Russo et al., 2021 - Google Patents
Detection of illicit cryptomining using network metadataRusso et al., 2021
View HTML- Document ID
- 1896292985126250043
- Author
- Russo M
- Šrndić N
- Laskov P
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- EURASIP Journal on Information Security
External Links
Snippet
Illicit cryptocurrency mining has become one of the prevalent methods for monetization of computer security incidents. In this attack, victims' computing resources are abused to mine cryptocurrency for the benefit of attackers. The most popular illicitly mined digital coin is …
- 238000001514 detection method 0 title abstract description 68
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/70—Protecting specific internal or peripheral components, in which the protection of a component leads to protection of the entire computer
- G06F21/82—Protecting input, output or interconnection devices
- G06F21/83—Protecting input, output or interconnection devices input devices, e.g. keyboards, mice or controllers thereof
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
- G06F21/554—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures involving event detection and direct action
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/70—Protecting specific internal or peripheral components, in which the protection of a component leads to protection of the entire computer
- G06F21/86—Secure or tamper-resistant housings
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/14—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
- H04L63/1408—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic by monitoring network traffic
- H04L63/1425—Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/30—Authentication, i.e. establishing the identity or authorisation of security principals
- G06F21/31—User authentication
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Tekiner et al. | SoK: cryptojacking malware | |
Cabaj et al. | Software-defined networking-based crypto ransomware detection using HTTP traffic characteristics | |
JP6527590B2 (en) | System and method for detecting covert channel network intrusion based on offline network traffic | |
Russo et al. | Detection of illicit cryptomining using network metadata | |
CN107646190B (en) | Malicious encrypted traffic detector, identification method, and computer program element | |
Kartaltepe et al. | Social network-based botnet command-and-control: emerging threats and countermeasures | |
Borders et al. | Quantifying information leaks in outbound web traffic | |
Brengel et al. | Identifying key leakage of bitcoin users | |
Soltani et al. | A survey on real world botnets and detection mechanisms | |
Tekiner et al. | A Lightweight IoT Cryptojacking Detection Mechanism in Heterogeneous Smart Home Networks. | |
Riccardi et al. | Titans’ revenge: Detecting Zeus via its own flaws | |
Gardiner et al. | Command & Control: Understanding, Denying and Detecting-A review of malware C2 techniques, detection and defences | |
Ariyapala et al. | A host and network based intrusion detection for android smartphones | |
Xue et al. | Design and implementation of a malware detection system based on network behavior | |
Lu et al. | Integrating traffics with network device logs for anomaly detection | |
Değirmenci et al. | ROSIDS23: Network intrusion detection dataset for robot operating system | |
Thapliyal et al. | A generic process model for botnet forensic analysis | |
Venkatesan et al. | Analysis of accounting models for the detection of duplicate requests in web services | |
Seo et al. | Abnormal behavior detection to identify infected systems using the APChain algorithm and behavioral profiling | |
Alageel et al. | Earlycrow: Detecting apt malware command and control over http (s) using contextual summaries | |
Habibi Gharakheili et al. | Cyber‐Securing IoT Infrastructure by Modeling Network Traffic | |
Lee et al. | Poster: Adversarial perturbation attacks on the state-of-the-art cryptojacking detection system in iot networks | |
MR | An Empirical Assessment of Botnets and Detection Methods. | |
Acarali et al. | Botnet-based attacks and defence mechanisms | |
Paul et al. | Denial of service attacks in the Internet of Things |