AU648934B2 - Process for enhancing the dewaterability of waste sludge from microbiological digestion - Google Patents
Process for enhancing the dewaterability of waste sludge from microbiological digestion Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU648934B2 AU648934B2 AU26360/92A AU2636092A AU648934B2 AU 648934 B2 AU648934 B2 AU 648934B2 AU 26360/92 A AU26360/92 A AU 26360/92A AU 2636092 A AU2636092 A AU 2636092A AU 648934 B2 AU648934 B2 AU 648934B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- sludge
- temperature
- concentrated waste
- dewaterability
- less
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
- 239000010802 sludge Substances 0.000 title claims description 204
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 title claims description 90
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 75
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title claims description 68
- 230000002906 microbiologic effect Effects 0.000 title claims description 16
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 title claims description 15
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 title claims description 13
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 122
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 67
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 67
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 53
- 239000012065 filter cake Substances 0.000 claims description 51
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 43
- 239000000706 filtrate Substances 0.000 claims description 29
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 28
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 27
- 235000008733 Citrus aurantifolia Nutrition 0.000 claims description 22
- 235000011941 Tilia x europaea Nutrition 0.000 claims description 22
- 239000004571 lime Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 claims description 19
- 238000006386 neutralization reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 210000003850 cellular structure Anatomy 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 claims description 9
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical group [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- AXCZMVOFGPJBDE-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium dihydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[Ca+2] AXCZMVOFGPJBDE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000000920 calcium hydroxide Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 229910001861 calcium hydroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000007800 oxidant agent Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 229940043430 calcium compound Drugs 0.000 claims description 5
- 150000001674 calcium compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 108010034145 Helminth Proteins Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000498 cooling water Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 244000000013 helminth Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003472 neutralizing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000567 combustion gas Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000004065 wastewater treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 34
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 21
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 17
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 14
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K phosphate Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([O-])=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 14
- 239000010452 phosphate Substances 0.000 description 14
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 12
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 11
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 11
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 9
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 9
- 235000019645 odor Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- 230000020477 pH reduction Effects 0.000 description 7
- -1 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 7
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000007858 starting material Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 7
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 235000011116 calcium hydroxide Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 6
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 6
- 239000013585 weight reducing agent Substances 0.000 description 6
- 235000013601 eggs Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 239000008394 flocculating agent Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000035484 reaction time Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910021529 ammonia Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000003039 volatile agent Substances 0.000 description 4
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910052793 cadmium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- BDOSMKKIYDKNTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N cadmium atom Chemical compound [Cd] BDOSMKKIYDKNTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 3
- BHEPBYXIRTUNPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydridophosphorus(.) (triplet) Chemical compound [PH] BHEPBYXIRTUNPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 230000002427 irreversible effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 229920000867 polyelectrolyte Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 2
- ODINCKMPIJJUCX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium oxide Chemical compound [Ca]=O ODINCKMPIJJUCX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000202567 Fatsia japonica Species 0.000 description 2
- 229910021578 Iron(III) chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sulfate Chemical compound [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052790 beryllium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- ATBAMAFKBVZNFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N beryllium atom Chemical compound [Be] ATBAMAFKBVZNFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009313 farming Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002550 fecal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003337 fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000011221 initial treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- RBTARNINKXHZNM-UHFFFAOYSA-K iron trichloride Chemical compound Cl[Fe](Cl)Cl RBTARNINKXHZNM-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 2
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 2
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- LPXPTNMVRIOKMN-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium nitrite Chemical compound [Na+].[O-]N=O LPXPTNMVRIOKMN-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O Ammonium Chemical compound [NH4+] QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O 0.000 description 1
- 241000244186 Ascaris Species 0.000 description 1
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000252067 Megalops atlanticus Species 0.000 description 1
- ZOKXTWBITQBERF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Molybdenum Chemical compound [Mo] ZOKXTWBITQBERF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011398 Portland cement Substances 0.000 description 1
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000607142 Salmonella Species 0.000 description 1
- BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N Selenium Chemical compound [Se] BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WRPMYECDQOZINJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N [Fe].[Cu].[Cr].[Cd] Chemical compound [Fe].[Cu].[Cr].[Cd] WRPMYECDQOZINJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- LTPFJXNGLYJFDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N [K].[Ni].[Mo].[Hg] Chemical compound [K].[Ni].[Mo].[Hg] LTPFJXNGLYJFDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VMZUJQSJVUAIJS-UHFFFAOYSA-L [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O.OS(O)(=O)=O.[Zn+2].[SeH2] Chemical compound [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O.OS(O)(=O)=O.[Zn+2].[SeH2] VMZUJQSJVUAIJS-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- VGNGWAZXKMTCKU-UHFFFAOYSA-N [Pb].[Fe].[Cu].[Cr].[Cd] Chemical compound [Pb].[Fe].[Cu].[Cr].[Cd] VGNGWAZXKMTCKU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- LPIMXZDYYXJXBW-UHFFFAOYSA-N [Zn].[Ni].[Pb].[Fe].[Cu] Chemical compound [Zn].[Ni].[Pb].[Fe].[Cu] LPIMXZDYYXJXBW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010564 aerobic fermentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000000129 anionic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 229910052785 arsenic Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N arsenic atom Chemical compound [As] RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052788 barium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- DSAJWYNOEDNPEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N barium atom Chemical compound [Ba] DSAJWYNOEDNPEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ATBAMAFKBVZNFJ-OUBTZVSYSA-N beryllium-10 Chemical compound [10Be] ATBAMAFKBVZNFJ-OUBTZVSYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 1
- BRPQOXSCLDDYGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N calcium oxide Chemical compound [O-2].[Ca+2] BRPQOXSCLDDYGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000292 calcium oxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000012255 calcium oxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000002091 cationic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000009264 composting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004035 construction material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007334 copolymerization reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000975 dye Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003311 flocculating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000543 intermediate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002147 killing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052750 molybdenum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011733 molybdenum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002823 nitrates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000002826 nitrites Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910000069 nitrogen hydride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000013386 optimize process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010979 pH adjustment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000045947 parasite Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000049 pigment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011085 pressure filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052711 selenium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011669 selenium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010865 sewage Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010288 sodium nitrite Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000002364 soil amendment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011343 solid material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004659 sterilization and disinfection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)
Description
S F Ref: 221971
AUSTRALIA
PATENTS ACT 1990 Q COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT
ORIGINAL
4*
C
C
C C
C
P Name and Address of Applicant: Actual Inventor(s): Address for Service: Invention Title: Pori International, Inc.
Suite 310, 1105 North Point Blvd.
Baltimore Maryland 21224 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Geza Louis Kovacs Spruson Ferguson, Patent Attorneys Level 33 St Martins Tower, 31 Market Street Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia Process for Enhancing the Dewaterability of Waste Sludge from Microbiological Digestion The following statement is a full descriptioi, of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us:- 5845/6 -1- FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention is concerned with a process for rendering fairly high solids waste sludges with substantial contents of water retaining cellular structures arising from microbiological action, amenable to further mechanical dewatering.
9 go :BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The treatment of aqueous waste streams having a significant content of organic matter has been and ID continues to be a matter of substantial technological interest. These waste streams may be general sewage or they may be. from various industrial operations such as food processing, oil refining or paper production.
A very old but still valid approach to this problem i is to reduce the dissolved and colloidally suspended organic content of the waste stream through microbiological action. This typically involves digestion of this organic matter by aerobic fermentation, anaerobic fermentation or both. Such 1o microbiological activity generates a gelatinous material commonly referred to as activated sludge. It has a high tightly bound water content.
2 The disposal of such sludges is also a matter of technological concern. The two primary goals have been to terminate the biological activity and to reduce the water content. Both have been addressed by either the S treatment of the sludge with lime or calcium hydroxide, or the heat treatment of the sludge with or without the addition of an oxygen bearing gas or an oxidizing agent. Neither approach has been entirely satisfactory.
.o The lime treatment is expensive and actually o significantly increases the amount of sludge with which one must deal. A fairly high loading of lime, typically between about 150 and 550 pounds per ton of dry sludge solids, is required for dewatering enhancement. The expense of such a treatment involves not only the costs 0. 5 of the lime itself but also the substantial labor costs n handling such a large quantity of additive.
Furthermore, effective dewatering also requires the addition of an inorganic metal salt, typically ferric chloride, at loadings commonly between about 40 and 125 S 20 pounds per ton of dry sludge solids. Most of the lime S• and all of the ferric chloride usually end up as additional solids in the filter cake, thus adding to the amount of solid material of which one must dispose.
In addition, some sludges require even higher ag loadings of lime for stabilization. An EPA case study has reported a need for as much as 1000 pounds per ton of dry sludge solids to reliably terminate biological activity.
On the other hands heat treatment has apparently Suniformly involved the heating of rather dilute feed streams with typical solids contents between about 3 3743/DCPAT 3 and 10 weight percent. This heat treatment has almost universally involved the use of some type of heat exchanger to recover some of the heat energy expended in raising the temperature of the very high water S content feed stream. Scaling problems are commonly encountered in passing these dilute sludges through such heat exchangers resulting in a frequent need to acid wash the heat exchanger.
Furthermore, two separate operations are usually O0 required to dewater the heat treated sludge. Generally, the heat treated material is fed to a decanter, clarifier or settling tank and then the underflow from this operation is fed to a rotary vacuum filter or a recessed chamber pressure filter.
There are disclosures of feeding a fairly dilute heat treated material directly to a centrifuge for 'i final dewatering. However, such procedures require the addition of a substantial quantity of flocculating polymer.
a. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention is concerned with a process of enhancing the dewaterability of waste sludge with a substantial content of a water-retaining cellular structure arising from microbiological action by heat D! treating the sludge. It is further concerned with an efficient and convenient procedure for killing the pathogens and odor generating microorganisms present in the sludge by heating a concentrated waste sludge to 3743/DCPAT temperatures higher than can be tolerated by such organisms.
According to a first embodiment of this invention there is provided a process for enhancing the dewaterability of concentrated waste sludges which have a substantial content of a water-retaining cellular structure arising from microbiological action comprising: 1) adjusting the pH of said sludge to a value of 4 or less; 2) heat treating said sludge without the addition of an oxygen-bearing gas or oxidizing agent at a temperature between about 260'F and 390'F for a sufficient time to maintain its enhanced filterability; io 3) readjusting the pH of said sludge to within about 2 points of neutral and heat treating this neutralized or partially neutralized sludge at a temperature between about 260 and 390'F for a sufficient time to maintain its enhanced filterability.
According to a second embodiment of this invention there is provided a process of dewatering relatively high solids content waste sludges while minimizing the COD and BOD load of the resultant effluent, said sludges having a substantial content of a water retaining a cellular structure arising from microbiological action which does not permit significant further dewatering by a simple room temperature filtration on a recessed chamber filter at a filtration pressure of 100 psi, comprising the steps of: 1) adjusting the pH of said sludge to a value of less than about 4; 2) heat treating the acidified sludge at a temperature between about 2900 and 370'F by direct contact with pressurized steam for a period between about 15 minutes and three hours sufficient that the ultimate dewaterability of the concentrated waste sludge is not significantly affected by subjected thile heat treated neutralized material to substantial shear; 3) neutralizing the heat treated sludge to a pH greater than about 5 with a basic calcium compound; S4) heat treating the neutralized sludge at a temperature of at least about 260'F in excess of about 5 minutes; and 5) filtering the heat treated neutralized sludge to a water content of less than about 55 weight percent in less than about two hours.
According to third embodiment of this invention there is provided a process for 555.
enhancing the dewaterability of concentrated waste sludge while minimizing the COD and BOD load of the resultant effluent, where said sludge has a solids content of about 7% or more by weight, and has a substantial content of a water-retaining cellular structure arising from microbioiogical action comprising 35 1) adjusting the pH of said sludge to a value of less than about 4, and then (2) heat treating said sludge without the addition of oxygen or an oxidizing agent, at a superatmospheric pressure sufficient to maintain the liquid in said sludge in its liquid state, and at a temperature between about 260'F (126°C) and 390'F (199°C) for a sufficient time to enhance and maintain the enhanced filterability of said sludge, 1- <I90337:S wherein the time of heat treatment of said sludge in said elevated temperature range is sufficient that a fifty gram sample of the concentrated waste sludge when mixed with an equal weight of water can be filtered at 140 0 F a) to solids content in excess of about 55 weight percent; b) in less than about 30 minutes; using a recessed chamber membrane pressure filter with filtration pressure of 100 psi and a squeeze pressure of 175 psi and wherein the dewaterability of the concentrated waste sludge is not significantly effected by subjecting the heat treated material to shear.
It is preferred to use mild temperatures between 2600 and 3900 F. It is further preferred to conduct the heat treatment without the addition of either an oxygen bearing gas or an oxidizing agent. In a particularly preferred embodiment the sludge is acidified or alkalized before the heat treatment and then at least partially neutralized before the heat treatment is ended. The neutralization is optional, but beneficial.
Typically, the pathogens in the sludge are rendered essentially inactive.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 is a scheminatic view of one embodiment of the invention wherein the process of the invention can be conducted substantially continuously.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION ••co The further dewatering of concentrated waste sludges which have a substantial content of organic water binding material is facilitated by heat treating them. In general these waste sludges can have solids contents of about 15 weight percent or greater, S preferably between about 20 and 30 weight percent. However, there is no minimum amount of solids content that a waste sludge must have in order to be suitable for treatment in 30 accordance with the invention, so long as at least some solids are present. The amount of 000.
00 0 i o 5 solids present will be dictated by the extent to which the concentrated waste sludges have been dewatered prior to being subjected to the processes of the present invention. The amount of solids contained in a E waste sludge is typically determined by the process and equipment employed to generate the sludge. In general, waste sludges are concentrated by skilled workers to a solids content of 15% or greater. While solids contents of 15% are typical, sludges with solids 10 contents of 10%, or even as low as from about 7% to about 9% are possible.
The organic water binding' material is typically of a cellular structure which has been built up as the result of the microbiological activity involved in the It activated sludge process, the process of reducing the biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) of an aqueous waste stream by aerobic digestion, anaerobic digestion or both. This aqueous waste stream may be from a multitude of sources 2t including but not limited to municipal sewerage and S• industrial operations such as paper making, food processing, oil refining and organic chemical synthesis. Typical organic chemical syntheses include dyestuff manufacture and conversion of petroleum feedstocks to chemical intermediates. In a preferred process the concentrated sludge has been dewatered to the point that significant further water removal cannot be effected with a recessed chamber membrane filter press with a 100 psi filter pressure.
A3 The concentrated waste sludge may have been obtained through the use of polyelectrolyte flocculants. These flocculants are typically high 3743/DCPAT 6 molecular weight polyacrylamides with various anionic or cationic pendant groups obtained by derivitization or co-polymerization. They are commonly used at loadings between about 10 and 15 pounds per ton of dry sludge solids. For many common waste sludges there is no practical way to obtain solids concentrations of unheated-treated waste sludges above about 6 weight percent without the use of such flocculants. However, it is believed that the presence of such flocculants in ID the concentrated waste sludges treated in the present procedure neither enhances nor inhibits the enhanced dewaterability obtained. Such flocculants simply provide a convenient route to the starting material of the present process.
5 The heat treatment should be sufficient to at least partially break down the cellular structure which binds the water content. It is believed that the heat treatment at least partially effects this breakdown by denaturing the proteins of this cellular structure. It 20 is preferred to use temperatures in excess of about •260 0 F, preferably between about 270°F and 390°F and most preferably between about 280°F and 366 0 F. At too low a temperature excessive times are required to obtain a significant improvement in dewaterability. At a sufficiently low temperature no improvement is observed over a reasonable treatment period. On the other hand, excessively high temperatures may cause an undesirable degree of redissolution of materials which increase the COD and BOD of the effluent from the 2C dewatering process. Furthermore, the improvement in dewaterability by heat treatment beyond a certain point yields only minimal improvements in dewaterability and is unnecessarily expensive in terms of both thermal 3743/DCPAT 7 energy and, if excessively high temperatures are involved, capital equipment and maintenance costs to deal with the high pressures needed to keep water liquid at such temperatures. In this regard, in the S present invention it is preferred to operate at a pressure of 200 psig or less, more preferably at 150 psig or less.
The effect of heat treatment may be substantially e* accelerated by adjusting the pH of the concentrated o waste sludge to a strongly acidic or alkaline value.
:It is particularly preferred to adjust the pH to a value of about 3 or more points from neutral. It is especially preferred to operate on the acidic side during heat treatment and even more preferred to operate at pH values about 3 or less. Operating on the alkaline side typically results in the generation of substantial amounts of ammonia and may require the use of a completely closed system to avoid the loss of this ammonia and a consequent drop in pH. Furthermore, this "V ammonia generation tends to remove nitrogen values from the ultimately recovered cake and poses an additional disposal problem. Either a gas waste stream is generated or dissolved ammonium is added to the effluent when the treated sludge is neutralized.
S It is also preferred to substantially neutralize an acidified or alkalized concentrated sludge before mechanically dewatering it. It is particularly preferred to bring the pH value within about three points, more preferably two points, or less, of neutral. This neutralization step results in the precipitation of both organic materials and metal salts which are soluble at the more extreme pH values.
3743/DCPAT 8 However, neutralization is optional and processes of the invention can be employed without a neutralization step.
Since the effluent from the dewatering of the concentrated waste sludge is typically recycled to the initial treatment plant, the organic materials dissolved in the effluent will lead to the generation of more sludge. Typically each pound of BOD will generate 0.6 pounds of activated sludge. On the other 10 hand the metals content of the primary waste stream .i being processed through the initial treatment plant will continue to increase as it is rixed with this recycle effluent if this effluent has an increased metals content.
SIt is further preferred to utilize a basic calcium compound to neutralize the acidified concentrated waste sludge. Calcium is a preferred cation because of its limited water solubility and because basic calcium compounds are relatively inexpensive. A particularly 20 advantageous neutralizing agent is calcium hydroxide which is readily available as slaked lime or can be readily obtaiued by slurrying quick lime in water.
In other preferred embodiments cement kiln dust may be employed as the alkaline agent. Cement kiln dust is readily available as a by-product of, portland cement production.
It is advantageous to extend the heat treatment for some period after the neutralization. If the heat treatment is discontinued before the neutralization is complete, a significant portion of the enhanced 3743/DCPAT 9 dewaterability of the concentrated waste sludge may be lost. It is particularly preferred to heat treat the neutralized concentrated sludge for at least about ten minutes.
heat treatment may be effected using any heat transfer means which can reliably and effectively raise the temperature of the concentrated waste sludge into the required range while maintaining it under pressure. It is preferred to avoid heat transfer means SID which involve the concentrated waste sluCge contacting a solid surface hotter than itself. This material typically displays a strong tendency to deposit scale on such surfaces thereby substantially inhibiting "further heat transfer, sometimes to the extent that the 15 coefficient of thermal transfer becomes essentially zero. It is further preferred that the heating means involve means for agitating the concentrated waste sludge, because such sludges have a poor heat transfer coefficient (one EPA study reports an inverse S o relationship between this coefficient and the sludge Solids content with a dramatic increase in the rate of diminution of this coefficient at solids contents of 6 percent or greater). It is particularly preferred to effect the heat transfer by contacting the concentrated waste sludge with a hot fluid and it is especially preferred to use pressurized steam. This steam can be injected into the air space immediately adjacent to the sludge or preferably it can be injected into the body of the sludge. Both the high viscosity and the low 2o coefficient of heat transfer to these sludges will make the use of conventional heat exchangers very impractical, if not impossible.
3743/DCPAT 10 The concentrated waste sludge should be heat treated under sufficient pressure to keep its water content suostantially liquid. Otherwise it becomes very difficult if not impossible to raise the temperature above the boiling point of the water. In going from the liquid to the gaseous state water absorbs a tremendous amount of heat, thus making it extremely uneconomical to attempt to dewater simply by boiling off the water.
io The length of time at the heat treitment temperature needed to effect a substantial enhancement of dewaterability of a given concentrated waste sludge depends primarily on the temperature of the treatment and the pH at which the treatment was effected, IS Generally for most sludges the optimum enhancement is achieved in between about 4 and 5 hours and this can be shortened to about 40 minutes or less by conducting the heat treatment at high or low pH values. However, significant benefit can be obtained in about two hours, e' or fifteen minutes with simultaneous pH adjustment.
There appears to be a linear relationship between the pH of the concentrated waste sludge and the log of the time necessary to obtain irreversible enhanced dewaterability at pH values less than neutral. The 2 enhanced dewaterability is considered irreversible when it is not significantly degraded by subjecting treated mr irial to either shear or aging before filtration.
It is believed that a family of curves can be readily developed, one curve for each treatment temperature in the appropriate range, relating the log of the treatment time to develop irreversibility to the pH of the material being treated. Such a curve for treatment 3743/DCPAT 11 with 100 psig steam (338 0 F) has been developed. This is defined by the equation y bmx wherein y is the treatment time to irreversibility in minutes, x is the pH of the concentrated waste sludge, b is 9.986 and m is 1.894. This equation fits the measured data with a correlation coefficient of 0.993.
The heat treatment acceleration obtained by the use ,of extreme pH values is of primary interest for continuous processing of the concentrated waste K) sludge. Many waste treatment plants operate at volumes such that the processing of waste sludge is conveniently done on a batch basis. In such situations the economic balance between the cost of a longer heat treatment and the additional cost of acidification or 5 alkalization followed by neutralization may dictate whether the acceleration procedure is desirable. As the throughput required of the sludge treatment facility increases, a bias toward acceleration develops; the same throughput can be obtained in a smaller and ao therefore less expensive heat treatment system with a •shorter residence time. As the heat treatment time increases the batch sizs for each cycle must be that much larger to obtain the same throughput.
In addition to conducting the process of the S invention on a batch basis, the invention can also be practiced on a continuous basis. Fig. I schematically represents a system in which the invention can be practiced on a continuous basis. In such a system, sludge is introduced through a sludge hopper or closed &D storage tan'k 1. A positive displacement pump (not shown) can be used to feed the sludge. Acid is introduced to the sludge through a mixing tee at 2 and 3743/DCPAT 12 mixed with the sludge in acid mixer 3. Steam is introduced to raise the temperature, downstream of the acid mixer, at 4. The acid is allowed to react with the sludge and acidify the sludge in the acid mixer 3 and the reaction is completed in acid reactor 5. In preferred embodiments, the pH can be adjusted to a value of 3 with sulfuric acid and the process can be operated at 100 PSIG at a temperature of 330 0 F (sludge temperature). Lime, conveniently in the form of a 1 solution, suspension or slurry is introduced via lime mixer 6. Most of the neutralization takes place in lime mixer 6. Neutralization of the acidified sludge is completed in the neutral reactor 7. Both the acid reactor and the neutralization reactor are conveniently 15 plug flow reactors. The residence time in the acid f reactor is preferably about 1 hour and in the neutral reactor, preferably 15 minutes. The portion of the system through the neutral reactor is pressurized, because steam is introduced under pressure through the dt2 mixing tee. The prc -ure is released through pressure letdo-.,ns (not shown) and then fed to a separator 8. At the separator, steam is recycled to the sludge storage tank or hopper 1. Sludge is fed to a filter feed tank 9. Cooling water may be added to the sludge at this S point (supply not shown). The cooled sludge is then fed to a filter 10. The filter is preferably a recessed plate diaphragm filter press (also referred to herein as a recessed chamber membrane pressure filter). The filtration operation results in filter Ao cakes which are deposited at zone II. Filtrate is fed to a filtrate holding tank 12 where it is held and subsequently recycled to, the waste water treatment system which originally produced the sludge.
If desired for odor control, off gases can be collected 3743/DCPAT 13 and treated in thermal oxider 13 which is fed with combustion gas from source 14.
As with the batch operation, the continuous operation is carried out on fully conventional equipment which is readily available to those of ordinary skill in the art. Suitable substitutions can be readily made. For instance, a recessed chamber membrane filter press can be used, or a suitable substitute can be employed.
0 The enhancement in dewaterability can be conveniently evaluated in terms of filtration time and cake solids. A decrease in filtration time and an increase in solids content both reflect an enhancement in dewaterability. It is preferred to use treatment conditions such that the filtration time is less than about two hours, preferably less than about one hour and even more preferably less than about thirty minutes. In fact filtration times of less than about five minutes and even less than two minutes can be a readily obtained. Such rapid filtration times a good indicator that optimum dewaterability has been approached, even if the capacity of commercially available pumps limit the ability to take full advantage of them.
The heat treatment can readily yield concentrated waste sludges which can be readily dewatered to solids contents in excess of about 30 weight percent. It is preferred to use conditions which yield cake solids in excess of about 45 weight percent, more preferably in excess of about 55 weight percent, most preferably in excess of about 60 weight percent.
3743/DCPAT 14 The enhanced dewaterability of the concentrated waste sludge can be further evaluated in terms of its aging behavior and sensitivity to shear. A sludge which has not been optimally conditioned will display a significant increase in filtration time and a significant decrease in cake solids upon aging a significant period of time after heat treatment. A typical evaluation period is overnight for about 16 hours.
10 Furthermore, subjecting a concentrated waste sludge which has not been optimally conditioned to substantial shear will cause it to lose a substantial degree of its enhanced dewaterability. A convenient evaluation technique is to vigorously stir a conditioned sludge at 5 140 0 F for about thirty minutes, It is especially preferred to sufficiently condition the concentrated waste sludge such that it does not display significant sensitivity to either aging or significant shear. For the purposes of this *ao: invention, the enhanced dewaterability of such a treated concentrated waste sludge is characterized as irreversible.
The filtration time a: cake solids obtainable may be conveniently evaluated using a recessed chamber f a l membrane pressure filter. In the work reported in this specification (unless otherwise indicated) the filtration was done at 7 filtration pressure of 100 psi; and a membrane sque-,e pressure of 175 psi. The concentrated waste sludge was filtered at a temperature -0o of 140 0 F. The filter cloth was a 43 X 80 9 oz/yd 2 polypropylene monofilamer.t sateen weave cloth with a 3743/DCPAT 15 calendared finish, an air porosity between about 60 and 100 cfm and a thread count of 75 x 32. However, the precise nature of the filter cloth was not considered critical so as it did not blind. It was believed that the filtration was basically effected by the cake as it built up on the cloth. The actual device used was a half of a filter set known as a bomb filter and commonly used for laboratory evaluation.
The recessed chamber membrane pressure filter is 10 well known to those skilled in the art. An extensive review of its use in dewatering is contained in the paper "Membrane Press Sludge Dewatering" presented by Dr. Ernest Mayer at the Second Annual Meeting of the American Filtration Society in Pittsburgh, PA in March of 1989. Its initial development for dewatering washed pigment cake is reported in U.S. Patent No. 3,289,845, incorporated by reference as though set forth in full herein. Filters of this type are available from a number of suppliers including Klinkau GmbH of 2 Marktoberdorf-Leuterschach, West Germany and Lenser America of Lakewood, New Jersey. This type of filter is basically a recessed chamber plate filter which contains an inflatable membrane for squeezing the filter cake after the initial pressure filtration has a 0 been essentially completed.
Although the dewaterability of the conditioned sludge was evaluated on a recessed chamber pressure membrane filter, it can be practically dewatered in a wide variety of mechanical dewatering devices including 3 0 centrifuges and rotary vacuum filters. The selection of a suitable device can be readily made by those of ordinary skill in the art. Of course, the results 3743/DCPAT 16 obtained will depend somewhat on the nature of the dewatering device. Currently the recessed chamber membrane pressure filters are the most preferred devices.
SThe following examples more fully illustrate specific embodiments of the invention.
EXAMPLE 1 Enhancing the Dewaterability of Concentrated Primary and Secondary Municipal Sewerage Sludge by Heat Treatment A concentrated waste sludge, which was obtained by filtration on a recessed chamber plate filter of a mixture of the primary and secondary sludge generated in a municipal waste treatment plant which utilizes aerobic digestion, was heat treated for various times to improve its dewaterability. The concentrate was obtained by adding between 10 and 15 pounds per dry ton of solids of a polyacrylamide-based polyelectrolyte flocculent to the sludge and then filtering it to a ao solids content of about 29 weight percent. This concentrated waste sludge had a pH of about 5.2 and an ash content of about 22.7 weight percent.
Four hundred gram samples of this concentrated waste sludge were heat treated in an autoclave at a pressure of 100 psig using 100 psig steam for varying periods of time. The steam was injected directly into the body of the sludge for between four and six minutes and thereafter it was provided to the air space around the sample. Temperature profiles had established that 3O this direct injection was sufficient to heat the sample to obtain a temperature of about 320 0 F. The treatment 3743/DCPAT 17 time was measured from completion of this direct injection to steam termination. It took some portion of this treatment, which varied from run to run, for the temperature of the sludge to equilibrate to the 338"F temperature of 100 psig steam. The heat treatment was discontinued by gradually releasing the pressure and this cool-down period was not included in the treatment time.
S.:0.
The dewaterability was tested by mixing a fifty Io gram sample with 50 mililiters of water and feeding this mixture to a test filtration apparatus known as a bomb filter which consisted of one-half of a recessed chamber membrane pressure filter set and which had a capacity of approximately 250 mililiters. A filtration pressure of 100 psi was used followed by a squeeze pressure which was gradually increased to 175 psi. The sludge was at a temperature of about 140° F during the filtration.
The evaluation criteria were filtration time until O gas could be observed passing through the filter (the filtration was driven with pressurized nitrogen) the percent solids achieved after squeezing, the effect of overnight aging and the effect of shear (applied by thirty minutes mixing with a household hand cake batter S mixer). The thickness of the filter cake after squeezing was also observed. The results are reported in Table 1.
3743/DCPAT
C
O
S C C CC C TABLE 1 Straight Heat Treatment of Concentrated Haste Sludge From Aerobic Digestion of Municipal Sewerage Treatment Time (in hours) As Treated Filtration Time (in minutes) Filtration Cake Solids (in Sheared Filtration Filtration Cake Thickmess Time (in (in mm) minutes) Cake Solids (in Aged Filtration Filtration Cake I Time (in Solids S minutes) (in Cake Thickness (in mm) 53.6 63.2 65.4 not filterable 60 65.4 7 8 3/4 52.8 63.8 66.6 1 1/8 3744:DCPAT Tables to 3743:DCPAT 19 Th3 cakes which are obtained did not initially exhibit or develop objectionable odors, even after prolonged storage periods. This was taken as an indication that the heat treatment had inactivated or killed any microorganisms present in the concentrated waste sludge.
Example 2 Acid Acceleration of the Heat Treatment Sof rimary and Secondary Municipal Sewerage Sludge D Four hundred gram samples of the concentrated waste sludge described in Example 1 were acidified to a pH value of about 2 by stirring in an appropriate :amount of concentrated sulfuric acid, heat treated for varying periods of time using 100 psig steam in the manner described in Example 1 and then evaluated as described in Example 1. The results are reported in Table 2.
TABLE 2 ac)* Dewaterability of Acidified and Heat Treated Concentrated Waste Sludge from Aerobic Digestion of Municipal Sludge Treatment As Treated Filtration Sheared Filtration Time (in Filtration Cake Cake Filtration Cake Cake minutes) Time (in Solids Thickness Time (in Solids Thickness 2S minutes) (in (in mm) minutes) in (in mm) 37 44.4 8 Not filterable 11 52.3 8 Not filterable 11 65.0 6.5 5 62.4 3743/DCPAT 20 As in Example 1, the cakes which were obtained were free of objectionable odors and did not develop such odors indicating a termination of biological activity.
Example 3 of Heat Treated Acidified and Neutralized Concentrated Municipal Sewerage from Anaerobic Digestion *00. A concentrated waste sludge, which was obtained by centrifuging a municipal sewerage sludge from an 10 anaerobic digestion, was acidified, heat treated for about one hour, neutralized, further heat treated for about fifteen minutes and then its dewaterability was evaluated in the manner similar to that described in Example 1. The initial sludge was modified by the Saddition of between about 10 and 15 pounds per dry ton of sludge solids of a polymer flocculent of the type described in Example 1 and then it was centrifuged to a solids content of about 20.7 weight percent which had an ash content of 42.3 weight percent. This sludge had S 20 a pH value of about 8.45.
Six hundred gram samples were acidified to a pH value of about 2 by stirring in an appropriate amount of concentrated sulfuric acid. They were then heat treated in an autoclave maintained at 100 psig by the 2! injection of 100 psig steam into the airspace around the specimen for about one hour. Temperature profiles indicated that it took approximately forty minutes for each specimen to reach a temperature in excess of about 310°F and that the specimen did not quite reach the 338OF temperature of the 100 psig steam.
3743/DCPAT 21 Each specimen was then neutralized by stirring in the appropriate amount of lime. In one case, the pH was taken to a value of 6.7 and in the other case to a value of The neutralized samples were then heat treated for about fifteen minutes by injecting 100 psig steam into the free airspace of an autoclave with a steam trap valve set at 100 psig. Temperature profiles indicated that the specimens reached a temperature between about ID 245 0 F and 270°F at the conclusion of the fifteen minute treatment.
The dewaterability of the concentrated waste sludge specimens was evaluated after treatment, after being mixed for thirty minutes with an overhead agitator and after aging overnight. In each case, a seventy five gram specimen was fed to the apparatus described in Example I (140 0 F filtration temperature, 100 psi filtration pressure and 175 psi squeeze pressure). All six runs (two neutralization pH values each subjected d ao to three post treatment conditions) gave approximately the same filtration time of between 2 and 3 minutes and cake solids of around 64 percent. The ash content of the solids was between about 55 and 65 weight percent.
As in Examples 1 and 2, the cakes obtained did not as display and did not later develop any objectionable odors thus evidencing an absence of biological activity.
3743/DCPAT 22 Example 4 Enhancing the Dewaterability of Concentrated Municipal Sewerage Sludge from Anaerobic Digestion by Acidification and Heat Treatment S A concentrated waste sludge, which was obtained in the manner as in Example 3 and which had a solids content of 20.7 weight percent with an ash content of 38.3 weight percent, was acidified, heat treated for one hour, neutralized, heat treated for 15 minutes and evaluated in the manner described in Example 3. The acidification was effected by stirring in an appropriate amount of concentrated sulfuric acid to yield a pH value of about 2. The heat treatment was effected by injecting 100 psig steam into the airspace of an autoclave with a steam trap valve set at 100 psig. The neutralization was effected by stirring in an appropriate amount of lime with a household hand cake batter mixer to give a pH value of about 7.7 (the cake batter mixer was used to test the shear o sensitivity of the treated material).
The treated material filtered in about two minutes and yielded a final squeezed cake of 10.5 mm thickness with a solids content of about 66 weight percent having an ash content of about 54 weight percent. The filter 235 feed had a suspended solids content of about 11 weight percent. Essentially, the same results were obtained from material which was aged overnight.
As in Examples I, 2 and 3, the cakes obtained did not display or develop any objectionable odors thus evidencing an absence of biological activity.
3743/DCPAT 23 However, when the same material was only heat treated for approximately 30 minutes, the acidified material could not be filtered at a filtration pressure of 110 psi. A temperature profile indicated that a S maximum temperature of 288°F was reached at the end of this thirty minute treatment. Only about 20ml of effluent was obtained after seven minutes of filtration and the run was terminated.
Example ID Enhancing the Dewaterability of Concentrated Primary and Secondary Municipal Sewerage Sludge from Aerobic Digestion by Acidification and Heat Treatment and Determining the Result of Residual CHemical Distribution A concentrated waste sludge, which was obtained in the same menner as Example 1 and which had a solids content of about 20.9 weight percent having an ash content of 18.5 weight percent, was acidified, heat treated for either 3/4 of an hour or one hour, 2o neutralized, heat treated for 15 minutes and evaluated as in the manner described in Example 1. The acidification was effected by stirring in an appropriate aiiLount of concentrated sulfuric acid to yield a pH value of about 2. The heat treatment was .25 effected by injecting 90 psig (about 331°F) steam into the airspace of an autoclave with a steam trap valve set at 90 psig. The neutralization was effected by stirring in an appropriate amount of lime to give a pH value of about 5.5. The results are reported in 2o Table 3.
3743/DCPAT 0 S. *S TABLE 3 Dewaterability of Acidified Concentrated Haste Sludge from Aerobic Digestion of Municipal Sewerage Treatment Time (in minutes) As Treated Sample Filtration Cake Solids Time (in (in minutes) Cake Thickness (in mm) Filtration Time (in minutes) Sample Aged Overnight Cake Solids Cake Thickness (in (in mm) (1.6)1' 44.8 (53.3) 57.7 (63.8) 14 (12) 9.5 (9) 20.5 (12.7) (2.5) 43.6 (48.6) (61.1) 13 (12) 1 (1.3) 1/ Values in parenthesis are for filtration at 165*F and a squeeze pressure of 225 psi as opposed to the 140°F filtration temperature and 175 psi squeeze pressure of the preceding claims.
3744:DCPAT Tables to 3743:DCPAT 25 Table 3 illustrates the development of optimum properties as the time at temperature is extended. A substantial improvement in dewaterability is already observed after the shorter treatment period but further improvement is clearly obtainable both in terms of percent solids and in terms of resistance to aging.
The latter is clearly important in the event that it is not possible to immediately dewater the treated material.
The filter cakes obtained had ash contents, based on dry solids, of about 33 weight percent and the filter feed had a suspended solids content between about 8 and 9 weight percent.
A detailed chemical analysis of the initial concentrated waste sludge and the filter cake and the filtrate of the forty five minute treatment followed by the 140 0 F filtration with the 175 psi squeeze is recorded in Table 4.
C
*oee 3743/DCPAT
V.
TABLE 4 A Chemical Analysis of a Concentrate Waste Sludge and the Dewatering Products obtained by Filtration at 140°F After Heat Treatment with Acidification and Neutralization Amount of Material in Concentrated Waste of Material Accounted for of Material in the Cake of Material in the Filtrate2/ NH3 as N To al Kjeldahl N as N Phosphate 1o Total as P Total Aluminum Total Cadmium Total Chromium Total Copper Total Iron Total Lead Total Nickel Total Zinc 0.33 wt 1.3 wt 0.4 wt 0.23 wt X 1.8 ppm 50 ppm 67 ppm 0.22 wt 21 ppm 7 ppm 250 ppmn 50.5 65.6 82.9 98.6 80.2 94.3 98.0 88.6 94.4 47.6 44.1 8.7 37.9 80.0 97.1 80.2 91.3 97.0 75.8 90.5 43.3 42.7 41.8 27.7 2.9 1.4 3 12.9 3.9 4.3 1.4 2 2 The filtrate also has a C.O.D. of 28000 mg/l.
3744:DCPAT Tables to 3743:DCPAT 27 EXAMPLE 6 Dewaterability of Acidified and Neutralized Heat Treated Concentrated Primary and Secondary Municipal Sewerage Sludge SA concentrated waste sludge, which was obtained by filtration on a belt filter of a mixture of the primary and secondary sludge generated in a municipal waste treatment plant which utilizes aerobic digestion, was acidified, heat treated, neutralized, and further heat Io treated to improve its dewaterability. The concentrate was obtained by adding between 10 and 15 pounds per dry .e ton of solids of a polyacrylamide based polyelectrolyte flocculent to the sludge and then filtering it to a e solids content of about 24.5 weight percent. This concentrated waste sludge had an ash content of about 27.4 weight percent.
A six hundred gram sample of this concentrated waste sludge was acidified to a pH value of about 2 by stirring in an appropriate amount of concentrated 20 sulfuric acid.
It was then heat treated in an autoclave at a pressure of 100 psig using steam for one hour. The steam was injected into the air space around the sample. A temperature profile indicated that a :S temperature of 330 0 F was reached after about forty minutes.
The sample was then neutralized to a pH value of about 5.9 by stirring it with an appropriate quantity of lime slurried in water.
3743/DCPAT 28 The neutralized sample was heat treated for fifteen minutes with 100 psig steam in an autoclave with a steam trap valve set at 100 psig. A temperature profile showed the sample reaching a temperature of about 260 0 F at the conclusion of the treatment period.
The dewaterability was tested by mixing a fifty gram sample with 50 mililiters of water and feeding this mixture to a test filtration apparatus known as a bomb filter which consisted of one half of a recessed chamber membrane pressure filter set and which had a capacity of approximately 250 mililiters. A filtration *pressure of 100 psi was used followed by a squeeze pressure which was gradually increased to 175 psi. The sludge was at a temperature of about 140 0 F during the D filtration.
The filtration was completed in about 2 minutes and a solids content of about 64.6 weight percent was obtained after squeezing. The filter cake had a half chamber thickness (as described in Example 1 the test .Io apparatus was one half of a filter :it) of Il mm and an ash content of about 36.7 weight percent.
l This filter cake did not exhibit an objectionable odor either as filtered or after aging at room temperature for an extended period. This indicated _S that all biological activity had been terminated by the heat treatment.
Example 7 A study was conducted to relate the pH of the concentrated waste sludge to the temperature needed to 3743/DCPAT 29 achieve irreversibility, as measured by insensitivity to overnight aging and shear. The material described in Example 1 was heat treated as in Example 1 except that in most cases the heat treatment was preceded by acidification by stirring in an appropriate amount of concentrated sulfuric acid and was followed by a neutralization to a pH value about 5.5 by stirring in an appropriate amount of lime slurry. The neutralized material was then heat treated for about fifteen minutes with 100 psig steam in an autoclave with a steam trap valve set at 100 psig. The neutralized material was then heat treated for about fifteen minutes with 100 psig steam in an autoclave with a steam trap valve set at 100 psig. The neutralized 5 Imaterial reached a temperature of between 260 and 300°F in this fifteen minute period. The dewaterability was evaluated by filtration in accordance with the technique described in Example 1. The results were recorded in Table o TABLE A Correlation of Treatment Time to Treatment pH to Achieve Irreversibility Treatment pH Treatment Time ((in minutes) 3 13 2 3 4 120 300 3 projected value 3743/DCPAT 30 Examples 8 and 9 Pilot Plant Testing at a Municipal Treatment Plant The sludge from a municipal waste treatment plant, a mixture of about one-half primary and one-half secondary sludge, was fed through the process and the resulting material was filtered on a 12.8 sq. ft., 4 chamber, diaphragm filter press. The material was adjusted to a pH of 2.5 3.0 in the plant with sulfuric acid and processed at 330 0 F and 100 psig with a 1 hour retention time (3 gpm initial feed) The material was then neutralized to a pH of 6.0 with lime slurry followed by a 15 minute retention time at 330 0 F. After the material was reduced in pressure and cooled to 120 0 F with cooling water, filtration was Sconducted by filtering at 60-80 psi followed by a diaphragr, squeeze at 175 psi. The system employed is e.
shown schematically in Fig. 1.
Example 8 The total solids in the feed to the process was 20 16.8%. After processing the material at a 3 gpm flow at a temperature of 330 0 F through the pilot plant, and reducing the pressure through the let down tube, a filter cake of 67.8% total solids was produced. The resulting filter cake was 51% volatile solids on a dry basis with an ash content of 42.1% on a dry basis.
This cake also had a BTU/LB value of 6,900 or 13,529 BTU/LB of volatiles on a dry basis.
3743/DCPAT 31 Example 9 The total solids in the feed to the process was 18.4%, with a 68% volatile solids content, on a dry basis, and an ash content of 29.1%, on a dry basis.
S This material also had a TKN (Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen) content of 9,800 Mg/Kg on an as is basis, and a total phosphate content of 3,400 Mg/Kg on an as is basis.
After processing the material through the pilot plant at a 3 gpm flow, at a temperature of 330 0 F, and reducing the pressure through the let down tube, a !iii filter cake of 66.3% total solids was produced. The resulting filter cake was 51% volatile solids on a dry basis. The filter cake had a BTU/LB value of 6,000 or 11,764 BTU/LB of volatiles on a dry basis. The I resulting filtrate had a C.O.D, content of 23,000 mg/liter. This value equals 0.32 Ibs. of C.O.D. per pound of total dry solids in the initial starting sludge. The ratio of BOD to COD was 0.43 for this material. Also, about 87% of the TKN was solubilized a and 52% of the total phosphorous was solubilized.
The following table gives the metals concentration for the initial raw material, the filter cake, and the filtrate.
3743/DCPAT 32 TABLE 6 a a.
a a Aluminum Arsenic Barium Beryllium 10 Cadmium chromium Copper Iron Lead 6 Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Potassium Selenium Sulfate Zinc Initial Raw Material 18.4% Total Solids 1,200 PPM less than 5 72 less than 0.2 1.5 62 52 2,800 10 0.05 less than 10 3.4 280 less than 5 73 Filter cake 66.3% Total Solids 6,900 PPM less tha:. 5 30 less than 0.2 7.3 280 240 13,000 49 0.18 less than 10 20 250 less than 5 343 0.4 PPM less than 0.4 less than 0.1 less than 0.01 0.050 0.30 0.038 6.6 0.02 less than 0.004 less than 0.6 0.34 92 less than 0.4 530 0.124 Filtrate The filtrate is very low in metals since the metals remain with the cake.
3743/DCPAT 33 Example The total solids feed to the process was 19.1%, with a 78% volatile solids content, on a dry basis, and an ash content of 21.0%, on a dry basis. This material Shad a TKN content of 7,700 Mg/Kg on an as is basis, and a total phosphate content of 2,800 Mg/Kg on an as is basis. After processing the material through the pilot plant at a 3 gpm flow, at a temperature of 330 0 F, a filter cake of 69.2% total solids was produced. (A 72 10 hour continuous run was conducted on the pilot plant.) The filter cake was 50% volatile solids on a dry basis with an ash content of 36.5% on a dry basis. The cake also had a BTU/LB value of 7,000 or 11,864 BTU/LB of volatiles on a dry basis. The filter cake had a density of 80.5 lbs./cubic foot. The filtrate had a C.O.D. value of 23,000 mg/liter. This value equals 0.34 lbs. of C.O.D. per lb. of total dry solids in the initial starting sludge. About 72% of the TKN was solubilized and 23% of the total phosphorous was 20 solubilized.
Example 11 Incorporating Cement Kiln Dust as the Alkaline Agent A sample of sludge from a Mid Atlantic municipal treatment facility, about one-half primary and one-half secondary, was treated using a process similar to the process of examples 1-6. The material was 23.8% total solids, and contained 75% volatile solids (dry weight basis). The Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N was 10,000 mg/kg on an as is basis.
3743/DCPAT 34 To 3,000 gms of the material, 50 mis of 93% sulfuric acid (1.84 was added, and the mixture was reacted in a laboratory pot at 330 0 F for 1 hour.
After this period of time, 275 mis of 30% s irry of cement kiln dust was added. The cement kiln dust contained about 14.0% free alkalinity expressed as calcium hydroxide. The mixture was then subjected to minutes reaction time at 330 0
F.
Upon filtration, a filter cake of about 65% solids ID was achieved using a diaphragm squeeze. The cake on a dry solids basis was 65% volatile solids, with a BTU value of 7,500 BTU/LB. The Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N was 17,000 mg/kg on an as is basis.
In terms of weight reduction, the 3,000 gms of starting material at 23.8% total solids produced about 670 gms of filter cake or about 23% of the original weight of the sludge.
For every pound of total solids, about 0.33 Ibs. of C.O.D. appeared in the filtrate. This corresponds to a 'O B.O.D. value of about 0.16 lbs. of B.O.D. per pound of total solids.
The results of an analysis done on the filtrate are as follows: Table 7 Ammonia as N 1,600 mg/1 Nitrogen/Kjeldahl/as N 3,100 mg/1 Phosphate/Total/as P 230 mg/1 Sulfate 6,500 mg/1 3743/DCPAT 35 Aluminum 12 mg/1 Cadmium 0.054 mg/1 Chromium 2.4 mg/1 Copper 0.272 mg/1 Iron 730 mg/1 Nickel 1.02 mg/1 Zinc 2.9 mg/1 Lead 0.54 mg/1 Examples 12 and 13 o 1 Treatment of Biological Sludge From A Paper Plant And An Oil Refinery Processed In the Lab Using a Process of the Invention 0 Example 12 *«on A sample of a biological sludge from a Northeastern I Paper Plant was processed in the lab using a process of the invention similar to those of examples 1-6. The material was initially 18.7% total dry solids with an ash of 16.3% on a dry basis. Four hundred grams of the material was adjusted to a pH of 3.0 with sulfuric 2D acid. About 9.2 grams as 94% sulfuric acid was required. The material was then subjected to minutes at 3300 F in a laboratory autoclave. Following this period of time, 10 mls of a 10% lime slurry was added to the material and it was subjected to minutes additional time at 330 0 F. Fifty gram increments of the material were cooled and filtered on a laboratory bomb filter at 100 psi followed by a diaphragm squeeze at 175 psi. This material filtered quickly in less than one minute to yield a cake of 23 55.0% solids with an ash of 26.2% solids on a dry basis and a 7,700 BTU/LB value on a dry basis. The processed material was aged overnight and filtered in less than 1 3743/DCPAT 36 minute. Therefore, the aged material did not regress on the lab filter in terms of filtration.
The filter cake represented about 25% of the weight of the initial starting material, so a 75% weight S reduction of disposable material occurred. The COD of the filtrate was 9,000 mg/liter and the 5 day BOD value was 4,500 mg/liter. About 73% of the TKN (Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen) was solubilized and about 43% of the Total Phosphorous was solubilized.
O The following table (Table 8) relates some metals concentrations of the initial raw material, the filter cake, and the filtrate.
S
S
*5 5 s Table 8 *5
S
S.
S
S
Initial Raw Material 740 PPM Filter Cake 2,800 Filtrate 1 Aluminum Cadmium Chromium 1.5 Copper Iron Lead Nickel zinc 11 450 less than 10 4 65 5.6 13 34 3,200 20 13 220 0.018 0.3 0.025 5.1 0.2 0.61 0.32 Example 13 A sample of a biological sludge from an Eastern Oil Refinery was processed in the lab using a process of 3743/DCPAT 37 the invention similar to those of examples 1-6. The material received was 13.8% total dry solids. Four hundred grams of the material was adjusted to a pH of with 3.7 gms of 94% sulfuric acid. The material Swas then processed for 80 minutes at 330°F in a laboratory autoclave. Following this period of time 4 mls of a 10% lime slurry was added to the material and it was subjected to 15 minutes adcdiional time at 330°F. One hundred gram increments ,f the material were cooled and filtered on a laboratory bomb filter at 100 psi following by a diaphragm squeeze at 175 psi.
This m.terial filtered in eight minutes to yield a cake of 41.0% solids having a BTU value of 11,200 on a dry basis. The filter represented about 19% of the weight 15 of the initial starting cake, so a weight reduction in excess of 80% was achieved.
Based upon the BTU value of the cake, 11,200 BTU/LB on a dry basis, it is apparent that the biological sludge contained a high concentration of oil.
9 20 Examples 14 16 Using a Process of the Invention Without Alkaline Neutralization Example 14 A sample of sludge from a Mid Atlantic municipal treatment facility, about one-half primary and one-half secondary, was treated using a process of the invention similar to examples 1-6. The material was 21.5% total solids, and the Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N was 5,800 mg/kg on an as is basis. The total phosphate as P was 1,900 -lo mg/kg on an as is basis.
3743/DCPAT 38 To 3,000 gms of the material, 58 mis of 93% sulfuric acid (1.84 was added, and the mixture was reacted in a laboratory pot at 338 0 F for 1 hour.
The initial pH of the mixture was 1.9, and the final pH of the mixture after the reaction time was Upon filtration, a filter cake of about 71% solids was achieved using a diaphragm squeeze at 175 psi. The mixture filtered quickly in less than 3 minutes on a laboratory filter at 100 psi. The Kjeldahl Nitrogen as o. N of the filter cake was 4,600 mg/kg on an as is basis. The total phosphate as P of the filter cake was 5,000 mg/kg on an as is basis. The ash, on a dry solids basis, of the filter cake was about 40%, and the .'J'U value, on a dry solids basis, was 7,200 BTU/pound.
S For every pound of total solids, about 0.21 lbs of C.O.D. appeared in the filtrate. This corresponds to a B.O.D. value of about 0.12 Ibs of B.O.D. per pound of total solids. Also, the filtrate had a Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N of 3,400 mg/l, and a total phosphate as P 20 of 1,000 mg/l.
In terms of weight reduction, the 3,000 gms of starting material at 21.5% total solids produced about 685 gms of filter cake or about 23 of the original weight of the sludge.
The following table (Table 9) relates some metal concentrations of the initial material, the filter cake, and the filtrate: 3743/DCPAT 39 Table 9 Initial Sludge Filter Cake at 21.5% at Total Solids 71.0% Total Solids Filtrate Aluminum 1,300 mg/kg 3,900 mg/kg 480 mg/1 Arsenic 5 5 0.4 Barium 35 39 0.1 Beryllium 0.2 0.2 0.01 Cadmium 1.2 2.6 0.476 Chromium 46 120 18 Copper 52 274 0.202 Iron 3,100 6,200 2,600 Lead 19 74 1.7 Mercury 0.13 0.68 0.004 i Molybdenum 10 10 0.6 Nickel 4.2 14 3.4 Potassium 280 240 140 Selenium 5 5 0.4 Sulfate 13,500 Zinc 83 123 54 Example To 3,000 gms of the same sludge as in example 14, 21.5% total solids, 75 mls of 93% sulfuric acid (1.84 was added, and the mixture was reacted in a as laboratory pot at 338 0 F for 1 hour. The initial pH of the mixture was 0.80, and the final pH of the mixture after the reaction time was 1.96.
Upon filtration, a filter cake of about 70% solids was achieved using a diaphragm squeeze at 175 psi. The Z- mixture filtered quickly in less than 5 minutes on a laboratory filter at 100 psi. The Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N of the filter cake was 4,500 mg/kg on an as is basis. The total phosphate as P of the filter cake was 1,600 mg/kg on an as is basis. The percent volatiles of k the filter cake, on a dry solids basis, was 50.0%.
3743/DCPAT 40 0 For every pound of total solids, about 0.23 Ibs. of C.O.D. appeared in the filtrate. This corresponds to a B.O.D. value of about 0.12 lbs of B.O.D. per pound of total solids.
the filtrate had a Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N of 2,300 mg/l, and a total phosphate as P of 1,200 mg/l.
In terms of weight reduction, the 3,000 gms of starting material at 21.5% total solids produced about 504 gms of filter cake or about 17% of the original I0 weight of the sludge.
Table 10 relates some metal concentrations of the initial material, the filter cake, and the filtrate: Table 9 oseo oolo oooee: on o oo *i Aluminum Arsenic Barium 0 Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Iron 2S Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Potassium -3 Selenium Sulfate Zinc Initial Sludge at 21.5% Total Solids 1,300 mg/kg <5 35 0.2 1.2 46 52 3,100 19 0.13 10 4.2 280 <5 83 Filter Cake at 71.0% Total Solids 1,700 mg/kg 5 26 <0.2 1.8 120 510 4,000 79 0.14 10 28 210 <5 136 Filtrate 670 mg/l 0.4 0.1 0.01 0.502 32 0.242 3,200 1.9 0.035 0.6 9.2 130 0.4 17,200 52 3743/DCPAT 41 Example 16 A sample of sludge from a Mid Atlantic municipal treatment facility, about one-half primary and one-half secondary, was treated using a process of the invention similar to those of examples 1-6. The material was 27.5% total solids, and the Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N was 12,000 mg/kg on an as is basis. The total phosphate as P was 3,300 mg/kg on an as is basis. The volatile solids, on a dry solids basis, were 77%.
~o To 3,000 gms of the material, 50 mls of 93% sulfuric acid (1.84 was added, and the mixture was reacted in a laboratory pot at 330 0 F fo: 1 hour.
The initial pH of the mixture was 2.8, and the final pH of the mixture after the reaction time was Upon filtration, a filter cake of about 63% solids was achieved using a diaphragm squeeze at 175 psi. The mixture filtered quickly in less than 5 minutes on a laboratory filter at 100 psi. The Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N of the filter cake was 12,000 mg/kg on an as is DD basis. The total phosphate as P of the filter cake was 4,600 mg/kg on an as is basis. The volatile solids, on a dry solids basis, of the filter cake was 73%.
For every pound of total solids, about 0.36 Ibs of C.O.D. appeared in the filtrate. This corresponds to a B.O.D. value of about 0.18 lbs of B.O.D. per pound of total solids. Also, the filtrate had a Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N of 4,400 mg/l, and the total phosphate as P of 560 mg/l.
3743/DCPAT 42 In terms of weight reduction, the 3,000 gms of siarting material at 27.% total solids produced about 770 gms of filter cake or about 25% of the original weight of the sludge.
The following table relates some metal concentrations on the initial material, the filter cake, and the filtrate.
s o c
D
r Table 11 Aluminum Cadmium Chromium 15 Copper Iron Lead Nickel Sulfate Zinc Initial Sludge at 27.5% Total Solids 2,400 mg/kg 2.3 130 91 3,400 30 3.9 150 Filter Cake at 63.0% Total Solids 6,000 mg/kg 5.1 270 210 6,000 60 8.1 310 Filtrate 26 mg/i 0.096 6.2 0.496 1,400 0.60 0.80 8,400 14 Example 17 Using a Process of the Invention for Pathogen Destruction A sample of an anaerobically digested sludge from a Mid-Atlantic municipal treatment facility was treated using the process of the invention similar to examples 1-6. The digested sludge was 15.0% total solids, and contained volatile solids (dry weight basis). The Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N was 8,300 mg/kg on an as is 0 basis, and also contained a total phosphate concentration as P of 3,000 mg/kg on an as is basis.
3743/DCPAT 43 To 3,000 gms of the material, 55 mis. of 93% sulfuric acid (1.84 was added, and the mixture was reacted in a laboratory pot at 330°F for 1 hour.
After this period of time, 370 mis. of a 10% calcium hydroxide was added, and the mixture was then subjected to 15 minutes of reaction time at 330 0
F.
Upon filtration, a filter cake of about 50.0% solids was achieved using a diaphragm squeeze. The cake was 58% volatile solids (dry weight basis), with a 10 BTU content of 6,300 BTU/LB. The Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N was 13,000 mg/kg on an as is basis, and also contained a total phosphate concentration as P of 6,700 mg/kg on an as is basis.
In terms of weight reduction, the 3,000 grams of 15 starting material at 15% solids produced about 570 gms of filter cake or 19% of the original weight of the sludge.
For every pound of total solids, about 0.32 Ibs. of C.O.D. appeared in the filtrate. This value 20 corresponds to a B.O.D. weight of about 0.16 Ibs. of B.O.D. per pound of total solids.
A pathogen analysis was done on the starting material, on the filter cake, and on the filter cake after 4.0% (by weight) of calcium hydroxide was added to the filter cake (See Table 12) These data indicate that the sludge meets PFRP criteria for proposed class A sludge with respect to pathogens.
3743/DCPAT 44 Table 12
PORI
Sludgo Treatment Anaerobically PORI Treatment with Liming S Digested Before Liming to pH 12 A. Bacteria (MPN/gram of SS) Fecal Streptococci 4.5 x 102 0.2 0.1 10 Fecal Coliform 10.0 0.04* 0.04* Salmonella 6.0 0.04* 0.04*
S
B. Eneric Viruses (MPN-1U/100 grams of SS) 6.0 5* 2* S C. Parasite Eggs Viable Eggs/Kg of SS) Ascaris eggs 1,580 70* Toxacara eggs 680 70* 20 COMMENTS: The sludge meets PFRP criteria or Proposed 503 Class A Sludge with respect to pathogens.
e "Below detection limit The foregoing examples also illustrate utilities of the products produced by the process of the invention.
a2 Illustrative of the utilities of the materials which result from the processes of the invention are: incineration, land fill, composting, fertilizer, soil amendment, top soil manufacturing, soil conditioning, interim land cover, fuel, land and mine reclamation and 3743/DCPAT 45 construction materials. For example, the filter cakes which result from the processes of this invention have a high BTU/LB value. These BTU/LB values are high enough so that the materials which result from the S process of the invention can be employed as fuels.
Workers of ordinary skill will readily be able to optimize process conditions for fuel production.
Granular materials which can result from processes of this invention can be employed in soil treatment and in farming and agriculture such as fertilizers and other soil treatment materials such as farming aids.
In such instances, the filter cake resulting from the process is ground up using conventional equipment, e.
a turbulator or similar grinder. Lime can be added .IS or cement kiln dust or other additives can be added as desired. The material, after being ground, can also be pelletized using a disk pelletizer or an extruder.
The soil treatment additive can be customized as above. For instance, when it is desired to raise the pH of the soil in a particular region, the material 3 resulting from the process of the invention can have mixed with it, lime, cement kiln dust, etc. If it is desired to employ the soil treatment agent, in Florida where there is little organic matter in the ZS soil and no need to alkalize the soil, no alkaline treatment may be needed. Nitrites or nitrates, such as sodium nitrite can also be added.
The criteria which are satisfied by the processes of this invention include stabilization and disinfection. The criteria for PFRP include the reduction of pathogens to below detectable levels; 3743/DCPAT 46 less than one PFU (plaque forming unit) for viruses, 3 CFR (count forming unit) for bacteria and one viable helminth egg per 100 ml of sludge. These levels can be achieved by the processes of this invention.
4 3743/DCPAT
Claims (25)
1. A process for enhancing the dewaterability of concentrated waste sludges which have a substantial content of a v/ater-retaining cellular structure arising from microbiological action comprising: 1) adjusting the pH of said sludge to a value of 4 or less; 2) heat treating said sludge without the addition of an oxygen-bearing gas or oxidizing agent at a temperature between about 260°F and 390°F for a sufficient time to maintain its enhanced filterability; 3) readjusting the pH of said sludge to within about 2 points of neutral and heat treating this neutralized or partially neutralized sludge at a temperature between about 260 and 390°F for a sufficient time to maintain its enhanced filterability.
2. The process of claim 2 wherein the time at temperature is sufficient that a fifty gram sample or the concentrated waste sludge when mixed with an equal weight of water can be filtered at 140°F a) to solids content in excess of about 55 weight percent; b) in less than about 30 minutes; using a recessed chamber membrane pressure filter with filtration pressure of 100 psi and a squeeze pressure of 175 psi.
3. The process of claim 2 wherein the concentrated waste sludge is subjected to a temperature between 270°F and 390°F by direct contact with pressurized steram.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein the steam is injected into the body of the concentrated waste sludge to bring it up to the treatment temperature.
5. The process of claim 3 wherein the time at temperature is sufficient that the 25 dewaterability of the concentrated waste sludge is not significantly affected by subjecting the heat treated material to substantial shear.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein the sludge is heat treated as a unitary mass.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein the pH readjusting is effected with an ionic calcium compound. 30
8. The process of claim 7 wherein the pH readjusting is effected with cement kiln dust.
9. The process of claim 7 wherein the pH readjustment is effected with calcium hydroxide.
10. The process of claim 1 wherein pathogens present in said sludge are rendered essentially inactive. 3 5
11. A process of claim 1 wherein the resultant sludge contains less than about 1 PFU, less than about 3 CFR and no more than one viable helminth egg per about 100 ml of sludge.
12. A process of dewatering relatively high solids content waste sludges while minimizing the COD and BOD load of the resultant effluent, said sludges having a substantial content of a water retaining a cellular structure arising from microbiological ction which does not permit significant further dewatering by a simple room temperature filtration on a recessed chamber filter at a filtration pressure of 100 psi, comprising the steps of: 1) adjusting the pH of said sludge to a value of less than about 4; 2) heat treating the acidified sludge at a temperature between about 290° and 370°F by direct contact with pressurized steam for a period between about 15 minutes and three hours sufficient that the ultimate dewaterability of the concentrated waste sludge is not significantly affected by subjected the heat treated neutralized material to substantial shear; 3) neutralizing the heat treated sludge to a pH greater than about 5 with a basic calcium compound; 4) heat treating the neutralized sludge at a temperature of at least about 260°F in excess of about 5 minutes; and filtering the heat treated neutralized sludge to a water content of less than about 55 weight percent in less than about two hours.
13. The process of claim 1 wherein the minimum heat treatment time and the pH of the concentrated waste sludge are correlated in accordance with the formula y bmx wherein y is the treatment time in minutes, x is the pH of the sludge during heat treatment, b is 9.986 and m is 1.894.
14. A process for enhancing the dewaterability of concentrated waste sludge while minimizing the COD and BOD load of the resultant effluent, where said sludge has a solids content of about 7% or more by weight, and has a substantial content of a water-retaining cellular structure arising from microbiological action comprising 1) adjusting the pH of said sludge to a value of less than about 4, and then (2) heat treating said sludge without the addition of oxygen or an oxidizing agent, at a superatmospheric pressure sufficient to maintain the liquid in said sludge in its liquid state, and at a temperature between about 260°F (126°C) and 390°F (199 0 C) for a sufficient time S. to enhance and maintain the enhanced filterability of said sludge, wherein the time of heat treatment of said sludge in said elevated temperature range is sufficient that a fifty gram sample of the concentrated waste sludge when mixed with an equal weight of water can be filtered at 140 0 F 30 a) to solids content in excess of about 55 weight percent; in less than about 30 minutes; using a recessed chamber membrane pressure filter with filtration pressure of 100 psi and a squeeze pressure of 175 psi and wherein the dewaterability of the concentrated waste sludge is not significantly effected by subjecting the heat treated material 35 to shear.
15. The process of claim 14 wherein the concentrated waste sludge is subjected to a temperature between about 270°F and 390°F by direct contact with pressurized steam.
16. The process of claim 14 wherein the steam is injected into the body of the concentrated waste sludge to bring it up to the treatment temperature. -0 d Js
17. The process of claim 14 wherein the time at said temperature is sufficient that the dewaterability of the concentrated waste sludge is not significantly affected by subje. !ng the heat treated material to substantial shear.
18. The process of claim 14 wherein the sludge is heat treated as a unitary mass. s
19. The process of claim 14 wherein pathogens present in said sludge are rendered essentially inactive.
A process of claim 14 wherein the resultant sludge contains less than about 1 PFU, less than about 3 CFR and no more than one viable helminth egg per about 100 ml of sludge.
21. The process of claim 1 wherein the solid content of said concentrated waste sludges is in the range of from about 7% to about
22. The process of claim 12 wherein the solid content of said waste sludges is in the range of from about 7% to about
23. A process for enhancing the dewaterability of concentrated waste sludges which have a substantial content of a water retaining cellular structure arising from microbiological action substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any one of the Examples or Figure I.
24. A process of dewatering relatively high solids content waste sludges while minimizing C.O.D. and B.O.D. load of the resultant effluent, said sludges having a substantial content of a water retaining cellular structure arising from microbiological action 20 which does not permit significant further dewatering by a simple room temperature filtration on a recessed chamber filter at a filtration pressure of 100 psi substantially as hereinbefore S described with reference to any one of the Examples of Figure I. S Dated 1 December, 1993
25 Pori International, Inc. 8* Patent Attorneys for the Applicant/Nominated Person SPRUSON FERGUSON 0 bxx100337:SEF l. Process for Enhancing the Dewaterability of Waste Sludge from Microbiological Digestion Abstract A process for enhancing the dewaterability of concentrated wr~ste sludges which have a substantial content of a water retaining cellular structure arising from microbiological action by heat treating them at temperatures in excess of about 260 0 F is disclosed. A preferred embodiment involves the use of treatment temperatures of less than about 390F and consequently a treatment pressure of less than about 200 psig. The heat treatment is advantageously conducted by direct contact between the concentrated waste sludge and pressurised steam. The effect of the heat treatment may be accelerated by adjusting the p1I of the sludge to an extreme value, particularly an acid value of about 4 or less. It is beneficial to neutralise the concentrated waste sludge before dewatering it and it is advantageous to neutralise before completing the heat treatment. In such a system, sludge is introduced through a sludge hopper or closed storage tank A positive displacement pump can be used to feed the sludge. Acid is introduced to the sludge through a mixing tee at and mixed with the sludge in acid mixer Steam is introduced to raise the temperature, downstream of the acid mixer, at The acid is allowed to react with the sludge and acidify the sludge in the acid mixer and the reaction is completed in acid reactor The pH can be adjusted to a value of with sulfuric acid and the process can be operated at 100 PSIG at a Stemperature of 330 0 OF (sludge temperature). Lime is introduced via lime mixer Most of the neutralisation takes place in lime mixer Neutralisation of the acidified sludge is completed in the neutral reactor The residence time in the acid reactor is o 25 preferably about 1 hour and in the neutral reactor, preferably 15 minutes. The portion of the system through the neutral reactor is pressurised, because steam is introduced under pressure through the mixing tee. The pressure is released through pressure letdowns and then fed to a separator At the separator, steam is recycled to the S" sludge storage tank or hopper Sludge is fed to a filter feed tank Cooling water may be added to the sludge at this point. The cooled sludge is then fed to a filter The filt:ation operation results in filter cakes which are deposited at zone Filtrate is fed to a filtrate holding tank (12) where it is held and subsequently recycled to, e.g., the waste water treatment system which originally produced the sludge. If desired for odour control, off gases can be collected and treated in thermal oxidiser (13) which is fed with combustion gas fron source (14). Figure 1.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US531059 | 1990-05-31 | ||
| US07/531,059 US5087378A (en) | 1990-05-31 | 1990-05-31 | Process for enhancing the dewaterability of waste sludge from microbiological digestion |
| US77332491A | 1991-10-11 | 1991-10-11 |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU76431/91A Division AU630809B2 (en) | 1990-05-31 | 1991-05-08 | Process for enhancing the dewaterability of waste sludge from microbiological digestion |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU2636092A AU2636092A (en) | 1992-12-17 |
| AU648934B2 true AU648934B2 (en) | 1994-05-05 |
Family
ID=27063454
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU26360/92A Ceased AU648934B2 (en) | 1990-05-31 | 1992-10-12 | Process for enhancing the dewaterability of waste sludge from microbiological digestion |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| AU (1) | AU648934B2 (en) |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3922221A (en) * | 1971-01-28 | 1975-11-25 | Rheinstahl Ag | Process for conditioning sewage sludges |
| US4221661A (en) * | 1978-06-20 | 1980-09-09 | Kurita Water Industries Ltd. | Method of dehydrating organic sludge |
| EP0189155A1 (en) * | 1985-01-21 | 1986-07-30 | The Dow Chemical Company | Method for reduction of sewage sludge from sewage clarification plants |
-
1992
- 1992-10-12 AU AU26360/92A patent/AU648934B2/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3922221A (en) * | 1971-01-28 | 1975-11-25 | Rheinstahl Ag | Process for conditioning sewage sludges |
| US4221661A (en) * | 1978-06-20 | 1980-09-09 | Kurita Water Industries Ltd. | Method of dehydrating organic sludge |
| EP0189155A1 (en) * | 1985-01-21 | 1986-07-30 | The Dow Chemical Company | Method for reduction of sewage sludge from sewage clarification plants |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU2636092A (en) | 1992-12-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5087378A (en) | Process for enhancing the dewaterability of waste sludge from microbiological digestion | |
| EP0536963A1 (en) | Process for enhancing the dewaterability of waste sludge from microbiological digestion | |
| US4675114A (en) | Process for dewatering municipal and other sewage sludges | |
| US6368511B1 (en) | Conditioning method for dehydrating clarification sludge | |
| US3649534A (en) | Wet oxidation of acidified activated sludge | |
| US5861100A (en) | Method of waste water treatment by flocculating sedimentation | |
| EP0625961B1 (en) | Effluent treatment process | |
| JP2005510354A (en) | Methods for stabilizing and treating urban and industrial wastewater sludge | |
| CA1074925A (en) | Solid-liquid separation method for organic waste sludge | |
| US4988442A (en) | Process for dewatering of biological sludge | |
| US4208283A (en) | Process for treatment of waste waters | |
| Wu et al. | Wet air oxidation of anaerobically digested sludge | |
| CN110776136A (en) | Pretreatment method for process wastewater generated in preparation of long-chain dicarboxylic acid by biological fermentation method | |
| JP6131465B2 (en) | Sludge dewatering method | |
| US3440165A (en) | Waste treatment process with recycling of lime | |
| AU648934B2 (en) | Process for enhancing the dewaterability of waste sludge from microbiological digestion | |
| Hyder et al. | Management of digestate from anaerobic digestion of municipal sludge | |
| CA2016310A1 (en) | Method of treating waste water | |
| RU2342204C1 (en) | Method for wastes recycling | |
| Abd Roni et al. | An Overview of the Removal Phosphorus in Wastewater | |
| Rabea et al. | Applying Mechanical Sludge Dewatering with Wood Chips to Foster Sustainability in Wastewater Treatment Plants | |
| MH | Utilization of cement kiln dust in domestic sewage sludge treatment for safe disposal and environmental protection | |
| Rudolfs | A Survey of Recent Developments in the Treatment of Industrial Wastes | |
| Murthy et al. | Biosolids processing from advanced digestion systems: experiences with the ATAD process | |
| Fernandez et al. | An evaluation of the options for secondary treatment of effluents produced from the anaerobic digestion of simulated coffee wastewaters |