[go: up one dir, main page]

AU2004202179B2 - Method and apparatus for covertly determining the rate of relative motion between two objects - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for covertly determining the rate of relative motion between two objects Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2004202179B2
AU2004202179B2 AU2004202179A AU2004202179A AU2004202179B2 AU 2004202179 B2 AU2004202179 B2 AU 2004202179B2 AU 2004202179 A AU2004202179 A AU 2004202179A AU 2004202179 A AU2004202179 A AU 2004202179A AU 2004202179 B2 AU2004202179 B2 AU 2004202179B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
pixel
imaging device
digital image
based imaging
rate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU2004202179A
Other versions
AU2004202179A1 (en
Inventor
Gregory A. Roberts
German Von Thal
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Boeing Co
Original Assignee
Boeing Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Boeing Co filed Critical Boeing Co
Priority to AU2004202179A priority Critical patent/AU2004202179B2/en
Publication of AU2004202179A1 publication Critical patent/AU2004202179A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2004202179B2 publication Critical patent/AU2004202179B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Image Analysis (AREA)

Description

Pool Section 29 Regulation 3.2(2)) AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT Application Number: Lodged: Invention Title: Method and apparatus for covertly determining the rate of relative motion between two objects The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us: I METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COVERTLY DETERMINING THE RATE OF RELATIVE MOTION BETWEEN TWO OBJECTS TECHNICAL FIELD s The present invention relates generally to pixel-based imaging devices, and more particularly to apparatus and methods for covertly determining the rate of relative motion between two objects with a pixel-based imaging device, such as a pixel-based imaging device system. BACKGROUND 10 During aerial refuelling operations, the rate of closure between a tanker aircraft and a receiver aircraft must be controlled to ensure that excessive rates of closure do not jeopardize the safety of the aircraft and their crews. For at least this reason, it sometimes becomes necessary for a boom operator and/or a pilot to cancel a refuelling sortie when the rate of closure becomes excessive. Is An inexperienced receiver aircraft pilot, for example during aerial refuelling training, may have difficulty in subjectively determining the appropriate airspeed at which to approach the tanker aircraft to maintain an acceptable rate of closure between the tanker and receiver aircraft. Accordingly, the training envelope during such sorties can be expanded by providing rate of closure 20 information to both the boom operator and the receiver aircraft pilot. Accordingly, a need remains in the art for a device and method for determining the rate of relative motion between two objects that can be implemented, tested, and maintained in a cost efficient and low risk manner. More particularly, there is a need for a device and method for determining the 25 rate of closure between a tanker aircraft and a receiver aircraft during aerial refuelling operations. Ideally, the rate of closure determination would be performed covertly and thus not disclose or broadcast the aircrafts' location to third parties. SUMMARY 30 According to one aspect, there is provided a method for determining a rate of relative motion between a moving target and a pixel-based imaging device, the method comprising: acquiring a first digital image of the moving target with the pixel-based imaging device; Ia selecting a first pixel set from the first digital image having at least one particular data value representing at least a portion of the moving target, and determining the pixel count of the first pixel set; s using the pixel count for the first pixel set to determine, by accessing correlation data, a first distance separating the pixel-based imaging device and the moving target when the first digital image was acquired; acquiring a second digital image of the moving target with the pixel-based imaging device after expiration of a time interval; 1o selecting a second pixel set from the second digital image having at least one particular data value representing at least a portion of the moving target, and determining the pixel count of the second pixel set; using the pixel count for the second pixel set to determine, by accessing said correlation data, a second distance separating the pixel-based imaging is device and the moving target when the second digital image was acquired; and using the difference between the first and second distances in the first and second digital images and the time interval to determine a rate of relative motion between the pixel-based imaging device and the moving target. According to another aspect, there is provided a method for 20 determining a rate of relative motion between a moving target and a pixel-based imaging device, the method comprising: acquiring a first digital image of the target with the pixel-based imaging device; selecting a first pixel set from the first digital image having data content 25 representing at least a portion of the target, and determining the pixel count of the first pixel set; acquiring a second digital image of the target with the pixel-based imaging device after expiration of a time interval; selecting a second pixel set from the second digital image having data 30 content representing at least a portion of the target, and determining the pixel count of the second pixel set; determining a pixel count change for at least a portion of the target as represented in the first digital image and the second digital image; and using the pixel count change and the time interval to derive the rate of relative 35 motion by accessing correlation data to determine a differential distance lb associated with the pixel count change, and dividing the differential distance by the time interval. According to another aspect, there is provided a system for determining a rate of relative motion between a moving target and an object, the 5 system comprising: a pixel-based imaging device disposed on the object, the pixel-based imaging device acquiring a first and a second digital image of the moving target, the second digital image being acquired after expiration of a time interval from when the first digital image was acquired; 1o at least one database including data correlating pixels counts with distances; and a computer executable module for using a number of pixels in a first pixel set and a second pixel set, selected from the first and second digital images, respectively, which pixel sets have data content representing at least a portion of the target in is each of the first and second digital images, and the time interval, to determine a rate of relative motion between the pixel-based imaging device and the moving target. The present invention is directed to a system and method for covertly determining the rate of motion between a pixel-based imaging device and a target 20 being viewed by the pixel-based imaging device. The method generally involves using the pixel-based imaging device to acquire a first and a second digital image of the target. The second digital image is acquired a time interval after the first digital image. The time interval and pixel counts for the pixel set within the first 2 and the second digital image representing a particular portion of the target are then used to determine a rate of relative motion between the pixel-based imaging device and the target. Advantageously, the rate of relative motion is determined covertly such that the locations of the pixel-based imaging device and the target 5 are not disclosed or broadcast to third parties. Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating at least one preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration 10 only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The present invention will be more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein: Figure 1 is a simplified block diagram of a system in accordance with a 15 preferred embodiment of the present invention illustrating a pixel-based imaging device supported on a mounting platform, wherein the pixel-based imaging device has captured a first digital image of a target; Figure 2 is another simplified block diagram of the system shown in image Figure 1, wherein the pixel-based imaging device has captured a second digital 20 image of the target at a later time when the pixel-based imaging device was positioned closer to the target; and Figure 3 is a flowchart of the steps performed by a method of the present invention in determining a rate of relative motion between the pixel-based imaging device and the target shown in Figure 1. 25 Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding features throughout the drawings. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its 30 application, or uses. Referring to Figure 1, there is shown a digital imaging system 10 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Generally, the system 10 includes at least one pixel-based imaging device 12 which is directed 3 or aimed at a target 14. The pixel-based imaging device 12 may comprise any one of wide range of devices capable of capturing pixel-based images (i.e., images formed by one or more pixels) that are now known in the art or that may be developed in the future. By way of example only, the pixel-based imaging 5 device 12 may comprise a digital camera, an infrared camera, LADAR (laser detecting and ranging) camera, among others. The pixel-based imaging device 12 is mounted on a platform 16, which is in turn supported on a different structure or platform 18, such as possibly an aircraft, ship, bus or other motor vehicle, or even a stationary support surface. 10 Accordingly, while it will be appreciated that the present invention will have particular utility with regard to use on mobile platforms such as refueling aircraft, the invention is not so limited and may be used in connection with fixed (i.e., ground-based) support structures. The system 10 further includes a suitable processing element 20 for 15 performing the various operations required by the present invention. The processing element 20 is typically comprised of a combination of hardware (e.g., one or more microprocessors, other processing devices) and software that is stored by memory and executed by the hardware. However, it should be understood that the processing element 20 can be comprised of other 20 combinations of hardware, software, firmware or the like. The processing element 20 is in communication with the pixel-based imaging device 12. The processing element 20 may be mounted on the platform 16 along with the pixel-based imaging device 12, or it may be mounted on the platform 18, or even remotely from the platform 18. 25 In operation, the pixel-based imaging device 12 produces images of the target 14, such as the images 14a and 14b shown respectively in Figures 1 and 2. The images 14a and 14b are painted in the pixel array 12a of the pixel-based imaging device 12. However, and as will be described in greater detail below, the image 14a occupies less pixels than the image 14b because the image 14b was 30 captured by the pixel-based imaging device 12 at a time when the pixel-based imaging device 12 was closer to the target 14 (i.e., d2 < dl). It will be appreciated that the target 14, when viewed as a digital image (e.g., 14a, 14b), will typically be 4 represented by hundreds, or perhaps thousands, of pixels, depending on the resolution of the pixel-based imaging device 12. Referring to Figure 3, a preferred method implemented by the system 10 of the present invention is illustrated in simplified flow chart form. The method 5 involves using the pixel-based imaging device 12 to capture a first digital image 14a of the target 14, as indicated at step 30. At step 32, a first pixel set or region is selected from the first digital image 14a by the processing element 20. The first pixel set indicates at least a portion of the target 14, such as the pixels captured between points A and B or the pixels representing the target 14 in its entirety. The 10 selection of the first pixel set is preferably based upon pixel information content. For example, the first pixel set may comprise each pixel within the pixel array 12a that contains certain image data, such as a particular gray scale value, a particular set of red, green, and blue tristimulus values, among other image data. At step 34, the processing element 20 determines a pixel count for the first 15 pixel set. That is, the processing element 20 counts each of the pixels comprising the first pixel set. Then, at step 36, the processing element 20 determines the first distance dl (i.e., the distance separating the lens 12b of the pixel-based imaging device 12 from the target 14 when the digital image 14a is captured) from the pixel count for the first pixel set. The distance determination is based upon the 20 number of pixels counted for the first pixel set and one or more dimensions of the target 14. To allow the processing element 20 to determine distances from pixel counts, the system 10 includes a database 22 that contains information correlating pixel counts to distances. Accordingly, the processing element 20 accesses the database 22 at step 36 when determining the first distance dl. 25 At step 38, the pixel-based imaging device 12 is used to capture a second digital image 14b of the target 14. The second digital image 14b is captured upon the expiration of a predetermined amount of time (At) after the first digital image 14a was acquired. The time interval (At) may comprise any one of a wide range of time intervals (e.g., 1 millisecond, 1 second, etc.) and may depend at least in part 30 on the particular application in which the system 10 is being used. At step 40, the processing element 20 selects a second pixel set or region from the digital image 14b. The second pixel set indicates or represents the identical portion of the target 14 as did the first pixel set selected at step 32. The 5 processor 20 determines a pixel count for the second pixel set by counting the pixels comprising the second pixel set at step 42. At step 44, the processing element 20 accesses the database 22 and uses the pixel count for the second pixel set to determine the distance d2 (i.e., the distance separating the lens 12b 5 of the pixel-based imaging device 12 from the target 14 when the digital image 14b is captured). As shown, the distance d2 is less than the distance dl, and the number of pixels comprising the second pixel set is greater than the number of pixels comprising the first pixel set. It should be noted, however, that if the target 14 and 10 pixel-based imaging device 12 are moving away from each other, the distance d2 would be greater than the distance dl. In which case, the number of pixels comprising the second pixel set would be less than the number of pixels comprising the first pixel set. At step 46, the processing element 20 determines the rate of relative 15 motion (e.g., rate of closure, rate of separation) between the pixel-based imaging device 12 and the target 14. To do so, the processing element 20 divides the difference between the distances d1 and d2 by the time interval (i.e., rate of relative motion is equal to (dl - d2)/ At). If the rate of relative motion determined at step 46 exceeds a threshold level, the system 10 provides a speed warning at 20 step 48. Steps 30 through 48 may then be repeated as necessary. Indeed, the rate of relative motion is preferably determined periodically over short time intervals to allow for substantially continuous monitoring of the relative motion rate. In another embodiment, the system 10 uses the pixels counts from steps 25 34 and 42 to determine a pixel count change (e.g., pixel count increase or decrease from the first to the second pixel set) instead of using the pixel counts to determine the first and second distances dl and d2, as was the case in the previous embodiment. Then, the system 10 accesses the database 22 to determine a differential distance (Ad) associated with the pixel count change. 30 Next, the system 10 computes the rate of relative motion by dividing the differential distance by the time interval (i.e., rate of relative motion = Ad/At). By way of a preferred example, the pixel-based imaging device 12 may be disposed or mounted on board a receiver aircraft and the target 14 may comprise 6 a boom tip of a tanker aircraft. In such an embodiment, the system 10 is used to covertly determine the closure rate between the tanker aircraft and the receiving aircraft during an aerial refueling operation. Preferably, the rate of closure is determined intermittently over short time intervals to allow for substantially 5 continuous monitoring of the rate of closure as the receiver aircraft approaches the tanker aircraft. The rate of closure may then be provided to the boom operator and/or the pilot(s) of either or both of the tanker and receiver aircraft. Alternatively, or additionally, the system 10 may provide a speed warning to the boom operator and/or the pilots when the rate of closure exceeds a certain 10 maximum threshold value. Providing rate of closure information during aerial refueling training operations allows for substantial cost reductions in flight test development, training, and operations. Because inexperienced pilots may have difficulty in subjectively determining the appropriate airspeed at which to approach the tanker 15 aircraft so as to not create an excessive rate of closure between the tanker and receiver aircraft, the use of the present invention will result in higher test success rates (i.e., less aborted refueling sequences due to excessive rates of closure). Accordingly, the present invention allows for increased refueling effectiveness during refueling training and operations. 20 Moreover, the rate of relative motion is covertly determined by the present invention and thus does not disclose or broadcast the aircrafts' location to third parties, as may happen with other non-covert aerial refueling processes (e.g., RADAR (radio detecting and ranging) and LADAR (laser detecting and ranging)). The present invention's use of digital image capture technology instead of a laser 25 system also eliminates the risk of eye injury from improper laser usage. In addition, the present invention is far less costly to produce, modify, test, and maintain than other costly sensors used during aerial refueling operations such as RADAR and LADAR. Indeed, the present invention can be implemented by using existing hardware and software technologies, such as the pixel-based 30 imaging devices already onboard aircraft. The present invention can be implemented, tested, maintained, and operated in a cost efficient and low risk manner, and thus provides significant life cycle cost (LCC) savings to the user. Moreover, the present invention allows for 7 improved factory-to-market schedules in that it does not require the building of either calibration or simulation facilities. While it will be appreciated that the present invention will find particularly utility in connection with military tanker aircraft employing a refueling boom, it is 5 anticipated that the invention will be applicable to any of a wide range of other mobile platforms such as busses, ships and other land, sea, air and space vehicles where determinations of rate of relative motion are needed. The present invention is further not limited to mobile platforms, but may also be used in connection with ground-based structures where determinations of rate of relative 10 motion are needed. Accordingly, the specific references to aircraft herein should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention, as the invention could be applied in any implementation where a determination as to the rate of relative motion between two objects would be beneficial regardless of whether both objects are mobile or only one object is mobile and the other is fixed. For 15 example, it is anticipated that the invention will be applicable to industrial applications (e.g., manufacturing, warehousing, material handling, etc.) for determining closure rate between vehicles, parts, and/or for providing speed warnings. Even further, the present invention could also be readily adapted for law enforcement purposes in monitoring vehicle speeds along roadways 20 regardless of whether the law enforcement vehicle is stationary or moving. The description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the substance of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims (15)

1. A method for determining a rate of relative motion between a moving target and a pixel-based imaging device, the method comprising: 5 acquiring a first digital image of the moving target with the pixel-based imaging device; selecting a first pixel set from the first digital image having at least one particular data value representing at least a portion of the moving target, and determining the pixel count of the first pixel set; 10 using the pixel count for the first pixel set to determine, by accessing correlation data, a first distance separating the pixel-based imaging device and the moving target when the first digital image was acquired; acquiring a second digital image of the moving target with the pixel-based imaging device after expiration of a time interval; 15 selecting a second pixel set from the second digital image having at least one particular data value representing at least a portion of the moving target, and determining the pixel count of the second pixel set; using the pixel count for the second pixel set to determine, by accessing said correlation data, a second distance separating the pixel-based imaging device and the 20 moving target when the second digital image was acquired; and using the difference between the first and second distances in the first and second digital images and the time interval to determine a rate of relative motion between the pixel-based imaging device and the moving target. 25
2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a rate of relative motion between the pixel-based imaging device and the moving target by using the first and second distances and the time interval comprises subtracting the second distance from the first distance and then dividing by the time interval. 30
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the rate of relative motion is a rate of closure between the pixel-based imaging device and the target.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the rate of relative motion is a rate of separation of the pixel-based imaging device from the target.
3384139-1 9 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising displaying the rate of relative motion to a user.
5
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing a speed warning to a user when the rate of relative motion exceeds a threshold level.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein: the target is disposed on a first platform; and the pixel-based imaging device is disposed on a second platform. 10
8. The method of claim 1, wherein: the target is disposed on an aircraft; and the pixel-based imaging device is disposed on another aircraft.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the selections of the first and second pixel sets 15 are at least partially based on pixel information content.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the pixel information content comprises image data. 20
11. A method for determining a rate of relative motion between a moving target and a pixel-based imaging device, the method comprising: acquiring a first digital image of the target with the pixel-based imaging device; selecting a first pixel set from the first digital image having data content 25 representing at least a portion of the target, and determining the pixel count of the first pixel set; acquiring a second digital image of the target with the pixel-based imaging device after expiration of a time interval; selecting a second pixel set from the second digital image having data content 30 representing at least a portion of the target, and determining the pixel count of the second pixel set; determining a pixel count change for at least a portion of the target as represented in the first digital image and the second digital image; and 3384139-1 10 using the pixel count change and the time interval to derive the rate of relative motion by accessing correlation data to determine a differential distance associated with the pixel count change, and dividing the differential distance by the time interval. 5
12. A system for determining a rate of relative motion between a moving target and an object, the system comprising: a pixel-based imaging device disposed on the object, the pixel-based imaging device acquiring a first and a second digital image of the moving target, the second digital image being acquired after expiration of a time interval from when the first 10 digital image was acquired; at least one database including data correlating pixels counts with distances; and a computer executable module for using a number of pixels in a first pixel set and a second pixel set, selected from the first and second digital images, respectively, 15 which pixel sets have data content representing at least a portion of the target in each of the first and second digital images, and the time interval, to determine a rate of relative motion between the pixel-based imaging device and the moving target.
13. The system of claim 12, wherein the computer executable module comprises: 20 a computer executable sub-module for selecting a first'pixel set from the first digital image, the first pixel set having a data content representing at least a portion of the moving target; a computer executable sub-module for determining a pixel count for the first pixel set; 25 a computer executable sub-module for using the pixel count for the first pixel set to determine a first distance separating the pixel-based imaging device and the moving target when the first digital image was acquired; a computer executable sub-module for selecting a second pixel set from the second digital image, the second pixel set having a data content representing the at 30 least a portion of the moving target; a computer executable sub-module for determining a pixel count for the second pixel set; 3384139-1 11 a computer executable sub-module for using the pixel count for the second pixel set to determine a second distance separating the pixel-based imaging device and the moving target when the second digital image was acquired; and a computer executable sub-module for determining a rate of relative motion 5 between the pixel-based imaging device and the moving target by subtracting the second distance from the first distance and then dividing by the time interval.
14. The system of claim 12, wherein the computer executable module comprises: a computer executable sub-module for determining a pixel count change for at 10 least a portion of the moving target as represented in the first digital image and the second digital image; and a computer executable sub-module for using the pixel count change and the time interval to derive the rate of relative motion.
15 15. The system of claim 12, wherein the pixel-based imaging device comprises a digital camera. 20 DATED this seventh Day of March, 2011 The Boeing Company Patent Attorneys for the Applicant SPRUSON & FERGUSON 25 3384139-1
AU2004202179A 2004-05-20 2004-05-20 Method and apparatus for covertly determining the rate of relative motion between two objects Ceased AU2004202179B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2004202179A AU2004202179B2 (en) 2004-05-20 2004-05-20 Method and apparatus for covertly determining the rate of relative motion between two objects

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2004202179A AU2004202179B2 (en) 2004-05-20 2004-05-20 Method and apparatus for covertly determining the rate of relative motion between two objects

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2004202179A1 AU2004202179A1 (en) 2005-12-08
AU2004202179B2 true AU2004202179B2 (en) 2011-04-21

Family

ID=35655411

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2004202179A Ceased AU2004202179B2 (en) 2004-05-20 2004-05-20 Method and apparatus for covertly determining the rate of relative motion between two objects

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2004202179B2 (en)

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5109345A (en) * 1990-02-20 1992-04-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Closed-loop autonomous docking system
US5436841A (en) * 1992-03-16 1995-07-25 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Method and device for determining the relative position and the relative path of two space vehicles
US5493392A (en) * 1992-12-15 1996-02-20 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Digital image system for determining relative position and motion of in-flight vehicles
US5530650A (en) * 1992-10-28 1996-06-25 Mcdonnell Douglas Corp. Computer imaging system and method for remote in-flight aircraft refueling
US20010012982A1 (en) * 2000-01-31 2001-08-09 Yazaki Corporation Side-monitoring apparatus for motor vehicle
US6324295B1 (en) * 1996-05-10 2001-11-27 Sextant Avionique Guiding method and device for in-flight-refuelling line
US20030007682A1 (en) * 2001-05-02 2003-01-09 Takamasa Koshizen Image recognizing apparatus and method

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5109345A (en) * 1990-02-20 1992-04-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Closed-loop autonomous docking system
US5436841A (en) * 1992-03-16 1995-07-25 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Method and device for determining the relative position and the relative path of two space vehicles
US5530650A (en) * 1992-10-28 1996-06-25 Mcdonnell Douglas Corp. Computer imaging system and method for remote in-flight aircraft refueling
US5493392A (en) * 1992-12-15 1996-02-20 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Digital image system for determining relative position and motion of in-flight vehicles
US6324295B1 (en) * 1996-05-10 2001-11-27 Sextant Avionique Guiding method and device for in-flight-refuelling line
US20010012982A1 (en) * 2000-01-31 2001-08-09 Yazaki Corporation Side-monitoring apparatus for motor vehicle
US20030007682A1 (en) * 2001-05-02 2003-01-09 Takamasa Koshizen Image recognizing apparatus and method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2004202179A1 (en) 2005-12-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8339583B2 (en) Visual detection of clear air turbulence
US7932853B1 (en) System and method for identifying incursion threat levels
EP3121763B1 (en) Helo bumper system using a camera for obstacle detection
US8040258B2 (en) Enhanced situational awareness system and method
CN106292684B (en) Vehicle carrying aircraft
CN111319628A (en) Method and system for evaluating false threat detection
EP2824460A1 (en) System and method for detecting turbulence based upon observations of light scintillation
US20170254895A1 (en) Detecting long objects by sensor fusion
US20130322697A1 (en) Speed Calculation of a Moving Object based on Image Data
US6285949B1 (en) Method and device for extensive traffic situation monitoring
US7171028B2 (en) Method and apparatus for covertly determining the rate of relative motion between two objects
US20220178735A1 (en) Displacement measurement apparatus for structure
EP3576438B1 (en) Method for enhancing the security of navigating a vehicle by providing real-time navigation data to the vehicle via a mobile communication network, system for enhancing the security of navigating a vehicle by providing real-time navigation data to the vehicle via a mobile communication network, program and computer program product
JP6652979B2 (en) Image processing device, flying object and program
US20230054256A1 (en) Method and System for Locating a Light Source
CN117416349A (en) Automatic driving risk prediction system and method based on improved YOLOV7-Tiny and SS-LSTM in V2X environment
JP2020046728A (en) Onboard equipment
CN113253619B (en) Ship data information processing method and device
US8373590B1 (en) Method and a system for processing and displaying images of the surroundings of an aircraft
AU2004202179B2 (en) Method and apparatus for covertly determining the rate of relative motion between two objects
CN111126237A (en) Safe vehicle distance detection method based on machine vision
US12080180B2 (en) Anti-collision system and method for an aircraft and aircraft including the anti-collision system
CN109649406A (en) A kind of automatic driving vehicle fault detection method and system
CN114296080A (en) Traffic data acquisition method and computer readable storage medium
JP2022061059A (en) Moving object tracking apparatus and program thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired