Schrader et al., 2020 - Google Patents
EFSA guidelines for emerald ash borer survey in the EUSchrader et al., 2020
- Document ID
- 14823195578015446908
- Author
- Schrader G
- Ciubotaru R
- Diakaki M
- Vos S
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research
External Links
Snippet
Abstract The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), by request of the European Commission, develops pest survey cards for pests of relevance for the European Union (EU) member states, summarizing key biological, epidemiological and diagnostic information …
- 241000275062 Agrilus planipennis 0 title abstract description 51
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0637—Strategic management or analysis
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Bogdziewicz et al. | Masting in wind‐pollinated trees: system‐specific roles of weather and pollination dynamics in driving seed production | |
| Candolfi et al. | Guidance document on regulatory testing and risk assessment procedures for plant protection products with non-target arthropods | |
| Davies et al. | Are current management recommendations for saproxylic invertebrates effective? A systematic review | |
| Carnegie et al. | An analysis of pest risk and potential economic impact of pine wilt disease to Pinus plantations in Australia | |
| Evans et al. | Potential economic impact of laurel wilt disease on the Florida avocado industry | |
| Eatough Jones et al. | Evaluations of insecticides and fungicides for reducing attack rates of a new invasive ambrosia beetle (Euwallacea sp., Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in infested landscape trees in California | |
| Faccoli et al. | Analysis of costs and benefits of Asian longhorned beetle eradication in Italy | |
| Mercader et al. | A comparison of girdled ash detection trees and baited artificial traps for Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) detection | |
| Peterson et al. | Distribution, predictors, and impacts of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis)(Coleoptera: Buprestidae) infestation of white fringetree (Chionanthus virginicus) | |
| Poland et al. | Trap designs, colors, and lures for emerald ash borer detection | |
| Kormann et al. | Reconciling biodiversity with timber production and revenue via an intensive forest management experiment | |
| Hoyer-Tomiczek et al. | Progress in the use of detection dogs for emerald ash borer monitoring | |
| Tobin et al. | Evaluation of trapping schemes to detect emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) | |
| Loy et al. | The impacts of bioenergy pine plantation management practices on bee communities | |
| Mugume et al. | How do human activities influence the status and distribution of terrestrial mammals in forest reserves? | |
| Schrader et al. | EFSA guidelines for emerald ash borer survey in the EU | |
| Matlock Jr et al. | Ants as indicators of pesticide impacts in banana | |
| Widén et al. | Direct and indirect effects of food, fear and management on crop damage by ungulates | |
| Fuller et al. | The response of ground-dwelling spiders (Araneae) and hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) to afforestation assessed using within-site tracking | |
| Priston et al. | A simple method for calculating the likelihood of crop damage by primates: an epidemiological approach | |
| Bergseng et al. | Combining ecological and economic modelling in analysing a pest invasion contingency plan–The case of pine wood nematode in Norway | |
| Bhattarai et al. | Diversity and impact of herbivorous insects on Brazilian peppertree in Florida prior to release of exotic biological control agents | |
| EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) et al. | Pest risk assessment of Eotetranychus lewisi for the EU territory | |
| Bianchi et al. | Co-management: balancing food safety, the environment, and the bottom line | |
| Jagodziński et al. | × Sorbaronia′ Mitschurinii′—an overlooked alien shrub rapidly expands in temperate Scots pine forests |