Wheeler et al., 2015 - Google Patents
Quantile benchmark dose estimation for continuous endpointsWheeler et al., 2015
View PDF- Document ID
- 1638789877582880924
- Author
- Wheeler M
- Shao K
- Bailer A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Environmetrics
External Links
Snippet
Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) characterizes the risk of an adverse health outcome for an organism exposed to a chemical, environmental, physical, or other hazard. Historically, QRAs define risk based upon the increased probability of adverse response because of …
- 231100000946 Benchmark Dose 0 title abstract description 93
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F17/30286—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor in structured data stores
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/60—Protecting data
- G06F21/62—Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules
- G06F21/6218—Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/20—Handling natural language data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/02—Banking, e.g. interest calculation, credit approval, mortgages, home banking or on-line banking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/08—Insurance, e.g. risk analysis or pensions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2221/00—Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Lewbel et al. | Comparing features of convenient estimators for binary choice models with endogenous regressors | |
Heck | A caveat on the Savage–Dickey density ratio: The case of computing Bayes factors for regression parameters | |
López‐López et al. | Estimation of the predictive power of the model in mixed‐effects meta‐regression: A simulation study | |
Robinson et al. | Linkage disequilibrium and effective population size when generations overlap | |
Winkelmann | Copula bivariate probit models: with an application to medical expenditures | |
Lambert et al. | Flexible parametric modelling of the cause‐specific cumulative incidence function | |
Phillips et al. | Inference in autoregression under heteroskedasticity | |
Kümmel et al. | Confidence and prediction intervals for pharmacometric models | |
Faes et al. | Model averaging using fractional polynomials to estimate a safe level of exposure | |
Mehrotra et al. | An efficient alternative to the stratified Cox model analysis | |
Wheeler et al. | Comparing model averaging with other model selection strategies for benchmark dose estimation | |
Schmid et al. | Outlier robust small‐area estimation under spatial correlation | |
Park et al. | Model selection and diagnostics for joint modeling of survival and longitudinal data with crossing hazard rate functions | |
Okuyama et al. | Combining genetic and ecological data to estimate sea turtle origins | |
Wheeler et al. | Quantile benchmark dose estimation for continuous endpoints | |
Wang | A simple, doubly robust, efficient estimator for survival functions using pseudo observations | |
DiazOrdaz et al. | Multiple imputation methods for bivariate outcomes in cluster randomised trials | |
Jorde | Allele frequency covariance among cohorts and its use in estimating effective size of age‐structured populations | |
Wheeler et al. | Continuous model averaging for benchmark dose analysis: Averaging over distributional forms | |
Lee et al. | Estimation in closed capture–recapture models when covariates are missing at random | |
Chipperfield | A weighting approach to making inference with probabilistically linked data | |
Shengjie et al. | A New Alpha Power Weibull Model for Analyzing Time‐to‐Event Data: A Case Study from Football | |
Fletcher et al. | Single‐fit bootstrapping: A simple alternative to the delta method | |
Lin et al. | Nonparametric benchmark dose estimation with continuous dose‐response data | |
Karavarsamis et al. | Comparison of four bootstrap‐based interval estimators of species occupancy and detection probabilities |