[go: up one dir, main page]

AU738399B2 - Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device - Google Patents

Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU738399B2
AU738399B2 AU94118/98A AU9411898A AU738399B2 AU 738399 B2 AU738399 B2 AU 738399B2 AU 94118/98 A AU94118/98 A AU 94118/98A AU 9411898 A AU9411898 A AU 9411898A AU 738399 B2 AU738399 B2 AU 738399B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
image
images
detector
selected object
fiducial
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU94118/98A
Other versions
AU9411898A (en
Inventor
Richard L Webber
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Wake Forest University
Original Assignee
Wake Forest University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU41158/93A external-priority patent/AU697905B2/en
Application filed by Wake Forest University filed Critical Wake Forest University
Priority to AU94118/98A priority Critical patent/AU738399B2/en
Publication of AU9411898A publication Critical patent/AU9411898A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU738399B2 publication Critical patent/AU738399B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Apparatus For Radiation Diagnosis (AREA)

Description

Our Ref: 709948 P/00/011 Regulation 3:2
AUSTRALIA
Patents Act 1990
ORIGINAL
COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT 0 o o
SO.
oo 0 °o 00 o0oo *o0o0 0. oo Applicant(s): Address for Service: Wake Forest University The Bowman Gray School of Medicine Medical Center Boulevard Winston-Salem North Carolina 27157-1023 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DAVIES COLLISON CAVE Patent Trade Mark Attorneys Level 10, 10 Barrack Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 Invention Title: Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me:- 5020 -1- SELF-CALIBRATED TOMOSYNTHETIC, RADIOGRPHIC-n(AGING SYSTEM, METHOD, AND DEVICE This invention was made with government support under Contract No. 70hMOmHlO70 awarded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a selfcalibrating tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device and, more particularly, to a calibrated radiographic-imaging device for use as part of a self-calibrating tomosynthetic X-ray system and method in which random relative positional geometries between the source of radiation and the radiographic imager affixed to the object of interest e may be utilized for recording radiographic images for tomosynthesis.
Background of the Invention Diagnostic performance obtainable from ooo.
radiographic systems is limited necessarily by
S'
sampling constraints which preclude uniform access to dynamic processes manifested in the three spatial .dimensions as well as time. Conventionally, improvements in diagnostic performance have been effected by manipulation of the temporal limitations 2 through immobilization of the object of diagnostic interest.
When temporal limitations are ignored, diagnostic performance can be enhanced through an increase in the range and number of x-ray projections produced. Early conventional bases for optimizing diagnostic performance simply involved taking multiple transmission radiographs from projection angles judged to be appropriate for the diagnostic task. When anatomical constraints precluded access to unambiguous -2single-projection geometries, supplemental approaches were developed involving the use of linear, circular, and hypercycloidal tomography.
A more recent improvement over conventional tomography is tomosynthesis. The primary advantage afforded by tomosynthesis over conventional tomography resides in the fact that tomosynthesis enables any number of tomographic slices to be reconstructed from a single scanning sequence of x-ray exposures.
However, one of the drawbacks with the practical implementation of conventional tomosynthetic systems has been that acquisition of all tomosynthetic projections must be made with little or no movement of the irradiated tissues or objects. Only by immobilizing the object of interest is it presently possible to establish the known geometric relationships required for conventional tomosynthetic reconstruction systems.
The advent of modern computerized tomography has greatly improved diagnostic performance of conventional tomography and tomosynthesis by facilitating access to tissue or object details visible only through 2- or 3-dimensional sampling in a way that eliminates tomographic blur. However, even computerized tomography has significant shortcomings, particularly for tasks requiring high spatial resolution or the need to track tissue or object changes over extended periods of time.
30 Unfortunately, computerized tomography is expensive and cumbersome. Another drawback with conventional computerized tomography is that it is .o 0 limited predominantly to examination of axial tissues.
Computerized tomography is not easily adapted for use on extremities or breast tissues. Furthermore, computerized tomography is confined to applications P:\WPOCS\]DYSWPECM7019W4.D1V 23/11/98 -3which are not limited by the intrinsically low spatial resolution of computerised tomography.
Computerised tomography is also intimidating to many patients and requires nearly complete patient immobilisation for relatively extended periods of time. Requiring patient immobilisation over extended periods of time restricts the degree to which long term temporal changes can be tracked. It is virtually impossible to reposition a patient in exactly the same way from one examination to another. As a result, changes in patient position tend to be confounded with tissue changes of diagnostic interest.
Similar problems are encountered with the application of conventional tomosynthesis *and computerised tomography in industrial applications. The use of conventional e~:tomosynthesi and computerised tomography is constrained. Both technologies require that 900: the object of radiographic interest bear a fixed geometric relationship to all of the multiple 00 0 projection geometries required to implement image reconstruction. Any change in projection a0015 geometry mediated by unanticipated object motion relative to the x-ray source, either during 0.
CC00*0, or between exposures, precludes accurate reconstruction.
0*000:According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided an apparatus for :00 tomosynthesis of multiple object images of a selected object comprising: an image detector positioned at a fixed position relative to a the selected object for detecting said multiple object images; P:\WPDOCS\DYS\SPECIE\709948.DIV 23/11/98 -4a fiducial reference positioned at a fixed position relative to the selected object for producing multiple reference images on said image detector to yield composite images of said reference and object images detected upon said image detector; and an image synthesizer for analysing parameters related to positions and sizes of reference images of said composite images detected upon said image detector to produce image translation data, and for reconstructing a tomographic slice from said composite images and said image translation data.
Preferably, the fiducial reference includes a metallic bead.
Preferably, the image detector includes a CCD device.
0 Preferably, the image detector includes a first image detecting medium for recording the multiple object images and a second image detecting medium supported in a fixed position at a selected angle of orientation relative to the first image detecting medium for recording the composite images.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a system for 20 synthesizing a tomographic image of selected object at a selected slice position through the selected object, the system comprising: a fiducial reference held in a fixed position relative to the selected object; P:\WpDoCs\I)Yscci\7D994&Vcddm 16 Muy 2001 an image projector for projecting object images of the selected object and reference images of said fiducial reference; an image detector located at a fixed position relative to the selected object for detecting said object images and said reference images projected by the image projector; and an image synthesizer for comparing parameters related to positions and sizes of reference images detected upon said image detector parameters of the fiducial reference to produce image translation data, and for reconstructing the tomographic image from said object images and said image translation data.
Preferably, parameters related to positions and sizes of the reference images detected upon said image detector include a frequency pattern and a phase shift of said detected reference images.
Preferably, the image projector comprises a source of radiation.
Preferably, the image detector is located for detecting composite images of said object images and said reference images projected by the image projector and wherein said image synthesizer compares parameters related to positions and sizes of the reference images within the composite images to parameters of the fiducial reference to produce the image translation data and wherein the image synthesizer reconstructs the tomographic image from said composite images and said image translation data.
P:\WPDOCS\DYS\SPECIE\709948.DIV 23/11/98 -6- According to yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of tomosynthesis of projected images of a selected object comprising the steps of: positioning a fiducial reference at a fixed position relative to the selected object; projecting object images of the selected object and reference images of the fiducial reference; detecting said projected object images and said projected reference images at a fixed location relative to the selected object to produce image data;
S..
comparing parameters related to positions and sizes of the detected reference images to parameters of the fiducial reference to produce image translation data; and S. reconstructing a tomographic slice of the selected object from said image translation data and said image data.
Preferably, the step of projecting object images and reference images includes 20 projecting composite images of the object images and the reference images and wherein the step of detecting said projected object images and said projected reference images includes detecting said composite images to produce composite image data and wherein the step of reconstructing a tomographic slice includes reconstructing a tomographic slice from said P:\WPDOCS\DYS\SPECIE\709948.DIV -23/11/98 -7image translation data and said composite image data.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a system for tomosynthesis of multiple projected object images of a selected object comprising: an image detector for detecting multiple projected object images at different relative positions to the selected object; a fiducial reference located at a fixed reference position relative to the selected object for producing multiple projected reference images upon said image detector; and an image synthesizer for analysing parameters related to positions and sizes of the reference images detected upon said image detector to produce image translation data, and Sfor reconstructing a tomographic slice from said object images and said image translation 15 data.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction
C.
with the accompanying drawings, in which: Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of a self-calibrating tomosynthetic x-ray system employing a calibrated radiographic recording device in accordance with the present invention; invention; P:\WPDOCS\DYS\SPECIE\709948.DfV 23/11/918 -8- Fig. 2 is a schematic representation of a self-calibrating tomosynthetic x-ray system employing a calibrated radiographic recording device in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 3 is a diagram representing the use of equivalent projection geometry as a basis for compensating for a change in object position relative to an x-ray source during a tomosynthetic scan sequence; a 09 06 009 6 -9- Fig. 4 is a flow chart of a method and system in accordance with the present'invention for producing a synthesized image of an object at a selected slice position from a plurality of recorded radiographic images of the selected object and a fiducial reference; Fig. 5 is a graphic illustration of position tracking of an initial locus of projections of a single fiducial reference point relative to a selected reference point for purposes of tomosynthetic reconstruction of an image at a selected slice position; Fig. 6 is a diagram representing relative projection displacement at a finite focalobject distance; Fig. 7 is a diagram representing relative magnification at a selected slice position for a finite focal-object distance; .Fig. 8 is a schematic representation of a self-calibrating tomosynthetic x-ray system using a calibrated radiographic recording device of the type schematically shown in Fig. 2 in which a conveyer belt moves an object of interest resting upon the radiographic recording device relative to a series of 25 point radiation sources; and a Fig. 9 is a schematic representation of S* a self-calibrating tomosynthetic x-ray system using a calibrated radiographic recording device of the type 3 0 schematically shown in Fig. 2 in which a rotatable turntable moves an object of interest resting upon the radiographic recording device relative to a series of point radiation sources.
a Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments Referring to Fig. 1, a self-calibrating tomosynthetic radiographic-imaging system is depicted in which a calibrated detection device generally designated 10 is employed for recording radiographic images of a selected object in the form of a tooth 12 irradiated by an arbitrarily positioned point source of radiation 15 such as a point source of x-rays. The detection device 10 includes a radiographic recording S medium 18 for recording a projected radiographic image of the selected object 12. The radiographic recording medium 18 may be in the form of a radiation-sensitive, solid-state image detector such as a radiolucent charge-coupled device (CCD). The CCD may be of the type currently manufactured by English Electron Valve of Great Britain for use in an intra-oral x-ray system marketed by Regam Medical System A.B. of Sundsvall, S* Sweden.
A single radiographic fiducial reference object 20 in the form of a small metallic bead is *e positioned conveniently between the source of radiation 15 and the image detector 18 to enable a projected image of the radiopaque fiducial reference object 20 to be recorded on the image detector 18 2 5, together with the projected image of the selected object 12. The fiducial reference object 20 serves to indicate a reference size and position for comparison to the size and position of the projected image of the S* fiducial reference object recorded on the image detector 18.
The detector device 10 includes a rigid radiolucent holder 22 for holding the radiopaque fiducial reference object 20 in fixed position relative to the image detector 18 so that the fiducial reference is always maintained at a fixed predetermined distance from the image recording -11surface 25 of the image detector. As shown in Fig. 1, the holder includes an object mounting portion 24 which permits the detector device 10 to be rigidly mounted with respect to the selected object 12 to hold the image detector 18 and the radiopaque fiducial reference object 20 in fixed position relative to the selected object 12. As shown in Fig. 1, the object mounting portion 24 of the holder may be securely gripped between the teeth being radiographed.
The object mounting portion 24 of the holder 22 enables the detector device 10 to be mounted in fixed position with respect to the selected object, tooth 12, so that the selected object is positioned intermediate the radiopaque fiducial reference object 20 and the image detector 18. In an alternative arrangement, the holder 22 could function to position the fiducial reference object 20 between the selected object of interest 12 and the image detector so long as a known fixed distance is 20 maintained between the fiducial reference object and the active recording surface of the image detector 18.
As shown in Fig. 1, the fiducial reference object 20 is conveniently positioned in front of the i 25 image detector 18 so that the projection of the fiducial reference object may be recorded on the active surface of the image detector at different positions of the x-ray source 15. For example, when the x-ray source is located at source position the 30 projection of the fiducial reference object 20 is recorded on the active surface 25 of the image detector at position 26. Likewise, when the x-ray source 15 is located at source position the ooo projection of the fiducial reference object 20 is recorded on the active surface 25 of the image -12detector 18 at position 28. For arbitrary positions of the x-ray source 15, the projections of diagnostic interest also contain projections of the radiopaque fiducial reference object 20. Accordingly, the relative displacement measurements required for tomosynthetic registration can'be read from the same images that contain the disparate radiographic projections required for .tomosynthetic reconstruction.
Referring to Fig. 2, a self-calibrating 1 tomosynthetic x-ray system employs a calibrated detector device, generally designated 30, having a different configuration from the detector device depicted in Fig. 1. Detector device 30 functions to record radiographic images of a selected object 32, 1 such as a tooth, irradiated by a distant, arbitrarily positioned point source of radiation 34 such as an xray source. As best shown in Figs. 8 and 9, the detector device 30 includes a support casing 34 having at least a radiolucent surface 35 to which the object 2 of interest 38 may be secured or mounted. A first radiolucent radiographic recording medium 40 is supported in fixed position relative to the support casing for recording a first projected radiographic image of the selected object. A second radiographic 25 recording medium 42 is supported relative to the support casing 34 in fixed position relative to the first radiographic recording medium 40 and at a selected angle of orientation relative to the first radiographic recording medium 40 to permit radiation from the source of radiation 34 to pass through the first radiographic recording medium and impinge upon the second radiographic recording medium for recording a second projected radiographic image of the selected object. As shown in Figs. 1, 8 and 9, a radiopaque 35 fiducial reference, generally designated 44, is -13supported relative to the support casing at a fixed position generally between the first and second radiographic recording mediums 40 and 42 to permit a projected image of the radiopaque fiducial reference 44 to be recorded on the second radiographic recording medium.
Preferably, the first and second radiographic recording mediums-.40 and 42 are in the form of solid-state, radiation-sensitive image detectors such as radiolucent charge-coupled devices (CCDs) Each image detector 40 and 42 includes a generally flat, radiation-sensitive active surface 46 which serves as a detector plane for recording 1 radiographic images. As shown in Fig. 2, the image detectors 40 and 42 are positioned so that the active surfaces 46 of the image detectors 40 and 42 are disposed generally parallel with one another. The parallel arrangement of the active surfaces 46 of image detectors 40 and 42 simplifies the projection 20 geometries.
The radiopaque fiducial reference 44 includes a radiopaque grid 50 which is attached to the underside of image detector 40. The radiopaque grid 25 50 is secured to the underside of the first image detector so that the grid is held in fixed position relative to the active surfaces 46 of first and second image detectors 40 and 42. The radiopaque grid 50 is positioned generally parallel with respect to the active surfaces 46 of the first and second image detectors 40 and 42 and is disposed at a fixed, predetermined distance Hz from the active surface 46 of the second image detector 42. The radiopaque grid 50 functions as a frequency indicator for exhibiting a selected frequency pattern at the fiducial reference.
The grid 50 includes any desired radiopaque pattern.
-14- For example, as shown in Fig. 2, the grid 50 includes uniform, cyclical, orthogonally patterned radiopaque linings at one selected frequency pattern of spacing.
However, the grid may also include non-uniformly spaced, orthogonally patterned radiopaque linings to produce a frequency pattern having different frequencies of spacing. In the most general case, the grid may be characterized by an asynchronous twodimensional pattern having a spatial frequency 0 distribution pattern characterized by the term white noise, all spatial frequencies are indicated with equal modulation. The most suitable configuration of the grid pattern depends on the particular application. The fiducial reference 44 may also include a radiographic fiducial reference object 52 such as a metallic bead affixed at a selected position to the underside of the first image detector The bead 52 functions as a displacement indicator at the fiducial reference for indicating a selected size and position of the fiducial reference.
As shown in Fig. 2, the radiation from the source 34 first passes through the selected object 32 of diagnostic interest, then through the first image Sdetector 40 to produce a radiographic image 60 of the 5 selected object on the active surface 46 of the image detector 40. The radiation then passes through the radiolucent image detector 40 and impinges on the fiducial reference 44 in the form of the fiducial reference grid 50 and the fiducial reference object 52 affixed to the underside of the first image detector Because the fiducial reference 44 is positioned beyond the active surface 46 of the first image detector 40, the effect of the fiducial reference on the image produced by the first image detector 40 is S35 egligible.
negligible.
The grid 50 is made from a highly radiopaque material such as metal wire. Consequently, when the grid is exposed by source x-rays penetrating the first image detector 40, the grid 50 produces a uniform, high contrast, cyclical, orthogonally patterned radiographic projection 65 on the active surface 46 of the second image detector 42. The projected image of the grid onto the active surface of the second image detector enables such image to be recorded by the second image detector. The frequency pattern of the recorded image may be enlarged and displaced relative to the frequency pattern of the grid itself.
Likewise, the fiducial reference bead 52 attached to the underside of the first image detector may create an enlarged and displaced projected image 66 on the active surface 46 of the second image detector 42. The enlarged and displaced image of the selected object 32 is recorded by the second image detector 42. Since one of the primary purposes of the 2 second image detector 42 is to detect displacement and magnification of the fiducial reference grid 50 and/or i :the fiducial reference bead 52, the second image detector 42 may be optionally smaller than the first 25. image detector 25 2 The use of the second image detector 42 together with a fiducial reference 44 positioned at a fixed predetermined distance from the active surface 46 of the second image detector 42 enables the detector device 30 to generate sufficient data to 3: reflect its position after exposure relative to the xray source 34 for each recorded projection. The relative positioning of the detector device 30 with respect to the x-ray source 34 may be determined either by frequency domain analysis of the image produced on the active surface of the produced on the active surface of the second image -16detector 44 by the radiopaque grid rigidly attached to the non-active underside of the first image detector or by spatial domain analysis of the image or images produced on the active surface of the second image detector by selected portions of the radiopaque grid or by the fiducial reference bead 52 attached to the underside of the first image detector Because the second image detector 42 is located farther from the source 34 than is the first image detector 40, the projected image 65 of the grid exhibits a different frequency pattern relative to the actual frequency pattern exhibited by the grid itself. The spatial frequency of the oscillations recorded by the second image detector 42 will be necessarily lower than the frequency of oscillations of the grid 50 itself. This change in spatial frequency can be used to provide an indication of associated magnification.
Magnification can be determined from the predetermined distance Hz separating the grid 50 from the imaging surface 46 of the second image detector 42 and the unknown distance Sz along the z axis separating the grid 50 from the source 34. The 25 magnification formula is: M (sz Hz)/Sz Where M magnification Hz the predetermined fixed distance separating the fiducial reference grid from the active surface of the second image detector Sz the unknown distance of separation between the radiation source and the fiducial reference along the z-axis.
From the magnification formula, the distance Sz can be derived as follows: 35 Sz Hz/(M-l) WO 93/22893 PCT/US93/03873 -17- What remains in order to locate the relative positions of the source of radiation from the image data, as is necessary for the tomosynthetic reconstruction of images, is the determination of projected positions of image data in selected planes parallel to the active surfaces 46 of the image detectors 40 and 42. The amount of displacement of the recorded image 65 of the fiducial reference grid 50 relative to the position of the actual grid itself can be ascertained from the phase shift exhibited by the recorded image of the grid pattern relative to the actual grid pattern. The phase difference between the actual grid pattern, and the projected image of the grid pattern can be determined through 2-dimensional Discrete Fourier Transformations of the original grid pattern and a demagnified off-axis projection image of the grid pattern. An inverse transformation of the phase difference from the frequency domain will 20 reflect positions of amplitude peaks in the spatial domain which are displaced by the respective shift distances. The determination of the phase shift permits localization of the x-ray source 34 relative to the spatially linked object 32 and the detector 25 device In the spatial domain, the change in size of the projection of the fiducial reference relative to the actual size of the fiducial reference reflects magnification. For example, the change in size of the projected image 66 of the fiducial reference bead 52 relative to the actual size of the bead 52 serves as a size displacement indicator which provides an indication of magnification. Likewise, the change in size of the projected image 65 of the fiducial grid 35 relative to the actual grid size also provides an indication of magnification. In order to determine the angulation of the x-ray source, the position of the projected image of the fiducial reference bead 66 can be compared to the actual position of the bead 52 itself. Similarly, the position of the projected image of the grid 65 can be compared to the actual position of the grid 50 itself to determine angulation. Comparison of the position of the image of the fiducial reference with- respect to the actual position of the fiducial reference serves as a position displacement indicator which yields a displacement of Ax in the x direction and a displacement of Ay in the y direction as best shown in Fig. 2.
The frequency-domain approach has an advantage in that the data contributing to the associated measurements are distributed across a large portion of the active surface 46 of the second image detector 42. Distributing the contributing data S* 20 across the active surface of the second image detector averages out the effects of any site-specific artifacts, thereby making the measurement process less prone to the effects of irrelevant x-ray patterns contributing to the composite image recorded on the 25 active surface of the second image detector 42. For example, x-ray patterns which are irrelevant to the recorded image of the fiducial reference are caused by contributions produced by the irradiated object itself .and the structural elements intrinsic to the first image detector 40. On the other hand, the spatialdomain approach has the advantage of mathematical and conceptual simplicity. In addition, the spatialdomain approach does not require much active surface 46 on the second image detector 42 because all 35 required image translation data can be produced from -19projections of a single reference point, i.e., fiducial reference bead 52.
An advantage in utilizing a detection device 30 having a pair of parallel image detectors 40 and 42 is that the projection on the active surface 46 of the first image detector 40 is necessarily correlated to a high degree with the image produced on the second image detector 42. With the pair of image detectors 40 and 42, the selected object is in effect radiographed twice. With appropriate processing and suppression of known artifacts such as the image data contributed by the fiducial reference and the characteristics of the first image detector 40, image data for the selected object obtained from the second image detector 42 can be used to improve the data obtained from the first image detector In order to obtain image data from which tomosynthetic reconstruction can be effected, it is 20 important that the selected object be maintained in a fixed position relative to the fiducial reference 44 and the image detectors 40 and 42 during radiation exposures. So long as the stability is maintained between the detector device 30 and the irradiated 25 structures of interest, tomosynthetic slices can be produced from projections generated from any angle in any position and in any sequence.
Moving objects can be analyzed by affixing the image detector 30 to the moving object so long as the time required for individual exposure is short compared to the movement of the object per unit time.
A fixed, field emission x-ray machine capable of producing extremely short bursts of high-energy x-rays may be used to produce a series of radiographic- 35 projections, each bearing a different angle relative to the source because of the movement of the irradiated structure between successive exposures.
The movement of the selected object together with the attached detector device 30 relative to the x-ray source creates the angular disparity required for tomosynthesis. As such, the system can be used with severely afflicted Parkinsonian patients and others prone to involuntary movement since there are no constraints on the nature of the movement of the irradiated object so long as the detector device can be held in fixed position relative to the object by securing the detection device to the object, and any such movement remains relatively slow with respect to the exposure time required per projection.
The system may also be used for sequential analysis of structures having cyclical movement, such as a beating heart. For applications of this nature, short x-ray bursts are synchronized by a trigger circuit linked to a particular part of the cardiac 20 cycle. Such synchronization, in effect, maintains the relative fixed position of the irradiated object with respect to the detector device during exposures.
The detector device 30 can also be used in industrial applications for purposes of nondestructive 25 testing of a selected object 38. For example, the detector device 30 can be used to detect fatigue cracks or other flaws in various critical structures.
As shown in Figs. 8 and 9, the selected object of interest 38 is placed upon the detector device 30 so that the selected object 38 remains in fixed position relative to the detector device 30. The detector device 30 includes the parallel stacked image detectors 40 and 42 supported within a sealed and calibrated radiolucent casing 34. The fiducial- 35 reference 44 is supported relative to the casing 34 generally between the image detectors 40 and 42. The WO 93/22893 PCT/US93/03873 -21detector device 30 may include a transmitter 72, such as an optional radio, infrared, or other type of transmitter, to permit remote-control data transfer from the detector device As shown in Fig. 8, the selected object of interest 38, together with the detector device 30, is placed as a unit on a movable conveyer belt 74 which functions to move the selected-object 38 and the detector device 30 relative to the radiation source The radiation source 75 includes a plurality of point-radiation sources which can be activated independently and in multiples as the selected object 38 together with the detector unit 30 moves along the conveyer. Similarly, as shown in Fig. 9, the selected object 38, together with the detector device 30, is placed as a unit on a rotatable turntable 78 which functions to rotatably move the detector device 30 and the selected object 38 as a unit with respect to the S 20 source of radiation 75. The radiation source may be in the form of a plurality of point radiation sources which can be activated independently and in multiples. The activation of different point radiation sources serves to create additional relative 25 movement of the x-ray source relative to the selected object 38 and the detector unit As the selected object 38 and the detector device 30 move relative to the radiation source projected radiographic images of the selected object 38 are recorded on image detector 40 while radiographic images of both the selected object and fiducial reference are recorded on the second image detector 42. The images are recorded at different, arbitrary relative positions between the source of 35 radiation 75 and the selected object 38, the fiducial reference 44, and the image detectors 40 and 42. The -22series of projected radiographic images of the object and the fiducial reference recorded by the detector device 30 permit tomosynthetic reconstruction of an image of the selected object at a selected slice position through the object.
As shown in Fig. 3, equivalent projection geometry can be used to compensate for a change in object position during a tomosynthetic scan sequence in order to obtain a locus of image projection of a single fiducial reference point within the same image plane. For relatively long focal-object distances, the effect of small displacements Az of the selected object on image magnification is relatively minimal.
Referring to Fig. 3, a fiducial reference object 80 is held in fixed position relative to the selected object 82 of interest and relative to the image plane 84 representing the active surface of an image detector such as a CCD. A radiation source located at actual source position #1 creates a projected image of the fiducial reference 80 at position #1 on image plane 84. If the radiation source 85 is moved to actual source position #2 without any movement of the image plane 84, the S 25 radiation source 85 will produce a projected image of the fiducial reference 80 at position on image plane 84. However, if the image plane 84 is moved to the position of the moved image plane 84', the fiducial reference 80 moves in position to the moved 30 fiducial reference position 80' and the selected object 82 moves in position to the moved object e position 82'. When the moved arrangement is exposed to radiation from the radiation source 85 located at actual source position the projected image of the 35 moved fiducial reference 80' is recorded on the moved image plane 84' at a position which is geometrically -23equivalent to the #2 position on the original image plane 84 for a radiation source 85 located at equivalent position fonsequently, movement of the image plane 84 together with the selected object 82 and the fiducial reference 80 creates an acceptable image on the image plane for tomosynthetic reconstruction based upon an equivalent positioning of the x-ray source to provide equivalent projection geometry.
Tomosynthetic reconstruction of a selected slice through the selected object of interest can be made from the selected arbitrary projections of images of the fiducial reference and the selected object recorded by the detector device 30. As shown in Fig.
4, the tomosynthetic reconstruction process starts at step 90. Each step of the tomosynthetic reconstruction may preferably be performed as part of a computer-executed process.
20 At step 92, the relative location of the projected image of a fiducial reference point at a plane corresponding to the active surface of the recording medium is determined for a selected projection. The X-Y coordinates of the projection image of a single fiducial reference are recorded. In addition, the magnification of the projection image of the fiducial reference at the plane is also determined and recorded. For relatively long focal-object distances, the effects of magnification are minimal.
In applications in which the detector device engages, or is in close proximity to, the selected •object of interest, when the distance between the x- *ray source and the fiducial reference grid becomes relatively large compared to the distance between the 35 fiducial reference grid and the detector plane of the -24second imaging device 42, the effects of magnification become negligible.and may be ignored.
After the X-Y coordinates and the magnification of the selected projection are recorded in step 92, the process at step 94 queries whether there are any additional projections. If additional projections are selected for input, the process reiterates step 92 to record the X-Y coordinates and the magnification for each selected projection. When the last selected projection is reached at step 94, the process proceeds to step 96 for purposes of determining a selected reference location for the locus of projection points from all selected projections of the fiducial reference object on the detector plane of the recording medium. For example, the process at step 96 determines the coordinates of the center of gravity of all recorded projection points of the single fiducial reference object.
20 Referring to Fig. 5, the small squares labelled 1 correspond to the initial locus of projection points of the single fiducial reference at the detector plane of the image detector. The square containing the circular target lies at the center of 25 gravity of the distribution of the small squares labelled 1. The square containing the circular target represents the point of uniform convergence of the small squares labelled 1 as such small squares collapse uniformly toward the target position in the *O center of the distribution.
At step 98, the distance and path of each initial projection point of the fiducial reference from the center of gravity is determined. The distance and path of each initial projection point 35 from the center of gravity is represented by the dotted lines shown in Fig. 5 passing from the square containing the target to the small squares labelled 1 representing the initial locus of projection points of the single fiducial reference.
At step 100, the relative slice position for the synthesized image is input. The selected slice position through the object is input as a relative slice position representing the distance of the desired slice from the detector plane relative to the distance of the fiducial reference from the detector plane.
At step 102, the relative projection displacement of each selected projection is determined on the basis of the desired relative slice position and the determined magnification of the fiducial reference object. Relative projection displacement provides a scalar correction factor for projections based on finite focal-object distances to permit the projection image to be shifted to proper location at 20 the relative slice position. When the distance from the source to the fidicial reference grid is relatively large with respect to the distance from the fiducial reference grid to the detector plane, the effects of relative projection displacement are negligible and may be ignored.
The principle of relative projection displacement is represented in Fig. 6, in which the Sfollowing variables are depicted: Z vertical distance between the radiation source and the detector plane of the 30 lower CCD H vertical distance between the plane of the fiducial grid and the detector plane of the lower CCD Y vertical distance between the plane of the desired slice and the detector plane of the lower CCD -26- A horizontal distance along the detector plane between the horizontal position of the radiation source and the horizontal position of an actual fiducial reference point B horizontal displacement along the detector plane between the actual position of the image of the fiducial reference point in the detector plane and the horizontal position of the actual fiducial reference point X horizontal displacement along the detector plane between the expected image position in the detector plane of the fiducial reference point when the actual fiducial reference point is vertically transposed into the desired slice plane and the horizontal position of the actual fiducial reference point From the foregoing descriptions, if F relative slice position, then F may be defined as follows: 7 Y/H 0 If M magnification of the fiducial reference, then: M Z/(Z-H) If f(F) relative projection displacement, then: f(F)=X/B From the following geometric relationships: Y/X Z/ (X+A) and H/B Z/ (A+B) the relative projection displacement f(F) can be 30 derived as a function of F and M to be: f(F) Accordingly, as set forth in step 102, the relative projection displacement f(F) can be determined from the relative slice position F and the magnification M.
Next, at step 104, magnification of the desired slice is standardized by a correction factor -27for slice magnification. The magnification correction factor represents a scalar adjustment factor in the relative magnification of the projection of the fiducial reference at a selected slice location. Once again, the computation of relative magnification is beneficial for finite focal-object distances. If the distance from the source of radiation to the fiducial reference grid 50 becomes relatively large with respect to the distance from the fiducial reference grid to the detector plane of the second image detector 42, then relative magnification becomes negligible and may be ignored.
The principle for correction of magnification of a selected projection for a particular slice is represented in Fig. 7. The variables Z, H, and Y, depicted in Fig. 7, are the same variables depicted in Fig. 6. With respect to variables Q, D, and E, the following definitions 20 apply: Q horizontal distance along the detector plane between the horizontal position of the radiation source and the horizontal position of an expected image location of the fiducial reference point in the plane of the desired slice D horizontal distance along the detector plane between the horizontal position of the radiation source and the horizontal position of the actual fiducial reference point a:*iO E horizontal distance along the detector plane between the horizontal position of the radiation source and the actual position of the image of the fiducial Creference point in the detector plane From the foregoing definitions, if F the relative slice position, then F may be defined as follows: F Y/H -28- If M magnification of the fiducial .reference, then M may be defined as .follows: M E/D If C the correction factor for slice magnification, then C may be defined as follows: C Q/D From the following geometric relationship: H/ Y (E-Q) the magnification correction factor C can be derived as a function of F and M to be: C M-F(H-1) Thus, the magnification correction factor C can be determined from the relative slice position F and the magnification H to enable the magnification of the desired slice to be standardized in step 104.
Next, at step 106, the coordinates of a single pixel located at the respective displacement of each projection of the fiducial reference point to the selected slice position are determined. Referring to Fig. 5 again, the square containing the circular target represents the center of gravity or the point of uniform convergence of the small squares labelled 1 which, in turn, represent the initial locus of projections of the single fiducial reference point in the detector plane. Intermediate positions of uniform convergence represent ideal positions of the images of the fiducial reference point for selected relative slice positions. For example, for a selected relative slice position of the small squares labelled indicate the ideal positioning of the respective images of the fiducial reference point. The lined squares with the dark borders correspond to the integer approximations of the respective ideal..
positions represented by the small squares labelled along the dotted lines connecting the initial -29positions represented by the small squares labelled 1 with the convergent target position. As such, the lined squares with the dark borders represent the respective pixels to which the initial locus of fiducial reference image points would respectively shift for a selected relative slice position of The remaining lined squares represent integer approximations to other remaining positions traversed by the connecting lines.
After determination in step 106 of the respective pixels to which each projection of the fiducial reference point should shift for a selected relative slice position, each constituent projection image is then shifted in step 108 such that all associated projections of the fiducial reference point move to their respective pixels at the selected relative slice position. Thus, as shown in Fig. all constituent images would be respectively shifted 20 so that the projections of the fiducial reference point would move to the lined squares with the dark black borders for a selected relative slice position of For a selected relative slice position of 1, all projections of the fiducial reference point would coincide at the target position. For a selected relative slice position greater than 1, all projections of the fiducial reference point would uniformly diverge on the opposite side of the target position relative the initial locus.
30 Next, in step 110, all of the shifted constituent images are spatially averaged. In step 112, the resulting image is optionally filtered in a task-dependent manner. The synthesized image is then displayed in step 114.
As set forth in step 116, if an additional image slice is desired, the process reiterates steps 100 through 114. However, if no additional slices are desired at step. 116, the process stops at step 118.
From the foregoing description, it can be seen that a self-calibrating tomosynthetic x-ray system is provided which does not require fixed geometric positioning of the x-ray source relative to the object of interest. In accordance with Applicant's invention, a versatile system is provided having diverse applicability for medical and industrial uses. Accordingly, the present invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described or depicted herein, but is intended to cover all modifications and changes within the scope of the accompanying claims.
Throughout this specification and the claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the word "comprise", and variations such as "comprises" or comprising" will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or step or group of integers or steps but not the exclusion of any other integer or step or group of integers or steps.
0 0

Claims (6)

1. An apparatus for tomosynthesis of multiple object images of a selected object comprising: an image detector positioned at a fixed position relative to a the selected object for detecting said multiple object images; a fiducial reference positioned at a fixed position relative to the selected object for producing multiple reference images on said image detector to yield composite images of said reference and object images detected upon said image detector; and an image synthesizer for analysing parameters related to positions and sizes of reference images of said composite images detected upon said image detector to produce image translation data, and for reconstructing a tomographic slice from said composite images and said image translation data. 15 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said fiducial reference includes a metallic bead.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said image detector includes a CCD device.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein .said image detector includes a first image detecting medium for recording said multiple object images and a second image detecting i medium supported in a fixed position at a selected angle of orientation relative to said first image detecting medium for recording said composite images. o. A system for synthesizing a tomographic image of selected object at a selected slice 25 position through the selected object, the system comprising: a fiducial reference held in a fixed position relative to the selected object; an image projector for projecting object images of the selected object and reference images of said fiducial reference; an image detector located at a fixed position relative to the selected object for detecting said object images and said reference images projected by the image projector; and P:\WPDOCS\DYSooie%70994z8pe.d 0 0 .I6 July 2001
32- an image synthesizer for comparing parameters related to positions and sizes of reference images detected upon said image detector parameters of the fiducial reference to produce image translation data, and for reconstructing the tomographic image from said object images and said image translation data. 6. The system of claim 5 wherein said parameters related to positions and sizes of the reference images detected upon said image detector include a frequency pattern and a phase shift of said detected reference images. 7. The system of claim 5 wherein said image projector comprises a source of radiation. 8. The system of claim 5 wherein said image detector is located for detecting composite images of said object images and said reference images projected by the image 15 projector and wherein said image synthesizer compares parameters related to positions and sizes of the reference images within the composite images to parameters of the fiducial reference to produce the image translation data and wherein, the image synthesizer i" reconstructs the tomographic image from said composite images and said image translation data. 9. A method of tomosynthesis of projected images of a selected object comprising the steps of: positioning a fiducial reference at a fixed position relative to the selected object; projecting object images of the selected object and reference images of the fiducial 25 reference; detecting said projected object images and said projected reference images at a fixed location relative to the selected object to produce image data; comparing parameters related to positions and sizes of the detected reference images to parameters of the fiducial reference to produce image translation data; and reconstructing a tomographic slice of the selected object from said image translation data and said image data. P:\WPDOCSXDYSXViiX709948sp.doc-16 July 2001
33- The method of claim 9 wherein the step of projecting object images and reference images includes projecting composite images of the object images and the reference images and wherein the step of detecting said projected object images and said projected reference images includes detecting said composite images to produce composite image data and wherein the step of reconstructing a tomographic slice includes reconstructing a tomographic slice from said image translation data and said composite image data. 11. A system for tomosynthesis of multiple projected object images of a selected object comprising: an.image detector for detecting multiple projected object images at different relative positions to the selected object; a fiducial reference located at a fixed reference position relative to the selected object for producing multiple projected reference images upon said image detector; and 15 an image synthesizer for analysing parameters related to positions and sizes of the reference images detected upon said image detector to produce image translation data, and for reconstructing a tomographic slice from said object images and said image translation i data. 12. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said fiducial reference is positioned between said o first and second image detecting mediums. 13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said fiducial reference includes a reference frequency pattern for providing a reference frequency pattern image within said composite 25 image so that said reference frequency pattern image recorded by said second image o detecting medium can exhibit a different frequency pattern and a phase shift relative to said reference frequency pattern. 14. The apparatus of claim 13 wherein said parameters related to positions and sizes of the reference images of said composite images detected upon said image detector include said different frequency pattern and said phase shift relative to said reference frequency P:\WDOCSDY~kpcdc7(Y943sp~dw-6 Juy 2001
34- pattern. The apparatus of claim 13 wherein said reference frequency pattern includes a grid. Dated this 16th day of July, 2001 WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY By its Patent Attorneys DAVIES COLLISON CAVE
AU94118/98A 1992-04-28 1998-11-24 Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device Ceased AU738399B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU94118/98A AU738399B2 (en) 1992-04-28 1998-11-24 Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/875249 1992-04-28
AU41158/93A AU697905B2 (en) 1992-04-28 1993-04-23 Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device
AU94118/98A AU738399B2 (en) 1992-04-28 1998-11-24 Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU41158/93A Division AU697905B2 (en) 1992-04-28 1993-04-23 Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU9411898A AU9411898A (en) 1999-03-04
AU738399B2 true AU738399B2 (en) 2001-09-20

Family

ID=3728536

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU94118/98A Ceased AU738399B2 (en) 1992-04-28 1998-11-24 Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU738399B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7801587B2 (en) 1998-03-05 2010-09-21 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Method and system for creating three-dimensional images using tomosynthetic computed tomography

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
WEBBER ET AL., "SYNTHESIS OF ARBITRARY X-RAY PROJECTIONS FROM A FINITE NUMBER OF EXISTING PROJECTIONS", SPIE, VOL. 535, 1985, PP 84-91 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7801587B2 (en) 1998-03-05 2010-09-21 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Method and system for creating three-dimensional images using tomosynthetic computed tomography

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU9411898A (en) 1999-03-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5668844A (en) Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device
US5214686A (en) Three-dimensional panoramic dental radiography method and apparatus which avoids the subject's spine
US4736396A (en) Tomosynthesis using high speed CT scanning system
AU2002215340B2 (en) System and method for cone beam volume computed tomography using circle-plus-multiple-ARC orbit
US6435714B1 (en) X-ray diagnostic device
US5307264A (en) Method and apparatus for computing tomographic scans
US6652142B2 (en) Method of calibration for reconstructing three-dimensional models from images obtained by tomograpy
EP2403411B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for differential phase-contrast fan beam ct, cone-beam ct and hybrid cone-beam ct
US6236708B1 (en) 2D and 3D tomographic X-ray imaging using flat panel detectors
US8005184B2 (en) Ultra low radiation dose X-ray CT scanner
US6038282A (en) X-ray imaging system
JP4537129B2 (en) System for scanning objects in tomosynthesis applications
US7244063B2 (en) Method and system for three dimensional tomosynthesis imaging
EP0520778B1 (en) Tomographic image reconstruction using cross-plane rays
EP0932363A1 (en) Tomosynthesis system for breast imaging
US7676020B2 (en) Tomography system
JP2008012319A (en) Method and system for reducing artifacts in tomosynthesis imaging systems
US20050133708A1 (en) Method and system for three dimensional tomosynthesis imaging
JPH06133961A (en) Computed tomography equipment
JP2825352B2 (en) CT device
AU738399B2 (en) Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method, and device
JP2825471B2 (en) CT device
JPS6397151A (en) Tomographic synthesis using high speed ct scanning system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired