:故障站名、故障起止时间和电磁故障方差因子-没有故障类型。监测站接收机故障参数包括:故障站名、故障起止时间。传播段故障主要为电离层暴故障。电离层暴故障参数包括:圆台参数和运动参数。圆台参数包括:上底面圆半径、下底面圆半径以及最大延迟值。运动参数包括:风暴中心初始经度、风暴中心初始纬度、风暴起止时间、风暴移动方向以及风暴移动速度。Then, according to the selected fault type, configure the corresponding fault parameters through the pop-up sub-window. The types of failures include: signal-in-space failures, monitoring station electromagnetic failures, ionospheric storm failures, and monitoring station receiver failures. Signal-in-space fault types include: step fault and ramp fault. The space signal fault parameters include: fault star number, fault type selection (step or ramp), fault start and end time, step value or ramp value. The electromagnetic fault parameters of monitoring station include: fault station name, fault start and end time and electromagnetic fault variance factor - no fault type. The fault parameters of the monitoring station receiver include: fault station name, fault start and end time. Propagation segment faults are mainly ionospheric storm faults. The ionospheric storm fault parameters include: circular cone parameters and motion parameters. The parameters of the circular cone include: the radius of the upper bottom surface, the radius of the lower bottom surface, and the maximum delay value. Movement parameters include: the initial longitude of the storm center, the initial latitude of the storm center, the start and end time of the storm, the direction of the storm, and the speed of the storm.
步骤2、数据导入模块根据人机交互模块配置的站星参数,将用户选取的监测站和用户站在规定时间内的真实观测文件和导航文件导入完好性故障仿真系统,存入数据处理模块中。Step 2: The data import module imports the monitoring station selected by the user and the real observation files and navigation files of the user station within the specified time into the integrity fault simulation system according to the station-star parameters configured by the human-computer interaction module, and stores them in the data processing module .
观测文件和导航文件的文件格式采用与接收机无关的交换格式RINEX(receiverindependent exchange format)。The file format of observation files and navigation files adopts the receiver-independent exchange format RINEX (receiverindependent exchange format).
步骤3、根据用户输入的故障参数,生成完好性故障并将其添加到观测数据文件中。Step 3. According to the fault parameters input by the user, the integrity fault is generated and added to the observation data file.
故障生成模块根据人机交互模块配置的完好性故障参数生成不同类型的故障事件,并计算选择的故障对观测数据产生的影响。观测文件中记载的码伪距和载波相位仿真观测数据。数据处理模块根据用户选择的故障事件在导入观测数据中叠加相应完好性故障造成的影响,得到添加故障后的码伪距和载波相位仿真观测数据。The fault generation module generates different types of fault events according to the integrity fault parameters configured by the human-computer interaction module, and calculates the impact of the selected faults on the observed data. Code pseudorange and carrier phase simulation observation data recorded in the observation file. The data processing module superimposes the influence caused by the corresponding integrity fault in the imported observation data according to the fault event selected by the user, and obtains the code pseudorange and carrier phase simulation observation data after adding the fault.
下面说明添加不同类型的故障的仿真过程。The simulation process for adding different types of faults is described below.
步骤301、添加监测站故障。本发明考虑两种情况下的监测站故障。Step 301 , adding monitoring station faults. The present invention considers monitoring station failures in two cases.
第一种情况是监测站电磁故障,监测站周边电磁干扰会引起信号载噪比严重恶化,测距误差急剧增大。由于电磁影响具有随机性,采用均值为0的高斯噪声作为电磁场异常变化对伪距和载波相位观测值的影响。其中,高斯噪声的方差大小由用户在人机交互模块上自行配置。电磁故障发生时间内,通过在故障监测站接收到所有卫星的码伪距和载波相位观测值上叠加服从相应高斯分布的误差来仿真电磁干扰的影响,高斯分布的误差即高斯噪声。The first case is the electromagnetic failure of the monitoring station. The electromagnetic interference around the monitoring station will cause serious deterioration of the signal carrier-to-noise ratio, and the ranging error will increase sharply. Due to the randomness of electromagnetic effects, Gaussian noise with a mean value of 0 is used as the effect of abnormal changes in the electromagnetic field on the pseudorange and carrier phase observations. Among them, the variance of Gaussian noise is configured by the user on the human-computer interaction module. During the electromagnetic fault occurrence time, the influence of electromagnetic interference is simulated by superimposing the error obeying the corresponding Gaussian distribution on the code pseudorange and carrier phase observations of all satellites received by the fault monitoring station. The error of the Gaussian distribution is Gaussian noise.
第二种情况是监测站接收机故障,监测站通信网络中断而导致观测数据质量下降至不能正常提供服务。在故障发生时间内,该故障监测站将接收不到任何有效观测数据和导航文件,正在接收的文件也被迫中断。因此通过将故障站所有观测数据清零来仿真此类故障。The second situation is that the monitoring station receiver fails, and the communication network of the monitoring station is interrupted, resulting in the degradation of the quality of the observation data and the inability to provide services normally. During the failure time, the failure monitoring station will not receive any valid observation data and navigation files, and the files being received are also forced to be interrupted. Therefore, such failures are simulated by clearing all observations of the faulty station to zero.
本发明添加监测站故障的过程如图3所示,根据在人机交互的控制台输入的监测站电磁故障参数,包括故障站名、故障类型、电磁故障方差因子以及故障起止时间,数据处理模块读取RINEX格式的观测文件,对监测站逐个遍历,判断站名是否是故障站,如果不是故障站,则对观测数据不添加监测站故障直接输出;如果是故障站,选择故障发生时间内的观测数据进行处理,如果是监测站接收机故障,则将观测数据清零;如果是电磁故障,则故障生成模块计算均值为0的高斯噪声干扰值,数据处理模块在双频的码伪距观测值和载波相位观测值上各自叠加高斯噪声干扰值。最后输出叠加监测站故障后的观测文件。The process of adding a monitoring station fault in the present invention is shown in Figure 3. According to the electromagnetic fault parameters of the monitoring station input in the man-machine interactive console, including the fault station name, fault type, electromagnetic fault variance factor and fault start and end time, the data processing module Read the observation file in RINEX format, traverse the monitoring stations one by one, and determine whether the station name is a faulty station. If it is not a faulty station, it will directly output the observation data without adding the monitoring station fault; if it is a faulty station, select the time when the fault occurred. The observation data is processed. If the monitoring station receiver is faulty, the observation data will be cleared; if it is an electromagnetic fault, the fault generation module will calculate the Gaussian noise interference value with a mean value of 0, and the data processing module will observe the dual-frequency code pseudorange. The Gaussian noise interference value is superimposed on the value and the carrier phase observation respectively. Finally, output the observation file after the superposition monitoring station fails.
步骤302、添加空间信号故障。Step 302, adding a signal-in-space fault.
星钟故障是最常发生的空间信号故障,产生的误差可分为漂移和跳变两种形式。其中时钟漂移通过叠加随时间线性变化的斜坡值来仿真,而时钟跳变可通过叠加常数值来仿真。叠加常数值,即阶跃值。The star clock failure is the most common space signal failure, and the error can be divided into two forms: drift and jump. Where clock drift is simulated by superimposing ramp values that vary linearly with time, and clock jumps can be simulated by superimposing constant values. Superimpose constant values, ie step values.
本发明将空间信号故障分为两类,斜坡故障和阶跃故障。用户在人机交互模块配置的斜坡值是GPS L1频点码伪距观测量增量的变化率,单位为m/s;阶跃值是码伪距观测量的增加值,单位为m。其他频点的观测值增量或者是载波相位观测值增量可通过简单的换算关系得到。The present invention divides signal-in-space faults into two categories, ramp faults and step faults. The ramp value configured by the user in the human-computer interaction module is the rate of change of the GPS L1 frequency point code pseudorange observation increment, in m/s; the step value is the incremental value of the code pseudorange observation, in m. The observation value increment of other frequency points or the carrier phase observation value increment can be obtained through a simple conversion relationship.
本发明添加空间信号故障的过程如图4所示。根据在人机交互的控制台输入的空间信号故障参数,包括故障卫星编号、故障起止时间、故障类型、阶跃值或斜坡值,数据处理模块读取RINEX格式的导航文件,遍历卫星,判断是否为故障卫星,如果不是,则对该卫星的观测数据不添加空间信号故障;如果是故障卫星,选取故障发生时间的故障卫星的观测数据进行处理。如果添加阶跃故障,则在故障卫星的所有观测值上添加常数误差;如果添加斜坡故障,则故障生成模块计算随时间线性变化的误差增量。数据处理模块在故障卫星的双频码伪距和载波相位观测值上添加阶跃误差或者计算的斜坡误差增量,最后输出添加空间信号故障后的观测数据。The process of adding a signal-in-space fault in the present invention is shown in FIG. 4 . The data processing module reads the navigation file in RINEX format, traverses the satellites, and determines whether If it is a faulty satellite, if it is not, no space signal fault will be added to the observation data of the satellite; if it is a faulty satellite, the observation data of the faulty satellite at the time of the fault occurrence will be selected for processing. If a step fault is added, a constant error is added to all observations of the faulty satellite; if a ramp fault is added, the fault generation module calculates an error increment that varies linearly with time. The data processing module adds the step error or the calculated slope error increment to the dual-frequency code pseudorange and carrier phase observations of the faulty satellite, and finally outputs the observation data after adding the signal-in-space fault.
步骤303、添加传播段故障。Step 303, adding a propagation segment fault.
传播段故障仿真中主要对电离层风暴进行建模。结合“泡”状、“墙”状以及楔形模型,本发明采用匀速运动的圆台来建立电离层风暴仿真模型。将该风暴模型加到平静期的电离层垂直延迟数据中来仿真风暴期的观测数据。该模型可调整参数的大小来仿真不同电离层暴的规模、方向、速度、前端梯度等。电离层风暴即电离层暴。Ionospheric storms are mainly modeled in the propagation segment fault simulation. Combined with "bubble", "wall" and wedge-shaped models, the present invention uses a circular trough moving at a uniform speed to establish an ionospheric storm simulation model. The storm model was added to the ionospheric vertical delay data during the calm period to simulate the observational data during the storm period. The model can adjust the size of parameters to simulate the scale, direction, speed, front-end gradient, etc. of different ionospheric storms. Ionospheric storms are ionospheric storms.
如图5所示,为本发明圆台风暴模型截面。该模型实际是在电离层薄壳模型基础上加的二维圆形电离层垂直延迟增量。在最大半径范围内,电离层受到风暴影响从而延迟值增加。在最小半径范围内,延迟增量保持最大值,最小半径和最大半径之间,延迟增量呈线性变化。最大延迟值是GPS L1频点电离层垂直延迟增量值。As shown in Figure 5, it is the cross section of the round typhoon storm model of the present invention. This model is actually a two-dimensional circular ionospheric vertical delay increment based on the ionospheric thin shell model. At the maximum radius, the ionosphere is affected by the storm and the delay value increases. Within the minimum radius, the delay increment remains at the maximum value, and between the minimum and maximum radius, the delay increment changes linearly. The maximum delay value is the ionospheric vertical delay increment value at the GPS L1 frequency.
本发明添加电离层暴故障的过程,如图6所示,根据人机交互的控制台输入的参数包括:圆台参数、风暴中心位置的初始经度和纬度、风暴移动方向、风暴移动速度以及风暴起止时间,数据处理模块读取RINEX格式的观测文件,得到监测站位置以及观测数据,读取RINEX格式的导航文件,计算卫星位置。The process of adding ionospheric storm faults in the present invention, as shown in FIG. 6 , the parameters input by the console according to human-computer interaction include: circular platform parameters, initial longitude and latitude of the storm center position, storm moving direction, storm moving speed, and storm start and end Time, the data processing module reads the observation file in RINEX format, obtains the position of the monitoring station and the observation data, reads the navigation file in RINEX format, and calculates the satellite position.
数据处理模块根据监测站位置和卫星位置,计算得到电离层穿透点(ionospherepierce point,IPP)的经纬度以及倾斜因子。设λu和分别为地面用户的经纬度,λipp和分别为电离层穿透点的经纬度。根据位置的几何关系,电离层穿透点的经纬度可按下式计算[参考文献5]:The data processing module calculates the longitude, latitude and inclination factor of the ionosphere pierce point (IPP) according to the position of the monitoring station and the satellite. Let λ u and are the latitude and longitude of the ground user, λ ipp and are the latitude and longitude of the ionospheric penetration point, respectively. According to the geometric relationship of the location, the latitude and longitude of the ionospheric penetration point can be calculated as follows [Ref. 5]:
其中,Ψipp为地心角;A为方位角[参考文献6],E为仰角[参考文献6],Re为地球的近似半径(取值为6378.1363km),hI为电离层电子密度含量最大的高度,也是薄壳模型的参考平面高度(取值为350km)。Among them, Ψ ipp is the geocentric angle; A is the azimuth angle [Reference 6], E is the elevation angle [Reference 6], Re is the approximate radius of the earth (valued at 6378.1363 km), and h I is the ionospheric electron density The height with the largest content is also the reference plane height of the thin shell model (the value is 350km).
利用倾斜因子函数Fipp可将信号视线路径上的电离层延迟转换为薄壳模型中天顶方向的垂直电离层延迟,倾斜因子定义为视线电离层延迟与垂直电离层延迟的比值,可按下式计算[参考文献7]:The ionospheric delay on the line-of-sight path of the signal can be converted to the vertical ionospheric delay in the zenith direction in the thin-shell model using the tilt factor function F ipp . The tilt factor is defined as the ratio of the line-of-sight ionospheric delay to the vertical ionospheric delay. Press Formula calculation [Reference 7]:
参考文献如下:References are as follows:
[5]RTCA/DO-229C.MINIMUM OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE STANDAR-DS FOR GLOBALPOSITIONING SYSTEM/WIDE AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEM AIRBOR-NE EQUIPMENT[S].2001.[5]RTCA/DO-229C.MINIMUM OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE STANDAR-DS FOR GLOBALPOSITIONING SYSTEM/WIDE AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEM AIRBOR-NE EQUIPMENT[S].2001.
[6]Pratap Misra,Per Enge.全球定位系统——信号、测量与性能(第二版)[M].北京:电子工业出版社.2008.[6] Pratap Misra, Per Enge. Global Positioning System - Signal, Measurement and Performance (Second Edition) [M]. Beijing: Electronic Industry Press. 2008.
[7]Lawrence,Sparks,et,al.Estimating ionospheric delay using kriging:1.Methodology[J].RADIO SCIENCE,2011,46(6),RS0D21,doi:10.1029/2011RS004667.[7] Lawrence, Sparks, et, al. Estimating ionospheric delay using kriging: 1. Methodology [J]. RADIO SCIENCE, 2011, 46(6), RS0D21, doi: 10.1029/2011RS004667.
故障生成模块计算得到圆台风暴模型中每一历元,对应圆形经纬度范围内的电离层垂直延迟值增量。数据处理模块在计算得到电离层穿透点的经纬度以及倾斜因子后,选择IPP经纬度在风暴范围内的所有观测值进行处理。判断IPP经纬度是否在圆形风暴区域内,如果不在,则不添加电离层暴故障,如果在,则根据得到的倾斜因子和电离层垂直延迟增量,计算并更改码伪距和载波相位观测值,最后输出添加电离层风暴故障后的观测文件。The fault generation module calculates and obtains each epoch in the circular typhoon storm model, which corresponds to the increment of the vertical ionospheric delay value within the circular latitude and longitude range. After the data processing module calculates the longitude and latitude of the ionospheric penetration point and the inclination factor, it selects all the observation values of the IPP longitude and latitude within the storm range for processing. Determine whether the IPP latitude and longitude is within the circular storm area, if not, do not add the ionospheric storm fault, if so, calculate and change the code pseudorange and carrier phase observations based on the obtained tilt factor and ionospheric vertical delay increment , and finally output the observation file after adding the ionospheric storm fault.
根据式(1)、(2)、(3)、(4)计算得到加入仿真电离层风暴模型后的双频码伪距和载波相位值。According to equations (1), (2), (3), and (4), the pseudorange and carrier phase values of the dual-frequency code after adding the simulated ionospheric storm model are obtained.
其中:ρ1和ρ2分别是原双频码伪距观测值,φ1和φ2分别是原双频载波相位观测值;和分别加入电离层风暴后的更改的双频码伪距观测值,和分别是加入电离层风暴后的更改的双频载波相位观测值。c是真空中的光速,f1和f2代表双频频点。Fipp是倾斜因子,h是L1频点电离层垂直延迟值增量。Among them: ρ 1 and ρ 2 are the original dual-frequency code pseudorange observations, respectively, and φ 1 and φ 2 are the original dual-frequency carrier phase observations, respectively; and The modified dual-frequency code pseudorange observations after adding the ionospheric storm, respectively, and are the altered dual-frequency carrier phase observations after the addition of ionospheric storms. c is the speed of light in vacuum, and f 1 and f 2 represent dual frequency points. F ipp is the tilt factor, and h is the increment of the ionospheric vertical delay value at the L1 frequency.
步骤4、数据输出模块将处理后的各文件数据按照RINEX标准文件格式进行输出,以供后续使用。Step 4: The data output module outputs the processed file data according to the RINEX standard file format for subsequent use.
本发明提出一种星基增强系统完好性故障仿真方法。可通过人机交互图形界面对监测站、卫星及完好性故障进行参数配置,在观测数据中添加空间信号故障、监测站故障以及传播段故障作为仿真事件,为后续SBAS处理模块提供数据。本发明实现了对完好性故障的模型仿真,对空间信号故障采用了阶跃模型和斜坡模型;对监测站电磁故障采用了0均值高斯噪声模型;对传播段电离层风暴故障采用了运动圆台模型。仿真故障生成的误差直接叠加到真实码伪距和载波相位观测值上,既可保证数据源贴近实际情况,又便于后续对加入故障前后数据的分析验证。本发明具有参数配置灵活,故障类型全面,输出格式标准化等优点。The invention proposes a method for simulating the integrity fault of a satellite-based augmentation system. The parameters of monitoring stations, satellites and integrity faults can be configured through the human-computer interaction graphical interface, and space signal faults, monitoring station faults and propagation segment faults can be added to the observation data as simulation events to provide data for subsequent SBAS processing modules. The invention realizes the model simulation of the integrity fault, adopts the step model and the slope model for the space signal fault; adopts the 0-mean Gaussian noise model for the electromagnetic fault of the monitoring station; adopts the moving circular cone model for the ionospheric storm fault in the propagation section . The error generated by the simulated fault is directly superimposed on the real code pseudorange and carrier phase observations, which not only ensures that the data source is close to the actual situation, but also facilitates the subsequent analysis and verification of the data before and after adding the fault. The invention has the advantages of flexible parameter configuration, comprehensive fault types, standardized output format and the like.
Claims (6)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811376580.9A CN109542084B (en) | 2018-11-19 | 2018-11-19 | A satellite-based augmentation system integrity fault simulation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811376580.9A CN109542084B (en) | 2018-11-19 | 2018-11-19 | A satellite-based augmentation system integrity fault simulation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109542084A CN109542084A (en) | 2019-03-29 |
| CN109542084B true CN109542084B (en) | 2020-06-12 |
Family
ID=65848200
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811376580.9A Active CN109542084B (en) | 2018-11-19 | 2018-11-19 | A satellite-based augmentation system integrity fault simulation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109542084B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP4184217A1 (en) * | 2021-11-19 | 2023-05-24 | Airbus Defence and Space GmbH | Method for detecting outliers in measurements of global navigation satellite systems |
Families Citing this family (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109991839B (en) * | 2019-04-08 | 2020-09-18 | 北京控制工程研究所 | Satellite timing method based on satellite clock drift iterative estimation |
| CN110456390B (en) * | 2019-07-24 | 2021-04-13 | 北京空间飞行器总体设计部 | Device and method for monitoring on-orbit integrity risk of navigation satellite |
| CN110879403A (en) * | 2019-10-29 | 2020-03-13 | 中海北斗(深圳)导航技术有限公司 | Simple and feasible monitoring method and system for satellite-based augmentation system |
| CN111025336B (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2022-03-04 | 西安空间无线电技术研究所 | Multi-satellite non-Gaussian carrier Doppler anomaly detection and elimination method |
| CN111025344B (en) * | 2019-12-20 | 2022-12-13 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十研究所 | Function verification device and verification method for satellite-based augmentation technology |
| CN111176310B (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2020-09-08 | 北京星际荣耀空间科技有限公司 | A test method, device and system for a launch vehicle attitude control system |
| CN111209219B (en) * | 2020-04-21 | 2020-09-01 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 | A satellite navigation simulation model consistency verification method and system |
| CN111596315B (en) * | 2020-05-23 | 2022-07-22 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十研究所 | Method for monitoring performance of dual-frequency multi-constellation satellite-based augmentation system in real time |
| CN113740885B (en) * | 2020-05-28 | 2023-11-28 | 千寻位置网络有限公司 | Base station and satellite fault simulation system based on network differential positioning service |
| CN114076961B (en) * | 2020-08-12 | 2025-09-02 | 千寻位置网络有限公司 | Simulation method and simulation system for simulating harsh environment errors in satellite navigation positioning |
| CN113267792B (en) * | 2021-05-26 | 2022-07-19 | 中国电子科技集团公司第五十四研究所 | An ionospheric anomaly monitoring and early warning method based on monitoring station network |
| CN115913993B (en) * | 2022-12-12 | 2024-06-04 | 千寻位置网络有限公司 | GNSS receiver observation data fault modeling and simulation method and device thereof |
| CN117970382B (en) * | 2024-03-29 | 2024-06-14 | 中国科学院国家空间科学中心 | GNSS simulation test method and system |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104280741B (en) * | 2014-09-29 | 2016-10-05 | 北京航空航天大学 | Anomalous of the ionosphere detection method |
| CN105676233B (en) * | 2016-01-07 | 2018-01-12 | 北京航空航天大学 | The RAS anomalous of the ionospheres monitoring method and system of air-ground coordination |
| CN106324622B (en) * | 2016-08-05 | 2019-12-31 | 西安希德电子信息技术股份有限公司 | Local area augmentation system integrity monitoring and real-time positioning augmentation method |
| CN106468774B (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2019-04-09 | 北京航空航天大学 | An Ephemeris Clock Correction Parameter and Space Signal Integrity Parameter Method Applied in Satellite-Based Augmentation System |
| CN107064961B (en) * | 2017-03-24 | 2018-05-22 | 北京航空航天大学 | The method and device tested satellite navigation system integrity monitoring performance |
-
2018
- 2018-11-19 CN CN201811376580.9A patent/CN109542084B/en active Active
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP4184217A1 (en) * | 2021-11-19 | 2023-05-24 | Airbus Defence and Space GmbH | Method for detecting outliers in measurements of global navigation satellite systems |
| WO2023088662A1 (en) * | 2021-11-19 | 2023-05-25 | Airbus Defence and Space GmbH | Method for detecting outliers in measurements of global navigation satellite systems |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN109542084A (en) | 2019-03-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109542084B (en) | A satellite-based augmentation system integrity fault simulation method | |
| US9557419B2 (en) | Methods for generating accuracy information on an ionosphere model for satellite navigation applications | |
| Walter et al. | Worldwide vertical guidance of aircraft based on modernized GPS and new integrity augmentations | |
| EP3035080B1 (en) | Navigation satellite system positioning involving the generation of correction information | |
| Angrisano et al. | Benefit of the NeQuick Galileo Version in GNSS Single‐Point Positioning | |
| CN110988929B (en) | GBAS system performance evaluation method and device under influence of ionized layer | |
| CN102016620A (en) | Networks and methods for computing ionospheric corrections | |
| Sarma et al. | Modelling of low-latitude ionosphere using modified planar fit method for GAGAN | |
| Weinbach et al. | Integrity of the Trimble® centerpoint RTX correction service | |
| El-Mowafy | Pilot evaluation of integrating GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou with GPS in ARAIM | |
| Melgard et al. | G2-the first real-time GPS and GLONASS precise orbit and clock service | |
| Jokinen | Enhanced ambiguity resolution and integrity monitoring methods for precise point positioning | |
| CN110988934A (en) | Multi-mode receiver satellite-based enhancement technology device and processing method | |
| Rodríguez-Pérez et al. | Inter-satellite links for satellite autonomous integrity monitoring | |
| Madrid et al. | PPP integrity for advanced applications, including field trials with Galileo, geodetic and low-cost receivers, and a preliminary safety analysis | |
| Sunehra | Estimation of prominent global positioning system measurement errors for Gagan applications | |
| Joerger et al. | Iridium/GPS carrier phase positioning and fault detection over wide areas | |
| Paziewski | Application of SBAS pseudorange and carries phase signals to precise instantaneous single-frequency positioning | |
| Costa et al. | Effectiveness of CCD ionospheric monitors for air navigation based on GBAS: Investigation and implementation under low geomagnetic latitude conditions | |
| Braun et al. | EGNOS V3 Legacy Service–Preliminary Performances | |
| Ahn et al. | Orbit ephemeris failure detection in a GNSS regional application | |
| Demyanov | GNSS overview | |
| Chen et al. | An Evaluation Algorithm for the Interoperability of Global Navigation Satellite Systems. | |
| Dovis et al. | The stratolite concept: Design of a stratospheric pseudo-satellite for Galileo | |
| Wang et al. | The effect of navigation frequency on smoothed pseudorange variance in SBAS |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |