CA2298262C - Method of determining conifer embryo maturity using sugar alcohol content - Google Patents
Method of determining conifer embryo maturity using sugar alcohol content Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2298262C CA2298262C CA 2298262 CA2298262A CA2298262C CA 2298262 C CA2298262 C CA 2298262C CA 2298262 CA2298262 CA 2298262 CA 2298262 A CA2298262 A CA 2298262A CA 2298262 C CA2298262 C CA 2298262C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- embryos
- inositol
- maturity
- fagopyritol
- seed
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 150000005846 sugar alcohols Chemical class 0.000 title claims abstract description 35
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 29
- 210000001161 mammalian embryo Anatomy 0.000 title abstract description 18
- 241000218631 Coniferophyta Species 0.000 title description 12
- 210000002257 embryonic structure Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 89
- 230000000392 somatic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- CDAISMWEOUEBRE-UHFFFAOYSA-N scyllo-inosotol Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1O CDAISMWEOUEBRE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 230000035784 germination Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- VCWMRQDBPZKXKG-UHFFFAOYSA-N (2S)-O1-alpha-D-Galactopyranosyl-myo-inosit Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1O VCWMRQDBPZKXKG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- DSCFFEYYQKSRSV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1L-O1-methyl-muco-inositol Natural products COC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1O DSCFFEYYQKSRSV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- VJXUJFAZXQOXMJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N D-1-O-Methyl-muco-inositol Natural products CC12C(OC)(C)OC(C)(C)C2CC(=O)C(C23OC2C(=O)O2)(C)C1CCC3(C)C2C=1C=COC=1 VJXUJFAZXQOXMJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- DSCFFEYYQKSRSV-KLJZZCKASA-N D-pinitol Chemical compound CO[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O DSCFFEYYQKSRSV-KLJZZCKASA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- VCWMRQDBPZKXKG-ADKCXELFSA-N fagopyritol B1 Chemical compound OC[C@H]([C@@H]([C@@H]([C@H]1O)O)O)O[C@@H]1O[C@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H]([C@H]1O)O)O)O)[C@H]1O VCWMRQDBPZKXKG-ADKCXELFSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- CDAISMWEOUEBRE-LKPKBOIGSA-N 1D-chiro-inositol Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O CDAISMWEOUEBRE-LKPKBOIGSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 229960000367 inositol Drugs 0.000 claims description 27
- -1 D-chino-inositol Chemical compound 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000013020 embryo development Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 241001236219 Pinus echinata Species 0.000 claims description 5
- 235000005018 Pinus echinata Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000017339 Pinus palustris Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004128 high performance liquid chromatography Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 150000001298 alcohols Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005349 anion exchange Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 235000008566 Pinus taeda Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 19
- 241000218679 Pinus taeda Species 0.000 abstract description 19
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 15
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 abstract description 6
- 239000002420 orchard Substances 0.000 abstract description 6
- 235000008331 Pinus X rigitaeda Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 5
- 241000018646 Pinus brutia Species 0.000 abstract description 5
- 235000011613 Pinus brutia Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 27
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 19
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 19
- JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-YKALOCIXSA-N (+)-Abscisic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)/C=C(/C)\C=C\[C@@]1(O)C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-YKALOCIXSA-N 0.000 description 16
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 15
- CDAISMWEOUEBRE-GPIVLXJGSA-N inositol Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]1O CDAISMWEOUEBRE-GPIVLXJGSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 14
- 150000003999 cyclitols Chemical class 0.000 description 13
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 13
- 230000035800 maturation Effects 0.000 description 12
- 150000002482 oligosaccharides Chemical class 0.000 description 12
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 10
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 10
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 9
- 229920001542 oligosaccharide Polymers 0.000 description 9
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- FCRACOPGPMPSHN-UHFFFAOYSA-N desoxyabscisic acid Natural products OC(=O)C=C(C)C=CC1C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C FCRACOPGPMPSHN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 8
- VCWMRQDBPZKXKG-FOHCLANXSA-N Galactinol Natural products O([C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O1)C1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)C(O)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1O VCWMRQDBPZKXKG-FOHCLANXSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 235000010469 Glycine max Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 244000068988 Glycine max Species 0.000 description 7
- VCWMRQDBPZKXKG-DXNLKLAMSA-N alpha-D-galactosyl-(1->3)-1D-myo-inositol Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]1O VCWMRQDBPZKXKG-DXNLKLAMSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 150000001720 carbohydrates Chemical class 0.000 description 7
- 230000008469 cellular response to desiccation Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 7
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 235000014633 carbohydrates Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 229910001868 water Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 239000003643 water by type Substances 0.000 description 6
- 240000008620 Fagopyrum esculentum Species 0.000 description 5
- 235000009419 Fagopyrum esculentum Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000005481 NMR spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 5
- 240000008299 Pinus lambertiana Species 0.000 description 5
- 235000008595 Pinus lambertiana Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 239000012869 germination medium Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000003204 osmotic effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- UQZIYBXSHAGNOE-XNSRJBNMSA-N stachyose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO[C@@H]3[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O3)O)O2)O)O1 UQZIYBXSHAGNOE-XNSRJBNMSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 5
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- OWEGMIWEEQEYGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 100676-05-9 Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OCC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(OC2C(OC(O)C(O)C2O)CO)O1 OWEGMIWEEQEYGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-PICCSMPSSA-N Maltose Natural products O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](CO)OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-PICCSMPSSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 240000004658 Medicago sativa Species 0.000 description 4
- 240000001416 Pseudotsuga menziesii Species 0.000 description 4
- UQZIYBXSHAGNOE-USOSMYMVSA-N Stachyose Natural products O(C[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@]2(CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O1)[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO[C@@H]2[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O2)O1 UQZIYBXSHAGNOE-USOSMYMVSA-N 0.000 description 4
- DTQVDTLACAAQTR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Trifluoroacetic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C(F)(F)F DTQVDTLACAAQTR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-QUYVBRFLSA-N beta-maltose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@H](O[C@H]2[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)O[C@@H]2CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-QUYVBRFLSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229960002160 maltose Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- MUPFEKGTMRGPLJ-ZQSKZDJDSA-N raffinose Chemical class O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O)O1 MUPFEKGTMRGPLJ-ZQSKZDJDSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 4
- HNSDLXPSAYFUHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,4-bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate Chemical compound CCCCC(CC)COC(=O)CC(S(O)(=O)=O)C(=O)OCC(CC)CCCC HNSDLXPSAYFUHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000005631 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000014466 Douglas bleu Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 229920002148 Gellan gum Polymers 0.000 description 3
- FAIXYKHYOGVFKA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Kinetin Natural products N=1C=NC=2N=CNC=2C=1N(C)C1=CC=CO1 FAIXYKHYOGVFKA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 3
- 235000010643 Leucaena leucocephala Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 241000218922 Magnoliophyta Species 0.000 description 3
- 235000017587 Medicago sativa ssp. sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- NWBJYWHLCVSVIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N N-benzyladenine Chemical compound N=1C=NC=2NC=NC=2C=1NCC1=CC=CC=C1 NWBJYWHLCVSVIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 235000005386 Pseudotsuga menziesii var menziesii Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- MUPFEKGTMRGPLJ-RMMQSMQOSA-N Raffinose Natural products O(C[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@]2(CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O1)[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 MUPFEKGTMRGPLJ-RMMQSMQOSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 235000004443 Ricinus communis Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- MUPFEKGTMRGPLJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N UNPD196149 Natural products OC1C(O)C(CO)OC1(CO)OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(COC2C(C(O)C(O)C(CO)O2)O)O1 MUPFEKGTMRGPLJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003463 adsorbent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 125000002519 galactosyl group Chemical group C1([C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O1)CO)* 0.000 description 3
- 229960002743 glutamine Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000122 growth hormone Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000005556 hormone Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229940088597 hormone Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- QANMHLXAZMSUEX-UHFFFAOYSA-N kinetin Chemical compound N=1C=NC=2N=CNC=2C=1NCC1=CC=CO1 QANMHLXAZMSUEX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229960001669 kinetin Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000037039 plant physiology Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000030118 somatic embryogenesis Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-LXGGSRJLSA-N 2-cis-abscisic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)/C=C(/C)\C=C\C1(O)C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-LXGGSRJLSA-N 0.000 description 2
- ATDWJHOSZLOQDJ-LMKXGGCJSA-N Ciceritol Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](OC)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O)O1 ATDWJHOSZLOQDJ-LMKXGGCJSA-N 0.000 description 2
- RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Diethyl ether Chemical compound CCOCC RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- DHMQDGOQFOQNFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycine Chemical compound NCC(O)=O DHMQDGOQFOQNFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- DCXYFEDJOCDNAF-REOHCLBHSA-N L-asparagine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC(N)=O DCXYFEDJOCDNAF-REOHCLBHSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 235000014647 Lens culinaris subsp culinaris Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 244000043158 Lens esculenta Species 0.000 description 2
- 240000007472 Leucaena leucocephala Species 0.000 description 2
- PVNIIMVLHYAWGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Niacin Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=CN=C1 PVNIIMVLHYAWGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 235000006089 Phaseolus angularis Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 240000000020 Picea glauca Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000008127 Picea glauca Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229930006000 Sucrose Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 240000007098 Vigna angularis Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000010711 Vigna angularis Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 230000004172 acquisition of desiccation tolerance Effects 0.000 description 2
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-PHYPRBDBSA-N alpha-D-galactose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-PHYPRBDBSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000007640 basal medium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- ATDWJHOSZLOQDJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N ciceritol Natural products OC1C(OC)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(COC2C(C(O)C(O)C(CO)O2)O)O1 ATDWJHOSZLOQDJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012136 culture method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229930182830 galactose Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 239000003349 gelling agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- JLJLRLWOEMWYQK-GDUNQVSHSA-N giberellic acid Chemical compound C([C@@]1(O)C(=C)C[C@@]2(C1)C1C(O)=O)CC2[C@@]2(OC3=O)C1[C@]3(C)[C@@H](O)CC2 JLJLRLWOEMWYQK-GDUNQVSHSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229930002203 giberellic acid Natural products 0.000 description 2
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N glutamine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 235000004554 glutamine Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004465 oilseed meal Substances 0.000 description 2
- PIRWNASAJNPKHT-SHZATDIYSA-N pamp Chemical compound C([C@@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)[C@H](C)N)C(C)C)C1=CC=CC=C1 PIRWNASAJNPKHT-SHZATDIYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- LXNHXLLTXMVWPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N pyridoxine Chemical compound CC1=NC=C(CO)C(CO)=C1O LXNHXLLTXMVWPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000008117 seed development Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011550 stock solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000008163 sugars Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 229910021642 ultra pure water Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000012498 ultrapure water Substances 0.000 description 2
- DFUSDJMZWQVQSF-XLGIIRLISA-N (2r)-2-methyl-2-[(4r,8r)-4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl]-3,4-dihydrochromen-6-ol Chemical compound OC1=CC=C2O[C@@](CCC[C@H](C)CCC[C@H](C)CCCC(C)C)(C)CCC2=C1 DFUSDJMZWQVQSF-XLGIIRLISA-N 0.000 description 1
- NHZCTHRPAAYNAI-VMPREFPWSA-N (5s)-5-benzyl-1-[4-[(2s)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-5,6-dioxopiperazin-2-yl]butyl]-4-[2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]piperazine-2,3-dione Chemical compound C1=CC(O)=CC=C1CCN1C(=O)C(=O)N(CCCC[C@@H]2N(C(=O)C(=O)NC2)CC2CCCCC2)C[C@@H]1CC1=CC=CC=C1 NHZCTHRPAAYNAI-VMPREFPWSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NWUYHJFMYQTDRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,2-bis(ethenyl)benzene;1-ethenyl-2-ethylbenzene;styrene Chemical compound C=CC1=CC=CC=C1.CCC1=CC=CC=C1C=C.C=CC1=CC=CC=C1C=C NWUYHJFMYQTDRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- MMWCIQZXVOZEGG-MLQGYMEPSA-N 1D-myo-inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](OP(O)(O)=O)[C@@H](OP(O)(O)=O)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1OP(O)(O)=O MMWCIQZXVOZEGG-MLQGYMEPSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HXKWSTRRCHTUEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyaceticacid Chemical compound OC(=O)C(Cl)OC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1 HXKWSTRRCHTUEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 5-(1-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-4-oxo-1-cyclohex-2-enyl)-3-methylpenta-2,4-dienoic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C=C(C)C=CC1(O)C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004475 Arginine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930192334 Auxin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Carbonate Chemical compound [O-]C([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- FBPFZTCFMRRESA-FSIIMWSLSA-N D-Glucitol Natural products OC[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)CO FBPFZTCFMRRESA-FSIIMWSLSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QNAYBMKLOCPYGJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N D-alpha-Ala Natural products CC([NH3+])C([O-])=O QNAYBMKLOCPYGJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZGTMUACCHSMWAC-UHFFFAOYSA-L EDTA disodium salt (anhydrous) Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].OC(=O)CN(CC([O-])=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC([O-])=O ZGTMUACCHSMWAC-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 108010036618 Galactinol-raffinose galactosyltransferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004471 Glycine Substances 0.000 description 1
- SQUHHTBVTRBESD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hexa-Ac-myo-Inositol Natural products CC(=O)OC1C(OC(C)=O)C(OC(C)=O)C(OC(C)=O)C(OC(C)=O)C1OC(C)=O SQUHHTBVTRBESD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101000635799 Homo sapiens Run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- QNAYBMKLOCPYGJ-UWTATZPHSA-N L-Alanine Natural products C[C@@H](N)C(O)=O QNAYBMKLOCPYGJ-UWTATZPHSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ONIBWKKTOPOVIA-BYPYZUCNSA-N L-Proline Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H]1CCCN1 ONIBWKKTOPOVIA-BYPYZUCNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QNAYBMKLOCPYGJ-REOHCLBHSA-N L-alanine Chemical compound C[C@H](N)C(O)=O QNAYBMKLOCPYGJ-REOHCLBHSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229930182816 L-glutamine Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 229930182821 L-proline Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 240000001221 Leucaena esculenta Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000219745 Lupinus Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000045959 Lupinus luteus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010648 Lupinus luteus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000010624 Medicago sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001579678 Panthea coenobita Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000008124 Picea excelsa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000218633 Pinidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000011334 Pinus elliottii Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920001030 Polyethylene Glycol 4000 Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000008572 Pseudotsuga menziesii Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 102220486681 Putative uncharacterized protein PRO1854_S10A_mutation Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 240000000528 Ricinus communis Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100030852 Run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein Human genes 0.000 description 1
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N Sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JZRWCGZRTZMZEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Thiamine Natural products CC1=C(CCO)SC=[N+]1CC1=CN=C(C)N=C1N JZRWCGZRTZMZEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960003767 alanine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 125000000217 alkyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940024606 amino acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000001014 amino acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000005571 anion exchange chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- ODKSFYDXXFIFQN-UHFFFAOYSA-N arginine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCCNC(N)=N ODKSFYDXXFIFQN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960001230 asparagine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000002363 auxin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000032823 cell division Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000170 cell membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004587 chromatography analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000366 copper(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004132 cross linking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001934 cyclohexanes Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000004062 cytokinin Substances 0.000 description 1
- UQHKFADEQIVWID-UHFFFAOYSA-N cytokinin Natural products C1=NC=2C(NCC=C(CO)C)=NC=NC=2N1C1CC(O)C(CO)O1 UQHKFADEQIVWID-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000000805 cytoplasm Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003599 detergent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005059 dormancy Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010828 elution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004720 fertilization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 206010016766 flatulence Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000011010 flushing procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- FBPFZTCFMRRESA-GUCUJZIJSA-N galactitol Chemical compound OC[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)CO FBPFZTCFMRRESA-GUCUJZIJSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004817 gas chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 1
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001307 helium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052734 helium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium atom Chemical compound [He] SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000007062 hydrolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006460 hydrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003301 hydrolyzing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- NBZBKCUXIYYUSX-UHFFFAOYSA-N iminodiacetic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)CNCC(O)=O NBZBKCUXIYYUSX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- CIPFCGZLFXVXBG-ZIQZFLOESA-N inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](OP(O)(O)=O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](OP(O)(O)=O)[C@H](OP(O)(O)=O)[C@@H]1OP(O)(O)=O CIPFCGZLFXVXBG-ZIQZFLOESA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010018154 inositol 1-alpha-galactosyltransferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 150000004001 inositols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000003456 ion exchange resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003303 ion-exchange polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229910000359 iron(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004816 latex Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000126 latex Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000021374 legumes Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910000357 manganese(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000013028 medium composition Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002503 metabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910021645 metal ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010755 mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002808 molecular sieve Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000402 monopotassium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- CDAISMWEOUEBRE-GNIYUCBRSA-N muco-inositol Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O CDAISMWEOUEBRE-GNIYUCBRSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000001968 nicotinic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229960003512 nicotinic acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000011664 nicotinic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 125000001477 organic nitrogen group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003415 peat Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010451 perlite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019362 perlite Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000007747 plating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920000036 polyvinylpyrrolidone Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000001267 polyvinylpyrrolidone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013855 polyvinylpyrrolidone Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004237 preparative chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960002429 proline Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000021251 pulses Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000008160 pyridoxine Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011677 pyridoxine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000001453 quaternary ammonium group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000012950 reanalysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013074 reference sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008929 regeneration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011069 regeneration method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000029058 respiratory gaseous exchange Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000012047 saturated solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035040 seed growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000741 silica gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910002027 silica gel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- URGAHOPLAPQHLN-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium aluminosilicate Chemical compound [Na+].[Al+3].[O-][Si]([O-])=O.[O-][Si]([O-])=O URGAHOPLAPQHLN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000600 sorbitol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001954 sterilising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004659 sterilization and disinfection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013517 stratification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000000185 sucrose group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000004114 suspension culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000019157 thiamine Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- KYMBYSLLVAOCFI-UHFFFAOYSA-N thiamine Chemical compound CC1=C(CCO)SCN1CC1=CN=C(C)N=C1N KYMBYSLLVAOCFI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960003495 thiamine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000011721 thiamine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003626 triacylglycerols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229940088594 vitamin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000013343 vitamin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011782 vitamin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930003231 vitamin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 229940011671 vitamin b6 Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 150000003722 vitamin derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000001075 voltammogram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003442 weekly effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910000368 zinc sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to the knowledge of sugar alcohols as indicators of biochemical maturity of pine zygotic and somatic embryos. It has been discovered that loblolly pine zygotic embryos have a progression of different sugar alcohols as they approach biochemical maturity. Pinitol is the first sugar alcohol to appear in abundance. This is followed by D-chiro-inositol, and finally by fagopyritol B1. As a later appearing alcohol becomes more abundant in the embryos, the earlier ones decrease in amount present. Analysis of the embryo sugar alcohols can be helpful in determining when to harvest cones from seed orchards. Further it can be used as a guideline for formulation of more effective culture media in the propagation of somatic embryos by tissue culture. There appears to be a requirement for fagopyritol B1 if good germination of somatic embryos is to be achieved.
Description
METHOD OF DETERMINING CONIFER EMBRYO MATURITY
USING SUGAR ALCOHOL CONTENT
S The present invention is directed to a method of determining bio-chemical maturity and readiness for harvest and subsequent germination of conifer embryos. The method is especially useful for the southern pine species and is appli-cable to determining both the optimum time of harvest for cones and the develop-mental maturity of somatic embryos produced by tissue culture.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Most reforestation is now done using seedlings grown in nurseries, if the Douglas-fir region of the Pacific Northwest or southern pine region of the South-eastern United States may be taken as examples. Most seed for the nurseries is pro-vided by seed orchards that, in some cases, are now a third generation of selected trees. Most of this orchard produced seed has been open pollinated and much of the pollen comes from wild trees located outside the orchard. For this reason, the maxi-mum genetic gain has not been reached. Some full sib seed is produced, in which both cone and pollen parents are known. However, this is in far too short supply and is much too expensive for any but very specialized applications. Some is effectively bulked up as nursery stock used for the production of rooted cuttings. While still in the early stages of commercial production of reforestation stock, selected seed may also be bulked up by tissue culture methods.
The optimum time to harvest cones for their contained seeds has al-ways been a problem in forest tree nurseries. Too early harvest will yield immature seed that may have poor germination or result in trees having less than the desired vigor. Too late harvest may result in significant seed loss from cones opening. In analogous fashion, it is always problematical when somatic embryos have obtained the maturity that will lead to good germination.
In seeds naturally grown on plants, "maturity" corresponds to the time when the seed dries and dehisces from the mother plant. This point in time may be assumed to represent the seed (zygotic) embryo biochemical maturity as well as mor-phological maturity. Morphological maturity may be defined as the time when cell division in the embryo ceases. Biochemical maturity is seen as the time when accu-mutation of storage products is complete and the seed is ready to enter dormancy.
Essentially, the genetically pre-programmed development and environmental re-sponses of the embryo and mother plant dictate maturity. It is only necessary to har-vest the mature seed at the proper time and treat it optimally after harvest.
However, this is not the case with somatic embryos. Scientists must dictate the timing and pro-tocol of every shift in hormones, media composition, water potential, photoperiod, and temperature. In somatic embryos, there is no period of quiescence which clearly demarcates maturation from readiness for germination in natural seed.
Tissue culture of somatic embryos of coniferous species has received heavy emphasis in recent years as a means of supplying genetically superior refores-tation stock.
A seed, or the contained embryo, is placed on a culture medium with 1 S appropriate mineral, vitamin and hormone nutrients. When initiation is successful, a gelatinous mass will form containing a multiplicity of immature embryos genetically identical to the parent embryo. This mass is then transferred to another medium, often reduced in hormone content, for maintenance and multiplication of the embryos.
The culture, or a portion of it, is again transferred to a growth or development medium where the embryos mature to a point where they morphologically resemble natural zygotic embryos. These embryos may then be placed on a germination medium where the resulting plantlets are allowed to grow until they can be transferred to soil.
Alternatively the embryos can be placed in manufactured seeds and be planted di-rectly in soil. U.S. Patent No. 5.036,007 to Gupta et al. is exemplary of the tissue culture methods used for coniferous species.
Unfortunately, tissue culture is known to be a highly unpredictable sci-ence. It is well accepted that there is a high level of unpredictability between and even within genera in morphological and biochemical development. This is particu-larly true comparing the angiosperms and gymnosperms. It has been shown many times that what might be true for alfalfa or soy beans is not necessarily true at all for pine or Douglas-fir trees. This applies even below the species level. A
culturing protocol that works well for one genotype may not be optimum for another genotype obtained from the same cone.
Appearance has heretofore been used as a criterion of maturity for so-matic embryos produced by tissue culture; i.e., if a somatic embryo looked like a ma-y tore zygotic embryo it was presumed to be mature. Unfortunately, this crude tool has proved to be highly undependable. The level of "storage products" has also received some attention as a maturity indicator. Storage products are generally defined as the protein, lipid, and carbohydrate materials needed to support the embryo during and immediately after germination. One group of workers has found that inducing an ex-aggerated level of triacylglycerides in conifer somatic embryos improves germination (Attree et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,464,769).
For many angiosperm species at least, it is now known that embryo biochemical maturity lags behind morphological maturity by a significant period of time. It is during this time interval, between morphological and biochemical maturity, that oligosaccharides of the raffinose series develop. As examples, G$recki et al.
(I997) and Obendorf (1997) discuss the importance of the oligosaccharides and note that certain cyclitols and galactosyl cyclitois appear to be formed in the time period between morphological and biochemical maturity. The presence of a protein group called dehydrins, generally formed after accumulation of storage products is cam-plete, is also an indicator of angiosperm readiness to germinate. Published application WO 98/48279, commonly assigned with the present one, describes a method of esti-mating maturity of conifer somatic embryos by analysis of their oligosaccharides.
Conifer seed, whether fulE sib seed from nurseries or seed gathered in the wild, will have all of the genetic diversity of the parent trees. , Some seeds will produce trees with more desirable characteristics than other seeds taken from the same cone. Tissue culture oilers a way to select the best trees before major plantings have been made in the forest. Embryos at the maintenance phase may be frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored white a small sample of the clone is further cultured and out-planted. After three to five years the characteristics of the clone are readily apparent and the decision can then be made whether or not to remove the remainder of the em-bryos from cryogenic storage for larger scale propagation.
USING SUGAR ALCOHOL CONTENT
S The present invention is directed to a method of determining bio-chemical maturity and readiness for harvest and subsequent germination of conifer embryos. The method is especially useful for the southern pine species and is appli-cable to determining both the optimum time of harvest for cones and the develop-mental maturity of somatic embryos produced by tissue culture.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Most reforestation is now done using seedlings grown in nurseries, if the Douglas-fir region of the Pacific Northwest or southern pine region of the South-eastern United States may be taken as examples. Most seed for the nurseries is pro-vided by seed orchards that, in some cases, are now a third generation of selected trees. Most of this orchard produced seed has been open pollinated and much of the pollen comes from wild trees located outside the orchard. For this reason, the maxi-mum genetic gain has not been reached. Some full sib seed is produced, in which both cone and pollen parents are known. However, this is in far too short supply and is much too expensive for any but very specialized applications. Some is effectively bulked up as nursery stock used for the production of rooted cuttings. While still in the early stages of commercial production of reforestation stock, selected seed may also be bulked up by tissue culture methods.
The optimum time to harvest cones for their contained seeds has al-ways been a problem in forest tree nurseries. Too early harvest will yield immature seed that may have poor germination or result in trees having less than the desired vigor. Too late harvest may result in significant seed loss from cones opening. In analogous fashion, it is always problematical when somatic embryos have obtained the maturity that will lead to good germination.
In seeds naturally grown on plants, "maturity" corresponds to the time when the seed dries and dehisces from the mother plant. This point in time may be assumed to represent the seed (zygotic) embryo biochemical maturity as well as mor-phological maturity. Morphological maturity may be defined as the time when cell division in the embryo ceases. Biochemical maturity is seen as the time when accu-mutation of storage products is complete and the seed is ready to enter dormancy.
Essentially, the genetically pre-programmed development and environmental re-sponses of the embryo and mother plant dictate maturity. It is only necessary to har-vest the mature seed at the proper time and treat it optimally after harvest.
However, this is not the case with somatic embryos. Scientists must dictate the timing and pro-tocol of every shift in hormones, media composition, water potential, photoperiod, and temperature. In somatic embryos, there is no period of quiescence which clearly demarcates maturation from readiness for germination in natural seed.
Tissue culture of somatic embryos of coniferous species has received heavy emphasis in recent years as a means of supplying genetically superior refores-tation stock.
A seed, or the contained embryo, is placed on a culture medium with 1 S appropriate mineral, vitamin and hormone nutrients. When initiation is successful, a gelatinous mass will form containing a multiplicity of immature embryos genetically identical to the parent embryo. This mass is then transferred to another medium, often reduced in hormone content, for maintenance and multiplication of the embryos.
The culture, or a portion of it, is again transferred to a growth or development medium where the embryos mature to a point where they morphologically resemble natural zygotic embryos. These embryos may then be placed on a germination medium where the resulting plantlets are allowed to grow until they can be transferred to soil.
Alternatively the embryos can be placed in manufactured seeds and be planted di-rectly in soil. U.S. Patent No. 5.036,007 to Gupta et al. is exemplary of the tissue culture methods used for coniferous species.
Unfortunately, tissue culture is known to be a highly unpredictable sci-ence. It is well accepted that there is a high level of unpredictability between and even within genera in morphological and biochemical development. This is particu-larly true comparing the angiosperms and gymnosperms. It has been shown many times that what might be true for alfalfa or soy beans is not necessarily true at all for pine or Douglas-fir trees. This applies even below the species level. A
culturing protocol that works well for one genotype may not be optimum for another genotype obtained from the same cone.
Appearance has heretofore been used as a criterion of maturity for so-matic embryos produced by tissue culture; i.e., if a somatic embryo looked like a ma-y tore zygotic embryo it was presumed to be mature. Unfortunately, this crude tool has proved to be highly undependable. The level of "storage products" has also received some attention as a maturity indicator. Storage products are generally defined as the protein, lipid, and carbohydrate materials needed to support the embryo during and immediately after germination. One group of workers has found that inducing an ex-aggerated level of triacylglycerides in conifer somatic embryos improves germination (Attree et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,464,769).
For many angiosperm species at least, it is now known that embryo biochemical maturity lags behind morphological maturity by a significant period of time. It is during this time interval, between morphological and biochemical maturity, that oligosaccharides of the raffinose series develop. As examples, G$recki et al.
(I997) and Obendorf (1997) discuss the importance of the oligosaccharides and note that certain cyclitols and galactosyl cyclitois appear to be formed in the time period between morphological and biochemical maturity. The presence of a protein group called dehydrins, generally formed after accumulation of storage products is cam-plete, is also an indicator of angiosperm readiness to germinate. Published application WO 98/48279, commonly assigned with the present one, describes a method of esti-mating maturity of conifer somatic embryos by analysis of their oligosaccharides.
Conifer seed, whether fulE sib seed from nurseries or seed gathered in the wild, will have all of the genetic diversity of the parent trees. , Some seeds will produce trees with more desirable characteristics than other seeds taken from the same cone. Tissue culture oilers a way to select the best trees before major plantings have been made in the forest. Embryos at the maintenance phase may be frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored white a small sample of the clone is further cultured and out-planted. After three to five years the characteristics of the clone are readily apparent and the decision can then be made whether or not to remove the remainder of the em-bryos from cryogenic storage for larger scale propagation.
The requirements of an embryo during maturation are completely dif ferent and virtually opposite to the requirements of an embryo during germination. In early and mid development, morphology is the outcome or result of changes that have taken place at the biochemical level. However, it does not reveal all of them, par-ticularly at the critical juncture between biochemical maturity and readiness to germi-nate. More precise biochemical tools to signal these changes would be extremely helpful to seed orchardists and to the scientists working with somatic embryogenesis.
In the case of the latter group, the availability of such tools would be of great value, both for determining readiness for germination and for developing culture medium protocols to optimally achieve such readiness. It would allow them to identify and develop needed protocol changes and the timing of their imposition.
The literature on the biochemistry of the late development period in small seed crops has noted the presence of sugar alcohols and presumed that they serve in the acquisition of desiccation tolerance. In the discussion that follows, litera-ture citations list only the lead author and date of publication. Full citations are given in the attached bibliography at the end of the specification.
Horbowicz et al. (1998) characterized a major soluble carbohydrate in buckwheat as O-oc-D-galactopyranosyl-(1-->2)-D-chiro-inositol or fagopyritol B1.
They suggest that accumulation of fagopyritol was associated with acquisition of desiccation tolerance during the latter part of seed development. D-chiro-inositol and myo-inositol were present throughout seed development but pinitol or other O-methylated inositols were not found at any time.
Obendorf et al. (1998) note that fagopyritol and galactopinitol accu-mulate in soybean axis tissues in parallel with stachyose accumulation, in association with the advent of desiccation tolerance. Phillipy (1998) notes various inositol de-rivatives in immature soybean tissue but does not discuss these in the context of em-bryo maturation. Peterbauer et al. ( 1998) note the synthesis of a galactosylcyclitol by stachyose synthase extracted from adzuki bean. Additionally, the enzyme catalyzed the galactinol-dependent synthesis of galactosylononitol from n-ononitol.
Murphy et al. (1998), in an analysis of the soluble sugars and hydrolytic enzymes in sugar pine embryos before and during germination, made no note of any sugar alcohols other than pinitol, which was present at a constant low level throughout their seed incuba-tion period. Kuo et al. (1997) identified pinitol as a major cyclitol in developing soy-bean. Pinitol was seen to decrease sharply as raffinose polysaccharides accumulated.
Gorecki et al. (1997) investigated cyclitols in lupine seeds during their period of maturation. They found n-pinitol, n-chiro-inositol, and myo-inositol, to be predomi-5 nant in the early stages of seed growth. During maturation raffinose family oligosac-charides accumulated as did the galactosyl cyclitols; e.g., fagopyritols and galac-topinitols. The increase of these latter compounds appeared to correlate with seed germinability after desiccation.
Chien et al. (1996) identified a galactopinitol in the late development stages of the seeds of leucaena seeds. Leucaena is a small leguminous tree and ap-pears to be the only tree seed which has been investigated for cyclitols.
Interestingly, the galactopinitol they found decreased during maturation while stachyose concentra-tion increased. Horbowicz et al. (1995) looked at the maturation of alfalfa seeds and somatic embryos. They note that during maturation and desiccation of somatic em-bryos, changes in soluble carbohydrates are similar to those of seeds, with the notable exception of the lack of pinitol and galactosyl pinitols in the somatic embryos. Hor-bowicz et al. (1994) studied carbohydrates in the axes, cotyledons, embryos, and seeds of 19 species in 7 families in regard to desiccation tolerance.
Considerable dif ferences were found. Legumes tended to accumulate stachyose series oligosaccha-rides whereas many other species accumulated galactosyl derivatives of cyclitols.
One species (castor bean) accumulated galactinol whereas buckwheat accumulated galacto-chiro-inositol (fagopyritol). The authors proposed that galactinol and galacto chiro-inositol functioned in the same manner as ramose in giving desiccation toler ance. The paper is a handy reference to the chemical structures of the various cycli tols.
Bernabe et al. (1993) detail a method used to identify the structure of ciceritol, a pseudotrisaccharide found in lentils. Kuo (1992) noted that galactinol (1-O-a.-n-galactopyranosyl-o-myo-inositol) is thought to be an essential intermediate in the biosynthesis of the raffinose series polysaccharides in plant tissues.
This paper describes a method for extracting reference quantities of galactinol from castor oil-seed meal. Baron (1970) studied the germination of sugar pine seeds. This early pa-per noted that during stratification, fat content decreased as did raffinose and stachyose. These oligosaccharides completely disappeared during germination.
The only cyclitol examined was myo-inositol which was found to increase as germination progressed.
Thus, it is seen that the literature regarding the biochemistry of the late development period has been essentially silent as to the presence and presumed function of the sugar alcohols in conifer seeds and/or embryos.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of determining the maturity of southern pine embryos which comprises: determining the content of sugar alcohols in the embryos, said alcohols including at least pinitol, D-chino-inositol, and fagopyritol B1; and noting the time in embryo development when the content of D-chino-inositol begins to decrease and fagopyritol has appeared, at which time the embryos are approaching biochemical maturity.
The embryos may be, for example, zygotic embryos in natural seeds or somatic embryos produced by tissue culture. The sugar alcohol content and composition may be used as an indicator, for example, of optimum time for cone harvest or readiness for germination.
The present invention is a method for determining biochemical maturity of embryos of plants within the botanical order Coniferales. It is particularly pertinent to embryos of trees within the genus Pious and most especially pertinent to the four species and their inter-hybrids known as the southern yellow pines. The method is based on determination of simple or complex cyclic sugar alcohols or cyclitols (polyhydroxy cyclohexanes and their derivatives) in conifer embryos.
This may be done using the techniques of high pressure liquid chromatography and gas chromatography. It has been determined for zygotic embryos of loblolly pine (Pious taeda L.), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco), and white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench.) Voss) that these cyclitols are formed during mid development as well as in the time period between morphological maturity and biochemical maturity. The belief is that the cyclitols act in concert with certain oligosaccharides developed late in the maturation process to provide desiccation protection to the embryos. It is possible that in some cases they may be essential for germination.
One would by analogy expect the same cyclitols to be critically important in somatic embryos to assure normal germination and this appears to be the case.
It has been found in loblolly pine (Pious taeda L.) that three sugar alcohols are particularly important. These have been found to form a progression in abundance as maturation occurs.
Pinitol is initially present in the early stages of maturation. Later, D-chino-inositol becomes the prominent alcohol. As biochemical maturity is closely approached, D-chino-inositol decreases and fagopyritol B 1 appears for the first time in significant quantity.
Fagopyritol ultimately becomes the dominant sugar alcohol. The knowledge of this progression is a useful tool for estimating biochemical maturity of embryos.
In the case of the latter group, the availability of such tools would be of great value, both for determining readiness for germination and for developing culture medium protocols to optimally achieve such readiness. It would allow them to identify and develop needed protocol changes and the timing of their imposition.
The literature on the biochemistry of the late development period in small seed crops has noted the presence of sugar alcohols and presumed that they serve in the acquisition of desiccation tolerance. In the discussion that follows, litera-ture citations list only the lead author and date of publication. Full citations are given in the attached bibliography at the end of the specification.
Horbowicz et al. (1998) characterized a major soluble carbohydrate in buckwheat as O-oc-D-galactopyranosyl-(1-->2)-D-chiro-inositol or fagopyritol B1.
They suggest that accumulation of fagopyritol was associated with acquisition of desiccation tolerance during the latter part of seed development. D-chiro-inositol and myo-inositol were present throughout seed development but pinitol or other O-methylated inositols were not found at any time.
Obendorf et al. (1998) note that fagopyritol and galactopinitol accu-mulate in soybean axis tissues in parallel with stachyose accumulation, in association with the advent of desiccation tolerance. Phillipy (1998) notes various inositol de-rivatives in immature soybean tissue but does not discuss these in the context of em-bryo maturation. Peterbauer et al. ( 1998) note the synthesis of a galactosylcyclitol by stachyose synthase extracted from adzuki bean. Additionally, the enzyme catalyzed the galactinol-dependent synthesis of galactosylononitol from n-ononitol.
Murphy et al. (1998), in an analysis of the soluble sugars and hydrolytic enzymes in sugar pine embryos before and during germination, made no note of any sugar alcohols other than pinitol, which was present at a constant low level throughout their seed incuba-tion period. Kuo et al. (1997) identified pinitol as a major cyclitol in developing soy-bean. Pinitol was seen to decrease sharply as raffinose polysaccharides accumulated.
Gorecki et al. (1997) investigated cyclitols in lupine seeds during their period of maturation. They found n-pinitol, n-chiro-inositol, and myo-inositol, to be predomi-5 nant in the early stages of seed growth. During maturation raffinose family oligosac-charides accumulated as did the galactosyl cyclitols; e.g., fagopyritols and galac-topinitols. The increase of these latter compounds appeared to correlate with seed germinability after desiccation.
Chien et al. (1996) identified a galactopinitol in the late development stages of the seeds of leucaena seeds. Leucaena is a small leguminous tree and ap-pears to be the only tree seed which has been investigated for cyclitols.
Interestingly, the galactopinitol they found decreased during maturation while stachyose concentra-tion increased. Horbowicz et al. (1995) looked at the maturation of alfalfa seeds and somatic embryos. They note that during maturation and desiccation of somatic em-bryos, changes in soluble carbohydrates are similar to those of seeds, with the notable exception of the lack of pinitol and galactosyl pinitols in the somatic embryos. Hor-bowicz et al. (1994) studied carbohydrates in the axes, cotyledons, embryos, and seeds of 19 species in 7 families in regard to desiccation tolerance.
Considerable dif ferences were found. Legumes tended to accumulate stachyose series oligosaccha-rides whereas many other species accumulated galactosyl derivatives of cyclitols.
One species (castor bean) accumulated galactinol whereas buckwheat accumulated galacto-chiro-inositol (fagopyritol). The authors proposed that galactinol and galacto chiro-inositol functioned in the same manner as ramose in giving desiccation toler ance. The paper is a handy reference to the chemical structures of the various cycli tols.
Bernabe et al. (1993) detail a method used to identify the structure of ciceritol, a pseudotrisaccharide found in lentils. Kuo (1992) noted that galactinol (1-O-a.-n-galactopyranosyl-o-myo-inositol) is thought to be an essential intermediate in the biosynthesis of the raffinose series polysaccharides in plant tissues.
This paper describes a method for extracting reference quantities of galactinol from castor oil-seed meal. Baron (1970) studied the germination of sugar pine seeds. This early pa-per noted that during stratification, fat content decreased as did raffinose and stachyose. These oligosaccharides completely disappeared during germination.
The only cyclitol examined was myo-inositol which was found to increase as germination progressed.
Thus, it is seen that the literature regarding the biochemistry of the late development period has been essentially silent as to the presence and presumed function of the sugar alcohols in conifer seeds and/or embryos.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of determining the maturity of southern pine embryos which comprises: determining the content of sugar alcohols in the embryos, said alcohols including at least pinitol, D-chino-inositol, and fagopyritol B1; and noting the time in embryo development when the content of D-chino-inositol begins to decrease and fagopyritol has appeared, at which time the embryos are approaching biochemical maturity.
The embryos may be, for example, zygotic embryos in natural seeds or somatic embryos produced by tissue culture. The sugar alcohol content and composition may be used as an indicator, for example, of optimum time for cone harvest or readiness for germination.
The present invention is a method for determining biochemical maturity of embryos of plants within the botanical order Coniferales. It is particularly pertinent to embryos of trees within the genus Pious and most especially pertinent to the four species and their inter-hybrids known as the southern yellow pines. The method is based on determination of simple or complex cyclic sugar alcohols or cyclitols (polyhydroxy cyclohexanes and their derivatives) in conifer embryos.
This may be done using the techniques of high pressure liquid chromatography and gas chromatography. It has been determined for zygotic embryos of loblolly pine (Pious taeda L.), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco), and white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench.) Voss) that these cyclitols are formed during mid development as well as in the time period between morphological maturity and biochemical maturity. The belief is that the cyclitols act in concert with certain oligosaccharides developed late in the maturation process to provide desiccation protection to the embryos. It is possible that in some cases they may be essential for germination.
One would by analogy expect the same cyclitols to be critically important in somatic embryos to assure normal germination and this appears to be the case.
It has been found in loblolly pine (Pious taeda L.) that three sugar alcohols are particularly important. These have been found to form a progression in abundance as maturation occurs.
Pinitol is initially present in the early stages of maturation. Later, D-chino-inositol becomes the prominent alcohol. As biochemical maturity is closely approached, D-chino-inositol decreases and fagopyritol B 1 appears for the first time in significant quantity.
Fagopyritol ultimately becomes the dominant sugar alcohol. The knowledge of this progression is a useful tool for estimating biochemical maturity of embryos.
It has been found that oligosaccharides of the raffinose series are also important markers of maturity. However, unlike the sugar alcohols these oligosaccha-rides appear quite abruptly at biochemical maturity and do not appear during early or mid development. For this reason, the sugar alcohols are more informative of the em-bryo development over time leading to biochemical maturity.
The present invention is further directed to conifer somatic embryos containing detectable and significant amounts of selected cyclitols.
It is an object of the invention to provide a method for determining biochemical maturity of conifer embryos It is yet an object to provide a method that may be used as a guide for determining cone harvest times.
It is a further object to provide a method that may be used to determine biochemical maturity of somatic embryos.
It is also an object to provide biochemically mature somatic embryos that are ready for germination.
These and many other objects will become readily apparent upon reading the following detailed description.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF
THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Analysis of the samples was carried out using the following proce-dures. Extracts of mature seeds of loblolly pine were examined by a high pressure liquid chromatographic (HPLC) technique known as anion exchange chromatography and described as follows. Where specific suppliers are noted this should not be con-sidered an endorsement of their products since equally suitable products may be available from other vendors.
The column used for determining sugar alcohols was the Dionex Car-boPac MA-1 (P/N 44066) (Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale CA). This is a 4 X 250 mm 7.S~m particle size column with 15% crosslinking of a latex substrate functionalized with an alkyl quaternary ammonium group. The guard column (P/N 44067) of the same material is 4 X SO mm. A Dionex MFC-1 iminodiacetate functionalized column to remove metal ions was in line before the guard column and the linked set is treated g as a single unit. A Dionex anion trap column ATC-1, 9 X 24 mm was installed before the Waters U6K manual injector (Waters Corp., Milford MA) to remove carbonate before injection.
Sugar alcohols were eluted with a gradient system of two Waters 510 pumps controlled by the Waters Millenium chromatography system version 2.15.
Post column addition of NaOH was done with a Scientific Systems, Inc., State Col-lege PA, Model 350 self flushing pump with an internal mixing column. The S10A
pump uses 100% ultrapure water.
Solvent addition (SSI) NaOH and S lOB NaOH were 500 mmolal. Sol-vents were degassed and sparged with helium. Water was weighed and sparged for at least 20 minutes to minimize possible exposure of the NaOH solution to C02.
The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min for the 510 gradient system and the SSI
pump. The gradient was as follows:
Table 1 Ste Time, min %A HZO %B 500 mM NaOH Curve Form 1 0 95 5 Initial 2 8 95 S Initial 3 23 0 100 Linear 4 37 0 100 Ste 5 40 95 5 Linear 6 75 95 5 Ste The detector was a Waters Pulsed Amperometric Detector with a gold working electrode and a base-resistant reference electrode. Pulse time settings were T1 = 0.216 sec, T2 = 0.216 sec, and T3' = 0.299 sec. The voltage El was determined daily by a volt ammogram scan of pamps vs mvolts over a range of +700 mV to -mV. It ranged from 120 to 150 mV. The other two voltages are calculated from E1, where E2 = El + 650 mV, and E3 = E1 - 650 mV. Data were collected at the 10 pamp scale for analytical work and at 50 or 100 pamp for preparative work.
Sugar alcohol stock solutions used as standards were 25 mM. Working standards were prepared at 250 pM, 83.33 pM and 25 pM. For both standards and samples 50 pL was injected with a syringe made for use with the Waters U6K
manual injector. Average retention times are listed below. Quantitation is by area except for pinitol and myo-inositol which are quantitated by height because of the close elution time.
Table 2 MA-1 Retention Times Com onent Retention Time, min n- initol 13.6 m o-inositol 14.7 sc llo-inositol 16.2 n-chiro-inositol 22.6 ~-chiro-inositol 22.6 a i-inositol 22.8 allo-inositol 39.5 fa o ritol B 1 40.2 muco-inositol 44.6 1 cerol 13.0 alactinol 22. 8 sorbitol 33.6 dulcitol 34.0 Preparative chromatography was preformed when individual peaks were isolated for further analysis. Pooled fractions were desalted with a mixed bed ion exchange resin. Desalted volume was reduced to near dryness under vacuum and transferred to vials for further analysis by nuclear magnetic resonance (I~1MR), or hy-drolysis and reanalysis of the breakdown products by HPLC.
No standard for fagopyritol B 1 was available from the usual sources.
Therefore, a standard was prepared from buckwheat seeds (e.g., see Horbowicz et al.
1 S 1998). The seeds still retaining their seed coat were ground and extracted with 80%
ethanol. The extract was subjected to HPLC and the material eluting as a 40.2 minute peak was subjected to NMR for confirmation of structure. An aliquot of the sample was enzymatically hydrolyzed with a-galactosidase and the product again analyzed by HPLC. The 40.2 minute peak had disappeared and new peaks representing n-galactose and n-chiro-inositol were present, further confirming structure of the ref erence sample.
Fagopyritol B 1 from the HPLC chromatogram of pine embryos was positively identified as follows. A 1.75 N solution of trifluoroacetic acid was pre-y pared. The HPLC fraction was reduced to dryness under vacuum and taken up in mL of H20. A 1 mL portion was removed for NMR, 50 pL of which was analyzed by HPLC as a control. The other 1 mL was dried under a stream of nitrogen at 70°C. A
1 mL aliquot of trifluoroacetic acid solution was added to the dried sample and vor-texed. It was then hydrolyzed at 70°C. After hydrolysis the material was again dried 10 under nitrogen and 1 mL water added. The resulting sample was analyzed by HPLC.
The fagopyritol B 1 peak had been replaced by peaks representing galactose and D-chiro-inositol.
As a confirmatory analysis, 100 pL of deionized concentrated putative fagopyritol B 1 fractions were incubated with 200 pL of dialyzed a-galactosidase overnight in a water bath maintained at 37°C. All samples were adjusted to a final volume of 1 mL and analyzed by HPLC. Again, the fagopyritol B1 peak had disap peared and peaks representing galactose and n-chiro-inositol were prominent.
To as certain activity of the enzyme a S mM stock solution of galactinol and 25 pL
from buckwheat samples were treated in the same manner. Additional confirmation of the structure was made by nuclear magnetic resonance.
Loblolly Pine Culture The following schedule of treatments has been very successfully used for the growth of plantlets by somatic embryogenesis of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Explants were the female gametophytes containing the zygotic embryos which had been removed from seeds 4 to 5 weeks after fertilization. The seed coat was re-moved but the embryo was not further dissected out of the surrounding gametophyte other than to excise the nucellar end. Seeds were obtained from cones supplied by a Weyerhaeuser Company seed orchard located at Washington, North Carolina. The cones were stored at 4°C until used. Immediately before removal of the immature embryos the seeds were sterilized using an initial washing and detergent treatment followed by a 10 minute sterilization in 15% H2O2. The explants were thoroughly washed with sterile distilled water after each treatment. Tables 3 and 4 give media compositions for loblolly pine embryogenesis.
Table 3 Pinus taeda Basal Medium (Modified 1/2 P6 Basal Salts*) Constituent Concentration, m~/L
NH4N03 150.0 KN03 909.9 KH2P04 13 6.1 Ca(N03 )2 . 4H20 23 6.2 CaC12.4H20 50.0 MgS 04 . 7H20 246. S
Mg(N03)2 . 6H20 256. 5 MgC 12 . 6H20 50.0 KI 4.15 H3B03 15.5 MnS04 . H20 10.5 ZnS04 . 7H20 14.4 NaMo04 . 2H20 0.12 S
CuS04 . 5H20 0.125 CoC 12 . 6H20 0.125 FeS04 . 7H20 13 .9 Na2EDTA 18.65 Maltose 20,000.-30,000.
myo-Inositol 100.
Casamino acids 500.
L-Glutamine ~ 1000.
Thiamine . HCI 1.00 Pyridoxine . HCI 0.50 Nicotinic acid 0.50 Glycine 2.00 Gelrite+ 200.
pH adjusted to 5.7 * According to Teasdale, Dawson,Woolhouse (1986) as and modified + Used if a solid medium is desired Table 4 Composition of Media for Different Stage Treatments BMl -- Induction Medium BM + 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (15 pM) + kinetin (KIN) (2 pM) + N6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) (2 pM) BM2 -- Maintenance and Multiplication Medium BM + 2,4-D (5 pM) + KIN (0.5 ~M) + BAP (0.5 pM) + 4900 mg/L
additional myo-inositol. Gelrite is added when a solid medium is desired.
BM3 -- Cotyledonary Embryo Development Medium BM + 50-100 mg/L abscisic acid (ABA) + 18% PEG 4000 & 8000 mixture + 2-2.5% maltose + 900 mg/L additional myo-inositol + 1000 mg/L gluta-mine + 0.125% activated charcoal. No gellant. The following amino acid mixture is added: L-proline - 100 mg/L, L-asparagine - 100 mg/L, r.- arginine - SO mg/L, L-alanine 20 mg/L, and ~-serine - 20 mg/L.
BM4 -- Germination Medium BM modified by replacing maltose with sucrose at 20,000 mg/L, myo-inositol to 100.0 mg/L, glutamine and casamino acids are omitted + 0.2%
Gelrite and 0.25% activated charcoal.
Stage I - Induction Sterile gametophytes with intact embryos were placed on a solid BM1 culture medium and held in an environment at 22°-25°C with a 24 hour dark photoperiod for a time of 3-5 weeks. The length of time depended on the particular genotype being cultured. At the end of this time a white mucilagenous mass had formed in association with the original explants. This appears to be identi-cal with that described by Gupta and Durzan (1987). Microscopic examination re-vealed numerous early stage embryos associated with the mass. These are generally characterized as having a long thin walled suspensor associated with a small head with dense cytoplasm and large nuclei. Osmolality of the induction medium may in some instances be as high as 170 mM/kg. Normally it will be about 160 mM/kg or even lower. The osmolality of the medium described above was 150 mM/kg.
Stake II - Maintenance and Multiplication Early stage embryos re-moved from the masses generated in the induction stage were first placed on a gelled maintenance and multiplication medium. This differs from the induction me-dium in that the growth hormones (both auxins and cytokinins) were reduced by at least a full order of magnitude. Osmolality of this medium will typically be raised from that of the induction medium to about 180 mM/kg or higher by increasing the concentration of myo-inositol to 0.5% w/v. The temperature and photoperiod were again 22°-25°C with 24 hours in the dark. Embryos were cultured for 12-14 days on BM2 solid medium before transferring to a liquid medium for further subculturing.
This liquid medium was of similar composition but lacked the gellant. The embryos at the end of the solid maintenance stage were similar in appearance to those from Stage I. After 5 to 6 weekly subcultures on the liquid maintenance medium advanced early stage embryos had formed. These are characterized by smooth embryonal heads estimated to have over 100 individual cells with multiple suspensors.
Osmotic potential of the maintenance media should typically fall within the range of about 180-400 mM/kg for Pinus taeda. Most typically the main-tenance media should be in the neighborhood of about 1.5 times higher in osmotic potential than the induction or multiplication media. As was noted earlier, the re-quirements for elevation of osmotic potential at this stage will vary for different spe-cies and may vary somewhat for differing genotypes within a given species.
Stage III - Embryo Development The advanced early stage embryos from Stage II culture were transferred to a filter paper support placed on a pad satu-rated with liquid development medium. This medium either lacks growth hormones entirely or has them present only at very low levels. However, here abscisic acid (5-( 1-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-4-oxo-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)-3-methyl-2,4-pentadienoic acid) (ABA) may be a necessary material for further development. As was noted ear Tier, the inclusion of an adsorbent material in this medium is highly advantageous.
The adsorbent may be chosen from a number of chemical materials having extremely high surface area and/or controlled pore size such as activated charcoal, soluble and insoluble forms of polyvinyl pyrrolidone), activated alumina, silica gel, molecular sieves, etc. The adsorbent will normally be present in a concentration of about 0.1-S
g/L, more generally about 0.25-2.5 g/L. Development time is generally 8-14 weeks in the dark. At the end of this period the cotyledonary embryos are 2-3 mm long and closely resemble mature zygotic embryos in morphology.
Stage IV - Drying The embryos still on their filter paper support are lifted from the pad and placed in a closed container over a saturated solution of K2SOa, at a relative humidity of 97%, for a period of three weeks.
Stage V - Germination The dried cotyledonary embryos from Stage IV were rehydrated by placing them, while still on the filter paper support, for about 24 hours on a pad saturated with liquid germination medium. The embryos were then placed individually on solid BM4 medium for germination. This is a basal medium lacking growth hormones which has been modified by substituting sucrose for mal-tose and eliminating organic nitrogen. After about 6-8 weeks under environmental conditions of 23°-25°C and a 16 hour light - 8 hour dark photoperiod, the resulting plantlets were approximately 20 mm in length and had a well developed radicle and hypocotyl and green cotyledonary structure and epicotyl. Alternatively, the cotyle-donary embryos may be made into artificial seeds.
Because of the reduced carbohydrate concentration, the osmotic po-tential of the germination medium is further reduced below that of the development medium. It will normally be below about 150 mM/kg and was, in the present exam-ple, about 100 mM/kg.
Stage VI - Conversion Plantlets from Stage V were removed from the germination medium and planted in a soil composed of equal parts of peat and fine perlite. Rooting percentage was excellent and the resulting plants showed good growth and vigor.
Example 1 Determination of Biochemical Maturity in Loblolly Pine Loblolly pine cones were picked from a seed orchard in Arkansas on August 20, October 3, and October 17. The last date was believed by conventional criteria to represent full biochemical maturity of the cones and was during the time of cone harvest time for seed. Cones were immediately packed in an iced cooler for transport to the laboratory. Within 24 hours the cones had been opened, the seeds re-moved, and embryos dissected from the seeds. The embryos were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen until they could be analyzed.
5 Embryos were then extracted for determination of sugar alcohols by the method described earlier. Extraction was generally by the method described by Handley et al. (1983) using 80% ethanol. Briefly, the method involves grinding the embryos in 80% ethanol and heating at 70°C for 10 minutes. The sample was centri-fuged and the supernatant reserved. The solids remaining were resuspended in 80%
10 ethanol and frozen at -10°C for at least 30 minutes to ensure that all cell membranes had been ruptured. The tissue was again reground, heated, and centrifuged as before and the supernatant combined with that obtained earlier. To the pooled supernatants was added 5 pL of 14C glucose (2.2 X 106 dpm). Duplicate 10 pL samples were counted in a scintillation counter. The remaining supernatant was evaporated to dry-15 ness under vacuum at 35°-40°C. After cooling, the dried sample was washed with several mL of ethyl ether to remove lipids and color bodies. The sample was then dissolved in 0.5-1.0 mL of ultrapure water. A duplicate 10 pL sample was again counted for radioactivity. The sample was then used for HPLC separation of the sugar alcohols. Results of the determinations are given in Table 5 which follows.
Table 5 Sugar Alcohols in Lobloll3r Pine Zygotic Embr ~~os Harvest Date- August October October Pinitol, nM/emb o 65.9 9.1 3.8 Pinitol, nM/m * d wei ht 73.4 5.3 2.0 M o-inositol, nM/emb o 21.4 10.1 5.7 M o-inositol, nM/m d wei 23.9 5.9 3.0 ht n-chiro-inositol, nM/emb 18.6 53.0 30.0 o n-chiro-inositol, nM/m d 20.7 31.1 16.2 wei ht Fa o itol B1, nM/emb o 0.8 20.4 38.9 Fa o ritol B 1, nM/m d wei 0.9 12.0 21.0 ht *nanomoles per milligram _..
At the initial harvest date of August 20 the seed embryos had attained full morphological maturity. They did not change in morphology for the duration of the sampling period. However, it is immediately evident that they underwent major biochemical changes in the almost two months between the initial and final harvests.
In August only a trace amount of fagopyritol B 1 was present. Pinitol was the pre-dominant alcohol with myo-inositol and n-chiro-inositol in significant and about equal amounts. By early October pinitol had dropped to a relatively low level and myo-inositol had dropped to about 40% of the August value. However, n-chiro-inositol had peaked sharply and B1-fagopyritol was present in a significant amount. At the latter October date, just before seed drop, pinitol and myo-inositol had fallen to low levels, D-chiro-inositol had dropped to about half of its value two weeks earlier and B 1-fagopyritol had doubled in amount.
It is evident from the above data that development of seed maturity can be closely followed and predicted by sugar alcohol analysis even though there is no visible change in embryo morphology.
Example 2 Effect of Differing Culture Media on Loblolly Pine Somatic Embryo Sugar Alcohols Loblolly pine somatic embryos were cultured as described earlier in the tissue culture procedure. However one sample was obtained from embryos cul-tured in a development medium containing 50 mg/L abscisic acid (ABA) and another from embryos in a development medium containing 10 mg/L ABA and 7.5 mg/L
giberellic acid (GA4i7). The embryos were removed directly from the development medium and analyzed as before for sugar alcohols. Results are seen in following Ta-ble 6.
Table 6 Sugar Alcohols in Loblolly Pine Somatic Embryos Genot a 7 7 5 5 Culture Medium ABA ABA/GA4n ABA ABA/GA4r7 Pinitol, nM/emb o Ne 1i Ne 1i ibleNe 1i Ne 1i ible ible ible M o-inositol, nM/emb 3.0 12.0 5.1 7.4 o M o-inositol, nM/m d 18.3 56.8 26.0 32.0 wei ht n-chiro-inositol, nM/emb23.3 61.6 24.1 29.2 o n-chiro-inositol, nM/m 143.8 271.3 122.0 127.0 d wt.
Fa o ritol B 1 nM/emb Trace Trace ? Trace Trace o ? ? ?
The above results on pooled samples of 40 embryos in the case of genotype 7 and 10 for genotype 5 show that determination of the sugar alcohol types and levels are an effective method for discriminating between culturing regimens.
Genotype 5 is known to be more recalcitrant towards germination than genotype 7.
Example 3 Determination of Biochemical Maturity in Loblolly Pine Somatic Embryos Embryos from two genotypes of loblolly pine were cultured as de-scribed earlier. Samples of embryos that appeared to be morphologically mature were harvested from the Stage III embryo development medium approximately 12 and 15 weeks after plating the early stage embryo culture. Replicate samples were taken from different culture plates and 10 embryos from each culture were pooled.
The embyos were treated and prepared for HPLC analysis as described for the seed em-bryos. Sugar alcohol levels were as found in Table 7 which follows.
Table 7 Sugar Alcohols in Lobloll~Pine Somatic Embryos Culture Time, weeks 12 15 Pinitol, nMlemb o Ne 1i ibleNe 1i ible M o-inositol, nM/emb o 58.2 ---D-chiro-inositol, nM/emb 23.5 50.5 o Fa o itol B1, nM/emb o Ne 1i ibleNe 1i ible * Sample contaminated Considerable dii~erence is seen between this sample of somatic em-bryos and the zygotic embryos of Example 1 in the content and distribution of the sugar alcohols. The additional three weeks on the medium increased D-chiro-inositol but no pinitol or fagopyritol Blwas present in either sample.
Embryos of the same genotype as above were cultured for 12 weeks in similar manner to those just described. However, they were then lifted from the de-velopment medium on their filter paper support and placed in a closed dish over satu-rated K2SOa solution for three weeks. At room temperature this created a 97%
rela-tive humidity environment and resulted in slow, partial desiccation of the embryos.
This treatment has been found from experience to be almost essential for ensuring good germination. Again, sugar alcohols present were determined by HPLC
analysis with the following results seen in Table 8.
Table 8 Sugar Alcohols in Partials Desiccated Somatic Embryos Sam 1e No. 1 2 D-chiro-inositol, nM/emb 32.6 39.9 o n-chiro-inositol, nM/m d 74.1 90.7 wei ht Fa o ritol B 1, nM/emb o 2.8 4.1 Fa o ritol B 1, nMlm d wei 6.4 9.3 ht While levels of fagopyritol B 1 did not reach those present in mature zygotic embryos, it is important that it did appear during the partial desiccation. Since the partial desiccation appears necessary for good germination, it may be regarded as a good indication that the presence of fagopyritol B1 loblolly pine somatic embryos is also essential.
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that many variations of the present invention not described in the examples can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. Thus, the invention should be regarded as limited only as it is defined in the appended claims.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Attree, S. M. and L. C. Fowke 1995 Desiccated conifer somatic embryos. U. S. Patent No. 5,464,769.
Baron, Frank J.
1970 Metabolic patterns in dormant and germinating seeds of sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana, Dougl.). In Advancing Frontiers of Plant Sciences, Lokesh Chandra ed., 24: 47-63.
Bernabe, M., R. Fenwick, J. Frias, J. Jimenez-Barbero, K. Price, S. Valverde, and C.
Vidal-Valverde 1993 Determination, by NMR spectroscopy, of the structure of ciceritol, a pseudo-trisaccharide isolated from lentils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chem-istry 41: 870-872.
Chien, C.-T., T.-P. Lin, C.-G. Jou, and G.-R. Her 1996 Occurrence of a novel galactopinitol and its changes with other non-reducing sugars during development of Leucaena leucocephala seeds. Plant Cell Physiodo~ 37: 539-544.
Gorecki, R. J., A. I. Piotrowicz-Cieslak, L. B. Lahuta, and R. L. Obendorf 1997 Soluble carbohydrates in desiccation tolerance of yellow lupin seeds during maturation and germination. Seed Science Research 7: 107-115.
Gupta, P. K. and D. J. Durzan .
1987 Biotechnology of somatic polyembryogenesis and plantlet regeneration in loblolly pine. BiolTechnology 5: 147-151.
Gupta, P. K. and G. S. Pullman 1991 Method for reproducing coniferous plants by somatic embryogenesis using abscisic acid and osmotic potential variation. U. S. Patent No. 5,036,007.
Handley, L. W., L. W. Pharr, and R. F. McFeeters 1983 Relationship between galactinol synthase activity and sugar compositions of 5 leaves and seeds of several crop species. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 108(4): 600-605.
Horbowicz, M., P. Brenac, and R. L. Obendorf 1998 Fagopyritol B 1, O-oc-n-galactopyranosyl-(1 ~ 2)-n-chiro-inositol, a galactosyl cyclitol in maturing buckwheat seeds associated with desiccation tolerance.
10 Planta 205: 1-11.
Horbowicz, M. and R. L. Obendorf 1994 Seed desiccation tolerance and stability: Dependence on flatulence-producing oligosaccharides and cyclitols-review and survey. Seed Science Research 4: 385-405.
15 Horbowicz, M., R. L. Obendorf, B. D. McKersie, and D. R. Viands 1995 Soluble saccharides and cyclitols in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) somatic em-bryos, leaflets, and mature seeds. Plant Science 109: 191-198.
Kuo, T. M.
1992 Isolation and identification of galactinol from castor oilseed meal.
Journal of 20 the American Oil Chemists Society 69: 569-574.
Kuo, T. M., C. A. Lowell, and T. M. Nelsen 1997 Occurrence of pinitol in developing soybean seed tissues. Phytochemistry 45:
29-3 5.
Murphy, J. B. and M. F. Hammer 1998 Respiration and soluble sugar metabolism in sugar pine embryos. Physiolo-gia Plantarum 74: 95-100.
Obendorf, R. L.
1997 Oligosaccharides and galactosyl cyclitols in seed desiccation tolerance (Re-view Update). Seed Science Research 7: 63-74.
_30 Obendorf, R. L., M. Horbowicz, A. M. Dickerman, P. Brenac, and M. E. Smith 1998 Soluble oligosaccharides and galactosyl cyclitols in maturing soybean seeds In planta and In vitro. Crop Science 38: 78-84.
Peterbauer, T. and A. Richter 1998 Galactosylononitol and stachyose synthesis in seeds of adzuki bean. Plant Physiology 117: 165-172.
Phillippy, Brian Q.
1998 Identification of inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate 5-kinase and inositol 1,3,4,5 tetrakisphosphate 6-kinase in immature soybean seeds. Plant Physiology 116: 291-297.
Teasdale, R. D., P. A. Dawson, and H. W. Woolhouse 1986 Mineral nutrient requirements of loblolly pine. (Pinus taeda cell suspension culture). Plant Physiology 82: 942-945.
The present invention is further directed to conifer somatic embryos containing detectable and significant amounts of selected cyclitols.
It is an object of the invention to provide a method for determining biochemical maturity of conifer embryos It is yet an object to provide a method that may be used as a guide for determining cone harvest times.
It is a further object to provide a method that may be used to determine biochemical maturity of somatic embryos.
It is also an object to provide biochemically mature somatic embryos that are ready for germination.
These and many other objects will become readily apparent upon reading the following detailed description.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF
THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Analysis of the samples was carried out using the following proce-dures. Extracts of mature seeds of loblolly pine were examined by a high pressure liquid chromatographic (HPLC) technique known as anion exchange chromatography and described as follows. Where specific suppliers are noted this should not be con-sidered an endorsement of their products since equally suitable products may be available from other vendors.
The column used for determining sugar alcohols was the Dionex Car-boPac MA-1 (P/N 44066) (Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale CA). This is a 4 X 250 mm 7.S~m particle size column with 15% crosslinking of a latex substrate functionalized with an alkyl quaternary ammonium group. The guard column (P/N 44067) of the same material is 4 X SO mm. A Dionex MFC-1 iminodiacetate functionalized column to remove metal ions was in line before the guard column and the linked set is treated g as a single unit. A Dionex anion trap column ATC-1, 9 X 24 mm was installed before the Waters U6K manual injector (Waters Corp., Milford MA) to remove carbonate before injection.
Sugar alcohols were eluted with a gradient system of two Waters 510 pumps controlled by the Waters Millenium chromatography system version 2.15.
Post column addition of NaOH was done with a Scientific Systems, Inc., State Col-lege PA, Model 350 self flushing pump with an internal mixing column. The S10A
pump uses 100% ultrapure water.
Solvent addition (SSI) NaOH and S lOB NaOH were 500 mmolal. Sol-vents were degassed and sparged with helium. Water was weighed and sparged for at least 20 minutes to minimize possible exposure of the NaOH solution to C02.
The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min for the 510 gradient system and the SSI
pump. The gradient was as follows:
Table 1 Ste Time, min %A HZO %B 500 mM NaOH Curve Form 1 0 95 5 Initial 2 8 95 S Initial 3 23 0 100 Linear 4 37 0 100 Ste 5 40 95 5 Linear 6 75 95 5 Ste The detector was a Waters Pulsed Amperometric Detector with a gold working electrode and a base-resistant reference electrode. Pulse time settings were T1 = 0.216 sec, T2 = 0.216 sec, and T3' = 0.299 sec. The voltage El was determined daily by a volt ammogram scan of pamps vs mvolts over a range of +700 mV to -mV. It ranged from 120 to 150 mV. The other two voltages are calculated from E1, where E2 = El + 650 mV, and E3 = E1 - 650 mV. Data were collected at the 10 pamp scale for analytical work and at 50 or 100 pamp for preparative work.
Sugar alcohol stock solutions used as standards were 25 mM. Working standards were prepared at 250 pM, 83.33 pM and 25 pM. For both standards and samples 50 pL was injected with a syringe made for use with the Waters U6K
manual injector. Average retention times are listed below. Quantitation is by area except for pinitol and myo-inositol which are quantitated by height because of the close elution time.
Table 2 MA-1 Retention Times Com onent Retention Time, min n- initol 13.6 m o-inositol 14.7 sc llo-inositol 16.2 n-chiro-inositol 22.6 ~-chiro-inositol 22.6 a i-inositol 22.8 allo-inositol 39.5 fa o ritol B 1 40.2 muco-inositol 44.6 1 cerol 13.0 alactinol 22. 8 sorbitol 33.6 dulcitol 34.0 Preparative chromatography was preformed when individual peaks were isolated for further analysis. Pooled fractions were desalted with a mixed bed ion exchange resin. Desalted volume was reduced to near dryness under vacuum and transferred to vials for further analysis by nuclear magnetic resonance (I~1MR), or hy-drolysis and reanalysis of the breakdown products by HPLC.
No standard for fagopyritol B 1 was available from the usual sources.
Therefore, a standard was prepared from buckwheat seeds (e.g., see Horbowicz et al.
1 S 1998). The seeds still retaining their seed coat were ground and extracted with 80%
ethanol. The extract was subjected to HPLC and the material eluting as a 40.2 minute peak was subjected to NMR for confirmation of structure. An aliquot of the sample was enzymatically hydrolyzed with a-galactosidase and the product again analyzed by HPLC. The 40.2 minute peak had disappeared and new peaks representing n-galactose and n-chiro-inositol were present, further confirming structure of the ref erence sample.
Fagopyritol B 1 from the HPLC chromatogram of pine embryos was positively identified as follows. A 1.75 N solution of trifluoroacetic acid was pre-y pared. The HPLC fraction was reduced to dryness under vacuum and taken up in mL of H20. A 1 mL portion was removed for NMR, 50 pL of which was analyzed by HPLC as a control. The other 1 mL was dried under a stream of nitrogen at 70°C. A
1 mL aliquot of trifluoroacetic acid solution was added to the dried sample and vor-texed. It was then hydrolyzed at 70°C. After hydrolysis the material was again dried 10 under nitrogen and 1 mL water added. The resulting sample was analyzed by HPLC.
The fagopyritol B 1 peak had been replaced by peaks representing galactose and D-chiro-inositol.
As a confirmatory analysis, 100 pL of deionized concentrated putative fagopyritol B 1 fractions were incubated with 200 pL of dialyzed a-galactosidase overnight in a water bath maintained at 37°C. All samples were adjusted to a final volume of 1 mL and analyzed by HPLC. Again, the fagopyritol B1 peak had disap peared and peaks representing galactose and n-chiro-inositol were prominent.
To as certain activity of the enzyme a S mM stock solution of galactinol and 25 pL
from buckwheat samples were treated in the same manner. Additional confirmation of the structure was made by nuclear magnetic resonance.
Loblolly Pine Culture The following schedule of treatments has been very successfully used for the growth of plantlets by somatic embryogenesis of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Explants were the female gametophytes containing the zygotic embryos which had been removed from seeds 4 to 5 weeks after fertilization. The seed coat was re-moved but the embryo was not further dissected out of the surrounding gametophyte other than to excise the nucellar end. Seeds were obtained from cones supplied by a Weyerhaeuser Company seed orchard located at Washington, North Carolina. The cones were stored at 4°C until used. Immediately before removal of the immature embryos the seeds were sterilized using an initial washing and detergent treatment followed by a 10 minute sterilization in 15% H2O2. The explants were thoroughly washed with sterile distilled water after each treatment. Tables 3 and 4 give media compositions for loblolly pine embryogenesis.
Table 3 Pinus taeda Basal Medium (Modified 1/2 P6 Basal Salts*) Constituent Concentration, m~/L
NH4N03 150.0 KN03 909.9 KH2P04 13 6.1 Ca(N03 )2 . 4H20 23 6.2 CaC12.4H20 50.0 MgS 04 . 7H20 246. S
Mg(N03)2 . 6H20 256. 5 MgC 12 . 6H20 50.0 KI 4.15 H3B03 15.5 MnS04 . H20 10.5 ZnS04 . 7H20 14.4 NaMo04 . 2H20 0.12 S
CuS04 . 5H20 0.125 CoC 12 . 6H20 0.125 FeS04 . 7H20 13 .9 Na2EDTA 18.65 Maltose 20,000.-30,000.
myo-Inositol 100.
Casamino acids 500.
L-Glutamine ~ 1000.
Thiamine . HCI 1.00 Pyridoxine . HCI 0.50 Nicotinic acid 0.50 Glycine 2.00 Gelrite+ 200.
pH adjusted to 5.7 * According to Teasdale, Dawson,Woolhouse (1986) as and modified + Used if a solid medium is desired Table 4 Composition of Media for Different Stage Treatments BMl -- Induction Medium BM + 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (15 pM) + kinetin (KIN) (2 pM) + N6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) (2 pM) BM2 -- Maintenance and Multiplication Medium BM + 2,4-D (5 pM) + KIN (0.5 ~M) + BAP (0.5 pM) + 4900 mg/L
additional myo-inositol. Gelrite is added when a solid medium is desired.
BM3 -- Cotyledonary Embryo Development Medium BM + 50-100 mg/L abscisic acid (ABA) + 18% PEG 4000 & 8000 mixture + 2-2.5% maltose + 900 mg/L additional myo-inositol + 1000 mg/L gluta-mine + 0.125% activated charcoal. No gellant. The following amino acid mixture is added: L-proline - 100 mg/L, L-asparagine - 100 mg/L, r.- arginine - SO mg/L, L-alanine 20 mg/L, and ~-serine - 20 mg/L.
BM4 -- Germination Medium BM modified by replacing maltose with sucrose at 20,000 mg/L, myo-inositol to 100.0 mg/L, glutamine and casamino acids are omitted + 0.2%
Gelrite and 0.25% activated charcoal.
Stage I - Induction Sterile gametophytes with intact embryos were placed on a solid BM1 culture medium and held in an environment at 22°-25°C with a 24 hour dark photoperiod for a time of 3-5 weeks. The length of time depended on the particular genotype being cultured. At the end of this time a white mucilagenous mass had formed in association with the original explants. This appears to be identi-cal with that described by Gupta and Durzan (1987). Microscopic examination re-vealed numerous early stage embryos associated with the mass. These are generally characterized as having a long thin walled suspensor associated with a small head with dense cytoplasm and large nuclei. Osmolality of the induction medium may in some instances be as high as 170 mM/kg. Normally it will be about 160 mM/kg or even lower. The osmolality of the medium described above was 150 mM/kg.
Stake II - Maintenance and Multiplication Early stage embryos re-moved from the masses generated in the induction stage were first placed on a gelled maintenance and multiplication medium. This differs from the induction me-dium in that the growth hormones (both auxins and cytokinins) were reduced by at least a full order of magnitude. Osmolality of this medium will typically be raised from that of the induction medium to about 180 mM/kg or higher by increasing the concentration of myo-inositol to 0.5% w/v. The temperature and photoperiod were again 22°-25°C with 24 hours in the dark. Embryos were cultured for 12-14 days on BM2 solid medium before transferring to a liquid medium for further subculturing.
This liquid medium was of similar composition but lacked the gellant. The embryos at the end of the solid maintenance stage were similar in appearance to those from Stage I. After 5 to 6 weekly subcultures on the liquid maintenance medium advanced early stage embryos had formed. These are characterized by smooth embryonal heads estimated to have over 100 individual cells with multiple suspensors.
Osmotic potential of the maintenance media should typically fall within the range of about 180-400 mM/kg for Pinus taeda. Most typically the main-tenance media should be in the neighborhood of about 1.5 times higher in osmotic potential than the induction or multiplication media. As was noted earlier, the re-quirements for elevation of osmotic potential at this stage will vary for different spe-cies and may vary somewhat for differing genotypes within a given species.
Stage III - Embryo Development The advanced early stage embryos from Stage II culture were transferred to a filter paper support placed on a pad satu-rated with liquid development medium. This medium either lacks growth hormones entirely or has them present only at very low levels. However, here abscisic acid (5-( 1-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-4-oxo-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)-3-methyl-2,4-pentadienoic acid) (ABA) may be a necessary material for further development. As was noted ear Tier, the inclusion of an adsorbent material in this medium is highly advantageous.
The adsorbent may be chosen from a number of chemical materials having extremely high surface area and/or controlled pore size such as activated charcoal, soluble and insoluble forms of polyvinyl pyrrolidone), activated alumina, silica gel, molecular sieves, etc. The adsorbent will normally be present in a concentration of about 0.1-S
g/L, more generally about 0.25-2.5 g/L. Development time is generally 8-14 weeks in the dark. At the end of this period the cotyledonary embryos are 2-3 mm long and closely resemble mature zygotic embryos in morphology.
Stage IV - Drying The embryos still on their filter paper support are lifted from the pad and placed in a closed container over a saturated solution of K2SOa, at a relative humidity of 97%, for a period of three weeks.
Stage V - Germination The dried cotyledonary embryos from Stage IV were rehydrated by placing them, while still on the filter paper support, for about 24 hours on a pad saturated with liquid germination medium. The embryos were then placed individually on solid BM4 medium for germination. This is a basal medium lacking growth hormones which has been modified by substituting sucrose for mal-tose and eliminating organic nitrogen. After about 6-8 weeks under environmental conditions of 23°-25°C and a 16 hour light - 8 hour dark photoperiod, the resulting plantlets were approximately 20 mm in length and had a well developed radicle and hypocotyl and green cotyledonary structure and epicotyl. Alternatively, the cotyle-donary embryos may be made into artificial seeds.
Because of the reduced carbohydrate concentration, the osmotic po-tential of the germination medium is further reduced below that of the development medium. It will normally be below about 150 mM/kg and was, in the present exam-ple, about 100 mM/kg.
Stage VI - Conversion Plantlets from Stage V were removed from the germination medium and planted in a soil composed of equal parts of peat and fine perlite. Rooting percentage was excellent and the resulting plants showed good growth and vigor.
Example 1 Determination of Biochemical Maturity in Loblolly Pine Loblolly pine cones were picked from a seed orchard in Arkansas on August 20, October 3, and October 17. The last date was believed by conventional criteria to represent full biochemical maturity of the cones and was during the time of cone harvest time for seed. Cones were immediately packed in an iced cooler for transport to the laboratory. Within 24 hours the cones had been opened, the seeds re-moved, and embryos dissected from the seeds. The embryos were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen until they could be analyzed.
5 Embryos were then extracted for determination of sugar alcohols by the method described earlier. Extraction was generally by the method described by Handley et al. (1983) using 80% ethanol. Briefly, the method involves grinding the embryos in 80% ethanol and heating at 70°C for 10 minutes. The sample was centri-fuged and the supernatant reserved. The solids remaining were resuspended in 80%
10 ethanol and frozen at -10°C for at least 30 minutes to ensure that all cell membranes had been ruptured. The tissue was again reground, heated, and centrifuged as before and the supernatant combined with that obtained earlier. To the pooled supernatants was added 5 pL of 14C glucose (2.2 X 106 dpm). Duplicate 10 pL samples were counted in a scintillation counter. The remaining supernatant was evaporated to dry-15 ness under vacuum at 35°-40°C. After cooling, the dried sample was washed with several mL of ethyl ether to remove lipids and color bodies. The sample was then dissolved in 0.5-1.0 mL of ultrapure water. A duplicate 10 pL sample was again counted for radioactivity. The sample was then used for HPLC separation of the sugar alcohols. Results of the determinations are given in Table 5 which follows.
Table 5 Sugar Alcohols in Lobloll3r Pine Zygotic Embr ~~os Harvest Date- August October October Pinitol, nM/emb o 65.9 9.1 3.8 Pinitol, nM/m * d wei ht 73.4 5.3 2.0 M o-inositol, nM/emb o 21.4 10.1 5.7 M o-inositol, nM/m d wei 23.9 5.9 3.0 ht n-chiro-inositol, nM/emb 18.6 53.0 30.0 o n-chiro-inositol, nM/m d 20.7 31.1 16.2 wei ht Fa o itol B1, nM/emb o 0.8 20.4 38.9 Fa o ritol B 1, nM/m d wei 0.9 12.0 21.0 ht *nanomoles per milligram _..
At the initial harvest date of August 20 the seed embryos had attained full morphological maturity. They did not change in morphology for the duration of the sampling period. However, it is immediately evident that they underwent major biochemical changes in the almost two months between the initial and final harvests.
In August only a trace amount of fagopyritol B 1 was present. Pinitol was the pre-dominant alcohol with myo-inositol and n-chiro-inositol in significant and about equal amounts. By early October pinitol had dropped to a relatively low level and myo-inositol had dropped to about 40% of the August value. However, n-chiro-inositol had peaked sharply and B1-fagopyritol was present in a significant amount. At the latter October date, just before seed drop, pinitol and myo-inositol had fallen to low levels, D-chiro-inositol had dropped to about half of its value two weeks earlier and B 1-fagopyritol had doubled in amount.
It is evident from the above data that development of seed maturity can be closely followed and predicted by sugar alcohol analysis even though there is no visible change in embryo morphology.
Example 2 Effect of Differing Culture Media on Loblolly Pine Somatic Embryo Sugar Alcohols Loblolly pine somatic embryos were cultured as described earlier in the tissue culture procedure. However one sample was obtained from embryos cul-tured in a development medium containing 50 mg/L abscisic acid (ABA) and another from embryos in a development medium containing 10 mg/L ABA and 7.5 mg/L
giberellic acid (GA4i7). The embryos were removed directly from the development medium and analyzed as before for sugar alcohols. Results are seen in following Ta-ble 6.
Table 6 Sugar Alcohols in Loblolly Pine Somatic Embryos Genot a 7 7 5 5 Culture Medium ABA ABA/GA4n ABA ABA/GA4r7 Pinitol, nM/emb o Ne 1i Ne 1i ibleNe 1i Ne 1i ible ible ible M o-inositol, nM/emb 3.0 12.0 5.1 7.4 o M o-inositol, nM/m d 18.3 56.8 26.0 32.0 wei ht n-chiro-inositol, nM/emb23.3 61.6 24.1 29.2 o n-chiro-inositol, nM/m 143.8 271.3 122.0 127.0 d wt.
Fa o ritol B 1 nM/emb Trace Trace ? Trace Trace o ? ? ?
The above results on pooled samples of 40 embryos in the case of genotype 7 and 10 for genotype 5 show that determination of the sugar alcohol types and levels are an effective method for discriminating between culturing regimens.
Genotype 5 is known to be more recalcitrant towards germination than genotype 7.
Example 3 Determination of Biochemical Maturity in Loblolly Pine Somatic Embryos Embryos from two genotypes of loblolly pine were cultured as de-scribed earlier. Samples of embryos that appeared to be morphologically mature were harvested from the Stage III embryo development medium approximately 12 and 15 weeks after plating the early stage embryo culture. Replicate samples were taken from different culture plates and 10 embryos from each culture were pooled.
The embyos were treated and prepared for HPLC analysis as described for the seed em-bryos. Sugar alcohol levels were as found in Table 7 which follows.
Table 7 Sugar Alcohols in Lobloll~Pine Somatic Embryos Culture Time, weeks 12 15 Pinitol, nMlemb o Ne 1i ibleNe 1i ible M o-inositol, nM/emb o 58.2 ---D-chiro-inositol, nM/emb 23.5 50.5 o Fa o itol B1, nM/emb o Ne 1i ibleNe 1i ible * Sample contaminated Considerable dii~erence is seen between this sample of somatic em-bryos and the zygotic embryos of Example 1 in the content and distribution of the sugar alcohols. The additional three weeks on the medium increased D-chiro-inositol but no pinitol or fagopyritol Blwas present in either sample.
Embryos of the same genotype as above were cultured for 12 weeks in similar manner to those just described. However, they were then lifted from the de-velopment medium on their filter paper support and placed in a closed dish over satu-rated K2SOa solution for three weeks. At room temperature this created a 97%
rela-tive humidity environment and resulted in slow, partial desiccation of the embryos.
This treatment has been found from experience to be almost essential for ensuring good germination. Again, sugar alcohols present were determined by HPLC
analysis with the following results seen in Table 8.
Table 8 Sugar Alcohols in Partials Desiccated Somatic Embryos Sam 1e No. 1 2 D-chiro-inositol, nM/emb 32.6 39.9 o n-chiro-inositol, nM/m d 74.1 90.7 wei ht Fa o ritol B 1, nM/emb o 2.8 4.1 Fa o ritol B 1, nMlm d wei 6.4 9.3 ht While levels of fagopyritol B 1 did not reach those present in mature zygotic embryos, it is important that it did appear during the partial desiccation. Since the partial desiccation appears necessary for good germination, it may be regarded as a good indication that the presence of fagopyritol B1 loblolly pine somatic embryos is also essential.
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that many variations of the present invention not described in the examples can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. Thus, the invention should be regarded as limited only as it is defined in the appended claims.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Attree, S. M. and L. C. Fowke 1995 Desiccated conifer somatic embryos. U. S. Patent No. 5,464,769.
Baron, Frank J.
1970 Metabolic patterns in dormant and germinating seeds of sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana, Dougl.). In Advancing Frontiers of Plant Sciences, Lokesh Chandra ed., 24: 47-63.
Bernabe, M., R. Fenwick, J. Frias, J. Jimenez-Barbero, K. Price, S. Valverde, and C.
Vidal-Valverde 1993 Determination, by NMR spectroscopy, of the structure of ciceritol, a pseudo-trisaccharide isolated from lentils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chem-istry 41: 870-872.
Chien, C.-T., T.-P. Lin, C.-G. Jou, and G.-R. Her 1996 Occurrence of a novel galactopinitol and its changes with other non-reducing sugars during development of Leucaena leucocephala seeds. Plant Cell Physiodo~ 37: 539-544.
Gorecki, R. J., A. I. Piotrowicz-Cieslak, L. B. Lahuta, and R. L. Obendorf 1997 Soluble carbohydrates in desiccation tolerance of yellow lupin seeds during maturation and germination. Seed Science Research 7: 107-115.
Gupta, P. K. and D. J. Durzan .
1987 Biotechnology of somatic polyembryogenesis and plantlet regeneration in loblolly pine. BiolTechnology 5: 147-151.
Gupta, P. K. and G. S. Pullman 1991 Method for reproducing coniferous plants by somatic embryogenesis using abscisic acid and osmotic potential variation. U. S. Patent No. 5,036,007.
Handley, L. W., L. W. Pharr, and R. F. McFeeters 1983 Relationship between galactinol synthase activity and sugar compositions of 5 leaves and seeds of several crop species. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 108(4): 600-605.
Horbowicz, M., P. Brenac, and R. L. Obendorf 1998 Fagopyritol B 1, O-oc-n-galactopyranosyl-(1 ~ 2)-n-chiro-inositol, a galactosyl cyclitol in maturing buckwheat seeds associated with desiccation tolerance.
10 Planta 205: 1-11.
Horbowicz, M. and R. L. Obendorf 1994 Seed desiccation tolerance and stability: Dependence on flatulence-producing oligosaccharides and cyclitols-review and survey. Seed Science Research 4: 385-405.
15 Horbowicz, M., R. L. Obendorf, B. D. McKersie, and D. R. Viands 1995 Soluble saccharides and cyclitols in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) somatic em-bryos, leaflets, and mature seeds. Plant Science 109: 191-198.
Kuo, T. M.
1992 Isolation and identification of galactinol from castor oilseed meal.
Journal of 20 the American Oil Chemists Society 69: 569-574.
Kuo, T. M., C. A. Lowell, and T. M. Nelsen 1997 Occurrence of pinitol in developing soybean seed tissues. Phytochemistry 45:
29-3 5.
Murphy, J. B. and M. F. Hammer 1998 Respiration and soluble sugar metabolism in sugar pine embryos. Physiolo-gia Plantarum 74: 95-100.
Obendorf, R. L.
1997 Oligosaccharides and galactosyl cyclitols in seed desiccation tolerance (Re-view Update). Seed Science Research 7: 63-74.
_30 Obendorf, R. L., M. Horbowicz, A. M. Dickerman, P. Brenac, and M. E. Smith 1998 Soluble oligosaccharides and galactosyl cyclitols in maturing soybean seeds In planta and In vitro. Crop Science 38: 78-84.
Peterbauer, T. and A. Richter 1998 Galactosylononitol and stachyose synthesis in seeds of adzuki bean. Plant Physiology 117: 165-172.
Phillippy, Brian Q.
1998 Identification of inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate 5-kinase and inositol 1,3,4,5 tetrakisphosphate 6-kinase in immature soybean seeds. Plant Physiology 116: 291-297.
Teasdale, R. D., P. A. Dawson, and H. W. Woolhouse 1986 Mineral nutrient requirements of loblolly pine. (Pinus taeda cell suspension culture). Plant Physiology 82: 942-945.
Claims (5)
1. A method of determining the maturity of southern pine embryos which comprises:
determining the content of sugar alcohols in the embryos, said alcohols including at least pinitol, D-chino-inositol, and fagopyritol B1; and noting the time in embryo development when the content of D-chino-inositol begins to decrease and fagopyritol has appeared, at which time the embryos are approaching biochemical maturity.
determining the content of sugar alcohols in the embryos, said alcohols including at least pinitol, D-chino-inositol, and fagopyritol B1; and noting the time in embryo development when the content of D-chino-inositol begins to decrease and fagopyritol has appeared, at which time the embryos are approaching biochemical maturity.
2. The method of claim 1 in which the embryos are zygotic embryos in natural seeds and the sugar alcohol content and composition is used as an indicator of optimum time for cone harvest.
3. The method of claim 2 in which cone harvest is delayed until the content of fagopyritol exceeds that of D-chiro-inositol.
4. The method of claim 1 in which the embryos are somatic embryos produced by tissue culture and the sugar alcohol content and composition is used as an indicator of readiness for germination.
5. The method of claim 1 in which the sugar alcohol content is determined by high pressure liquid chromatography using anion exchange techniques.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/253,169 | 1999-02-19 | ||
| US09/253,169 US6150167A (en) | 1998-02-19 | 1999-02-19 | Method of determining conifer embryo maturity using sugar alcohol content |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2298262A1 CA2298262A1 (en) | 2000-08-19 |
| CA2298262C true CA2298262C (en) | 2006-01-31 |
Family
ID=22959161
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2298262 Expired - Fee Related CA2298262C (en) | 1999-02-19 | 2000-02-07 | Method of determining conifer embryo maturity using sugar alcohol content |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| AU (1) | AU764174B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2298262C (en) |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5036007A (en) * | 1989-03-09 | 1991-07-30 | Weyerhaeuser Company | Method for reproducing coniferous plants by somatic embryogenesis using abscisic acid and osmotic potential variation |
| US5677185A (en) * | 1996-05-14 | 1997-10-14 | Westvaco Corporation | Method for regeneration of coniferous plants by somatic embryogenesis in culture media containing abscisic acid |
| US5731204A (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 1998-03-24 | Westvaco Corporation | Method for regeneration of coniferous plants by somatic embryogenesis employing polyethylene glycol |
-
2000
- 2000-02-07 CA CA 2298262 patent/CA2298262C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2000-02-09 AU AU14994/00A patent/AU764174B2/en not_active Ceased
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU1499400A (en) | 2000-08-24 |
| AU764174B2 (en) | 2003-08-14 |
| CA2298262A1 (en) | 2000-08-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6150167A (en) | Method of determining conifer embryo maturity using sugar alcohol content | |
| Lelu et al. | An improved method for somatic plantlet production in hybrid larch (Larix× leptoeuropaea): Part 1. Somatic embryo maturation | |
| Redenbaugh | Application of artificial seed to tropical crops | |
| US6117678A (en) | Method for determining maturity of conifer somatic embryos | |
| Tsay et al. | Embryogenesis and plant regeneration from anther culture of bamboo (Sinocalamus latiflora (Munro) McClure) | |
| US5068184A (en) | Flavor composition and method | |
| Harry et al. | In vitro culture of forest trees | |
| Jones et al. | Plantlet production from somatic embryos of Pinus patula | |
| Parrott et al. | Characterization of recurrent somatic embryogenesis of alfalfa on auxin-free medium | |
| Lipavská et al. | Carbohydrate status during somatic embryo maturation in Norway spruce | |
| Chibi et al. | Changes in polyamine synthesis during anther development and pollen germination in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) | |
| Hays et al. | Hormones in zygotic and microspore embryos of Brassica napus | |
| CA2298262C (en) | Method of determining conifer embryo maturity using sugar alcohol content | |
| HOSSEIN et al. | Somatic embryogenesis: an alternative method for in vitro micropropagation | |
| Parrott et al. | Somatic embryogenesis in legumes | |
| US5177306A (en) | Abienol-producing somaclonal variants of nicotiana | |
| NZ502756A (en) | Determining cyclic sugar alcohol (cyclitol) content in loblolly pine embryos using high pressure liquid chromatography and thereby establishing the stage in development | |
| Jasik et al. | Somatic embryogenesis in hybrid firs | |
| Hunter | Cinchona spp.: micropropagation, and the in vitro production of quinine and quinidine | |
| McKersie et al. | Role of maturation and desiccation of somatic embryos in the production of dry artificial seed | |
| US5012040A (en) | Somaclonal variants of Nicotiana glutinosa | |
| AU778880B2 (en) | Method for inducing and determining maturity in conifer somatic embryos | |
| Webb et al. | Eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) | |
| AU2006299757B2 (en) | Method of culturing conifer somatic embryos using S(+)-abscisic acid | |
| Marquard et al. | Expression of heritable biochemical markers from various pecan tissues |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20130207 |