CN107544899B - Method and device for executing test case - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for executing a test case, which comprises the following steps: detecting whether a test platform identifier in a conflict identifier is the same as a current test platform identifier or not when detecting that the conflict identifier in the test case is not empty; when detecting that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is different from the current test platform identification, detecting whether the global parameter identification in the conflict identification conflicts with the global parameter identification set by the current test platform; when detecting that the global parameter identification in the conflict identification conflicts with the global parameter identification set by the current test platform, detecting whether the difference value between the current time and the marking time in the conflict identification is greater than the preset time; and when the difference value is detected to be larger than the preset time, clearing the conflict identification, setting the conflict identification of the current test platform, and executing the test case. The invention also discloses a device for executing the test case.

Description

A method and apparatus for executing a test case

technical field

The invention relates to data testing technology, in particular to a method and device for executing a test case.

Background technique

In the modem (Momem, Modulator Demodula-tor) or terminal test, the parameters of the radio network controller (RNC, Radio Network Controller) in the system environment directly affect all the third-generation mobile communication technologies (3G, The 3rd Generation) under the RNC. Mobile Communications) cell parameters, evolved Node B base station (eNodeB, Evolved Node B) parameters, directly affect the parameters of all fourth generation mobile communication technology (4G, The 4rd Generation Mobile Communications) cells under eNodeB, so many tests Some parameter configurations under the platform are global, and changes in global parameters will affect the test environment of all test platforms.

Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of the structure of a test environment for 4G/3G multi-mode interoperability of global parameters in the prior art; as shown in Fig. 1, including: OMCR server 101, ATPi automated test platform 102, ATPi automated test platform 103, eNodeB 104, RNC 105, LTE Cell 106, W(TD) Cell 107, HOC adjustable attenuator 108, test platform 109 and test platform 110, wherein,

The OMCR server 101 is configured to configure and modify the parameters of a Long Term Evolution (LTE, Long Term Evolution) cell under the eNodeB 104 and the RNC 105, that is, a 4G cell/W (TD) cell, that is, a 3G cell;

The eNodeB 104 is used in the 4G network to make the interaction between different protocol layers in the wireless access network closer, reduce the delay and improve the efficiency. The 4G network adopts a flat structure, and the UMTS terrestrial wireless connection of 4G network evolution Network access (E-UTRAN, Evolved UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access Network) is only composed of eNodeB network, eNodeB is responsible for all wireless-related functions, and each function is responsible for managing multiple cells;

The RNC 105, used in the 3G network, is a network element responsible for controlling radio resources. Multiple 3G cells can be attached to the RNC 105, and multiple test platforms can also perform use cases for multiple 3G cells under the same RNC 105. test;

The ATPi automated testing platform 102 is connected to the testing platform 109, and the ATPi automated testing platform 103 is connected to the testing platform 110; the ATPi automated testing platform 102 and the ATPi automated testing platform 103 also pass through the OMCR server respectively. 101 is connected with eNodeB 104 and RNC 105; and the HOC adjustable attenuator 108 is used to perform automatic test control on the signal strength from two different LTE cells 106 and 3G cells 107 under eNodeB 104 and RNC 105, respectively.

In the prior art, the parameters of the eNodeB and/or RNC are usually modified by using the manual operation interface and Telnet remote login. When using an automated test platform to execute test cases, the parameters of the eNodeB and/or RNC are modified by using the Telnet remote login method. .

Since the parameters of the eNodeB 104 and the RNC 105 will affect the test environment of the TPi automated test platform 102 and the TPi automated test platform 103, if the TPi automated test platform 102 modifies the global parameters (parameters of the eNodeB and/or RNC) through the OMCR server 101, and this At this time, the TPi automated test platform 103 cannot know that the TPi automated test platform 102 has modified the global parameters, and will execute the test case according to the modified global parameters of the TPi automated test platform 102, which deviates from the original test case design scenario .

In the prior art, in order to avoid the above problems, manual communication or test cases that simultaneously test the same global parameters are used for test execution, which cannot achieve complete automated testing, has low test efficiency, and wastes test equipment resources.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In order to solve the existing technical problems, the embodiments of the present invention are expected to provide a method and apparatus for executing a test case, which can realize a complete automatic test and improve the test efficiency.

The technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention is realized as follows:

According to an aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a method for executing a test case, the method comprising:

When detecting that the conflict identifier in the test case is not empty, detect whether the test platform identifier in the conflict identifier is the same as the current test platform identifier;

When detecting that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is different from the current test platform identification, detect whether the global parameter identification in the conflict identification conflicts with the global parameter identification set by the current test platform;

When detecting that the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier conflicts with the global parameter identifier set by the current test platform, detect whether the difference between the current time and the marked time in the conflict identifier is greater than a preset time;

When it is detected that the difference value is greater than the preset time, the conflict flag is cleared, the conflict flag of the current test platform is set, and the test case is executed.

In the above scheme, the method also includes:

When detecting that the global parameter identification in the conflict identification does not conflict with the global parameter identification set by the current test platform, multiplex the global parameter, add the current test platform identification in the conflict identification, and modify the conflict identification At the marked time in , the test case is executed.

In the above scheme, the method also includes:

When it is detected that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is the same as the current test platform identification, the global parameter identification and the marking time in the conflict identification are updated, and the test case is executed.

In the above scheme, the method also includes:

When it is detected that the conflict identifier in the test case is empty, the conflict identifier of the current test platform is set, and the test case is executed.

In the above solution, after the test case is executed, the method further includes:

The conflict identifier of the current test platform is cleared, and the value of the use case execution identifier of the test case is set to a preset value.

In the above solution, before it is detected that the conflict identifier in the test case is not empty, the method further includes:

Detecting whether the value of the use case execution identifier of the test case is a preset value;

When detecting that the value of the use case execution identifier of the test case is a preset value, stop executing the current test case, check and execute the next test case;

When it is detected that the value of the use case execution identifier of the test case is not a preset value, triggering to detect whether the conflict identifier in the test case is empty.

In the above solution, the test case is set in the test case pool, and before detecting whether the value of the use case execution identifier of the test case is a preset value, the method further includes:

Detecting whether the value of the loop test identifier of the test case pool is a preset value;

When detecting that the value of the loop test identifier is a preset value, stop testing the test cases in the test case pool;

When it is detected that the value of the loop test identifier is not a preset value, detect whether the value of the loop test identifier in the test case pool is a preset value, and detect the use case of the unexecuted test case in the test case pool Whether the value of the execution flag is a preset value.

In the above scheme, the method also includes:

When it is detected that the difference is less than the preset time, the execution of the test case is exited, and the next test case is detected.

According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for executing a test case, the apparatus comprising:

The first detection unit, the second detection unit, the third detection unit, the fourth detection unit and the execution unit, wherein,

the first detection unit, configured to detect whether the conflict identifier in the test case is empty;

The second detection unit is configured to detect whether the test platform identification in the conflict identification is the same as the current test platform identification when the first detection unit detects that the conflict identification in the test case is not empty;

The third detection unit is used for the second detection unit to detect that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is different from the current test platform identification, and detect that the global parameter identification in the conflict identification is different from the current test platform identification. Whether the global parameter identifiers set by the platform conflict;

The fourth detection unit is used for the third detection unit to detect that when the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier conflicts with the global parameter identifier set by the current test platform, detect the current time and the conflict identifier. Whether the difference between the marked time is greater than the preset time;

The execution unit is configured to clear the conflict flag when the fourth detection unit detects that the difference is greater than a preset time, set the conflict flag of the current test platform, and execute the test case.

In the above scheme, the execution unit is further configured to reuse the global parameter when the third detection unit detects that the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier does not conflict with the global parameter identifier set by the current test platform, The current test platform identifier is added to the conflict identifier, and the test case is executed after the marking time is modified.

In the above scheme, the execution unit is also used for the second detection unit to update the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier and the The time is marked and the test case is executed.

In the above solution, the execution unit is further configured to, when the first detection unit detects that the conflict identifier in the test case is empty, set the conflict identifier of the current test platform, and execute the test case.

In the above scheme, the device also includes:

A clearing unit, configured to clear the conflict flag of the current test platform after the execution unit has finished executing the test case, and set the value of the test case execution flag of the test case to a preset value.

In the above scheme, the device also includes:

the fifth detection unit and trigger unit; wherein

the fifth detection unit, configured to detect whether the value of the use case execution identifier of the test case is a preset value;

The execution unit is further configured to stop executing the current test case, check and execute the next test case when the fifth detection unit detects that the value of the use case execution identifier of the test case is a preset value;

The triggering unit is specifically configured to trigger the first detection unit to detect whether the conflict identifier in the test case is null.

In the above solution, the test case is set in the test case pool, and the device further includes: a sixth detection unit and a loop test unit; wherein,

The sixth detection unit is used to detect whether the value of the loop test identifier in the test case pool is a preset value;

The loop testing unit is configured to stop the testing of the test cases in the test case pool when the sixth detection unit detects that the value of the loop test identifier is a preset value;

When the sixth detection unit detects that the value of the loop test identification is not a preset value, it detects whether the value of the loop test identification in the test case pool is a preset value, and the fifth detection unit detects the value of the loop test identification. Whether the value of the case execution identifier of the unexecuted test case in the test case pool is a preset value.

In the above scheme, the device also includes:

The exit unit is used for exiting the execution of the test case and detecting the next test case when the difference detected by the fourth detection unit is less than a preset time.

The embodiment of the present invention provides a method for executing a test case, by detecting that the conflict identifier in the test case is not empty, detecting whether the test platform identifier in the conflict identifier is the same as the current test platform identifier; detecting the conflict When the test platform identification in the identification is different from the current test platform identification, it is detected whether the global parameter identification in the conflict identification conflicts with the global parameter identification set by the current test platform; the global parameter identification in the conflict identification is detected When the identification conflicts with the global parameter identification set by the current test platform, detect whether the difference between the current time and the marked time in the conflict identification is greater than the preset time; when it is detected that the difference is greater than the preset time, clear For the conflict identification, the conflict identification of the current test platform is set, and the test case is executed. In this way, firstly execute the use cases with non-conflicting global parameter identifiers, or first execute the use cases whose global parameter identifiers conflict but can reuse the global parameters, and then perform cyclic testing on the use cases in the use case pool through the cyclic test identifier, and test the use cases that are not executed. Execute the test with the use case, realize the test automation, execute the test without manual intervention, and improve the test efficiency.

Description of drawings

1 is a schematic diagram of the composition of the test environment structure of the 4G/3G multi-mode interoperability of global parameters in the prior art;

2 is a schematic flowchart of a method for executing a test case in an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the composition of an apparatus for executing a test case in an embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed ways

The specific embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to illustrate and explain the present invention, but not to limit the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic flowchart of a method for executing a test case in an embodiment of the present invention; as shown in FIG. 2 , the method includes:

Step 201, when detecting that the conflict identifier in the test case is not empty, detect whether the test platform identifier in the conflict identifier is the same as the current test platform identifier;

Here, the conflict identifier is represented by P1:EVN1@TIME, including: global parameter identifier, test platform identifier and marking time; wherein, the global parameter identifier refers to which parameter in the global parameters is used, for example, it can be set is P1 or P2; the platform mark refers to the serial number of each test platform, for example, test platform 1 is set as ENV1, and test platform 2 is set as ENV2; the marking time refers to the time when the test platform sets the global parameters, set is TIME; before detecting whether the conflict flag of the test case is empty, first check whether the value of the loop test flag in the test case pool is the default value; here the loop test flag is ALL flag, and the default value is 1. When the value of the ALL flag of the loop test identifier in the test case pool is 1, it means that all test cases in the test case pool have been tested, stop the test of the test cases in the test case pool, and output the test report; when When it is detected that the value of the ALL flag of the loop test identifier in the test case pool is not 1, but the value of ALL flag=0, it means that there are test cases in the test case pool that have not been tested, and the test case pool needs to be tested in a loop. Then check whether the value of the unexecuted test case execution flag in the test case pool is a preset value. Here, the test case execution flag is case flag, and the default value is 1; When the value is set to 1, it means that the test case has been executed, then the execution of the test case is stopped, and the next test case is detected and executed; when it is detected that the case flag of the test case is not the default value of 1 Instead, when the case flag=0, it means that the test case has not been tested, and then the test is performed on the test case. The cycle test identifier ALL flag and the case execution identifier case flag can be generated by the new run list latest Run List automatically generated by ATPI, and the generated ALL flag and case flag are saved in a fixed format to a fixed place for modification and modification of test cases. Query, specifically, before executing the test case, check whether the ALL flag is the default value 1, and whether the case flag is the default value 1, can be detected through the TCL use case script. The control flow of the specific TCL use case scripting language is as follows:

It should be noted that the control flow is only a simplified control flow of the script voice of the TCL use case, and is only an implementation example.

When the test is performed on the test case, first, it is triggered to detect whether the conflict identifier of the test case is empty. If it is detected that the conflict identifier in the test case is empty, it means that no test platform is using the global parameters. The current test platform can use the global parameters, set the conflict flag of the current test platform, execute the test case, after the test case is executed, clear the conflict flag, and set the use case execution flag of the test case is the default value: case flag=1;

If it is detected that the conflict identifier in the test case is not empty, it means that a test platform is using the global parameter, and the current test platform cannot directly use the global parameter. Here, the test platform in the conflict identifier needs to be detected Whether the identifier is the same as the current test platform identifier.

Step 202, when detecting that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is different from the current test platform identification, detect whether the global parameter identification in the conflict identification conflicts with the global parameter identification set by the current test platform;

Here, when it is detected that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is the same as the current test platform identification, it means that the test platform has not normally cleared the conflict identification set by the test platform after executing the test case last time. It is necessary to update the global parameter identification and the marking time in the conflict identification. After the update is completed, the test case is executed, and after the test case is executed, the set conflict identification is cleared, and the test is set. The value of the use case execution flag of the use case is case flag=1;

When it is detected that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is not the same as the current test platform identification, it indicates that there are the global parameters after the test platform has been modified, and the environment under the global parameters is being changed, and the current test platform cannot directly When using the global parameter, it is necessary to detect whether the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier conflicts with the global parameter identifier set by the current test platform.

Step 203, when detecting that the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier conflicts with the global parameter identifier set by the current test platform, detect whether the difference between the current time and the marked time in the conflict identifier is greater than a preset time;

Here, when it is detected that the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier does not conflict with the global parameter identifier set by the current test platform, it means that the global parameter used by the current test platform is the same as the global parameter used by the test platform that is using the global parameter. , then the current test platform can reuse the global parameters, after the current test platform reuses the global parameters, after setting the current test platform identifier and modifying the marking time, execute the test case, and after the execution of the test is completed After the use case, clear the conflict flag set by the current platform, and set the value of the use case execution flag of the test case to case flag=1;

When it is detected that the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier conflicts with the global parameter identifier set by the current test platform, it indicates that the global parameter used by the current test platform is different from the global parameter used by the test platform using the global parameter, and further steps are required. Detect whether the current time minus the marked time in the conflict flag is greater than the preset time, where the preset time is represented by maxtimer, which is used to prevent other test platforms from exiting abnormally, the conflict flag set by them is not cleared, resulting in more tests When the platform uses the global parameter test case, the global parameter cannot be used.

Step 204 , when it is detected that the difference is greater than a preset time, the conflict flag is cleared, the conflict flag of the current test platform is set, and the test case is executed.

Here, when it is detected that the current time minus the marked time is greater than the preset time, it means that after the test platform has completed the test, the set conflict flag has not been cleared normally. At this time, the conflict flag needs to be cleared, and After setting the conflict flag of the current test platform, execute the test case, and after executing the test case, clear the conflict flag set by the test case, and set the value of the use case execution flag of the test case to case flag= 1; when it is detected that the current time minus the marked time is less than the preset time, it means that the test platform is using the global parameters, then the global parameters conflict, and the current test platform is not allowed to modify the global parameters, here, it is necessary to Exit execution of the test case and execute the next test case.

For example: Test platform A and test platform B are both executing tests. Among them, test platform A is executing a test case and uses the scenario P1 in the global parameter P. Set the conflict identifier of test platform A as: P1:ENV1@TIME ; Test platform B also executes a use case that uses the global parameter P. If the test platform B uses the scene P2 in the global parameter P, it means that P1 in the global parameter P conflicts with P2, and the method in the above method needs to be executed. Step 203, detecting whether the marked time in the current time minus the conflict flag is greater than the preset time, if it is greater than the preset time, it means that there is a test platform in use, and the conflict flag set by it is not cleared. Here, it is necessary to clear After the conflict identification, set the conflict identification of test platform B, for example: P2:ENV2@TIME, and execute the test case, and after the execution of the test case is completed, clear the conflict identification set by it, and set all The value of the case execution flag of the test case is case flag=1; if it is less than the preset time, the current test platform B exits the execution of the test case and executes the next test case.

If the test platform B also uses the scene P1 in the global parameter P, the test platform B uses the same global parameters as the test platform A, and the test platform B can reuse the global parameters, and after setting the conflict flag of the test platform B, It is: P1: ENV12@TIME, the TIME at this time is the time when the conflict flag is set for the test platform B, and the test case is executed.

In the embodiment of the present invention, solving the global parameter conflict is to write the parameter control command of the OMCR server in the TCL script, and query and modify the global parameter implementation. Specifically, the OMCR server provides a graphical user interface (GUI, Graphical User Interface) for manual operation, And provide a method for Telnet remote login to modify parameters, the simplified process is as follows (only for illustration):

In this embodiment of the present invention, the test loop flag ALL flag and the use case execution flag case flag may be used when a use case with global parameters is executed, or may be used when a use case without global parameters is executed, which is not limited herein. Through the use case loop execution and the solution when the global parameters conflict, when the global parameters conflict, the automatic detection can be completely realized without manual intervention, which greatly improves the test efficiency.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the composition of an apparatus for executing a test case in an embodiment of the present invention; as shown in FIG. 3 , the apparatus includes: a first detection unit 301 , a second detection unit 302 , a third detection unit 303 , and a fourth detection unit 304 and execution unit 305, where,

The first detection unit 301 is configured to detect whether the conflict identifier in the test case is empty;

The second detection unit 302 is configured to detect whether the test platform identification in the conflict identification and the current test platform identification are not empty when the first detection unit 301 detects that the conflict identification in the test case is not empty. same;

The third detection unit 303 is used for the second detection unit 302 to detect that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is different from the current test platform identification, and detect that the global parameter identification in the conflict identification is the same as that of the current test platform identification. Whether the global parameter identifiers set by the current test platform conflict;

The fourth detection unit 304 is configured to detect that the current time minus the Whether the marking time in the conflict flag is greater than the preset time;

The execution unit 305 is configured to clear the conflict flag when the fourth detection unit 304 detects that the current time minus the marked time is greater than the preset time, and set the conflict flag of the current test platform. , execute the test case.

Here, on the basis of the device shown in FIG. 3 , the device further includes a fifth detection unit, a sixth detection unit, a trigger unit, a loop test unit, an exit unit and a clearing unit, wherein the fifth detection unit, the sixth detection unit The six detection units, trigger unit, loop test unit, exit unit and clearing unit are not shown in the figure; before the first detection unit 301 detects whether the conflict flag in the test case is empty, the fifth detection unit Detect whether the value of the loop test flag in the test case pool is a preset value; here the loop test flag is ALL flag, and the default value is 1. When the fifth detection unit detects the value of the loop test flag ALL flag in the test case pool When it is the default value of 1, it means that all the test cases in the test case pool have been tested, and the loop test unit stops the test of the test cases in the test case pool, and outputs the test report; when the fifth detection unit detects When the value of the ALL flag of the loop test flag in the test case pool is not the default value of 1, but ALL flag=0, it means that there are test cases in the test case pool that have not been executed, and the loop test unit will test the test in a loop Whether the value of the loop test flag in the use case pool is a preset value, and the sixth detection unit detects whether the value of the test case execution flag that is not executed in the test case pool is a preset value. Set the value to 1; when the sixth detection unit detects that the value of the case flag of the case flag of the test case is the default value of 1, it means that the test case has been executed, and the execution case unit stops executing the test case and executes the The next test case; when the sixth detection unit detects that the value of the case flag case flag of the test case execution identifier is not the default value 1, but case flag=0, it means that the test case does not perform the test, then the execution Unit 305 executes tests on the test cases.

The cycle test identifier ALL flag and the case execution identifier case flag can be generated by the new run list latest Run List automatically generated by ATPI, and the generated ALL flag and case flag are saved in a fixed format to a fixed place for modification and modification of test cases. Inquire. Specifically, before executing the test case, the fifth detection unit detects whether the value of the loop test flag ALL flag is the preset value 1, and the sixth detection unit detects whether the value of the case flag case flag is the preset value 1, Detection can be done through TCL use case scripts. The control flow of the specific TCL use case scripting language is as follows:

It should be noted that the control flow is only a simplified control flow of the script voice of the TCL use case, and is only an implementation example.

When the execution unit 305 executes the test on the test case, first, the trigger unit triggers the first detection unit 301 to detect whether the conflict flag in the test case is empty, if the first detection unit 301 detects that the test case is in the When the conflict flag is empty, it means that no test platform is using the global parameters, the current test platform can use the global parameters, and the execution use case unit sets the conflict flag of the current test platform to execute the test case. After the execution use case unit finishes executing the test case, it informs the clearing unit, and the clearing unit clears the conflict flag, and sets the value of the test case execution flag of the test case to a default value: case flag=1;

If the first detection unit 301 detects that the conflict flag in the test case is not empty, it means that a test platform is using the global parameters, and the current test platform cannot directly use the global parameters. In this case, a second detection is required. The unit 302 detects whether the test platform identification in the conflict identification is the same as the current test platform identification. When the second detection unit 302 detects that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is the same as the current test platform identification, it means that the test platform has not normally cleared the conflict identification set by the test platform after executing the test case last time, At this time, the execution unit 305 only needs to update the global parameter identifier and the marked time in the conflict identifier, execute the test case after the update is completed, and notify the clearing after the test case is executed. unit, the clearing unit clears the conflict flag set by it, and sets the value of the test case execution flag of the test case as case flag=1;

If the second detection unit 302 detects that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is not the same as the current test platform identification, it indicates that the global parameter after the test platform has been modified, and the environment under the global parameter is being changed. , the current test platform cannot directly use the global parameter, at this time, the third detection unit 303 is required to detect whether the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier conflicts with the global parameter identifier set by the current test platform. When the third detection unit 303 detects that the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier does not conflict with the global parameter identifier set by the current test platform, it indicates that the global parameter used by the current test platform is the same as the one used by the test platform that is using the global parameter. If the global parameters are the same, the current test platform can reuse the global parameters. After the current test platform reuses the global parameters, the execution unit 305 sets the current test platform identifier and modifies the marked time, and then executes the test case, And after the test case is executed, the clearing unit is notified, and after the clearing unit clears the conflict flag set by the current test platform, the value of the use case execution flag of the test case is set as case flag=1;

When the third detection unit 303 detects that the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier conflicts with the global parameter identifier set by the current test platform, it explains the global parameter used by the current test platform and the global parameter used by the test platform that is using the global parameter. The parameters are different, and the fourth detection unit 304 needs to detect whether the current time minus the marked time in the conflict flag is greater than the preset time, where the preset time is represented by maxtimer, which is used to prevent other test platforms from exiting abnormally, not cleared The conflict flag set by it causes that when another test platform uses the global parameter test case, the global parameter cannot be used.

When the fourth detection unit 304 detects that the current time minus the marked time is greater than the preset time, it means that after the test platform has completed the test, the set conflict flag is not cleared normally. At this time, a clearing unit is required. Clear the conflict identification, and after the clearing unit clears the conflict identification, the execution unit 305 sets the conflict identification of the current test platform, and executes the test case, and the execution unit 305 completes the execution of the test case Then, inform the clearing unit, after clearing the conflict flag set by the clearing unit, set the value of the test case execution flag of the test case as case flag=1;

When the fourth detection unit 304 detects that the current time minus the marked time is less than the preset time, it indicates that a test platform is using the global parameters, then the global parameters conflict, and the current test platform is not allowed to modify the global parameters, At this time, the exit unit needs to exit the execution of the test case, and the execution unit 305 executes the next test case.

In the embodiment of the present invention, the conflict identifier is represented by, for example, P1:EVN1@TIME, including: a global parameter identifier, a platform identifier, and a marking time; wherein, the global parameter identifier refers to which of the global parameters is used. The parameter, for example, can be set to P1 or P2; the platform label refers to the number of each test platform, for example, test platform 1 is set to ENV1, and test platform 2 is set to ENV2; the marking time refers to the test platform setting The time of the global parameter, set to TIME;

Solving global parameter conflicts is to write the parameter control commands of the OMCR server in the TCL script, query and modify the global parameters to achieve, specifically, the OMCR server provides a graphical user interface (GUI, Graphical UserInterface) for manual operation, and provides Telnet remote login methods to modify parameters , the simplified process is as follows (only for illustration):

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, embodiments of the present invention may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the invention may take the form of a hardware embodiment, a software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media having computer-usable program code embodied therein, including but not limited to disk storage, optical storage, and the like.

The present invention is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each flow and/or block in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to the processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor or other programmable data processing device to produce a machine such that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing device produce Means for implementing the functions specified in a flow or flow of a flowchart and/or a block or blocks of a block diagram.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory capable of directing a computer or other programmable data processing device to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory result in an article of manufacture comprising the arrangement of the instructions, The instruction means implements the functions specified in the flow or flows of the flowcharts and/or the block or blocks of the block diagrams.

These computer program instructions can also be loaded on a computer or other programmable data processing device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process such that The instructions provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flow or blocks of the flowcharts and/or the block or blocks of the block diagrams.

The above descriptions are only preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (16)

1. A method of executing test cases, the method comprising:

detecting whether a test platform identifier in a conflict identifier is the same as a current test platform identifier or not when detecting that the conflict identifier in the test case is not empty;

when detecting that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is different from the current test platform identification, detecting whether the global parameter identification in the conflict identification conflicts with the global parameter identification set by the current test platform;

when detecting that the global parameter identification in the conflict identification conflicts with the global parameter identification set by the current test platform, detecting whether the difference value between the current time and the marking time in the conflict identification is greater than the preset time;

and when the difference value is detected to be larger than the preset time, clearing the conflict identification, setting the conflict identification of the current test platform, and executing the test case.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

and when detecting that the global parameter identification in the conflict identification does not conflict with the global parameter identification set by the current test platform, multiplexing the global parameter, adding the current test platform identification in the conflict identification, modifying the marking time in the conflict identification, and executing the test case.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

and when detecting that the test platform identification in the conflict identification is the same as the current test platform identification, updating the global parameter identification and the marking time in the conflict identification, and executing the test case.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

and setting the conflict identifier of the current test platform and executing the test case when the conflict identifier in the test case is detected to be null.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein after the test case is executed, the method further comprises:

and clearing the conflict mark of the current test platform, and setting the value of the use case execution mark of the test case as a preset value.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein before the detecting that the conflicting identifications in the test case are not empty, the method further comprises:

detecting whether the value of the use case execution identifier of the test case is a preset value;

when detecting that the value of the case execution identifier of the test case is a preset value, stopping executing the current test case, and checking and executing the next test case;

and triggering and detecting whether the conflict mark in the test case is empty or not when the value of the case execution mark of the test case is detected to be a non-preset value.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the test case is disposed in a test case pool, and before detecting whether a value of a case execution identifier of the test case is a preset value, the method further comprises:

detecting whether the value of the cyclic test identifier of the test case pool is a preset value;

stopping testing the test cases in the test case pool when detecting that the value of the cyclic test identifier is a preset value;

and when the value of the cyclic test identifier is detected to be a non-preset value, detecting whether the value of the cyclic test identifier in the test case pool is a preset value, and detecting whether the value of the case execution identifier of the unexecuted test case in the test case pool is a preset value.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

and when the difference is detected to be smaller than the preset time, quitting the execution of the test case and detecting the next test case.

9. An apparatus for executing test cases, the apparatus comprising:

a first detection unit, a second detection unit, a third detection unit, a fourth detection unit and an execution unit, wherein,

the first detection unit is used for detecting whether the conflict mark in the test case is empty or not;

the second detection unit is configured to detect whether a test platform identifier in the conflict identifier is the same as a current test platform identifier when the first detection unit detects that the conflict identifier in the test case is not empty;

the third detection unit is configured to detect whether a global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier conflicts with a global parameter identifier set by the current test platform when the second detection unit detects that the test platform identifier in the conflict identifier is different from the current test platform identifier;

the fourth detection unit is configured to detect whether a difference between current time and a marking time in the conflict identifier is greater than a preset time when the third detection unit detects that a global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier conflicts with a global parameter identifier set by the current test platform;

and the execution unit is used for clearing the conflict identifier, setting the conflict identifier of the current test platform and executing the test case when the fourth detection unit detects that the difference value is greater than the preset time.

10. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the execution unit is further configured to, when the third detection unit detects that the global parameter identifier in the conflict identifier does not conflict with the global parameter identifier set by the current test platform, multiplex a global parameter, add a current test platform identifier in the conflict identifier, and modify the marking time, and then execute the test case.

11. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the execution unit is further configured to, when the second detection unit detects that the platform id in the conflicting ids is the same as the current platform id, update the global parameter id and the tag time in the conflicting ids, and execute the test case.

12. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the execution unit is further configured to set the collision identifier of the current test platform and execute the test case when the first detection unit detects that the collision identifier in the test case is empty.

13. The apparatus of claim 9, further comprising:

and the clearing unit is used for clearing the conflict identifier of the current test platform after the execution of the test case by the execution unit is finished, and setting the value of the case execution identifier of the test case as a preset value.

14. The apparatus of claim 9, further comprising:

a fifth detection unit and a trigger unit; wherein

The fifth detecting unit is configured to detect whether a value of the use case execution identifier of the test case is a preset value;

the execution unit is further configured to, when the fifth detection unit detects that the value of the case execution identifier of the test case is a preset value, stop executing the current test case, check and execute the next test case;

the triggering unit is specifically configured to trigger the first detecting unit to detect whether the conflict flag in the test case is empty when the fifth detecting unit detects that the value of the case execution flag of the test case is not the preset value.

15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the test cases are located in a test case pool, the apparatus further comprising: a sixth detection unit and a cycle test unit; wherein,

the sixth detection unit is configured to detect whether a value of the cyclic test flag in the test case pool is a preset value;

the cycle test unit is used for stopping the test of the test cases in the test case pool when the sixth detection unit detects that the value of the cycle test identifier is a preset value;

when the sixth detection unit detects that the value of the cyclic test identifier is not a preset value, it is detected whether the value of the cyclic test identifier in the test case pool is a preset value, and the fifth detection unit detects whether the value of the case execution identifier of the unexecuted test case in the test case pool is a preset value.

16. The apparatus of claim 9, further comprising:

and the quitting unit is used for quitting the execution of the test case and detecting the next test case when the difference value detected by the fourth detection unit is less than the preset time.

Images