[go: up one dir, main page]

Bhattacharya et al., 2023 - Google Patents

ORCID ID—a must for all the academic surgeon

Bhattacharya et al., 2023

View PDF
Document ID
15399835926543822233
Author
Bhattacharya K
Kumar S
Publication year
Publication venue
Indian Journal of Surgery

External Links

Snippet

Every academic surgeon should have an ORCID ID which removes all types of ambiguity in case of any change in the name or surname during the career of the author. ORCID ID helps the journal publisher in finding the academic experience of the author and helps in …
Continue reading at www.researchgate.net (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
    • A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
    • A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
    • A61B17/84—Fasteners therefor or fasteners being internal fixation devices
    • A61B17/86—Threaded wires, pins or screws; Nuts therefor
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
    • A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
    • A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
    • A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
    • A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
    • A61B17/7064—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral facets; Tools therefor
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/34—Trocars; Puncturing needles
    • A61B17/3417—Details of tips or shafts, e.g. grooves, expandable, bendable; Multiple coaxial sliding cannulas, e.g. for dilating
    • A61B17/3421—Cannulas
    • A61B17/3439—Cannulas with means for changing the inner diameter of the cannula, e.g. expandable
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/34—Trocars; Puncturing needles
    • A61B17/3415—Trocars; Puncturing needles for introducing tubes or catheters, e.g. gastrostomy tubes, drain catheters
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/32—Surgical cutting instruments
    • A61B17/320016—Endoscopic cutting instruments, e.g. arthroscopes, resectoscopes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
    • A61M25/00—Catheters; Hollow probes
    • A61M25/01—Introducing, guiding, advancing, emplacing or holding catheters
    • A61M25/02—Holding devices, e.g. on the body
    • A61M25/04—Holding devices, e.g. on the body in the body, e.g. expansible

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Singhal et al. Publication ethics: Role and responsibility of authors
Brems et al. Barriers to healthcare as reported by rural and urban interprofessional providers
Felaefel et al. A cross-sectional survey study to assess prevalence and attitudes regarding research misconduct among investigators in the Middle East
Haeder et al. A knotty problem: consumer access and the regulation of provider networks
Rashid et al. Building employers’ capacity to support vocational opportunities for adults with developmental disabilities
De Sutter et al. Personalized and long-term electronic informed consent in clinical research: stakeholder views
Marshall et al. Documenting research with transgender and gender diverse people: protocol for an evidence map and thematic analysis
Sudlow et al. EFSPI/PSI working group on data sharing: accessing and working with pharmaceutical clinical trial patient level datasets–a primer for academic researchers
Woolley et al. Patient authorship of medical research publications: An evolution, revolution, and solution?
Bailey et al. Medical students on long-term rural clinical placements and their perceptions of urban and rural internships: a qualitative study
Irajpour et al. The quality of guidelines on the end-of-life care: a systematic quality appraisal using AGREE II instrument
Goozner et al. A common standard for conflict of interest disclosure in addiction journals
Feldmeier et al. Heterogeneity of state stroke center certification and designation processes
Jin et al. An evaluation of the quality of COVID-19 internet resources for cancer patients
Bhattacharya et al. ORCID ID—a must for all the academic surgeon
Hefferman et al. Information availability on emergency radiology fellowship websites: current state and paths to improvement
Prang et al. The use of public performance reporting by general practitioners: a study of perceptions and referral behaviours
Wigmore-Álvarez et al. The United Nations Global Compact Progress Reports as management control instruments for social responsibility at Spanish universities
Manrow et al. NCI's Physician Data Query (PDQ®) cancer information summaries: history, editorial processes, influence, and reach
Thain et al. Information needs of specialist healthcare professionals: a preliminary study based on the West of Scotland Colorectal Cancer Managed Clinical Network
Son et al. Understanding of for whom, under what conditions and how the compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals works in Brazil and Thailand: a realist synthesis
Starkings et al. An online review of informational sources for advanced or high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Miller et al. Harnessing policy to promote inclusive medical product evidence: development of a reference standard and structured audit of clinical trial diversity policies
Head et al. Systematic analysis of funding awarded to institutions in the United Kingdom for infectious disease research, 1997–2010
Gelinas et al. Nonexceptionalism, research risks, and social media: response to open peer commentaries on “using social media as a research recruitment tool: ethical issues and recommendations”