CA2010316C - Cathode protection - Google Patents
Cathode protection Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2010316C CA2010316C CA002010316A CA2010316A CA2010316C CA 2010316 C CA2010316 C CA 2010316C CA 002010316 A CA002010316 A CA 002010316A CA 2010316 A CA2010316 A CA 2010316A CA 2010316 C CA2010316 C CA 2010316C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- aluminium
- cathode
- cell
- temperatures
- layer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 239000004411 aluminium Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- JKWMSGQKBLHBQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N diboron trioxide Chemical compound O=BOB=O JKWMSGQKBLHBQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 229910052810 boron oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 238000003723 Smelting Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 56
- QYEXBYZXHDUPRC-UHFFFAOYSA-N B#[Ti]#B Chemical compound B#[Ti]#B QYEXBYZXHDUPRC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 44
- 229910033181 TiB2 Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 43
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 8
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titan oxide Chemical compound O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 7
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052720 vanadium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052735 hafnium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052750 molybdenum Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052758 niobium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052715 tantalum Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052721 tungsten Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052726 zirconium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910000838 Al alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052723 transition metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000003624 transition metals Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 abstract description 14
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 14
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 33
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 32
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 32
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 31
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 27
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 26
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 26
- 239000000571 coke Substances 0.000 description 17
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 15
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 11
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 11
- 239000010406 cathode material Substances 0.000 description 10
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000003792 electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 229910052796 boron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229910001610 cryolite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 5
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- ZOXJGFHDIHLPTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Boron Chemical compound [B] ZOXJGFHDIHLPTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910002804 graphite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000010439 graphite Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 4
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 238000002441 X-ray diffraction Methods 0.000 description 3
- AZDRQVAHHNSJOQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N alumane Chemical compound [AlH3] AZDRQVAHHNSJOQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- RHZUVFJBSILHOK-UHFFFAOYSA-N anthracen-1-ylmethanolate Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C=C3C(C[O-])=CC=CC3=CC2=C1 RHZUVFJBSILHOK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000003830 anthracite Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000011888 autopsy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009533 lab test Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000007800 oxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910000048 titanium hydride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000009736 wetting Methods 0.000 description 3
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001723 curing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011010 flushing procedure Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011888 foil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003292 glue Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000155 melt Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010926 purge Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011819 refractory material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007480 spreading Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M Chloride anion Chemical compound [Cl-] VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 229910001128 Sn alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910000905 alloy phase Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000005030 aluminium foil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010420 art technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008199 coating composition Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000032798 delamination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005868 electrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011049 filling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010419 fine particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000004673 fluoride salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100001261 hazardous Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001026 inconel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011261 inert gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002687 intercalation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009830 intercalation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012332 laboratory investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- LQBJWKCYZGMFEV-UHFFFAOYSA-N lead tin Chemical compound [Sn].[Pb] LQBJWKCYZGMFEV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001338 liquidmetal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- -1 mixed oxides Chemical compound 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000465 moulding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010943 off-gassing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011176 pooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000013049 sediment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010802 sludge Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012619 stoichiometric conversion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008961 swelling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920001187 thermosetting polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000011179 visual inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003313 weakening effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25C—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC PRODUCTION, RECOVERY OR REFINING OF METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25C3/00—Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts
- C25C3/06—Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts of aluminium
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Electrolytic Production Of Metals (AREA)
- Fuel Cell (AREA)
- Primary Cells (AREA)
- Inert Electrodes (AREA)
- Magnetic Heads (AREA)
- Cell Electrode Carriers And Collectors (AREA)
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
- Electroluminescent Light Sources (AREA)
- Gas-Filled Discharge Tubes (AREA)
- Battery Electrode And Active Subsutance (AREA)
- Secondary Cells (AREA)
Abstract
A method of operating an aluminium smelting cell during the start-up phase of the cell comprising forming a layer of boron oxide on the exposed surface of the cathode of the cell, forming a layer of aluminium on the boron oxide layer, said boron oxide layer forming a barrier impervious to oxygen at temperature from 400°C to about 650°C, and said aluminium layer forming a barrier to oxygen at temperatures above about 600°C up to temperatures of about 1000°C thereby reducing the development of oxidation products in the cathode during cell start-up.
Description
' 75626-3 TITLE: CATHODE PROTECTION
Field of the Invention:
This invention relates to the protection of refractory hard material cathodes used in aluminium smelting cells and to aluminium smelting systems incorporating such protected cathodes.
Background of the Invention:
In conventional designs for the Hall-Heroult cell, the molten aluminium pool or pad formed during electrolysis itself acts as part of the cathode system. The life span of the carbon lining or cathode material may average three to eight years, but may be shorter under adverse conditions. The deterioration of the carbon lining materials is due to erosion and penetration of electrolyte and liquid aluminium as well as intercalation by metallic sodium, which causes swelling and deformation of the carbon blocks and ramming mix. Penetration of cryolite through the carbon body has caused heaving of the cathode blocks. Aluminium penetration to the iron cathode bars results in excessive iron content in the aluminium metal, or in more serious cases, a tap-out.
Another serious drawback of the carbon cathode is its non-wetting by aluminium, necessitating the maintenance of a substantial height of pool or pad of metal in order to ensure an effective molten aluminium contact over the cathode surface.
In conventional cell designs, a deep metal pad promotes the accumulation of undissolved material (sludge or muck) which forms insulating regions on the carbon cathode surface.
Another problem of maintaining such an aluminium pool is that electromagnetic forces create movements and standing waves in the molten aluminium. To avoid shorting between the metal and the anode, the anode-to-cathode distance (ACD) must be kept at a safe 4 to 6 cm in most designs. For any given cell installation there is a minimum ACD below which there is a serious loss of current efficiency, due to shorting of the metal (aluminium) pad to the anode, resulting from instability of the metal pad, combined with increased back reaction under highly stirred conditions. The electrical resistance of the inter-electrode distance traversed by the current through the electrolyte causes a voltage drop in the range of 1.4. to 2.7 volts, which represents from 30 to 60 percent of the voltage drop in a cell, and is the largest single voltage drop in a given cell.
To reduce the ACD, and associated voltage drop, extensive research using Refractory Hard Materials (RHM), such as titanium diboride (TiB2), as cathode materials has been carried out since the 1950's. Because titanium diboride and similar Refractory Hard Materials which are wetted by aluminium, resist the corrosive environment of a reduction cell, and are excellent electrical conductors, numerous cell designs utilising Refractory Hard Materials have been proposed in an attempt to save energy, in part by reducing anode-to-cathode distance.
The use of titanium diboride current-conducting elements in electrolytic cells for the production or refining of aluminium is described in the following exemplary U.S.
patents: U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,915,442, 3,028,324, 3,215,615, 3,314,876, 3,330,756, 3,156,639, 3,274,093, and 3,400,061.
Despite the rather extensive effort expended in the past, as indicated by these and other patents, and the potential advantages of the use of titanium diboride as a current-conducting element, such compositions have not been commercially adopted on any significant scale by the aluminium industry.
Lack of acceptance of TiB2 or RHM current-conducting elements of the prior art is related to their lack of stability in service in electrolytic reduction cells. It has been reported that such current-conducting elements fail after relatively short periods in service. Such failure has been associated with the penetration of the self-bonded RHM
structure by the electrolyte, and/or aluminium, thereby causing critical weakening with consequent cracking and failure. It is well known that liquid phases penetrating the grain boundaries of solids can have undesirable effects. For example, RHM tiles wherein oxygen impurities tend to segregate along grain boundaries are susceptible to rapid attack by aluminium metal and/or cryolite bath. Prior art techniques to combat TiB2 tile disintegration in aluminium cells have been to use highly refined TiB2 powder to make the tile, where commercially pure TiB2 powder contains about 3000 ppm oxygen.
Moreover, fabrication further increases the cost of such tiles substantially. However, no cell utilizing TiB2 tiles is known to have operated successfully for extended periods without loss of adhesion of the tiles to the cathode, or disintegration of the tiles. Other reasons proposed for failure of RHM tiles and coatings have been the solubility of the composition in molten aluminium or molten flux, or the lack of mechanical strength and resistance to thermal shock.
Additionally, different types of TiB2 coating materials, applied to carbon substrates, have failed due to differential thermal expansion between the titanium diboride materials and the carbon cathode block or chemical attack of the binder materials. To our knowledge no prior RHM-containing materials have been successfully operated as a commercially employed cathode substrate because of thermal expansion mismatch, bonding problems, chemical erosion, etc.
Field of the Invention:
This invention relates to the protection of refractory hard material cathodes used in aluminium smelting cells and to aluminium smelting systems incorporating such protected cathodes.
Background of the Invention:
In conventional designs for the Hall-Heroult cell, the molten aluminium pool or pad formed during electrolysis itself acts as part of the cathode system. The life span of the carbon lining or cathode material may average three to eight years, but may be shorter under adverse conditions. The deterioration of the carbon lining materials is due to erosion and penetration of electrolyte and liquid aluminium as well as intercalation by metallic sodium, which causes swelling and deformation of the carbon blocks and ramming mix. Penetration of cryolite through the carbon body has caused heaving of the cathode blocks. Aluminium penetration to the iron cathode bars results in excessive iron content in the aluminium metal, or in more serious cases, a tap-out.
Another serious drawback of the carbon cathode is its non-wetting by aluminium, necessitating the maintenance of a substantial height of pool or pad of metal in order to ensure an effective molten aluminium contact over the cathode surface.
In conventional cell designs, a deep metal pad promotes the accumulation of undissolved material (sludge or muck) which forms insulating regions on the carbon cathode surface.
Another problem of maintaining such an aluminium pool is that electromagnetic forces create movements and standing waves in the molten aluminium. To avoid shorting between the metal and the anode, the anode-to-cathode distance (ACD) must be kept at a safe 4 to 6 cm in most designs. For any given cell installation there is a minimum ACD below which there is a serious loss of current efficiency, due to shorting of the metal (aluminium) pad to the anode, resulting from instability of the metal pad, combined with increased back reaction under highly stirred conditions. The electrical resistance of the inter-electrode distance traversed by the current through the electrolyte causes a voltage drop in the range of 1.4. to 2.7 volts, which represents from 30 to 60 percent of the voltage drop in a cell, and is the largest single voltage drop in a given cell.
To reduce the ACD, and associated voltage drop, extensive research using Refractory Hard Materials (RHM), such as titanium diboride (TiB2), as cathode materials has been carried out since the 1950's. Because titanium diboride and similar Refractory Hard Materials which are wetted by aluminium, resist the corrosive environment of a reduction cell, and are excellent electrical conductors, numerous cell designs utilising Refractory Hard Materials have been proposed in an attempt to save energy, in part by reducing anode-to-cathode distance.
The use of titanium diboride current-conducting elements in electrolytic cells for the production or refining of aluminium is described in the following exemplary U.S.
patents: U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,915,442, 3,028,324, 3,215,615, 3,314,876, 3,330,756, 3,156,639, 3,274,093, and 3,400,061.
Despite the rather extensive effort expended in the past, as indicated by these and other patents, and the potential advantages of the use of titanium diboride as a current-conducting element, such compositions have not been commercially adopted on any significant scale by the aluminium industry.
Lack of acceptance of TiB2 or RHM current-conducting elements of the prior art is related to their lack of stability in service in electrolytic reduction cells. It has been reported that such current-conducting elements fail after relatively short periods in service. Such failure has been associated with the penetration of the self-bonded RHM
structure by the electrolyte, and/or aluminium, thereby causing critical weakening with consequent cracking and failure. It is well known that liquid phases penetrating the grain boundaries of solids can have undesirable effects. For example, RHM tiles wherein oxygen impurities tend to segregate along grain boundaries are susceptible to rapid attack by aluminium metal and/or cryolite bath. Prior art techniques to combat TiB2 tile disintegration in aluminium cells have been to use highly refined TiB2 powder to make the tile, where commercially pure TiB2 powder contains about 3000 ppm oxygen.
Moreover, fabrication further increases the cost of such tiles substantially. However, no cell utilizing TiB2 tiles is known to have operated successfully for extended periods without loss of adhesion of the tiles to the cathode, or disintegration of the tiles. Other reasons proposed for failure of RHM tiles and coatings have been the solubility of the composition in molten aluminium or molten flux, or the lack of mechanical strength and resistance to thermal shock.
Additionally, different types of TiB2 coating materials, applied to carbon substrates, have failed due to differential thermal expansion between the titanium diboride materials and the carbon cathode block or chemical attack of the binder materials. To our knowledge no prior RHM-containing materials have been successfully operated as a commercially employed cathode substrate because of thermal expansion mismatch, bonding problems, chemical erosion, etc.
Titanium diboride tiles of high purity and density have been tested, but they generally exhibit poor thermal shock resistance and are difficult to bond to carbon substrates employed in conventional cells. Mechanisms of debonding are believed to involve high stresses generated by the thermal expansion mismatch between the titanium diboride and carbon, as well as aluminium penetration along the interface between the tiles and the adhesive holding the tiles in place, due to wetting of the bottom surface of the tile by aluminium. In addition to debonding, disintegration of even high purity tiles may occur due to aluminium penetration of grain boundaries.
These problems, coupled with the high cost of the titanium diboride tiles, have discouraged extensive commercial use of titanium diboride elements in conventional electrolytic aluminium smelting cells, and limited their use in new cell design. To overcome the deficiencies of past attempts to utilize Refractory Hard Materials as a surface element for carbon cathode blocks, coating materials comprising Refractory Hard Materials in a carbonaceous matrix have been suggested.
In U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,526,911, 4,466,996 and 4,544,469 by Boxall et al, formulations, application methods, and cells employing TiB2/carbon cathode coating materials were disclosed.
This technology relates to spreading a mixture of Refractory Hard Material and carbon solids with thermosetting carbonaceous resin on the surface of a cathode block, followed by cure and bake cycles. Improved cell operations and energy savings result from the use of this cathode coating process in conventionally designed commercial aluminium reduction cells.
Plant test data indicate that the energy savings attained and the coating life are sufficient to make this technology a commercially advantageous process.
Advantages of such composite coating formulations over hot pressed RHM tiles include much lower cost, less ' 75626-3 _ 5 _ sensitivity to thermal shock, thermal expansion compatibility with the cathode block substrate, and less brittleness. In addition, oxide impurities are not a problem and a good bond to the carbon cathode block may be formed which is unaffected by temperature fluctuations and cell shutdown and restart. Pilot plant and operating cell short term data indicate that a coating life of from four to six years or more may be anticipated, depending upon coating thickness.
The aforesaid patents both teach that the baking process should be carried out in an inert atmosphere, coke bed or similar protective environment to prevent "excessive air burn." In laboratory studies it is possible to bake the test samples in a retort which maintains a high grade inert atmosphere and excludes air/oxygen ingress, however this is not practical for commercial use. Baking under a coke bed is reported to give satisfactory protection for the TiB2/carbon composite material.
Composite coatings have been tested in plants using full scale aluminium reduction cells (U. S. Pat. No. 4,624,766;
Light Metals 1984, pp 573-588; A.V. Cooke et al., "Methods of Producing TiB2/Carbon Composites for Aluminium Cell Cathodes", Proceedings 17th Biennial Conference on Carbon, Lexington, Kentucky (1985)). After curing, the coating is quite hard and the coated blocks may be stored indefinitely until baking. For baking, the coated blocks were placed in steel containers, covered with a protective coke bed, and baked using existing plant equipment such as homogenizing furnaces. Once baked, the blocks could be handled without further precautions during cell reline procedures. The integrity of the cured coating and substrate bond remained excellent after baking. No changes in cell start-up procedure were required for using the blocks coated with composite TiB2 material. No difficulties were encountered when the coated cathode cells were started-up using either a conventional coke resistror bake or hot metal start-up procedure. Core samples from the test cells demonstrated areas of good coating condition after 109 and 310 days of service in the operating cell, but performance was non-uniform.
Extensive testing of TiB2/carbon composite materials have been performed in both laboratory and plant tests. The improved laboratory tests and more detailed cell autopsies have shown a variability in material performance not observed in previously reported tests. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis was used to measure the trace impurities in the test samples.
It was discovered that the poor performance of a test material had a direct correlation with the presence of oxidation products of Ti and B such as Ti0 and/or TiB03, within the structure of the material. A similar variation was detected in the RHM coating applied to a carbon cathode.
Laboratory tests demonstrated that none of the conventional methods (e. g. coke bed, inert gas, liquid metal, boron oxide coating on anodes) for preventing/controlling carbon oxidation was adequate to prevent the formation of TiB03 or similar oxidation products during the bake operation and/or the cell start-up.
In addition to the above described problems associated with RHM cathodes, the start-up phase of operation of conventional cells can also result in oxidation damage leading to reduced operational life, and the present invention is not therefore limited to cells have RHM cathodes.
Brief Description of Invention and Objects:
It is the primary object of the present invention to provide a method of protecting aluminium smelter cathodes against deterioration in use, and more specifically to provide _ 7 -an improved start-up procedure by means of which the life of aluminium smelter cell cathodes may be extended.
In its broadest form, the invention provides an improved start-up procedure for aluminium smelting cells characterized by the creation or establishment of conditions which reduce the formation of oxides from external oxidant sources in cathode materials during the start-up period of the cell. This reduction in the formation of oxides will result in cathode materials having superior longevity when compared with Refractory Hard Materials and other cathode materials which have not been similarly protected against the development of oxide products.
In one currently preferred form of the invention, the desired conditions are established in the smelting cell by the formation of a barrier which is liquid or molten during the start-up temperatures above about 400°C, which is in intimate contact with the exposed surfaces of the cathode, which is stable and effective at temperatures up to about 1000°C and which is substantially impervious to oxygen throughout the start-up period of the cell.
One of the major advantages of the use of a barrier which is liquid or molten is that it allows outgassing from the refractory material during the start up procedure while preventing the return of such gases or other oxidants to the cathode material. This would not be the case where say a gaseous barrier is present since the outgasses and other oxidants may readily mix with the barrier gas and will therefore be free to react with the cathode material.
The barrier may be formed of two materials, one which is effective up to one temperature and the other effective from said one temperature to temperatures up to about 1000°C.
- 7a -In one form of the invention, this is achieved by the use of boron oxide (B203), which melts at about 450°-470°C or lower due to impurities, or some other suitable material which is liquid or molten at temperatures above about 400°C, which is substantially impervious to oxygen transport and which wets carbon. This material provides_a barrier which substantially prevents the Refractory Hard Materials (or other cathode materials) of the cathode from being oxide contaminated. At temperatures above about 650°-700°C at which the boron oxide material is likely to be less effective, aluminium pellets or the like which are added to the cell with the boron oxide and form a molten aluminium barrier which functions during start-up until the cell starts producing aluminium which functions as a barrier for the remainder of the operating life of the cell.
Thus, by establishing a substantially oxygen impermeable barrier which essentially prevents formation of oxides during the start-up period, the cathode of the cell is protected against subsequent damage of the type outlined above.
The boron oxide can be used directly or alternatively can be formed in situ by controlled oxidation of TiB2 containing material such as the refractory hard material coating or a commercially available product such as GraphiCoat.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method of reducing the development of oxidation products in Refractory Hard Material or other cathodes during the cell start-up procedure, comprising the step of adding to the cell at least one material which is liquid or molten at temperatures above about 400°C and which is stable at temperatures up to about 1000°C, which covers the cathode of the cell and thereby forms a - 7b -barrier to oxygen, and which does not materially affect the operation of the cell.
In one preferred form, the method includes adding first material which is liquid or molten at temperatures above about 400°C and which is substantially impervious to oxygen transport, as well as a second material which is liquid or molten at temperatures above about 600°C and which forms a substantially impervious barrier to oxygen transport.
While a currently preferred first material is boron oxide (B203), other materials which are liquid or molten at about 400°C and which form a carbon wetting film substantially impervious to oxygen at temperatures above 400°C may be used.
For example, materials such as mixtures of chloride or fluoride salts or liguid melts such as lead tin alloys may be used, although they are currently considered to be less practical than boron oxide. The boron oxide can be used directly or alternatively can be formed in situ by controlled oxidation of a TiB2 containing material such as the refractory hard material coating or a commercially available product such as Graphi-Coat*. While use of this alternative method may result in an outer skin of oxide contaminated RHM, this skin may be regarded as a sacrificial layer which an operator is willing to lose in return for a protection system which is less complex and costly to operate. The effectiveness of this alternative protection method will be dependent on the porosity of the ref ractory hard material with lower porosities giving better results.
Clearly the most preferable second material, for practical reasons, is aluminium metal since this is present in * Trade-mark _ 88 _ the cell in any event. However, other metals or compounds, which are fluid at about 600°C and above, which completely cover the carbon to create a substantially impervious barrier to oxygen transport may be used.
In the post-start-up phase of operation of the cell, it may be necessary or desirable to remove the viscous boron oxide layer, or other viscous layer derived from the boron oxide coating, which adhere to the surface of the cathode.
While this removal may be achieved in a number of ways, such as flushing the cell with fresh metal to physically remove the layer, it is presently preferred to remove the layer chemically by converting the boron oxide into a more innocuous boron-containing phase such as by contacting the boron oxide phase with a Ti-containing species, leading to the precipitation of TiB2. For example, Ti-bearing additions such as Ti02 may be added to the electrolyte or Ti-A1 alloys may be added to the metal. Other transition metal species in the fourth to sixth groups of the periodic system which are able to form borides from the boron oxide layer may also be used with acceptable results, such as Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo and W.
Description of Preferred Embodiments:
In the following description, the conditions under which RHM material can be heated above 400°C without degrading its consistency and service life in an aluminium cell will be outlined in greater detail. Two types of TiB2/carbon composite materials were evaluated in laboratory and plant exposure tests to determine their uniformity and service life when used to form an aluminium wetted cathode surface for the electrolyte winning of aluminium from a molten cryolite based bath. The cathode coating material was formulated, mixed, applied to the cathode block top surface and cured as taught in U.S. Pat. No.
4,526,911 to Boxall et al. The cured coating blocks were then baked under a fluid coke bed as described by Boxall et al. A
nitrogen purge was maintained through the metal box containing the coated blocks and fluid coke to prevent any ingress of air during the bake procedure. After cooling to less than 200°C, the baked coated blocks were removed from the coke bed. Normal cell construction procedures were used to construct a conventional pre-bake cathode using the coated blocks.
The cathode tiles were moulded, cured and baked as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,582,553 by Buchta. A fluid coke bed with a nitrogen purge was used to protect the tiles from - 9a -"excessive air burn". The tiles were attached to the top of the cathode blocks in a conventionally rammed cathode using UCAR C-34 cement as described by Buchta.
A conventional resistor coke bed start-up procedure was used to heat the coated lined cathode cell up to about 900°-950°C before fluxing with molten bath transferred from other cells in the potline. The test cells were operated as regular cells for approximately 6 weeks before the shut down for autopsy. Most of the bath and metal were tapped from the cell during the shutdown procedure. After cooling, the remaining bath and metal were removed from the cathode surface to expose the coated tiled surface. Visual inspection and photographs of the cathode surface were used to evaluate the condition of the exposed cathode coating tiles. Core samples were taken for metallurgical and chemical analysis.
The seven day laboratory exposure test was performed in a Hollingshead cell comprising an inconel pot, a graphite crucible, a variable height graphite stirrer driven by a 60 r.p.m. geared motor and insulating lid of pyrocrete.
Test samples of T182/C composite were glued to the bottom of the crucible with UCAR C-34* cement and were coated with boron oxide paste. Samples were then buried in synthetic cryolite (2kg) and about 2kg of aluminium metal granules were placed on top. The temperature was raised at 40°/hr to 980°C
and the stirrer was immersed so that it mixed both metal and bath. After seven days operation at 980°C, the graphite crucible and contents were allowed to cool and then cross sectioned to enable visual and chemical analysis of the test samples. Test results confirmed that this long term dynamic * Trade-mark l0a -exposure test can be used to screen RHM cathode materials, glues, formulations and baking rates in the laboratory prior to their use in industrial scale cells.
The following TiH2 composite failure mechanisms observed in the industrial cells were reproduced in the test cell:
(a) delamination cracking of tiles and coatings (b) complete debonding of tiles due to stresses set up by sodium swellingf (c) partial debonding of tiles due to chemical attack of the glue, and (d) deformation of tiles.
Furthermore, the dynamic exposure testing of TiB2 composite materials also confirmed the following observations made during cell autopsies and laboratory investigations.
~ glued joints between tiles and cathode block are subject to chemical attack;
~ coating produced and baked under laboratory conditions performs much better than that produced and baked in the plant;
~ order of rank of laboratory performance is coated anthracite block > coated MLI block > tiled anthracite block > tiled graphite block;
~ structural integrity of the laboratory baked coatings is better than the laboratory baked tiles and much better than the plant baked coatings;
~ the bonding interface between coating and anthracite block is at least as resistant to bath and sodium as the coating itself.
A large variation in coating/tile quality was found on the cathode surface of the autopsied test cells. There appeared to be a random distribution of good, poor and missing coating/tile areas over the cathode surface. The presence of well bonded undeformed areas of coating/tile demonstrated that the material could survive the aluminium cell environment provided a more consistent material could be produced.
No correlation between the material test results and the mixing, spreading, moulding and curing process parameters could be established to explain the variability observed in the plant tests.
It was discovered that the condition of the exposed coating/tile material was related to the presence of oxides of titanium, including mixed oxides, in the material, the oxide content being determined using known X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis.
TiB2/Carbon Composite Baking Tests Test Protection Where Oxides of Titanium Sample Systems Baked Relative XRD
Peak Height Coatings BN1 Coke bed Lab 10 BN1 B203 only Lab 6 BN1 B203 only Lab 5 BN1 A1 powder Lab 10 BN1 B203 + A1 Lab 1 BN1 Graphicoat Lab 6 BNl TiB2/C icing Lab 5 BN1 B203 Lab 7 BN1 Graphicoat Lab 5 BN1 TiB2/C icing Lab 7.5 BN1-2C Coke bed Plant-28/5/87 4 BN1-4C " " " " 10 BNl-6C " " " " 4 BN1-7C " " " " 10 BN1-8C " " " " 24 BN1-1C B203 + A1 Plant-4/8/87 1 BN1-3C " " " " 2 BN1-6C " " " " 2 Pitch Bonded Coke bed + Ar Lab 34 Pitch Bonded Coke bed + Ar Lab 34 BM1 Graphi-Coat + A1 Plant Test 2 BM1 TiB2/C icing + A1 Plant Test 2 Cast Tiles BR7 Coke bed + Ar Lab 6 BR7 Coke bed " 8 BR7 B203 only " 5 BR7 B203 + A1 " 2 The preferred B203/A1 protection system was found to provide the best results, although the use of a sacrificial layer or coating, such as Graphi-Coat or TiB2/C icing, in lieu of the B203 component also produced acceptable results.
By preventing this low level oxidation of the TiB2, the composite structure remains intact and a long service life is maintained.
The appreciable oxidation of TiB2 evident during unprotected start-up was not anticipated since data sheets for TiB2 indicate a high resistance to air oxidation at temperatures up to 1100°C (ICD Group Inc., New York, NY, technical bulletin dated 10/79). Based on this data, the prior art use of a coke bed to prevent air burn of the carbon matrix and the carbon matrix itself was relied upon to provide adequate oxidations protection for the TiB2.
The data in Table 1 show that the conventional methods for protecting carbon from air burn are inadequate and that an unexpected synergism was found when a combination of B2O3 (or a suitable 'sacrificial' layer) plus Al was used to protect the TiB2 material.
According to one practical embodiment, the B203/A1 protection system and cell start up procedure according to one embodiment is as follows:
1. B203 powder is evenly distributed over the cured composite surface of the cathode. About 30 kgs was used in the 100 K ampere test cell. For difficult or vertical surfaces a H3B03 powder added to water to form a viscous paste is used.
2. Cover the B203 with aluminium foil to protect the powder against disturbance during subsequent operation. Overlapping strips of 1200mm wide heavy duty foil has been found to be sufficient.
- 14a -3. Cover the foil with aluminium "pellets". The amount should be calculated to provide at least 20mm of molten metal over the highest part of the cathode.
About 4 tonnes of pellets was found sufficient for the 100 K ampere test cell.
4. Baking is carried out by directing oil fired burners between the anodes and the pellets, and heating at a rate of about 50°C/hr. After the aluminium has melted, the anodes can be lowered, current applied and the baking process continued.
It will be evident from the above discussion that the improved start-up procedure embodying the invention provides the following advantages over the prior art practices:
1. Provides improved protection for materials from oxidation damage at temperatures in excess of 400°C.
2. Provides low oxygen activity environment required to prevent oxidation of RHM and RHM containing composites when heated above 400°C.
3. Provides a quality control test for vendor supplied RHM composite articles (XRD analysis procedure for critical oxide impurities).
4. Improves reliability, uniformity and service life for RHM type cathodes.
These problems, coupled with the high cost of the titanium diboride tiles, have discouraged extensive commercial use of titanium diboride elements in conventional electrolytic aluminium smelting cells, and limited their use in new cell design. To overcome the deficiencies of past attempts to utilize Refractory Hard Materials as a surface element for carbon cathode blocks, coating materials comprising Refractory Hard Materials in a carbonaceous matrix have been suggested.
In U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,526,911, 4,466,996 and 4,544,469 by Boxall et al, formulations, application methods, and cells employing TiB2/carbon cathode coating materials were disclosed.
This technology relates to spreading a mixture of Refractory Hard Material and carbon solids with thermosetting carbonaceous resin on the surface of a cathode block, followed by cure and bake cycles. Improved cell operations and energy savings result from the use of this cathode coating process in conventionally designed commercial aluminium reduction cells.
Plant test data indicate that the energy savings attained and the coating life are sufficient to make this technology a commercially advantageous process.
Advantages of such composite coating formulations over hot pressed RHM tiles include much lower cost, less ' 75626-3 _ 5 _ sensitivity to thermal shock, thermal expansion compatibility with the cathode block substrate, and less brittleness. In addition, oxide impurities are not a problem and a good bond to the carbon cathode block may be formed which is unaffected by temperature fluctuations and cell shutdown and restart. Pilot plant and operating cell short term data indicate that a coating life of from four to six years or more may be anticipated, depending upon coating thickness.
The aforesaid patents both teach that the baking process should be carried out in an inert atmosphere, coke bed or similar protective environment to prevent "excessive air burn." In laboratory studies it is possible to bake the test samples in a retort which maintains a high grade inert atmosphere and excludes air/oxygen ingress, however this is not practical for commercial use. Baking under a coke bed is reported to give satisfactory protection for the TiB2/carbon composite material.
Composite coatings have been tested in plants using full scale aluminium reduction cells (U. S. Pat. No. 4,624,766;
Light Metals 1984, pp 573-588; A.V. Cooke et al., "Methods of Producing TiB2/Carbon Composites for Aluminium Cell Cathodes", Proceedings 17th Biennial Conference on Carbon, Lexington, Kentucky (1985)). After curing, the coating is quite hard and the coated blocks may be stored indefinitely until baking. For baking, the coated blocks were placed in steel containers, covered with a protective coke bed, and baked using existing plant equipment such as homogenizing furnaces. Once baked, the blocks could be handled without further precautions during cell reline procedures. The integrity of the cured coating and substrate bond remained excellent after baking. No changes in cell start-up procedure were required for using the blocks coated with composite TiB2 material. No difficulties were encountered when the coated cathode cells were started-up using either a conventional coke resistror bake or hot metal start-up procedure. Core samples from the test cells demonstrated areas of good coating condition after 109 and 310 days of service in the operating cell, but performance was non-uniform.
Extensive testing of TiB2/carbon composite materials have been performed in both laboratory and plant tests. The improved laboratory tests and more detailed cell autopsies have shown a variability in material performance not observed in previously reported tests. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis was used to measure the trace impurities in the test samples.
It was discovered that the poor performance of a test material had a direct correlation with the presence of oxidation products of Ti and B such as Ti0 and/or TiB03, within the structure of the material. A similar variation was detected in the RHM coating applied to a carbon cathode.
Laboratory tests demonstrated that none of the conventional methods (e. g. coke bed, inert gas, liquid metal, boron oxide coating on anodes) for preventing/controlling carbon oxidation was adequate to prevent the formation of TiB03 or similar oxidation products during the bake operation and/or the cell start-up.
In addition to the above described problems associated with RHM cathodes, the start-up phase of operation of conventional cells can also result in oxidation damage leading to reduced operational life, and the present invention is not therefore limited to cells have RHM cathodes.
Brief Description of Invention and Objects:
It is the primary object of the present invention to provide a method of protecting aluminium smelter cathodes against deterioration in use, and more specifically to provide _ 7 -an improved start-up procedure by means of which the life of aluminium smelter cell cathodes may be extended.
In its broadest form, the invention provides an improved start-up procedure for aluminium smelting cells characterized by the creation or establishment of conditions which reduce the formation of oxides from external oxidant sources in cathode materials during the start-up period of the cell. This reduction in the formation of oxides will result in cathode materials having superior longevity when compared with Refractory Hard Materials and other cathode materials which have not been similarly protected against the development of oxide products.
In one currently preferred form of the invention, the desired conditions are established in the smelting cell by the formation of a barrier which is liquid or molten during the start-up temperatures above about 400°C, which is in intimate contact with the exposed surfaces of the cathode, which is stable and effective at temperatures up to about 1000°C and which is substantially impervious to oxygen throughout the start-up period of the cell.
One of the major advantages of the use of a barrier which is liquid or molten is that it allows outgassing from the refractory material during the start up procedure while preventing the return of such gases or other oxidants to the cathode material. This would not be the case where say a gaseous barrier is present since the outgasses and other oxidants may readily mix with the barrier gas and will therefore be free to react with the cathode material.
The barrier may be formed of two materials, one which is effective up to one temperature and the other effective from said one temperature to temperatures up to about 1000°C.
- 7a -In one form of the invention, this is achieved by the use of boron oxide (B203), which melts at about 450°-470°C or lower due to impurities, or some other suitable material which is liquid or molten at temperatures above about 400°C, which is substantially impervious to oxygen transport and which wets carbon. This material provides_a barrier which substantially prevents the Refractory Hard Materials (or other cathode materials) of the cathode from being oxide contaminated. At temperatures above about 650°-700°C at which the boron oxide material is likely to be less effective, aluminium pellets or the like which are added to the cell with the boron oxide and form a molten aluminium barrier which functions during start-up until the cell starts producing aluminium which functions as a barrier for the remainder of the operating life of the cell.
Thus, by establishing a substantially oxygen impermeable barrier which essentially prevents formation of oxides during the start-up period, the cathode of the cell is protected against subsequent damage of the type outlined above.
The boron oxide can be used directly or alternatively can be formed in situ by controlled oxidation of TiB2 containing material such as the refractory hard material coating or a commercially available product such as GraphiCoat.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method of reducing the development of oxidation products in Refractory Hard Material or other cathodes during the cell start-up procedure, comprising the step of adding to the cell at least one material which is liquid or molten at temperatures above about 400°C and which is stable at temperatures up to about 1000°C, which covers the cathode of the cell and thereby forms a - 7b -barrier to oxygen, and which does not materially affect the operation of the cell.
In one preferred form, the method includes adding first material which is liquid or molten at temperatures above about 400°C and which is substantially impervious to oxygen transport, as well as a second material which is liquid or molten at temperatures above about 600°C and which forms a substantially impervious barrier to oxygen transport.
While a currently preferred first material is boron oxide (B203), other materials which are liquid or molten at about 400°C and which form a carbon wetting film substantially impervious to oxygen at temperatures above 400°C may be used.
For example, materials such as mixtures of chloride or fluoride salts or liguid melts such as lead tin alloys may be used, although they are currently considered to be less practical than boron oxide. The boron oxide can be used directly or alternatively can be formed in situ by controlled oxidation of a TiB2 containing material such as the refractory hard material coating or a commercially available product such as Graphi-Coat*. While use of this alternative method may result in an outer skin of oxide contaminated RHM, this skin may be regarded as a sacrificial layer which an operator is willing to lose in return for a protection system which is less complex and costly to operate. The effectiveness of this alternative protection method will be dependent on the porosity of the ref ractory hard material with lower porosities giving better results.
Clearly the most preferable second material, for practical reasons, is aluminium metal since this is present in * Trade-mark _ 88 _ the cell in any event. However, other metals or compounds, which are fluid at about 600°C and above, which completely cover the carbon to create a substantially impervious barrier to oxygen transport may be used.
In the post-start-up phase of operation of the cell, it may be necessary or desirable to remove the viscous boron oxide layer, or other viscous layer derived from the boron oxide coating, which adhere to the surface of the cathode.
While this removal may be achieved in a number of ways, such as flushing the cell with fresh metal to physically remove the layer, it is presently preferred to remove the layer chemically by converting the boron oxide into a more innocuous boron-containing phase such as by contacting the boron oxide phase with a Ti-containing species, leading to the precipitation of TiB2. For example, Ti-bearing additions such as Ti02 may be added to the electrolyte or Ti-A1 alloys may be added to the metal. Other transition metal species in the fourth to sixth groups of the periodic system which are able to form borides from the boron oxide layer may also be used with acceptable results, such as Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo and W.
Description of Preferred Embodiments:
In the following description, the conditions under which RHM material can be heated above 400°C without degrading its consistency and service life in an aluminium cell will be outlined in greater detail. Two types of TiB2/carbon composite materials were evaluated in laboratory and plant exposure tests to determine their uniformity and service life when used to form an aluminium wetted cathode surface for the electrolyte winning of aluminium from a molten cryolite based bath. The cathode coating material was formulated, mixed, applied to the cathode block top surface and cured as taught in U.S. Pat. No.
4,526,911 to Boxall et al. The cured coating blocks were then baked under a fluid coke bed as described by Boxall et al. A
nitrogen purge was maintained through the metal box containing the coated blocks and fluid coke to prevent any ingress of air during the bake procedure. After cooling to less than 200°C, the baked coated blocks were removed from the coke bed. Normal cell construction procedures were used to construct a conventional pre-bake cathode using the coated blocks.
The cathode tiles were moulded, cured and baked as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,582,553 by Buchta. A fluid coke bed with a nitrogen purge was used to protect the tiles from - 9a -"excessive air burn". The tiles were attached to the top of the cathode blocks in a conventionally rammed cathode using UCAR C-34 cement as described by Buchta.
A conventional resistor coke bed start-up procedure was used to heat the coated lined cathode cell up to about 900°-950°C before fluxing with molten bath transferred from other cells in the potline. The test cells were operated as regular cells for approximately 6 weeks before the shut down for autopsy. Most of the bath and metal were tapped from the cell during the shutdown procedure. After cooling, the remaining bath and metal were removed from the cathode surface to expose the coated tiled surface. Visual inspection and photographs of the cathode surface were used to evaluate the condition of the exposed cathode coating tiles. Core samples were taken for metallurgical and chemical analysis.
The seven day laboratory exposure test was performed in a Hollingshead cell comprising an inconel pot, a graphite crucible, a variable height graphite stirrer driven by a 60 r.p.m. geared motor and insulating lid of pyrocrete.
Test samples of T182/C composite were glued to the bottom of the crucible with UCAR C-34* cement and were coated with boron oxide paste. Samples were then buried in synthetic cryolite (2kg) and about 2kg of aluminium metal granules were placed on top. The temperature was raised at 40°/hr to 980°C
and the stirrer was immersed so that it mixed both metal and bath. After seven days operation at 980°C, the graphite crucible and contents were allowed to cool and then cross sectioned to enable visual and chemical analysis of the test samples. Test results confirmed that this long term dynamic * Trade-mark l0a -exposure test can be used to screen RHM cathode materials, glues, formulations and baking rates in the laboratory prior to their use in industrial scale cells.
The following TiH2 composite failure mechanisms observed in the industrial cells were reproduced in the test cell:
(a) delamination cracking of tiles and coatings (b) complete debonding of tiles due to stresses set up by sodium swellingf (c) partial debonding of tiles due to chemical attack of the glue, and (d) deformation of tiles.
Furthermore, the dynamic exposure testing of TiB2 composite materials also confirmed the following observations made during cell autopsies and laboratory investigations.
~ glued joints between tiles and cathode block are subject to chemical attack;
~ coating produced and baked under laboratory conditions performs much better than that produced and baked in the plant;
~ order of rank of laboratory performance is coated anthracite block > coated MLI block > tiled anthracite block > tiled graphite block;
~ structural integrity of the laboratory baked coatings is better than the laboratory baked tiles and much better than the plant baked coatings;
~ the bonding interface between coating and anthracite block is at least as resistant to bath and sodium as the coating itself.
A large variation in coating/tile quality was found on the cathode surface of the autopsied test cells. There appeared to be a random distribution of good, poor and missing coating/tile areas over the cathode surface. The presence of well bonded undeformed areas of coating/tile demonstrated that the material could survive the aluminium cell environment provided a more consistent material could be produced.
No correlation between the material test results and the mixing, spreading, moulding and curing process parameters could be established to explain the variability observed in the plant tests.
It was discovered that the condition of the exposed coating/tile material was related to the presence of oxides of titanium, including mixed oxides, in the material, the oxide content being determined using known X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis.
TiB2/Carbon Composite Baking Tests Test Protection Where Oxides of Titanium Sample Systems Baked Relative XRD
Peak Height Coatings BN1 Coke bed Lab 10 BN1 B203 only Lab 6 BN1 B203 only Lab 5 BN1 A1 powder Lab 10 BN1 B203 + A1 Lab 1 BN1 Graphicoat Lab 6 BNl TiB2/C icing Lab 5 BN1 B203 Lab 7 BN1 Graphicoat Lab 5 BN1 TiB2/C icing Lab 7.5 BN1-2C Coke bed Plant-28/5/87 4 BN1-4C " " " " 10 BNl-6C " " " " 4 BN1-7C " " " " 10 BN1-8C " " " " 24 BN1-1C B203 + A1 Plant-4/8/87 1 BN1-3C " " " " 2 BN1-6C " " " " 2 Pitch Bonded Coke bed + Ar Lab 34 Pitch Bonded Coke bed + Ar Lab 34 BM1 Graphi-Coat + A1 Plant Test 2 BM1 TiB2/C icing + A1 Plant Test 2 Cast Tiles BR7 Coke bed + Ar Lab 6 BR7 Coke bed " 8 BR7 B203 only " 5 BR7 B203 + A1 " 2 The preferred B203/A1 protection system was found to provide the best results, although the use of a sacrificial layer or coating, such as Graphi-Coat or TiB2/C icing, in lieu of the B203 component also produced acceptable results.
By preventing this low level oxidation of the TiB2, the composite structure remains intact and a long service life is maintained.
The appreciable oxidation of TiB2 evident during unprotected start-up was not anticipated since data sheets for TiB2 indicate a high resistance to air oxidation at temperatures up to 1100°C (ICD Group Inc., New York, NY, technical bulletin dated 10/79). Based on this data, the prior art use of a coke bed to prevent air burn of the carbon matrix and the carbon matrix itself was relied upon to provide adequate oxidations protection for the TiB2.
The data in Table 1 show that the conventional methods for protecting carbon from air burn are inadequate and that an unexpected synergism was found when a combination of B2O3 (or a suitable 'sacrificial' layer) plus Al was used to protect the TiB2 material.
According to one practical embodiment, the B203/A1 protection system and cell start up procedure according to one embodiment is as follows:
1. B203 powder is evenly distributed over the cured composite surface of the cathode. About 30 kgs was used in the 100 K ampere test cell. For difficult or vertical surfaces a H3B03 powder added to water to form a viscous paste is used.
2. Cover the B203 with aluminium foil to protect the powder against disturbance during subsequent operation. Overlapping strips of 1200mm wide heavy duty foil has been found to be sufficient.
- 14a -3. Cover the foil with aluminium "pellets". The amount should be calculated to provide at least 20mm of molten metal over the highest part of the cathode.
About 4 tonnes of pellets was found sufficient for the 100 K ampere test cell.
4. Baking is carried out by directing oil fired burners between the anodes and the pellets, and heating at a rate of about 50°C/hr. After the aluminium has melted, the anodes can be lowered, current applied and the baking process continued.
It will be evident from the above discussion that the improved start-up procedure embodying the invention provides the following advantages over the prior art practices:
1. Provides improved protection for materials from oxidation damage at temperatures in excess of 400°C.
2. Provides low oxygen activity environment required to prevent oxidation of RHM and RHM containing composites when heated above 400°C.
3. Provides a quality control test for vendor supplied RHM composite articles (XRD analysis procedure for critical oxide impurities).
4. Improves reliability, uniformity and service life for RHM type cathodes.
5. Enables the use of RHM cathode materials which were previously unacceptable due to poor service life.
The above described start-up procedure leaves a viscous boron oxide layer, or other layer derived from the boron oxide coating, on the surface of the cathode. The continued presence of the viscous boron oxide layer prevents a sloping cathode cell from operating in its desired manner.
That is, the aluminium metal is restricted from draining to the metal sump. Other operational difficulties may also occur, as described elsewhere (E.N. KARNAUKIIOV et al, Soviet Journal of - 14b -Non-Ferrous Metals Research, English version Vol. 6 No. 1 1978, p. 16). Our own experience has shown that metal pooling may occur on the cathode surface, leading to uneven anode burning and/or short-circuiting, low current efficiency and general cell instability. The transition from start-up conditions to normal stable cell operation may therefore become problematic unless the boron oxide layer can be effectively removed at the end of the start-up phase. We have found that the establishment of stable operating conditions can be accomplished more effectively by accelerating the rate of removal of the boron oxide. A number of methods have been found successful for achieving this removal. For instance, by flushing the cell with fresh metal the removal of the boron oxide has been promoted. However, the transferring of large volumes of molten metal into and out of the cell, whilst effective, is inconvenient.
hazardous and undesirable.
We have discovered that the removal of boron oxide can be most conveniently facilitated by the chemical conversion in situ to a separate and more innocuous boron-containing phase that does not interfere with the draining of the cathode metal to the sump. Hy contacting the B203 phase with a Ti-containing species, chemical interaction between Ti and B is achieved leading to the conversion of H203 to TiH2 and the precipitation thereof. Importantly this chemical conversion process provides for the removal of the potentially problematic boron oxide viscous phase, which in turn allows for a rapid transition to stable and efficient drained cathode cell operation, as evidenced by normal bath temperatures and the uninterrupted filling of the metal sump at a rate consistent with the expected metal production rate.
Alternatively, it may be possible to use Ti in the form of an alloy of aluminium (e. g. T1-A1) to provide close contact between the H and Ti species, respectively. Ti-A1 alloys are a preferred form of Ti addition since they are readily available as master alloys in the aluminium foundry industry.
Furthermore, it is well known in aluminium foundry practice (eg. AU 21393/83 issued to Alcan International Ltd., entitled "Removal of Impurities from Molten Aluminium" published on May 24, 1994) that the removal of metal impurities from molten aluminium can be achieved in a straightforward manner by contacting molten aluminium with a boron-containing material, thus leading to the generation of insoluble metal borides (eg.
(Ti, V) B2). The formation and deposition of TiH2 is - 15a -therefore readily accomplished. However, the use of T1-A1 alloys for the removal of viscous boron-containing layers on the cathode surface, by the chemical conversion to another phase, has not been previously demonstrated.
While the use of T1 species is preferred for the above reasons, any RHM species, such as the metals in the fourth to sixth groups of the periodic system (Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo and W), which can form borides from the boron oxide layer may be used with acceptable results.
In one preferred form of the process, Ti-bearing additions, or other RHM boride forming species, such as those mentioned above, may be made directly to the electrolyte.
Cryolite electrolytes are good solvents for oxide ores, so a convenient form of the Ti-containing species is as Ti02, although other additives may also be employed. The Ti-containing species reacts with the B203 to form at least TiB2 precipitate, although other equally acceptable precipitates may form.
In each of the above cases, an aluminium-RHM diboride alloy phase is formed on the cathode surface, and this may offer additional restorative and other benefits to the cathode surface .
In laboratory tests it was observed that a 1.8758 addition to the bath of Ti02 effectively removed a 0.9758 layer of B203 originally located at the interface between the composite and the metal (ie. no B203 could be detected at the interface by either visual or chemical microprobe methods).
The mass of Ti02 was chosen to be in excess of that needed for stoichiometric conversion of TiB2 to ensure that all the B203 was removed. The mass ratio of Ti/B in TiB2 is 2.218:1 and the mass ratio of Ti/B actually used was 3.71:1, which equates to a Ti mass excess of 67~. Thus a Ti02/B203 mass ratio of 1.875/0.975 = 1.92 (ie. ~ 2) is effective for removing the B203 layer at the cathode surface.
The TiB2 precipitate is formed as randomly distributed and irregularly shaped fine particles ranging in size from less than 1 ~,m to about 10 Vim. These particles sometimes aggregate as clusters consisting of from 3 or 4 to 30 or 40 particles. Because of the much higher density of TiB2 compared to Al (ie. 4.5g/cm3 vs 2.3g/cm3) the TiB2 has been observed to form a sediment on the cathode surface and may therefore provide restorative and other benefits for cathodes containing RHM, such as TiB2 (eg. reduces solubility of the RHM). Similar comments apply equally to the other RHM boride forming species referred to above.
The above described post-start-up operations provide the means for enhancing the removal of a major portion of the boron oxide phase that is potentially disruptive to normal cell operation. The enhanced rate of removal facilitates the smooth transition from the start-up phase in which the boron oxide layer performs a useful protective function-to cell operation.
The above described start-up procedure leaves a viscous boron oxide layer, or other layer derived from the boron oxide coating, on the surface of the cathode. The continued presence of the viscous boron oxide layer prevents a sloping cathode cell from operating in its desired manner.
That is, the aluminium metal is restricted from draining to the metal sump. Other operational difficulties may also occur, as described elsewhere (E.N. KARNAUKIIOV et al, Soviet Journal of - 14b -Non-Ferrous Metals Research, English version Vol. 6 No. 1 1978, p. 16). Our own experience has shown that metal pooling may occur on the cathode surface, leading to uneven anode burning and/or short-circuiting, low current efficiency and general cell instability. The transition from start-up conditions to normal stable cell operation may therefore become problematic unless the boron oxide layer can be effectively removed at the end of the start-up phase. We have found that the establishment of stable operating conditions can be accomplished more effectively by accelerating the rate of removal of the boron oxide. A number of methods have been found successful for achieving this removal. For instance, by flushing the cell with fresh metal the removal of the boron oxide has been promoted. However, the transferring of large volumes of molten metal into and out of the cell, whilst effective, is inconvenient.
hazardous and undesirable.
We have discovered that the removal of boron oxide can be most conveniently facilitated by the chemical conversion in situ to a separate and more innocuous boron-containing phase that does not interfere with the draining of the cathode metal to the sump. Hy contacting the B203 phase with a Ti-containing species, chemical interaction between Ti and B is achieved leading to the conversion of H203 to TiH2 and the precipitation thereof. Importantly this chemical conversion process provides for the removal of the potentially problematic boron oxide viscous phase, which in turn allows for a rapid transition to stable and efficient drained cathode cell operation, as evidenced by normal bath temperatures and the uninterrupted filling of the metal sump at a rate consistent with the expected metal production rate.
Alternatively, it may be possible to use Ti in the form of an alloy of aluminium (e. g. T1-A1) to provide close contact between the H and Ti species, respectively. Ti-A1 alloys are a preferred form of Ti addition since they are readily available as master alloys in the aluminium foundry industry.
Furthermore, it is well known in aluminium foundry practice (eg. AU 21393/83 issued to Alcan International Ltd., entitled "Removal of Impurities from Molten Aluminium" published on May 24, 1994) that the removal of metal impurities from molten aluminium can be achieved in a straightforward manner by contacting molten aluminium with a boron-containing material, thus leading to the generation of insoluble metal borides (eg.
(Ti, V) B2). The formation and deposition of TiH2 is - 15a -therefore readily accomplished. However, the use of T1-A1 alloys for the removal of viscous boron-containing layers on the cathode surface, by the chemical conversion to another phase, has not been previously demonstrated.
While the use of T1 species is preferred for the above reasons, any RHM species, such as the metals in the fourth to sixth groups of the periodic system (Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo and W), which can form borides from the boron oxide layer may be used with acceptable results.
In one preferred form of the process, Ti-bearing additions, or other RHM boride forming species, such as those mentioned above, may be made directly to the electrolyte.
Cryolite electrolytes are good solvents for oxide ores, so a convenient form of the Ti-containing species is as Ti02, although other additives may also be employed. The Ti-containing species reacts with the B203 to form at least TiB2 precipitate, although other equally acceptable precipitates may form.
In each of the above cases, an aluminium-RHM diboride alloy phase is formed on the cathode surface, and this may offer additional restorative and other benefits to the cathode surface .
In laboratory tests it was observed that a 1.8758 addition to the bath of Ti02 effectively removed a 0.9758 layer of B203 originally located at the interface between the composite and the metal (ie. no B203 could be detected at the interface by either visual or chemical microprobe methods).
The mass of Ti02 was chosen to be in excess of that needed for stoichiometric conversion of TiB2 to ensure that all the B203 was removed. The mass ratio of Ti/B in TiB2 is 2.218:1 and the mass ratio of Ti/B actually used was 3.71:1, which equates to a Ti mass excess of 67~. Thus a Ti02/B203 mass ratio of 1.875/0.975 = 1.92 (ie. ~ 2) is effective for removing the B203 layer at the cathode surface.
The TiB2 precipitate is formed as randomly distributed and irregularly shaped fine particles ranging in size from less than 1 ~,m to about 10 Vim. These particles sometimes aggregate as clusters consisting of from 3 or 4 to 30 or 40 particles. Because of the much higher density of TiB2 compared to Al (ie. 4.5g/cm3 vs 2.3g/cm3) the TiB2 has been observed to form a sediment on the cathode surface and may therefore provide restorative and other benefits for cathodes containing RHM, such as TiB2 (eg. reduces solubility of the RHM). Similar comments apply equally to the other RHM boride forming species referred to above.
The above described post-start-up operations provide the means for enhancing the removal of a major portion of the boron oxide phase that is potentially disruptive to normal cell operation. The enhanced rate of removal facilitates the smooth transition from the start-up phase in which the boron oxide layer performs a useful protective function-to cell operation.
Claims (9)
1. A method of operating an aluminium smelting cell, having an exposed cathode surface, during a start-up phase of the cell, comprising covering said cathode surface before said start-up phase with at least one material defining a barrier which is liquid or molten during said start-up phase at temperatures above about 400°C, said barrier being in intimate contact with said exposed surface and being stable and substantially impervious to oxygen at temperatures up to about 1000°C throughout the start-up phase of the cell.
2. The method of claim 1, comprising covering said cathode surface with a first material which is molten or liquid at temperatures in excess of about 400°C and which is stable and substantially impervious to oxygen at temperatures up to about 650°C, and covering said first material with a second material which is molten at temperatures above 600°C
and which wets the cathode and is stable and substantially impervious to oxygen at temperatures up to about 1000°C.
and which wets the cathode and is stable and substantially impervious to oxygen at temperatures up to about 1000°C.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein said first material comprises a layer of boron oxide applied to the cathode surface and said second material comprises a layer of aluminium, said boron oxide forming a molten layer substantially impervious to oxygen at temperatures substantially falling in the range 400°C to about 700°C, said aluminium layer forming a molten layer over the cathode surface at temperatures above about 600°C, said aluminium layer substantially excluding oxygen from said cathode surface at temperatures up to about 1000°C.
4. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein said cathode surface comprises a refractory hard material in a carbonaceous matrix.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein said refractory hard material is titanium diboride.
6. The method of claim 3, or claim 4, or claim 5 when appended to claim 3, further comprising treating said B2O3 layer with a B2O3-reactive compound in an amount, for a time, and at a temperature effective for substantially removing the B2O3 layer from the cathode surface.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the B2O3-reactive compound is an RHM boride forming species which causes precipitation of an RHM diboride aluminium alloy.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the species is selected from the transition metals Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo and W.
9. The method of claim 6 or 7, wherein said B2O3-reactive compound is TiO2.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUPJ2827 | 1989-02-20 | ||
| AUPJ282789 | 1989-02-20 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2010316A1 CA2010316A1 (en) | 1990-08-20 |
| CA2010316C true CA2010316C (en) | 2000-04-11 |
Family
ID=3773727
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002010316A Expired - Lifetime CA2010316C (en) | 1989-02-20 | 1990-02-19 | Cathode protection |
Country Status (8)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP0393817B1 (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE105340T1 (en) |
| BR (1) | BR9000795A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2010316C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69008611D1 (en) |
| IS (1) | IS3553A7 (en) |
| NO (1) | NO304798B1 (en) |
| NZ (1) | NZ232582A (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103981539B (en) * | 2014-03-26 | 2016-05-11 | 广西百色银海铝业有限责任公司 | Aluminium cell stops cathode protecting process after groove |
| RU2724236C9 (en) * | 2019-09-24 | 2020-09-03 | Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Объединенная Компания РУСАЛ Инженерно-технологический центр" | Method of protecting cathode blocks of aluminum electrolysis cells with burned anodes, a protective composition and a coating |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US621805A (en) * | 1899-03-28 | Emil fischer | ||
| SU1331906A1 (en) * | 1986-03-28 | 1987-08-23 | Братский алюминиевый завод | Lining of cathode part of aluminium electrolyzer |
-
1990
- 1990-02-19 NZ NZ232582A patent/NZ232582A/en unknown
- 1990-02-19 IS IS3553A patent/IS3553A7/en unknown
- 1990-02-19 EP EP90301747A patent/EP0393817B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-02-19 AT AT9090301747T patent/ATE105340T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1990-02-19 CA CA002010316A patent/CA2010316C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-02-19 DE DE69008611T patent/DE69008611D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-02-20 BR BR909000795A patent/BR9000795A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1990-02-20 NO NO884019A patent/NO304798B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2010316A1 (en) | 1990-08-20 |
| AU5001090A (en) | 1990-08-23 |
| IS3553A7 (en) | 1990-08-21 |
| NO900802L (en) | 1990-08-21 |
| AU617040B2 (en) | 1991-11-14 |
| NZ232582A (en) | 1991-09-25 |
| ATE105340T1 (en) | 1994-05-15 |
| NO304798B1 (en) | 1999-02-15 |
| EP0393817A1 (en) | 1990-10-24 |
| DE69008611D1 (en) | 1994-06-09 |
| EP0393817B1 (en) | 1994-05-04 |
| BR9000795A (en) | 1991-02-05 |
| NO900802D0 (en) | 1990-02-20 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| AU672396B2 (en) | Refractory protective coatings, particularly for electrolytic cell components | |
| CA1240635A (en) | Cell component for an electrolytic aluminum production cell | |
| US5227045A (en) | Supersaturation coating of cathode substrate | |
| US5961811A (en) | Potlining to enhance cell performance in aluminum production | |
| CA1239617A (en) | Cathode pot for an aluminum electrolytic cell and process for manufacturing composite bodies for its sidewall | |
| EP0688369B1 (en) | The bonding of bodies of refractory hard materials to carbonaceous supports | |
| RU2257425C2 (en) | Method of forming protective coating for carbon containing components of electrolysis cell | |
| US5492604A (en) | Coating composition for carbon electrodes | |
| US5352338A (en) | Cathode protection | |
| US6338785B1 (en) | Start-up of aluminum electrowinning cells | |
| US6616829B2 (en) | Carbonaceous cathode with enhanced wettability for aluminum production | |
| CA2010316C (en) | Cathode protection | |
| US3787300A (en) | Method for reduction of aluminum with improved reduction cell and anodes | |
| EP0953070B1 (en) | The start-up of aluminium electrowinning cells | |
| RU2415974C2 (en) | Electrolysis bath for production of alluminium | |
| US3787310A (en) | Reduction of aluminum with improved reduction cell and anodes | |
| CA2230864A1 (en) | Maintaining protective surfaces on carbon cathodes in aluminium electrowinning cells | |
| CA2174741C (en) | Composite refractory/carbon-containing components of aluminium production cells | |
| US20040089539A1 (en) | Start-up of aluminium electrowinning cells | |
| US5746895A (en) | Composite refractory/carbon components of aluminium production cells | |
| US5728466A (en) | Hard and abrasion resistant surfaces protecting cathode blocks of aluminium electrowinning cells | |
| AU615596B2 (en) | Supersaturation plating of aluminum wettable cathode coatings during aluminum smelting in drained cathode cells |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |