[go: up one dir, main page]

Russo et al., 2021 - Google Patents

Detection of illicit cryptomining using network metadata

Russo et al., 2021

View HTML @Full View
Document ID
1896292985126250043
Author
Russo M
Šrndić N
Laskov P
Publication year
Publication venue
EURASIP Journal on Information Security

External Links

Snippet

Illicit cryptocurrency mining has become one of the prevalent methods for monetization of computer security incidents. In this attack, victims' computing resources are abused to mine cryptocurrency for the benefit of attackers. The most popular illicitly mined digital coin is …
Continue reading at link.springer.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/70Protecting specific internal or peripheral components, in which the protection of a component leads to protection of the entire computer
    • G06F21/82Protecting input, output or interconnection devices
    • G06F21/83Protecting input, output or interconnection devices input devices, e.g. keyboards, mice or controllers thereof
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/55Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
    • G06F21/554Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures involving event detection and direct action
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/70Protecting specific internal or peripheral components, in which the protection of a component leads to protection of the entire computer
    • G06F21/86Secure or tamper-resistant housings
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/14Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1408Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic by monitoring network traffic
    • H04L63/1425Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/30Authentication, i.e. establishing the identity or authorisation of security principals
    • G06F21/31User authentication

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Tekiner et al. SoK: cryptojacking malware
Cabaj et al. Software-defined networking-based crypto ransomware detection using HTTP traffic characteristics
JP6527590B2 (en) System and method for detecting covert channel network intrusion based on offline network traffic
Russo et al. Detection of illicit cryptomining using network metadata
CN107646190B (en) Malicious encrypted traffic detector, identification method, and computer program element
Kartaltepe et al. Social network-based botnet command-and-control: emerging threats and countermeasures
Borders et al. Quantifying information leaks in outbound web traffic
Brengel et al. Identifying key leakage of bitcoin users
Soltani et al. A survey on real world botnets and detection mechanisms
Tekiner et al. A Lightweight IoT Cryptojacking Detection Mechanism in Heterogeneous Smart Home Networks.
Riccardi et al. Titans’ revenge: Detecting Zeus via its own flaws
Gardiner et al. Command & Control: Understanding, Denying and Detecting-A review of malware C2 techniques, detection and defences
Ariyapala et al. A host and network based intrusion detection for android smartphones
Xue et al. Design and implementation of a malware detection system based on network behavior
Lu et al. Integrating traffics with network device logs for anomaly detection
Değirmenci et al. ROSIDS23: Network intrusion detection dataset for robot operating system
Thapliyal et al. A generic process model for botnet forensic analysis
Venkatesan et al. Analysis of accounting models for the detection of duplicate requests in web services
Seo et al. Abnormal behavior detection to identify infected systems using the APChain algorithm and behavioral profiling
Alageel et al. Earlycrow: Detecting apt malware command and control over http (s) using contextual summaries
Habibi Gharakheili et al. Cyber‐Securing IoT Infrastructure by Modeling Network Traffic
Lee et al. Poster: Adversarial perturbation attacks on the state-of-the-art cryptojacking detection system in iot networks
MR An Empirical Assessment of Botnets and Detection Methods.
Acarali et al. Botnet-based attacks and defence mechanisms
Paul et al. Denial of service attacks in the Internet of Things