CA1075598A - Dithiocarbamate fungicide systems of enhanced effectiveness - Google Patents
Dithiocarbamate fungicide systems of enhanced effectivenessInfo
- Publication number
- CA1075598A CA1075598A CA269,909A CA269909A CA1075598A CA 1075598 A CA1075598 A CA 1075598A CA 269909 A CA269909 A CA 269909A CA 1075598 A CA1075598 A CA 1075598A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- vinyl acetate
- poly
- dithiocarbamate
- control
- hours
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 239000000417 fungicide Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 29
- 230000000855 fungicidal effect Effects 0.000 title claims description 33
- DKVNPHBNOWQYFE-UHFFFAOYSA-N carbamodithioic acid Chemical compound NC(S)=S DKVNPHBNOWQYFE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims description 15
- 239000012990 dithiocarbamate Substances 0.000 title claims description 15
- 150000004659 dithiocarbamates Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- XTXRWKRVRITETP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Vinyl acetate Chemical compound CC(=O)OC=C XTXRWKRVRITETP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 229920002689 polyvinyl acetate Polymers 0.000 claims description 47
- -1 poly(vinyl acetate) Polymers 0.000 claims description 39
- 239000011118 polyvinyl acetate Substances 0.000 claims description 28
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 claims description 27
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 206010061217 Infestation Diseases 0.000 claims description 8
- 235000007688 Lycopersicon esculentum Nutrition 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000002538 fungal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- 241000227653 Lycopersicon Species 0.000 claims 4
- AWYFNIZYMPNGAI-UHFFFAOYSA-L ethylenebis(dithiocarbamate) Chemical compound [S-]C(=S)NCCNC([S-])=S AWYFNIZYMPNGAI-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims 2
- YKSNLCVSTHTHJA-UHFFFAOYSA-L maneb Chemical compound [Mn+2].[S-]C(=S)NCCNC([S-])=S YKSNLCVSTHTHJA-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 abstract description 34
- 229920000940 maneb Polymers 0.000 abstract description 34
- FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-OVSJKPMPSA-N all-trans-retinol Chemical compound OC\C=C(/C)\C=C\C=C(/C)\C=C\C1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-OVSJKPMPSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 14
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 13
- 240000003768 Solanum lycopersicum Species 0.000 description 9
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 9
- 239000011717 all-trans-retinol Substances 0.000 description 7
- 235000019169 all-trans-retinol Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 7
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 7
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 7
- VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethene Chemical compound C=C VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 239000005977 Ethylene Substances 0.000 description 5
- 240000005561 Musa balbisiana Species 0.000 description 5
- 235000016213 coffee Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 235000013353 coffee beverage Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- WHDGWKAJBYRJJL-UHFFFAOYSA-K ferbam Chemical compound [Fe+3].CN(C)C([S-])=S.CN(C)C([S-])=S.CN(C)C([S-])=S WHDGWKAJBYRJJL-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 5
- 229920001519 homopolymer Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 239000000575 pesticide Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 5
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-M Acetate Chemical compound CC([O-])=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 235000018290 Musa x paradisiaca Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 4
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000005949 Malathion Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000013543 active substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000003945 anionic surfactant Substances 0.000 description 3
- CVXBEEMKQHEXEN-UHFFFAOYSA-N carbaryl Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(OC(=O)NC)=CC=CC2=C1 CVXBEEMKQHEXEN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 3
- JXSJBGJIGXNWCI-UHFFFAOYSA-N diethyl 2-[(dimethoxyphosphorothioyl)thio]succinate Chemical compound CCOC(=O)CC(SP(=S)(OC)OC)C(=O)OCC JXSJBGJIGXNWCI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229960000453 malathion Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 235000013311 vegetables Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 229920002554 vinyl polymer Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 239000004563 wettable powder Substances 0.000 description 3
- DUBNHZYBDBBJHD-UHFFFAOYSA-L ziram Chemical compound [Zn+2].CN(C)C([S-])=S.CN(C)C([S-])=S DUBNHZYBDBBJHD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 3
- 239000005739 Bordeaux mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 240000007124 Brassica oleracea Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000003899 Brassica oleracea var acephala Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000011299 Brassica oleracea var botrytis Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000011301 Brassica oleracea var capitata Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000001169 Brassica oleracea var oleracea Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 240000003259 Brassica oleracea var. botrytis Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000005752 Copper oxychloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000219112 Cucumis Species 0.000 description 2
- 240000008067 Cucumis sativus Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000010799 Cucumis sativus var sativus Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000005853 Cyperus esculentus Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 241000131448 Mycosphaerella Species 0.000 description 2
- 240000007594 Oryza sativa Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 241000233622 Phytophthora infestans Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000221535 Pucciniales Species 0.000 description 2
- KAESVJOAVNADME-UHFFFAOYSA-N Pyrrole Chemical compound C=1C=CNC=1 KAESVJOAVNADME-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000005870 Ziram Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- HKMOPYJWSFRURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N chloro hypochlorite;copper Chemical compound [Cu].ClOCl HKMOPYJWSFRURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000000084 colloidal system Substances 0.000 description 2
- ZYGHJZDHTFUPRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N coumarin Chemical compound C1=CC=C2OC(=O)C=CC2=C1 ZYGHJZDHTFUPRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000004879 dioscorea Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008029 eradication Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920000126 latex Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000003902 lesion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- AFCCDDWKHLHPDF-UHFFFAOYSA-M metam-sodium Chemical compound [Na+].CNC([S-])=S AFCCDDWKHLHPDF-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920003002 synthetic resin Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000000057 synthetic resin Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- QGDIJZMKEQCRBX-UHFFFAOYSA-N zinc;ethene Chemical group [Zn+2].[CH-]=C.[CH-]=C QGDIJZMKEQCRBX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- IAKOZHOLGAGEJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-methoxyphenyl)-Ethane Chemical compound C1=CC(OC)=CC=C1C(C(Cl)(Cl)Cl)C1=CC=C(OC)C=C1 IAKOZHOLGAGEJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- GOXQRTZXKQZDDN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-Ethylhexyl acrylate Chemical compound CCCCC(CC)COC(=O)C=C GOXQRTZXKQZDDN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000144725 Amygdalus communis Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000007087 Apium graveolens Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000015849 Apium graveolens Dulce Group Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000010591 Appio Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000003416 Asparagus officinalis Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005340 Asparagus officinalis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000004221 Brassica oleracea var gemmifera Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000017647 Brassica oleracea var italica Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000308368 Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002566 Capsicum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000009467 Carica papaya Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000006432 Carica papaya Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000222233 Colletotrichum musae Species 0.000 description 1
- JJLJMEJHUUYSSY-UHFFFAOYSA-L Copper hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[Cu+2] JJLJMEJHUUYSSY-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 239000005750 Copper hydroxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- QPLDLSVMHZLSFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper oxide Chemical compound [Cu]=O QPLDLSVMHZLSFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005751 Copper oxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000682919 Cordana Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000015510 Cucumis melo subsp melo Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000010071 Cucumis prophetarum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000285774 Cyperus esculentus Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000001505 Cyperus odoratus Species 0.000 description 1
- YVGGHNCTFXOJCH-UHFFFAOYSA-N DDT Chemical compound C1=CC(Cl)=CC=C1C(C(Cl)(Cl)Cl)C1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1 YVGGHNCTFXOJCH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000221785 Erysiphales Species 0.000 description 1
- JIGUQPWFLRLWPJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethyl acrylate Chemical compound CCOC(=O)C=C JIGUQPWFLRLWPJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000001828 Gelatine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 244000068988 Glycine max Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010469 Glycine max Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000005562 Glyphosate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241001181537 Hemileia Species 0.000 description 1
- 229920000663 Hydroxyethyl cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004354 Hydroxyethyl cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 240000008415 Lactuca sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000003228 Lactuca sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001293495 Lactuca virosa Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000070406 Malus silvestris Species 0.000 description 1
- PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Manganese Chemical compound [Mn] PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000031888 Mycoses Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241001365887 Neocordana musae Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000061176 Nicotiana tabacum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002637 Nicotiana tabacum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000010627 Phaseolus vulgaris Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000046052 Phaseolus vulgaris Species 0.000 description 1
- 231100000674 Phytotoxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 241000758706 Piperaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 101100505672 Podospora anserina grisea gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000009827 Prunus armeniaca Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000018633 Prunus armeniaca Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000005809 Prunus persica Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000006029 Prunus persica var nucipersica Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000006040 Prunus persica var persica Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000017714 Prunus persica var. nucipersica Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000184297 Pseudocercospora musae Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000061456 Solanum tuberosum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002595 Solanum tuberosum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000009337 Spinacia oleracea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000300264 Spinacia oleracea Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000005848 Tribasic copper sulfate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241001152372 Uromyces musae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000221561 Ustilaginales Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000001717 Vaccinium macrocarpon Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000219094 Vitaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- JNVCSEDACVAATK-UHFFFAOYSA-L [Ca+2].[S-]SSS[S-] Chemical compound [Ca+2].[S-]SSS[S-] JNVCSEDACVAATK-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 230000000895 acaricidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000642 acaricide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000001252 acrylic acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylic acid group Chemical group C(C=C)(=O)O NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000002671 adjuvant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020224 almond Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 125000000129 anionic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 235000021016 apples Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000021015 bananas Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000440 bentonite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000278 bentonite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- SVPXDRXYRYOSEX-UHFFFAOYSA-N bentoquatam Chemical compound O.O=[Si]=O.O=[Al]O[Al]=O SVPXDRXYRYOSEX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004305 biphenyl Substances 0.000 description 1
- CQEYYJKEWSMYFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N butyl acrylate Chemical compound CCCCOC(=O)C=C CQEYYJKEWSMYFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000000484 butyl group Chemical group [H]C([*])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])[H] 0.000 description 1
- LKNFSJXXGBLRAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N carbamodithioic acid;ethene Chemical compound C=C.NC(S)=S.NC(S)=S LKNFSJXXGBLRAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005018 casein Substances 0.000 description 1
- BECPQYXYKAMYBN-UHFFFAOYSA-N casein, tech. Chemical compound NCCCCC(C(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=N)N=C(O)C(CC(C)C)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(C(C)O)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=N)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=N)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=N)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(COP(O)(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=N)N=C(O)C(N)CC1=CC=CC=C1 BECPQYXYKAMYBN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000021240 caseins Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000013043 chemical agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001427 coherent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910001956 copper hydroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910000431 copper oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910000365 copper sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- ARUVKPQLZAKDPS-UHFFFAOYSA-L copper(II) sulfate Chemical compound [Cu+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] ARUVKPQLZAKDPS-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229960000956 coumarin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000001671 coumarin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000021019 cranberries Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 1
- TVWTZAGVNBPXHU-NXVVXOECSA-N dioctyl (z)-but-2-enedioate Chemical class CCCCCCCCOC(=O)\C=C/C(=O)OCCCCCCCC TVWTZAGVNBPXHU-NXVVXOECSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000002019 disulfides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- AWZOLILCOUMRDG-UHFFFAOYSA-N edifenphos Chemical compound C=1C=CC=CC=1SP(=O)(OCC)SC1=CC=CC=C1 AWZOLILCOUMRDG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004945 emulsification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003995 emulsifying agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002148 esters Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- SUPCQIBBMFXVTL-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethyl 2-methylprop-2-enoate Chemical compound CCOC(=O)C(C)=C SUPCQIBBMFXVTL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010419 fine particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019688 fish Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000013312 flour Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- VZCYOOQTPOCHFL-OWOJBTEDSA-L fumarate(2-) Chemical class [O-]C(=O)\C=C\C([O-])=O VZCYOOQTPOCHFL-OWOJBTEDSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 230000001408 fungistatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- JLYXXMFPNIAWKQ-GNIYUCBRSA-N gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane Chemical compound Cl[C@H]1[C@H](Cl)[C@@H](Cl)[C@@H](Cl)[C@H](Cl)[C@H]1Cl JLYXXMFPNIAWKQ-GNIYUCBRSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JLYXXMFPNIAWKQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane Natural products ClC1C(Cl)C(Cl)C(Cl)C(Cl)C1Cl JLYXXMFPNIAWKQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920000159 gelatin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000019322 gelatine Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000003292 glue Substances 0.000 description 1
- XDDAORKBJWWYJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N glyphosate Chemical compound OC(=O)CNCP(O)(O)=O XDDAORKBJWWYJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940097068 glyphosate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000021021 grapes Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002363 herbicidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000005556 hormone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940088597 hormone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000019447 hydroxyethyl cellulose Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003999 initiator Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002917 insecticide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000004816 latex Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960002809 lindane Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000944 linseed oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011572 manganese Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004379 membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- SNICXCGAKADSCV-UHFFFAOYSA-N nicotine Chemical compound CN1CCCC1C1=CC=CN=C1 SNICXCGAKADSCV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000002736 nonionic surfactant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000014571 nuts Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- PNJWIWWMYCMZRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N pent‐4‐en‐2‐one Natural products CC(=O)CC=C PNJWIWWMYCMZRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000003359 percent control normalization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002688 persistence Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002085 persistent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008659 phytopathology Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008635 plant growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002685 polymerization catalyst Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006116 polymerization reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003097 polyterpenes Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229920002451 polyvinyl alcohol Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000915 polyvinyl chloride Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004800 polyvinyl chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000012015 potatoes Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000008476 powdered milk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940080817 rotenone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- JUVIOZPCNVVQFO-UHFFFAOYSA-N rotenone Natural products O1C2=C3CC(C(C)=C)OC3=CC=C2C(=O)C2C1COC1=C2C=C(OC)C(OC)=C1 JUVIOZPCNVVQFO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000020183 skimmed milk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000003549 soybean oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- LITQZINTSYBKIU-UHFFFAOYSA-F tetracopper;hexahydroxide;sulfate Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[OH-].[OH-].[OH-].[OH-].[Cu+2].[Cu+2].[Cu+2].[Cu+2].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O LITQZINTSYBKIU-UHFFFAOYSA-F 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003981 vehicle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000000391 vinyl group Chemical group [H]C([*])=C([H])[H] 0.000 description 1
- JRPGMCRJPQJYPE-UHFFFAOYSA-N zinc;carbanide Chemical group [CH3-].[CH3-].[Zn+2] JRPGMCRJPQJYPE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N25/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests
- A01N25/24—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests containing ingredients to enhance the sticking of the active ingredients
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N25/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests
- A01N25/08—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests containing solids as carriers or diluents
- A01N25/10—Macromolecular compounds
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N47/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom not being member of a ring and having no bond to a carbon or hydrogen atom, e.g. derivatives of carbonic acid
- A01N47/08—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom not being member of a ring and having no bond to a carbon or hydrogen atom, e.g. derivatives of carbonic acid the carbon atom having one or more single bonds to nitrogen atoms
- A01N47/10—Carbamic acid derivatives, i.e. containing the group —O—CO—N<; Thio analogues thereof
- A01N47/12—Carbamic acid derivatives, i.e. containing the group —O—CO—N<; Thio analogues thereof containing a —O—CO—N< group, or a thio analogue thereof, neither directly attached to a ring nor the nitrogen atom being a member of a heterocyclic ring
- A01N47/14—Di-thio analogues thereof
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Effectiveness of dithiocarbamate salt foliar fungicides, e.g., Maneb, enhanced with vinyl acetate polymer dispersions.
Description
7~598 1 This invention relates to foliar fungicide applications and more particularly, systems for enhanced fungicidal effectiveness of dithiocarbamate salts utiliz-ing film forming poly(vinyl acetate) emulsions.
: 5 Foliar fungicides i.e. chemical agents having fungicidal or fungistatic properties employed in direct application e.g. sprayed onto the foliage of plant species for control or eradication of fungal infestation are well~
j known. Maneb (manganous ethylene bis[dithiocarbamate~), 10 and Zineb (zinc ethylene bis~dithiocarbamate]) are typical, and are widely used in the control o~ a broad class of fungi including molds, mildews, rusts, yeasts and smuts, ln cultivation of tomato, potatoes, or vine crops for example.
Maneb is normally applied to foliage as an aqueous dispersion in water of an 80~o wettable powder ( 80 WP i . e. 80% Maneb plus 20% of an inert inorganic sub-strate with a surfactant). Despite its relati~ely low solubility in water, it is readily removed from the foliage 20 by rainfall, necessitating reapplication as many as eight times in one season for effective fungus control. Fungicides especially must be able to withstand weathering since it is during rainy periods that infection potential is maximized.
The problem is discussed in U.S. 3~592,910, pro-25 posing a liquid polyterpene as a sticking agent forfungicides such as Maneb. In general, it has long been known that many substances having low water solubility and which are also sticky, gummy or varnish-like at high ~p .
. . .
~0755~8 concentrations or when dry have the ability to enhance the tenaciousness of pesticides to the protected locus, e.g. leaves. Examples of such 'sticking agents' include proteinaceous materials such as glue, gelatine, casein, ; 5 flour and skim and dried milk; or petroleum, fish, soy-bean and linseed oils; or miscellaneous materials such as bentonite, bentonite-sulfur, Bordeaux mixture, resins from sugar, coumarin resin, rubber latex, vinyl latex, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl chloride and acrylic 10 adhesives. (See "Laboratory and Field Comparisons of Tenacity Agents for Agr~cultural Spray Fungicides", Harry, J.B. pH. D. Thesis, Univ. Pa. (1948): ~niversity Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Publ. ~2139; "Analysis of the basic processes involved in the deposition, degra-15 dation, persistence and effectiveness of pesticides"Ebeling, W. Residue Rev. 3, p. 35-163 (1963)~.
The selection of such adjuvants involves a number of factors beyond the resistance to weathering of the combination or the phytotoxicity thereof, including 20 interference by reaction or otherwise with the operatlon of the active fungicidal agent, the clogging of leaf stomata, and the issue of persistent residues. Moreover, the material utilized must be easily handled, operate consistently with the spray schedule, be economical and 25 be consistent with environmental concerns.
In general, the synthetic resins improve tenacity~
but without increases in efficacy of the fungicidal agent.
In fact Harry, supra reports that standardized tests showed , 3~
1 that certain synthetic resins interfered with the normal inhibiting effect of a tribasic copper sulfate fungicide.
Other reports, in experiments with copper oxychloride and small amounts of e.g. surfactant containing polyvinyl 5 acetate emulsions, are in conflict: 'Some observations on size and biological activity of spray deposits produced by various formulations of copper oxychloride' Evans, E.
et al Ann. appl. Biol, 58, p. 131-144 (1966)). See also Somers, E. J. Sci. Fd. A~ric. (1956) p. 160 ff, ibid 10 10 (1959) p. 548 ff.
In a particular application of Parzate (65% zinc ethylene bis[dithiocarbamate~) with sticXing agents for control of coffee rust, it was found that althou~h the inherent tenacity of the active agent could be improved, 15 the differences in effieacy for the respective systems were statistieally insignificant. {'A Field Evaluation of six stickers in combination with Parzate for the Control of Coffee Rust' Valdez, R.B. et al. Plant Dis. Reptr. 43 p.
562-~ (1959)).
Moreover, a comparative study ('For Foliar Application of Chemicals' Billard, R.W. and Campbell, D.L.
Forest Science 14 (1) pp. 39-43 (1968)) ranking polymeric species as stieking agents for sueh materials as zinc dimethyl dithioearbamate show none as effective as the 25 aerylies in eommon use (particularly Rhoplex AC-33), and vinyl acetate - based adhesives exhibited less weather resistance than the other classes tested. At best, it is apparent from the art that enhancement of pesticide tenaeity ~` 30 `
D~ ~ ~RIc .:
1 and fungitoxicity is empirical and agent specific.
Although polyvinyl acetate emulsions constitu~-ing the selected agent and vehicle for the co~positions and delivery systems of the invention have been used in 5 agriculture heretofore as noted above, no known applica-- tion has evidenced enhanced and retained fungicidal efficacy for dithiocarbamate salts. U.S. 3,873,689 shows the use of a small proportion of polyvinyl acetate disper-sion in a multi-component system for plant agents such as 10 Maneb, but no enhancement of activity of any agent ~s disclosed.
In accordance with this invention, there are provided foliar fungicide compositions of enhanced and retained activity comprising a minor proportion of at 15 least one dithiocarbamate salt, a ma~or proportion of polyvinyl acetate and an agriculturally acceptable carrier.
The dithiocarbamate material, usually a wettable powder, is typically dispersed in a concentrate for spraying by dilution with water in conventional apparatus for the 20 purpose and can therefore be conveniently adapted for combination with polyvinyl acetate, as in an emulsion com-prising a stable milky dispersion of solid resin in water.
Thus, the present invention also provides a method of improving the fungicidal activity of dithiocarbamate salts 25 by providing the salt in combination with a maJor proportion of vinyl acetate polymer.
Levels of poly(vinyl acetate) to fungicide ranging from l:l to 30:1 (weight ratio) may be used or, 1 (at a nominal 50% solids level) from 2:1 to 60:1 based upon emulsion, although best results are often secured at intermediate levels e.g. 12:1 emulsion basis.
;~ ~he foliar fungicide/polyvinyl acetate emulsion 5 is usually applied to the crop to provide 1/12 to 4 lbs. of dithiocarbamate/acre. Thus, Maneb/PVAc may be provided e.g. as concentrates containing 6% Maneb with 37.59% to -~ 93.75% of poly(vinyl acetate) (55% emulsion), and diluted and applied at a rate to supply 1 to 4 lbs. Maneb/acre.
10Although analysis of leaf tissue at the low application levels applicable is exceedingly difficult, it is believed that the active fungicide component is carried within and deposited on ~he plant surfaces in combination with the film forming polymer. Thus, pockets or patches 15 of appliea material form sections of generally discontinu-ous but sometimes interconnected film segments. The fast set property and excellent leveling of polyvinyl acetate emulsions, taken together with their soft, flexible and water resistant film properties together make the polymer 20 uniquely suited to utilization in accordance with the invention.
Without wishing to be bound by an essentially hypothetical elucidation of the~underlying mechanisms, it is believed that the foliar fungicide is on the one hand 25 physically isolated by the film barrier from contact with conditions leading to degradation and loss of effectiveness, while on the other hand offering sufficient availability to counter ~ungus infestation~ and at the same time benefiting ''~
1~75598 1 from tenacious adherence to the substrate. Possibly, a combination of factors including permeability or porosity of the film as well as its more complex barrier and mem-brane transfer properties interplay to offer the large 5 increases in fungicidal effectiveness seen in this system.
It is not known with certainty which mechanisms pertain in the utilization of dithiocarbamate fungicide i.e. whether the initially applied compounds or breakdown products con-stitute the active agent, and whether passage into the plant 10 tissue or access to the mycelia is a limiting factor in effectiveness. Thus, the ratio o~ lipid to water solubility of the combined delivery system may give rise to preferential ~bsorption into fungus spores or mycelium pads. Since leaf tissue is typically negatively charged, as are such materials 1~ as Zineb, fungicidal effectiveness in this system due to improved deposition and retention may be at least in part aue to a minimization of repellant charge by coating with the emulsified polymer. (See 'Dynamics of Deposltion and Tenacity of Fungicides' Rich, S. Phytopathology, 44 (1954) 20 ~p. 203-213)-The effect of the dithiocarbamate salt-pol~vinyl acetate system also appears specialized by comparison to combinations that might have been expected to exhibit similar performance. Thus, systems utilizing polyvinyl 25 acetate emulsions in combination with (1) Karathane 25 WD
(2,4- and 2,6- Dinitro 6-octylphenyl crotonate) for protec-tant control of powdery mildew in cucumber (Cucumis sativa)
: 5 Foliar fungicides i.e. chemical agents having fungicidal or fungistatic properties employed in direct application e.g. sprayed onto the foliage of plant species for control or eradication of fungal infestation are well~
j known. Maneb (manganous ethylene bis[dithiocarbamate~), 10 and Zineb (zinc ethylene bis~dithiocarbamate]) are typical, and are widely used in the control o~ a broad class of fungi including molds, mildews, rusts, yeasts and smuts, ln cultivation of tomato, potatoes, or vine crops for example.
Maneb is normally applied to foliage as an aqueous dispersion in water of an 80~o wettable powder ( 80 WP i . e. 80% Maneb plus 20% of an inert inorganic sub-strate with a surfactant). Despite its relati~ely low solubility in water, it is readily removed from the foliage 20 by rainfall, necessitating reapplication as many as eight times in one season for effective fungus control. Fungicides especially must be able to withstand weathering since it is during rainy periods that infection potential is maximized.
The problem is discussed in U.S. 3~592,910, pro-25 posing a liquid polyterpene as a sticking agent forfungicides such as Maneb. In general, it has long been known that many substances having low water solubility and which are also sticky, gummy or varnish-like at high ~p .
. . .
~0755~8 concentrations or when dry have the ability to enhance the tenaciousness of pesticides to the protected locus, e.g. leaves. Examples of such 'sticking agents' include proteinaceous materials such as glue, gelatine, casein, ; 5 flour and skim and dried milk; or petroleum, fish, soy-bean and linseed oils; or miscellaneous materials such as bentonite, bentonite-sulfur, Bordeaux mixture, resins from sugar, coumarin resin, rubber latex, vinyl latex, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl chloride and acrylic 10 adhesives. (See "Laboratory and Field Comparisons of Tenacity Agents for Agr~cultural Spray Fungicides", Harry, J.B. pH. D. Thesis, Univ. Pa. (1948): ~niversity Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Publ. ~2139; "Analysis of the basic processes involved in the deposition, degra-15 dation, persistence and effectiveness of pesticides"Ebeling, W. Residue Rev. 3, p. 35-163 (1963)~.
The selection of such adjuvants involves a number of factors beyond the resistance to weathering of the combination or the phytotoxicity thereof, including 20 interference by reaction or otherwise with the operatlon of the active fungicidal agent, the clogging of leaf stomata, and the issue of persistent residues. Moreover, the material utilized must be easily handled, operate consistently with the spray schedule, be economical and 25 be consistent with environmental concerns.
In general, the synthetic resins improve tenacity~
but without increases in efficacy of the fungicidal agent.
In fact Harry, supra reports that standardized tests showed , 3~
1 that certain synthetic resins interfered with the normal inhibiting effect of a tribasic copper sulfate fungicide.
Other reports, in experiments with copper oxychloride and small amounts of e.g. surfactant containing polyvinyl 5 acetate emulsions, are in conflict: 'Some observations on size and biological activity of spray deposits produced by various formulations of copper oxychloride' Evans, E.
et al Ann. appl. Biol, 58, p. 131-144 (1966)). See also Somers, E. J. Sci. Fd. A~ric. (1956) p. 160 ff, ibid 10 10 (1959) p. 548 ff.
In a particular application of Parzate (65% zinc ethylene bis[dithiocarbamate~) with sticXing agents for control of coffee rust, it was found that althou~h the inherent tenacity of the active agent could be improved, 15 the differences in effieacy for the respective systems were statistieally insignificant. {'A Field Evaluation of six stickers in combination with Parzate for the Control of Coffee Rust' Valdez, R.B. et al. Plant Dis. Reptr. 43 p.
562-~ (1959)).
Moreover, a comparative study ('For Foliar Application of Chemicals' Billard, R.W. and Campbell, D.L.
Forest Science 14 (1) pp. 39-43 (1968)) ranking polymeric species as stieking agents for sueh materials as zinc dimethyl dithioearbamate show none as effective as the 25 aerylies in eommon use (particularly Rhoplex AC-33), and vinyl acetate - based adhesives exhibited less weather resistance than the other classes tested. At best, it is apparent from the art that enhancement of pesticide tenaeity ~` 30 `
D~ ~ ~RIc .:
1 and fungitoxicity is empirical and agent specific.
Although polyvinyl acetate emulsions constitu~-ing the selected agent and vehicle for the co~positions and delivery systems of the invention have been used in 5 agriculture heretofore as noted above, no known applica-- tion has evidenced enhanced and retained fungicidal efficacy for dithiocarbamate salts. U.S. 3,873,689 shows the use of a small proportion of polyvinyl acetate disper-sion in a multi-component system for plant agents such as 10 Maneb, but no enhancement of activity of any agent ~s disclosed.
In accordance with this invention, there are provided foliar fungicide compositions of enhanced and retained activity comprising a minor proportion of at 15 least one dithiocarbamate salt, a ma~or proportion of polyvinyl acetate and an agriculturally acceptable carrier.
The dithiocarbamate material, usually a wettable powder, is typically dispersed in a concentrate for spraying by dilution with water in conventional apparatus for the 20 purpose and can therefore be conveniently adapted for combination with polyvinyl acetate, as in an emulsion com-prising a stable milky dispersion of solid resin in water.
Thus, the present invention also provides a method of improving the fungicidal activity of dithiocarbamate salts 25 by providing the salt in combination with a maJor proportion of vinyl acetate polymer.
Levels of poly(vinyl acetate) to fungicide ranging from l:l to 30:1 (weight ratio) may be used or, 1 (at a nominal 50% solids level) from 2:1 to 60:1 based upon emulsion, although best results are often secured at intermediate levels e.g. 12:1 emulsion basis.
;~ ~he foliar fungicide/polyvinyl acetate emulsion 5 is usually applied to the crop to provide 1/12 to 4 lbs. of dithiocarbamate/acre. Thus, Maneb/PVAc may be provided e.g. as concentrates containing 6% Maneb with 37.59% to -~ 93.75% of poly(vinyl acetate) (55% emulsion), and diluted and applied at a rate to supply 1 to 4 lbs. Maneb/acre.
10Although analysis of leaf tissue at the low application levels applicable is exceedingly difficult, it is believed that the active fungicide component is carried within and deposited on ~he plant surfaces in combination with the film forming polymer. Thus, pockets or patches 15 of appliea material form sections of generally discontinu-ous but sometimes interconnected film segments. The fast set property and excellent leveling of polyvinyl acetate emulsions, taken together with their soft, flexible and water resistant film properties together make the polymer 20 uniquely suited to utilization in accordance with the invention.
Without wishing to be bound by an essentially hypothetical elucidation of the~underlying mechanisms, it is believed that the foliar fungicide is on the one hand 25 physically isolated by the film barrier from contact with conditions leading to degradation and loss of effectiveness, while on the other hand offering sufficient availability to counter ~ungus infestation~ and at the same time benefiting ''~
1~75598 1 from tenacious adherence to the substrate. Possibly, a combination of factors including permeability or porosity of the film as well as its more complex barrier and mem-brane transfer properties interplay to offer the large 5 increases in fungicidal effectiveness seen in this system.
It is not known with certainty which mechanisms pertain in the utilization of dithiocarbamate fungicide i.e. whether the initially applied compounds or breakdown products con-stitute the active agent, and whether passage into the plant 10 tissue or access to the mycelia is a limiting factor in effectiveness. Thus, the ratio o~ lipid to water solubility of the combined delivery system may give rise to preferential ~bsorption into fungus spores or mycelium pads. Since leaf tissue is typically negatively charged, as are such materials 1~ as Zineb, fungicidal effectiveness in this system due to improved deposition and retention may be at least in part aue to a minimization of repellant charge by coating with the emulsified polymer. (See 'Dynamics of Deposltion and Tenacity of Fungicides' Rich, S. Phytopathology, 44 (1954) 20 ~p. 203-213)-The effect of the dithiocarbamate salt-pol~vinyl acetate system also appears specialized by comparison to combinations that might have been expected to exhibit similar performance. Thus, systems utilizing polyvinyl 25 acetate emulsions in combination with (1) Karathane 25 WD
(2,4- and 2,6- Dinitro 6-octylphenyl crotonate) for protec-tant control of powdery mildew in cucumber (Cucumis sativa)
(2) Hinosan 40% EC (o-ethyl-S,S-diphenyl phosphorodithiolate)
3~
~a~ rYl~r~
.
: ~075598 :
1 for control of rice blast disease in rice (Or~za sativa);
and (3) Glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethylglycine)), for pos~-emergence herbicidal control of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) were generally ineffective under standard rain-5 fall conditions.
An advantage of the present invention is the~inimization of reapplication fre~uency for the fungicide.
Obviously, loss of e.g. Maneb from the foliar region leads to potentially undesirable concentrations of the substance 10 in the soil, particularly with iterated treatments required by rainy weather. Retention on the leaves also maintains effectiveness levels at relatively reduced material cost.
This is particularly advantageous for fungal disease con-trol in long growing season tropical and subtropical crops 15 such as banana, coffee and yams, since fewer applications of fungicide with retained effeckiveness may be envisaged using a weathering or rain resistant formulation according to the invention.
The film forming polymer delivery system is also 20 beneficial for application to leaf crops e.g. lettuce, cabbage and the like since the coherent film deposits tend to be discharged by the plant before harvest by the loss of tenaciousness through plant growth. In this instance, or even where removal from the leaf of the composite system 25 may be accomplished by weather conditions, the present fungicidal compositions are seen as more effective soil drenches. Moreover, residual soil levels can be controlled more effectively by the use of the present invention with , 1 ecological limits.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, an ethylene bis[dithiocarbamate] salt is applied to tomatoes for control of late blight in combination with about 3:1 5 up to about 8:1 parts by weight of a polyvinyl acetate emulsion, at a level of fungicide to provide 2 lb./acre.
As seen from Examples III-IV, better than 90% control is B achieved with Maneb and two different PVAc emulsions, even with substantial simulated rainfall.
In addition to Maneb and Zineb~ other fungicides of the class may be used, such as Ferbam (ferric dimethyl dithiocarbamate); Ziram~(zinc dimethyl dithiocarbamate);
Vapam (sodium N-methyl dithiocarbamate~; Polyram (mixture of 5.2 pts. weight (83.9%) of ammoniates of [ethylene bis-15 (dithiocarbamate)] zinc, 1 pt. wgt. (16.1%) of ethylene bis-[dithlocarbamic acid], bimolecular and trimolecular cyclic anhydrosulfides and disulfides); and the coordina-tion product of zinc (2%) and manganese (16%) ethylene : bis-~dithiocarbamate] (62%). The usually employed 20 toxicologically acceptable salts of these materials are suitable ~or the present purposes. (See U.S. Patents 1,972,961 or Re: 22,750; 2,317,765; 2,504,404; 2,974,156;
3,248,400 and 3,379,610) i~rporatod hor~in by roferenoo.) The polyvinyl acetate conveniently takes the ; 2~ form of an emulsion both for its ready compoundability ~rith the principal fungicidal agent, and its simple adaptability to spraying operations. Surfactants of course may be employed where desired to facilitate emulsification.
~ Trod~ rna~ _g_ . .
107559~3 1 Aqueous emulsions comprising homopolymers and copolymers of vinyl acetate of the well-known type may be conveniently utilized in accordance with the invention.
The procedures used to prepare such polymer emulsions 5 generally involve adding, with rapid stirring, one or more of the monomers to water which contains or to which ls added, either simultaneously or subsequently, surfactants or emulsifying agents, a polymerization catalyst or initia-tor and, in many cases, a protective colloid-forming sub-10 stance. This mixture is then heated to polymerizationtemperature with continued stirring~ and held at that temperature until substantially complete polymerization of the monomer or monomers has occurred. Delayed add~tion of one or more monomers may be practiced, and pre-emulsion 15 techniques utilized to maximize solids levels (See U.S.
3,637,563, 3,423,352-3.) Fine particle size (0.1-0.2 micron) poly(vinyl acetate) emulsions with anionic or nonionic surfactants, are commercially available, as are the large particle size 20 (0 5-3.0 micron) variants stabilized by a protective colloid.
The polymer may be internally plasticized or modified with lO to 30 percent comonomer units based upon the unsaturated esters, such as the acrylates e.g. ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, the methyacrylates 25 and the dialkyl e.g. dibutyl or dioctyl maleates and fumarates. Poly(vinyl alcohol) and hydroxyethylcellulose are conventionally used as protective colloids. The use of coalescing agents to improve film formation (e.g. Butyl ~075S98 1 Carbitol and the Cellosolves) is also contemplated.
Preferred for the purpose of this invention, are the homopolymer, and copolymers which dry rapidly to a soft flexible, relatively clear film. Best results have been 5 achieved with Stein, Hall Vin Rez 7R-15 comprising an B internally plasticized poly(vinyl acetate) copolymer and an anionic surfactant, of 55% solids, l micron particle size providing a permanently soft flexible water resistant film; or Vin Rez 202A (Stein Hall) comprising a homopolymer 10 of poly(vinyl acetate) and an anionic surfactant of 5~%
solids, 2-lO micron particle size, providing a film of good flexibility and fair water resistance. Similar emulsions are availableg as SB-5, SB-9 or SB-ll (~B. Feller), Flexbond 800 (Air Reduction), 40 124 ~Jalpol (Reichhold) 15 P529 or P763 (Borden) and Elv ~ t--81 900 (duPont).
The application of the emulsion in the absence/
of fungicide of course shows some favorable effect as a protectant, but the result is believed due to little more than surface coverage and chemical and physical surface 20 modification, per se, rather than any significant level of fungicidal activity.
It is, of course, understood that the dithiocarba-mate may form only part of a multipurpose spray. Thus, Maneb or Zineb may be formulated with Methoxych~r or Sevin, $ ~ ~
25 and Rotenone or Malathion for vegetables; Ferbam may be mixed with Methoxychlor or Sevin, and Malathion for fruits;
and Zineb or Ferbam may be used with sulfur or Karathane, DDT, lindane or Sevin, and Malathion for flowers, trees and shrubs.
~ rr6.DI~ M~rK -11-,' 1 Of course, combinations with inorganic pesticides are also contemplated where compatible as formulations with sulfur, copper sulfate tbasic), copper oxide (brown), Bor-deaux mixture tdry), copper hydroxide, lime sulfur and the 5 like. Obviously, other plant agents such as insecticides, acaricides, minerals and hormones commonly used in agricul-ture for the maintenance or nurture of plant life, or the control or eradication of pests or disease therein, or the pres$nce of undesired species thereabout may be incorporated 10 in the compositions of the inventi~n wherever compatible.
C-enerally speaking the dithiocarbamate fungicides are protective rather than eradicant in nature: thus Zineb, Polyram, or Ziram are used essentially to keep the spores or mycelia of disease causing fungi from entering treated 15 plants. Maneb or Ferbam have some eradicant character, but the class typically is applied before infestatlon, which has given rise to the frequent reapplication this invention seeks to minimize.
While the invention has been described hereinabove 20 by particular reference to foliar application where its advantages are best illustrated, it is to be understood that the system is also effective as a fungicide in other conven-tional usages in lawns and gardens, or for agricultural crops.
Thus, Zineb is commonly used as a soil drench ~or control of a 25 number of turf diseases.
The various dithiocarbamate fungicides have vari-able, preferred7 or specific applications in recognized use, and response levels vary, as between mildews and rusts, for ~75~98 1 example. The practice of this invention is accordingly go~erned in some respects by the conventional skill of the artisan in selecting agents treatment levels and the like for optimum control.
It is intended that the active foliar fungicide component will be utilized within reco~mended dosage limits for the species and infestations as listed in the EPA
Compendium of Registered Pesticides and believed that reduced levels of fungicide will be rendered useable for 10 efficient control in accordance with the practices of this invention. Thus, Maneb will be typically employed at a level of l.2 to l.6 lb./lO0 gal./acre in control of fungus infestation in fruit, vegetables~ and ornamentals. For tomatoes, dosages may range from 0.4 to 3.2 lb./lO0 gallons.
Appllcation levels may vary with applicable ecosystems, and especially for tropical and subtropical environments a higher level of application to provide effective control may be required, as in the treatment of banana diseases (such as banana leaf spot (Mycosphaerella 20 musicola), Sikatoka disease (Cercospora musae~, Black leaf streak (Mycosphaerella Fi~iensis), banana rust (Uromyces musae), Cordana leaf spot (Cordana musae), Johnson spot (Piricularia grisea), and Anthracnose (Colletotrichum musae) or coffee diseases, such as coffee rust (Hemileia 25 vastatrix or coffele~ola).
The fungicidal system of the invention may be readily prepared by admixture of the agents in preformed concentrates or in the field. Conveniently, the dithiocar-bamate salt is diluted in water to about a lO:l ~eight )75598 1 ratio, and the diluted agent admixed with the poly(vinyl acetate) emulsion by routine shaking at room temperature to effect interdispersion for application.
As a measure of the effectiveness of the present 5 fungicid~l systems under rainfall condltions in the field, simulated rainfall equipment has been employed as disclosed in Chemistry and Industry, March 29, 1969, p. 414. Basically, the apparatus employs a spray of tap water at 20 psi directed ; normally against a leaf held at a distance of about 3 inches 10 from the nozzle. The spray head is traversed slowly across the leaf, and applies about 3 ml of water/sec. The water i3 collected every 50 seconds and the spray reapplied to reach the intended total dosage. A course T ~et noz~le was employed, of the type available from ~praying Systems.
The invention is further illustrated without limitation in the following Examples. Maneb was utilized in each instance as the wettable powder comprising 80%
active agent and 20% inert inorganic substrate with surfac-tant. Percent fungus control represents a calculation of 20 percentage total infection loci on treated plants compared to total infection loci on untreated inoculated controls.
EXAMPLE I
Poly(vinyl acetate) homopolymer (Vin Rez 202A:
Stein, Hall, 55% solids) alone at 600 ppm (emulsion, 26 equivalent to 0.5 lb./acre at 100 gal. or about .25 lb./acre of poly(vinyl acetate) was applied to 9 tomato plants which were removed to the greenhouse, after drying. Four hours after PVAc treatment, 6 of these plants were placed in the ~07559l3 1 rain chamber, subjected to one inch simulated rainfall, allowed to dry and then returned to the greenhouse. Twenty-four hours after the PVAc treatment 3 of the 6 plants subjected to simulated rainfall were placed in the rain 5 chamber, sub~ected to one inch additional simulated rainfall and allowed to dry. At this time all 9 PVAc 202A-treated plants were removed from the greenhouse to the treatment area, spray-inoculated with a mixed sporangial and zoospore suspension of Phytophthora infestans (commonly, late blight) 10 and immediately placed in an incubation chamber maintained at 70F. and 95% plus RH. After 40 hours in the incubation chamber, the plants were removed and observed for total infection lesions of the top three leaves. Effectiveness of treatments was determined by direct comparison with 15 inoculated untreated controls.
By the same procedure, tomato plants were treated with Maneb (manganous ethylene bis~dithiocarbamate], 80 WP) alone at lO0 ppm and compared to the untreated inoculated control.
2~ Tomato plants were also treated in the same manner -~ with a fungicidal system according to the inven~ion, comprising lO0 ppm Maneb dispersed in Vin Rez 202A poly(vlnyl acetate) emulsion at 600 ppm.
~075598 1 The results, expressed as % fungus control relative to the untreated inoculated controls, are tabulated as follows:
Treatment Simulated Rainfall% Fungus Control 5 A. PVAc 202A, 0 0 600 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 17 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 49 B. Maneb, 0 54 100 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 51 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 52 C. Maneb, 0 77 100 ppm. & 1" at 4 hours 77 PVAc 202A, 1" at 4 hours & 2~ hrs. 61 600 ppm.
Thus, even at relatively low levels of Maneb, a significant degree of fungus control was achieved by the fungicidal system of the invention, evidencing con-1~ siderably more effecti~eness than either treatment alone.
! Superior effectiveness levels were retained even after substantial and repeated rainfall.
EXAMP~E II
Poly(vinyl acetate) copolymer (Vin Rez 7R-15:
20 Stein, Hall, 55~ solids) alone at 600 ppm (emulsion, equivalent to 0.5 lb./acre at 100 gal. or about .25 lb./
acre of poly(vinyl acetate) was applied to 9 tomato plants which were removed to the greenhouse, a~ter drying. Four hours after PVAc treatment, 6 of these plants were placed 25 in the rain chamber, subjected to one inch simulated rainfall, allowed to dry and then returned to the greenhouse.
Twenty-four hours after the PVAc treatment 3 of the 6 plants sub~ected to simulated rainfall were placed in the rain chamber, subjected to one inch additional simulated rainfall .
10'75598 :
1 and allowed to dry. At this time all 9 P~Ac 7R-15 ^ treated plants were removed from the greenhouse to the treatment area, spray-inoculated with a mixed sporangial and zoospore suspension of Phytophthora infestans (commonly, 5 late blight) and immediately placed in an incubation chamber maintained at 70F. and 95% plus RH. After 40 hours in the incubation chamber, the plants were removed and observed ~or total in~ection lesions o~ the top three leaves. Effective-ness of treatments was determined by direct comparison with 10 inoculated untreated controls.
By the same procedure, tomato plants were treated ; with Maneb (manganous ethylene-bis~dithiocarbamateJ~ 80 WP) alone at 100 ppm and compared to the untreated inoculated control.
Tomato plants were also treated in the same manner with a fungicidal system according to the invention, compris-ing 100 ppm Maneb dispersed in Vin Rez 7R-15 poly(vlnyl acetate) copolymer emulsion at 60o ppm.
The results, expressed as % fungus control relative 20 to the untreated inoculated controls, are tabulated as follows:
Treatment Simulated Rainfall ~ Fungus Control A. PVAc 7R-15, 0 0 ; 600 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 0 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 42 ; B. Maneb, 0 54 100 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 51 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 52 C. Maneb, 0 58 100 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 84 PVAc 7R-15, 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 87 600 ppm.
, 30 -.
-- 1.075598 1 Thus, even at relatively low levels o~ Maneb, a significant degree of fungus control was achieved by the fungicidal system of the invention~ evidencing con-siderably more effectiveness than either treatment alone.
5 Superior effectiveness levels were retained even after substantial and repeated rainfall.
EXAMPLE III
The procedure of Example I was repeated, except that the proportion of Vin Rez 202A in each instance was 10 increased to 1200 ppm, equivalent to 1 lb./acre at 100 gal. or about .5 lb./acre of poly(vinyl acetate). The follow~ng results were obtained:
Treatment Simulated Rainfall% Fungus Control A. PVAc 202A, 0 0 1200 ppm. 1" a~ 4 hours 17 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 49 B. Maneb, 0 77 100 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 81 1" at 4 hours & 2~ hrs. 27 C. Maneb, ~ 0 99 100 ppm.& 1" at 4 hours 100 PVAc 202A 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 96 -2Q Although in such testing relative differentiation is attributed more significance than absolute values which commonly vary from test to test, the relative degree of control obtained here for the combined system is remarkàble, and the effect of Maneb wash-off with repetitive rainfall apparent.
EXAMPLE IV
The procedure of Example II was repeated, except that the proportion of Vin Rez 7R-15 was increased in each :
1 instance to 1200 ppm. The following results were obtained:
Treatment Simulated Rain~all % Fungus Control - A. PVAc, 7R-15, 0 1200 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 19 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 31 5 B. Maneb, 0 77 100 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 81 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 27 C. Maneb, 0 98 100 ppm. & 1" at 4 hours 97 PVAc, 1200 ppm. 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 95 The same observation may be made for the copolymer 10 as in Example III, relative to the homopolymer, indicating the general equivalence of the species.
EXAMPLE V
The procedure of Example I-II was repeated, except ; that the concentration of vinyl acetate emulsion was increased 15 to 4800 ppm, with the following results:
Treatment l Applied ppm Simulated Rainfall % Fungus Control ; PVAc 202A,4800 0 8 1" at 4 hours 30 1" at 4 hours & 2ll hrs. 0 PVAc 7R-15,4800 0 3 1" at 4 hours 0 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 9 Maneb, 100 0 46 1" at 4 hours 37 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 20 Maneb, 100 0 62 PVAc 202A, 4800 1" at 4 hours 34 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 44 Maneb, 100 0 71 PVAc 7R-15,4800 1" at 4 hours 18 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 41 1 Although some increase in efficacy is evidenced, it is apparent that performance at the intermediate ratios (12:1) of Examples III-IV is preferred.
EXAMPLE VI
: 5 The fungicidal system of the invention may also be applied in the cultivation of fruits and nuts such as almonds, apples, apricots, bananas, cranberries, figs, grapes, nectarines, papaya, and peaches, vegetables such as asparagus, beans, broccoli, brussel sprouts, cauliflower, 10 cabbage, celery, corn, cucumber, lettuce, melons, peppers and spinach or other cultivars such as yams, coffee and tobacco, ~or effective control of fungal infestation therein.
. .. _.
~a~ rYl~r~
.
: ~075598 :
1 for control of rice blast disease in rice (Or~za sativa);
and (3) Glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethylglycine)), for pos~-emergence herbicidal control of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) were generally ineffective under standard rain-5 fall conditions.
An advantage of the present invention is the~inimization of reapplication fre~uency for the fungicide.
Obviously, loss of e.g. Maneb from the foliar region leads to potentially undesirable concentrations of the substance 10 in the soil, particularly with iterated treatments required by rainy weather. Retention on the leaves also maintains effectiveness levels at relatively reduced material cost.
This is particularly advantageous for fungal disease con-trol in long growing season tropical and subtropical crops 15 such as banana, coffee and yams, since fewer applications of fungicide with retained effeckiveness may be envisaged using a weathering or rain resistant formulation according to the invention.
The film forming polymer delivery system is also 20 beneficial for application to leaf crops e.g. lettuce, cabbage and the like since the coherent film deposits tend to be discharged by the plant before harvest by the loss of tenaciousness through plant growth. In this instance, or even where removal from the leaf of the composite system 25 may be accomplished by weather conditions, the present fungicidal compositions are seen as more effective soil drenches. Moreover, residual soil levels can be controlled more effectively by the use of the present invention with , 1 ecological limits.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, an ethylene bis[dithiocarbamate] salt is applied to tomatoes for control of late blight in combination with about 3:1 5 up to about 8:1 parts by weight of a polyvinyl acetate emulsion, at a level of fungicide to provide 2 lb./acre.
As seen from Examples III-IV, better than 90% control is B achieved with Maneb and two different PVAc emulsions, even with substantial simulated rainfall.
In addition to Maneb and Zineb~ other fungicides of the class may be used, such as Ferbam (ferric dimethyl dithiocarbamate); Ziram~(zinc dimethyl dithiocarbamate);
Vapam (sodium N-methyl dithiocarbamate~; Polyram (mixture of 5.2 pts. weight (83.9%) of ammoniates of [ethylene bis-15 (dithiocarbamate)] zinc, 1 pt. wgt. (16.1%) of ethylene bis-[dithlocarbamic acid], bimolecular and trimolecular cyclic anhydrosulfides and disulfides); and the coordina-tion product of zinc (2%) and manganese (16%) ethylene : bis-~dithiocarbamate] (62%). The usually employed 20 toxicologically acceptable salts of these materials are suitable ~or the present purposes. (See U.S. Patents 1,972,961 or Re: 22,750; 2,317,765; 2,504,404; 2,974,156;
3,248,400 and 3,379,610) i~rporatod hor~in by roferenoo.) The polyvinyl acetate conveniently takes the ; 2~ form of an emulsion both for its ready compoundability ~rith the principal fungicidal agent, and its simple adaptability to spraying operations. Surfactants of course may be employed where desired to facilitate emulsification.
~ Trod~ rna~ _g_ . .
107559~3 1 Aqueous emulsions comprising homopolymers and copolymers of vinyl acetate of the well-known type may be conveniently utilized in accordance with the invention.
The procedures used to prepare such polymer emulsions 5 generally involve adding, with rapid stirring, one or more of the monomers to water which contains or to which ls added, either simultaneously or subsequently, surfactants or emulsifying agents, a polymerization catalyst or initia-tor and, in many cases, a protective colloid-forming sub-10 stance. This mixture is then heated to polymerizationtemperature with continued stirring~ and held at that temperature until substantially complete polymerization of the monomer or monomers has occurred. Delayed add~tion of one or more monomers may be practiced, and pre-emulsion 15 techniques utilized to maximize solids levels (See U.S.
3,637,563, 3,423,352-3.) Fine particle size (0.1-0.2 micron) poly(vinyl acetate) emulsions with anionic or nonionic surfactants, are commercially available, as are the large particle size 20 (0 5-3.0 micron) variants stabilized by a protective colloid.
The polymer may be internally plasticized or modified with lO to 30 percent comonomer units based upon the unsaturated esters, such as the acrylates e.g. ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, the methyacrylates 25 and the dialkyl e.g. dibutyl or dioctyl maleates and fumarates. Poly(vinyl alcohol) and hydroxyethylcellulose are conventionally used as protective colloids. The use of coalescing agents to improve film formation (e.g. Butyl ~075S98 1 Carbitol and the Cellosolves) is also contemplated.
Preferred for the purpose of this invention, are the homopolymer, and copolymers which dry rapidly to a soft flexible, relatively clear film. Best results have been 5 achieved with Stein, Hall Vin Rez 7R-15 comprising an B internally plasticized poly(vinyl acetate) copolymer and an anionic surfactant, of 55% solids, l micron particle size providing a permanently soft flexible water resistant film; or Vin Rez 202A (Stein Hall) comprising a homopolymer 10 of poly(vinyl acetate) and an anionic surfactant of 5~%
solids, 2-lO micron particle size, providing a film of good flexibility and fair water resistance. Similar emulsions are availableg as SB-5, SB-9 or SB-ll (~B. Feller), Flexbond 800 (Air Reduction), 40 124 ~Jalpol (Reichhold) 15 P529 or P763 (Borden) and Elv ~ t--81 900 (duPont).
The application of the emulsion in the absence/
of fungicide of course shows some favorable effect as a protectant, but the result is believed due to little more than surface coverage and chemical and physical surface 20 modification, per se, rather than any significant level of fungicidal activity.
It is, of course, understood that the dithiocarba-mate may form only part of a multipurpose spray. Thus, Maneb or Zineb may be formulated with Methoxych~r or Sevin, $ ~ ~
25 and Rotenone or Malathion for vegetables; Ferbam may be mixed with Methoxychlor or Sevin, and Malathion for fruits;
and Zineb or Ferbam may be used with sulfur or Karathane, DDT, lindane or Sevin, and Malathion for flowers, trees and shrubs.
~ rr6.DI~ M~rK -11-,' 1 Of course, combinations with inorganic pesticides are also contemplated where compatible as formulations with sulfur, copper sulfate tbasic), copper oxide (brown), Bor-deaux mixture tdry), copper hydroxide, lime sulfur and the 5 like. Obviously, other plant agents such as insecticides, acaricides, minerals and hormones commonly used in agricul-ture for the maintenance or nurture of plant life, or the control or eradication of pests or disease therein, or the pres$nce of undesired species thereabout may be incorporated 10 in the compositions of the inventi~n wherever compatible.
C-enerally speaking the dithiocarbamate fungicides are protective rather than eradicant in nature: thus Zineb, Polyram, or Ziram are used essentially to keep the spores or mycelia of disease causing fungi from entering treated 15 plants. Maneb or Ferbam have some eradicant character, but the class typically is applied before infestatlon, which has given rise to the frequent reapplication this invention seeks to minimize.
While the invention has been described hereinabove 20 by particular reference to foliar application where its advantages are best illustrated, it is to be understood that the system is also effective as a fungicide in other conven-tional usages in lawns and gardens, or for agricultural crops.
Thus, Zineb is commonly used as a soil drench ~or control of a 25 number of turf diseases.
The various dithiocarbamate fungicides have vari-able, preferred7 or specific applications in recognized use, and response levels vary, as between mildews and rusts, for ~75~98 1 example. The practice of this invention is accordingly go~erned in some respects by the conventional skill of the artisan in selecting agents treatment levels and the like for optimum control.
It is intended that the active foliar fungicide component will be utilized within reco~mended dosage limits for the species and infestations as listed in the EPA
Compendium of Registered Pesticides and believed that reduced levels of fungicide will be rendered useable for 10 efficient control in accordance with the practices of this invention. Thus, Maneb will be typically employed at a level of l.2 to l.6 lb./lO0 gal./acre in control of fungus infestation in fruit, vegetables~ and ornamentals. For tomatoes, dosages may range from 0.4 to 3.2 lb./lO0 gallons.
Appllcation levels may vary with applicable ecosystems, and especially for tropical and subtropical environments a higher level of application to provide effective control may be required, as in the treatment of banana diseases (such as banana leaf spot (Mycosphaerella 20 musicola), Sikatoka disease (Cercospora musae~, Black leaf streak (Mycosphaerella Fi~iensis), banana rust (Uromyces musae), Cordana leaf spot (Cordana musae), Johnson spot (Piricularia grisea), and Anthracnose (Colletotrichum musae) or coffee diseases, such as coffee rust (Hemileia 25 vastatrix or coffele~ola).
The fungicidal system of the invention may be readily prepared by admixture of the agents in preformed concentrates or in the field. Conveniently, the dithiocar-bamate salt is diluted in water to about a lO:l ~eight )75598 1 ratio, and the diluted agent admixed with the poly(vinyl acetate) emulsion by routine shaking at room temperature to effect interdispersion for application.
As a measure of the effectiveness of the present 5 fungicid~l systems under rainfall condltions in the field, simulated rainfall equipment has been employed as disclosed in Chemistry and Industry, March 29, 1969, p. 414. Basically, the apparatus employs a spray of tap water at 20 psi directed ; normally against a leaf held at a distance of about 3 inches 10 from the nozzle. The spray head is traversed slowly across the leaf, and applies about 3 ml of water/sec. The water i3 collected every 50 seconds and the spray reapplied to reach the intended total dosage. A course T ~et noz~le was employed, of the type available from ~praying Systems.
The invention is further illustrated without limitation in the following Examples. Maneb was utilized in each instance as the wettable powder comprising 80%
active agent and 20% inert inorganic substrate with surfac-tant. Percent fungus control represents a calculation of 20 percentage total infection loci on treated plants compared to total infection loci on untreated inoculated controls.
EXAMPLE I
Poly(vinyl acetate) homopolymer (Vin Rez 202A:
Stein, Hall, 55% solids) alone at 600 ppm (emulsion, 26 equivalent to 0.5 lb./acre at 100 gal. or about .25 lb./acre of poly(vinyl acetate) was applied to 9 tomato plants which were removed to the greenhouse, after drying. Four hours after PVAc treatment, 6 of these plants were placed in the ~07559l3 1 rain chamber, subjected to one inch simulated rainfall, allowed to dry and then returned to the greenhouse. Twenty-four hours after the PVAc treatment 3 of the 6 plants subjected to simulated rainfall were placed in the rain 5 chamber, sub~ected to one inch additional simulated rainfall and allowed to dry. At this time all 9 PVAc 202A-treated plants were removed from the greenhouse to the treatment area, spray-inoculated with a mixed sporangial and zoospore suspension of Phytophthora infestans (commonly, late blight) 10 and immediately placed in an incubation chamber maintained at 70F. and 95% plus RH. After 40 hours in the incubation chamber, the plants were removed and observed for total infection lesions of the top three leaves. Effectiveness of treatments was determined by direct comparison with 15 inoculated untreated controls.
By the same procedure, tomato plants were treated with Maneb (manganous ethylene bis~dithiocarbamate], 80 WP) alone at lO0 ppm and compared to the untreated inoculated control.
2~ Tomato plants were also treated in the same manner -~ with a fungicidal system according to the inven~ion, comprising lO0 ppm Maneb dispersed in Vin Rez 202A poly(vlnyl acetate) emulsion at 600 ppm.
~075598 1 The results, expressed as % fungus control relative to the untreated inoculated controls, are tabulated as follows:
Treatment Simulated Rainfall% Fungus Control 5 A. PVAc 202A, 0 0 600 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 17 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 49 B. Maneb, 0 54 100 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 51 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 52 C. Maneb, 0 77 100 ppm. & 1" at 4 hours 77 PVAc 202A, 1" at 4 hours & 2~ hrs. 61 600 ppm.
Thus, even at relatively low levels of Maneb, a significant degree of fungus control was achieved by the fungicidal system of the invention, evidencing con-1~ siderably more effecti~eness than either treatment alone.
! Superior effectiveness levels were retained even after substantial and repeated rainfall.
EXAMP~E II
Poly(vinyl acetate) copolymer (Vin Rez 7R-15:
20 Stein, Hall, 55~ solids) alone at 600 ppm (emulsion, equivalent to 0.5 lb./acre at 100 gal. or about .25 lb./
acre of poly(vinyl acetate) was applied to 9 tomato plants which were removed to the greenhouse, a~ter drying. Four hours after PVAc treatment, 6 of these plants were placed 25 in the rain chamber, subjected to one inch simulated rainfall, allowed to dry and then returned to the greenhouse.
Twenty-four hours after the PVAc treatment 3 of the 6 plants sub~ected to simulated rainfall were placed in the rain chamber, subjected to one inch additional simulated rainfall .
10'75598 :
1 and allowed to dry. At this time all 9 P~Ac 7R-15 ^ treated plants were removed from the greenhouse to the treatment area, spray-inoculated with a mixed sporangial and zoospore suspension of Phytophthora infestans (commonly, 5 late blight) and immediately placed in an incubation chamber maintained at 70F. and 95% plus RH. After 40 hours in the incubation chamber, the plants were removed and observed ~or total in~ection lesions o~ the top three leaves. Effective-ness of treatments was determined by direct comparison with 10 inoculated untreated controls.
By the same procedure, tomato plants were treated ; with Maneb (manganous ethylene-bis~dithiocarbamateJ~ 80 WP) alone at 100 ppm and compared to the untreated inoculated control.
Tomato plants were also treated in the same manner with a fungicidal system according to the invention, compris-ing 100 ppm Maneb dispersed in Vin Rez 7R-15 poly(vlnyl acetate) copolymer emulsion at 60o ppm.
The results, expressed as % fungus control relative 20 to the untreated inoculated controls, are tabulated as follows:
Treatment Simulated Rainfall ~ Fungus Control A. PVAc 7R-15, 0 0 ; 600 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 0 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 42 ; B. Maneb, 0 54 100 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 51 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 52 C. Maneb, 0 58 100 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 84 PVAc 7R-15, 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 87 600 ppm.
, 30 -.
-- 1.075598 1 Thus, even at relatively low levels o~ Maneb, a significant degree of fungus control was achieved by the fungicidal system of the invention~ evidencing con-siderably more effectiveness than either treatment alone.
5 Superior effectiveness levels were retained even after substantial and repeated rainfall.
EXAMPLE III
The procedure of Example I was repeated, except that the proportion of Vin Rez 202A in each instance was 10 increased to 1200 ppm, equivalent to 1 lb./acre at 100 gal. or about .5 lb./acre of poly(vinyl acetate). The follow~ng results were obtained:
Treatment Simulated Rainfall% Fungus Control A. PVAc 202A, 0 0 1200 ppm. 1" a~ 4 hours 17 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 49 B. Maneb, 0 77 100 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 81 1" at 4 hours & 2~ hrs. 27 C. Maneb, ~ 0 99 100 ppm.& 1" at 4 hours 100 PVAc 202A 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 96 -2Q Although in such testing relative differentiation is attributed more significance than absolute values which commonly vary from test to test, the relative degree of control obtained here for the combined system is remarkàble, and the effect of Maneb wash-off with repetitive rainfall apparent.
EXAMPLE IV
The procedure of Example II was repeated, except that the proportion of Vin Rez 7R-15 was increased in each :
1 instance to 1200 ppm. The following results were obtained:
Treatment Simulated Rain~all % Fungus Control - A. PVAc, 7R-15, 0 1200 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 19 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 31 5 B. Maneb, 0 77 100 ppm. 1" at 4 hours 81 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 27 C. Maneb, 0 98 100 ppm. & 1" at 4 hours 97 PVAc, 1200 ppm. 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 95 The same observation may be made for the copolymer 10 as in Example III, relative to the homopolymer, indicating the general equivalence of the species.
EXAMPLE V
The procedure of Example I-II was repeated, except ; that the concentration of vinyl acetate emulsion was increased 15 to 4800 ppm, with the following results:
Treatment l Applied ppm Simulated Rainfall % Fungus Control ; PVAc 202A,4800 0 8 1" at 4 hours 30 1" at 4 hours & 2ll hrs. 0 PVAc 7R-15,4800 0 3 1" at 4 hours 0 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 9 Maneb, 100 0 46 1" at 4 hours 37 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 20 Maneb, 100 0 62 PVAc 202A, 4800 1" at 4 hours 34 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 44 Maneb, 100 0 71 PVAc 7R-15,4800 1" at 4 hours 18 1" at 4 hours & 24 hrs. 41 1 Although some increase in efficacy is evidenced, it is apparent that performance at the intermediate ratios (12:1) of Examples III-IV is preferred.
EXAMPLE VI
: 5 The fungicidal system of the invention may also be applied in the cultivation of fruits and nuts such as almonds, apples, apricots, bananas, cranberries, figs, grapes, nectarines, papaya, and peaches, vegetables such as asparagus, beans, broccoli, brussel sprouts, cauliflower, 10 cabbage, celery, corn, cucumber, lettuce, melons, peppers and spinach or other cultivars such as yams, coffee and tobacco, ~or effective control of fungal infestation therein.
. .. _.
Claims (8)
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process for the foliar treatment of plants susceptible to fungal infestation comprising applying to the foliage a poly(vinyl acetate) emulsion comprising a minor pro-portion of a dithiocarbamate salt foliar fungicide at a rate sufficient to control said infestation.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein said dithiocarbam-ate salt is manganous ethylenebis [dithiocarbamate].
3. The process of claim 2, wherein the weight ratio of vinyl acetate polymer to salt is between about 3:1 and 30:1.
4. A composition comprising an aqueous dispersion of a dithiocarbamate salt foliar fungicide and a poly(vinyl acetate) the weight ratio of said poly(vinyl acetate) to said dithiocarbamate salt being from 3:1 up to 30:1.
5. A poly(vinyl acetate) emulsion comprising a fung-icidally effective amount of manganeous ethylenebis [diothiocarbam-ate].
6. A process for the protectant control of fungus infestation in plant foliage comprising applying to said foliage a fungicidal composition comprising a fungicidally effective pro-portion of a dithicarbamate salt and an excess by weight of poly (vinyl acetate) sufficient to enhance the control of fungal in-festation.
7. A process for the protectant control of late blight in tomatoes comprising applying to the tomato foliage the composition of claim 4.
8. A process for the protectant control of late blight in tomatoes comprising applying to tomato foliage a composition comprising an aqueous dispersion of manganeous ethy-lene bis[dithiocarbamate] and poly(vinyl acetate) the weight ratio of said poly(vinyl acetate) to said dithiocarbamate being from 3:1 up to 30:1.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US65048676A | 1976-01-19 | 1976-01-19 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1075598A true CA1075598A (en) | 1980-04-15 |
Family
ID=24609119
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA269,909A Expired CA1075598A (en) | 1976-01-19 | 1977-01-18 | Dithiocarbamate fungicide systems of enhanced effectiveness |
Country Status (9)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS52105212A (en) |
| AR (1) | AR219911A1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU504522B2 (en) |
| BR (1) | BR7700341A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1075598A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE2702096A1 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES455309A1 (en) |
| FR (1) | FR2337998A1 (en) |
| IT (1) | IT1075802B (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1980002360A1 (en) * | 1979-05-10 | 1980-11-13 | M Sampson | Engineering improved chemical performance in plants |
| IE50142B1 (en) * | 1979-07-11 | 1986-02-19 | Sampson Michael James | Improved method of using a plant-growth regulator |
| US4447984A (en) * | 1979-10-13 | 1984-05-15 | Sampson Michael James | Process for obtaining improved yields from plants |
| JPS5810052A (en) * | 1981-07-10 | 1983-01-20 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Deodorizing and deodorizing treatment agent |
| JPH0798723B2 (en) * | 1985-09-05 | 1995-10-25 | 雄二 加藤 | Footwear germicidal spray |
| DE4432404C1 (en) * | 1994-08-30 | 1995-11-30 | Exner Heinrich Dr Med Vet | Agent for treating seed potatoes to control wet rot and black leg |
| BE1020900A5 (en) * | 2013-05-02 | 2014-08-05 | Globachem Nv | SEED COATING WITH COPOLY LAKE |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR1132800A (en) * | 1955-10-14 | 1957-03-15 | Fahlberg List G M B H | Product to fight parasites |
-
1977
- 1977-01-18 AU AU21405/77A patent/AU504522B2/en not_active Expired
- 1977-01-18 BR BR7700341A patent/BR7700341A/en unknown
- 1977-01-18 CA CA269,909A patent/CA1075598A/en not_active Expired
- 1977-01-19 ES ES455309A patent/ES455309A1/en not_active Expired
- 1977-01-19 IT IT1943777A patent/IT1075802B/en active
- 1977-01-19 DE DE19772702096 patent/DE2702096A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1977-01-19 AR AR26624277A patent/AR219911A1/en active
- 1977-01-19 JP JP406877A patent/JPS52105212A/en active Pending
- 1977-01-19 FR FR7701431A patent/FR2337998A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU2140577A (en) | 1978-07-27 |
| JPS52105212A (en) | 1977-09-03 |
| IT1075802B (en) | 1985-04-22 |
| BR7700341A (en) | 1977-09-20 |
| AU504522B2 (en) | 1979-10-18 |
| FR2337998A1 (en) | 1977-08-12 |
| DE2702096A1 (en) | 1977-07-28 |
| AR219911A1 (en) | 1980-09-30 |
| ES455309A1 (en) | 1978-11-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| DE69005855T2 (en) | Biocidal compositions and treatments. | |
| DE69824559T2 (en) | PROCESS FOR THE PROTECTION OF SURFACES FROM ARTHROPODES | |
| US20010055628A1 (en) | Natural oils having a synergistic effect as a pesticide | |
| UA74844C2 (en) | Insecticidal and acaricidal agent | |
| LT3225B (en) | Copper complex bactericide/fungicide and method of making same | |
| DE69821615T3 (en) | A 4-PHENOXYCHINOLINE-CONTAINING FUNGICIDE MIXTURES | |
| CA1075598A (en) | Dithiocarbamate fungicide systems of enhanced effectiveness | |
| Collins et al. | Residual efficacy of four organophosphate insecticides on concrete and galvanized steel surfaces against three liposcelid psocid species (Psocoptera: Liposcelidae) infesting stored products | |
| US6414019B1 (en) | Synergistic mixtures of selected amino acids | |
| DE60103292T2 (en) | FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS | |
| DE1620175A1 (en) | Fungicidal agent | |
| RK et al. | Chromotoxic effects of one fungicide (Dithane M-45) and two insecticides (Aldrex-30 and Metacid-50) | |
| DE2952377A1 (en) | WOOD PRESERVATIVES | |
| ZA200603844B (en) | Novel copper-containing formulations | |
| DE1108975B (en) | Fungicides based on aniline compounds | |
| DE69935872T2 (en) | Fungicidal mixtures containing a derivative of glyoxalic acid methyl ester methyloxime | |
| DD248725A5 (en) | PESTICIDES COMPOSITION | |
| Abdel-Kader et al. | Efficacy of different plant resistance inducers against downy and powdery mildew diseases of pepper under plastic houses conditions | |
| DE1017405B (en) | Fungicidal pesticides with therapeutic efficacy | |
| US3065124A (en) | Bisdithiocarbamate hypochlorite reaction products for agricultural use | |
| JP3793356B2 (en) | Communication disruptor and communication disruption method | |
| AU2019391691C1 (en) | Solutions for enhancing the effectiveness of insecticides and fungicides on living plants and related methods | |
| Kisha | Foliar sprays and disulfoton granules for the control of Aphis gossypii on okra | |
| DE2602804C2 (en) | Fungicidal preparations for plant protection | |
| Wojdyła | Evaluation of the effectiveness of Agro-Sorb Folium and its mixtures with fungicides in the protection of roses against powdery mildew |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |