AU2011381327B2 - Method for evaluating binding strength of mechanical composite pipe - Google Patents
Method for evaluating binding strength of mechanical composite pipe Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU2011381327B2 AU2011381327B2 AU2011381327A AU2011381327A AU2011381327B2 AU 2011381327 B2 AU2011381327 B2 AU 2011381327B2 AU 2011381327 A AU2011381327 A AU 2011381327A AU 2011381327 A AU2011381327 A AU 2011381327A AU 2011381327 B2 AU2011381327 B2 AU 2011381327B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- composite pipe
- mechanical composite
- pipe
- tested
- excitation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M7/00—Vibration-testing of structures; Shock-testing of structures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N2203/02—Details not specific for a particular testing method
- G01N2203/0202—Control of the test
- G01N2203/0212—Theories, calculations
- G01N2203/0218—Calculations based on experimental data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N3/32—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying repeated or pulsating forces
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
A method for evaluating the binding strength of a mechanical composite pipe comprises the following steps: selecting a standard mechanical composite pipe; imposing excitation on the standard mechanical composite pipe in specific manner, recording an excitation force signal, collecting acceleration signals in real time, and obtaining a modal parameter value of the standard mechanical composite pipe after analysis; imposing the same excitation on a mechanical composite pipe under test in the same manner, collecting acceleration signals at corresponding points in real time, and obtaining the same modal parameter value of the mechanical composite pipe under test after analysis; comparing the two modal parameter values; and determining, according to a comparison result, whether the binding strength of the mechanical composite pipe under test meet requirements, thereby solving the problems in the prior art that the destructive test needs to be performed, the test error is big, the cost is high, the efficiency is low, and the on-line test cannot be performed.
Description
METHOD FOR EVALUATING BINDING STRENGTH OF MECHANICAL
COMPOSITE PIPE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The invention relates to the field of the technology for evaluating the mechanical performance, and more particularly to a method for evaluating a bonding strength of a mechanioal composite pipe.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The liner pipe and the base pipe of a mechanical composite pipe are bonded together by means of the relative deformation thereof. No metallurgical bonding interface is formed between the liner pipe and the base pipe. The bonding of the liner pipe and base pipe is maintained primarily by a radial residual stress of the base pipe on the liner pipe. Thus, the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe decides the service environment thereof.
[0003] Typical indexes for evaluating the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe include axial shear separation strength and radial clamping force. The axial shear separation strength refers to an interfacial shear stress in the axial direction when relative slide occurs between the base pipe and the liner pipe under the force of an external load. The radial clamping force refers to a radial compression residual stress acting on an outer surface of the liner pipe after the base pipe and the liner pipe are re-bonded.
[0004] To evaluate the above Lwo indexes, a desLrucLive sampling means is generally used. The destructive sampling means include: a residual stress release method for measuring the radial clamping force, and an axial compression or an axial tension method for measuring the axial shear strength. The residual stress release method is a method for calculating the hoop residual stress of the composite pipe by measuring the variation of the axial strain and the hoop strain of the liner pipe before and after the removal of the base pipe. The axial extension or axial compression method is a method for measuring a maximum axial shear stress by extending or compressing the liner pipe and (lie base pipe to cause relative slide.
[0005] The above two measuring methods have three drawbacks. First, the two evaluating methods belong to the destructive testing, and the testing cost is high. Second; the testing methods are troublesome; and the testing speed is low, it generally takes two or three days to evaluate the bonding strength of the composite pipe by using the residual stress method or the axial extension or axial compression method. Third, the sampling can be achieved only at two ends of the composite pipe. The testing has a large error, and the reliability of the testing result is low.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] In view of the above-described problems, it is one objective of the invention to provide a method for evaluating a bonding strengLh of a mechanical composite pipe. The method solves Hie problems in the prior aits that the destiuctive test is required, the test has a large testing error, high production costs, low efficiency, and is unable to be conducted on-line.
[0007] Technical scheme of the invention is as follows: a method for evaluating a bonding strength of a mechanical composite pipe, the method comprising the following steps: [0008] F) selecting a standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe having the same material and the same specification as the mechanical composite pipe to be tested has and having a bonding strength satisfying evaluating requirements; [0009] 2) exerting an excitation force on the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe obtained from step 1) by a certain method; recording an excitation force signal: real time gathering an acceleration signal at specific points; analyzing and processing obtained signals; and acquiring values of modal parameters of the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe; [0010] 3) using the same operations in step 2), exerting the same excitation on the mechanical composite pipe to be tested; real time gathering an acceleration signal thereof at corresponding specific points; analyzing and processing obtained signals; and acquiring values of the same modal parameters of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested; and [0011 ] 4) comparing the values of the modal parameters of the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe obtained in step 2) with the values of the modal parameters of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested obtained in step 3), and detennining whether the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified according to a comparison result.
[0012] The standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe in step 1) is specifically selected as Follows: [0013] 1.1) providing a base pipe and a liner pipe having the same material, the some outer diameter, the same wall thickness, and the same length as the mechanical composite pipe to be tested have, and assembling the base pipe and the liner pipe in coaxial to obtain a mechanical composite pipe before standardization; [0014] 1.2) standardization [0015] 1.2.1) initial loading [0016] disposing sealing devices on two ends of the composite pipe obtained in step 1.1), and attaching an axial strain gauge and a hoop strain gauge at a middle point position right above an outer part of the base pipe; [0017] injecting water into an inner cavity of the liner pipe, controlling an injection speed equivalent to an increase of 0.01 J-0.005 magapascal per min of a hydrostatic pressure in the liner pipe, and dynamically gathering and recording a hoop strain £fl and an axial strain z of the base pipe; and [0018] calculating a real time hoop stress σθ of an inner surface of the base pipe according to the hoop strain 0 and the axial strain z; stopping water injection and unloading water when σθ > ; calculating a hoop residual stress σ 0 according to a hoop stress ε 9 and an axial stress ε z of the base pipe after unloading water; and obtaining a mechanical composite pipe alter standardization if <7* to,-fa* ^σ'β is satisfied, in which, is a preset minimum hoop stress value, or otherwise, conducting step 1.2.2); [0019] 1.2.2) repeated loading [0020] injecting water into the inner cavity of the liner pipe again, controlling the injection speed equivalent to the increase of 0.01±0.005 magapascal per min of the hydrostatic pressure in the liner pipe; unloading water after one minute of water injection: gathering the hoop stress ε 0 and the axial stress ε - of the base pipe after unloading water and calculating the hoop residual stress σ e; and obtaining the mechanical composite pipe after standardization when < σ e <1.5is satisfied, or otherwise,-repealing step 1.2.2) until rrftUll,iw7i < σ'e < 1 -^aimdard is satisfied; and [0021] 1.2.3) removing the sealing devices disposed at two ends of the mechanical composite pipe after standardization, and obtaining the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe.
[0022] The modal parameter is a natural frequency CO . Step 2) specifically comprises: horizontally disposing the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe having a length of 1 obtained in step 1) on two V-grooves; regulating positions of the two V-grooves to vertically align an external end face of a supporting part of each of the two V-grooves with each external end face of the composite pipe, respectively; disposing an acceleration sensor at the middle point position right above the outer part of the base pipe; exerting an excitation force on the base pipe by an excitation device; controlling a horizontal distance between a position for exerting excitation and the acceleration sensor within arange ofbetween and 7//10- connecting both the acceleration sensor and the excitation device to a computer via a dynamic signal acquisition device; conducting frequency response analysis by the computer according to the real Lime acceleration signal and the excitation force signal gathered by the dynamic signal acquisition device; and obtaining the natural frequency C0,tmiiaril of the standard piece of the mechanical composite device by recognition of the modal parameter.
[0023] Step 3) comprises: adopting the same method of step 2) to obtain a natural frequency Ό) u of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested.
[0024] Step 4) comprises: comparing the natural frequency a)S3mpling of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested obtained in step 3) with the natural frequency C0simd3rd of the standard piece of the mechanical composite device obtained in step 2); and determining the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified if Sampling — Qtmdam ’ or otherwise, determining the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is not qualified.
[0025] The modal parameter is a damping ξ. Step 2) specifically comprises: horizontally disposing the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe having the length of l obtained in step 1) on the two V-grooves; regulating positions of the two V-grooves to vertically align the external end face of the supporting part of each of the two V-grooves with each external end face of the composite pipe, respectively; disposing the accelerat ion sensor at. the middle point position right above the outer part of the base pipe; exerting an excitation force on the base pipe by the excitation device; controlling the horizontal distance between the position for exerting excitation and the acceleration sensor within the range of between 10 and 1 rj; connecting both the acceleration sensors and the excitation device to the computer via the dynamic signal acquisition device; conducting frequency response analysis by the computer according to the real time acceleration signal and the excitation force signal gathered by the dynamic signal acquisition device; and obtaining the damping ξ of the standard piece of the mechanical composite device by recognition of the modal parameter.
[0026] Step 3) comprises: adopting the same operations in step 2) to obtain a damping ξ\amviing of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested.
[0027] Step 4) comprises: comparing the damping ξ of the meohanical composite pipe to be tested obtained in step 3) with the natural frequency 4nmdard of the standard piece of the mechanical composite device obtained in step 2); and determining the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified if 4sampling - Standard* or otherwise, determining the bonding strength of the meohanical composite pipe to be tested is not qualified.
[0028] The modal parameter is transfer rate η. Step 2) specifically comprises: horizontally disposing the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe having the length of 1 obtained in sLep 1) on the Lwo V-grooves; regulaLing positions of Lhe two V-grooves to vertically align the external end face of the supporting part of each of the two V-grooves with each external end face of the composite pipe, respectively. Disposing a first acceleration sensor at a position A of an opening right above an inner part of the liner pipe, and disposing a second acceleration sensor at a position B of the middle point right above the outer pail of the base pipe; exerting excitation on the base pipe by the excitation device; connecting both the acceleration sensors and the excitation device to the computer via the dynamic signal acquisition device; analyzing the obtained signals by the computer to obtain a time domain signal at the position A and a time domain signal ^(0 at the position B; conducting Fourier transform to obtain and dividing by to obtain a transfer rate i]simiar!t of the acceleration at the position A in relative to the acceleration at the position B, in which, 0 ^ Tj,tadtrd < 1.
[0029] Step 3) comprises; adopting the same operations of step 2) to obtain a transfer rate Ή sampling °f the mechanical composite pipe to be tested. 100301 Step 4) comprises: comparing the transferrate Tj,ampljng of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested obtained in step 3) with the transfer rate //.dqrri of the standard piece of the mechanical composite device obtained in step 2); and determining the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified if ihomytin)' — 7,undard > or otherwise, determining the bonding strength of Lhe mechanical composite pipe to be tested is not qualified.
[0031] Advantages according to embodiments of the invention are summarized as follows: [0032] 1. Excitations are exerted on the selected standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe and the mechanical composite pipe to be tested, respectively, to obtain the modal parameters are; and the model parameters are compared to know whether the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified. Thus, the invention does not require pipe destruction, thereby lowering the testing cost.
[0033] 2. The method of the invention is simple and reasonable, it is proved from extensive experiments that the method of the invention has small testing errors and reliable results for each modal parameter.
[0034] 3. The method of the invention is simple and accessible and has high testing efficiency. It requires no more than one minute to test one composite pipe, so that the on line real time testing of the bonding strength of the composite pipe can be realized. Furthermore, the method of the invention is superior to the sampling method in that it decreases the testing error; and comparing with the residual stress method and the axial compression or the axial tension method in the prior art, the method of the invention has high testing accuracy.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0035] FIG. 1 is a structure diagram of a mechanical composite pipe of the invention; [0036] FIG. 2 is a structure diagram of a vibration model having two degrees of freedom of a mechanical composite pipe of the method of the invention; and [0037] FIG. 3 is a structure diagram of a mechanical composite pipe exerted with excitation by using the method of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
[0038] For further illustrating the invention, experiments detailing a method for evaluating a bonding strength of a meohanical composite pipe are described hereinbelow combined with the drawings.
[0039] As shown in FIG. 1, a mechanical composite pipe 1 comprises a base pipe 2 and a liner pipe 3 disposed inside the base pipe 2.
Example 1 [0040] A method for evaluating a bonding strength of a mechanical composite pipe, the method comprises the following steps: [0041] Step 1): Select a standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe having the same material and the same specification as the mechanical composite pipe to be tested has and having a bonding strength satisfying evaluating requirements. In other words, the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe has the same material, the same ouLer diameter, the same wall thickness, and the same length as the mechanical composite pipe to be tested has.
[0042] The standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe in step 1) is specifically selected as follows: [0043] Step 1.1): provide a base pipe and a liner pipe having the same material, the same outer diameter, the same wall thickness, and the same length as the mechanical composite pipe to be tested has, and assembling the base pipe and the liner pipe in coaxial to obtain a mechanical composite pipe before standardization; [0044] Step 1.2): standardization [0045] Step 1.2.1): initial loading [0046] dispose sealing devices on two ends of the composite pipe obtained in step 1.1), and attaoh an axial strain gauge and a hoop strain gauge at a middle point position right above an outer part of the base pipe; [0047] inject water into an inner cavity of the liner pipe, control an injection speed equivalent to an increase of 0.01+0.005 magapascal per min of a hydrostatic pressure in the liner pipe, and dynamically gather and record a hoop strain C9 and an axial strain c z of the base pipe; and [0048] calculate a real time hoop stress <Jg of an inner surfaoe of the base pipe according to an equation
, in which, r2 represents an inner diameter of the base pipe, r3 represents an outer diameter of the base pipe, E represent an elastic modulus of the base pipe, and V represents a Poisson's ratio of the base pipe; stop water injection and unload water when og > cra.ttndard; calculate a hoop residual stress σ e according to a hoop stress Ee and an axial stress ε = of the base pipe after unloading water; and obtain a mechanical composite pipe after standardization if VatmArt onward « satisfied, in which, Ga.taadard is a preset minimum hoop stress value, or otherwise, conduct step 1.2.2.
[0049] step 1.2.2): repeated loading [0050] Inject water into the inner cavity of the liner pipe again, control the injection speed equivalent to the increase of 0.01+0.005 magapascal per inin of the hydrostatic pressure in the liner pipe; unload water after one minute of water injection; gather the hoop stress ε e and the axial stress ε i of the base pipe after unloading water and calculate the hoop residual stress σ e; and obtain the mechanical composite pipe after standardization when σβ,< σβ < 1 5t!mdard ls satisfied, or otherwise, repeat step 1.2.2) until ffmmdard < σ 0 ^^omXmdaid is satisfied; and [0051] Step 1.2.3): remove the sealing devices disposed at two ends of the mechanical composite pipe after standardization, and obtain the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe.
[0052] The selection of the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe in step 1) can be directly determined according to the designation of the user to meet different requirements of the users.
[0053] Step 2): exert an excitation force on the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe obtained from step 1) by a certain method; record an excitation force signal; real time gather an acceleration signal at specific points; analytical process obtained signals; and acquire a nature frequency OX.Umiard of the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe.
[0054] Step 2) is specifically conducted as follows: [0055] As shown in FIG. 3, horizontally dispose the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe having a length of 1 obtained in step 1) on two V-grooves 2; and regulate positions of the two λ’-grooves 2 to vertically align an external end face of a supporting part of each of the two V-groovcs 2 with each external end face of the composite pipe, respectively.
[0056] Dispose an acceleration sensor 4 at the middle point position right above the outer part of the base pipe, the acceleration sensor 4 has a sensitivity generally being equal to or larger than 100 mv/g. Exert an excitation force on the base pipe by an excitation device 3. Control a horizontal distance between a position for exerting excitation and the acceleration sensor 4 within a range of between 1110 and 7//10 . Connect both the acceleration sensor 4 and the excitation device to a computer via a dynamic signal acquisition device (DHDAS5920). Conduct frequency response analysis by using modal analysis software (DHMA) in the computer according to the real time acceleration signal and the excitation force signal gathered by the dynamic signal acquisition device. Obtain the natural frequency 0)slmdard of the standard piece of the mechanical composite device by recognition of the modal parameter.
[0057] A selection criteria of the excitation device is that a rubber hammer head is adopted if an estimated nature frequency is less than or equal to 200 Hz, a nvlon hammer head is adopted if the estimated nature frequency is between 200 Hz and 500 Hz, and a metal hammer head is adopted if an estimated nature frequency is larger than 500 Hz.
[0058] Step 3): use the same operations in step 2), exert the same excitation on the mechanical composite pipe to be tested; real time gather the acceleration signal thereof at corresponding specific points; analytical process obtained signals; and acquire the natural frequency io u of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested; and [0059] Step 3) is specifically conducted as follows: [0060] Horizontally dispose the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe having the length of 1 obtained in step 2) on the two V-grooves; and regulate positions of the two V-grooves to vertically align the external end face of the supporting part of each of the two V-grooves with each external end face of the composite pipe, respectively.
[0061] Dispose the acceleration sensor at the middle point position right above the outer part of the base pipe, the acceleration sensor has the sensitivity generally being equal to or larger than 100 mv/g. Exert an excitation force on the base pipe by an excitation device. The excitation device, and the position, the excitation force, and the way the excitation being exerted arc all the same as those of step 2). The position for gathering the acceleration senor is the same as that of step 2). Conneot both the acceleration sensor and the excitation device to the computer via the dynamic signal acquisition device. Conduct frequency response analysis by using the computer aeoording to the real time acceleration signal and the excitation force signal gathered by the dynamic signal acquisition device.
Obtain the natural frequency G)sampUrig of the mechanical composite device to be tested by recognition of the modal parameter.
[0062] Step 4): compare the natural frequency 0)mmpling of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested obtained in step 3) with the natural frequency 6)slmdard of the standard piece of the meohanioal composite device obtained in step 2); and determine the bonding ,strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified if cosamrMnf, > > or otherwise, determine the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is not qualified.
Example 2 [0063] In this Example, the modal parameter for evaluating the bonding strength of the composite pipe is a damping ξ . In step 2). conduct the frequency response analysis of the acceleration signal and the excitation force signal to acquire the damping ^nmda.d of the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe. In step 3), conduct the frequency response analysis of the acceleration signal and the excitation force signal of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested to acquire the damping ^7!impll„g of the mechanioal composite pipe to be tested. Other operations from step 1) to step 3) are the same as those in Example 1. 100641 In step 4), compare the damping %sampUng of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested obtained in step 3) with the natural frequency %.nmda,d of the standard piece of the mechanical composite device obtained in step 2); and determine the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified if ζ„ηρ·ιίηί < ^sianjard > or otherwise, determine the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is not qualified.
[0065] 1. Relation between the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe and the normal stiffness of the bonding interface: [0066] According to a fractal model of a normal contact stiffness of a rough surface, and providing that the contact surface is isotropic and interaction between asperities of the rough surface can be ignored, then, a dimensionless normal stiffness of the mechanical bonding interface can be expressed as follows: [0067]
[0068] in which, » refers to a normal contact stiffness of the dimensionless mechanical bonding surface, refers to a dimensionless real contact area, D refers to a fractal dimension of the bonding surface, and refers to a dimensionless critical contact area.
[0069] When plastic deformation occurs on the contact surface, the relation between a normal load and the contact area between two cylinders arc expressed as follows:
[0070] [0071] [0072] in which, p refers to a dimensionless normal force, G refers a dimensionless fractal roughness parameter, k refers to a coefficient relates to a hardness and a yield strength of a material, s' and ^2 refer to functions of a fractal dimension D.
[0073] According to the relation of the normal contact stiffness of the dimensionless mechanical bonding surface and the dimensionless nonnal force, it is known that the stiffness of the mechanical bonding interface increases along with the increase of the normal load.
[0074] Because the mechanical composite pipe is formed by adopting the underwater blasting technology to make plastic deformation occur in the base pipe and the liner pipe to realize the meohanical attachment, the bonding strength of the meolianioal composite pipe relates to the radial residual stress of the interface between the base pipe and the liner pipe, that is, the larger the radial residual stress is, the higher the bonding strength of the composite pipe is. The radial residual stress of the composite pipe is expressed as σ = P !A ^ in which, P is the nonnal force of the bonding surface of the composite pipe, and A is the real contact area of the composite pipe.
[0075] In summary, the higher the bonding strength is, Lhe larger the normal load of the bonding interface is; whereas the larger the normal load of the bonding interface is, die larger the normal stiffness of the bonding interface is; thus, the higher the bonding strength is, the larger the nonnal stiffness of the bonding interface is.
[0076] 2. Relation between the nonnal stiffness of the bonding interface and the nature frequency of the composite pipe [0077] As the interface between the base pipe and the liner pipe of the mechanical composite pipe is relatively complicate, it is difficult to use a vibration model having an infinite degree of freedom to theoretically analyze the influence of the bonding interface of the base pipe and the liner pipe on the dynamic characteristic of the composite pipe. To decrease the difficulty of the analysis, the transverse vibration of the simple supports of the two ends of the composite pipe is simplified into a vibration model having two degrees of freedom. As shown in I-IG. 2, mx represents a weight of the base pipe, m, represents a weight of the liner pipe, /q represents a bending stiffness of the composite pipe, kl represents an interface stiffness between the base pipe and the liner pipe, c represents an interface damping between the base pipe and the liner pipe, and 03 represents the nature frequency of the model system. The interface stiffness and the interface damping between the base pipe and the liner pipe are imitated by the spring stiffness and damping element, respectively.
[0078] A differential equation of motion is: [0079]
[0080] A characteristic equation is: [0081]
[0082] So that,
----1”'2 [0083] When
[0084] Derivate of k2 is as follows: [0085]
[00861
[0087] Similarly, when
[0088] Results of derivate of k2 is: [0089]
[0090] From the above analysis, it is known that ^071 ^2 is always larger than zero, 2 k Jc and w increases with the increase of 2. Since 2 represents thenonnal stiifness of the bonding interface of the base pipe and the liner pipe, it is concluded that the larger the nonnal stiffness of the bonding interface is, the higher the nature frequency is.
[0091] 3. Relation between the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe and the nature frequency and the damping: [0092] Based on the analysis conclusion of the relation between the bonding strength and the normal stiffness of the bonding interface (the higher the bonding strength is, the larger the nonnal stiffness of the bonding interface is) and the analysis conclusion of the relation between the normal stiffness of tire bonding interface and the nature frequency (the larger the nonnal stiffness of the bonding interface is, the higher the nature frequency is), it is known that the higher bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe is, the higher natural frequency is.
[0093] Meanwhile, as shown in the following fable, the nature frequency and damping of a plurality of the mechanical composite pipes are obtained by using the method of the invention; the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipes are obtained by using the shear separation destructive testing method; and it is concluded that the higher the bonding strength of the composite pipe is, the higher the nature frequency is, and the smaller the damping is and that the accuracy of the method for evaluating the bonding strength of mechanical composite pipe of the invention is verified. For a mechanical composite pipe having a specification of 76 x (6+2), the outer diameter of the mechanical composite pipe is 76 mm, the wall thickness of the base pipe is 6 mm, and a wall thickness of the liner pipe is 2 mm. For a mechanical composite pipe having a specification of 219 x (14.3+3), the outer diameter of the mechanical composite pipe is 219 mm, the wall thickness of the base pipe is 14.3 mm, and a wall thickness of the liner pipe is 3 mm.
Example 3 [0094] In this example, the modal parameter for evaluating the bonding strength of the composite pipe is a transfer rate //. Operation of step 1) is the same as that of Example 1. 100951 Step 2): exert an excitation force on the standard piece of the meohanical composite pipe obtained from step 1); record the excitation force signal; real time gather the acceleration signal at specific points; analytical process obtained signals; and acquire the transfer rate l]slmda,d of the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe.
[0096] Step 2) is specifically conducted as follows: horizontally dispose the standard piece of the mechanical composite pipe having the length of 1 obtained in step 1) on the two V-grooves; regulate positions of the two V-grooves to vertically align the external end face of the supporting part of each of the two V-grooves with each external end face of the composite pipe, respectively.
[0097] Dispose a first acceleration sensor at a position A of an opening right above an inner part of the liner pipe, a distance a between the position A and the opening of the liner pipe satisfies 0<a<50mm. Dispose a second acceleration sensor at a position B of the middle point right above the outer part of the base pipe. Exert excitation on the base pipe by the excitation device; a position where the excitation is exerted is disposed between 100 mm and 500 mm on a right side of the position B. Connect both the acceleration sensors and the excitation device to the computer via the dynamic signal acquisition device. Analyze the obtained signals by the computer to obtain a time domain signal a^ at the position A and a time domain signal ^(0 at the position B; conduct Fourier transform to obtain and , and divide by to obtain a transfer rate 'r]nmdard of the acceleration at the position A in relation to the acceleration at the position B, in which, 0 < ljslmdard < 1.
[0098] Step 3): using the same operation of step 2), exert the same excitation force on the mechanical composite pipe to be tested; real time gather the acceleration signal at specific points; analytical process obtained signals; and acquire the transfer rate η u of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested, 0 < 'l]damph„P S1.
[0099] Step 4): compare the transfer rate TJmmpUns of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested obtained in step 3) with the transfer rate rj,fmdnrd of the standard piece of the mechanical composite device obtained in step 2); and determine the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified if i1samp,mf, ^ 1h\mdari > or otherwise, determine the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is not qualified.
[0100] In the method of the invention, the transfer rate η can also be the modal parameter to evaluate the bonding strength of the composite pipe. Transfer rate and bonding strength of a plurality of mechanical composite pipe are obtained by using the method of the invention and by using the shear destructive testing method in the prior art. It is known from the following table that the higher the bonding strength is, the larger the transfer rate is, and that the accuracy of the method for evaluating the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe of the invention is verified. For the mechanical composite pipe having the specification of 89 x (5+2), the outer diameter of the mechanical composite pipe is 89 mm, the wall thickness of llie base pipe is 5 mm, and the wall thickness of the liner pipe is 2 mm.
Claims (5)
- METHOD FOR EVALUATING BINDING STRENGTH OF MECHANICAL COMPOSITE PIPE CLAIMS I. A method for evaluating a bonding strength of a mechanical composite pipe to be tested, the mechanical composite pipe to be tested comprising a base pipe and a liner pipe, the liner pipe being disposed inside the base pipe, characterized in that the method comprising the following steps: 1) selecting a standard mechanical composite pipe having the same material and the same specification as the mechanical composite pipe to be tested has and having a bonding strength satisfying evaluating requirements; 2) exerting an excitation force on the standard mechanical composite pipe obtained from step 1); recording an excitation force signal; real time gathering an acceleration signal at multiple points of the standard mechanical composite pipe; analyzing and processing obtained signals; and acquiring values of modal parameters of the standard mechanical composite pipe; 3) using the same operations in step 2), exerting the same excitation force on the mechanical composite pipe to be tested; real time gathering an acceleration signal at corresponding multiple points of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested; analyzing and processing obtained signals; and acquiring values of the same modal parameters of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested; and 4) comparing the values of the modal parameters of the standard mechanical composite pipe obtained in step 2) with the values of the modal parameters of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested obtained in step 3), and determining whether the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested reaches a threshold value and whether the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified according to a comparison result.
- 2. The method of claim 1, characterized in that the standard mechanical composite pipe in step 1) is selected as follows: 1.1) providing a base pipe and a liner pipe having the same material, the same outer diameter, the same wall thickness, and the same length as the base pipe and the liner pipe of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested have, and assembling the base pipe and the liner pipe in coaxial to obtain a mechanical composite pipe; 1.2) disposing sealing devices on two ends of the composite pipe obtained in step 1.1), and attaching an axial strain gauge and a hoop strain gauge at a middle point position right above an outer part of the base pipe; 1.3) injecting water into an inner cavity of the liner pipe, controlling an injection speed equivalent to an increase of 0.01 ±0.005 megapascal per min of a hydrostatic pressure in the liner pipe, and dynamically gathering and recording a hoop strain £θ and an axial strain £z of the base pipe; 1.4) calculating a real time hoop stress °θ of an inner surface of the base pipe according to the hoop strain £θ and the axial strain £z; stopping water injection and unloading water when ~ ; calculating a hoop residual stress σ θ according to a hoop stress ε θ and an axial stress ε z of the base pipe after unloading water; and obtaining a mechanical composite pipe if -σ« -js satisfied, in which, σ^ηdard is a preset minimum hoop stress value, or otherwise, conducting step 1.5); 1.5) injecting water into the inner cavity of the liner pipe again, controlling the injection speed equivalent to the increase of 0.01 ±0.005 megapascal per min of the hydrostatic pressure in the liner pipe; unloading water after one minute of water injection; gathering the hoop stress ε θ and the axial stress ε < of the base pipe after unloading water and calculating the hoop residual stress σ θ; and obtaining the mechanical composite pipe when σ*ί3ηdard ~σθ jS satisfied, or otherwise, repeating step 1.5) until ^fttandard - σ θ — ^·$σabmdard jg satisfied; and 1.6) removing the sealing devices disposed at the two ends of the mechanical composite pipe, whereby obtaining the standard mechanical composite pipe.
- 3. The method of claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the modal parameter is a natural frequency ω ; step 2) comprises: horizontally disposing the standard mechanical composite pipe having a length of1 obtained in step 1) on two V-grooves; regulating positions of the two V-grooves to vertically align an external end face of a supporting part of each of the two V-grooves with each external end face of the composite pipe, respectively; disposing an acceleration sensor at the middle point position right above the outer part of the base pipe; exerting an excitation force on the base pipe by an excitation device; controlling a horizontal distance between a position for exerting excitation and the acceleration sensor within a range of between 1/10 and 11/10; connecting both the acceleration sensor and the excitation device to a computer via a dynamic signal acquisition device; conducting frequency response analysis by the computer according to the real time acceleration signal and the excitation force signal gathered by the dynamic signal acquisition device; and obtaining the natural frequency Standard 0f the standard mechanical composite pipe by recognition of the modal parameter; step 3) comprises: adopting the same method of step 2) to obtain a natural frequency ω°α™ρ1ίηζ of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested; and step 4) comprises: comparing the natural frequency of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested obtained in step 3) with the natural frequency of the standard mechanical composite pipe obtained in step 2); and determining the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified if ~ Q^ndard; or otherwise, determining the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is not qualified.
- 4. The method of claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the modal parameter is a damping ^; step 2) comprises: horizontally disposing the standard mechanical composite pipe having the length of1 obtained in step 1) on the two V-grooves; regulating positions of the two V-grooves to vertically align the external end face of the supporting part of each of the two V-grooves with each external end face of the composite pipe, respectively; disposing the acceleration sensor at the middle point position right above the outer part of the base pipe; exerting an excitation force on the base pipe by the excitation device; controlling the horizontal distance between the position for exerting excitation and the acceleration sensor within the range of between 1/10 and7//1°; connecting both the acceleration sensors and the excitation device to the computer via the dynamic signal acquisition device; conducting frequency response analysis by the computer according to the real time acceleration signal and the excitation force signal gathered by the dynamic signal acquisition device; and obtaining the damping ^itandarf of the standard mechanical composite pipe by recognition of the modal parameter; step 3) comprises: adopting the same method of step 2) to A obtain a damping >samp‘mg of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested; and A step 4) comprises: comparing the damping ^samPlm& of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested obtained in step 3) with the natural frequency ^itandarf 0f the standard mechanical composite pipe obtained in step 2); and determining the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified if ^samp‘mg ^standard ^ or otherwise, determining the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is not qualified.
- 5. The method of claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the modal parameter is transfer rate ^; step 2) comprises: horizontally disposing the standard mechanical composite pipe having the length of 1 obtained in step 1) on the two V-grooves; regulating positions of the two V-grooves to vertically align the external end face of the supporting part of each of the two V-grooves with each external end face of the composite pipe, respectively; disposing a first acceleration sensor at a position A of an opening right above an inner part of the liner pipe, and disposing a second acceleration sensor at a position B of the middle point right above the outer part of the base pipe; exerting excitation force on the base pipe by the excitation device; connecting both the acceleration sensors and the excitation device to the computer via the dynamic signal acquisition device; analyzing the obtained signals by the computer to obtain a time domain signal a^ at the position A and a time domain signal at the position B; conducting Fourier transform to obtain A(^ and B^, dividing A(^ by B^ to obtain a transfer rate ^standard 0f the acceleration at the position A in relative to the acceleration at the position B, in which, 0-^η-1; step 3) comprises: adopting the same method of step 2) to obtain a transfer rateBsampling of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested; and step 4) comprises: comparing the transfer rate BsamPUns of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested obtained in step 3) with the transfer rate of the standard mechanical composite pipe obtained in step 2); and determining the bonding strength of the sampling ~ s tan dard mechanical composite pipe to be tested is qualified if , or otherwise, determining the bonding strength of the mechanical composite pipe to be tested is not qualified.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201110367835.7 | 2011-11-18 | ||
| CN201110367835.7A CN102507742B (en) | 2011-11-18 | 2011-11-18 | Method for evaluating bonding strength of mechanical composite tube |
| PCT/CN2011/084533 WO2013071673A1 (en) | 2011-11-18 | 2011-12-23 | Method for evaluating binding strength of mechanical composite pipe |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU2011381327A1 AU2011381327A1 (en) | 2014-05-22 |
| AU2011381327B2 true AU2011381327B2 (en) | 2016-08-18 |
Family
ID=46219848
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU2011381327A Active AU2011381327B2 (en) | 2011-11-18 | 2011-12-23 | Method for evaluating binding strength of mechanical composite pipe |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN102507742B (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2011381327B2 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE112011105860B4 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2013071673A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102507742B (en) * | 2011-11-18 | 2014-05-07 | 西安向阳航天材料股份有限公司 | Method for evaluating bonding strength of mechanical composite tube |
| CN104502450B (en) * | 2014-10-21 | 2018-03-13 | 南京航空航天大学 | Simple pipeline mount stress recognition methods |
| NL2015919B1 (en) * | 2015-12-07 | 2017-06-28 | Xyztec B V | A method for determining a strength of a bond and/or a material as well as a bond tester apparatus. |
| CN105759076B (en) * | 2016-03-09 | 2019-12-24 | 西北工业大学 | A strain-type acceleration sensor with an integrated structure capable of detecting the striking force of a forging hammer |
| CN106053339B (en) * | 2016-06-07 | 2019-02-05 | 西安向阳航天材料股份有限公司 | A kind of evaluation method of mechanical multiple tube bond strength |
| CN107782478A (en) * | 2017-08-28 | 2018-03-09 | 南京航空航天大学 | Online pipe joint element erection stress detecting system and detection recognition method |
| CN110135123B (en) * | 2019-06-21 | 2022-11-22 | 江西理工大学 | A Method for Obtaining the Mechanical/Metallurgical Bond Strength of Friction Stir Welded Joints |
| CN110348166B (en) * | 2019-07-19 | 2022-12-06 | 辽宁工程技术大学 | Visual identification method for virtual material parameters of basalt fiber resin concrete joint surface |
| JP7227541B2 (en) * | 2019-10-08 | 2023-02-22 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Vibration reproducer |
| CN111398045B (en) * | 2020-04-30 | 2024-11-01 | 华南农业大学 | Internal pressure test apparatus and test method for measuring the hoop tensile properties of fiber reinforced composite pipes for structural engineering |
| CN112781515A (en) * | 2020-12-24 | 2021-05-11 | 西安向阳航天材料股份有限公司 | Hydraulic composite online strain monitoring control system and method for bimetal composite pipe |
| CN114894361B (en) * | 2022-05-09 | 2023-07-25 | 中北大学 | Metal member residual stress quantitative detection method based on cross-point frequency response damping characteristic |
| CN120145771A (en) * | 2025-03-21 | 2025-06-13 | 佛山市交通科技有限公司 | Performance testing method, device and equipment for steel composite pipe |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7647839B2 (en) * | 2005-03-04 | 2010-01-19 | Vallourec Mannesmann Oil & Gas France | Installation and method for testing system of loads of a sample using a packer |
Family Cites Families (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3693432A (en) * | 1971-06-22 | 1972-09-26 | Us Army | Artillery gun shock simulator |
| US4211107A (en) * | 1977-01-17 | 1980-07-08 | Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation | Pipe testing machine with clamping pressure keyed to hydrostatic test pressure |
| JPS60147636A (en) * | 1984-01-13 | 1985-08-03 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Method for pressure test of tube |
| DE19703709C1 (en) * | 1997-01-23 | 1998-08-27 | Mannesmann Ag | Method for detecting the actual state of a container, in particular composite compressed gas containers for vehicles |
| CN2398626Y (en) * | 1999-09-18 | 2000-09-27 | 胜利石油管理局工程机械总厂 | Pressure testing device for metal plastic composited tube |
| AU2002255878A1 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2002-10-08 | Mirant International Asset Management And Marketing, Llc | Pipeline inspection system |
| US7574922B2 (en) * | 2007-07-12 | 2009-08-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Test apparatus to determine the shear strength of a composite sandwich beam under a high hydrostatic load |
| CN201413278Y (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2010-02-24 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | A pipeline pressure test device |
| CN101782486B (en) * | 2009-11-06 | 2012-04-18 | 北京隆盛泰科石油管科技有限公司 | Method for selection of test specimens for transverse yield strength of steel pipes |
| CN101839797B (en) * | 2010-04-24 | 2011-08-31 | 上海交通大学 | Device for testing transverse impact rigidity and damping characteristic of pipe joint for naval vessel |
| CN101936852B (en) * | 2010-07-12 | 2012-07-04 | 哈尔滨工业大学深圳研究生院 | Confirming method of axial compression bearing capacity of steel tube-FRP (Fiber Reinforced Plastic)-concrete column as well as application |
| CN102507742B (en) * | 2011-11-18 | 2014-05-07 | 西安向阳航天材料股份有限公司 | Method for evaluating bonding strength of mechanical composite tube |
-
2011
- 2011-11-18 CN CN201110367835.7A patent/CN102507742B/en active Active
- 2011-12-23 WO PCT/CN2011/084533 patent/WO2013071673A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2011-12-23 DE DE112011105860.8T patent/DE112011105860B4/en active Active
- 2011-12-23 AU AU2011381327A patent/AU2011381327B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7647839B2 (en) * | 2005-03-04 | 2010-01-19 | Vallourec Mannesmann Oil & Gas France | Installation and method for testing system of loads of a sample using a packer |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE112011105860T5 (en) | 2014-08-21 |
| CN102507742B (en) | 2014-05-07 |
| WO2013071673A1 (en) | 2013-05-23 |
| DE112011105860B4 (en) | 2016-07-28 |
| AU2011381327A1 (en) | 2014-05-22 |
| CN102507742A (en) | 2012-06-20 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| AU2011381327B2 (en) | Method for evaluating binding strength of mechanical composite pipe | |
| EP4280259A3 (en) | Bond test apparatus, cartridge for a bond test apparatus and method of measuring a force in a bond test apparatus | |
| CN109253932B (en) | A variable stiffness elastic energy storage device and a method for testing rock instability using the same | |
| CN105814433B (en) | A device and method for characterizing elastic properties of friction materials | |
| CN111289388A (en) | Coal-rock combination impact tendency evaluation method considering damage effect | |
| CN204666322U (en) | A kind of seal plug | |
| CN102128754B (en) | Method for determining tensile elasticity modulus of fragile material in SHPB (split Hopkinson pressure bar) split tension test | |
| CN107907409A (en) | A kind of method, equipment and the storage device of definite rock crack initiation stress | |
| CN103760008A (en) | Method for determining fracture closure stress of rock under uniaxial compression condition | |
| CN106441210A (en) | Device for measuring circumferential strain of rock specimen | |
| CN104677736B (en) | Rubber ring device for detecting mechanical property | |
| CN109342219A (en) | A coating shear strength testing device | |
| CN111964824B (en) | Method for testing residual stress based on indentation energy difference | |
| CN103760017A (en) | Carbon fiber reinforced composite laminate compression test clamp and test method using same | |
| CN208206682U (en) | A kind of system that rock crack initiation stress is determined based on opposite compression strain | |
| CN204964302U (en) | Flexible material compression stress and strain digital display formula testing arrangement | |
| CN108507892B (en) | Organic film Young modulus standard measuring and calculating method | |
| CN112198052A (en) | Method for calculating tensile strength of rock under confining pressure condition and application | |
| Park et al. | Low-constraint toughness testing of two SE (T) methods in a single specimen | |
| CN206248462U (en) | Anchorage, fixture and connector static load anchoring test overall strain measurement apparatus | |
| US20090095083A1 (en) | Acoustic method and apparatus for fracture detection of ball bearings | |
| CN108414439B (en) | Method and device for testing time-varying adhesion force characteristic of valve core and valve sleeve interface | |
| CN104155049A (en) | Apparatus for detecting pressure of fluid in a flexible pipe | |
| CN114965042A (en) | Small-size sample-based test sample assembly for testing static/dynamic compression and tension mechanical properties | |
| US11506045B2 (en) | Two-point polished rod load-sensing system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGA | Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent) |