CA1269942A - Method and inoculant for preserving agricultural products for animal feed - Google Patents
Method and inoculant for preserving agricultural products for animal feedInfo
- Publication number
- CA1269942A CA1269942A CA000528549A CA528549A CA1269942A CA 1269942 A CA1269942 A CA 1269942A CA 000528549 A CA000528549 A CA 000528549A CA 528549 A CA528549 A CA 528549A CA 1269942 A CA1269942 A CA 1269942A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- lactobacillus plantarum
- plantarum atcc
- mutants
- corn
- atcc
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 33
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 title claims description 13
- 239000002054 inoculum Substances 0.000 title description 3
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 240000006024 Lactobacillus plantarum Species 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 235000013965 Lactobacillus plantarum Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 229940072205 lactobacillus plantarum Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 claims description 27
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 claims description 27
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 claims description 27
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 claims description 27
- 239000004460 silage Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 235000013339 cereals Nutrition 0.000 claims description 12
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 claims description 11
- 240000004658 Medicago sativa Species 0.000 claims description 11
- 235000017587 Medicago sativa ssp. sativa Nutrition 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000002538 fungal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004321 preservation Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 240000004713 Pisum sativum Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000010582 Pisum sativum Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 244000061456 Solanum tuberosum Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000002595 Solanum tuberosum Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000021374 legumes Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000007319 Avena orientalis Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 244000075850 Avena orientalis Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 240000005979 Hordeum vulgare Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000007340 Hordeum vulgare Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000209056 Secale Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000007238 Secale cereale Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000021307 Triticum Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 244000098338 Triticum aestivum Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 244000013123 dwarf bean Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000013311 vegetables Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000219310 Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 102100028717 Cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 3A Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 240000004585 Dactylis glomerata Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000209082 Lolium Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000219745 Lupinus Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000010624 Medicago sativa Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000219830 Onobrychis Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 240000000111 Saccharum officinarum Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000007201 Saccharum officinarum Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000021536 Sugar beet Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000219793 Trifolium Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000002096 Vicia faba var. equina Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 244000105017 Vicia sativa Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000005489 dwarf bean Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 244000144977 poultry Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 240000006394 Sorghum bicolor Species 0.000 claims 2
- 235000011684 Sorghum saccharatum Nutrition 0.000 claims 2
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 claims 2
- 108010077805 Bacterial Proteins Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 241000234642 Festuca Species 0.000 claims 1
- IEDVJHCEMCRBQM-UHFFFAOYSA-N trimethoprim Chemical compound COC1=C(OC)C(OC)=CC(CC=2C(=NC(N)=NC=2)N)=C1 IEDVJHCEMCRBQM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 1
- JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N lactic acid Chemical compound CC(O)C(O)=O JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 18
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 10
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 9
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000004310 lactic acid Substances 0.000 description 9
- 235000014655 lactic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 9
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 8
- 241000186660 Lactobacillus Species 0.000 description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000012773 agricultural material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229940039696 lactobacillus Drugs 0.000 description 5
- PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycerine Chemical compound OCC(O)CO PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 4
- XBDQKXXYIPTUBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N dimethylselenoniopropionate Natural products CCC(O)=O XBDQKXXYIPTUBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- HEBKCHPVOIAQTA-UHFFFAOYSA-N meso ribitol Natural products OCC(O)C(O)C(O)CO HEBKCHPVOIAQTA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 3
- SHZGCJCMOBCMKK-UHFFFAOYSA-N D-mannomethylose Natural products CC1OC(O)C(O)C(O)C1O SHZGCJCMOBCMKK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- PNNNRSAQSRJVSB-UHFFFAOYSA-N L-rhamnose Natural products CC(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)C=O PNNNRSAQSRJVSB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001857 anti-mycotic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium carbonate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]C([O-])=O VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 241000222120 Candida <Saccharomycetales> Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000193403 Clostridium Species 0.000 description 2
- SRBFZHDQGSBBOR-SOOFDHNKSA-N D-ribopyranose Chemical compound O[C@@H]1COC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]1O SRBFZHDQGSBBOR-SOOFDHNKSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000235395 Mucor Species 0.000 description 2
- 231100000678 Mycotoxin Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 241000209504 Poaceae Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000194017 Streptococcus Species 0.000 description 2
- SRBFZHDQGSBBOR-UHFFFAOYSA-N beta-D-Pyranose-Lyxose Natural products OC1COC(O)C(O)C1O SRBFZHDQGSBBOR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 2
- 231100001010 corrosive Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- BJRNKVDFDLYUGJ-RMPHRYRLSA-N hydroquinone O-beta-D-glucopyranoside Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1OC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 BJRNKVDFDLYUGJ-RMPHRYRLSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000003471 mutagenic agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 231100000707 mutagenic chemical Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 239000002636 mycotoxin Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000019260 propionic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- IUVKMZGDUIUOCP-BTNSXGMBSA-N quinbolone Chemical compound O([C@H]1CC[C@H]2[C@H]3[C@@H]([C@]4(C=CC(=O)C=C4CC3)C)CC[C@@]21C)C1=CCCC1 IUVKMZGDUIUOCP-BTNSXGMBSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000010188 recombinant method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003053 toxin Substances 0.000 description 2
- 231100000765 toxin Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 108700012359 toxins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000005418 vegetable material Substances 0.000 description 2
- HDTRYLNUVZCQOY-UHFFFAOYSA-N α-D-glucopyranosyl-α-D-glucopyranoside Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(CO)O1 HDTRYLNUVZCQOY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WTOIRKBUWMPVHG-VEIQOZLZSA-N (3R,4R,5S,6R)-3-amino-2-hexadecyl-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-2,4,5-triol Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC1(O)O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1N WTOIRKBUWMPVHG-VEIQOZLZSA-N 0.000 description 1
- XUCIJNAGGSZNQT-JHSLDZJXSA-N (R)-amygdalin Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1OC[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O[C@@H](C#N)C=2C=CC=CC=2)O1 XUCIJNAGGSZNQT-JHSLDZJXSA-N 0.000 description 1
- LDVVTQMJQSCDMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,3-dihydroxypropan-2-yl formate Chemical compound OCC(CO)OC=O LDVVTQMJQSCDMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OWEGMIWEEQEYGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 100676-05-9 Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OCC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(OC2C(OC(O)C(O)C2O)CO)O1 OWEGMIWEEQEYGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- MWBWWFOAEOYUST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-aminopurine Chemical compound NC1=NC=C2N=CNC2=N1 MWBWWFOAEOYUST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VBUYCZFBVCCYFD-JJYYJPOSSA-N 2-dehydro-D-gluconic acid Chemical compound OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)C(=O)C(O)=O VBUYCZFBVCCYFD-JJYYJPOSSA-N 0.000 description 1
- LQLQRFGHAALLLE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 5-bromouracil Chemical compound BrC1=CNC(=O)NC1=O LQLQRFGHAALLLE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PLXMOAALOJOTIY-FPTXNFDTSA-N Aesculin Natural products OC[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1Oc2cc3C=CC(=O)Oc3cc2O PLXMOAALOJOTIY-FPTXNFDTSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920000936 Agarose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 240000002470 Amphicarpaea bracteata Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000000073 Amphicarpaea bracteata Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 101100133992 Amycolatopsis sp Aaar gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241001237431 Anomala Species 0.000 description 1
- FCTTZIVTDGUWTM-UHFFFAOYSA-N C1=CC=CC2=NC3=CC=CC=C3C=C12.N(=O)NC(=N)N Chemical class C1=CC=CC2=NC3=CC=CC=C3C=C12.N(=O)NC(=N)N FCTTZIVTDGUWTM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WNBCMONIPIJTSB-BGNCJLHMSA-N Cichoriin Natural products O([C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1)c1c(O)cc2c(OC(=O)C=C2)c1 WNBCMONIPIJTSB-BGNCJLHMSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000371644 Curvularia ravenelii Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000019459 Cynara cardunculus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000019106 Cynara scolymus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- HEBKCHPVOIAQTA-NGQZWQHPSA-N D-Arabitol Natural products OC[C@H](O)C(O)[C@H](O)CO HEBKCHPVOIAQTA-NGQZWQHPSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RFSUNEUAIZKAJO-VRPWFDPXSA-N D-Fructose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)(CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O RFSUNEUAIZKAJO-VRPWFDPXSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FBPFZTCFMRRESA-FSIIMWSLSA-N D-Glucitol Natural products OC[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)CO FBPFZTCFMRRESA-FSIIMWSLSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FBPFZTCFMRRESA-KVTDHHQDSA-N D-Mannitol Chemical compound OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)CO FBPFZTCFMRRESA-KVTDHHQDSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SHZGCJCMOBCMKK-SVZMEOIVSA-N D-fucopyranose Chemical compound C[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1O SHZGCJCMOBCMKK-SVZMEOIVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RGHNJXZEOKUKBD-SQOUGZDYSA-M D-gluconate Chemical compound OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)C([O-])=O RGHNJXZEOKUKBD-SQOUGZDYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-QTVWNMPRSA-N D-mannopyranose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-QTVWNMPRSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QWIZNVHXZXRPDR-UHFFFAOYSA-N D-melezitose Natural products O1C(CO)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1OC1C(O)C(CO)OC1(CO)OC1OC(CO)C(O)C(O)C1O QWIZNVHXZXRPDR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004386 Erythritol Substances 0.000 description 1
- UNXHWFMMPAWVPI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Erythritol Natural products OCC(O)C(O)CO UNXHWFMMPAWVPI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RFSUNEUAIZKAJO-ARQDHWQXSA-N Fructose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@](O)(CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O RFSUNEUAIZKAJO-ARQDHWQXSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920002527 Glycogen Polymers 0.000 description 1
- SQUHHTBVTRBESD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hexa-Ac-myo-Inositol Natural products CC(=O)OC1C(OC(C)=O)C(OC(C)=O)C(OC(C)=O)C(OC(C)=O)C1OC(C)=O SQUHHTBVTRBESD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- AVXURJPOCDRRFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydroxylamine Chemical compound ON AVXURJPOCDRRFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- UXOXDDUEWZOAIW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Inuline Natural products CCN1CC2(CC(=O)Oc3ccccc3N)CCC(OC)C45C6CC7C(CC(O)(C6C7OC)C(O)(C(OC)C24)C15)OC UXOXDDUEWZOAIW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- LKDRXBCSQODPBY-AMVSKUEXSA-N L-(-)-Sorbose Chemical compound OCC1(O)OC[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O LKDRXBCSQODPBY-AMVSKUEXSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SHZGCJCMOBCMKK-PQMKYFCFSA-N L-Fucose Natural products C[C@H]1O[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O SHZGCJCMOBCMKK-PQMKYFCFSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SHZGCJCMOBCMKK-DHVFOXMCSA-N L-fucopyranose Chemical compound C[C@@H]1OC(O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]1O SHZGCJCMOBCMKK-DHVFOXMCSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SHZGCJCMOBCMKK-JFNONXLTSA-N L-rhamnopyranose Chemical compound C[C@@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O SHZGCJCMOBCMKK-JFNONXLTSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SRBFZHDQGSBBOR-OWMBCFKOSA-N L-ribopyranose Chemical compound O[C@H]1COC(O)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1O SRBFZHDQGSBBOR-OWMBCFKOSA-N 0.000 description 1
- AYFVYJQAPQTCCC-GBXIJSLDSA-N L-threonine Chemical compound C[C@@H](O)[C@H](N)C(O)=O AYFVYJQAPQTCCC-GBXIJSLDSA-N 0.000 description 1
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-QKKXKWKRSA-N Lactose Natural products OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](O[C@H]2[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)C(O)O[C@@H]2CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1O GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-QKKXKWKRSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000186781 Listeria Species 0.000 description 1
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-PICCSMPSSA-N Maltose Natural products O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](CO)OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-PICCSMPSSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229930195725 Mannitol Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 229920000881 Modified starch Polymers 0.000 description 1
- IOVCWXUNBOPUCH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrous acid Chemical compound ON=O IOVCWXUNBOPUCH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000192001 Pediococcus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000228143 Penicillium Species 0.000 description 1
- PYMYPHUHKUWMLA-LMVFSUKVSA-N Ribose Natural products OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)C=O PYMYPHUHKUWMLA-LMVFSUKVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000235070 Saccharomyces Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 description 1
- NGFMICBWJRZIBI-JZRPKSSGSA-N Salicin Natural products O([C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O1)c1c(CO)cccc1 NGFMICBWJRZIBI-JZRPKSSGSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920002472 Starch Polymers 0.000 description 1
- AYFVYJQAPQTCCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Threonine Natural products CC(O)C(N)C(O)=O AYFVYJQAPQTCCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HDTRYLNUVZCQOY-WSWWMNSNSA-N Trehalose Natural products O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 HDTRYLNUVZCQOY-WSWWMNSNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- MUPFEKGTMRGPLJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N UNPD196149 Natural products OC1C(O)C(CO)OC1(CO)OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(COC2C(C(O)C(O)C(CO)O2)O)O1 MUPFEKGTMRGPLJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- TVXBFESIOXBWNM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Xylitol Natural products OCCC(O)C(O)C(O)CCO TVXBFESIOXBWNM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- DPKHZNPWBDQZCN-UHFFFAOYSA-N acridine orange free base Chemical compound C1=CC(N(C)C)=CC2=NC3=CC(N(C)C)=CC=C3C=C21 DPKHZNPWBDQZCN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000002168 alkylating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940100198 alkylating agent Drugs 0.000 description 1
- HMFHBZSHGGEWLO-UHFFFAOYSA-N alpha-D-Furanose-Ribose Natural products OCC1OC(O)C(O)C1O HMFHBZSHGGEWLO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NGFMICBWJRZIBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N alpha-salicin Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OC1=CC=CC=C1CO NGFMICBWJRZIBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940089837 amygdalin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- YZLOSXFCSIDECK-UHFFFAOYSA-N amygdalin Natural products OCC1OC(OCC2OC(O)C(O)C(O)C2O)C(O)C(O)C1OC(C#N)c3ccccc3 YZLOSXFCSIDECK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VNRZCPPHNPEBFC-UHFFFAOYSA-N anthranoyllycoctonine Natural products CCN1CC2(COC(=O)c3ccccc3N)CCC(OC)C45C2C(OC)C(O)(C14)C6(O)CC(OC)C7CC5(O)C6C7OC VNRZCPPHNPEBFC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PYMYPHUHKUWMLA-UHFFFAOYSA-N arabinose Natural products OCC(O)C(O)C(O)C=O PYMYPHUHKUWMLA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960000271 arbutin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000016520 artichoke thistle Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- DZBUGLKDJFMEHC-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzoquinolinylidene Natural products C1=CC=CC2=CC3=CC=CC=C3N=C21 DZBUGLKDJFMEHC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- DLRVVLDZNNYCBX-ZZFZYMBESA-N beta-melibiose Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H]1OC[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)O1 DLRVVLDZNNYCBX-ZZFZYMBESA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910000019 calcium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001913 cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002678 cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013365 dairy product Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003085 diluting agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003292 diminished effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000001962 electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019414 erythritol Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229940009714 erythritol Drugs 0.000 description 1
- UNXHWFMMPAWVPI-ZXZARUISSA-N erythritol Chemical compound OC[C@H](O)[C@H](O)CO UNXHWFMMPAWVPI-ZXZARUISSA-N 0.000 description 1
- XHCADAYNFIFUHF-TVKJYDDYSA-N esculin Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1OC(C(=C1)O)=CC2=C1OC(=O)C=C2 XHCADAYNFIFUHF-TVKJYDDYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940093496 esculin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- AWRMZKLXZLNBBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N esculin Natural products OC1OC(COc2cc3C=CC(=O)Oc3cc2O)C(O)C(O)C1O AWRMZKLXZLNBBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZMMJGEGLRURXTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethidium bromide Chemical compound [Br-].C12=CC(N)=CC=C2C2=CC=C(N)C=C2[N+](CC)=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 ZMMJGEGLRURXTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960005542 ethidium bromide Drugs 0.000 description 1
- PPCXFTKZPBHXIW-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethyl ethanesulfonate Chemical compound CCOS(=O)(=O)CC PPCXFTKZPBHXIW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- YGHHWSRCTPQFFC-UHFFFAOYSA-N eucalyptosin A Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OC1C(OC(C#N)C=2C=CC=CC=2)OC(CO)C(O)C1O YGHHWSRCTPQFFC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000006846 excision repair Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009313 farming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003608 fece Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000004459 forage Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000855 fungicidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001408 fungistatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- FBPFZTCFMRRESA-GUCUJZIJSA-N galactitol Chemical compound OC[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)CO FBPFZTCFMRRESA-GUCUJZIJSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229930182830 galactose Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 229940050410 gluconate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940096919 glycogen Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000004461 grass silage Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009036 growth inhibition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000383 hazardous chemical Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009396 hybridization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- CDAISMWEOUEBRE-GPIVLXJGSA-N inositol Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]1O CDAISMWEOUEBRE-GPIVLXJGSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960000367 inositol Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008101 lactose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006194 liquid suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000594 mannitol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010355 mannitol Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- HOVAGTYPODGVJG-ZFYZTMLRSA-N methyl alpha-D-glucopyranoside Chemical compound CO[C@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O HOVAGTYPODGVJG-ZFYZTMLRSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019426 modified starch Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 231100000350 mutagenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000050 nutritive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- BJRNKVDFDLYUGJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N p-hydroxyphenyl beta-D-alloside Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 BJRNKVDFDLYUGJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002085 persistent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000012357 postreplication repair Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000012015 potatoes Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003389 potentiating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- MUPFEKGTMRGPLJ-ZQSKZDJDSA-N raffinose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O)O1 MUPFEKGTMRGPLJ-ZQSKZDJDSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000006798 recombination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005215 recombination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108091008146 restriction endonucleases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- HEBKCHPVOIAQTA-ZXFHETKHSA-N ribitol Chemical compound OC[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)CO HEBKCHPVOIAQTA-ZXFHETKHSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940120668 salicin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- CDAISMWEOUEBRE-UHFFFAOYSA-N scyllo-inosotol Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1O CDAISMWEOUEBRE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000008247 solid mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000600 sorbitol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002269 spontaneous effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008107 starch Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019698 starch Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000007858 starting material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000008163 sugars Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036642 wellbeing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000811 xylitol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010447 xylitol Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- HEBKCHPVOIAQTA-SCDXWVJYSA-N xylitol Chemical compound OC[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)CO HEBKCHPVOIAQTA-SCDXWVJYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960002675 xylitol Drugs 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Fodder In General (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
The invention relates to a method of preserving agricultural products comprising treating these pro-ducts with an effective amount of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187 or mutants thereof and the treat-ing organism.
The invention relates to a method of preserving agricultural products comprising treating these pro-ducts with an effective amount of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187 or mutants thereof and the treat-ing organism.
Description
~Z69~342 TITLE OF THE INVENTION:
METBOD AND INOCUL~NT FOR
PRESERVING AGRICULT~RAL PRODUCTS
FOR ANIMAL FFED
BPCKG~O~D OF THE INVE~TION
Field of the Invention The invention relates to a method for preserving agricultural products which are used for animal feed and a Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant for use in the method.
Brief ~escription of the Backaround ~rt Spoilage of stored agricultural products is a major problem in the farming industry. This spoilage often arises during long-term storage of these aqri-cultural materials. Typically, long-term storage is necessary to provide adequate supplies of feed for domestic animals during those times of the year when fresh feeds are unavailable.
The storage of silage, baled hay, and storaae of high moisture grain are among the most common approaches for providing an adequate supply of feed for those months when fresh feeds are unavailable.
~ ilage is produced by the anaerobic fermentation of the materials described above. Typically, the material i~ veaetable matter which is cut and then ~`
~ -~2 9942 loaded into a silo, most commonly a vertical cylin-drical structure, and kept anaerobic to inhibit the growth of aerobic spoilage organisms. Ideally, under anaerobic conditions the homofermentative bacteria proliferate, producing lactic acid which, by lowering the pH of the environment, further inhibits the qrowth of undesirable organisms. Unfortunately, the contents of the silo often become exposed to air due to leaks in the silo structure or during the gradual removal of silage. Such re-exposure to aerobic conditions allows proliferation of fungi to occur and results in spoil-age of the silage.
In most circumstances, hay is cut and allowed to dry in the field until the moisture level has dropped to 8-15%. This drying process is performed because hay baled at higher levels of moisture is much more likely to degenerate due to th`e influence of heat of decomposition and the activity of epiphytic spoilage organisms. Unfortunately, while drying the hay to 8-15% moisture substantially avoids these detrimental effects, these low levels of moisture resul, in high field losses due to drying and hay of diminished nutritional value due to loss of the leafy ~art of the plant. It is, therefore, most desirable to bail hay at moisture levels of 25-30% if deterioration due to heat and microorganisms can be controlled.
The high moisture grain is stored in silos under anaerobic conditions, as described above for silage.
Spoilage of high-moisture corn is due primarily to funai which proliferate under storaae conditions.
~andida auilliermondii, Candida ~elliculosa, ~ansemula __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ anomala, Penicillium s~p., and ~speroillus sp~. are .
among those fungi often responsible for the spoilage of high-moisture orains and silaae.
Often the materials which are preserved using these processes contain naturally-occurring o~portu-nistic epiphytes. These epiphytes may be beneficial or detrimental in determining the eventual status of the preserved agricultural material and compete among themselves for ecological dominance in the stored material.
The predominance of undesirable organisms can result in spoilage and contamination of the feed material such that it can no lonaer be used to main-tain domestic animals. These undesirable organisms may exert their effect by destroying the nutritive value of the feed, or even by producing toxins which are dangerous to the well-being of the animals. A
common source of s~oilage organisms is found in stor-age facilities and on associated processino equipment.
These spoilage organisms may be either bacteria or fungi. Common bacterial spoilaoe organisms are those which are members of the genera Clostridium and Listeria. Fungal spoilage is often caused by members of the genera ~sperqillus, Candida, Mucor, and Sac-charomyces.
Various approaches have been made to limit the proliferation of those epiphytes and storage organisms responsible for spoilage of agricultural products.
Since the de~irable epiphytes are tolerant of low pH, while spoilage organisms such as Clostridium ~ are not, one simple approach has been to spray the agri-cultural material at the time of storage with an acid as, for example, propionic acid. ~ major disadvantage ~2605 073185 lZ69942 of this approach is its cost since large quantities of acid must be used to adequately treat the agricultural material. In addition, the inherently toxic and cor-rosive nature of propionic acid requires that special handling techniques be used by the farmer to protect personnel handling the acid. ~urther, all equipment coming in contact with the acid must be thoroughly decontaminated to avoid corrosive damaae.
Another approach to limiting the arowth of unde-sirable organisms during the storaae of aaricultural materials has been to inoculate these materials with those epiphytes thought to be beneficial to the pre-servation of the agricultural material such that the epiphytes will be able to out-compete and thereby, limit the proliferation of the spoilage organisms.
Those organisms which were considered most beneficial in the past nave been selected primarily on the basis that they were homofermentative lactic acid producers.
The rationale for this approach is that the low pH
caused by the lactic acid produced by these organisms would inhibit the growth of spoilage organisms.
Strains from species of the genera Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Pedicoccus are among those consid-ered to be most beneficial in achieving this tyDe of inhibitory effect.
Lactic acid bacteria have often been used in the preservation of food products utilizing fermentation processes. For example, Jeffreys, United States Patent 3,677,897, discloses a method of culturing and preserving lactic acid bacteria for use as starter cultures in various fermentation Drocesses. The patentee states that the method of the invention can ~Z699g2 be used to stabilize any of the lactic acid bacteria, singly or in combination, which are well known in the dairy and fermentation industries. ~mong those organ-isms which are mentioned is actobacillus E~antarum.
The method comprises coating the organisms with an acetylated monoglyceride and adding a carrier selected from the group consisting of modified cellulose and modified starches as, for example, bran solids.
In Moon (Journal of Science, Food & Aqriculture, 32: 675 (1981)), the author studied the effect of experimental silage prepared from green bean and potato processing wastes which were inoculated with a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum. Since these materials were very high in moisture, it was necessary to add ground peanut hulls to reduce the percentage of moisture prior to inoculationO~ In producing silage in this manner, the author reports that large numbers of undesirable organisms were only present in the uninoc-ulated control silages and that overall the addition of ~. plantarum had a beneficial effect on the fermen-tation of this silage material.
Woolford et al. (Grass & Forage Scie ce, 39: 139 k (1984)) describes studies on the effect of different cultures of lactic acid bacteria on silage fermenta-tion. The authors set up experimental silages and evaluated 21 strains of lactic acid bacteria from various genera and species, in terms of meeting cer-tain criteria which the authors believe are indicative of the ability to produce good silage. The authors state that none of these cultures satisfied all of the criteria, but three strains (Stre~tococcus durans, strain 1024; Lactobacillus acido~hilus, strain 2356;
~2605 073185 `- 1Z699~
and Lactobacillus plantarum, strain 6) had greater potential for producing good farm silage than the other 18 strains tested.
In a study reported by McMahon et al. (~pplied Microbioloqy, 30: 103 tl975)), the authors studied the deterioration of high-moisture corn in leaky silos which were filled with either normal high-moisture corn ~HMC) or with HMC severely infested with Southern corn leaf blight fungus (Helminthosporium _aydis). The authors determined the number of mesophilic bacteria, lactobacilli, coliforms, yeast and molds present on the corn samples as received and periodically during 220 days of storage. The authors state that Lacto-bacillus plantarum was the most frequent bacterial isolate, although it was not as predominant in the normal corn as had been found in a previous study.
Indeed, L. plantarum was found at greater frequency in the blight infested corn than in the normal corn.
In Dellagio et al. (S~YStemic ~ Ppplied Microbiol_-~, 5: 534 (1984)), the authors studied the lactic acid bacteria present in high-moisture corn grain for up to 120 days using DN~-DN~ hybridization. The authors determined that all of the homofermentative lactobacilli tested were highly related to the type strain of Lactobacillus vlantarum.
The American Type Culture Collection has publicly available a strain of Lactobacillus E~ntarum (ATCC
14431) which was isolated from grass silage.
However, in spite of extensive research into the isolation and development of various organisms for use as agricultural product inoculants, spoilage of these products has remained an on-going problem.
~Z~9g42 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In the present invention, agricultural products that are to be preserved as a feed are treated with an effective amount of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC
53187. ~nlike most members of this species, L. ~lan-tarum ATCC 53187 is capable of inhibiting common fungal spoilage organisms that are known to be respon-sible for the deterioration of agricultural products stored for long periods of time for use as feeds. It is possible that the inhibition of these fungi and molds is caused by the production of a toxin or anti-biotic-like substance which causes a fungistatic or fungicidal effect on these organi~ms.
Thus, the present invention provides a method of treating agricultural products to enhance their pres-ervation which comprises administering to the agricul-tural products an effective amount of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187 or mutants thereof.
The invention also provides the T,actobacillus strain and effective mutants thereof.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Spoilage of agricultural products due to deteri-oration caused by the growth of harmful fungi is a major problem in the agricultural community. In the method according to the invention, agricultural pro-ducts are treated with an effective amount of Tacto-bacillus plantarum ATCC 53187, or mutants thereof, to enhance preservation of the ~roducts and diminish the proliferation of spoilaae organisms.
The method of the invention is especially useful in that the oraanism of the invention is non-~atho-genic and thereby will not cause disease in an animal consuming the preserved agricultural product. Unlike many types of preservation which util;ze the applica-tion of expensive or hazardous chemicals, the method of the invention relies instead uDon the enhancement of coloni~ation by desirable organisms through improv-ing their ability to compete with naturally-occurring spoilage organisms. Controlling these harmful organ-isms is a major consideration, since many of the organisms associated with spoilage of preserved agri-cultural products are fungi which are known to produce potent mycotoxins. These mycotoxins are known to cause illness and even death in animals consuming feed contaminated with these fungi.
The organism which is effective in enhancing the preservation of agricultural products is Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187 or effective mutants thereof.
I,actobacillus ~ntarum ~TCC 53187 is on deposit at the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Maryland and has the ATCC ~ccession ~o. 53187. By the term "effective mutants thereof" is intended any and all mutants of ~. plantarum ATCC 53187 which demon-strate the desired fungal inhibiting properties of the present strain or substantial equivalents thereof.
Such mutants are considered to be functionally equiva-lent to the parental strain. L. plantarum ATCC 53187 was isolated from corn silage using techniques well known in the art.
It is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art that spontaneous mutation is a common occurrence in microorganisms and that mutations can also be in-tentionally produced by a variety of known techniques.
For example, mutants can be induced using chemical, radioactive, and recombinant techniques. Chemical ~2605 073185 g mutagens can be divided into four main qroups based upon their mode of activity. The four groups and examples of each are set out in Table 1 below.
ACTIVITY EXAMPBES
Base analogues 5-bromouracil, 2-amino-purine Deaminating agents nitrous acid, hydroxyla-mine Alkylating agents ethyl ethanesulfonate, nitrosoguanidine Acridine derivatives Acridine orange, ethidium bromide Radiation-induced mutations can be caused by such agents as ultraviolet light and x-rays. The primary mechanism by which mutations may be caused result from excision or post-replication repair by recombination.
In addition, mutations can also be produced by recom-binant techniques using restriction endonucleases. The utilization of this technique is especially valuable in allowing the deletion or insertion of large DNA
fragments. The present invention includes within its scope mutants of L. ~lantarum ~TCC 53187 produced utilizing any of the mutagens known to the art.
Regardless of the manner in which the mutations are induced, the critical issue is that the mutants function to preserve the agricultural product as described for the parent strain. In other words, the present invention includes mutations resulting in such ~269942 minor changes as, for example, minor taxonomic altera-tions such as the fermentation of certain sugars.
The agricultural products which are effectively preserved by the present invention include all agri-cultural products in which deterioration due to the activity of spoilage organisms is a potential problem.
Among the agricultural products which can be treated using the present invention are silage, baled hay and high-moisture grain. By the term ~silage" is intended animal feeds prepared from agricultural products that can be derived from animal or vegetable matter or mixtures thereof. The animal matter which is utilized can be derived from fish, poultry, or cattle. Most commonly, silage is derived from the fermentation of vegetable material such as, for exam-ple, grasses, legumes, whole-crop cereals, potatoes, or food manufacture wastes. Commonly ensiled grasses are rye grass, timothy, cocksfoot, and fesque. Exam-ples of legumes which can be used to produce silage are alfalfa, peas, clover, lucerne, sainfoin, field bean, common vetch, and lupin. Whole-crop cereals which can be ensiled include corn, sorahum, barley, wheat, oats, and rye. It is also possible to produce silage using waste material derived from food manu-facturing processes such as, for example, those derived from sugar cane, sugar beets, peas, or fruit.
By the term "hay" is intended all forms of hay as the term is commonly used in agriculture. Hay is most commonly composed of alfalfa, or mixtures of alfalfa and grass.
By the term "high-moisture grain" is intended corn in the form of whole shelled corn, or ground or rolled shelled corn.
~.269~4;2 In the present invention, the inhibition of fungi responsible for spoilage of agricultural products such as silage, hay, and high-moisture grain, is accom-plished by treating the agricultural material with L.
E~l___rum ATCC 53187 or compositions containing this organism, as well as treatment with effective mutants of L. plantarum ATCC 53187 and compositions containing same.
The compositions which are used in the method of the invention may be in either liquid or dry form and may contain additional bacterial strains. In solid treatment forms, the composition may comprise the organism of the invention together with a carrier. The carrier may be in the nature of an aqueous or non-aqueous liquid or a solid. In solid forms, the compo-sition may contain such diluents as calcium carbonate, starch, or cellu]ose. The solid composition can be applied directly to the agricultural product or can be first dispersed in a liquid suspension and sprayed thereon.
Typical compositions useful for treating products according to this invention contain 102-1012 viable organisms/gm, preferably 104-101 viable organisms/gm, and more preferably 106-103 viable organisms/gm.
The treatment range for an agricultural product is typically 105-1015 viable organisms/ton, preferably 107-1013 viable organisms/ton, and more preferably 109-1011 viable organisms/ton.
The compositions of the present invention can include, in addition to Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC
53187 or mutants of this organism, such other common farm product preservation organisms as, for example, Streptococcus spp. or Pediococcus spp.
Those or ordinary skill in the art will know of other suitable carriers and dosaqe forms, or will be able to ascertain such, using routine experimentation.
Further, the administration of the various composi-tions can be carried out using standard techniques common to those of ordinary skill in the art.
The above disclosure ~enerally describes the present invention. A more complete understanding can be obtained by reference to the following specific exa~ples which are provided herein for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to be limiting unless otherwise specified.
Lactobacillus plantarum (ATCC 53187) is a gram-positive rod which was isolated from corn silage. The fermentation profile of this organisms is shown in Table 2. This profile was performed using a com-mercially available test system ~CHL kit, ~MS Labora-tories, Darts Mill, Flemington, New Jersey1.
* Trad~k .. ,., ,, :
~ A2605 073185 *.. ~,~. , .. I
12699~2 Table 2 SUBSTRATE RE~CTION SUBSTRATE RF~CTION
Glycerol - Salicin +
Erythritol - Cellobiose +
D-Arabinose - Maltose +
L-Arabinose + Lactose +
Ribose + Melibiose +
~-Xylose - & ccharose +
LrXylose - Trehalose +
Adonitol - Inuline E-Methyl-xyloside - Melezitose +
Galactose + D-Raffinose +
O-Glucose + Starch D-Fructose + Glycogen D-Mannose + Xylitol L-Sorbose - beta-Gentiobiose +
Rhamnose - D-Tùranose Dulcitol - D-~yxose Inositol - D-Tagatose Mannitol + D-Fucose Sorbitol + L-Fucose alpha-Methyl D-nannoside - D-Arabitol alpha-Methyl D-glucoside - L-Arabitol N-~cetyl-glucosamine + Gluconate +
Amygdalin + 2-Keto-gluconate Arbutin + 5-Keto-glucoate Esculin +
9~4;~
Strain ATCC ~3187 was grown in MRS broth (DIFCO) supplemented with DL-threonine (Chassy et al., Journal of Bacterioloqy, 127: 1576, 1976) and the plasmid profile determined as described by Anderson et al., Applied & Environmental Microbioloqy, 46: 549 (1983).
The size of the plasmids was established using hori-zontal electrophoresis in agarose tO.6%~ with a TRIS-borate buffer (Myers et al., Journal of sacteri-oloqy, 127: 1529 (1976)). ATCC 53187 was found to have plasmids of 3.5 and 35.0 me~adaltons.
EXAMPL~ 2 The ability of L. plantarum ATCC 53187 to inhibit fungi known to cause spoilaae in aaricultural products was compared to that of 18 other strains of ~. Plan-tarum. These strains were i,solated from vegetable material that can be used to produce preserved agri-cultural feedstuffs. The indicator mold used in the experiment was isolated from spoiled high-moisture corn and was identified as being from the genus Mucor.
All isolation techniques used are common to those of skill in the art.
In order to measure the anti-mycotic activity of a given strain of L. plantarum, the organism was asep-tically streaked down the center of an ~RS agar plate (MRS broth (DIFCO) with 0.15% Bacto agar (DIFCO)), after anaerobic incubation at 37C for 48 hours to allow growth of the Lactobacillus. The funqal indi-cator organism was inoculated into 5 ml of sterile, melted (48C) Potato ~extrose ~aar (DIFCO) which was poured onto the surface of the MRS aaar plate. The overlay agar containing the fungal indicator organism was allowed to solidify at room temperature for 5-10 * Trademark lZ69942 minutes. The plates were then incubated aerobically at 37C and examined for zones of inhibition on days 4 and 7. The results of this testing are shown in Table 3.
~2605 073185 ~Z69942 Table 3 Mold Inhibition By Various Strains of ~. plantarum Strain Source Inhib_tiona_ Day 4 Day 7 ATCC 53187 corn 27 22 S80 feces 0 0 C54 corn 0 0 alpha 5 alfalfa 0 0 C55 corn 24 21 345 alfalfa 0 346 alfalfa 8 0 347 alfalfa 0 0 287 corn 0 0 SC13A corn 5 0 SC18A corn 0 0 639A grass 10 0 640A grass 3 0 15B alfalfa 10 0 57B unknown 3 0 SC30B corn 0 0 84B corn 0 0 121B corn 0 0 97A artichoke 0 0 a mm ~lthough several strains of ~. plantarum displayed early transient inhibition on Day 4, only one strain (C55) other than strain ATCC 53187 displayed persis-tent anti-mycotic activity as indicated by the zones of fungal growth inhibition on Day 7. The results of -- ~;26g~4 ~
this testing show that the ability of a given strain of L. plantarum to show anti-mycotic activity cannot be predicted.
The invention now being fully described, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as set forth herein.
~2605 073185
METBOD AND INOCUL~NT FOR
PRESERVING AGRICULT~RAL PRODUCTS
FOR ANIMAL FFED
BPCKG~O~D OF THE INVE~TION
Field of the Invention The invention relates to a method for preserving agricultural products which are used for animal feed and a Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant for use in the method.
Brief ~escription of the Backaround ~rt Spoilage of stored agricultural products is a major problem in the farming industry. This spoilage often arises during long-term storage of these aqri-cultural materials. Typically, long-term storage is necessary to provide adequate supplies of feed for domestic animals during those times of the year when fresh feeds are unavailable.
The storage of silage, baled hay, and storaae of high moisture grain are among the most common approaches for providing an adequate supply of feed for those months when fresh feeds are unavailable.
~ ilage is produced by the anaerobic fermentation of the materials described above. Typically, the material i~ veaetable matter which is cut and then ~`
~ -~2 9942 loaded into a silo, most commonly a vertical cylin-drical structure, and kept anaerobic to inhibit the growth of aerobic spoilage organisms. Ideally, under anaerobic conditions the homofermentative bacteria proliferate, producing lactic acid which, by lowering the pH of the environment, further inhibits the qrowth of undesirable organisms. Unfortunately, the contents of the silo often become exposed to air due to leaks in the silo structure or during the gradual removal of silage. Such re-exposure to aerobic conditions allows proliferation of fungi to occur and results in spoil-age of the silage.
In most circumstances, hay is cut and allowed to dry in the field until the moisture level has dropped to 8-15%. This drying process is performed because hay baled at higher levels of moisture is much more likely to degenerate due to th`e influence of heat of decomposition and the activity of epiphytic spoilage organisms. Unfortunately, while drying the hay to 8-15% moisture substantially avoids these detrimental effects, these low levels of moisture resul, in high field losses due to drying and hay of diminished nutritional value due to loss of the leafy ~art of the plant. It is, therefore, most desirable to bail hay at moisture levels of 25-30% if deterioration due to heat and microorganisms can be controlled.
The high moisture grain is stored in silos under anaerobic conditions, as described above for silage.
Spoilage of high-moisture corn is due primarily to funai which proliferate under storaae conditions.
~andida auilliermondii, Candida ~elliculosa, ~ansemula __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ anomala, Penicillium s~p., and ~speroillus sp~. are .
among those fungi often responsible for the spoilage of high-moisture orains and silaae.
Often the materials which are preserved using these processes contain naturally-occurring o~portu-nistic epiphytes. These epiphytes may be beneficial or detrimental in determining the eventual status of the preserved agricultural material and compete among themselves for ecological dominance in the stored material.
The predominance of undesirable organisms can result in spoilage and contamination of the feed material such that it can no lonaer be used to main-tain domestic animals. These undesirable organisms may exert their effect by destroying the nutritive value of the feed, or even by producing toxins which are dangerous to the well-being of the animals. A
common source of s~oilage organisms is found in stor-age facilities and on associated processino equipment.
These spoilage organisms may be either bacteria or fungi. Common bacterial spoilaoe organisms are those which are members of the genera Clostridium and Listeria. Fungal spoilage is often caused by members of the genera ~sperqillus, Candida, Mucor, and Sac-charomyces.
Various approaches have been made to limit the proliferation of those epiphytes and storage organisms responsible for spoilage of agricultural products.
Since the de~irable epiphytes are tolerant of low pH, while spoilage organisms such as Clostridium ~ are not, one simple approach has been to spray the agri-cultural material at the time of storage with an acid as, for example, propionic acid. ~ major disadvantage ~2605 073185 lZ69942 of this approach is its cost since large quantities of acid must be used to adequately treat the agricultural material. In addition, the inherently toxic and cor-rosive nature of propionic acid requires that special handling techniques be used by the farmer to protect personnel handling the acid. ~urther, all equipment coming in contact with the acid must be thoroughly decontaminated to avoid corrosive damaae.
Another approach to limiting the arowth of unde-sirable organisms during the storaae of aaricultural materials has been to inoculate these materials with those epiphytes thought to be beneficial to the pre-servation of the agricultural material such that the epiphytes will be able to out-compete and thereby, limit the proliferation of the spoilage organisms.
Those organisms which were considered most beneficial in the past nave been selected primarily on the basis that they were homofermentative lactic acid producers.
The rationale for this approach is that the low pH
caused by the lactic acid produced by these organisms would inhibit the growth of spoilage organisms.
Strains from species of the genera Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Pedicoccus are among those consid-ered to be most beneficial in achieving this tyDe of inhibitory effect.
Lactic acid bacteria have often been used in the preservation of food products utilizing fermentation processes. For example, Jeffreys, United States Patent 3,677,897, discloses a method of culturing and preserving lactic acid bacteria for use as starter cultures in various fermentation Drocesses. The patentee states that the method of the invention can ~Z699g2 be used to stabilize any of the lactic acid bacteria, singly or in combination, which are well known in the dairy and fermentation industries. ~mong those organ-isms which are mentioned is actobacillus E~antarum.
The method comprises coating the organisms with an acetylated monoglyceride and adding a carrier selected from the group consisting of modified cellulose and modified starches as, for example, bran solids.
In Moon (Journal of Science, Food & Aqriculture, 32: 675 (1981)), the author studied the effect of experimental silage prepared from green bean and potato processing wastes which were inoculated with a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum. Since these materials were very high in moisture, it was necessary to add ground peanut hulls to reduce the percentage of moisture prior to inoculationO~ In producing silage in this manner, the author reports that large numbers of undesirable organisms were only present in the uninoc-ulated control silages and that overall the addition of ~. plantarum had a beneficial effect on the fermen-tation of this silage material.
Woolford et al. (Grass & Forage Scie ce, 39: 139 k (1984)) describes studies on the effect of different cultures of lactic acid bacteria on silage fermenta-tion. The authors set up experimental silages and evaluated 21 strains of lactic acid bacteria from various genera and species, in terms of meeting cer-tain criteria which the authors believe are indicative of the ability to produce good silage. The authors state that none of these cultures satisfied all of the criteria, but three strains (Stre~tococcus durans, strain 1024; Lactobacillus acido~hilus, strain 2356;
~2605 073185 `- 1Z699~
and Lactobacillus plantarum, strain 6) had greater potential for producing good farm silage than the other 18 strains tested.
In a study reported by McMahon et al. (~pplied Microbioloqy, 30: 103 tl975)), the authors studied the deterioration of high-moisture corn in leaky silos which were filled with either normal high-moisture corn ~HMC) or with HMC severely infested with Southern corn leaf blight fungus (Helminthosporium _aydis). The authors determined the number of mesophilic bacteria, lactobacilli, coliforms, yeast and molds present on the corn samples as received and periodically during 220 days of storage. The authors state that Lacto-bacillus plantarum was the most frequent bacterial isolate, although it was not as predominant in the normal corn as had been found in a previous study.
Indeed, L. plantarum was found at greater frequency in the blight infested corn than in the normal corn.
In Dellagio et al. (S~YStemic ~ Ppplied Microbiol_-~, 5: 534 (1984)), the authors studied the lactic acid bacteria present in high-moisture corn grain for up to 120 days using DN~-DN~ hybridization. The authors determined that all of the homofermentative lactobacilli tested were highly related to the type strain of Lactobacillus vlantarum.
The American Type Culture Collection has publicly available a strain of Lactobacillus E~ntarum (ATCC
14431) which was isolated from grass silage.
However, in spite of extensive research into the isolation and development of various organisms for use as agricultural product inoculants, spoilage of these products has remained an on-going problem.
~Z~9g42 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In the present invention, agricultural products that are to be preserved as a feed are treated with an effective amount of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC
53187. ~nlike most members of this species, L. ~lan-tarum ATCC 53187 is capable of inhibiting common fungal spoilage organisms that are known to be respon-sible for the deterioration of agricultural products stored for long periods of time for use as feeds. It is possible that the inhibition of these fungi and molds is caused by the production of a toxin or anti-biotic-like substance which causes a fungistatic or fungicidal effect on these organi~ms.
Thus, the present invention provides a method of treating agricultural products to enhance their pres-ervation which comprises administering to the agricul-tural products an effective amount of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187 or mutants thereof.
The invention also provides the T,actobacillus strain and effective mutants thereof.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Spoilage of agricultural products due to deteri-oration caused by the growth of harmful fungi is a major problem in the agricultural community. In the method according to the invention, agricultural pro-ducts are treated with an effective amount of Tacto-bacillus plantarum ATCC 53187, or mutants thereof, to enhance preservation of the ~roducts and diminish the proliferation of spoilaae organisms.
The method of the invention is especially useful in that the oraanism of the invention is non-~atho-genic and thereby will not cause disease in an animal consuming the preserved agricultural product. Unlike many types of preservation which util;ze the applica-tion of expensive or hazardous chemicals, the method of the invention relies instead uDon the enhancement of coloni~ation by desirable organisms through improv-ing their ability to compete with naturally-occurring spoilage organisms. Controlling these harmful organ-isms is a major consideration, since many of the organisms associated with spoilage of preserved agri-cultural products are fungi which are known to produce potent mycotoxins. These mycotoxins are known to cause illness and even death in animals consuming feed contaminated with these fungi.
The organism which is effective in enhancing the preservation of agricultural products is Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187 or effective mutants thereof.
I,actobacillus ~ntarum ~TCC 53187 is on deposit at the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Maryland and has the ATCC ~ccession ~o. 53187. By the term "effective mutants thereof" is intended any and all mutants of ~. plantarum ATCC 53187 which demon-strate the desired fungal inhibiting properties of the present strain or substantial equivalents thereof.
Such mutants are considered to be functionally equiva-lent to the parental strain. L. plantarum ATCC 53187 was isolated from corn silage using techniques well known in the art.
It is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art that spontaneous mutation is a common occurrence in microorganisms and that mutations can also be in-tentionally produced by a variety of known techniques.
For example, mutants can be induced using chemical, radioactive, and recombinant techniques. Chemical ~2605 073185 g mutagens can be divided into four main qroups based upon their mode of activity. The four groups and examples of each are set out in Table 1 below.
ACTIVITY EXAMPBES
Base analogues 5-bromouracil, 2-amino-purine Deaminating agents nitrous acid, hydroxyla-mine Alkylating agents ethyl ethanesulfonate, nitrosoguanidine Acridine derivatives Acridine orange, ethidium bromide Radiation-induced mutations can be caused by such agents as ultraviolet light and x-rays. The primary mechanism by which mutations may be caused result from excision or post-replication repair by recombination.
In addition, mutations can also be produced by recom-binant techniques using restriction endonucleases. The utilization of this technique is especially valuable in allowing the deletion or insertion of large DNA
fragments. The present invention includes within its scope mutants of L. ~lantarum ~TCC 53187 produced utilizing any of the mutagens known to the art.
Regardless of the manner in which the mutations are induced, the critical issue is that the mutants function to preserve the agricultural product as described for the parent strain. In other words, the present invention includes mutations resulting in such ~269942 minor changes as, for example, minor taxonomic altera-tions such as the fermentation of certain sugars.
The agricultural products which are effectively preserved by the present invention include all agri-cultural products in which deterioration due to the activity of spoilage organisms is a potential problem.
Among the agricultural products which can be treated using the present invention are silage, baled hay and high-moisture grain. By the term ~silage" is intended animal feeds prepared from agricultural products that can be derived from animal or vegetable matter or mixtures thereof. The animal matter which is utilized can be derived from fish, poultry, or cattle. Most commonly, silage is derived from the fermentation of vegetable material such as, for exam-ple, grasses, legumes, whole-crop cereals, potatoes, or food manufacture wastes. Commonly ensiled grasses are rye grass, timothy, cocksfoot, and fesque. Exam-ples of legumes which can be used to produce silage are alfalfa, peas, clover, lucerne, sainfoin, field bean, common vetch, and lupin. Whole-crop cereals which can be ensiled include corn, sorahum, barley, wheat, oats, and rye. It is also possible to produce silage using waste material derived from food manu-facturing processes such as, for example, those derived from sugar cane, sugar beets, peas, or fruit.
By the term "hay" is intended all forms of hay as the term is commonly used in agriculture. Hay is most commonly composed of alfalfa, or mixtures of alfalfa and grass.
By the term "high-moisture grain" is intended corn in the form of whole shelled corn, or ground or rolled shelled corn.
~.269~4;2 In the present invention, the inhibition of fungi responsible for spoilage of agricultural products such as silage, hay, and high-moisture grain, is accom-plished by treating the agricultural material with L.
E~l___rum ATCC 53187 or compositions containing this organism, as well as treatment with effective mutants of L. plantarum ATCC 53187 and compositions containing same.
The compositions which are used in the method of the invention may be in either liquid or dry form and may contain additional bacterial strains. In solid treatment forms, the composition may comprise the organism of the invention together with a carrier. The carrier may be in the nature of an aqueous or non-aqueous liquid or a solid. In solid forms, the compo-sition may contain such diluents as calcium carbonate, starch, or cellu]ose. The solid composition can be applied directly to the agricultural product or can be first dispersed in a liquid suspension and sprayed thereon.
Typical compositions useful for treating products according to this invention contain 102-1012 viable organisms/gm, preferably 104-101 viable organisms/gm, and more preferably 106-103 viable organisms/gm.
The treatment range for an agricultural product is typically 105-1015 viable organisms/ton, preferably 107-1013 viable organisms/ton, and more preferably 109-1011 viable organisms/ton.
The compositions of the present invention can include, in addition to Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC
53187 or mutants of this organism, such other common farm product preservation organisms as, for example, Streptococcus spp. or Pediococcus spp.
Those or ordinary skill in the art will know of other suitable carriers and dosaqe forms, or will be able to ascertain such, using routine experimentation.
Further, the administration of the various composi-tions can be carried out using standard techniques common to those of ordinary skill in the art.
The above disclosure ~enerally describes the present invention. A more complete understanding can be obtained by reference to the following specific exa~ples which are provided herein for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to be limiting unless otherwise specified.
Lactobacillus plantarum (ATCC 53187) is a gram-positive rod which was isolated from corn silage. The fermentation profile of this organisms is shown in Table 2. This profile was performed using a com-mercially available test system ~CHL kit, ~MS Labora-tories, Darts Mill, Flemington, New Jersey1.
* Trad~k .. ,., ,, :
~ A2605 073185 *.. ~,~. , .. I
12699~2 Table 2 SUBSTRATE RE~CTION SUBSTRATE RF~CTION
Glycerol - Salicin +
Erythritol - Cellobiose +
D-Arabinose - Maltose +
L-Arabinose + Lactose +
Ribose + Melibiose +
~-Xylose - & ccharose +
LrXylose - Trehalose +
Adonitol - Inuline E-Methyl-xyloside - Melezitose +
Galactose + D-Raffinose +
O-Glucose + Starch D-Fructose + Glycogen D-Mannose + Xylitol L-Sorbose - beta-Gentiobiose +
Rhamnose - D-Tùranose Dulcitol - D-~yxose Inositol - D-Tagatose Mannitol + D-Fucose Sorbitol + L-Fucose alpha-Methyl D-nannoside - D-Arabitol alpha-Methyl D-glucoside - L-Arabitol N-~cetyl-glucosamine + Gluconate +
Amygdalin + 2-Keto-gluconate Arbutin + 5-Keto-glucoate Esculin +
9~4;~
Strain ATCC ~3187 was grown in MRS broth (DIFCO) supplemented with DL-threonine (Chassy et al., Journal of Bacterioloqy, 127: 1576, 1976) and the plasmid profile determined as described by Anderson et al., Applied & Environmental Microbioloqy, 46: 549 (1983).
The size of the plasmids was established using hori-zontal electrophoresis in agarose tO.6%~ with a TRIS-borate buffer (Myers et al., Journal of sacteri-oloqy, 127: 1529 (1976)). ATCC 53187 was found to have plasmids of 3.5 and 35.0 me~adaltons.
EXAMPL~ 2 The ability of L. plantarum ATCC 53187 to inhibit fungi known to cause spoilaae in aaricultural products was compared to that of 18 other strains of ~. Plan-tarum. These strains were i,solated from vegetable material that can be used to produce preserved agri-cultural feedstuffs. The indicator mold used in the experiment was isolated from spoiled high-moisture corn and was identified as being from the genus Mucor.
All isolation techniques used are common to those of skill in the art.
In order to measure the anti-mycotic activity of a given strain of L. plantarum, the organism was asep-tically streaked down the center of an ~RS agar plate (MRS broth (DIFCO) with 0.15% Bacto agar (DIFCO)), after anaerobic incubation at 37C for 48 hours to allow growth of the Lactobacillus. The funqal indi-cator organism was inoculated into 5 ml of sterile, melted (48C) Potato ~extrose ~aar (DIFCO) which was poured onto the surface of the MRS aaar plate. The overlay agar containing the fungal indicator organism was allowed to solidify at room temperature for 5-10 * Trademark lZ69942 minutes. The plates were then incubated aerobically at 37C and examined for zones of inhibition on days 4 and 7. The results of this testing are shown in Table 3.
~2605 073185 ~Z69942 Table 3 Mold Inhibition By Various Strains of ~. plantarum Strain Source Inhib_tiona_ Day 4 Day 7 ATCC 53187 corn 27 22 S80 feces 0 0 C54 corn 0 0 alpha 5 alfalfa 0 0 C55 corn 24 21 345 alfalfa 0 346 alfalfa 8 0 347 alfalfa 0 0 287 corn 0 0 SC13A corn 5 0 SC18A corn 0 0 639A grass 10 0 640A grass 3 0 15B alfalfa 10 0 57B unknown 3 0 SC30B corn 0 0 84B corn 0 0 121B corn 0 0 97A artichoke 0 0 a mm ~lthough several strains of ~. plantarum displayed early transient inhibition on Day 4, only one strain (C55) other than strain ATCC 53187 displayed persis-tent anti-mycotic activity as indicated by the zones of fungal growth inhibition on Day 7. The results of -- ~;26g~4 ~
this testing show that the ability of a given strain of L. plantarum to show anti-mycotic activity cannot be predicted.
The invention now being fully described, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as set forth herein.
~2605 073185
Claims (17)
LETTERS PATENT IS:
1. A method of preserving an agricultural pro-duct which comprises treating said product with an effective amount of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187 or effective mutants thereof.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said agricul-tural product is selected from silage, baled hay, and high-moisture grain.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein said silage comprises at least one of animal or vegetable matter.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein said animal matter comprises at least one of fish, poultry, or cattle.
5. The method of claim 3, wherein said vegetable matter comprises at least one of grass, legume, whole-crop cereal, potato, or food manufacture waste.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein said grass is selected from rye grass, timothy, cocksfoot, or fescue.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein said legume is selected from alfalfa, pea, clover, lucerne, sainfoin, field bean, common vetch, or lupin.
8. The method of claim 5, wherein said whole-crop cereal is selected from corn, sorghum, barley, wheat, oats, or rye.
9. The method of claim 5, wherein said food manufacture waste is selected from sugar cane, sugar beets, peas, or fruit waste.
10. The method of claim 2, wherein said high-moisture grain is selected from corn, sorghum, barley, wheat, oats, or rye.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein said treating comprises applying said Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC
53187 or mutants thereof to said agricultural products by mixing or spraying.
53187 or mutants thereof to said agricultural products by mixing or spraying.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein said mixing or spraying uses a bacterial composition comprising Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187 or effective mutants thereof.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein said bac-terial composition is in a liquid or dried form.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein said composition comprises additional bacterial strains.
15. A method of suppressing the growth of fungi in an agricultural product which comprises treating said product with an effective amount of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187 or effective mutants thereof.
16. A biologically pure culture of an organism selected from the group consisting of:
(a) Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187 which possesses a fungal inhibiting property, and (b) a mutant derivative of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC
53187 which possesses a fungal inhibiting property that is equivalent to said fungal inhibiting property of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187;
wherein said culture is capable of use in enhancing the preser-vation of an agricultural product.
(a) Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187 which possesses a fungal inhibiting property, and (b) a mutant derivative of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC
53187 which possesses a fungal inhibiting property that is equivalent to said fungal inhibiting property of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 53187;
wherein said culture is capable of use in enhancing the preser-vation of an agricultural product.
17. A composition of matter comprising the biologically pure culture of claim 16 and a carrier.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000528549A CA1269942A (en) | 1987-01-30 | 1987-01-30 | Method and inoculant for preserving agricultural products for animal feed |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000528549A CA1269942A (en) | 1987-01-30 | 1987-01-30 | Method and inoculant for preserving agricultural products for animal feed |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1269942A true CA1269942A (en) | 1990-06-05 |
Family
ID=4134857
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000528549A Expired CA1269942A (en) | 1987-01-30 | 1987-01-30 | Method and inoculant for preserving agricultural products for animal feed |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1269942A (en) |
-
1987
- 1987-01-30 CA CA000528549A patent/CA1269942A/en not_active Expired
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4842871A (en) | Method and inoculant for preserving agricultural products for animal feed | |
| Kung Jr et al. | The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and other additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of barley silage | |
| CA2246273C (en) | Microorganisms and their use in treating animal feed and silage | |
| CA1301060C (en) | Bacterial treatment to preserve hay quality by addition of microorganisms of the genus bacillus | |
| US20090011085A1 (en) | Ferulate Esterase Producing Strains and Methods of Using Same | |
| CN106103697B (en) | Fast-acting Lactobacillus strain and its use in improving the aerobic stability of silage | |
| GB2237723A (en) | Preservation of silage | |
| US5371011A (en) | Mold control in forage | |
| AU626341B2 (en) | Forage preservation | |
| US6054148A (en) | Method and compositions for ensiling silage | |
| EP0408220B1 (en) | Mould control in forage | |
| US20070231311A1 (en) | Method for preserving grain by-products | |
| US4863747A (en) | Bacterial treatment to preserve hay quality by addition of microorganisms of the genus Bacillus | |
| Zahiroddini et al. | Effects of microbial inoculants on the fermentation, nutrient retention, and aerobic stability of barley silage | |
| CA1269942A (en) | Method and inoculant for preserving agricultural products for animal feed | |
| Wu-tai et al. | The effects of two inoculants applied to forage sorghum at ensiling on silage characteristics | |
| Đorđević et al. | Development and effect of a Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant on quality of maize grain silage | |
| Lindgren | Storage of waste products for animal feed | |
| GB2310124A (en) | Microorganisms and their use in treating animal feed and silage | |
| FI95724C (en) | Feed mold prevention | |
| Santoso et al. | Jeni (2019). Effect of addition of liquid or dry inoculant of lactic acid bacteria containing different starches on the fermentation quality and in vitro nutrient digestibility of king grass silage | |
| Sofyan et al. | RESPONSE OF LACTIC ACID BACTERIA GROWTH ON THE MEDIA CONTAINING EARTH WORM MEAL (Lumbricus rubellus) AS FEED ADDITIVE |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKLA | Lapsed |