CN108389032A - Aeronautical product collaborative design method - Google Patents
Aeronautical product collaborative design method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108389032A CN108389032A CN201810114230.9A CN201810114230A CN108389032A CN 108389032 A CN108389032 A CN 108389032A CN 201810114230 A CN201810114230 A CN 201810114230A CN 108389032 A CN108389032 A CN 108389032A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- design
- model
- meta
- working node
- node
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/101—Collaborative creation, e.g. joint development of products or services
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Aeronautical product collaborative design method provided by the invention, includes the following steps：It determines the profession for participating in collaborative design, and major design profession is determined according to the task of design process；On the basis of basic working model, complex work model caused by design resource constraint is transformed into independent meta-model；According to the working node that determining design specialist or meta-model are formed, different working nodes is combined to form Process in Cooperative Design according to design cycle；Design process is evaluated, problem working node is found out, problem working node, which is fed back to major design profession, carries out decision；Allow multiple professions of aeronautical product development convenient for design data granting, management and understanding Process in Cooperative Design；The appearance of any design change or problem will all narrow down to some meta-model or working node to independently solve in design process, reduce the influence to overall situation design；The affirming score of feedback information in accurate Process in Cooperative Design.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of design method more particularly to a kind of aeronautical product collaborative design methods.
Background technology
Increase with the complexity of Aerospace Products, design difficulty is gradually increased, and develops business activity quantity in flow
Huge, aeronautical product develops enterprise and lacks the optimization to design process, and upstream and downstream is special parallel in aeronautical product development process
Industry is more, and relationship is complicated between activity, keeps the aeronautical product whole lead time longer and data granting complexity, difficult management.
In order to ensure the efficient design process of new product, associated mechanisms, scholar propose many solutions, wherein cooperateing with
The concept of design is proposed out.American National defence analysis and research in 1988 completely propose the concept of concurrent engineering,
It is the systems approach of a kind of integrated, parallel deisgn product and its correlated process, collaborative design is that concurrent engineering is led in design
A kind of implementation means in domain, the characteristics of inheriting concurrent engineering, can efficiently be designed work.However for aeronautical product
For development, complicated design relation keeps Process in Cooperative Design very complicated, and mainly with remote asynchronous, concurrent shape
Formula Method of Spreading Design work, how effectively under distributed environment carry out aeronautical product collaborative design, reach improve designing quality,
Efficiency is aeronautical product collaborative design technology difficult point.
Therefore, in order to solve the above-mentioned technical problem, need to propose a kind of new collaborative design method.
Invention content
In view of this, the object of the present invention is to provide aeronautical product collaborative design method, aeronautical product development process is allowed
Multiple professions are convenient for design data granting, management and understand Process in Cooperative Design；Any design change or problem in design process
Appearance will all narrow down to some meta-model or working node to independently solve, reduce to the overall situation design influence；It is accurate
The affirming score of feedback information in Process in Cooperative Design；Process in Cooperative Design mould is formd by more design specialists and meta-model
Type defines collaborative processes information feedback, realizes that collaborative design adapts to the design process of dynamic change.
Aeronautical product collaborative design method provided by the invention, includes the following steps：
S1. it determines the profession for participating in collaborative design, and major design profession is determined according to the task of design process；
S2. on the basis of basic working model, complex work model caused by design resource constraint is transformed into solely
Vertical meta-model；
S3. the working node formed according to determining design specialist or meta-model, by different working nodes according to design
Path combination forms Process in Cooperative Design；Wherein, working node includes that single design specialist is joined as working node and meta-model
With complex work node；
S4. design process is evaluated, problem working node is found out, problem working node, which is fed back to major design profession, to carry out
Decision.
Further, in step S3, Process in Cooperative Design is determined according to following method：
Major design profession selects meta-model and according to design cycle work in combination section according to the job specification of design objective
Point, and Process in Cooperative Design is subjected to publicity；In public notification period, actively proposed to be added or exit in meta-model by each design specialist
The design process of some meta-model；
Each design specialist is sequentially completed each working node, and is assessed certainly design result by major design profession
Plan.
Further, problem determination is carried out to the working node of single design specialist by the following method：
S41. factor of evaluation collection U and design Comment gathers V are established, wherein：
U={ u1,u2,…,un, uiFor i-th of working node of n working node；
V={ v1,v2,v3,v4, wherein v1、v2、v3And v4It is respectively relatively strong respectively to the influence degree of design objective
Influence, General Influence, minimal effect and without influence；
S42. structure factor of evaluation matrix R：
Wherein, rijIt indicates from working node uiStart with, to assessed object
Make vpThe possibility degree of comment, rij∈ [0,1], p=1,2,3,4；
S43. evaluation weight matrix A is established：A=(a1,a2,...,an), aiFor working node uiEvaluation
Weight, ai>=0 and
S44. weight matrix and factor of evaluation matrix are subjected to fuzzy union and obtain fuzzy overall evaluation matrix B：
S45. union is carried out to each element of fuzzy overall evaluation matrix and calculates membership values bt：
bt=(b1∪b2∪...∪bm)=max (b1,b2,...,bm)；
S46. Construct question point evaluates model Mi(vp,bti)：
Work as Mi(vp,bti) value when being 0, then ignore this node, otherwise, record membership values bt, and traverse all working node
ui, find out influential working node；
S47. problem membership values b is determinedfValue range, wherein：
M indicates the number of membership values, and m=n；It finds out at membership values
In the working node of the range be problem.
Further, the problem of complex work node that the meta-model participates in, determines that method is as follows：
Data processing is done to meta-model, meta-model is divided into multiple simple process modeling of collaborative design；
Q membership values b is calculated according to step S41 to S46q, wherein Q indicates the design specialist number in meta-model；
By to Q membership values bqCarry out the membership values that fuzzy union finds out entire meta-model
By the membership values of the meta-model acquiredIt is updated in step S47 and determines problem.
Beneficial effects of the present invention：Through the invention, multiple professions of aeronautical product development process is allowed to be convenient for design data
Provide, manage and understand Process in Cooperative Design；The appearance of any design change or problem will all narrow down to some in design process
Meta-model or working node are independently solved, and reduce the influence to overall situation design；Feedback letter in accurate Process in Cooperative Design
The affirming score of breath；Process modeling of collaborative design is formd by more design specialists and meta-model, it is anti-to define collaborative processes information
Feedback realizes that collaborative design adapts to the design process of dynamic change.
Description of the drawings
The invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples：
Fig. 1 is the flow chart of the present invention.
Specific implementation mode
Further description is made to the present invention below in conjunction with Figure of description：
A kind of aeronautical product collaborative design method provided by the invention, includes the following steps：
S1. it determines the profession for participating in collaborative design, and major design profession is determined according to the task of design process；Wherein,
The profession and major design profession for participating in collaborative design are determined according to aeronautical product actual design task, different aviations
Product design task is different, and the design specialist and major design profession participated in is also different；
S2. on the basis of basic working model, complex work model caused by design resource constraint is transformed into solely
Vertical meta-model；Wherein, basic working model is but this base according to an originally determined working node of design objective
This working model is often not suitable for Process in Cooperative Design, and therefore, it is necessary to convert, wherein resource constraint such as technology is about
Beam, the completion of some working node, two design specialists of A and B are completed, and A is necessarily dependent upon B, as technological constraint；
S3. the working node formed according to determining design specialist or meta-model, by different working nodes according to design
Path combination forms Process in Cooperative Design；Wherein, working node includes that single design specialist is joined as working node and meta-model
With complex work node；I other words：Single design specialist is that working node is exactly that a design specialist can be completed one
Design process, the process are just simple process modeling of collaborative design, its essence of meta-model is exactly a complex work node,
It is made of multiple design specialists in meta-model, refers to completing a design process jointly by multiple design specialists；
S4. design process is evaluated, problem working node is found out, problem working node, which is fed back to major design profession, to carry out
Decision；By the above method, allow multiple professions of aeronautical product development convenient for design data granting, management and understanding collaborative design
Process；The appearance of any design change or problem will all narrow down to some meta-model or working node independently to solve in design process
Certainly, the influence to overall situation design is reduced；The affirming score of feedback information in accurate Process in Cooperative Design；By designing specially more
Industry and meta-model form process modeling of collaborative design, define collaborative processes information feedback, realize that collaborative design adapts to dynamic
The design process of variation.
In the present embodiment, in step S3, Process in Cooperative Design is determined according to following method：
Major design profession selects meta-model and according to design cycle work in combination section according to the job specification of design objective
Point, and Process in Cooperative Design is subjected to publicity；In public notification period, actively proposed to be added or exit in meta-model by each design specialist
The design process of some meta-model, especially technique and tooling profession, great role is played to the efficient design of product；Design is special
In industry Process in Cooperative Design, due to the variation of actual conditions, they also answer self-organizing in addition to carrying out collaborative design according to model
Collaborative processes are improved, as two design specialists of A, B find that A design specialists rely on without design relation, but after start-up operation in model
Professional in B, A design specialists should feed back to major design profession at this time, adjust process modeling of collaborative design in time, form new work
Make node,
Each design specialist is sequentially completed each working node, and is assessed certainly design result by major design profession
Plan, for example design result accept or reject or the decisions such as is modified to design result.
It in the present embodiment, in Process in Cooperative Design, needs to feed back collaborative processes information, when feedback just needs to comment
Valence determines the problem of needing to change adjustment when the problems such as design conflicts occurs, that is, the working node of design conflicts occurs, for
For simple Process in Cooperative Design, problem determination is carried out to the working node of single design specialist by the following method：
S41. factor of evaluation collection U and design Comment gathers V are established, wherein：
U={ u1,u2,…,un, uiFor i-th of working node of n working node；
V={ v1,v2,v3,v4, wherein v1、v2、v3And v4It is respectively relatively strong respectively to the influence degree of design objective
Influence, General Influence, minimal effect and without influence；
S42. structure factor of evaluation matrix R：
Wherein, rijIt indicates from working node uiStart with, to assessed object
Make vpThe possibility degree of comment, rij∈ [0,1], p=1,2,3,4；
S43. evaluation weight matrix A is established：A=(a1,a2,...,an), aiFor working node uiEvaluation weight, ai≥0
And
S44. weight matrix and factor of evaluation matrix are subjected to fuzzy union and obtain fuzzy overall evaluation matrix B：
S45. union is carried out to each element of fuzzy overall evaluation matrix and calculates membership values bt：
bt=(b1∪b2∪...∪bm)=max (b1,b2,...,bm)；
S46. Construct question point evaluates model Mi(vp,bti)：
Work as Mi(vp,bti) value when being 0, then ignore this node, otherwise, record membership values bt, and traverse all working node
ui, find out influential working node；
S47. problem membership values b is determinedfValue range, wherein：
M indicates the number of membership values, and m=n；Membership values are found out to be in
The working node of the range is problem；By the above method, problem can be accurately determined, to be conducive to be cooperateed with
The amendment of design process.
In the present embodiment, the problem of complex work node that the meta-model participates in, determines by the following method：
Data processing is done to meta-model, meta-model is divided into multiple simple process modeling of collaborative design；As above-mentioned, due to member
Model has multiple design specialists to constitute, and therefore, it is necessary to handle meta-model, meta-model is converted simple collaborative design
Journey model, usually, meta-model are made of how many a design specialists, and how many simple associations are converted into according to the number of design specialist
Same design process；
Q membership values b is calculated according to step S41 to S46q, wherein Q indicates the design specialist number in meta-model；
By to Q membership values bqCarry out the membership values that fuzzy union finds out entire meta-model
By the membership values of the meta-model acquiredIt is updated in step S47 and determines problem.
Further explanation is made to the present invention with a specific example below：
One of development according to certain aeronautical product process, the design specialist needed have totality, structure, technique and work
Dress.
In serial, parallel, branch and under recycling these groundwork models, transformation caused by designing resource constraint its
His complex work model, independent meta-model is formed by the working model of serial, parallel, branch, cycle and conversion.
The characteristics of according to design process and mission requirements, major design profession are responsible for combining each working node.If a certain
A design specialist can be with some task of complete independently, then can be using this design specialist as a working node, a first mould
Type regards a working node as, combines each working node and forms different process modeling of collaborative design.
In the design process, if design conflicts occur in two of which working node A and B, the work for needing to change is fed back
Node gives major design profession, is calculated as follows：
Take Comment gathers V as follows
V={ has stronger influence, has an impact, there is a little influence, is no to influence }；
Take factor of evaluation collection：
U={ function, fatigue manufacture difficulty or ease }；
Form single factor evaluation matrix：
Major design profession chooses evaluation weight according to actual conditions：
A=(0.19,0.80,0.01)
Using blurring mapping, obtaining overall merit is：
Only have the B working nodes corresponding to 0.8 eligible according to the above method, so feeding back this working node to main
Design specialist, then the working node for finally needing to change is selected near B working nodes according to actual conditions.
Finally illustrate, the above examples are only used to illustrate the technical scheme of the present invention and are not limiting, although with reference to compared with
Good embodiment describes the invention in detail, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that, it can be to the skill of the present invention
Art scheme is modified or replaced equivalently, and without departing from the objective and range of technical solution of the present invention, should all be covered at this
In the right of invention.
Claims (4)
1. a kind of aeronautical product collaborative design method, it is characterised in that：Include the following steps：
S1. it determines the profession for participating in collaborative design, and major design profession is determined according to the task of design process；
S2. on the basis of basic working model, complex work model caused by design resource constraint is transformed into independent
Meta-model；
S3. the working node formed according to determining design specialist or meta-model, by different working nodes according to design cycle
Combination forms Process in Cooperative Design；Wherein, working node includes that single design specialist is participated in as working node and meta-model
Complex work node；
S4. design process is evaluated, problem working node is found out, problem working node, which is fed back to major design profession, determines
Plan.
2. aeronautical product collaborative design method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that：In step S3, according to following method
Determine Process in Cooperative Design：
Major design profession selects meta-model and according to design cycle work in combination node according to the job specification of design objective, and
Process in Cooperative Design is subjected to publicity；In public notification period, actively proposed to be added or exit some in meta-model by each design specialist
The design process of meta-model；
Each design specialist is sequentially completed each working node, and carries out evaluation decision to design result by major design profession.
3. aeronautical product collaborative design method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that：By the following method to individually designing
The working node of profession carries out problem determination：
S41. factor of evaluation collection U and design Comment gathers V are established, wherein：
U={ u1,u2,…,un, uiFor i-th of working node of n working node；
V={ v1,v2,v3,v4, wherein v1、v2、v3And v4Respectively to the influence degree of design objective, respectively relatively strong influence,
General Influence, minimal effect and without influence；
S42. structure factor of evaluation matrix R：
Wherein, rijIt indicates from working node uiStart with, assessed object is made
vpThe possibility degree of comment, rij∈ [0,1], p=1,2,3,4；
S43. evaluation weight matrix A is established：A=(a1,a2,...,an), aiFor working node uiEvaluation weight, ai>=0 and
S44. weight matrix and factor of evaluation matrix are subjected to fuzzy union and obtain fuzzy overall evaluation matrix B：
S45. union is carried out to each element of fuzzy overall evaluation matrix and calculates membership values bt：
bt=(b1∪b2∪...∪bm)=max (b1,b2,...,bm)；
S46. Construct question point evaluates model Mi(vp,bti)：
Work as Mi(vp,bti) value when being 0, then ignore this node, otherwise, record membership values bt, and traverse all working node ui,
Find out influential working node；
S47. problem membership values b is determinedfValue range, wherein：
M indicates the number of membership values, and m=n；It finds out membership values and is in this
The working node of range is problem.
4. aeronautical product collaborative design method according to claim 3, it is characterised in that：The complicated work that the meta-model participates in
The problem of making node determines that method is as follows：
Data processing is done to meta-model, meta-model is divided into multiple simple process modeling of collaborative design；
Q membership values b is calculated according to step S41 to S46q, wherein Q indicates the design specialist number in meta-model；
By to Q membership values bqCarry out the membership values that fuzzy union finds out entire meta-model
By the membership values of the meta-model acquiredIt is updated in step S47 and determines problem.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810114230.9A CN108389032A (en) | 2018-02-05 | 2018-02-05 | Aeronautical product collaborative design method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810114230.9A CN108389032A (en) | 2018-02-05 | 2018-02-05 | Aeronautical product collaborative design method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN108389032A true CN108389032A (en) | 2018-08-10 |
Family
ID=63075123
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810114230.9A Pending CN108389032A (en) | 2018-02-05 | 2018-02-05 | Aeronautical product collaborative design method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN108389032A (en) |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2005029250A2 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2005-03-31 | Meridian Project Systems | Collaborative information system for real estate, building design, construction and facility management and similar industries |
| US7321883B1 (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2008-01-22 | Perceptronics Solutions, Inc. | Facilitator used in a group decision process to solve a problem according to data provided by users |
| CN101661520A (en) * | 2009-09-28 | 2010-03-03 | 西安交通大学 | Synergetic design method for mechanical and electrical products |
| CN103699731A (en) * | 2013-12-19 | 2014-04-02 | 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司 | Method for constructing real scene model collaborative design platform of railway engineering |
| CN105354622A (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2016-02-24 | 田军 | Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based enterprise production management evaluation method |
| CN106920045A (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2017-07-04 | 西南石油大学 | A kind of aeronautical product maturity modeling method |
-
2018
- 2018-02-05 CN CN201810114230.9A patent/CN108389032A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2005029250A2 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2005-03-31 | Meridian Project Systems | Collaborative information system for real estate, building design, construction and facility management and similar industries |
| US7321883B1 (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2008-01-22 | Perceptronics Solutions, Inc. | Facilitator used in a group decision process to solve a problem according to data provided by users |
| CN101661520A (en) * | 2009-09-28 | 2010-03-03 | 西安交通大学 | Synergetic design method for mechanical and electrical products |
| CN103699731A (en) * | 2013-12-19 | 2014-04-02 | 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司 | Method for constructing real scene model collaborative design platform of railway engineering |
| CN105354622A (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2016-02-24 | 田军 | Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based enterprise production management evaluation method |
| CN106920045A (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2017-07-04 | 西南石油大学 | A kind of aeronautical product maturity modeling method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Rao et al. | Flexible manufacturing system selection using a combinatorial mathematics-based decision-making method | |
| Vinodh et al. | Application of fuzzy compromise solution method for fit concept selection | |
| CN112862217A (en) | Bilateral matching method for supply and demand parties of high-end equipment cloud manufacturing platform | |
| CN103425774A (en) | Tacit knowledge acquisition method based on HWME (Hall for Workshop of Metasynthetic Engineering) | |
| Mayangsari et al. | Understanding a viable value co-creation model for a sustainable entrepreneurial system: a case study of Batik Solo industrial cluster | |
| CN106228354A (en) | The charge system of rule-based engine in regulation engine and cloud computing platform | |
| CN110322217A (en) | Manufacture cloud service Requirement Decomposition system and method based on template | |
| Salvador et al. | Strategic foresight: Determining patent trends in additive manufacturing. | |
| Chen et al. | A fuzzy back propagation network ensemble with example classification for lot output time prediction in a wafer fab | |
| Wan et al. | The spatial and temporal situation of China’s digital technology innovation and its influencing factors | |
| CN108389032A (en) | Aeronautical product collaborative design method | |
| CN105373996A (en) | Modeling system based on approval data | |
| Figueiredo et al. | Group decision-based construction of scenarios for multicriteria analysis in conditions of uncertainty on the basis of quantitative and qualitative information | |
| Jinyang | Application of data mining in logistics industry in the era of big data | |
| Lin et al. | An interactive meta-goal programming-based decision analysis methodology to support collaborative manufacturing | |
| CN110196887A (en) | A kind of management method of pair of manufacturing industry process equipment model | |
| CN112905845B (en) | Multi-source unstructured data cleaning method for discrete intelligent manufacturing applications | |
| Liu et al. | An intelligent system for estimating full product Life Cycle Cost at the early design stage | |
| Ajalli et al. | A hybrid FSIR-TOPSIS approach for selecting of manufacturing levers | |
| CN108133427A (en) | A kind of Shandong agricultural policy analysis and decision supports system | |
| Liu et al. | Collaborative decision-making of wind-storage combined power generation system based on a variety of improved evaluation methods | |
| Chen et al. | Export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural products: E volution, performance, and influencing factors | |
| CN119026674B (en) | A multi-stage human-machine attribute value alignment method and system based on large model | |
| Khan et al. | The concavity assumption on felicities and asymptotic dynamics in the RSS model | |
| Melnik et al. | Requirements for companies’ energy saving programs under the conditions of digitalization of Russian economy |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20180810 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |