AU776364B2

AU776364B2 - Veterinary vaccines

Info

Publication number: AU776364B2
Application number: AU37025/02A
Authority: AU
Inventors: Richard Buchta; Philip Ralph Lehrbach; Christopher Leigh Schwartzkoff
Original assignee: Fort Dodge Australia Pty Ltd
Current assignee: Zoetis Services LLC
Priority date: 1996-12-24
Filing date: 2002-04-26
Publication date: 2004-09-09
Anticipated expiration: 2017-12-22
Also published as: AU3702502A

Description

S&F Ref: 404248AUD1

AUSTRALIA

PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT

ORIGINAL

Name and Address of Applicant: Actual Inventor(s): Address for Service: Invention Title: Fort Dodge Australia Pty Limited 23 Victoria Avenue Castle Hill New South Wales 2154 Australia Richard Buchta, Christopher Leigh Schwartzkoff, Philip Ralph Lehrbach Spruson Ferguson St Martins Tower,Level 31 Market Street Sydney NSW 2000 (CCN 3710000177) Veterinary Vaccines The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us:- 5845c -1- VETERINARY VACCINES The present invention relates to novel vaccine compositions for parenteral administration, methods for their use and to processes for their preparation.

Bacterial and viral diseases of cattle, sheep and pigs, such as Clostridial diseases, cause considerable economic damage in the agriculture industry. Vaccination is therefore a very important means of controlling these diseases.

Currently available vaccines comprise antigens absorbed onto alkali earth metal salts such as aluminium phosphate or aluminium hydroxide and water in oil emulsion vaccines. The animals have to be mustered each year for an annual vaccination, however, these vaccines have to be administered to naive animals, i.e. animals which have not been previously vaccinated, in a two stage or two dose regime consisting of an initial dose and a second "booster" dose a few weeks later which raises the antibody level to a level which sustains protection for a year. This means that the animals must either be kept corralled for the period until the booster dose is given or they have to be mustered again. This is time consuming and expensive and such methods of vaccination are therefore undesirable.

The aluminium based vaccines have been found to have relatively short durations of protection while water-in-oil emulsion vaccines have longer durations of protection, but have been found to be unsuitable for use because they cause unacceptable lesions at the injection sites of the animals Experimental Clostridial Oil Emulsion Vaccines' Thomson R.O. and Batty Bull. Off. int. Epiz. 1967 67 (11-12) 1569-1581; 'The Immunogenicity of a multicomponent Clostridial Oil Emulsion Vaccine in sheep' Thomson et al, The Veterinary Record, 26 July 1969). In 1976 Jansen et. al.

reported the immune response of Clostridium botulinum C and D toxoids in a waterin-oil emulsion vaccine and noted that the two-stage aluminium based vaccine was not boosted by the second dose to the same extent as the water in oil compositions (Jansen, B C, Knoetze, P C Visser, F; Onderstepoort J Vet Res, 43(4) 165-174 (1976)). However, the water in oil compositions gave an undesirable granulomatous swelling resulting from subcutaneous injection of the vaccine in a large percentage of animals which is a severe disadvantage for the vaccine's routine use in commercial cattle.

-2- WO 91/00106 discloses multi-phase emulsions suitable for administering active substances or antigens by injection of the water in oil in water type. These emulsions are produced from pharmaceutically acceptable emulsifiers which when dissolved in an injectable oil, form a homogeneous clear phase and have inversion points approaching the temperature of human or animal bodies. The oils contained in the emulsions include mineral, vegetable or animal oils, and synthetic hydrocarbons. It was observed that these vaccines were well tolerated in pigs and did not cause any local reactions, abscesses or necroses. However, no data were provided regarding the level and duration of the immune responses.

The applicants have found that adjuvants containing synthetic hydrocarbons are particularly suitable for vaccines for the prevention of diseases of sheep and cattle and for the majority of diseases provide an effective immunity for up to a year or more following a single injection or dose including in naive sheep and cattle. Therefore, the present invention addresses the problems associated with known vaccines, providing a level of effective immune response in naive cattle or sheep for the period of approximately one year or more following a single injection or dose of vaccine.

Thus according to the present invention there is provided a vaccine composition which is an injectable multi-phase emulsion of the water in oil in water type having a viscosity of 100 mPas or less, comprising: a) an oily adjuvant acceptable for veterinary purposes comprising: i) a synthetic hydrocarbon being between 40% and 60% by weight of the emulsion and ii) one or more emulsifiers selected so that the inversion point of the resulting emulsion is between 25°C and 45°C and being between 2% and 10% by weight of the emulsion; and b) an aqueous phase comprising one or more antigens selected from diseases of cattle and sheep.

The synthetic hydrocarbon, is preferably one which is liquid at 40 0 C and has a viscosity lower than 100mPas at 25C. Preferred synthetic hydrocarbons include polyisobutenes and polyisoprenes. Polyisobutylene is particularly preferred.

Antigens suitable for use in the compositions of the present invention include antigens derived from bacterial and viral pathogens of sheep and cattle. Preferred bacterial antigens include Clostridial antigens such as Clostridium botulinum C and A26226 -3- D, Clostridium perfringens type A, B, C and D, Clostridium septicum, Clostridium tetani, Clostridium chauvoei, Clostridium novyi type B, Clostridium sordellii, Clostridium haemolyticum; Leptospira antigens, for example, Leptospira interrogans such as Leptospira hardjo, Leptospira pomona, Leptospira copenhageni, Leptospira zanoni, Leptospira tarassovi; Pasteurella antigens such as Pasteurella multocida and Pasteurella haemolytica; Corynebacterium antigens such as Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, Corynebacterium renale, Corynebacterium cystitis, Corynebacterium pilosum and Corynebacterium bovis; and Hacmophilus antigens such as Haemophilus somnus and Haemophilus pleuropneumoniac; Dichelobacter nodosus pilus; Mycoplasma antigens such as Mycoplasma agalactiae, and Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae. Preferred viral antigens include Bovine Viral Diarrhoea (BVD) antigens, Bovine Rhinotracteitus Virus (IBR) antigens, Parainfluenza-3 antigens, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) antigens and Bovine Ephemeral Fever (BEF) antigens.

Particularly preferred embodiments of the invention include botulinum C and/or D toxins as antigens. Suitable antigens include those which are useful in the treatment of diseases such as Lamb dysentery, Pulpy Kidney disease (cnterotoxemia), Malignant Oedema (blood poisoning), Tetanus, Blackleg disease, Black disease, caseous lymphadenitis, ovine foot rot, pasteurellosis and botulism.

Embodiments of the invention include those which are multivalent vaccines, i.e.

vaccines which provide protection against a number of different diseases by incorporating a number of different antigens e.g. the vaccine may contain any number of antigens selected from the list provided above. It is particularly useful to provide a multivalent vaccine, i.e. one which provide adequate immune response to a number of pathogens to increase the range of protection provided by the vaccine. It is particularly difficult to provide multivalent vaccines because it is necessary to provide a vaccine which induces an adequate antigenic response to all the microorganisms of interest. Thus the threshold antibody responses are described in compendial standards Australian Therapeutic Goods order No. 30; British Pharmacopoeia; European Pharmacopoeia and United States Code of Federal regulation). Where compendial standards do not exist for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis) recognised thresholds based on protection from challenge are accepted.

Vaccines provided by the invention include, but are not limited to, 3, 4, 5 and 6 valent vaccines. They may provide protection against a number of diseases of the same type, e.g. the vaccines may contain a number of similar antigens. Alternatively the vaccines may provide protection against a number of diseases caused by different types of micro-organism.

Preferred embodiments of this type are vaccines comprising at least two types of antigen, each one being active against any one of the following: Clostridium borulinum, Clostridium perfringens; Clostridium novyi; Clostridium chauvoei; Clostridium septicum Clostridium retani and Corvnebacterium pseudotuberculosis.

Particularly preferred embodiments arc vaccines comprising an antigen to all the diseases listed above.

Particular embodiments are vaccines comprising at least two of the following types of antigen: Clostridium botulinum C toxin, Closiridium botuliinm D toxin, Clostridium perfringens D toxoid; Clostridium no vi B toxoid; Clostridium chauvoci anaculture; Clostridium septicum toxoid, Clostridium tciani toxoid and Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. Particularly preferred embodiments are vaccines comprising all the antigens listed.

The vaccines of the invention may suitably also include mineral supplements such as selenium or cobalt (vitamin B12) and/or anthelmintics such as avermcctins (c.g.abamectin) and milbemycins (e.g.moxidectin).

The emulsifiers included in the vaccine are non-ionic products such as fatty acid esters or ethers of sugars and polyols, e.g. sorbitol, mannitol, saccharose, glucose and glycerol, and hydrophilic derivatives of such esters, e.g. alcohol, ether-oxide, carboxylic acid, amine and amide derivatives. Lecithins and fatty acids and/or alcohols condensed with ethylene and/or propylene oxide are examples of suitable emulsifiers. The fatty chains of the emulsifiers normally have between 8 and 22 carbons atoms and preferably between 14 and 20 carbon atoms. Preferred fatty acids are oleic, stearic and ricinoleic acids. Liquid emulsifiers are preferred.

More specifically preferred emulsifiers include fatty acid esters of sorbitol, mannitol, glycerol, polyethylene and/or propylene oxides, glycero-phospholipids or a mixture of any two or more thereof. Emulsifiers of particular interest in the present invention are mannide oleate (or mannitol monooleate ester) and PEG oleates, e.g. oleate. Particularly preferred emulsifiers are oleic esters of the following formula: HO-(CH2CH20)n-OC -(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH 2 7

-CH

3 wherein n is an integer from 1 to 18.

Co-adjuvants may optionally be included in the vaccines of the present invention.

The antigens may be in the form of toxoids or cell antigens but if cell antigens are used a co-adjuvant may be required such as a saponin, e.g. quil A, or cytokines such as Interleukin-1, 2 and/or 4 or muramyl dipeptide. Further emulsifiers such as dioctyl decyl ammonium bromide (DDA) may also be included in the vaccines if desired.

The vaccine composition of the present invention may contain one or more antigens and one or more emulsifiers and/or one or more co-adjuvants.

Vaccines according to the present invention may be prepared by dissolving antigens in a suitable aqueous medium such as normal saline, stirring the resultant mixture and adding it to a suitable oil phase. The mixture is then stirred at 200 to 600 rpm) and/or homogenised at 1000 psi) to the desired viscosity (<100 mPas) and conductivity (0.5 to 5.0 millisiemens at 20 0 Preservatives such as thiomersal may optionally be included in the aqueous mixture prior to adding the antigens. This process is preferably carried out at about 20 0 C to about 250C.

Surprisingly it has been found that the vaccines of the invention can provide a sustained and elevated immune response when administered to target animals, such as cattle and sheep, in a single dose. The vaccines are suitable for administration to young and pregnant animals without adverse reaction. The vaccine compositions of the present invention are stable and may be stored for several months or even years without loss of antigenic potency.

The present invention will now be exemplified with reference to the following Examples by way of illustration only.

-6-

EXAMPLES

EXAMPLE 1: PREPARAI DOSE BOTULINUM

VACCINE

ION AND EVALUATION OF A SINGLE Vaccine compositions were prepared according to Table I below. Composition 1 was prepared by mixing botulinum toxoid antigens C and D with normal saline and thiomersal. This aqueous mixture was stirred at room temperature and added to a synthetic hydrocarbon oil phase (ISA207 obtained from SEPPIC SA, 75 Quai D- Orsay, 75007 Paris) equilibrated to room temperature (about 20 0 C to about 25 0

C).

The mixture was stirred at 100 to 600 rpm at room temperature for 15 minutes (Conductivity 0.9 millisiemens, viscosity 30 CPS). Vaccine Composition 2 was prepared in the same way, except that an aluminium based adjuvant Tasgel was used instead of ISA207.

Table I: Vaccine Compositions Component Composition Amount v/v) _1 2 CI. botulinum C 1.25 toxoid concentrate Cl. bolulinum D 0.87 0.35 toxoid concentrate Water or Normal saline 41.78 68.15 Thiomersal 1 1 ISA207® 55.1 Tasgel® A group of fifty Murray Grey/Hereford cross cattle (approximately 12 month old naive cattle) were vaccinated by subcutaneous injection of the compositions described above and also with a further commercially available vaccine CSL Botulinum Vaccine Batch No 0708 15102 (also containing an aluminium based adjuvant). The vaccinations were performed according to the regimes described below in Table II.

-7- Table II: Vaccination Regime I I Vaccine Dose Volume (mL) No.

Cattle Vaccine Regime (Control) Composition 1 2 10 single vaccination Week 0 Composition 2 5 10 single vaccination Week 0 Composition 2 5 10 two vaccinations Weeks 0 and CSL Botulinum 5 10 single vaccination Vaccine Batch Week 0 No 0708 15102

I

Site reactions were recorded and found to be negligible for all groups. All site reactions had resolved seven to twelve weeks after vaccination. Overall the site reactions due to Composition I were slightly larger initially than the other vaccine formulations but these had also resolved completed by week 12. No adverse effects on the general condition of the cattle in any of the experimental groups following vaccination were reported. The mean site reactions are shown below in Table IU.

Table III: Mean Site Reactions in Cattle Vaccine Mean Site Reactions (cm 3 Week 7 12 18 (Control) 0 0 0 0 Composition 1 7.5 0.7 0 0 Composition 2 0 0 0 0 Composition 2 0 0 0 0 CSL Botulinum 1.7 0.9 0 0 Vaccine -8- Serum samples were collected from the cattle over a 52 week period and mouse serum neutralisation titres on pooled group sera were carried out. C1. boiulinurn C ancLD serum neutral isation (SN) titres are sumnmarised below in Tables IV and V.

Table TV: Cl. botulinum C SN Titres (unis/mL) Vaccine SN Titres (unilsmL) a S 7 12 18 26 52 (Control) <4 <3.3 NT NT 1 <2.2 <2)X Composition 1 <3.3 1.1- 1.65- 3.38- 3.3- 3.45 1.65 2.48 5.07 4.95 Composition 2 <3.3 NT NT <1 2. 2 NT Composition 2 NT >8.37 5.58- 2.25- <2.2 <2 8.37 3.38 CSL Botulinum <3.3 NT NT <1 <2.2 NT VaccineIIIIII a Prcvaccination titres based on pooled serum from all groups.-- NT means not tested.

Table V: C. boulin ur D SN Titres (units/mU Vaccine SN Titres (units/mL) 0 a 5 7 12 18 26 52 (Control) <1.8 <1.8 NT NT <2 <2.2 <2 Composition 1 <1.8 <1.8 2.7 10.8- 21.97-- 10.13- 24.17 15.19 Coinosition 2 <1.8 NT NT <2 <2.2 NT Composition 2 NT 13.67 9.12- 3.6-5.4 3.3- 2-3 4.95 Botulinum Vaccine <1.8 <2.2 <2.2 NT aPrevaccination titres based on pooled serum from all groups NT means not tested From the CI. botulinum C and D SN titres it can be seen that a single vaccination of botulinum C and D vaccine of Composition 1 generated detectable SN titres by week 7 post-vaccination for Cl. botulinum C and week 12 post-vaccination for Cl.

botulinum D. Peak SN titres were observed for Cl. botulinum C and D at weeks 18 and 26 respectively. In contrast a single vaccination of a Cl. botulinum C and D vaccine formulated with Tasgel (Composition 2) or a similar commercially available botulinum vaccine (CSL Botulinum Vaccine Batch No 0708 15102) failed to produce sustained SN titres to Cl. botulinum C or D during the same period of observation. Only when the Tasgcl® vaccine (Composition 2) was administered in two injections five weeks apart was a measurable SN response obtained, evcn so the titres were not sustained beyond weeks 26 (unlike Composition Thus the SN titres indicate that long term protection (12 months) associated with measurable SN titres, can be achieved in cattle vaccinated with a single dose of the botulinum C and D vaccine (Composition whereas two doses of the other vaccines tested are required to achieve such titres.

A specific ELISA was used to monitor total antibody levels to Cl. borulinum following vaccination. Although this test does not discriminate between C and D serotypes, it is particularly useful in monitoring antibody levels below the sensitivity of the SN test. The mean ELISA titres are presented below in Table VI as OD405nm for 1/100 dilutions of sera from each of the experimental groups.

Table VI: Mean ELISA litres Mean ELISA Titres (OD405nm at 1/100 dilution) Vaccine Week (Cont 0 5 7 12 18 rol) 0.063 0.065 0.063 0.075 0.078 26 39 52 0.111 0 190 n ]An Composition 1 0.054 0.901 1.071 1.393 1.555 1.648 1.577 0.517 Composition 2 0.081 0.530 0.461 0.386 0.235 0.284 NT NT Composition 2 0.086 0.510 1.299 1.177 1.114 0.773 0.523 0.288 CSL 0.037 0.745 0.666 0.722 0.674 0.435 NT NT Botulinum Vaccine NT not tested ELISA titres were detected in all groups at week 5. The titres from the single dose botulinum vaccine (Composition 1) continued to increase over a 40 week period, in contrast to the other single dose vaccine groups, where ELISA titres had rapidly declined by week 26. These results demonstrate that the single dose botulinum vaccine according to Composition 1 provides a sustained and elevated immune response to cattle without causing unacceptable vaccine site reactions.

EXAMPLE 2: EVALUATION OF SINGLE DOSE BOTULINUM VACCINE IN PREGNANT ANIMALS AND CALVES Composition I was assessed in 5 to 12 month old calves and 2 to 8 year old pregnant cows which had not been previously treated with botulinum C or D vaccines. Bos indicus Brahman cattle were vaccinated with either a single 2mL dose, a single 4mL dose and two 2mL doses, the second being administered 14 days after the initial vaccination. Vaccine compositions were prepared and administered according to Table VII.

Table VII: Vaccination regime Vaccine/Adjuvant Dose Vol.

T Vaccination (Week) Control Composition 1 Composition 1 Composition 1 Control Composition 1 Composition 1 Composition 1 I ii Animal administered to Calves Calves Calves Calves Pregnant Cows Pregnant Cows Pregnant Cows Pregnant Cows 2 0 0,2 1 The rectal temperatures, site reactions and general well being of the cattle was monitored for eight weeks. No significant differences between the vaccinate and nonvaccinate cattle were observed at the end of the trial. The cattle remained in good health and were grazing well. Site reactions were difficult to detect on a daily basis -11depending on the movement of the animals neck and head. Site reactions were hard with no "fluid feel". Swelling was confined to the dermis and subdermal. There was no evidence of pain when firmly pressed. Repeated vaccination indicated that the pregnant cattle were more sensitive than the calves, as site reactions were quite large, but as in the case of the first vaccination these site reactions were resolving, as observed by the decreasing site reaction size. Importantly all site reactions were resolving by the end of the trial, at Week 8.

Eight weeks after the first vaccination site reactions on selected cattle were excised and the area beneath the skin examined for necrosis, inflammation, cellular infiltration and unadsorbed vaccine. The histopathology of the excised vaccination sites showed post-vaccinal subcutaneous granulomatous nodules up to 30mm in depth. Macrophages comprised 60 to 80% of cell mass. The dennis was relatively free of inflammatory change. In some cases the nodule extended into the underlying skeletal muscle. This suggests that the injection may have been more than just subcutaneous and probably reflects variable inoculation techniques. Oily adjuvant was dispersed within phagocytic vesicles within macrophages and in some cases remained in the tissue. There was no widespread necrosis within the granuloma. The lymphoproliferation within the granuloma was consistent with immunological stimulation. The presence of oily adjuvant was not unlike other reports on oil emulsion vaccines J. Bollinger (1970) J.Pharm. Sci. 59 1084-1088).

The cattle were bled at Weeks 0 and 8, serum samples prepared and Botulinum C and D SN's determined by the mouse SN assay. Botulinum antibody levels were also determined by ELISA. The results indicated an immune response. The bivalent Botulinum C D oil emulsion vaccine was shown to be safe in Bos indicuis calves and pregnant cows. Although vaccination produced initial site reactions they had resolved by the conclusion of the trial. There was no pain associated with the swelling, and negligible tissue damage occurred. Excised site reactions indicated a typical immune response with localised lymphocyte proliferation. Systemic effects, following vaccination were negligible.

EXAMPLE 3: THE PREPARATION AND EVALUATION OF A SINGLE DOSE LEPTOSPIRA

VACCINE

The safety and efficacy of single and two dose Leptospira hardjo vaccines formulated with the non-mineral oil ISA207 (Composition 4) was compared with 12the standard two dose vaccine formulated with Tasgel® (Composition 3) and to a two dose vaccine formulated with potassium aluminium sulphate (Pot Alum; Composition The animal group vaccinated with Composition 3 is referred to as Group B; those vaccinated with one and two dose of Composition 4 are referred to as Groups C and D respectively and the group vaccinated with Composition are referred to as Group E. Vaccine compositions were prepared according to Table VIII below. A 2 x 109 organisms/2mL dose of Leptospira hardjo antigen at a concentration of 1.08 x 1010 organisms/ml was used in all vaccines.

Table VIII: Leptospira Vaccine Composition Composition Components (Amount v/v) 3 4 Leptospira hardjo 9.26 9.26 9.26 Thiomersal 1 1 1 Normal Saline 59.74 34.74 58.44 Tasgel® ISA207® Pot alum (10% w/v) 25.12 sodium hydroxide 6.18 w/v) Cattle(approximately 6 months old) were vaccinated by subcutaneous injection and the rectal temperatures, site reactions and weight of the calves monitored.

Groups B,C and E were vaccinated a second time at Week 4. No general changes in behaviour or well being of the cattle were observed. Site reactions were estimated by palpation. A summary is shown below in Table IX, wherein the results are given as group mean site reaction (cm 3 and number of cattle with a site reaction /number of cattle per group at each time point for each injection.

13- Table IX: Mean Site Reaction Volume in Cattle Animal Comp Vaccine/ Mean Site Reactions (cm 3 Group osition Adjuvant

WEEK

2 4 6 a 20 10 2° A Control B 3 L.hardjo/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tasgcl® (0/10 (0/10) (0/10 (0/10) (0/10 (0/10) C 4 L.hardjo/ 11.2 10.4 5.2 0.4 1.6 0 ISA207 (4/10 (2/8 (0/8) D 4 L.hardjo/ 8 4.4 3.2 1.4 ISA207 (3/10) (3/10) (3/9 _(2/10) E 5 L.hardjo/ 0 0 0 0 0 SPot Alum (0/10) (0/10 l(0/10 a. I1 vaccination site I RHS of neck 2" vaccination site 2 LIIS of neck Detectable site reactions were observed with the oil adjuvanted vaccines but were generally considered to be minor and all had resolved by week 10. Two calves had large site reactions, one each from Group C and Group 1) a Week 4. but these had almost resolved by Week 10. A L. hardjo ELISA as described below and a Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) assay (according to Australian Techniques Manual Standard Diagnostics) were carried out on serum samples collected from the blood of the cattle. The group mean L. hardjo ELISA results are presented below in Table X and the group mean MAT results are presented below in Table XI.

L. hardjo ELISAs were performed on individual serum samples. L. hardjo antigens were prepared by sonicaton of 5 x 10 7 cells/mi in PBS (pHl7.3) for 40 seconds at 2- 8"C. 100 .l antigen was added to 96 well flat-bottomed microtitre plates which were then incubated overnight at 4 0 C after which unbound antigens were removed by washing the plates with phosphate buffered saline PBS/Tween 20 v/v; pH7.2).

200 ptl Blocking buffer (Bovine serum albumin; 1% w/v in PBS/Tween 20) was then added and the plates incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature after which they were washed with PBS/Tween 20. Dilutions of cattle sera (and positive and negative sera controls) were added to the wells and the plates incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature. The plates were washed with PBS/Tween 20. A dilution of rabbit antibovine horseradish peroxidase conjugate (NORDIC) in PBS/Tween 20 was added and 1 14the plates incubated for a further 60 minutes at 37"C and then washed with PBS/Twcen Activated substrate o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride dissolved in citrate phosphate buffer (pH4.2) at 0.34mg/ml and activated by the addition of 0.3% hydrogen peroxide was added to the plate. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 8N sulphuric acid after 30 min at room temperature and absorbance at 492 nm was read using a Titertek Multiscan reader. Results are shown in Table X.

Table X: Leptospira hardjo ELISA (Group Mean ELISA Units) Animal Groupl Week 0 4 6 A <1 <1 I <1 B <1 <1 36 22 C <1 7 144 206 D <1 a 16 18 76

I

E <1° <1 40 A in I I. .40 I I v a.

b.

une call had a utrc of 20 One calf had a itre of The standard vaccine in Group B at Week 4 did not generate detectable titres, while the test vaccines incorporating ISA207 (Groups C and D) did induce antibody formation by this time. Following a second dose the titres of Group C animals (ISA207 two dose) were 4 times higher than those induced by the standard vaccine. By week 10, both vaccines incorporating ISA207 (Group C two dose and Group D single dose) generated titres 6 and 3 times higher respectively than the standard vaccine. The use of pot alum to replace Tasgel® (Group E) resulted in similar titres to the standard vaccine. A statistical analysis of Week 6 and Week 10 data shows a significant difference (p <0.05) between the vaccines incorporating ISA207 and the standard vaccine.

Table XI Leptospira hardio MAT (Group Mean Titres) Animal Group Week 6 A 3.1 3.1 B 18.9 10.9 C 25.0 200.0 D 19.8 34.0 E Not tested Not tested The MAT analysis at Week 6 reveals a group mean titre for groups ,B to D of approximately 18.9 to 25 compared to the non-vaccinated control (Group A).

However, there was no significant difference between vaccine groups (p >0.05) A MAT of 25 is required for a detectable L.hardjo response, (seroconversion or natural infection). The MAT analysis at Week 10 indicates larger differences between the groups, with a significant difference between groups B and C (p<0.05).

The vaccine formulated with ISA207 was demonstrated to be safe in cattle.

Temperature rises were minimal following injection and no adverse clinical effects or body weight effects were observed.

The vaccine formulated with ISA207 induced significant antibody responses as measured both by ELISA and MAT. A response was detectable by ELISA at week 4 after only one dose of ISA207 vaccines. A single dose of ISA207 vaccine generated titres at week 6 which were comparable with those generated following two doses of aluminium adjuvanted vaccine. By week 10 the titres of double dosed aluminium adjuvanted vaccine groups had declined, while the single dosed ISA207 group titres continued to increase, suggesting the likelihood of an enhanced duration of immunity.

Two doses of the ISA207 vaccine generated extremely high titres, more typical of levels induced by disease rather than conventional vaccination. These titres were still increasing at the scheduled completion of the trial (week 10 post vaccination).

EXAMPLE 4: THE PREPARATION AND EVALUATION

OF

MULTIVALENT SINGIE DOSE VACCINES Multivalent vaccine compositions containing antigens against a number of diseases and vaccine compositions containing a number of different adjuvants were prepared according to Table XII. Volumes of antigens used in the compositions depended on the concentrations of the bulks from which they are taken.

Table XII: Multivalent Vaccine Compositions Comp onent Composition (amount 67 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Cl. perfringensD 2.6 5.2 1.44 5.T20 2.35 2.35 2.828 toxoid2.8 2820 Cl. novyi B -toxoid 3.0 5.9 04 5.Y74 0 0.8 0.8 1.4 Cl. ch itnvoet 2.2 4.4 1.62 4.40- 28 2 33.53.532 anaculmm3u5re2 32 Cl. septicurn 0.7 1.4 1.33 1.4 2.74 2.7 2.67 2.67 1.12 Cl. fetani toxo-id -4.5 9 49 0.28 028 02 .802 pseudotuberculosis I 01 0.8 4 0. 30 0 30 0.30 0.3 0.r- 2 4- Normal Saline MiJtiQ Thiom ersa] M2 7 Tasgel Quil A DEAF Dextran Dextran Sulphate

DDA

MDP

5-36.0 30 63. 9 2 18.1- 55.0- 22.2 50 34.5 30.0 14.8 3 9.83 36.2 5454.4 54 54 1.18 1.18 20 25 17compositions adjuvanted by Tasgel® (Composition 6) and M207 (Composition 7) were prepared; the five antigens included are described in Table XII_ Analogous 6-in-I compositions adjuvanted by Tasgel® (Composition 8) and M207 (Composition 9) were also prepared by additionally including Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. Compositions containing various supplements or co-adjuvants were also prepared as detailed in Table XII (Compositions 10 to 14).

The vaccines were assessed in the rabbit potency and Cl chauvoei guinea pig challenge tests according to the Therapeutics Goods Order No. 30 (Australian Government Publishing Services), amended where necessary. Mice serum neutralisation titres of pooled group sera for Cl. novyi C. tetani,, Cl. septicum and CI. pcrfringens D were carried out according to the Therapeutic Goods Order No. (Australian Government Publishing Services, 1987). CLA serum neutralisation titres for individuals and pooled sera samples based on observations by Muckel Giles, Am. J. Vet. Res. 44, 1149-1153, 1983 in order to measure a response to the Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. antigens. The Cl chauvoei ELISA was based on the method described in Crichton, Solomon and Barton. Biologicals 18, 49-54, 1990. The results of these tests are detailed below in Table XIII Table XIII: Effectiveness of multivalent vaccines Rabbit Potency Cl. chauvoei Comp- SN (U/mL) osition C. CI. Cl. Cl. CLA ELISA Guinea terani perfringens septicum novyi B (U/mL) Pig D Challenge 6 2.9 9-13.5 5.6-8.4 4.7-7.1 <1 118 8/9 7 6.2-9.3 13.5-20.2 3.8 >10.67 <1 262 6/10 a N NT NT NT 2.5 112 9 >12.66 >27.8 2.5-3.8 >13 1.1 230 NT 8.4-12.7 18.6-27.8 8.4-12.7 >10.7 <1 108 11 >12.7 8.2-12.4 8.4-12.7 7.1-10.7 1 77 NT 12 NT NT NT NT <1 >200 13 NT NT NT NT 1 166 I A o r o -14.z >12 2.7 172 10/10 CODEX 2.5 5 2.5 3.5 1.5 60 10/10

PASS

18- The M207 adjuvanted 5-in-I and 6-in-I vaccines (Compositions 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and_14) passed potency tests for the four clostridial toxoid fractions (Cl. tetani, CI.

perfringens D, Cl. septicum and Cl. novyi B following a single dose vaccination.

This result is similar to that of the Tasgel® vaccine (Composition 8) after two doses.

The addition of co-adjuvants was found to improve the responses to Cl. chauvoei and/or Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosi..

Several vaccines were assessed in fine wool Merryville Merino lambs for safety and efficacy. Site reactions were not found on any lambs vaccinated and no adverse effects on their general well being was observed.

Blood was collected at several time intervals after initial vaccination and at four weeks post annual vaccination. Serum samples were collected from blood centrifuged for 15 minutes at 3000 RPM at room temperature. The following assays were performed on serum samples: Cl. perfringens D ELISA were performed on individual serum samples using purified rabbit anti-Cl. perfringens epsilon toxin diluted in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) in a 96 well microtitre plate. This was incubated at 37'C for 2 hours before purified Cl.

pcrfringcns toxin diluted in phosphate buffered salincTwccn 20 w/v; (pH7.2) was added and the plate incubated at 37"C for 1 hour. Dilutions of sheep sera (and positive and negative sera) were added to the wells and the plate incubated for 1 hour at 37C. The plates were then washed with PBS/Tween and a dilution of rabbit antisheep IgG horseradish pcroxidase conjugate (Biorad) in PBS/Tween added. The plate was incubated at 37'C for a further hour and then washed with PBSFTween.

Activated substrate (2.2 azino-di-3-ethylbcnzthiazolinosulfonate) dissolved in citrate phosphate buffer (pH 4.2) at 1 mg/ml and activated by addition of 0.3% hydrogen peroxide was added to the plate. Absorbance at 405 nm was read after 30 to minutes using a Titertek Multiscan reader. A similar procedure was carried out for Cl. tetani using purifiedCl. tetani toxoid on individual serum samples. The results of these tests are detailed below in Tables XIV and XV: 19- Table XIV: CI. veifringens D ELISA Titre (U/ml,) Comp Vacine/C1. perfningens D ELISA Titre U/mL osition Adjuvant _____Marking Wk 4 Wk 8 Wkl12 Wk 19 Wk 26 Wk 51 Wk vaccinate Tasgel® 63 5inI +S e 3.6 I I I <1 :7I 1 2.4 Tasgcl® 7 5inI/M207 1 2.3 2.5 9.2 14 7.6 7 11.9 7 5S1n ITSe/ 5 1.7 1 4.6 6 2.3 4.4 29.6- M207 9 6i n I/ M2 07 2.0 10.8 5.5 12 24 6.8 NiT NT 91 6inlI+Sc/ 2.8 3.2 1.8 5.6 11.2 E.4 IN Ni M207 61n I/M207 I-I. 2 7.2 5.6 9.8 2.8 NT NT Qui a. Seleniumi (Se) added as sodium sclenatc as a supplement at a level of I mglrnL of Selenium Table XV: C1. letani ELI.SA Titre L-mL.) C1. zezani ELISA Titre (tJ/iiL) Conip. Vaccine/ osition Adjuvant Marking Week Week Week Week Week leek Week 4 8 12 19 26 51 Vaccinate 6" in+S/ I I I 1I <1 7<1 1.6 ______Tasgel®R 7 5inI/M20 I< I I 2. <1I I 1 1.6 7" inl+Sc/ 1.4 <1 1.1 <1 <I 1 I I- 1 -10.4 M207 9- 6in IfM207 <1 <1 2.2 1.4 1 1.3 NT NT In 6i+Se/ 1.5 1.2 2.1. 1.3 NT NT M207 6i/M2071 1 1.5 2.1 3.2 I I -N-T NT -QuilA a. Selenium (Se) added as sodium selenate as a supplement at a level of I mg/mL of Selenium The 6 -in-1/M207-Quil A vaccine composition was assessed in randomly selected lambs. Pooled group sera was shown to have maternal antibodies as detected by Cl.

perfringens and Cl. tetani ELISAs. The vaccines formulated with M207 and also with co-adjuvant Quil A gave similar responses in both the Cl. perfringens and Cl.

tetani ELISAs. These responses were higher than that observed with the Tasgel® vaccines (Composition The addition of selenium as a mineral supplement did not appear to influence the responses to the antigens. All M207 formulations gave variable CI. tetani ELISA titre responses regardless of the maternal antibody.

Claims

1. A vaccine composition which is an injectable multi-phase emulsion of the water in oil in water type having a viscosity of 100mPas or less, comprising: a) an oily adjuvant acceptable for veterinary purposes comprising: i) a synthetic hydrocarbon being between 40% and 60% by weight of the emulsion and ii) one or more emulsifiers selected so that the inversion point of the resulting emulsion is between 25'C and 45°C and being between 2% and 10% by weight of the emulsion; and b) an aqueous phase comprising one or more antigens selected from diseases of cattle and sheep.

2. A vaccine composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein the synthetic hydrocarbon is liquid at 4 0 C.

3. A vaccine composition as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the synthetic hydrocarbon is a polyisobutene or a polyisoprene.

4. A vaccine composition as claimed in claim 3 wherein the synthetic hydrocarbon is a polyisobutylene. A vaccine composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the emulsifier(s) is/are fatty acid esters or ethers of sugars or polyols or derivatives thereof.

6. A vaccine composition as claimed in claim 5 wherein the emulsifier(s) is/are esters or ethers of fatty acids having 8 to 22 carbon atoms in the fatty acid chain.

7. A vaccine composition as claimed in claim 5 or claim 6 wherein the emulsifier(s) is/are esters or ethers of oleic, stearic or ricinoleic acid; mannide oleate; or PEG oleates.

8. A vaccine composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 further comprising one or more co-adjuvants.

9. A vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein the aqueous phase comprises at least 2 different antigens. A vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein the aqueous phase comprises 3 to 6 different antigens.

11. A vaccine composition according to claim 9 or claim 10 wherein the antigens are of a similar type, the vaccine thereby providing protection against at least two diseases of the same type.

12. A vaccine composition according to claim 9 or claim 10 wherein the antigens are of at least 2 different types, the vaccine thereby providing protection to diseases caused by at least two different types of microorganisms.

13. A vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 12 wherein said antigen(s) is/are derived from the following group of microorganisms: A26226 -22- Clostridium botulinum, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium movyi; Clostridium chauvoei; Clostridium septicum; Clostridium tetani; or Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis.

14. A vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 13 wherein said antigen(s) is/are: Clostridium botulinum C toxin; Clostridium botulinum D toxin; Clostridium perfringens D toxoid; Clostridium movyi B toxoid; Clostridium chauvoei anaculture; Clostridium septicum toxoid; Clostridium tetani toxoid; and Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. A vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 14 wherein said antigen(s) include at least of the Clostridium botulinum C toxin antigens and/or the Clostridium botulinum D toxin antigens.

16. A vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 15 further comprising a preservative.

17. A vaccine composition, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any one of the examples, but excluding any comparative examples.

18. A method of preparing a vaccine composition as defined in any one of claims 1 to 17 said method comprising: dissolving the antigen(s) in a suitable aqueous medium with stirring thereby producing the aqueous phase; adding the aqueous phase to the oily adjuvant; and stirring and/or homogenising the resulting mixture to a viscosity of less than 100mPas and a conductivity of 0.5 to 5.0 millisiemens at 20 0 C.

19. A method according to claim 18 wherein the mixture is stirred at 200 to 600rpm.

20. A method according to claim 18 or claim 19 wherein the mixture is homogenised at less than 1000psi.

21. A method according to any one of claims 18 to 20 carried out at about 20 0 C to about 25 0 C.

22. A method according to any one of claims 18 to 21 wherein the aqueous phase further comprises a co-adjuvant and/or a preservative.

23. A method of preparing a vaccine composition, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any one of the examples, but excluding any comparative examples.

24. A vaccine composition prepared by a method according to any one of claims 18 to 23. A method for the prophylaxis of one or more diseases in sheep and cattle comprising administering to said sheep or cattle an immunologically effective amount of a vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 17 or 24. A26226 -23-

26. A vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 17 or 24 when used for the prophylaxis of one or more diseases in sheep and cattle.

27. Use of a vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 17 or 24 in the manufacture of a veterinary preparation for the prophylaxis of one or more diseases in sheep and cattle.

28. A method of eliciting an immunological response in sheep or cattle to one or more diseases of sheep or cattle, said method comprising administering to said sheep or cattle a vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 17 or 24.

29. A vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 17 or 24 when used for eliciting an immunological response in sheep or cattle to one or more diseases of sheep or cattle. Use of a vaccine composition according to any one of claims 1 to 17 or 24 in the manufacture of a veterinary preparation for eliciting an immunological response in sheep or cattle to one or more diseases of sheep or cattle.

31. A veterinary preparation manufactured through a use according to claim 27 or claim Dated 23 April 2002 FORT DODGE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED Patent Attorneys for the Applicant/Nominated Person SPRUSON FERGUSON A26226