Pellegrinetti et al., 1994 - Google Patents
H∞ controller design for boilersPellegrinetti et al., 1994
- Document ID
- 15399321433278438200
- Author
- Pellegrinetti G
- Bentsman J
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
External Links
Snippet
This paper examines the ability of the H∞ design methodology to provide a solution to a gas‐ or oil‐fired boiler control problem, and addresses the nontrivial application issues of the H∞ design. The H∞ methodology is applied to an experimentally verified heating‐cogeneration …
- 238000000034 method 0 abstract description 27
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0265—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion
- G05B13/027—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion using neural networks only
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B11/00—Automatic controllers
- G05B11/01—Automatic controllers electric
- G05B11/32—Automatic controllers electric with inputs from more than one sensing element; with outputs to more than one correcting element
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0205—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system
- G05B13/024—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
- G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Pellegrinetti et al. | H∞ controller design for boilers | |
| US8055358B2 (en) | Multi-objective predictive process optimization with concurrent process simulation | |
| US20040221889A1 (en) | Methods, systems, and articles for controlling a fluid blending system | |
| Mohanty et al. | Moth‐flame optimization algorithm optimized dual‐mode controller for multiarea hybrid sources AGC system | |
| Parlos et al. | Nonlinear control of U-tube steam generators via H∞ control | |
| Jiang et al. | Robust control of uncertain nonlinear systems via measurement feedback | |
| Xakimovich et al. | Mathematical modeling of transient processes of the automatic control system of water level in the steam generator | |
| CN108983602A (en) | A kind of Auto-disturbance-rejection Control for fast reactor power and coolant outlet temperature | |
| Zhao et al. | Simulation modeling of nuclear steam generator water level process—a case study | |
| Menon et al. | Gain-scheduled nonlinear control of U-tube steam generator water level | |
| Morilla | Benchmark for PID control based on the boiler control problem | |
| Abdennour | An intelligent supervisory system for drum type boilers during severe disturbances | |
| Janus et al. | Effects of sampling on stability and performance of electronically controlled pressure-reducing valves | |
| Aryan et al. | Optimal internal model control-based decoupled dual-loop control method for boiler steam drum | |
| Prasad et al. | A hierarchical physical model-based approach to predictive control of a thermal power plant for ef” cient plant-wide disturbance rejection | |
| Moreno et al. | Super-twisting observer-based output feedback control of a class of continuous exothermic chemical reactors | |
| Basher | Development of a robust model-based water level controller for U-tube steam generator | |
| Icev et al. | Supervisory-plus-regulatory control design for efficient operation of industrial furnaces | |
| Mustafa et al. | A New Model‐Free Adaptive Integral Sliding Mode Control for Interconnected Power Systems Load Frequency Control | |
| Wade et al. | Towards automatic real-time controller tuning and robustness | |
| Wang et al. | A new internal model control scheme with simplified design and implementation | |
| Niu et al. | Methodology of Process Analysis | |
| Skogestad et al. | Self-optimizing control: The basic idea and taylor series analysis | |
| Van Willigenburg et al. | On the synthesis of time‐varying LQG weights and noises along optimal control and state trajectories | |
| Na et al. | Modified two-degree-of freedom fractional order Smith predictive control for MIMO processes with time-delays |