[go: up one dir, main page]

CA1091622A - Coal recovery system from mine tailings - Google Patents

Coal recovery system from mine tailings

Info

Publication number
CA1091622A
CA1091622A CA284,139A CA284139A CA1091622A CA 1091622 A CA1091622 A CA 1091622A CA 284139 A CA284139 A CA 284139A CA 1091622 A CA1091622 A CA 1091622A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
coal
water
organic liquid
solids
gangue
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA284,139A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
James D. Deimler
Thomas A. Vivian
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dow Chemical Co
Original Assignee
Dow Chemical Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dow Chemical Co filed Critical Dow Chemical Co
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1091622A publication Critical patent/CA1091622A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03BSEPARATING SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS
    • B03B5/00Washing granular, powdered or lumpy materials; Wet separating
    • B03B5/28Washing granular, powdered or lumpy materials; Wet separating by sink-float separation
    • B03B5/30Washing granular, powdered or lumpy materials; Wet separating by sink-float separation using heavy liquids or suspensions
    • B03B5/44Application of particular media therefor
    • B03B5/442Application of particular media therefor composition of heavy media
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03BSEPARATING SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS
    • B03B1/00Conditioning for facilitating separation by altering physical properties of the matter to be treated
    • B03B1/04Conditioning for facilitating separation by altering physical properties of the matter to be treated by additives
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03BSEPARATING SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS
    • B03B9/00General arrangement of separating plant, e.g. flow sheets
    • B03B9/005General arrangement of separating plant, e.g. flow sheets specially adapted for coal
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D3/00Differential sedimentation

Landscapes

  • Liquid Carbonaceous Fuels (AREA)
  • Solid Fuels And Fuel-Associated Substances (AREA)
  • Separation Of Solids By Using Liquids Or Pneumatic Power (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
The invention resides in the area of separating coal from the accompanying gangue.
The coal and gangue are contacted with water and a water-immiscible organic liquid, agitation applied, and the water fraction and organic liquid fraction are separated. Depending on the ratio of water and organic liquid to coal-gangue, the gangue and water are drawn off from the top of the mixture and the coal and organic liquid from the bottom or the water-coal from the top and gangue--liquid from the bottom.
The advantages produced are a lower sulfur content and lower ash content.

Description

~o9~zz The coal mining industry has recently come under pressure from the environmentally conscious community to remove the large quantities of tailings which have accumulated over the years. The amounts of S tailings are projected to increase more rapidly in the future because coal is expected to be mined at an increased rate.
The coal mining industry has used and is toda~
using dense media separation techniques as well as froth-flotation, in some instances in series, to reduce the iron pyrites which contribute to the ash in coal as well as sulfur gases on combustion of the coal containing the pyrites. In addition, these steps also upgrade the coal by reducing the clays and shale associated with the coal, both of which also contribute the major residue known as ash on combustion of the coal. These treatments, known in the art as concentrating (bene-faction), because the clays and pyrites contents are reduced, produce a parting liquid, usually water, con-taining large volumes of coal fines and clay fines,i.e., usually less than about 28 mesh (Tyler ~ieve Sexies), particularly in respect to treatment of coal which has been crushed and sized for use in stoker-fed boilers or other heat-generating apparatus known as "steam coal" as well as metallurgical coal (i.e., coking coal) for use in making steels and casting irons. The slurries of fines resulting from these treatments are pumped to tailings piles or ponds where ~he water runs off and in many instances is collected and reused.
The tailings presently being discharged are in the form ~916ZZ

of a water slurry, the solids being mainly clays and coal with small amounts of other impurities, i.e., pyrite, quartz, etc., of which from 10 percent to 60 percent is coal. It is estimated that several million tons of solids are discarded onto the landscape each year. The coal content, if recoverable, could be a significant addition to our short energy supply.
Therefore, it is desirable to provide a process for separating the coal from the clays in the mine tailings slurries.
The present invention resides in a method for separating coal from the clay that is mixed with the coal and accompanying gangue, comprising mixing an aqueous slurry of finely divided gangue-coal-clay with an organic liquid that is immiscible with water and has a specific ¦ gravity sufficiently greater than water to permit phase I separation of the water and organic liquid, the amounts ¦ of water to gangue-clay-coal solids being ad~usted to ¦ provide a ratio greater than 4 to 1, and the organic liquid to solids ratio being adjusted to provide at least a 1 to 1 ratio, separating the phases thereby to remove the gangue and clay~with the water and the coal as a slurry in the organic liquid.
The present inventio~ further resides in a method for separating coal from its accompanying clays, gangue and sulfur compounds comprising (a) feeding in the form of a slurry to a phase separator coal having a size less than 8 mesh together with at least 0.1 part to 6 parts by weight of water per part of solids and at least 1 part by weight per part of solids of an organic ~'~ ' .
.

~2 ~9~6ZZ

liquid having a density greater than water, (b) separating (1) when the water to solids ratio is a~ove 4 to 1, the clayey material with the water and the coal with reduced ash content with the organic liquid, or (2) when the water to solids ratio is between 0.1 to 6 parts by weight of water per part of solids, the coal with reduced sulfur and ash content is taken overhead with the water, and organic solvent and some coal with a predominate propor-tion of sulfur compounds and gangue is taken as underflow, said organic liquid aiso having a density equal to or greater than the coal; and repeating treatment of the coal containing fraction under either condition to further concentrate the coal and ~ree it from the clayey material.
lS The water may be that used to transport the coal in a coal preparation process or may be added or ¦ drained to adjust to the appropriate water to solids con-tent and the organic liquid added.
The organic liquid has a specific gravity greater than water. The phenomenon of separation of the coal and the clays, etc., is similar to washing the clays away from the coal as compared to the sink-float tech-nique or ~roth-flotation which latter processes require the organic liquid have a density greater than the coal and less than the clay. In the instant aspect ~i .
~ ' .
-2a-~091622 of the present invention the coal, which has a density less than the clays, remains with the organic liquid and the clays, which have a density greater than the coal, disperse in the water phase. This selective extraction is a result of wettability differences of coal and clay with the organic liquid and water and is not related to differences in specific gravity dif-ferences of the respective solid materials. This phe-nomenon permits a dry (with respect to water) coal to be obtained and a clay suspended in water which is capable of precipitation from the water by high molecular weight polymeric flocculating agents or cationic surface--active agents.
It may be advantageous to add a surface--active agent to the water and organic liquid mixture.
In some instances, such as in batch operations, the sur-factants may be added to the point of producing an emulsion. However, in continuous operations it is preferred to use only a small amount of surface-active a~ent, i.e., from 0.01 to 0.05 grams per 320 milliliters of water and organic liquid when, for example, an octyl-phenoxypolyethoxyethanol is used. It is to be clearly understood that other surface-active agents will be required in greater or lesser quantities, depending on the strength of the surface-active agent in the formulation employed, as well as the class of surface-active agents and its structure. Among the surfactants found useful, i.e., compatible with the present invention liquid systems, are the nonionics such as N,N-dimethyloleates, modified oxyethylated straight chain alcohols, propylene oxide--ethylene diamine-ethylene oxide condensates having an average molecular weight of about 700, polyethoxy ethers, condensates of ethylene oxide and propylene glycol, poly-ethylene monolaurates, an octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol, a nonylphenol ethylene oxide adduct containing about 100 moles of ethylene oxide, and alkali metal petroleum sul-fonates, or the anionic surfactants such as the alkyl-benzene sulfonates, tetraisopropyl benzene sulfonate and dodecylbenzene sulfonate. When these surface-active agents are added in larger quantities, i.e., from 0.15 or more grams of, for example octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol per 320 ml of water and organic liquid, an emulsion usually results. The exact amount of surface-active agent which may be added varies with the specific surface-active agent and may be readily ascertained by adding the surface-active agent to proportionate amounts of the particular water-organic liquid mixture and stirring the resulting mixture to determine whether an emulsion occurs. While the above discussion has been directed to the test for emulsion as previously stated, it is preerred to use an amount o surface-active agent less than that which orms the emulsion. From 0.01 to 0.05 ~rams per 320 ml of the mixture seems to be adequate and, in those instances tested usin~
the above-enumerated surface-active agents, did not form emulsions under the conditions of the stirring and sepa-ration in accordance with the present inventionO
Substantially any organic liquid immisciblewith water and having a density greater than water such that gravity separation of the solvent and water can occur is suitableu It is to be understood that in this aspect of the present invention the solvent can be of any 109~L62~

density greater than water, and where the solvent can be phase-separated from water. However, the preferred organic liquids, from a safety and ecological standpoint, as well as for economic reasons, are the halogenated C
to C4 hydrocarbons having 2 to 6 halogen atoms and a specific gravity of at least 1.30~ The most preferred of this class of organic liquids are perchloroethylene-(tetrachloroethylene), methylene chloride and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, since these have specific gravities of about 1.6, 1.322 and 1.33 respectively, are substantially immiscible with water, can be recovered by water condenser systems for reuse, do not react with the coal or clay, are not flammable by Tag Open Cup Flammability Test and have low heats of vaporization so that they can be freed from the coal readily and from the water by simple water separators. Additionally, these solvents are compatible with other liquids used in the coal industry, i.e., those used for froth-flotakion and pyrite removals.
The amounts of water and organic liquid which have been found advantageous for rapid non-emulsion type continuous operations above-described is in the range o 4-6 to 50 parts by weight of water per part by wei~ht of solids and 1 to 70 parts by weight of organic liquid per part by weight of solids. The preferred ranges are 6 to 20 parts water per part of solids and 1 to 5 parts of organic liquid per part of solids.
A single contact of the coal-clay with a high ratio of water and organic liquid to solids mixture, under agitation, will upon settling reduce the clay content of the coal considerably, that is, as much as 40 percent ~916Z2 to 60 percent of the clay associated with the coal is released and removed. However, it may be advantageous to employ the ratios mentioned above and to conduct several such mixings and settlings. It has been observed that the clay content of the coal is substantially reduced with each subsequent treatment.
An alternative method for separating the coal-organic phase from the clayey material-water phase is centrifuging as, for example, in a cyclone separator, i.e., a hydrocyclone. Although a conventional centrifuge may be used, the energy expended far exceeds that which is required to operate a cyclone. The advantage of using one or more cyclones is the ease of separation, standard pumps known in the coal processing industry can be used, the power or energy requirements are rea-sonable, and adjustments in flow can be made readily to alter the distribution of the coal-organic stream to very low clayey content or moderate clayey content.
In another aspect of the present invention a coarse coal can be freed of both sul~ur and clays ~ash forming components) by treating the coal with a mixture of water and an organic liquid, which in this aspect of the invention has a density equal to or greater than the density of coal. The water is present in about 0.1 to 6 parts by weight per part of solids and the organic liquid is present in at least 1 part by weight per part of solids and the coal is separated from the clayey material and sulfur compounds using either a hydrocyclone or settling-skimmers or a combination, i.e., skimming the underflow after settling.

.

.

~L0~ L6~X~

Figure 1 is a block flow diagram illustrating the high-water, high-solvent to solids ratio aspect of the present invention.
Figure 2 is a more detailed J modified sche-matic diagram of a flow chart related to Example 5.
Figure 3 is a more detailed, modified sche-matic diagram of a flow chart related to Example 6.
Figure 4 is a more detailed, modified sche-matic diagram of a flow chart related to Example 7.
Figure 5 is a more detailed, modified sche-matic diagram of a flow chart related to Example 8.
Example 1.
A mine tailings aqueous slurry obtained from a thickener following a froth-flotation treatment was added to a perchloroethylene-water mixture adjusted to provide, based on the solids weight, 10 parts of water and 5 parts of perchloroethylene each per part of tailings. The resulting mixture was agitated vigorously or 15-30 seconds. Upon stopping the a~itakion the coal and perchloroethylene settled rapidly, in 15-30 seconds, to the bottom of the container. Upon decantation o the water layer which conkains most of the clay, two additional aliquots of water (about 10 parts) were shaken with and decanked from the perchloroethylene.
The coal was recovered by filtration from the perchloro-ethylene. Analysis showed that over 45 percent of the original tailing was recovered as coal product. The ash content of this sample was 8.37 percent.
Other runs were made as above using various surfactants and the results tabulated below.

Surfactant Ash %
l. None 8.37
2. Propylene oxide-ethylenediamine- 8.36 -ethylene oxide condensate, mol.
wt. 702, HLB 7.0
3. Modified oxyethylated straight 9.17 chain alcohol, HLB 7.0
4. Condensate of ethylene oxide and 10.9 propylene glycol, HLB 27.5
5. Nonyl phenol-ethylene oxide adduct13.22 containing about 100 moles ethylene oxide, HLB l9.0
6. N,N'-dimethyl oleamide, HLB 7.0 9.42
7. Nonylphenoxy poly(ethyleneoxy) 9.19 ethanol
8. Isopropylamine dodecylbenzene 12.1 sulfonate All of the coal cuts filtered easily ~19~6~2 Example 2.
In another example mine tailings were mixed with various ratios of water and perchloroethylene, by agitating 15 grams of the tailings in the selected water-perchloroethylene system, allowing the two liquids to settle and measuring and analyzing the coal for ash content. The solvent phase was washed with a second aliquot of water in all but one run. The results of the several runs are set forth in the table below.

Perchloro- Ratio Ash Water, ethylene~ Water ~erc %
gm gm _ Solids solids Cycles in Coal 751 40 gm 5 2.66 2 22.6 150 40 gm 10 2.66 1 21~6 ool 40 gm 6.66 2.66 2 15.6 01 40 gm 10 2.66 2 16.39 1501'2 40 gm 10 2.66 2 14.94 150 72 gm 10 4.8 2 12.75 lEach wash.
Laboratory blender used to mix~

A representative flow diagram of the present process is set forth in the drawings, Figure 1. A feed, an aqueous slurry of coal and clay, is admixed with additional water to bring the water to solids content in the range of 6 to 50 parts of water per part of solid and with an organic solvent to bring the solvent to solids content, in the range of 2 to 70 parts of solvent per 1~9~L6~Z

part of solid. The mixing should be of sufficient agitation to insure that the water and solvent are thoroughly mixed and that the coal and clay are distributed to contact the water and solvent to insure that each particle of solid has a chance to selectively be wet by the solvent or water. The well-mixed slurry is then forwarded to a separator, e.gO, a cyclone separator, wherein the water and solvent separate by specific gravity differences and their mutual immiscibility. The coal will, for the greater part, stay with the solvent, and the clay with khe water.
A layer of oil-solvent and some water resulting from extraction of the oil in the coal will form on the top of the water layer, or in the case of the cyclone will come over with the water or can be recovered as separate stream. Decanta-tion, or separation as in a cyclone, of the layers onefrom the other results in a clay-water fraction, which, after skimming to remove the oil-solvent-water scum, can be sent to a settling pond for dewatering. The coal-solvent fraction is readily filtered. The solvent is sent to a water separator, then to storage for return to the process. The coal may be freed of residual solvent in a dr~er and the solvent vapors condensed and sent to the water separator. The solvent may extract oil from the coal and, if so, is freed of oil on a continuous or semi--continuous basis by sending the solvent to a still, con-densing it and returning it to storage.
The foregoing description, with particular reference to the use of a cyclone separator, is a presently conceived, preferred scheme for utilizing the present invention in actual practice.

1~916Z;2 Example 3.
In another example, 10 grams of dried solids from a mine tailings containing about 50 percent ash and 50 percent coal was mixed with perchloroethylene and water containing 0.01 gram of detergent having an HLB of 18. The agitated mixture was permitted to separate into two phases, the water phase was decanted, the per-chloroethylene phase filtered, and the filter cake dried and analyzed. The result of two such operations are set forth below: !

Perchloro- Percent Solids H Oethylene Coal/Ash gm ~ gm Content .
300 ca 320 23 400 ca 160 25 Example 4.
In an additional run several organic liquids were used in the following manner.
In each of a series o experiments 100 ml.
of a 10 percent slurry of mine tailings (50.6 percent ash, 49.4 percent coal, dry weight) was mixed with 50 cc. o a solvent. The phases were permitted to separate, the water phase decanted and the solvent phase remixed with about 200 ml. water shaken, decanted twice. ~he resulting solvent phase was filtered and the cake dried. Analysis for ash content was made. The results are set forth in the following table.

~.

~11--~L~916Z~

Solvent % Ash Content l,l,l-Trichloroethane 12.42 Methylene Chloride 7.56 Bromoform 8.0 Freon 113 9.95 Carbon Tetrachloride 7.12 Example 5.
Figure 2 illustrates in schematic manner a flow diagram of a coal processing opera~ion in which a residue (tailings or gangue) from~a hydrocyclone separation technique for wet concentration of fine coal is employedl The run of the mine (ROM) coal having a sulfur content of 1.74 percent and a 19.6 percent ash content is crushed and screened. The coal then has a 1.7 percent sulfur content and 17.23 percent ash content. This 20 m x 0 coal is slurried with water, in this instance to make a 10 percent solids in water slurry. The slurry is decanted and the decantate (about 45 percent o~ the coal) is pumped to a three inch (7.62 cm.) hydrocyclone at a rate of 200 U.S. gallons (755 1.) per hour and the cyclone adjùsted to take about 44 percent o~ the solids over as about a 5 percent slurry in water (the gangue, tailings or residue) and about 56 percent as underflow or bottoms as a sale-able coal, i.e., having a reduced ash content, i.e., 16.17 percent ash. The sulfur content of this particular coal was 2.29 percent.

.

~3Lal9~6Z2 The overhead was mixed with perchloroethylene, to provide about a 4 to 1 perchloroethylene ratio by weight per part o~ solid, and fed to a hydrocyclone, at a ratio of 200 U.S. gallons per hour (755 1.). The hydrocyclone was adjusted to take 52 percent solids overhead tclay and water) and a 48 percent solids underflow (bottoms), coal and perchloroethylene, the coal having 1.53 percent sulfur and 5,6 percent ash content.
Example 6.
Treatment of the coal which remained from the slurry decantation, about 55 percent, is illustrated in Figure 3 and demonstrates the alternative procedure within the invention. The coal was dralned and found to contain 1.59 percent sulfur and a 10.47 percent ash content.
This coal was slurried with perchloroethylene in a ratio o about 4 parts perchloroethylene per part soiids and hydrocycloned. The overhead, about 64 percent of the solids, had a sulfur content of 1.41 percent and an ash content of 6.76 percent. The underflow Erom this hydrocyclone, about 36 percent of the solids feedr had a sulfur content of about 2.07 percent and an ash content oE about 17.72 percent.
This example illustrates the versatility of the present invention to recover valuable coal from coal preparation tailings (gangue or residue), as well as a low sulfur, low ash coal from conventional saleable coal as now prepared by the industry.
Example 7.
In a still further example, as illustrated in Figure 4, the ROM coal crushed to 8 m x 0 was screened to provide a 20 m x 0 screen and an 8 m x 28 m size.

~Q916~Z

The 20 m x 0 size was treated with water in a hydrocy-clone to yield a 55 to 60 percent overhead residue ~gangue or tailings~ and a 40-45 percent underflow coal having 2.97 percent sul~ur and 34.54 percent ash. The overhead flow was treated as in the above example by mixing with about 4 parts of perchloroethylene per part of solids and hydrocycloning to a 55 percent overhead (clay and water) and an underflow (bottoms) of coal having 1.47 percent sulfur and 4.37 percent ash. The underflow from the first hydrocyclone was drained and mixed with about 4 parts of perchloroethylene per part of solids and hydrocycloned~ The overhead contained 93.8 percent of the solids as a coal having 1.71 percent sulfur and 9.55 percent ash and a bottoms, 6.2 percent, having 3.52 percent sulfur and 38.6 percent ash.
Example 8.
In a still ~urther example of the applicability o~ the present invention, as illustrated in Fi~ure S, a tailings obtained from a mine preparing coal using hydrocyclones was mixed with perchloroethylene and water to provida a ratio of water to solids and perchloroethy lene to solids at 4 to 1 and 1.3 to 1, respectively.
This slurry was treated in a first hydrocyclone and the clay-water fraction was drawn o~f at the top, while the coal-perchloroethylene fraction was taken off at the bottom and was a saleable grade o~ coal. The clay-water fraction was treated with additional perchloroethylene and passed into a second hydrocyclone adjusted to flow out at the top at about a 55 percent solids content. This outflow was a 10.6 percent solids (clays) slurry in water. The ~09~l622 bottoms from this cyclone, 45 percent of the solids was coal in perchloroethylene which was fed to a third hydro-cyclone to provide a top outflow of 69 percent of solids (coal, 3.44 percent sulfur, 6.38 percent ash) and a bottoms, 31 percent, which was allowed to settle, then skimmed.
Ninety-three percent of the bottoms solids was skimmed off. This skim contained 4.11 percent sulfur and 7.07 percent ash. The sink contained 18.15 percent sulfur and 40.5 percent ash. This example illustrates the value of the treatment o the present invention or removing sulfur in addition to removing ashO The order of the various steps has been demonstrated to be flexible wikh desirable results for each order.

Claims (6)

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A method for separating coal from the clay that is mixed with the coal and accompanying gangue, comprising mixing an aqueous slurry of finely divided gangue-coal-clay with an organic liquid that is immis-cible with water and has a specific gravity sufficiently greater than water to permit phase separation of the water and organic liquid, the amounts of water to gangue--clay-coal solids being adjusted to provide a ratio greater than 4 to 1, and the organic liquid to solids ratio being adjusted to provide at least a 1 to 1 ratio, separating the phases thereby to remove the gangue and clay with the water and the coal as a slurry in the organic liquid.
2. The method of Claim 1 wherein said organic liquid-water mixture contains a surface-active agent.
3. The method of Claim 2 wherein the surface--active agent is present in an amount sufficient to form an emulsion with at least a part of the water and organic liquid.
4. The method of Claim 2 wherein the surface--active agent is present in an amount less than that which will emulsify any part of the water and organic liquid.
5. The method of Claim 1 wherein the organic liquid is a halogenated hydrocarbon having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms and from 2 to 6 halogen atoms and a specific gravity of at least 1.30.
6. A method for separating coal from its accompanying clays, gangue and sulfur compounds com-prising (a) feeding in the form of a slurry to a phase separator coal having a size less than 8 mesh together with at least 0.1 part to 6 parts by weight of water per part of solids and at least 1 part by weight per part of solids of an organic liquid having a density greater than water, (b) separating (1) when the water to solids ratio is above 4 to 1, the clayey material with the water and the coal with reduced ash content with the organic liquid, or (2) when the water to solids ratio is between 0.1 to 6 parts by weight of water per part of solids, the coal with reduced sulfur and ash content is taken overhead with the water, and organic solvent and some coal with a predominate proportion of sulfur compounds and gangue is taken as underflow, said organic liquid also having a density equal to or greater than the coal; and repeating treatment of the coal containing fraction under either condition to further concentrate the coal and free it from the clayey material.
CA284,139A 1976-08-16 1977-08-04 Coal recovery system from mine tailings Expired CA1091622A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US71473776A 1976-08-16 1976-08-16
US714,737 1976-08-16
US79301877A 1977-05-02 1977-05-02
US793,018 1977-05-02

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1091622A true CA1091622A (en) 1980-12-16

Family

ID=27109204

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA284,139A Expired CA1091622A (en) 1976-08-16 1977-08-04 Coal recovery system from mine tailings

Country Status (7)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS5323803A (en)
AU (1) AU511234B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1091622A (en)
DE (1) DE2736801A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2361940A1 (en)
GB (1) GB1584673A (en)
IN (1) IN147345B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103657838A (en) * 2013-12-09 2014-03-26 广州有色金属研究院 Method for recovering pyrite from coal gangue

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6767465B1 (en) 1999-07-08 2004-07-27 Govenors Of The University Of Alberta Process for treating fine coal particles
AU5669100A (en) * 1999-07-08 2001-01-30 Governors Of The University Of Alberta, The Process for treating fine coal particles
CN106607183B (en) * 2017-02-09 2019-11-08 中国矿业大学 A modular high-density coal-measure oil shale upgrading process and upgrading system
EP3412754B1 (en) * 2017-06-08 2020-08-05 L'air Liquide, Société Anonyme Pour L'Étude Et L'exploitation Des Procédés Georges Claude Fine coal charge for a fixed bed pressure gasifier
JP7215199B2 (en) * 2018-02-06 2023-01-31 日本製鉄株式会社 Separation method, hydrophilic particle recovery method, and hydrophobic particle recovery method
CN114247554A (en) * 2021-12-03 2022-03-29 内蒙古科技大学 A method for selecting valuable minerals in coal gangue
CN117309926B (en) * 2023-11-28 2024-02-02 中国矿业大学(北京) A method to improve the accuracy of coal gangue identification by using active micro-nano bubble water

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2151578A (en) * 1937-08-27 1939-03-21 Du Pont Method of and apparatus for isolating minerals
US2686592A (en) * 1949-11-18 1954-08-17 Hugo S Miller Process for separating minerals
DE974151C (en) * 1951-03-20 1960-09-29 Bergwerksverband Ges Mit Besch Process for the extraction of high quality fuels from raw material containing hard coal or lignite
US3608717A (en) * 1969-07-01 1971-09-28 Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp Method and apparatus for the liquid separation of a mixture of materials
DE2346742C3 (en) * 1972-12-29 1979-02-01 Texaco Development Corp., New York, N.Y. (V.St.A.) Process for removing carbon particles from an aqueous dispersion

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103657838A (en) * 2013-12-09 2014-03-26 广州有色金属研究院 Method for recovering pyrite from coal gangue

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB1584673A (en) 1981-02-18
DE2736801A1 (en) 1978-02-23
FR2361940A1 (en) 1978-03-17
FR2361940B1 (en) 1981-12-11
IN147345B (en) 1980-02-09
JPS5323803A (en) 1978-03-04
AU511234B2 (en) 1980-08-07
AU2788477A (en) 1979-02-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2232929C (en) Method for processing a diluted oil sand froth
US4875998A (en) Hot water bitumen extraction process
US3875046A (en) Recovery of oil from tar sand by an improved extraction process
US4249699A (en) Coal recovery processes utilizing agglomeration and density differential separations
CA2662346C (en) Recovery of bitumen from froth treatment tailings
US3856668A (en) Method for treatment of coal washery waters
US4575418A (en) Coal cleaning and the removal of ash from coal
US5244492A (en) Process for recovery of metallic mercury from contaminated mercury-containing soil
JPH11188729A (en) Separation of mixed plastic into light and heavy plastic phases
US4140628A (en) Dense medium separation
US4252639A (en) Coal beneficiation processes
US4857221A (en) Recovering coal fines
CA1091622A (en) Coal recovery system from mine tailings
CA1265264A (en) Particle separation
US4175035A (en) Method for increasing fine coal filtration efficiency
US5795444A (en) Method and apparatus for removing bituminous oil from oil sands without solvent
US4331532A (en) Method for recovering bitumen from tar sand
US3394893A (en) Heat treatment of surface active reagents in flotation
US4376700A (en) Method for beneficiating coal ore
CA1291957C (en) Treatment of froth form oil sands hot water recovery process
US4859318A (en) Recovering coal fines
US2656118A (en) Disposal of slime-bearing water
EP0034896B1 (en) Treatment of heterogeneous liquid materials
US4198289A (en) Mobile, waterless, coal and mineral separating method
EP0246105B1 (en) Recovering coal fines

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry