AU696376B2 - Prophylaxis of allergic disease - Google Patents
Prophylaxis of allergic disease Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU696376B2 AU696376B2 AU13074/95A AU1307495A AU696376B2 AU 696376 B2 AU696376 B2 AU 696376B2 AU 13074/95 A AU13074/95 A AU 13074/95A AU 1307495 A AU1307495 A AU 1307495A AU 696376 B2 AU696376 B2 AU 696376B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- allergen
- cells
- specific
- ige
- lymphocytes
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
- 208000026935 allergic disease Diseases 0.000 title claims description 12
- 238000011321 prophylaxis Methods 0.000 title description 2
- 239000013566 allergen Substances 0.000 claims description 131
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 54
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 31
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 claims description 27
- 239000002671 adjuvant Substances 0.000 claims description 27
- 210000004698 lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000443 aerosol Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000002502 liposome Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 claims description 5
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 210000003746 feather Anatomy 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000003937 drug carrier Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000007918 intramuscular administration Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000007920 subcutaneous administration Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000013586 microbial product Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000069 prophylactic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 claims 2
- 239000000568 immunological adjuvant Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 61
- 210000001744 T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 55
- 229940092253 ovalbumin Drugs 0.000 description 46
- 108010058846 Ovalbumin Proteins 0.000 description 43
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 description 40
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 description 40
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 description 38
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 24
- 206010003645 Atopy Diseases 0.000 description 17
- 230000036039 immunity Effects 0.000 description 17
- 210000004988 splenocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 15
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 15
- 102000004127 Cytokines Human genes 0.000 description 12
- 108090000695 Cytokines Proteins 0.000 description 12
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000009257 reactivity Effects 0.000 description 10
- 206010070834 Sensitisation Diseases 0.000 description 9
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 9
- 208000010668 atopic eczema Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000000172 allergic effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 6
- 206010020751 Hypersensitivity Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 102000000588 Interleukin-2 Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108010002350 Interleukin-2 Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 5
- 210000002421 cell wall Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000037452 priming Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 4
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 4
- 241000700159 Rattus Species 0.000 description 4
- 230000005867 T cell response Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000000662 T-lymphocyte subset Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000007815 allergy Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000002649 immunization Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 230000028327 secretion Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000002255 vaccination Methods 0.000 description 4
- 235000018185 Betula X alpestris Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 235000018212 Betula X uliginosa Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 241000218645 Cedrus Species 0.000 description 3
- WNROFYMDJYEPJX-UHFFFAOYSA-K aluminium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[OH-].[Al+3] WNROFYMDJYEPJX-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 3
- 229910021502 aluminium hydroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000004163 cytometry Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000586 desensitisation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 231100000673 dose–response relationship Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000013568 food allergen Substances 0.000 description 3
- 210000000987 immune system Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 3
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 241000223600 Alternaria Species 0.000 description 2
- 206010002198 Anaphylactic reaction Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 241001674044 Blattodea Species 0.000 description 2
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000282326 Felis catus Species 0.000 description 2
- 102000013462 Interleukin-12 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010065805 Interleukin-12 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000004388 Interleukin-4 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090000978 Interleukin-4 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000209082 Lolium Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000004677 Nylon Substances 0.000 description 2
- 108020004511 Recombinant DNA Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001464 adherent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000036783 anaphylactic response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000003455 anaphylaxis Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000005875 antibody response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000890 antigenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000003719 b-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000016396 cytokine production Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000684 flow cytometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000001900 immune effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000036737 immune function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940117681 interleukin-12 Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 210000002540 macrophage Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 229920001778 nylon Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000005259 peripheral blood Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000011886 peripheral blood Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009696 proliferative response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000002345 respiratory system Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003248 secreting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004989 spleen cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000003393 splenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000024664 tolerance induction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 208000027930 type IV hypersensitivity disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229960005486 vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 2
- DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N β‐Mercaptoethanol Chemical compound OCCS DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108010042708 Acetylmuramyl-Alanyl-Isoglutamine Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000012657 Atopic disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000001266 CD8-positive T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 101710180366 CDP-L-myo-inositol myo-inositolphosphotransferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000006820 DNA synthesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- GZZPOFFXKUVNSW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dodecenoic acid Natural products OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCC=C GZZPOFFXKUVNSW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010014950 Eosinophilia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000008949 Histocompatibility Antigens Class I Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010088652 Histocompatibility Antigens Class I Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000001718 Immediate Hypersensitivity Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108700018351 Major Histocompatibility Complex Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241001529936 Murinae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000187479 Mycobacterium tuberculosis Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000012979 RPMI medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000024932 T cell mediated immunity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006052 T cell proliferation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000009618 Transforming Growth Factors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010009583 Transforming Growth Factors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010045240 Type I hypersensitivity Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010053613 Type IV hypersensitivity reaction Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013572 airborne allergen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002009 allergenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003042 antagnostic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003242 anti bacterial agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000840 anti-viral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940088710 antibiotic agent Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000030741 antigen processing and presentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007503 antigenic stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000010216 atopic IgE responsiveness Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002051 biphasic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000981 bystander Effects 0.000 description 1
- 244000309466 calf Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000004970 cd4 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036755 cellular response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001447 compensatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000021615 conjugation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012228 culture supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001086 cytosolic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000005911 diet Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000378 dietary effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 1
- 239000012636 effector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001035 gastrointestinal tract Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000030279 gene silencing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000013632 homeostatic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000028996 humoral immune response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037189 immune system physiology Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003053 immunization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004073 interleukin-2 production Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940028885 interleukin-4 Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000007912 intraperitoneal administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001165 lymph node Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001785 maturational effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- BSOQXXWZTUDTEL-ZUYCGGNHSA-N muramyl dipeptide Chemical compound OC(=O)CC[C@H](C(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@@H](C)O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1NC(C)=O BSOQXXWZTUDTEL-ZUYCGGNHSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000000822 natural killer cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000017074 necrotic cell death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000003204 osmotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007911 parenteral administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008927 postnatal maturation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003389 potentiating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004043 responsiveness Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000020382 suppression by virus of host antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen via MHC class I Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000024891 symptom Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940104230 thymidine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000020192 tolerance induction in gut-associated lymphoid tissue Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001890 transfection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009959 type I hypersensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005951 type IV hypersensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003981 vehicle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003612 virological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003442 weekly effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
Description
oi9'm WO 95/17208 PCT/A'U94/00780 -1I- PROPEMhAXIS OF ALLERGIC DISEASE This invention relates to methods and compositions for the prophylaxis of allergic disease, and in particular to allergic disease triggered by environmental antigens or allergens, The present inventor has extensively reviewed the literature relating to induction of humoral and cellular immune responses to parenteral and enteral administration of allergens, and now proposes a novel and unexpected mechanism for inducing protective immunity against a-Liergic diseases, via selective stimulation of allergen-specific T-helper-1 (TH-1) lymphocytes during early life.
For the purposes of this specification the following definitions are used: is allergen: any foreign antigen which stimulates allergic-type immune responses, characterised by activation of TH-2 lymphocytes and production of specific IgE antibody; environmental allergen: any allergen found in the environment; such allergens are usually, but not necessarily, naturally occurring; sensitisation: "priming" of populations of T-cells to respond specifically to subsequent challenge with the priming antigen or allergen; in the context of this specification, priming of allergen-specific TH-2 cells; desensitisation: therapeutic administrati~on of allergen, or a derivative thereof, to allergen-reactive "allergic" individuals, with the aim of selective suppression of the activity of allergen-specific T-cells, in particular TH-2 cells, and/or other cell types recruited intb the allergen-specific immune or allergic response.
Background of the Invention It was recognised early in this century that feeding experimental animals an antigen they had previously VP4'' V; 4#XeflflL\ 4 WO 95/17208 PCT'/AU94/00780 not encountered elicited transient symptoms of immediate hypersensitivity, which waned with continued food antigen exposure, to be replaced by a state of antigen-specific unresponsiveness. The phenomenon is now known as Oral Tolerance, and has been shown to be preferentially directed against IgE-mediated immediate hypersensitivity responses and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses This form of tolerance can be transferred from animal to animal by T-cells secreting TH-1-like cytokines and allergen specific T-cells secreting such cytokines develop rapidly in the mesenteric lymph nodes during allergen feeding.(10,12) The inventor was the first to recognise the equivalent phenomenon in the respiratory tract, and has been investigating the underlying mechanisms since the early 1980s The essential elements are identical: repeated inhalation of antigen aerosols elicits an initially heterogenous immune response which includes a component of TH-2-dependent IgE production, but the latter eventually wanes in the face of repeated antigenic challenge, leaving only vestiges of specific IgG and IgA production. Animals passively exposed to antigen aerosols in this fashion are unable to mount subsequent IgE responses to the same antigen for the remainder of their lives, regardless of the route or intensity of challenge.
As is the case with antigen feeding, the "tolerance" resulting from antigen inhalation is expressed preferentially against IgE and delayed-type hypersensitivity, and is mediated by T-cells, including a population expressing CDS, which secrete TH-l-like cytokines(6) Additionally, the opt&oa for this form of "tolerance" induction appears open to the immune system only at or around the time of initial allergen exposure presensitised animals with stable on-going IgE responses are not "desensitised" by aerosol These processes exhibit two further important features in common in experimental animals. Firstly, V '~"il'M~t~WYI-t# 4 ~"PP~f~~C~DE~a~LWY;~~C~fY~cr'lV WO 95/17208 PCT/AU94/00780 3 sensitivity to tolerance induction is genetically determined, and high sensitivity is co-inherited with the low-IgE-responder-phenotype. Operationally, this manifests as a requirement for up to 103 to 10 4 -fold more intense allergen exposure to successfully tolerise high-IgE-responder rats and mice, compared to their low-responder counterparts. However, it is clear that both high and low responders can ultimately be tolerised by either route, and the inherent sluggishness of these mechanisms in the high-IgE-responders can be overcome by applying more intense allergen Secondly, the process functions poorly in the pre-weaning period(7), to the extent that allergen exposure in the very early phase of infancy can prime for subsequent pathogenic T-cell reactivity, as opposed to inducing protective tolerance: this is consistent with the existence of an early "window" of high risk for allergic sensitisation, presumably due to delayed postnatal maturation of one or more key elements of mucosal immune function which are rate-limiting in the tolerance induction process(7) It is not clear to what extent mucosal allergen exposure via the gastrointestinal tract can suppress ongoing TH-2 responses in IgE-positive high-responder animals, but recent work employing intranasally administered allergen peptides encourages further pursuit of this approach in the context of desensitisation.
Initial exposure of humans to ubiquitous environmental allergens occurs during infancy or early childhood, and the notion that many of the triggers for allergic disease in the adult are set during childhood is attracting increasing attention. In this context, there is a growing consensus, based upon an expanding paediatric sero-epidemiological literature, that high-level allergen exposure during the first few months of life predisposes to allergic sensitisation which manifests in later childhood as TH-2-like reactivity. This implies that, as in llllgllli~bl C_ C II I~L~ WO 95/17208 PCT/AU94/00780 experimental animals, transient maturational defect(s) in aspects of immune function which are important for efficient "selection" for TH-1 reactivity to allergens encountered at mucosal surfaces may also be common in newborn humans.
The present inventor has now recognized that the key element of the relevant human literature, however, is the characteristic biphasic nature of IgE responses to individual food and inhalant allergens which commonly occur during early childhood.
Thus, both normal children and those with a family history of atopic responses typically develop serum IgE antibody responses against common food allergens during the first year of life, their magnitude and duration reflecting IgE-responder-phenotype(8) A comparable pattern is evident for IgE responses to inhalant allergens(8) (Figure however, the latter commence later in infancy, and take considerably longer to switch off ("tolerise") in the non-atopics. Furthermore, a much higher proportion of potential atopics maintain their serum IgE reactivity to inhalant allergens into later childhood than they do for food allergens(8) These differences in the kinetics and overall efficiency of "tolerance" induction to inhalant versus dietary antigens may derive directly from the differing levels of antigen exposure in the two organs: as T-cell subset selection is "antigen driven", the less intense stimulation provided via low-level respiratory tract exposure may be expected to result in a slower and ultimately less efficient process.
It is known that the magnitude and duration of IgE responses to parenteral antigenic challenge in experimental animals is regulated by competing signals from CD4 T-cell subsets. In particular T-helper-2 (TH-2) cells, which secrete interleukin-4 and promote IgE-B-cell switching, and TH-1 cells, which secrete interleukin-2 and interferon-y, inhibit TH-2 clonal I _p WO 95/17208 PCITAU194/00780 expansion and hence limit the IgE response(9) The present inventor's review of a variety of data obtained using in vitro experimental systems employing human peripheral blood T- and B-cells indicates that an identical mechanism exists in man(10), and this view is reinforced by the clear demonstration that both atopic and IgE-negative normal adults contain T-cells in peripheral blood which are reactive to the major inhalant allergens: in the atopic individuals, these cells appear to be predominantly of the TH-2 type, whereas in non-atopic individuals they appear to be mainly TH-1 (11) Considerable debate surrounds the precise classification of these human T-cell subsets relative to their murine counterparts, as respective cytokine patterns are not identical in the two species; accordingly, current opinion favours their classification in man as THl-"like" and TH-2-'"like" respectively.
Thus we suggest that in the non-atopic adult, each exposure to an environmental allergen would elicit a S. burst of TH-1-like cytokine release at sites of allergen 20 presentation to the T-cell system, which would "protect" against the emergence of potentially pathogenic TH-2-like reactivity; each exposure event would additionally serve to consolidate host-protective TH-l-like "memory".
Throughout the description and claims of this 25 specification, the word "comprise" and variations of the word, such as "comprising" and "comprises", means "including but not limited to" and is not intended to exclude other additives, components, integers or steps.
~I~L~Lp~ [I$QgllBSP~S~raP~~ WO 95/17208 PCe/AUW9/00)780 S6- Summary of the Invention The present inventor now proposes that the T-lymphoid system in humans engages in active surveillance for environmental "allergens" throughout life, and that it is the nature of (as opposed to the mere presence of) allergen-specific T-cell responses in individuals that determines whether they express the allergic (atopic) or immunologically normal (non-responder) phenotype. The inventor has recognised that selection of the appropriate T-cell population is an antigen-driven process which occurs during the early stages of immune responses in the naive (unsensitised) host. If selection favours the growth of allergen-specific T-cells of the T-helper-l-like (TH-l)-like phenotype low-grade non-pathogenic IgG and IgA responses ensue, whereas the emergence of TH-2-like cells can lead to IgE production and eosinophilia and ultimately atopic disease. Additionally, TH-l-like cytokines actively suppress the expansion of TH-2-like clones, and hence a Sdominant, stable TH-1-like response to an allergen is 20 proposed to be actively protective against the development of TH-2-like dependent allergic disease. With respect to T-cell responses to ubiquitous environmental allergens, the inventor's review of the recent paediatric literature has identified early childhood as the life period during which 25 this selection normally occurs, and shows that the process can take several years to complete. Once the significance of the selection is appreciated, sufficient is already known of how this natural selection process operates to e contemplate controlling it in vivo, via deliberate administration of allergen(s) in a form adapted to preferentially stimulate the development of host-protective TH-l-like immunity.
Our data suggest that "bystander" cell populations, in particular CD8 and/or Ty/5 cells, can actively assist the overall TH-l-like selection process, and the term "TH-l-like immunity" in this specification is S to be understood to include the contribution of these cells.
-d~L7 IlsllCltaaRila~asm*sRI~-- 6a Accordingly, the present invention provides a sterile prophylactic composition comprising at least one environmental allergen, wherein the allergen is formulated as an aerosol, together with a pharmaceutically acceptable adjuvant capable of selectively stimulating allergenspecific T-helper-l-like memory lymphocytes in an individual susceptible to such disease, but who has not previously been sensitised to said allergen, said lymphocytes being capable of inhibiting activity or amplification of allergen-specific T-helper-2-like lymphocytes responsible for stimulating production of IgE antibodies specific for at least one allergen and optionally a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier.
According to a first aspect, invention provides a method of prevention of allergic disease in an individual susceptible to such disease, comprising the step of administering to a previously unsensitised individual a dose and form of allergen effective to induce establishment of a stable population of allergen-specific T-helper-l-like 20 memory lymphocytes, said lymphocytes being capable of inhibiting activity or amplification of allergen-specific T-helper-2-like lymphocytes responsible for stimulating production of IgE antibodies specific for said allergen.
Preferably the allergen is an environmental antigen, and may be administered either singly or as a *0 H:\Luisa\Keepspecis\l3O 4 95.do 24107/98 -r L ~LsP~ IPLI WO 95/17208 11070ICAU94/00700 7 combination of two or more such allergens. The allergen may be in its naturally-occurring form. Alternatively the allergen may be a protein prepared using recombinant DNA technology, or may be a synthetic peptide. The allergen may be in purified form or may be impure or partially purified. The allergen may represent either the whole allergen molecule, or may be a part thereof, for example including one or more epitopes. Allergens contemplated to be suitable for use in the invention include those from house dust mite, animal danders such as cat, dog or bird dander, cockroach, grass pollens such as those from ryegrass or alternaria, tree pollens such as those from birch or cedar, feathers and moulds. The most suitable allergens will depend on the geographical location. For example, birch and cedar pollens are a major cause of allergies in northern Europe and Japan, but are of minor importance in Australia.
For both aspects of the invention, the allergen may be administered by the oral, intranasal, oronasal, rectal, intradermal, intramuscular or subcutaneous route.
The adjuvant is preferably a liposome or a microbial cell wall product.
The allergen may optionally be administered together with an adjuvant. Suitable adjuvants will be known to the person skilled in the art. An adjuvant which selectively stimulates T-helper-l-like lymphocytes is preferred.
The dose of allergen will generally be in the nanogram to milligram range, depending on the allergen, the route of administration, and whether or not an adjuvant is used. The person skilled in the art will readily be able to determine the number and frequency of doses, using wellestablished principles. It is expected that for parenteral administration the dose range will be of the order of micrograms, that for intranasal administration the dose range will be in the microgram to milligram region, and that for oral or rectal administration the dose will be in ~II Ip I-JPP~BIY WO 95/17208 IPCT/AU94/00780 8 the milligram to gram range. It will be appreciated that the dose could vary depending on whether an adjuvant is used, and depending on the nature of the adjuvant.
The method of the inventirn is suitable only for treatment of individuals who are not already allergic, ie.
hypersensitive, to the allergen being administered.
In general, the method is most suitable for treatment of children between 3 months and 7 years old, but is also applicable to individuals older tnan 7 years.
Preferably the immunization is administered to children not less than 6 months old, more preferably not less than 9 months old.
Because in early childhood most individuals will not yet have been exposed to sensitisation by environmental allergens, it is considered that this period provides the optimum opportunity to select for allergen-specific hostprotective TH-l-like mediated immunity. It is especially preferred that immunisation against airborne allergens, ie.
allergens to which the individual is exposed by inhalation, be effected during early childhood.
According to one preferred embodiment of the invention, allergen is administered orally or intranasally during early childhood.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment, which is considered to provide selective induction of TH-1-like response to allergens with minimal stimulation of TH-2-like response, a mixture of two or more allergens of the airborne type is administered parenterally together with a TH-1-like selective adjuvant during early childhood.
According to a second aspect, the invention provides a sterile composition comprising an environmental allergen, together with an adjuvant capable of selectively stimulating T-helper-1-like lymphocytes, and optionally a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier.
The allergen may be impure or purified, and may.
be of natural origin, produced by recombinant DNA technology, or synthetic.
-~pql CI i W0 91/1720" Pi'/1AU( 940070 9 Preferably the allergen is selected from the group which consists of house dust mite, animal danders such as cat, dog or bird dander, cockroach, grass pollens such as those from ryegrass or alternaria, tree pollens such as those from birch or cedar, feathers and moulds.
Preferably the composition is adapted for oral, intranasal, oronasal or rectal administration, but intradermal, subcutaneous or intramuscular administration may also be used.
Detailed Description of the Invention The invention will now be described in detail, with reference following non-limiting examples, and to the accompanying drawings, in which Figure 1 illustrates post-natal serum IgE responses to environmental allergens in normal and atopic children. Individual curves represent results of repeated serum samples from a single child; curves for individual normal or atopic children fell within the regions shown.
The data are derived from Reference 8. RAST represents radioallergoabsorbent test for IgE; PRU represents paper radioimmunoabsorbent test for IgE (units/ml).
Figure 2 shows selective suppression of IgE anti-ovalbumin (OVA) responses by adoptive transfer of CD8 lymphocytes from C57BI/6J mice rendered "tolerant" to OVA by repeated exposure. Open bars, IgE; hatched bars, IgG (asterisk, controls; P 0.01).
Figure 3 illustrates suppression of IgE response by 76 T cells. Open bars, IgE; hatched bars, IgG (asterisk, controls; P 0.01).
Figure 4 shows dose-response analysis of adoptive transfer of OVA-specific tolerance by positively selected T cells from OVA-tolerant mice. Data shown are IgE titres from individual mice; the shaded area represents the confidence limits for the peak primary IgG response in normal animals, and IgG titres in all animals in the experiment fell within this area. comparable results WO 95/17208 PCT/AU94/00780 10 obtained with untouched controls or recipients of splenocytes from naive animals. Asterisk, controls; P 0.01.
Figure 5 illustrates the antigen specificity of y7 T cells in suppression of primary IgE responses.
Asterisk, controls; P 0.01.
Without wishing to be bound by any mechanism for the observed beneficial effect, we propose that the "natural" mechanism for prevention of allergic sensitisation in humans is a cognate immunological process, which operates as follows: during early childhood, there is active immunological recognition of the major environmental allergens which are encountered, and the maturing immune system mounts low-grade, initially heterogenous T-cell responses, comprising cross-competing TH-l-like and TH-2-like allergen-specific clones; (ii) during repeated rounds of restimul&tion via normal environmental exposure, one of the competing T-cell phenotypes eventually becomes dominant in the response (typically TH-1-like in non-atopic normal subjects), leading to the establishment of a stable pool of T-memory cells which "police" immune responses to the allergen throughout later life, preventing the emergence of TH-2-like clones reactive against the same allergen.
With respect to inhalant allergens, this competition between co-existing antagonistic TH-l-like and TH-2-like T-cell populations appears to continue for a period of years during childhood, as these early allergen-specific IgE responses are often not terminated in non-atopics until as late as age 5 7 years(8); (Figure Based on current understanding of how T-cell reactivity develops, we consider that responses to inhalant allergens are "plastic" during this early period, and can be influenced toward either direction by exogenous factors. In particular, the known environmental risk factors for primary allergic sensitisation(7) must ultimately promote 111~1---91 WO 95/17208 PlCT/AU94/00780 11 selection for TH-2-like reactivity. Additionally, the experimental literature indicates the existence of a series of powerful mechanisms which can potentially push the equilibrium of the immune system towards selection for host-protective anti-allergen responses, notably cytokines such as interleukin-12 and interferon-a, produced by macrophages responding to certain microbial stimuli(12), and interferon-y produced by allergen-specific CD8* T-cells(6), both of which select strongly for TH-l-like cells by inhibiting the expansion of TH-2-like cells.
The inventor has now recognised that the plasticity of these early allergen-specific immune responses, and their slow kinetics in vivo, provide potential opportunities for intervention. The period of early childhood, which has long been designated as the "window for sensitisation" to environmental allergens, can thus equally be considered as providing a "window of opportunity" for regulating the development of normal anti-allergen immunity in as yet unsensitised children.
Active intervention in the ongoing allergen-specific T-cell selection process which occurs during early childhood would optimise selection for allergen-specific host-protective TH-l-like immunity: the slow overall kinetics of the natural immune response to inhalant allergens (see Figure 1) suggests that such an approach would be particularly applicable to prevention of sensitisation to such allergens.
Firstly, it is proposed to accelerate and control the natural selection process via either feeding or intranasal administration of allergen (or associated peptides) during early childhood. This approach derives from the finding that even in atopics, the success with which nature "tolerises" emerging IgE responses to food allergens during infancy is much higher than is achieved with inhalant allergens, where overall levels of allergenic stimulation are normally much lower. Thus enhancing the overall 7evel of inhalant allergen stimulation via the WO 95/17208 PCT/AU94/00780 12 right route at the right time may increase the overall efficiency of TH-1-like selection.
It is emphasized that while this approach may appear superficially similar to desensitisation strategies currently under development in many laboratories, it is in fact precisely the opposite: the latter are based upon "silencing" pathogenic TH-2-like cells in the sensitised host with pre-established TH-2-like memory, whereas the approach of the present invention is based on prevention of their emergence as a stable memory population in the first place.
A more direct strategy is suggested by recent developments in modern vaccine technology, which hold the promise of being able selectively to induce TH-1-like responses to nominal antigens via appropriate parenteral immunisation, with minimal danger of stimulating parallel TH-2-like pathways. Thus deliberate parenteral vaccination with a cocktail of the major inhalant allergens in appropriate TH-1-like selective adjuvant at the appropriate time in childhood may provide a safe and reliable method to bolster populations of appropriate TH-l-like cells which are emerging as a result of natural mucosal stimulation, thus hastening their eventual dominance of allergen-specific T-memory pools. With respect to inhalant allergens, the finding that a high proportion of serum IgE in most atopics can be accounted for by a relatively small number of major environmental allergen specificities(13) encourages the view that the relevant allergen (vaccine) cocktails may not necessarily be highly complex.
A preferred strategy is based on the use of adjuvants which: a) stimulate the secretion of interleukin-12 and'interferon-a by macrophages, thus selecting for the growth of TH-l-like cells by mechanisms described in Reference 12; these adjuvants are likely to be derived from microbial products; and/or WO 95/17208 PCT/AU94/00780 13 b) selectively stimulate an initial burst of Class 1 MHC-restricted immunity against the administered allergen, in order to select for the ensuing growth of allergen-specific TH-1-like cells by the mechanism which we have reported recently(6); a suitable adjuvant and delivery system for this purpose is expected to be various forms of liposomes, or an allergen-lipid conjugate, such as an iscom.
Example 1 Selective Suppression of Primary Allergen- Specific IgE Responses by Pre-Induction of Class 1 MHC-Restricted Immunity Mice were initially vaccinated against the allergen ovalbumin, using a protocol designed to prime CD8* T-cells. This protocol, which is known per se, is based upon selective activation of CD8 T-cells by initial priming with spleen cells which have been cytoplasmically "loaded" with soluble ovalbumin by osmotic shock. Our preliminary results indicate that the vaccinated mice are unable to mount subsequent high titre primary antigenovalbumin IgE response to parenteral challenge with ovalbumin, but are able to make normal IgG responses. This indicates that the initial vaccination selectively suppressed the TH-2-like component of the anti-ovalbumin response of these mice, whereas TH-1-like dependent IgG production proceeded normally. This result clearly supports the principles underlying the proposed vaccination strategy, and further experiments involving alternative vaccination protocols designed to achieve the same end result are in progress.
Example 2 Use of Liposomes as Adjuvants It has been suggested that liposomes can be used as vehicles for delivery of antigens in order to generate anti-viral immunity, in particular immunity based upon the generation of mixed "memory" in antigen-specific CD8 and CD4 TH-1-like viral antigen-specific T-cell populations.
WO 95/17208 'C'/AU94/00780 14 This strategy is being used for generation of allergenspecific CD8* TH-1-like immunity in mice, which is expected to be highly protective against the subsequent development of TH-2-1ike dependent IgE responses to these allergens.
Various formulations of liposomes and allergens are being tested.
Example 3 Microbial Cell Wall Products as Selected TH-1-Like Adjuvants We and others have demonstrated that parenteral challenge of mice with certain microbial cell wall-derived adjuvants selectively suppresses TH-2-like dependent IgE responses, while stimulating TH-1-like dependent IgG responses. The most commonly available adjuvants, such as Freund's complete adjuvant, are not suitable for human use, as they course tissue necrosis at the injection site.
Cell wall extracts from a wide variety of bacterial strains are being tested in order to identify preparations which are both non-toxic and TH-2-like suppressive, using a screening protocol based on co-injection of extract together with ovalbumin into mice, and measuring the subsequent ovalbumin-specific IgE and IgG responses. A variety of cell wall-derived adjuvants from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, such as muramyl dipeptide, have been intensively investigated as potential adjuvants for human use, and it is contemplated that these may be useful for the purposes of this invention.
Example 4 Use of a Modified Allergen as an IgE "Tolerogen" Some recent publications have indicated that protein antigens artificially modified by the addition of conjugated lipid "tails" elicit Class I MHC-restricted immune responses, whereas the native proteins stimulate an exclusively Class II MCH-restricted response. As discussed above, according to the principles underlying the present invention such a modified antigen should also selected for I LLIL WO 95/17208 C:I;'1AU94/007 0 15 TH-1-like immunity to the antigen, thus inhibiting the development of a TH-2-like dependent IgE response. Mice which had not been previously exposed to the allergen ovalbumin (OVA) were parenterally immunised and subsequently challenged with either native ovalbumin, or ovalbumin which had been structurally modified by conjugation with the lipid dodecenoic acid. Mice were initially primed with either native ovalbumin as a control, or with the lipid conjugate (Dodec-OVA) on Day 0, bled on Days 14 and 20, challenged with the same preparations respectively on Day 25, and bled again on Day 39. Serum titres of anti-ovalbumin IgE antibody were measured, and the results, presented as group median passive cutaneous anaphylaxis units, are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Ovalbumin Dodec-OVA Day 14 1280 Day 20 1280 Day 39 1280 These results clearly show that priming with a modified antigen which selects for TH-1-like immunity does indeed prevent subsequent development of a TH-2-like dependent IgE response.
Example 5 yS T Cells Regulate IgE Responses to Inhale Allergen We have previously shown that either oral or intranasal administration of allergen to animals which have not been previously exposed to this allergen can confer active protection against production of allergen-specific IgE by induction of a state of allergen-specific immunity which results in TH-l-like cytokine responses each time the g L E~l~ WO 95/17208 16 allergen is encountered Our earlier publication identified the cellular sources of these cytokines as being both Class I MHC-restricted CD8 T Cells and Class II MHC-restricted CD4 T cells.
We have now shown that allergen-specific T y6 cells provide a further source of TH-1-like cytokines in these responses; similar results have been obtained in both mice and rats.
C57BI/6J mice were exposed daily for 10 days to aerosolized OVA in phosphate-buffered saline and once weekly thereafter until used as described in our earlier work Intraperitoneal (ip) challenge of a subgroup of these animals with 10 ig of OVA in 4.0 mg of aluminium hydroxide (AH) adjuvant revealed normal primary IgG responses but virtually complete suppression of parallel IgE responses, as demonstrated in our earlier studies Splenocytes were prepared from other (unchallenged) "tolerant" animals and divided into three samples. The first sample was left unfractionated, the second was negatively depleted of CD8* cells by cytometry, and CD8 cells were purified from the third using positive selection by cytometry (Epics Elite, Coulter Electronics); the CD8* antibody used was from the 53-6.72 clone (14) and the cytometry methodology used was as previously described The CD8 population was more than 99.5% pure, and the CD8- population contained less than 0.4% of contaminating CD8* cells. Immediately after ip injection of these cell populations, animals were immunised ip with 10 gg of OVA in mg of AH adjuvant, and bled at Days 14 and 21.
IgG subclasses were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with anti-IgG subclass antibodies (Southern Biotechnology). Splenocytes were prepared as previously described and passed through nylon wool to remove adherent cells, thus yielding 85% T cells.
Negative selection of ap T cells was performed by flow rytometry with H57-597.19 (anti-ap TCI) y 5 T cells constitute approximately 30% of the remaining cells; hence WO 95/17208 *JICTIAU94100780 17 1 x 105 splenocytes will contain 3 x 104 y5 T cells.
Adoptive transfer of 106 unfractionated splenocytes from the tolerised mice inhibited IgE, but not IgG, antibody responses to ovalbumin in the recipient animals. These results are illustrated in Figure 2.
The data shown are the mean SD (n 5 to 10 per group) at Day 21 (peak primary Ig response) and indicate reciprocal log 2 (IgE and IgG) anti-OVA titres as determined by standard methods Data from Day 14 did not alter the interpretation of the results of these experiments.
The magnitude of the overall IgG anti-OVA response did not change significantly in mice pretreated with OVA aerosol. However, analysis of individual IgG subclasses by ELISA with subclass-specific anti-IgG antibodies (Southern Biotechnology) showed that suppression of the IgE response was accompanied by decreased IgG, reactivity and a compensatory rire in IgG2a, whereas IgG2b and IgG responsiveness was essn ly unchanged.
Example 6 Dose-Response Relationships for 78 T Cells Depletion of y6 T cells abolished the capacity of splenocytes to suppress the IgG response. There are approximately 3 x 10 4 75 T cells per 106 splenocytes. When this number of y5 T cells purified to 98.5% by positive selection was transferred to recipient animals, the degree of suppression of the IgE response was comparable to that seen in animals receiving 106 unfractionated cells. This is illustrated in Figure 3. Spleen cells from tolerized animals were negatively depleted of 78 T cells with the antibody GL3 GL3 (y5 cells were .prepared by positive selection. Adoptive transfer, ip antigen challenge, and determination of primary IgE and IgG responses were performed as above. These results are shown in Figure 3.
Dose-response experiments showed that as few of 5 x 102 positively selected y5 T cells are sufficient for suppression of the IgE component of anti-OVA response.
WO 9S/17208 PCT/A U94/00780 18 y6 T cells were prepared by negative selection from OVAtolerant donors. Splenocytes were prepared as above and passedd through nylon wool to remove adherent cells, yielding approximately 85% T cells. Negative selection of ap cells was achieved by flow cytometry with H57-57.19 (anti-ap TCR) y 5 T cells constitute approximately of the remaining cells, so that 1 x 105 splenocytes will contain 3 X 104 y7 cells. These 85 cells yielded a suppression of the IgE response comparable to that achieved with positively selected cells, as shown in Figure 4. We have previously shown that adoptive transfer of splenocytes depleted of ap+ T cells from OVA-tolerance rats was capable of mediating antigen-specific tolerant in the IgE isotype (17).
Example 7 Antigen Specificity of y5 T Cell-Mediated Suppression In order to test for the antigen specificity of the 75 T cell-mediated suppressive response, unfractionated splenocytes or'purified y5 T cells were transferred from OVA-tolerant mice to groups of syngerneic recipients, which were then challenged with OVA or an unrelated antigen, Der P1 from the house dust mite. The transferred cells suppressed primary anti-OVA responses, but did not affect corresponding anti-Der P1 responses. Unfractionated or positively selected y7 T cells from OVA-tolerant rats were transferred, and the recipients were challenged with OVA or Der PI. The results are shown in Figure 5. Antigen specificity was observed in this system, even at higher cell dosages.
Example 8 Cytokine Production in Mice Tolerised to
OVA
Splenocytes from mice tolerized to OVA were challenged in vitro with 100 Lg/ml OVA, and supernatants of these cells were harvested after 24 hrs for assessment of cytokine production. Splenocytes were depleted of 99.5% -I WO 95/17208 PC'T/AIU9,/I0070) 19 CD4*, CD8* aP or 78Y T cells by negative selection, using flow cytometry. Cells were cultured at 2 x 105 per microplate well in RPMI medium containing 10 s
M
2-mercaptoethanol plus antibiotics, supplemented with 1 to 10% foetal calf serum, and stimulated with 100 gg/ml OVA.
Supernatants were harvested after 24 hrs, and frozen at 0 C prior to assay. IL-2 secretion was measured usin a standard CTLL assay and IFN-y and transforming growth factor PI. TCF-P3 were determined by ELISA (Pharmingen and Genzyme respectively). The cells did not respond to an irrelevant control antigen, and cells from unimmunized control animals did not secrete detectable levels of cytokines in response to OVA.
Unfractionated splenocytes from tolerant animals secreted high levels of interferon-y (IFN-y) in response to specific antigen, and this secretary response was markedly reduced by depletion of CD8 cells, but not CD4 cells.
Depletion of CD8 cells markedly enhanced the OVA-specific interleukin-2 (IL-2) response. These results are summarized in Table 2, which shows mean standard deviation (SD) for replicate 24 hr culture supernatants.
WO 95I/17208 PCT/AU94/00780 20 Table 2 Cytokine secretion Cells IFN-Y IL-2 TGF-PI (ng/ml) (U/ml) (ng/ml) Unfractionated 226.5 7.8 2.7 0.3 1.59 0.15 CD4- 245.0 28.3 1.8 t 1.1 1.84 0.73 CD8" 63.5 12.0 9.3 0.7 2.01 0.57 ac" 147.5 21.9 2.6 1.9 1.65 0.39 90.0 2.5 8.7 1.2 1.98 0.24 Non-T cells ND ND 0.45 0.09 (CD3-) ND: not determined.
TGF-Pl was also measured, since it has been suggested to play an important role in CD8' T cell-mediated tolerance to orally-administered antigens However, as shown in Table 1, TGF-Pl was in fact found to be produced in similar amounts by all T cell subsets after antigenic stimulation of tolerant animals, regardless of the potency of the subsets in transfer of tolerance. This suggests that TGF-PI does not play a central role.
Example 9 Proliferative Response to OVA of Splenic T Cells from Aerosol-Exposed Mice We also examined the ability of splenic T cells to proliferate in vivo in response to OVA, following prior exposures of mice to OVA aerosols. The negative selection of ap T cells was performed as described above, and proliferation measured after stimulation with 100 jig/mi of OVA. Results, presented as mea. SD of replicate cultures measured after 96 hrs incorporation of 3 H] -thymidine, are shown in Table 3. The subsets contained not more than contaminant cells.
WO 951!720R 21 Cell population Proliferation 3 H]DNA Synthesis) Undepleted 5,232 t ap- 699 32 78- 13,255 563 Cells from OVA-exposed animals did not proliferate in response to an unrelated control antigen, and normal cells did not proliferate in the presence of OVA. A moderate proliferative response to antigen was consistently seen in unfractionated splenocytes; this was abrogated by depletion of cp T cells, and enhanced by depletion of the y8 subset. As shown in Table 2, the latter procedure was also accompanied by a large increase IL-2 production. This suggests inhibition of c4 T cell proliferation by the y8 population, which is consistent with the reported effects of in vivo y6 T cell depletion (21).
We conclude that the effector cells mediating the selective suppression of IgE responses in this model in mice are CD4- CD8 y5 T cells which are specific for OVA.
From Table 1, it appears that these cells secrete interferon-y in response to OVA, which is consistent with reports of y8 cell responses to stimulation with microbial antigens They may also trigger interferon-y release from other cell populations, such as natural killer cells, which are CD4-, or from CD8 4 ap T cells, both of which can be potent sources of interferon-y Thus the T cell response to inhaled OVA in tolerised mice displays a TH-1-like profile, which is consistent with the pattern of selective suppression of specific IgE and IgG, production and concomitantly enhanced IgG 2 secretion observed in these animals. Our results suggest an important role for antigen-specific 16 T cells in the maintenance of WO 9./17208 10(10IA904I070 immunological homeostasis in the lung and airways by selective suppression of potentially pathogenic TH-2-like dependent IgE responses, while preserving the host's capacity to produce specific IgG antibody.
Example 10 Induction of Class I MHC-Restricted Immunity Against OVA Via Transfection In order to gain more definitive evidence that immunisation which results in a selective boosting of CD8mediated responses against allergens can confer protection against development of TH-2-like reactivity, we have primed for anti-OVA immunity via inoculation of mice with a cell line which expresses Class I but not Class II MHC responses, and which has been transfected with the gene encoding OVA. These cells produced OVA intracellularly, resulting in introduction of OVA into cytoplasmic Class I antigen-processing pathways, which are generally inaccessible to exogenous proteins. The transfected cells therefore present complexes of "processed" OVA or their surface in conjuntion with Class I MHC antigens. This primes Class I MHC-restricted CD8* T cells in the recipient animals for anti-OVA immunity. Primed animals and <Dntrols were then challenged parenterally with native OVA and bled 14 and 30- days later for determination of IgE anti-OVA titres. The results, presented as group medians in passive cutaneous anaphylaxis units, are shown in Table 4.
Table 4 Control Primed Day 14 640 Day 30 640 OVA-specific reactivity was in fact demonstrated.
These results are consistent with our overall postulate.
Y IIII q A WO 0/17208 PCT/AU94/00780 23 It will be apparent to the person skilled in the art that while the invention has been described in some detail for the purposes of clarity and understanding, various modifications and alterations to the embodiments and methods described herein may be made without departing from the scope of the inventive concept disclosed in this specification.
References cited herein are listed on the following pages, and are incorporated herein by this reference.
F~~flrrmm WO 95/17208 PCT/AU94/00780 24
REFERENCES
1. Mowat, A.M.
"The regulation of immune responses to dietary protein antigens" Immunol Today 1987 8 93-96 2 Miller Lider Roberts Sporn, M.B.
"Suppressor T cells generated by oral tolerization to myelin basic protein suppress both in vitro and in vivo immune responses by the release of TGF-P following antigenic specific triggering" Proc Natl Acad Sci., USA, 1992 89 421-5.
3 Zhang Michael J.G.
"Orally inducible immune unresponsiveness is abrogated by IFN, y treatment" J. Immunol., 1990 144 4163-5.
4 Holt, P.G and Sedgwick J.D.
"Suppression of IgE responses following antigen inhalation: A natural homeostatic mechanism which limits sensitization to aeroallergens" Immuriol Today, 1987 8 14-5 Holt, P.G. and McMenamin C.
"Defence against allergic sensitization in the healthy lung: the role of inhalation tolerance" Clin. Exp. Allergy, 1989 19 255-62 6 McMenamin, C. and Holt, P.G.
The natural immune response to inhaled soluble protein antigens involves major histocompatibility complex (MUC) class I-restricted CD8' T cell-mediated but MHC class II-restricted CD4* T cell-dependent immune deviation resulting in selective suppression of IgE production" J. Exp. Med., 1993 178 889-99.
WO 95/17208 WO 9517208PCTI/AU94OO780 25 7 Holt, P.G, McMenamin, C. and Nelson, D.
"Primary sensitisation to inhalant allergens during infancy" Ped. Allergy Iiunol., 1990 1 3-13 8 Hattevig, Kjeliman, B. and Bj6rkst6n, B.
Appearance of IgE antibodies to ingested and inhalsd allergens during the first 12 years of life in atopic and non-atopic children" Ped. Allergy Iimunol., 1993 4 182-6.
9 Finkcelman, Holmes, Katona, I.M., Urban, Beckmann, Park, L.S., Schooley, Coffman, Mosmann, T.R. and Paul, W.E.
"lLymphokine control of in vivo immulnoglobulin isotype selection" Annual Rev. Inimunol., 1990 8 303-33.
Pene, Rousset, Briere, Chretien, I., Paliard, Banchereau, Spits, H. and De Vries, J.E.
"1IgE production by normal human B cells induced by alloreactive T1 cell clones is mediated by IL-4 and suppressed by IFN-y" J. Immunol., 1988 141 1218-24.
11 Wierenga, Snoek, de Groot, C., Chretien, Bos, Jansen, N.M., Kapsenberg, M.L.
Evidence for compartmentalization of functional subsets of CD2+ T lymphocytes in atopic patients.
j. immunol., 1990 144 4651-6.
12 Romagnani, S.
"Induction of 'TH1 and TH2 responses: a key role.
f or the "natural" immune response?" immunol. Today, 1992 13 379-81.
-~crmrarr~~;;;.
WO 95/17208 PCT/AU94/00780 26 13 Chapman, M.D. and Platts-Mills, T.A.E.
"Purification and characterization of the major allergen from Dermatophagoides pteronyssinusantigen Pi.
J. Immunol., 1980 125 587-92.
14 Fox, P.C. and Siraganian, R.P.
Immunology, 1981 43 227 Stewart, G.A. and Holt, P.G.
Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol., 1987 83 44 16 Goodman, T. and Lefrancois, L.
Nature, 1988 333 855 17 Kubo, Born, Kappler, P. and Pigeon, M.
J. Immunol., 1989 142 2236 18 McMenamin, C. et al Immunology, 1991 74 234 19 Dialynas, D.P. et al J. Immunol., 1983 131 2445 Miller, Lider, Roberts, A.B. Sporn, M.B.
and Weiner, H.L.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 1992 89 421 21 Kaufmann, Blum, C. and Yamamoto., S.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 1993 90 9620 22 Yamamoto., S. Russ, Teixeira, Conradt, P.
and Kaufmann, S.H.E.
Infect. Immun., 19.93 61 2154 rm~--P~a st-
Claims (17)
1. A sterile prophylactic composition comprising at least one environmental allergen, wherein the allergen is formulated as an aerosol, together with a pharmaceutically acceptable adjuvant capable of selectively stimulating allergen-specific T-helper-l-like memory lymphocytes in an individual susceptible to such disease, but who has not previously been sensitised to said allergen, said lymphocytes being capable of inhibiting activity or amplification of allergen-specific T-helper-2-like lymphocytes responsible for stimulating production of IgE antibodies specific for at least one allergen and optionally a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier.
2. A composition according to claim 1, wherein the allergen is selected from the group consisting of insect allergens, pollens, animal danders, bird danders, feathers, and moulds.
3. A composition according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the adjuvant is a microbial product.
4. A composition according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the adjuvant is liposomes, or an allergen-lipid conjugate. S*
5. A method of prevention of allergic disease in an individual susceptible to such disease, comprising the step of administering to a previously unsensitised individual a dose and form of allergen effective to induce establishment of a stable population of allergen-specific T-helper-l-like memory lymphocytes, said lymphocytes being capable of inhibiting activity or amplification of allergen-specific 30 T-helper-2-like lymphocytes responsible for stimulating production of IgE antibodies specific for said allergen.
6. A method according to Claim 5, wherein the individual is a human.
7. A method according to Claim 5 or Claim 6, wherein the individual is 3 months to 7 years old.
8. A method according to Claim 7, wherein the individual is 6 months to 7 years old. H:\Luisa\Keep\specis\1 3 07 4 -95.doc 24/07/98 ii i4--C-- 28
9. A method according to Claim 8, wherein the individual is 9 months to 7 years old.
A method according to any one of Claims 5 to 9, wherein the allergen is administered by the oral, intranasal, oronasal, rectal, intradermal, intramuscular or subcutaneous route.
11. A method according to Claim 10, wherein the allergen is administered orally or intranasally.
12. A method according to any one of Claims 5 to 11, wherein the allergen is administered together with an immunological adjuvant.
13. A method according to Claim 12, wherein the adjuvant is one which selectively stimulates T-helper-l-like lymphocytes.
14. A method according to any one of Claims 5 to 13, wherein the allergen is an environmental allergen.
A method according to Claim 14, wherein the allergen is selected from the group consisting of insect allergens, pollens, animal danders, bird danders, feathers, 20 and moulds.
16. A method according to Claim 14 or Claim wherein the allergen is an inhaled allergen.
17. A method according to any one of Claims 5 to 16, S* wherein two or more allergens are administered. Dated this 28th day of July 1998 TVW TELETHON INSTITUTE FOR CHILD HEALTH RESEARCH and PROFESSOR PATRICK G HOLT DIVISION OF CELL BIOLOGY By their Patent Attorneys 30 GRIFFITH HACK Fellows Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia H:\Luisa\Keep\,pecis\1k307495.doc 28/07/98 slasl s
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU13074/95A AU696376C (en) | 1993-12-22 | 1994-12-19 | Prophylaxis of allergic disease |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUPM3077 | 1993-12-22 | ||
| AUPM3077A AUPM307793A0 (en) | 1993-12-22 | 1993-12-22 | Prophylaxis of allergic disease |
| AU13074/95A AU696376C (en) | 1993-12-22 | 1994-12-19 | Prophylaxis of allergic disease |
| PCT/AU1994/000780 WO1995017208A1 (en) | 1993-12-22 | 1994-12-19 | 'prophylaxis of allergic disease' |
Publications (3)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU1307495A AU1307495A (en) | 1995-07-10 |
| AU696376B2 true AU696376B2 (en) | 1998-09-10 |
| AU696376C AU696376C (en) | 2000-03-16 |
Family
ID=
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0058021A2 (en) * | 1981-02-06 | 1982-08-18 | Beecham Group Plc | Pharmaceutical compositions |
| EP0064366A1 (en) * | 1981-04-29 | 1982-11-10 | Beecham Group Plc | Pharmaceutical compositions |
| FR2561523A1 (en) * | 1984-03-23 | 1985-09-27 | Pasteur Institut | New preparations of allergens, method for obtaining them and their application as desensitising agents |
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0058021A2 (en) * | 1981-02-06 | 1982-08-18 | Beecham Group Plc | Pharmaceutical compositions |
| EP0064366A1 (en) * | 1981-04-29 | 1982-11-10 | Beecham Group Plc | Pharmaceutical compositions |
| FR2561523A1 (en) * | 1984-03-23 | 1985-09-27 | Pasteur Institut | New preparations of allergens, method for obtaining them and their application as desensitising agents |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU1307495A (en) | 1995-07-10 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6086898A (en) | Method of converting a Th2-type allergic immune response into a Th1-type immune response | |
| Daynes et al. | Induction of common mucosal immunity by hormonally immunomodulated peripheral immunization | |
| US5562910A (en) | Vaccine compositions and method for enhancing an immune response | |
| McCluskie et al. | CpG DNA as mucosal adjuvant | |
| Herz et al. | Animal models of type I allergy using recombinant allergens | |
| Rask et al. | Prolonged oral treatment with low doses of allergen conjugated to cholera toxin B subunit suppresses immunoglobulin E antibody responses in sensitized mice. | |
| Michalek et al. | Antigen delivery systems: new approaches to mucosal immunization | |
| Winkler et al. | Allergen‐specific immunosuppression by mucosal treatment with recombinant Ves v 5, a major allergen of Vespula vulgaris venom, in a murine model of wasp venom allergy | |
| US6333038B1 (en) | Prophylaxis of allergic disease | |
| DE69830900T2 (en) | IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE INDUCTIVE COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING ANTIGEN AND MUCOSEPHYING COMPONENT | |
| Foss et al. | Mechanisms of vaccine adjuvanticity at mucosal surfaces | |
| Thorbecke et al. | Modulation by cytokines of induction of oral tolerance to type II collagen | |
| McCLUSKIE et al. | Immunization against hepatitis B virus by mucosal administration of antigen–antibody complexes | |
| Bohle | T lymphocytes and food allergy | |
| AU696376B2 (en) | Prophylaxis of allergic disease | |
| AU696376C (en) | Prophylaxis of allergic disease | |
| US20070190078A1 (en) | Filamentous haemagglutinin in the treatment and/or prophylaxis of immune-mediated disorders | |
| HK1108127A (en) | Prophylaxis of allergic disease | |
| Sato et al. | Oral tolerance induction in dermatophagoides pteronyssinus-sensitized mice induces inhibition of IgE response and upregulation of TGF-β secretion | |
| Czerkinsky et al. | Oral tolerance and anti-pathological vaccines | |
| Srivastava et al. | Current immunological approaches for management of allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma | |
| Frieri | New frontiers in immunotherapy | |
| JP2002502883A (en) | Vaccine comprising interleukin-12 and respiratory legal virus antigen | |
| Tarzi et al. | Peptide immunotherapy for allergic disease | |
| Sasaki et al. | Live varicella vaccine polarizes the mucosal adjuvant action of cholera toxin or its B subunit on specific Th1‐type helper T cells with a single nasal coadministration in mice |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| DA3 | Amendments made section 104 |
Free format text: THE NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT IS AS WAS NOTIFIED IN THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL DATED 19990826 |