Kama et al., 2014 - Google Patents
Considering Partially Developed Artifacts in Change Impact Analysis Implementation.Kama et al., 2014
View PDF- Document ID
- 12407317057766282659
- Author
- Kama N
- Basri S
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- J. Softw.
External Links
Snippet
It is important to manage the changes in the software to meet the evolving needs of the customer and hence, satisfy them. Accepting too many changes causes delay in the completion and it incurs additional cost. One type of information that helps to make the …
- 238000004458 analytical method 0 title abstract description 126
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3676—Test management for coverage analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3604—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs
- G06F11/3612—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs by runtime analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3604—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs
- G06F11/3608—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs using formal methods, e.g. model checking, abstract interpretation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/30—Monitoring
- G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
- G06F11/3409—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment for performance assessment
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/70—Software maintenance or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Segura et al. | A survey on metamorphic testing | |
Zimmermann et al. | Predicting subsystem failures using dependency graph complexities | |
Cobb et al. | Engineering software under statistical quality control | |
Runeson et al. | An experimental evaluation of an experience-based capture-recapture method in software code inspections | |
Schneidewind | Body of knowledge for software quality measurement | |
Nagappan et al. | Early estimation of software quality using in-process testing metrics: a controlled case study | |
US20170153967A1 (en) | Using model-based diagnosis to improve software testing | |
Selim et al. | Model transformation testing: The state of the art | |
Kang et al. | Development of a Bayesian belief network model for software reliability quantification of digital protection systems in nuclear power plants | |
Kama et al. | A change impact analysis approach for the software development phase | |
Asl et al. | A change impact size estimation approach during the software development | |
Hofer et al. | Combining models for improved fault localization in spreadsheets | |
Härtel et al. | Operationalizing threats to MSR studies by simulation-based testing | |
Kama et al. | Considering Partially Developed Artifacts in Change Impact Analysis Implementation. | |
Sehgal et al. | Predicting faults before testing phase using Halstead’s metrics | |
Sison | Investigating the effect of pair programming and software size on software quality and programmer productivity | |
Basri et al. | A change impact analysis tool for software development phase | |
Aranha et al. | Estimating manual test execution effort and capacity based on execution points | |
Godboley et al. | Poster: VeriSol-MCE: Verification-Based Condition Coverage Analysis of Smart Contracts Using Model Checker Engines | |
Walkinshaw | Assessing test adequacy for black-box systems without specifications | |
Pitchford | Embedded software quality, integration, and testing techniques | |
Sinha et al. | A measurement framework for evaluating model-based test generation tools | |
Szvetits et al. | Controlled experiment on the comprehension of runtime phenomena using models created at design time | |
Wijendra et al. | Software complexity reduction through the process automation in software development life cycle | |
Joshi et al. | Do Software Reliability Prediction Models Meet Industrial Perceptions? |