AU1538900A - Immunostimulatory dna - Google Patents
Immunostimulatory dna Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU1538900A AU1538900A AU15389/00A AU1538900A AU1538900A AU 1538900 A AU1538900 A AU 1538900A AU 15389/00 A AU15389/00 A AU 15389/00A AU 1538900 A AU1538900 A AU 1538900A AU 1538900 A AU1538900 A AU 1538900A
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- dna
- immunostimulatory dna
- rpa
- odn
- immunostimulatory
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000003308 immunostimulating effect Effects 0.000 title claims description 129
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 129
- 210000002540 macrophage Anatomy 0.000 claims description 81
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 69
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 52
- 102100028198 Macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor Human genes 0.000 claims description 46
- 239000005557 antagonist Substances 0.000 claims description 40
- 239000000556 agonist Substances 0.000 claims description 38
- 108010058398 Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Receptor Proteins 0.000 claims description 24
- 101710150918 Macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor Proteins 0.000 claims description 24
- RYYWUUFWQRZTIU-UHFFFAOYSA-K thiophosphate Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([O-])=S RYYWUUFWQRZTIU-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 claims description 22
- 150000004713 phosphodiesters Chemical group 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000025084 cell cycle arrest Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 229940124447 delivery agent Drugs 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000000069 prophylactic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000010166 immunofluorescence Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000002797 proteolythic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 229940046166 oligodeoxynucleotide Drugs 0.000 description 185
- CTMZLDSMFCVUNX-VMIOUTBZSA-N cytidylyl-(3'->5')-guanosine Chemical compound O=C1N=C(N)C=CN1[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@H](OP(O)(=O)OC[C@@H]2[C@H]([C@@H](O)[C@@H](O2)N2C3=C(C(N=C(N)N3)=O)N=C2)O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CTMZLDSMFCVUNX-VMIOUTBZSA-N 0.000 description 110
- 101500027983 Rattus norvegicus Octadecaneuropeptide Proteins 0.000 description 100
- 108010027643 Replication Protein A Proteins 0.000 description 95
- 102000018780 Replication Protein A Human genes 0.000 description 95
- 229940046168 CpG oligodeoxynucleotide Drugs 0.000 description 91
- MWUXSHHQAYIFBG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitric oxide Chemical compound O=[N] MWUXSHHQAYIFBG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 62
- 230000027455 binding Effects 0.000 description 61
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 58
- 108091034117 Oligonucleotide Proteins 0.000 description 48
- 239000002158 endotoxin Substances 0.000 description 47
- 229920006008 lipopolysaccharide Polymers 0.000 description 47
- 238000009739 binding Methods 0.000 description 46
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 40
- 108010071942 Colony-Stimulating Factors Proteins 0.000 description 37
- 102000007644 Colony-Stimulating Factors Human genes 0.000 description 37
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 35
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 34
- 210000004979 bone marrow derived macrophage Anatomy 0.000 description 33
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 32
- JLCPHMBAVCMARE-UHFFFAOYSA-N [3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-hydroxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methyl [5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-3-yl] hydrogen phosphate Polymers Cc1cn(C2CC(OP(O)(=O)OCC3OC(CC3OP(O)(=O)OCC3OC(CC3O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)C(COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3CO)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)O2)c(=O)[nH]c1=O JLCPHMBAVCMARE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 30
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 29
- 102000053602 DNA Human genes 0.000 description 28
- 239000005089 Luciferase Substances 0.000 description 23
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 23
- 108060001084 Luciferase Proteins 0.000 description 22
- 230000001086 cytosolic effect Effects 0.000 description 22
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 22
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 19
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 19
- 238000002337 electrophoretic mobility shift assay Methods 0.000 description 18
- 101100256077 Caenorhabditis elegans aos-1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 17
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 17
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 17
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 15
- 231100000673 dose–response relationship Toxicity 0.000 description 15
- 102000005962 receptors Human genes 0.000 description 15
- 108020003175 receptors Proteins 0.000 description 15
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 14
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 13
- 230000022131 cell cycle Effects 0.000 description 12
- XJMOSONTPMZWPB-UHFFFAOYSA-M propidium iodide Chemical compound [I-].[I-].C12=CC(N)=CC=C2C2=CC=C(N)C=C2[N+](CCC[N+](C)(CC)CC)=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 XJMOSONTPMZWPB-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 12
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 11
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 11
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 11
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 description 11
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 description 11
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 11
- 108020000946 Bacterial DNA Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 108700027649 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3 Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 102100024192 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 Human genes 0.000 description 10
- RYYWUUFWQRZTIU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Thiophosphoric acid Chemical group OP(O)(S)=O RYYWUUFWQRZTIU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 10
- 239000012148 binding buffer Substances 0.000 description 10
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000000684 flow cytometry Methods 0.000 description 10
- 210000000987 immune system Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 10
- 241001529936 Murinae Species 0.000 description 9
- 108060008682 Tumor Necrosis Factor Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 102100040247 Tumor necrosis factor Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- 241000972773 Aulopiformes Species 0.000 description 8
- 230000004568 DNA-binding Effects 0.000 description 8
- IOVCWXUNBOPUCH-UHFFFAOYSA-M Nitrite anion Chemical compound [O-]N=O IOVCWXUNBOPUCH-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 8
- 210000003719 b-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 8
- 235000019515 salmon Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- 238000013518 transcription Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000035897 transcription Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000006907 apoptotic process Effects 0.000 description 7
- 235000009508 confectionery Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000026731 phosphorylation Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000006366 phosphorylation reaction Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 7
- 108700008625 Reporter Genes Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 6
- 210000000805 cytoplasm Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- OPTASPLRGRRNAP-UHFFFAOYSA-N cytosine Chemical compound NC=1C=CNC(=O)N=1 OPTASPLRGRRNAP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000003828 downregulation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000001943 fluorescence-activated cell sorting Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 6
- 102000039446 nucleic acids Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 6
- -1 phosphodiester modified oligonucleotides Chemical class 0.000 description 6
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000005778 DNA damage Effects 0.000 description 5
- 231100000277 DNA damage Toxicity 0.000 description 5
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 230000018199 S phase Effects 0.000 description 5
- 241000251539 Vertebrata <Metazoa> Species 0.000 description 5
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000004132 cross linking Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000002264 polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 5
- 101001092125 Homo sapiens Replication protein A 70 kDa DNA-binding subunit Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000014150 Interferons Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010050904 Interferons Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000007999 Nuclear Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010089610 Nuclear Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102100035593 POU domain, class 2, transcription factor 1 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 101710084414 POU domain, class 2, transcription factor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102100027654 Transcription factor PU.1 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 239000012190 activator Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008512 biological response Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000006369 cell cycle progression Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003833 cell viability Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000004443 dendritic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- UYTPUPDQBNUYGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N guanine Chemical compound O=C1NC(N)=NC2=C1N=CN2 UYTPUPDQBNUYGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000011533 pre-incubation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 4
- 108010008929 proto-oncogene protein Spi-1 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OCC[NH+]1CCN(CCS([O-])(=O)=O)CC1 JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- WOVKYSAHUYNSMH-RRKCRQDMSA-N 5-bromodeoxyuridine Chemical compound C1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1N1C(=O)NC(=O)C(Br)=C1 WOVKYSAHUYNSMH-RRKCRQDMSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 3
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Formaldehyde Chemical compound O=C WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycerine Chemical compound OCC(O)CO PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000007995 HEPES buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 101000729474 Homo sapiens DNA-directed RNA polymerase I subunit RPA1 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 101000650600 Homo sapiens DNA-directed RNA polymerase I subunit RPA2 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 101001092206 Homo sapiens Replication protein A 32 kDa subunit Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000013462 Interleukin-12 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010065805 Interleukin-12 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000014158 Interleukin-12 Subunit p40 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010011429 Interleukin-12 Subunit p40 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102100024193 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108700015928 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 13 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 101710163270 Nuclease Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 108700020796 Oncogene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 108010004729 Phycoerythrin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102100035525 Replication protein A 32 kDa subunit Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 102100035729 Replication protein A 70 kDa DNA-binding subunit Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108020004682 Single-Stranded DNA Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 210000001744 T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- ZMANZCXQSJIPKH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Triethylamine Chemical compound CCN(CC)CC ZMANZCXQSJIPKH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002671 adjuvant Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002424 anti-apoptotic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 description 3
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 102000023732 binding proteins Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108091008324 binding proteins Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 3
- 210000001185 bone marrow Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 108091092356 cellular DNA Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 230000004700 cellular uptake Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003776 cleavage reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000013270 controlled release Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229940104302 cytosine Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003085 diluting agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008034 disappearance Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 3
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- MHMNJMPURVTYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate Chemical compound O1C(=O)C2=CC(N=C=S)=CC=C2C21C1=CC=C(O)C=C1OC1=CC(O)=CC=C21 MHMNJMPURVTYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000009169 immunotherapy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229940117681 interleukin-12 Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000004807 localization Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000000822 natural killer cell Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000003389 potentiating effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 230000007017 scission Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000028327 secretion Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000007480 spreading Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012800 visualization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001262 western blot Methods 0.000 description 3
- YBJHBAHKTGYVGT-ZKWXMUAHSA-N (+)-Biotin Chemical compound N1C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@H](CCCCC(=O)O)SC[C@@H]21 YBJHBAHKTGYVGT-ZKWXMUAHSA-N 0.000 description 2
- HWPZZUQOWRWFDB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-methylcytosine Chemical compound CN1C=CC(N)=NC1=O HWPZZUQOWRWFDB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- KDCGOANMDULRCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 7H-purine Chemical compound N1=CNC2=NC=NC2=C1 KDCGOANMDULRCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- WOVKYSAHUYNSMH-UHFFFAOYSA-N BROMODEOXYURIDINE Natural products C1C(O)C(CO)OC1N1C(=O)NC(=O)C(Br)=C1 WOVKYSAHUYNSMH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108091029430 CpG site Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010041986 DNA Vaccines Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000004543 DNA replication Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011238 DNA vaccination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229940021995 DNA vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 102000052510 DNA-Binding Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101710096438 DNA-binding protein Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 229920002307 Dextran Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 102000004533 Endonucleases Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010042407 Endonucleases Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000709305 Homo sapiens Replication protein A 14 kDa subunit Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000007651 Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010046938 Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 102000008299 Nitric Oxide Synthase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010021487 Nitric Oxide Synthase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 102100034372 Replication protein A 14 kDa subunit Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 229920002684 Sepharose Polymers 0.000 description 2
- IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-XLPZGREQSA-N Thymidine Chemical compound O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)C1 IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-XLPZGREQSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000026935 allergic disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical group [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000000721 bacterilogical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004166 bioassay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000002798 bone marrow cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 229950004398 broxuridine Drugs 0.000 description 2
- OSGAYBCDTDRGGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium sulfate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O OSGAYBCDTDRGGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 239000002775 capsule Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000423 cell based assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000036755 cellular response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000001913 cellulose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002678 cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 235000010980 cellulose Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011278 co-treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009089 cytolysis Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003599 detergent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 2
- BFMYDTVEBKDAKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L disodium;(2',7'-dibromo-3',6'-dioxido-3-oxospiro[2-benzofuran-1,9'-xanthene]-4'-yl)mercury;hydrate Chemical compound O.[Na+].[Na+].O1C(=O)C2=CC=CC=C2C21C1=CC(Br)=C([O-])C([Hg])=C1OC1=C2C=C(Br)C([O-])=C1 BFMYDTVEBKDAKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 239000002552 dosage form Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 102000013165 exonuclease Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108020001507 fusion proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000037865 fusion proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 238000001415 gene therapy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000004408 hybridoma Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000002865 immune cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000002055 immunohistochemical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001976 improved effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000411 inducer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940079322 interferon Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000003834 intracellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002427 irreversible effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003446 ligand Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 210000004962 mammalian cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000001616 monocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 2
- 125000002467 phosphate group Chemical group [H]OP(=O)(O[H])O[*] 0.000 description 2
- 239000013600 plasmid vector Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000037452 priming Effects 0.000 description 2
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000159 protein binding assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000019491 signal transduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002415 sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007790 solid phase Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 2
- UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N streptomycin Chemical compound CN[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@](C=O)(O)[C@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003826 tablet Substances 0.000 description 2
- MPLHNVLQVRSVEE-UHFFFAOYSA-N texas red Chemical compound [O-]S(=O)(=O)C1=CC(S(Cl)(=O)=O)=CC=C1C(C1=CC=2CCCN3CCCC(C=23)=C1O1)=C2C1=C(CCC1)C3=[N+]1CCCC3=C2 MPLHNVLQVRSVEE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229940124597 therapeutic agent Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000032258 transport Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000028973 vesicle-mediated transport Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 2
- MXYRZDAGKTVQIL-IOSLPCCCSA-N (2r,3r,4s,5r)-2-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methyloxolane-3,4-diol Chemical compound C1=NC2=C(N)N=CN=C2N1[C@]1(C)O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1O MXYRZDAGKTVQIL-IOSLPCCCSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WHTVZRBIWZFKQO-AWEZNQCLSA-N (S)-chloroquine Chemical compound ClC1=CC=C2C(N[C@@H](C)CCCN(CC)CC)=CC=NC2=C1 WHTVZRBIWZFKQO-AWEZNQCLSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VGIRNWJSIRVFRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2',7'-difluorofluorescein Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1C1=C2C=C(F)C(=O)C=C2OC2=CC(O)=C(F)C=C21 VGIRNWJSIRVFRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZCWPHDXKEDBCER-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,5-diphenyl-2h-tetrazol-2-ium;bromide Chemical compound [Br-].C1=CC=CC=C1C1=[NH+]N(C=2C=CC=CC=2)N=N1 ZCWPHDXKEDBCER-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZLOIGESWDJYCTF-XVFCMESISA-N 4-thiouridine Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1N1C(=O)NC(=S)C=C1 ZLOIGESWDJYCTF-XVFCMESISA-N 0.000 description 1
- BZTDTCNHAFUJOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 6-carboxyfluorescein Chemical compound C12=CC=C(O)C=C2OC2=CC(O)=CC=C2C11OC(=O)C2=CC=C(C(=O)O)C=C21 BZTDTCNHAFUJOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PXBWLHQLSCMJEM-IOSLPCCCSA-N 9-[(2r,3r,4s,5r)-3,4-dihydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methyloxolan-2-yl]-3h-purin-6-one Chemical compound C1=NC2=C(O)N=CN=C2N1[C@]1(C)O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1O PXBWLHQLSCMJEM-IOSLPCCCSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920000178 Acrylic resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004925 Acrylic resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930024421 Adenine Natural products 0.000 description 1
- GFFGJBXGBJISGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Adenine Chemical compound NC1=NC=NC2=C1N=CN2 GFFGJBXGBJISGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000002260 Alkaline Phosphatase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020004774 Alkaline Phosphatase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000011330 Armoracia rusticana Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000003291 Armoracia rusticana Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100026596 Bcl-2-like protein 1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- DWRXFEITVBNRMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Beta-D-1-Arabinofuranosylthymine Natural products O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1C1C(O)C(O)C(CO)O1 DWRXFEITVBNRMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100313196 Caenorhabditis elegans cct-5 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100289995 Caenorhabditis elegans mac-1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000283707 Capra Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010001857 Cell Surface Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000000844 Cell Surface Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241001227713 Chiron Species 0.000 description 1
- 108020004635 Complementary DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091035707 Consensus sequence Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004127 Cytokines Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000695 Cytokines Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000007260 Deoxyribonuclease I Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010008532 Deoxyribonuclease I Proteins 0.000 description 1
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108060002716 Exonuclease Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000012413 Fluorescence activated cell sorting analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001828 Gelatine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102000005720 Glutathione transferase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010070675 Glutathione transferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- JZNWSCPGTDBMEW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycerophosphorylethanolamin Natural products NCCOP(O)(=O)OCC(O)CO JZNWSCPGTDBMEW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010093488 His-His-His-His-His-His Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 1
- 101001046686 Homo sapiens Integrin alpha-M Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100033874 Homo sapiens RPA2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108090000144 Human Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000003839 Human Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000725303 Human immunodeficiency virus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000713772 Human immunodeficiency virus 1 Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010020751 Hypersensitivity Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000008394 Immunoglobulin Fragments Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010021625 Immunoglobulin Fragments Proteins 0.000 description 1
- UGQMRVRMYYASKQ-KQYNXXCUSA-N Inosine Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1N1C2=NC=NC(O)=C2N=C1 UGQMRVRMYYASKQ-KQYNXXCUSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229930010555 Inosine Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 102100022338 Integrin alpha-M Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000008070 Interferon-gamma Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010074328 Interferon-gamma Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000000589 Interleukin-1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010002352 Interleukin-1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010025323 Lymphomas Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000043136 MAP kinase family Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091054455 MAP kinase family Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010030317 Macrophage-1 Antigen Proteins 0.000 description 1
- FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium Chemical compound [Mg] FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710175625 Maltose/maltodextrin-binding periplasmic protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010085220 Multiprotein Complexes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000007474 Multiprotein Complexes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- GXCLVBGFBYZDAG-UHFFFAOYSA-N N-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]-N-methylprop-2-en-1-amine Chemical compound CN(CCC1=CNC2=C1C=CC=C2)CC=C GXCLVBGFBYZDAG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010057466 NF-kappa B Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000003945 NF-kappa B Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 230000006051 NK cell activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000007399 Nuclear hormone receptor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- QWZRZYWLWTWVLF-UHFFFAOYSA-N O.OP(O)=O Chemical compound O.OP(O)=O QWZRZYWLWTWVLF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000004028 Octamer Transcription Factors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010082496 Octamer Transcription Factors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100035591 POU domain, class 2, transcription factor 2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710084411 POU domain, class 2, transcription factor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229930040373 Paraformaldehyde Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 229930182555 Penicillin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N Penicillin G Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000003992 Peroxidases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091000080 Phosphotransferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108020005120 Plant DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920000954 Polyglycolide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 102000003923 Protein Kinase C Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000315 Protein Kinase C Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000002067 Protein Subunits Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010001267 Protein Subunits Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 201000004681 Psoriasis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- CZPWVGJYEJSRLH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Pyrimidine Chemical compound C1=CN=CN=C1 CZPWVGJYEJSRLH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000012980 RPMI-1640 medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108010008281 Recombinant Fusion Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000007056 Recombinant Fusion Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000283984 Rodentia Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000006146 Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241001222774 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Minnesota Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010040070 Septic Shock Diseases 0.000 description 1
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 229920002472 Starch Polymers 0.000 description 1
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sulfate Chemical compound [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108091023040 Transcription factor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000040945 Transcription factor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229920004890 Triton X-100 Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000013504 Triton X-100 Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102000004142 Trypsin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000631 Trypsin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- ULHRKLSNHXXJLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L Yo-Pro-1 Chemical compound [I-].[I-].C1=CC=C2C(C=C3N(C4=CC=CC=C4O3)C)=CC=[N+](CCC[N+](C)(C)C)C2=C1 ULHRKLSNHXXJLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- DPKHZNPWBDQZCN-UHFFFAOYSA-N acridine orange free base Chemical compound C1=CC(N(C)C)=CC2=NC3=CC(N(C)C)=CC=C3C=C21 DPKHZNPWBDQZCN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960000643 adenine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000001464 adherent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000443 aerosol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001042 affinity chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011543 agarose gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000783 alginic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010443 alginic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920000615 alginic acid Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229960001126 alginic acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 150000004781 alginic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 125000000217 alkyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 125000005600 alkyl phosphonate group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000006368 anti-apoptosis response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000692 anti-sense effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000890 antigenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001640 apoptogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 206010003246 arthritis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 125000003118 aryl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 208000006673 asthma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000001363 autoimmune Effects 0.000 description 1
- DZBUGLKDJFMEHC-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzoquinolinylidene Natural products C1=CC=CC2=CC3=CC=CC=C3N=C21 DZBUGLKDJFMEHC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N beta-L-thymidine Natural products O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1C1OC(CO)C(O)C1 IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000003833 bile salt Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940093761 bile salts Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000002902 bimodal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960002685 biotin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000020958 biotin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011616 biotin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007413 biotinylation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006287 biotinylation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011237 bivariate analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008366 buffered solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000011132 calcium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000309466 calf Species 0.000 description 1
- 150000001720 carbohydrates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000014633 carbohydrates Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000002091 cationic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000001364 causal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000020411 cell activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006037 cell lysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000170 cell membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000004663 cell proliferation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001516 cell proliferation assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003570 cell viability assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035567 cellular accumulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000030570 cellular localization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960003677 chloroquine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- WHTVZRBIWZFKQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N chloroquine Natural products ClC1=CC=C2C(NC(C)CCCN(CC)CC)=CC=NC2=C1 WHTVZRBIWZFKQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960001231 choline Drugs 0.000 description 1
- OEYIOHPDSNJKLS-UHFFFAOYSA-N choline Chemical compound C[N+](C)(C)CCO OEYIOHPDSNJKLS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001684 chronic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- DQLATGHUWYMOKM-UHFFFAOYSA-L cisplatin Chemical compound N[Pt](N)(Cl)Cl DQLATGHUWYMOKM-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 229960004316 cisplatin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 206010009887 colitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000007398 colorimetric assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108010047295 complement receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000006834 complement receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 230000009918 complex formation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000001010 compromised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000016396 cytokine production Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108091007930 cytoplasmic receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000003674 cytoplasmic vesicle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000172 cytosol Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- BOKOVLFWCAFYHP-UHFFFAOYSA-N dihydroxy-methoxy-sulfanylidene-$l^{5}-phosphane Chemical compound COP(O)(O)=S BOKOVLFWCAFYHP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003292 diminished effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002009 diols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- NAGJZTKCGNOGPW-UHFFFAOYSA-K dioxido-sulfanylidene-sulfido-$l^{5}-phosphane Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([S-])=S NAGJZTKCGNOGPW-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010494 dissociation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005593 dissociations Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- VHJLVAABSRFDPM-QWWZWVQMSA-N dithiothreitol Chemical compound SC[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)CS VHJLVAABSRFDPM-QWWZWVQMSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003937 drug carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001962 electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003995 emulsifying agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002121 endocytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002148 esters Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- ZMMJGEGLRURXTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethidium bromide Chemical compound [Br-].C12=CC(N)=CC=C2C2=CC=C(N)C=C2[N+](CC)=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 ZMMJGEGLRURXTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960005542 ethidium bromide Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000003527 eukaryotic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000028023 exocytosis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011536 extraction buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012091 fetal bovine serum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000945 filler Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005194 fractionation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013467 fragmentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006062 fragmentation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920000159 gelatin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000019322 gelatine Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000008570 general process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000024 genotoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000001738 genotoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000007565 gingivitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003102 growth factor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009036 growth inhibition Effects 0.000 description 1
- IIRDTKBZINWQAW-UHFFFAOYSA-N hexaethylene glycol Chemical compound OCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCO IIRDTKBZINWQAW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001744 histochemical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000057074 human RPA1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229920001600 hydrophobic polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000001866 hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003088 hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- UFVKGYZPFZQRLF-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose Chemical compound OC1C(O)C(OC)OC(CO)C1OC1C(O)C(O)C(OC2C(C(O)C(OC3C(C(O)C(O)C(CO)O3)O)C(CO)O2)O)C(CO)O1 UFVKGYZPFZQRLF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000010979 hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229940005608 hypericin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000009610 hypersensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000009326 ileitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000003100 immobilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008102 immune modulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003119 immunoblot Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003365 immunocytochemistry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010820 immunofluorescence microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000016784 immunoglobulin production Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002955 immunomodulating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940121354 immunomodulator Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000001114 immunoprecipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007943 implant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000027866 inflammatory disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000002757 inflammatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003112 inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015788 innate immune response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960003786 inosine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 108010044426 integrins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000006495 integrins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229960003130 interferon gamma Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000019734 interleukin-12 production Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000027411 intracellular receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091008582 intracellular receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002502 liposome Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003670 luciferase enzyme activity assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003468 luciferase reporter gene assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000034701 macropinocytosis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 1
- MYWUZJCMWCOHBA-VIFPVBQESA-N methamphetamine Chemical compound CN[C@@H](C)CC1=CC=CC=C1 MYWUZJCMWCOHBA-VIFPVBQESA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000011987 methylation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007069 methylation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- YACKEPLHDIMKIO-UHFFFAOYSA-N methylphosphonic acid Chemical compound CP(O)(O)=O YACKEPLHDIMKIO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004005 microsphere Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003278 mimic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003226 mitogen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000302 molecular modelling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000006417 multiple sclerosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000000066 myeloid cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- VMGAPWLDMVPYIA-HIDZBRGKSA-N n'-amino-n-iminomethanimidamide Chemical compound N\N=C\N=N VMGAPWLDMVPYIA-HIDZBRGKSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006654 negative regulation of apoptotic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035407 negative regulation of cell proliferation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000440 neutrophil Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000007764 o/w emulsion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019198 oils Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 125000004430 oxygen atom Chemical group O* 0.000 description 1
- 229920002866 paraformaldehyde Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000007110 pathogen host interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940049954 penicillin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000003024 peritoneal macrophage Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 108040007629 peroxidase activity proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000010452 phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K phosphate Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([O-])=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 125000001095 phosphatidyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 150000008104 phosphatidylethanolamines Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- PTMHPRAIXMAOOB-UHFFFAOYSA-L phosphoramidate Chemical compound NP([O-])([O-])=O PTMHPRAIXMAOOB-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 102000020233 phosphotransferase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 230000003114 pinocytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008884 pinocytosis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920000747 poly(lactic acid) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000768 polyamine Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000447 polyanionic polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001223 polyethylene glycol Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 102000040430 polynucleotide Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091033319 polynucleotide Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000002157 polynucleotide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920005862 polyol Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 150000003077 polyols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000013641 positive control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000029279 positive regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002203 pretreatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009290 primary effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 230000002062 proliferating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001742 protein purification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003212 purines Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000003230 pyrimidines Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000009790 rate-determining step (RDS) Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- BOLDJAUMGUJJKM-LSDHHAIUSA-N renifolin D Natural products CC(=C)[C@@H]1Cc2c(O)c(O)ccc2[C@H]1CC(=O)c3ccc(O)cc3O BOLDJAUMGUJJKM-LSDHHAIUSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001718 repressive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000000306 sarcoidosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000009738 saturating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036303 septic shock Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000003384 small molecules Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000002764 solid phase assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010532 solid phase synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000009870 specific binding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019698 starch Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011550 stock solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960005322 streptomycin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000008163 sugars Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910021653 sulphate ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000008093 supporting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000829 suppository Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008961 swelling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000031068 symbiosis, encompassing mutualism through parasitism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000024891 symptom Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920001059 synthetic polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000006188 syrup Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020357 syrup Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000007910 systemic administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000000596 systemic lupus erythematosus Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000000454 talc Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052623 talc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000012222 talc Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- UWHCKJMYHZGTIT-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetraethylene glycol Chemical compound OCCOCCOCCOCCO UWHCKJMYHZGTIT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WGTODYJZXSJIAG-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetramethylrhodamine chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].C=12C=CC(N(C)C)=CC2=[O+]C2=CC(N(C)C)=CC=C2C=1C1=CC=CC=C1C(O)=O WGTODYJZXSJIAG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000007970 thio esters Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229940104230 thymidine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000001541 thymus gland Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001890 transfection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012588 trypsin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000701447 unidentified baculovirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012646 vaccine adjuvant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940124931 vaccine adjuvant Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000015112 vegetable and seed oil Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000008158 vegetable oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000001993 wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011240 wet gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
- Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)
Description
WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 1 TITLE "IMMUNOSTIMULATORY DNA" FIELD OF THE INVENTION THIS INVENTION relates to methods for identifying 5 immunostimulatory DNA, which DNA stimulates cells of a mammalian immune system. This invention is also directed to methods for identifying agonists and antagonists of immunostimulatory DNA. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION A fundamental attribute of the mammalian immune system is 10 the ability to distinguish self from non-self. This is most generally understood with regard to proteins and peptides, but it also applies to DNA. In this regard, certain cells of the immune system such as B lymphocytes and macrophages are able to distinguish bacterial DNA from vertebrate and plant DNA (Messina et al., 1991, J. Immunol. 147 1759; 15 Yamamoto et al., 1992, Immunol. 36 983; Stacey et al., 1996, J. Immunol. 157 2116; Klinman et al., 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 2879). That is, bacterial DNA can stimulate cells of the immune system, and as such is an example of "immunostimulatory DNA". A core motif common to immunostimulatory DNA is the CpG 20 dinucleotide motif, which appears to be central to the immunostimulatory capacity of DNA (Krieg et al., 1995, Nature 374 546). However, it is also clear that flanking sequence can be important, in that CpG sequences flanked by a cytosine (C) or guanine (G) nucleotide are less immunostimulatory (Krieg et al., 1995, supra). 25 CpG sequences are relatively common in bacterial DNA, and are generally unmethylated. In contrast, CpG sequences occur less commonly in vertebrate DNA (about 25% of what would be expected based on random base utilization) and are generally methylated (Bird, 1987, Trends Genet. 3 342; Bird, 1993, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 58 30 281), this characteristic being referred to as CpG suppression". Thus, by virtue of the presence of unmethylated CpG sequences, bacterial DNA can WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 2 be distinguished by the immune system as being non-self, whereas "CpG suppressed" vertebrate sequences are treated as self. It should also be noted that unmethylated vertebrate CpG sequences tend to be flanked by C or G nucleotides, rendering them less immunostimulatory. 5 In B lymphocytes, CpG-containing DNA is a polyclonal activator of mitogenesis and cytokine production, and furthermore acts to block apoptosis, such as induced by anti-lgM treatment (Krieg et al., 1995, supra; Messina et al., 1991, supra; Sun et al., 1997, J. Immunol. 159 3119; Piseteky & Reich, 1993, Mol. Biol. Rep. 18 217; Liang etal., 1996, J. Clin. 10 Invest. 98 1119). In macrophages and dendritic cells, and indirectly in NK cells, CpG-containing DNA partially mimics the action of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Chace etal., 1997, Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 84 185; Cowdery et al. 1996, J. Immunol. 156 4570; Halpern et al., 1996, 15 Cell. Immunol. 16772; Sparwasser etal., 1997, Eur. J. Immunol. 27 1671; Sparwasser et al., 1997, Nature 386 336; Stacey et al., 1996, supra; Sweet et al., 1998, J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 18 263; Yamamoto et al., 1992, supra). However, there are important differences between the effect of LPS and CpG-containing DNA. For example, although CpG DNA is as effective 20 as LPS at inducing the transcription factor NF-KB and TNF-a mRNA, unlike LPS it is a poor inducer of interleukin 1 P3 (lL-1p) and does not, by itself, induce nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (Stacey etal., 1996, supra; Sweet etal., 1998 supra). It has also been noted that CpG DNA is an excellent inducer of interleukin 12 (IL-12), and thereby acts to promote interferon gamma (IFN 25 y) production in mixed cell cultures (Chace et al., 1997, supra; Cowdery et al., 1996, supra). IFN-y in turn primes macrophages to respond to immunostimulatory DNA by expressing iNOS, thereby creating a self amplifying loop with NK cells (Sweet et al., 1998, supra). The emerging consensus is that immune modulation by 30 immunostimulatory DNA involves elicitation of IL-12 production by macrophages or dendritic cells which thereby contributes to the polarization WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 3 of T-lymphocyte responses towards an IFN-y-producing T-helper 1 (Thl) phenotype (Carson & Raz, 1997, J. Exp. Med. 186 1621; Chu et al., 1997, J. Exp. Med. 186 1623; Davis etal., 1998, J. Immunol. 160 870; Lipford et al., 1997, Eur. J. Immunol. 27 2340; Roman et al., 1997, Nature Med. 3 849; 5 Weiner et al., 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 10833; Zimmerman et al., 1998, J. Immunol. 160 3627). As would be expected from the Thl cytokines induced by immunostimulatory DNA, the immune response is typically Thl like, and characterized by a predominance of IgG 2 a antibody production and strong CTL induction. In fact, it has been noted that CpG-containing DNA is 10 a stronger Thl adjuvant than complete Freunds adjuvant (Chu et al., 1997, supra). An important consequence of the immune response to immunostimulatory DNA is that when such sequences are present in a plasmid vector, the plasmid vector can effectively act as an adjuvant. This 15 has implications for vectors used in DNA vaccines, and it has been reported that CpG sequences are essential for effective DNA vaccination (Gregoriades, 1998, Pharm. Res. 15 661, Klinman etal., 1997, J. Immunol. 158 3635; Sun et al., 1988, J. Exp. Med. 187 1145; Sato et al., 1996, Science 273 352). It will also be appreciated that an increasing number of 20 studies have utilized synthetic oligonucleotides (ODN) which contain immunostimulatory CpG sequences as immunomodulators in their own right (Schwartz et al., 1997, J. Clin. Invest. 100 68; Wooldridge etal., 1997, Blood 89 2994; Kline et al., 1998, J. Immunol. 160 2555). The limited mechanistic studies of how immunostimulatory 25 DNA stimulates macrophages and B lymphocytes suggest that immunostimulatory DNA must be internalized. For example, chloroquine which interferes with endosomal function, blocks the actions of immunostimulatory DNA, but not the actions of LPS (MacFarlane & Manzel, 1998, J. Immunol. 160 1122; Yi etal., 1998, J. Immunol. 160 4755). Thus, 30 it has been postulated that cellular recognition of immunostimulatory DNA probably occurs within the cytoplasm or nucleus.
WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 4 Replication protein A (RPA) is a known DNA-binding activity in eukaryotic cells. RPA exists as a complex of three subunits: (i) a 70 kD subunit (RPA70 or RPA1) which contains two 5 DNA-binding domains; (ii) a 34 kD subunit (RPA34 or RPA2); and (iii) a 14 kD subunit (RPA14 or RPA3). RPA34 and RPA14 have been shown recently to form a separate DNA binding domain that may also interact with the C-terminus of 10 RPA70. The major functional role for RPA is as an indispensable player in normal cellular DNA replication, namely by being required for DNA strand separation and unwinding. (reviewed in Wold, 1997, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 66 61). RPA also recognizes DNA damaged by agents such as UV light and 15 cisplatin, and contributes to repair of damaged DNA (Burns et al., 1996, J. Biol. Chem. 271 11607; Patrick & Turchi, 1998, Biochemistry 37 8808). Thus, the crucial role of RPA in general processes relating to cellular DNA replication and RPA's relative lack of sequence specificity, had rendered RPA an unlikely candidate as a sequence-specific receptor for CpG 20 containing immunostimulatory DNA (Wold, 1997, supra). OBJECT OF THE INVENTION In contrast to the expectations provided by the prior art, the present inventors have identified RPA as a cellular receptor for immunostimulatory DNA. This discovery has provided new molecular and cellular methods of 25 identifying immunostimulatory DNA. It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a method of identifying an immunostimulatory DNA. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention is broadly directed to identifying 30 immunostimulatory DNA. The methods of the invention include detection of complexes formed between RPA subunits and immunostimulatory DNA, and WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 5 detection of macrophage responses to immunostimulatory DNA, such responses including CSF-1R down-regulation and cell cycle arrest. These methods also enable identification of immunostimulatory DNA agonists and antagonists. 5 In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method of detecting immunostimulatory DNA, including the steps of: (i) combining isolated RPAwith a sample containing DNA; (ii) forming a complex between said isolated RPA and immunostimulatory DNA, if present in said sample; and 10 (iii) detecting said complex formed at step (ii). In a second aspect, the invention provides a method of identifying an immunostimulatory DNA agonist or antagonist, including the steps of: (i) combining isolated RPA with a sample suspected of 15 containing an immunostimulatory DNA agonist or antagonist; and (ii) determining whether or not a complex forms between said isolated RPA and said agonist or antagonist, formation of a complex indicating that said agonist or 20 antagonist is present in said sample. In a preferred embodiment, an immunostimulatory DNA is added at step (i) so that at step (ii) said agonist or antagonist prevents formation of a complex between said immunostimulatory DNA and said isolated RPA. 25 Preferably, the complexes formed at step (ii) are detected by EMSA. More preferably, an anti-RPA antibody is included at step (i). In a third aspect, the invention provides a kit for detecting immunostimulatory DNA, said kit comprising: 30 (i) one or more isolated RPA subunits; and (ii) an RPA-specific antibody.
WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 6 In a fourth aspect, the invention provides a method of detecting an immunostimulatory DNA including the steps of: (i) combining macrophage cells with a sample suspected of containing immunostimulatory DNA; 5 (ii) measuring a response by said macrophage cells to said immunostimulatory DNA if present in said sample, said response selected from the group consisting of: (a) a cell-cycle arrest; and (b) a reduction in CSF-1 receptor (CSF1-R) 10 expression. In a fifth aspect, the invention provides a method of identifying an immunostimulatory DNA antagonist, including the steps of: (i) combining macrophage cells with immunostimulatory DNA and a sample suspected of containing an 15 immunostimulatory DNA antagonist; (ii) measuring a response, or an absence of said response, by said macrophage cells to said immunostimulatory DNA, said response selected from the group consisting of: 20 (a) a cell-cycle arrest;and (b) a reduction in CSF-1 receptor (CSF1-R) expression; wherein said absence of a response is indicative of said antagonist being present in said sample. 25 In a sixth aspect, the invention provides a method of identifying an immunostimulatory DNA agonist, including the steps of: (i) combining macrophage cells and a sample suspected of containing an immunostimulatory DNA agonist; (ii) measuring a response by said macrophage cells 30 selected from the group consisting of: (a) a cell-cycle arrest; WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 7 (b) a reduction in CSF-1 receptor (CSF1-R) expression; wherein a response by said macrophage cells is indicative of said agonist being present in said sample. 5 In a seventh aspect, the present invention provides an immunostimulatory DNA, agonist or antagonist identified by the methods of the invention. In an eighth aspect, the present invention provides an immunostimulatory DNA antagonist comprising a DNA having a 10 phosphorothioate backbone. Preferably, the immunostimulatory DNA is a CpG-containing DNA having a phosphodiester backbone. In a ninth aspect, the present invention provides therapeutic or prophylactic compositions which comprise the immunostimulatory DNA, 15 agonist or antagonist of the seventh aspect or eighth aspect, together with an acceptable carrier or delivery agent. Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, "comprise", "comprises" and "comprising" are used inclusively rather than exclusively, in that a stated integer or integer group may include 20 one or more other non-stated integers or groups of integers. It will also be appreciated that scientific terms are to be given their usual scientific meaning, although in some cases certain terms will be defined in order to assist interpretation by the skilled person. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES 25 FIG. 1 Effect of various oligonucleotides on luciferase activity in RAW264a4 cells. The indicator RAW264a4 cells with integrated HIV-LTR-luciferase construct were cultivated with the indicated oligonucleotides (defined in Materials and Methods) at the concentrations shown. After 2 hrs, or the indicated time in 30 panel C, they were washed with PBS, lysed and luciferase activity was determined. In panel A and B the luciferase activity of control cells is WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 8 normalised to a value of 1. Results are the average of triplicate determinations. In Panel C, RLA is relative luciferase activity. FIG. 2 Effect of oligonucleotides on TNF-a secretion. RAW264 cells (5 x 105 in 0.5 5 ml in a 24 well plate) were incubated with the oligonucleotides shown or with LPS as a positive control at the concentrations indicated for 18 hrs. The supernatants were harvested and the level of TNF-a secretion was assessed by ELISA. Results are the average of duplicates. FIG. 3 10 Uptake of propidium iodide as an assay of DNA action. 106 BMM were harvested, washed and replated for 24 hrs in the presence of CSF-1, or in its absence (lower three panels). As indicated, E. col genomic DNA (10 pg/ml) or LPS (100 ng/ml) was added. After 24 hrs, propidium iodide was added for 1.5 hrs as described in Materials and Methods. The FACS 15 analysis plots fluorescence (vertical axis) against forward light scatter (an indicator of cell size). Cells in the R2 region of the profile are assessed as having taken up propidium iodide and therefore are non viable. Note that CSF-1, DNA and LPS all repress the appearance of these cells and also maintain a larger average (indicated by the right shift on the horizontal axis). 20 FIG. 4 LPS and bacterial DNA cause cell cycle arrest in proliferating macrophages. BMM (lx106) were incubated in 10 4 U/ml CSF-1 with addition of LPS (100 ng/ml) or E. coli genomic DNA (10 pg/ml) as indicated for 24 hrs. They were then permeabilized and stained for DNA content using propidium iodide as 25 described in Materials and methods. Cells are ascribed a position in G 1 ,
G
2 M or S phase based upon 2N, 4N or intermediate DNA content respectively as indicated. FIG. 5 Down modulation of CSF-1 surface receptor expression in bone marrow 30 derived macrophages. A. Bone marrow-derived macrophages were harvested, washed and replated on glass cover slips in the presence or WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 9 absence of 104 U/ml CSF-1 overnight. CSF-1 -starved cells were incubated with CSF-1, E. coil genomic DNA (10 pg/ml) or LPS (100 ng/ml) as indicated, the fixed for immunofluorescence localisation of CSF-1R antigen as described in Materials and Methods. Note the high level of surface CSF 5 1R expression in CSF-1 starved cells, which is rapidly down-modulated in response to CSF-1, DNA or LPS. B. FACS profiles CSF-1R down modulation. Bone marrow-derived macrophages were starved of CSF-1 overnight, and incubated for 1 hr without or with CSF-1 (10 4 U/mL), E. coil DNA (ECDNA; 10 pg/mL), LPS (100 ng/mL), DNAse I treated E. col DNA 10 (DNASED EC DNA; 10 pg/mL), calf thymus DNA (CTDNA; 10 ptg/mL) or salmon sperm DNS (SSDNA; 10 ptg/mL) for 1 hr. Cells were harvested and stained for CSF-1R surface expression and then analyzed by flow cytometry. C. Time course analysis of CSF-1 treated and E. col genomic DNA treated bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM). BMM were starved 15 of CSF-1 overnight, and incubated without or with CSF-1 (10 4 U/mL) or E. coil DNA (ECDNA; 10 tg/mL) for varying times as indicated and then analyzed by flow cytometry. D. Time course analysis of AO-1 and NAO-1 treated BMM.MM were starved of CSF-1 overnight, and incubated without or with 20 tg/mL CpG-containing AO-1, or20 ptg/mL GpC-containing NAO-1 20 for indicated times and analyzed by flow cytometry. FIG. 6 Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of location and specificity of ssDNA binding activity in various extracts. Radiolabelled single-stranded (AO-1) or double-stranded ODN probes (PU-1, the PU box recognition sequence 25 or Octamer; see Materials and Methods) were incubated with 2 pg of cytoplasmic (C) or nuclear (N) extracts in a binding buffer containing 12% glycerol, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9) plus 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM EDTA, 40 mM KCI and 20 pg/ml sheared salmon sperm DNA. Extracts were then separated on non-denaturing 7.5% PAGE and exposed to autoradiographic 30 film. The unbound probe has been run off the end to increase resolution of the protein bands. Panel A demonstrates the compartmentation of binding WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 10 activity for ssAO-1 compared to well documented targets for dsDNA binding proteins in macrophages; PU.1 and Oct-1. The abundant band towards the bottom of the gel in both the PU.1 tracks (Panel A) has been shown previously to be PU. 1, whilst the abundant nuclear band in the Oct tracks is 5 Oct-1. Panel B compares the distribution of activities in RAW264 and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. In both panels A and B the cold competitor is 20 pg/ml of sheared salmon sperm DNA. Panel C shows cytoplasmic extracts of RAW264 cells incubated with labelled ssAO-1 ODN. Various amounts of salmon sperm DNA are used as a cold competitor DNA. Note there is some 10 selective loss of the B' band at 0.2 pg of added cold competitor (20 pg/ml). In Panel D RAW264 cytoplasmic extracts were incubated with labeled immunostimulatory ssODN probe M12 together with plasmid DNA (the reporter plasmid pGL3C) in excess (fold-excess on a pg per pg basis) as indicated. Note the selective release of the lower band (band C) which has 15 resolved slightly further in this particular experiment compared to panels A C. FIG. 7 Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of sequence specificity of ssDNA binding activity. RAW264 cytoplasmic extracts were incubated with 20 radiolabelled probes as indicated and separated on 7.5% non-denaturing PAGE. Buffer conditions were changed in different experiments to optimise visualisation of particular bands as indicated. Panel A compares the binding of RAW264 cytoplasmic proteins to single stranded or double stranded immunostimulatory ODN AAC-22. Binding buffer is the same as 25 the nuclear extract buffer D and to avoid loss of dsDNA binding activities, no cold competitor was added. Four independent extracts of RAW264 (#1 to #4) show the same pattern of binding and the pattern is similar whether the probe is single-stranded (left panel) or double-stranded (right panel). Cold competition with single-stranded AAC-22, reveals that a 125-fold 30 excess of self ODN completely prevents binding of both ss and ds-AAC-22, whereas the same amount of ss non-stimulatory ACC-22 failed to prevent WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 11 significant binding of ss or dsAAC-22. Panel B shows quantitative cold competition of binding of ss stimulatory ODN AAC-22 with cold self ODN or non-stimulatory ACC-22 ODN. Note that there is approximately 4-fold difference in apparent relative affinity for stimulatory compared to non 5 stimulatory ODN. Binding buffer is also Buffer D. Panel C compares a different set of ODNs using a separate RAW264 cytoplasmic extract, in this case band C (the lower band) is particularly abundant. Labelled probes are the immunostimulatory ODN AO-1 and the non-stimulatory GC transversion NAO-1 or the methylated form AOM-1. Note that in each case the pattern of 10 binding is the same, but regardless of which ODN is labelled, AO-1 is the more effective cold-competitor. Binding buffer is the same as in FIG. 6, without cold competitor. This pattern is confirmed independently in panel D, with a separate RAW264 extract and AO-1 labelled as indicated. In this case, salmon sperm DNA was added (20 pg/ml) but does not alter the 15 pattern of relative binding activity. Note that AO-1 is at least 5 fold more effective as cold competitor than either NAO-1 or AOM-1. In Panel E, the labelled probe is again AO-1 and the cold competitors are a separate immunostimulatory ODN (1668) and the weak activator IL-12p40. Note that a 10-fold excess of 1668 reduces binding to a similar extent to a 50-fold 20 excess of IL-12p40 ODN. Binding buffer in this case contains 10 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl 2 and 50 mM CaCl 2 to optimise detection of band C. FIG. 8 Characteristics of the binding of ssDNA by RAW264 cytoplasmic proteins. Panel A shows a further independent confirmation of the ability of 25 stimulatory ODN (AO-1) to cold-compete approximately 5-fold more effectively than non-stimulatory ODN, NAO-1. Binding buffer is the same as in FIG. 6 with 20 pg/ml salmon sperm DNA as competitor. In the right panel, the labelled ODN was allowed to preincubate with cytoplasmic extract for 15 mins at room temperature prior to addition of cold competitor. Note that 30 the faster migrating band is still competed but no reduction in the slower band (band A) is evident. Panel B examines the effect of changing the ion WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 12 composition of the binding buffer. In each case the buffer is the and incubations are carried out in 20 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.9, varying only by additions of MgCl 2 or KCI as indicated. Note that binding of band A. the slower band, is increased by KCI and decreased by MgCI 2 . Note also that 5 the middle band, band B, is detected most readily in the presence of MgCl 2 and the absence of KCl. FIG. 9 Primary gel shifts were carried out in binding buffer as in FIG. 6 and UV cross-linked in situ as described in Materials and Methods. The relevant 10 bands were located, excised, extracted and re-run on SDS-PAGE with molecular weight standards as indicated. Bands and UV cross-link times are indicated as follows: Lane 1= Bands A, B and C (0 minutes); Lane 2= Band C (2 minutes); Lane 3= Band B(2 minutes); and Lane 4= Bands A, B abd C (2 minutes). 15 FIG. 10 Cytoplasmic extracts were prepared from RAW264 cells and from the human macrophage cell line MonoMac6. Prior to addition of labeled ODN, the cytoplasmic extracts were incubated for 10 mins in irrelevant monoclonal antibody, anti-RPA34 or anti-RPA70 monoclonal antibody. Note that anti 20 RPA34 generates a new supershifted complex and completely represses the formation of the faster-migrating complexes. Anti-RPA70 abolishes the formation of the faster-migrating complexes in the human line only, but does not generate a super-shifted band. Binding buffer in this case contained 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 140 mM KCI, 13 mM NaCI, 5 mM MgCI 2 and 20 pg/ml 25 salmon sperm DNA. FIG. 11 Phosphorothioate-modified CpG ODN are more active in induction of nitrite production than sequence identical phosphodiester ODN. Bone marrow derived macrophages (Panel A) or RAW264 cells (Panel B) were primed 30 with interferon-y, then incubated for a further 24hrs with the indicated concentration of PS (AOS-1, NAOS-1) or PO (AO-1) prior to harvesting and WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 13 measurement of nitrite as described in Materials and Methods. Points are the average of triplicates. The experiment is representative of three. FIG. 12 Phosphorothioate-modified CpG ODN are more active than phosphodiester 5 ODN in maintenance of viability of CSF-1-starved bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM). BMM were starved of CSF-1 for 48hrs with no additions or the indicated concentrations of PS (AOS-1, NAOS-1) or PO (AO-1, NAO-1). Cleavage of the dye MTT to form an insoluble formazan product was measured as an indirect measure of the number of viable cells 10 as described. The result is representative of three experiments. FIG. 13 Phosphorothioate-modified CpG ODN are inactive in activation of NF-icB dependent transcription. RAW264a4 cells, with an integrated HIV-1-LTR luciferase reporter gene, were incubated for two hours with the ODN at the 15 indicated concentrations prior to being harvested for determination of luciferase activity. The activity observed in unstimulated cells is arbitrarily given a value of 1. Results are the average of triplicates. The experiments are representative of at least three. FIG. 14 20 Phosphorothioate-modified CpG ODN fail to down-modulate the CSF-1R from the surface of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM). BMM were starved of CSF-1 overnight then incubated with the indicated concentrations of ODN, fixed, and immunostained for surface expression of CSF-1R using the specific monoclonal antibody AFS-98. Panel A shows representative 25 FACS profiles from one experiment. Panel B shows analysis of the proportion of cells showing down-modulated CSF-1R (based upon gating into the M1 fraction shown in Panel A) from two separate experiments where cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of ODN. FIG. 15 30 Phosphorothioate-modified ODN induce phosphorylation of ERK-1/2 more slowly than phosphodiesters. Bone marrow-derived macrophages were WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 14 starved of CSF-1 overnight, then incubated for the indicated times with 3 pM AO-1 or AOS-1 prior to lysis and Western blotting to detect ERK-1/2 phosphorylation as shown. A representative experiment is shown. FIG. 16 5 Phosphorothioate-modified ODN prevent activation of NF-KB-dependent transcription by CpG DNA. RAW264a4 cells, with integrated HIV-1-LTR luciferase reporter gene, were treated with AO-1 at 2 pM for 2hrs prior to harvesting and determination of luciferase. Unstimulated luciferase activity is given an arbitrary value of 1. In panel A, cells were either pretreated for 10 2hrs, or co-treated with an equimolar concentration of non-stimulatory PO ODN (NAO-1) or PS-ODN (NAOS-1). In panel B, the concentration of AO-1 tested was 5pM, which is just maximal, and a 6 fold excess of NAO-1 was added. FIG. 17 15 Inhibition of CpG DNA response by phosphorothioate-modified ODN does not require preincubation. RAW264a4 cells, with integrated HIV-1-LTR luciferase reporter gene, were treated with 2 pM AO-1 for 2hrs prior to harvesting for measurement of luciferase activity. AOS-1 at equimolar concentration was added at the times indicated relative to the addition of 20 AO-1. Results are the average of triplicates of a representative experiment. FIG. 18 Phosphorothioate-modified ODN prevent activation of nitrite production induced by CpG DNA. RAW264 cells were primed with interferon-y then treated for 24hrs with 1 pM AO-1 or 5ng/ml LPS as indicated. NAO-1, or 25 NAOS-1 were added at the concentrations shown, either alone, or 30 min priorto LPS orAO-1. The cellswere incubated for a further 24 hrthen nitrite production was determined. Results are the average of triplicates from a representative experiment. FIG. 19 30 CCGG-containing ODN do not prevent activation by CpG DNA. RAW264 cells primed with interferon-y were incubated with the indicated WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 15 concentrations of the PO-ODN 10-2, which has the same sequence as AO-1 except the core stimulatory motif is CCGG instead of ACGT. After 24 hr, cells were harvested for determination of nitrite production after 24 hr. Results are the average of triplicates. 5 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention is predicated, at least in part, on the present inventors discovery that RPA is the intracellular receptor for immunostimulatory DNA. This discovery led from the observations by the present inventors that assays which utilize macrophages, and macrophage 10 derived cell lines, can identify immunostimulatory DNA. Further to this, the present inventors have dissected the mechanisms underlying recognition of immunostimulatory DNA and have discerned differences between phosphodiester-backbone DNA and phosphorothioate-backbone DNA. This has enabled the present inventors to propose means by which 15 immunostimulatory agonists and antagonists may be designed. As used herein, "DNA" is a dexoxyribonucleic acid in single-or double-stranded form, inclusive of single- or double-stranded oligonucleotides and plasmids such as used in gene therapy or DNA vaccination. DNA normally comprises the purine bases adenine (A) and 20 guanine (G), and the pyrimidine bases cytosine (C) and thymidine (T). However, the skilled person will also appreciate that DNA may include modified bases such as methylcytosine, inosine, methylinosine, methyladenosine, thiouridine and methylcytosine, for example. As used herein, "immunostimulatoryDNA" is DNAwhich elicits 25 or potentiates an immune response by cells of the vertebrate immune system, preferably the mammalian immune system, and more preferably the human immune system. Suitably, responsive cells of the immune system include macrophages, NK cells, dendritic cells, B cells and T cells. As used herein, a "macrophage" is a cell of the macrophage 30 monocyte myeloid lineage, preferably in mammals or more preferably in humans, or a cell line derived therefrom. This definition therefore includes WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 16 and encompasses primary macrophages such as bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM) and cell lines such as MonoMac6, RAW264 and derivates thereof such as RAW264a4. A useful discussion of monocyte macrophage development and function can be found, for example, in 5 Chapter 11 of IMMUNOLOGY 3rd Ed. Roitt et al.(Mosby-Year Book Europe Ltd), which is herein incorporated by reference. As used herein "oligonucleotide", abbreviated herein to "ODN", is single-stranded or double-stranded DNA comprising between six (6) and one hundred (100) contiguous nucleotides, or preferably fifteen (15) to thirty 10 (30) nucleotides. An oligonucleotide may have naturally-occurring phosphodiester linkages between constituent bases, abbreviated herein to "PO-ODIVN", or phosphorothioate linkages, abbreviated herein to "PS-ODN". Phosphorothiaote linkages are created by replacing a non-bridging oxygen atom of the internucleotide phosphate group with a sulfur, to thereby create 15 a thioester linkage. It will also be appreciated that oligonucleotides may be modified by addition of peptide linkages, enzymes, biotin, radiolabel, fluorochromes, lipids and carbohydrates. For use in vivo, nucleic acids are preferably relatively resistant to degradation (e.g., are stabilized). A "stabilized nucleic acid' shall mean 20 a nucleic acid that is relatively resistant to in vivo degradation (e.g. via an exo- or endo-nuclease). Stabilization can be a function of length or secondary structure. Unmethylated CpG oligonucleotides that are tens to hundreds of kbs long are relatively resistant to in vivo degradation. For shorter CpG oligonucleotides, secondary structure can stabilize and 25 increase their effect. For example, if the 3' end of an oligonucleotide has self-complementarity to an upstream region, so that it can fold back and form a stem loop type of structure, then the oligonucleotide becomes stabilized and therefore exhibits more activity. Alternatively, nucleic acid stabilization can be accomplished via phosphate backbone modifications. 30 Preferred stabilized oligonucleotides of the instant invention have a modified backbone. It has been demonstrated that modification of the oligonucleotide WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 17 backbone provides enhanced activity of the CpG oligonucleotides when administered in vivo. These stabilized structures are preferred because the CpG molecules of the invention have at least a partial modified backbone. CpG constructs, including at least two phosphorothioate linkages at the 5 5 end of the oligonucleotide and multiple phosphorothioate linkages at the 3' end, preferably 5', provide maximal activity and protect the oligonucleotide from degradation by intracellular exo- and endo-nucleases. Other modified oligonucleotides include phosphodiester modified oligonucleotides, combinations of phosphodiester and phosphorothioate oligonucleotide, 10 methylphosphonate, methylphosphorothioate, phosphorodithioate, and combinations thereof. Each of these combinations and their particular effects on immune cells is discussed in more detail in PCT Published Patent Application Nos. PCT/US95/01570 and PCT/US97/19791 claiming priority from U.S. Serial Nos. 08/386,063 and 08/960,774, filed on February 7, 1995 15 and October 30, 1997 respectively, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. It is believed that these modified oligonucleotides may show more stimulatory activity due to enhanced nuclease resistance, increased cellular uptake, increased protein binding, and/or altered intracellular localization. 20 Modified backbones such as phosphorothioates may be synthesized using automated techniques employing either phosphoramidate or H-phosphonate chemistries. Aryl-and alkyl-phosphonates can be made, e.g., as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,469,863; and alkylphosphotriesters (in which the charged oxygen moiety is alkylated as described in U.S. 25 Patent No. 5,023,243 and European Patent No. 092,574) can be prepared by automated solid phase synthesis using commercially available reagents. Methods for making other DNA backbone modifications and substitutions have been described (Uhlmann & Peyman,1990, Chem. Rev. 90 544; Goodchild, 1990, Bioconjugate Chem. 1 1650). 30 Both phosphorothioate and phosphodiester oligonucleotides containing CpG motifs are active in immune cells. However, based on the WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 18 concentration needed to induce CpG specific effects, the nuclease resistant phosphorothioate backbone CpG oligonucleotides are more potent. Other stabilized oligonucleotides include: nonionic DNA analogs, such as alkyl- and aryl-phosphates (in which the charged 5 phosphonate oxygen is replaced by an alkyl or aryl group), phosphodiester and alkylphosphotriesters, in which the charged oxygen moiety is alkylated. Oligonucleotides which contain diol, such as tetraethyleneglycol or hexaethyleneglycol, at either or both termini have also been shown to be substantially resistant to nuclease degradation. 10 Oligonucleotides are readily available in synthetic form, and can be "made to order" from a variety of commercial and laboratory sources. Oligonucleotides generated by digestion of nucleic acids are also contemplated. It will be appreciated that the method according to the first 15 mentioned aspect of the invention provides a means whereby the immunostimulatory capacity of DNA can be assessed. The first aspect of the invention makes particular use of the discovery that RPA is the receptor for immunostimulatory DNA, and allows direct identification of immunostimulatory DNA by virtue of its ability to bind isolated RPA. 20 In this regard, the present inventors have identified three RPA species hereinafter designated Band A and Band B and Band C respectively, which form complexes with immunostimulatory DNA. The proposed subunit composition of Bands A-C will be discussed in detail hereinafter. 25 By "isolated" is meant removed from a natural state, such as the cellular or tissue environment in which a biomolecule exists naturally, and includes recombinant synthetic biomolecules. By "RPA subunit' is meant an intact RPA protein or fragment thereof which binds immunostimulatory DNA. For example, an RPA subunit 30 includes 70kD protein or a 55kD fragment thereof, a 32-34 kD protein or a 14 kD protein which are capable of combining to form an RPA complex. As WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 19 will be described hereinafter, RPA subunits have been identified in a variety of animal species, each subunit encoded by a distinct gene. Isolated RPA subunits may be purified recombinant, purified from a cellular source, or in the form of a nuclear or cytosolic extract. 5 Recombinant RPA may be produced in bacteria, insect cells (e.g. by baculovirus expression in Sf9 cells) or in mammalian cells by techniques well known in the art, such as provided in Chapter 5 of CURRENT PROTOCOLS IN PROTEIN SCIENCE (Coligan et al., Eds; John Wiley & Sons) which is herein incorporated by reference. 10 Recombinant polynucleotides which encode RPA subunits are readily available to the skilled person. In this regard, there are a number of mammalian RPA cDNAs, for example, the nucleotide sequences of which are available through the NCBI Entrez database. Of particular note are: (i) human RPA 70kD subunit (RPA70) cDNA; Accession 15 number M63488; Erdile et al., 1991, J. Biol. Chem. 266 12090; (ii) human RPA 32 kD subunit (RPA34) cDNA; Accession number J05249; Erdile et al., 1990, J. Biol. Chem. 265 3177; and 20 (iii) human RPA 14kD subunit (RPA14) cDNA; Accession number L07493; Umbricht et al., 1993, J. Biol. Chem. 268 6131; each database submission and corresponding publication incorporated herein by reference. 25 Recombinant RPA protein subunits may be prepared as fusion proteins together with appropriate fusion partners such as glutathione-S transferase, hexahistidine, and maltose-binding protein as are well known in the art. Indeed, kits are commercially available which facilitate construction of plasmids encoding recombinant fusion proteins and which 30 facilitate fusion protein purification. Formation of RPA-containing complexes, and detection WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 20 thereof, may be performed using an Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) or solid phase binding assays. Appropriate solid phase assays include immobilizing either RPA or said sample to a solid matrix such as microtitre plate, BIACORE sensor chip (as will be discussed in more detail 5 hereinafter), magnetic bead (e.g. DynaBead or BioMag bead) or synthetic polymer (e.g. sepharose) beads, and detecting formation of said complex on said solid matrix. Preferably, EMSA is used.. As used herein "EMSA" is a technique which detects formation 10 of a complex between DNA and protein, for example RPA present in a macrophage-derived nuclear or cytosolic extract, and electrophoretic separation of the DNA-protein complexes from relatively lower molecular weight non-complexed DNA. Preferably, separation is by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Alternatively, agarose gel 15 electrophoresis is used. Detection of RPA-containing complexes and non complexed DNA is achieved by virtue of the DNA being associated with a label. Suitable labels include radionuclides or fluorescent labels such as TET, 6-FAM, ROX, Oregon Green or HEX. Preferably, the label is 32 P. Preferably, EMSA includes a "supershiff' step whereby RPA 20 containing complexes are formed by addition of an anti-RPA antibody or antibody fragment during formation of said DNA-protein complex. Such supershifted complexes have higher relative molecular weight than DNA protein complexes in the absence of added antibody, and hence are readily discernible following size separation such as by PAGE. The particular 25 advantage of this step is that the antibody provides a more specific means of identifying RPA-containing complexes. Anti-RPA antibodies are well known and widely available in the art readily. Furthermore, anti-RPA antibodies are available from commercial sources such as NeoMarkers and Serotec. 30 A preferred EMSA method aplicable to RPA may be found, for example, in Ross etal., 1994, Oncogene 9 121 which is herein incorporated WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 21 by reference, and which forms the basis of a detailed description of an EMSA method applicable to the method of the invention as provided hereinafter. In an embodiment, the isolated RPA is recombinant synthetic 5 RPA produced according the methods such as already described. It is envisaged that different subunit compositions may be provided (e.g. comprising RPA70, RPA34, RPA14 and the aforementioned 55 kD proteolytic fragment of RPA70). The kit may be applicable to EMSA or solid phase binding assays as previously discussed. In this regard, additional 10 components may be provided such as pre-cast polyacrylamide gels, molecular size standards or RPA immobilized to beads, microtitre plates or other solid matrices. Furthermore, control reagents may be included such as a known immunostimulatory DNAstandard, and a non-immunostimulatory DNA "negative control". 15 With regard to aspects of the invention relating to macrophage-based methods of identifying immunostimulatory DNA, cell cycle arrest is a specific response of macrophage cells to immunostimulatory DNA. The particular stage at which cell cycle arrests is at the G 1 to S-phase transition. Preferably, cell cycle status is measured by 20 flow cytometric analysis of DNA content. Preferably, propidium iodide (PI) is used to stain total cellular DNA for flow cytometric analysis. However, it will be appreciated that other nucleic acid stains can be used, including acridine orange, YO-PRO-1, Hoechst 33358, and ethidium bromide. Alternatively, cell cycle status is measured by methods which 25 employ bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation and detection of cells which have entered S-phase using an anti-BrdU antibody. Detection may be performed either by flow cytometric analysis [where the anti-BrdU antibody is conjugated to a fluorochrome such as fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), Cy5, Cy3, tetramethyl rhodamine iosothicyanate (TRITC), Texas Red or 30 phycoerythrin (PE), for example], or by histochemical analysis (where the anti-BrdU antibody is conjugated to alkaline phosphatase or horseradish WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 22 peroxidase, for example). It will also be apparent to one skilled in the art that flow cytometric analysis of DNA content can be combined with BrdU incorporation to provide a particularly sensitive bivariate analysis of cell cycle status. A detailed discussion of cell cycle analysis, DNA stains, 5 fluorochromes, flow cytometry and methods of BrdU detection is provided in Chapter 7 of PRACTICAL FLOW CYTOMETRY ( 3 rd ED) by Howard M Shapiro (John Wiley & Sons), which is herein incorporated by reference. With regard to CSF-1 R, this receptor (also known as c-fms) is constitutively expressed at the cell surface of primary macrophages (eg. 10 BMMs) and a variety of monocyte-macrophage lineage cell lines such as RAW264 and monoMac6. Suitably, measurement of CSF-1R is performed using an anti-CSF-1R mAb. Preferably, the anti-CSF-1R antibody is mAb AFS-98 as described in Sudo et al., 1995, Oncogene 11 2469, which is herein incorporated by reference. 15 Preferably, the anti-CSF-1R antibody is detected by a secondary antibody conjugated to Cy5, or alternatively to another fluorochrome such as FITC, TRITC, PE or Texas Red. It is also envisaged that the anti-CSF-1R antibody may be directly conjugated to one of the abovementioned fluorochromes. Preferably, measurement of CSF-1R is 20 performed by flow cytometric analysis of CSF-1R expression or by immunofluorescence microscopy, as will be described in detail hereinafter. Other techniques for measuring cell surface CSF-1R expression include: (i) radioiodination of intact cells or membranes followed 25 by immunoprecipitation (using anti-CSF-1R antibody); or (ii) biotinylation of intact cells or membranes followed by affinity chromatography (using streptavidin-sepharose) and immunoblotting (using anti-CSF-1R antibody). 30 Strategies such as outlined in (i) and (ii) are well known in the art, and exemplary experimental protocols may be found in Chapter 3 of WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 23 CURRENT PROTOCOLS IN PROTEIN SCIENCE (Coligan etal., Eds; John Wiley & Sons) which is herein incorporated by reference. The present invention also contemplates immunostimulatory DNA agonists and antagonists. As used herein, an "agonist' causes 5 immune system cells, preferably macrophage cells, to respond in a fashion similar to their response to immunostimulatory DNA. Conversely, an "antagonist" will inhibit, prevent, reduce or minimize a cellular response to immunostimulatory DNA. In one embodiment, agonists and/or antagonists are identified 10 by their ability to compete with immunostimulatory DNA, and hence prevent formation of a complex between RPA and immunostimulatory DNA. Detection of the presence or absence of said complex may be according to the method of the first-mentioned aspect of the invention. In another embodiment, antagonists and/or agonists are 15 identified which do not compete with immunostimulatory DNA, but are identified by binding RPA at a site other than that which binds immunostimulatory DNA. This embodiment is preferably performed using a BIACORE sensor chip with immobilized RPA to detect binding of an agonist or antagonist. BIACORE technology is increasingly well known in the art, 20 and exemplary references applicable to this technology are provided by Malmqvist & Karlsson, 1997, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1 378 and Fivash et al., 1998, Curr Opin. Biotechnol. 9 97, which are herein incorporated by reference. However, it will also be understood that an antagonist cannot 25 be distinguished from an agonist according to the aforementioned embodiments, but can subsequently be distinguished by a macrophage based assay of the invention. Another useful macrophage-based assays applicable in this regard utilizes RAW264a4 cells, which have a HIV LTR luciferase construct stably integrated into their genome (Stacey et al., 1996, 30 supra; Sweet etal., 1998, supra). These cells respond to immunostimulatory DNA by expression of luciferase which can be readily measured in a semi- WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 24 automated fashion. Yet another useful assay is measurement of nitric oxide (NO) production by interferon-y-primed macrophages in response to immunostimulatory DNA (Stacey et al., 1996, supra; Sweet et al., 1998, supra. Examples of the RAW264a4 luciferase assay and the NO assay will 5 be provided in detail hereinafter. In light of the foregoing, it is envisaged that the methods of the invention may be used to identify immunostimulatory DNA, and agonists or antagonists thereof, in directed or high-throughput screens. Potential agonists and antagonists could be known compounds of unknown efficacy 10 with respect to immunostimulation, the products of combinatorial chemistry, or be derived from natural sources. Such agonists and antagonists could become candidate drugs which mimic or block the effects of immunostimulatory DNA. As will be described in detail hereinafter, the phosphodiester 15 backbone of PS-ODN appears to inhibit CSF-1R down-regulation by macrophages in response to immunostimulatory DNA, and is thereby an example of a class of antagonist. Based on the known properties of immunostimulatory DNA, novel agonists or antagonists could be used as: 20 (i) vaccine adjuvants; (ii) immunotherapy for any form of cancer, allergic diseases (e.g. asthma); (iii) immunotherapy for both chronic and acute inflammatory diseases and inflammatory autoimmune 25 diseases (including but not restricted to systemic lupus erythematosus, arthritis, psoriasis, gingivitis, sarcoidosis, multiple sclerosis, colitis and ileitis); and (iv) activators of innate immune responses to protect against infection or to ameliorate symptoms of infection 30 (e.g. septic shock). Small molecule agonists or antagonists of immunostimulatory WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 25 DNA may possess the particular advantage of displaying improved absorption by the oral route, compared to CpG-containing DNAfor example, and be far more economical to produce on a commercial scale. Therefore, the present invention contemplates therapeutic and 5 prophylactic compositions comprising immunostimulatory DNA, agonists and antagonists thereof, together with an acceptable carrier or delivery agent. Compositions for delivery of immunostimulatory DNA, or agonists and antagonists in the form of DNA, include lyophilized dry powder formulations which comprise lipids such as phosphatidyl ethanolamine, phosphatidyl 10 choline, cationic bile salts and a variety of ethylphosphocholine- and cholestyl ester-containing derivatives, such as provided in U.S. Patent No. 5,811,406, which is herein incorporated by reference. Also contemplated are compositions in the form of DNA-hypericin polyamine complexes, such as described in U.S. Patent No. 5,824,654, which is herein incorporated by 15 reference. In light of theforegoing, the skilled person is referred to Mahon et al., 1998, Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 18 257 for a recent review of new approaches to delivery of DNA for therapeutic purposes, which is herein incorporated by reference. 20 Other carriers, diluents and delivery agents generally applicable to therapeutic or prophylactic compositions are also contemplated. These generally include a solid or liquid filler, diluent or encapsulating substance which may be safely used in systemic administration. Depending upon the particular route of administration, a 25 variety of pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers or diluents, well known in the art may be used. These may be selected from a group including sugars, starches, cellulose and its derivatives, malt, gelatine, talc, calcium sulfate, vegetable oils, synthetic oils, polyols, alginic acid, phosphate buffered solutions, emulsifiers, isotonic saline, and pyrogen-free water. 30 Dosage forms include tablets, dispersions, suspensions, injections, solutions, syrups, troches, capsules, suppositories, topically WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 26 administered powders, aerosols and emulsions, transdermal patches and the like. These dosage forms may also include controlled release devices or other forms of implants modified to act in this fashion. Controlled release of the therapeutic agent may be effected by coating the same, for example, 5 with hydrophobic polymers including acrylic resins, waxes, higher aliphatic alcohols, polylactic and polyglycolic acids and certain cellulose derivatives such as hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose. In addition, the controlled release may be effected by using other polymer matrices, liposomes and/or microspheres. 10 Compositions of the present invention may be suitable for administration orally or by injection, and in such cases may be presented as discrete units such as capsules, sachets or tablets, as a powder or granules, or as a solution or a suspension in an aqueous liquid, a non-aqueous liquid, an oil-in-water emulsion or a water-in-oil liquid emulsion. 15 So that the present invention can be understood in more detail, the skilled person is directed to the following non-limiting experimental examples. EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1 20 General Materials and Methods 1.1 Cells RAW264 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). To avoid phenotypic drift during prolonged culture, the original aliquot obtained from ATCC was expanded without subculture and 25 frozen. Cells were maintained in culture for no more than one month before reinitiating culture from a fresh vial. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM) were obtained by cultivation of femoral bone marrow cells for one week on bacteriological petri dishes in recombinant human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1; a gift from Chiron Corp, Emeryville, CA). 30 Adherent cells were harvested by squirting them from the plastic surface with medium using a 20 mL syringe and 18 gauge needle. The medium in WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 27 all experiments was RPMI-1640 plus 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum with 20U/ml penicillin and 20,ug/ml streptomycin. Serum was screened for low LPS contamination using RAW264a4 cells. RAW264a4 is a stable transfectant of RAW264 with an integrated HIV-1-LTR-luciferase 5 reporter gene that is activated by low concentrations of LPS, or CpG DNA. 1.2 Luciferase reporter assays The RAW264a4 macrophage cell line, a stable transfectant of RAW264 with integrated HIV-1-LTR driving a luciferase reporter gene, was described previously (Sweet et al., 1998, supra). Briefly, 2 x 105 cells were 10 cultivated overnight in 24 well plates in 1 ml of medium overnight, then treated for the desired time with agonist, washed and extracted for luciferase activity determination using the Luciferase Reporter Gene kitfrom Boehringer-Mannheim and the 1450 Microbeta TRILUX plate luminometer. 1.3 Nitrite Assay 15 The assay of nitrite using the Griess reagent was used as an indicator of NO production by both BMM and the murine macrophage-like cell line RAW-264 as described previously. Briefly, 4 x 104 RAW-264 or 105 BMM (with 1000 U/ml CSF-1) were plated in 96-well plates in 200 pl supplemented RPMI and cultured overnight. The following day cells were 20 primed with 20 U/ml recombinant murine interferon-y (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MI) for 2 hrs, followed by addition of the triggering stimulus. After 24 hrs supernatants were removed and assayed for nitrite. 1.4 Viable cells The reduction of the dye MTT (Sigma; 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2 25 yl]2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) was used as a indirect assay of the number of viable cells. BMMs were harvested and plated in CSF-1-free medium for 18hrs (4x 104 cells/well in 0.2ml in a 96 well plate). The desired additions were made, and the cells were incubated for a further 48 hrs, prior to assessment of MTT reduction. 30 1.5 Olicqonucleotides and LPS Phosphodiester (PO) and phosphorothioate (PS) WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 28 oligonucleotides (ODN) were purchased from Geneworks (Adelaide, Australia) or Pacific Oligos (Brisbane, Australia). Oligonucleotide sequences were: (i) AO-1 (SEQ ID NO:1): 5'-GCT CAT GAC GTT CCT 5 GAT GCT G-3'; (ii) AOM-1 (SEQ ID NO:2) is a version of AO-1 where the C of ACGT is methylated: 5'-GCT CAT GAC GTT CCT GAT GCT G-3'; (iii) NAO-1 (SEQ ID NO:3) is the same as AO-1, except 10 that the core CG is transverted to GC: 5' GCT CAT GAG CTT CCT GAT GCT G 3'; (iv) AOS-1 (SEQ ID NO:4) and NAOS-1 (SEQ ID NO:5) are the phosphorothioates corresponding to (i) and (iii) respectively; 15 (v) 10-2 (SEQ ID NO:6) has the same sequence as AO-1 except that the core ACGT motif is replaced by CCGG: 5'-GCT CAT GCC GGT CCT GAT GCT G-3'; (vi) AAC-22 (SEQ ID NO:7):5'-ACC GAT AAC GTT GCC GGT GAC G-3'; 20 (vii) ACC-22 (SEQ ID NO:8): 5'- ACC GAT ACC GGT GCC GGT GAC G-3'; (viii) M12 (SEQ ID NO:9): 5'-ATC CAT AAC GTT CCA GAA GCT G-3'; (ix) PU-1 (SEQ ID NO:10): 5'- GTA GGA CCG GAA GTG 25 GGA GT-3'; (x) Oct (SEQ ID NO: 11): 5'- AAT TCG AGC TCG GTA CCC GAT CCT AGC CCC TCT ATG CAA ATG AGA AGC ATT CCT TTC GAA TTG GGG ATC CTC TAG AGT CGA CCT GCA GGC ATG CAA GCT-3'; 30 (xi) 1668 (SEQ ID NO:12): 5'-TCC ATG ACG TTC CTG ATG CT- 3'; WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 29 (xii) IL12-p40 (SEQ ID NO:13): 5'- GCT ATG ACG TTC CAA GGG-3'; and (xiii) SAAC (SEQ ID NO:14) has the same sequence as AAC-22, but with a phosphorothioate backbone. 5 LPS from salmonella minnesota Re595 was purchased from Sigma and was dissolved as a 10mg/ml stock solution in 0.1% triethylamine and sonicated. 1.6 Cell proliferation/cell cycle and apoptosis measurements. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM) were prepared by 10 cultivation of CD1 outbred mouse femoral bone marrow cells in recombinant CSF-1 and harvested after 6-8 days as previously described (Stacey et al., 1995, Mol. Cell Biol. 15 3430, which is herein incorporated by reference). For cell proliferation assays, cells were cultivated in medium for the desired time with or without CSF-1 and other additions, then a measure of the 15 number of viable cells was obtained by incubation in the vital dye MTT as detailed previously (Stacey et al., 1993, Immunol. Cell Biol. 71 75). To assess cell cycle status, 107 cells preincubated with the desired stimuli were harvested, fixed and permeabilised by resuspension in 1 ml of PBS followed by addition of 3 ml of 95% ethanol and storage for at least 1 hr. Cells were 20 washed in PBS, harvested and then incubated for 30 min in the dark with 2 ml of PBS containing RNaseA (0.2 mg/ml) and propidium iodide (40 pg/ml PI). Stained cells were analysed to determine the proportions in G 1 , S, G 2 and M stages of the cell cycle using a Becton-Dickinson FACSCalibur flow cytometer. The proportion of apoptotic cells in similar incubations was 25 assessed on the basis of exclusion of the vital dye propidium iodide (PI). Cells were incubated in 40 pg/ml PI in complete medium for 1.5 hrs at 370C then analysed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer. 1.7 Immunofluorescence For direct visualisation, BMM were harvested, cultivated 30 overnight on coverslips with the desired stimulus (e.g. with or without CSF 1) then treated or not with the appropriate stimulus and fixed with 4% WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 30 paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline. Fixed cells were permeabilised with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min, washed 3 times with PBS, then 0.5% BSA in PBS for 15 min. Fixed and permeabilized cells were incubated with anti-CSF-1R monoclonal antibody (obtained from Dr J. 5 Hamilton, University of Melbourne), for 90 mins, then Cy5-labelled F(ab) 2 goat anti-rat IgG second antibody (obtained from Serotec) with extensive washing in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) between each step. For FACS analysis, BMM were harvested at the desired time, fixed for 5 min in 4% formaldehyde in PBS, then incubated in the same 10 succession of reagents as for direct visualisation. Staining was assessed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer. To measure down-modulation of CSF-1 R, BMM were starved of CSF-1 overnight then incubated with the desired treatments on bacteriological petri dishes, prior to being fixed and immunostained for 15 surface expression of CSF-1R using the specific monoclonal antibody AFS98 (Sudo et al., 1995, supra) as described previously herein. 1.8 Phosphorylation of MAPKinases Cell extracts and Western blotting for the determination of the phosphorylation state of the MAPKinases ERK-1 and ERK-2 were carried 20 out as described previously (Sweet & Hume, 1995, J. Inflamm. 45 126, which is herein incorporated by reference). 1.9 Electrophoretic mobility shift assays Approximately 10' cells were lysed by hypotonic swelling followed by incubation in 0.1% NP40 detergent as described previously 25 (Ross et al., 1994, supra). Nuclei were separated from cytoplasm by centrifugation and the cytoplasmic extract was made up to a volume of 50 pl. Nuclear proteins were extracted from nuclei and made up to 50 pl in extraction buffer. Single-stranded or double-stranded oligonucleotide (DNA) probes were end-labelled with 32 P, and incubated with 2 pg of cytoplasmic 30 or nuclear protein extract for 30 minutes prior to separation on non denaturing 7.5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). For supershift WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 31 studies, monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against human RPA subunits RPA70 and RPA34 were provided by Dr. Bruce Stillman of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY USA, and were used directly as hybridoma supernatants. A rabbit heteroantiserum raised against purified human RPA (all three 5 subunits), was a gift from Dr. Guiseppe Baldacci (Institut de Recherches sur Le Cancer, Villejuif, France). Irrelevant antiserum or hybridoma supernatant was added to control incubations. For UV cross-linking experiments, EMSA gels were exposed directly to UV transillumination and the positions of bands were identified by 10 exposure of the wet gel to film. Bands were excised, extracted, and subjected to further separation by SDS-PAGE as described previously (Ross et al., 1994, supra) EXAMPLE 2 Macrophaqe-based detection of immunostimulator' DNA 15 2.1 Determination of the optimal DNA structure recoqnised by murine macrophages In earlier studies the present inventors described a cell line assayfor LPS in which the HIV-1-LTR driving luciferase enzyme expression is stably integrated into the DNA of the murine macrophage cell line 20 RAW264 (Sweet & Hume, 1995, supra). Addition of LPS to these cells (RAW264a4 cells) caused rapid activation of luciferase expression, peaking after around 2 hrs. This cell line also responds to plasmid DNA or activating oligonucleotides in a similar fashion. (Stacey et al., 1996, supra; Sweet et al., 1998, supra). Others (Lipford et al., 1997, Eur. J. Immunol. 27 3420) 25 have claimed that different specific CpG DNA sequences can induce IL-12, but not TNF-a, in macrophages, with the implication that such "selective" oligonucleotides could harness therapeutic activities of CpG whilst avoiding toxic activities associated with induction of genes such as TNF-a. Most such studies have been based upon the use of phosphorothioate-modified 30 oligonucleotides. Whilst of therapeutic relevance, such modification adds another variable since the phosphorothioate backbone is biologically active WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 32 and may be toxic at high concentrations. The present inventors therefore sought to ascertain whether differences in apparent efficacy might relate to shifts in dose response curve that are not evident when a single concentration is examined. Such studies are expedited by the availability of 5 an economical, rapid and convenient bioassay such as provided by RAW264a4 cells. FIG. 1A compares the relative activities of a range of published phosphodiester oligonucleotides with varying activities on the induction of luciferase activity in a4 cells. Examined at a single concentration, the AO-1 oligonucleotide is the most active phosphodiester 10 oligonucleotide tested in macrophage assays, and is more active than the phosphodiester equivalent of the 1668 oligonucleotide (Yi et al., 1996, J. Immunol. 1574918) and the IL12-p40 phosphorothioate ODN (described by Lipford et al., 1997, supra as a weak activator that did not induce TNF-a). The difference between AO-1 and 1668 is simply an increase in length by 15 adding terminal G nucleotides and inversion of the two most 5' bases in ODN1668. ODN1668 and IL12p40 have the same core 10 bp sequence and differ in flanking bases on either side. Mutation of either one of the single flanking bases reduced the activity of the 1668 ODN. FIG. 1B shows that the difference in activity between ODN 1668 and IL12p40 is greater than is 20 evident from a single concentration comparison, and results primarily from a change in dose response curve (i.e. a 5 fold shift in half-maximal concentration). Mutation in 1668 ODN of either of the flanking bases that distinguishes the two ODNs reduced the activity towards that of the less active IL12p40 ODN. The differences in efficacy of different ODNs are time 25 independent; like the response to LPS, the response to each of the oligonucleotides reaches a peak after 2-3 hrs (FIG. 1 C). Activation of the HIV-1-LTR in the cell line assay in general parallels activation of TNF-a mRNA. Lipford et al. 1997, supra reported that the IL-12p40 ODN did not induce TNF-a mRNA or protein secretion, but the 30 observation was made only at a single concentration (1 IJM) and, as noted above, the ODN was a phosphorothioate derivative.
WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 33 FIG. 2 compares the dose response curves for induction of TNF-a protein release from RAW264 macrophages. The conclusion is the same as for RAW264a4 cells. The difference in apparent efficacy of the different oligonucleotides simply reflects a shift in half-maximal activating 5 concentration on the dose response curve. This conclusion is important in terms of defining the mechanism of CpG DNA action, since it obviates any necessity to propose more than one recognition molecule or signalling pathway. In summary, the results in the RAW264a4 cell assay, which 10 measures NF-KB-dependent transcriptional activation, indicate that the sequence specificity of the response to ODNs is comparatively loose. The motif that is recognised may extend over up to 16 nucleotides. Different oligonucleotides have different dose response curves in the assay, and because the curves are very steep, assays at a single concentration can 15 give a misleading impression as to the absolute requirement for sequence specificity. 2.2 Cell cycle status, proliferation and apoptosis by bacterial DNA Induction of NF-KB-dependent transcription is one hallmark of the response of mammalian cells to DNA damage induced by a range of 20 genotoxic agents (Liu et al., 1996, Nature 384 273). Indeed, activation of the HIV-1-LTR has also been used as an indicator of such damage in fibroblasts (Miller et al., 1997, Exp. Cell Res. 230 9) and defective induction of NF-KB is associated with hypersensitivity to DNA damage-induced apoptosis (Jung et al., 1998, Radiat. Res. 149 596). It was therefore 25 considered whether the response to immunostimulatory DNA by macrophages might include changes in cell cycle progression. One of the hallmarks of the response to damaged DNA (e.g. caused by ionizing irradiation) is cell cycle arrest, or depending upon the extent of the insult, inhibition of apoptosis (see Liu et al., 1998, supra). Others have shown that 30 CpG DNA can prevent apoptosis induced in a B lymphoma line induced by anti-IgM (MacFarlane et al., 1997, supra; Yi et al., 1996, supra; Yi et al., WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 34 1998, supra), but interpretation of these results is complicated by the fact that CpG DNA is itself a mitogen for B cells. The present inventors therefore examined whether treatment with immunostimulatory DNA affects cell cycle progression in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages which 5 depend upon the macrophage-specific growth factor CSF-1, for survival and proliferation. BMMs starved of CSF-1 analysed following a propidium iodide based vital staining procedure showed decreased dye exclusion indicative of reduced cell membrane integrity. Bacterial plasmid DNA or immunostimulatory ODN prevented apoptosis completely, to the same 10 extent as readdition of CSF-1 or LPS (FIG. 3). In contrast to CSF-1, neither plasmid DNA or ODN allowed cells to progress into the S and G2M phases of the cell cycle. In fact, like LPS (Hume et al., Lymphokine Res. 6 127) CpG-containing DNA also caused almost complete inhibition of cell proliferation. This was evident by the reduction in the increase in cell 15 number using a simple colorimetric assay for viable cells (data not shown). Cell cycle analysis using the FACS indicated that like LPS, CpG DNA caused a block to progression into S phase of the cell cycle (FIG. 4). These results indicate that both LPS and immunostimulatory DNA affect macrophages in a fashion similar to DNA damage in other cell types. 20 2.3 CSF-1 receptor regulation in response to LPS and CpG DNA LPS has been shown previously to cause rapid down regulation of CSF-1 binding to murine macrophages (Hume et al., 1987, supra; Guilbert & Stanley, 1984, J. Immunol. Meth. 73 17; Baccarini et al., 1992, J. Immunol. 149 2656). It was postulated by the present inventors that 25 this response may underlie both the growth inhibition and survival described in the previous section. For this reason, the present inventors examined whether immunostimulatory DNA elicits CSF-1R down-regulation. FIG. 5A examines the expression of CSF-1 receptor on the surface of BMMs determined by immunofluorescence using an anti-CSF-1RmAb (Sudo etal., 30 1995, Oncogene 11 2469). The specificity of the staining is evident from the rapid down-regulation that occurs in response to CSF-1). Both LPS and WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 35 plasmid DNA or stimulatory ODN caused rapid disappearance of the CSF-1 receptor from the cell surface and its appearance in small cytoplasmic vesicles. These pictures also show that both treatments cause rapid spreading that is morphologically distinct from that elicited by CSF-1. At 5 higher magnification it is evident that both treatments apparently deplete the intracellular pool of CSF-1R that can be distinguished in the presumptive perinuclear Golgi regions and cause the appearance of extensive cytoplasmic vesiculation, which manifests as granularity under phase contrast. 10 The time course of CSF-1R down modulation can be measured more readily by FACS using anti-CSF-1R mAb, which also gives single cell information. FIG. 5B compares down modulation by CSF-1, LPS and various DNAs after 1 hr. While immunostimulatory E. coli DNA caused down-modulation of CSF-1R, non-stimulatory DNA such as CTDNA and 15 SSDNA did not. Stimulatory DNAs inclusive of E. coli DNA and active CpG containing ODN caused down-modulation of CSF-1 receptor in an all-or nothing manner as represented by bimodal surface expression profiles as shown in FIG. 5C & D.An ODN containing an inversion of the active CpG to GpC did not affect surface CSF-!R levels (FIG. 5D). 20 EXAMPLE 3 Identification of immunostimulatory DNA-bindinq proteins in macrophages Based upon the macrophage cell-based assays, the recognition molecule that mediates responses to immunostimulatory DNA 25 should distinguish bacterial dsDNA from methylated or mammalian DNA. It need not be absolutely sequence specific for CpG motifs in single-stranded DNA but might be expected to follow the hierarchy of stimulatory potential identified in the bioassays described above. One previous study has reported that all detectable single 30 stranded DNA binding activity in the cytoplasm of human or rodent cells extracted with mild detergent lysis is immunoreactive with antibodies WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 36 directed against 70kD and/or 34kD subunits of RPA (Seroussi & Lavi, 1993, J. Biol. Chem. 268 7147). FIG. 6A shows electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) using cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts produced from RAW264 cells together with AO-1 ODN. For comparison, the same extracts 5 are probed with dsDNA probes having consensus sequences recognized by the macrophage-specific transcription factor PU.1, and the octamer transcription factors Oct-1 and Oct-2, both of which are expressed in macrophages (FIG. 6B). In each case, a low level of poly-dlC is present to reduce binding by a non-specific low affinity DNA binding protein that has 10 been detected previously in mouse cells under similar conditions (Ross et al., 1994, supra). The results show a complex set of bands that bind a single-stranded immunostimulatory ODN. In contrast to PU.1, and in even greater contrast to the octamer binding proteins (which are completely nuclear restricted), the observed set of bands are not specifically enriched 15 in the nuclear extracts, nor are they specifically excluded. In general, the gel system used herein resolves three major bands of binding activity in cytoplasmic extracts, referred to as Bands A, B and C in order of increasing electrophoretic mobility. A 4th single-stranded DNA binding band (B') is evident solely in nuclear extracts in this experiment, but was occasionally 20 observed in cytoplasmic extracts. FIG. 6B shows that the major band present in EMSA analysis of RAW264 extracts (A + B) are also present when extract from the fibroblast cell line NIH3T3 is used. The use of poly-dlC as a cold competitor was considered 25 undesirable since it is also able to activate macrophages (Stacey et al., 1996, supra). The present inventors therefore used sheared salmon-sperm DNA as a competitor. FIG. 6C shows a cold competition experiment in which increasing amounts of the DNA are added. In the extract shown there are 4 bands. Addition of competitor reduced binding of all of the bands, with 30 some selectivity for the B' nuclear band discussed above. FIG. 6D shows a cold-competition experiment in which the complex formed with activating WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 37 ODN is cold-competed with plasmid DNA, which is immunostimulatory. The faster migrating bands (including bands B and C) were effectively cold competed with plasmid DNA. The present inventors next considered whether the major 5 binding activities could distinguish between activating and non-activating ODNs. FIG. 7 contains a series of comparisons of non-activating and activating ODNs. In FIG. 7A, the binding of ssDNA and dsDNA oligonucleotides is compared, in this case using the active ODN referred to previously as AAC-22 (Stacey et al., 1996, supra). A series of independent 10 extracts from RAW264 cells provided very similar patterns of binding, and despite the presence of the salmon sperm DNA, single-stranded and double-stranded activating ODN behaved similarly. Because probe is present in excess, it is not possible to determine with assurance whether this binding involves recognition of non-annealed ssDNA. Cold competition 15 with an excess of either ssAAC-22, or the ACC ODN which lacks immunostimulatory activity, provides evidence that the activity does bind ssDNA preferentially. Furthermore, where ssAAC-22 could completely cold compete all the bands, the inactive ODN was unable to do so at a similar concentration, indicating that both ssDNA and dsDNA binding is sequence 20 specific. To extend these findings, the present inventors performed dose-dependent cold-competition experiments. Panel 7B provides evidence for greater relative binding activity by the activating oligonucleotide (AAC 22) under the conditions of the assay. Panel 7C shows an independent 25 comparison of relative binding of a different set of ODNs with unrelated flanking sequences to AAC-22; the strongly activating AO-1, a non activating GC transversion (NAO-1) and an oligonucleotide in which the core CpG motif is methylated. In each case the same set of complexes was formed with the labelled oligonucleotide. AO-1 was the most effective cold 30 competitor regardless of whether it was competing with self, or with the less active ODNs. Panel 7D confirms the findings in 7C with a comparative dose WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 38 response curve for cold competition by each of the ODNs for binding of AO 1, indicating that 5-fold higher amounts of NAO-1 or methylated ODN are required to compete to the same extent as AO-1. Finally, FIG. 7E shows a comparative cold competition for a strong (ODN1668) and weak (IL12p40) 5 oligonucleotide that differ approximately 5-fold in relative activity in the RAW264a4 macrophage cell line assay (see above). Again, there was a 5 fold difference in the ability of the two ODNs to cold compete for binding to AO-1. The affinity of RPA for ODN can be so high as to be effectively 10 irreversible under the conditions of EMSA (Wold, 1997, supra). To determine whether this was the case for the cytoplasmic proteins in the present study, we examined the effectiveness of cold competitor added 15 minutes after the radiolabel (FIG. 8A). In this case, no release of labelled probe was observed even after a further 15 minutes of incubation for the 15 slowest migrating band (Band A) whereas the faster migrating band B (C was not evident in this experiment) released the probe. The binding activity of RPA is known to be sensitive to alterations in ionic composition of the binding buffer, particularly the addition of magnesium (Wold, 1997, supra). The present inventors therefore 20 examined whether addition of Mg 2+ or increased levels of K' to the EMSA binding reaction altered complex formation. FIG. 8B shows that monovalent cations increased the absolute binding activity of the abundant slow migrating complex. Conversely, Mg 2+ above 2 mM caused a very substantial reduction in binding activity of the more slowly-migrating complex. These 25 patterns are essentially consistent with binding activities of known forms of RPA (see discussion). Note that reduction/increase in binding activity of one of the three bands is not correlated with any change in other bands, suggesting that the alterations do not involve interconversion between different forms of DNA binding protein, but rather independent optimisation 30 of the binding of each form. To estimate the relative molecular weight of the ssDNA binding WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 39 proteins, we performed a UV cross linking on RAW264 cell extracts. Results are shown in FIG. 9. The faster migrating band (band C) produced a single complex of around 55 kD. The slowest migrating band (Band A, which binds irreversibly) was not sufficiently resolved from the next band 5 (band B) to give a clearly distinctive signal in preliminary experiments. Band B produced a doublet of around 70-75 kD with a very weak signal co migrating with the 55 kD band produced from band C. When the total binding activity of the cytoplasmic extract was examined, it resolved into three major bands, the 55 kD band, the 70-75 kD doublet seen with band B 10 and an additional major band of 30-35 kD. The 70-75 kD and 30-35 kD bands are consistent with identity as RPA1 and RPA2 subunits respectively. The 55 kD complex is consistent with a known truncated product of RPA70 (Wold, 1997, supra; Seroussi & Lavi, 1993, supra). Indeed, it was found that limited digestion of the extracts with trypsin led to the disappearance of 15 the slower migrating band A and appearance of a band that co-migrated with band C (not shown). Final confirmation of the identity of the three bands as forms of RPA was obtained using specific antisera. Because these antisera were raised against human proteins, we prepared an extract from the human macrophage line monoMac6 for comparison. Monoclonal 20 antibody directed against human RPA70 or RPA34 completely supershifted the band B complex obtained from monoMac6 cells. Anti-RPA70 was inactive in mouse, but anti-RPA34 also shifted the faster migrating bands B&C. A heteroantiserum raised against purified human RPA also supershifted all the faster migrating bands (B&C) in both human and mouse 25 (not shown). The specificity of these supershifts was confirmed by the absence of comparable changes in mobility with irrelevant monoclonal antibody or heteroantiserum at the same concentration. EXAMPLE 5 Identification of inhibitory effects of PS-backbone 30 5.1 PS-ODN can be more potent than PO-ODN in assays of CpG DNA activity in macrophages.
WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 40 RAW264 macrophages and primary bone marrow-derived acrophages (BMM) primed with interferon-y respond to exposure to CpG DNA with expression of inducible nitric oxide synthetase mRNA and increased nitric oxide (NO) production (Stacey et al., 1996, supra; Sweet et 5 al., 1998, supra). This assay provides a convenient and sensitive measure of the efficacy of immunostimulatory DNA in macrophages. PO-ODN and PS-ODN of the same sequence AO-1 and AOS-1, were compared for their ability to induce NO production in interferon-primed BMM and RAW-264 cells in FIGS. 11A and 11B respectively. The dose response profiles for the 10 primary cells and the cell line are almost indistinguishable. Both ODNs were active. The PS-ODN always gave a lower maximum, but the major effect of the PS modification was on the half-maximal effective dose. Maximal response to AOS-1 was achieved at approximately 100-fold lower concentration than for AO-1 and further elevation of the concentration 15 caused NO production to decline from the maximum. CpG specificity was preserved for the response to AOS-1, although low levels of NO production were observed occasionally with the PS-ODN NAOS-1, which differs only in having a reversal of the CpG motif to GpC. The same differential sensitivity of sequence identical PS-ODN and PO-ODN was observed with 20 unrelated ODNs, including the PO-ODN AAC-22 utilised in previous studies (Stacey etal., 1996, supra; Sweet etal., 1998, supra) and the corresponding phosphorothioate SAAC-22. In both cases, the dose response curves to PS ODNs displayed a clear maximum, above which higher concentrations of PS-ODN reduced NO production (data not shown). By contrast to LPS, 25 which induces NO production without an absolute requirement for interferon priming, even the active PS-ODN did not induce NO production when added as the sole stimulus (not shown). Because the induction of NO production depends upon interferon-y priming, the present inventors considered the possibility that 30 interferon sensitised specifically to PS-ODN. The present inventors have shown elsewhere herein that CpG DNA can prevent apoptosis that occurs WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 41 in BMM deprived of the growth and survival factor, macrophage colony stimulating factor (CSF-1). FIG. 12 compares the dose response curves for the anti-apoptotic activity of AO-1 and AOS-1. The assay used is based upon an indirect assessment of viable cells based upon reduction of the dye 5 MTT. It has been validated in terms of counts of cell numbers and evidence of DNA fragmentation shown herein. In this assay AO-1 and AOS-1 both maintained cell viability in the absence of CSF-1, whereas the corresponding GpC tranversions lacked activity. In comparative dose response curves AOS-1 was again approximately 100-fold more active than 10 AO-1 (FIG. 12). The dose response curves forAOS-1 and AO-1 were similar in the cell viability and NO assays, suggesting that interferon-y does not sensitise preferentially to phosphorothioate CpG DNA. 5.2 PS-ODN are less active than PO-ODN in CpG activation of transcription and CSF-1R down-modulation 15 Both the iNOS assay, and the anti-apoptotic assay, involve incubation for extended periods in culture where the relative stability of PS ODN could be a determinant of outcome. Mechanistically, NF-KB was the first signalling molecule demonstrated to be activated by CpG DNA (Stacey et al., 1996, supra). NF-KB-dependent transcription in macrophages has 20 been assessed using an RAW-264a4 cell line. Both bacterial DNA, and stimulatory ODN (AO-1) were very active in this assay. By contrast, the PS ODN AOS-1 was much less active than the corresponding PO-ODN AO-1 (FIG. 13A). The same pattern was observed with the PO-ODN AAC-22 and its corresponding PS-ODN SAAC-22 (FIG. 13B). Both ODNs caused a 25 minimal activation of HIV-1-LTR at low concentration, but had little additional impact with increasing concentration. The anti-apoptotic effect of CpG DNA in BMMs is preceded by acute and rapid down-modulation of the CSF-1 receptor from the cell surface, a response that occurs in an all-or-nothing manner at the single cell 30 level. This assay permits an assessment of whether the low response of macrophages to PS-ODN reflects a partial response in individual cells. Dose WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 42 response analysis of CSF-1 receptor down-modulation was conducted with AOS-1 and AO-1 (FIGS. 14Aand 14B). FIG. 1 4 A shows the representative FACS profiles. Note that increasing AO-1 concentration increases the proportion of cells with completely down-modulated receptors (falling within 5 the M1 gates). Similar to the observations made with activation of the HIV-1 LTR, PS-ODN were much less active than their PO-ODN counterparts. Whereas 95% of cells fully-down-modulated their CSF-1R within one hour with 3 pM AO-1, only 25% of cells had responded to 3 pM AOS-1 within the same time frame. The same trend was observed in a comparison of SAAC 10 22 and AAC-22 (FIG. 14C). FIG. 14C also reveals that the less active ODN, AAC-22, differs from AO-1 by approximately 5-fold in the concentration required to activate 50% of cells to down-modulate their CSF-1 receptors. Maintenance of cell viability in CSF-1-starved BMMs has previously been associated with the ability of both LPS and CpG DNA to 15 activate the MAP Kinases, ERK-1 and ERK-2 (Sweet & Hume, 1995, J. Inflamm. 45 126, which is herein incorporated by reference). LPS causes very rapid activation of these enzymes, which can be detected by Western blotting using anti-phospho-ERK1/2 antibodies. A stimulatory ODN such as AO-1 acts more slowly than LPS, perhaps reflecting the time required for 20 internalisation. FIG. 15 compares the time course of activation of ERK-1/2 in BMM by AO-1 and AOS-1. AO-1 caused maximal activation of ERK-1/2 phosphorylation after 20 minutes, followed by a small decline to stable, elevated steady state after 40 minutes. By contrast, AOS-1 had no significant effect after 20 minutes, and reached a maximum after 1 hr that 25 was still less than the peak observed with AO-1. 5.3 Differential Blockade of CpG DNA responses by non-CpG PS QDN and PO-ODN Hacker et al., 1998, EMBO J. 17 6230 have presented evidence that endosomal uptake of PS-ODN can be saturated, and that non 30 CpG PS-ODNs can compete and specifically block the response to CpG ODNs. The question of whether the actions of CpG PO-ODN might be WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 43 similarly compromised by non-CpG ODN has not previously been addressed. Pre-incubation or co-treatment with an equimolar concentration of PO-ODN NAO-1 had no significant effect on activation of HIV-LTR dependent luciferase activity in RAW264a4 cells induced by AO-1, whereas 5 both pre- and co-treatment with an equimolar concentration of the equivalent PS-ODN NAOS-1 substantially diminished activation by AO-1 (FIG. 16A). Even a six-fold molar excess of the non-CpG PO-ODN NAO-1 had no significant effect on the response to AO-1 at a concentration that was near saturating in biological "CpG" activity (FIG. 16B). The effect of 10 non-CpG PS-ODN was specific in that it reduced CpG DNA mediated activation of the HIV-1-LTR, but not activation mediated by LPS (FIG. 16A). Since even the CpG-containing PS-ODN were inactive in the RAW264 assay, the present inventors examined whether these might also be inhibitory. Indeed, SAAC-22 was also able to prevent activation byAO-1 and 15 AAC-22 (not shown). These findings indicate that the phosphorothioate backbone has a dominant repressive effect on the ability of CpG DNA to activate in the short term assays. The time course of action of PS-ODN specific blockade is investigated in FIG. 17. There appeared to be no requirement for 20 pretreatment; in fact the extent of inhibition of NF-KB-dependent transcription was greatest when PS-ODN were co-administered, whereas there was little effect where it was added only 15 minutes after treatment with CpG PO-ODN (FIG. 17). The lack of inhibition following delayed addition is consistent with the pattern of activation of ERK-1/2 (see FIG. 15) 25 which is already maximal after 20 minutes. High dose inhibition observed in the dose response curve for PS-ODN activation of NO production could also reflect a compromise between stimulation by the CpG motif, and inhibition by the backbone. This possibility was investigated by preincubating cells with non-CpG ODN. As observed in the RAW264-HIV-1-LTR assay, non 30 stimulatory PS-ODN specifically blocked the response to AO-1 or AOS-1, whereas no inhibition of the LPS response was observed (FIG. 18). By WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 44 contrast, there was no effect of the corresponding non-CpG PO-ODN (NAO 1) even at 10-fold excess. Note that the concentration of NAOS-1 that prevents responses to stimulatory DNA is in the same range that caused high dose inhibition, indicating that the two phenomena are probably 5 related. 5.4 CCGG motifs can stimulate macrophages and lack inhibitory activity The previous sections demonstrated that PS-ODN specifically prevent responses to CpG DNA, whereas non-stimulatory PO-ODN lack this 10 activity. However, there is some evidence that specific PO-ODNs can inhibit responses to CpG DNA. Specifically, CCGG motifs have been reported to be inhibitory both in cis (when such a CCGG motif is included within the active ODN) and in trans (when the CCGG motif is present on another ODN co-adminstered with an active ODN) (Krieg et al., 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. 15 Sci. USA 95 12631). The present inventors considered the possibility that inhibition by PS-ODN and CCGG PO-ODN might be related. To address the actions of CCGG motifs we co-incubated cells with AO-1 and varying amounts of 10-2 (a PO-ODN based on AO-1 with the single GACGTT motif of AO-1 replaced with ACCGGT). FIG. 19A shows that no inhibition was 20 observed with IO-2 even at a 30-fold molar excess over that of AO-1. FIG. 19A suggested that co-incubation of 10-2 with AO-1 was actually increasing the activity, therefore we investigated whether IO-2 was active in its own right. Indeed, although much less potent than AO-1, 10-2 did activate at high concentrations (FIG. 19B). Activation was not due to contaminating LPS as 25 DNase I digestion abolished activity (FIG. 19C). As 10-2 did have activity, albeit low, it is speculated that such low level activation at moderate concentrations may induce a form of tolerance, possibly accounting for the inhibition reported by others. To address this, preincubation was performed with 10-2 at varying concentrations with subsequent AO-1 treatment. Even 30 pretreatment with 10-2 at activating concentrations for 2 or 6 hrs did not reduce the subsequent CpG specific activation by AO-1 (FIG. 19D).
WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 45 EXAMPLE 6 General Discussion Based upon the results presented herein, the present inventors have shown that RPA is the receptor for immunostimulatory DNA. 5 The first evidence that a relatively non-specific ssDNA binding protein such as RPA is the receptor is based upon reassessment of the sequence specificity of the response. In essence, the response of macrophages to immunostimulatory ODNs is not absolutely determined by CpG core motifs, and actually appears to involve a relaxed activation motif of up to 16 bases 10 wherein the primary effect of substitutions is to shift the dose-response curve. Because of the logistics of carrying out substitutions of all possible bases even within a short 6 base core motif, there have been limited studies of sequence specificity of ODN responses, confused further by the effect of phosphorothioate backbone. The original report that a palindromic core was 15 required for NK cell activation was not confirmed in studies on B cell mitogenesis (Krieg etal., 1995, supra) and is not evident in any macrophage assays such as described herein. The second line of evidence favouring RPA as receptor is that immunostimulatory DNAs induce in primary macrophages a range of 20 changes that are characteristic of DNA damage in other cell types, including induction of NF-KB-dependent transcription and arrest of the cell cycle in G1. There is overwhelming evidence that RPA is a recognition molecule in several forms of DNA damage (Wold, 1997, supra). The present inventors have introduced novel cell-based assays for identifying immunostimulatory 25 DNA: the rapid down-regulation of the CSF-1 receptor (c-fms); and prevention of cell cycle progression from G 1 to S phase. The former reflects a massive increase in vesicle trafficking that occurs in stimulated macrophages and can be seen in rapid polar spreading of the stimulated cells on the substratum (not shown). The down 30 modulation is specific to the CSF-1 receptor in that the complement receptor (CD11b) and the macrophage-specific F4/80 antigen were not down- WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 46 modulated in the same time frame (data not shown). It may also be that down modulation generates some form of stimulation via the CSF-1 receptor that is, in turn, connected to the anti-apoptotic response to both DNA and LPS. Low amounts of the receptor ligand, CSF-1 itself, can maintain viability 5 of macrophages without triggering cell cycle progression (Roth & Stanley, 1992, Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 181 141). Regardless of the causal relationship, and the mechanism of selective down-modulation, disappearance of CSF-1R provides a rapid and sensitive assay for immunostimulatory ODNs (and LPS). 10 Thirdly, complementing the evidence that the sequence specificity of the biological response to ODNs is relatively relaxed, and even that the core CpG is not absolutely required, we show that RPA has sequence specificity for binding to DNA which correlates with relative biological efficacy in macrophages. RPA can distinguish activating from 15 non-activating or methylated ODN, and ODN with subtly differing activity in the RAW264a4 assay. RPA has been reported previously to have a 50-fold selective affinity for poly-pyrimidines as opposed to poly-purines (Wold, 1997, supra). Solution of the crystal structure of RPA70 complexed with an oligo-dC 8mer (Bochkarev et al., 1997, Nature 385 176) revealed a core 20 binding site comprising the two ssDNA-binding domains in asymmetric conformation. Each ssDNA binding domain contacts 3 nucleotides, and the space between the two domains is bridged by two nucleotides. Both domains form multiple hydrogen bonds with all the DNA bases, implying potential for DNA-sequence-specific binding. The two nucleotides that span 25 the gap between the two ssDNA-binding domains make 6 independent hydrogen bonds with the protein, including 4 with the bases. The hydrogen bonds with these nucleotides are the same as would be formed in a base pair, involving 02 and N4 in each case. Given that the critical CpG is centred in the optimal sequence for immunostimulatory oligonucleotides, the 30 present inventors hypothesise that the active CpG would form the two spanning nucleotides in the active complex with RPA and that the WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 47 asymmetry of the two ssDNA binding domains in the complex could explain the asymmetry of the optimal immunostimulatory sequence RRCGYY. Further molecular modelling studies may provide insight into the possible effect of methylation of a bound cytosine in this proposed structure and the 5 possible effect of contacts with the two bridging bases on the conformation of RPA70. Of course, as discussed below, the full complex with RPA also involves contact with RPA34, which could explain the more extended 16bp optimal motif indicated by the biological and DNA binding data. Thus, CpG sequence specificity and the reduced affinity for ODNs containing 10 methylated C is entirely conceivable based upon the structure of RPA70. The final evidence supporting the identity of RPA as the receptor is that it is abundant in the cytoplasm. Furthermore, there is no other detectable candidate receptor for DNA under our conditions of assay. In the cell fractionations shown in FIG. 1, a nuclear protein of comparable 15 size to RPA, Oct1, was completely restricted to the nuclear fraction under similar conditions. A complex as large as RPA is probably not expelled from the nucleus under the conditions of mild cell lysis with NP-40 when other nuclear proteins are retained. The location of RPA in the nucleus has been inferred based upon immunohistochemical localisation. However, there are 20 contrary published data obtained from experiments using antibodies against different subunits; RPA14 was clearly detected in the cytoplasm (Wold, 1997, supra). Immunocytochemistry may give a false impression based upon the particular concentration of protein in the nucleus, leakage or selective destruction of antigen under the conditions of 25 immunohistochemical localisation, or obscuring of antigenic epitopes in specific complexes of cytoplasmic RPA with other proteins (see below). An important aspect of the work presented herein is the identification of at least three forms of RPA in macrophages and B cells. The UV cross-linking indicates that band A (in the mouse) contains both RPA 70 30 and RPA34, and that both subunits contact DNA. As noted in the introduction, RPA is known to undergo a conformational change upon WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 48 binding of ssDNA. Initial binding of RPA is proposed to involve the approximate 8 base "footprint" seen in the 3D structure (Wold, 1997, supra) and to be relatively low affinity. Interactions between the RPA 34 and RPA14 subunits (also known as RPA2 and RPA3 respectively), which have 5 independent ssDNA binding activity and the C-terminus of RPA70 (RPA1; Wold, 1997, supra) are required for transition to a high affinity irreversible binding state. Based upon the irreversibility of binding, the UV cross-linking and the inhibitory effect of Mg 2+ (which is known to affect the conformational change in RPA) the present inventors propose that band A is the end-stage 10 high affinity conformation of RPA. The conformation difference may explain why Band A did not react with all of the particular anti-RPA antibodies available to the present inventors. Others (Seroussi & Lavi, 1993, supra) have found that the slowest migrating RPA band was bound by a different anti-RPA70 antibody which failed to recognize the faster migrating band(s) 15 containing proteolytically cleaved RPA. In the band B complex in FIG. 9, which can be cold competed by oligonucleotide added after binding of label only the 70kD RPA subunit appears to be in sufficiently close proximity to the ODN to permit UV cross linking, but the complex is supershifted by anti-RPA34 antibody. One basis 20 for the difference between RPA in band A and band B would be the phosphorylation of RPA 34 which is known to be occur upon DNA binding (Wold, 1997, supra) and might conceivably alter subsequent binding activity so that the high affinity complex involving contact with RPA34 cannot be formed. Band C, the complex containing the 55kD putative proteolytic 25 cleavage product of RPA70 also showed no evidence of DNA contact with RPA 34. Initially, band C was observed inconsistently in macrophage extracts. Others have suggested that RPA70 cleavage may occur following cell extraction as an explanation for inconsistent identification of a presumed equivalent of our band C (Seroussi & Lavi, 1993, supra). However, the 30 present inventors found that when extracts are prepared fresh and the incubation is carried out with added calcium, the level of band C in WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 49 cytoplasmic extracts is consistent and reproducible (not shown). Accordingly, it has been concluded that band C is normally present in macrophages and represents a novel functional form of RPA. Interest in studying the responses to CpG-containing DNA 5 arises from several distinct biological applications. In the context of gene therapy, DNA vaccines and the possible roles of CpG DNA sequences in host-pathogen interactions, the active molecules of interest are native phosphodiester DNAs. Conversely, applications of CpG DNA in immunotherapy are based upon phosphorothioate-modified backbones, and 10 PS-ODNs are also commonly applied in anti-sense therapies. In this study we have shown that PS-ODNs have quite distinct biological activities from PO-ODNs in modulating CpG driven responses. The induction of NO production in interferon-y-primed macrophages has proven to be a robust and convenient assay of the actions 15 of CpG DNA. In this assay, PS-ODNs containing a single CpG motif were much more active than their PO-ODN counterpart, but the response was still abolished by a GpC transversion in the core motif. The dose-response for CpG PS-ODNs commonly exhibited an optimal concentration for maximal activity, and the response declined at higher concentrations (FIGS. 11 a and 20 11 b). High dose inhibition of NO induction is probably not due to intrinsic toxicity but reflects specific inhibition of the response to stimulatory DNA. Pretreatment of RAW264 cells with non-stimulatory PS-ODN prevented subsequent activation by stimulatory PO-ODN, CpG containing PS-ODN and bacterial DNA (data not shown), but did not block activation by LPS 25 (FIG. 17). By contrast to the higher activity in the iNOS and cell viability assays, in the HIV-LTR and CSF-1R down-modulation assays, PS-ODN were much less active than PO-ODN. As in the longer assays, PS-ODN specifically blocked responses to PO-ODN or bacterial DNA. In effect, the 30 phosphorothioate backbone auto-inhibits response to CpG motifs. The lack of activity in the shorter assays is probably a reflection of slower time WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 50 courses. Activation of NF-KB in macrophages is transient and luciferase is unstable (Sweet et al., 1997, supra). With a fast-acting agonist such as PO ODN or LPS, there is a relatively synchronous activation of cells in the population so that there is a large peak of luciferase activity after 2 hrs. The 5 low level activation seen in response to PS-ODN probably reflects asynchronous activation of smaller subpopulations of cells at any particular time. This hypothesis is supported by the pattern of down-modulation of CSF-1R (FIG. 14) which occurred in only 25% of cells after 2 hrs. Stimulation of the MAPKinases ERK-1, and ERK-2, a rapid response to both 10 LPS and CpG DNA in CSF-1-starved BMM, also occurred much more slowly in response to PS-ODN (FIG. 14D). The fact that it did occur eventually is consistent with the putative role of ERK-1/2 in CSF-1 signal transduction leading to the maintenance of cell viability. ERK-1/2 are the major kinases responsible for phosphorylation of the transcription factor Ets 15 2 in macrophages (Fowles et al., 1998, Mol. Cell. Biol. 18 5148; Stacey et al., 1995, Mol. Cell. Biol. 15 3430)), which in turn activates transcription of several target genes associated with cell survival including Bcl-xL (Sevilla etal., 1999, Mol. Cell. Biol. 19 2624). By contrast to PS-ODN, non-stimulatory PO-ODN (GpC 20 transversion) did not prevent activation by CpG DNA (FIG. 15B). Others have reported on the existence of inhibitory CpG DNA sequences containing a core CCGG motif (Krieg et al., 1998, supra) but even preincubation with a large excess of CCGG-containing ODN failed to reduce the response to subsequent stimulation by optimal activating sequences (FIG. 18). In fact, 25 the CCGG sequence was biologically active, simply requiring higher concentrations than an optimal motif to activate the HIV-1-LTR in RAW264 cells and in the iNOS assay (not shown). This confirms that the major effect of altered sequences flanking the core CpG motif is to change the dose response curve. 30 Another group has reported that non-stimulatory PS-ODN can prevent the activation of murine dendritic cells by an active ODN, and has WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 51 inferred that the mechanism involves saturation of a non-selective cellular uptake pathway for DNA (Hacker et al., 1998, supra). The uptake mechanism is likely to differ between cell types. T cells internalise ODN poorly. In murine bone marrow B cells, the uptake of oligonucleotides 5 involved saturable binding to a cell surface receptor that also bound polyanions such as dextran sulphate (Zhao et al., 1994, Blood 84 3660). The process was regulated by stimuli such as LPS. The integrin, Mac-1, has been implicated as a specific receptor for ODN in neutrophils (Benimetskaya et al., 1997, Nat. Med. 3 414) but the present inventors found no evidence 10 to support this function in murine macrophages, in which ODN did not alter the level of Mac-1 antigen detectable on the cell surface. In a number of other cell systems ODN at concentrations above 1 pM was internalised primarily by fluid-phase endocytosis (Yakubov et al., 1989, Biochem. 86 6454; Beltinger et al., 1995, J. Clin. Invest. 95 1814), which is inherently 15 unlikely to become saturated by ligand. Given the intrinsically highendocytic rate of macrophages, the fluid phase pathway probably predominates in this cell type. In fact, one of the earliest effects of LPS and CpG DNA on macrophages is a profound spreading response and, in the case of LPS at least, increased vesicle trafficking and macropinocytosis (Poussin et al., 20 1998, J. Biol. Chem. 273 20285; Peppelenbosch et al., 1999, Blood 93 4011) which is probably associated in part with the rapid internalisation of the CSF-1R studied herein. Hence, CpG DNA is likely to increase its own uptake into macrophages leading to a self-amplifying cascade in response to stimulatory sequences. The lack of any inhibitory effect of a large excess 25 of PO-ODN in this system indicates that the cellular uptake process is not saturated at concentrations of DNA that generate a maximal biological response and strongly supports the view that the determinant of CpG specificity lies within the cell. What is the basis for the different behaviour of PS-ODN and 30 PO-ODN? Studies on trafficking of ODNs in a number of cell systems have highlighted differences. In HL-60 human myeloid cells PS-ODNs appeared WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 52 to be mobilised to an acidic compartment, whereas PO-ODN were not, but this differential trafficking was also affected by sequence variations (Tonkinson & Stein, 1994, Nucl. Acid. Res. 22 4268). In the same cells, PS ODN, and to a lesser extent PO-ODN, blocked uptake of a pinocytotic 5 marker, probably by stimulating exocytosis via inhibition of protein kinase C (Stein et al., 1993, Biochemistry 32 4855). Such a mechanism could permit PS-ODN to block the uptake of PO-ODN or bacterial DNA without competing directly for binding to a receptor. However, Chu et al., 1999, J. Immunol. 163 1188) observed only a small reduction of fluid-phase uptake 10 of FITC-dextran in activated peritoneal macrophages treated overnight with PS-ODN, or LPS. The mechanisms by which ODNs are released from the endocytic compartment to the cytosol are not well understood. Endosomal release could be a rate limiting step for responses to CpG DNA irrespective of the cellular accumulation of ODN per se. It may be this step that occurs 15 more slowly with PS-ODN. If the release of ODN into the cytoplasm is limiting and saturable, non-stimulatory PS-ODN are likely to accumulate to greater levels in the endosomal compartment because of their greater stability and hence will be more effective competitive inhibitors of release than PO-ODN. In keeping with a limiting role at this stage, transfection 20 reagents have been found to increase the efficacy of ODN-mediated cellular responses in a number of systems (Thierry & Dritschilo, 1992, Nucl. Acid. Res. 20 5691; Sonehara et al., 1996, J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 16 799). The hypothesis that PS-ODN act in part at the level of CpG recognition was supported by studies of the putative receptor for CpG DNA, 25 RPA. PS-ODN at low concentration were able to compete for binding of PO ODN to RPA under the conditions of EMSA. The affinity of competition was so high as to preclude realistic assessment of CpG DNA specificity; even non-CpG PS-ODN were at least as effective as self CpG PO-ODN in cold competition. The ability of RPA to distinguish CpG motifs must require 30 alignment of oligonucleotide in such a way that the CpG dinucleotide can be recognised by a specific secondary recognition moiety within RPA or WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 53 another protein. It may be this secondary recognition that is critical for initiation of a biological response. Structural studies of RPA indicate the presence of at least two DNA-binding sites, one within the 70 kD subunit and one formed by the 32 kD and 14 kD subunits. Binding probably involves 5 a two-stage process where the 70 kD subunit, which possesses much higher affinity binding activity in isolation, makes the first contact and secondary contact is made subsequently with the 32 kD/14 kD subunits or with another component, such as the zinc fingers. A very high affinity initial interaction of PS-ODN with RPA70 is likely to inhibit dissociation and "scanning" to permit 10 secondary recognition of the CpG dinucleotide. Hence, correct binding of CpG leading to activation would occur solely as predicted by chance (i.e. in 1 complex in 20 with a 20base ODN). It should be noted that such scanning also must occur in the binding of a PO-ODN. The complexes seen in EMSA are likely to be a mixture of random lower affinity complexes, where the CpG 15 is not aligned, and higher affinity correctly aligned complexes. This pattern obscures the full extent of differential binding affinity of RPA for CpG. The response to PS-ODN is complex because their intrinsic lack of effectiveness is compensated in part by their greater stability. The prediction of the above model is that in PS-ODNs, inclusion of an additional 20 CpG motif, perhaps with appropriate spacing to another motif allowing simultaneous binding by more than one RPA molecule, could amplify the probability of response exponentially. Aside from sequence changes, optimisation of stimulatory PS-ODNs requires a compromise between optimising uptake and stability, which may be favoured by longer ODNs, and 25 reducing the number of inhibitory phosphorothioate linkages in the backbone. Assuming uptake can be optimised, it should be possible to modulate that balance by reducing the length of the PS component of the ODN to the known "footprint" of RPA (8 bases), increasing further the number of CpG motifs per unit length, producing ODNs with mixed 30 backbones, or identifying backbone modifications that do not generate inhibitory activity (which could be tested using the assays disclosed herein).
WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 54 Chimaeric immunostimulators can also be envisaged, in which the stable PS-ODN core is flanked by signals, such as high mannose sugars, that can fulfil the function of expediting uptake and access to RPA. In summary, the present inventors have provided evidence 5 that there are several forms of RPA in macrophages, one or all of which have characteristics consistent with identity as the cytoplasmic receptor for immunostimulatory DNA. This conclusion is based upon the sub-cellular location of RPA, the binding specificity of RPA and the nature of the biological response to immunostimulatory DNA. A fundamental 10 understanding of the recognition of immunostimulatory DNA by different forms of RPA should permit a more rational structure-function approach to optimising immunostimulatory DNA as a therapeutic agent. The present inventors have also demonstrated that the relative efficacy of immunostimulatory DNA in macrophage activation varies 15 depending upon the assay system. It has also been shown that the phosphorothioate modification specifically interferes with some actions of CpG DNA, so that PS-ODNs are intrinsically self-inhibitory. This observation could lead to development of improved reagents to exploit the therapeutic potential of immunostimulatory DNA in a wide range of human disease 20 states. It will be understood by the skilled person that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described in detail herein, but also includes other embodiments consistent with the broad spririt and scope of the invention.
Claims (20)
1. A method of detecting immunostimulatory DNA, including the steps of: (i) combining isolated RPAwith a sample containing DNA; 5 (ii) forming a complex between said isolated RPA and immunostimulatory DNA if present in said sample; and (iii) detecting said complex formed at step (ii).
2. A method of identifying an immunostimulatory DNA agonist or antagonist, including the steps of: 10 (i) combining isolated RPA with a sample suspected of containing an immunostimulatory DNA agonist or antagonist; and (ii) determining whether or not a complex forms between said isolated RPA and said agonist or antagonist, 15 formation of a complex indicating that said agonist or antagonist is present in said sample.
3. The method of Claim 2, wherein an immunostimulatory DNA is added at step (i) so that at step (ii) said agonist or antagonist prevents formation of a complex between said immunostimulatory DNA and said 20 isolated RPA.
4. The method of any one of Claims 1-3, wherein the RPA complex, if formed at step (ii), is detected by EMSA.
5. The method of Claim 4, wherein an anti-RPA antibody is included at step (ii). 25
6. A kit for detecting immunostimulatory DNA, said kit comprising: (i) one or more isolated RPA subunits; and (ii) an RPA-specific antibody.
7. The kit of Claim 6, wherein the isolated RPA subunits include 30 a 70kD subunit, a 34 kD subunit and a 14 kD subunit and, optionally, a 55 kD proteolytic fragment of the 70 kD subunit. WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 56
8. A method of detecting an immunostimulatory DNA including the steps of: (i) combining macrophage cells with a sample suspected of containing immunostimulatory DNA; 5 (ii) measuring a response by said macrophage cells to said immunostimulatory DNA if present in said sample, said response selected from the group consisting of: (a) a cell-cycle arrest; and (b) a reduction in CSF-1 receptor (CSF1-R) 10 expression.
9. A method of identifying an immunostimulatory DNA antagonist, including the steps of: (i) combining macrophage cells with immunostimulatory DNA and a sample suspected of containing an 15 immunostimulatory DNA antagonist; and (ii) measuring a response, or an absence of said response, by said macrophage cells to said immunostimulatory DNA, said response selected from the group consisting of: 20 (a) a cell-cycle arrest;and (b) a reduction in CSF-1 receptor (CSF1-R) expression; wherein said absence of a response is indicative of said antagonist being present in said sample. 25
10. A method of identifying an immunostimulatory DNA agonist, including the steps of: (i) combining macrophage cells a sample suspected of containing an immunostimulatory DNA agonist; (ii) measuring a response by said macrophage cells 30 selected from the group consisting of: (a) a cell-cycle arrest;and WO 00/31540 PCT/AU99/01052 57 (b) a reduction in CSF-1 receptor (CSF1-R) expression. wherein said response is indicative of said agonist being present in said sample. 5
11. The method of any one of Claims 8-10, wherein the cell cycle arrest is at G 1 -S phase transition.
12. The method of any one of Claims 8-10, wherein the reduction in CSF-1R expression is detected by cell surface immunofluorescence.
13. An immunostimulatory DNA identified by the method of Claim 10 1 or Claim 8.
14. An immunostimulatory DNA agonist identified by the method of any one of Claims 2, 3 or 9.
15. An immunostimulatory DNA antagonist identified by the method of any one of Claims 2, 3 or Claim 10. 15
16. An immunostimulatory DNA antagonist which comprises a DNA having one or more phosphorothioate linkages.
17. The antagonist of Claim 16, wherein the immunostimulatory DNA is a CpG-containing DNA having a phosphodiester backbone.
18. A therapeutic or prophylactic composition comprising the 20 immunostimulatory DNA of Claim 13, together with an acceptable carrier or delivery agent.
19. A therapeutic or prophylactic composition comprising the immunostimulatory DNA agonist of Claim 14, together with an acceptable carrier or delivery agent. 25
20. A therapeutic or prophylactic composition comprising the immunostimulatory DNA antagonist of any one of Claims 15-17, together with an acceptable carrier or delivery agent.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU15389/00A AU1538900A (en) | 1998-11-25 | 1999-11-25 | Immunostimulatory dna |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUPP7288 | 1998-11-25 | ||
| AUPP7288A AUPP728898A0 (en) | 1998-11-25 | 1998-11-25 | Immunostimulatory dna |
| AU15389/00A AU1538900A (en) | 1998-11-25 | 1999-11-25 | Immunostimulatory dna |
| PCT/AU1999/001052 WO2000031540A1 (en) | 1998-11-25 | 1999-11-25 | Immunostimulatory dna |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU1538900A true AU1538900A (en) | 2000-06-13 |
Family
ID=25615981
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU15389/00A Abandoned AU1538900A (en) | 1998-11-25 | 1999-11-25 | Immunostimulatory dna |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| AU (1) | AU1538900A (en) |
-
1999
- 1999-11-25 AU AU15389/00A patent/AU1538900A/en not_active Abandoned
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP3006043B1 (en) | Immunostimulatory g,u-containing oligoribonucleotides | |
| Rimbach et al. | 2'-O-methylation within bacterial RNA acts as suppressor of TLR7/TLR8 activation in human innate immune cells | |
| Vollmer et al. | Oligodeoxynucleotides lacking CpG dinucleotides mediate Toll‐like receptor 9 dependent T helper type 2 biased immune stimulation | |
| Vollmer et al. | Characterization of three CpG oligodeoxynucleotide classes with distinct immunostimulatory activities | |
| EP1177439B1 (en) | Screening for immunostimulatory dna functional modifiers | |
| Uccellini et al. | Autoreactive B cells discriminate CpG-rich and CpG-poor DNA and this response is modulated by IFN-α | |
| Lundberg et al. | Herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA is immunostimulatory in vitro and in vivo | |
| WO2021041541A1 (en) | Modified circular rnas and methods of use thereof | |
| EP2360252A1 (en) | Immunostimulatory nucleic acid molecules comprising GTCGTT motifs | |
| CN102256594A (en) | Modulation of toll-like receptor 8 expression by antisense oligonucleotides | |
| CN102245187A (en) | Modulation of TOLL-like receptor 3 expression by antisense oligonucleotides | |
| KR20110081337A (en) | Modulation of TOL-Like Receptor 4 Expression by Antisense Oligonucleotides | |
| JP7079495B2 (en) | TLR-inhibiting oligonucleotides and their use | |
| Wu et al. | Selection of oligonucleotide aptamers with enhanced uptake and activation of human leukemia B cells | |
| Pisetsky et al. | The influence of base sequence on the immunological properties of defined oligonucleotides | |
| EP1133695A1 (en) | Immunostimulatory dna | |
| KR20110081338A (en) | Modulation of TOL-Like Receptor 5 Expression by Antisense Oligonucleotides | |
| AU1538900A (en) | Immunostimulatory dna | |
| Stacey et al. | Phosphorothioate backbone modification changes the pattern of responses to CpG | |
| WO2008048685A2 (en) | Ox40 aptamers | |
| Corrias et al. | Interaction of human plasma membrane proteins and oligodeoxynucleotides | |
| ZA200408496B (en) | Immunostimulatory G,U-containing oligoribonucleotides | |
| Tuetken | in the Pathogenesis of Lupus | |
| HK1220636B (en) | Immunostimulatory g,u-containing oligoribonucleotides | |
| HK1071495B (en) | Immunostimulatory g, u-containing oligoribonucleotides |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MK5 | Application lapsed section 142(2)(e) - patent request and compl. specification not accepted |