[go: up one dir, main page]

Lima et al., 2020 - Google Patents

A framework for verifying deadlock and nondeterminism in UML activity diagrams based on CSP

Lima et al., 2020

View HTML
Document ID
17379057368118946411
Author
Lima L
Tavares A
Nogueira S
Publication year
Publication venue
Science of Computer Programming

External Links

Snippet

Deadlock and nondeterminism may become increasingly hard to detect in concurrent and distributed systems. UML activity diagrams are flowcharts that model sequential and concurrent behavior. Although the UML community widely adopts such diagrams, there is no …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit
    • G06F9/06—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit using stored programme, i.e. using internal store of processing equipment to receive and retain programme
    • G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programmes
    • G06F9/4443—Execution mechanisms for user interfaces
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit
    • G06F9/06—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit using stored programme, i.e. using internal store of processing equipment to receive and retain programme
    • G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programmes
    • G06F9/4421—Execution paradigms
    • G06F9/4428—Object-oriented
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit
    • G06F9/06—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit using stored programme, i.e. using internal store of processing equipment to receive and retain programme
    • G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programmes
    • G06F9/455—Emulation; Software simulation, i.e. virtualisation or emulation of application or operating system execution engines
    • G06F9/45504—Abstract machines for programme code execution, e.g. Java virtual machine [JVM], interpreters, emulators
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit
    • G06F9/06—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit using stored programme, i.e. using internal store of processing equipment to receive and retain programme
    • G06F9/46—Multiprogramming arrangements
    • G06F9/54—Interprogramme communication; Intertask communication
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit
    • G06F9/06—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit using stored programme, i.e. using internal store of processing equipment to receive and retain programme
    • G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programmes
    • G06F9/445—Programme loading or initiating
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668—Software testing
    • G06F11/3672—Test management
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/30—Creation or generation of source code
    • G06F8/38—Implementation of user interfaces
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/40—Transformations of program code
    • G06F8/41—Compilation
    • G06F8/43—Checking; Contextual analysis
    • G06F8/436—Semantic checking
    • G06F8/437—Type checking
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/30—Creation or generation of source code
    • G06F8/34—Graphical or visual programming
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/30—Creation or generation of source code
    • G06F8/36—Software reuse
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/30—Creation or generation of source code
    • G06F8/31—Programming languages or programming paradigms
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/30—Creation or generation of source code
    • G06F8/35—Model driven
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/70—Software maintenance or management
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3664—Environments for testing or debugging software
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/20—Handling natural language data
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/10—Requirements analysis; Specification techniques
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/20—Software design
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/50—Computer-aided design

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Lima et al. A framework for verifying deadlock and nondeterminism in UML activity diagrams based on CSP
US9311057B2 (en) Action languages for unified modeling language model
US20140143762A1 (en) Symbolic execution of dynamic programming languages
Balasubramanian et al. Polyglot: modeling and analysis for multiple statechart formalisms
Challita et al. Towards formal-based semantic interoperability in multi-clouds: the fclouds framework
US20190370155A1 (en) Observer for simulation test and verification
US11442845B2 (en) Systems and methods for automatic test generation
CN119668576B (en) Low-code software development system
KR20090099977A (en) Reserved component container based software development method and apparatus
US20080295079A1 (en) System and Method for Verifying and Testing System Requirements
Davies et al. Concurrency and refinement in the unified modeling language
WO2007136684A2 (en) Action languages for unified modeling language model
Brunette et al. A metamodel for the design of polychronous systems
Barroca et al. Integrating a neutral action language in a DEVS modelling environment.
Pereira et al. Development of self-diagnosis tests system using a DSL for creating new test suites for integration in a cyber-physical system
Ferreira et al. A CSP semantics for UML state machines aiming at hidden formal methods verification
Jarraya et al. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of SysML activity diagrams
Grabe et al. Credo methodology: Modeling and analyzing a peer-to-peer system in credo
CN111737888B (en) Function logic dynamic execution method
Dotti et al. Verifying object-based graph grammars: An assume-guarantee approach
Pérez-Toledano et al. A safe dynamic adaptation framework for aspect-oriented software development
Ballarini et al. Validation and evaluation of a software solution for fault tolerant distributed synchronization
Alghamdi Queued and pooled semantics for state machines in the Umple model-oriented programming language
Lin et al. Towards verifying VDM using SPIN
CN101263459A (en) A graphical XML programming system and engine