CN105389448B - A kind of graph model building method for protecting the assessment of energy degree for computer cluster - Google Patents
A kind of graph model building method for protecting the assessment of energy degree for computer cluster Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105389448B CN105389448B CN201510975124.6A CN201510975124A CN105389448B CN 105389448 B CN105389448 B CN 105389448B CN 201510975124 A CN201510975124 A CN 201510975124A CN 105389448 B CN105389448 B CN 105389448B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- node
- graph model
- computer
- computer cluster
- assessment
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/18—Network design, e.g. design based on topological or interconnect aspects of utility systems, piping, heating ventilation air conditioning [HVAC] or cabling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2111/00—Details relating to CAD techniques
- G06F2111/02—CAD in a network environment, e.g. collaborative CAD or distributed simulation
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及一种用于计算机集群保能度评估的图模型构造方法。The present invention relates to a method for constructing a graph model used for evaluating the survivability of computer clusters.
背景技术Background technique
计算机集群是一组独立的计算机的集合体,计算机间通过高性能的互联网络连接,各计算机可以协同工作并表现为一个单一的、集中的计算资源向网络用户提供服务。计算机集群是一种造价低廉、易于构筑并且具有较好可扩放性的并行机体系结构。集群的各计算机之间是相互独立的,并且具有不同的性能值。例如,一个计算机集群中的不同的IBM计算机、HP计算机和联想计算机多具体的性能值往往具有很大的差异。而整个计算机集群的性能是所有组成该集群的计算机性能值的累加(汇总)。在运行过程中计算机集群中的各个计算机会出现随机故障,当一个计算机发生故障,该计算机对整个集群的性能值贡献为0,而当一个计算机不发生故障正常工作时,该计算机对整个集群的性能值贡献为该计算机的性能值。A computer cluster is a collection of independent computers. The computers are connected through a high-performance interconnection network. Each computer can work together and provide services to network users as a single, centralized computing resource. Computer cluster is a parallel machine architecture with low cost, easy construction and good scalability. The computers in the cluster are independent of each other and have different performance values. For example, the specific performance values of different IBM computers, HP computers, and Lenovo computers in a computer cluster tend to vary widely. The performance of the entire computer cluster is the accumulation (aggregation) of the performance values of all the computers that make up the cluster. During operation, each computer in the computer cluster will have random failures. When a computer fails, the computer contributes 0 to the performance value of the entire cluster. When a computer does not fail and works normally, the computer contributes to the performance of the entire cluster. The performance value contribution is the performance value of that computer.
评估计算机集群的保能度就是评估在计算机会发生随机故障的条件下计算机集群的性能值处于某个规定的区间的概率。这个区间也成为保能度评估区间。其存在如下问题:已有的计算机集群保能度评估通常是基于系统状态枚举的方法,当集群包含的计算机数量N增加,集群所具有的系统状态数量2N就急剧增加。从而使得枚举方法仅适用于小型的计算机集群,对大规模计算机集群评估较为困难,难以获得精确的评估值。Evaluating the survivability of a computer cluster is to evaluate the probability that the performance value of the computer cluster is in a specified interval under the condition that the computer will fail randomly. This interval is also known as the sturdiness evaluation interval. It has the following problems: the existing computer cluster sufficiency evaluation is usually based on the method of system state enumeration. When the number N of computers included in the cluster increases, the number of system states 2N in the cluster increases sharply. Therefore, the enumeration method is only suitable for small computer clusters, and it is difficult to evaluate large-scale computer clusters, and it is difficult to obtain accurate evaluation values.
发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
本发明的目的在于针对现有技术的缺陷和不足,提供一种结构简单,设计合理、使用方便的一种用于计算机集群保能度评估的图模型构造方法,它解决系统状态枚举方法性能不足,难以进行大规模计算机集群保能度评估的问题,它具有使保能度评估更快更节省资源等优点。The purpose of the present invention is to aim at the defects and deficiencies of the prior art, to provide a simple structure, reasonable design, and convenient use of a graph model construction method for computer cluster survivability evaluation, which solves the performance of the system state enumeration method. Insufficient, it is difficult to evaluate the energy retention of large-scale computer clusters. It has the advantages of making energy retention evaluation faster and saving resources.
为实现上述目的,本发明采用的技术方案是:For achieving the above object, the technical scheme adopted in the present invention is:
本发明所述的一种用于计算机集群保能度评估的图模型构造方法,它采用如下方法步骤:A method for constructing a graph model for evaluating computer cluster tenacity according to the present invention adopts the following method steps:
步骤一:构造用于计算机集群保能度评估的树模型;其中,计算机集群的保能度就是评估在计算机会发生随机故障的条件下计算机集群的性能值处于某个规定的区间的概率,这个区间也成为保能度评估区间;Step 1: Construct a tree model for the evaluation of computer cluster energy retention; among them, the energy retention of computer cluster is to evaluate the probability that the performance value of the computer cluster is in a specified interval under the condition that the computer will randomly fail. The interval also becomes the energy retention evaluation interval;
步骤二:针对步骤一所获得的树模型,采用合并节点的方法进行图模型转换;Step 2: For the tree model obtained in step 1, the method of merging nodes is used to convert the graph model;
步骤三:针对步骤二所获得的图模型,采用无用节点删除的方法进行图模型转换;Step 3: For the graph model obtained in step 2, use the method of deleting useless nodes to convert the graph model;
步骤四:针对步骤三所获得的图模型,采用冗余节点删除的方法进行图模型转换。Step 4: For the graph model obtained in step 3, the method of deleting redundant nodes is used to convert the graph model.
进一步地,所述步骤一中,针对计算机集群中各个计算机所具有的‘正常’和‘故障’两个状态,以及各个计算机在‘正常’状态下所具有的性能值,建立相应的状态空间树模型,并根据保能度的评价区间定义,设置树模型的叶子节点。Further, in the first step, according to the 'normal' and 'fault' states of each computer in the computer cluster, and the performance values of each computer in the 'normal' state, a corresponding state space tree is established. model, and set the leaf nodes of the tree model according to the definition of the evaluation interval of energy retention.
进一步地,所述步骤二中,对步骤一所获得的树模型中每一层节点,根据节点所具有的汇总性能值进行同构判断,当一层中存在两个节点具有相同的汇总性能值,则合并这两个节点Further, in the second step, for each layer of nodes in the tree model obtained in the first step, isomorphism is judged according to the aggregated performance value of the node, and when there are two nodes in one layer with the same aggregated performance value. , then merge the two nodes
进一步地,所述步骤三中,对步骤二所获得的图模型中每个节点,根据节点所具有的汇总性能值进行判断,如果当前汇总性能值已经超出保能度的评价区间上限,则该节点是无用节点可以直接用叶子节点‘0’替换该节点;如果当前汇总性能值加上剩余最大汇总性能值仍然不能够大于保能度的评价区间下限,则该节点是无用节点可以直接用叶子节点‘0’替换该节。Further, in the third step, each node in the graph model obtained in the second step is judged according to the aggregated performance value of the node. If the current aggregated performance value has exceeded the upper limit of the evaluation interval of the energy preservation degree, the If the node is a useless node, you can directly replace the node with the leaf node '0'; if the current aggregated performance value plus the remaining maximum aggregated performance value still cannot be greater than the lower limit of the evaluation interval of the energy preservation degree, the node is a useless node and can directly use the leaf Node '0' replaces the section.
进一步地,所述步骤四中,对步骤三所获得的图模型中每个节点,如果节点的两个分支指向相同的子节点,则该节点是冗余节点可以利用子节点替换该节点。Further, in the fourth step, for each node in the graph model obtained in the third step, if the two branches of the node point to the same child node, the node is a redundant node and the child node can be used to replace the node.
采用上述结构后,本发明有益效果为:本发明所述的一种用于计算机集群保能度评估的图模型构造方法,它解决系统状态枚举方法性能不足,难以进行大规模计算机集群保能度评估的问题,它具有使保能度评估更快更节省资源等优点。After the above structure is adopted, the beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows: the method for constructing a graph model for evaluating the energy retention of computer clusters according to the present invention solves the problem of insufficient performance of the system state enumeration method and is difficult to maintain energy in large-scale computer clusters. It has the advantages of faster and more resource-saving evaluation of energy conservation.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1是计算机集群实例保能度评估状态枚举模型;Fig. 1 is the state enumeration model of computer cluster instance survivability evaluation;
图2是计算机集群实例保能度评估树模型;Fig. 2 is the tree model of the evaluation tree model of the computer cluster instance;
图3是经过合并节点的方法处理之后的保能度评估图模型;Fig. 3 is a graph model of the energy retention evaluation graph after being processed by the method of merging nodes;
图4是经过无用节点删除的方法处理之后的保能度评估图模型;Fig. 4 is the graph model of energy retention evaluation after the method of deleting useless nodes;
图5是经过冗余节点删除的方法处理之后的保能度评估图模型;Fig. 5 is a graph model for evaluating the retention degree after the method of deleting redundant nodes;
具体实施方式Detailed ways
下面结合附图对本发明作进一步的说明。The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
如图1所示,本发明所述的一种用于计算机集群保能度评估的图模型构造方法,它采用如下方法步骤:As shown in Fig. 1, a graph model construction method for computer cluster sufficiency evaluation according to the present invention adopts the following method steps:
步骤一:构造用于计算机集群保能度评估的树模型;其中,计算机集群的保能度就是评估在计算机会发生随机故障的条件下计算机集群的性能值处于某个规定的区间的概率,这个区间也成为保能度评估区间;Step 1: Construct a tree model for the evaluation of computer cluster energy retention; among them, the energy retention of computer cluster is to evaluate the probability that the performance value of the computer cluster is in a specified interval under the condition that the computer will randomly fail. The interval also becomes the energy retention evaluation interval;
步骤二:针对步骤一所获得的树模型,采用合并节点的方法进行图模型转换;Step 2: For the tree model obtained in step 1, the method of merging nodes is used to convert the graph model;
步骤三:针对步骤二所获得的图模型,采用无用节点删除的方法进行图模型转换;Step 3: For the graph model obtained in step 2, use the method of deleting useless nodes to convert the graph model;
步骤四:针对步骤三所获得的图模型,采用冗余节点删除的方法进行图模型转换。Step 4: For the graph model obtained in step 3, the method of deleting redundant nodes is used to convert the graph model.
作为本发明的一种优选,所述步骤一中,针对计算机集群中各个计算机所具有的‘正常’和‘故障’两个状态,以及各个计算机在‘正常’状态下所具有的性能值,建立相应的状态空间树模型,并根据保能度的评价区间定义,设置树模型的叶子节点。As a preference of the present invention, in the first step, according to the two states of 'normal' and 'failure' of each computer in the computer cluster, and the performance value of each computer in the 'normal' state, establish The corresponding state space tree model, and according to the definition of the evaluation interval of energy retention, set the leaf nodes of the tree model.
作为本发明的一种优选,所述步骤二中,对步骤一所获得的树模型中每一层节点,根据节点所具有的汇总性能值进行同构判断,当一层中存在两个节点具有相同的汇总性能值,则合并这两个节点As a preference of the present invention, in the second step, for each layer of nodes in the tree model obtained in step the same aggregated performance value, then merge the two nodes
作为本发明的一种优选,所述步骤三中,对步骤二所获得的图模型中每个节点,根据节点所具有的汇总性能值进行判断,如果当前汇总性能值已经超出保能度的评价区间上限,则该节点是无用节点可以直接用叶子节点‘0’替换该节点;如果当前汇总性能值加上剩余最大汇总性能值仍然不能够大于保能度的评价区间下限,则该节点是无用节点可以直接用叶子节点‘0’替换该节。As a preferred aspect of the present invention, in the third step, each node in the graph model obtained in the second step is judged according to the aggregated performance value of the node. If the current aggregated performance value has exceeded the evaluation of the energy preservation degree The upper limit of the interval, the node is a useless node, and the node can be directly replaced with the leaf node '0'; if the current aggregated performance value plus the remaining maximum aggregated performance value still cannot be greater than the lower limit of the evaluation interval of the energy preservation degree, the node is useless A node can directly replace the section with a leaf node '0'.
作为本发明的一种优选,所述步骤四中,对步骤三所获得的图模型中每个节点,如果节点的两个分支指向相同的子节点,则该节点是冗余节点可以利用子节点替换该节点。As a preference of the present invention, in the fourth step, for each node in the graph model obtained in the third step, if the two branches of the node point to the same child node, the node is a redundant node and the child node can be used. Replace the node.
本发明的工作原理如下:The working principle of the present invention is as follows:
步骤一:构造用于计算机集群保能度评估的树模型;Step 1: Construct a tree model for the evaluation of computer cluster energy retention;
针对计算机集群中各个计算机所具有的‘正常’和‘故障’两个状态,以及各个计算机在‘正常’状态下所具有的性能值,建立相应的树模型,并根据保能度的评价区间定义,设置树模型的叶子节点。According to the two states of 'normal' and 'fault' of each computer in the computer cluster, and the performance value of each computer in the 'normal' state, a corresponding tree model is established, and defined according to the evaluation interval of energy retention. , set the leaf node of the tree model.
以计算机集群A为例。Take computer cluster A as an example.
计算机集群A包含4台计算机。计算机1的性能值为1,计算机2的性能值为1,计算机3的性能值为0.5,计算机4的性能值为0.5。保能度的评价区间为[1,1.5],即集群性能值的下限是1上限是1.5。Computer cluster A contains 4 computers. Computer 1 has a performance value of 1, computer 2 has a performance value of 1, computer 3 has a performance value of 0.5, and computer 4 has a performance value of 0.5. The evaluation interval of energy retention is [1, 1.5], that is, the lower limit of the cluster performance value is 1 and the upper limit is 1.5.
对于该计算机集群可以直接构造如图1所示的状态枚举模型。树模型中的每个非底层节点都对应一台计算机,比如顶层节点对应计算机1,第二层节点对应计算机2.树模型中的每个节点都有2个分支,分支1表示计算机处于正常状态,分支0表示计算机处于故障状态。树模型中的每个节点都有一个当前汇总性能值。下面通过例子说明当前汇总性能值的计算方法。例如,图1中所标注的第四层的一个属于计算机4的节点,从顶层节点到该节点需要满足的条件是:计算机1是故障的,计算机2和计算机3是正常的,所以这个标注的计算机4节点的当前汇总性能值为计算机2性能值加上计算机3性能值,即1+0.5=1.5.又例如,图1中所标注的第五层的一个底层节点,从顶层节点到该节点需要满足的条件是:计算机2和计算机3是故障的,计算机1和计算机4是正常的,所以这个标注的底层节点的当前汇总性能值为计算机1性能值加上计算机4性能值,即1+0.5=1.5。For this computer cluster, the state enumeration model shown in Figure 1 can be directly constructed. Each non-bottom node in the tree model corresponds to a computer, for example, the top-level node corresponds to computer 1, and the second-level node corresponds to computer 2. Each node in the tree model has 2 branches, and branch 1 indicates that the computer is in a normal state , branch 0 indicates that the computer is in a failed state. Each node in the tree model has a current aggregated performance value. The calculation method of the current summary performance value is described below with an example. For example, a node belonging to computer 4 in the fourth layer marked in Figure 1, the conditions that need to be met from the top node to this node are: computer 1 is faulty, computer 2 and computer 3 are normal, so this marked The current aggregate performance value of the computer 4 node is the performance value of computer 2 plus the performance value of computer 3, that is, 1+0.5=1.5. For another example, a bottom node of the fifth layer marked in Figure 1, from the top node to the node The conditions that need to be met are: Computer 2 and Computer 3 are faulty, and Computer 1 and Computer 4 are normal, so the current aggregate performance value of the bottom node marked with the performance value of Computer 1 plus the performance value of Computer 4, that is, 1+ 0.5=1.5.
对于图1中的状态枚举模型可以根据保能度的评价区间定义,把底层节点转换成为叶子节点。转换的规则是:如果底层节点的当前汇总性能值处于保能度的评价区间,则该底层节点转换为叶子节点1,;如果底层节点的当前汇总性能值不处于保能度的评价区间,则该底层节点转换为叶子节点0。最终获得图2所示的计算机集群实例保能度评估树模型。For the state enumeration model in Figure 1, the bottom node can be converted into a leaf node according to the definition of the evaluation interval of energy retention. The conversion rule is: if the current aggregated performance value of the underlying node is in the evaluation interval of energy preservation, then the underlying node is converted to leaf node 1; if the current aggregated performance value of the underlying node is not in the evaluation interval of energy preservation, then The underlying node is converted to leaf node 0. Finally, the tree model of the computer cluster instance retention evaluation shown in Figure 2 is obtained.
步骤二、采用合并节点的方法进行图模型转换;Step 2, using the method of merging nodes to convert the graph model;
对步骤一所获得的树模型中每一层节点,根据节点所具有的当前汇总性能值进行同构判断,当一层中存在两个节点具有相同的当前汇总性能值,则合并这两个节点。For each layer of nodes in the tree model obtained in step 1, the isomorphism is judged according to the current aggregated performance value of the node. When there are two nodes in one layer with the same current aggregated performance value, the two nodes are merged. .
以计算机集群A为例。Take computer cluster A as an example.
图2中第三层的两个属于计算机3的节点具有相同的当前汇总性能值(都为1),则可以合并这两个节点,获得图3所示的经过合并节点的方法处理之后的保能度评估图模型。The two nodes belonging to computer 3 in the third layer in Fig. 2 have the same current aggregated performance value (both are 1), then these two nodes can be merged to obtain the guaranteed performance value processed by the method of merging nodes shown in Fig. 3. Capability assessment graph model.
步骤三、采用无用节点删除的方法进行图模型转换;Step 3: Use the method of deleting useless nodes to convert the graph model;
对步骤二所获得的图模型中每个节点,根据节点所具有的当前汇总性能值进行判断,如果当前汇总性能值已经超出保能度的评价区间上限,则该节点是无用节点可以直接用叶子节点‘0’替换该节点;如果当前汇总性能值加上剩余最大汇总性能值仍然不能够大于保能度的评价区间下限,则该节点是无用节点可以直接用叶子节点‘0’替换该节点。For each node in the graph model obtained in step 2, judge according to the current aggregated performance value of the node. If the current aggregated performance value has exceeded the upper limit of the evaluation interval of the energy preservation degree, the node is a useless node and the leaf can be used directly. The node '0' replaces the node; if the current aggregated performance value plus the remaining maximum aggregated performance value still cannot be greater than the lower limit of the evaluation interval of the energy preservation degree, the node is a useless node and the leaf node '0' can directly replace the node.
以计算机集群A为例。Take computer cluster A as an example.
图3中第三层的一个属于计算机3的节点,其当前汇总性能值已经超出保能度的评价区间上限,所以该节点是无用节点可以直接用叶子节点‘0’替换该节点。第四层的一个属于计算机4的节点,其当前汇总性能值0加上剩余最大汇总性能值0.5仍然不能够大于保能度的评价区间下限1,所以该节点是无用节点可以直接用叶子节点‘0’替换该节点。最终获得图4所示的经过无用节点的方法处理之后的保能度评估图模型。A node belonging to computer 3 in the third layer in Figure 3, its current aggregated performance value has exceeded the upper limit of the evaluation interval of the energy preservation degree, so the node is a useless node and can directly replace the node with the leaf node '0'. A node belonging to computer 4 in the fourth layer, its current aggregated performance value of 0 plus the remaining maximum aggregated performance value of 0.5 still cannot be greater than the lower limit of the evaluation interval of energy preservation degree 1, so this node is a useless node and can be directly used as a leaf node' 0' to replace the node. Finally, the graph model for evaluating the energy preservation degree after being processed by the useless node method as shown in Fig. 4 is obtained.
步骤四、采用冗余节点删除的方法进行图模型转换。Step 4: Use the method of deleting redundant nodes to convert the graph model.
对步骤三所获得的图模型中每个节点,如果节点的2个分支指向相同的子节点,则该节点是冗余节点可以利用子节点替换该节点。For each node in the graph model obtained in step 3, if the two branches of the node point to the same child node, the node is a redundant node and the child node can be used to replace the node.
以计算机集群A为例。Take computer cluster A as an example.
图3中第四层的一个属于计算机4的节点,该节点的2个分支指向相同的子节点,即叶子节点1,所以该节点是冗余节点可以利用子节点(叶子节点1)替换该节点。获得图5所示的经过无用节点的方法处理之后的保能度评估图模型。A node in the fourth layer in Figure 3 belongs to computer 4. The two branches of the node point to the same child node, that is, leaf node 1, so this node is a redundant node and can be replaced by a child node (leaf node 1). . Obtain the graph model for evaluating the energy preservation degree after processing the useless node method shown in Fig. 5 .
本发明的实施效果:从图1和图5的比较看出,图1是采用传统的状态枚举方法所处理的模型,图5是采用本发明提供的图模型构造方法所处理的模型。本发明的模型远小于传统枚举方法的模型,从而可以使得保能度评估更快更节省资源。Implementation effect of the present invention: It can be seen from the comparison between Fig. 1 and Fig. 5 that Fig. 1 is the model processed by the traditional state enumeration method, and Fig. 5 is the model processed by the graph model construction method provided by the present invention. The model of the present invention is much smaller than the model of the traditional enumeration method, so that the evaluation of energies can be made faster and resources are saved.
本发明所述的一种用于计算机集群保能度评估的图模型构造方法,它解决系统状态枚举方法性能不足,难以进行大规模计算机集群保能度评估的问题,它具有使保能度评估更快更节省资源等优点The method for constructing a graph model for the evaluation of the energy retention of computer clusters according to the present invention solves the problem that the system state enumeration method has insufficient performance and is difficult to evaluate the energy retention of large-scale computer clusters. Evaluate the advantages of faster and less resource-intensive
以上所述仅是本发明的较佳实施方式,故凡依本发明专利申请范围所述的构造、特征及原理所做的等效变化或修饰,均包括于本发明专利申请范围内。The above descriptions are only the preferred embodiments of the present invention, so all equivalent changes or modifications made according to the structures, features and principles described in the scope of the patent application of the present invention are included in the scope of the patent application of the present invention.
Claims (4)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510975124.6A CN105389448B (en) | 2015-12-22 | 2015-12-22 | A kind of graph model building method for protecting the assessment of energy degree for computer cluster |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510975124.6A CN105389448B (en) | 2015-12-22 | 2015-12-22 | A kind of graph model building method for protecting the assessment of energy degree for computer cluster |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN105389448A CN105389448A (en) | 2016-03-09 |
CN105389448B true CN105389448B (en) | 2019-07-23 |
Family
ID=55421732
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510975124.6A Active CN105389448B (en) | 2015-12-22 | 2015-12-22 | A kind of graph model building method for protecting the assessment of energy degree for computer cluster |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN105389448B (en) |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1601510A (en) * | 2003-03-06 | 2005-03-30 | 微软公司 | Architecture for distributed computing system and automated design, deployment, and management of distributed applications |
CN104158840A (en) * | 2014-07-09 | 2014-11-19 | 东北大学 | Method for calculating node similarity of chart in distributing manner |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8589855B1 (en) * | 2012-05-30 | 2013-11-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Machine-learning based datapath extraction |
-
2015
- 2015-12-22 CN CN201510975124.6A patent/CN105389448B/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1601510A (en) * | 2003-03-06 | 2005-03-30 | 微软公司 | Architecture for distributed computing system and automated design, deployment, and management of distributed applications |
CN104158840A (en) * | 2014-07-09 | 2014-11-19 | 东北大学 | Method for calculating node similarity of chart in distributing manner |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
A Multiple-Valued Decision Diagram Based Method for Efficient Reliability Analysis of Non-Repairable Phased-Mission Systems;Mo Y 等;《IEEE Transactions on Reliability》;20140331;第63卷(第1期);第320-330页 |
一种基于移动服务器端的树图建模方法;刘炜 等;《计算机科学》;20110430;第38卷(第4期);第55-60页 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN105389448A (en) | 2016-03-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN102143022B (en) | Cloud measurement device and method for IP network | |
US11146624B2 (en) | Real time multi-tenant workload tracking and auto throttling | |
CN107423493B (en) | A Coupling Modeling Method of Power Cyber-Physics Based on Correlation Matrix | |
CN107944705B (en) | Full-end reliability calculation method for dividing communication communities based on modularity | |
CN102938708A (en) | Alarm transmission mode based alarm correlation analysis system and analysis method thereof | |
CN103475544A (en) | Service monitoring method based on cloud resource monitoring platform | |
CN106844083B (en) | Fault-tolerant method and system for stream computing system anomaly perception | |
CN105024880A (en) | A Resilient Monitoring Method for Mission-Critical Computer Clusters | |
JP2012533129A5 (en) | ||
CN118210772B (en) | Log management method, device, electronic device and storage medium | |
CN105071963A (en) | Multi-service traffic estimation method facing big data Internet | |
CN105703957A (en) | Robustness calculating method of aviation electrical network system | |
CN104572467A (en) | Method for testing performance of virtual platform database of server | |
CN105389448B (en) | A kind of graph model building method for protecting the assessment of energy degree for computer cluster | |
CN107153526A (en) | A kind of parallel data reflow method under streaming computing environment | |
CN103226572A (en) | Expandable monitoring method and monitoring system based on data compression | |
CN110390027A (en) | A method and system for constructing fault model of information system based on graph database | |
CN102694395B (en) | Method for evaluating reliability of two terminals of power transmission network | |
CN104579842A (en) | Processing method for acquiring cluster monitoring computing node state based on socket communication | |
CN106959885A (en) | A kind of virtual machine High Availabitity realizes system and its implementation | |
CN104461848B (en) | A kind of file system appraisal procedure and system | |
CN103761336B (en) | Inter-class coupling measurement method for object-oriented software system | |
CN115119241A (en) | Wireless sensor network link fault detection method | |
Wang et al. | A density-based anomaly detection method for mapreduce | |
Chandra et al. | Co-designing the failure analysis and monitoring of large-scale systems |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
TA01 | Transfer of patent application right | ||
TA01 | Transfer of patent application right |
Effective date of registration: 20190621 Address after: 362021 No. 269 North China Road, Fengze District, Quanzhou City, Fujian Province Applicant after: Huaqiao University Address before: No. 688 Yingbin Road, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Applicant before: Zhejiang Normal University |
|
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |