CA1161198A

CA1161198A - Process for preparing agglomerated fibrous cellulose

Info

Publication number: CA1161198A
Application number: CA000381965A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Richard L. Antrim; Louis S. Hurst
Original assignee: Standard Brands Inc
Current assignee: Standard Brands Inc
Priority date: 1980-10-08
Filing date: 1981-07-17
Publication date: 1984-01-24
Also published as: IT8124325A0; ES8204306A1; GB2085449B; MX157681A; ES504704A0; IT1153989B; NL189300B; NL8103620A; FR2491483B1; FI67560C; YU41991B; BG45218A3; AU7467381A; AU538846B2; SU1759234A3; PT73653B; SE8105926L; PT73653A; GB2085449A; FI67560B

Abstract

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A process is provided wherein a fibrous ion exchange cellulose composite is prepared by agglomerating a hydrophobic polymer and fibrous cellulose and then derivatizing the cellu-lose to impart ion exchange properties thereto. The process is an improvement over the prior art processes wherein the composite is prepared by agglomerating the polymer with fibrous cellulose which has been converted to ion exchange cellulose prior to agglomeration.

Description

1 ~ 611~ 370~/37U7 IMPROVED PROCESS FOR PREPAPING
AGGLOMERATED FIBROUS CELLULOSE

This invention relates to an improved process for preparing agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composites. More particularly, this invention relates to a more efficient process for preparing such composites having greater ion exchange capacity than those prepared 10 by prior art methods.
In food processing and other commercial applications the use of microbial or fungal enzymes adsorbed onto or bonded to inert carriers to provide immobilized biological catalysts has largely superseded older methods wherein soluble enzymes or whole cells of microorganisms were utilized. In general, the use of immobilized enzymes provides a number of significant ad-vantages over the older methods. The major advantage is that the immobilized enzymes are adaptable for use in con-20 tinuous conversion processes. Thus, a more efficient use ofthe enzyme is attained and the contact time between the enzyme and the substrate is reduced, thereby resulting in an lmproved product ~uality and a reduction in enzyme and production costs.
Although the following description and E~amples are primarily directed to the utilization of agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose to adsorb and immobilize glucose isomerase, it is contemplated that the agglomerated material will have the capability of adsorbing other 3enzymes, charqed macro-molecules such as other proteins, nucleic acids and the like, and, further, would be capable .~.

1 ~ 611~

of recovery of said molecules from a variety of substances such as food waste streams, e.g. recovery of protein from milk whey, meat processing streams and vegetable processing streams, reduction of soD from waste streams, etc.
Because of the economics invGlved in producing glucose isomerase, it is of the utmost importance to use the isomerase under conditions whereby maximum yields of fructose are produced using minimum quantities of the enzyme.
Moreover, the conditions for isomerization should be such that minimal quantities of objectionable by-vroducts are produced.
In recent years, more economical methods for `producing fructose-containing solutions have been developed utilizing glucose isomerase bound or immobilized on inert 15support materials. Such materials include various polymeric substances such as derivatized cellulose, ion exchange resins and synthetic fibers, glass, insoluble organic and inorganic compounds, etc. Glucose isomerase has also been encapsulated or englobed in suitable materials but such preparations suffer 20from the disadvantage that they generally cannot be reused.

Cellulose occurs in nature as a linear volymer comprised of anhydroglucose units joined together byJ~ -1,4 25glucosidic bonds. Each anhydroglucose unit contains three free hydroxyl groups capable of reacting with appropriate reagents to form insoluble cellulose derivatives which, due to their relative inertness, large surface area and open, porous structure, have a high adsorptive or ion-30exchange capacity for protein molecules.
The preparation and utilization of ion exchangeenzyme adsorbents derived from cellulose are known in the art. Peterson and Sober~ J.A.C.S. 78, 751 (1956) and Guthrie and Bullock, I/EC, 52, 935 (1960) described methods 1~ Bl ~g~

1 for preparing adsorptive c~llulose products which could be utilized to separate or purify enzymes and other proteins.
Tsumura et al., Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi, 14 (12), (1967) discloses binding glucose isomerase to DEAE-Sephadex.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,708,397 to Sipos relates -to a process for immobilizing glucose isomerase on basic anion exchange celluloses. U.S. Pat. No. 3!823,133 to Hurst et al. is directed to a method for preparing cationic cellulose ethers having a high adsorptive capacity for 10 enzymes and other proteinaceous materials. U.S. Pat. No.
3,838,007 to van Velzen sets forth a process in which an enzyme preparation is obtained in particulate Eorm.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,788,945 and 3,909,354, both to Thompson et al., disclose continuous processes for converting glucose 15 to fructose by passing a glucose-containing solution through fixed or fluidized beds containing glucose isomerase bound to various cellulose products. U.S. Pat. No. 3,947,325 to Dinelli et al. is directed to the preparation of cellulose-containing englobed enzymatic material. The cellulose is 20 formed from an emulsion comprising an aqueous enzyme solution and nitrocellulose. UOS. Pat. No. 3,~56,065 to Idaszak et al. is concerned with a continuous process for converting glucose to fructose whereby a glucose-containing solution is passed through a bed comprising a 25 cellulose derivative having glucose isomerase immobilizea thereon and non-porous or granular polystyrene beads. The beads inhibit packing and channeling of the bed when such is used in flow reactors. Peska et al. in an article entitled "Ion Exchange Derivatives of Bead Cellulose," Die 30 Angewandte ~akromolekulare Chemie, 53, pp. 73-80 (1976), describes several derivatized celluloses prepared in bead ' form.

1 J 61~8 1 U.S. Patents 4,110,164 and 4,168,250 both to Sutthoff et al. relate to agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composites and processes for preparing the same. In these processes a hydrophobic polymer is 5combined with fibrous cellulose which has previously been derivatized to impart ion exchange properties thereto.
Although these composites perform satisfactorily in a number of applications, their ion exchange capability and eapaeity for adsorbing or binding glucose isomerase are not as great as desired. Moreover, the economics of these processes are such as to make the production of ~he composites more eostly thàn is preferred.
The present invention relates to a ~)rocess for preparing an agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose 15composite capable of adsorbing or binding charged maero molecules wherein a fibrous eellulose having ion exchange properties is agglomerated with a hydrophobie polymer by first forming an agglomerate comprising a fibrous eellulose and a hydrophobic polymer and then derivatizing the agglom-20erated fibrous ion exehange cellulose to impart ion exchangeproperties thereto.

An improved process is provided for preparing an agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composite 5 wherein relatively large portions of the cellulose are free to adsorb charged macro-molecules. An agglomerate is formed comprising fibrous cellulose and a hydrophobic polymer following which the cellulose is derivatized to impart ion exchange properties thereto.

The term "fibrous" as used in this specification and the appended claims refers to cellulose derived from natural sources which has been subdivided or fiberized by mechanical or chemical means and does not include 15 cellulose or derivatives therof which have been subjected to chemical treatments which result in dissolution of the natural fibrous structure of the cellulose such as may occur when cellulose is derivatized to high degrees of substitution.
Fibrous cellulose can be derivatized to provide ion exchange materials having high loading capacities in regard to adsorbing or immobilizing macro-molecules. For this purpose, the cellulose may be derivatized to provide ion exchange materials having either anion or cation exchange 25 capabilities, depending upon the charge present on the material to be adsorbed. When the material to be adsorbed is glucose isomerase, the cellulose will advantageously be derivatized to the anion exchange form since in this form its loading capacity for this enzyme is extremely high.
3 Typically, to produce the anion exchange form, the agglomer-ated fibrous cellulose will be treated with appropriate reagents to form, among others, the di- and tre-ethyl~
aminoethyl celluloses, such as DEAE-cellulose and TEAE-cellulose, and the cellulose derivatives of epichlorohydrin 1 1 6 ~ 8 . 6-1 and triethanolamine, such as ECTEOLA-cellulose. Background information and methods for derivatizing cellulose are dis-closed in U.S. Patent 3,823,133 to Hurst, et al.
~ue to the high loading capaclty of fibrous ion e~change cellulose preparations containing glucose isomerase, when such are utilized in industrial applications, relatively small reactors may be employed to convert large auantities of glucose to fructose.
Additionally, because of this high loading capacitv, the substrate and the resulting product are maintained under isomerization conditions for only a short period.. These isomerization conditions, generally are conducive to production of small amountsof unwanted by-products due to the reactive nature of the fructose, and, thus, the longer the period the fructose is maintained under such conditions, the greater the amounts of unwanted by-products produced. Thus, the high loading capacity of fibrous ion exchange cellulose results in the substrate being isomerized to the desired degree in a short time, thereby decreasing the period during which the fructose component is maintained under isomerization conditions. Ho~7ever, such preparations containing fibrous ion exchange cellulose suffer from the disadvantage of "packing" and, therefore, such are usually utilized in shallow beds to avoid the development of problems due to excessive backpressure. ~ven when shallow beds are utilized, there is the possibility of channeling occurring whereby the substrate is not contacted to the desired degree with the bound or immobilized glucose isomerase. ~lthough certain immobilized glucose isomerase preparations have been developed to minimize these problems, they generally suffer other dis-advantages, e.g., their enzyme capacity or activity per unitvolume is not as high as is desired, and/or they are not as ` economical as fibrous ion exchange cellulose.

1 ~1 6~ 1~8 l In practicing the present invention a number of polymers may be utilized to agglomerate the fibrous cellulose.
Exemplary of such are melamine formaldehyde resins, epoxy resins, polystyrene and the like. The preferred polymer is polystyrene.
In U.S. Patents 4,110,164 and 4,16~,250 it is dis-closed that when fibrous cellulose which has been derivatized to provide an ion exchange material is agglomerated with a hydrophobic polymer under suitable conditions, such cellulose retains its capacity to immobilize or bind glucose isomerase.
The preferred process taught for preparing the co~posites comprises treating alkali-cellulose with a solution of diethyl-aminoethyl chloride hydrochloride (DEC) and then agglomerating the derivatized ion exchange cellulose formed thereby with polystyrene. ~ue to the solubility of polystyrene in the DEC
reaction mixture, however, it would be anticipated that the cellulose could not be efficiently derivatized if the agylom-erates were formed prior to derivatization of the cellulose.
We have surprisingly discovered th~t fibrous cellulose can be efficiently derivatized in the presence of the hydrophobic 20 polymer by controlling process conditions during derivatization so as to prevent the polymer from becoming solubilized in the derivatizing solution. Thus, it has been found that by adding the derivatizing material at a controlled rate to a water suspension of the agglomerate under alkaline conditions, the hydrophobic polymer component of the granular composite does not become solubilized to a significant degree.
A furtl~er unexpected finding is that when the cellu-lose is derivatized following agglomeration thereof, the cellu-lose composite may be derivatized to a higher degree and thus 30 have a greater ion exchange capacity than the agglomerated cellulose composite produced by the process of the prior art, ` ` ~161~
,~ --8 1 wherein the cellulose is derivatized before agglomeration.
~hile the ion exchange capacity of the agglomerated fibrous cellulose composite of thi,s invention may vary widely~ typically the ion exchange capacity should be at least about 0,1 meq g-l and preferably at least about 0,2 meq g-l., The agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composites of this invention may also he re~enerated~, that is~
after the activity of the immobilized glucose isomerase has decreased to a certain extent due to denaturation or other factors resulting from prolonged use, a solution of solubilized glucose isomerase can be brought into contact with a bed or colunn of the composite so that the glucose isomerase activity thereof is increased again to the desired degree. Prior to regeneration, however~ it is generally preferred to treat the composite with a solution of alkali to make the ion exchange sites of the fibrous cellulose more readily available to isomerase adsorption. While we do not wish to be bound to any theory in regard to the mechanism involved, it is likely tha,t substrate debris, denatured isomerase or other p,roteinaceous 20 'materials which have become attracted to the fibxous cellulose are removed or soluhilized.
W~hen fibrous cellulose is derivatized prior -to agglomeration~ the materials used in the derivatization reaction tend to cause the cellulose to s~lell or become partially solu-bilized and difficult to recover by filtration., Recovery of thecomposite of the present invention is simplified by the fact that such swelling as may occur does not present a serious filtration problem due to the granular nature of the derivatized product. Additionally, since the granular cellulose composites do not suffer from serious packing problems~ they can be utilized in deep bed reactors without difficulty and with a ' minimum of channeling occurring.

1 ~119~
" - 9 -1 Depending upon the specific gravity of the substrater the agglomerated flbrous ion exchange cellulose composite may tend to f]oat thereon and~ therefore, there is the possibility of some loss of composite occuring through the inlet or outlet portions of column type reactors~ ~loreoverr problems could occur when the column is initially packed with the composite.
Therefore, in certain cases~ it ~s preferred to incorporate a densification agent into the agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composite to increase the density thereof, While a variety of densification agents may be util-ized, they must, of course k be substantially inert in regard to the substrate and also must not inactivate the glucose isomerase. Densification agents such as powdered metal oxides or silicates or mixtures thereof may be utilized., To form the agglomerated fibrous composite~ the fibrous cellulose must be embedded in the hydrophobic polymer in such a manner that the cellulose is not completely encapsulated or enrobed in the polymer. Otherwise~ the capacity of the fibrous ion e~change cellulose to adsorb enzymes would be deleteriously affected. The greater the free surface of the cellulose~ the greater the adsorptive capacity of the composite.
While a number of methods may be utiliz~d to embed the fibrous cellulose in the hydrophobic polymer F the two which may be typically used involve dissolying the hydrophohic polymer in an organic solvent and incorporating the other materials thereinr or heating the polymer to a plastic state and incorporating the other materials~ The latter procedure is preferred since no solvent evaporation is necessa,ry., The resulting ~aterial can then be reduced by grinding or the liker the granules classified 30 on appropriate sized screensr and the agglomerated fibrous cellulose derivatized.
The particle size distribution of the granules may vary somewhat widely, Satisfactory results have been obtained 1 1 61 1~8 1 using granules which passed through No. 20 and were retained on No. 60 U.S. mesh screens~
In order to more clearly describe the nature of the present invention, specific examples will hereinafter be described. It should be understood, however, that this is done solely by way of example and is intended neither to delineate the scope of the invention nor limit the ambit of the appended claims, 3o g~ ~
--11~

This e~ample illustrates the process for preparing an ag~lomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose com~osite whereby the cellulose component of the composite is derivatized after ac3glomeration.
An agglomerate was prepared by mixing 25 parts of chemical grade cellulose (C-100* manufactured by International Filler Corp., North Tonawanda, N.Y.) with 25 parts of alumina and compounding the mixture with 50 parts of polystyrene on a heated (180-200C) twin roll compounder for a period of about 10 minutes. After cooling, the compounded com~osite was ground and sized to 40-100 mesh.
220 grams of the sized composite was slurried in 616 15 ml of water containing 176 grams of Na2SO4 and 26.4 grams of NaOH. The slurry was heated to 40C following which 57.2 grams of a 50 percent aqueous solution of DEC was metered into the slurry with stirring at a rate of 0.7 ml min 1 over a period of about one hour. Next, another 26.4 grams of NaOH dissolved 20 in 26 ml of water was added to the slurry followed hy an additional 57~2 grams of the DEC solution at 0.7 ml min. 1, The temperature of the slurry was then ra~lsed to 60C
and held at this temperature for 15 minutes. A volume of water approximately equal to the volume of the slurry was added and 25 the composite recovered on a 60 mesh screen~ The composite was washed on the screen with water and reslurried in a volume of water similar to that added previously. This slurry was adjusted to a pH of about 7 with HCl, washed and dewatered on filter paper and dried, The ion exchange capacity of the dried product was determined to be 0.84 meq g 1 on a cellulose basis and 0.21 ~ meq g 1 on the basis of the agglomerated composite, * Trade Mark ~ ~ 61 1~
~12-1 The ion exchange capacity of the composite was deter-mined by the following procedure:
- 1. Weigh 20g d.b. of derivatized agylomerated cellu-lose (5-lOg cellulose basis).

2. Slurry in water and adjust the pH to 12 . 5-13.0 with l-N NaOH.

3~ Wash the slurry into a chromatography column and place a porous disk on top of bed.

4. Add approximately 10 ml of l-N NaOH to column and drain dropwise to disk level, rinse column with wash bottle and drain to disk.

5. Wash with approximately 6 bed volumes of water using approximately 2 bed volumes per rinse. Allow head to drain down to top of disk for each rinse.

6. Add 25 ml of l-M HCl to top of bed and rinse down with about 10 ml of water from wash bottle. Start fresh col-lection of effluent, dropwise, at about 1-1.5 ml/min. ~inse down with wash bottle as head level reaches disk.

7. Wash with approximately 6 bed volumes as in 20 `Step 5.

8. Titrate the effluent to pH 7.0 with l-M NaOH.
The ion exchange capacity was calculated as follows:

T . E. Capacity (meq g 1, d.b.~ = (ml HCL x M ) - (ml NaOH x ~ ) gms adsorbent, d.b.
In Example 1 it can be calculated that the ratio of derivatizing agent (DEC) to cellulose was 1.04 on a dry weight basis whereas in the prior art method described in U.S. Pate~t 4,110,164 the ceIlulose was derivatized before agglomeration at a DEC to cellulose ratio of 0.7. This value represents approximately the maximum extent to which non-agglomerated cellulose can be derivatized and recovered without difficulty by conventional means.

1 9 ~

1 EXArlPLE II

This example illustrates the process for preparing an agglomerated fibrous ion exchanye cellulose composite wherein the cellulose is derivatized after agglomeration at a DEC to cellulose ratio of greater than two.
An agglomerated composite, prepared as shown in Example I, was ground and sized to 40 to 80 mesh. 100 grams of the sized composite was slurried in 280 ml of water in which had been dissolved 80 grams of Na2SO~ and 24 grams of NaOH. ~lith the slurry at a temperature of 40C, 55 grams of a 50 percent DEC solution was metered thereinto with stirring at a rate of 0.5 ml min 1 over a period of about 1.5 hours.
Additional NaOH (26 grams of a 50 percent solution) was then added to the slurry and an additional 55 grams of the DEC
solution was metered into the slurry as in the first addition.
The reaction mixture was heated to 60C and held at this temp-erature for 15 minutes. A volume of water equal to the slurry volume was added and the diluted slurry dewatered and washed on a 60 mesh screen. The product was reslurried in water, adjusted to a pH of from about 6.5 to 7.0 with HCL and screened and washed as above.
The ion exchange capacity of the dried composite was determined by the method shown above to be 1.28 meq g 1 on a cellulose basis and 0.32 meq g 1 on a composite basis. To achieve a comparable ion exchange capacity using the prior art method whereby derivatized DEAE-cellulose is agglomerated with polystyrene would require a degree of derivatization such as to render the cellulose gelatinous and difficult to recover, filter 3O and dry without expensive treatments such as the use of a solvent or salt solutions or crosslinking the cellulose.

-]4 This example illustrates the adsorptive capacity for glucose isomerase of the agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composi-tes hereinabove described and the composites described in the prior art and provides a comparison of the characteristics and functional properties of said composites.
Glucose isomerase derived from microorganisms of a Streptomyces species, and having a potency of about 20 IGIU
ml-l was added to equal weights of the composites prepared by the processes described in U.S. Patent 4,110,164 and in Examples I and II above. The enzyme/composite slurries were adjusted to p~ 7 and stirred for 5 hours at a temperature of 25C. The composites were recovered by filtration and the amount of the enzyme adsorbed thereon determined by measuring the residual glucose isomerase activity in the respective filtrates by the method described by N.E. Lloyd et al. in Cereal Chem., Vol, 49(5), p. 544, 1972.
The amounts of glucose isomerase adsorbed by the individual composites and data illustrating certain functional characteristics of the same are set forth in Table I.

TABLE I
~atio (wt/wt)Ion ExchangeAdsorptive 25 Composite DEC:CelluloseCapac~tyCapaci~y (meq g ) (IGIU g Example I 1.04 0.21 490 Example II 2.2 0.32 690 U.S. 4,110,164 0.7 0.14 361 I 1 6 ~
- . -15~

EXAMPLE IV
This example illustrates the porosity characteristics of agglomerated fibrous ion e~change cellulose composites prepared by the present process and compares the flow properties of said composites with those of a prior art composite and of certain unagglomerated fibrous cellulose products.
The porosity characteristics of the following mater-ials were determined:
1. a&b. Crosslinked Whatman celluloses manufactured by W & R Balston Ltd., England.
2. Non-crosslinked DEAE-cellulose (prepared as described in U.S. Patent 3,823,133).
3. Composite prepared by agglomerating fibrous ion exchange cellulose and polystyrene (prepared as described in U.S. Patent 4,110,164).
4. Composite prepared in Example I, above.
5. Composite prepared in Example II, above.
A porosity constant was determined for each of the above materials by the following procedure:
15 to 75 grams of dry product was slurried in water and the slurry deaerated by stirring under vacuum for 15 minutes. A glass column (1.5 inches inside diameter, 18 inches high) fitted with a porous glass disc and a stopcock at the bottom was attached to a vacuum flask through a rubber stopper. The flask was in turn attached to a vacuum source. The deaerated slurry was poured into the column and a vacuum (12.3 p.s.i. below atmospheric pressure) was applied to the bottom of the column by opening the stopcock, thereby 3 forming a bed of the material on the porous glass disk.
Simultaneously, water was admitted at the top of the colu~m to replace that removed by filtration so that ll~llg~

1 about 5 inches of water was maintained above the bed at all times, When a total of 1,000 ml of water had been collected, the stopcock was closed, the flask removed and the water emptied from the flask, The flask was then reattached to the column, the vacuum reestablished, the stopcock opened and a measured quantity tl,000 to 3,000 ml) of water was filtered through the packed bed and collected.
The time required to collect the water was deter-mined with a stop watch. The ~orosity constant was calculated using the following equation~
K = (VH)/(TPA) Where:
K = porosity constant (ml cm g 1 min 1) V = volume of water collected (ml) H - height of packed bed (cm) T = time to collect the water (min) P = pressure drop across bed (g per square cm) A = cross section of bed (square cm) The results are shown in Table II.
TA~LE II
Porosity Constant (1) Material ( 1 -1 i -1 (a) 0.21 1 ~b) 0.60 2 0.01 3 4.7 4 2.6 3 5 3.6 (1) a porosity constant of at least 1.5 ml cm g 1 min 1 is considered necessary for satisfactory performance in a deep bed reactor.

1 ~ 6 1 15~8 l The terms and expressions which have been employed herein are used by way of description and not of limitation since it is not intended by the use of said terms and expressions to exclude any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof and since it is recognized ~hat various modifications are possible within the scope of the claimed invention.

3o

Claims

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. A process for preparing an agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composite capable of adsorbing or binding charged macromolecules wherein a fibrous cellulose having ion exchange properties is agglomerated with a hydrophobic polymer which comprises first forming an agglomerate comprising a fibrous cellulose and a hydrophobic polymer and then deriva-tizing the agglomerated fibrous cellulose to impart ion exchange properties thereto.

2. Process as in claim 1 wherein the charged macromolecule is an enzyme.

3. Process as in claim 1 or 2, wherein the agglomerated cellulose is derivatized to impart anion exchange properties thereto.

4. Process as in claim 1 or 2, wherein the derivatized cellulose formed is DEAE-cellulose.

5. A process as in claim 1 or 2, wherein the hydro-phobic polymer is polystyrene.

6. A process as in claim 1, wherein the composite 'has present a densification agent.

7. A process as in claim 6, wherein the densification agent is selected from the group consisting of powdered metal oxides, silicates and mixtures thereof.

8. A process as in claim 1 or 7, wherein the agglomerate is prepared by compounding the cellulose with the polymer which has been heated to a plastic state,

9. Process as in claim 1 or 7, wherein the agglom-erate is prepared by forming a solution of the polymer in an organic solvent and then incorporating the cellulose therein.

10. Process as in claim 1, wherein the com-posite is reduced to a particle size such that granules thereof will pass through a 20 mesh screen and be retained on a 60 mesh screen.

11. Process as in claim 1, wherein the hydro-phobic polymer is selected from the group consisting of mel-amine formaldehyde resins, epoxy resins, polystyrene and mixtures thereof.

12. Process as in claim 1 or 11, wherein the ion exchange capacity of the composite is at least about 0,10 meq g-1 on the basis of the dried ion exchange cellulose composite.

13. Process as in claim 1 or 11, wherein the ion exchange capacity of the composite is at least about 0.20 meq g-1 on the basis of the dried ion exchange cellulose composite.

14. Process according to claim 1, wherein the fibrous cellulose is embedded in the hydrophobic polymer,

15. Process according to claim 1, wherein the macromolecule is glucose isomerase,

16. An agglomerate of a fibrous cellulose and a hydrophobic polymer produced in accordance with claim 1, 7 or 15.